博客

  • Two people killed as floods hit Spain’s Catalonia region

    Two people killed as floods hit Spain’s Catalonia region

    Deadly flash flooding has swept across northeastern Spain’s Catalonia region, leaving at least two people dead and triggering a massive emergency response as authorities warn of ongoing risks to local communities.

    In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez addressed reporters, confirming that the crisis remains in a critical phase. “The situation in Catalonia is still very complicated,” Sánchez stated, noting that ongoing rainfall and saturated river basins are preventing first responders from fully containing the hazard. Local emergency management agencies have deployed hundreds of firefighters, police officers, and civil defense personnel to carry out water rescues, evacuate at-risk neighborhoods, and clear roads blocked by mud and debris.

    The extreme weather event, driven by an unusually slow-moving storm system that dumped more than 200 millimeters of rain over a 24-hour period in parts of the region, has caused widespread infrastructure damage. Dozens of rural and suburban towns have lost access to clean drinking water, and key transport links including regional rail lines and major highways have been closed indefinitely. The Catalan regional government has declared a 15-day state of emergency for the worst-hit areas, unlocking immediate emergency funding for relief efforts and long-term recovery.

    Authorities have urged residents in low-lying and flood-prone zones to follow evacuation orders strictly, warning that residual flood risk remains high even as rainfall begins to taper off. Spanish officials have also begun preliminary assessments of the total economic damage, with early estimates suggesting losses could run into hundreds of millions of euros for agricultural operations, small businesses, and public infrastructure. As of the latest update, search operations are still ongoing to confirm no additional people are unaccounted for in the most severely affected areas.

  • US Marine arrested over murder of woman in Okinawa, Japan

    US Marine arrested over murder of woman in Okinawa, Japan

    A deadly alleged criminal incident involving an American service member has roiled U.S.-Japan relations and reignited long-simmering tensions over American military basing in Okinawa, after local Japanese authorities took a 20-year-old U.S. Marine into custody on suspicion of murder following the discovery of a local woman’s body in a Naha City hotel.

    The suspect, Devin Jacob Ballard, is assigned to the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, one of the largest American military installations on the Japanese southern prefecture. The victim has been identified by Japan’s national public broadcaster NHK as 39-year-old Anna Yagi, a local resident of Okinawa. Her body was found early Saturday morning in a hotel in Naha, the capital of Okinawa Prefecture, according to Japan’s Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi.

    Top Japanese leaders have issued sharp condemnation of the alleged crime, framing it as an unacceptable violation of local safety that deepens longstanding public anxiety over the presence of American troops. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi labeled the incident a “brutal and heinous” robbery-murder, confirming that she has formally called on the United States to implement far stricter discipline for all military personnel stationed across Japanese territory. Koizumi echoed that outrage in a social media statement, saying, “Such an incident is utterly inexcusable and fills me with strong indignation. Incidents and accidents involving U.S. military personnel cause significant anxiety to the local community and must never occur.”

    Okinawa’s regional leadership went further, arguing that the alleged killing proves that repeated U.S. promises to improve personnel conduct have failed. Okinawa Governor Genta Koja noted that his prefecture has repeatedly demanded action from Washington to prevent similar incidents, saying the killing demonstrates a fundamental lack of discipline among American forces. “The fact that this kind of event has happened again leaves us no choice but to conclude that the U.S. military’s efforts in maintaining discipline, educating personnel, and other such measures are completely ineffective,” Koja said.

    In response to the incident, U.S. officials have pledged full cooperation with Japanese investigative authorities. The U.S. Marine Corps released a statement on social media confirming it is working alongside Japanese law enforcement following the allegations of serious criminal conduct by one of its service members, and extended official condolences to Yagi’s family. The U.S. Embassy in Tokyo also confirmed it is coordinating fully with the Japanese government and local police. On Sunday, Japan’s foreign ministry formally summoned U.S. Ambassador to Japan George Glass for talks about the incident, a step that underscores the diplomatic friction the killing has generated.

    Okinawa has hosted a heavy American military presence for decades, with tens of thousands of U.S. troops stationed across multiple bases in the prefecture. While the basing agreement is a core pillar of the U.S.-Japan security alliance, it has long been a source of discontent among local Okinawans, who have repeatedly protested crimes, environmental damage, and public nuisance linked to American military personnel.

