标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Journey of a lifetime: A US teen Buddhist lama is now a monk studying in the Himalayan foothills

    Journey of a lifetime: A US teen Buddhist lama is now a monk studying in the Himalayan foothills

    At a quiet monastery tucked into Nepal’s Himalayan foothills, a 19-year-old Buddhist lama stood before thousands of pilgrims, one by one blessing bowed heads with a ceremonial vase and peacock feather, sprinkling holy water to grant protection, purification, and wisdom. He paused to grin at wide-eyed children who stared back at him with a mix of curiosity and reverence, working to keep pace with the small group of senior spiritual leaders chosen to deliver the ritual’s final blessing. Just six months before this sacred moment, this same young man — Jalue Dorje — was pulling all-nighters playing *Madden NFL* on his Xbox in his family’s home outside Minneapolis, pausing only to grab pizza rolls and Diet Coke, or text friends about upcoming meetups at TopGolf or Buffalo Wild Wings. Two seemingly incompatible worlds, and both are deeply his home.

    Recognized as a reincarnated lama by senior Tibetan Buddhist leaders, including the Dalai Lama, from infancy, Dorje grew up balancing a fully ordinary American teenage life with rigorous spiritual training that stretches back over 350 years. He graduated from his Columbia Heights, Minnesota high school in 2023, and just months later left his home state to begin full-time training at India’s Mindrolling Monastery, 7,200 miles from everything he had ever known. His recent trip to Nepal brought him together with his parents, who traveled from Minneapolis to see him, and allowed him to participate in sacred teachings led by Shechen Monastery’s abbot near Kathmandu.

    Where his everyday wardrobe once consisted of hoodies and sweatpants, maroon and gold monastic robes now mark his role — but traces of his American upbringing remain. He quotes both rapper Drake and 8th-century Buddhist scholar Shantideva in the same conversation, and under his traditional robes, he often wears white Crocs covered in *The Simpsons* Jibbitz charms. Each dawn, he wakes for morning prayers, then walks through Kathmandu’s bustling crowded streets, past street vendors selling fresh fruit, incense, and exotic spices, weaving around speeding mopeds as he approaches the Boudhanath Stupa, a 1,500-year-old sacred site ringed with colorful Tibetan prayer flags and marked by the iconic painted eyes of Buddha gazing out over the valley.

    On a recent ritual day, Dorje entered a prayer hall reserved for high-ranking lamas and doctorate-level monks, sliding off his Crocs before stepping onto the wooden floor. Incense drifted through the hall, and the deep, steady notes of traditional cymbals, bells, and drums cut through the low drone of monastic chants. Standing before three massive gilded Buddha statues, he bowed to Shechen Rabjam Rinpoche, the monastery’s spiritual leader, and presented a golden plate symbolizing the entire universe, along with a khata — a traditional white Tibetan ceremonial scarf. This was the first formal mandala offering Dorje had made since committing to his predestined spiritual path full-time, and the moment hit him with profound clarity. “This is the real one, you know? We’re here and this is really happening,” he said. “I’m doing what the prophecy fulfilled.”

    Dorje’s place in this lineage stretches back to 1655, when the first Terchen Taksham Rinpoche was born. Just four months after his birth, he was identified as the eighth reincarnation of the lineage by Kyabje Trulshik Rinpoche, one of Tibetan Buddhism’s most venerated modern masters, and later confirmed by multiple senior lamas. When he was 2 years old, his parents brought him to meet the Dalai Lama during a 2010 visit to Wisconsin, where the spiritual leader cut a lock of Dorje’s hair during an official recognition ceremony and advised his parents to let him grow up in the U.S. to master English before sending him to a monastery for full training.

    “From my parents’ end, educating me was a really big one,” Dorje explained. “They followed the words of his holiness; he laid the foundation, and they took that gamble.” For years, his parents — both working-class people who cleaned hotel rooms and did hospital laundry to support their only child — balanced secular education with early spiritual training. As a child, Dorje often wondered why he could not sleep in on weekends or watch cartoons like his friends, but his father would remind him that the early work was “like planting a seed that one day would sprout.” He remembers long early mornings spent memorizing sacred texts, and the stress that online skepticism about his status as a reincarnated lama put on his parents. “It wasn’t all rainbows and unicorns every day,” Dorje said. “We overcame a lot.”

    Fluent in both English and Tibetan, Dorje excelled in his public high school. Though he was officially enthroned as a lama during a 2019 ceremony in India, his parents let him remain in the U.S. to finish high school, honoring the Dalai Lama’s guidance. Growing up, his bedroom walls reflected his dual identity: a framed photo of the Dalai Lama hung above his DVD collection of *The Simpsons*, *South Park*, and *Family Guy*, right next to a copy of the graphic novel series *Buddha*. On his bedside table, he kept a journal full of diagramed football plays he hoped to run as his team’s left guard, and his living room held a senior year poster of him in sunglasses and his football uniform, striking a meditation gesture. He even made a deal with his father: memorize a section of Buddhist scripture, earn new Pokémon cards, and he often snuck the trading cards into his robes during formal ceremonies. “I remember when I first learned my Tibetan ABCs, when I was able to recite it all by memory, my dad was so happy,” he recalled.

    His daily routine reflected the balance he maintained: wake at dawn to recite sacred texts, attend secular high school, go to football practice, return home for tutoring in Tibetan history and Buddhist doctrine, and spend evenings practicing calligraphy or listening to hip-hop. After he got his driver’s license, he would cruise around town listening to Taylor Swift. When asked what he would have done if not called to spiritual life, he answered without hesitation: “Sports journalist would have been cool.” An avid sports fan, he roots for the Atlanta Hawks in basketball, Atlanta Falcons in football, and Real Madrid in soccer, and counts American figure skater Alysa Liu as his favorite athlete: “She brings so much swagger, but it doesn’t overshadow the sports.” He even won an award for a student newspaper story about Tibet he wrote in high school, and his teammates remembered him for his upbeat attitude that kept the team focused on having fun rather than fixating on losses. Still, he cried after his final senior season game, knowing it would likely be his last time playing organized football.

    For his 18th birthday, more than 1,000 people gathered at the Tibetan American Foundation of Minnesota for a farewell party before he left for India. On the long flight to New Delhi, he found himself thinking of one thing: “I was like, ‘Dang! I’m missing the first week of NFL!’” He packed light, bringing only headphones, a laptop, a fantasy football magazine, and a book on Guru Rinpoche, the master who brought Tantric Buddhism to Tibet. His parents traveled with him to his new monastery in Dehradun, near the Himalayan foothills — a moment equivalent to dropping a child off at college — helping him set up his room, buying a new bed, painting the walls, and building a personal shrine for his daily dawn and dusk prayers. As an only child who had never spent more than three days away from home on a northern Minnesota camping trip, saying goodbye was emotional for everyone, and his parents cried as they left.

    Dorje speaks of his parents with deep gratitude: “Everything leading up to this point in the history of all your lifetimes — the billions and billions of lifetimes you accumulated — leads to your family. To have such great parents is a result of a great past life’s merit. But not only past life merit, but the connection of karma — and love.” His mother, Dechen Wangmo, says she never stopped seeing him as her boy first, even as he embraced his role as a tulku, the Tibetan term for a reincarnated lama. “Would he be hungry? What if he fell asleep?” she remembered worrying about her toddler son during long prayer sessions. To her relief, Dorje has thrived in monastic life. While his American high school friends now study history, science, and literature at U.S. colleges, Dorje studies Buddhist philosophy, hones his calligraphy, and practices chanting daily. “He’s kind of found his groove at the monastery,” said Kate Thomas, one of his former tutors in Minneapolis.

