标签: North America

北美洲

  • Trump signs order to limit childhood vaccines and limit MMR shots

    Trump signs order to limit childhood vaccines and limit MMR shots

    In a controversial move announced from the Oval Office on Monday, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order that mandates a rollback of recommended childhood vaccines and calls for splitting the combined mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) vaccine into separate single-disease doses.

    During his remarks, Trump repeated a long-debunked claim that the modern expanded childhood vaccine schedule has driven declining public health and rising autism rates in the United States. “Decades ago, children received only a small fraction of the vaccines required today,” Trump argued. “In those times, people were much healthier and of course the high rates of autism now observed did not exist.”

    The Trump administration has a well-documented history of promoting the discredited conspiracy theory that the MMR vaccine is connected to autism diagnoses. Decades of peer-reviewed, large-scale scientific studies conducted by global public health institutions have consistently found no causal relationship between any childhood vaccine and autism.

    Under the terms of the new order, the administration would set a new “gold standard” recommendation of only 11 core vaccines for the most high-risk infectious diseases: measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, and varicella (chicken pox). Beyond cutting the total number of recommended vaccines, the order also proposes spreading remaining doses across multiple separate doctor visits, rather than combining doses during routine check-ups.

    Critics have quickly pointed out a major legal barrier to the policy’s implementation: the U.S. federal government lacks the authority to set vaccine requirements for school attendance, a power that is exclusively reserved for individual U.S. states. Long-time vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been closely aligned with Trump on this issue, has been a prominent advocate for rolling back childhood vaccine recommendations in recent years. Public health experts warn that reduced vaccination rates and splits to combined vaccines like the MMR would increase the risk of deadly preventable disease outbreaks across the country.

  • ‘That fire came so fast’: Wildfire rages in British Columbia

    ‘That fire came so fast’: Wildfire rages in British Columbia

    A rapid-spreading wildfire has carved a path of destruction across British Columbia, leaving officials scrambling to assess the full scope of residential damage even as the blaze continues to burn unchecked. Eyewitness accounts highlight the terrifying speed of the inferno, with one resident describing the disaster by saying, “That fire came so fast.” As of Monday, emergency management teams have not yet finalized a full count of homes destroyed or damaged by the uncontrolled wildfire, which has upended communities across the region and stretched local response resources thin. Provincial wildfire services have deployed additional crews and aerial support to contain the blaze, but challenging terrain and dry, windy conditions have hampered containment efforts, leaving the fire still listed as out of control. Authorities have urged residents in evacuation zones to follow emergency orders immediately, as shifting fire behavior can lead to sudden changes in risk levels across affected areas.

  • 30 years later, a former rival will stand trial for Tupac’s murder

    30 years later, a former rival will stand trial for Tupac’s murder

    Thirty years have passed since the drive-by shooting that claimed the life of rap legend Tupac Shakur, a killing that remained shrouded in mystery, fueled endless conspiracy theories, and left decades of unresolved anger among fans and loved ones. Now, for the first time, a suspect is set to face a jury, offering a long-awaited chance to untangle the web of 1990s gang and rap rivalries that led to the rapper’s death.

    The killing of 25-year-old Shakur on September 7, 1996, permanently altered the course of hip-hop history, transforming the already famous performer from the public face of gangsta rap into a globally recognized cultural icon whose influence endures three decades later. No arrests were made in the case for 27 years, until prosecutors in Las Vegas unexpectedly charged former Los Angeles gang leader Duane “Keffe D” Davis with murder in 2023. Jury selection for Davis’ trial got underway this week, with opening arguments scheduled to begin on August 17.

    Davis, 60, who has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder with a deadly weapon committed to further criminal gang activity, faces a mandatory sentence of life without parole if convicted. Prosecutors allege he masterminded the attack as retaliation for the beating of his nephew, Orlando Anderson, by Shakur and his entourage just hours before the shooting, and that he supplied the weapon used in the attack. What makes the case particularly unusual is that the bulk of the evidence against Davis comes from his own public statements and a 2019 memoir he co-authored, Compton Street Legend.

    To understand why this killing became one of popular culture’s most mythologized unsolved crimes, it is necessary to revisit the bitter rivalries that defined 1990s Los Angeles and hip-hop. At the time, a violent territorial feud between two of the city’s largest street gangs, the Bloods and the Crips, merged into a high-profile national rivalry between East Coast and West Coast rap scenes. This divide was embodied by two competing record labels: Suge Knight’s West Coast-based Death Row Records, which signed Shakur, and Sean “Diddy” Combs’ New York-based Bad Boy Records, home to rival rap star the Notorious B.I.G. (also known as Biggie Smalls).

