标签: Africa

非洲

  • Cameroon lawmakers revive vice presidency, handing aging president sweeping control over the post

    Cameroon lawmakers revive vice presidency, handing aging president sweeping control over the post

    In a move that has reignited long-simmering political tensions across the Central African nation, Cameroon’s parliament has passed a deeply divisive constitutional amendment that reinstates the office of vice president, a change opponents warn will solidify 93-year-old President Paul Biya’s hold on power after more than four decades in office.

    Biya, the world’s oldest sitting head of state, has led Cameroon since 1982 and secured his seventh consecutive term in 2018, with his most recent 2025 reelection结果 widely contested by opposition groups and international observers. The amendment, which is all but certain to be signed into law by Biya, was approved during a Saturday joint sitting of the National Assembly and Senate, with the main opposition party boycotting the vote entirely. Final tallies showed 200 lawmakers backing the bill, 18 voting against it, and 4 abstentions.

    Under the terms of the new amendment, the sitting president retains unchecked authority over the vice presidency. Biya will have the unilateral power to appoint and remove a vice president at any time, and the appointee will only be able to exercise powers explicitly delegated to them by the president. Critically, if the president dies, resigns, or is permanently unable to carry out his duties, the vice president will automatically serve out the remainder of the seven-year presidential term, rather than triggering a new national election.

    Lawmakers from the ruling Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM) have framed the change as a critical safeguards for institutional continuity, arguing that a clear line of succession will prevent political chaos in the event of a sudden leadership vacuum. But critics across the political and legal spectrum have decried the amendment as a direct attack on Cameroon’s democratic foundations, arguing it replaces electoral legitimacy with a system of presidential appointment that concentrates power even further in Biya’s hands.

    The main opposition Social Democratic Front (SDF) said in an official statement that the amendment “fails to guarantee democratic legitimacy, inclusiveness, and proper institutional balance.” Fusi Namukong, an SDF member of parliament, told the Associated Press that the new law effectively lays the groundwork for authoritarian dynastic rule. “It’s not democratic. This is a republic, and in a republic, those who wield power at the highest level of the state should be elected and not appointed,” Namukong said.

    The Cameroon Bar Association has echoed these concerns, warning that the change “erodes the democratic legitimacy (of) the presidential office” and undermines the core guardrails of the country’s constitution. The vice presidency was first eliminated from Cameroon’s political structure in 1972, following a national constitutional referendum.

    Biya’s health has been the subject of persistent public speculation for years, with the aging leader spending the majority of his time abroad in Europe, leaving day-to-day governance to a small circle of senior party officials and family members. His 2025 reelection sparked widespread mass protests across the country, which left at least four people dead and highlighted deepening friction between Cameroon’s largely young population and one of the longest-ruling, oldest leaders in the world.

  • World’s oldest leader to get a deputy for first time in 43-year rule

    World’s oldest leader to get a deputy for first time in 43-year rule

    After 41 years of uninterrupted rule by 91-year-old President Paul Biya — the world’s oldest serving head of state — Cameroon’s parliament has passed a landmark constitutional amendment to reinstate the office of vice-president, a post abolished nearly 50 years ago, triggering fierce backlash from the country’s opposition and raising new questions about the nation’s political future.

    The reform, approved Saturday during a joint sitting of Cameroon’s upper and lower legislative chambers, passed by a wide margin: 200 lawmakers supported the bill, 18 voted against it, and four abstained. It will take effect once signed by President Biya, who has led the central African nation since November 1982. Under the new rules, if Biya is incapacitated or passes away while in office, the appointed vice-president will automatically assume the presidency and complete the remaining seven-year term, rather than triggering an immediate snap election. Prior to this change, the constitution designated the Senate president to serve as interim president only until a new election could be organized.

    The vice-presidency has not existed in Cameroon since 1972, when a national referendum replaced the country’s original federal system — which granted autonomy to its French-speaking and English-speaking regions — with a unitary state. The abolition of the post came alongside the end of a longstanding convention that split the presidency and vice-presidency between the two linguistic communities. For years, persistent private speculation has swirled around Biya’s health, though public discussion of the topic remains a taboo in Cameroon. The president has repeatedly refuted rumors of his death by appearing in public following extended periods out of the public eye.

