标签: Europe

欧洲

  • UK defense secretary quits, says government isn’t willing to spend enough on military

    UK defense secretary quits, says government isn’t willing to spend enough on military

    LONDON – In a sudden shake-up to Keir Starmer’s newly formed Labour government, UK Defense Secretary John Healey stepped down on Thursday, citing the administration’s failure to allocate sufficient military funding to counter mounting global security risks.

    In his formal resignation letter addressed to Prime Minister Starmer, Healey criticized the government’s upcoming Defense Investment Plan, stating that the proposal falls “well short of what is required at this dangerous time” for the United Kingdom and its defense commitments around the world.

    Discussions over the new defense strategy have been mired in internal conflict for weeks. Publication of the plan has already been pushed back multiple times, with multiple government sources confirming deep rifts between the Ministry of Defence and the Treasury over how much public funding should be directed to military upgrades and operations.

    Prime Minister Starmer has already laid out a long-term timeline for increasing UK defense spending: a target of 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027, and a rise to 3% of GDP by 2034. But senior defense figures and military leaders have repeatedly pushed back on this schedule, arguing that the gradual increase is too slow to address the rapidly shifting global threat landscape.

    Healey echoed this criticism in his letter, writing: “You have been unable, and the Treasury has been unwilling, to commit the resources that the nation needs to defend the country at this time of rising threats.” He pointed to a sharp rise in global security demands, specifically naming ongoing tensions from the conflict in Ukraine, persistent aggressive posture from Russia, and escalating instability tied to the ongoing conflict in Iran as evidence of the growing strain on UK military capacity.

    With no path to resolve the funding dispute, Healey concluded, “I am now left with no other option than to submit my resignation as your Defence Secretary.”

    Healey has only held the post of defense chief since the Labour Party won general elections in July 2024, but in his short tenure he earned a reputation as a focused, capable minister widely respected across party lines. He made major contributions to Western security efforts in recent months: he played a central role in expanding international backing for Ukraine’s sovereignty, and led efforts to build a multinational security coalition to guarantee long-term stability for the country if a ceasefire is negotiated. He also spearheaded work to develop an international maritime security task force designed to protect commercial shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy chokepine, amid ongoing instability in the Middle East.

    Healey’s departure marks the latest significant challenge for Starmer, who already faces growing internal pressure from within his own party to step down, adding further political instability to a new government still finding its footing just months after taking office.

  • World ski president Eliasch loses election by one vote and alleges IOC influence

    World ski president Eliasch loses election by one vote and alleges IOC influence

    BELGRADE, Serbia — In a stunning upset that has sent ripples through global winter sports, longtime International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) president Johan Eliasch has been removed from his post by a razor-thin one-vote margin, capping a chaotic campaign that pitted the incumbent against a coalition of traditional skiing powerhouses and elite athletes.

    The Thursday election ended with Alexander Ospelt, a little-known lawyer from the Alpine principality of Liechtenstein, securing a 65-64 victory over Eliasch, a Swedish-British billionaire and owner of global sports equipment brand Head. Ospelt will now take the helm of FIS for a four-year term, after the vote went his way at the governing body’s general congress held in the Serbian capital.

    For Eliasch, the defeat comes with an additional high-profile consequence: he immediately loses his seat in the International Olympic Committee (IOC), one of the most exclusive and influential bodies in global sport. The 64-year-old, who served as FIS president for five years, had previously run for IOC presidency 15 months ago, a race ultimately won by Kirsty Coventry.

    In his immediate concession address, Eliasch made a bombshell allegation against the IOC, claiming the Olympic governing body had interfered to sway the election result. “The IOC tried to influence the outcome of today’s vote. Against this we must stay firm,” he told delegates, before urging FIS to defend its institutional independence and extending congratulations to his opponent.

    The writing was on the wall for Eliasch from the opening moments of the FIS congress, as delegates moved quickly to signal their dissatisfaction with his leadership. By an 88% majority, members voted to rearrange the official agenda and advance the presidential election to the first order of business, an unusual move that reflected widespread discontent. Later, another 60% vote approved a shift from electronic voting to paper ballots, a change widely interpreted as a vote of no confidence in Eliasch’s outgoing administration over transparency concerns.

    Unlike international soccer governing body FIFA’s one-member-one-vote system, FIS uses a weighted voting framework that grants larger, more established skiing nations two or three votes apiece. That structure worked against Eliasch, who had spent half a decade locked in bitter public disputes with the sport’s traditional heartland nations in Europe and North America over his autocratic management style and controversial decisions around spending FIS’s cash reserves.

    Even his home national federations of Sweden and Great Britain refused to back his re-election bid. To comply with FIS nomination rules, Eliasch ultimately secured a nomination and citizenship from Georgia to appear on the ballot. His campaign was opposed by a coalition of leading winter sports nations that secured the backing of many top professional skiers, including American skiing legend Mikaela Shiffrin, one of the most decorated athletes in the sport’s history.

