标签: South America

南美洲

  • Argentine couple to return Nazi-looted painting to rightful owner

    Argentine couple to return Nazi-looted painting to rightful owner

    Eighty years after it was looted by Nazi forces from a Jewish art collector’s collection, a long-missing late-baroque masterpiece has been ordered returned to its rightful lineage following a surprising discovery hidden in plain sight in coastal Argentina.

    The artwork, *Portrait of a Lady* (also referred to as *Contessa Colleoni*), was first spotted by pure chance in August 2025: a Dutch newspaper, Algemeen Dagblad, identified the painting in public listing photos posted by an estate agent advertising a home for sale in Mar del Plata, a popular coastal town just outside Buenos Aires. The canvas was hanging unassumingly above a green sofa in the living room of Patricia Kadgien, daughter of former Nazi fugitive Friedrich Kadgien.

    Friedrich Kadgien, who fled to Argentina after World War II, was a senior adviser to Hermann Göring—Adolf Hitler’s second-in-command, who oversaw the mass plunder of thousands of artworks across occupied Europe. The portrait was one of more than 1,000 pieces stolen from the collection of Jacques Goudstikker, a prominent Jewish Dutch art dealer, following the Nazi invasion of the Netherlands in 1940.

    After the painting was identified, authorities launched a search of Kadgien’s property in September 2025 that failed to turn up the artwork. Kadgien and her husband Juan Carlos Cortegoso were subsequently charged with concealment of stolen property and placed under house arrest. On Friday, however, a court in Mar del Plata reached a negotiated resolution: all criminal proceedings against the couple have been suspended in exchange for their full cooperation to return the painting and a financial settlement.

    Under the terms of the agreement between Kadgien’s family, prosecutors, and Goudstikker’s heirs, Kadgien and Cortegoso will surrender all legal claims to the artwork. They have also agreed to donate 4.8 million Argentine pesos (equivalent to approximately £2,356 or $3,185) to local public hospitals in exchange for avoiding prosecution for concealing the stolen piece.

    The sole surviving heir to Goudstikker’s collection is Marei von Saher, Goudstikker’s daughter-in-law. Per reporting from Argentine newspaper *Clarin*, von Saher plans to place the portrait on temporary loan to Buenos Aires’ Holocaust Museum, where it will be displayed to raise public awareness of Nazi-looted art and the ongoing work to return stolen cultural property to its rightful owners. Von Saher has long reaffirmed her family’s commitment to the recovery effort, stating previously that the goal remains “to bring back every single artwork robbed from Jacques’ collection, and to restore his legacy.”

    Art historical scholarship on the portrait has been divided since its recovery. The work is broadly attributed to late-baroque Italian artist Giuseppe Ghislandi, though some experts have argued it may instead be the work of Giacomo Ceruti, another prominent Italian painter from the same historical period.

  • UK will ‘resolutely uphold’ Falklands self-determination, Miliband says

    UK will ‘resolutely uphold’ Falklands self-determination, Miliband says

    Decades of tense sovereignty dispute over the South Atlantic Falkland Islands (known as the Malvinas in Argentina) have reignited, after Argentine President Javier Milei recently made new claims to the territory and threatened sanctions against international companies moving forward with planned oil exploration near the archipelago.

    Milei used a national address Thursday to double down on Argentina’s longstanding territorial claim, arguing that the Falkland Islands are historically and legally part of Argentina. He claimed that the “winds of change” are shifting in Argentina’s favor, and warned that the proposed Sea Lion oil development off the islands’ coast poses a “clear and present danger” to his country’s interests. If Argentina does not act quickly, Milei asserted, foreign companies will gain permanent access to what he calls Argentina’s offshore oil reserves – a development he said the nation would never accept.

    The president announced plans to impose new sanctions on companies involved in the exploration project, though details of how or how broadly these restrictions will be applied have not yet been released. Argentine law already allows for sanctions against energy firms operating in projects Buenos Aires does not authorize in the disputed territory.

    The project at the center of the latest dispute is a partnership between UK-based Rockhopper Exploration and Israeli energy firm Navitas Petroleum, which plans to begin commercial oil extraction at the Sea Lion field by 2028. Located roughly 130 miles off the Falklands coast, the field holds an estimated 1.7 billion barrels of high-quality crude oil – nearly six times the volume of the North Sea’s major Rosebank oil field. In a joint statement released Friday, the two companies confirmed they hold valid exploration licenses granted by the Falkland Islands government, with full backing from the UK government. The firms added that current political tensions will not delay their project timeline.

