标签: Asia

亚洲

  • ‘High risk’ of lake breaching and causing second flood, warns China

    ‘High risk’ of lake breaching and causing second flood, warns China

    A new and urgent threat has emerged along the Nepal-Tibet border just days after a catastrophic glacial collapse triggered a deadly flash flood, with Chinese authorities warning that a newly formed barrier lake faces a “high risk” of bursting its natural debris dam and unleashing a second catastrophic downstream deluge. The new water body formed upstream from the site of Wednesday’s deadly flood, which glaciologists and disaster researchers confirm was sparked when a large section of a mountain glacier near Langtang Lirung peak broke free and crashed into a river below.

    As of Friday morning, state broadcaster CCTV reports that approximately 2.5 million cubic meters of water have already collected behind the debris dam that created the barrier lake – a natural water formation that occurs when landslide or glacial debris blocks a river channel. Officials added that an additional 3 million cubic meters of water is projected to flow into the lake between Thursday and the end of the weekend, pushing the structure far past its capacity and creating extreme conditions for a potential breach. The Chinese Ministry of Water Resources confirmed that the lake, located at the intersection of the Chhochen Khola and Purepu Tsangpo rivers, has already begun overflowing its dam, and the region has been battered by unseasonably heavy rainfall that is worsening the already unstable situation.

    In response to the unfolding emergency, authorities have deployed specialized engineering teams to conduct round-the-clock monitoring of water levels, geological stability, and local atmospheric conditions. However, access to the high-risk site remains severely limited. Friday morning’s CCTV report noted that the bulk of Chinese emergency response teams are currently stranded roughly seven kilometers from Gyirong Port, the critical overland border crossing between China and Nepal that was heavily damaged in Wednesday’s flood. The ongoing non-stop overflow of the barrier lake has created immediate risks of new flash floods and debris flows, forcing officials to temporarily pause all search and rescue operations for victims of the initial disaster across the border region.

    The barrier lake sits in the same high-altitude region as Langtang Lirung, the mountain where the original glacial collapse originated, and is located several kilometers upstream from the damaged Gyirong Port. In a separate warning issued in Kathmandu, Nepali authorities have also flagged growing risks of additional flooding along the Bhote Koshi and Trishuli rivers, where new debris blockages could form and trigger sudden surges. Officials have urged all residents and visitors in river basins across the region to stay clear of waterways until further official notice that the threat has passed.

    The initial flash flood on Wednesday has already left a devastating toll across the region. Hundreds of people have been confirmed dead in Nepal, with hundreds more still unaccounted for. On the Tibetan side of the border alone, more than 550 people remain missing, nearly half of whom are foreign nationals. Scientists have emphasized that the glacial collapse that triggered this disaster is consistent with growing risks of glacial outburst floods across the Himalayan region, as rising global temperatures destabilize high-altitude ice formations. Chinese state media has also released aerial footage of the newly formed barrier lake to document the ongoing emergency for the public.

  • US, South Korea and Japan to hold trilateral drill as North Korea ramps up pressure on US

    US, South Korea and Japan to hold trilateral drill as North Korea ramps up pressure on US

    In the wake of fresh North Korean threats of retaliation against perceived U.S. aggression, senior South Korean government officials confirmed Friday that the United States, South Korea, and Japan will move forward with a planned trilateral military exercise next month, aimed at strengthening collective defense capabilities against Pyongyang’s growing nuclear and missile threats. This development has significantly dampened hopes that diplomatic negotiations between North Korea and the United States could resume in the near term, even after former U.S. President Donald Trump took a seemingly conciliatory step by ordering a major cutback to the long-standing bilateral military exercise between Washington and Seoul.

    South Korea’s Defense Ministry announced in an official statement that the five-day “Freedom Edge” exercise will kick off September 7 in international waters off the southern Korean island of Jeju. Military officials emphasize that the drill is strictly defensive in its purpose, designed to sharpen coordinated responses to North Korean nuclear and missile provocations while upholding peace and stability across the Northeast Asian region. Launched in 2024, the Freedom Edge drill integrates simultaneous air and naval operations to upgrade allied capabilities in key strategic areas including joint ballistic missile defense, anti-submarine warfare, and cross-border surveillance coordination.

    North Korea has long condemned this trilateral exercise as a reckless, confrontational demonstration of military power. Pyongyang has further claimed that the drill also serves a hidden U.S. agenda: to encircle China and exert strategic pressure on Russia amid current global geopolitical shifts. Just one day before South Korea’s confirmation of the drill, Pyongyang issued a new vow to retaliate against what it frames as unrelenting U.S. hostile actions. On Thursday, North Korea’s Foreign Ministry reiterated that accusation, pointing to a planned U.S. sale of air-to-air missiles and associated military equipment to South Korea as a fresh example of aggression, warning that Pyongyang would deliver a “serious, immediate and powerful response” to such hostile moves across multiple domains.

    This latest escalation comes on the heels of a scaled-back bilateral exercise between the U.S. and South Korea. Last week, Washington and Seoul cut their annual Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise six days short of its scheduled conclusion, following Trump’s order to substantially reduce the scope of drills that North Korea has long decried as a rehearsal for a full-scale invasion of the country. Trump justified the cutback by citing his positive personal relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, framing the move as a goodwill gesture to open the door for renewed diplomacy.

