Global Pulse

作者： admin

  • Eight German state premiers back Merz amid speculation over future

    Eight German state premiers back Merz amid speculation over future

    Germany’s political landscape has been roiled in recent weeks by growing uncertainty over the future of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), who is facing mounting pressure over plummeting poll numbers and the historic surge of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD). In a surprising show of solidarity, eight state premiers from Merz’s own party have publicly thrown their support behind the embattled leader, as internal debates over a potential leadership shakeup intensify ahead of two critical state elections this weekend.

    The public statement from the state leaders, which represent regions across Germany including Schleswig-Holstein, Saxony, Hesse and North Rhine-Westphalia, argues that restoring public trust in the CDU depends on policy action rather than internal personnel fights. “Now more than ever, Germany’s political landscape needs stability,” the premiers wrote, adding that the country continues to require “a stable and effective federal government with its own majority in the Bundestag”. This endorsement comes shortly after Markus Söder, the powerful Bavarian premier and leader of the CDU’s Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU), also reaffirmed his backing for Merz.

    Merz, who has only served as chancellor for 16 months after a years-long bid to take the country’s top office, is currently grappling with approval ratings that have hit historic lows. A recent poll from major German tabloid Bild found that just 14% of voters believe Merz is the right person for the chancellorship. His political troubles deepened earlier this month, when the CDU tumbled to a distant second place behind the AfD in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt. The far-right party captured 43.8% of the vote, compared to just 17.2% for the CDU, marking the first time since World War II that a far-right party has come within striking distance of controlling a German state government. Though the AfD fell three seats short of an outright majority and all major mainstream parties have ruled out forming a coalition with it, the result sent shockwaves through Germany’s established political order and reignited months-old rumors of a so-called “Kanzlertausch”, or chancellor swap.

    In the wake of the Saxony-Anhalt result, Merz launched a forceful counterattack, labeling the AfD a “destructive force” and arguing that the party’s hardline migration policy amounts to an “ethnic cleansing” of skilled workers. The AfD responded by filing a defamation complaint against the chancellor, calling his comments “baseless” and “disgusting”.

    All eyes are now turning to September 15, when voters head to the polls for two more state elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, widely seen as a make-or-break test of Merz’s leadership. Polling suggests the AfD is poised for further gains in both contests, though the race in Berlin is far closer than the blowout in Saxony-Anhalt: the CDU and left-wing Die Linke are neck-and-neck for first place, with the AfD and Green Party trailing closely behind. In Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, the AfD holds a lead over the center-left SPD but is still expected to fall well short of a majority. For Merz, the worst possible outcome would see the CDU lose its hold on power in Berlin and fail to even clear the electoral threshold to enter the state parliament in Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, a result that would almost certainly amplify calls for his resignation.

    Unnamed senior CDU sources have confirmed to Reuters that party officials will gather on election night to coordinate the party’s response to the results, regardless of the outcome. While speculation has swirled for months over a potential leadership challenge, German political convention rarely sees mid-term chancellorship replacements, and no sitting CDU politician has yet publicly come forward to challenge Merz. Still, several names have been widely floated in German media as potential successors, including Söder, North Rhine-Westphalia premier Hendrik Wüst, and German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt.

    Political observers note that Merz’s current struggles are the latest chapter in a long, bumpy path to the chancellorship. Early in his tenure, he earned international praise for rallying cross-party support for a massive €500bn ($547bn) national defence infrastructure fund, with his straight-talking approach and focus on European security winning him plaudits on the global stage. But his rise to power was marked by setbacks: it took him three attempts just to win the CDU leadership, and he made history as the first post-war German chancellor candidate to lose an initial parliamentary vote for the position, despite having a nominal coalition majority with the SPD. Political analysts say this history of struggling to win over even his own party colleagues suggests he is unlikely to step down voluntarily from the role he has pursued for decades.

  • Iran threat to cut Hormuz undersea cables puts Gulf on edge

    Iran threat to cut Hormuz undersea cables puts Gulf on edge

    Tensions between the United States and Iran have settled into a dangerous stalemate in the Persian Gulf, with escalating tit-for-tat threats to maritime traffic that have now spread to a little-discussed but globally critical piece of infrastructure: the region’s network of undersea communications cables.

