分类: world

  • Maghreb sees demographic shift with fertility at historic low

    Maghreb sees demographic shift with fertility at historic low

    Across Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria, the North African Maghreb region is undergoing an unprecedented demographic transformation, as shifting social norms and mounting economic strain push growing numbers of couples to have fewer children, pushing regional fertility rates to all-time historic lows. This rapid decline is upending long-held cultural stereotypes of large, multi-child families that have long defined the region, mirroring similar global demographic shifts while unfolding at a faster, more sustained pace than many experts anticipated.

    A new analysis from France’s National Institute for Demographic Studies (INED) confirms the downward trend is both exceptionally sharp and likely permanent, a shift Tunisian leading demographer Mohamed Ali Ben Zina has described as “profound” in its long-term implications for the region. Official demographic data collected across the three countries underscores the scale of the change: since the 1970s, average fertility rates have dropped by more than half across the Maghreb.

    As of 2024, Tunisia holds the lowest fertility rate in the region, with an estimated average of just 1.53 children per woman, down from 1.58 in 2023. Morocco follows with an average of 1.97 children per woman, while Algeria has the highest regional rate at 2.61.

    Interviews with residents and experts across the region point to a tangled web of interconnected factors driving the shift. Leading demographic researcher Hassen Kassar, based in Tunisia, notes deep structural social changes are at the root of Tunisia’s particularly steep decline: growing urbanization and the modernization of family structures have naturally reduced preferences for large household sizes, he explains.

    Generational shifts in outlook are striking. In Algiers, 66-year-old retired finance executive Said—who asked to not share his full name—grew up one of 10 children. “My father struggled constantly to put food on the table for all of us,” he recalled. “That experience is why I decided to stop at two children. What matters most is that they have enough to eat, proper clothes, and a stable, comfortable life.”

    Economic precarity remains one of the most commonly cited drivers for smaller families. Chaimae Drioui, a researcher and professor at Morocco’s National Institute of Statistics and Applied Economics (INSEA), frames declining fertility as a logical, calculated choice for modern families adjusting to new economic realities. For generations, many low-income Maghreb households viewed children as a long-term financial investment, counting on adult children to support aging parents. That conventional wisdom has flipped completely in recent years, Drioui explains: “Today, raising a child costs far more than any immediate or long-term economic benefit he or she can provide.”

    In Tunis, 42-year-old civil servant Nadia Jaouadi says she and her husband made the deliberate decision to remain childless 10 years ago, a choice she has never regretted. “There is nothing in this current climate that encourages people to have even one child,” she says, pointing to Tunisia’s ongoing deep economic struggles and unstable social environment as core reasons for her choice.

    Beyond financial pressure, growing awareness of the mental and physical toll of parenthood is also pushing many women to limit or forgo having children. Zina, a 42-year-old Algerian woman who had her only daughter at age 38, says she has no plans for a second child: “After giving birth, I understood just how much of a strain motherhood puts on both your physical and mental health.” In Rabat, 38-year-old public sector manager Kaouthar—who also requested partial anonymity—says she has chosen to remain permanently childless: “I opted for a calm life, free from the constant worry and stress that comes with raising a child.”

    Drioui emphasizes that expanding access to education and growing economic empowerment for women have been game-changing in dismantling traditional large-family norms. Longer educational pathways for women and rising professional ambitions have delayed childbearing and reduced the total number of children many choose to have, while rising divorce rates have also altered family planning patterns across the region.

    This dramatic demographic shift comes with far-reaching long-term consequences, most immediately a rapidly aging population across the Maghreb. In Tunisia, adults aged 60 and older already make up 17 percent of the total population, equal to nearly 2 million residents. The trend is less advanced in the other two countries: in 2023, adults 60 and older made up 10 percent of Algeria’s population, while the figure hit 13.8 percent for Morocco in 2024.

    A shrinking working-age population and growing cohort of retirees will put increasing strain on public pension systems and upend the balance between working contributors and retired beneficiaries, experts warn. If current trends hold and deaths begin to outnumber births, INED researchers note that only sustained immigration can prevent overall population decline. Foreign workers could also fill critical labour gaps as the working-age population shrinks.

    But opening borders to large-scale immigration remains a politically and socially sensitive topic across all three Maghreb countries. Even so, some experts say the region will have little choice but to embrace migration from neighbouring regions. Kassar says the writing is already on the wall: “We will need sub-Saharan migrants to address these gaps.”

  • Ukraine’s drones hit a major Russian refinery 800 miles from the border, sparking a fire

    Ukraine’s drones hit a major Russian refinery 800 miles from the border, sparking a fire

    Four years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Kyiv has ramped up a sustained campaign targeting Russia’s critical energy sector, carrying out the fourth deep-strike drone attack on Russian oil infrastructure in just three days, Ukrainian military officials confirmed Thursday.

    As one of the world’s largest energy exporters, Russia’s oil industry forms the backbone of its national economy, funding the ongoing military campaign that has pushed slowly and at massive human and material cost deeper into Ukrainian territory. Kyiv’s strategy of disrupting Russia’s oil refining capacity aims to cut off a key revenue stream for Moscow’s war effort and force President Vladimir Putin into negotiating a peace deal, though there is currently no public evidence this objective is being achieved.

    The latest target was the Gazprom Neftekhim Salavat oil refining and petrochemical complex, located in Russia’s Republic of Bashkortostan roughly 1,300 kilometers (800 miles) southeast of Moscow and 800 miles from the Ukrainian border. Ukraine’s General Staff announced via Telegram that overnight drone strikes sparked a large fire at the facility, one of Russia’s largest refining and petrochemical hubs, which processes up to 74 million barrels of crude oil annually to produce gasoline, diesel and a range of other petroleum products.