    However, Pyongyang rejected the overture outright, arguing that simply shortening the drill does nothing to alter its “provocative, aggressive nature.” In a direct show of defiance, North Korea launched roughly 10 short-range ballistic missiles into the sea, carrying out a threat it had issued earlier to respond to the bilateral exercise.

    Since the collapse of the first round of U.S.-North Korea diplomatic talks in 2019, Kim Jong Un has systematically expanded North Korea’s nuclear arsenal, deepened the country’s strategic alignment with Russia amid its ongoing war in Ukraine, and strengthened both his military and diplomatic standing globally. Regional security experts note that Kim now holds far greater leverage in any potential negotiations, and is likely to demand major concessions from Washington: formal international recognition of North Korea as a legitimate nuclear weapons state, and full relief from crippling international economic sanctions, in exchange for only partial rolling back of Pyongyang’s nuclear program. Pyongyang has repeatedly stated it will not return to diplomatic talks until the U.S. drops its insistence on North Korean denuclearization as a precondition for negotiations.

  • Trump’s Africa envoy condemns Chad strikes, ‘external support’ in Sudan war

    Trump’s Africa envoy condemns Chad strikes, ‘external support’ in Sudan war

    Three years into Sudan’s devastating civil conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the breakaway Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the war has spilled across international borders, drawing formal condemnation from Washington and exposing deep rifts in international diplomatic efforts to end the crisis.

    On Thursday, Massad Boulos, U.S. President Donald Trump’s special envoy for African affairs, issued a public rebuke of the SAF via the social platform X, after Chadian government officials reported bombings in the country’s eastern Ennedi region carried out by Sudan’s military last week.

    “The United States condemns the SAF’s recent air strikes inside Chad,” Boulos wrote. “The violence must stop in Sudan and beyond. There is no military solution to this conflict—and absolutely no justification for expanding the violence beyond Sudan’s borders.”

    Boulos called on both warring factions to immediately implement a humanitarian truce, step up protections for civilian populations, and grant full, unobstructed access for humanitarian aid groups delivering life-saving support to millions of people displaced by the conflict. He also urged the United Nations Security Council, where the U.S. holds veto power, to tighten existing arms embargoes and expand sanctions against parties fueling the fighting. In a key demand, he called for an immediate end to all external financial and military backing for the SAF and RSF, though he notably did not name the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – a major power accused of arming the RSF – nor provide any explanation for why the SAF launched the cross-border strikes.

    Multiple reports have already linked the UAE to the RSF’s war effort: the United Nations has confirmed the Gulf state routes weapons shipments to the paramilitary group via Chadian territory, and reporting from Middle East Eye has documented how Chad forms the core of the UAE’s logistics network supplying the RSF. The UAE’s overt role in the conflict has been so consequential that Mohamed Abdulla Idris, Sudan’s ambassador to the U.S., said last year that Khartoum would reject any peace negotiation that includes Abu Dhabi as a mediator.

    “It’s unacceptable to us,” Idris told reporters. “The United Arab Emirates is a party to the conflict, so it cannot play both roles – become a party, and then become a mediator, no.”

    For its part, the SAF has defended its cross-border strike, saying it acted to protect Sudan’s “sovereignty, security, and safety” when it targeted a military convoy inside Chadian territory last week. In response to the incursion, Chadian security officials raised the country’s threat alert to the maximum level and deployed 100 armored vehicles along with drone-jamming technology to the eastern border shared with Sudan, according to a Chadian security source who spoke to Reuters.

    Boulos’s condemnation quickly drew pushback from regional experts, who criticized the statement for being one-sided and ignoring longstanding accusations that Chad has allowed its territory to be used to supply the RSF. Cameron Hudson, an Africa specialist and former U.S. State Department official, responded directly to Boulos’s post on X, asking: “Why hasn’t he condemned Chad allowing its territory to be used to arm the RSF for the last several years? Statements like this do absolutely nothing to advance a diplomatic solution.”

    The rebuke also comes amid growing scrutiny of the failure of U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to resolve the Sudan conflict. Back in February, Boulos announced that the U.S. had finalized a comprehensive peace plan for Sudan’s civil war, drafted with the approval of the so-called Quad – a quartet of regional and global powers including the U.S., Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt formed to coordinate peace efforts. The Quad first unveiled a framework roadmap to end fighting between the SAF and RSF last September, and Boulos said at the time the full, detailed peace plan had been three months in the making and would be publicly unveiled in mid-February, claiming it would be acceptable to both warring parties.

    To date, the plan has never been released. When pressed by reporters, Boulos declined to name the specific obstacles or parties blocking the plan’s release, only describing it as “quite comprehensive.” The five-pillar plan was structured to address the immediate humanitarian crisis, protect civilians and coordinate their safe return to displaced areas, establish a permanent ceasefire, launch a political transition to a civilian-led government, and set up a dedicated reconstruction fund, Boulos previously said, naming the UK, Norway, and Egypt as key partners working on the transition framework.