    Under FIS bylaws, Ospelt will not officially take office until one full day after the election, allowing Eliasch to oversee the remaining congress business on his final day in the role. Framing the outcome as a positive result either way in pre-election comments, Eliasch struck a measured tone in his closing remarks. “It’s been a great privilege to serve you,” he said. “Either way I am very happy,” adding that a loss would let him “get my life back.”

    Ospelt, who has served as a member of the FIS Council under Eliasch’s leadership, struck a unifying tone in his first remarks as president-elect. “I will start my new job with great joy and humility,” he said. “I will be the president for all of you. Let’s be united.”

    Unlike his predecessor, Ospelt will not automatically gain IOC membership immediately after taking office. However, as the head of FIS — the governing body that oversees roughly half of all medal events at every Winter Olympic Games — he is widely expected to receive an invitation to join the IOC in due course.

  • Ryanair investigated over charging parents to sit with children

    Ryanair investigated over charging parents to sit with children

    The UK’s top competition regulator has opened a formal probe into budget airline giant Ryanair over its policy of charging parents additional fees to sit alongside their children during flights, triggering a fierce public pushback from the carrier that has labeled the inquiry politically motivated and groundless.

    The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the body responsible for enforcing UK consumer and competition rules, confirmed this month that it is examining whether Ryanair’s standard seat charges—an average of £8 per passenger per one-way trip—violate existing consumer protection legislation. Under Ryanair’s current terms of service, adult passengers traveling with children between the ages of 2 and 11 are required to reserve a paid “mandatory family seat” to sit with their minor travel companions, aligning with the airline’s own policy that requires guardians to be seated next to young children for the duration of a flight.

    A core focus of the CMA’s inquiry is whether Ryanair is wrongfully charging passengers to meet pre-existing safety and accessibility obligations laid out in global and UK aviation regulations. Regulators also noted that Ryanair stands out among major airlines operating out of UK airports as the only carrier that imposes these mandatory charges for family seating. Most other major airlines either automatically assign adjacent seats to families at no extra cost during the booking process or allow guardians to select seats next to children without charging additional fees.

    Ryanair has rejected all of the CMA’s preliminary implications, calling the investigation “bogus” and insisting that its family seating policy adheres fully to all applicable UK and aviation laws. The airline pushed back on the regulator’s description of its pricing structure, clarifying that adults only pay for one reserved seat when traveling with children, while up to four additional children on the same booking can reserve adjacent seats at no cost.

    Beyond defending its policy, Ryanair attacked the inquiry as a political distraction from the current Starmer government’s failure to eliminate Air Passenger Duty (APD), a tax that the airline argues drives up ticket prices for all travelers and suppresses growth across the UK’s aviation, tourism and broader national economy. The carrier said it is confident it will disprove the CMA’s claims over the course of the investigation.

    The CMA is also probing two additional potential consumer protection issues: whether the mandatory family seat fee is “drip-priced” — meaning it is only revealed to customers partway through the booking process, rather than disclosed upfront as part of the total advertised price. CMA Director of Consumer Protection Hayley Fletcher explained that these hidden extra charges can quickly erode the affordability of family summer holidays, a key concern as households across the UK continue to grapple with persistent cost of living pressures.

    “For the past year, we’ve told businesses to ensure their customers are shown the total price upfront – those who don’t face the very real possibility of action from the CMA,” Fletcher said, adding that the investigation is in its early stages and no final conclusion on whether Ryanair broke the law has been reached. If the CMA finds Ryanair violated consumer protection law, the regulator’s new enforcement powers allow it to levy fines of up to 10% of the airline’s global annual turnover.

    Leading UK consumer rights organization Which? has welcomed the CMA’s probe, noting that it has repeatedly raised alarms about Ryanair’s seating policies that separate families unless extra fees are paid, even for children as young as three years old. Rory Boland, Which? Travel Editor, called on Ryanair to proactively change its policy before the investigation concludes. “Ryanair doesn’t have to wait for the outcome of the CMA’s investigation, it could stop charging these unreasonable fees today and we would encourage them to do that,” Boland said.

    The investigation is part of a wider CMA initiative to reduce financial burdens on UK households by cracking down on unfair consumer pricing practices amid ongoing economic pressure.

  • French singer Patrick Bruel charged with rape, attempted rape and sexual assault

    French singer Patrick Bruel charged with rape, attempted rape and sexual assault

    PARIS — One of France’s most celebrated entertainment figures, 67-year-old singer and actor Patrick Bruel, has been charged with multiple counts of rape, attempted rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment spanning an 11-year period from 2008 to 2019, Nanterre’s public prosecutor’s office confirmed in an official announcement Thursday. The celebrity has repeatedly denied all allegations against him.