    Radiy Khabirov, the governor of Bashkortostan, confirmed the attack, noting that two civilians were wounded and a fire broke out in Salavat’s industrial zone. Russia’s largest e-commerce retailer Wildberries also reported that a fire ignited at one of its unused facilities located within the same industrial zone following the strike, prompting a full evacuation of the site with no stored goods damaged.

    Thursday’s attack on the Salavat refinery came just one day after Ukrainian anti-ship missiles and drones carried out a large-scale blitz on a key Russian naval stronghold along the Black Sea coast. In a separate incident Thursday in Sevastopol, the port city on Russia’s illegally annexed Crimean Peninsula, five people — four Russian Emergency Ministry explosive experts and one security guard — were killed when an unexploded Ukrainian weapon detonated as the team inspected the site of an earlier attack. To date, no independent third party has been able to verify the conflicting claims of the two warring sides.

    The strike on Salavat follows a separate drone attack earlier this week on another key Russian refinery in Orsk, located in the Orenburg region near the Kazakhstan border. Orenburg Governor Yevgeny Solntsev confirmed Thursday that the Orsk facility has suspended all operations after critical infrastructure, including imported processing equipment, was damaged. In an unusual public acknowledgment of the disruption caused by Kyiv’s attacks, Solntsev noted that repairs could take up to six months due to ongoing international sanctions that limit access to replacement parts.

    Russia has responded to Ukraine’s deep-strike drone campaign with intensified barrages across Ukraine, launching waves of ballistic missiles, jet-powered Shahed drones and glide bombs — weapons that are highly destructive and difficult for Ukrainian air defenses to intercept. According to United Nations estimates, these Russian strikes have killed more than 16,000 Ukrainian civilians since the full-scale invasion began.

    Overnight between Wednesday and Thursday, Russian forces launched 133 long-range attack drones across Ukrainian territory, killing at least four people and wounding eight more. In the southern Odesa region, a Russian Shahed drone hit a passenger train, killing the lead engineer and his assistant, state railway operator Ukrzaliznytsia confirmed. A separate drone strike in the southern city of Kherson killed two civilians Wednesday evening, regional military administrator Oleksandr Prokudin reported.

    On the diplomatic and military assistance front, Ukraine is facing growing shortages of critical air defense equipment, specifically U.S.-made Patriot interceptor missiles needed to counter Russian ballistic missile strikes. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed in a CNN interview broadcast Wednesday that Kyiv currently has only two-fifths the number of Patriot interceptors it had in 2025, with stockpiles depleted in part by ongoing conflict tensions related to Iran. Zelenskyy noted he makes daily requests to secure additional interceptors, and has asked the U.S. to sell Ukraine 5% of its current stockpile to help Ukraine defend its power grid through the coming winter, when Russia typically intensifies strikes on energy infrastructure. To date, Ukraine has only secured 1% of the requested munitions, he said.

    A new report published Thursday by Germany’s Kiel Institute, a leading organization tracking international military assistance to Ukraine, found that European countries have paid U.S. defense contractors at least 3 billion euros ($3.5 billion) for military equipment transferred to Kyiv in the first half of 2026. Overall, military aid commitments to Ukraine in the first six months of 2026 remained close to 2025 levels, but financial and humanitarian aid dropped by 41% year-over-year. The report also noted that the current U.S. administration led by former President Donald Trump has declined to provide new direct U.S. aid to Ukraine, but has permitted other allied nations to purchase U.S.-made weapons for transfer to Kyiv.

  • US ambassador denounces settler siege as Israel dispatches troops

    US ambassador denounces settler siege as Israel dispatches troops

    In a striking turn of events in the long-turbulent occupied West Bank, Israeli military forces launched a fresh operation against extremist rogue settlers on Thursday, responding to unusually blunt public condemnation from the United States ambassador. The operation comes on the same day that Israeli leadership inaugurated a new settlement built on the site of an outpost evacuated more than two decades ago, laying bare the deep internal and diplomatic tensions surrounding settlement expansion in the occupied territory.

    The crisis began last Sunday, when settlers in the area near Nablus imposed a total blockade on multiple Palestinian residential properties, including a home belonging to a United States citizen. Trapped residents report being completely cut off from access to food, drinking water, and critical essential supplies for days. In an extraordinary rebuke from a figure long known as one of the most vocal American backers of Israeli settlement activity, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee issued a scathing public denunciation of the siege on social platform X.

    Huckabee, an evangelical Christian pastor who has spent decades rejecting Palestinian statehood and openly supporting Jewish settlement across the West Bank, wrote that there is “no excuse for such thuggish behaviour”. He added that the intimidation and harassment targeting the besieged Palestinian families amounted to a horrific act of terror, calling the actions “disgusting”. The ambassador also confirmed that Israeli authorities launched the new operation at the explicit request of the US government, Israel’s closest and most critical international ally.

    The Israeli military confirmed that it deployed forces to the Qusra region for a second time overnight, dismantling two unauthorized settler outposts and taking one Israeli settler into custody. But local witnesses report that the majority of the settlers who participated in the blockade remain in surrounding areas near the Palestinian village. Aisha Hassan, a resident trapped inside one of the besieged homes, told reporters that the entire area remains completely sealed off, with no way for humanitarian supplies to reach trapped residents. “The settlers are spread out in nearby areas on the adjacent hill. So far, no one has been able to get food and supplies to us because the area is completely sealed off by the army,” Hassan said.