    The U.S. has long been careful to avoid straining bilateral relations with the UAE over its role in the Sudan conflict, a dynamic that has undermined Washington’s credibility as a neutral broker, analysts say.

  • Death toll from flash floods rises with rescuers in Nepal and China working to find hundreds missing

    Death toll from flash floods rises with rescuers in Nepal and China working to find hundreds missing

    KATHMANDU, Nepal – Authorities confirmed Friday that the death toll from catastrophic flash floods striking the Nepal-China border region has climbed to 469, as rescue teams race against time to locate hundreds of unaccounted-for people still missing in the disaster zone. Just two days prior, officials had reported a combined death toll of 393 across Nepal and China’s Tibet Autonomous Region, with more than 1,400 people listed as missing across both areas in the wake of the Wednesday disaster.

    Nepalese government officials report that hundreds of trapped people have already been pulled from flood and debris wreckage by rescue teams. Dozens of injured survivors are currently receiving inpatient medical care in Nepal’s capital city of Kathmandu. Among those still unaccounted for are foreign nationals from multiple countries, including numerous long-distance trekkers and religious pilgrims who were visiting the sacred Himalayan region when the floods hit.

    Graphic photographs and footage from the hardest-hit areas paint a devastating picture of the destruction. In Nepal’s Nuwakot district, one of the worst-impacted regions, entire buildings and public streets are coated in thick layers of mud, tangled debris is caught in tree branches, and dazed survivors covered in silt wait for aid. On the Chinese side of the border, in Tibet’s Shigatse prefecture, a major two-lane riverside highway was completely buried by rushing mud and rock. Aerial surveys have also documented a newly formed, expanding natural lake trapped behind debris at the border, with officials issuing urgent warnings that the debris dam could fail and trigger a second catastrophic flood.

    For families connected to the region living thousands of miles away, the disaster has brought unbearable grief. Rajan Tamang, a restaurant owner based in New York City, shared that he received word from relatives in Kathmandu that his mother and sister were among the confirmed fatalities, while dozens more family members and friends remain unaccounted for. “My family was just waking up, and they didn’t even get any warning, and suddenly this flood came. Some of them are missing, some lost their lives, only a few survived,” Tamang told the Associated Press after a memorial vigil held for victims in New York.

    As of the latest update, around 90 U.S. citizens are still unaccounted for in the aftermath of the floods, according to related U.S. official reports. The disaster has also drawn renewed international attention to the growing risks of glacial outburst events in the warming Himalayan mountain range, a threat that scientists have warned about for decades.

    U.S. President Donald Trump commented on the scale of the destruction during a press meeting at the White House, noting that the flood damage was “terrible to see,” adding that even “strong, well-built buildings were wiped out like they were toothpicks.” Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump confirmed that U.S. officials had spoken with Nepalese government leadership and that the U.S. has extended an open offer to provide “anything they want” in terms of disaster relief and recovery support.

    Researchers who have analyzed recent satellite imagery of the region have pinpointed the root cause of the disaster: the collapse of bedrock beneath a high-altitude Himalayan glacier. The collapse pulled a large portion of the glacial ice down with it, sending a surge of rock, debris and melted glacial water into the river valleys below. The resulting torrent, which at points reached several stories in height, swept away buildings, bridges, and entire swathes of riverbank as it rushed downstream into populated border areas.

  • Australia rests captain Harry Wilson for the 1st rugby test against Argentina

    Australia rests captain Harry Wilson for the 1st rugby test against Argentina

    SAN SALVADOR, Argentina — Ahead of Australia’s opening rugby test match against the Los Pumas this Saturday, new Wallabies head coach Les Kiss has made a surprising but strategic call: omitting long-time starting skipper Harry Wilson from the match-day squad and handing the captain’s armband to prop Allan Ala’alatoa for the fixture.

    Wilson first took over the captaincy under former Wallabies head coach Joe Schmidt, and he retained the leadership role through the start of Kiss’s tenure, leading the side in two recent test matches against Japan. Despite the change for this weekend’s clash, Kiss has emphasized that Wilson still retains his full confidence, and the exclusion is purely a planned rest to manage the backrower’s workload.

    Australia is set to face Argentina across back-to-back test matches over the next two weekends, with the second fixture scheduled to take place in Mendoza. In Wilson’s absence, Rob Valetini will step into the backrow position alongside Fraser McReight and Tom Hooper, while Charlie Cale has earned a spot on the replacements bench. Carlo Tizzano, by contrast, has been left out of the 23-player match-day squad entirely.

    Speaking to reporters after confirming his team selection, Kiss reaffirmed his faith in Wilson as the team’s top leadership option. “Harry’s the man — he remains my preferred captain,” Kiss stated.

    The coach went on to praise the core leadership traits Wilson has brought to the Wallabies throughout his captaincy, highlighting his emotional investment in the side, sharp on-field rugby IQ, strong work ethic, and widespread respect among the playing group. “The responsibility of that is massive, but I don’t want it to be a weight,” Kiss explained, noting that the congested international test calendar leaves Wilson fully deserving of a scheduled break to refresh ahead of upcoming fixtures.

