标签: Asia

亚洲

  • At least 19 dead after major earthquake strikes southern Philippines

    At least 19 dead after major earthquake strikes southern Philippines

    A powerful magnitude 7.8 earthquake that hit off the coast of Mindanao island in the southern Philippines has left at least 19 people dead and more than 130 injured, according to initial local official reports. The deadly seismic event struck at 7:37 a.m. local time on Monday, equal to 23:37 GMT on Sunday, sending shockwaves across the region and prompting emergency tsunami warnings across four nations: the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, and Australia. Most of these alerts were lifted within hours of the initial quake.

    Visual documentation circulating on social media and shared by local outlets captured the devastating force of the quake, showing multiple structures reduced to rubble. One widely circulated clip shows a local Jollibee fast-food outlet in a southern Philippine city completely crumbled, a striking image that has underscored the quake’s destructive power. Initial casualty counts, compiled by local authorities, list injuries across three hard-hit provinces — South Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, and Sarangani — as well as General Santos city, the major urban center closest to the quake’s epicenter. These preliminary numbers are still undergoing formal verification by the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC), the national body that formalizes disaster casualty statistics by aggregating data from police, local governments, and relief organizations, a process that typically takes roughly 24 hours to complete.

    In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. issued a public statement confirming that national government agencies were coordinating a unified disaster response. “The national government is moving and we will not leave Mindanao behind,” Marcos assured the public. The quake coincided with the first day of the new Philippine school year, prompting Marcos to order an immediate suspension of classes across all affected regions. Footage from a primary school in Davao Occidental province captured the terrifying experience of students during the quake: dozens of children can be seen crouching on open ground as the earth shook beneath them, while a corrugated metal shelter collapsed behind the group. The school later confirmed that no students or staff were injured in the incident.

    As of Tuesday morning, more than 130 aftershocks have been recorded across the region, with magnitudes ranging from a minor 1.3 up to a significant 6.7. In Sarangani, the coastal province closest to the epicenter, the initial quake knocked out power grids and mobile communication networks for several hours, though services have since been restored for most residents.

    General Santos, the largest city near the quake’s origin, holds two major claims to fame: it is widely known as the tuna capital of the Philippines, and it is also the hometown of legendary world boxing champion turned politician Manny Pacquiao.

    The Philippines lies along the Pacific Ring of Fire, a geologically active region where seismic activity is extremely common. While most seismic events in the country are minor and cause little to no damage, large deadly quakes are a recurring hazard. In September 2023, a magnitude 6.9 quake struck the central Visayas region, killing more than 70 people.

    Immediately after the Monday quake, Japanese authorities issued an urgent warning for potential one-meter tsunami waves along the country’s coasts. By later Monday, only minor waves had been recorded: a small surge of a few centimeters hit southern Okinawa prefecture, and a 20-centimeter wave was measured in the distant Ogasawara Islands. Minor tsunami surges, ranging from a few centimeters to 1.4 meters, were also recorded along coastlines of Indonesia, Palau, and the Philippines.

  • Manav Suthar picks up 6-33 on debut as India enforces follow-on against Afghanistan

    Manav Suthar picks up 6-33 on debut as India enforces follow-on against Afghanistan

    On Monday, a historic debut performance from young Indian spinner Manav Suthar stole the spotlight in the one-off Test match between India and Afghanistan held in New Chandigarh, as the 22-year-old turned in a sensational 6 wickets for just 33 runs to bundle the Afghan side out for a total of 152 runs in their first innings.

    Suthar’s spell not only announced his arrival on the international Test stage but also carved his name into Indian cricket’s record books. His figures mark the second-best bowling performance by an Indian on Test debut, falling only behind Narendra Hirwani’s iconic 8 wickets for 61 runs against the West Indies back in 1988. He also became just the second Indian slow bowler to claim a five-wicket haul in his maiden Test innings, a feat last achieved by Amit Mishra, who took 5 for 71 against Australia in 2008.

    The day’s play built on India’s already dominant position in the match, after the home side declared their first innings at 564 for 8, earning a massive 412-run first innings lead that allowed them to enforce the follow-on on Afghanistan. When play resumed for the third day’s lunch break, Afghanistan had navigated four overs of their second innings without losing a wicket, reaching 18 for 0, with opening batter Sediqullah Atal not out on 16 and Abdul Malik yet to get off the mark, holding on at 2 not out.

    Monday’s first session had begun with Afghanistan resuming their first innings at 113 for 5, still five wickets away from being all out. Just five overs into the day, India seamer Prasidh Krishna broke the resistance, knocking over Azmatullah Omarzai’s stumps to claim his third wicket of the innings, finishing with final figures of 3 for 37.

    That wicket opened the door for Suthar’s match-winning spell. The young spinner picked up two key wickets across two consecutive overs: he had Sharafuddin Ashraf caught behind the wicket for 11, before clean bowling Rahmat Shah through the gap between bat and pads. Shah, who top-scored for Afghanistan, put up a valiant 60 runs from 135 deliveries, decorated with nine fours and one six.