    He still stays connected to friends back home through texts and WhatsApp, even with a 10-hour time difference. On his days off, he builds with Legos, walks to a local arcade to play *FIFA*, and watches Marvel movies and NBA/NFL games on his laptop — he still raves about Bad Bunny’s 2023 Super Bowl halftime show. It was his first experience with ascetic life, eating a simple daily diet of rice and lentils and washing his own clothes by hand, but he adjusted quickly, bonding with fellow monks from across Asia over conversations that mix spirituality, pop culture, and sports talk. “Dudes are dudes!” he laughed.

    For the first time, he is also living alongside other young tulkus, reincarnated spiritual leaders around his age. One is 13-year-old Trulshik Yangsi Rinpoche, believed to be the reincarnation of the same Kyabje Trulshik Rinpoche who first identified Dorje as a tulku when he was four months old. The pair bonded over their shared love of *Tintin* comics, and Dorje now serves as the younger lama’s English tutor. “I think of him as my spiritual teacher,” Dorje said after sharing a meal. “I’m profoundly grateful that I get to repay my debt to the one who found me and improving his English.” The younger lama simply smiled and called Dorje his best friend.

    Hours after Dorje blessed thousands of pilgrims — including his own parents — on the final day of the 12-day Nepalese ritual, the family woke before dawn to make an eight-hour bone-rattling drive over rutted dirt roads to the ancient Maratika Caves, a site sacred to both Hindus and Buddhists, 100 miles southwest of Mount Everest. After exploring the ancient caves in awe, Dorje sat cross-legged on the rocky ground next to his father, and the pair prayed together, just as they had done almost every day since Dorje was a small boy.

    After several more years of disciplined training and contemplation, Dorje plans to return to Minnesota to teach at the Nyingmapa Taksham Buddhist Center, with the goal of becoming “a leader of peace,” following the example of the Dalai Lama, Nelson Mandela, and Gandhi. This journey began just months after he was born, and now, at 19, he says he feels ready for what comes next. “This,” he said, “is just the beginning.”

  • Trump says Beijing opposes Iranian toll in Hormuz, as Chinese vessels exit waterway

    Trump says Beijing opposes Iranian toll in Hormuz, as Chinese vessels exit waterway

    In a landmark bilateral meeting that sent ripples across global geopolitics, the White House released new details Thursday outlining shifting alignments between Washington and Beijing on the escalating crisis around Iran and the strategic Strait of Hormuz, following face-to-face talks between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

    The diplomatic gathering wrapped up with an elaborate state dinner hosted by Xi, attended by top-ranking U.S. administration officials and American business leaders. The two leaders of the world’s largest economies opted to set aside long-running public disagreements over contentious flashpoints including Taiwan and Iran policy at least for the day, turning their public focus toward advancing bilateral commercial agreements.

    In an interview with Fox News following his closed-door meeting with Xi, Trump offered new remarks about China’s shifting position, claiming Xi had proposed to mediate an end to the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran while downplaying frictions over Beijing’s long-standing ties to Tehran. According to Trump, Xi made a firm statement that China would not supply military equipment to Iran amid the conflict. He added that Xi affirmed China’s commitment to keeping the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints, open to international shipping, and offered Chinese assistance to de-escalate tensions wherever possible.

    These claims come amid multiple media reports outlining recent military support from Beijing to Tehran. Middle East Eye (MEE) was the first outlet to report that China delivered air defense systems to Iran after its June 2025 conflict with Israel and the United States. The outlet further reported that ahead of a planned 2026 Iranian attack, Beijing also supplied Tehran with kamikaze drones. The New York Times later confirmed that shipments of Chinese shoulder-fired air defense systems arrived in Iran back in April, while the Financial Times reported that Iranian forces have used advanced Chinese satellite imagery to target U.S. military installations positioned across the Gulf region.

    Even ahead of Trump’s high-profile visit to China, analysts noted that Beijing has clear strategic incentives to push for an early end to the ongoing war in Iran. Ahmed Aboudouh, an associate fellow at the London-based Chatham House and head of the China Studies research unit at the Emirates Policy Center, previously told MEE that both Washington and Beijing share core overlapping goals: preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons and securing the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping.

    As the world’s top buyer of Iranian crude oil, purchasing roughly 90 percent of Tehran’s total oil exports, China’s posture toward Iran is being closely watched by policymakers in Tehran and across global energy markets. Trump acknowledged the deep economic ties between the two countries in his Fox News interview, noting, “Look, anybody that buys that much oil has obviously got some kind of relationship with them [Iran],” when referencing Xi’s engagement with Tehran.

    On Thursday, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced it had authorized passage for a group of Chinese-flagged vessels through the Strait of Hormuz in line with pre-negotiated agreements on Tehran’s strait management protocols. The IRGC confirmed that the transit of these vessels began overnight Wednesday. Iranian state television reported that “more than 30 ships” had been cleared for passage, though it did not confirm how many of the vessels were Chinese-owned or flagged.

    Even as Chinese vessels were allowed to transit the waterway, new reports of Iranian maritime activity emerged Thursday that signaled ongoing tensions. The UK Maritime Trading Organization confirmed that Iranian forces seized a commercial cargo vessel anchored off the coast of the United Arab Emirates’ Fujairah port earlier the same day, a move that underscores the fragile security environment in the region even as major powers negotiate new de-escalation frameworks.

  • Trump-Xi summit puts US exports, Iran at center of reset bid

    Trump-Xi summit puts US exports, Iran at center of reset bid

    A landmark summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing has delivered a series of tangible commitments from Beijing on agricultural imports, energy purchases and aircraft orders, creating a critical foundation to de-escalate years of mounting trade and security tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The 135-minute one-on-one meeting between the two leaders has also paved the way for a full reset of bilateral relations after a prolonged period of escalating trade disputes, restrictive export controls and sharpening geopolitical disagreements, with Trump formally extending an invitation for Xi and his wife Peng Liyuan to visit the White House on September 24.

    Speaking to Fox News on Thursday, Trump outlined the key commitments secured during the talks: Xi has pledged China’s cooperation on the Iran nuclear issue, and agreed to ramp up purchases of American soybeans, crude oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and other U.S. energy exports. Trump also confirmed that China will procure 200 Boeing 737 commercial jets, a major win for the U.S. aerospace manufacturing sector.

    A senior anonymous U.S. administration official added further context to the discussions around Iran and energy security, noting that Xi has publicly opposed the militarization of the Strait of Hormuz and any attempt to impose navigation tolls on the critical global energy chokepoint. Xi also signaled China’s interest in expanding imports of U.S. crude oil as a long-term strategy to reduce Beijing’s reliance on energy shipments passing through the Strait of Hormuz, the official said. Both leaders also reached a clear joint position, with the official confirming that “both countries agreed that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.”

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a Thursday CNBC interview that Beijing has reaffirmed its major existing soybean purchase commitment, a core pledge from the previous 2025 Trump-Xi summit held in Busan, South Korea. “And then soybeans, we have a very large purchase commitment from the Busan agreement for the next three years. So beans are really all taken care of,” Bessent stated. That original agreement, reached during the October 2025 Busan summit, committed China to importing 25 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans annually through 2028.