  • US missile interceptor shortfall ‘beyond critical’ due to war on Iran: Report

    US missile interceptor shortfall ‘beyond critical’ due to war on Iran: Report

    Multiple recent media reports have laid bare severe, critical shortfalls in the United States’ advanced weapons stockpiles, driven largely by months of ongoing military operations against Iran, with ripple effects that threaten defense capabilities across Europe, Ukraine and other global hotspots. According to an Associated Press investigation published Thursday, two senior officials – one from NATO and one from the U.S. government – confirmed that stockpiles of advanced missile interceptors, particularly the widely deployed Patriot systems, have fallen to dangerously low levels after widespread use of the systems to down Russian ballistic missiles.

    The U.S. official told AP that U.S. military assets stationed in Europe lack sufficient Patriot interceptors to repel a sustained ballistic missile assault, with even defensive capabilities against a single large-scale strike reduced to “very limited” capacity. The current conflict traces back to February 28, when the U.S. and Israel launched joint military strikes against Iran. While a June ceasefire was negotiated via the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the two warring parties, heavy fighting has continued to escalate through the summer months.

    Many defense analysts have pointed to a miscalculation by the Trump administration: fueled by Israeli promises of a swift regime change in Tehran and the successful U.S. capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro earlier in 2025, President Donald Trump reportedly expected a quick, decisive victory over Iran. Instead, Tehran responded with a widespread barrage of drone and missile attacks targeting U.S. partner states across the Persian Gulf, forcing the U.S. to reposition critical air defense systems and troop deployments away from East Asia to shore up its Middle East presence.

    The AP’s revelation of depleted Patriot stocks has sparked urgent new concerns about the vulnerability of NATO member states in Eastern Europe to potential Russian aggression. Just this week, The Wall Street Journal reported that CIA Director John Ratcliffe made a high-profile trip to Moscow, with a key goal of the visit being to warn Russian President Vladimir Putin against launching any offensive strike against NATO alliance members.

    The stockpile shortage extends far beyond defensive interceptors, however. Ukraine, which continues to defend itself against full-scale Russian invasion, has relied heavily on U.S.-supplied ATACMS medium-range ballistic missiles to strike Russian targets behind enemy lines. The AP confirmed that U.S. stockpiles of ATACMS are also running critically low, echoing an earlier Reuters report from this month that warned the U.S. had already exhausted most of its stockpile of sophisticated long-range offensive missiles during its war on Iran.

    Just weeks ago, President Trump alternated between threats to unleash the “biggest attack” on Iran since World War II, before backing away from direct large-scale offensive action and shifting to new threats of expanded economic sanctions. Citing two anonymous defense sources, Reuters reported that the U.S. has depleted “virtually all” of its stockpiles of surface-to-surface weapons, including both ATACMS and the newer Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). These long-range precision weapons are a core component of U.S. military doctrine, allowing forces to strike enemy targets with high accuracy from distance without putting crewed warplanes at risk of enemy air defense systems.

    To cover the shortfall from Middle East operations, U.S. Central Command, which oversees all military activity in the region, has been forced to reallocate existing missile stockpiles from other global operational theaters, according to the Reuters report. The interceptor shortage predates the current 2025 open conflict: even before large-scale ground and air operations against Iran, the U.S. had already drawn down interceptor stockpiles to defend Israel during June 2025 fighting that ended with U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

    While the Trump administration spent months publicly claiming that Iran’s entire integrated air defense network had been destroyed during the conflict, independent outlet Middle East Eye and other media organizations have confirmed that Iran has received large numbers of new advanced air defense systems from both China and Russia to replace damaged or destroyed infrastructure.

    The financial and material cost of the war on Iran extends beyond missiles, too. Around two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported that more than $1.3 billion worth of U.S. MQ-9 Reaper surveillance and strike drones have been destroyed or rendered unusable during the conflict – a loss equal to roughly 25% of the entire U.S. pre-war Reaper fleet. That figure is slightly higher than an earlier May estimate from Bloomberg, which placed the total loss at 20% of the pre-war inventory.

    As documented by the U.S. Air Force, MQ-9 Reapers are high-altitude unmanned aerial vehicles valued between $30 million and $50 million each, depending on their customized sensor, radar and weapons configuration. The drones are designed to carry out long-endurance surveillance, reconnaissance missions and precision targeted strikes, and can be armed with Hellfire air-to-surface missiles or Joint Direct Attack Munition guided bombs.

  • Rohingya refugees face fierce new wave of hostility in Malaysia

    Rohingya refugees face fierce new wave of hostility in Malaysia

    Nine years ago, then-Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak stood as a public advocate for the Rohingya, a stateless Muslim minority that fled systematic violence and discrimination in Myanmar. “We must defend them, not just because they are of the same faith, but because they are humans, their lives have value,” Razak declared in 2017. Today, that commitment has evaporated, replaced by a surging wave of anti-Rohingya hostility that has upended the fragile safety the community spent years building in the Southeast Asian nation.

