标签： Oceania

A shocking animal cruelty case out of Mount Barker, South Australia, has exposed the horrific neglect 30 cats and two dogs endured at the hands of local couple Kelly and Matthew De La Haye, who this week received sentencing after pleading guilty to 24 separate counts of animal ill-treatment.

The case unfolded after officials from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) South Australia launched an investigation into the couple’s three-bedroom residential property. When RSPCA inspectors first arrived at the home, they were immediately overwhelmed by the thick, putrid stench of accumulated animal waste. Body-worn camera footage and official photos captured by inspectors lay bare the full scale of the unsanitary conditions the animals were forced to endure: feces and pooled urine covered nearly every surface, caking flooring, walls, and door frames across all rooms of the home.

Of the animals found on the property, many showed clear signs of severe neglect and untreated illness. Some cats were visibly emaciated and unwell, with most suffering from untreated conditions including cat flu, conjunctivitis, and advanced dental disease, several of which required urgent surgical intervention. Three young kittens were found entirely coated in diarrhea from their legs to their backs, and when questioned, Kelly De La Haye admitted she had known the three kittens had been ill for months but had never booked a veterinary appointment for them. Only six of the 32 animals removed from the property had been desexed, in violation of South Australia’s Dog and Cat Management Act.

Following the inspection, 28 cats were voluntarily surrendered by De La Haye, while the remaining two cats and two dogs were legally seized by the organization. All animals were transported to RSPCA SA’s dedicated animal care campus in O’Halloran Hill for urgent veterinary assessment and care. Unfortunately, the severe neglect left some animals with irreversible health complications: one animal died of natural causes related to its poor condition, and four others required humane euthanasia to end their unmanageable suffering. Twenty-seven of the rescued animals were able to recover with treatment and have since been adopted into new, loving homes.

Speaking after the sentencing, Andrea Lewis, head of animal welfare at RSPCA SA, expressed disappointment that the couple failed to take action to improve the deadly conditions in their home before the investigation. “It is disappointing this couple didn’t address their squalid and unhygienic conditions, as it jeopardized the health and wellbeing of the animals in their care,” Lewis said. She also used the case to issue a critical public reminder to prospective pet owners: “We seriously urge people to only commit to pets that they have the resources to adequately care for, and desex their animals, as required by law under the dog and cat management act.”

At a hearing held at Mount Barker Magistrates Court on Thursday, Magistrate Oliver Koehn handed down the court’s sentence. The couple were each issued a two-year good behavior bond requiring a $200 security deposit, and ordered to pay $6,672 each in victim of crime levies. In addition to the financial penalties, Koehn issued a permanent ban preventing the De La Hayes from owning any kind of pet in the future, unless the court issues a subsequent order reversing the ban. All animals originally in the couple’s care were formally forfeited to the RSPCA to complete their recovery and adoption process.

A major suburban shopping centre in Brisbane’s northwest was forced into an immediate evacuation and full lockdown on Wednesday after a pair of teenage girls launched a destructive rampage through an on-site Woolworths supermarket, threatening bystanders and destroying store property before arriving police took the pair into custody.

Videos of the chaotic incident, which were widely shared across Australian social media platforms, capture the full sequence of the disturbance at the Keperra Great Western Super Centre. Footage shows the two teens wandering through the supermarket aisles, yanking hundreds of dollars worth of packaged goods, beverages and grocery products off display shelves and leaving items scattered across the floor in their wake. Audio recorded on one clip captures the open frustration of trapped shoppers who confronted the pair mid-rampage. One woman is heard sarcastically praising the teens’ destructive actions, while an angry man shouts that he hopes they will face jail time for their behavior.

One video shows one of the teenage suspects sipping from a stolen bottle of Powerade, before shrugging off angry shopper confrontations and moving to spray the beverage’s contents toward nearby bystanders. Throughout the footage, the wail of the shopping centre’s evacuation alarm can be heard blaring in the background, as staff and customers begin exiting the building in response to the unfolding emergency.

