标签： North America

A decorated U.S. Army Special Forces master sergeant is facing a slew of federal charges for allegedly exploiting classified knowledge of the covert operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro to place illegal, profitable bets on the outcome of the mission, federal prosecutors have confirmed. The case has thrown a spotlight on growing regulatory concerns over unregulated crypto prediction platforms that enable government insiders to profit from confidential national security information.

Gannon Ken Van Dyke, a 17-year active-duty soldier stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, who earned promotion to master sergeant in 2023, has been at the center of the unfolding scandal. As a member of elite special operations command, Van Dyke signed a strict non-disclosure agreement in 2018 that bound him to protect all sensitive classified information, acknowledging the U.S. government placed unique trust in him to guard operational secrets. Prosecutors allege that despite this commitment, he used his insider access to details of the January Maduro seizure to trade on Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, netting more than $400,000 in illicit winnings.

Outside of his military career, Van Dyke built a growing side career as a real estate investor, public records and online profiles show. He founded Better Homes NC LLC, a property investment firm registered in 2022, and owns at least six residential properties across North Carolina. He also operates a popular mountain Airbnb retreat called Daddy Bear Cave, where he holds a 5-star superhost rating, with guests praising his responsiveness and attention to detail. Most notably, public property records show Van Dyke closed on a $340,000, 2,400-square-foot three-bedroom home just 20 days after Maduro’s capture, coinciding with the transfer of his alleged betting winnings. His wife works alongside him in the real estate industry, advertising rental and sales listings through major industry brands, though her social media accounts have been taken offline in recent days, and Van Dyke’s own Facebook profile currently lists him as single.

According to the unsealed indictment issued last week, Van Dyke created his Polymarket account on December 26, 2025, using a virtual private network to route his connection through a foreign country to hide his location. Over the following week, between December 27 and January 2, he invested roughly $33,934 into a series of bets that predicted the timeline of U.S. military action in Venezuela and the date of Maduro’s removal from power.

On January 3, just hours after Van Dyke placed his final bet, then-President Donald Trump publicly announced that U.S. special operations forces had captured Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores in an overnight raid in Caracas. The couple were transported to the USS Iwo Jima, the U.S. Navy amphibious assault ship staged in the Caribbean for the mission, with photos later confirming Maduro in custody. Prosecutors also allege that just over an hour after Trump’s public announcement of the capture, Van Dyke uploaded a photo to his personal Google account showing him posing with a rifle alongside other special operations soldiers on the deck of a ship at sunrise, apparently confirming his presence on the operation.

Polymarket, the platform Van Dyke allegedly used, has faced growing regulatory scrutiny in recent months over the risks of insider trading by government officials with access to non-public information. The platform’s anonymous blockchain-based structure has been compared to the “Wild West” by legal experts, as most users cannot be identified by their public blockchain addresses alone. In early January, after Maduro’s capture, online investigators quickly noticed an anonymous bettor had earned nearly half a million dollars from correctly predicting the seizure, sparking widespread public outcry, but the bettor’s identity remained unknown for months.

Prosecutors say Van Dyke made a critical misstep that unmasked him: he used his personal email address to register his Polymarket account. After news reports began highlighting the large winning bet, Van Dyke allegedly took steps to cover his tracks, closing his account and attempting to hide his illicit winnings. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, he first withdrew roughly $409,881 in winnings and transferred most of the sum to a foreign interest-generating crypto vault, then changed the email associated with his crypto exchange account to a new, unlinked address. On January 16, he transferred the full sum, including accumulated interest totaling approximately $444,209, to a new personal brokerage account. Despite these efforts, federal investigators were able to trace the activity back to Van Dyke and unseal the full indictment last week.

Van Dyke faces five federal charges: unlawful use of confidential government information for personal profit, theft of non-public government data, commodities fraud, wire fraud, and unlawful monetary transaction. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has also filed a separate civil lawsuit against him alleging insider trading. He is scheduled to be arraigned and formally enter a plea at a federal courthouse in New York this coming Tuesday, according to U.S. media reports. The indictment does not detail Van Dyke’s exact day-to-day role in the Maduro operation, which involved months of preparation, air strike capabilities, a network of on-the-ground intelligence assets, and a large coordinated military build-up in the Caribbean region.