    For Rohingya children, who have long been barred from enrolling in Malaysia’s public education system, even the simple act of attending classes has become fraught with risk. That is the reality described by Irhan, a Rohingya refugee who established a community learning center for 6- to 15-year-old children in northern Malaysia (his name has been changed to protect his safety). Last month, eight uniformed police officers raided Irhan’s center, photographed the students, and ordered multiple children to return home immediately. “The students are just here to learn. Now their families are afraid,” Irhan explained.

    Across the country, other unlicensed community-run learning spaces, the only educational option available to most Rohingya children, have been targeted by crackdowns. A center in the western state of Selangor suspended operations for a full month, and when it reopened in late July, it imposed strict new rules: students may not wear school uniforms, and must leave immediately after classes end, with no lingering or group gathering allowed. “We’re keeping a low profile to protect our students from getting attacked,” said Farooq, a Rohingya teacher at the center.

    Crackdowns on Rohingya communities are uneven, widely driven by shifting public anger, and have already forced dozens of learning centers to close permanently in recent months. Beyond education, Rohingya families that have lived in Malaysian villages for years are now being forcibly evicted. Local residents have repeatedly claimed to Malaysian media that allowing the refugees to stay would lead to unspecified “social problems.” Most recently, 120 Rohingya—more than half of them children—were left homeless after eviction from a fishing village near Penang. When the group sought shelter outside the Kuala Lumpur office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), they were taken into temporary detention by authorities.

    For a community that has already survived decades of persecution, this new wave of uncertainty has reinstated a constant state of fear. “In the early years, the Malaysians were our friends. They cared for our children. But it’s changed,” Irhan said. The refugee, who first arrived in Malaysia as a teenage asylum seeker in 2001, added, “I would leave if I could, but where else can I go? We are not wanted anywhere.”

    ### Background of a Global Displacement Crisis
    The UNHCR estimates that more than 126,000 Rohingya currently reside in Malaysia, making the country the world’s second-largest host for the displaced community, after Bangladesh. Human rights groups believe the actual number is far higher, as thousands arrive via unregulated sea crossings.

    The Rohingya’s crisis stems from their disenfranchisement in their home country, Myanmar. A majority-Buddhist nation, Myanmar has refused to grant citizenship to the Rohingya, who trace centuries of ancestral roots in Rakhine State. Successive governments have instead labeled the group as illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh. Decades of simmering ethnic tension exploded into a brutal 2017 military crackdown, when Myanmar’s military killed thousands of Rohingya, raped women and girls, and burned hundreds of Rohingya villages to the ground. The UN labeled the campaign “textbook ethnic cleansing,” and the Biden administration later formally designated it a genocide. Myanmar currently faces a landmark genocide case at the International Court of Justice, where former leader Aung San Suu Kyi—who was widely criticized for downplaying the 2017 violence—testified on the country’s behalf.

    After the 2017 crackdown, more than 1 million Rohingya fled to neighboring Bangladesh. But overcrowded refugee camps, rising violence, and declining international aid pushed thousands to undertake deadly, smuggling-led sea voyages across the Andaman Sea to Malaysia. Thousands have died en route on overcrowded, unseaworthy fishing vessels.

    While Malaysia has never formally granted legal status to asylum seekers—leaving refugees with no formal right to work, housing, or education—the majority-Muslim nation was long viewed by the Rohingya as a relatively safe haven, aligned with its leaders’ past rhetoric of solidarity. That welcome began to erode during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Rohingya were falsely blamed for spreading the virus and accused of stealing jobs from local Malaysians. Petitions calling for mass deportations spread rapidly across social media, and Malaysian authorities turned away hundreds of Rohingya asylum seekers who had been stranded adrift at sea for weeks.

    ### A Surge in Organized Vitriol
    Today, that anti-Rohingya sentiment has returned with far greater intensity, fueled once again by viral social media misinformation. In May, unsubstantiated claims that Rohingya improperly disposed of animal remains after the Eid al-Adha holiday went viral, quickly snowballing into false, exaggerated claims that the community was demanding automatic Malaysian citizenship, seeking political power, and planning to “take over” the country. One online petition calling for the removal of all Rohingya from Malaysia gathered more than 420,000 signatures before it was removed following outcry from human rights groups.

    For long-time Rohingya residents, the shift in public attitude has been staggering. Karim, a 45-year-old activist who first arrived in Penang in 2003, recalled that local hospitality once made him feel safe. “Life as a refugee is tough. It’s disappointing to be stuck working in construction all these years. However, I found Malaysians to be very friendly and kind, which made me feel safe,” he said. “Now, however, life has become increasingly difficult. I am often afraid to go outside. I’ve been asked several times while on my commute, ‘Why are you making a mess of our city? Why don’t you go back?’”

    Most Rohingya say they wish to return to Myanmar eventually, but returning is not a viable option today. Myanmar has been locked in a brutal civil war since the 2021 military coup, and Rakhine State has been reduced to ruins by intense fighting between the military junta and the Arakan Army. Displaced Rohingya who return face the threat of forced conscription by the junta or targeting by rebel groups.

    A new UN report from an independent fact-finding mission released this week warned that the conditions for minorities across Myanmar have “plummeted to a new low.” The Rohingya are “suffering misery and cruelty on multiple levels and across the country that is heartbreaking,” UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said this week.