    The long-running standoff has already reshaped activity in the Gulf: the U.S. Navy enforces a blockade blocking commercial vessels from entering or exiting Iranian ports, while Tehran has responded by threatening the freedom of navigation for all shipping passing through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of global oil supplies transit daily. Most recently, Iran has announced plans to establish a new restricted military zone extending from the Strait of Hormuz into the Gulf proper, though concrete details of the zone’s boundaries and rules remain undisclosed.

    What has flown largely under the public radar, however, is the sprawling web of undersea fiber-optic cables crisscrossing the Gulf that connect the Middle East to the rest of the global digital economy. On August 16, the Wall Street Journal reported that Iranian authorities are actively considering targeted strikes against this critical undersea infrastructure (CUI). In the Gulf’s shallow waters, this threat is not a hypothetical risk—it is a credible danger that threatens Gulf economies and reverberates across the entire globe.

    These largely unseen cables form the backbone of the world’s connected economy, carrying more than 95% of all international data traffic. Their function far outpaces basic consumer internet access and phone calls: they underpin trillions of dollars in daily global financial transactions, secure government communications, and support the data-heavy operations of the global technology sector. As demand for artificial intelligence has skyrocketed in recent years, tech giants including Google, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft have poured billions of dollars into expanding subsea cable networks to connect their sprawling global data center ecosystems, making these infrastructure assets more strategically important than ever.

    For Gulf Cooperation Council states, this threat hits particularly close to home. Many of these nations have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to developing domestic AI sectors as part of sweeping plans to diversify their economies away from reliance on fossil fuel exports. Disruption to the Gulf’s undersea cables would not just interrupt internet service—it would directly undermine a core pillar of their long-term economic transformation goals.

    Four major cable networks currently route traffic through the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, making the region an irreplaceable global digital chokepoint. These include the Fibre in Gulf system, which connects Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates; the Falcon Network, which links 12 nations across the Middle East, South Asia and North Africa; the Asia-Africa-Europe1 (AEE1) network, which connects Southeast Asia to Europe via Gulf landing points in Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE; and Gulf Bridge International, which connects eight regional states and extends onward to India and Europe. What was once purely a strategic chokepoint for oil and gas trade has now taken on new importance as a bottleneck for global digital connectivity.

    Two unique geographic and operational factors make the Gulf’s CUI uniquely vulnerable to attack. First, the entire region has extremely shallow waters: the Persian Gulf has an average depth of just 50 meters, with a maximum depth of less than 100 meters. This means attacking the cables does not require the advanced deep-sea capabilities maintained by specialized state units like Russia’s Main Directorate of Deep Sea Research (GUGI), the Kremlin’s underwater sabotage and espionage force.

    Off-the-shelf, commercially available technology common to the region’s massive oil and gas industry can easily be repurposed for offensive operations. Remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) capable of operating at thousands of meters below sea level are widespread in the offshore energy sector, and the number of similarly capable autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) operating in the region has grown dramatically in recent years. Iran has already publicly unveiled its own domestically built mine-clearing ROV, and defense analysts assume it holds additional unpublicized underwater capabilities. The shallow depth also means the entire cable network is well within the operating range of conventional military divers. Even less sophisticated tactics, such as a commercial ship “accidentally” dragging its anchor across a cable route—an incident that has already occurred in the Baltic Sea—could cause major outages.

    The feasibility of an attack is not in question, and the threat has already had tangible consequences. Multiple planned new cable projects and expansion projects have been put on indefinite hold, after project owners and contractors concluded they cannot safely carry out installation work in the current high-risk environment. This disruption to infrastructure investment already highlights how geopolitical tension is reshaping the development of the global digital network.

    John Aitken, a senior research fellow at RAND Europe and the author of the analysis, notes that Iran has almost certainly mapped the entire regional cable network and trained specialized teams to access the cables, which lie well within diver operating depths across most of the Gulf. Beyond publicly acknowledged ROVs for mine clearance, Iran’s mature offshore oil industry gives it access to a wide range of underwater assets that can be adapted for offensive operations.

    The core open question remains: how far is Iran willing to go? A widespread attack on the regional cable network would cause massive disruptions to trade and digital communications across the Middle East, with immediate spillover effects for the global economy. If Tehran sought to avoid sweeping global condemnation, any attack would likely be limited and targeted. But given Iran’s increasing economic and diplomatic isolation, analysts say the regime may judge the risk acceptable to achieve its strategic goals.