Queensland Police confirmed that officers were dispatched to the Ridgeline Way shopping centre at approximately 3 p.m. local time following multiple emergency calls about the public disturbance. In an official statement following the incident, a police spokesperson confirmed that the entire supermarket was fully evacuated as a safety precaution, and the two teen girls were taken into police custody without further incident. As of Thursday morning, law enforcement officials have not released any additional details about whether formal charges will be filed against the pair, nor have they released the ages of the suspects due to Australian youth privacy laws.

Local business owner Felicity Osborne, who operates Keirden Dry Cleaners just steps from the Woolworths location, told local outlet The Courier Mail that early unconfirmed reports suggest the rampage stemmed from an internal argument between the two suspects. She confirmed the entire Great Western Super Centre was cleared of all visitors and staff for roughly 30 minutes while police responded to the scene, and the Woolworths location remained closed for the rest of the day to clean up the damage caused by the incident.

Representatives for both Great Western Super Centre and Woolworths Australia have been contacted for additional comment on the incident and the extent of property damage, but have not yet released a public statement as of publication.

Against the backdrop of a persistent, deadly national gun violence epidemic that has plagued K-12 campuses across the United States, one private company has introduced an unconventional new approach to stopping active shooters before first responders can arrive: human-piloted unarmed drones designed to disable attackers.

The concept is the creation of Campus Guardian Angel, a U.S.-based firm that has already launched pilot programs for the technology at schools in Georgia and Florida, with mounting interest from education communities in Texas — a state that has seen some of the country’s deadliest school shootings in recent years. To date, the system has not been tested in a real active shooter scenario, but its developers say it fills a critical gap in campus safety between the moment an attack is reported and law enforcement reaches the scene.

The framework mirrors a long-running ideological strain in U.S. gun violence policy debates, which argues that the solution to recurring mass shootings is not stricter firearms regulation, but additional defensive technology in public spaces — similar to the controversial push to arm teachers and school staff.

Here is how the system operates: When a potential shooter enters a school campus, a teacher or staff member triggers an alarm via a smartphone app that simultaneously alerts local police. While officers are en route, a drone is immediately activated from a pre-positioned hiding spot inside the school, serving as the first line of defense against the attacker.

These small, black, roughly square craft weigh approximately two pounds (one kilogram) each. Unlike military offensive drones, they carry no bullets or lethal projectiles. Instead, they are controlled remotely by human operators based in Austin, Texas, who navigate the drones through school hallways using custom 3D maps of each campus pre-loaded into the system.

According to Khristof Oborski, Campus Guardian Angel’s director of tactical operations, the idea grew out of observations of small drone effectiveness on battlefields in the war in Ukraine. Bill King, the company’s CEO and a former Navy SEAL, noticed how even lightweight, low-cost drones could disrupt and disable targets, prompting him to adapt the technology for the growing U.S. crisis of school shootings.

Oborski explained that the drone’s response is tailored to the attacker’s actions. If the suspect is still moving through hallways without opening fire, the drone’s built-in two-way radio allows remote operators to communicate directly with the attacker, attempting to persuade them to surrender and lay down their weapon. Operators maintain constant contact with responding law enforcement, guiding officers directly to the attacker’s location to cut down on response time. If the shooter has already begun firing on students and staff, the system immediately escalates to disabling tactics: either direct kinetic impacts by flying into the attacker, or a blast of less-lethal JPX pepper gel to incapacitate them.

Data from the firearms incident database IntelliSee shows that U.S. schools recorded 233 separate incidents involving firearms in 2025 alone. The 2022 mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas — which left 19 children and two teachers dead — highlighted catastrophic delays in law enforcement response, with officers taking 77 minutes to engage and kill the attacker. Proponents of the drone system say it addresses exactly this gap, providing an immediate response while police are on the way.

Campus Guardian Angel offers the system through annual service contracts, with pricing adjusted based on a school’s student population, size and number of campus buildings. Beyond the ongoing pilot projects in Florida and Georgia, the company reports that groups of parents in Houston, Texas have already expressed interest in installing the drones at their local children’s schools.

King emphasized that the ultimate goal of the system is deterrence, rather than active use. “The best-case scenario is we put this in every single school in America and then never have to use it, right? Because it’s got a deterrent quality to it,” he said. King also addressed common concerns about autonomous operation, confirming that no artificial intelligence is used to pilot the drones — a detail that many school stakeholders find reassuring.

