作者: admin

  • Senior minister says UK will ‘no longer’ stand by while ‘innocent children are killed in Gaza’

    Senior minister says UK will ‘no longer’ stand by while ‘innocent children are killed in Gaza’

    A sharp shift in the United Kingdom’s policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has emerged in recent days, with top government officials taking an unprecedented critical stance against Israeli actions in Gaza and illegal West Bank settlements, triggering an immediate angry rebuke from Israeli diplomatic authorities.

    The new position was laid out publicly by Louise Haigh, UK First Secretary of State, during a keynote address to the annual Trade Union Congress (TUC) conference held in Brighton on Tuesday. Haigh, whose role includes oversight of the Prime Minister’s Office and cabinet operations, openly acknowledged that the UK had moved far too slowly to address the escalating humanitarian and political crisis unfolding across Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

    “We will no longer stand by while innocent Palestinian families are torn apart, while innocent children are killed in Gaza and while the hope of a two-state solution evaporates before our eyes,” Haigh told assembled union delegates. She noted that since the outbreak of large-scale Israeli military operations in the besieged Gaza Strip in 2023, more than 21,000 Palestinian children have been killed, with an additional 1,400 Palestinian lives lost in the territory since the temporary ceasefire was agreed in October. Even amid the pause in hostilities, Haigh emphasized, the human cost of the conflict continues to mount.

    Her comments came just one week after UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband made a landmark announcement that the British government officially recognizes Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory as illegal, and unveiled sweeping new sanctions targeting all illegal Israeli settlements built on occupied Palestinian land. Haigh affirmed during her TUC speech that the new sanctions package represents a deliberate break from the UK’s past approach to the conflict. Crucially, she clarified that the punitive measures are targeted specifically at the infrastructure and operations of illegal settlements, not the Israeli public as a whole. “The Israeli people are not responsible for the actions of their government, so we are purposefully targeting the illegal settlements,” she explained. The ultimate goal of the sanctions, Haigh added, is to ramp up pressure on the Israeli government to reverse course and preserve the fading possibility of a negotiated two-state solution that delivers lasting peace to the Middle East. “We will stand against injustice. We will stand up for peace. We will build a coalition of international partners to speak with one voice and remind the world who we are,” she said.

    Miliband expanded on the details of the new sanctions regime during a parliamentary address last week, outlining that the core measure will be a full import ban on all goods produced in illegal Israeli settlements, preventing these products from entering UK retail channels. “I do not believe the British people want us supporting the occupation by accepting products from settlements in our shops and supermarkets,” Miliband told lawmakers. Beyond the import ban, the UK will implement a comprehensive sanctions framework that includes targeted penalties against specific companies and individuals that provide key services for settlement expansion, including construction, infrastructure financing, and real estate development. “So to those who finance or facilitate illegal settlements, let me say this: you will face the full force of UK sanctions. Settlements are illegal. They should not be promoted in our country,” the foreign secretary stated, adding that the new regime will include narrow, appropriate religious exemptions to avoid unnecessary disruption to religious communities.

    The UK’s policy shift is not an isolated action. Eleven other European and North American nations—including Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden—joined the UK in signing a joint statement affirming their shared commitment to introducing national trade restrictions on illegal settlement goods or supporting broader European Union-level restrictions, with some nations actively evaluating additional measures aligned with their own domestic legislative procedures.

    Israel has responded to the new UK policy with swift and punitive diplomatic measures. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar announced that Israel would shut down the British consulate general in East Jerusalem and bar 11 elected British members of parliament from entering the country, among other retaliatory sanctions. The Israeli Embassy in London also issued a formal public rebuke of the UK government’s statements, posting its criticism to the social platform X. The embassy argued that UK officials have presented a deeply one-sided account of the conflict that centers the Palestinian narrative while entirely ignoring the experiences of Jewish victims of terrorist attacks, including Israeli children who have been killed in violence. “Any serious discussion of the conflict must acknowledge the Israeli victims of Palestinian terrorism, and the ongoing struggle against those who deliberately target civilians. Ignoring these victims does not promote peace or justice; it creates a deeply distorted and one-sided picture of reality,” the embassy’s statement read.

    This unprecedented break from decades of UK policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict marks a major shift in Western diplomatic alignment on the issue, as a growing bloc of Western nations moves to take concrete action against illegal Israeli settlements amid widespread international condemnation of the mounting civilian death toll in Gaza.

  • US dictionary adds 1,400 words, including neckbeard, trash panda and cuffing season

    US dictionary adds 1,400 words, including neckbeard, trash panda and cuffing season

    As one of the most authoritative and longest-running dictionary publishers in the United States, Merriam-Webster has just unveiled its latest round of updates, adding 1,400 fresh words and meanings to its catalog that capture how language evolves alongside modern life, pop culture, technology, and societal shifts. Among the most eye-catching new entries is “trash panda” — the affectionate, viral nickname for raccoons that emerged from online communities, inspired by the animals’ well-known habit of foraging for food in human household trash and their passing resemblance to small pandas.