    Abdel Azim Wadi, mayor of the Palestinian village of Qusra, added that the Israeli military has issued temporary eviction orders for the blockaded Palestinian homes amid its operation to remove the rogue settlers. A day before the overnight deployment, troops had already dismantled most of a makeshift settler tent at the site, but settlers remained defiantly in place, using only blankets for shelter.

    The parallel push to remove the rogue blockade and inaugurate a new settlement underscores the conflicting political pressures facing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s hardline government, just weeks ahead of October 27 national elections that current polling indicate will be extremely close. On Thursday, top Israeli officials including Defence Minister Israel Katz gathered to celebrate the reopening of the Ganim settlement in the northern West Bank, which was originally dismantled more than 20 years ago as part of a national disengagement plan designed to reduce friction with Palestinian populations by withdrawing from heavily Palestinian-populated areas. That 2005 plan also saw Israel withdraw all troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip, which later fell under the control of the militant group Hamas.

    The unprecedented criticism from Huckabee has sent shockwaves through the Israeli settlement movement, even among settlement leaders who recognize the ambassador as one of their most stalwart American allies. Oded Revivi, former head of the council for the moderate Jerusalem-area settlement of Efrat, argued that the rebuke from such a reliable friend should serve as a wake-up call for the entire settlement movement. “It is impossible to slap a leftist label on Ambassador Huckabee, the greatest friend of the settlement enterprise in the US,” Revivi said. “If a true friend like Huckabee has to bang on the table, then all of us need to stop and ask how it happened that we lost our way, and fix it immediately.”

    Settler violence against Palestinian communities across the West Bank has risen sharply since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that killed roughly 1,200 people, mostly civilians. Currently, more than 500,000 Israeli settlers reside in West Bank settlements that are widely recognized as illegal under international law, alongside an estimated 3 million Palestinian residents of the occupied territory.

  • Taiwan briefly slows its mobile internet to text-only speed as part of defense drill

    Taiwan briefly slows its mobile internet to text-only speed as part of defense drill

    As cross-strait tensions remain at heightened levels, Taiwan has rolled out its most realistic and public-facing annual Han Kuang military exercises to date, bringing unprecedented disruption to daily civilian life across multiple urban centers as part of preparations for a potential crisis. The 30-minute slowdown of mobile internet services across Taipei and six other cities and counties on Thursday was a central component of the exercise’s final phase, a scenario-based drill designed to test the island’s ability to function under degraded communication conditions amid a simulated military incursion.

    Telecom providers across the affected regions deliberately throttled mobile data speeds to a maximum of 256 Kbps, a dramatic reduction from the widespread 5G connectivity most urban residents rely on daily. The speed cap left only basic text-based messaging functional, cutting off access to streaming, social media, and most cloud-based services for half an hour. Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te publicly apologized for the inconvenience the controlled disruption caused, framing the measure as a critical, non-negotiable step for national preparedness. “We ask for your understanding and support, as this is a necessary drill,” Lai stated, after the exercise drew public attention for its tangible impact on daily routines.

    This year’s drills mark a clear shift in approach from previous years, with Taiwan’s military expanding the scope of exercises to actively integrate reservists and civilian populations into realistic crisis scenarios, moving away from the low-disruption, largely unnoticeable drills held in past iterations. Previous urban preparedness drills, for example, included low-key air raid exercises in Taipei subway stations that did not interrupt regular passenger flow, attracting little public notice. This year, by contrast, closed subway station entrances and held passengers inside for the duration of the air raid simulation, mirroring conditions of a real emergency.

    Local outlet the Taipei Times confirmed that civilian participation and interagency coordination with local government bodies were core priorities for the 2024 iteration of the drills. One detained passenger, Allen Hsieh, a Hong Kong tourist, told reporters he was surprised by how authentic the simulation felt, and said the minor disruption was understandable given regional security dynamics. “I did not expect it to be so real. I thought I would only receive text messages,” Hsieh said, adding “The exercise did not cause me any inconvenience. I know that Taiwan needs to conduct exercises, given the current situation. I can understand that.”

    Alongside the communication and civilian evacuation drills, President Lai also visited a local Taipei hospital that was running its own simulation: testing the process of relocating critical medical services and operations to pre-prepared underground facilities, a key preparedness step for preserving healthcare capacity during a potential conflict.

    The increasingly rigorous exercises come as Taiwan steadily boosts its defense training and military procurement in response to steadily rising tensions with Beijing. China continues to claim Taiwan as part of its sovereign territory, and maintains regular military presence near the island, with daily sorties by military aircraft and regular patrols by Chinese Coast Guard and naval vessels. Large-scale combat exercises near Taiwan’s borders are also conducted on a periodic basis to assert Beijing’s territorial claims. In the latest display of this sustained presence, Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense reported that between Wednesday and Thursday morning alone, 18 Chinese military aircraft and 11 People’s Liberation Army Navy vessels were detected operating in waters and airspace surrounding the island.

  • Colombia’s earthquake is déjà vu for Venezuelans. The government response is anything but

    Colombia’s earthquake is déjà vu for Venezuelans. The government response is anything but

    Two major seismic events struck South America within two months this year, leaving behind flattened buildings, grieving communities, and urgent calls for help that spread across social media. As nations from every continent stepped forward to offer assistance, a sharp contrast in how the two impacted countries—Colombia and Venezuela—mobilized their disaster responses has laid bare deep divides in political structure, institutional capacity, and available resources between the neighboring Latin American nations.