Alex Campbell, a 30-year-old system operator and professional drone-racing competitor, framed his role as a quiet contribution to campus safety. “To be the nerd behind the scenes, to help the heroes on this Earth saving us from the bad things happening, it’s really fulfilling to be able to have a hand in that,” Campbell said.

Every spring, one of Europe’s rarest avian species embarks on a grueling 5,000-kilometer odyssey from wintering grounds in Africa to ancestral breeding habitats across the Balkan Peninsula. By April, dozens of Egyptian vultures — recognizable by their striking lemon-yellow facial skin and contrasting white plumage — would normally be settled into their cliffside nests for breeding season. This year, however, conservation researchers tracking the endangered birds have counted barely a handful of individuals, sparking urgent concern that ongoing wars across the Middle East have pushed an already precarious migration to the brink of collapse.

For decades, Egyptian vultures have faced a growing cascade of threats along their migration corridor. The scavengers, which play an irreplaceable ecological role cleaning up animal carcasses and stopping the spread of disease, have been decimated by accidental electrocutions, unregulated poaching, and toxic poisoning from agricultural bait left out for predators. Over the past 30 years alone, Balkan populations of the species have plummeted by 80%, leading the International Union for Conservation of Nature to list Egyptian vultures as endangered across the globe.

The Middle East sits at the heart of this critical migration route, making regional conflict an extra, catastrophic layer of risk for the already shrinking population. “The war is adding to the risks already present along this species’ migration route,” explained Nikolai Petkov, project manager at the Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds, in an interview with AFP. Xhemal Xherri, a conservation specialist with Albania’s Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment (PPNEA), echoed this alarm, noting that widespread bombing and military activity have created unquantifiable danger for all migratory birds passing through the region. With ongoing active conflict making on-the-ground research nearly impossible, even leading experts lack clear data on how many vultures have been killed or displaced by violence. Beyond the impact on this single species, Xherri warned that the sharp drop in returning vultures could be an early warning sign of broader ecological disruption across the Middle East.

Targeted conservation efforts in recent years have yielded small but hopeful gains. Protection of critical roosting sites and captive breeding programs have helped stabilize and slightly grow vulture populations in Bulgaria, which now hosts the majority of Balkan breeding pairs. Still, the species remains extremely vulnerable, with accidental poisoning from farmland bait continuing to be a leading cause of death.

In the remote, mountainous wilderness of southern Albania, local shepherds in the village of Salaria have long viewed the vultures’ annual return as a natural harbinger of spring. This year, as April drew to a close, the shepherds spotted just two birds circling above their flocks. Confirming the sighting took Xherri hours of careful searching across steep, rocky nesting terrain, until he finally spotted one of the white-plumed vultures descending to a ledge 400 meters up a sheer rock face. Even after that confirmation, he was forced to wait days longer to confirm the second individual had reached its traditional high-altitude perch.

The painstaking work of counting returning vultures means that even in peacetime, experts cannot say exactly how many birds successfully reach Balkan breeding sites each spring. Petkov offered a note of cautious optimism, suggesting that unseasonably cold weather earlier in the season may have delayed the vultures’ journey rather than cutting it short. “So they might be a bit late, but hopefully, as we often say, you count the birds in autumn,” he said.

A Sydney killer obsessed with notorious American serial killer Ted Bundy, who murdered one 17-year-old girl and left another seriously injured in a 2020 Parramatta hotel attack, has had his total prison sentence cut by seven years following a successful appeal ruling.

Kristian Kovaleff was just 19 years old when he carried out the brutal, premeditated attack on two teenage friends who had booked an apartment at Parramatta’s Meriton Suites to celebrate one of the girls’ birthdays. The victims had only invited Kovaleff to join the gathering because they needed an adult over the age of 18 to complete the room check-in process, court documents confirm.

Weeks before the attack, court records show Kovaleff developed a deep, pathological fixation on Ted Bundy, one of the most infamous serial killers in US history, and began plotting a murder to experience the “thrill” he believed killing would bring. He prepped for his attack by purchasing binding materials including rope and duct tape, acquiring a handsaw, and running repeated internet searches for potential weapons. He initially planned to kill just one victim a week before the birthday gathering, before expanding his plan to target both girls.