    The publisher explained in an official blog post that every new entry included in this update has been tracked and vetted over years of widespread use across different contexts, making these additions more than just new spellings — they are a snapshot of how people communicate and what matters to them in the current era.

    The new entries span a wide range of categories, from food and culture to technology, internet slang, and social trends. Food-related terms figure prominently in this update, reflecting growing global culinary exchange and changing eating habits. These include “superfood”, the widely used term for nutrient-dense foods linked to health benefits; “bao”, the fluffy, stuffed steamed bun that has grown popular far beyond its East Asian origins; “cake pop”, the handheld portable treat that combines cake and icing on a lollipop stick; and “chili crisp”, the spicy, crunchy oil-based condiment packed with fried peppers, garlic, and shallots that has become a pantry staple for many home cooks.

    Internet and pop culture slang also makes up a large share of the new additions, capturing decades of viral trends and shared online experiences. Long-time internet users will recognize “Rickroll”, the iconic prank that tricks people into clicking a link leading to Rick Astley’s 1987 hit *Never Gonna Give You Up*. Other widely recognizable terms added include “glow-up”, meaning a dramatic positive transformation in one’s appearance or confidence; “looksmaxxing”, the practice of making intentional changes to maximize one’s physical attractiveness; “meme coin”, the cryptocurrency created as a joke or viral trend rather than as a serious financial investment; and “the Mandela effect”, the widely shared phenomenon where large groups of people collectively hold the same false memory of a past event or detail.

    Terms describing common social and emotional experiences also earned a spot in the dictionary: “cuffing season”, the annual trend of single people seeking a steady romantic partner to spend the colder fall and winter months with; “Sunday scaries”, the anxiety or unease many people feel as the weekend ends and the work week approaches; “parasocial”, describing the one-sided emotional bond audiences form with public figures, influencers, or celebrities; “whack-a-mole”, which now also describes the frustrating pattern of solving one problem only for an identical new issue to pop up immediately elsewhere; and “crashout”, a term referring to a sudden emotional breakdown, a dramatic defeat, or an abrupt collapse of a situation.

    Technology has also left its mark on this update, with “vibe coding” joining the dictionary — defined as the practice of using artificial intelligence tools to generate full blocks of computer code based on informal user prompts. Other notable entries include “Uncanny valley”, the unsettling feeling people get when viewing an artificial creation (such as a robot or CGI character) that is almost indistinguishable from a real human but has subtle off qualities; “neckbeard”, a term that refers both to a specific style of beard covering the chin and neck and is often used as a disparaging label for misogynistic, socially awkward online hobbyists; “California sober”, a distinctly American term describing the practice of abstaining from hard drugs like cocaine or methamphetamine while continuing to use marijuana and/or alcohol; “yacht rock”, the mellow soft rock music genre that originated in Southern California in the 1970s; “shapewear”, tight-fitting clothing designed to smooth and contour the body’s silhouette.

    Following this update, Merriam-Webster is preparing to announce its annual Word of the Year in the coming months. Last year’s pick, “slop”, was selected after its definition was expanded to encompass low-quality digital content mass-produced using artificial intelligence, a reflection of growing conversations around AI-generated media today.

  • Israeli officials leak details of secret US-Israel-Arab military meeting, says report

    Israeli officials leak details of secret US-Israel-Arab military meeting, says report

    A highly confidential gathering of top military commanders from the United States, Israel, and multiple Arab nations took place in Germany last week to coordinate strategy around the ongoing Israel-US military campaign against Iran, details of which have been disclosed by anonymous Israeli sources to journalists. The exclusive report, published by Axios and written by Barak Ravid — a former Israeli intelligence officer who now works as a political and security correspondent — reveals that the closed-door “private retreat” was arranged personally by Admiral Brad Cooper, the head of U.S. Central Command (Centcom).

    According to two unnamed Israeli officials interviewed by Ravid, the meeting included the highest-ranking military chiefs of staff from eight nations: Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, and Egypt. This gathering marks the first formal collective meeting of these military leaders since the Israel-US war against Iran began more than six months ago.

    While none of the participating regional nations have issued any public confirmation of the meeting, Centcom has released an official, albeit vague, acknowledgment of the event. In a short public statement, the command confirmed it “hosted senior military leaders from eight nations during a scheduled conference in Germany” and added that attendees “discussed opportunities for enhancing security cooperation in the Middle East.”

    Beyond the broad public confirmation, leaked details from the closed-door sessions indicate that Admiral Cooper used the meeting to deliver a key reassurance to regional partner nations. Despite repeated large-scale Iranian strikes on U.S. military installations across the Middle East that have caused extensive damage, Cooper stated that Washington has no intention of withdrawing its military forces from the region.