    Global geopolitical shifts have altered the negotiating landscape since early 2026, when U.S. forces captured former Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and his wife in January, followed by Washington’s imposition of a full blockade on commercial shipping to and from Iranian ports in April. Some Chinese policy analysts note that rising Middle East instability and persistent global supply chain disruptions have made Beijing far more receptive to Trump’s request for expanded U.S. energy purchases.

    In a separate, unexplained development reported by Reuters on Thursday, China’s General Administration of Customs initially appeared to renew market access licenses for hundreds of U.S. beef exporters, a move that would have restored access for dozens of processing facilities whose permits expired over the past 12 months. However, the agency quickly reversed the change, restoring the “expired” status for those exporters on its public database, leaving the reasons for the sudden reversal unclear.

    Beyond trade and agriculture, the summit also produced incremental progress on technology trade. A last-minute stop by Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang to join Trump’s delegation in Alaska en route to Beijing stoked widespread market expectations that the two sides would reach a tentative deal to allow Chinese firms to import and deploy Nvidia’s advanced H200 graphics processing units (GPUs). Reuters later confirmed Thursday that the U.S. Commerce Department has granted export approval for roughly 10 major Chinese technology firms to purchase H200 chips, including e-commerce and technology giants Alibaba, JD.com, Tencent, and ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok. U.S. regulators also approved Lenovo and Foxconn to act as authorized distributors for the chips. To date, Nvidia has not shipped any H200 units to China, as Beijing has implemented policies urging domestic technology firms to prioritize locally produced semiconductors over foreign alternatives, and full details on potential future shipment timelines remain undisclosed.

    Observers noted ahead of the summit that Trump’s core domestic priorities for the trip were clear: boost sales for U.S. farmers and manufacturers to the Chinese market, giving Republican congressional candidates a strong economic messaging boost ahead of November 2026 midterm elections. Other key U.S. negotiating objectives included pressing Beijing to end imports of Iranian oil, halt shipments of drone components and missile-related materials to Tehran, and secure the release of jailed Hong Kong pro-democracy businessman Jimmy Lai. Media outlets also report that the two governments are scheduled to hold follow-up negotiations to reduce tariffs on roughly $30 billion worth of bilateral trade that is not tied to national security-related sectors.

    For Beijing, the summit’s top priority was advancing efforts to rebuild stable China-U.S. ties and prevent the reimposition of sweeping U.S. tariffs scheduled for early November 2026, after a one-year tariff truce between the two sides. Beijing also pushed for the Trump administration to end U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, roll back existing punitive tariffs and loosen restrictive export controls targeting Chinese industries.

    During a formal banquet honoring Trump and his visiting delegation, Xi emphasized the global stakes of the bilateral relationship, noting that China-U.S. ties directly shape the well-being of more than 1.7 billion people across the two countries, and impact the interests of all 8 billion people worldwide. Xi urged both sides to shoulder their shared historic responsibility and steer the “giant ship” of China-U.S. relations along a steady, positive course.

    Notably, Xi framed China’s national rejuvenation agenda – Beijing’s core policy goal of building a wealthy, globally influential nation by 2049 and achieving cross-strait reunification with Taiwan – as fully compatible with Trump’s signature “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) policy agenda, rather than inherently conflicting.

    “The people of China and the U.S. are both great people. Achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again can go hand in hand. We can help each other succeed and advance the well-being of the whole world,” Xi said in his ceremonial toast.

    During the official working meeting, Xi emphasized the centrality of the Taiwan question to long-term bilateral stability, telling Trump: “If the Taiwan issue is handled properly, the bilateral relationship between the U.S. and China will be overall stable. Otherwise, the two countries will have clashes and even conflicts, putting the entire relationship in great jeopardy.” He added that safeguarding cross-strait peace and stability is the broadest common interest for both sides, stressing that “Taiwan independence” and cross-Strait peace are as irreconcilable as fire and water, and urged the U.S. to exercise extreme caution in all actions related to Taiwan. Xi also confirmed that the two leaders had agreed on a new shared vision for building a constructive China-U.S. relationship rooted in strategic stability, saying “I look forward to working together with you to set the course and steer the giant ship of China-U.S. relations, so as to make 2026 a historic, landmark year that opens up a new chapter in China-US relations.”

    This new shared vision will provide overarching strategic guidance for bilateral relations over the next three years and beyond, a outcome Xi said should be welcomed by populations of both countries and the broader international community. Reaffirming the core nature of bilateral economic ties, Xi noted that “China-US economic ties are mutually beneficial and win-win in nature. Where disagreements and frictions exist, equal-footed consultation is the only right choice.” He called on both governments to fully implement the consensus reached by the two leaders, expand utilization of existing communication channels across political, diplomatic and military domains, and deepen collaborative exchanges in trade, public health, agriculture, tourism, people-to-people ties and law enforcement.

    During the meeting, Xi posed three fundamental questions that frame the long-term future of the bilateral relationship, centered on the concept of the Thucydides Trap – a theory popularized by American political scientist Graham Allison that holds that rising powers almost inevitably go to war with existing dominant powers. The three questions Xi posed were: “Can China and the US overcome the Thucydides Trap and create a new paradigm of major-country relations? Can we meet global challenges together and provide greater stability for the world? Can we build a bright future together for our bilateral relations in the interest of the well-being of the two peoples and the future of humanity?” He added that “These are the questions vital to history, to the world and to the people.”

    Cui Hongjian, a professor at the Academy of Regional and Global Governance at Beijing Foreign Studies University, explained that in recent years, many U.S. commentators and policymakers have framed U.S.-China rivalry as inevitable, arguing the two countries have already fallen into the Thucydides Trap and are fated to compete for global supremacy. “This pessimistic and negative sentiment not only affected China-US relations, but also affected the international community, raising the sense of insecurity and uncertainty,” Cui said. He added that this latest summit, coming on the heels of the 2025 Busan meeting, demonstrates that both sides are committed to moving the relationship beyond pessimistic zero-sum framing and back toward managed, constructive engagement. “This has resolved a major psychological concern in the international community,” Cui said. “This interaction is expected to reverse that sense of losing control and put the two countries back on a track of reasonably and effectively managing their relationship.”

  • Senior Emirati scholar says ‘war criminal’ Netanyahu never visited UAE

    Senior Emirati scholar says ‘war criminal’ Netanyahu never visited UAE

    A bitter public dispute has erupted over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent claim of a secret March meeting with United Arab Emirates leader Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, pitting a prominent Emirati commentator against the Israeli leader while exposing underlying frictions in the Abu Dhabi-Tel Aviv relationship forged by the 2020 Abraham Accords.

    The controversy began Wednesday, when Netanyahu’s own office announced that the Israeli prime minister had conducted an unannounced, off-the-books visit to the UAE amid the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. The claim was immediately pushed back by the UAE’s foreign ministry, which issued an official statement denying any such meeting ever took place.

    In the wake of that official denial, prominent Emirati scholar Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a non-resident fellow at the Washington-based Arab Gulf States Institute, delivered a scathing rebuke of Netanyahu in a post on the social platform X on Thursday. Abdulla labeled Netanyahu a war criminal and the killer of Palestinian children in Gaza, asserting the Israeli leader is completely unwelcome on Emirati soil. He went further, dismissing Netanyahu’s claim of a visit as a fabrication born of a distorted political imagination, arguing the false claim was crafted to advance Netanyahu’s opportunistic domestic electoral goals, given the prime minister’s long track record of misleading public statements.