    Suthar continued to dismantle the Afghan lower order, with the final five wickets of the innings falling for just 39 runs to wrap up the innings quickly. This one-off Test is just the second meeting between the two sides in the longest format of the game. Afghanistan’s inaugural Test match back in 2018 was also hosted by India in Bengaluru, where the home side secured a dominant innings and 262-run victory, setting the stage for India’s another commanding showing in this latest encounter.

  • Hong Kong proposes to let city leader decide what counts as national security offense

    Hong Kong proposes to let city leader decide what counts as national security offense

    HONG KONG – The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government tabled new subsidiary legislation to the city’s legislature on Monday, introducing a formal mechanism that lets the city’s chief executive label specific criminal acts as national security offenses. The move marks the latest step in the regional government’s ongoing efforts to strengthen national security frameworks in the Asian financial hub, a process that has drawn sharp scrutiny from critics who argue it is accelerating the erosion of long-held civil liberties.

    This new legislative proposal comes in the wake of two major national security measures already enacted in the city. First, after large-scale pro-democracy protests upended daily life in Hong Kong in 2019, the central Chinese government in Beijing implemented a sweeping national security law that has been used to detain dozens of high-profile pro-democracy activists. Most recently, in 2024, the Hong Kong government passed a second standalone security law targeting offenses including espionage and unlawful disclosure of state secrets.

    Critics of these existing frameworks argue that the two laws have effectively gutted the Western-style civil liberties that Beijing agreed to preserve under the handover agreement when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. But regional authorities have repeatedly pushed back against this criticism, maintaining that robust national security legislation is a non-negotiable foundation for the city’s long-term political and social stability.

    In the official document submitted to the Legislative Council on Monday, the Hong Kong Security Bureau and Department of Justice laid out the details of the new subsidiary legislation, which aims to formalize and codify the classification process for what the existing legal framework labels “other offenses endangering national security.”

    Under the proposed rules, if the chief executive issues an official certificate confirming that a given criminal act in a pending case involves national security interests, that case will automatically be classified as a national security offense. The proposal also specifies that if a suspect faces both a primary national security charge and an alternative secondary charge stemming from the same actions, the alternative charge will also be categorized as an offense endangering national security.

    Officials emphasized in the document that amid today’s increasingly complex global geopolitical environment, national security threats remain a persistent risk for Hong Kong. Codifying this classification mechanism through subsidiary legislation, they argued, will strengthen both the legal framework and enforcement infrastructure that Hong Kong relies on to protect national security.

    The authorities added that the new legislation is designed solely to refine procedural details and add greater clarity and predictability to the implementation of existing national security provisions. Crucially, officials stressed that the subsidiary legislation does not create any new criminal offenses, introduce harsher penalties, or grant new enforcement powers to authorities.

    The Hong Kong government has called for the legislative process to be completed as soon as possible, noting that the final text of the proposal will be adjusted to incorporate feedback from sitting legislators before it is finalized. Once approved, the legislation will go into effect immediately on the day it is published in the Hong Kong government gazette.

  • Iran fires missiles at Israel in retaliation for continued attacks on Lebanon

    Iran fires missiles at Israel in retaliation for continued attacks on Lebanon

    In a sharp escalation of Middle East tensions that has upended months of tentative ceasefire efforts, Iran launched a barrage of missiles toward northern Israel on Sunday, carrying out a long-threatened retaliation for Israel’s expanding military campaign in Lebanon. The attack marks the first direct Iranian strike on Israeli territory since a fragile truce was reached in April, and it has pushed the region closer to a full-scale regional conflict that risks drawing in major global powers.

    Prior to launching the strikes, Iranian leaders issued a clear ultimatum: Israel must immediately halt its air assaults across Lebanon, particularly intensified targeting of Beirut’s southern Dahieh suburb, or face severe consequences. Following the missile launch, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) explicitly tied the operation to Israel’s recent escalation in Lebanon, confirming that the attack was a direct response to Israeli strikes that had crossed what Iran called “all red lines.”

    “We had previously warned that if the crimes in the Dahieh area of Beirut expand, we will attack targets in the occupied territories,” the IRGC’s top joint military command stated in an official announcement after the strikes.

    Israeli military officials confirmed that they detected the incoming missile launches immediately and activated their layered air defense networks to intercept the projectiles. Despite interception efforts, the incident has dramatically raised stakes, with an unnamed Israeli official warning that any direct Iranian attack on Israeli soil would trigger an immediate military retaliation, and could even open a window for Israel to restart its full cross-regional military campaign.

    General Ali Abollahi, commander of Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, doubled down on Iran’s warnings Sunday, as Israeli air defense crews worked to neutralize the incoming missile salvos. “The Israeli army must stop its attacks on southern Lebanon and the suburbs, and if it expands its attacks to that region or responds to Iran’s action, it will face more devastating and regrettable blows,” Abollahi said.