    Government supporters frame the reform as a practical adjustment to streamline governance and succession planning. Proponents argue the change boosts administrative efficiency by creating a clear, permanent line of succession when a stand-in for the president is required, while also removing succession-related burdens from the Senate to allow the body to focus on its core legislative work. The new framework specifies that the vice-president will be directly appointed by the sitting president, rather than elected via popular vote alongside the head of state.

    Opposition groups have decried the amendment as a power grab rushed through parliament without inclusive national consultation. The Social Democratic Front (SDF), Cameroon’s main opposition party which holds six parliamentary seats, boycotted the vote entirely. The party had pushed for two key changes that were not adopted: it called for the vice-president to be jointly elected on a ticket with the president, and for a return to the pre-1972 convention that splits the country’s top two offices between the anglophone and francophone communities, to reflect Cameroon’s linguistic divide. SDF chairman Joshua Osih called the reform a “missed historic opportunity,” noting that what could have been a moment of transformative political courage ended as a wasted chance to address longstanding national divides.

    Other senior opposition figures have gone even further in their criticism. Maurice Kamto, leader of the Cameroon Renaissance Movement, labeled the amendment a “constitutional and institutional coup” carried out by Biya’s ruling party. Kamto accused the incumbent administration of working to establish a “republican monarchy” and announced plans to launch a nationwide online campaign to oppose the change. Even one senator from Biya’s own ruling party has publicly described the legislative process behind the amendment as “suspicious.”

    Biya’s extended tenure has already been marked by controversy: he won an eighth term in office last October with 53.7% of the vote, a result the opposition rejected as fraudulent. Now that the constitutional change has been approved, public and political discourse across Cameroon is dominated by one pressing question: who will Biya appoint as the country’s first vice-president in more than half a century? Even with the new succession framework in place, the long-term political trajectory of Cameroon beyond Biya’s rule remains deeply uncertain.

  • Senegal bans ministers from foreign travel as oil price rise bites

    Senegal bans ministers from foreign travel as oil price rise bites

    The ongoing conflict tied to the US-Israeli war on Iran has triggered a sharp upward swing in global oil prices, creating severe fiscal strain on governments across Africa — and Senegal is the latest nation to roll out austerity measures to counter the crisis. In an address delivered at a youth gathering on Friday, Senegalese Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko announced an immediate ban on all non-essential international travel for government ministers, a measure he is also applying to his own official schedule. Sonko confirmed he has postponed planned trips to Niger, Spain and France to align with the new cost-cutting rules, and added that the country’s mines minister will unveil a broader package of government spending curbs in the coming week.

    Despite the development of a young domestic oil and gas sector, Senegal remains heavily dependent on imported fuel to meet its domestic energy needs. Sonko told attendees that the current per-barrel price of crude oil is now nearing twice the amount budgeted by his administration for the year, pushing the country’s already precarious public finances closer to the edge. The West African nation carries a public debt load equal to more than 130% of its annual gross domestic product, a burden Sonko — who took office as prime minister two years ago — blames on mismanagement by the previous administration. He noted that this pre-existing debt has left his government with far less flexibility to absorb the shock of global energy price increases.

    In his remarks, Sonko struck a balanced tone: he avoided stoking unnecessary panic among young Senegalese citizens, instead aiming to build public understanding of the challenging global context. “I do not want to frighten you or put unnecessary pressure on you,” he said. “I simply want you to grasp what kind of world we are facing right now — it is a world marked by great difficulty. But even as we confront these hardships, we know the Senegalese people have always shown extraordinary resilience.”

    Just one year ago, the International Monetary Fund praised Senegal’s economy as “robust”, highlighting an annual growth rate of nearly 8% and relatively low inflation compared to regional peers. But the sudden global energy shock has upended that positive trajectory, forcing urgent cost-cutting action.

    Senegal’s travel ban is the most recent in a string of responses to skyrocketing oil prices across the African continent, as nations grapple with supply disruptions stemming from the conflict in Iran. Earlier this week, South Africa cut excise taxes on petrol to cap retail price increases for consumers. In Ethiopia, widespread fuel shortages have forced multiple government agencies to furlough employees by sending them on mandatory annual leave. South Sudan has implemented rolling electricity rationing in its capital city of Juba, while Zimbabwe has adjusted fuel standards to increase the share of ethanol blended into petrol to stretch supplies.