    Many Rohingya say they are being scapegoated for Malaysia’s own domestic struggles, including rising cost of living, because they are the country’s largest group of undocumented asylum seekers. “I’m not saying that all Rohingya are good. There are good and bad people in every community. So why should a few individuals’ actions be used to typecast a whole community?” Farooq asked. “I escaped the genocide in Myanmar hoping to find safety. Instead, many Rohingya today continue to live with fear of simply being who we are.”

    ### Anti-Rohingya Rhetoric Enters Mainstream Politics
    The growing acceptance of anti-Rohingya hostility in mainstream Malaysian politics has alarmed observers. In a July campaign speech, current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced that Myanmar had agreed to repatriate 5,000 Rohingya refugees, citing improved bilateral relations between the two countries. Anwar added a warning to the Rohingya community: “This is our country. Malaysia is our country. Let no one else interfere.”

    High-profile public figures have gone even further in their rhetoric. Nurulhidayah Zahid, daughter of Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, compared the Rohingya community to “monkeys in the forest” in a viral Threads post. “Enough of using religious and humanitarian sentiments. Do good in moderation. Don’t let the monkeys in the forest be fed, while the children at home die of hunger,” she wrote alongside a photo of Rohingya refugees. Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay, a former deputy Malaysian police chief, described the Rohingya influx as a “cancer” requiring immediate, aggressive action.

    Human rights researchers warn that anti-Rohingya sentiment will only intensify as Malaysia approaches a general election required by law before February 2028. “Refugees and migrants are once again being turned into convenient political scapegoats to divert attention from deeper domestic challenges,” said Yap Lay Sheng, a Malaysia-based researcher with human rights organization Fortify Rights. “For years, the Malaysian government has sought to present the country internationally as a humane and compassionate Muslim nation. Its treatment of the Rohingya exposes the hollowness of that claim.”

    Back at his learning center, Irhan is far more focused on his students’ future than on national political shifts. “I don’t know where to get help, or who can get us registered as a school,” he said. “I hope the Malaysians can understand that the children just want an opportunity to learn.”

  • Why India wants Bangladesh’s Tarique Rahman in Delhi

    Why India wants Bangladesh’s Tarique Rahman in Delhi

    Diplomatic intrigue between South Asia’s two largest neighboring nations has spilled into public view, after an accidental internal email from India’s presidential palace exposed New Delhi’s urgent behind-the-scenes efforts to host Bangladesh’s newly inaugurated Prime Minister Tarique Rahman for a landmark bilateral reset.

    The early August email, sent to officials ahead of a scheduled change of guard ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan, notified recipients that the traditional event would be canceled to make way for rehearsal activities ahead of a formal ceremonial welcome for Rahman. The catch? No official announcement of the visit had been made by either government. The email was swiftly withdrawn within hours, but it validated weeks of growing speculation over the long-rumored trip and laid bare New Delhi’s eagerness to lock in the first visit from Rahman since his Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) won a landslide parliamentary election in February 2026.

    The election marked the end of a decades-long political era for Bangladesh, coming on the heels of a mass 2024 popular uprising that ousted long-serving Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who now lives in exile in India after fleeing Dhaka amid the unrest. Hasina, who was sentenced to death in absentia by a Bangladeshi special tribunal on charges of ordering lethal force against anti-government protestors – charges she denies – has become the central sticking point in New Delhi’s push to reset strained bilateral ties.

    After Hasina’s removal, an interim government led by Muhammad Yunus took power in Dhaka, and bilateral relations deteriorated sharply. Now, New Delhi views Rahman’s newly seated administration as a critical opening to repair the relationship, but Dhaka has made the extradition of Hasina a non-negotiable precondition for any high-level summit.

    “We called for the creation of a propitious environment and are awaiting response from the Indian side regarding expediting extradition of Sheikh Hasina,” AAM Saleh, press secretary to the Bangladeshi prime minister, confirmed to media. For its part, India has stated only that the extradition request is under active review, a response that has left Dhaka unsatisfied. As of late August, Rahman has not yet confirmed his acceptance of India’s invitation, with Saleh noting that “no decision has yet been made on the visit.”

    Despite the impasse over Hasina, New Delhi has pulled out all stops to court Rahman’s government. A formal invitation was extended within days of Rahman taking office, and India’s High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi has held multiple high-level discussions with Rahman and senior Bangladeshi officials in recent weeks. Trivedi has publicly stated that a visit from Rahman would see the new leader “accorded the highest honour” and given a “memorable welcome” – an unusually public show of enthusiasm for a visiting neighbor, a departure from India’s typical restrained diplomatic protocol.

    Shyam Saran, a former Indian foreign secretary, told reporters that New Delhi has already gone to great lengths to accommodate Dhaka’s priorities beyond the extradition issue. “Except for actually handing over Hasina, they have gone pretty far in terms of reaching out to Dhaka,” Saran said, noting that India has moved quickly to meet Bangladesh’s immediate needs including expanded supplies of electricity and fuel, streamlined processing for medical visas, and the revival of multiple bilateral trade facilitation mechanisms. Still, Saran acknowledged that New Delhi is growing frustrated by the continued delay in securing the visit.