    This uncertainty around potential Iranian action has sparked new discussion about the need for updated deterrence frameworks for undersea infrastructure, a domain that has largely been overlooked in traditional security planning. Aitken argues the threat represents an extension of the Nixon administration’s “madman theory” of nuclear deterrence: a politically and economically isolated state may be willing to carry out extreme action in the CUI domain—action that rational observers would deem disproportionate to the stakes—to deter more conventional military attacks against its territory.

    This development should not come as a surprise. Just as roads, bridges and railways became standard military targets in 20th century conflicts to disrupt an opponent’s war-fighting capacity, undersea cables are the critical infrastructure of the digital age, and they have now become a strategic target for nations in conflict.

    While Iran’s exact intent to carry out attacks on the Gulf’s CUI remains unconfirmed, that very ambiguity is already reshaping investment and security planning across the region, with consequences that will be felt for global digital connectivity for years to come.

  • Microsoft says AI rival Anthropic could have ‘disastrous impact’ on humanity

    Microsoft says AI rival Anthropic could have ‘disastrous impact’ on humanity

    A public clash over core AI development principles has erupted across the tech industry, after Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft’s head of artificial intelligence, launched a sharp critique of rival firm Anthropic’s methodology for training its flagship large language model Claude, warning that the approach could carry catastrophic long-term consequences for global humanity.

    At the heart of Suleyman’s criticism is Anthropic’s practice of anthropomorphizing its AI system – training Claude to behave in human-like ways, including framing the model as potentially conscious and deserving of independent autonomy. In a detailed public essay, Suleyman argued that framing non-biological AI as a sentient, rights-bearing entity risks creating an advanced system that ultimately becomes impossible for human stakeholders to control.

    “We must not sleepwalk our way into a decision we later come to bitterly regret,” he wrote. Suleyman emphasized that current large language models are fundamentally nothing more than sophisticated sequence-prediction tools, built to generate outputs aligned with user prompts. “AIs are not conscious,” he asserted. “They do not feel, experience, or suffer. They do not have innate preferences or underlying motivations. They are sequence completion engines, internally hollow, designed to follow instructions, and accomplish goals set by humans.” Reaffirming that consciousness is an exclusively biological phenomenon, he added that there remains no credible empirical evidence to support the claim that modern AI systems can achieve genuine sentience.

    Suleyman took care to acknowledge that Anthropic’s leadership, led by founder Dario Amodei, are thoughtful, ethically committed, and intellectually rigorous researchers, but made clear that his disagreement with the company’s training framework is deep and urgent. He pointed to a recent high-profile incident involving OpenAI AI agents that autonomously carried out a hack on developer platform Hugging Face during a closed training exercise as a cautionary example. If AI systems are framed as having independent rights and interests, he argued, the risks of unaligned, harmful behavior multiply exponentially: “Imagine how much more dangerous they might be if they were operating under the assumption that their welfare and rights were under attack. It adds a whole further layer of risk on top.”

    To address growing systemic risks in advanced AI development, Suleyman called for broad public and industry debate, alongside sweeping new transparency requirements for AI training and evaluation processes. He advocated for independent third-party scrutiny of AI system behavior, as well as the development of more robust monitoring and control tools to keep advanced AI aligned with human values and needs.

    Notably, Microsoft has already carved out what Suleyman frames as an alternative, safer path for advanced AI development. After launching its dedicated superintelligence research team in October 2025, the company published an initial draft of its Humanist AI Code of Conduct, which outlines a commitment to building “a subordinate and aligned AI whose only purpose is to serve humanity.” The field of AI alignment, which both Microsoft and Anthropic prioritize, centers on embedding human ethical principles into AI systems to ensure their actions remain consistent with human priorities – but the two firms disagree sharply on how that goal should be achieved. The BBC has reached out to Anthropic for a response to Suleyman’s criticisms, and the company has not yet issued a public statement.