    The escalation has already derailed ongoing diplomatic efforts to reach a permanent ceasefire deal, according to U.S. President Donald Trump. Speaking to Fox News, Trump said that Sunday’s Israeli strike on Beirut had ruined momentum that had been building toward a final agreement, which he said was expected to be finalized as early as this week.

    “I had expected an agreement could be signed “on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday and now this takes place,” Trump said. He added that he was “not happy” about the Beirut strike that prompted Iran’s retaliation, and confirmed that the Israeli operation had not been coordinated with the U.S. government.

    Trump also noted that Iran’s missile launch would only further hinder diplomatic progress, saying “it is certainly not going to help negotiations.” Amid the escalating crisis, the U.S. president confirmed that American military forces positioned across the Middle East have been placed on high alert.

    The current tensions grow out of a broader conflict that began in February, when Trump launched U.S. air strikes alongside Israel against Iran. Negotiations between Washington and Tehran have remained deadlocked in recent weeks, even as the Trump administration has pushed for a quick final deal. Just days before the latest escalation, in an interview recorded Friday and broadcast Sunday during Trump’s visit to his New Jersey golf course, he repeated his aggressive threat to resume large-scale bombing if Iran did not accept a deal swiftly.

    “We’re very close to a deal, or I’m going to blow the hell out of them,” Trump told NBC News.

    The rapid sequence of escalations — from Israel’s expanded strikes in Beirut to Iran’s direct missile attack on Israel — has once again stoked widespread fears that the localized conflict could spiral into a full-scale regional war that draws in multiple neighboring countries and major powers beyond the immediate combatants.

  • Israel says it has struck Iran after taking missile fire

    Israel says it has struck Iran after taking missile fire

    In a dramatic escalation that has sent shockwaves across the Middle East, Israel launched early-morning airstrikes on Monday targeting military sites across central and western Iran, a direct retaliatory strike against Tehran’s recent missile attack that has pushed the region closer to a full-scale regional war.

    Multiple explosions were reported across several major Iranian cities, including Isfahan, Karaj, Tabriz and the capital Tehran, according to Iranian state media, which did not immediately release further details on casualties or damage. A local witness in Tehran confirmed hearing at least one large explosion west of the capital. In the immediate aftermath of the strikes, Iranian authorities closed the airspace surrounding Imam Khomeini International Airport, the country’s busiest and most strategically important international air hub, while still withholding information on what infrastructure or targets were hit. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard confirmed that Israel used air-launched ballistic missiles to carry out the morning assault, but offered no additional context on the attack’s outcomes.

    In an official statement released as the strikes commenced, the Israeli military confirmed its action: “A short while ago, the Israeli Air Force struck military targets belonging to the Iranian terror regime in western and central Iran.” The military declined to elaborate further on the scope of the operation.

    Shortly after Israel’s airstrikes, alerts were triggered across multiple locations. In Israel, air raid sirens sounded after the military confirmed a missile had been launched from Yemen toward Israeli territory, though no casualties or damage have been reported by Israeli rescue services. The missile launch comes from territory controlled by the Iran-aligned Houthi rebel movement, which has launched intermittent strikes against Israel since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war but has not yet been drawn into direct, large-scale conflict between Iran and Israel. The Houthi movement has not yet claimed responsibility for the launch, a delay that is consistent with the group’s past pattern of waiting hours or days to acknowledge attacks.

    Across the border in Saudi Arabia, missile warning sirens activated in Al Kharj governorate, the location of Prince Sultan Air Base which hosts U.S. military personnel. Saudi state media later confirmed that the missile threat had passed, offering no further details on the incident.

    The Israeli strike directly contradicts public and private appeals for restraint from U.S. leadership. A senior anonymous U.S. official revealed Sunday that former President Donald Trump, in a private call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, urged Netanyahu to delay any retaliation against Iran following Tehran’s missile strike. The official claimed Trump believed he had successfully convinced Netanyahu to hold off on immediate action, saying “Trump got Bibi to hold off for the time being.” No immediate comment was issued by Netanyahu’s office in response to the claim, and the White House has not responded to requests for comment on whether Monday’s strike was coordinated with U.S. officials.

    In multiple public comments before the airstrike, Trump made clear his opposition to immediate escalation. Speaking to Fox News, Trump stated he wanted Iran to cease missile fire and return to diplomatic negotiations, and added that Israel’s Sunday airstrikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs were not coordinated with the U.S., saying “I’m not happy about it.” In a pre-strike interview with the Financial Times, Trump went further, claiming he sets the terms for Israel’s military campaign in the region. “He won’t have any choice,” Trump said in the phone interview. “I call the shots. I call all the shots. He (Netanyahu) doesn’t call the shots.”