    Despite often being framed as the face of West Coast rap, Tupac Amaru Shakur was born and raised in New York City, the son of prominent Black Panther activist Afeni Shakur. He moved to California as a teenager, and signed to Death Row Records after building his early career as a solo artist and actor. Tupac’s biography, which blended working-class upbringing, Black liberation politics, Hollywood acting experience, and raw street storytelling, set him apart from many of his contemporaries. Months before his death, he released *All Eyez on Me*, the first double album in hip-hop history, which sold more than five million copies and cemented his legacy as a defining voice of gangsta rap.

    The fatal night of September 7 began when Shakur and Knight attended a high-profile boxing match between Mike Tyson and Bruce Seldon at Las Vegas’ MGM Grand. After the match, security footage captured Shakur and his entourage, who were affiliated with the Mob Piru Bloods gang, attacking Orlando Anderson, a member of the rival South Side Compton Crips and Davis’ nephew. Roughly three hours after the altercation, as Shakur rode as a passenger in Knight’s BMW through central Las Vegas, a white Cadillac pulled alongside the vehicle and opened fire. Shakur was hit four times, and died six days later.

    For nearly 30 years, the case went cold. Las Vegas law enforcement long cited a widespread refusal of witnesses to cooperate with the investigation, a street code that forbade working with police, and the deaths of multiple potential witnesses in unrelated gang violence. Investigators identified Anderson as a person of interest within weeks of the shooting, but he denied involvement and was never charged; he was killed in an unrelated gang shooting in 1998. It was not until Davis, Anderson’s uncle, began speaking publicly that the case moved forward again.

    Ironically, it was the investigation into the killing of Biggie Smalls — who was gunned down in a 1997 Los Angeles drive-by killing that remains unsolved to this day — that ultimately led to charges in Tupac’s case. In the mid-2000s, Los Angeles investigators re-interviewed Davis in connection with Biggie’s death. While Davis denied any knowledge of Biggie’s killing, he admitted he was in the Cadillac when Tupac was shot, and claimed he had passed the gun used in the attack to the shooter. He entered an immunity agreement with police in exchange for that testimony, which remained in place until he began giving public interviews and publishing his memoir.

    In Compton Street Legend, Davis openly confirmed his account of the night, writing that he supplied the murder weapon. His defense team argues that portions of the book were fictionalized and embellished by his co-author to boost sales, and that Davis never actually admitted to planning or ordering the killing. In a recent interview with local Fox 5 Las Vegas, Davis denied writing the book entirely, claiming “a ghost writer wrote that,” and denied he was even in Las Vegas the night Tupac was killed. He has also indicated he may take the stand in his own defense to deny the charges.

    Davis has also made repeated public claims that Sean “Diddy” Combs offered him $1 million to kill Tupac and Suge Knight. Combs, who is currently serving a 50-month prison sentence on separate prostitution-related convictions, has repeatedly and categorically denied any involvement in Tupac’s death.

    Prosecutors argue that Davis’ decision to go public with his account of the killing broke the terms of his original immunity agreement, a ruling a judge accepted, clearing the way for his 2023 arrest. Prosecutors have assembled a list of more than 200 potential witnesses, including members of Tupac’s family, former Las Vegas mayor Oscar Goodman, and former Los Angeles Police Department detective Greg Kading. The most high-profile potential witness is former Death Row Records CEO Suge Knight, who is the last surviving person who was in the car with Tupac the night of the shooting. It remains unclear if Knight will testify; he has previously stated he will not cooperate, but his testimony would be unprecedented, as he has never shared information with law enforcement about the case.

    Legal observers have described the upcoming trial as a landmark event, with one trial attorney calling it “a legal scholar’s Super Bowl.” Beyond the legal process, the trial is expected to pull back the curtain on the deadly, high-stakes East Coast-West Coast rap rivalry and gang turf wars that defined 1990s hip-hop, answering questions that have lingered for an entire generation.

  • ‘Total incinerated destruction’: Canada wildfire evacuees wonder if they still have homes

    ‘Total incinerated destruction’: Canada wildfire evacuees wonder if they still have homes

    On a Friday in early August, a new wildfire sparked to life in British Columbia’s beloved Okanagan region, a scenic stretch of Western Canada famous for its crystal blue lake and award-winning wine estates. Named the Bald Range Fire, what began as a small ignition exploded across parched landscape over the following weekend, expanding rapidly to cover 136 square kilometers (53 square miles) in mere hours and triggering urgent evacuation orders for thousands of local residents.