    The legal process moved forward this week after Bruel completed two days in police custody. On Wednesday, he was brought before four investigative judges at the Nanterre court, located in the western suburbs of Paris, to hear the formal charges. The ongoing formal investigation covers a specific set of documented accusations: a rape allegation from 2008 in Neuilly-sur-Seine, an attempted rape reported in 2010 in Brussels, and multiple counts of sexual assault and sexual harassment that allegedly took place in 2019 in the southern French city of Perpignan and Ajaccio on the island of Corsica.

    Prosecutors added that the judicial inquiry will also expand to examine additional claims of rape, attempted rape and sexual harassment that occurred between 2010 and 2019 across three other French cities and Nyon, Switzerland. Notably, several accusations that were previously closed without further action have been reopened and added to the current case file.

    Following the hearing, Bruel was released from custody but placed under strict conditional judicial supervision. The terms of his release include a ban on exiting French territory, a requirement to surrender his passport to authorities, a mandate to complete ongoing psychological assessment and treatment, and a €500,000 ($576,760) bail payment. He is also prohibited from making any contact with his accusers or their family members, and barred from entering massage parlors — the location where some of the alleged offenses are said to have occurred.

    In a statement released after the hearing, Bruel’s legal team confirmed that their client will fully cooperate with the ongoing investigation and remains compliant with all requests from judicial authorities.

    The case gained public momentum in recent weeks, after French investigative outlet Mediapart published a series of reports highlighting accusations from multiple women against Bruel that date back decades. Those reports prompted additional accusers to come forward and file new formal complaints with authorities. Prosecutors noted that even accusations from other women that fall outside the applicable statute of limitations have been added to the case file, to allow investigating judges to build a full, comprehensive picture of the claims. Complaints filed in other jurisdictions may also be consolidated into the Nanterre-based investigation at a later date.

    A towering figure in French popular culture, Bruel rose to massive fame across the French-speaking world in the late 1980s and 1990s. His unprecedented popularity earned the nickname “Bruelmania” from French media, a comparison to the global Beatlemania frenzy that surrounded the Beatles in the 1960s. Hit tracks from his 1989 second album became enduring staples of French popular music, exploring relatable universal themes of love, heartbreak, nostalgia and childhood that resonated with cross-generational audiences for decades. Alongside his music career, Bruel built a successful parallel acting career, appearing in dozens of French film and television productions over the course of decades. In response to the emerging allegations last month, Bruel canceled all scheduled public performances planned for this summer across France, Canada, Switzerland and Belgium, as well as his end-of-year tour dates in Canada.

  • Pope Leo heads to Canary Islands to highlight perilous journeys of migrants

    Pope Leo heads to Canary Islands to highlight perilous journeys of migrants

    At 19 years old, Bakary Jaiju made an unthinkable choice: leave behind his young wife and infant child in the Gambia, board an overcrowded wooden dinghy, and cross the deadly Atlantic Ocean to Europe in search of a future he could never build at home. For seven terrifying days at sea, the gravity of his gamble sank in with every passing hour. Food and fresh water dwindled to almost nothing, and sleep became a luxury no one dared afford—one wrong move, and a sleeper would tumble into the churning open water.

    “I decided to go, whether I survive or I die, because I want my family to be in a good condition,” Jaiju recalled from his new home in Tenerife, where he finally landed late last year after surviving the crossing. He counts himself among the extraordinarily lucky. In the months since his arrival, hundreds of other migrants have perished attempting the same treacherous journey, their stories ending before they ever reach Europe’s shores.

    This week, the perilous plight of these migrants and the harrowing survival stories of those who make it will take center stage, as Pope Leo XIV kicks off a visit to Spain’s Canary Islands starting Thursday. The Pope’s focus on migration stands in deliberate contrast to the rising rhetoric of a migration “crisis” and “ideological invasion” that has gained traction across much of Europe.

    Recent data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees confirms that overall migrant sea arrivals to Spain have dropped sharply this year, a decline largely attributed to increased EU-funded interception operations off the coast of West Africa. Even so, thousands of desperate people continue to attempt the crossing, and hundreds continue to lose their lives to the Atlantic. During his trip to Gran Canaria and Tenerife, the Pope will push for expanded “safe and legal pathways” for migration, while calling for a deeply humane approach and a “respectful welcome” for those who have already risked everything to reach European borders. He will also honor those who never made it, dropping a wreath of flowers into the ocean off Gran Canaria to commemorate entire boatloads of migrants that vanished without a trace.