    The current escalation comes after weeks of rising tensions that have derailed fragile ceasefire negotiations. Diplomatic talks between Iran and the U.S. focused on de-escalating the broader regional war have been stalled for days by ongoing fighting between Israeli forces and the Iran-backed Lebanese militia Hezbollah. Israeli forces have advanced into southern Lebanon, seizing territory the country has not controlled in 25 years, amplifying fears that the conflict would widen beyond Gaza and Lebanon. The cycle of violence that led to Monday’s strike began Sunday, when Israel carried out airstrikes in southern Beirut; Iran retaliated with its own missile strike against Israel, setting the stage for the current escalation.

  • Chinese leader Xi heads to North Korea for closely watched talks with Kim

    Chinese leader Xi heads to North Korea for closely watched talks with Kim

    For the first time in seven years, Chinese President Xi Jinping will touch down in Pyongyang on Monday for a two-day diplomatic visit that experts say carries far-reaching implications for the balance of power across Northeast Asia and global geopolitical rivalry with the United States. The core highlight of the trip will be a scheduled summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, marking the first face-to-face meeting between the two leaders since their last encounter in Beijing last September, when both attended a major military parade alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin. No official public agenda has been released for the talks, but foreign policy analysts widely frame the visit as a deliberate bid to reinforce China’s historical influence in Pyongyang while advancing mutual strategic goals at a moment when both countries face escalating tensions with Washington.

    This high-profile trip comes on the heels of consecutive summits Xi held in Beijing with U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Putin just one month prior, and it precedes a planned September visit by Xi to the U.S. for another meeting with Trump. According to Kwak Gil Sup, head of the Seoul-based One Korea Center, a research outlet focused on North Korean affairs, the visit is designed to showcase China’s outsize influence across the Korean Peninsula and cement its role as the leading power in Northeast Asia amid intensifying great power competition with the United States.

    For decades, China has served as North Korea’s primary economic lifeline and its most critical diplomatic backer on the global stage. It is widely reported that Beijing has refrained from fully implementing United Nations sanctions imposed on Pyongyang over its nuclear program and has discreetly provided critical aid to support the economically struggling North Korean regime. This year also marks the 75th anniversary of the establishment of bilateral diplomatic ties and the 65th anniversary of the two countries’ mutual defense treaty, a key milestone that adds symbolic weight to Xi’s trip.

    In recent years, however, questions have grown over the stability of the Sino-North Korean alliance, as Pyongyang has deepened its strategic and military cooperation with Moscow. North Korea has supplied thousands of troops and artillery ammunition to support Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, and in exchange, it has received significant economic assistance and advanced military technology from the Kremlin. Still, analysts note North Korea cannot depend exclusively on Russia for support, creating an opening for Beijing to reassert its traditional role.

    For Xi, restoring China’s exclusive strategic sway over North Korea would deliver a key diplomatic advantage ahead of his upcoming talks with Trump, who has repeatedly stated his desire to restart diplomatic negotiations with Kim Jong Un over Pyongyang’s nuclear program. Experts point out that enforcing UN sanctions on North Korea is not a top priority for the Chinese government. In a pre-visit op-ed published by North Korea’s state-run flagship newspaper Rodong Sinmun on Monday, Xi emphasized that Beijing and Pyongyang must deepen strategic coordination and work jointly to push back against “hegemonism and coercive politics” to build a balanced, multipolar global order.

    Analysts forecast that Xi will bring tangible economic incentives to strengthen bilateral ties during the visit, including packages of urgently needed rice and fertilizer aid, a relaunch of Chinese group tourism to North Korea, and pledges to advance stalled cross-border joint economic development projects. “North Korea can’t solely rely on Russia. It needs to maintain a balanced alignment with China,” Kwak noted. The warm welcome extended by North Korean state media reflects Pyongyang’s enthusiasm for the visit: Rodong Sinmun referred to Xi as “the most honored state guest” in a Monday editorial, noting that Pyongyang’s capital was already steeped in a welcoming atmosphere of friendship ahead of the trip.

    A key concession Kim is expected to seek from Xi is a softer approach on the contentious issue of North Korean denuclearization. Analysts expect Xi will avoid pressing Kim aggressively for denuclearization commitments, instead offering vague general statements in support of regional peace and stability. This leniency is critical for Kim, who is actively pushing for global recognition of North Korea as a legitimate nuclear-armed state as a core prerequisite for convincing the international community to lift crippling UN sanctions.

    “Chinese officials have long taken the position of not speaking publicly about denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula, while still keeping it as a stated long-term policy goal. Kim appears to want Xi to accept North Korea as a nuclear neighbor,” explained Leif-Eric Easley, a professor of international studies at Ewha University in Seoul.

    In recent weeks, Kim has ramped up public displays of his nuclear ambitions. Just one week before Xi’s visit, Kim presided over the opening of a new industrial facility for producing enriched uranium, a core material for nuclear weapons, and pledged to expand North Korea’s nuclear arsenal “at an exponential rate.” He also oversaw sea trials of a newly built guided missile destroyer and called for accelerating efforts to develop a sea-based nuclear force capable of holding regional and global targets at risk. On the eve of Xi’s visit, Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of Kim Jong Un and a top senior Pyongyang official, doubled down on the regime’s position, dismissing U.S. demands for full denuclearization as an “escapist and anachronistic dream.”