    For long-term locals like Earl Kurz, who has called the lakeside town of Peachland home for 30 years, wildfire scares have become an all-too-familiar part of life over the past decade. But the Bald Range Fire marks the first time he has been forced to abandon his property—and the aftermath he witnessed after the blaze passed has been gut-wrenching. “It’s total incinerated destruction,” Kurz described of the charred landscape. “The hot spots are just barren areas of nothing except 12 inches of ash.”

    As of Monday, the inferno remains completely out of control, and provincial officials are still working to count the full number of homes destroyed by the flames. More than 12,000 residents across the region remain under mandatory evacuation orders, and local police confirmed Sunday that one 80-year-old woman died while attempting to flee the rapidly advancing fire.

    The Okanagan region has been grappling with severe, long-term drought for years, a crisis that has left vegetation tinder-dry and primed for combustion. Data from the Okanagan Basin Water Board shows that as of July, Okanagan Lake’s water levels dropped to their lowest point since 1992, creating ideal conditions for wildfires to spread at breakneck speed.

    The Bald Range Fire is far from an isolated incident: as of Monday, more than 100 active wildfires are burning across British Columbia, 70 of which ignited just in the last seven days. In response to the escalating crisis, provincial premier David Eby declared a provincial state of emergency over the weekend, urging all residents in at-risk areas to follow evacuation orders immediately and warning that the blazes continue to advance “incredibly quickly”.

    Keegan Radomski, an 18-year-old resident of Summerland— a lakeside town just south of Peachland— is one of thousands of displaced residents, having fled her family home in the middle of Friday evening’s dinner. The property, built by Radomski’s grandmother in 1996, was one the family had held for three decades, and like many long-term Okanagan locals, they had weathered multiple wildfire scares in the past. But nothing prepared them for how fast the Bald Range Fire would move. After spotting distant smoke over dinner, less than four hours passed before Radomski watched a hill on her family’s property catch fire. She barely escaped with only her mother’s ashes before the fire crossed onto the property line, and she still has no confirmation on whether the family home has survived, or when she will be able to return to assess the damage. “We’ve had a lot of close calls before, but it’s never been like this,” Radomski said. “You always think it’s not going to be you, and then it’s you.”

    The Bald Range Fire follows closely on the heels of the nearby Bradley Creek Fire, another major Okanagan blaze that is estimated to have destroyed more than 200 homes. After days of “tireless work” by firefighting crews, officials announced that the Bradley Creek Fire is now contained. But the crisis stretching across Western North America is far from over. Just south of British Columbia, the U.S. state of Washington is also facing extreme drought-fueled fires that have forced more than 65,000 people to evacuate their homes. Across the Atlantic, Southern Europe is grappling with its own devastating summer fire season, fueled by record-breaking heat and prolonged drought. France is currently facing its worst wildfire season in 20 years, while regional officials in Madrid, Spain describe the current blazes as the most destructive the region has ever seen.

    While wildfires are a natural part of the ecological cycle in Canada’s extensive boreal forests, climate experts agree that human-caused climate change has dramatically amplified the risk: rising temperatures and prolonged dry conditions have made wildfires across Canada more frequent and far more intense over the past decade. In 2023, Canada recorded its most destructive wildfire season in recorded history, measured by total area burned. This summer’s outbreak in British Columbia is the latest example of the growing threat climate change poses to communities across the globe.

  • Taylor Farms recalls jalapeno products after salmonella outbreak

    Taylor Farms recalls jalapeno products after salmonella outbreak

    One of the United States’ largest fresh produce suppliers, Taylor Farms — a company that confirms it accounted for 40% of all salad kits sold across the U.S. in 2025 — has launched a second major product recall in weeks, this time pulling dozens of jalapeño-containing items from store shelves over confirmed salmonella contamination risks.

    The recall covers roughly 20 fresh products, ranging from pre-made sandwiches, dips, and salsa to pre-sliced jalapeños and prepared burritos, distributed to major national retail chains including Walmart, Target, and Whole Foods across 26 U.S. states. Company representatives emphasized that as of the announcement, no illnesses connected to the potentially contaminated jalapeño products have been reported, but the proactive withdrawal was launched after supplier Coast Citrus Distributors issued its own recall of the peppers over salmonella concerns.