    In response to Milei’s remarks, senior UK officials have issued a unified, firm rebuke, reaffirming the UK’s commitment to upholding the Falkland Islanders’ right to self-determination. Writing on the social platform X Friday, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said the UK would “resolutely uphold” the self-determination of the islanders, and the territory will remain British because that is the overwhelming democratic will of its residents.

    Defence Secretary Wes Streeting echoed that position, describing the UK’s commitment to the Falklands as “absolute and unshakeable.” Streeting argued that Milei’s statement has more to do with domestic political positioning in Argentina than it does with the actual status of the disputed islands. Downing Street also issued a formal reaffirmation of the UK’s longstanding stance: the Falklands will remain a British Overseas Territory for as long as the islands’ residents wish to keep that status. A Downing Street spokesperson noted that economic threats against the Falklands from Argentine governments are not new, and added that the islanders’ right to self-determination explicitly includes the right to develop and exploit their own natural resources.

    The current dispute comes more than 40 years after the 1982 Falklands War, and the sovereignty of the South Atlantic archipelago remains a deeply divisive issue between London and Buenos Aires. In a 2013 referendum held on the islands, 99.8% of resident voters cast ballots in favor of remaining a British Overseas Territory, with just three votes against the option.

    The latest diplomatic tension also drew comment from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who hinted Thursday that the U.S. would not side with the UK in any future military conflict over the Falklands. Trump claimed the U.S. would not back the UK because Britain did not support him during what he described as his “war with Iran.” Trump’s remarks come as he previously confirmed that the U.S. position on the Falklands dispute is one of multiple policies currently under review.

  • Argentine leader says oil firms working off Falklands face sanctions

    Argentine leader says oil firms working off Falklands face sanctions

    Decades after a brutal 1982 armed conflict that claimed nearly 1,000 lives, the long-running sovereignty dispute over the Falkland Islands (known as Las Malvinas to Argentina) has reignited, with Argentine President Javier Milei unveiling aggressive new steps to advance his country’s claim to the British overseas territory in the South Atlantic.

    In a nationally televised address this week, Milei confirmed he would move forward with sanctions targeting international oil companies planning exploration work off the archipelago’s coast. His announcement centers on the Sea Lion oilfield, a massive untapped reserve holding an estimated 1.7 billion barrels of crude, where a British and an Israeli energy firm are scheduled to launch exploratory drilling in the coming months. Milei framed the upcoming project as a direct threat to Argentina’s territorial claims, warning that delaying action would give energy companies the permanent physical infrastructure to extract resources that Argentina asserts rightfully belong to the country.

    “Winds of change are blowing across the globe that favor our claim to the Falklands,” Milei told the Argentine public, pointing to growing signals that the United States is prepared to revise its longstanding policy of neutrality in the decades-old dispute. The Argentine leader emphasized that former U.S. President Donald Trump has openly flagged the possibility of a U.S. position shift if the United Kingdom fails to meet its NATO defense spending commitments, and added that current U.S. officials are reassessing Washington’s historical stance on the sovereignty issue. “This is not empty rhetoric,” Milei said. “U.S. leaders understand that Argentina is a reliable partner and a valuable ally for the decades ahead. The Falklands are Argentinean — historically, legally, and irrefutably.”

    Milei also used the address to announce plans to construct a new Argentine naval base in Tierra del Fuego, the southernmost province of Argentina, located just a short distance from the Falkland archipelago. While details of the proposed sanctions remain unclear, existing Argentine legislation already enables the government to impose restrictions on any company participating in unauthorized energy projects on the islands.

    The sovereignty dispute stretches back more than 200 years, but erupted into open conflict in 1982, when Argentine military forces invaded the islands to stake a territorial claim. The UK deployed a naval task force that retook control of the archipelago after a 74-day conflict that left 255 British service members, three Falkland island residents, and 649 Argentine soldiers dead. In a 2013 referendum held on the islands, 99.8% of residents voted overwhelmingly to remain a British overseas territory, reaffirming their right to self-determination. The UK has repeatedly stood by that result, reiterating this week that Falkland islanders are British citizens with an unassailable right to determine their own political future. BBC News has reached out to the UK government for additional comment on Milei’s latest announcement.

    Recent developments have introduced new uncertainty to the dispute, particularly shifting signals from the United States. In a GB News interview Thursday, Trump was asked whether the U.S. would intervene to support the UK in a potential future escalation of the dispute. The former president replied that the UK had “not been there to help me” during tensions between the U.S. and Iran, echoing his earlier warnings that a U.S. neutrality revision is on the table if the UK does not increase its defense spending. Just hours before Milei’s national address, a senior U.S. State Department official sparked further speculation by posting a photo of her meeting with Milei on social media with the caption: “Exciting things are happening in the Western Hemisphere.”