    Since the collapse of high-stakes denuclearization talks with Trump in 2019, Kim Jong Un has rejected repeated overtures for negotiations from both Washington and Seoul, focusing exclusively on expanding and modernizing his country’s nuclear and missile arsenals. Last September, Kim noted he still held “good personal memories” of his previous interactions with Trump, but insisted the U.S. must drop its demand for complete denuclearization as a precondition for any new diplomatic talks. Experts ultimately predict Kim aims to eventually enter into arms reduction negotiations with the U.S. to secure sanctions relief and other economic concessions in exchange for partial rollbacks of his nuclear program.

  • A 7.8 magnitude earthquake rocks the southern Philippines, causing some damage and a tsunami warning

    A 7.8 magnitude earthquake rocks the southern Philippines, causing some damage and a tsunami warning

    In the early hours of Monday, a powerful 7.8-magnitude earthquake rocked parts of the southern Philippines, leaving infrastructure damaged, cutting power supplies, and prompting urgent tsunami warnings for coastal zones across multiple regional nations. The seismic event has put emergency response teams on high alert, though no confirmed fatalities or injuries have been released in the immediate aftermath.

    According to data from the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS), the earthquake’s epicenter was located 13 kilometers southwest of General Santos, a major coastal commercial hub on the island of Mindanao that is home to more than 700,000 residents and renowned for its large-scale tuna processing industry. The agency recorded the quake hitting at 7:37 a.m. local time at a depth of 10 kilometers. The U.S. Geological Survey offered a slightly different depth measurement of 55 kilometers, a common discrepancy between agencies in the immediate hours following large seismic events. In the wake of the initial quake, aftershocks reaching as high as magnitude 6.5 were recorded by the U.S. body.

    Widespread damage has already been reported in General Santos, including the partial collapse of a four-story small commercial building that housed a provincial branch of Manila-based DZRH radio station. Station representatives confirmed that all on-site staff fled to the ground floor safely and escaped without injury, but uncertainty remains over whether any other people were trapped in the rubble, as the quake struck before standard office hours when most workers had not yet arrived.

    Immediately following the seismic event, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) issued a series of regional alerts. The center warned that tsunami waves as high as 3 meters could impact sections of the Philippine coastline, while surges of up to 1 meter were possible for coastal areas of Indonesia and Malaysia. Smaller, non-destructive sea level changes were flagged for Taiwan, Japan, Guam, Papua New Guinea, and multiple small island nations and territories across the western Pacific. The PTWC explicitly confirmed that Hawaii faced no tsunami threat from the quake. As of Tuesday local time, Indonesia’s meteorological agencies have already recorded minor tsunami surges of up to 18 centimeters along coastlines in North Sulawesi and North Maluku provinces, where residents also reported feeling clear tremors from the main quake.

    Teresito Bacolcol, head of PHIVOLCS, issued an urgent advisory for at-risk coastal populations, urging residents to evacuate immediately to elevated inland areas or higher ground to avoid potential tsunami inundation.

    This seismic event underscores the constant natural hazard risk the Philippines faces as a nation positioned along the Pacific “Ring of Fire”, an extensive arc of active seismic faults that circles the Pacific Basin. The archipelagic nation counts among the world’s most disaster-prone countries, regularly experiencing major earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and is hit by an average of 20 typhoons and tropical storms each year.

  • Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez to visit Turkey for talks with Erdogan

    Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez to visit Turkey for talks with Erdogan

    Multiple insiders briefed on the planned itinerary have confirmed to independent outlet Middle East Eye that Venezuela’s interim president Delcy Rodriguez will embark on an official visit to Turkey this coming Monday, marking a key step in the Latin American nation’s new outreach to global partners following recent political shifts.

    Sources familiar with the schedule note that the trip will include a high-stakes meeting between Rodriguez and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, scheduled to take place in Istanbul. The visit comes as an extension of Rodriguez’s ongoing regional and global tour, which has already included a week-long stop in India. During her time in New Delhi, she held extensive talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration on expanding bilateral cooperation in energy, trade and cross-border investment, according to prior updates from the trip.

    Turkey and Venezuela have shared deep political and economic bonds for nearly a decade, a relationship rooted in mutual diplomatic support. For years, Erdogan maintained a close working relationship with former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was removed from power and taken into US custody earlier this year. Maduro is currently being held at a detention facility in New York as he faces ongoing federal criminal charges. Following Maduro’s ouster, Rodriguez assumed the interim presidency with the formal backing of US President Donald Trump, and has overseen a steady expansion of American economic interests in Venezuela, including expanded operations for US oil giant Chevron.