    The UAE foreign ministry’s formal statement stressed that all of the country’s relations with Israel are conducted openly within the framework of the officially recognized Abraham Accords, and do not rely on non-transparent or unofficial back-channel arrangements. The ministry also called on global media outlets to uphold professional standards of accuracy, urging them not to spread unconfirmed information or amplify misleading political narratives.

    Despite the official UAE denial, multiple independent and open-source sources appear to corroborate elements of Netanyahu’s claim. Both Israeli and Arab sources told Middle East Eye that the meeting between Netanyahu and Mohammed bin Zayed did indeed take place on March 26 in Al-Ain, an oasis city located along the UAE’s border with Oman. Independent flight tracking evidence also supports this timeline: on March 26, Avi Scharf, open-source intelligence and national security editor for Israeli newspaper Haaretz, posted to social media noting that two Israeli business jets typically used for very important official (VVIP) travel had landed in Al-Ain and returned to Israel just four hours later that same evening. Independent verification of flight data has since confirmed that the two jets traveled from Tel Aviv to Al-Ain, departing Israel in the afternoon and returning the same night.

    The dispute over the claimed visit unfolds against a shifting backdrop of security and diplomatic cooperation between the UAE and Israel, which has deepened dramatically since the Abraham Accords were first signed in 2020 under the first Trump administration. The agreement made the UAE the first Gulf Arab state to establish formal diplomatic ties with Israel, and the two countries have since partnered on multiple joint military and intelligence initiatives alongside the United States.

    Ties between Abu Dhabi and Tel Aviv have grown even closer since the U.S. and Israel launched their coordinated military campaign against Iran in late February, but this deepening cooperation has also created new strains. The emerging security partnership has been thrown into sharp relief in recent days by the first on-the-record confirmation of Israeli military assistance to the UAE: U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee confirmed Tuesday that Israel has deployed Iron Dome air defense batteries to the UAE, alongside Israeli military personnel to operate the systems, to help the Gulf state defend against Iranian drone and missile attacks. Huckabee framed the deployment as proof of the extraordinary strategic bond between the two countries rooted in the Abraham Accords.

    Huckabee’s public confirmation marked the first on-the-record acknowledgment of this Israeli military support, following earlier unconfirmed reports from outlets including Axios, which first reported the Iron Dome deployment last month. The Financial Times later added that Israel has also deployed its advanced Iron Beam laser defense system to the UAE, specifically designed to intercept low-cost drones and short-range missiles.

    The deployment of Israeli air defenses comes after Iran launched a massive barrage of retaliatory attacks across the region, following the February U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign against Iranian targets. The UAE was one of the most heavily targeted countries, with Emirati authorities confirming that Iran fired roughly 550 ballistic and cruise missiles and more than 2,200 drones at targets across the country. While the vast majority of these projectiles were intercepted, the attacks have still caused significant damage and disrupted key sectors of the UAE’s economy. The country’s reputation as a stable luxury tourism and global financial hub has also taken a hit. Critical energy infrastructure has been particularly affected: the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company announced this week that the Habshan natural gas processing facility, the UAE’s primary gas plant, will not return to full operational capacity until 2027 after being targeted twice by Iranian attacks. The facility is currently operating at just 60% of its normal output.

    The broader regional conflict has also exposed differing approaches among Gulf Arab states to the U.S.-led war on Iran. While most Gulf states opposed the initiation of the conflict, they have largely aligned with their long-standing core security partner the United States since fighting broke out. Saudi Arabia, for example, has provided the U.S. with expanded access to military bases, basing rights and overflight permission, but has also supported mediation efforts led by its close strategic partner Pakistan. By contrast, the UAE has adopted a far more hawkish stance aligned closely with U.S. and Israeli positions in the conflict.

  • New Zealand’s Māori Queen meets King Charles at Buckingham Palace

    New Zealand’s Māori Queen meets King Charles at Buckingham Palace

    In a landmark moment marking nearly two centuries of formal ties between Māori people and the British Crown, New Zealand’s newly installed Māori Queen Te Arikinui Kuini Nga Wai hono i te po has held her first official audience with King Charles III at London’s Buckingham Palace. This meeting comes two years after Te Arikinui ascended to the Māori throne in 2024, following the passing of her father Kiingi Tuheitia, the previous Māori monarch.

    Earlier the same week, the Māori Queen was formally welcomed by Prince William at Windsor Castle, in a meeting that covered a broad spectrum of pressing global issues. In an Instagram post following the encounter, Prince William shared that it had been a great pleasure to welcome Te Arikinui and host her at the royal residence. A post-meeting statement from Kīngitanga, the Māori monarchy institution, confirmed that Te Arikinui used the discussion to reaffirm her conviction that indigenous knowledge and long-term, cross-generational environmental stewardship are critical tools to address the world’s most urgent environmental and social challenges.

    Te Arikinui’s ascension in 2024 made her only the second Māori queen in the history of the Kīngitanga movement; the first was her grandmother, Te Arikinui Dame Te Atairangikaahu, who held the role for four decades. The institution of Māori monarchy was first established in the 19th century, when disparate Māori iwi (tribes) united to create a single unifying leadership figure modeled on the European monarchical structure. At its founding, the movement was conceived as a defensive strategy to slow widespread land loss to British colonial settlers and protect Māori cultural identity from erasure. Today, the role remains largely ceremonial, but carries enormous cultural and symbolic weight for Māori communities across New Zealand.

    The historic meeting at Buckingham Palace underscores a bilateral relationship that was first formalized with the 1840 signing of the Treaty of Waitangi, one of the foundational founding documents of modern New Zealand. According to a spokesperson for Te Arikinui, the conversation between the Māori Queen and King Charles III was warm and heartfelt. It included reflections on the passing of Queen Elizabeth II, the late mother of King Charles III, alongside discussions focused on deepening and strengthening the long-standing relationship between the Māori monarchy and the British Crown.

  • US agrees to settle lawsuit that accused an Indian billionaire of hiding an alleged bribery scheme

    US agrees to settle lawsuit that accused an Indian billionaire of hiding an alleged bribery scheme

