标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Zelensky rallies EU support as Trump says Ukraine leader ‘more difficult to deal with than Putin’

    Zelensky rallies EU support as Trump says Ukraine leader ‘more difficult to deal with than Putin’

    As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Brussels Friday for a high-stakes summit with top European Union leaders, former U.S. President Donald Trump unleashed a fresh wave of sharp criticism against him, deepening tensions between the former American leader and the Ukrainian administration amid the ongoing full-scale Russian invasion.

    In an interview with U.S. media outlet Newsmax Thursday evening, Trump compared Zelensky unfavorably to Russian President Vladimir Putin, claiming the Ukrainian leader is “more difficult to deal with” than his Russian counterpart. The former president also denounced Ukraine’s recent resumption of drone and missile strikes targeting Russian oil refineries as “a disgrace”, arguing that the attacks drive up global energy prices.

    The breakdown of a brief, Trump-proposed ceasefire on energy infrastructure attacks explains the renewed hostilities. Zelensky had agreed to pause Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy facilities for three days at Trump’s request, but announced Thursday that strikes would resume immediately. The Ukrainian leader justified the reversal by noting that Russia never halted its own attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure, a violation of the informal ceasefire terms.

    Overnight Thursday, that continuing Russian assault claimed new civilian casualties in northeastern Ukraine. Regional governor Oleg Synegubov confirmed via Telegram that a Russian drone strike on Kharkiv killed multiple civilians and left at least 14 others injured. As of Friday morning, Zelensky has not issued a public response to Trump’s latest critical remarks.

    Top European leaders have publicly backed Zelensky’s position following the collapse of the energy ceasefire. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who greeted Zelensky alongside European Council President António Costa at the Brussels summit, reaffirmed the EU’s unified stance against Russian aggression. “Of course we supported President Trump’s energy ceasefire but we’ve seen that Russia did not respect it, not a single minute,” von der Leyen told reporters on the ground. “Russia escalated and therefore we have to increase sanctions on Russia… We will not lift any sanctions unless Russia stops the war.”

    Trump’s harsh comments signal a clear worsening of relations between the leading U.S. Republican presidential candidate and the Ukrainian government. The former U.S. president doubled down on his criticism, telling Newsmax: “Zelensky is not a good guy for us to deal with. He doesn’t want to settle. He says he wants to settle, but he doesn’t. I’m not a big fan of Zelenskyy.”

    The dispute over energy strikes stems from competing U.S. and Ukrainian priorities. Trump’s frustration with Ukraine’s refinery strikes comes in the wake of a recent U.S. deal to import 300,000 tonnes of Russian diesel to the American market, a move designed to lower domestic fuel prices ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. That agreement already drew fierce pushback from Zelensky, who publicly labeled it a “gift to Putin” earlier this week.

    During his visit to Europe, Zelensky has maintained a packed schedule of diplomatic talks aimed at securing continued military and political support for Ukraine. Following a stop in London a day earlier, where he met with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (corrected from the original report’s misstatement of Andy Burnham), Zelensky met NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and the heads of state of Poland, France, Denmark, and Belgium in Brussels on Thursday. Friday’s summit schedule includes additional meetings with European Council and Commission leadership, as well as the prime ministers of Hungary, Finland, and Sweden, as Ukraine pushes for continued progress toward EU and NATO membership.

  • They fled Russia, but the West sent them back

    They fled Russia, but the West sent them back

    In early December 2024, when a deportation flight carrying expelled Russian nationals touched down on the tarmac in Moscow, Russian federal security agents were already waiting on the ground. Among the passengers was Katya – a name changed to protect her from retaliation, as she remains trapped within Russia’s borders – who would later describe the overwhelming terror of that moment: “It was unbelievably frightening. My knees were shaking with fear.”

    Two years prior, Katya had fled Russia after Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, submitting an application for political asylum in the United States that documented her participation in anti-war protests and her membership in a Russian opposition movement. Her application was ultimately rejected.

    Today, Katya’s experience is far from unique. Just over three years after much of the Western world publicly opened its doors to Russians fleeing political repression and conscription, shifting political tides have hardened attitudes toward asylum-seeking Russians. Deportations of anti-war dissidents, army deserters and opposition activists from the U.S. and European Union are climbing rapidly, and returnees face predictable, devastating consequences: long prison sentences for anti-government speech, forced conscription to fight in Ukraine, and routine state harassment.

