分类: world

  • Russia’s fuel crisis intensifies as Ukraine steps up strikes on occupied territories

    Russia’s fuel crisis intensifies as Ukraine steps up strikes on occupied territories

    A severe fuel shortage has swept across Russian-occupied Crimea, with strict purchase caps imposed on consumers at most filling stations, after Ukraine’s sustained campaign of drone and long-range strikes shattered Russian supply routes into the peninsula. The crisis, which has hit both civilian populations and Russian military operations, traces its roots to two layers of Ukrainian targeting: months of long-range attacks on Russian oil refineries, and an intensifying recent push to disrupt overland logistics routes connecting Crimea to mainland Russia.

    Russia illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, and the peninsula holds outsized strategic importance for Moscow: it serves as a key launchpad for Russian drone and missile strikes against Ukrainian territory, and is a top summer tourist destination for Russian travelers. Today, however, it is grappling with a logistical collapse that has left residents and tourists stranded, with fuel often unavailable even for those willing to pay inflated prices.

    The most critical disruption stems from Ukrainian strikes on the main overland artery linking the southern Russian city of Rostov to Crimea via occupied Mariupol. Analysts describe this motorway as the central backbone of Russia’s occupation infrastructure in southern Ukraine. Clément Molin, an analyst with French think tank Atum Mundi, reports that since the start of May, Ukrainian forces have carried out more than 300 drone strikes on supply trucks traveling this route, including 30 fuel tankers, with the pace of attacks accelerating sharply in June. A June 7 strike further damaged a key bridge in northern Crimea’s Chonhar region, a critical crossing for Russian military and civilian traffic along the R-280 motorway, forcing a full suspension of traffic.

    The impact of these strikes is immediately visible across Crimea. Videos shared on social media show multi-kilometer queues stretching outside petrol stations, with residents reporting wait times of up to 10 hours to access limited fuel supplies. At most filling stations, local residents are now restricted to a maximum purchase of 20 liters of fuel per person, available only via prepaid vouchers when stocks last. Russian tourists who traveled to Crimea before the crisis erupted are now trapped, unable to secure enough fuel to drive back to mainland Russia. Local occupation authorities have been forced to launch a dedicated emergency hotline to assist stranded visitors, while prices for petrol and diesel have skyrocketed amid tight supplies.

    Sergei Aksyonov, the Kremlin-appointed head of Crimea’s occupation administration, acknowledged the severity of the crisis in a June 5 statement, admitting that current supply levels cannot meet civilian demand and confirming that hundreds of public buses have been pulled from service due to lack of fuel. The situation leaves Russia with few viable alternatives to restock the peninsula. The Kerch Strait Bridge, the only direct fixed link between mainland Russia and Crimea, has been restricted after repeated Ukrainian attacks and threats of future strikes. Oil industry expert Craig Kennedy, an associate at Harvard University’s Davis Center, notes that few operators are willing to risk moving fuel-laden trucks across the bridge, given its high-profile status as a target. Sea routes are also unworkable, after Ukrainian strikes took multiple Crimean ferries out of operation. That leaves only the Mariupol overland route – which remains exposed to constant Ukrainian drone attacks along its entire length.

    The fuel shortage is not limited to Crimea. Ukrainian drone strikes have also disrupted logistics in other occupied Ukrainian regions, including Luhansk and Kherson. Occupation authorities in Luhansk have already banned all bus traffic on two key motorways leading to Mariupol and Crimea, urging local residents to avoid the routes entirely for “security reasons.”

    The crisis is the result of a deliberate shift in Ukraine’s targeting strategy, experts explain. After months of disabling large-scale Russian oil refining capacity – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky estimates that nearly 40% of Russia’s primary oil refining capacity was put out of action in May alone – Ukraine has now expanded its campaign to target regional distribution and logistics networks. “This is having a more focused or concentrated impact on local populations and the military in certain regions such as Crimea,” Kennedy explained.

    Yevhen Karas, commander of the 413th separate “Raid” battalion of Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces, confirmed that disrupting Russian military fuel logistics is a core priority for his unit, which has carried out many of the recent strikes. Karas told the BBC that his drones face minimal effective resistance from Russian air defenses during most missions, allowing his unit to strike targets across occupied territory freely. “The main dish is Russian storage, oil and fuel tanks, buildings and even small bunkers with Russian officers,” he said.

    Russia has accused Ukraine of causing civilian casualties in recent strikes, including reported attacks on a passenger bus in Kherson and a commuter train in Crimea that killed one person and injured another in early June. Karas did not directly address these specific incidents, but acknowledged that civilian collateral damage is a risk in the active combat zone. “This is a very busy area, and it is obvious that heavy trucks and large transport vehicles are all at risk of being hit, because the Russians use them,” he said. “Mistakes can happen, but this is not a deliberate targeting of civilian vehicles.”