    For Jaiju, survival was only the first hurdle. The 160-person boat that carried him—including dozens of women and children—managed to evade the heightened naval patrols off the coasts of Mauritania and Senegal, only to run out of fuel hundreds of miles from shore. They were eventually spotted and rescued off the small Spanish island of El Hierro. After that, Jaiju spent three freezing, grueling months in a migrant reception camp on Tenerife, before he connected with a local integration project that helps him learn Spanish and navigate the process of securing legal residency.

    The project is the brainchild of Padre Pepe, an outgoing local parish priest who eschews a traditional clerical collar for jeans and checked shirts. He noticed a growing gap in support: local authorities only provided care for underage migrants until they turned 18, after which young people were left completely on their own. “But the streets will eat you up, young people are like carrion there,” Padre Pepe explained. Today, his Good Samaritan Foundation provides housing and vocational training for roughly 170 young migrant men, and the priest argues that local labor markets are more than capable of absorbing these workers. “The labour market could absorb all these people, there is huge demand,” he said. Questioning the increasingly hardline attitudes toward migration across the continent, he added: “It’s hard for me to understand why the human heart is so hard. If we do it well, integrate people well, there is nothing bad in it at all. Quite the contrary.”

    Jaiju’s path to legal status has been smoothed by a controversial one-time policy from Spain’s ruling Socialist government led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. The administration is currently allowing hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants who arrived before December 2025 to apply for residence and work permits to regularize their status. Padre Pepe’s team is working around the clock to help as many eligible migrants as possible submit their paperwork before the application deadline closes.

    The policy has drawn fierce condemnation from Spanish opposition groups. The conservative Popular Party has labeled the move “irresponsible” and out of step with EU immigration frameworks, while far-right party Vox has decried it as enabling an “invasion” that will overwhelm the country’s public health system, housing market, and security infrastructure. For the Socialist government, however, the move balances humanitarian principle with practical economic reality: like much of the rest of Europe, Spain faces an aging, shrinking native population and a growing gap in available workers.

    That demand is already visible on the ground in the Canary Islands. At the Domingo Alonso Group, a car dealership and service center in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, managers struggled for months to fill open positions for bodywork painters and panel beaters, unable to recruit local workers. The company partnered with a local government scheme to hire young migrants after they age out of state care, and today the firm employs roughly 30 migrant workers. Initially, the move drew intense backlash online, with critics accusing migrants of “stealing” local jobs, said human resources manager Diana del Molino Rodriguez. “It was a really hard thing to do because immigration was not something seen as positive. Nobody was looking at migrants like persons,” she explained. Today, the program is a success: one of their workers, 19-year-old Tiene Lama from Ivory Coast, earns enough to send hundreds of euros home to his family each month. Dozens of local businesses, including major hotel chains that rely on the islands’ booming tourism industry, have now joined the scheme.

    As Pope Leo works to shift the narrative around migration toward greater compassion, a new EU migration pact is set to take effect this week that will further tighten Europe’s external border controls. The new framework is designed to make it easier to detain and deport migrants who arrive irregularly by sea. For desperate young people like Jaiju, who are already willing to risk death for a better future, policy experts say the new restrictions will do little to deter crossings. Human rights organizations warn the new rules will create new barriers for asylum seekers seeking to have their claims heard.

    The sharpest criticism of the new pact comes from local officials in the Canary Islands, where the policy will be implemented directly. “We have no-one to work in the hotels, drive our buses or work in construction; we don’t have masons or mechanics,” said Francis Candil, the Canary Islands’ deputy minister for welfare. “What we need is a real migration policy that means people from African countries don’t have to risk their lives but can come to Europe and have options for work. Instead, we have Europe trying to protect itself behind walls – and to expel people.”

  • Pope visiting ‘dock of shame’ in Canary Islands where migrants slept in squalor

    Pope visiting ‘dock of shame’ in Canary Islands where migrants slept in squalor

    BARCELONA, Spain — On the final leg of his week-long official visit to Spain, Pope Leo XIV traveled Thursday to the Canary Islands, a Spanish archipelago off the northwest coast of Africa, to honor a long-held wish of his predecessor Pope Francis and shine a global spotlight on the dangerous journey that hundreds of thousands of migrants undertake each year to reach European shores. Positioned far closer to West Africa than to mainland Spain’s Iberian Peninsula, the Canaries have emerged as one of the most pivotal entry points for irregular migration to the European Union, making it a natural epicenter for debates over migration policy across the continent.

    During his two-day visit, the pontiff scheduled a series of engagements: private meetings with migrants who have arrived in the archipelago in recent months, discussions with representatives of Catholic Church outreach groups and humanitarian organizations that provide life-saving aid and integration support for new arrivals, and a solemn commemoration at a site that has become a global symbol of the world’s failure to protect vulnerable migrants: Arguineguin Port, infamously dubbed the “dock of shame” after a 2020 crisis exposed inhumane conditions for displaced people.