    Verified open-source satellite analysis conducted by *The Washington Post* has confirmed that Iranian attacks have left their mark on at least 15 separate U.S. military sites spread across the region, including bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, and Jordan. Hundreds of structures and pieces of military hardware have been destroyed or damaged, with many bases rendered functionally unusable. The most severe impact has been felt at the U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, where extensive damage forced Centcom to reroute all regional logistics operations to alternate sites.

    In addition to addressing force posture, Cooper also outlined U.S. plans to increase commercial and military ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint for oil and gas trade that has become a major flashpoint in tensions with Iran.

    For his part, Israeli Chief of Staff General Eyal Zamir used the gathering to give attendees a full briefing on ongoing Israeli military operations across the Middle East, per one Israeli official quoted in the Axios report. A key structural change also followed the meeting: Israel was officially transferred from the U.S. European Command’s area of responsibility to Centcom, a shift that opens the door to far more direct military cooperation between Israel and the participating Arab states under the U.S. military command structure.

    Not all regional and security observers view the new alignment and Admiral Cooper’s leadership positively, however. Andreas Krieg, an associate professor at King’s College London who specializes in Middle East security, noted that there is widespread underlying distrust of Cooper among Gulf Arab governments. Krieg argued that regional capitals see Cooper as excessively aligned with Israel, overly hawkish toward Iran, and prone to pushing military operational options that carry high risks of strategic disaster for the region.

  • UK Lawyers for Israel calls to proscribe Doctors Without Borders as terror group

    UK Lawyers for Israel calls to proscribe Doctors Without Borders as terror group

    A long-running campaign targeting international humanitarian medical organization Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF) has escalated dramatically, with British pro-Israel advocacy group UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) formally calling on the British government to designate the Gaza-operating charity as a terrorist organization.

    The push from UKLFI is rooted in a recent report claiming unproven links between MSF employees and Palestinian militant groups, allegations that MSF has forcefully and repeatedly rejected. The core of the claims centers on Fadi Jihad Mohammed al-Wadiya, a physiotherapist on MSF’s payroll who was killed in an Israeli airstrike on June 25, 2024. Israeli officials immediately asserted al-Wadiya was a member of Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), an armed Palestinian group.

    MSF pushed back on the claim within months of the strike, stating in February that it had found no evidence of any military affiliation by al-Wadiya before his death at the hands of Israeli forces. In an official statement responding to UKLFI’s latest demand last week, the charity doubled down on its denial. “MSF unequivocally refutes the allegations made by the Israeli authorities that we knowingly hired people with ‘ties to terrorism’,” the organization said. “MSF would never knowingly employ anyone involved in military activities, which contradicts our core values and ethics.”

    MSF further noted that Israeli authorities have only made claims of militant links against its staff after those employees have already been killed, with no advance warning or evidence shared while they were alive. “If Israeli authorities had reliable information about any MSF staff involvement in military activity, they never shared it with us before their deaths,” the statement added. The charity also confirmed it has been the target of a sustained disinformation campaign for months, and strongly condemned the deliberate spread of false accusations against its team.

    The tensions come amid a string of recent attacks on MSF operations in Gaza: just this week, an Israeli airstrike damaged an MSF-owned bus carrying 10 humanitarian workers in Gaza City, adding to a long list of incidents that have threatened aid workers delivering critical care to the besieged enclave.

    Financial records show MSF’s UK branch raised £11.3 million in 2023 specifically for its humanitarian work in occupied Palestine. In defending its demand for a ban, a UKLFI spokesperson argued that British donors deserve full transparency and rigorous vetting for any funds sent to Hamas-controlled Gaza. “The evidence we have assembled raises serious questions about people employed by MSF, the organisations with which it works and whether adequate safeguards have been put in place to ensure that charitable resources cannot be exploited by terrorist organisations,” the spokesperson said.

    The UK’s Charity Commission confirmed last week it is now actively reviewing the concerns raised by UKLFI to determine what action, if any, it will take next. The current allegations are not new: they can be traced back to claims from the Israeli government earlier this year that two MSF employees held ties to Hamas and PIJ, another accusation MSF has emphatically denied. In February, Israel moved to ban MSF from operating in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank after the organization refused to turn over a full list of its Palestinian and international staff. MSF said it could not share the data because it could not secure guaranteed assurances that the information would be protected and not misused.

    This is part of a broader pattern: the Israeli government has repeatedly accused international and local aid groups operating in Gaza of ties to Hamas in recent years. Earlier this year, Israel imposed bans on dozens of aid groups working in the enclave, a move that human rights organizations have warned has severely restricted already fragile humanitarian access to Gaza, where more than two million people face widespread food insecurity and collapsing medical infrastructure.