    On Monday, a 7.4-magnitude earthquake hit western Colombia, toppling buildings in multiple provinces including the country’s third-largest city, Cali. Barely an hour after the ground stopped shaking, Colombia’s newly inaugurated President Abelardo de la Espriella had already established a central emergency command post to coordinate search-and-rescue operations. By contrast, when two consecutive earthquakes hit Venezuela on June 24, acting President Delcy Rodríguez waited nearly four full hours before addressing the nation about the unfolding crisis.

    This gap in response speed was just the first of many stark differences. In the days after Colombia’s quake, trained rescue teams deployed heavy machinery including cranes and excavators to dig through rubble for trapped survivors. In Venezuela, ordinary civilians spent weeks digging through collapsed structures by hand, with no heavy equipment provided by the state. Venezuela’s government was forced to rely entirely on international rescue teams to fill critical gaps in its disaster response, while Colombia confirmed it has sufficient domestic personnel to lead search efforts, only accepting support from the United States and requesting humanitarian supplies rather than foreign rescue crews.

    For Colombia, the rapid response came even amid an unprecedented political transition. De la Espriella, a conservative former criminal defense lawyer with no prior national political experience, was only sworn in 72 hours before the earthquake struck. His narrow electoral victory over former leftist president Gustavo Petro, Colombia’s first left-wing head of state, was initially disputed, with Petro refusing to recognize the result and alleging electoral fraud. This political feud delayed the formal handover of power, leaving key agencies including the national disaster management authority in the hands of officials de la Espriella had criticized during his campaign. Despite this disruption, humanitarian workers and international observers note that Colombia’s disaster response rose above political tensions, highlighting the resilience of the country’s democratic institutions.

    “All the institutions have worked,” said María José Torres Macho, the United Nations’ top representative in Colombia. “Our ability to be working with them has not been affected by the change of government.”

    Just an hour after the quake, de la Espriella released a public video confirming he would take personal leadership of the response, telling impacted communities in the hard-hit coffee-growing region, “You’re not alone.” Within hours he was coordinating with national officials and relief agencies in Bogota, and within 36 hours he had already toured disaster zones in the western cities of Quibdo, Cali and Pereira, while dispatching cabinet ministers to more remote impacted areas.

    Ana Karina García, director of Fundación Juntos Se Puede, a Colombian-based aid group for Venezuelan migrants, explained the strength of Colombia’s institutional framework: “There is an entire system that means that even when you change the person at the top, the institution keeps functioning.”

    Still, Colombia’s response has not been without criticism. De la Espriella’s decision to decline most international rescue teams has sparked questions about his administration’s handling of foreign aid, with China’s ambassador publicly noting on social media that he could not even identify which Colombian official was responsible for coordinating international assistance. Rugged mountain terrain, decades of underinvestment in rural infrastructure, and post-quake communication disruptions have also slowed the collection of casualty data from the hardest-hit areas. The national government’s official count stands at at least 265 dead and 500 missing, a figure far lower than counts released by local authorities, while an independent public database lists more than 4,100 people as unaccounted for.

    In Venezuela, by contrast, experienced political leaders have faced widespread backlash over their chaotic, delayed response to the June quakes. Rodríguez, who has nearly 20 years of experience in Venezuela’s highest levels of government, failed to project clear authority over the disaster response from the start. Hours before Rodríguez addressed the nation to declare a national emergency, ruling party rival and interior minister Diosdado Cabello went on state television to release his own damage report, revealing competing power struggles within the ruling socialist party that undermined a unified response. When Rodríguez released the first official casualty count, she excluded La Guaira—the earthquake’s epicenter and the area that suffered the worst destruction. Many of La Guaira’s victims lived in low-cost government-built housing complexes constructed during the 2000s oil boom, part of a massive subsidized housing program that became a core pillar of the ruling party’s political patronage system. Rodríguez remained in Caracas for a full day before traveling to La Guaira to assess damage, and for weeks the government only updated the death toll without releasing any data on missing persons, fueling widespread accusations of undercounting as civilians struggled to recover remains without heavy machinery.

    More than six weeks after the Venezuelan quakes, an opposition-run database widely cited by independent observers lists 29,000 people as unaccounted for. The government now updates the death toll just once a week; as of this week, the official count stands at 6,301. Years of systematic political repression have also left most Venezuelans deeply distrustful of the official response to the disaster.

    “It was very difficult for citizens to access important information about the emergency, get themselves to safety and know where to seek help,” said Gabriel Bastidas, a Venezuela-based journalist now living in Argentina who runs Monitoreamos.com, an independent outlet critical of the ruling movement that is one of dozens of independent media outlets blocked within Venezuela’s borders.

    Experts note that geographic and timing differences also separate the two disasters: Venezuela’s twin quakes struck densely populated La Guaira around nightfall, complicating immediate search and reconnaissance efforts, while Colombia’s quake hit largely rural areas during daylight hours. It also typically takes weeks for full casualty data to emerge after a disaster of this magnitude, and Colombia is only days into its response efforts, with thousands still unaccounted for. Still, the contrast is impossible to ignore for many Venezuelans, who have watched their country’s state capacity hollowed out after years of crippling economic crisis and mass migration under former President Nicolás Maduro.

    “From the very beginning, we saw the news media broadcasting live from the sites of the catastrophe; mayors, governors, health secretaries, emergency officials providing details about the dead and missing,” Bastidas said.