    In 2020, a sudden spike in migrant crossings to the Canary Islands overwhelmed local authorities, forcing thousands of new arrivals to camp in open-air makeshift facilities on the port’s dock. For weeks, migrants had access only to basic blankets, with no functioning shower facilities, limited access to food and medical care, and no proper legal support for people seeking international asylum. Many were detained far longer than the 3-day maximum detention period permitted under Spanish law, triggering national outcry. Spain’s national ombudsman eventually ordered the camp closed and all migrants relocated, leaving a permanent stain on the country’s immigration policy reputation.

    Pope Francis, who centered much of his papacy on upholding the biblical call to “welcome the stranger” and made refugee rights a defining policy priority, had long planned to visit the Canary Islands to stand in solidarity with migrants after the 2020 crisis, but he never had the opportunity to make the trip before stepping down. Pope Leo, the first American pope, has carried forward this commitment, emerging as a vocal critic of hardline migration policies both in his home country, where he has pushed back against former President Donald Trump’s mass deportation crackdown, and across the globe.

    Earlier in his Spanish trip, Pope Leo made history by becoming the first pope ever to address the Spanish Parliament, where he delivered a rousing defense of migrant dignity that earned him a seven-minute standing ovation from lawmakers. “The moral greatness of a nation is manifested, above all, in its capacity to accompany, protect and love those lives that are most fragile,” he told the chamber, extending his framing of inherent human dignity to unborn children, the elderly, and people living with terminal illness. Beyond his call for welcome, the pope has pushed for coordinated global action to dismantle human smuggling networks, establish safe, legal migration pathways, and invest in economic development in migrants’ countries of origin to give people the choice to build stable lives at home rather than undertaking dangerous cross-border journeys.

    Spain’s current Socialist-led government has carved out a unique stance on migration relative to many other Western nations, bucking the hardline trend that has taken hold across much of Europe and the United States. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has openly defended liberal immigration policies on both humanitarian and economic grounds, pointing to Spain’s rapidly aging population and chronically low birth rate, which have left critical gaps in the national workforce that immigrant workers can fill. Earlier this year, the administration launched an ambitious regularization campaign that will grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of unauthorized migrants currently living and working in the country.

    Migrant arrivals to the Canary Islands hit a peak of nearly 47,000 people in 2024, but numbers have dropped dramatically in recent years, with just over 2,000 arrivals recorded in the first four months of 2026. Following his visit to the Canaries, Pope Leo will continue his tour of key migration epicenters next month, when he plans to spend U.S. Independence Day on the Italian island of Lampedusa — another major entry point for migrants crossing from North Africa. The visit will echo Pope Francis’ first official trip outside Rome back in 2013, when he traveled to Lampedusa to toss a wreath into the Mediterranean Sea in honor of thousands of migrants who died attempting the crossing, and coined his iconic phrase decrying the “globalization of indifference” that allows the world to turn a blind eye to migrant suffering.

    This coverage from the Associated Press is supported through a collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding provided by Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP retains sole editorial responsibility for all content.

  • What to know about the stabbing that set off fiery riots in Northern Ireland

    What to know about the stabbing that set off fiery riots in Northern Ireland

    BELFAST, Northern Ireland – A brutal street stabbing committed by an asylum-seeking Sudanese man in Northern Ireland has ignited two consecutive nights of violent, arson-fueled rioting, stoked by preexisting anti-migrant rhetoric that has been spreading across parts of the United Kingdom and Europe. The 30-year-old suspect, Hadi Alodid, made his first court appearance at Belfast Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday, where he faced charges including attempted murder, a separate count of threatening to kill, and illegal possession of a bladed weapon.

    According to law enforcement testimony delivered during the hearing, Alodid carried out the attack with a common kitchen knife, leaving his primary victim, Stephen Ogilvie, permanently blinded in the left eye with deep lacerations across the head, face, and back. After the stabbing, while Alodid received medical treatment for a self-inflicted hand wound, he allegedly threatened to kill an attending radiologist. A detective testifying in court shared that Alodid told hospital staff, “I’ve killed someone, I don’t know if they are dead.” To date, investigators have not confirmed a clear motive for the attack, though they have explicitly ruled out terrorism as a driving factor. Alodid declined to secure legal representation through an Arabic interpreter, entered no plea during the Wednesday hearing, and was ordered to remain in custody pending further proceedings.