  • Watch: What we know about Russian strikes on Kyiv bridges

    Watch: What we know about Russian strikes on Kyiv bridges

    A fresh wave of Russian attacks has once again struck a critical infrastructure link in the Ukrainian capital, marking the second straight day that strikes have targeted Kyiv’s Northern Bridge. Dan Johnson, the BBC’s senior Ukraine correspondent, is currently positioned in the immediate vicinity of the damaged crossing, providing on-the-ground reporting of the aftermath of the latest attack.

    The repeated targeting of the river crossing underscores the ongoing pressure Russian military operations are placing on key transportation networks in and around Kyiv, as the conflict in Ukraine enters another phase of intensified strikes on urban infrastructure. Local authorities have not yet released full details on casualties or the extent of structural damage to the bridge, which serves as a vital connection for residents and supply movements in the northern part of the capital region.

    Johnson’s presence near the site comes as international media continues to document the impact of daily strikes on Ukrainian cities, bringing first-hand perspective on how the attacks are disrupting civilian life and transport links across Kyiv.

  • Ethiopian rebel forces withdraw from Tigray regional capital

    Ethiopian rebel forces withdraw from Tigray regional capital

    After nearly two years of fragile peace following a brutal civil war, Ethiopia’s northern Tigray region has once again become the center of escalating armed conflict, with a recent development marking a dramatic turning point in tensions between federal authorities and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF).

    The TPLF, the rebel group that governed Tigray prior to the 2020 civil war and retained de facto regional control after the 2022 peace deal, announced that it has ordered a tactical temporary withdrawal of its forces from Mekelle, Tigray’s capital, as pro-government troops advance on the city. Spokespeople for the group emphasized that the decision was driven primarily by humanitarian priorities, to avoid mass civilian casualties that would come from intense urban combat within Mekelle’s populated neighborhoods.

    Two local residents confirmed the shift in control to the BBC, stating that pro-government forces now hold full authority over the city, and TPLF fighters have fully withdrawn from key infrastructure and population centers. One resident also reported a limited restoration of mobile communications services in several districts of Mekelle, a small sign of returning normalcy after weeks of disrupted connectivity.

    Renewed hostilities broke out across northern Ethiopia in recent weeks, with clashes spreading beyond Tigray into the neighboring Afar and Amhara regions, pitting TPLF fighters against Ethiopia’s national army and its allied local militias. The collapse of the 2022 African Union-brokered Pretoria Agreement, which had been celebrated as a landmark step toward ending one of the deadliest conflicts of the 21st century, has been underway for six months, with both the federal government and the TPLF repeatedly trading accusations of violating the terms of the peace deal.

    Tensions escalated dramatically last month, when the TPLF announced it had formed a unified armed alliance with six other opposition militant groups across Ethiopia, including the Amhara-based Fano militia. The coalition openly declared its core goal to be the removal of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s sitting government from power.

    The original 2020-2022 Tigray conflict left a legacy of catastrophic harm: the African Union’s lead mediator for the peace talks estimated that roughly 600,000 people died from combat, famine, and preventable disease, pushing the entire region to the brink of mass starvation. Even after the peace deal was signed, Tigray residents have struggled to rebuild their lives and communities amid lingering political and economic instability.

    The TPLF’s withdrawal from Mekelle has shifted the trajectory of the conflict dramatically, and regional and global observers have sounded alarms over the risk of wider destabilization across the entire Horn of Africa. Many analysts warn that escalating conflict could draw neighboring states into open confrontation, worsening an already volatile security landscape.

    Diplomatic tensions have already spiked between Ethiopia and its border neighbors. On Friday, Ethiopia and Eritrea formally severed diplomatic ties after Addis Ababa accused Asmara of providing military and logistical support to the new rebel alliance — a claim Eritrean authorities have outright denied. Ethiopia has also levied similar accusations against Egypt, a longstanding regional rival of Addis Ababa over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam dispute. The tit-for-tat escalations led Ethiopia to expel a senior Egyptian diplomat, which Egypt reciprocated by ordering an Ethiopian embassy official to leave the country within the same timeframe.