    After clearing passport control that December day in Moscow, Katya says officers from the Federal Security Service (FSB) interrogated her for hours. When agents discovered what they deemed “incriminating information” stored on her personal phone, she said their demeanor shifted immediately. “I was very afraid that they would simply bundle me off somewhere,” she recalled. Though Katya was eventually released to stay with relatives, constant surveillance has turned her daily life into a prolonged nightmare. “I feel as if I’m in a cage, like in a zoo,” she said. “Whenever I see a police car, I feel terrified and start thinking, ‘What if they’re coming for me?’”

    For male deportees on that flight, the risk was even more immediate: FSB officers distributed military conscription papers, ordering all men to report to local enlistment offices, the same hub through which tens of thousands of Russian conscripts have been deployed to the front lines in Ukraine. Another passenger and activist on the flight confirmed Katya’s account to the BBC.

    Official data underscores the sharp rise in deportations. In the U.S., forced removals of Russian nationals jumped from 222 in 2023 to more than 1,200 in 2025, a surge that comes as part of broader immigration restrictions enacted during the second term of President Donald Trump. Rights activists say many of those deported are known dissidents and army deserters. One high-profile example is Leonid Melekhin, an anti-war activist who fled Russia after being arrested at a protest and sought asylum in the U.S. Melekhin had openly criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin on social media, posting images of the leader alongside the message “Putin: murderer, fascist, usurper.” He was deported back to Russia in 2024, charged with “justifying terrorism,” and sentenced to six years in a maximum-security penal colony.

    Andrei Pivovarov, a leading figure in Russia’s exiled Anti-War Committee, who is himself currently serving a four-year prison sentence for “operating an undesirable organization,” notes that far longer sentences are common for returnees. “We have several examples of people who got eight years in prison when they crossed the [Russian] border,” he said. The rising risk of deportation has forced his organization to update its guidance for escaping dissidents: the European Union is no longer classified as a safe haven, and activists are now advised to seek refuge further afield.

    Deportations are rising sharply across the EU as well. German government figures show the country deported just seven Russian nationals in 2023, a number that jumped to more than 110 in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, more than 21,000 Russians applied for asylum in Germany, but the approval rate plummeted from 29% in 2023 to just 6.8% in the first 11 months of 2025. Germany’s Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) told the BBC that protection is only granted to applicants who can prove “an actual, well-founded fear of persecution.” Last year, Berlin suspended its entire humanitarian visa program for Russians. EU-wide data shows the overall asylum approval rate for Russian applicants fell from 23% in 2024 to roughly 17% in the first nine months of 2025.

    This broader clampdown on asylum for Russian dissidents is tied to larger political shifts across the West. Growing public anxiety over high volumes of irregular migration, rising political pressure, and increasing support for far-right populist parties have pushed mainstream governments to tighten immigration rules across the board. Rights advocates say anti-war Russian dissidents, many of whom fled targeted repression, are getting swept up in this broader crackdown.

    “Western governments are focused on limiting humanitarian programmes and asylum seekers,” said Anastasia Burakova, a human rights lawyer and founder of Kovcheg (Ark), an organization that helps anti-war Russians escape the country. The shift, she added, is a direct response to “public concerns and rising support for right-wing populist parties.”

    Even after an asylum application is rejected, many Russian nationals are given a window to leave the receiving country voluntarily. But a growing share are now being forcibly escorted back to Russia, often via indirect routes through third countries. Multiple exiled Russian activists told the BBC that Western immigration officials regularly dismiss the risks they face, claiming they face no danger upon return and often lack basic understanding of Russia’s current repressive legal landscape.

    Artyom, a former Russian soldier who deserted the army in 2022 after his commanders threatened to deploy him to Ukraine, described how his warnings fell on deaf ears. “I tried to explain that if they sent me back, I would be put in prison, or sent to war where I’d be killed,” he said. “They just didn’t believe me.” Even though Artyom provided U.S. officials with official documentation proving a criminal desertion case had been opened against him in Russia, he was still placed on a deportation flight to Moscow, routed through Egypt. “I was preparing for death,” he said. “I was thinking, ‘how can I die without it being painful?’” After being held in a military detention center in Moscow, Artyom managed to escape and is now in hiding in an unnamed third country. “Another country could investigate me better and give me asylum. Why didn’t they give me that chance? Instead they deported me specifically to Russia,” he said. “It ruined my life.”

    In a statement to the BBC, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security defended its policy: “All illegal aliens receive due process. If a judge finds an illegal alien has no right to be in this country, we are going to remove them.”