    If exploration proceeds as planned at Sea Lion, production is on track to launch in 2028, marking the first large-scale commercial extraction of the archipelago’s offshore oil reserves — a development Milei warned would fundamentally change the territorial status quo if Argentina does not act quickly.

  • Trump hints US would not back UK over Falkland Islands due to lack of Iran war support

    Trump hints US would not back UK over Falkland Islands due to lack of Iran war support

    A controversial new statement from former and current US President Donald Trump has sent ripples through international diplomacy, after he openly refused to guarantee American military backing for the United Kingdom if a new territorial conflict breaks out over the Falkland Islands between London and Buenos Aires.

    Speaking in a recent interview with UK broadcaster GB News, Trump tied his reluctance to what he frames as unreciprocated cooperation from the UK during the United States’ ongoing tensions with Iran. He argued that when he requested limited naval support from the then-UK prime minister Keir Starmer for operations in the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global chokepoint for oil supplies, a large share of which are imported by the UK — his request was denied on the grounds that no vessels were available for deployment.

    “It was pretty sad,” Trump told GB News. “Your country was not there to help me. We didn’t need help, but I did ask Nato, and I asked your former leader, ‘why didn’t you send a couple of ships?’ Nato was not there, even though most of those countries get a big portion of their oil from there. So we’re doing that by ourselves.”

    The Falkland Islands, a remote British overseas territory located in the South-West Atlantic, have been at the center of a bitter sovereignty dispute between the UK and Argentina for decades. The disagreement boiled over into open armed conflict in 1982, when Argentine military forces invaded the islands to stake Buenos Aires’ long-held territorial claim. A 74-day conflict followed, ending when a British task force retook the islands. The war claimed the lives of 255 British service members, three Falkland Island civilians and 649 Argentine soldiers, leaving a lasting legacy of tension between the two nations.

    This is not the first time Trump has signaled a potential break from longstanding US policy on the Falklands. Earlier, he stated that the US could revise its long-held neutral position on the islands’ sovereignty if the UK failed to meet NATO’s required target for defense spending. When questioned by the BBC recently about whether he was reviewing the US’ long-standing position on the sovereignty dispute, Trump replied: “I always review every position. That’s just one of many.”

    For decades, all previous US administrations have maintained a formal policy of recognizing the UK’s de facto administrative control over the Falklands, while declining to take an official stance on the ultimate question of sovereignty. That long-standing neutrality may now be at risk of shifting under a second Trump administration.

    The comments come as Argentine President Javier Milei is set to address the nation in a prime-time televised address on Thursday evening, where he is expected to lay out his government’s stance on what Buenos Aires calls its “historic sovereignty claim” to the islands.

    The UK government has issued a firm response to Trump’s remarks, reaffirming its long-held commitment to the self-determination of the Falkland Islanders. “Falkland islanders are British with a right to determine their own future,” a UK government spokesperson said. “The islanders have repeatedly expressed their wish to remain a British overseas territory and our commitment to them is unwavering.” That commitment was most recently validated by a 2013 referendum, where 99.8% of voting island residents opted to retain their status as a British overseas territory, with only three votes cast against the proposal.

  • Venezuelans’ pride is bruised by deal to give US one-fifth of their oil reserves

    Venezuelans’ pride is bruised by deal to give US one-fifth of their oil reserves

    For more than a century, oil has been the foundational thread weaving together every aspect of modern Venezuelan identity. Rooted in the national consciousness is the deeply held belief that the country’s unmatched reserves of crude – the largest on the planet – belong not to political leaders or private corporations, but to every Venezuelan citizen. That long-held conviction, and the collective pride of a nation that has weathered decades of turmoil, suffered a major blow last week when acting Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez signed an agreement granting U.S.-backed entities control over roughly one-fifth of the country’s total proven oil reserves.

    While the deal holds the long-term potential to unlock billions of dollars in investment for an oil sector and broader national economy crippled by decades of mismanagement and international sanctions, it has been widely decried by ordinary Venezuelans as an unprecedented surrender of national sovereignty. Many have linked the agreement to the January U.S. military operation that targeted former President Nicolás Maduro, arguing that seizing control of Venezuela’s vast energy wealth was the unstated core goal of the intervention that left Rodríguez in power.

    “For ordinary citizens like us, there is nothing we can do to stop this – it is not just worrying, it is outrageous,” said Lisandro Castro, an architect based in the capital Caracas. “Across the country right now, there is real, widespread anxiety about what is unfolding before our eyes.”