    A diplomatic meeting focused on the Ethiopian conflict is scheduled to take place on Sunday in Egypt, bringing together leaders from several of Ethiopia’s neighboring countries. Ahead of the talks, the U.S. Department of State issued a statement calling for all warring parties to exercise maximum restraint and return to negotiations to resolve disputes through dialogue rather than force.

    The United Nations has also issued urgent warnings about the humanitarian impact of the renewed fighting, noting that the deteriorating security situation has severely disrupted life-saving aid operations across northern Ethiopia. The UN has called on all factions to guarantee safe, unimpeded access for humanitarian organizations to deliver food, medicine, and other critical supplies to vulnerable civilian populations trapped in conflict zones.

  • Kyiv bridge hit in further Russian drone attack as German chancellor makes surprise visit

    Kyiv bridge hit in further Russian drone attack as German chancellor makes surprise visit

    A fresh wave of Russian drone attacks has struck one of Kyiv’s key river crossings for the second straight day, unfolding just as German Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrived in the Ukrainian capital for an unannounced solidarity visit. The Sunday morning strike on Pivnichnyi, or Northern, Bridge came 24 hours after an initial drone assault that damaged the bridge’s roadway and snarled local cross-city traffic.\n\nKyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed that the latest attack inflicted additional damage beyond the bridge itself: a critical heating main serving the capital’s northeastern Desnyanskyi district was hit, leaving thousands of local residents without temporary hot water access. In an immediate update posted to his Telegram channel, Klitschko wrote, “Hitting the roadway on the North Bridge. Emergency services are on their way to the scene.” Unverified amateur footage circulating online captures the chaos of the strike: civilian cars are seen traveling across the span moments before a drone slams into the structure, triggering a massive fireball that sends thick plumes of black smoke billowing into the sky above the Dnipro River.\n\nThis latest attack is part of an intensifying four-day campaign by Moscow to target major critical infrastructure across Kyiv. Over the past week, two of the capital’s key Dnipro River bridges — Pivnichnyi and Pivdennyi, or Southern, Bridge — have been repeatedly hit by Russian drones. Prior to Thursday, neither span had been targeted since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. Both bridges play a vital logistical role, connecting the western and eastern halves of the capital.\n\nThe first strike on Pivnichnyi Bridge on Saturday left two people injured and damaged both the road surface and overhead trolleybus power lines, Klitschko said. Just days earlier, Pivdennyi Bridge endured multiple direct drone hits that damaged its structural cables. The repeated assaults prompted Kyiv’s defense council to convene an emergency crisis meeting on Friday to coordinate response efforts.\n\nRussia has publicly defended the targeting of the two bridges, claiming they are used by Ukrainian forces to transfer troops and military supplies across the capital. The Kremlin has also issued a repeated warning urging all foreign citizens, including diplomatic staff, to evacuate Kyiv immediately. Russian President Vladimir Putin has framed the recent wave of infrastructure attacks as a retaliatory measure against Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy facilities, a claim that ignores the fact that Moscow launched its own large-scale attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure first.\n\nWhile military analysts note that modern reinforced concrete bridges such as those crossing the Dnipro are unlikely to collapse from individual drone strikes, repeated consecutive attacks carry significant risks. Experts explain that even if the spans do not fully collapse, frequent assaults will force prolonged closures to repair damage and gradually weaken the bridges’ structural integrity over time, rendering them unusable for both civilian and military traffic.\n\nKlitschko has sounded the alarm over the growing pressure on Kyiv, warning the city is facing a “very dramatic situation” as Russian forces batter critical infrastructure, logistics hubs, residential housing and other key city facilities.\n\nCoinciding with the latest strike, Merz’s surprise trip to Kyiv brought a fresh show of German support for Ukraine. Arriving in the capital by train, the German chancellor met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and paid respects to fallen Ukrainian defenders at a city memorial. During his visit, Merz reaffirmed Berlin’s longstanding commitment to Kyiv and pledged new additional assistance to strengthen Ukraine’s air defense capabilities.\n\nIn a post on X outlining the purpose of his visit, Merz wrote: “Ukraine is facing decisive weeks. That is why I travelled to Kyiv today with the message: You can rely on us. Germany’s security also depends on the outcome of this war. That is why we are helping out of our own self-interest as well.”