On the night of December 13, 2020, at roughly 8:40 p.m., Kovaleff launched his attack. One of the teens was in the bathroom preparing for a swim when he entered and stabbed her repeatedly in the abdomen. He forced both teens into the bedroom, where he continued his assault on the first victim. When the second girl bravely stepped between Kovalev and her injured friend to block his path, he stabbed her in the stomach as well. Even as the surviving victim begged him to call emergency services, Kovalev refused to request help, instead pacing the room while muttering that he knew he would face life in prison for his crimes and singing a song with lyrics referencing being an explosive about to detonate. When the surviving victim regained consciousness after passing out from her injuries, she found Kovalev had loosely bandaged her wounds — a move the court confirmed was only to preserve her so he could sexually assault her. After the attack, Kovalev fled the apartment with both victims’ phones, turning himself in to local police the following morning. First responders found one victim dead in the bedroom, while the second was rushed to hospital for life-saving emergency surgery.

After his arrest, Kovalev spent two years behind bars faking symptoms of psychosis and claiming he heard internal voices, in an attempt to build an insanity defense. A full assessment by a forensic psychiatrist ultimately ruled he did not suffer from any clinically significant mental illness. He later entered guilty pleas to one count of murder and one count of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.

Initially, New South Wales Supreme Court Justice Stephen Rothman sentenced Kovalev to a 36-year total prison term, with a 26-year non-parole period that would have made him eligible for release in 2046. Justice Rothman only granted a 15% sentence discount for Kovalev’s guilty plea, citing the extreme severity of the crimes. Kovalev subsequently launched an appeal against his sentence, arguing the original penalty was too harsh.

On Friday, the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal delivered a unanimous ruling to quash the original sentence and issue a reduced penalty. In their judgment, Justices Ian Harrison, Deborah Sweeney and Edward Muston agreed the original 36-year term was “manifestly excessive”, accounting for Kovalev’s age at the time of the crime. “Acknowledging the seriousness of the circumstances of the offending, I have concluded that when regard is had to Mr Kovaleff’s youth, immaturity, and emotional and intellectual dysfunction, the starting sentence of 40 years imprisonment, and the sentence after discount for the murder offence, was too high having regard to those personal characteristics,” Justice Sweeney wrote in the published decision. The appeal court also increased the sentence discount for Kovalev’s early guilty plea from 15% to 25%, ruling that the level of culpability did not justify restricting the discount that is typically granted for early guilty pleas in the state’s justice system.

The new sentence hands Kovalev a 29-year total prison term, with a 21-year non-parole period that will make him eligible for release in December 2041, five years earlier than his original release date.

A mass recall of a widely sold children’s walkie-talkie model has been rolled out across Australia after a critical manufacturing oversight left the devices operating on radio frequencies legally reserved exclusively for licensed communication operators. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) announced the public recall for Anko brand Long Range Walkie-Talkies, which were distributed through major national retail chains Kmart and Target. The affected units were sold between September 30, 2013, and February 6 of this year, putting tens of thousands of household devices potentially in violation of Australian communication regulations.

According to ACMA’s official statement released Friday, a simple but consequential oversight during product configuration left the walkie-talkies calibrated to operate on the 467.425 MHz frequency band. This specific spectrum is designated as a licensed private band, reserved for use only by certified radio operators who have gone through official regulatory approval to operate on that range. The regulator has urged all consumers who purchased the affected devices to immediately cease use, warning that unlicensed operation on this frequency can create harmful, unintended interference for licensed services that rely on the band for critical communications.

Retail partners Kmart and Target have backed the recall effort, confirming that any customer who returns the recalled walkie-talkies to any of their Australian store locations will receive a full refund, no receipt required for most cases. ACMA also noted that continued unlicensed use of the devices not only creates interference risks but could also put users at risk of violating federal communication laws, which carry penalties for unauthorized spectrum use in Australia. The recall comes as regulators across the country continue to crack down on misconfigured consumer communication devices that encroach on licensed frequency bands, a growing issue as more consumer-connected devices hit the market.

A self-appointed vigilante who killed a man based on unproven child abuse rumors has lost his legal bid to overturn his murder conviction and life sentence, after Victoria’s Court of Appeal rejected every ground of his challenge late last week.