    Rights groups warn that the risk to deported dissidents is growing because political repression inside Russia has reached unprecedented levels. Memorial, the Nobel Prize-winning Russian human rights organization, reports its official list of recognized political prisoners grew from 803 to 1,265 in 2025, marking the largest single-year increase on record. The Russian Embassy in London declined to comment on this story when contacted by the BBC.

    For many other dissidents, the threat of deportation hangs over them daily. Anti-war activist Mikhail and his wife Dasha – whose names have also been changed to protect their family members still in Russia – are currently awaiting forced expulsion from Finland “any day.” Russian authorities have already blocked Mikhail’s social media accounts for spreading anti-war content that Moscow classifies as “fake information,” and police have repeatedly questioned his mother at their home. Dasha is a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses, a religious group the Russian government has banned as an extremist organization. The couple provided Finnish authorities with extensive evidence of their targeted persecution, including a video recording of police telling Mikhail’s mother that more than 300 of his posts violate Russian law, where even a single anti-war post can carry a multi-year prison sentence.

    Finnish immigration authorities have rejected the couple’s asylum application five times, ruling there is “no reasonable basis to believe” they would face serious human rights violations if returned. “We’re sitting here and someone could knock on our door at any moment, take us to the Russian border and simply hand us over to Russian officers,” Mikhail said. “We fear for our lives! We came to Finland for help, and they’re refusing us. My wife cries constantly.” Amnesty International, which is supporting the couple’s appeal, says they face a “real risk” of detention, prosecution, long imprisonment, and even torture if deported. The Finnish Immigration Service says all of its asylum decisions comply with international refugee law standards, and the approval rate for Russian applicants is in line with the EU average.

    The growing threat of deportation comes as growing numbers of Russians are once again considering fleeing the country. Unconfirmed rumors of a new wave of military mobilization to reinforce Russian troop levels in Ukraine have spread widely in recent months, a move the Kremlin has repeatedly denied. The 2022 mobilization round prompted more than 700,000 Russians to flee the country in a matter of weeks, mostly to neighboring ex-Soviet states like Armenia and Georgia. Burakova says requests for help from Russians seeking to escape have increased tenfold in August 2025 compared to May of the same year. For the growing number of Russians hoping to flee repression and conscription, the core question remains unanswered: will the West offer them safe refuge, or send them back to face harm?

  • Are student protests being manipulated ahead of France’s presidential election?

    Are student protests being manipulated ahead of France’s presidential election?

    France’s long, storied tradition of mass public protest is once again taking center stage across the country, as three straight weeks of high school blockades and street demonstrations have widened to include union workers and veteran activists from the decade-old yellow vest movement – opening deep rifts over systemic inequality, fiscal policy and political gridlock just six months before the nation’s next presidential election.

    For years, displays of public discontent have shaped French political life: angry farmers have lobbed manure at municipal buildings to push back against costly regulatory burdens, while frustrated youth in marginalized suburban neighborhoods have clashed repeatedly with riot police. Today, that legacy of protest has been reignited by thousands of secondary school students, who have blocked campus entrances and marched on city streets to voice anger at crumbling infrastructure, overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools and stark educational inequity that disproportionately harms low-income communities in disadvantaged suburbs. This Saturday, a new wave of hundreds of demonstrations is scheduled across the nation, with planned participation from labor unions and prominent figures from the 2018 yellow vest movement, which staged a year of nationwide protests against soaring living costs.

    France’s Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has sparked controversy this week by alleging that the radical left party La France Insoumise (LFI), led by presidential hopeful Jean-Luc Mélenchon, is deliberately manipulating student anger to gain electoral traction ahead of 2027’s presidential vote. “Members of LFI are instrumentalising the high school movement for their electoral advantage,” Lecornu stated this Wednesday, accusing the party of encouraging unrest while performing perfunctory condemnations of violence that erupt during protests. “This hypocrisy damages France.”

    For many protesting students, however, Mélenchon’s platform – which includes a new wealth tax, lowering the voting age to 16, and direct engagement with underfunded schools that most national candidates ignore – has made him a popular figure, with chants of “Mélenchon for President!” common at marches. Prominent yellow vest activist Jérôme Rodrigues, who helped lead the 2018 movement, has publicly urged supporters to join Saturday’s protests, framing the unrest as a fight for basic economic dignity. “Anger has no political party. An empty fridge has no political party,” Rodrigues said in an Instagram video, adding that protesters demand the ability to “live decently, no longer have to count every cent, and no longer have to choose between eating and driving.”