    The Iran conflict has had ripple effects beyond energy markets, too. The effective disruption to shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint in the Persian Gulf that handles roughly 30% of all global traded fertilizer — has restricted global fertilizer supplies. On Wednesday, the International Rescue Committee, a leading global humanitarian organization, warned that the supply crunch amounts to a “ticking timebomb for food security”, particularly for East African nations that rely heavily on fertilizer imports from the Middle East to sustain their agricultural sectors.

    For more coverage of the Iran conflict’s impact on African energy and food systems, additional reporting is available at BBCAfrica.com, where audiences can also follow the BBC Africa team across social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.

  • Senegal limits foreign trips for officials as the fallout from Iran war deepens

    Senegal limits foreign trips for officials as the fallout from Iran war deepens

    DAKAR, SENEGAL — Facing mounting economic pressure from a global energy crisis spurred by the Iran conflict, the Senegalese government has implemented strict new rules barring cabinet ministers from all foreign travel except for trips deemed absolutely critical to state affairs, as part of sweeping cost-cutting initiatives to stabilize public finances.

    Like most sub-Saharan African nations, Senegal relies almost entirely on imports to meet its domestic petroleum product demand. this heavy dependence leaves the country’s already fragile economy extremely exposed to global supply chain disruptions, most notably the tensions around the Strait of Hormuz — a key global oil chokepoint. Ongoing conflict linked to the Iran war has driven dramatic, sustained increases in global crude prices, squeezing both public budgets and household finances across the country.

    Speaking publicly Friday, Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko outlined the scope of the new austerity measures, noting that the national government’s initial 202X budget was built around a projected crude oil price of just $62 per barrel. In the wake of market volatility tied to the Iran conflict, current crude prices have surged to nearly twice that forecast, creating a massive unplanned budget shortfall that requires urgent action.

    “I have implemented a series of drastic measures to rein in all unnecessary government spending, starting with the full cancellation of all non-essential international missions,” Sonko stated in comments carried by state-owned national newspaper Le Soleil. The prime minister confirmed he had already scrapped multiple of his own planned trips to regional and European destinations, including Niger, Spain, and France.

    Going forward, Sonko emphasized, “No minister in my government will be permitted to leave the country except for missions that are absolutely essential.”

    The energy-driven price shock has extended far beyond government balance sheets, worsening daily hardship for millions of low-income Senegalese and other Africans who already struggled with poverty. For many households across the region, soaring fuel prices have made daily commutes to work unaffordable and put regular meals out of reach for vulnerable families.

  • ‘Wow!’ The eye surgery marathon that restored sight for some South Africans

    ‘Wow!’ The eye surgery marathon that restored sight for some South Africans

    In the South African township of Tsakane, 84-year-old Gladys Khoza had for years been separated from the simple joy of seeing her family — not due to travel restrictions or distance, but because age-related cataracts had robbed most of her vision. Today, that separation is over. Khoza is one of 133 South Africans who regained their sight during a two-weekend marathon of free cataract surgeries held at two regional hospitals near Johannesburg last month.

    When a nurse removed her post-operative bandage one day after the quick procedure, Khoza stared at the newly clear world around her and whispered in delighted disbelief, “Wow!” When the nurse asked if she could make out her form, Khoza replied with a wide grin, “Very well.”

    For Khoza, who faced total blindness in one eye and long-standing impairment in the other, the 15-minute routine surgery has transformed her daily quality of life. After months of longing, she can once again visit with loved ones, read her cherished Bible, and enjoy the late-night soap operas she loves — small pleasures millions of people take for granted.

    Cataracts, a condition where the eye’s natural lens becomes clouded over, is the world’s leading cause of curable blindness, most commonly affecting older adults. The straightforward surgery replaces the clouded lens with an affordable artificial implant, permanently restoring vision. Yet for patients relying on South Africa’s public health system, even this simple procedure can require years-long waits on official waiting lists. Many of the patients selected for this month’s surgical marathon had been waiting for clear vision since 2019.

    For Dr. Tebogo Fakude, one of the volunteer ophthalmologists who participated in the initiative, the work carries deep personal meaning: his own mother lived with blindness before her passing. “Restoring sight is beautiful,” he explained. “It doesn’t just fix a person’s eyes — it alleviates the depression that comes with losing your vision, and it eases the constant feeling that you are a burden to your loved ones.”