    Court filings made public Thursday have confirmed that the U.S. government has reached a civil settlement in a high-profile fraud lawsuit against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani, leaders of the global energy conglomerate Adani Green Energy Limited. The case, filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in late 2024, centers on allegations that the pair misled international investors by hiding a large-scale alleged bribery scheme tied to the company’s massive Indian solar energy project. According to the SEC’s original complaint, the Adanis promised hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes to Indian government officials in exchange for lucrative public contracts that guaranteed inflated rates for energy purchased from the company. At the same time, the conglomerate raised billions of dollars in capital from Wall Street investors, who were falsely assured that the firm maintained a rigorous anti-bribery compliance framework and that senior leadership had committed to no corrupt practices. The SEC asserts these actions directly violated U.S. securities law anti-fraud provisions. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, Gautam Adani will pay $6 million in civil penalties, while Sagar Adani will pay $12 million. Critically, the agreement does not require either defendant to admit guilt to the allegations brought by the SEC. The Adani Group has repeatedly denied all claims since the lawsuit was filed, describing them as entirely baseless, and requests for comment from the Adanis’ legal teams Thursday went unanswered. Alongside the civil settlement, multiple major U.S. news outlets including The New York Times and Bloomberg reported Thursday that the criminal securities fraud and conspiracy charges brought against the pair in a New York federal court in late 2024 are expected to be dropped. Requests for confirmation from prosecutors for the Eastern District of New York have not yet been returned. The impending dismissal of criminal charges follows a sequence of events that many observers see as a clear foreshadowing of the move, starting after former President Donald Trump won a second term in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, an outcome Gautam Adani publicly praised extensively. In March 2025, Trump issued an executive order suspending enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the federal law that bans U.S.-linked companies from paying bribes to foreign officials to secure business deals. The move immediately led to widespread speculation in Indian business and political circles that the entire Adani prosecution would be derailed. For decades, Gautam Adani has built one of the world’s largest personal fortunes and emerged as one of India’s most powerful business figures. He got his start building a coal business in the 1990s, before expanding the Adani Group into a sprawling conglomerate with holdings across critical sectors including renewable energy, defense, and agriculture. Marketing itself under the slogan “Growth with Goodness,” the group has built one of the world’s largest renewable energy portfolios, totaling more than 20 gigawatts of installed capacity, including a massive solar power plant in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu. The firm has publicly committed to investing $70 billion in new clean energy projects by 2032, with a stated goal of becoming India’s largest clean energy producer by 2030. Adani’s career has long been marked by controversy, however. His well-documented close political ties to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the ruling national government have repeatedly drawn accusations of crony capitalism, with critics claiming he has secured unfair preferential treatment for government contracts, claims the Adani Group has consistently denied. In 2023, U.S.-based short seller Hindenburg Research released a scathing report accusing Adani and his conglomerate of “brazen stock manipulation” and systemic accounting fraud, claims the group dismissed as a malicious set of outdated, discredited, and selective misinformation. This latest U.S. legal action has already had global ripple effects on Adani’s international business: after the original indictment was announced in Brooklyn, Kenya’s president scrapped hundreds of millions of dollars in planned contracts with the Adani Group for airport modernization and energy infrastructure. Adani Green Energy was also forced to withdraw planned wind energy projects from Sri Lanka after the country moved to renegotiate contracted pricing, while a major French energy giant paused all new planned investments in Adani-led projects. Market analysts note that Adani’s decades-long rapid rise to power has been largely driven by his ability to align the Adani Group’s strategic priorities with the policy goals of the Modi government, a dynamic that has kept him at the center of Indian political and economic life even as controversy has followed his career. The impending end of the U.S. criminal case marks a major turning point in the legal saga, though questions about the conglomerate’s business practices and political ties remain unresolved.

  • Iran war energy shock drives interest in ethanol and other biofuels across hard-hit Asia

    Iran war energy shock drives interest in ethanol and other biofuels across hard-hit Asia

    The ongoing Iran war has triggered crippling energy supply shocks across Asia, with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — the world’s most critical energy shipping chokepoint — upending fuel access and sending prices soaring for millions of ordinary households. From the crowded streets of New Delhi to the coastal hubs of Southeast Asia, consumers are grappling with steep cost hikes and disrupted daily routines, pushing regional governments to accelerate plans to expand biofuel use as a buffer against global energy volatility.

    In New Delhi, taxi driver Ravi Ranjan, who supports his wife and young child on his driving income, has seen his cooking fuel costs triple amid widespread shipping delays and supply shortages. “I used to pay 1,000 rupees ($11) for a standard LPG cylinder. Now I’m forced to pay 3,000 rupees ($31) on the black market just to put food on the table,” he explained. Halfway across the country in Chennai, advertising executive Sushmita Sankar faces similar strains: her gasoline and cooking fuel bills have skyrocketed, and the 20% ethanol-blended gasoline that is now standard at Indian pumps has cut her car’s fuel efficiency, adding extra time and stress to her already packed schedule of work and childcare.

    “With prices going up and mileage dropping, I now have to spend far more time queuing to fill my tank or track down cooking gas,” Sankar said. “It’s turned a routine chore into another major source of stress.”

    For India, which imports nearly 90% of its crude oil to meet domestic energy demand, the supply disruptions from the Iran war have hit every corner of the economy — from private motorists and home cooks to industrial operations reliant on natural gas. Only the country’s national power grid, powered mostly by coal with a growing share of renewables, has remained largely unaffected. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has publicly called on Indian citizens to make “nationally responsible choices” to conserve fuel, urging more carpooling, greater use of public transport, and cutting back on non-essential international travel.

    To address the long-term risk of global energy shocks, New Delhi has laid out aggressive plans to ramp up domestic ethanol production and increase the share of biofuel blended into national gasoline supplies. The country already hit its 20% ethanol blending target nationwide in 2025, five years ahead of its original schedule, and policymakers are now weighing a push to 27% blending by 2030. In a policy shift that signals a major push for higher biofuel adoption, India’s transport ministry has recently proposed allowing passenger and commercial vehicles to run on blends of 85% ethanol, or even 100% pure ethanol, a move designed to pressure automakers to begin manufacturing engines compatible with these higher concentrations. To protect domestic supplies of feedstock for ethanol production, the government has also banned all sugar exports through at least September, ensuring enough raw material is available to scale up output.

    Proponents frame the policy shift as a win for both energy security and climate action. “Moving toward higher ethanol blends reflects the government’s long-term vision for energy security, lower emissions, and reduced dependence on imported crude oil,” explained Chandra Kumar Jain, president of the Grain Ethanol Manufacturers Association. Data from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) shows the current 20% ethanol blend already cut India’s crude oil imports by 2.5% in 2025.

    But the rapid push for higher crop-based ethanol blending has drawn sharp criticism from analysts, who warn of multiple trade-offs for consumers, food security, and the environment. Drivers already report reduced fuel mileage with existing 20% blends, and ethanol’s lower energy density means higher blends will lead to even greater efficiency losses. Environmental and energy analysts warn that diverting large volumes of corn, rice, and sugarcane — staples of India’s food system — to ethanol production could create competition for arable land, drive up food prices, and worsen existing water stress. Producing just one liter of grain-based ethanol requires between 3,000 and 10,000 liters of water, a major concern in a country already facing widespread groundwater depletion.

    “It’s not clear how higher ethanol blends will perform in existing vehicle engines, and it will take years to scale up manufacturing of new engines built to handle these higher concentrations,” said Shyamasis Das, a senior researcher at the New Delhi-based Centre for Social and Economic Progress. “The broader climate benefits of crop-based ethanol are also very limited when you account for land use change and water consumption. Only ethanol produced from agricultural residues, municipal waste, and used cooking oil — materials that don’t require new land or water inputs — can truly qualify as sustainable.”

    India is not alone in turning to biofuels amid the current energy crisis. Across Southeast Asia, governments are also rolling out new policies to expand biofuel blending to boost energy sovereignty and insulate their economies from global price shocks. In Indonesia, President Prabowo Subianto launched a new program in March that aims to increase biodiesel blending from 40% to 50%, with the country relying on palm oil as its primary biofuel feedstock.

    “We are going in a big way to biofuel,” Subianto said. The policy also helps support Indonesia’s domestic palm oil industry by creating a larger local market for the commodity, but analysts warn that expanded production could drive new land clearing and deforestation of old-growth tropical forests.