    The bilateral relationship between Ankara and Caracas was built on early reciprocal support. In 2016, right after a failed military coup attempt against Erdogan, Maduro was among the first global leaders to reach out and express solidarity—a gesture that laid the groundwork for years of growing cooperation. When the 2018 Venezuelan presidential election sparked controversy and the opposition-led National Assembly labeled Maduro an illegitimate leader in 2019, Erdogan publicly backed the then-president, telling him in a direct call: “Brother, you should stand firm. We are with you.”

    By 2023, bilateral trade between the two nations had climbed to nearly $1 billion, with heavy focus on the mining and gold sectors that hold major untapped potential in Venezuela. The two countries have already laid formal groundwork for expanded cooperation: in February 2024, their respective energy ministries signed two memorandums of understanding covering collaboration in oil, natural gas and mining. Later that year, Maduro confirmed that the pair had also agreed to a deal allowing Turkish firms to extract gold from fields in southern Venezuela. For years starting around 2019, Turkey imported large volumes of Venezuelan gold in exchange for exporting manufactured goods to the Latin American country, though the trade arrangement shrank over time after it drew scrutiny from US regulators.

    For years, widespread US sanctions imposed on Venezuela’s energy and mining sectors blocked further progress on these bilateral initiatives. But earlier this year, the Trump administration rolled back a portion of these restrictions, creating new openings for investment from both Turkish public and private entities in Venezuela’s key commodity sectors.

    Insiders told MEE that Rodriguez’s upcoming visit is rooted in a recognition of Turkey’s long-standing diplomatic support for Venezuela across successive administrations, and Caracas is open to deepening bilateral trade and investment through new joint projects. Sources add that Ankara is expected to prioritize discussions around expanding access to Venezuela’s lucrative oil and gold reserves during the talks. While Rodriguez’s administration has prioritized expanding US economic access, the upcoming meeting signals that Venezuela’s new government also aims to cultivate diversified economic partnerships with other global powers.

  • Friendship or leverage: Why is Xi Jinping going to North Korea?

    Friendship or leverage: Why is Xi Jinping going to North Korea?

    For more than seven decades, China and North Korea have framed their bilateral ties as a “blood-forged” alliance, rooted in their shared struggle during the Korean War. Yet for Beijing, this geographically proximate neighbor has long occupied a complicated position: it is a strategic buffer against U.S. military presence in Northeast Asia that China cannot afford to lose, but its unpredictable nuclear ambitions and independent foreign policy put it far beyond China’s full control. Now, as North Korea draws increasingly close to Russia, Beijing is moving to reassert its influence over this critical, volatile partner, ahead of an expected visit by Chinese leader Xi Jinping to Pyongyang this week.

    Diplomatic observers widely frame Xi’s upcoming trip as less a celebration of historic friendship and more a calculated push to reinforce China’s leverage. For years, strains of mistrust have eroded the once-closer relationship between Beijing and Pyongyang, a shift that became starkly visible in 2024. The 75th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic relations passed with muted public messaging and little fanfare; China’s ambassador skipped North Korea’s national founding celebrations earlier that year, and no senior-level diplomatic exchanges took place across the entire year. This inactivity stood in sharp contrast to the rapidly warming public ties between Pyongyang and Moscow, a development that has quietly unsettled Chinese leaders.

    Western diplomatic sources familiar with regional dynamics confirm that Beijing has grown increasingly concerned over the deepening partnership between North Korea and Russia. Following North Korea’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Pyongyang has dramatically expanded military cooperation with the Kremlin, culminating in a sweeping mutual defense pact signed during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Pyongyang in 2024. A BBC investigation estimates that roughly 2,300 North Korean troops have been killed fighting alongside Russian forces in Ukraine, and Pyongyang has been widely accused of supplying large volumes of ammunition to Russia’s war effort in exchange for Russian oil and economic aid. While this arrangement has sparked public alarm from Washington and its regional allies, it has also caused quiet anxiety in Beijing.

    “China wants to ensure that its interests vis-a-vis North Korea are protected at a time of rapid convergence between Moscow and Pyongyang,” explains Ankit Panda, a nuclear policy specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. China holds only one formal mutual defense treaty globally, and it is with North Korea. For Beijing, a scenario where Russia becomes the dominant external power in Pyongyang is far from ideal: a more confident, less economically dependent Kim Jong Un would almost certainly erode China’s historical leverage over the Korean Peninsula.

    Scholars note that Beijing holds mixed views of the Pyongyang-Moscow rapprochement. On one hand, the closer alignment distracts U.S. attention and complicates American strategic planning across multiple global regions, a shift that indirectly benefits Chinese interests. On the other hand, expanding military ties between North Korea and Russia could trigger a far more robust military response from the U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral alliance, a development that would greatly increase security pressure on Beijing. This balancing act shapes China’s approach to North Korea’s nuclear program: Beijing has not publicly endorsed Pyongyang’s nuclear ambitions, recognizing that open support would draw deeper U.S. military involvement into the region, but it has also refused to confront North Korea head on. In 2022, China joined Russia in vetoing a U.S.-led United Nations resolution that would have imposed new sanctions on North Korea over its repeated missile tests. As Victor Cha, head of foreign policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, puts it: a hardline Chinese stance against Pyongyang’s nuclear program would only push North Korea deeper into Russia’s orbit.

