Global Pulse

标签： North America

北美洲

  • Black woman found hanging from tree was dead before body was ‘staged’ – US media

    Black woman found hanging from tree was dead before body was ‘staged’ – US media

    A shocking development has emerged in the high-profile death investigation of 29-year-old Tasia Fortune in Jackson, Mississippi, where a law enforcement official has confirmed authorities believe the Black woman was already deceased before her body was staged and left hanging from a tree on the property of an abandoned residence.

    According to reporting from the Associated Press, the revelation was made under oath in court this Friday by a investigating detective on the case. Multiple US media outlets have also confirmed the detective told the court investigators suspect Fortune’s killing stemmed from a drug-related dispute between the victim and her attackers.

    Fortune’s body was first discovered by members of the public back in August, hanging from a tree on the overgrown grounds of a vacant Jackson home. The grim discovery immediately ignited intense fear and outrage across Jackson, a city where more than 80% of residents identify as Black. The state of Mississippi has a violent, well-documented history of lynchings and racial terror against Black people, leading many local residents to immediately fear the killing was a modern-day racially motivated attack, a tension that has stretched on for weeks amid limited official information.

    After weeks of public speculation, growing protests and repeated demands from the community for transparency, Jackson law enforcement made multiple arrests in connection with Fortune’s homicide. The BBC reached out to multiple relevant parties, including the local court, the state medical examiner’s office, and Fortune’s mother, Christy Spivey, for comment on the new court disclosure.

    In an official statement provided to the BBC on Friday, Jackson Police Chief RaShall Brackney pushed back against the new narrative, saying: “Our language has been consistent…Ms Fortune was found in a hanging position. We have not released any information contrary to that statement.” Brackney has not responded to follow-up questions seeking clarification on the discrepancy between her public statement and the detective’s sworn court disclosure.

    To date, top state and local officials have not publicly confirmed the exact cause of Fortune’s death, nor have they shared detailed evidence supporting the claim that the hanging was staged after her killing. Earlier this month, the state medical examiner’s office officially classified Fortune’s death as a homicide and confirmed authorities would pursue murder charges against the suspects.

    So far, two people have been taken into custody in connection with the case. The first, 51-year-old Jarques Ratliff, has already entered a plea of not guilty to all charges and remains being held without bond in the county jail. This week, authorities arrested a second suspect, 25-year-old Earnest Lloyd Jr. Law enforcement have confirmed they are still actively searching for a third person of interest connected to Fortune’s killing, though no additional details on the third suspect have been released to the public.

  • What is kratom, the ‘gas station heroin’ alarming officials in the US?

    What is kratom, the ‘gas station heroin’ alarming officials in the US?

    For millions of Americans living with unmanaged chronic pain, the herbal product kratom has emerged as a controversial, unregulated lifeline — but a recent incident involving two deceased college students has reignited long-simmering debates over its safety and legal status across the country.

    Jeffrey Deaver, a 58-year-old retired timber cutter from Washington state, is one of many kratom users who swear by the plant’s pain-relieving effects. After years of severe, unrelenting hip and knee pain that failed to respond to conventional medical treatments, and while he waited for scheduled joint replacement surgeries, Deaver turned to kratom on a recommendation. Wary of its unknown effects at first, he began with small doses, gradually increasing his intake until his pain subsided. Describing the outcome as nothing short of a miracle, Deaver said the herb allowed him to sleep through the night and return to daily function, adding that he cannot imagine managing his condition without access to it.

    Kratom, a tropical tree native to the rainforests of Southeast Asia including Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia, has a centuries-long history of traditional use as a natural stimulant, typically brewed as a tea for workers to combat fatigue. It was first introduced to the U.S. consumer market as a dietary supplement around 2016, and its popularity has skyrocketed over the past decade, with users purchasing over-the-counter kratom in pill, powder, or concentrated liquid form from convenience stores, gas stations, vape shops, and online retailers.