    Oil has shaped every corner of Venezuelan life since commercial deposits were first discovered in the country’s northwest in the 1920s. What began as a new energy sector transformed a poor, largely agrarian nation into an urbanized regional economic power almost overnight. American energy workers who relocated to Venezuela introduced and popularized baseball, constructing fields across oil-producing regions that turned the sport into a national pastime for working-class communities before it spread across the entire country.

    The boom created unprecedented economic opportunity that drew waves of European migrants fleeing post-World War II hardship. Portuguese immigrants opened neighborhood bakeries that remain community staples today, while Italian architects designed iconic buildings that still define Venezuelan cityscapes. As a young democracy, Venezuela came to rely almost entirely on oil export revenues rather than domestic taxes on citizens and businesses, creating a dynamic where politicians used oil wealth to secure public support, explained Ronal Rodríguez, a researcher at the Venezuela Observatory at Colombia’s Universidad del Rosario.

    Venezuela went on to become a founding member of OPEC, and by the 1970s, when the country boasted the highest per capita income in Latin America, the government nationalized the entire oil sector with the creation of the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., known universally as PDVSA. Under the nationalized model, foreign firms were only permitted to operate as minority partners in joint ventures, and PDVSA’s revenues funded an extensive network of public benefits: heavily subsidized gasoline for all citizens, scholarships for international study, free healthcare and countless other social programs.

    “Every single Venezuelan grows up understanding that oil is a collective right that every one of us can claim,” researcher Ronal Rodríguez noted.

    Over the decades, Venezuela’s history has been defined by the repeated cycle of oil booms and crippling busts. When global crude prices plummeted in the 1980s, the economy collapsed, forcing the government to secure a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and eliminate core public subsidies. The resulting social unrest paved the way for the rise of Hugo Chávez, a young military officer who first gained national attention for a failed coup attempt.

    After being elected president in 1998, Chávez expanded the country’s social safety net dramatically – including expanded access to public health, affordable housing and free education – fueled by a resurgence in global oil prices that generated an estimated $981 billion in revenue for PDVSA between 1999 and 2011. The government distributed everything from new homes to household appliances to free medication, and millions of families secured stable, well-paid jobs across public and private sectors. Emboldened by widespread popular support, Chávez tightened state control over PDVSA, sidelining major U.S. oil firms including ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips in the process.

    But PDVSA’s fortunes declined sharply as oil prices fell again in the 2010s. Systemic corruption and decades of mismanagement eroded production capacity and profits, first under Chávez and then under his hand-picked successor, Nicolás Maduro, who took office following Chávez’s death in 2013. By that time, the country was already sliding into a catastrophic economic crisis, worsened by sweeping U.S. sanctions imposed over concerns about democratic backsliding and human rights abuses that gutted the oil sector and the broader economy.

    What was once a magnet for global migrants became a source of mass emigration: severe food shortages and widespread deprivation linked to economic collapse pushed more than 7 million Venezuelans to leave the country. Even today, while grocery store shelves are fully stocked, soaring hyperinflation has left basic goods out of reach for most working people. Public sector employees now earn an average of roughly $160 per month, while private sector workers averaged around $237 per month in 2024.

    “Something is better than nothing,” said Romel Abreu, a former PDVSA worker who now works as a security guard in Cabimas, the heart of Venezuela’s historic oil region in the country’s northwest. Referring to Venezuela’s current crude production of roughly 1 million barrels per day, he added: “If we had no oil production at all, we would be completely lost.” Like many residents of the oil belt, Abreu holds out hope for another boom that would bring back well-paying jobs for the next generation.

    The new oil deal has deepened widespread skepticism among Venezuelans of all political stripes. After Maduro’s capture in January, many Venezuelans hoped that would end the ruling party’s 27-year hold on power. When that did not materialize – with the Trump administration backing Rodríguez over opposition leaders – many held out optimism that the easing of crippling U.S. sanctions would deliver long-overdue economic improvement. A February regulatory overhaul that opened the door to expanded private investment in the oil sector was widely seen as a sign of coming progress.

    But for critics like Castro, the January intervention was always just a stepping stone to this moment. “Everything that happened on January 3 was just a strategy to get us to where we are today: full U.S. control over our energy sector for their own gain, not to benefit ordinary Venezuelans,” he said.

    Under the terms of the agreement, the U.S. is entering a joint venture with North American Blue Energy Partners, Venezuela’s second-largest private oil operating company, trailing only industry giant Chevron. Rodríguez has granted the joint venture 100-year exploitation rights to 17 oil fields holding 65 billion barrels of proven reserves – roughly one-fifth of Venezuela’s total 300 billion barrel reserve base.