    The first wave of unrest broke out within hours of the attack on Tuesday, when groups of masked rioters took to Belfast’s streets. The mob set fire to multiple residential properties that they claimed housed migrant families, torched a city bus, and launched a barrage of rocks and other projectiles at responding police officers. Firefighters were forced to carry out dramatic rescue operations to pull trapped residents out of burning homes. By the end of the two days of violence, more than 20 local residents had been left homeless, including African migrant communities already settled in the area. Anselme Shima, a Congolese native who has lived in Belfast for nearly a decade, described the chaos as deeply traumatic. “I’ve lived on my street for almost 10 years, I have a good relationship with my neighbors, but last night was a horrific one,” Shima said. “We don’t know what to do. I’m scared. Seeing this, I’m wondering if I’m next.” Police deployed water cannons to disperse the rioters, who tore bricks and stone chunks from local garden walls and patios to hurl at officers.

    Senior political leaders from both blocs of Northern Ireland’s power-sharing regional government have unanimously condemned the outbreak of violence. First Minister Michelle O’Neill of the Irish nationalist party Sinn Féin labeled the unrest “thuggery,” echoing widespread cross-party rejection of the rioting.

    The current unrest in Belfast mirrors a pattern of anti-migrant violence that has followed recent high-profile stabbing cases across the U.K. over the past two years. Most notably, three young girls were killed in a 2024 stabbing attack at a dance class near Liverpool, which sparked widespread rioting across England and parts of Northern Ireland after false social media claims misidentified the underage suspect as a Muslim asylum seeker. Even after police confirmed the suspect was a British citizen born in Wales, raised by Rwandan Christian parents, violence remained centered on migrant and Muslim communities. The Belfast riots also come just one week after violent clashes between protesters and police in Southampton, which erupted following the sentencing of a man convicted of fatally stabbing university student Henry Nowak.

    In the Southampton case, the stabbing, carried out by Vickrum Digwa, exposed deep tensions over policing and immigration. Judge William Mousley found that Digwa, who used an illegal long dagger after initially carrying a traditional Sikh ceremonial knife, misled police by falsely claiming Nowak had attacked him first, resulting in a life prison sentence. Outrage among far-right groups grew after it was revealed that responding officers, called to the scene of a reported racist assault, misidentified Nowak as the perpetrator. Officers dismissed his dying pleas that he had been stabbed and could not breathe, handcuffing him as he lost consciousness. Nigel Farage, leader of the anti-immigration Reform UK party, seized on the case to promote the far-right talking point of “two-tier policing” – the unsubstantiated claim that British policing systems systematically favor ethnic minorities over white residents. While government officials and police leaders have repeatedly denied the existence of such bias, many independent analysts note that multiple major studies, including a 2022 report on London’s Metropolitan Police, the U.K.’s largest force, have confirmed the force is plagued by widespread institutional racism that disadvantages ethnic minority communities.

    Far-right and anti-immigration activists across social media have actively organized these post-stabbing protests, with prominent international figures amplifying their rhetoric to stoke division. High-profile far-right British activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known by his pseudonym Tommy Robinson, has been a key voice calling protesters to action. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, owner of the social platform X, has amplified the outrage over Nowak’s killing, posting more than 100 times about the case around the time of Digwa’s trial and offering to fund a private prosecution of the local police force. U.S. Vice President JD Vance also waded into the debate, posting on X that the killing was proof of “the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.” U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer pushed back sharply against these foreign interventions, criticizing outside actors “trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.”

    The unrest in Belfast reflects a broader, years-long surge in anti-immigrant sentiment across the U.K. and much of Western Europe, fueled by ongoing political debates over asylum policy, the steady arrival of asylum seekers via small-boat crossings across the English Channel, and rising public pressure on housing and public services.

    Some British anti-immigration political figures have blamed the open border policy between the U.K.’s Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland for allowing Alodid to enter the region. Alodid reportedly traveled from Paris to Dublin before moving north into Northern Ireland, a path made possible by the free movement policy that has been a core pillar of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, the peace deal that ended 30 years of sectarian conflict known as “The Troubles” that killed nearly 3,600 people. “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this man should not have been in this country,” Farage said Wednesday. “He entered the country illegally. And is it any surprise that people in Belfast and elsewhere are scared?”

  • G7 summit at Swiss-French border brings tight security in case violent protests occur

    G7 summit at Swiss-French border brings tight security in case violent protests occur

    GENEVA — Ahead of the upcoming G7 summit set to kick off on Monday near Lake Geneva, French and Swiss law enforcement and border officials are rolling out strict, pandemic-style border controls to counter anticipated large-scale and potentially violent protests against the attending leaders, including former U.S. President Donald Trump. The three-day gathering, which runs from June 15 to 17 in the French lakeside town of Evian-les-Bains, brings together the heads of government from the world’s seven largest advanced economies to deliberate on key global issues ranging from Middle East stability and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine to growing global economic imbalances.