    Founded in 2011, UKLFI has established itself as a leading British advocacy group focused on pressuring and discrediting UK-based individuals and organizations that criticize Israeli government policy, as well as humanitarian groups that provide aid to Palestinians. The group is prominently featured in the European Legal Support Centre’s Britain Index of Repression, a database that documents what the center calls systematic repression of pro-Palestine solidarity activism across the United Kingdom. UKLFI is listed 128 times in the database, and the center found that the group has contributed to a “chilling environment” that pushes people and organizations to pull back from or alter fully lawful pro-Palestine activity out of fear of legal action. The center’s analysis also shows UKLFI frequently acts as an initiating or escalating actor against pro-Palestinian solidarity work, often using formal complaint letters, legal threats, and public pressure to push schools, universities, employers, and public institutions to launch disciplinary investigations or cancel planned events related to Palestine.

  • Amnesty calls for arrest of 87 Iran officials over ‘crimes against humanity’ during protests

    Amnesty calls for arrest of 87 Iran officials over ‘crimes against humanity’ during protests

    Human rights watchdog Amnesty International has made a landmark call for the international arrest of 87 senior Iranian officials, accusing them of direct involvement in crimes against humanity carried out during the brutal state crackdown on the 2022 “Woman, Life, Freedom” uprising. The demand is anchored in a sprawling 1,000-plus-page investigative report, titled *Architects of Atrocities: State Machinery Orchestrating Crimes Against Humanity in Iran’s 2022 Woman Life Freedom Uprising*, which lays bare the full scale of systematic repression deployed by Tehran to crush the mass anti-government movement. The 2022 nationwide protests were ignited by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, an Iranian-Kurdish woman who died in morality police custody shortly after being arrested for allegedly violating the country’s strict mandatory hijab regulations. In the months of unrest and state-led retaliation that followed, hundreds of protesters and bystanders lost their lives.

    After years of meticulous evidence-gathering, Amnesty’s investigation has verified the deaths of 377 civilians caught up in the crackdown, 56 of whom were children. Disproportionately, the victims came from Iran’s marginalized Kurdish and Baloch ethnic minority communities, groups that have long faced systemic discrimination under the Islamic Republic. “Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity, against protesters demanding dignity, human rights and fundamental political change,” Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International’s secretary general, told reporters at the report’s official launch press conference on Wednesday.

    Callamard detailed the full scope of state abuses, confirming that Iranian security and political institutions carried out deliberate crimes against humanity including extrajudicial murder, widespread torture, enforced disappearances, arbitrary mass imprisonment, sexual violence including rape, and targeted persecution on the basis of political belief, gender identity, ethnicity, and religion—all in a coordinated campaign to annihilate the uprising. The rights group is pushing for two key international actions to deliver accountability: first, it calls on the United Nations General Assembly to create a dedicated international criminal justice mechanism that can investigate crimes, prosecute perpetrators, and deter future repressive crackdowns on dissent. Second, it demands the UN Security Council refer the entire situation in Iran to the International Criminal Court’s Office of the Prosecutor for formal investigation.

    Joining Callamard at the press conference was Mahsa Piraei, an Iranian activist whose mother was shot and killed by security forces during protests in the western city of Kermanshah. Piraei emphasized that accountability cannot stop at low-level officers who carried out violence, arguing that blame extends all the way up Iran’s chain of command. “The person who fired the shot that killed my mother must be held accountable, but it must not stop there,” she said. “My mother was not killed by the actions of just one person – she was killed by a system.”

    In a striking rebuke of outside military intervention, Callamard also warned that ongoing unlawful military attacks on Iran by the United States and Israel are severely undermining global efforts to secure justice for victims of the 2022 crackdown, and called for an immediate enduring ceasefire across Iranian territory. Since the US-Israeli military campaign launched in February, at least 3,600 Iranians—including both senior government officials and civilian non-combatants—have been killed. The US has publicly justified its military assault by pointing to a separate January 2025 crackdown on anti-government demonstrations, where Iranian security forces killed thousands of protesters within days.

    But rights groups have documented that the US-Israeli war has also killed and wounded Iranian dissidents and opponents of the Islamic Republic, including political prisoners held in jails located in strategically targeted areas. In response to the external invasion, the Iranian government has also sharply ramped up internal repression against domestic dissent. Six of the 87 officials named in Amnesty’s report have already been killed in targeted strikes during the war, while other senior figures implicated in the 2022 crackdown—including Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps chief Ahmad Vahidi—have received promotions within the Iranian government.

    Callamard made clear that Amnesty opposes both the targeted killing of Iranian officials and the efforts by Washington and Tel Aviv to instrumentalize documented human rights abuses in Iran to justify their full-scale military assault. “No matter how complex the panorama is…we want to insist that international law should guide the path of action right now,” she said. “A principled response required rejecting both unlawful military attacks and impunity for crimes against humanity.”

  • African greats inspired by the potential of Nairobi 2029

    African greats inspired by the potential of Nairobi 2029

    In a landmark decision that has sent waves of celebration across the entire African continent, World Athletics announced Tuesday that Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, has secured the right to host the 2029 World Athletics Championships. This will mark the first time the sport’s flagship global event has ever been held on African soil, with Nairobi beating out two former Olympic host cities, London and Rome, to claim the historic bid.