    Industry experts warn that because Venezuela’s energy infrastructure has fallen into severe disrepair after decades of underinvestment, it will take years of large-scale capital investment before production increases significantly.

    Speaking in Caracas this week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said the Trump administration’s mission in Venezuela “is to bring peace, freedom, opportunity and prosperity to the people.” In a national address Saturday, Rodríguez defended the agreement, saying she aims to restore Venezuela’s status as a global “energy powerhouse.”

    For residents of Cabimas, the deal leaves them torn between conflicting fears and hopes. “On one hand, you have to acknowledge that we are handing over control of one of our largest reserve holdings,” said Erwin Ayala, a current oil sector worker, outside his home in Cabimas. “But if this is for the good of the country and for future generations, then we can support it. What good does it do us to hold all this oil in the ground if we have no machinery, no technology, to get it out and use it to improve our lives?”

  • UN report details foreign networks fueling war in Sudan

    UN report details foreign networks fueling war in Sudan

    BRUSSELS – Nearly two years into the brutal civil war pitting Sudan’s regular army against the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a new United Nations investigation confirms that transnational foreign networks have dramatically escalated the violence, turning what began as a power struggle into a humanitarian catastrophe that has killed tens of thousands and pushed millions to the brink of starvation. The conflict, which erupted in April 2023, has already left at least 59,000 people dead according to the latest UN accounting, forced roughly 13 million to flee their homes, and pushed entire regions of the northeast African nation into catastrophic food insecurity approaching full-scale famine. In a public summary of the investigation released Thursday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk outlined clear evidence that cross-border networks anchored in companies based in the United Arab Emirates, Colombia, and Chad have funneled critical resources to the RSF, including weapons, military training, and foreign contractor personnel. “The mission finds reasonable grounds to believe that a transnational network supplied the Rapid Support Forces with weapons, logistics, training and foreign personnel, including Colombian contractors involved in advanced weapons and drone systems,” the summary reads. The investigation specifically highlights that individuals and corporate entities connected to, operating from, or formally registered in the United Arab Emirates hold a central role in these networks, overseeing recruitment, financing, transportation, and deployment of foreign military contractors to provide direct military support that benefits the RSF. Abu Dhabi has repeatedly and publicly denied all accusations that it provides military backing to the paramilitary group, a position it has maintained even amid growing international scrutiny. While the report’s most concrete findings focus on support to the RSF, investigators also note that externally supplied drones have expanded the Sudanese army’s aerial strike capabilities, adding that additional research into external support for the military remains ongoing and preliminary. Beyond mapping external support, the UN probe documents widespread attacks on civilian targets that may qualify as war crimes committed by both warring parties. Investigators specifically tied foreign-trained fighters to two brutal massacres carried out in 2025 at the Zamzam internally displaced persons camp and the city of El Fasher. More than 100,000 residents have fled El Fasher since the violence erupted there, and surviving witnesses describe RSF fighters systematically gunning down unarmed civilians in their homes and on city streets, leaving corpses scattered across urban areas. Subsequent analysis of commercial satellite imagery has provided visual evidence suggesting RSF units have attempted to conceal the killings by disposing of remains in unmarked mass graves or through open burning. When it comes to cooperation with the UN investigation, the report notes that authorities in Chad, Colombia, and the United Arab Emirates engaged with investigators, but no substantive response has been received from governments in Ethiopia, Libya, South Sudan, and Somalia. Panama, whose offshore finance sector has long faced global accusations of large-scale industrial money laundering, requested additional time to provide a formal response. Notably, neither Sudan’s official military leadership nor the RSF have agreed to cooperate with the UN probe. The UN findings align with an earlier Associated Press investigation published in July that uncovered evidence Colombian mercenaries had been recruited to train child soldiers to fight for the RSF. Human rights organizations have further alleged that these Colombian fighters were recruited by a state-linked firm based in the UAE, a claim the UAE continues to reject alongside broader accusations of military support to either Sudanese warring party. In line with its findings, the investigative panel has called on the UN Security Council to expand and extend the existing arms embargo imposed on Sudan, stressing that all cross-border flows of weapons, financing, personnel, and advanced military technology that sustain the conflict must be cut off to create space for peace talks. The United States has already thrown its support behind new multilateral action, circulating a draft Security Council resolution in August that was reviewed by the Associated Press. The draft resolution condemns the steady influx of external military aid, weapons, and ammunition to both warring parties, noting that outside support prolongs the conflict and undermines international mediation efforts. It specifically calls out the operation of drone and unmanned aerial system programs launched from third-party countries to support the Sudanese war effort, and demands that all nations immediately end any direct or indirect support – whether logistical, financial, or military – that allows the conflict to continue.