    Global health data underscores the scale of unaddressed need for this life-changing care. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 2 billion people worldwide live with some form of vision impairment, and half of those cases could be prevented or corrected with accessible treatment. Of the nearly 100 million people globally living with operable cataracts, half still lack access to the surgery they need. A March 2026 study published in *The Lancet* found that the gap is far wider in Africa, where 75% of people with cataracts never receive corrective surgery.

    In South Africa, backlogged elective surgery has emerged as a major public health challenge. Government-run public hospitals serve more than 75% of the country’s 62 million residents, but stretched resources force facilities to prioritize emergency and life-saving procedures over routine elective care like cataract removal. Currently, South Africa has a national backlog of more than 240,000 people waiting for cataract surgery, with more than 35,000 people living with cataract-related blindness in Gauteng province alone — the country’s most populous region, where the recent surgery marathon was held. The country sees roughly 300,000 new cataract diagnoses each year, according to Fakude.

    To chip away at this growing backlog, South Africa’s Department of Health launched targeted surgical marathons, first held on Nelson Mandela International Day in 2023 to honor the legacy of the country’s first Black democratic president. The initiative has since grown into an ongoing public-private partnership that hosts multiple events annually, focused on clearing backlogs for different high-need procedures. Past marathons have addressed prostate conditions, cleft palate repairs, and gastric issues, with cataracts selected as the latest priority given the scale of unmet need.

    During the recent cataract event, teams of volunteer surgeons worked at a steady pace to treat as many patients as possible. At Pholosong Regional Hospital, a new patient entered the operating theater roughly every 30 minutes, with soothing gospel music playing over speakers to keep the medical team focused and energized. At peak times, two surgeons operated concurrently to speed up the flow of procedures. Surgeons made tiny incisions through a surgical microscope, removed the clouded lens, and inserted the new artificial implant — all in less than 20 minutes per patient. By the end of the two weekends, the team had completed 133 procedures, including 60 on the final weekend alone.

    Seventy-two-year-old Molefe Mokoena, who had lived with cataracts for four years before his surgery, shared the widespread excitement among patients. “I want to see my great-grandchildren,” he said. “I want to drive my car again, and I’m just so happy about this second chance.”

    The WHO classifies cataract surgery as one of the most cost-effective medical interventions in global health, noting that it does not just restore vision — it restores patients’ independence, dignity, and access to economic and social opportunities. South African health officials have pledged to expand the surgical marathon model to continue clearing backlogs and expand access to life-changing care for low-income and public health patients across the country.

  • ‘We want a voice in our land’ – the people evicted to build Nigeria’s capital

    ‘We want a voice in our land’ – the people evicted to build Nigeria’s capital

    Fifty years after Nigeria established its Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to house the new capital city of Abuja, indigenous communities that gave up their ancestral lands still battle for the compensation, basic services, and political representation promised to them decades ago. For Lami Ezekiel, an 80-something elder who still carries vivid memories of the late 1980s, the arrival of heavy construction machinery marked the end of life as she knew it. “We just watched big trucks and bulldozers flatten our farms,” she recounts. Ezekiel and thousands of other original inhabitants of the land that became Abuja have waited generations for the compensation pledged when their communities were cleared for government buildings, foreign embassies, and luxury developments.

    The push for a new Nigerian capital began in the 1960s, driven by growing concerns that the former capital, Lagos, was too vulnerable to attack due to its coastal location and politically divisive as a major hub of the Yoruba ethnic group in a country balancing deep ethnic rivalries. In February 1976, the military government under Murtala Muhammed carved out the 7,315-square-kilometer FCT from parts of three existing states: Niger, Plateau, and Kaduna. The government officially branded the territory “neutral, no man’s land” — a phrase that still stings for the at least 10 indigenous groups, including the Gbagyi people, who have called this land home for millennia.

    Daniel Aliyu Kwali, president of the FCT Stakeholders’ Assembly, points out that archaeological and historical records confirm indigenous communities have inhabited the region for more than 6,000 years. “The FCT is only 50 years old; I am 70 years old. We are far older than the capital territory itself,” Kwali notes.