    For decades, East Africa has been a powerhouse of global track and field, producing some of the sport’s most legendary champions and record-breaking athletes. That legacy makes the 2029 announcement feel like a homecoming for the sport, according to many local figures. A 2026 World Athletics survey underscores this deep cultural connection: 68% of Kenyan respondents reported high personal interest in athletics, reflecting the sport’s unique place in the nation’s identity. The 2029 championships will be held at the 48,000-seat Kasarani Stadium, which is already undergoing major redevelopment work to prepare for the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations.

    Legendary Ethiopian long-distance runner Haile Gebrselassie, a two-time Olympic 10,000m gold medalist, was among the first to celebrate the announcement, calling the decision wonderful news for the entire continent. Gebrselassie predicted that the home-field advantage will create an unparalleled atmosphere for both athletes and fans. “Like in soccer, playing at home and playing away is different,” he noted. “It’s a big chance for Kenyans, it’s a big chance for Ethiopians, in 2029, to win a race.” The running great added that he plans to attend the event in person, and he expects the global community will be impressed by Kenya’s ability to host a world-class tournament. He also argued that the win will open doors for other African cities to bid for major global events in the future, saying “If Nairobi can host this championship, why not Addis Ababa? Why not Lagos or South Africa, Uganda, Rwanda? In 2029, I think the whole world will be surprised at how well they host.”

    2015 javelin world champion Julius Yego echoed that optimism, describing the bid win as a transformative moment for the entire continent. “I’m so happy that the world will come to Kenya,” Yego told BBC World Service. “Africa has produced the best of athletes but we’ve never had a chance to witness such a big championship. It is something that will bring people to Africa. And people will know Africa.” Yego added that the milestone should give African nations the confidence to pursue even larger global sporting events, including the Olympic Games. “As Africans, we need to think big and plan ahead and think ‘Yes, it is possible for Africa to host a championship like the World Championships’,” he said. “Same of course for the Olympics. Africa hosted the World Cup in 2010 in South Africa, so I think we’re capable of hosting big events. Let’s dream of hosting the Olympics and bring the best of the world in sports to Africa – to feel Africa, to enjoy Africa.”

    Current and former Kenyan stars have emphasized that the 2029 event will be more than a one-off celebration: it is expected to be a catalyst for a new generation of African athletic talent. Retired 800m world champion Janeth Jepkosgei, who now works as a coach, said the announcement has already electrified the young athletes she trains. “It means a lot for the youth and the juniors because it makes the dream really big,” she explained. “This is the time where the youth and juniors should begin dreaming of winning at home. We have three years for those athletes who are really promising. It is a good way to make them stay dedicated to it, focused and disciplined to the event. I’ve been speaking to my athletes and they’re saying ‘It has come home, we have to be there, on that starting line’.”

    Kenyan sprinter Ferdinand Omanyala, holder of the African 100m record, knows firsthand how a home global youth event can shape an athletic career: he was inspired by Nairobi’s hosting of the 2017 Under-18 World Championships. Now, he says the 2029 senior championships will give a massive boost to both current and future athletes. “I can imagine what this is going to do to up-and-coming athletes,” Omanyala said. “They’re going to see all these stars coming into the country and they’ll be having this chance to watch them warm up and compete. That will be a huge motivation.” He added that hosting the World Championships has always been a dream for the Kenyan athletics community.

    The 2029 World Athletics Championships fits into a growing pipeline of major global sporting events coming to Africa over the next four years. The first of these is the Youth Olympics, set to kick off in Dakar, Senegal, from October 31 to November 13 this year. Next year, South Africa, Zimbabwe and Namibia will co-host the men’s Cricket World Cup, and in 2030, the men’s FIFA World Cup will return to the continent for the first time since South Africa’s 2010 tournament, when Morocco co-hosts alongside Spain and Portugal. Both Egypt and South Africa have already publicly expressed interest in bidding to host the 2036 Olympic Games, building on the momentum of recent major event wins across the continent.

  • ICJP urges investigation into UK charity over support for illegal Israeli settlement

    ICJP urges investigation into UK charity over support for illegal Israeli settlement

    A London-based legal advocacy organization focused on Palestinian rights has formally called on Britain’s Charity Commission to launch a formal investigation into a UK-registered charity over its documented support for an illegal Israeli settlement built on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank.

    The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) confirmed it has submitted an official grievance against the Gainsborough Trust, highlighting that the charity’s publicly stated core objectives include collecting and dispersing funds to support residents of Modiin Illit — a large Israeli settlement established in the occupied West Bank that the UK government now formally recognizes as illegal under international law.

    Citing a recent public statement from UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband that explicitly reaffirms the UK’s position that Israel’s ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories is unlawful, the ICJP is pushing the Charity Commission to not only open a probe but also issue a formal ruling on whether a UK-registered charity can legally designate residents of an illegal settlement in the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt) as official charitable beneficiaries.