  • Argentine league to pause games to honour Messi

    Argentine league to pause games to honour Messi

    One of the greatest footballers in history, Lionel Messi, is set to receive a heartfelt tribute from his home nation’s top football league following his formal retirement from international football. All matches held across Argentine domestic competitions this coming weekend will grind to a halt at the 10-minute mark to hold a full minute of applause, honoring the decorated forward’s legendary decades-long career with Argentina’s men’s national team. The 39-year-old icon, who famously wore the number 10 shirt for his country throughout his international tenure, announced his decision to step away from national team duty on Monday.

    Messi’s final outing for the Albiceleste came in July’s 2026 FIFA World Cup final, where Argentina fell to Spain in a match that brought an end to a historic international run that included some of the biggest highs in the nation’s modern football history. A statement released by the Argentine Football Association confirmed the honor, saying, “In tribute and homage to Lionel Messi’s career with the Argentina national team, at the 10th minute of play in all matches the referees will stop the game and a general minute of applause will be held. We look forward to seeing you on the fields – join us in this recognition!”

    Over his 21-year international career, Messi rewrote the Argentina national team record book. He holds the nation’s all-time record for appearances with 207 senior caps, and has scored 125 international goals – the second-highest total in men’s international football history, trailing only long-time rival Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal, who has netted 146 times. Across World Cup tournaments, Messi notched 21 goals, one behind current leader Kylian Mbappé of France for the all-time tournament scoring record.

    This is not the first time Messi has walked away from international football, though this retirement is expected to be permanent. He first announced a departure from the national side in 2016, following a heartbreaking penalty shootout defeat to Chile in the Copa America final – a result that marked Argentina’s fourth major final loss in just nine years, after Messi missed his spot kick in the deciding shootout. He reversed that decision just months later, and went on to lead Argentina to long-awaited glory: a 2021 Copa America title, followed by the nation’s third World Cup championship in Qatar 2022, where he captained the side to a dramatic penalty shootout win over France in one of the most iconic finals in tournament history.

    Messi’s path to stardom took him away from his native Argentina as a teenager, when he moved to Spain at 13 to join FC Barcelona’s famed La Masia youth academy. He never played senior club football in Argentina during his long professional career, and currently plies his trade with Major League Soccer side Inter Miami in the United States, where his contract runs through the end of the 2028 season. He will continue to play club football for Miami, despite his international retirement.

    The decision to retire permanently was cemented by a personal loss for Messi earlier this summer. In August, the footballer revealed he had been evaluating his entire football future following the death of his father, Jorge Messi, who passed away at age 68 after a prolonged battle with illness. When announcing his international retirement, Messi confirmed that his father’s passing left him “even more convinced than before” that stepping away from national team duty was the right choice for this next chapter of his life and career.

  • Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and wife seek to end drug charges case on immunity grounds

    Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and wife seek to end drug charges case on immunity grounds

    MANHATTAN, N.Y. – In a high-stakes legal filing in Manhattan federal court Wednesday, legal teams for ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores formally moved to dismiss a long-standing U.S. drug trafficking indictment against the pair, basing their argument on long-held principles of international sovereign immunity that shield sitting and current foreign heads of state from prosecution in other nations’ courts.

    Maduro, 63, and Flores, 69, have remained in custody at a federal detention facility in Brooklyn since early January, when U.S. security forces carried out a midnight raid on their Caracas residence to apprehend them and transport them to New York to face charges. The indictment was initially brought six years earlier, naming the pair alongside dozens of other alleged co-conspirators in an alleged narcotics trafficking plot. U.S. prosecutors accuse Maduro of conspiring with Venezuelan law enforcement officials to facilitate the movement of thousands of tons of cocaine into the United States on behalf of major drug cartel leaders. If convicted on the conspiracy charges, both Maduro and Flores face the possibility of life imprisonment.

    In the court documents submitted this week, Maduro’s legal team argued that U.S. law requires the judge to throw out the indictment entirely, asserting that no U.S. judicial body has ever held a criminal trial for a foreign leader recognized as the sitting head of state by their own nation at the time charges were filed.

    “This is no historical accident,” the lawyers wrote. “It reflects a principle older than common law itself: heads of state are exempt from the criminal process of any national court other than their own.” Even if the court rejected the claim of head-of-state immunity, the defense added, Maduro still qualifies for conduct-based sovereign immunity that protects official acts undertaken in his capacity as a nation’s leader. Maduro vehemently rejects all allegations against him, the team emphasized: “If this case were to proceed to trial, it would be apparent that he has been falsely accused.”