    That transparency and rapid response has even struck Venezuelans with family caught up in Colombia’s disaster. Juan Mogollon, a 28-year-old Venezuelan who now lives in Orlando, Florida, learned Monday morning that his 16-year-old cousin José Juan Vivas and the boy’s grandparents were trapped in the rubble of their collapsed Cali apartment building. Vivas, a U.S. permanent resident, had been staying with his grandparents, who resettled in Colombia after fleeing Venezuela’s crisis. Having watched Venezuelan civilians beg for rescue equipment and support after the June quakes, Mogollon expected the worst.

    Yet within just a few hours, footage from the collapse site showed excavators, cranes, and other heavy machinery already on the ground, alongside firefighters flown in from Bogota. Colombian security forces deployed search dogs and thermal-equipped drones to scan for survivors across impacted towns.

    “They are prepared, they have the equipment, they have the protocols, they know what to do,” Mogollon said, as he waits anxiously for news of his relatives. “That’s the least we should expect as citizens in every country, you know? That’s the difference between my country and Colombia right now.”

    Ronal Rodríguez, a Venezuela specialist at Colombia’s Rosario University, summed up the lesson of the side-by-side disasters: “The differences between an authoritarian regime and a democratic system can be seen clearly in the institutions and in their capacity to respond to an emergency. Crises are also political opportunities.”

  • Putin can no longer claim victory in Ukraine, Nobel Peace Prize winner tells BBC

    Putin can no longer claim victory in Ukraine, Nobel Peace Prize winner tells BBC

    Once Russia’s most prominent beacon of independent investigative journalism, the Moscow headquarters of *Novaya Gazeta* now stands as a hollow, silent monument to the country’s eroding free speech. Its former editor-in-chief and 2021 Nobel Peace Prize co-winner Dmitry Muratov confirms what the empty corridors already make clear: the print edition of the outlet he co-founded more than 30 years ago no longer exists.

    For decades, *Novaya Gazeta* built its legacy as a fearless watchdog, exposing high-level government corruption and widespread human rights abuses across Russia. Its work came at a devastating cost: six of its journalists, including iconic Chechen war correspondent Anna Politkovskaya, were assassinated for their reporting. The 2021 Nobel Peace Prize honored that extraordinary courage, with the committee highlighting the outlet’s decades-long fight to protect freedom of expression. But even this global recognition could not shield it from the Kremlin’s expanding crackdown on dissent that accelerated after the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Muratov, who auctioned off his Nobel medal shortly after the invasion to raise funds for UNICEF’s Ukrainian refugee humanitarian programs, explains the blunt force that shut down the print operation: “Putin issued a decree and the newspaper’s printing presses were nationalised. Its registration was revoked.” While a small digital footprint remains, Russian authorities have blocked domestic access to the outlet’s website, forcing Russian readers to rely on virtual private networks (VPNs) to access its content, a workaround available only to a small subset of the population.

    The demise of *Novaya Gazeta* is far from an isolated case. Muratov estimates that at least 1,500 Russians have been imprisoned since the launch of the Kremlin’s “special military operation” in Ukraine for speaking out against state policy. That figure, he notes, is three times higher than the number of political prisoners documented in the Soviet Union during the height of KGB power. Hundreds of the country’s most prominent public voices have already been labeled “foreign agents,” “extremists,” or “terrorists” to silence their criticism. As he points out, the scale of repression today outpaces even that of the Soviet era, when dissident Andrei Sakharov could only name 120 political prisoners in his 1975 Nobel Peace Prize address, and Amnesty International counted just 600 prisoners of conscience across the entire USSR a decade later.

    Against this backdrop of escalating internal repression, Muratov issues a stark warning about the growing risk of nuclear escalation in Ukraine, a conflict that has already become the bloodiest European war since World War II. While Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to publicly predict victory, Muratov rejects that framing outright: “There will never be ‘victory’. Because what has been going on for nearly five years – no matter how it ends – can no longer be considered a victory. It cannot be a victory when two Slavic nations have ripped a million people to shreds. Or more than a million.”

    Muratov argues that while Russia cannot fully conquer Ukraine, it can choose to destroy it through continued escalation that could ultimately lead to the use of nuclear weapons. When asked whether he believes Putin would actually authorize a nuclear strike, he pushes back on pundits who claim to read the Russian leader’s mind: “All those political experts who say ‘Putin thinks this’ or ‘Putin is scared of that’…they’re all charlatans. It’s in the same league as astrology. Nobody knows what’s going on in Vladimir Putin’s head. And I don’t know.”

    Still, as a veteran journalist analyzing public discourse, Muratov cites alarming trends: since the start of 2026, discussion of the potential need for nuclear weapons use has appeared more than 500 times in Russian public discourse. While fringe extremist rhetoric does not surprise him, he notes that these conversations have moved into mainstream state-controlled media, and even appeared at the official St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, where a speaker framed nuclear deployment as a positive outcome.

    Muratov also challenges Putin’s core justification for the invasion: that it would strengthen Russia’s national security. “Tell me, has security increased?” he asks, pointing to recent Ukrainian drone strikes targeting logistics hubs deep inside Russian territory – including warehouses belonging to Wildberries, Russia’s largest online retailer – alongside widespread fuel shortages, mobile internet disruptions, and the growing population of political prisoners.

    Despite reports of slipping domestic approval ratings, Muratov argues that Putin retains an iron grip on power, dismissing widespread speculation of elite splits or internal conspiracies. “The country is run by Vladimir Putin. They’re frightened of him,” he says, noting that this fear is systematically reinforced by Putin’s core base of support in the Federal Security Service (FSB), the successor agency to the Soviet KGB.