    Malaysia, another major palm oil producer, followed suit in April, approving a plan to gradually increase biodiesel blending to 15%, with a future target of 20% under consideration. “Skyrocketing fuel prices from the Iran war have revived political and public support for expanded biofuel use,” said Kuala Lumpur-based energy analyst Ahmad Rafdi Endut. “But higher blends require extensive additional testing, and many consumers are already wary of the reduced fuel efficiency that comes with higher biofuel mixes.”

    Despite the sudden policy momentum driven by the Iran war energy crisis, industry analysts caution that it will still take years for higher ethanol and biodiesel blends to become widely available across Asia. Developing the full supply chain, testing new fuel formulations, and rolling out vehicles compatible with high-concentration blends all require significant lead time. Many analysts also note that biofuels are at best a temporary buffer against energy shocks, arguing that electric vehicles paired with expanded renewable energy generation represent a more sustainable long-term solution for both energy security and climate action.

    “The current crisis has pushed governments to prioritize near-term energy independence, but rapid expansion of crop-based biofuels carries new long-term risks for food security and environmental protection,” said IEEFA analyst Charith Konda. “Moving forward, the focus needs to be on scaling sustainable non-crop biofuels and accelerating the transition to electric vehicles and renewables.”

  • How the fall of Starmer will reshape British policy on Israel

    How the fall of Starmer will reshape British policy on Israel

    As speculation builds over the race to replace Keir Starmer as British prime minister, one critical issue has so far been sidelined by political commentators: Starmer’s controversial handling of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza and ongoing settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank. For now, media coverage has fixated on candidate horse-trading and critiques of Starmer’s governing style, but political insiders agree this dynamic will shift dramatically once the leadership contest formally gets underway. When it does, Starmer’s approach to the Gaza crisis will emerge as one of the race’s defining flashpoints.

    Across the Labour Party, a growing consensus holds that whoever succeeds Starmer will need to adopt a far more uncompromising stance toward Israel, with potential policy shifts ranging from targeted sanctions on illegal West Bank settlements and a ban on settlement goods to sweeping, state-level sanctions against Israel itself. Senior Labour figures have already framed the issue as a critical electoral and moral turning point for the party. “Labour’s refusal to properly oppose Israel’s actions in Gaza is one of the key issues that has appalled huge numbers of former Labour voters and driven them away from the party,” Labour MP Richard Burgon told Middle East Eye. Fellow MP Kim Johnson echoed that sentiment, noting: “Any future leader must demonstrate a clear willingness to challenge the Israeli government over the continued violence in Gaza and illegal settlement expansion in the West Bank. I will be looking closely at where any future leader stands on these issues. This includes their willingness to take tough, principled action and their independence from foreign interests in the form of financial backing.”

    The field of likely contenders has begun to take shape, with former Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband all tipped as potential candidates. Currently, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has emerged as the early frontrunner, should he win the upcoming by-election in Makerfield — a seat vacated by former Starmer ally Josh Simons. Burnham holds overwhelming popularity among Labour’s grassroots membership, but his record on Israel and Middle East policy is nuanced.

    As a regional mayor, Burnham has not shaped national Labour policy on the conflict, and he has never positioned himself as a strident pro-Palestine advocate in the mold of former leader Jeremy Corbyn. He joined Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) in 2015, during his first unsuccessful run for the party leadership, when he stated his first overseas visit as leader would be to Israel and described the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement as “spiteful.” Yet even then, Burnham criticized Israeli leadership, calling Benjamin Netanyahu’s 2015 re-election “depressing” and noting that Palestine would require increased international support. After the October 7 2023 Hamas attack, Burnham broke sharply with Starmer’s pro-Israel line, calling for an immediate ceasefire just weeks into the war — at a time when Labour MPs were ordered not to support parliamentary ceasefire votes. He has since cited lessons from the 2003 Iraq War, which he voted for as a young MP, to justify his stance: “the US-UK action resulted in huge harm to innocent civilians,” he has said, adding that those experiences shaped his opposition to the Gaza campaign. Most analysts agree that as prime minister, Burnham would almost certainly toughen Britain’s stance on Israeli violations of international law.

    Ed Miliband, Labour leader between 2010 and 2015, has also signaled he would take a harder line than Starmer. Like Burnham, Miliband has long identified as a friend of Israel and opposed boycott campaigns, but he broke with Conservative government policy during the 2014 Israeli bombing of Gaza, which killed more than 1,400 Palestinian civilians. He sharply criticized then-Prime Minister David Cameron’s “inexplicable silence” on “the killing of innocent Palestinian civilians caused by Israel’s military action,” calling Cameron’s position outright wrong. That same year, Miliband backed unilateral recognition of Palestinian statehood, a policy rejected by the Tories. Within Starmer’s cabinet, sources confirm Miliband was a leading voice pushing Starmer to formally recognize a Palestinian state, a step Starmer ultimately took in September 2025. He also successfully lobbied Starmer privately to block the U.S. from using British bases to strike Iran in February 2026, before Starmer partially reversed his decision. For her part, Angela Rayner has been publicly tied to Starmer’s Gaza position as deputy prime minister, but has a longstanding record of supporting Palestinian statehood recognition.

    The most politically ambiguous contender is Wes Streeting, whose stance on the issue has shifted dramatically in recent years. A longstanding member of LFI who meets regularly with the group in Westminster, Streeting has received more than £20,000 in donations between 2021 and 2025 from Trevor Chinn, a 90-year-old philanthropist awarded the Israeli Presidential Medal of Honour in 2024 for his service to the state. Immediately after October 7, Streeting followed the official Labour line, repeating Israel’s unsubstantiated claim that Hamas used civilians as human shells and refused to back a ceasefire. In January 2024, he even dismissed South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice as a “distraction” from diplomatic efforts.

    But in recent months, Streeting has rebranded himself as a critic of Israel. Anonymous Labour sources claim he privately pushed Starmer for a more pro-Palestinian stance while serving in cabinet. Last September, he stated that Israel’s actions in Gaza were “leading Israel to pariah status.” Then in February 2026, private text correspondence between Streeting and former U.S. ambassador Peter Mandelson was leaked — a move multiple Labour sources believe Streeting orchestrated to boost his leadership prospects. In the July 2025 texts, Streeting warned he could “become toast at the next election” in his marginal Ilford North seat, admitting: “Israel is committing war crimes before our eyes … the Israeli government talks the language of ethnic cleansing, and I have met with our own medics out there who describe the most chilling and distressing scenes of calculated brutality against women and children.” He called Israel a rogue state, arguing: “Let them pay the price as pariahs with sanctions applied to the state, not just a few ministers.”

    Critics have slammed Streeting for hypocrisy, noting he remained in a cabinet that cooperated with Israel even while holding these private beliefs. But the leak itself signals a key political shift: Streeting calculates that taking a hard line against Israel will benefit his campaign, a calculation rooted in his own 2024 election experience, where he held Ilford North by fewer than 600 votes against a pro-Palestine independent challenger.

    This shift reflects broader pressure across the party: grassroots Labour members are far more critical of Israel than the parliamentary party, with a June 2025 poll finding nine out of ten rank-and-file members believe the UK should take a much harder line against Israel than the current government. Once the contest begins, all candidates will face intense pressure from members to publicly address Starmer’s handling of Gaza, a record marked by inconsistency and criticism from the left.