    To pull Pyongyang back into its sphere of influence, Beijing has already taken incremental, calculated steps. Late last year, Xi invited Kim Jong Un to attend a military parade in Beijing, where he was placed prominently alongside Putin, marking the two leaders’ first formal summit in six years. During the meeting, Xi described the two countries as “good neighbours, good friends and good comrades bound by a shared destiny” and called for expanded strategic coordination, with no public mention of North Korea’s controversial nuclear arsenal. Trade ties have also deepened: Chinese exports to North Korea surged to roughly $2.3 billion (£1.7 billion) in 2025, the highest level recorded in six years, and cross-border passenger rail services between Beijing and Pyongyang restarted earlier this year following a six-year suspension. All these moves, analysts say, are designed to rebuild Beijing’s sway.

    For Kim Jong Un, maintaining positive ties with China is also a pragmatic strategic choice. Kim cannot afford to alienate his largest historical source of economic aid, and there is long-term uncertainty in his alignment with Moscow: if the war in Ukraine ends, Russia’s need for North Korean military support could diminish significantly. Unlike an increasingly isolated Putin, Xi continues to host high-profile global diplomatic engagements in Beijing, giving China far more strategic leverage on the global stage than a war-weakened Russia. For Kim, balancing ties between the two major powers reduces the risk of being left reliant on a single, weakened partner.

    This current push for rapprochement comes after decades of growing tension between the two neighbors. When Kim Jong Un inherited power from his father Kim Jong Il, he quickly shifted priorities away from the close alignment with Beijing his father had maintained. Instead, he accelerated North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, conducting roughly 90 missile tests and four nuclear detonations in his first six years in office — more than both his father and grandfather combined. The rift deepened following the 2013 execution of Jang Song Thaek, Kim’s uncle, who was widely viewed in Beijing as a pro-China stabilizing force in Pyongyang. Xi responded with a rare public snub, visiting South Korea for the first time in 2014 before ever meeting Kim, a move that prompted Pyongyang to publicly label China a “turncoat and our enemy.” It was not until 2018, when international sanctions over North Korea’s nuclear program began to severely damage the country’s economy, that Kim made his first known foreign trip as leader, traveling by armoured train to Beijing to reset ties. After that summit, Kim always consulted Beijing ahead of any high-profile meetings with U.S. and South Korean leaders, sending a clear signal that Pyongyang would not negotiate over its future without China’s backing.

    Today, the dynamic remains unchanged at its core: North Korea acts as both a strategic buffer and a persistent policy burden for China. It keeps U.S. military forces at a distance from China’s northeastern border, but its regular weapons tests consistently destabilize the regional security environment. For Kim, the relationship is equally transactional: he wants Chinese economic and diplomatic protection, but refuses to submit to full Chinese control. Neither side holds full trust in the other, but both recognize that continued engagement serves their core strategic interests for the foreseeable future, keeping the door open for dialogue despite underlying tensions.

  • ‘We don’t look at the sky anymore’: The Air India crash victims who were not on the plane

    ‘We don’t look at the sky anymore’: The Air India crash victims who were not on the plane

    Twelve months have passed since an Air India passenger jet bound for London slammed into the BJ Medical College hostel complex in Ahmedabad, leaving 260 people dead – 241 onboard the aircraft and 19 on the ground. For the local community that bore the brunt of the disaster, time has not erased the raw pain of loss, nor has it removed the mangled, burned wreckage that stands as a permanent reminder of that fateful June day.

    The first thing Prahlod Thakur sees every morning when he opens his eyes are the framed photographs of his wife Sarlaben and two-year-old granddaughter Aadhya, hanging on the flaking bright green walls of his small home, tucked between religious symbols, tarnished brass cookware, and decades-old fading family portraits. Both were at the college on the day of the crash: for 15 years, Thakur’s family ran a popular tiffin meal service for trainee doctors and staff at the adjacent hospitals, and Sarlaben was working the lunch shift at the hostel mess when the plane hit. When Aadhya, who rarely left her grandmother’s side, needed to use the restroom, the pair climbed the stairs together. Seconds later, the aircraft crashed through the building’s roof.

    Thakur, working in another part of the campus that day, dropped everything and ran toward the thick black smoke rising from the wreckage. All he can recall now are fragmented, terrifying memories: the deafening explosion, searing heat, gas cylinders scattered across the destroyed kitchen, and his desperate, frantic search, calling Sarlaben’s name over and over through the rubble. For six days, Thakur and his family combed through every hospital, morgue, and relief camp across Ahmedabad, chasing unconfirmed leads and clinging to faint hope. It was only on the sixth day that they recovered the bodies of Sarlaben and Aadhya from a city mortuary.