On April 27, 2026, senior U.S. law enforcement officials held an official press conference at the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. to update the public on a high-stakes security incident that unfolded the previous weekend at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner. At the briefing, officials displayed images of the arsenal recovered from 31-year-old suspect Cole Tomas Allen, who is now facing federal charges for orchestrating an assassination plot targeting former president and current officeholder Donald Trump.

Following the Saturday night shooting incident, Allen appeared for his first federal court hearing at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Monday, where prosecutors formally levied three criminal counts against him: attempted assassination of the sitting U.S. president, illegal interstate transportation of firearms, and unlawful discharge of a weapon during the commission of a violent felony.

Per CNBC reporting citing prosecution filings, when law enforcement officers took Allen into custody, he was found in possession of a 12-gauge pump-action shotgun, a .38 caliber handgun, three bladed weapons, and a cache of additional dangerous equipment. Law enforcement investigators have since reconstructed the suspect’s pre-attack movements, confirming that Allen traveled cross-country from his home state of California to Washington D.C. via passenger train, and smuggled his full arsenal into the Washington Hilton — the venue hosting the high-profile dinner — before launching his attack.

Shortly before he attempted to breach security, Allen sent an email to family members that laid out his premeditated plan in explicit terms. In the message, he identified senior Trump administration officials as his intended targets, ranked in order of priority from highest to lowest. He also wrote, “I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.”

Live event footage captured the chaotic moments of the attack: Allen attempted to rush past a magnetometer security checkpoint, triggering an immediate exchange of gunfire between the suspect and responding Secret Service agents. One Secret Service officer was wounded in the shootout before Allen was apprehended.

Immediately following the incident, Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and all sitting Cabinet members were rapidly evacuated from the event venue to secure locations. Live broadcasts from the scene showed hundreds of attendees scrambling for cover, crouching behind dinner tables to avoid stray gunfire.

U.S. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi confirmed the incident in an early post on X, noting that the agency launched a full investigation into the shooting near the dinner’s main security screening area in close coordination with the Metropolitan Police Department of D.C.

The incident marks the latest in a growing wave of political violence that has rocked the United States in recent years. Trump has been the target of multiple assassination attempts and repeated death threats both during his 2024 presidential campaign and his current second term in office. The most high-profile prior attack came in July 2024, when a shooter opened fire on Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, leaving the then-candidate with minor injuries after he narrowly escaped the assault.

A high-stakes court hearing unfolded this week in Washington D.C. for 20-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, the man accused of plotting to assassinate former U.S. President Donald Trump ahead of a high-profile press dinner. As reported by the BBC, the proceedings marked the first public court appearance for Allen, who faces federal charges of attempted assassination of a former U.S. head of state. Court documents outline that the alleged plot was targeted at Trump, who remains the leading Republican contender for the 2024 presidential election, during the annual media dinner hosted by the White House Correspondents’ Association, a widely attended event that draws top political journalists, government officials and public figures each year. No details of a potential plea have been released at this early stage of the legal process, and the hearing centered on establishing formal charges and setting future procedural deadlines. Law enforcement officials have confirmed that they intercepted Allen before he could carry out any violent action, though they have not yet released full details of the evidence gathered in the case. The incident has sparked renewed national discussion around political violence in the United States, amid a deeply polarized 2024 election cycle that has already seen multiple high-profile threats against political figures. Security arrangements for major public political events, particularly those involving leading presidential candidates, are now being reviewed by federal and local law enforcement agencies to address emerging risks.

On a Saturday evening just outside the venue of the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner, a violent exchange of gunfire erupted between an armed suspect identified as Cole Tomas Allen and law enforcement officers. The shooting came just days before a critical congressional deadline to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a controversial law granting U.S. intelligence agencies broad warrantless surveillance powers that is set to expire at the end of this week. Within hours of the incident, former President Donald Trump moved quickly to tie the shooting to his ongoing campaign to extend the program, arguing the attempted attack proved the FBI must retain the authority to collect the communications of U.S. citizens without prior judicial approval.

In a Sunday interview with Fox News, Trump doubled down on his earlier position, stating he is personally willing to forgo his own security protections to secure a multi-year extension of Section 702, and claimed all Americans should be willing to make the same tradeoff for the sake of national safety. “It’s really needed for national security,” Trump told Fox anchor Jacqui Heinrich. “Iran is decimated, and we got a lot of information by using FISA… I’m willing to give up my security for the military because ultimately that’s to me the highest cause is, you know, the safety of our nation.”