  • Australia investigating Flydubai co-pilot’s links to country

    Australia investigating Flydubai co-pilot’s links to country

    On September 30, a routine commercial flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv devolved into an unprecedented mid-air crisis that has now sparked multinational investigations spanning four continents. Flydubai Flight, carrying more than 170 passengers and crew, was two and a half hours into its journey when its Omani co-pilot, identified by major international outlets as Hamam al-Hammami, launched a violent attack on the lead captain using a crash axe. The assault sent the plane plummeting 17,000 feet (approximately 5,200 meters) before quick-thinking passengers and reserve pilots intervened to avert a catastrophic disaster.

    In the chaotic moments after the attack, injured captain Smit Machchhar, an Indian national, managed to drag himself to the cockpit door and force it open, letting passengers inside to overpower the co-pilot. Two off-duty reserve pilots traveling on the flight then stepped in to take control of the aircraft and divert it to a safe emergency landing in southern Saudi Arabia. Following the landing, Machchhar was transported for emergency medical care, first to a local hospital and later to Abu Dhabi, where medical officials confirm he remains in stable condition. The accused co-pilot was taken into custody by Saudi authorities immediately after landing and is currently undergoing questioning, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

    In the wake of the incident, Australian law enforcement and security agencies have launched a formal investigation into any connections between Hammami and Australia. Multiple sources with knowledge of the case have confirmed to Australian media that Hammami was granted an Australian student visa in 2014, and resided in the country for academic study between 2015 and 2017 before departing. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reports that his student visa was formally canceled in 2019, after he dropped out of his enrolled course and became ineligible to maintain the visa. Australian counter-terrorism officials have confirmed they will specifically examine whether Hammami underwent radicalization during his time in Australia, a key line of inquiry in the ongoing probe. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) confirmed in a statement to the BBC that the investigation involves collaboration with state police units and Australia’s national security agency, with updates to be released “at the appropriate time.”

    UAE authorities have already categorized the incident as an attempted terrorist act. UAE Attorney General Hamad Saif Al Shamsi announced over the weekend that official investigations are ongoing to fully map out the circumstances of the attack, identify clear motives, and uncover any possible co-conspirations or related connections. Additional reporting from U.S. media outlets has revealed red flags in Hammami’s employment history long before the Flydubai incident: while enrolled in flight training at Oman Air, Oman’s national flag carrier, he was removed from the training program over explicit concerns about his radical ideological views, and reassigned to a non-flight role within the airline.

    Further public records show that between 2020 and 2023, Hammami completed a distance-learning degree in aviation management through Buckinghamshire New University in the United Kingdom. University officials have confirmed he graduated with the degree in 2023, and clarified that he never enrolled in or received any pilot training through the institution. Netanyahu has confirmed the accused is an Omani national, and multiple nations are now cooperating to share intelligence and build a full picture of the plot that nearly claimed more than 170 lives.

  • What to know about Brazil’s election pitting Lula against Flávio Bolsonaro

    What to know about Brazil’s election pitting Lula against Flávio Bolsonaro

    On Sunday, nearly 160 million eligible Brazilian voters headed to the polls for a general election shaped by lingering political turmoil, familiar partisan divisions, and unexpected new controversies that have upended the race. As opinion polling has consistently shown, the contest has narrowed to just two leading candidates: incumbent left-wing president Luíz Inácio Lula da Silva, and right-wing senator Flávio Bolsonaro, eldest son of former disgraced president Jair Bolsonaro.

    The echoes of the 2022 election still reverberate across Brazil’s political landscape. Four years ago, Lula won a narrow 1.8 percentage point victory over Jair Bolsonaro, a result that sparked mass unrest when thousands of the former president’s supporters stormed the Brazilian Congress. Jair Bolsonaro was later convicted of coup plotting for his role in the insurrection, and is now serving a 27-year criminal sentence. Due to ongoing health issues, the 71-year-old former army captain is serving his term under house arrest, with a ban on public statements and social media activity. His conviction also bars him from running for public office indefinitely — a barrier that cleared the path for his son to carry the Bolsonaro political banner into the 2026 race.