    This week, new public warnings have been issued after investigators found packaged kratom in the possession of two deceased University of Mississippi students. While authorities have not linked the herb directly to the students’ deaths, the discovery has drawn renewed attention to the risks of unregulated kratom consumption. Unlike pharmaceutical drugs, kratom is not overseen by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and its legal status varies widely across the country, with 11 states having enacted full bans, including Massachusetts, which issued a temporary emergency ban just last month.

    Medical experts warn that the unregulated nature of the U.S. kratom market poses the greatest threat to public health. Dr. Shane Speights, dean of the New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine at Arkansas State University, explained that unlike the low-concentration loose-leaf kratom used traditionally in Southeast Asia, most products sold in the U.S. are highly concentrated formulations. Because they are classified as dietary supplements rather than controlled substances, there is no federal oversight of ingredients, dosing, or manufacturing standards. “There’s no way to know exactly what you’re getting,” Speights said. “An unregulated producer could mix any compound into a product, market it as kratom, and no authority would check its contents before it reaches consumers.”

    Kratom’s active chemical compounds, such as 7-Hydroxymitragynine, interact with the brain’s dopamine system to produce effects similar to narcotic opioids. At low doses, it acts as a stimulant, producing a caffeine-like energy boost, which has led some users to turn to it to wean off of harder opioids like fentanyl. At higher doses, it produces intense euphoria and a sense of being high, and can also trigger hallucinations. The most serious risk, Speights noted, is central nervous system depression at high doses, which can lead to cardiovascular collapse and respiratory failure — the primary cause of kratom-related deaths.

    Addiction treatment specialists add that dependence and withdrawal are common side effects of regular kratom use. Jana Wu, director of clinical integration at Mountainside addiction treatment center, explained that users quickly develop a tolerance to kratom, requiring increasingly larger doses to achieve the same effect, leading some to consume up to 20 pills per day. “Kratom addiction destroys personal relationships and careers,” Wu said. “I’ve seen patients lose their jobs and spend thousands of dollars a month to support their habit.”

    Efforts to enact a federal ban have stalled for years. In 2016, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) moved to classify kratom as a Schedule 1 controlled substance, the same category as heroin and LSD, citing “an imminent hazard to public safety.” But the agency abandoned the plan months later after the Department of Justice received tens of thousands of public comments opposing the ban from chronic pain patients and advocacy groups.

    Since the failed federal ban, regulatory action has been left to individual states. Recent efforts include a lawsuit filed by Arizona against a company selling kratom-infused beverages, and anti-kratom advocacy groups are pushing for more state-level bans, calling unregulated kratom a “gas-station drug that is poisoning American communities.” On the other side of the debate, pro-kratom groups such as the American Kratom Association support bans only on synthetic products mislabeled as natural kratom, rather than a full ban on the herb itself.

    Internationally, regulatory frameworks also vary: kratom is fully illegal in the United Kingdom, legal status differs across European Union member states, and even in its native Malaysia, sale and consumption have been banned under the country’s 1952 Poisons Act. For users like Deaver, however, the debate over regulation leaves their access to pain management in limbo, highlighting the deep divide over how to balance individual access to alternative pain treatment with public health safety.

  • Why an international arrest warrant didn’t stop Netanyahu’s US trip

    Why an international arrest warrant didn’t stop Netanyahu’s US trip

    When the International Criminal Court issued an international arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this year, many global observers assumed that any cross-border trip by the leader would end in his detention. But when Netanyahu traveled to the United States to address the United Nations General Assembly in New York, no arrest took place — leaving many people around the world asking why the warrant never led to enforcement during the high-profile visit.

    To unpack this outcome, it is first necessary to break down the structural limitations of the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant framework. Unlike domestic law enforcement agencies, the ICC does not have its own standing police force that can execute warrants across sovereign borders. Instead, it relies entirely on cooperation from member states to carry out arrests on their territory. Even for countries that have formally joined the ICC, political considerations and bilateral diplomatic relationships often override legal obligations to enforce a warrant.