    Isaac David, born in 1982 in the FCT’s Kabusa community, grew up playing in clean streams and helping his family tend crops on land that had sustained his ancestors for generations. Today, the streams that once watered his community are gone, replaced by the five-star Transcorp Hilton Abuja. Former farmland now hosts the United Nations headquarters, the U.S. Embassy, and Nigeria’s seat of power, the Aso Rock Presidential Villa — built on what was once a sacred community shrine. Today David owns farms in neighboring Niger state, because indigenous residents who want to farm now must purchase land far outside Abuja’s city limits.

    Initially, the Nigerian government planned to relocate all “few local inhabitants” outside the FCT boundaries, but scrapped the plan over the high cost of mass resettlement. “Due to the high cost of resettlement, the government allowed residents who wished to stay in the FCT to remain,” explained Nasiru Suleiman, director of resettlement and compensation at the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA). Under the adjusted policy, residents of what would become central Abuja were relocated to planned resettlement communities like Kubwa, about 30 minutes from their original homes.

    For many families, the forced removal was a traumatic experience. John Ngbako, who served as Maitama community secretary at the time, recalls asking authorities why original inhabitants could not stay alongside the new arrivals moving into the capital. Community leaders say they were promised new farmland, housing, and fully installed water and electricity infrastructure at the Kubwa relocation site. But before negotiations over the terms of resettlement could be finalized, security forces moved in. Families were loaded onto open tipper trucks and dropped off in Kubwa, where none of the promised amenities existed, and tensions quickly flared with Kubwa’s original inhabitants.

    Laraba Adamu, who was newly married when she was relocated, remembers open hostility when she went to the local river to fetch water. “People would see us coming and shout, ‘The government cows have arrived,’” she says. Today, Ezekiel lives in a small two-room home in Kubwa where she has to cook outdoors. “When we were moved, they promised us all the social amenities,” she says. “None of them have been fulfilled. We pay for our drinking water, we pay for our electricity, and we have no farmland at all.” The displaced Maitama community named their new settlement Maitama-Kubwa, clinging to the identity of the neighborhood they were forced to leave. Esu Bulus Yerima Pada, who became chief of Maitama-Kubwa in 2001 as a descendant of the community’s traditional ruling line, says the government also promised to issue formal land titles confirming residents’ ownership of their new plots. “To this day, they have never done it,” he says. Community leaders still bring younger generations to visit the upscale Maitama district of central Abuja to show them the land their ancestors tended, where even the banana trees planted by previous generations still stand.

    Tensions over land and forced demolitions have not faded — they continue to erupt today. In March 2025, bulldozers moved into Gishiri, another indigenous community that predates the FCT, to demolish dozens of homes. Princess Juliet Jombo, a 32-year-old schoolteacher, lost all the properties her late father, a traditional ruler, had built and left for her family. “Everything my father worked for his whole life and left to us — it was all destroyed,” she says. Her one-bedroom flat was originally valued at just 260,000 naira ($170), and even after public protests the valuation only doubled to 520,000 naira — far too little to buy alternative housing in Abuja’s rising market. The demolition also destroyed the community primary school, leaving nearly 500 students out of classes for months.

    Suleiman of the FCDA insists the resettlement process is conducted through consultation with affected communities, and that compensation is either paid directly to recipient bank accounts or provided as newly built housing. But community activists and leaders say support and resettlement always come after forced demolitions, never before. “By law, the government must first hold dialogue with the people, who have the right to choose a place where they feel safe,” David says. “Then the government should build new housing, and only then relocate people to the new site.” David, who has become one of the most visible advocates for FCT indigenous rights earning him the nickname “Commander,” entered political activism in the mid-2000s after learning about the FCT’s unique constitutional status.

    For indigenous communities, the fight goes far beyond unfulfilled compensation promises — it is also a battle against systemic political exclusion. Unlike any of Nigeria’s 36 states, the FCT has no elected governor. Instead, the country’s president appoints a minister from anywhere in Nigeria to exercise powers equivalent to a state governor. “As an indigene of Niger state, I could run for governor of Niger state,” Kwali says. “But here in the FCT, my home, I have no constitutional right to elect a governor, and I cannot run for the position myself. Any other Nigerian can become FCT minister, but I never can.”