    Muratov also holds little illusion about Western hypocrisy in its dealings with Putin. He notes that for years, European leaders publicly lectured Putin on human rights while simultaneously signing lucrative trade deals for Russian oil, gas, and diamonds – a contradiction that Putin openly mocks. “He knows the true value of people who preached to him those values,” Muratov says.

    Now labeled a foreign agent himself, Muratov has been stripped of many basic rights: he is banned from teaching, barred from running for public office, and even restricted from accessing proceeds from selling his own property. The label is deliberately designed to stigmatize critics and frame them as enemies of the state within Russian society. Yet Muratov deflects attention from his own struggles to highlight the plight of hundreds of political prisoners locked away for opposing the war, a crisis he says has largely fallen off the global agenda.

    Flipping through a folder of portraits, he shares the stories of ordinary Russians jailed for their anti-war views: four *Novaya Gazeta* journalists convicted of extremism for alleged links to Alexei Navalny’s opposition anti-corruption movement; Moscow city councilor Alexei Gorinov, jailed for spreading “false information” about the Russian military after speaking out against the invasion; 68-year-old Ukrainian-born pediatrician Nadezhda Buyanova, sentenced to five and a half years in a penal colony for criticizing the war at work; and 39-year-old concert pianist Pavel Kushnir, who died in a pre-trial detention center during a hunger strike after being arrested for posting anti-war videos online. Even the outlet’s own managing editor, Oleg Roldugin, is currently under house arrest, and police blocked the newspaper’s legal team from entering the headquarters for 13 hours during a recent search.

    When asked whether his Nobel Peace Prize offers any protection to speak freely, Muratov deflects: “This is not a question for me. Whenever you have the opportunity, ask the authorities that.”

    Despite the bleak picture he paints of contemporary Russia, Muratov holds small glimmers of hope. While open criticism is now effectively impossible, he says ordinary Russians continue to express quiet gratitude for *Novaya Gazeta*’s work on the streets of Moscow. “We live in a time when you stay quiet. But so many people support what we do,” he says. “They are spoken in a whisper. But what people think is very important.”

  • What to know from AP’s report about pregnant women and babies dying in Nepal amid USAID cuts

    What to know from AP’s report about pregnant women and babies dying in Nepal amid USAID cuts

    Grounded in on-the-ground reporting from Nepal, an Associated Press investigation has drawn a direct line between sweeping cuts to United States foreign aid enacted by the former Donald Trump administration and a sharp rise in preventable deaths of pregnant women and newborns across the South Asian nation. The 2023 decision to dissolve the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) — long the world’s largest single provider of humanitarian global health assistance — gutted community-focused maternal and child health initiatives that had spent years reducing mortality rates in some of Nepal’s most impoverished regions.

    While the U.S. State Department maintains that Washington continues to back maternal and child health programming in Nepal, interviews with local health workers, government officials, aid leaders, and affected families tell a far grimmer story: the loss of funding shuttered life-saving outreach and nutrition services, leaving vulnerable communities without the support they relied on to address pregnancy complications and infant care needs.

    The collapse of U.S. funding triggered a domino effect across Nepal’s community health ecosystem. According to World Health Organization data, 60% of local women’s health organizations have been forced to scale back critical services after the U.S. cuts were followed by matching reductions in foreign aid from other donor nations. Before the cuts, USAID and partner aid groups like CARE ran a multi-year initiative that reached 100,000 pregnant women and girls across Nepal. The program provided free nutrient supplements and food to low-income expectant mothers, supplied life-saving equipment and medication to rural birthing centers, and trained a network of local nurses, midwives, and community outreach workers.

    These trained workers made regular home visits to identify risk factors for complications, explain warning signs that required immediate medical care, and often escorted women who lacked transportation or health literacy to prenatal and delivery appointments. Since the program shut down, that on-the-ground support has vanished entirely.

    Global health leaders warn the cuts will have devastating global consequences, not just in Nepal. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation projects that 2025 will mark the first year this century that annual child mortality rates will rise globally, a shift driven in large part by widespread foreign aid cuts to maternal and child health programs.

    In Nepal, the impact is already visible in mortality data that does exist — though many deaths will likely never be counted, as the funding cuts also eliminated jobs for local workers tasked with tracking maternal and newborn mortality across rural regions. Mona Sherpa, country director for CARE Nepal, which lost more than half of its operating budget due to the U.S. cuts, called the surge in deaths catastrophic. “The number of deaths of young mothers during delivery has really increased,” Sherpa said. “The expected number within a year is happening within four to six months.”

    Newborn deaths have followed the same upward trend. In the village of Prempur Gonahi in Nepal’s Rautahat district, local administrative officer Sadho Baitha documented a remarkable public health win after CARE’s program launched in December 2022: prior to the initiative, the village recorded 10 to 15 neonatal deaths per year, a figure that dropped to zero by 2024. But just 10 months after the U.S. funding was cut and the program shut down, newborn deaths have returned: the first post-cut death was recorded in December 2023, with four more following by March 2024.

    The majority of women affected by the program closures live in extreme poverty, have little formal education, and are geographically isolated from major medical facilities. For many, the outreach workers served as more than just health educators — they were translators and advocates who helped women navigate a confusing, often inaccessible public health system.