    The legal group added that the regulator must also examine whether the Gainsborough Trust’s board of trustees has properly fulfilled its fiduciary and legal obligations in managing the charity’s operations, fundraising, and distribution of grants. Under existing UK charity legislation, all funds raised by registered entities must be exclusively allocated to recognized charitable causes that deliver public benefit, with no provisions for supporting activities deemed illegal under international law.

    The call for investigation follows a bombshell investigation published this week by Declassified UK, which uncovered that the Gainsborough Trust is one of six UK-based charities that have collectively channeled nearly £2 million to illegal Israeli settlements over the past three years. Declassified’s analysis of charity financial records shows the Gainsborough Trust reported total income of more than £448,000 between 2021 and 2024.

    While the exact sum transferred directly to projects in Modiin Illit remains unconfirmed, as the Gainsborough Trust’s annual financial filings do not name specific grant recipients, the documents show roughly £120,000 was disbursed to institutions categorized as higher education, £70,000 to groups labeled as providing basic education in Jewish principles, £2,595 to a religious center for prayer and learning, and additional grants to initiatives supporting “destitute families” and “poor brides.”

    This latest complaint comes months after the Charity Commission launched a statutory inquiry into eight other UK charities, following allegations from Labour MP Melanie Ward that 32 UK-registered charities have funneled a total of £28 million to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

    The ICJP emphasized that the UK’s recent updated policy announcement on Israeli settlements aligns the country with the landmark 2024 advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which formally concluded that Israel’s continued presence and settlement activity in the occupied Palestinian territories violates international law.

    Orlaith Roe, public affairs and communications officer for the ICJP, said the UK government’s formal recognition of the occupation’s illegal status makes targeted regulatory scrutiny of UK charities far more urgent. “Having recognised that Israel’s occupation is unlawful and announced measures to ban economic activity connected to illegal settlements, there can be no inconsistency when it comes to the charitable sector,” Roe explained. “The Charity Commission must ensure that UK charities are not being used as a vehicle to support activities that are unlawful, political or otherwise outside their exclusively charitable purposes.”

  • Family ‘devastated’ as missing girl case stays closed

    Family ‘devastated’ as missing girl case stays closed

    It has been more than five and a half decades since a three-year-old British toddler vanished from an Australian beach, and the long-running fight for justice for the young victim has hit another devastating roadblock.

    Cheryl Grimmer, a native of Bristol, had only just relocated with her family to Australia when she disappeared in January 1970 from Fairy Meadow Beach near Wollongong, just outside Sydney. The toddler was waiting in beach changing rooms while her older brother, who was supervising her at the time, turned away for a matter of seconds – by the time he looked back, Cheryl was gone. Extensive searches across the area turned up no clues about what happened to her, leaving the family trapped in decades of unresolved grief.

    Decades after the disappearance, the case saw a major breakthrough in 2017, when investigators charged a man in his 60s with Cheryl’s abduction and murder. The case, however, collapsed before it could go before a full trial in 2019, after a judge ruled that a confession the suspect had given as a teenager was inadmissible in court. The man, who cannot be named publicly for legal reasons and is only referred to as ‘Mercury’, has consistently denied any involvement in Cheryl’s death, and prosecutors were forced to drop all charges.

    In the years that followed, Cheryl’s family mounted a years-long public campaign to pressure authorities to revisit the case. The 2022 BBC podcast *Fairy Meadow*, which explored the full details of the disappearance and its aftermath, brought renewed attention to the cold case, and at least one new witness came forward with potential information after the series aired.

    Earlier this year, New South Wales Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Sally Dowling agreed to revisit the original 2019 decision to drop the case, in response to repeated requests from the Grimmer family. But in a recent letter to the family, Dowling confirmed she would not reverse the original decision, upholding the judge’s ruling to exclude the confession.

    In the letter, Dowling explained that she had conducted a full fresh review of the case to determine whether the original decision to end proceedings was justified. She noted that the core question of the review was whether the trial judge’s ruling to throw out the recorded confession could be reasonably challenged. After careful examination, she concluded the ruling was sound, and the original decision to drop further prosecution would stand. Acknowledging the outcome would be hard for the family, Dowling offered to meet with them to discuss the decision further.

    The Grimmer family, who submitted hundreds of pages of detailed legal arguments to support their request to reopen the case, says they have been left furious and heartbroken by what they describe as a cursory, brief response to their years of campaigning. They have now sent a formal reply to the DPP demanding a more thorough explanation of how their legal arguments were addressed in the review.

    Ricki Nash, Cheryl’s eldest brother, said the decision and its limited explanation was ‘incredibly difficult to accept’. He reflected on the life the toddler was never able to live: ‘Cheryl was three years old. She never got the opportunity to grow up, have a career, fall in love, have children or live the life that was taken from her. Our family has spent more than half a century living with that loss.’