    Even from house arrest, Jair Bolsonaro has remained a central figure in the campaign. At Flávio Bolsonaro’s official campaign launch, an AI-generated deepfake avatar of the former president delivered a public endorsement of his son’s candidacy. While Jair Bolsonaro’s legal team later claimed he had not authorized the use of the image, political observers and Brazilian Supreme Court investigators have little doubt that the elder Bolsonaro remains the ideological backbone of his son’s campaign. Flávio Bolsonaro, a 45-year-old trained lawyer who has served as a senator since 2019, has centered his candidacy on continuing his father’s policy agenda, even as he adopts a slightly less confrontational political tone than his dad.

    Running on the Liberal Party ticket, Flávio Bolsonaro has built his platform around hardline crime policies: he has pushed for longer prison sentences, looser gun ownership laws, and successfully lobbied for the U.S. to designate two major Brazilian criminal organizations as foreign terrorist groups — a move the Lula administration strongly opposed. He has also actively courted evangelical voters and the powerful agricultural lobby, promising to roll back environmental regulations he claims stifle farm production. On climate, he has walked back earlier claims that climate change does not exist, but still argues that recent extreme weather events are merely natural cyclical patterns, not human-driven. Flávio Bolsonaro has also positioned himself as a close ally to U.S. President Donald Trump, and has promised to join the Trump administration’s newly launched “Shield of the Americas” anti-crime alliance if he wins the presidency.

    For the incumbent Lula, the 2026 race marks an unexpected fifth campaign for the presidency, and a bid for a fourth term. The 80-year-old former metalworker, who will turn 81 days after the first round of voting, first led Brazil from 2003 to 2010, where his signature Bolsa Família cash transfer program lifted more than 20 million Brazilians out of poverty and left him with record 80% approval ratings. After years of legal turmoil that saw his corruption convictions annulled in 2021, Lula reclaimed the presidency in 2022, and has positioned his third term as a return to democratic normality after Jair Bolsonaro’s tenure.

    Lula’s presidency has drawn both praise and criticism on environmental policy. Supporters hail his administration’s success in cutting Amazon deforestation to its lowest level in a decade for the first half of 2026, cementing his reputation as a global leader on climate action. However, his decision to approve exploratory offshore oil drilling near the mouth of the Amazon has drawn sharp rebuke from some environmental activists, a criticism Lula has pushed back on by arguing that oil revenues are critical to funding Brazil’s long-term transition to renewable energy, and that he remains committed to phasing out fossil fuels over time. On the international stage, Lula has repeatedly pushed back against the Trump administration’s “Monroe Doctrine” security policy, asserting Brazilian sovereignty and rejecting the idea that the country should be treated as an American sphere of influence, while warning against foreign and domestic interference in the democratic election process.

    Heading into election day, polling shows a razor-tight race: both leading candidates hover around 40% support in aggregated polling, with Lula holding a narrow single-digit lead over Flávio Bolsonaro. All other 10 candidates trail far behind, polling at 4% or less. Under Brazilian electoral rules, a candidate must win a majority of 50% of valid votes to win outright in the first round. Polling currently indicates a runoff between the top two contenders on October 25 is the most likely outcome, though around 9% of voters remain undecided or plan to spoil their ballots or abstain, leaving an outside chance of an upset first-round victory.

    The final weeks of the campaign were upended by a major corruption scandal linked to imprisoned banker Daniel Vorcaro, who stands accused of orchestrating one of the largest financial frauds in Brazilian history. When voice recordings emerged showing Flávio Bolsonaro asking Vorcaro for 134 million reais (approximately $25.9 million) to fund a biographical film about Jair Bolsonaro, the senator admitted to the request, and Brazilian police launched a formal investigation into Flávio Bolsonaro on suspicion of corruption and money laundering. The scandal quickly expanded, however, when investigators uncovered alleged ties between Vorcaro and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who presided over Jair Bolsonaro’s 2023 coup trial and oversaw the terms of his house arrest. Police reports show hundreds of communications between Vorcaro and a phone linked to Moraes, in which the banker requested help avoiding arrest. Moraes has repeatedly denied all wrongdoing, but Flávio Bolsonaro has seized on the revelations to attack Lula, claiming that a vote for the incumbent is a vote for the controversial justice, and framing the scandal as evidence of systemic corruption among the ruling left. Lula has attempted to distance himself from Moraes, affirming that “no one is above the law,” but polling suggests the scandal has dragged down support for both candidates in the final stretch of the campaign.