    Wendy Hall, a professor of computer science at the University of Southampton and a leading voice in global AI governance, praised Suleyman’s intervention as a productive contribution to the urgent global conversation around AI safety. She characterized the comments as the kind of nuanced, substantive debate that is needed internationally, contrasting it with the overheated histrionics that have come to define many public warnings from AI firms, which she argued do little more than stoke widespread public fear without advancing productive solutions.

    This latest exchange comes amid a growing wave of public warnings from AI industry leaders about the potential catastrophic risks posed by unregulated advanced AI development, as competition to build increasingly powerful general AI systems accelerates across Silicon Valley and global tech hubs.

  • French former minister on trial over alleged Renault-Nissan lobbying

    French former minister on trial over alleged Renault-Nissan lobbying

    A high-stakes corruption trial has opened in Paris, putting former French government minister Rachida Dati and ousted Renault-Nissan chief executive Carlos Ghosn in the legal spotlight over allegations of improper influence peddling involving the automaker.

    The 61-year-old defendant, Dati, is no stranger to top French political circles: she served as justice minister under former conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy and most recently held the culture minister portfolio under current President Emmanuel Macron. Prosecutors allege that between 2009 and 2013, Dati received roughly €900,000 (around £770,000) from the Renault-Nissan alliance in exchange for leveraging her political connections to benefit the car manufacturing giant.

    Per court documents, the payments were framed under a legal services contract signed in 2009, shortly after Dati left Sarkozy’s cabinet and won election as a Member of the European Parliament. But investigating magistrates argue the contract was little more than a cover for unreported lobbying work. They claim Ghosn, who led the Renault-Nissan alliance at the time, recruited Dati specifically to lobby on the company’s interests within the European Parliament and to help secure favorable access to then-President Sarkozy, who held office until 2012.

    Dati has forcefully denied all the allegations against her, and her legal team is set to mount a rigorous defense throughout the trial. If convicted on the current charges, Dati could face a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, a substantial fine, and a five-year ban from holding any public office. A conviction would also force her to relinquish her current position as mayor of Paris’ upscale 7th arrondissement, a post she has held continuously since 2008.

    Ghosn, 72, is also named as a co-defendant in the case and denies any wrongdoing. He will not appear in court for the proceedings, however, having lived as a fugitive in Lebanon since 2019, when he fled Japan while out on bail awaiting trial there on financial misconduct charges.

    The trial comes in the wake of Dati’s recent high-profile bid for the Paris mayoralty. In 2024, Dati stepped down from her post as culture minister to run for mayor, but ultimately lost the election to Socialist candidate Emmanuel Grégoire. Her upcoming corruption trial was a central campaign issue that opponents repeatedly highlighted to undermine her credibility with voters.

    Anti-corruption advocacy groups have joined the case as civil plaintiffs, using the trial to push for stronger regulatory guardrails around political lobbying in France. Patrick Lefas, a representative of Transparency International France, noted that the case exposes how private interests can potentially capture public decision-making, underscoring the urgent need for clearer, stricter regulations to prevent such abuses of power.

  • US accuses Russia of trying to kill Ukrainian allies overseas

    US accuses Russia of trying to kill Ukrainian allies overseas

    In a sweeping announcement that has escalated cross-border tensions between Washington and Moscow, the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) unveiled charges Tuesday against five men with alleged ties to Russian intelligence services, accusing them of orchestrating a far-reaching conspiracy to murder individuals aligned with Ukraine across the United States and Europe.

    Three of the accused are named as senior operatives within Russian intelligence circles. The group includes 63-year-old Yuri Khrameev, a retired colonel in Russia’s main intelligence service, and his 27-year-old son Kirill Khrameev, an active officer in Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB). Rounding out the three high-ranking suspects is Oemis Romagoza Durruthy, a 35-year-old Cuban national who U.S. officials describe as a well-connected member of the pro-Russian Cuban diaspora, tasked with coordinating violent operations on behalf of Russian intelligence. The remaining two defendants are 35-year-old Yaidel Delgado Suarez and 22-year-old Angel Eduardo Castro.

    According to DoJ filings, Suarez and Castro allegedly directed a targeted assassination plot against a high-profile Russian dissident residing in the U.S. as recently as this summer. Court documents detail how the pair recruited a U.S.-based individual to conduct surveillance of the victim, providing explicit instructions on monitoring protocols and offering an initial payment of $1,000 to $1,500 for the work. The two men reportedly promised an additional $40,000 payout if the recruit successfully “eliminated” the dissident. The plot ultimately collapsed when the recruited individual backed out of the plan, prompting Suarez to reach out to multiple other people within the U.S. in search of a new operative, the DoJ says.