    On the ground in Paris, student protesters say their grievances stretch far beyond electoral politics. Three 17-year-old students blocking their high school entrance in Paris’ 3rd district told reporters that while their campus already suffers from crumbling walls, overcrowded classes and a shortage of teachers, conditions are far worse for peers in poor suburban districts. “France likes to speak of égalité,” they said, “but the reality is the poor here are prejudiced against, while the rich benefit.” Though none will be old enough to vote in next spring’s election, the teens expressed widespread distrust of the political establishment, saying large-scale protest is the only tool left to force authorities to listen to young people. Intergenerational support for the movement is widespread: many mothers have joined marches in solidarity, taking turns to coordinate between student protesters and police after earlier demonstrations saw hundreds injured, including a 15-year-old boy in Lens who lost a hand when police used stun grenades. The French interior ministry has denied accusations of police brutality and has since suspended stun grenade use at high school protests. One participating mother, 37-year-old Gwen, said she does not mind her son missing weeks of classes, noting “It’s a far better education for him to wake up to his civic duty and to fight for what is just in society.” Another 17-year-old protester, Lola, whose mother participated in the historic 1968 May student protests, carried a joint placard with her mother reading “revolution is the most beautiful expression of humanity.” “Now it’s my turn. No point in waiting for the presidential election in France. We want change now,” Lola said.

    Beyond the immediate standoff over student grievances, the unrest lays bare deeper structural crises facing France, the European Union’s second-largest economy: spiraling public debt, a deeply fragmented parliament, a revolving door of prime ministers (six in the last five years alone) and widespread public disillusionment with the status quo. Leading economists have pushed back against widespread speculation that France is approaching a Greek-style 2012 debt crisis, noting that the nation retains the fiscal capacity to address budget shortfalls. “The markets recognised already in 2024 that we would have a budgetary problem after snap elections left parliament deeply divided between three opposing political blocs but they also realise France is a big country with the ability to raise taxes if necessary,” explained Anne-Laure Delatte, a tenured CNRS researcher at Paris Dauphine University and a leading commentator on French public finance. Delatte compared France’s current fiscal strain to the 2023 UK crisis under then-Prime Minister Liz Truss, noting that the crisis was short-lived because markets recognized the UK had the tools to correct course. For France, she said, “it would be painful, but a 4% increase in VAT would raise the 120bn euros needed to plug government debt. Investors know that.” She added that the European Central Bank would likely intervene if France’s fiscal troubles threatened to spill over into other EU economies. Even so, policy moves like tax hikes or cuts to welfare and education spending would likely trigger even deeper public anger, given the widespread discontent already visible on French streets.

    Delatte argued that no new president, regardless of political affiliation, will be able to resolve France’s underlying challenges without systemic constitutional change. The Fifth Republic’s system concentrates power in the presidency, leaving parliament to block initiatives rather than build cross-bloc consensus, she explained. “We need a system where MPs have more power and should learn consensus and coalition-building from our European neighbours,” Delatte said, adding that underfunded, unequal education systems drag on long-term economic growth by stifling innovation and productivity. “Our current system of inequality in schooling and low wages for teachers means we lose out from benefiting from the best and brightest across French society. That is not only unfair on individuals but our economy ultimately loses out on innovation and productivity.”

    Centrist French senator Anne-Catherine Loisier, a member of the Centrist Union in the upper parliament and vice president of the parliamentary group for sciences and technology, said immediate progress can be made by reallocating existing education funding and decentralizing power away from Paris. “Our budgets are limited, but you don’t necessarily need more money. You can make improvements by redistributing funding better. Education is a regional competence in France. Every region should take a look at local needs and address priorities accordingly. That action can be taken immediately,” Loisier said, echoing calls for greater regional power that mirror similar pushes in the UK. “France has traditionally been very Paris-centric but so much could be improved by decentralising the country. My France isn’t broken. We need to give power back to the people. Local governments can look people in the eye directly, so voters feel they have power over their own future, rather than politicians handing them their fate from up high. That way I hope we can restore voters’ – and students’ – faith in politics.”

    The promise of reform is a common refrain from all political factions ahead of next year’s election, but polling across France and much of Europe shows public trust in the political establishment continues to decline, leaving the outcome of the upcoming election – and the future of France’s growing protest movement – far from certain.