    That gap had fatal consequences for 20-year-old Kabita Mukhiya, an uneducated woman from a poor village near the Nepal-India border. During her pregnancy, Mukhiya developed severe symptoms: excruciating abdominal pain, extreme swelling, and delirium, worsened by severe malnutrition after the nutrition supplements she had received during her first pregnancy were cut. No outreach workers visited her home to identify her red flags, as they had done before the program shut down.

    Unaware that her symptoms signaled a life-threatening emergency, Mukhiya suffered at home for weeks before her family finally arranged transport to a hospital. By that point, it was too late: both Mukhiya and her unborn child died. Health workers confirmed her death was caused by untreated eclampsia complicated by severe anemia — two conditions that are almost always manageable if caught early through routine prenatal care.

    Rajkumari Patel, a former outreach worker who was laid off when the CARE program shut down, said Mukhiya’s death is exactly the kind of preventable tragedy the program was designed to stop. “I would have asked her, ‘Is the baby kicking? When did you last feel movement?’ I would have checked for swelling in her hands and face. I would have looked at her eyes for signs of anemia,” Patel said. “These are the signs I would have noticed in Kabita and said, ‘This woman needs a hospital today — not tomorrow.’ Maybe we could have saved her life.”

  • Pentagon tells Congress US killed 153 civilians in Yemen air strikes

    Pentagon tells Congress US killed 153 civilians in Yemen air strikes

    A confidential internal assessment from the United States Department of Defense, submitted to congressional lawmakers, has confirmed that U.S. military attacks on Yemen carried out last year left hundreds of civilian bystanders dead and injured, according to disclosures that have recently entered the public sphere.

    In a 12-page report transmitted Monday to the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, the Pentagon formally documented that 153 Yemeni civilians were killed and an additional 243 sustained wounds across the campaign of airstrikes launched by former President Donald Trump. Trump authorized the bombing campaign targeting Houthi militant positions in March 2025, a retaliatory measure launched after the group launched a series of attacks on commercial shipping transiting the Red Sea. The Houthis have stated their attacks on Red Sea vessels are an act of solidarity with Palestinian communities under siege in Gaza.

    The report lays out specific details of multiple airstrikes that the Pentagon acknowledges “more likely than not” resulted in unintended civilian harm. One strike carried out on April 6 in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa left five civilians dead and 25 more injured, according to the document. A separate U.S. attack on the coastal city of Hodeidah on April 17 killed no fewer than 80 civilians, a strike that Human Rights Watch concluded in a June analysis should be probed as a potential war crime.

    Niku Jafarnia, a researcher specializing in Yemeni and Bahraini affairs at Human Rights Watch, condemned the strike targeting Ras Issa Port, a vital hub for humanitarian aid entering Yemen that was hit while hundreds of port workers were on site. “The U.S. government’s decision to strike this critical aid entry point, while hundreds of workers were present, demonstrates a callous disregard for civilians’ lives,” Jafarnia said. Another late-April airstrike in Yemen’s northwestern Saada province killed at least 68 African migrants who were staying in the area, the report confirms.

    To date, Pentagon officials confirm that 15 additional strike-related incidents remain under active review to assess whether civilian casualties occurred. Beyond the casualty disclosures, the launch of the Trump administration’s military campaign was initially overshadowed by a major security breach that has become known as SignalGate, when Atlantic magazine editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to a private Signal group chat planning the military operation. The chat included 19 senior U.S. national security officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz, and special envoy Steve Witkoff. The accidental inclusion of an outsider journalist provided an unprecedented look into the administration’s internal deliberations around the campaign, which largely focused on grievances that Europe and Egypt were not compensating the U.S. for its military involvement.

    Over the course of the two-month campaign, the U.S. carried out more than 1,000 airstrikes against Houthi positions across Yemen. The campaign was ultimately halted in May 2025, just ahead of a planned visit by Trump to the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Investigative reporting by Middle East Eye has revealed that Saudi Arabia, a key U.S. partner in the region, pushed American officials to end the strikes ahead of Trump’s visit.

    Regional officials who spoke to Middle East Eye noted that while the U.S. bombardment inflicted significant damage to the Houthis’ stockpiled military equipment, the impact of the campaign was short-lived. In the months since the strikes ended, the Houthi movement has resumed its attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and even expanded its operational reach to target energy infrastructure sites within Saudi Arabia itself.

  • Tourists rush to Mount Etna as Italian volcano erupts

    Tourists rush to Mount Etna as Italian volcano erupts

    Europe’s tallest active volcano, Mount Etna, has captured global attention after days of continuous ash and lava eruptions, triggering an unexpected surge in tourist footfall to Sicily’s eastern coast. Striking visual footage of glowing lava cascading down the volcano’s slopes has become a viral draw, drawing crowds of casual sightseers and adventure seekers alike—even as the ongoing activity has forced extended closures of nearby Catania Airport, the primary travel hub for visitors to the island.

    Local tour guiding companies that specialize in guided nighttime hikes to view volcanic activity up close have reported a staggering spike in booking requests. Daniele Perricelli, a 41-year-old veteran guide who runs the firm Guide Etna, told Agence France-Presse on Wednesday that his team normally hosts a few dozen guests per evening during peak summer season. Currently, however, the company receives roughly 300 booking inquiries every day—three times the average volume. “They all want to come and see the lava flow, everyone is drawn to this unique beauty,” Perricelli explained.

    Fellow local guide Ernesto Maria Magri described the event as a “touristic eruption,” noting that the lava flow remains observable from relatively safe lower-altitude zones, making it accessible to a broad range of visitors. Even local residents, who have witnessed dozens of Etna’s eruptions over the years, are flocking to the mountain to see the spectacle, though Magri added that many onlookers gather in disorganized, unregulated crowds that create additional hazards.