    Flores’ legal team echoed the immunity argument in a separate filing Wednesday, noting that as former first lady of Venezuela, immunity is an inherent attribute of Venezuelan national sovereignty that only the Venezuelan government can waive. “It is an attribute of Venezuela’s sovereignty, and only Venezuela may surrender it,” her lawyers wrote.

    U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has scheduled oral arguments on the dismissal motions for November 17, with the jury trial currently set to begin on June 1 next year. Federal prosecutors have been directed to submit their formal response to the defense’s arguments by the end of this month.

    The detention and prosecution have already sparked intense international and political controversy. The Trump administration, which authorized the raid to apprehend Maduro, has defended the action as a targeted “surgical law enforcement operation.” Maduro, for his part, has described his capture as an act of kidnapping and has referred to himself as a prisoner of war. The case is unfolding alongside shifting U.S. energy policy toward Venezuela, with recent reports indicating oil giant Chevron is set to expand its operational footprint in the South American nation under new U.S. authorization.

  • In Chile, injured penguins sport copper vests to help them heal

    In Chile, injured penguins sport copper vests to help them heal

    SANTIAGO, Chile — As one of the world’s most vulnerable penguin species faces rapid population decline across Chile, local wildlife researchers and veterinarians have launched an innovative new trial to improve rescue outcomes: custom-fitted red vests woven with healing copper and zinc fibers designed to accelerate wound recovery for injured aquatic birds.

    The experimental treatment draws on a proven approach already used in veterinary care for domestic pets. For years, veterinarians have successfully leveraged microfiber garments embedded with copper and zinc to treat skin wounds in domestic dogs and cats. Now, researchers are adapting this technology for Humboldt penguins, a cold-water species that counts Chile as home to its largest global concentration, where it is currently listed as vulnerable by international conservation standards.

    The first round of custom vests was developed at Buin Zoo, a wildlife sanctuary located on the outskirts of Santiago, where research teams took precise body measurements of penguins to craft well-fitted garments. “For years, vests with microfibers containing elements like copper and zinc have been tested on pets, particularly dogs and cats, and have greatly helped in the recovery of skin wounds,” explained Ignacio Idalsoaga, director of Buin Zoo, in an interview with the Associated Press Wednesday. “We began to wonder — why can’t this be used on penguins?”

    The timing of the trial could not be more urgent. Recent surveys of major Humboldt penguin breeding colonies conducted by Chilean and international research teams between 2024 and 2025 reveal a devastating 63% drop in active nests compared to counts at the same sites just three years prior. The species is confronting a growing cascade of threats: widespread entanglement in commercial fishing nets, rampant plastic pollution, periodic disease outbreaks, and intensified competition with industrial fishing operations for the small fish that make up their core diet.

    Compounding these existing pressures, the species is now facing extreme disruption from El Niño, one of the most impactful global weather patterns. El Niño pushes unusually warm water into large swathes of the eastern Pacific Ocean, pushing the cold-water fish Humboldt penguins depend on further south or to deeper depths, making prey far harder to access. As hungry adult penguins are forced to travel longer distances in search of food, they often leave their chicks unprotected and abandoned at nesting sites.

    “Especially now, with all the problems caused by El Niño, we’re likely to see many abandoned chicks in the coming weeks, with injuries they suffer in the environment,” Idalsoaga noted.

    Wildlife rehabilitation clinics across Chile already treat dozens of distressed penguins stranded along the country’s extended coastline every year. Many arrive with deep gashes from fishing nets or boat propellers, while others are severely weakened by prolonged hunger, according to Tomás Pino, a veterinarian who leads Conservación Humboldt, a northern Chile-based nonprofit dedicated to rescuing and rehabilitating injured marine wildlife.

    Treating these wounds has long posed unique challenges for veterinarians. Penguins’ flexible long necks allow them to reach their own body wounds, and they frequently peck at gashes and pull out surgical stitches before injuries can fully heal, Pino explained. The custom vests solve this problem by creating a protective barrier that prevents pecking, while also putting Chile’s most abundant natural resource to work for conservation: Chile is the world’s top producer of copper, which acts as an natural antimicrobial agent when woven into the garment fabric.

    Both copper and zinc woven into the vest fabric actively inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria and fungi that can cause wound infections. Zinc also offers an extra healing benefit, stimulating the growth of new blood vessels that speed regeneration of damaged tissue and cut overall recovery time.