    The exclusion extends to local office: unlike other regions of Nigeria that reserve local elected positions for people with indigenous family origins in the area, any Abuja resident can run for local office regardless of their birthplace. Many FCT elected representatives come from other parts of Nigeria, a situation that strikes indigenous residents as deeply unfair. “I could never go to your home village and run for local office and expect to win,” said Methuselah Jeji, a 32-year-old new father who worries about the barriers his child will face growing up in the FCT. “My child can never be governor. That is very sad — it is not that I am unable, it is just that this is the land where God placed me.”

    David argues that the lack of indigenous political representation directly explains why most FCT indigenous communities remain mired in underdevelopment, even as central Abuja sees massive state investment. While central Abuja boasts wide, paved boulevards, gleaming foreign embassies, and luxury high-rise apartments, most indigenous settlements on the capital’s outskirts have potholed dirt roads, overcrowded classrooms, understaffed clinics, unreliable electricity, and no formal secure land ownership for residents. “When we had one of our own in the Senate, we saw real change,” David says, referring to Philip Aduda, the only FCT indigenous person ever elected to the Nigerian Senate, who lost his seat in 2023 to a candidate originally from Kano state.

    Danladi Jeji, Methuselah’s father, warns that the decades of unresolved grievances and stalled court cases have created a tinderbox. With many legal challenges languishing in the court system for years, many indigenous residents feel their concerns are completely ignored by the government. He fears that the younger, more politically aware generation of indigenous FCT residents will grow tired of peaceful advocacy and turn to confrontation: “This is a bomb waiting to explode.”

    Despite decades of disappointment, activists still prioritize non-violent action to advance their demands. “We can demand our rights peacefully,” David says. “We want representation. We want to have a voice in our own land.” For her part, Ezekiel still holds out hope that the government will finally keep its promises, and that she will get farmland to work before she dies. “If I could be given land to farm today, land where I and my children can work, I would be truly grateful,” she says. “I am still strong.”

  • African leaders call for policy action amid rising energy and food prices

    African leaders call for policy action amid rising energy and food prices

    Against the backdrop of a worsening global economic outlook fueled by ongoing Middle East conflict, leading African and international development institutions have issued a coordinated call for urgent policy intervention to protect African economies and vulnerable households from spiraling energy, food and fertilizer prices.

    The appeal was formally made during the 58th Session of the UN Economic Commission for Africa, held between March 28 and April 3 in Tangier, Morocco, by four major bodies: the African Development Bank, the African Union Commission, the United Nations Development Programme, and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

    In their official warnings, the institutions emphasized that current global shocks linked to the Middle East tensions are spreading far more rapidly and through more concentrated economic channels than previous global disruptions. This accelerated transmission leaves African nations with extremely limited time to adjust their economic policies and mitigate incoming damage, a stark contrast to past crises that gave regional economies more room for maneuver.

    By late March 2026, the impacts of these disruptions were already tangible across every tier of African economies and household finances. Global oil prices have surged by more than 50 percent, while 29 African national currencies have depreciated significantly against major global reserve currencies. This currency weakening has simultaneously driven up the cost of servicing external sovereign debt and the price of importing essential goods including food, fuel, and fertilizer.

    Disruptions to Gulf energy exports have also created critical shortages of ammonia and urea, key fertilizer components, at the worst possible moment: the March to May planting season across most of the continent. The shortage threatens to cut 2026 agricultural output sharply, deepening already widespread food insecurity that disproportionately harms low-income households and African nations that rely heavily on food and energy imports.

    Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, chairperson of the African Union Commission, noted that continued escalation of the Middle East conflict will only further erode global stability, with uniquely severe consequences for energy markets, food security, and long-term economic resilience across Africa, where baseline economic pressures already remain at acute levels.

    Claver Gatete, UN under-secretary-general and executive secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, pointed out that Africa has repeatedly been forced to absorb the impact of major external shocks that the continent did nothing to create. “This moment calls for decisive action, to protect people now, but also to accelerate Africa’s long term push towards energy security, food sovereignty, and financial self-reliance,” Gatete said. “Crises like this reinforce why Africa must finance more of its own future and strengthen regional solutions that build resilience before the next shock hits.”

    To address the immediate crisis, the four institutions laid out a tiered set of policy recommendations. In the short term, they called on African national governments, international development partners, and the private sector to roll out immediate targeted measures to cushion vulnerable households from price shocks and stabilize supply chains for fuel, food, and fertilizer.