    Brazil’s electoral rules require compulsory voting for all literate citizens between the ages of 18 and 70, with non-voters facing financial fines. While polling has consistently pointed to a close race between Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro, electoral observers note that pre-election surveys typically sample only thousands of voters from the 160 million-strong electorate, meaning the final result could diverge significantly from published polling numbers.

  • Rare tornado whips through small Australian town

    Rare tornado whips through small Australian town

    A rare and unexpected weather event has disrupted daily life in the quiet coastal community of Ulladulla, located in Australia’s New South Wales, after a powerful tornado tore through the area on [recent date]. Local residents and bystanders captured dramatic footage of the twister as it carved a path through the small town, leaving a trail of structural damage and uprooted vegetation in its path.

    Eyewitness accounts describe a sudden shift in weather conditions, with dark, roiling storm clouds giving way to the distinct funnel shape that is uncommon in this part of the country. The tornado’s strong winds knocked down multiple large trees across residential streets and main thoroughfares, blocking road access for several hours and forcing local transport authorities to deploy cleanup crews immediately. Multiple residential and commercial properties reported visible damage, including broken roof tiles, ripped off siding, and broken windows from flying debris. No immediate reports of serious injuries or fatalities have been confirmed by local emergency services, though several residents were treated for minor cuts and shock at the scene.

    New South Wales has long faced a range of extreme weather events, including bushfires, severe flooding, and intense thunderstorms, but tornadoes remain a rare occurrence in the coastal regions of the state. Meteorologists from the Bureau of Meteorology have confirmed the tornado formation, noting that it developed as part of a fast-moving cold front that swept across southern New South Wales earlier this week. Local emergency management officials have urged residents to remain alert for further severe weather warnings and to check on vulnerable neighbors in the wake of the storm.

    Cleanup operations are already underway across Ulladulla, with work crews working to clear fallen trees from roads and assess the full extent of property damage. Local authorities have advised affected residents to document damage for insurance claims and contact emergency support services if they require temporary accommodation or assistance with repairs.

  • Pro-Israel advocates hound Green Party members over ‘Zionism is Racism’ motion

    Pro-Israel advocates hound Green Party members over ‘Zionism is Racism’ motion

    The United Kingdom’s Green Party finds itself roiled in a bitter national controversy this weekend, centered around a groundbreaking motion that would officially label Zionism as a form of racism. The motion was drafted by Lubna Speitan, a British-Palestinian party member, who is set to see her proposal put to a vote of the party’s conference delegates on Sunday.

    The debate has already spilled beyond conference walls, igniting heated demonstrations on the streets of Brighton, where the annual Green Party gathering is being held. On Saturday, dozens of pro-Israel demonstrators gathered outside the venue, jeering and shouting at delegates as they entered the building. Protesters chanted slogans including “Terrorist supporters off our streets” and “There’s no Palestine,” with many holding aloft Israeli flags. Signs held by demonstrators read “Stand up to racist Greens,” “Anti Zionism = terrorism” and “More trees less Hamas.” One attendee, a self-identified Indian Jew, waved a combined Indian-Israeli flag, while a small number of protesters also displayed Union Jacks.

    Speaking to Middle East Eye amid the demonstrations, Speitan pushed back against the opposition, emphasizing that the motion does not target Jewish people. “There’ll always be opposition… but we have to stand strong and firm and steadfast in the face of injustice. We should confront all forms of racism, discrimination, genocide and the Holocaust. We’ve made explicitly clear in the motion that not all Jews are Zionist and not all Zionists are Jewish,” she said.