    Today, the loss feels as sharp as it did the day after the crash. “I just miss them,” Thakur says softly. “I see the photos and feel like crying.” Whenever a plane passes overhead – a daily occurrence so close to Ahmedabad’s airport, once just a familiar part of the city’s background hum – the old pain rushes back. “Whenever a plane passes by, we feel the same pain. We don’t even look at the sky,” he says. The 72-year-old now copes by replaying a short video on his phone, recorded just one day before the crash: in it, a tiny Aadhya carefully lifts a morsel of food to feed her smiling grandmother. Outside his window, another jet crosses the pale Ahmedabad sky. Thakur does not look up.

    Unlike most disaster sites, where rubble is cleared and scars are smoothed over within months, the wrecked BJ Medical College hostel still stands, an open wound less than two kilometers from Ahmedabad’s airport. Its upper floors are ripped open to the sky, jagged slabs of exposed concrete hang loose, a smoke-blackened staircase vanishes into inky darkness, and soot streaks every concrete wall. Buried under the dust, broken concrete, and twisted steel beams, personal belongings – suitcases, textbooks, clothing – still remain, left untouched since the crash. Local officials have approved plans to raze the damaged structure and build a new hostel, but as the first anniversary approaches, the ruins still stand.

    For the trainee doctors who study and walk past the wreckage daily, the crash left psychological scars that have yet to fade. Arman Khan Pathan, a second-year student, had just sat down for lunch when the crash struck. A collapsing section of wall pinned his legs under a heavy table, and as secondary gas explosions filled the room with dust and smoke, rescuers were pushed back to safety. Trapped, suffocating in total darkness, Arman managed to break a window with his bare fist, buying himself enough oxygen to stay alive until rescue workers pulled him out.

    His best friend Aditya Dayal had been running late for lunch that day, and arrived at the scene just as Arman was freed. Aditya helped carry his injured friend out of the wreckage on a borrowed mattress to a waiting ambulance, but the images he saw that day have never left him. As trainee doctors, both young men had seen death before, but nothing prepared them for the scale of destruction they encountered that afternoon. Many victims were so badly burned they could not be identified, and the acrid smell of charred flesh and jet fuel still lingers in Aditya’s memory, sometimes rising unbidden a full year later. “It made me want to throw up,” he says. They still grieve for classmates who never made it out – young people who spent years working toward a medical career, their futures erased in seconds.

    Other survivors carry physical scars that will alter their lives permanently. Brijesh, another student who was riding his scooter to the mess when the plane came down, still undergoes regular physiotherapy for severe burn injuries. Even through Ahmedabad’s sweltering summer heat, he must wear constant pressure garments to manage his healing, and struggles with simple daily tasks like turning the pages of his medical textbooks. When asked about the crash, he simply shrugs: “It happened. What can be done?” Like many students who pass the ruined hostel on their way to class, he has fallen into the habit of looking away, as if ignoring the wreckage can make the pain of what happened there disappear.

    For local residents who live within meters of the campus, there is no choice but to live alongside the memory of the disaster. Vijay, who lives just 200 meters from the hostel, was at home when he heard the explosion. He jumped on his motorbike and rushed to the scene, joining hundreds of local residents who pulled survivors from the rubble, brought blankets and water to the injured, and assisted emergency services in the chaotic first hours after the crash. The images he saw that day still haunt his sleep. “Wherever I look, there is fire,” he says. “Someone’s head, someone’s hands.”

    In the weeks after the crash, media attention faded, ambulances and news crews departed, and the hard, quiet work of rebuilding began. Meenakshi Parikh, the college’s dean, bore the weight of keeping the institution running while the entire community grappled with overwhelming grief. She describes the aftermath as not one tragedy, but dozens layered into one: distraught parents searching for missing children, injured students recovering from physical and psychological trauma, overworked staff, and families waiting days for DNA identification results to claim their loved ones. One memory that has stayed with her is of a father who lost his son, daughter-in-law, and granddaughter, who refused to leave the morgue without seeing his family. When officials explained DNA testing was required to confirm identities, he told them, “My eyes are the DNA test.” Parikh says she understood exactly what he meant.

    Slowly, the rhythms of campus life returned: classes resumed, exams were held, and a new cohort of first-year students arrived. As the first anniversary of the June 12 crash approaches, the college has planned a quiet commemoration: a prayer service for the lost, a community blood donation drive, and the planting of memorial trees on campus. But Parikh is clear that moving forward with daily life is not the same as moving on from the disaster. “There wasn’t one moment when I felt I had processed it,” she says. “It was a gradual process of settling back into life.”

    Investigators are expected to release their final official report on the cause of the crash in the coming weeks. For the past year, public attention has focused largely on the passengers of the London-bound flight and the unanswered questions about the plane’s final moments. But in Ahmedabad, a quieter, more persistent question lingers: how do communities live with catastrophe when the wreckage stays, and the grief remains an unspoken part of daily life?