  • Irish police social media accounts breached by hackers

    Irish police social media accounts breached by hackers

    A high-profile cyber incident has disrupted official social media channels of Ireland’s national police force, An Garda Síochána, after unauthorized actors gained access to two prominent accounts on the X platform earlier this week to push cryptocurrency promotions. According to Ireland’s national public service broadcaster RTÉ, the compromised accounts — @GardaTraffic, the force’s main account for road safety and traffic updates, and @GardaInfo, a general public information account — had their official Garda branding stripped from their profiles by Wednesday night. The bad actors replaced the original branding and began publishing a stream of posts advertising an unspecified cryptocurrency. Multiple posts were automatically flagged by X’s content moderation systems, which added warnings linking the content to an already suspended third-party profile. The hackers also altered the profile location setting to list Amsterdam, masking the actual origin of the activity. In an official statement released shortly after the breach was discovered, An Garda Síochána confirmed that the unauthorized access was limited exclusively to its two public-facing X accounts. The force emphasized that no internal police data systems were compromised in the incident, and there has been no loss of sensitive police information or disruption to core operational work. A police spokesperson issued a public advisory urging social media users to avoid interacting with any content posted to the two compromised accounts, or any imposter accounts claiming to represent the official Garda channels. “An Garda Síochána continues to carry out our internal enquiries and work with the X platform to understand how this unauthorised access has occurred,” the spokesperson added in the initial statement. By Thursday, the force issued an updated announcement confirming that the two compromised accounts had been successfully recovered and restored to police control. However, officials confirmed the accounts will remain inactive over the coming days to allow the Garda National Cyber Crime Bureau to conduct a full forensic investigation into the incident, identify the attackers, and shore up any security vulnerabilities that allowed the breach. The incident highlights the growing risk of unauthorized access to public institution social media accounts, which bad actors often target to spread misinformation or promote fraudulent schemes to large follower bases.

  • Bus hits train stopped on French side of  Channel Tunnel, with 19 injured

    Bus hits train stopped on French side of Channel Tunnel, with 19 injured

    A traffic incident near the Channel Tunnel’s French entrance in Coquelles, close to Calais, has left 19 people injured after a bus collided with a parked freight train on Saturday evening, according to local French authorities.

    The vehicle involved in the crash was transporting lorry drivers who were scheduled to board a shuttle rail service through the tunnel when the collision occurred at approximately 19:27 local time (17:27 GMT) on the tunnel’s loading platform.

    Agathe Cury, the local sub-prefect, confirmed to reporters that two of the 19 injured people, which include the bus driver and 18 passengers, have sustained severe injuries and were airlifted to nearby medical facilities via helicopter. As of the latest update, none of the injured are reported to be in life-threatening condition.

    Cury also noted that all people affected in the crash are men from multiple different nationalities. Images released by local French newspaper La Voix du Nord show emergency response personnel crowded around the scene, where the damaged bus with visible dents and breaks to its front and side panels is parked alongside the stationary freight train.

    In terms of traffic impact, Cury stated that only a brief pause in both freight and Eurostar passenger transit through the tunnel was ordered, to allow emergency teams to evacuate injured people. Beyond this short suspension, regular traffic flow through the Channel Tunnel was not disrupted in the longer term.

    Eurostar, the high-speed rail service that operates passenger routes through the tunnel between the United Kingdom and mainland Europe, later released an official statement confirming that the crash took place several kilometers from the tunnel proper. The company clarified that the incident does not involve any Eurostar trains traveling to or from London, and all services have continued to operate on schedule as planned.

  • Investigation launched after male body found in County Cork

    Investigation launched after male body found in County Cork

    Irish national police, Gardaí, have opened a full criminal investigation following the discovery of an unidentified man’s body in the County Cork town of Mallow this Thursday. The grim find was made around 1:30 p.m. local time in the Ballyellis area of the town, according to official police statements. Local public broadcaster RTÉ first reported details of the case, confirming the deceased bore visible injuries when he was found. The body was located by members of the public who were using a public walking path that runs along the banks of the River Blackwater, RTÉ added. Forensic teams have left the body undisturbed at the discovery site to preserve all potential evidence ahead of official forensic testing. Investigators have established a dedicated incident command room at Mallow Garda Station to coordinate the probe, and a post-mortem examination has been scheduled to help detectives clarify the cause of death and guide the next steps of their inquiry. As of Thursday evening, authorities had not released any further details about the identity of the deceased or potential persons of interest connected to the case.

  • School headscarf ban sparks rare protests in Azerbaijan and row with Turkey

    School headscarf ban sparks rare protests in Azerbaijan and row with Turkey

    A rare wave of public dissent has swept across Azerbaijan after the government introduced new school uniform rules that bar Muslim girls wearing Islamic headscarves, or hijabs, from entering state classrooms, triggering widespread pushback that has now strained Baku’s long-standing alliance with Turkey.