    In the medium term, the institutions urged wide-ranging structural reforms to boost regional energy security, expand national social protection programs, and accelerate intra-African trade under the framework of the African Continental Free Trade Area, which is designed to break down long-standing barriers to cross-border commerce across the continent.

    Looking to the long term, the group pushed for stronger domestic resource mobilization across African economies and the establishment of continent-wide African financial safety nets. A key priority named is the accelerated implementation of the African Financing Stability Mechanism, a regional tool designed to help nations respond to future economic shocks before they spiral into full-blown crises.

  • US deports eight people ‘of African origin’ to Uganda

    US deports eight people ‘of African origin’ to Uganda

    In the first major implementation of a bilateral migration agreement struck between Washington and Kampala last year, eight migrants hailing from different African nations have been transferred and deported from the United States to Uganda. Uganda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed in an official statement that the group touched down on Ugandan soil Wednesday, after a U.S. federal judge signed off on the approval of their deportation cases.

    Under the terms of the 2024 agreement, Uganda was formally designated a “safe third country” for migrants who are unable to return to their home countries, most commonly due to documented persecution or violence that prevents safe resettlement there. The deal forms a core pillar of the Donald Trump administration’s hardline immigration enforcement agenda, which the president has ramped up across the board since launching his second term in office.

    Uganda’s foreign ministry noted that it cannot release detailed personal information about the eight deportees to protect their privacy. In its statement, the department reaffirmed the East African nation’s long-standing tradition of hosting vulnerable displaced people, adding that “Uganda continues to uphold its longstanding commitment to providing sanctuary to persons in need and assuring they are treated with dignity.” It also clarified that none of the transferred individuals hold Ugandan or U.S. citizenship; they are African-born migrants who were denied asylum status in the U.S. and were unwilling or unable to return to their countries of origin. According to CBS News, the BBC’s U.S. partner, Uganda agreed to take in these deported migrants on the condition that none have a prior criminal record, a stipulation that differs from U.S. third-country deportation policy that often sends convicted migrants to partner nations.

    The deportation move has already sparked sharp condemnation from legal and human rights groups within Uganda and internationally. The Uganda Law Society, the country’s apex legal professional body, has publicly denounced the transfers, arguing that the process by which the migrants were brought to Uganda was “undignified, harrowing and dehumanising.” The organization has formally called the entire transfer process unlawful and confirmed it intends to challenge the agreement and the deportation in Ugandan courts. Global human rights campaigners have also echoed this criticism, raising long-standing questions about the legal standing of the Trump administration’s third-country deportation policy, which has already seen dozens of undocumented migrants sent to partner nations since the current administration took office in January 2025.

    Uganda is not the only African nation participating in this program: Eswatini, Ghana, and South Sudan have also joined the U.S. as third-country safe haven destinations for deported migrants. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration enforcement, has yet to issue a public comment on this first deportation under the Uganda agreement, following a request for statement from the BBC.

  • Burkina Faso must ‘forget’ about democracy, military leader says

    Burkina Faso must ‘forget’ about democracy, military leader says

    In a stark public interview broadcast on Burkina Faso’s state television, the West African nation’s military ruler Captain Ibrahim Traoré has delivered a sweeping rejection of liberal democratic governance, claiming the system is inherently harmful to African nations and calling on his people to abandon calls for democratic transition. Traoré, who seized power in a 2022 coup, initially committed to restoring civilian democratic rule by July 2024, but the ruling junta reversed that pledge earlier this year, extending its hold on power for an additional five-year term.

    During the interview, the 38-year-old leader, who frames himself as a revolutionary leader pushing back against Western neocolonial interference, argued that democracy is not suited for the African continent. To back his claim, he pointed to the chaos that has engulfed Libya since the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that removed longtime autocratic leader Muammar Gaddafi. “Wherever Western powers try to establish democracy in the world, it’s always accompanied by bloodshed,” Traoré stated. “People need to forget about the issue of democracy. Democracy is not for us.”

    Earlier this year, the junta moved to ban all formal political parties as part of a broader plan to rebuild national governance from the ground up. Expanding on this decision during the interview, Traoré labeled political parties as divisive, dangerous forces fundamentally incompatible with his administration’s revolutionary project. He went on to criticize the culture of African politics as he has observed it in Burkina Faso, claiming that conventional politicians in the country embody corruption and moral failing, describing them as habitual liars, sycophants, and manipulative smooth-talkers.