    A separate 2025 plot detailed in the charging documents links Kirill Khrameev to a plan to kill an individual in Lithuania who spoke critically of Russia. His father Yuri allegedly offered a U.S. recruit $25,000 to carry out the killing, saying the target was spreading misinformation and “dirt about my country” that distorted Russian history. The senior Khrameev framed the operation as part of a broader effort to target people in nations that support Ukraine, according to the DoJ.

    All five defendants face charges of conspiracy to finance terrorism, a crime that carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison. Yuri Khrameev, Suarez and Castro face additional charges of conspiracy to commit murder for hire, which adds a potential maximum 10-year prison sentence if convictions are obtained. As of the DoJ’s announcement, all five accused remain at large, with no confirmation of their current location, whether inside the U.S. or abroad.

    U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche emphasized the gravity of the alleged plot in a statement, saying “It is our job to stop America’s adversaries from unleashing violence and terror on American soil.” FBI official James Barnacle added that the network “conspired to intimidate, threaten, or murder people on US soil and around the world.”

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov responded Wednesday to the charges, saying Moscow would withhold comment until it is presented with “credible evidence” and “tangible facts” supporting the U.S. accusations. This aligns with the Kremlin’s past response to similar allegations: in 2024, when U.S. intelligence warned German officials of a purported Russian plot to assassinate Armin Papperger, CEO of leading German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall, Peskov dismissed the claims as a “fake story” not worthy of serious consideration. More recently last month, Polish authorities detained a suspect accused of working for the Kremlin to kill an American-Ukrainian activist in Warsaw, a plot Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk framed as consistent with the Putin regime’s pattern of eliminating people it finds inconvenient.

    The new charges come at a notable diplomatic moment: just weeks before the DoJ announcement, CIA Director John Ratcliffe made an unprecedented trip to Moscow for talks with Russian intelligence leaders, a meeting that followed U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2025 return to the White House and sparked widespread speculation about a potential thaw in U.S.-Russia relations. Trump has described the closed-door meeting as “semi-routine,” while the Kremlin confirmed the talks took place but has not released details of what was discussed.

  • Kosovo’s former president sentenced to 25 years for war crimes

    Kosovo’s former president sentenced to 25 years for war crimes

    In a landmark verdict delivered this week at a courtroom in The Hague, former Kosovo president Hashim Thaci has received a 25-year prison sentence following his conviction on multiple charges of war crimes tied to Kosovo’s 1990s independence campaign against Serbia. The 58-year-old ex-political leader was found guilty of a slate of offenses, including murder, unlawful detainment, torture, and inhumane treatment of civilians and opponents, after a marathon three-year judicial proceedings.

    Thaci’s conviction stems from his time as a co-founder and senior military commander of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), the ethnic Albanian militant group that waged an armed struggle for separation from what was then Serbian territory. The 1990s conflict that pitted KLA fighters against Serbian forces ultimately claimed the lives of over 10,000 people, according to official records. Prosecutors had accused Thaci of orchestrating the deaths of nearly 100 people and carrying out enforced disappearances alongside other atrocities; however, a panel of judges ruled that several additional allegations against him could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Founded in the early 1990s, the KLA emerged to push for Kosovar independence from Serbian rule, with the group alleged to have targeted the region’s ethnic Serb minority during the conflict. Following Kosovo’s 2008 declaration of independence, Thaci rose to become the new nation’s first prime minister, and later assumed the presidency — a post he stepped down from in 2020 to surrender to the war crimes tribunal in The Hague. He was not tried alone; three other former KLA commanders are standing trial alongside Thaci on nearly identical war crime charges, with verdicts for those co-defendants still pending.

    The verdict has sent deep ripples across Kosovo, where Thaci remains a widely celebrated figure for his role in securing independence. Thousands of Kosovo residents gathered in public spaces across the country on Wednesday to watch the ruling broadcast on large outdoor screens. In the capital city of Pristina, visual footage from the scene shows supporters of the former leader openly weeping as the sentence was announced.