    Investigators have traced the contaminated jalapeños back to a single grower based in Sinaloa, Mexico. In a public statement, Taylor Farms confirmed it has immediately cut ties with the farm and shifted all jalapeño sourcing to alternative approved suppliers. The company has issued clear guidance for consumers: anyone holding recalled products should discard the items immediately, and full refunds are available at the original point of purchase.

    According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), salmonella infection typically develops between 12 and 72 hours after consuming contaminated food, with common symptoms including diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and fever. Most cases resolve on their own, but vulnerable groups including young children, elderly people, and immunocompromised individuals can develop severe complications that require hospitalization.

    This recall marks the second high-profile food safety scare for Taylor Farms in less than a month. The company is already at the center of a large-scale cyclospora outbreak linked to its Mexican-grown iceberg lettuce, which has emerged as one of the most widespread foodborne illness events in recent U.S. history. As of an August 4 update from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 22,000 people have fallen ill from cyclosporiasis linked to the outbreak across 45 U.S. states, and Michigan health officials confirmed the first two fatalities linked to the parasite outbreak last week.

    Cyclospora is a microscopic parasite that causes severe gastrointestinal illness, most commonly explosive diarrhea and prolonged abdominal discomfort. The outbreak has even drawn international attention: UK public health officials have issued warnings for travelers returning from the U.S. who may have consumed Taylor Farms lettuce, after reporting several imported cases among recent visitors.

    Headquartered in California, Taylor Farms is a cornerstone of the North American fresh food supply chain, supplying not only major retail grocers but also leading fast-food chains including McDonald’s and Taco Bell, with a workforce of more than 25,000 employees across its operations. The back-to-back outbreaks have renewed scrutiny of food safety protocols for imported fresh produce from Mexico, which supplies a large share of U.S. fresh fruits and vegetables year-round.

  • Netanyahu’s rejection of Trump’s 15-point Gaza plan unlikely to be final word

    Netanyahu’s rejection of Trump’s 15-point Gaza plan unlikely to be final word

    As Israel heads toward a high-stakes general election on October 27, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has thrown down the gauntlet, formally rejecting a US-backed 15-point peace roadmap crafted to disarm Hamas and end the years-long Gaza war. The rejection, delivered last Sunday to his cabinet, has thrown a high-profile diplomatic breakthrough into doubt, though US officials appear ready to write off the move as pre-election political posturing rather than a final break from negotiations.

    The framework, announced by US President Donald Trump in July following months of closed-door negotiations through the Board of Peace, marked what the American leader called a “major milestone” toward ending the conflict. Under the terms of the deal, Hamas and all other Palestinian armed groups in Gaza would complete a phased full disarmament, with all weapons secured and stored by a new Palestinian administration that reports to the Board of Peace. In exchange, Israeli forces would withdraw from more than 60% of Gaza that they currently occupy, clearing the way for long-delayed reconstruction of the war-ravaged enclave, where vast swathes of infrastructure have been reduced to rubble after more than two years of fighting.

    Senior Hamas officials confirmed their commitment to the agreement, contingent on Israel upholding its end of the bargain. The deal was broadly celebrated by the international community: the UK issued a statement welcoming the breakthrough, while the European Union labeled it a “crucial step” toward lasting peace in the region. For more than a week after the agreement was announced, however, Israeli officials offered only a muted, non-committal response, with a government spokesperson only noting that the roadmap did not align with Israeli positions. Hardline far-right government figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir quickly came out against the plan, calling it “unacceptable,” while mainstream opposition politicians raised their own doubts over the details of disarmament and the sequencing of Israeli withdrawals. Those pressures ultimately pushed Netanyahu to issue a formal rejection.

    In his cabinet address, Netanyahu spelled out his red lines clearly: “I wish to be precise here: Israel does not accept the 15-point document. The IDF [Israel Defense Forces] will not carry out any withdrawal until Hamas is disarmed. And when I say the disarming of Hamas, it means heavy weaponry, lighter weaponry, all weaponry. And we are talking about genuine disarmament, not fictitious disarmament.” While he described Trump as “the greatest of our friends in the White House,” Netanyahu added that Israel would “stand firm” against any terms it deems unacceptable.