    Pro-Kremlin military analysts admit that the fuel crisis has impacted both civilian and Russian military operations alike. “The strikes that empty fuel stations for civilians also affect supplies to troops in the south,” the popular pro-Russian military analysis Telegram channel Rybar posted recently. “The logistics crisis does not distinguish between military and civilian needs, it hits everything at once.”

    Beyond eroding Russia’s military capabilities, the campaign aligns with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s stated goal of “bringing the war home” to Russian-controlled territory, turning the disruption of conflict back onto populations and occupation forces that have operated in relative security on occupied Ukrainian land.

  • ICC chief prosecutor suspended pending decision by oversight body on sexual misconduct allegations

    ICC chief prosecutor suspended pending decision by oversight body on sexual misconduct allegations

    THE HAGUE, Netherlands — In a historic first for the International Criminal Court, embattled chief prosecutor Karim Khan has been suspended from official duties, following a vote by the court’s governing oversight body to open formal disciplinary proceedings against the British barrister. The 56-year-old has been entangled in a sexual misconduct scandal stretching back more than two years, stemming from accusations made by a female former member of his staff. Khan has repeatedly and firmly denied all claims of wrongdoing against him.

    The final determination of whether Khan will retain his position as the ICC’s top prosecutor now rests with the Assembly of States Parties, the 125-member governing body that oversees the international tribunal. The body will convene a special plenary session to cast a binding vote on Khan’s future. No date for the special session has been finalized, but assembly officials confirmed it will be called as quickly as logistically possible. To remove Khan from office, a majority of 63 member states would need to vote in favor of dismissal, the only outcome the body has the authority to enact.

    The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties, the executive committee that manages the oversight body’s day-to-day operations, announced its suspension decision in an official public statement Monday night. The Bureau noted its action was informed by multiple authoritative sources: an investigative report compiled by the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), the full body of underlying evidence collected during the probe, legal guidance from an independent ad hoc panel of judicial experts, and formal written submissions from all involved parties. The statement explicitly emphasized that Khan’s temporary suspension ahead of the full assembly vote does not amount to a prejudgment of the final outcome, nor does it confirm the allegations are true.

    According to an authenticated copy of the OIOS investigation reviewed by the Associated Press, the U.N. probe uncovered evidence that Khan engaged in repeated nonconsensual sexual contact with the complainant, with incidents alleged to have occurred in his ICC office, his private residence, and during official overseas work trips. An independent Associated Press investigation earlier detailed how Khan first encountered the woman working in a separate ICC department, then arranged to transfer her to a role on his personal staff, after which she became a regular attendee of official international trips with him.

    Whistleblower documents cited in the AP inquiry outline specific alleged incidents: on one overseas work trip, Khan is accused of asking the complainant to rest with him on a hotel bed before sexually touching her. Other claims include instances of Khan locking the door of his ICC office and reaching into the complainant’s pocket without consent, as well as repeated unwanted invitations for her to join him on a personal vacation.

    However, the independent three-judge panel appointed by the Bureau to conduct a legal review of the OIOS findings concluded that the investigation’s conclusions were not sufficiently conclusive to support immediate disciplinary action. Court documents previously made public have also noted that the panel did not rule out the possibility of Khan resuming his duties if the final assembly vote clears him of wrongdoing.

    Khan first voluntarily stepped back from his responsibilities as chief prosecutor in May 2025, after the investigation was launched, and has not performed official duties since. The entire process is unprecedented in the ICC’s history, requiring the Assembly of States Parties to draft and adopt new ad hoc procedural rules multiple times to address the unique situation. When reached for comment by reporters on Monday, Khan’s legal team said a formal public statement would be released on Tuesday.

  • Iran attacking Israel seeks to shape the region on its own terms

    Iran attacking Israel seeks to shape the region on its own terms

    On June 7, 2026, Iran launched a large-scale barrage of missile strikes against Israel, marking its first direct attack on Israeli territory in two months. The immediate catalyst for this assault came hours earlier, when Israeli forces carried out a targeted strike on a Hezbollah position in Beirut, Lebanon’s capital – an operation that former U.S. President Donald Trump had explicitly urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avoid just days prior.

    Within hours of Iran’s initial missile volley, the Israeli military launched retaliatory air strikes against military and infrastructure targets across western and central Iran, once again ignoring the Trump administration’s repeated calls for regional de-escalation and restraint. In response, Iran quickly organized a second wave of missile attacks, before official Iranian military spokesperson announced the conclusion of Tehran’s offensive operations. In an official public statement, Tehran issued a stark warning: if Israel continues its military campaign against Hezbollah positions in Lebanon, Iran will launch a far more severe military response in the future.

    What sets this round of cross-border escalation apart from prior confrontations is the distinct geopolitical context in which it unfolds. Over the course of the ongoing regional conflict, Iran has moved steadily to establish a new regional order structured around revised rules of engagement that it dictates – and a growing body of evidence suggests Tehran is on track to successfully implement this new framework.