    Despite the setback, the family says they will not abandon their fight. ‘We have continued fighting because we believe Cheryl deserves to have the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and death properly examined,’ Nash said. ‘Our family is devastated and angry, but we are not going to stop asking questions – we owe that to Cheryl.’

  • New imagery reveals US underplaying extent of damage from Iranian attacks

    New imagery reveals US underplaying extent of damage from Iranian attacks

    New leaked images obtained exclusively by CBS News have pulled back the curtain on what multiple active-duty US service members allege is a deliberate effort by the US government to downplay the severe scope of damage Iran has inflicted on American military assets across the Middle East. The images, shared by anonymous deployed personnel, offer visual confirmation of far greater destruction than the public has been told of to date.

    One clear photo captured at Saudi Arabia’s Prince Sultan Air Force Base documents a direct strike on the rear section of a Boeing E-3 Sentry four-engine airborne early warning aircraft. Additional imagery from the same base shows gutted barracks and operational buildings left hollowed by Iranian attacks. The pattern of unreported destruction extends to Kuwait’s Camp Buehring, where photos also show significant damage to US infrastructure.

    “This is major damage to our bases that hasn’t been communicated to the American public,” one anonymous active service member told CBS. “We’re standing there with our eyes closed getting punched in the face.”

    The allegations of public understatement come amid longstanding criticism that US officials have minimized the impact of Iranian retaliation for ongoing military operations tied to the US-Israel campaign against Iran, which began in February of this year. Beyond the unreported infrastructure damage, growing alarms have sounded over the massive depletion of US munitions stockpiles caused by the sustained conflict.

    A declassified report released Monday by the US Department of War’s Office of the Inspector General, submitted for congressional review, confirms these growing concerns, explicitly acknowledging that the conflict has created critical strategic ammunition “shortfalls” for the US. “The munitions expenditure on OEF [Operation Epic Fury] has resulted in strategic inventory shortfalls and revealed industrial base bottlenecks for munitions resupply,” the inspector general’s report states.

    To address the growing gaps and production delays, the Pentagon has launched efforts to cut red tape in procurement, reduce manufacturing lead times, and build up stockpiles of critical materials, components, and high-demand munitions, the report adds. However, the document also warns that scaling up domestic defense production requires extended lead times, meaning shortfalls could persist for years.

    Notably, the inspector general’s findings directly contradict public claims made by US President Donald Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who have repeatedly stated the conflict has not created any munitions shortages for the US. This is not the first time unaddressed stockpile gaps have been reported: in the opening weeks of the conflict, Middle East Eye first revealed that US missile interceptor stockpiles were stretched so thin that allied Gulf states were placed on waiting lists for requested defense systems.

    The inspector general’s report also catalogs far heavier losses to US air and naval assets than previous official statements acknowledged. It confirms four F-15 fighter jets have been completely destroyed, one F-35 stealth fighter has sustained damage, seven KC-135 aerial refueling tankers have been damaged, and as many as 30 MQ-9 Reaper surveillance and strike drones have been lost to Iranian attacks. The report also verifies that Iran has carried out targeted drone and ballistic missile strikes on the US Navy’s primary regional logistics hub based in Bahrain.

    Across all US military installations in seven Middle Eastern nations—Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, and Jordan—the report documents that hundreds of buildings and structures have been either damaged or destroyed by Iranian retaliatory strikes. Officials have not yet determined whether all damaged bases will be fully reconstructed, nor has a clear plan been finalized to cover the costs of repairs, which are not included in the current estimated war price tag.

    The report pegs current documented war costs at approximately $33.4 billion, a figure that excludes additional infrastructure repair expenses. Of that total, $3.7 billion is tied to lost and destroyed equipment, while $22.3 billion accounts for munitions expended since the conflict began.

  • Life on the edge in Lebanon: The psychological toll of living along Israel’s ‘Yellow Line’

    Life on the edge in Lebanon: The psychological toll of living along Israel’s ‘Yellow Line’

    Perched on a strategic hilltop just outside Israel’s self-declared Yellow Line in south Lebanon, the small village of Ghandouriyeh bears the brutal, visible scars of months of cross-border conflict. Most of its residential buildings stand as hollowed rubble or flattened heaps of concrete, the result of Israeli strikes earlier this year that turned once-lived-in homes into uninhabitable wreckage. It is here that 66-year-old Mariam Ismail Ballout waited on August 28 at the entrance of a Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) mobile medical clinic, desperate to collect medication and escape the chaos that has upended her life.

    “All our houses are ruined, all our houses are on the ground, demolished,” Ballout told Middle East Eye, her voice cracking before tears overtook her. She lost everything when her home burned to the ground: no refrigerator, no washing machine, no access to gas for cooking—every basic necessity of daily life gone overnight.

    Ghandouriyeh sits just south of Froun, one of Lebanon’s designated “pilot zones” in the Nabatieh governorate, a region that has remained on edge despite a US-brokered ceasefire announced in June. A rolling green valley called Wadi al-Hujeir blocks direct sightlines to Israeli military positions on the other side of the border, but little else shields residents from the constant threat of violence. A large plastic bin marked with an Arabic warning of “enemy” territory beyond is the only barrier between the village outskirts and roads now closed to all travel.