    The controversy began on October 14, when Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Education began enforcing new uniform regulations approved in late September. The rules ban any clothing that violates the country’s constitutionally mandated secular principles for public education. While the hijab is not explicitly named in the text, enforcement has focused exclusively on turning away female students who wear the religious head covering. Similar restrictions were extended to teachers in early October.

    Footage captured at a Baku school entrance shows a teenage girl in a navy blue hijab confronting a school staff member, asking: “You are telling me, I can’t come to school? Why should I have to give up my religion?” The video, shared widely across Azerbaijani social media, shows a group of fellow hijab-wearing students standing behind her applauding her challenge. Protests quickly erupted outside state schools in the capital Baku, as well as several southern districts including Masally and Jalilabad, concentrated mostly in religiously conservative neighborhoods near the Iranian border.

    Public demonstrations are uncommon in Azerbaijan, a country of 10.5 million people rich in oil and gas reserves, where President Ilham Aliyev has held power since 2003 and tolerates almost no public dissent. The government has a long track record of detaining opposition politicians and independent journalists, and strictly enforces the country’s secular constitutional order.

    Azerbaijan’s geographic and geopolitical position puts it between two powerful neighbors: Turkey, its closest political and military ally, and Iran, which shares a 765-kilometer southern border with Baku. While Azerbaijanis are a Turkic-speaking people with deep cultural ties to Turkey, more than 60% of the population identifies as Shia Muslim, matching the religious identity of majority-Iran.

    Since the protests began, authorities have moved quickly to crack down on demonstrators. Azerbaijan’s Interior Ministry confirmed it had detained 37 people by Monday on charges of obstructing the new rules and “grossly violating public order.” Shahiza Huseynova, a mother who joined protests outside a school in Baku’s Mashtaga district, was detained on Tuesday. In an interview with German-based independent Azerbaijani outlet Meydan TV, Huseynova’s husband Agha said she was given an explicit ultimatum: “Either you take off your child’s hijab and send them to school, or you go to prison.”

    Authorities have also targeted activists organizing alternative support for barred students. On Tuesday, activist Ilkin Huseynov launched an online platform called “Let Leyli Go to School,” which connected students barred from class with volunteer teachers offering free lessons. But on Wednesday afternoon, Huseynov left his Baku home with a group of unidentified men and has not been heard from since; his phone remains switched off, and the platform’s Instagram page was taken down by Thursday. Azerbaijani internet users have also reported being blocked from accessing Instagram and TikTok without a virtual private network, a common tactic Baku uses to restrict access to protest content.

    Azerbaijani officials have defended the new rules, framing the ban as a defense of secular education. “A child has no freedom to choose a religion. This is a conscious prerogative of adults,” ruling party MP Nigar Arpadarai told local outlet 1news.az, arguing that children were being pressured by their families to wear hijabs rather than choosing them of their own free will.

    In recent days, the dispute has spilled across the border into Turkey, creating an unprecedented rift between the two closest allies, who describe their relationship as “one nation, two states.” Turkey provided critical military support to Azerbaijan during its 2020 war with Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, but Ankara has emerged as the most vocal critic of Baku’s hijab ban.

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, a devout Muslim who has campaigned on building a “pious generation” in Turkey, has seen senior members of his ruling AK Party publicly condemn the restrictions. Oktay Saral, Erdoğan’s chief adviser, called the Azerbaijani policy “unacceptable” and urged Baku to “reverse this mistake” in a post on X, writing: “A headscarf is not an obstacle; it is a requirement of one’s faith!” Several AK Party MPs joined in the criticism.

    Small demonstrations have also been organized outside Azerbaijan’s embassy in Ankara and consulate in Istanbul by Turkish Islamist groups. Azerbaijan’s ruling New Azerbaijan Party has hit back, accusing Turkish officials of waging an “openly defamatory” information campaign based on “baseless accusations” and warning that Saral’s comments risk damaging bilateral ties. Baku has repeatedly cautioned Ankara against interfering in its internal affairs, with Aliyev himself saying earlier this month that no one should “stick their noses into our way of life.”