    While Traoré declined to lay out detailed blueprints for a formal alternative governing system, he emphasized that Burkina Faso will pursue an entirely homegrown approach, rejecting pressure to copy Western institutional models from abroad. The new framework he outlined centers on national sovereignty, radical patriotism, and mass grassroots revolutionary mobilization, with key governance power allocated to traditional community leaders and local grassroots structures. The junta leader also stressed the critical importance of economic and military self-reliance, arguing that modest 6 to 8-hour workdays are insufficient for the country to close the development gap with wealthy global nations.

    Traoré’s rule has been marked by widespread crackdowns on political dissent, with restrictions imposed on opposition groups, independent media outlets, and civil society organizations. Credible reports have even accused his administration of punishing political critics by forcing them to serve on the front lines of the country’s long-running war against Islamist insurgents. Despite these authoritarian measures, Traoré has built a large, enthusiastic following across the African continent, where his pan-Africanist rhetoric and unapologetic criticism of Western geopolitical influence resonate strongly with many people.

    Like neighboring military-ruled states Mali and Niger, Burkina Faso under Traoré has cut long-standing security partnerships with Western nations – most notably former colonial power France – in its counter-insurgency campaign. All three Sahel nations have instead turned to Russia for military support, but deadly Islamist violence has continued to spread across the region, with no signs of abating.

    The same week of Traoré’s interview, Human Rights Watch released a damning new report documenting that more than 1,800 civilians have been killed in violence across Burkina Faso since Traoré took power in September 2022. The report attributes roughly two-thirds of these civilian deaths to the Burkinabé military and its allied civilian militias, with the remaining deaths blamed on Islamist insurgent groups.

    It is important to note that while West Africa has seen a wave of military coups over the past five years, most African sovereign states still hold regular national elections, even though many of these votes have faced widespread international criticism for irregularities and bias in favor of sitting incumbent leaders. In two recent cases, military leaders who seized power in Gabon and Guinea have organized national elections and emerged victorious, cementing their hold on power through formal electoral processes.

  • 13 dead as fire triggers explosions in Burundi

    13 dead as fire triggers explosions in Burundi

    BUJUMBURA, Burundi – A devastating accidental fire at a Burundian military ammunition storage facility has left 13 people dead and dozens more injured after igniting stored explosives that sparked hours of blasts across the southern outskirts of the country’s largest city, Burundi’s military confirmed Wednesday.

    The deadly chain of events unfolded overnight Tuesday in the Musaga district on the outskirts of Bujumbura, East Africa’s Burundi’s primary commercial and population hub. According to army spokesperson Gaspard Baratuza, the disaster originated from an electrical short circuit inside the secured storage unit located within the military camp.

    By Wednesday morning, official tallies confirmed 13 fatalities and at least 57 injured people, with three of the wounded being active-duty soldiers. Spokesperson Baratuza noted that authorities have not yet released a breakdown confirming whether all fatalities were civilian residents of nearby neighborhoods.

    Local residents living within close proximity of the military installation fled their homes in immediate panic as blasts rocked the area. The intensity of the fire was so great that glowing plumes of smoke could be spotted from kilometers away. The force of the repeated explosions sent live munitions flying into residential areas surrounding the camp, prompting senior military leader Major General Aloys Ndayikengurukiye to issue a public appeal for residents to report any unspent ordnance or unfamiliar suspicious objects immediately so that explosive ordnance disposal teams can remove them safely.

    In an effort to curb widespread misinformation that spread rapidly across local communities in the hours after the blasts, Baratuza explicitly stated that the incident was not the result of a militant or rebel attack on the military installation. The fire knocked out local power grids, cutting electricity service to the military camp and all adjacent neighborhoods. Baratuza called on residents of the most affected areas – Gasekebuye, Kanyosha, Kinindo and their surrounding suburbs – to remain calm and avoid unnecessary panic amid ongoing response and cleanup operations.

    The incident, which dates to April 1, 2026, is currently the deadliest accidental disaster recorded in Burundi so far this year, as recovery efforts continue and authorities work to clear all hazardous unexploded materials from affected residential areas.