    Netanyahu’s hardline stance comes as no surprise to many political observers, given deep-seated skepticism across Israeli society that Hamas will follow through on its disarmament commitments. The Islamist group has long framed armed resistance to Israeli occupation as a core ideological principle, and recent months have brought signs it is reconsolidating its authority across parts of Gaza. Fleur Hassan-Nahoum, an Israeli commentator and former deputy mayor of Jerusalem, told the BBC that the trauma of the October 7, 2023 attacks that sparked the war cannot be overstated. “Israel can certainly never agree to retreating anywhere where the terrorist group that caused the worst massacres since the Holocaust is still there and is still ruling the Strip,” she said.

    Crucially, Netanyahu’s rejection comes against the backdrop of a make-or-break election, the first Israel has held since the October 7 attacks. Three years into the war, the prime minister has yet to deliver on his campaign promise of “absolute victory” over Hamas, and he faces a tough uphill battle to hold onto his position. Analysts note that the prime minister is walking a diplomatic tightrope: he needs to shore up support among his right-wing base ahead of polling day, while avoiding a full break with Trump, his closest ally in the White House.

    So far, that bet appears to be paying off with the Trump administration. While the White House has not issued an official public response to Netanyahu’s rejection, senior US officials have privately downplayed the move, framing it as nothing more than campaign rhetoric ahead of Israel’s election. “We understand Bibi’s political needs,” a senior unnamed US official told Israeli journalist Barak Ravid. “We have no problem with it as long as he continues to do what we ask – especially regarding restraining attacks in Gaza.” In recent days, Israel has already paused large-scale strikes on Gaza, a key concession Hamas demanded when it signed onto the roadmap. There are also signs that Israeli authorities are still moving forward with preparations for the implementation of Trump’s broader plan, including the deployment of a new International Stabilization Force (ISF) made up of international troops. The force will partner with a new Palestinian police force to secure Gaza after Israeli withdrawal, and Israeli public broadcaster Kan News reports that construction of the first ISF base in the ruins of Rafah in southern Gaza is still on track to begin by the end of the month, clearing the way for reconstruction to start.

    Aaron David Miller, a veteran former US diplomat and Middle East negotiator, told the BBC that Netanyahu is facing “the most consequential election” of his decades-long political career, and that the White House is willing to give him leeway in the lead-up to polling day. “He’s navigating a very fine line between keeping his constituents happy and not angering or alienating President Trump,” Miller said. “It’s hard to believe that you’re going to see any serious movement before you have another Israeli government.”

    Board of Peace officials have moved quickly to reassure the Israeli public that the roadmap is structured to protect Israeli security interests, even after Netanyahu’s rejection. Nickolay Mladenov, the Board’s High Commissioner for Gaza who led the months of negotiations with Hamas, told Israel’s Channel 12 just hours after Netanyahu’s announcement that the plan’s core goal is to ensure “that Gaza is never again a threat to Israeli security and that what happened before, [on] October 7, never happens again.”

    Mladenov emphasized that the plan relies on a phased, verification-first approach, not blind trust: “If there is verified decommissioning of weapons, that they are taken away from the factions and stored and ultimately rendered unusable, Israel then withdraws from Gaza. Nothing is being built on the basis of trust, but on verification.”

    Hamas has since reaffirmed its commitment to the roadmap, calling on international mediators and the Board of Peace to pressure Israel to honor the agreed terms. Netanyahu has confirmed that bilateral talks with US officials are continuing, but pressure from Washington is expected to ramp up in the coming weeks. Trump is also facing high stakes this election cycle: with November’s US midterm elections approaching, his Republican Party is bracing for potential heavy losses, driven in part by soaring fuel and grocery prices that have been tied to Washington’s unpopular five-month military intervention in Iran. Trump’s approval ratings have fallen sharply, and a high-profile foreign policy win from his Gaza peace plan would offer a much-needed boost to his party’s electoral prospects, making continued Israeli intransigence a major problem for the US president.

  • Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez freezing her eggs and hasn’t ‘ruled out’ presidential run

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez freezing her eggs and hasn’t ‘ruled out’ presidential run

    New York Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has made a rare, personal reveal: the 36-year-old progressive leader has opted to freeze her eggs, and she is opening up about the early stages of the process to destigmatize fertility care amid a national reckoning over reproductive rights in the United States.

    Ocasio-Cortez first shared short video clips documenting her experience on social media this past Sunday. Just hours after posting the content, she appeared on ABC News’ *This Week* where she addressed both her fertility journey and swirling speculation about her future political ambitions.