    Geostrategic and economic stakes for both sides are extraordinarily high. India and Bangladesh share a 4,096-kilometer open border, and share deep cultural and linguistic ties that stretch back centuries. Bilateral trade between the two nations topped $12 billion in the last calendar year, with a substantial trade surplus in India’s favor. For India, Bangladesh is also critical to improving overland access to its geographically isolated northeastern states; during Hasina’s 15 years in office, the two governments expanded cross-border road, rail, and port connectivity that cut travel times to India’s northeast dramatically, and collaborated closely on counterinsurgency security operations, with Hasina’s government cracking down on insurgent groups that New Delhi said operated from Bangladeshi territory.

    But India’s close alignment with Hasina became deeply unpopular in Bangladesh in her final years in power, with critics accusing New Delhi of turning a blind eye to growing concerns over democratic backsliding and human rights abuses under her administration. Hasina’s continued presence on Indian soil has kept these public tensions high, and tensions flared again earlier this month when Hasina delivered a virtual address to a press event hosted by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of South Asia in New Delhi, where she vowed to return to Bangladesh in December and accused Rahman’s BNP government of political repression against her supporters.

    Dhaka reacted with fury, stating it was “outraged” that Indian authorities allowed Hasina to speak publicly from Indian territory. India’s foreign ministry attempted to de-escalate the situation, stating it had “no role” in organizing the event and did not “endorse anything said at the forum, especially with regard to the duly constituted government of Bangladesh.” Even so, the incident derailed tentative progress on a visit: Dhaka University international relations professor Lailufar Yasmin told media that Rahman had been seriously considering accepting the invitation before Hasina’s address, which triggered a major public backlash in Bangladesh that forced the new government to pump the brakes. “It actually created a huge backlash in Bangladesh,” Yasmin said. “Questions were raised whether Indian authorities were sincere about a reset in bilateral relationship.”

    For Rahman, agreeing to a visit to New Delhi while Hasina remains in exile in India carries significant domestic political risk, as he seeks to establish his government’s independent foreign policy footing. Beyond the Hasina issue, New Delhi is also facing a new geostrategic challenge: since Hasina’s ouster, Bangladesh has moved to rebuild long-dormant ties with India’s long-standing regional rival Pakistan, with the two nations exchanging high-level military delegations and publicly discussing plans to expand bilateral defense cooperation.

    The issue has taken on added urgency this month with the announcement of the so-called Mecca Pact, a collective defense agreement modeled on NATO’s mutual defense principle signed by Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan. While the details of the pact and membership obligations remain unclear, Bangladeshi junior foreign minister Humayun Kabir confirmed this week that Dhaka views potential participation positively. “If there is a security arrangement among Islamic nations in the Middle East, it is not unusual for us to consider participating,” Kabir said. “It is being viewed positively.” Saudi Arabia has also extended a separate bilateral invitation for Rahman to visit the kingdom, adding another option for the new Bangladeshi leader as he weighs his diplomatic priorities.

    Yasmin noted that Bangladesh has good reason to move cautiously on joining the pact, arguing that “Bangladesh should be a bit cautious about entering into any defence pact. It’s not just about antagonizing India; Bangladesh needs to wait for a while to see which way it’s going and whether it will align with our interests.”

    For New Delhi, the shifting diplomatic landscape makes clear that the unusually close bilateral relationship it enjoyed with Bangladesh during Hasina’s tenure can no longer be taken for granted. For Rahman’s government, meanwhile, there is strong domestic pressure to demonstrate that Bangladesh’s foreign policy is not overly reliant on its much larger neighbor. Even so, there are two upcoming high-profile opportunities for Rahman to finally make the trip: Yasmin has publicly urged Rahman to visit New Delhi ahead of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York in mid-September, and India will host a BRICS summit later that month where Bangladesh has been invited as a special guest. After weeks of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, public overtures, and one accidentally leaked email that exposed New Delhi’s hand, all eyes remain on Dhaka to see if Rahman will finally accept India’s invitation.

  • Ratko Mladic, architect of Srebrenica genocide and ‘Butcher of Bosnia’, dies aged 84

    Ratko Mladic, architect of Srebrenica genocide and ‘Butcher of Bosnia’, dies aged 84

    Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb military commander infamously known as the ‘Butcher of Bosnia’ for orchestrating Europe’s worst act of mass genocide since World War II, has passed away at the age of 84. His death was first reported by Serbia’s state-owned public broadcaster RTS, and later independently confirmed by Mladic’s legal representative to Reuters news agency.

    Mladic rose to prominence in the 1990s, amid the violent collapse of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Then-Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic pursued an aggressive nationalist agenda to forge a ethnically pure ‘Greater Serbia’ from the fragments of the disintegrating federation, a project that inflamed long-simmering ethnic and religious tensions and sparked a series of brutal wars across the Balkans. As the top commander of Bosnian Serb separatist forces, Mladic became the primary military architect of this campaign, which targeted non-Serb populations across Bosnia and Herzegovina.