    Many protesters expressed deep fears over what the motion would mean for the future of the UK. An Iranian protester outside the conference argued the motion showed the Greens were aligned with radical Islamists, saying “I’ve seen what’s happened in Iran with the radical Islamists, and I’m terrified it will happen to the UK.” A middle-aged white Christian protester called the party antisemitic, and labeled Green Party leader Zack Polanski — who is Jewish — a “self-hating Jew,” adding that “We did the Holocaust. Now, Jewish people are being persecuted by Islam.” A French attendee, who danced during the demonstration, claimed the Greens were Hamas sympathizers, saying “Have you seen what happened in France with the Islamists and the left? I don’t want that to happen here.”

    Separated from the pro-Israel demonstrators by a cordon of police, a group of counter-protesters — most of them Green Party members — held their own peaceful demonstration nearby. Many waved Palestinian flags and chanted slogans calling for an end to what they describe as genocide in Gaza. One prominent banner declared “Jews against Zionism.” Ori, a young Jewish counter-protester, told MEE his group was there to support the motion. “I think it will be a good thing for there to be a mainstream political party in parliament that says that Zionism is racism, and that can hopefully lead to sanctions against Israel,” he explained. Ori rejected claims that passing the motion would make Jewish members feel unwelcome, adding “Often oppressors see themselves as victims of the people they are oppressing. Zionists think they are victims of the Palestinian liberation struggle. It’s completely untrue.”

    If delegates approve the motion on Sunday, the Green Party will become the first major UK political party to formally adopt the position that Zionism is racism, an unprecedented step in British politics that will embed the position as official party policy. The proposal has already secured high-profile backing from prominent Holocaust survivor and activist Stephen Kapos, who stated that “Zionism both as an ideology and practice is harmful and has no legitimacy and must be rejected.”

    However, the motion has also drawn sharp criticism from senior figures within the party. Former Green leader Caroline Lucas publicly condemned the proposal as divisive on Friday, saying she held “serious concerns” over its impact on the inclusivity of the party. “There is no single definition of Zionism, and irrespective of the intentions of the people who put that motion forward, I think there is a real risk that it’ll be divisive and could be seen as a sign that Jewish people aren’t welcome in the party,” Lucas said. Prior to the conference, widespread reports claimed that Jewish members who attended Zionist-aligned synagogues would face internal disciplinary action if the motion passed, but Speitan has dismissed these claims entirely. She explained that the motion is classified as an “E-Motion,” meaning it addresses external policy matters and has no impact on internal party disciplinary processes.

    Polanski, who is Jewish, has said the motion needs amending to explicitly protect the position of Jewish members who hold Zionist views. He argued that even if a member “stands against the occupation, stands against apartheid, stands against the genocide, but happens to be a member of a synagogue that calls itself a Zionist synagogue, they should not be treated any differently within the Green Party.” But Speitan argued that such an amendment would undermine the core purpose of the motion. “We shouldn’t need as Palestinians to have a disclaimer before we speak for the liberation of our people every time that we’re not antisemites, or to legitimise our cause by saying it’s not an attack against Jews, which indeed it’s not. My grandfather lived next to his Jewish neighbor in Palestine, playing cards every morning and never had a problem,” she said.

    Kieran Andrieu, a British Palestinian political economist and Green Party member, supported the motion, arguing that it was necessary to confront the ideological foundation of Palestinian displacement. “If you acknowledge that what has been done to the Palestinians over the past 100 years or more is a long process of colonisation, ethnic cleansing, apartheid and genocide, you have to ask yourself, how can that happen? It was underpinned by an ideology, Zionism. It’s a racist ideology that dehumanises Palestinians,” he explained. Hamza Egal, chair of the internal party group Global Majority Greens, also backed the proposal, noting that “It’s only the Green Party that’s ever come up and said: ‘let’s give the Palestinians their voice, let them speak for themselves.’ And the motion that they created is what we’ve gone with as global majority Greens. We’ve supported the motion because it’s come from our Palestinian members.”