    The United States holds a unique position in this dynamic, as it has never been a member of the International Criminal Court, and has long-standing legal and political policies that reject the court’s jurisdiction over American personnel and allied foreign leaders. Washington has repeatedly made clear that it does not recognize the ICC’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu, and has no legal obligation to comply with it. As the host country for the United Nations headquarters in New York, U.S. law enforcement authorities are the only agencies with the power to carry out arrests on UN premises, outside of the UN’s limited internal security jurisdiction.

    Another key factor is the long-standing security and diplomatic alliance between the U.S. and Israel. The Biden administration has repeatedly reaffirmed its unwavering support for Israel amid ongoing regional conflicts, and has publicly criticized the ICC’s warrant as unjust and counterproductive to regional peace efforts. For U.S. officials, arresting a visiting allied head of government would represent an unprecedented rupture in bilateral relations, a outcome that no sitting U.S. administration would be willing to entertain regardless of legal arguments from the ICC.

    Even beyond U.S. policy, the precedent of sovereign immunity plays a major role in this outcome. As the sitting head of government of a sovereign state, Netanyahu retains full sovereign immunity under international law when traveling on official diplomatic business, including to attend a session of the UN General Assembly. Many legal scholars argue that this immunity supersedes the ICC arrest warrant under existing international conventions, even for states that recognize the court’s authority.

    This case has laid bare the deep gap between the ICC’s formal authority to issue arrest warrants and the practical ability of the court to enforce those warrants against powerful leaders backed by major global powers. It has sparked renewed debate about the effectiveness of international justice mechanisms, and how political power dynamics often shape whether international law is enforced in high-profile cases.

  • Two arrested after people seen mysteriously emerging from various New York City sewers

    Two arrested after people seen mysteriously emerging from various New York City sewers

    A routine security response in New York City has intersected with high-stakes global event preparations, after local law enforcement apprehended two of three men spotted emerging from an underground sewer manhole just blocks from the hotel where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to stay during the annual United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).

    The incident unfolded at approximately 4:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on Wednesday, when first responders were dispatched to the scene after reports of unauthorized individuals exiting the manhole. Law enforcement sources from the New York Police Department (NYPD) confirmed that all three men fled the location immediately after being spotted, but investigators were able to take 26-year-old Kevin Rodriguez and 25-year-old Samuel Reveron—both Queens residents—into custody a day later. The pair now face criminal charges of conspiracy and trespassing.

    In an official statement shared with the BBC, the NYPD noted that unauthorized entries into the city’s sewer system have become an increasingly common occurrence in recent months. In most cases, people enter the underground network after major storm events to search for discarded valuables and scrap metal that gets washed into the pipes. “This incident fits that same criteria, but out of an abundance of caution given the U.N. General Assembly and the sensitivity of the location, the NYPD is conducting additional security sweeps with our federal partners,” the department’s statement read.

    Court records from the pair’s initial hearing Friday morning show that both Rodriguez and Reveron entered not guilty pleas to all charges against them, and were subsequently released from custody pending future court proceedings. The third man involved in the incident remains at large as of press time.

    This arrest is far from an isolated case: New York City law enforcement has documented a string of similar unauthorized sewer entries across multiple boroughs since the start of 2024. In August alone, two separate incidents were recorded: one captured a single person emerging from a Queens manhole in the early hours of the day, while another found three people dressed in work overalls and fitted with headlamps climbing out of a manhole near midtown Manhattan’s Penn Station, one of the city’s busiest transit hubs. Back in May, surveillance cameras in South Brooklyn recorded a small group moving a manhole cover to climb down into the city’s sewer network.

    City officials have repeatedly warned that unauthorized entry into New York’s sewer system is both a criminal offense and an extreme safety hazard. The enclosed, confined space of sewer pipes carries constant risks of exposure to toxic fumes and sudden flash flooding that can trap and kill anyone inside. “For these reasons, members of the public should never enter a pipe, drain, catch basin, manhole, or outfall,” the city’s Department of Environmental Protection told the BBC in a prior statement. The danger of unregulated manhole activity was tragically demonstrated earlier this year, when a pedestrian woman in Midtown Manhattan died after stepping into an unsecured open manhole while exiting her vehicle.