    Under Starmer, the UK has conducted at least 518 spy flights over Gaza during Israel’s campaign, sharing intelligence with Israel despite government claims the flights were solely for locating hostages. The Starmer government has also permitted British dual nationals to serve in the Israeli military, and approved $169 million in military exports to Israel in the three months after imposing a partial arms embargo — more than the entire volume of military exports approved by the Conservative government between 2020 and 2023. While Starmer broke with previous Tory policy by dropping the UK’s objection to International Criminal Court jurisdiction over Israel, imposing a partial arms embargo, and sanctioning far-right Israeli ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, he has walked back repeated attempts to label Israeli actions a breach of international law, refused to accuse Israel of war crimes, and allowed the U.S. to use British bases for 2026 strikes on Iran, a move legal experts describe as illegal. Domestically, Starmer’s government outlawed pro-Palestine direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organization, arresting thousands of supporters — including many elderly activists — despite a High Court ruling that the ban was unlawful.

    All of these policies will be put to the test during the leadership contest, with candidates forced to answer tough questions: Does Israel qualify as an apartheid state? Has it committed genocide in Gaza? Will they continue to support Labour Friends of Israel? Will they ban settlement goods, impose a full arms embargo, reverse the Palestine Action ban, or block U.S. use of British bases for future strikes against Iran?

    These questions are not just internal party business. Labour faces growing electoral pressure from the left from the Green Party, which has positioned itself as the leading UK political voice opposing British support for Israel and participation in U.S.-led Middle East wars. Leading pollster John Curtice noted after recent local elections that the Greens have done far more damage to Labour’s vote share than the right-wing Reform Party, with Gaza a top driver of that defection.

    The next Labour leader will face a clear choice: double down on Starmer’s strategy of courting right-leaning voters, or shift left to recoup disaffected voters lost to the Greens by returning to Labour’s historic roots of supporting marginalized and occupied populations. Even candidates with long pro-Israel records like Streeting now recognize that taking a harder line on Israel is politically beneficial, as his leaked texts make clear.

    The end result is inevitable: whoever wins the contest will rewrite Britain’s Israel policy. Even if Starmer survives his current leadership crisis, he will likely be forced to adjust his stance to shore up support from the party’s left. For Labour, a break from Starmer’s approach is not just morally necessary, it is politically smart, argues Burgon: “Sanctioning Israel to bring the government into line with its legal obligations under international law would not only be the right thing to do, it would also be popular. And if Labour under a new leader wants to convince people it has genuinely changed, then such a clear break with the failures of the Starmer era on Gaza will be essential.”

  • Trump insists US-China relations are in a good place despite differences as he wraps up Beijing trip

    Trump insists US-China relations are in a good place despite differences as he wraps up Beijing trip

    BEIJING – As U.S. President Donald Trump concluded his fast-paced diplomatic visit to China on Friday, he remained steadfast in his public framing that relations between the world’s two largest economies are strong and improving, even as deep, unresolved divisions over flashpoint issues from Taiwan to the Iran conflict continue to test bilateral ties.

    On his final day in the Chinese capital, Trump took to social media to claim that Chinese President Xi Jinping had praised his “tremendous successes” in office. He also sought to clarify Xi’s recent comment describing the U.S. as a potentially declining power, arguing the remark was directed exclusively at his predecessor Joe Biden, not his own administration.

    Yet Trump’s upbeat assessment of the U.S.-China relationship runs headlong into tangible disagreements that dominated closed-door negotiations this week, with no sign of breakthrough on the most contentious items on the agenda.

    ### Taiwan: Core Interest Sparks Sharp Warnings
    The Taiwan question emerged as the most sensitive topic of this week’s talks, with Chinese officials confirming that Xi privately warned Trump that mishandling differences over the self-governing island could push the two global powers into open confrontation.

    For Beijing, Taiwan has long been framed as an non-negotiable core national interest, and Chinese leaders have ramped up this messaging in recent weeks amid growing defense cooperation between Washington and Taipei. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who joined the U.S. delegation for negotiations, emphasized that longstanding U.S. policy toward Taiwan remains unchanged, warning that any attempt to seize the island by force would be a catastrophic error, while also noting that Beijing’s tough rhetoric on the issue follows longstanding diplomatic norms.

    The current state of play on Taiwan exposes conflicting strands of Trump’s policy toward the island. In December, his administration approved a record $11 billion arms package for Taiwan – the largest ever offered to the democracy – but the deal has yet to be implemented, and Trump has publicly questioned the value of U.S. security commitments to Taipei. He has complained that Taiwan “stole” the U.S. semiconductor industry and repeatedly demanded the island pay full cost for American military protection, while using tariff threats and incentives inherited from the Biden administration to pressure Taipei into committing to massive new investments in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and multi-billion dollar purchases of American crude oil and liquefied natural gas. These inconsistent stances have fueled widespread speculation that Trump could be willing to scale back U.S. support for Taiwan in exchange for concessions on other issues.

    Ma Chun-wei, a specialist in cross-strait relations at Taiwan’s Tamkang University, explained that growing defense ties between Washington and Taipei have directly prompted Beijing’s harder line on the issue. “For Xi Jinping, he must show that the Taiwan issue is in China’s hands. He must demonstrate this image, or else he would be criticized,” Ma noted.

    ### The Iran Conflict: Disagreement Over Global Energy Security
    The ongoing war in Iran, which has effectively closed the critical Strait of Hormuz chokepoint for global oil trade, also featured prominently in Thursday’s two-hour talks between the two leaders at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People.

    Trump told Fox News in an interview that both he and Xi agreed the Strait of Hormuz – which carried roughly 20% of the world’s global oil supplies before the war began in February – must be reopened to meet global energy demand. Trump claimed that Xi privately offered to mediate to help end the conflict, though details of any potential Chinese role remain unclear, particularly given Beijing’s longstanding strategic partnership with Tehran. The U.S. has repeatedly pressed China to use its unique leverage as Iran’s largest trading partner to pressure Tehran into negotiating an end to the war, but Beijing has shown little public willingness to take steps that would damage its relationship with the Iranian government.

    “He’d like to see the Hormuz Strait open,” Trump said of Xi. “He said if I can be of any help whatsoever, I would like to help.” Trump added that Xi also opposes the imposition of tolls on ships transiting the strait and signaled China could increase purchases of American oil to reduce its reliance on Gulf energy supplies in the future.

    Just days before arriving in Beijing, Trump downplayed the urgency of resolving the Iran conflict during talks with Xi, telling reporters “we have Iran very much under control” and framing the issue as a lower priority. But senior administration officials struck a different tone ahead of the meetings, arguing that it is directly in China’s economic interest to help end the war. Rubio noted that the conflict has driven up global energy prices, slowing consumer demand around the world and leading to fewer purchases of Chinese goods, which harms China’s export-driven economy. While Beijing has so far cushioned the impact of the energy crisis using its strategic oil reserves, economists warn that that buffer is not unlimited, and prolonged disruption to global energy markets could cause significant damage to Chinese economic growth.

    On another longstanding point of friction, the White House still maintains that China could do more to crack down on the flow of Chinese-made precursor chemicals to Mexican drug cartels, which are used to produce illicit fentanyl that has caused a public health crisis across thousands of American communities.

    ### Trade and Business: Expectations of Potential Deals Ahead of Departure
    Heading into the visit, White House officials signaled that Trump would not conclude the trip without tangible progress on trade, suggesting new announcements could be coming before his departure for Washington. The U.S. side is pushing for formal Chinese commitments to increase purchases of American soybeans and beef, while Trump confirmed Friday that Xi had indicated China would move forward with a purchase of 200 Boeing commercial jets.