    In her candid social media clips, Ocasio-Cortez walks viewers through a self-administered injection required for the egg-freezing process, shares actionable tips she has picked up from her own medical appointments, and answers common public questions about everything from the steep costs of fertility treatment to the clinical steps involved and how accessing this care navigates what she describes as America’s broken healthcare system.

    Speaking to *This Week*, the congresswoman explained her decision to share such a personal process: she aims to normalize open conversations about egg freezing and fertility care, particularly at a moment when reproductive autonomy is under attack across the country. “This administration is denying reproductive care to women across the country, from abortion rights to the ability to carry out a healthy pregnancy,” she told anchor George Stephanopoulos. “I think it’s important for us as leaders to have these conversations and share these processes,” she added, framing her transparency as an act of political solidarity with people navigating reproductive care access nationwide.

    The conversation soon turned to growing rumors about Ocasio-Cortez’s national political aspirations, prompted by recent polling that shows strong popularity for her as a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate. When first asked about a White House run, Ocasio-Cortez laughed and deflected the question, emphasizing her immediate political priority. “I’m focused on winning the midterms, I’m running for Congress right now,” she said.

    When pressed further on whether she would leave the door open to a 2028 presidential bid and whether such a run is a realistic prospect, Ocasio-Cortez confirmed she has not closed off that path. “I haven’t ruled out the possibility and I’m very humbled by the tremendous amount of support out there,” she said, adding that “We have a responsibility to remain focused on the midterms and not on our individual aspirations or plans.”

    When asked about another high-profile potential race—a challenge to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, New York’s senior Democratic senator, for his Senate seat—Ocasio-Cortez offered a similarly open-ended response, saying “anything was possible.”

    The upcoming U.S. midterm elections, scheduled for early November, fall in the middle of President Biden’s four-year presidential term. All 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are up for election, along with 35 of the 100 seats in the U.S. Senate, making the cycle critical for Democrats looking to maintain or expand their control of Congress.

  • ‘Not afraid to stay’: The Canadians taking fighting wildfires into their own hands

    ‘Not afraid to stay’: The Canadians taking fighting wildfires into their own hands

    Amid one of the most active wildfire seasons in Canada’s modern history, a growing divide has emerged over how to protect remote, fire-prone communities — as longer, more intense blazes driven by climate change stretch national firefighting resources dangerously thin. As of August 2026, more than 750 active wildfires are burning across the country, following 2023’s record-breaking season that destroyed an expanse of boreal forest roughly equivalent to the entire nation of Syria. The smoke from these blazes has drifted as far south as the U.S. Midwest, choking urban airspace and even drawing a hostile tariff threat from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who attacked Canada for allowing “filthy, polluted” air to cross the border.

    For Hubert Wigwas, a 58-year-old councillor with Gull Bay First Nation in northern Ontario, the choice to stay when a wildfire approached his community in mid-2026 was not an act of defiance for defiance’s sake — it was a decision to protect the life he spent decades building. As regional officials ordered all residents to evacuate and deployed firefighting resources to higher-priority populated areas, Wigwas stayed behind. He installed sprinklers on his roof to douse falling embers, checked on isolated elders who also refused to leave, and fueled four docked boats to have a quick escape route ready if the blaze advanced. Now, he faces a C$800 fine for violating the evacuation order, a penalty he plans to fight in court. “This is everything I’ve built in my 58 years,” Wigwas told reporters. “I’m just not going to run away and let it burn.”

    Wigwas’s experience laid bare a gaping flaw in Canada’s national wildfire response strategy, he argued: remote First Nations communities, which sit adjacent to vast swathes of flammable boreal forest, are often left waiting for outside support that never arrives in time. That realization has pushed him to call for a new model: self-organized, community-led wildfire response teams trained to protect homes and elders before provincial crews can reach remote areas. “Everybody talks about climate change, but nobody is doing something to unite the (First Nations) reserves and have a system like that set up,” he said.

    Provincial officials say their resource allocation follows strict protocols based on fire activity, weather conditions and risk to populated areas, and that they maintain constant communication with First Nations leadership. But thousands of kilometers away in northeast British Columbia, long Canada’s wildfire response front line, that community-led model Wigwas envisions is already a reality.

    Over the past three years, wildfire researcher Sonja Leverkus has trained more than 400 local residents — most of them Indigenous — through her volunteer group, the Northeast BC Rural Incident Management Team. Leverkus launched the initiative after concluding that Canada’s traditional response system cannot keep up with the growing frequency and intensity of blazes driven by climate change. “There are not enough human beings in Canada, with the appropriate training, to fight the fires that we have currently, especially over the last five years,” she explained.