    Early results from the trial are promising. “We’ve seen that the penguins tolerate it quite well,” Pino said. “We noticed that from one day to the next, the wounds were in better condition with the vest.”

  • Brazilian justice who imprisoned Bolsonaro now under fire for alleged links to disgraced banker

    Brazilian justice who imprisoned Bolsonaro now under fire for alleged links to disgraced banker

    Less than two months before Brazil’s critical October general elections, a widening scandal involving one of the country’s top Supreme Court justices has thrown the nation’s highest judicial body into crisis, triggering widespread calls for resignation and putting public trust in core democratic institutions to the test.

    The controversy centers on Alexandre de Moraes, the Supreme Court justice who recently handed down a 27-year prison sentence to former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro over his role in a 2022 coup attempt. Newly unsealed federal police documents have linked Moraes to disgraced fallen banker Daniel Vorcaro, the embattled owner of collapsed Banco Master, who is currently in jail awaiting trial on corruption charges.

    The documents, made public by Moraes’ fellow Supreme Court Justice André Mendonca—an appointee of former President Bolsonaro—outline that investigators have concluded Vorcaro repeatedly sought and acted on guidance from a person law enforcement identifies as de Moraes. In encrypted messages recovered by police, Vorcaro thanked the justice for the guidance (in sections of communications investigators have not been able to fully access) and referenced the alleged conversations in exchanges with personal associates. The filings also confirm a previously public 130 million Brazilian reais (equivalent to roughly $26 million) contract between Vorcaro and Moraes’ wife, Viviane Barci de Moraes, which Moraes personally reviewed.

    Legal representatives for Barci de Moraes issued a public statement Tuesday defending the justice’s actions, noting that Moraes only reviewed the contract to confirm no conflict of interest existed with his judicial role. They emphasized that Moraes has never participated in any court proceedings involving Banco Master or Vorcaro. As of Thursday, Moraes himself has not issued any public response to the allegations.

    Just 24 hours after the documents were unsealed, the full 10-member Supreme Court gathered for a scheduled session in Brazil’s capital Brasilia. Notably, none of the sitting justices publicly addressed the unfolding scandal during the meeting. Moraes sat directly next to Mendonca, the justice who released the documents, and the two did not exchange any words during the session, which was dedicated to other judicial business.

    Outside the court’s walls, however, pressure for Moraes to step down has grown rapidly across the political spectrum. Brazil’s leading daily newspaper Folha de S. Paulo issued a scathing editorial Wednesday arguing that Moraes’ continued tenure on the court brings ongoing dishonor and discredit to Brazil’s entire judicial system. “The most dignified and swift course would be for the justice to resign. That would spare the country’s institutions unnecessary and prolonged damage,” the paper stated, adding that the Brazilian Senate should move forward with impeachment proceedings if Moraes refuses to resign voluntarily.

    The scandal has already ensnared multiple high-profile politicians, and comes at a highly charged moment just ahead of October’s municipal elections. Flávio Bolsonaro, opposition senator and son of the former president, has already admitted to receiving at least $12 million in funding from Vorcaro to produce a biographical documentary about his father. Speaking at a campaign event in the southern state of Rio Grande do Sul, Bolsonaro called for Moraes’ immediate ouster, claiming the justice “committed several crimes” and arguing it is unacceptable for him to remain on the Supreme Court bench in light of the revelations. Multiple other electoral candidates across the political divide have echoed the call for Moraes to step down.

    Even allies of current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva have joined the calls for accountability. Carlos Fávaro, a former Lula agriculture minister who is widely seen as a leading voice for Brazil’s business community, wrote on social media that Moraes has only two paths forward: publicly clarify the full details of his relationship with Vorcaro, or resign. Sitting Lula government ministers have not commented publicly on the scandal, and Lula himself has also remained silent on the issue. The scandal has also drawn in other figures, including a long-time Lula ally who has been tied to Vorcaro’s corrupt activities.

    Moving forward, the full Supreme Court will need to vote on whether to authorize a formal investigation into Moraes’ alleged ties to Vorcaro. Procedural decisions about the timing and scope of any probe will fall to Mendonca, who is chairing the case, and Supreme Court Chief Justice Luiz Edson Fachin. Speaking at a formal ceremony ahead of the court’s afternoon session Wednesday, Fachin said he would carefully review all available evidence and follow all established procedures before announcing next steps in the coming days. “In moments of particular gravity, it is everyone’s duty to preserve the integrity of the Supreme Court, the authority of its decisions, respect for its rules and, above all, society’s trust in the institution,” Fachin said.