Sixty-year-old Albert Thorn was originally handed a mandatory life sentence in 2023 for the 2018 kidnapping, torture and execution-style murder of 30-year-old Bradley Lyons, a beloved young father and stepfather. The fatal violence grew out of baseless gossip that spread through the tight-knit coastal community of Lakes Entrance in regional Victoria, claiming Lyons had sexually abused local children.

Lyons disappeared from his home on December 2, 2018, sparking a three-month manhunt that ended when police discovered his bound body, shot once in the back of the head, buried in a shallow unmarked grave in remote bushland. In total, seven people have been jailed for their roles in the coordinated vigilante plot that led to Lyons’ death, but Thorn was the only defendant to face a murder charge.

Court documents detail the brutal hours-long abuse Lyons endured before his death: he was dragged from his home by a group of men including Thorn, stuffed into the boot of a Toyota Corolla and driven to Thorn’s rural property in Nyerimilang. For hours, he was held either trapped in the car boot or strapped to a massage table, where he was tortured in an attempt to force a false confession to the child abuse claims. Roughly 10 hours after he was abducted, Lyons was driven to isolated bushland near the town of Bruthen, executed, and buried.

At his original trial, Thorn pleaded guilty to charges of kidnapping, causing intentional injury and false imprisonment, but repeatedly denied carrying out the murder. He claimed he was only involved in the abduction, and that Lyons left his property alive with two other co-accused, Jordan Bottom and Rikki Smith. The jury rejected this account, finding him guilty of murder. Bottom and Smith were acquitted of murder but convicted of assault and false imprisonment, for which they also received custodial sentences.

When handing down Thorn’s original life sentence, Justice Andrew Tinny delivered a scathing rebuke of his actions, noting that Thorn had attempted to frame himself as a heroic citizen protecting vulnerable children after the killing, when his behavior actually exposed a complete lack of basic human decency. “Throughout the many hours of the terrifying ordeal leading up to his shocking death, (Mr Lyons) was treated by you with violence and disdain, reflecting the hatred you felt for him because of your belief that he was a pedophile,” Tinney said. “When speaking most dishonestly to the police in the aftermath of your crimes, you portrayed yourself as a benevolent citizen coming to the assistance of young children in need when, in reality, yours was conduct which showed a want of common human decency.”

Thorn launched his appeal against the conviction and sentence in 2024, arguing two key legal errors had led to a substantial miscarriage of justice. First, he claimed the trial judge erred in allowing the jury to hear testimony from his own daughter, who told the court Thorn had admitted to her that he “killed somebody” the night of the murder. Second, he argued the decision to hold a joint trial for him, Bottom and Smith created unfair prejudice against him, as both co-accused had shifted blame for the murder onto him.

Thorn also separately challenged his life sentence, arguing it was “crushing and manifestly excessive”, particularly given he would not be eligible for parole until he reaches 85 years of age.

In an 88-page judgment published on Friday, Justices Karin Emerton, Kevin Lyons and Peter Kidd unanimously rejected all of Thorn’s grounds of appeal, upholding both the murder conviction and the original life sentence. The judges ruled that Thorn’s daughter’s testimony was legally admissible under evidence rules, and that while the joint trial created some level of prejudice for Thorn, it did not compromise the overall fairness of the proceeding.

The judgment noted that the overlapping accusations of blame between the three co-defendants created a powerful public interest in holding a single joint trial: all three had pointed fingers at one another for the assault and murder, and a joint trial allowed the same jury to weigh all conflicting accounts and avoid the risk of inconsistent, contradictory verdicts across separate proceedings. “Bottom and Smith blamed the applicant for the assault on the deceased on the massage table in the shed and for the murder of the deceased. The applicant laid the blame upon Bottom and Smith,” the judges wrote. “There was therefore a direct conflict between the applicant on the one hand and Bottom and Smith on the other … there was thus a powerful public interest that their differences should be resolved by the same jury at the same trial so as to avoid the risk of inconsistent verdicts.”

The appeal court’s ruling closes the first round of legal challenges to Thorn’s conviction, cementing the life sentence that will see him remain behind bars well into his 80s before he can even apply for parole.