Unlike traditional surveillance authorities that require judges to approve individual warrants for targeting U.S. persons, Section 702 explicitly permits U.S. intelligence agencies to collect the electronic communications of foreign nationals located overseas without a warrant. Because thousands of these foreign targets regularly communicate with American citizens, the law also allows agencies to vacuum up the emails, text messages, and phone calls of unwitting U.S. residents without prior judicial review, with approximately 350,000 foreign targets currently monitored under the program. When Heinrich noted that investigators have not confirmed whether Allen was radicalized by any foreign individual or extremist group, she asked Trump if the shooting highlighted the urgent need to retain the surveillance tool, prompting Trump to pivot to longstanding grievances over past FISA use against his 2016 campaign.

Trump complained that former FBI Director James Comey abused FISA powers to obtain a warrant to surveil a former Trump campaign aide during the agency’s investigation into 2016 Russian election interference, before incorrectly claiming FISA powers had been used to support U.S. military actions against Iran and in an incursion into Venezuela earlier this year. To date, no public evidence has connected Allen, the suspected shooter, to any foreign actors; investigators have confirmed Allen appears to have acted alone, and a document he left behind references his Christian beliefs and criticizes the Trump administration’s policies on immigrant detention, anti-drug bombing operations in maritime waters off the Americas, and military strikes in Iran that hit an elementary school.

Critics of an un reformed Section 702 extension have pushed back on Trump’s attempts to tie the shooting to the surveillance debate, noting that the incident actually undermines the argument that the program is necessary to stop lone attacks with no foreign ties. Jordan Liz, an associate professor of philosophy at San José State University, argued in a recent Common Dreams column that despite sweeping claims from Trump, congressional Republicans, and intelligence leaders that Section 702 has stopped dozens of terror attacks, there is almost no public evidence to back up these assertions. Liz pointed out that only one independently verified, well-documented case exists of the program disrupting a terror attack on U.S. soil: the 2009 plot to bomb the New York City subway system. In that case, the NSA used Section 702 to track communications between an al-Qaeda courier and plotter Najibullah Zazi, who was residing in the U.S., but the NSA only obtained the courier’s email address from British intelligence partners — meaning the successful disruption was as much a product of international intelligence sharing as it was of Section 702 itself. Worse, Liz argued, the incident actually highlights how Trump’s repeated attacks on U.S. allies ultimately weaken, rather than strengthen, American national security.

The push to extend Section 702 has already roiled Congress in recent weeks, with two separate extension bills — one for an 18-month term and another for five years — failing to pass earlier this month. Opponents of the bills uniformly objected to the lack of meaningful privacy reforms, particularly a critical loophole that allows government agencies to purchase private personal data about U.S. citizens from commercial data brokers without first obtaining a warrant. After the initial proposals failed, House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, unveiled a new compromise last week that would extend the program for three years, require the FBI to submit monthly reports on its searches of American data to an internal oversight official, and impose nominal penalties for misuse of the program. Privacy advocates have dismissed these reforms as wholly inadequate, noting they do nothing to end the practice of warrantless backdoor searches of U.S. citizens’ data.

The House Rules Committee was scheduled to convene Monday to advance the new bill to a full floor vote, and top congressional Democrats have already mobilized opposition to the measure. Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland circulated a memo to colleagues last week urging them to reject the Republican proposal, arguing that it “continues the disastrous policy of trusting the FBI to self-police and self-report its abuses of Section 702 and backdoor searches of Americans’ data… FBI agents can still collect, search, and review Americans’ communications without any review from a judge.”

The bill’s path to passage remains uncertain, as four House Democrats broke with their party earlier this month to support a procedural vote advancing the reauthorization, joining all House Republicans. Privacy advocacy groups have ramped up pressure on these four Democrats — Josh Gottheimer and Tom Suozzi of New Jersey, Marie Gluesencamp Perez of Washington, and Jared Golden of Maine — to flip their positions on the latest proposal. “It all comes down to those four and where they are going to land,” Hajar Hammado, senior policy adviser at advocacy group Demand Progress, told The Intercept on Monday. “If they are going to continue to try to hand Trump and White House homeland security adviser Stephen Miller warrantless surveillance authorities without any sort of checks or reforms that make sure they’re not violating civil liberties.”