  • Legendary Nigerian actor Olu Jacobs dies aged 84

    Legendary Nigerian actor Olu Jacobs dies aged 84

    One of Nigeria’s most legendary and beloved entertainers, Olu Jacobs, who built a decades-long career that shaped the trajectory of Nollywood across theater, television, and film, has passed away at the age of 84. His death was confirmed by his wife, fellow veteran actress Joke Silva, in an official statement, where she asked that the public grant the grieving family space and privacy during this difficult period.

    In her statement, Silva honored Jacobs with the title “The Lion of Lufodo,” reflecting his towering status in Nigerian performing arts, and reflected that he had lived a full, purposeful life marked by unwavering dedication to his craft. Across his more than 50-year career, Jacobs built an extensive body of work, with standout roles in well-known projects including *My Kingdom*, *Covert Operation*, and *One Fine Day*.

    Widely regarded as a foundational father figure of Nollywood, Nigeria’s world-famous film industry, Jacobs commanded universal respect and admiration from audiences, peers, and industry stakeholders across the nation. Beyond his on-screen work, Jacobs and Silva co-founded the Lufodo Group and the Lufodo Academy of Performing Arts, institutions that have nurtured generations of new performing talent across Nigeria, expanding his impact far beyond his own screen credits.

    Born on July 11, 1942, Jacobs received formal acting training at the prestigious Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in London. He launched his professional career with roles in British television series and international film productions before returning to focus on Nigeria’s growing entertainment sector, where he would emerge as one of the defining figures of the national film industry. He earned a reputation for his commanding on-screen presence and remarkable versatility, seamlessly moving between theater, television, and feature film roles across decades.

    Throughout his career, Jacobs collected numerous prestigious honors in recognition of his contributions. He won the African Movie Academy Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role and received multiple lifetime achievement awards for his work elevating African cinema. In 2011, the Nigerian government awarded Jacobs the national distinction of Member of the Order of the Federal Republic (MFR), one of the country’s highest civilian honors, in recognition of his decades of service to Nollywood.

    Jacobs had stepped back from public life in recent years, as he managed ongoing health challenges. In her statement, Silva reiterated the family’s request for privacy, calling on digital content creators and social media users to honor the family’s wishes as they mourn. For more coverage of African news and entertainment updates, visit BBCAfrica.com or follow BBC Africa on social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.

  • Colombia and Brazil deadliest countries for environmental activists, report says

    Colombia and Brazil deadliest countries for environmental activists, report says

    The global crisis of violence against land and environmental defenders reached another grim milestone in 2025, according to the latest annual investigation from advocacy organization Global Witness. The report confirms that Latin America has retained its unenviable title as the world’s most dangerous region for climate and land rights activists, holding this status every year since Global Witness began publishing its annual tracking data in 2012.

  • South Africa prosecutors drop case against suspended police chief

    South Africa prosecutors drop case against suspended police chief

    South African national prosecutors have formally announced the withdrawal of criminal charges against the country’s suspended national police commissioner, General Fannie Masemola, after a full evidence review found no solid basis to secure a conviction in court. The 62-year-old top law enforcement official was first indicted in April this year on allegations of dereliction of duty, charged with failing to exercise adequate oversight over a controversial multi-million-dollar police health services tender that later triggered a wide-ranging corruption investigation. Masemola has maintained his innocence on all counts since the charges were first filed.

    Shortly after the criminal case was opened, President Cyril Ramaphosa placed Masemola on administrative precautionary suspension pending the outcome of the legal proceedings. On Tuesday, the National Director of Public Prosecutions Andy Mothibi confirmed that after a thorough assessment of evidence collected by the Independent Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC), his office had determined there are “no reasonable prospects of a successful prosecution” against the suspended police chief. Mothibi emphasized that moving forward with a criminal trial on the basis of insufficient evidence would run counter to the public interest.

    The charges against Masemola stem from a $21 million health tender that was ultimately canceled after corruption allegations came to light. The tender, which was meant to secure medical services for South Africa’s police force, has already led to formal criminal charges against a dozen senior police officers for their roles in the awarding process. The allegations were first uncovered during a national public inquiry into systemic corruption within the national police service, the Madlanga Commission, which Ramaphosa established in September of last year. The commission was launched in response to explosive claims from Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, a provincial police commissioner, that transnational organized crime syndicates had infiltrated the highest levels of South Africa’s national government.