  • Supreme Court revives controversial US data system for citizenship checks

    Supreme Court revives controversial US data system for citizenship checks

    In a sharp partisan split decision that has sent ripples through American electoral politics, the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned lower court rulings to lift restrictions on the Trump administration’s use of a controversial federal citizenship database for voter eligibility checks.

    The program at the center of the legal battle is the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, commonly known as SAVE. Originally launched in 1986, the database was designed for a narrow purpose: to help government agencies confirm the citizenship and immigration status of individuals applying for federal public benefits. Last year, the Trump administration implemented a significant expansion of the tool, adding the ability to run bulk searches of voter roll records using Social Security numbers to identify and flag alleged non-citizens potentially registered to vote.

    The policy quickly faced legal pushback. In June of this year, U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Soonnan, an appointee of President Joe Biden, ruled that the revamped SAVE program was illegal. In her ruling, Soonnan found that the federal government had “knowingly trampled on the privacy rights” of U.S. citizens, in a move that put the fundamental right to vote at direct risk. Her ruling blocking the expanded program was subsequently upheld by a federal appeals court, setting up a final appeal to the nation’s highest court.

    On Friday, the Supreme Court overturned the lower courts’ decisions in a 6-3 vote that broke along ideological lines. All six conservative justices backed the Trump administration’s request to restore access to the database, while the court’s three liberal justices issued a joint dissent opposing the ruling.

    The decision marks a major political and legal victory for the Trump administration, which has centered its election policy agenda on cracking down on unsubstantiated claims of widespread non-citizen voting. But critics have raised urgent alarms over the long-term impacts of the ruling, warning that the use of the database for voter roll purges carries a high risk of erroneous removals that would disenfranchise thousands of eligible American citizens who are legally entitled to cast ballots in upcoming elections.

  • Ed Sheeran’s next US concerts cancelled due to storm warning

    Ed Sheeran’s next US concerts cancelled due to storm warning

    Two highly anticipated Ed Sheeran performances at Foxborough, Massachusetts’ Gillette Stadium, scheduled for Friday and Saturday this weekend, have been called off entirely amid active severe weather warnings across the New England region. The shows were a planned stop on the pop star’s ongoing United States tour, a run that has already dominated entertainment headlines for a heated political controversy surrounding the removal of opening act Macklemore.

    In an official statement released Wednesday, venue management confirmed the cancellation, noting that after close consultation with local emergency officials and reviewing persistent weather forecasts for dangerous conditions across the Boston area and New England through the entire weekend, tour organizers and promoters made the tough call to scrap both performances. “Every decision we made centered on the safety of concertgoers, venue staff, and every member of the tour team, that was our non-negotiable top priority,” the statement added.

    High wind warnings remain in effect across southern New England through early Sunday morning, with state transportation officials already urging non-essential drivers to avoid travel as much as possible to prevent accidents. Ticketholders will be eligible for full refunds: purchases made directly through the original point of sale can be processed immediately, while all tickets bought via Ticketmaster will receive automatic refunds to the original payment method.

    This cancellation comes just weeks after the tour became the center of a fierce national debate over free speech and political expression in live music. The controversy erupted when Macklemore, the tour’s original supporting act, was dropped from the lineup after making public pro-Palestinian comments during earlier shows. The rapper had called for a free Palestine, described the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as genocide, and projected images of damage in Gaza during his sets, which sparked pushback from venue owners.

    Among the most prominent opponents was Robert Kraft, owner of Gillette Stadium and the New England Patriots, who is Jewish. Kraft called Macklemore’s comments hate speech and stated the rapper would not be permitted to perform at his venue, and lobbied alongside other venue owners to have him removed from the tour entirely.

    In the aftermath of the decision, Ed Sheeran moved to distance himself from the call, saying the choice to drop Macklemore was made by tour promoters, not him. Promoters clarified their position in turn, explaining that venue owners including Kraft had threatened to block the entire show from taking place if Macklemore remained on the performance bill.