    The threat of unrest stems from a long history of disruptive protests at elite global summits, and local stakeholders in nearby Geneva, Switzerland are determined to avoid a repeat of the violent clashes that damaged downtown storefronts during the 2003 G8 summit, when Russia was still a member of the group. This year, a broad coalition of activist groups has organized demonstrations to channel widespread frustration across multiple flashpoints: from Trump’s policy stances on trade tariffs and Middle East conflicts to perceived inaction on climate change, as well as renewed scrutiny of his past ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    The coalition of anti-capitalist, environmental, feminist, and progressive activist groups, which brands itself the No G7 coalition, framed the gathering as a meeting of global powers that perpetuates exploitation and inequality. “As the G7 meets in Evian, France, to plan the destruction of peoples, the exploitation of life and the domination of bodies, let us organize our resistance against fascism and imperialism,” the coalition said in an official call for large-scale international protest mobilization. The standoff between authorities and activists centers on competing priorities: the right of demonstrators to gather and voice dissent, and the right of residents and businesses to be protected from damage and unrest targeting symbols of political and corporate power.

    In preparation for potential unrest, businesses across central Geneva, a major hub for United Nations and global intergovernmental agencies, have already boarded up their storefronts. Several key institutions, including the World Trade Organization — which was the target of massive anti-globalization protests in Seattle in the 1990s — have closed their downtown offices and ordered all non-essential staff to work remotely for the duration of the summit. While Switzerland is not a G7 member state, the close proximity of Geneva to the summit host town makes it a natural gathering point for traveling activists.

    To coordinate security, the two neighboring nations have signed a new military cooperation agreement tailored to the summit. Because Geneva’s main international airport is 95% surrounded by French territory, all arriving G7 leaders will travel through French-controlled airspace and border checks before entering Switzerland. The Swiss federal government confirmed it will deploy roughly 4,000 armed forces personnel to support local police operations, which include sweeping airspace restrictions, floating patrols across Lake Geneva, and targeted closures on cross-border road routes. Only seven of the 35 existing road border crossings between the two countries will remain open for the week, and Geneva officials have permanently closed a major downtown park that activists had selected as their primary protest gathering spot.

    On the French side of the border, security will be even more stringent: more than 13,000 police and gendarmerie officers will be deployed to secure the summit perimeter, with 800 dedicated border control officers on duty — a major jump from the 60 officers that work the crossing on a typical day. French authorities have implemented a special resident permit system for Evian, a town best known globally for its branded bottled water, and cordoned off a large secure exclusion zone around the Hotel Royal, where G7 leaders will hold their closed-door meetings. Only one pre-authorized protest march has been approved, scheduled for June 14 ahead of the summit’s official start, and all unapproved public gatherings are banned for the week.

    Not all observers agree that the harsh security measures are justified. Cedric Dupont, a professor of international relations at the Geneva Graduate Institute, argues that authorities are overreacting to the protest threat, pointing to widespread economic disruption and long border delays similar to those experienced during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. “It seems that they have not learned the lesson,” Dupont said, noting that protesters can easily enter Geneva from other regions of Switzerland regardless of border restrictions. “It’s just creating more problems than actually solving them.”

    The restrictions are already set to upend daily life for cross-border communities. According to the French Foreign Ministry, more than 110,000 commuters cross the France-Switzerland border daily to work in Geneva. French officials have advised all residents to cancel non-essential travel to the region and work from home where possible. Commuter ferry crossings across Lake Geneva that normally stop in Evian have been rerouted to other docks outside the restricted zone, though authorities have confirmed recreational activities such as swimming and paddleboarding will remain permitted in non-restricted areas as the summer tourist season gets underway. To offset expected economic losses for local businesses, the Geneva cantonal government has allocated a 6 million Swiss franc ($7.6 million) compensation fund for any properties damaged during protests. Officials have acknowledged that violent unrest cannot be ruled out entirely, even with the sweeping security measures in place.

  • The ‘King of the North’ seeks a path to becoming Britain’s next leader in a special election

    The ‘King of the North’ seeks a path to becoming Britain’s next leader in a special election

    Deep in the former coal-mining belt of northwest England, 75,000 eligible voters in the Makerfield constituency are preparing to cast ballots that hold the potential to upend the entire trajectory of British national politics. Scheduled for June 18, this special House of Commons by-election is no ordinary midterm vacancy contest: it could elevate a new prime minister to power, deepen the political chaos roiling the nation’s ruling party, or even deliver both outcomes in one blow.

    For decades, this working-class district has been an unshakable stronghold of the center-left Labour Party, holding Labour representation for 120 consecutive years. But this year, the race is anything but predictable, drawing global media attention rarely seen for a single parliamentary by-election. At the center of the contest is Andy Burnham, the wildly popular mayor of Greater Manchester, who has been dubbed the “King of the North” for his regional popularity and independent political brand. Burnham, who is running as Labour’s candidate, needs a parliamentary seat to mount a leadership challenge against embattled incumbent Prime Minister Keir Starmer—whose tenure has been marked by stumbling performance, sinking approval, and growing calls for his resignation from within Labour’s own ranks.