The opening day of the British King and Queen’s visit to the United States kicked off with a formal welcome aligned with longstanding diplomatic protocol, marking the start of a high-profile bilateral engagement between the two close allies. Immediately after their aircraft touched down on U.S. soil, the royal couple proceeded to the White House, where they were received in a formal greeting by then-U.S. President Donald Trump. The meeting served as an early opportunity for diplomatic exchange, highlighting the enduring relationship between the United Kingdom and the United States. Following their warm welcome at the executive residence, the monarchs traveled to the United Kingdom’s official diplomatic mission in the U.S. capital, paying a visit to the British Embassy to meet with stationed diplomatic staff and observe the mission’s ongoing work. This first full day of activities set the tone for the rest of their visit, which was focused on strengthening diplomatic, cultural, and economic ties between the two nations.

On a Saturday night at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, a gathering of journalists, politicians, and public figures at the Washington Hilton was upended by sudden gunfire, turning what is normally a lighthearted annual tradition into a scene of chaos and fear that echoed the all-too-familiar trauma of political violence that has gripped modern America.

For many attendees, the moment of panic carried deeply personal echoes of past attacks. Erika Kirk, the widow of conservative activist Charlie Kirk who was killed in a shooting just seven months prior, was left sobbing amid the evacuation. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, who survived a near-fatal shooting at a 2017 Republican congressional baseball practice, was immediately escorted out by security personnel. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who lost both his father and uncle to political assassinations, was also removed from the venue for his safety. Even many of the journalists present had covered or witnessed the 2024 rally shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, where an attacker shot former President and then-candidate Donald Trump, grazing his ear before being killed by a Secret Service sniper.

Saturday’s shooting marks the third direct assassination attempt targeting Trump, who is now serving as U.S. president. The first occurred at the Butler rally, the second at his Palm Beach golf resort in 2024, and a separate incident last year saw the Secret Service kill an armed man attempting to breach Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property while the president was out of state. For the United States, the incident has cemented a grim reality: political violence has become a persistent, omnipresent threat that can strike any gathering, no matter how high-profile or protected, at any time.

In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, the familiar cycle of response to political violence played out rapidly. Speaking from the scene Saturday night, Trump called for national unity and a toning down of divisive political rhetoric, a moment that even some of his critics acknowledged struck the right tone. A Wall Street Journal editorial noted that Trump’s post-shooting comments hit the right notes of gratitude and mutual respect. But by Sunday evening, that call for unity quickly dissolved into familiar partisan friction during a primetime interview on CBS’s *60 Minutes*. In the sit-down, Trump blamed Democrats for cultivating a cultural atmosphere that he claimed enabled the attack, and went on to deride interviewer Norah O’Donnell as “a disgrace” and “horrible” after she pressed him on the alleged gunman’s published manifesto. On the left, unfounded conspiracy theories quickly circulated online claiming the attack had been staged to boost Trump’s political standing, fueled by fears of coming crackdowns on political activism and free speech.

Within days, the Trump administration and its congressional Republican allies had moved to tie the shooting directly to one of the president’s long-standing policy priorities: constructing a large, fortified new ballroom on the site of the White House’s former East Wing. In a social media post Sunday, Trump explicitly framed Saturday’s attack as direct justification for the project, writing that the incident was “exactly the reason” the new ballroom was needed. In a formal letter to the historic preservation group that has filed a lawsuit blocking the project, Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate argued that the current venue arrangements put the president, his family, and his staff at grave risk, writing that the preservation group’s legal challenge directly endangers those lives. Top congressional Republicans have already pledged to introduce new legislation that would explicitly authorize the construction, with House Speaker Mike Johnson telling Fox News Monday that the fortified ballroom would provide a safe, secure venue for events like the White House Correspondents’ Dinner itself.

But experts and observers note that a new, fortified White House ballroom alone cannot resolve the core security gaps exposed by Saturday’s shooting. Key unanswered questions remain: how was the suspected gunman able to bring weapons into a venue hosting the sitting president and dozens of top government officials? Was the Secret Service’s established security perimeter sufficient for the event? Should all guests in all areas of the hotel, not just the dinner ballroom, have been screened for weapons ahead of time? In response to these open questions, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles has scheduled an early-week meeting with top Secret Service officials to review existing protocols and security practices for all major presidential events, including the upcoming 250th U.S. centennial celebrations scheduled for this summer.