    The removal sparked widespread backlash: multiple other supporting and backing artists on the tour dropped out in protest of the decision, and a heated national conversation emerged over whether venue owners should have the power to cede artists for political statements. When Sheeran returned to the stage the following weekend, he addressed the controversy for the first time, telling fans: “I’ve had to make hard calls along this tour, I’ve made mistakes, and I am so, so sorry.”

    What was already one of the most debated stops on Sheeran’s 2024 U.S. tour will now not go forward, as weather concerns take priority over live entertainment for the weekend.

  • Man shot during 2024 Trump campaign rally in Butler dies

    Man shot during 2024 Trump campaign rally in Butler dies

    Nearly two years after a mass shooting at a 2024 Donald Trump presidential campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, a second attendee wounded in the attack has died from long-term complications of his injuries, state law enforcement officials have confirmed.

    Jim Copenhaver, a 76-year-old U.S. military veteran and ardent Trump supporter, was struck twice when 20-year-old gunman Thomas Crooks opened fire on the rally crowd from a nearby elevated rooftop on July 13, 2024. The attack immediately killed another attendee, 56-year-old Corey Comperatore, and grazed former president and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s right ear. Copenhaver passed away on Wednesday at a Pittsburgh-area hospital, according to a spokesperson for the Allegheny County Medical Examiner, whose office shared the confirmation with local Pennsylvania news outlets.

    The assailant, Crooks, was shot and killed on-site by U.S. Secret Service agents moments after he began firing into the crowd. The shooting sparked widespread national scrutiny of gaps in presidential campaign security protocols, a debate that has persisted as victims continue to grapple with the aftermath of the attack.

    On his Truth Social platform, former President Trump issued a public tribute to Copenhaver following news of his death, calling the late rally attendee a “true American patriot.” “More than two years ago in Butler, Pennsylvania, a crazed gunman attempted to stifle our America First Movement. Instead, Jim and so many other wonderful Patriots who love our Country, stood united in defense of our shared values of Freedom, Liberty, and Justice,” Trump wrote. He extended condolences to Copenhaver’s family, singling out his wife Marianne in his statement.

    A legal representative for the Copenhaver family echoed that tribute, telling CBS News—BBC’s U.S. partner outlet—that Copenhaver’s lifelong devotion to the United States was the defining trait of his life. “As a veteran, he proudly served our nation in the armed forces, and his love of country never wavered,” the attorney said.

    In an interview with CBS one year after the rally, Copenhaver and the third wounded attendee, David Dutch, opened up about the ongoing health struggles they faced in the wake of the shooting. Copenhaver told reporters he had been hit in the arm and abdomen, and one bullet remained lodged near his spine months after the attack, forcing him to rely on a cane to walk. Both men said they had endured multiple invasive surgeries and serious post-wound infections that altered their daily lives permanently.

    In June 2025, Copenhaver and Dutch filed a joint damages lawsuit against the U.S. federal government, arguing that the Secret Service’s negligent failure to secure the rally venue and perimeter directly led to their injuries, making the government legally liable for harm and long-term health costs. The lawsuit remains pending as of Copenhaver’s death.

    House Republicans also released a statement honoring Copenhaver on social media Friday, writing that “Jim endured unimaginable hardship with strength and perseverance.” The death marks the second fatality linked to the 2024 Trump rally shooting, reigniting national conversations around political violence and gun control in the United States ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

  • Jay-Z rape accuser says her allegation was false

    Jay-Z rape accuser says her allegation was false

    A years-long legal controversy centered on explosive sexual assault allegations against iconic hip-hop artist Jay-Z has taken a sharp turn, with the woman who brought the claims formally admitting her entire accusation against the rapper was fabricated from start to finish.