    A growing number of visitors are choosing to hike the mountain without professional guidance, either because they cannot secure a spot with a registered guide or because they believe they can navigate the terrain safely on their own. This trend has sparked urgent safety warnings from local guides, who emphasize that the volcano remains geologically unstable, and only experienced professionals can read subtle signs of changing activity to avoid danger.

    Perricelli warned that overcrowding on existing hiking trails has amplified risks, with up to 2,000 people attempting the climb each evening. He pointed to alarming examples of underprepared visitors, including some who attempted the hike in flip-flops, and called on Italian civil authorities to increase patrols and enforce safety regulations more strictly. High-profile visitors, including popular Italian television host Diletta Leotta, have also faced social media criticism for sharing photos taken within meters of active, glowing lava, prompting concerns that the images could encourage other tourists to take unnecessary risks.

    Guides note that it is safe to approach cooled lava flows within a few meters at lower altitudes, but higher elevation zones closer to the active crater carry far greater risk. Under current Italian regulations, visitors are permitted to hike independently up to an altitude of 2,400 meters, but any climb beyond that point requires accompaniment by a licensed guide. The summit of Mount Etna sits at 3,324 meters.

    Italy’s national civil protection agency has maintained a yellow alert for Mount Etna, the second-highest level on a four-tier warning scale that ranges from green (low risk) to red (extreme risk). A yellow alert indicates frequent ongoing eruptive activity and a risk of unexpected explosions. The sustained ash emissions from the eruption have forced repeated flight suspensions at Catania Airport, with hundreds of commercial flights cancelled since Saturday. As of Wednesday, airport authorities extended the suspension of all arrivals and departures through 2:00 pm GMT on Thursday.

    Catania International Airport is a critical infrastructure hub for Sicily’s $10 billion annual tourism industry, handling roughly 12 million passenger transits in 2024. The region surrounding Mount Etna is one of Italy’s most popular tourist destinations, drawing millions of visitors each year for its volcanic landscapes, coastal towns, and cultural heritage.

  • Ecuador’s police seize a cocaine shipment with stickers of Norway’s soccer star Erling Haaland

    Ecuador’s police seize a cocaine shipment with stickers of Norway’s soccer star Erling Haaland

    QUITO, Ecuador — Global soccer superstar Erling Haaland has built an iconic public profile in recent years, his face gracing everything from billboards and collectible trading cards to global television broadcasts. The Norwegian striker became a viral social media sensation after netting seven goals across four matches at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, spawning endless memes and fan content across platforms. Now, law enforcement in Ecuador has found his likeness in an entirely unexpected context: printed on packaging for a massive cocaine shipment seized near the country’s northern border with Colombia.

    Ecuadorian national police confirmed Wednesday that anti-narcotics officers arrested a truck driver following the seizure of 469 kilograms (1,034 pounds) of high-purity cocaine. The seizure unfolded along the Pan-American Highway, where agents launched a stop and search after receiving an anonymous tip about suspicious activity early Tuesday. A search of the vehicle uncovered 370 green rectangular drug packages hidden in a custom-built false compartment in the truck’s bottom. Law enforcement has so far offered no official explanation for why traffickers chose to adorn the packages with stickers of the golden-haired Norwegian striker, but the practice is well-documented in international drug trafficking circles.

    Criminal networks commonly label drug shipments with the names and images of high-profile celebrities and star athletes, a tactic used to signal which cartel produced the narcotics and which recipient the shipment is intended for. Police released public footage of the seizure showing packages pouring out of the truck’s hidden compartment, with Haaland’s face clearly visible on the packaging stickers. The striker, who is affectionately nicknamed “pretty princess” and “babygirl” by legions of his online fans, was one of the breakout stars of the 2026 World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Canada. His combination of imposing physical stature, dead-eye finishing, and playful, goofy sense of humor turned him into a global viral favorite, with thousands of creative fan videos and memes circulating online in the months following the tournament.

    Haaland is far from the first top soccer player whose image has been co-opted by drug smuggling operations. Law enforcement officials have previously found cocaine shipments marked with images of Argentine captain and eight-time Ballon d’Or winner Lionel Messi, confirming the trend of traffickers using high-profile sports figures for shipment branding.

    The seizure, which took place in the Guagua Negro region near the border city of Tulcan, around 153 miles north of Ecuador’s capital Quito, also led to a second arrest. Police took a woman identified only as María R., who holds Colombian identity documents, into custody as part of the operation. According to drug enforcement estimates, the seized shipment carries a street value of nearly $842,000 in Ecuador, but would be worth more than $11 million if it reached the U.S. market, and upwards of $19.6 million (17 million euros) if distributed across Europe.

    Ecuador has long served as a key logistical hub for international drug trafficking. Criminal networks based in the country stockpile, store, and ship narcotics north through Central American routes primarily to consumer markets in the United States, though significant volumes are also trafficked to Europe. Local Ecuadorian gangs work in alliance with major Colombian and Mexican cartels to manage these trafficking routes. Roughly 80% of all narcotics trafficked through Ecuador originate in Colombia, with the remaining 20% coming from neighboring Peru.

    Data from Ecuadorian law enforcement shows consistent large-scale drug seizures across recent years. In the first half of this calendar year, police have already seized 80 tons of illicit drugs. In 2025, authorities confiscated nearly 215 tons of narcotics, the vast majority of which was cocaine, while seizures reached almost 295 tons in 2024.