    Remote communities in British Columbia are often deprioritized for provincial firefighting crews when major blazes threaten heavily populated areas, Leverkus noted, with the nearest backup support sometimes hundreds of kilometers away. Her team has addressed this gap by carrying out controlled prescribed burns to reduce excess fuel that can turn small blazes into catastrophic infernos, and has even purchased its own fire wagons through community fundraising and grants to extinguish small fires before they spread, often arriving ahead of provincial crews. During the 2024 Fort Nelson wildfire, Leverkus and 40 team members stayed behind and were contracted by the provincial government to clear flammable vegetation and support large-scale fire suppression efforts. She has also organized structural protection training to teach locals how to shield buildings from flying embers, the leading cause of home destruction during wildfire events.

    Leverkus’s model has drawn support from local residents like 70-year-old former helicopter pilot Cam Allen, who took her training course to learn ground-based fire suppression after seeing the viral story of John Carr, a California man who saved his home from the 2025 Palisades Fire by defending it with a garden hose after most residents evacuated. “It makes you wonder, if 100 people had stayed or 1,000 people had stayed behind and actually did what he did, how much more could have been saved?” Allen asked.

    But the push for community-led wildfire defense has sparked fierce debate among emergency management experts and government officials, who warn that allowing residents to defy evacuation orders puts both civilians and first responders at unnecessary risk. Last month, British Columbia wildfire crews were forced to stage a dangerous rescue operation after a man who refused to evacuate became trapped by flames surrounding his home in Clinton. British Columbia Emergency Management Minister Kelly Greene reiterated this month that all residents under evacuation orders must leave, noting that evacuation orders are only issued as a last resort to protect public safety, and that emergency teams may not be able to reach residents who stay behind if conditions worsen.

    Paul Kovacs, director of the Catastrophic Loss Institute at the University of Western Ontario, explained that Canada’s low wildfire fatality rate is directly tied to its strict evacuation-first policy, a stance that contrasts with approaches in other fire-prone nations like Australia that allow for “stay and defend” strategies. “In the hierarchy of what is it that you do to manage a wildfire, preservation of life is first,” Kovacs said. While he agreed that local communities can play a critical role in fireproofing homes and structures ahead of fire season, he argued that that work should never take place while an active blaze is approaching.

    Provincial officials note that British Columbia has expanded its full-time wildfire staff by 56% in recent years to match growing fire risk, and that self-organized rural groups can be temporarily contracted during major blazes when no provincial crews are available. But Leverkus’s group still lacks official government recognition, leaving trained volunteers at risk of penalties for staying behind to defend their communities. Leverkus is currently working to change that, emphasizing that her training program prioritizes safety above all else: all trainees learn to map multiple escape routes, read fire behavior, and follow orders from trained commanders who will order an evacuation if conditions become too dangerous. Not all trainees choose to stay and defend during active blazes, she added — only those who understand the risks are selected to remain.

    “If people want to stay and defend, they need to understand what that means for themselves, what that means for their family,” Leverkus said. Her long-term goal is to turn her program into a national blueprint that can be adopted by remote and rural communities across Canada, creating a network of trained local teams that can fill gaps left by strained provincial response resources. For Wigwas, the fight is just beginning: as he prepares to contest his C$800 fine in court, he says he has no regrets about his choice to stay and protect his community.

  • Puerto Rico rations water supplies due to intense drought

    Puerto Rico rations water supplies due to intense drought

    A crippling drought, worsened by decades of crumbling infrastructure, has pushed the U.S. Caribbean territory of Puerto Rico into a widespread water crisis, forcing authorities to implement strict rolling water cutoffs that have left hundreds of thousands of residents without consistent access to running water.

    Under the emergency rationing plan, most affected households have been divided into two rotating groups, with each group facing full 48-hour suspensions of their piped water supply. As of this week, 180,000 properties across seven regions that rely on the critically depleted Carraízo Reservoir are covered by the measure, and officials have not yet announced when the restrictions will be lifted. When San Juan’s taps went dark for its scheduled 48-hour shutdown Friday, residents across the capital immediately decried the disruptive policy.