    The accuser, identified in court filings only by the pseudonym Jane Doe, first filed a high-profile civil lawsuit in 2024 alleging that Jay-Z (legal name Shawn Carter) and fellow music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs drugged and raped her when she was 13 years old at a post-MTV Video Music Awards party in 2000. Both men immediately and vehemently denied the claims, and Doe voluntarily withdrew her lawsuit against Carter in early 2025. Following the withdrawal, Carter launched his own legal action against Doe and her legal team, led by prominent Texas-based attorney Tony Buzbee, to address the harm the false claims had caused.

    In a sworn declaration filed Thursday as part of Carter’s lawsuit, Doe completely walked back every allegation she made against the 14-time Grammy-winning rapper. She wrote, “Shawn ‘Jay-Z’ Carter never raped me. I have never met or spoken to Mr. Carter. Mr. Carter never engaged in any inappropriate conduct toward me whatsoever.” She went on to confirm that her broader claims that Carter and Combs assaulted her while a third unnamed celebrity watched were also entirely untrue, adding, “There is no truth to any of my claims against Mr Carter.”

    Doe acknowledged the irreversible damage her false accusations inflicted, writing, “I understand my false accusations have caused Mr. Carter immense pain, suffering, and damage that can never be fully undone.” The Alabama-based woman also pushed back on prior claims from Buzbee that Carter’s legal team had intimidated her into recanting, stating clearly, “I never received any threat from Mr. Carter or anyone acting on his behalf.” She further confirmed that she has not accepted any payment from Carter or any representative of his to issue this retraction.

    Detailing how the false claims came to be filed, Doe explained that she saw a Facebook advertisement in late 2024 seeking individuals with sexual assault allegations against Combs. The ad, she said, triggered her existing memories of a childhood assault that she misattributed to Carter and Combs before the lawsuit was drafted. She also alleged that Buzbee and his legal team filed the 2024 lawsuit against her instructions, claiming the legal team never shared a draft of the complaint with her, did not get her formal approval before filing, and failed to conduct any independent investigation, background checks, due diligence, or seek corroborating evidence for the explosive claims. She emphasized that the entire allegation of assault by Carter is categorically false.

    As part of the updated legal proceedings, Doe has now been dismissed from Carter’s ongoing lawsuit. The rapper continues to pursue legal action against Buzbee and the other former attorneys on the case. In response to the breaking news, which was first reported by *Rolling Stone*, Buzbee said he had not yet reviewed Doe’s new declaration. He noted that Doe had told the same version of the false story to at least four other attorneys before she connected with him, casting the sudden recantation as unanticipated new information. When Carter filed his lawsuit against Doe and Buzbee’s team in February 2025, Buzbee had alleged that Carter’s investigators had repeatedly harassed and threatened Doe to force her to withdraw her claims, an assertion Doe directly contradicts in her new declaration.

    Combs, who has also denied Doe’s allegations against him, is currently incarcerated after being convicted on prostitution-related charges involving two of his ex-girlfriends in a July 2025 criminal trial. He is serving a four-year prison sentence. Buzbee, who represents dozens of other plaintiffs with civil claims against Combs, has not issued any further public comment on the recantation as of Friday, and the BBC has confirmed that requests for additional comment from Buzbee remain unanswered.

    For his part, Carter has long maintained that the allegations against him were nothing more than a blackmail scheme, describing them in 2025 as “frivolous, fictitious and appalling allegations.” When Doe first dropped her initial lawsuit last year, the rapper, who is married to global pop superstar Beyoncé, noted that the damage done to his family and loved ones could not be erased, saying, “The trauma that my wife, my children, loved ones and I have endured can never be dismissed.”

  • Watch: Protests and walkouts as Netanyahu addresses UN

    Watch: Protests and walkouts as Netanyahu addresses UN

    As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to take the stage at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York, the high-stakes diplomatic event was overshadowed by widespread public demonstrations and coordinated walkouts from multiple delegations and attendees. Long-simmering tensions over the Israeli government’s policies, particularly in the occupied Palestinian territories and domestic judicial reforms, have drawn sharp international scrutiny in recent months, creating a charged atmosphere that boiled over ahead of Netanyahu’s scheduled address.