    According to a White House readout of Thursday’s talks, the two leaders discussed expanding Chinese agricultural imports from the U.S. and exploring opportunities for reciprocal investment expansion. The Trump administration is also pushing to establish a new bilateral Board of Trade to address ongoing commercial disputes between the two countries.

    Chinese Premier Li Qiang struck a conciliatory tone during separate talks with American business leaders, including Elon Musk of Tesla, Tim Cook of Apple and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang – all of whom joined Trump’s delegation for the visit. “China and the United States have been able to maintain frank and smooth dialogue and communication and actively safeguard a stable and healthy bilateral relationship” despite global upheaval, Li said.

    As Friday wraps up, Trump and Xi are scheduled for additional informal talks at Xi’s official Beijing residence before the U.S. president departs for the return trip to Washington, with no clear sign that the two sides have bridged the deep divides that continue to shape the world’s most important bilateral relationship.

  • LGBTQ campaigners denounce Eurovision ‘pinkwashing’ ahead of final

    LGBTQ campaigners denounce Eurovision ‘pinkwashing’ ahead of final

    As the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest prepares to crown its winner in Saturday’s grand final in Vienna, the long-running European music spectacle has been plunged into unprecedented controversy, with queer activists leading global calls to boycott the event over what they label deliberate “pinkwashing” of Israeli state violence against Palestinians.

    The controversy traces back to December 2024, when the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Eurovision’s governing body, voted to allow Israel to compete in this year’s contest. That decision has sparked sustained protests across Europe, from mass demonstrations on the streets of host city Vienna to the expulsions of pro-Palestine campaigners who disrupted live shows, and loud public booing and chants of “stop the genocide” during Israel’s qualifying performance. Five countries — Spain, Ireland, Iceland, Slovenia and the Netherlands — have already withdrawn from the contest entirely in protest, and multiple national public broadcasters have refused to air Saturday’s final.

    A flashpoint for queer criticism came in Thursday’s live semi-final broadcast, which included a pre-taped segment celebrating the contest’s long history of inclusivity for the LGBTQ+ community, a demographic that has long formed one of Eurovision’s core global audiences. For activists, the segment laid bare what they call the EBU and Israel’s coordinated campaign of reputation laundering: using the language of queer inclusivity to distract from ongoing military violence against Palestinians.

    Omar Khatib, a queer Palestinian writer and organiser based in Jerusalem, framed the moment as a clear moral test for global audiences. “Either you are against genocide and against the mass killing of Palestinians, or you are willing to normalise and coexist with it,” Khatib told Middle East Eye. He argued that the myth of Eurovision’s political neutrality no longer holds up, noting that the event has become a stage where “liberalism, nationalism and colonialism intersect under the language of diversity and inclusion.” For queer Palestinian organizers, Khatib added, Israel’s participation is not just a minor entry in a music contest: it is part of a broader state propaganda push that weaponizes queer identity to legitimize state violence against Palestinian people.

    In response to the EBU’s decision, thousands of LGBTQ+ viewers who have watched Eurovision for decades are now breaking that long-held habit and boycotting Saturday’s final. Queers for Palestine, a UK-based activist group that held a pro-Palestine symposium in London last month, is urging queer viewers to skip the broadcast and instead join the queer contingent at London’s annual Nakba Day demonstration, which commemorates the forced displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians during the 1948 creation of the State of Israel. For those who stay home, group member Tara suggests organizing local actions: asking local queer venues to cancel their Eurovision screenings, or distributing educational leaflets to attendees explaining how the event enables what activists call Israeli settler-colonialism and genocide.

    “Find those around you who want more from their queerness than annual shows of opulence dripping with blood, and set your sights again on what queerness is really all about: liberation,” Tara said. Addressing claims of hypocrisy from pro-Israel commentators, who often point to anti-LGBTQ+ policies from Palestinian political groups like Hamas, Tara pushed back on the false binary. “As queer activists, we love freedom and dignity for everyone and we want to contribute to the end of this oppression,” she said. “We, of course, also support our queer Palestinian friends and siblings when they struggle against the violence of patriarchy in their own society, as all queer people do everywhere in the world… there is quite obviously nothing hypocritical about this.”

    Mainstream reporting has backed up activists’ pinkwashing claims: The New York Times revealed earlier this week that Israel has spent more than $1 million on its Eurovision participation, framing the contest as a key soft power tool to repair the country’s damaged international reputation and rally global support amid widespread condemnation of its military operations in occupied Palestinian territories. Records show Israel launched this formal promotional campaign back in 2018, as criticism of its participation grew alongside its ongoing settlement expansion and military operations.

    For decades, Israel has positioned itself as a regional LGBTQ+ haven compared to neighboring countries: same-sex relations and same-sex adoption are legal in the country, and Tel Aviv has cultivated a global reputation as a leading queer travel and culture hub. But that reputation has long been challenged by critics, who note that same-sex marriage remains unlegalized in Israel, that powerful Jewish fundamentalist groups routinely push back against LGBTQ+ rights advances, and that a 2025 Pew Research Center survey found 47 percent of Israelis view homosexuality as morally unacceptable. Most notably, queer Palestinians have documented being targeted by Israeli intelligence, who routinely blackmail queer Palestinians into collaborating with Israeli occupation forces.

    The boycott campaign has drawn widespread support from artists across the globe, with more than 2,000 musicians signing the “No Music For Genocide” petition calling for a full boycott of the 2026 contest. UK feminist punk band Big Joanie, which centers the experiences of Black and queer women in its work, was one of those signatories. Lead singer Stephanie Phillips said the desire to enjoy a beloved cultural event cannot override the reality of violence facing Palestinians. “I think there is definitely merit for an accusation of pinkwashing,” she said. “While I fully understand that Eurovision means a lot to the LGBTQ+ community, I also think it does not cancel out the reality that many Palestinians are living right now – there are LGBTQ+ Palestinians as well and I doubt they feel represented or seen by the choices of Eurovision.” Phillips noted that the band’s audience has been overwhelmingly supportive of their pro-Palestine stance, with only one negative incident after a show in Cologne, Germany, where an attendee aggressively confronted her for dedicating a song to the Palestinian people.

    The controversy has already had a measurable impact on the contest’s global reach. Typically, Eurovision’s 25-country grand final draws more than 150 million viewers worldwide, but this year’s final is on track to be the least-watched in the event’s history. Alongside the five withdrawing countries, Spanish public television has already confirmed it will not air the final, and Slovenian and Irish public broadcasters have also pulled their broadcasts. Semi-final viewership in countries still airing the contest has already slumped sharply from previous years. As final rehearsals wrapped up in Vienna on Friday, a parallel pro-Palestine event featuring speeches and a concert was held in the city center, drawing hundreds of attendees.

    Even former contest winners have sounded the alarm over the long-term damage the controversy has done to Eurovision’s reputation as a unifying cultural event. Emmelie de Forest, the Danish singer who won the 2013 contest, told Middle East Eye that the EBU’s decision has left her heartbroken. “I think it has already done a lot of damage to Eurovision, and that makes me genuinely sad to say because the contest has been such a meaningful part of my life,” she said. “I sadly think the contest is creating more division than unity. The controversy surrounding Israel’s participation, the backlash from fans and artists, the countries withdrawing and the growing distrust toward the EBU have all fundamentally changed the atmosphere around Eurovision.”