    Geopolitical friction adds another layer of tension to the dispute. Turkish protesters have linked Azerbaijan’s strict enforcement of the hijab ban to Baku’s close diplomatic and economic ties with Israel, which purchases Azerbaijani oil and sells Baku advanced weaponry. Turkey’s own relations with Israel have collapsed in recent weeks over the ongoing conflict in Gaza, leaving Azerbaijan caught in the middle as it tries to maintain good relations with both countries. This delicate balancing act was on display Thursday, when Israeli President Isaac Herzog addressed a regional security summit hosted in Baku – delegations from Turkey, Iran and several other countries walked out of the hall in protest.

    Azerbaijan has long been wary of growing religious influence from Iran, where a larger ethnic Azerbaijani population lives than in Azerbaijan itself. Earlier this week, a pro-Iranian hacker group calling itself the 313 Team (Cyber Islamic Resistance) claimed responsibility for a cyberattack that took down more than 100 Azerbaijani state websites.

  • Seven crew missing after drone attack leaves tanker ablaze off Romania’s coast

    Seven crew missing after drone attack leaves tanker ablaze off Romania’s coast

    A major search and rescue mission is ongoing in treacherous, high-wave conditions off Romania’s Black Sea coast after a pair of drone attacks on commercial chemical tankers left seven crew members unaccounted for, marking the latest escalation in a growing wave of maritime violence targeting shipping in the strategic waterway.

    Early Thursday morning, at approximately 07:00 local time, the San Marino-flagged tanker *Wine Trader* — which was traveling empty from Tunisia to Romania, positioned 13 nautical miles east of the Danube River’s Sulina mouth — reported multiple explosions and an out-of-control fire onboard. Naval officials confirmed five crew members have been accounted for, seven remain missing, and four of those recovered are confirmed alive, with rescuers working against dangerous sea conditions to reach them.

    Romanian President Nicușor Dan confirmed a second tanker, the *Yara J* flying the flag of the Comoros, was also hit by a drone late Wednesday in the same general area. All crew members aboard the *Yara J* escaped unharmed and managed to extinguish the fire that broke out after the strike, the Romanian government confirmed.

    The attacks come on the heels of a similar drone strike targeting merchant shipping further south along neighboring Bulgaria’s Black Sea coast earlier this week. That strike sank one vessel and left 11 crew members missing, prompting Bulgaria to summon Russia’s top diplomatic envoy over the incident, which Bulgarian officials blame Moscow for orchestrating.

    Overnight ahead of Thursday’s attack, Romanian defense officials detected a large swarm of Russian drones operating near Ukraine’s Snake Island, just a short distance from the strike site. Russia has publicly acknowledged targeting two cargo vessels carrying what it calls military cargo bound for Ukraine’s Odesa port, though it did not name the ships hit off Romania’s coast.

    Moscow has repeatedly stated its campaign of maritime strikes in the Black Sea targets vessels delivering weapons and dual-use military goods to Ukraine, which has been the target of a full-scale Russian invasion since 2022. However, Kyiv and Western allies say Russia is deliberately targeting civilian merchant ships, including vessels carrying grain and other essential humanitarian cargo through the Black Sea, a historically critical global trade route for food exports.

    In response to the escalating attacks on NATO allied territory in the Black Sea region, Romanian and Bulgarian leaders are set to discuss whether to trigger Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which allows any alliance member to call for emergency consultations with fellow allies when it believes its territorial integrity or national security is under threat. Dan is scheduled to meet NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in Brussels alongside Bulgarian Prime Minister Rumen Radev in the coming days to discuss growing security risks in the region, with talks expected to center on requests for additional defensive equipment to protect civilian shipping transiting the area.

    “We want to have all the information about what happened, but there will be a response from the Romanian state,” Dan said in comments to reporters following the attack.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has already condemned the escalating maritime violence, saying earlier this week that the Black Sea has become “another front of escalation of the Russian war in Ukraine. This is unacceptable.”

    The recent surge in attacks began last week, when two more ships were struck off Bulgaria’s coast. On the same day, Ukraine struck a Russian oil tanker anchored in the Black Sea port of Sochi. Turkey, which has acted as a mediator in the conflict, has called on both Russia and Ukraine to implement a ceasefire in the Black Sea to protect civilian shipping. Moscow has rejected repeated calls from the United States and European Union for a naval truce, blaming Ukraine for starting the cycle of attacks on commercial vessels in the region. Currently, Russian forces occupy approximately 18 percent of Ukraine’s internationally recognized territory, more than two years after Putin launched the full-scale invasion.

  • Arrests made after couple and two children killed in arson attack

    Arrests made after couple and two children killed in arson attack

    A devastating suspected arson attack on a suburban family home in Waterford, Ireland, has left four people dead and two children fighting for their lives in hospital, with two suspects now in police custody.