The shooting has also reshaped Trump’s approach to public campaigning ahead of the looming midterm elections. Following the 2024 Butler rally shooting, Trump drastically scaled back his large outdoor public rallies, a signature staple of his political career. Since taking office, he has favored small, closed-door events at secure military bases and smaller indoor venues, moving all large public appearances to enclosed arenas that allow the Secret Service to more rigorously screen all attendees. But with midterms approaching, political strategists note that Trump will face mounting pressure to return to the campaign trail to energize his base, which historically sees lower turnout in non-presidential election years when Trump is not on the ballot. While a more cautious, closed-off approach to public appearances may reduce the president’s personal security risk, it could carry a significant political cost for his party in the upcoming elections.

More than 19 years have passed since the last British state visit to the United States, and on Monday, King Charles III and Queen Camilla touched down at Maryland’s Andrews Air Force Base to kick off a four-day diplomatic mission focused on mending strained transatlantic relations and reinforcing shared democratic values.

The royal couple was greeted on the tarmac by senior U.S. protocol official Monica Crowley, British Ambassador to the U.S. Sir Christian Turner, and other high-ranking dignitaries. Two local children presented the pair with bouquets, before a military band performed both the British and American national anthems to mark the formal start of the visit. From the airbase, the delegation traveled directly to the White House, where President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump welcomed the royals on the building’s iconic South Portico, where ongoing renovation work is currently underway.

Following the formal welcome, the visitors joined the Trumps for tea in the White House Green Room, before touring the grounds to view a newly expanded beehive shaped like a miniature White House. The customized installation was a deliberate nod to King Charles’ longstanding public advocacy for bee conservation and sustainable beekeeping, a small personal touch woven into official diplomatic programming.

This state visit, organized at the request of the UK government, comes as the United States prepares to mark its 250th anniversary of independence, and is framed as a deliberate soft power push to strengthen bilateral ties that have been tested in recent months. Tensions have flared between the Trump administration and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government over the UK’s refusal to deepen military involvement in the ongoing Iran conflict, creating a rocky backdrop for the diplomatic talks.

In a nod to shared transatlantic history, Queen Camilla wore a historic union jack-stars and stripes brooch originally gifted to Queen Elizabeth II by the Mayor of New York during a 1957 state visit. That 1957 trip was itself a mission to rebuild UK-U.S. relations after the 1956 Suez Crisis split the two allies over Middle East policy, making the brooch a quiet symbolic reference to past diplomatic reconciliations.

After their White House stop, the royal couple traveled to the British Embassy in Washington D.C. for a garden party hosting more than 600 guests with cross-Atlantic ties, drawn from political, scientific, charitable and military circles. Even the menu carried diplomatic weight: the beef served in traditional tea sandwiches came from the first batch of tariff-free British beef imported to the U.S. under a recently finalized bilateral trade agreement. Attendees included former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senator Ted Cruz, and UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper.

Queen Camilla dedicated a significant portion of her time at the garden party to meeting with women’s advocacy leaders working to combat domestic abuse. Sandra Jackson, a representative of U.S.-based support organization House of Ruth, which aids survivors of domestic violence, spoke after the meeting about the Queen’s longstanding commitment to the cause. “It’s very important to have such advocates and it’s a cause very close to her heart,” Jackson said, adding that she respected the royal household’s decision not to arrange a meeting with survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, a choice made to avoid interfering with ongoing legal proceedings related to the case. Michelle DeLaune, another anti-domestic abuse campaigner in attendance, noted that high-profile royal engagement on the issue marked meaningful progress in elevating public awareness of the crisis.

Heading into the second day of the visit on Tuesday, King Charles is set to become the first British monarch to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress since Queen Elizabeth II spoke to lawmakers in 1991. The address comes just days after a shooting at a Washington D.C. event attended by President Trump, and royal sources confirm the King will open his remarks by expressing sympathy for the victims of the attack. Heavy security remains in place across the city following the Saturday incident.

In his prepared remarks, the King is expected to acknowledge current policy disagreements between the U.S. and UK, while emphasizing that the two allies have a long history of overcoming differences to work together. He will call for reconciliation and renewal of the bilateral partnership, and urge joint action to defend shared values of tolerance, liberty and equality. Royal sources say the King will frame the transatlantic alliance as rooted in a commitment to compassion, peace, interfaith understanding, and mutual respect, and will reaffirm British commitment to NATO collective defense and support for Ukraine in its war against Russian invasion.

After the congressional address, the visit will continue with a formal ceremonial military welcome at the White House, followed by a state dinner hosted by President Trump that will bring together political leaders and public figures from both nations.