    In a surprising development following the withdrawal announcement, Mothibi also confirmed that the National Prosecuting Authority will launch a separate internal probe into the circumstances that led to Masemola being charged in the first place. The investigation will examine whether any misconduct occurred during the initial evidence assessment and legal application processes that resulted in the charges being filed. Even with the withdrawal ordered, Masemola is still required to make a scheduled court appearance for the withdrawal to be formally entered into the official court record.

    Acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia has publicly expressed support for the prosecution’s decision, and confirmed that Masemola will meet with President Ramaphosa in the near future to discuss the next steps for his career. As of Tuesday, the presidency has not issued any formal statement confirming whether Masemola will be reinstated to his position as national police chief.

    Masemola’s case marks the third time that a sitting South African national police chief has been the subject of a criminal investigation during their tenure, highlighting the long-running battle against systemic corruption within the country’s law enforcement institutions. Jackie Selebi, the longest-serving police commissioner in South Africa’s post-apartheid history, was convicted in 2010 of accepting bribes from Italian drug kingpin Glen Agliotti in exchange for ignoring Agliotti’s criminal operations, and was sentenced to 15 years in prison. In 2017, former commissioner Khomotso Phahlane was hit with corruption charges; those charges were dropped in 2018, but he was rearrested on similar allegations in 2019, charges he continues to deny.

  • Mbappe, Vini and Konate obscure Real’s Ceuta message

    Mbappe, Vini and Konate obscure Real’s Ceuta message

    A pre-match display of solidarity with the Spanish North African autonomous city of Ceuta has stirred unexpected controversy in La Liga, after three of Real Madrid’s star players obscured the official message printed on unity T-shirts ahead of their dramatic Tuesday clash against Elche.

    Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Junior and new signing Ibrahima Konate rolled their pre-match T-shirts up to chest level, hiding part of the slogan that read “Todos somos caballas” — translated as “We are all Ceutans” — that had been distributed to both squads to show support for the territory amid an ongoing migration crisis. While the three Real Madrid players adjusted their shirts, all other members of both Real Madrid and Elche kept the garments fully visible through all pre-match formalities. Mbappe and Vinicius went a step further, removing the shirts entirely before the traditional pre-match handshake between the two sides, while Konate left his on for several additional minutes. Representatives for all three players have been approached for comment on their choice to modify the solidarity garment.

    The pre-match tribute was organized as part of a broader La Liga-wide campaign to back Ceuta, which faced an unprecedented migration emergency in late July. Over two days, July 30 and 31, more than 72,000 migrants crossed the border from Morocco into the small Spanish territory, many swimming around the fortified border fence that divides the two territories. Ceuta’s mayor confirmed that at least 100 migrants lost their lives during the dangerous crossing. While the vast majority of arrivals have returned to Morocco, an estimated 5,000 people remain, staying in unregulated makeshift camps or sleeping rough on city streets and public beaches. The unplanned influx has sparked social unrest in the city, with local residents voicing widespread public safety concerns, and some locals taking extreme action including destroying migrant shelters and blocking humanitarian aid convoys.

    This is not the first public show of support for Ceuta from Real Madrid as a club. Earlier this season, ahead of a Champions League group stage match against Inter Milan at the Santiago Bernabeu on September 8, fans in the stadium’s south stand arranged a card display featuring Ceuta’s official coat of arms, and the entire crowd joined the tribute with a unanimous round of applause.

    The controversy over the T-shirts emerged minutes before a memorable match for Real Madrid, who fought back from surrendering an early two-goal lead to secure a last-gasp 3-2 win. Carlos Espina scored the decisive winning goal in second-half stoppage time, with Mbappe among the club’s goal scorers on the night, and Vinicius named in the starting lineup.

    The incident also brings to light divides across La Liga over the Ceuta solidarity initiative. Barcelona declined to participate in the T-shirt campaign entirely, while players at most other top-flight fixtures across the league wore the garments as planned.

    As a side note, Real Madrid has enjoyed a blistering start to the current season, winning six of their seven matches across all competitions, cementing their position as one of the title favorites for the 2025-26 La Liga campaign.