    Starmer’s Labour government, which swept to power in July 2024, has failed to deliver on core campaign promises of economic growth, repaired public services, and relief from the country’s persistent cost-of-living crisis. A series of high-profile missteps—including the controversial appointment of scandal-linked Peter Mandelson as U.S. ambassador—have compounded the party’s woes. Last month’s abysmal local election results triggered open mutiny among Labour lawmakers, forcing cabinet minister Wes Streeting to resign to prepare for an impending leadership contest. A win for Burnham in Makerfield would clear his path to challenge Starmer, making a leadership change that would install him as Britain’s next prime minister almost a foregone conclusion, political analysts say.

    Standing in Burnham’s way is Reform UK, the hard-right anti-immigration party led by veteran populist Nigel Farage. Last month, Farage’s party shocked the political establishment by taking 24 of 25 up-for-grabs local council seats in the Makerfield area, signaling a dramatic erosion of Labour’s longstanding hold on the region. Reform’s candidate, local plumber and sitting councilor Rob Kenyon, is framing the race as a rejection of a failing Labour establishment, tapping into deep voter frustration over the UK’s recent immigration surge. The contest comes as immigration has reemerged as the most polarizing issue in British politics, fueled by high annual net migration in recent years and fresh unrest following a stabbing attack in Belfast that sparked violent arson protests.

    On the ground in Ashton-in-Makerfield, the constituency’s main town, many voters echo Reform’s narrative that record immigration has stretched public housing, healthcare, and other local services to breaking point, with working-class taxpayers bearing the cost. “Immigration’s too high, all the services are being put under pressure and Labour just keep inviting more and more people into the country and it’s the taxpayer who has to pay for them,” said retiree Phil Arrowsmith, one of a growing number of long-time Labour voters abandoning the party in this election. Long-time Makerfield resident Shirley Prior summed up the widespread disillusionment with the status quo: “I think they’re all a waste of time,” she said of the field of candidates, noting she abandoned her family’s generations-long Labour voting pattern years ago.

    Burnham, who has served as Greater Manchester’s mayor since 2017, is leaning hard into his successful regional record to win over skeptical voters. Under his leadership, post-industrial central Manchester has experienced an economic boom, with new skyscrapers transforming once-blighted former factory sites. He won widespread praise for bringing the region’s fragmented public transport system under municipal control as the Bee Network, delivering cheaper, more reliable service for commuters. Though he served 15 years as a Labour MP and cabinet minister before entering regional office, he leans into his “outsider” brand, positioning himself as a leader who can deliver tangible change that London’s political establishment has failed to deliver. “What we’ve built in Greater Manchester needs to go national,” Burnham told reporters at a recent campaign stop. “I know what it is to turn places around.”

    Burnham has acknowledged the deep anger driving support for Reform, calling the party’s rising local support a “cry for real change” that Labour cannot ignore. Even so, he faces a steep uphill battle to hold the seat, with even long-time Labour supporters admitting the unpopularity of Starmer’s national government will make the contest close. Retired teacher and Labour backer Michael Poultney noted that without Burnham’s personal local popularity, the party would struggle to hold the seat. “Keir Starmer has done reasonably well on the international stage, but the government are yet to be in control of the economy,” Poultney explained.

    Burnham for his part has refused to take victory for granted, insisting he is focused on representing Makerfield constituents rather than his national leadership ambitions. “I am making no assumptions beyond the 18th of June,” he said, though he acknowledged the historic stakes of the contest: “this is a change by-election. I will take the fight for the changes I want to see in politics as far as I can take it.” With national leadership hanging in the balance, all eyes of British and global politics will be on this small corner of northwest England when polls open next week.

  • Watch: Thousands fill Barcelona streets for Pope Leo visit

    Watch: Thousands fill Barcelona streets for Pope Leo visit

    Barcelona’s central streets were flooded with thousands of excited attendees this week, as Pope Leo XIV made a high-profile stop at the city’s world-famous Sagrada Família basilica during his seven-day official visit to Spain. The historic landmark, a UNESCO World Heritage Site known for its one-of-a-kind Antoni Gaudí architecture, served as the centerpiece of the pontiff’s itinerary during the Catalan stop of the trip. Crowds lined the thoroughfares leading up to the basilica from early morning, waiting for hours to catch a glimpse of Pope Leo XIV as his motorcade made its way to the iconic site. The week-long visit to Spain marks a key moment in papal engagement with the country’s Catholic community, with the Sagrada Família stop drawing one of the largest public gatherings of the entire trip. Local authorities had deployed enhanced security measures to accommodate the massive turnout, while organizers reported that the crowd remained peaceful and enthusiastic throughout the pontiff’s time at the basilica.