    Multiple protest groups gathered outside UN headquarters in Manhattan, holding large signs and chanting to demand a end to Israeli occupation and hold the Netanyahu administration accountable for alleged human rights violations. Inside the assembly hall, several diplomatic delegations from Arab and Muslim-majority nations were joined by progressive Western representatives in a coordinated walkout designed to signal their disapproval of the prime minister and his policy agenda. Even before Netanyahu stepped up to the podium, the disruption had already shifted global media focus from the content of his planned speech to the deep divisions that exist within the international community over Israel’s actions.

    According to on-the-ground reporting from the BBC’s Nada Tawfik, the scale of organized opposition caught many UN officials off guard, requiring extra security to be deployed to prevent the situation from escalating into larger unrest. The pre-speech protests and walkouts underscore how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains one of the most divisive unresolved issues on the UN’s agenda, with growing global pressure on the Netanyahu administration to reverse course on its most controversial policies. This display of public and diplomatic dissent also marks a notable shift from previous years, as opposition to Israeli policy has moved beyond fringe activism to gain open support from multiple official diplomatic delegations.

  • Canada prosecutors drop charges against two in Toronto gold heist

    Canada prosecutors drop charges against two in Toronto gold heist

    One of Canada’s most high-profile theft cases has taken an unexpected turn, as Canadian prosecutors have withdrawn criminal charges against two men linked to the 2023 massive gold heist at Toronto Pearson International Airport. Amit Jalota and Ali Raza, the two accused individuals, saw their charges formally dismissed last week, closing a chapter that upended their personal and professional lives for nearly three years.

    The brazen heist, which remains the largest gold theft in Canadian history, unfolded in April 2023 inside an airport cargo terminal, shortly after a shipment arrived via an Air Canada flight originating from Zurich, Switzerland. In total, thieves made off with more than 6,500 gold bars weighing approximately 400 kilograms, alongside millions of dollars in untraceable cash. The total value of the stolen goods is estimated at C$20 million, equal to roughly $14.5 million USD. According to investigators from Peel Regional Police, the operation relied on a clever ruse: an accomplice gained access to the secured cargo by presenting a fraudulent airway bill, the official documentation required to claim shipped goods, before loading the stolen cache onto a waiting truck for transport off airport grounds.

    It took authorities one full year to wrap up the initial investigation phase, which led Peel Regional Police to announce a series of arrests and charges connected to the heist in 2024. But last week’s court action has now cleared two of the highest-profile accused in the case. Lawyers for both Jalota and Raza confirmed to national Canadian media outlets that their clients have consistently maintained their innocence from the moment they were first linked to the crime, and that they are now relieved to put the ordeal behind them.

    In a formal statement provided to reporters, Jalota’s legal team emphasized that the public nature of the allegations had already inflicted irreversible harm on their client, even before the case reached a trial. “He has been punitively and unreasonably punished for the last three years as he was forced to navigate the criminal justice system and the fall out of these allegations that were publicly broadcasted both nationally and internationally,” the statement read. Both men, the legal teams added, saw their daily lives and livelihoods completely upended by the accusations, which included charges of possession of stolen gold and stolen currency connected directly to the heist.

    The broader investigation into the coordinated theft has already yielded multiple convictions in Canada and the United States. Earlier this year, a Canadian court handed down a four-year prison sentence to one man who pleaded guilty to helping plan the heist. Across the border, the U.S. Department of Justice handed a 160-month prison sentence to a second connected individual, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to illegally traffic firearms. That man was intercepted by law enforcement in Pennsylvania with 65 handguns stashed in his car’s trunk; Canadian investigators have alleged the funds used to purchase the illegal weapons were traced directly to proceeds from the Toronto airport gold theft.

    Two additional accused individuals are still scheduled to face separate trials later in 2025 on charges of conspiracy to commit theft, and both have entered not guilty pleas. The withdrawal of charges against Jalota and Raza leaves the outcome of the broader investigation still unresolved, with much of the stolen gold still unaccounted for as the judicial process moves forward for the remaining defendants.