  • Why pastors may not be seen – or heard – preaching on Ghana’s buses for much longer

    Why pastors may not be seen – or heard – preaching on Ghana’s buses for much longer

    In the pre-dawn hush before Accra’s morning rush engulfs Neoplan bus station, the air shifts from the quiet rumble of idling engines to the rhythmic sound of drumming, singing, and prayer. Leading a small group of 13 worshippers – nine men and four women – 61-year-old pastor Boateng Bismark James lifts his voice in blessing for drivers and passengers bound for destinations across Ghana. For nearly three years, Boateng has led this ritual: gathering believers at the station, praying together, then boarding long-distance commercial buses to spread the Christian gospel to travelers who may never set foot in a traditional church on Sundays. But a newly enforced law is poised to bring this deeply ingrained cultural and religious practice to an abrupt end.

    Ghana is a majority Christian nation, where public transport evangelism has been a common sight for decades. On cross-country bus routes, it is not unusual to see pastors standing in the stairwell beside the driver or pacing the aisle, reading from scripture and calling on passengers to repent, their voices carrying over the noise of the engine for hours on end. Many travelers offer voluntary donations to preachers, and for figures like Boateng, these gifts have become a critical source of income – enough to put his youngest child through university, he says. “Not everyone can get to church on Sunday,” Boateng explained to the BBC in an interview conducted before he boarded a bus bound for Kumasi, Ghana’s second-largest city. “There are many passengers who need this message of salvation. We have even prayed for the sick on buses, and people say they have felt healed.” As Boateng moves through the rows of idling buses, his clerical collar marking his calling, some passengers lean in to listen to his message, while others stare down at their phones or chat quietly with traveling companions. “Some people tell me they had never heard the gospel in a church, but through preaching on the bus, they have found it in the Bible,” he says.

    The new regulation, passed by Ghana’s parliament in May and enforced in recent weeks, classifies preaching and hawking on moving public service vehicles as a public nuisance, citing risks to passenger safety and comfort. Anyone convicted of violating the ban now faces up to eight months in prison, a fine of nearly 50 dollars, or both. This is not the first time Ghana has restricted bus evangelism: a 2012 ban carried penalties of up to 30 days in prison, but weak enforcement allowed the practice to continue largely unchallenged. The updated law significantly strengthens penalties to crack down on the persistent activity. Notably, preachers who use megaphones in lorry parks and open-air markets are not targeted by the new rules, leaving that form of evangelism untouched.

    The ban has deeply divided public opinion in one of the world’s most religious nations. Critics of bus evangelism, who support the new rules, argue that unregulated preaching is not just an annoyance but a genuine safety hazard, saying loud, mobile preachers can distract drivers and increase the risk of accidents. “I just want to travel in peace,” says Chery Lokko, a 30-something traveler who spoke to the BBC. “Some preachers spit without noticing when they’re shouting, especially if you’re sitting close to them. It’s a nuisance with the noise and the mess. I just want quiet when I’m on the bus.” This frustration has spilled into public view: a video recently went viral on Ghanaian social media showing a passenger angrily shouting down a pastor who tried to board a minibus, demanding he get off the vehicle before it departed.

    But supporters of public transport evangelism say the ban infringes on constitutionally guaranteed religious freedom, and note that bus preaching reaches people who rarely attend traditional church services. Bernice Nartey, a passenger heading to Kumasi, says she believes preachers should be allowed to speak as long as passengers consent. “Sometimes the message helps people repent,” she says. “If someone is going through a really stressful time, a pastor’s word can give them new hope.” Boateng says he and his fellow preachers are shaken by the new rule, and are calling for a religious exemption that would allow them to preach before the bus departs Accra. “We are very worried because many pastors here depend on the gifts from passengers to support their families,” he says. For Boateng, this is not just a matter of religious calling: it is his livelihood.

    Even within religious circles, opinions differ. The Christian Council of Ghana declined to comment on the new law, but Senior Pastor Enoch Paul Hayes of the prominent International Central Gospel Church says he does not believe the ban violates religious freedom. He has urged fellow preachers to abide by the law and adapt their methods, pointing to social media as an alternative platform that can reach thousands of people with the gospel message, far more than could ever fit on a single bus.

    Ghana’s constitution does guarantee freedom of religion, but it also allows for restrictions on that freedom when public safety is at stake. For Boateng and hundreds of other bus preachers across the country, the new rules leave a difficult choice: find new ways to practice their ministry and give up a key source of income, or continue preaching and risk jail time and fines for breaking the law.