    Against all advice, roughly 228 families have returned to Ghandouriyeh in recent months, even though the village has no access to running water or electricity. Village mayor Mohammed Ali Nader told Middle East Eye that most returnees have no other option: they cannot afford to rent housing elsewhere, forcing them to cram into damaged, partially standing homes and share space with neighbors who have also lost everything. While Nader confirmed the village has not suffered a direct strike in months, residents live in a permanent state of high alert—a chronic stress that medical experts say is fueling a growing, underreported mental health crisis across the region.

    MSF, which operates daily mobile medical units across hard-to-reach parts of south Lebanon, has become a critical lifeline for communities cut off from regular healthcare access. Almas Al Andary, a 33-year-old MSF counselor and clinical psychologist working out of the Ghandouriyeh clinic, says the conflict has triggered new mental health disorders among people who never experienced symptoms before. “We definitely see a lot of people having acute stress disorders. And these symptoms we can’t formally diagnose because the crisis is still ongoing,” Al Andary explained. Intense, persistent responses to daily triggers—including the constant buzzing of Israeli drones that hover over the village nearly every day—are the most common complaints: widespread tension, hypervigilance, crippling fear, and constant anxiety about the next strike.

    MSF’s internal records reflect the scale of the growing need: since the war resumed on March 2, the organization’s counselors have conducted 1,326 individual mental health sessions across southern Lebanon, and requests for psychological support have climbed steadily month over month. On the day of Middle East Eye’s visit to Ghandouriyeh, the persistent hum of an Israeli drone hung over the village. Only three patients came to the clinic that day—an unusually low number, which Al Andary attributed to overnight air strikes that sent most residents fleeing to the relative safety of the valley overnight. Of the three patients that did show up, two were first-time visitors seeking mental health support.

    The crisis extends far beyond Ghandouriyeh. Earlier this year, Embrace, a leading Lebanese mental health non-profit that runs the country’s National Lifeline, reported that call volume during the 2026 conflict was 55 percent higher than during the 2024 cross-border war. Despite this surge, little public data exists to document the full scope of mental health harm in southern Lebanon under the fragile, nominally ceasefire conditions. On the ground, frontline medics say the reality is stark. Farah Kerbaj, a community health educator, told Middle East Eye that widespread sleep disorders are rampant, forcing many residents to rely on sleep and mental health medications just to get through the day. Reem Farhat, an MSF midwife working in the region, added that most patients she sees are in a state of constant agitation, their nerves frayed by months of uncertainty.

    Stigma around mental health treatment and the chaos of tracking care for displaced families have only compounded the crisis, medics say. For Ghandouriyeh, the most urgent immediate need is access to clean water—without it, residents cannot grow crops to feed their families, the mayor says. But even the most basic calm remains out of reach: most families keep their bags packed, ready to flee at a moment’s notice, a constant state of readiness that aligns with the hypervigilance Al Andary documents in her patients.

    “We’re fed up, honestly. We’re fed up with wars; we’ve had enough wars,” said Mohammed Gannem, a local resident who returned to Ghandouriyeh with his family in June, relieved to find his home still standing but still unable to sleep through the night. Gannem says he is particularly worried about the impact of constant conflict on his two young daughters; his youngest, nearly two years old, now flinches in terror at the sound of incoming shelling, a fear she never had before this year’s war.

    Medics say the steady rise in demand for mental health support has two overlapping causes: a growing willingness among Lebanese people to seek help for mental health struggles, as historical stigma slowly fades, and a parallel rise in desperation as the ceasefire holds in name only. Israel continues to carry out strikes beyond the Yellow Line in Nabatieh, Tyre, and other southern districts, which have claimed dozens of lives since the June truce. The Lebanese Army confirmed last week it has ramped up operations in southern non-occupied areas amid growing signs of escalating tensions.

    Georges Jreij, an MSF counselor based at another mobile clinic in Beirut’s southern suburbs, says mental health distress often rises in waves following the outbreak of conflict, with a predictable surge around the six-month mark— a threshold the war will hit this month. “It’s usually the time it takes for the brain to really realise the situation, to be able to think about the stuff that people are going through,” Jreij explained. “And the central nervous system sort of calms down in these periods, so other sides of the brain are reactivated.”

    As the MSF clinic’s day in Ghandouriyeh drew to a close, a brief, unexpected sound cut through the constant drone buzz: the playful jingle of a pale pink ice cream van, its windscreen cracked from past strikes, slowly winding past the piles of ruined homes. For a moment, the sound offered a faint, fleeting echo of normal life in the hilltop village. But as the jingle faded into the distance, the menacing buzz of surveillance drones returned, a constant reminder that for the residents of south Lebanon, the crisis is far from over.