    Data from the U.S. Drought Monitor confirms that 68% of Puerto Rico is currently experiencing drought conditions, ranging from moderate to extreme. July 2026 ranks as the driest July ever recorded on the island, draining Carraízo—one of Puerto Rico’s most important water storage hubs—to critically low levels that are clearly visible in recent drone footage, which shows large swathes of the reservoir’s normally submerged bed now exposed to the air. Governor Jenniffer González has framed the crisis as primarily weather-driven, noting that the rationing decision came after a joint review of current reservoir levels and long-range weather forecasts. “This situation is beyond our control,” González stated in an official press release. “It is the result of the weather conditions we have been facing, which experts had warned about weeks ago.” She added that rain may return to the island once a lingering blanket of Saharan dust that has stalled storm systems moves out of the Caribbean region, and confirmed that more than 1,000 wildfires are currently burning across the territory as dry conditions persist.

    Yet long-standing systemic failures have drastically amplified the impact of the dry spell. According to Puerto Rico’s own water authority, roughly 65% of all treated water produced on the island is lost before reaching customers, largely through unpatched leaks in a network of aged, corroded pipes that have not received full systematic upgrades for decades. Additional contributing factors cited by water management experts include excessive sediment buildup that has reduced the total storage capacity of the island’s key reservoirs.

    As the rationing took effect, hundreds of residents across affected areas lined up at government water distribution trucks to fill large containers for drinking, cooking, and hygiene. Many have voiced frustration and confusion over inconsistent implementation of the rotating schedule and unclear communication about which areas will be affected when. For example, residents in Morcelo, a community south of San Juan, were promised running water for a 48-hour window starting Friday, but reported no water service even after the first 24 hours of the scheduled access period had passed. “People are uncertain because they know we’re in the 48-hour window where we’re supposed to have drinking water,” local community leader Rubén Torres told Puerto Rico’s *El Nuevo Dia* Saturday. “What’s happening? The first 24 hours have already passed and the water hasn’t arrived.” San Juan resident Gloriany Baba summed up the widespread frustration in comments to CBS News, calling the conditions “brutal” and adding “It’s unbelievable to live through this today.”

    This is not the first time Puerto Rico has been forced to implement large-scale water rationing to combat drought: similar harsh measures were deployed in 2015 and 2020, when some 400,000 households only received running water once every three days. Climate scientists note that extreme weather events like this record-breaking drought are growing more frequent and more intense across the Caribbean as a result of human-caused climate change. The island already has a well-documented history of climate-linked extreme weather disasters, most notably Hurricane Maria in 2017, which devastated Puerto Rico’s already fragile electricity grid, killed thousands of residents, and brought extreme rainfall that scientists confirmed was made far more likely by human-induced climate change.

    Governor González stated that the U.S. federal government is providing assistance to address the crisis, though she offered no additional details on the scope or type of support. BBC News has reached out to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for further comment on the federal response.

  • Man arrested after boat capsizes near Statue of Liberty killing woman and infant

    Man arrested after boat capsizes near Statue of Liberty killing woman and infant

    A devastating boating accident off the coast of New York’s Statue of Liberty has left two people dead — a woman and a five-month-old infant — and led to the immediate arrest of the vessel’s operator on reckless endangerment charges, New York Police Department officials confirmed this week.

    The incident unfolded on Saturday night in New York Harbor, triggering an enormous multi-agency search and rescue operation that brought together local law enforcement, fire departments and federal maritime authorities. Shortly after the boat capsized and overturned in the busy harbor, first responders pulled 12 surviving passengers from the chilly water. Aggressive life-saving efforts were not enough to save the two victims, who were pronounced dead at the scene.

    In addition to local criminal charges, U.S. Coast Guard investigators have opened a separate probe into whether the vessel was operating as an illegal charter, a common safety violation in busy recreational boating hubs around New York City. As of Monday, officials have not released the identities of any passengers or a detailed breakdown of what caused the boat to capsize, citing the active investigation.

    The scale of the response underscored the urgency of the incident: two Coast Guard cutters, four New York City Fire Department boats, two NYPD patrol boats, and a police helicopter were all deployed to the accident site to assist with rescue and recovery. Private vessels that were in the area also stopped to help pull survivors from the water before official responders arrived.

    Capt. Doreen McCarthy, commander of the local Coast Guard sector, praised the coordinated response in a statement Monday, highlighting the speed with which agencies mobilized. “We are extremely grateful for the heroic, swift actions of our partner agencies and Good Samaritan vessel who assisted in rescuing survivors from the water,” McCarthy said.

    Local officials confirmed that the investigation remains open and active, with updates expected as investigators piece together the timeline and root causes of the fatal accident.