    Gardaí, the national police service of the Republic of Ireland, confirmed that a man in his 20s and a woman in her 30s have been taken into custody in connection with the deadly incident, which unfolded on Tuesday. Both suspects are currently being detained at a Garda station in the eastern part of the country as investigators carry out ongoing questioning and evidence gathering.

    The victims have been named locally as Kim English, Philip English, and their two young sons: 12-year-old Callum and 9-year-old Jayden. The blaze broke out at the family’s property on Birch Avenue, located on the outskirts of Waterford, and the four members of the family could not be saved. Two additional children, who were also inside the home when the fire started, were rescued and rushed to a specialist hospital in Crumlin, Dublin, where they remain in critical condition as of the latest updates.

    Forensic post-mortem examinations have already been completed on the four deceased family members, but Gardaí have declined to publicly release the findings of the autopsies, citing operational investigative requirements that prevent the disclosure of sensitive details at this stage of the case.

    Investigating officers have issued a public appeal for any member of the community who may have relevant information about what they are describing as a “murderous attack” to come forward to assist with the probe. Specifically, police have asked any drivers who were traveling in the area around the time of the fire and have dash cam footage from that window to share their recordings, as such material could provide critical evidence to help build the case and clarify the sequence of events leading up to the attack.

  • ‘Utter contempt’ for human life shown in deadly arson attack

    ‘Utter contempt’ for human life shown in deadly arson attack

    The Republic of Ireland is reeling from a devastating act of criminal violence that claimed the lives of an entire family, sparking urgent calls for greater policing resources and action against drug-linked intimidation in the Dáil, Ireland’s national parliament.

    On Tuesday, a deliberately set fire tore through a home on Birch Avenue, on the outskirts of Waterford, killing Kim English, her husband Philip English, and their two young sons — 12-year-old Callum and nine-year-old Jayden. Investigators have linked the deadly arson attack to organized crime and intimidation tied to the illegal drug trade, according to reports from Irish public broadcaster RTÉ.

    Speaking before the Dáil this week, Sinn Féin parliamentarian David Cullinane delivered a scathing rebuke of the criminal networks behind the attack, saying the killings demonstrated utter contempt for human life. Cullinane emphasized that the terror inflicted on the English family is not an isolated tragedy, noting that other households across Waterford now live in fear that they could be targeted next.

    “No family should have to put their children to bed wondering whether someone will set fire to their home,” Cullinane told legislators. “And yet drug gangs and murderous criminals are inflicting precisely that terror on families.”

    The Sinn Féin deputy put forward three key demands for the Irish government: first, to guarantee Waterford has all the policing resources it needs to combat drug-linked criminal intimidation; second, to ensure families that report threats receive the full support they require to stay safe; and third, to launch a formal review of how threat reports and requests for protection are currently managed. Cullinane also called on Ireland’s Justice Minister to address the Dáil next week to outline a plan to tackle drug-related intimidation.

    Cullinane went on to detail the pattern of violence used by these criminal gangs, saying “They threaten children, they assault people, they burn homes, they murder people and they pursue parents, friends and even neighbours for money. This is not debt collection, it is violent criminality and we need to call it for what it is. Vulnerable families and innocent people need to be protected and live safe.”

    Foreign Affairs Minister Helen McEntee, responding on behalf of the Irish government, echoed Cullinane’s condemnation, describing the attack as “appalling and vicious” and extending heartfelt condolences to the relatives of the deceased.

    “It was an appalling and vicious attack on a family who should still be with us today,” McEntee told the Dáil. “This is not debt collection, this is violence, criminality. Debt collection is an absolute scourge on our society and I think we all need to commit to work collectively together to try and stamp it out.”

    McEntee confirmed that the government would commit any additional resources required to bring those responsible for the Waterford attack to justice, noting that drug-linked intimidation is a widespread problem that affects many communities across Ireland. She encouraged residents who receive threats to reach out directly to An Garda Síochána, Ireland’s national police service, which maintains a dedicated unit for countering drug-related criminal activity.

    Both Cullinane and McEntee publicly commended first responders and hospital medical teams who attended to the scene of the fire for their quick response and efforts to save the family.

    In the coming days, the community of Waterford will gather to lay the English family to rest. A funeral mass will be held at 1 p.m. local time on Monday, October 19 at the Sacred Heart Church Parish Centre, followed by burial at Kilbarry Cemetery in Waterford.