    The most horrific chapter of Mladic’s campaign came in July 1995, when his forces overran the UN-designated safe zone of Srebrenica. In the weeks leading up to the massacre, Mladic invoked a 14th-century Serbian military defeat by the Ottoman Empire to frame his campaign as a act of revenge against Bosniak Muslims, six centuries after the original conflict. Over the following days, Mladic’s troops systematically captured more than 8,000 Bosniak men and boys, before executing them in cold blood. Widespread sexual violence was perpetrated against Bosniak women and girls, while perpetrators covered up the atrocity by burying victims in mass graves, later exhuming remains and scattering them across remote secondary burial sites to destroy evidence of the crime.

    Mladic was also directly responsible for the 44-month siege of Sarajevo, a brutal blockade that subjected the capital’s civilian population to systematic terror, starvation, and constant attack.

    In total, the Bosnian war claimed the lives of roughly 100,000 people and displaced more than 2.2 million from their homes, making it one of the deadliest conflicts in post-WWII European history.

    For nearly 16 years after the end of the war, Mladic evaded international justice, with covert support from factions within the Serbian state that helped him hide from authorities. His years on the run became one of the longest and most high-profile manhunts in modern history, coming to an end only in May 2011, when Serbian security forces arrested him in a small village north of Belgrade.

    In 2017, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), based in The Hague, found Mladic guilty on 10 counts of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Presiding judge Alphons Orie described Mladic’s offenses as ranking among ‘the most heinous known to humankind,’ and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

    Despite his well-documented atrocities and international conviction, Mladic remains a glorified figure among Serbian ultranationalists, and many senior Serbian political leaders have continued to deny or downplay the severity of crimes committed by Bosnian Serb forces during the conflict. The ICTY ultimately prosecuted nearly 100 individuals for war crimes and atrocities committed during the Yugoslav wars, with Mladic’s trial standing as one of the tribunal’s final and most high-profile cases.

  • Moroccan minister questions Spanish sovereignty over enclave of Ceuta

    Moroccan minister questions Spanish sovereignty over enclave of Ceuta

    A fresh sovereignty row over the North African enclave of Ceuta has sent diplomatic tensions between Morocco and Spain soaring, after a senior Moroccan cabinet minister publicly questioned Madrid’s rule over the territory during an official state ceremony.

    Ahmed Toufiq, Morocco’s Minister of Habous and Islamic Affairs, made the contested remarks at an event marking the birth of the Prophet Muhammad, held at Rabat’s Royal Palace and hosted by King Mohammed VI. During his speech highlighting centuries of Islamic scholarly work on the life and teachings of the Prophet, Toufiq named three influential texts written by Islamic intellectuals hailing from Ceuta: Al-Shifa by Qadi Iyad, Al-Durr al-Manzum by Al-Azafi, and the well-known collection of prayers Dala’il al-Khayrat by Imam Al-Jazuli.

    Toufiq went on to frame Dala’il al-Khayrat as a historic symbol of Moroccan collective mobilization to free what he called “occupied cities” along Morocco’s Atlantic coast during the early modern era. The reference was a clear nod to 15th and 16th century Moroccan resistance movements that pushed back against Portuguese and Spanish territorial expansion along both the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of the region.

    The comments sparked immediate outrage in Spain, which is already grappling with persistent diplomatic friction and migration pressures linked to a massive border crisis at Ceuta that unfolded in late July. During that crisis, more than 72,000 people crossed from Morocco into Ceuta, including roughly 7,000 unaccompanied minors, according to official Spanish data. Viral footage captured thousands of migrants swimming around the border barrier to reach the enclave, many relying on basic flotation devices to make the dangerous crossing. While most migrants returned to Morocco within hours, several thousand remained in Ceuta, overwhelming local reception facilities. Madrid ultimately rolled out an emergency plan to relocate 500 of the most vulnerable minors to the Spanish mainland to ease overcrowding.

    At least 141 people were killed during the July 30 crossing incident, an event that already drove a sharp wedge between the two neighboring countries. Many Spanish political figures have openly accused Moroccan authorities of deliberately enabling the mass migration surge to pressure Madrid over longstanding territorial disputes.

    Toufiq’s sovereignty claim is not an isolated incident: he is the second senior Moroccan government official to publicly stake a claim to Ceuta and the neighboring adjacent enclave of Melilla in the months following the July crisis. Just one week prior, Moroccan Justice Minister Abdellatif Ouahbi publicly referenced Morocco’s “historical and geographical right” to both territories, and proposed establishing a bilateral commission to negotiate their “return to the homeland.”

    Spanish officials have moved swiftly to reject the new claims. On Tuesday, Spanish Migration Minister Elma Saiz issued a firm rebuke of Toufiq’s comments during a public press briefing. “Ceuta and Melilla are Spanish,” she stated. “They are our southern borders, as well as the borders of Europe. There is nothing more to add.” Madrid has previously “categorically” rejected any challenge to its sovereignty over the two territories.

    Ceuta and Melilla are both Spanish autonomous cities located entirely within Moroccan territory along the country’s northern Mediterranean coast. They host the only shared land border between the European Union and the African continent, making their status a critical point of both diplomatic and policy contention for the EU as well. The Moroccan government has never formally recognized Spanish sovereignty over either enclave, leaving the issue as one of the longest-running unresolved disputes in North African-European relations.