    The first defining feature of this emerging order is Iran’s growing willingness and ability to dictate acceptable military action to both Israel and the United States. Critically, Iran initiated this latest round of fighting not in response to an attack on its own sovereign territory, but to push back against Israeli military operations in Lebanon, aiming to set clear limits on what Israel can do in its own neighboring border region. Just six months ago, Israel was able to conduct unrestricted military operations across Lebanon without fear of direct Iranian retaliation. Today, shifted regional dynamics brought on by months of open conflict have left Tehran sufficiently emboldened to impose explicit constraints on Israeli military activity.

    This same dynamic of Iranian assertiveness has played out more gradually over the past month in the Strait of Hormuz, the vital global energy chokepoint through which nearly 20% of the world’s oil supplies pass daily. Shortly after the full-scale regional war began in late February, Iran established de facto control over movement through the waterway, and has shown no indication that it plans to relinquish this leverage. This control, too, is a core component of Iran’s new regional order: Tehran is sending a clear message to its rivals that compliance with its demands is required, or it will tighten its chokehold on the global energy economy. So far, U.S. policy has reflected a clear willingness to accept this new status quo rather than risk the consequences of military confrontation to reverse it.

    The second key element of this new order is Iran’s expanding toolkit of coercive options to pressure its opponents into accepting the new rules, all while avoiding meaningful punitive consequences. Tehran has now proven it can launch large-scale missile barrages into Israel, strike critical infrastructure across U.S.-aligned Gulf Arab states, target American military personnel operating in the region, and disrupt global energy supplies – all without triggering the large-scale regime-change intervention that long deterred such actions. Iran still retains a wide range of unplayed leverage as well: it can expand targeting of energy and water desalination infrastructure across the Gulf, or reactivate its Houthi allies in Yemen to disrupt global shipping through the Red Sea. Already, following the latest escalation, the Houthis have announced a full ban on all Israeli-flagged commercial shipping transiting the Red Sea.

    While the U.S. has issued repeated public threats to retaliate against Iran – including strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure, a seizure of Iran’s critical Kharg Island oil export terminal, or the deployment of naval convoys to enforce free passage through the Strait of Hormuz – Washington has backed down from every planned action, driven by fear of the catastrophic regional escalation that would follow.

    The third defining feature of Iran’s emerging order is the growing rift in longstanding coordinated policy between the U.S. and Israel, a development that has long been a core strategic goal for Tehran. In response to Iran’s initial missile strikes against Israel, Trump emphasized that his top priority was preventing Israel from launching a major retaliatory campaign. “I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate,” Trump stated publicly immediately after the first Iranian assault. The current situation, in which a sitting Republican U.S. president is urging Israel not to respond to direct Iranian missile attacks targeting civilian populations, would have been considered nearly unimaginable just six months ago, a testament to how dramatically regional dynamics have shifted.

    While Trump has not yet threatened to withhold American missile interceptor defense supplies from Israel over its resumption of hostilities, even with continued U.S. defensive support, sustaining a major new conflict with Iran poses significant challenges for Jerusalem. For example, large-scale ground operations to target Iranian missile launchers would stretch Israeli air power thin, particularly without active U.S. assistance in targeting enemy positions, and the ongoing active front against Hezbollah in the north would draw down already strained Israeli military resources even further.

    Looking ahead, a critical open question remains: how long will the U.S. be willing to deplete its own domestic stocks of missile interceptors to defend Israel, in a conflict that the U.S. president explicitly urged Israel not to initiate? In the short term, this arrangement may hold, but over the long run, it is not sustainable for the U.S. to dedicate a large share of its national missile defense inventory to protect Israel in an ongoing open conflict.

    The fourth and final feature of the new regional order is that a lasting regional peace settlement appears increasingly out of reach. Netanyahu cannot politically accept an Iranian veto over Israeli military action in Lebanon, nor can he afford to erode longheld Israeli deterrence by allowing unpunished Iranian missile attacks on Israeli territory. At the same time, Trump cannot advance his stated goal of negotiating a new peace deal with Iran while Israel continues its military campaign in Lebanon. For its part, Iran has every incentive to keep increasing pressure on its opponents, inflicting steadily rising costs with little fear of meaningful consequences under the new regional order it has built.

    Ultimately, this shifting dangerous landscape is the outcome of a poorly considered war of choice that will go down as one of the most ill-conceived military engagements in modern American history.

    This analysis is contributed by Andrew Gawthorpe, a lecturer in history and international studies at Leiden University, republished under a Creative Commons license from The Conversation.

  • Armed group kidnaps 39 people during negotiations in northwestern Nigeria

    Armed group kidnaps 39 people during negotiations in northwestern Nigeria

    ABUJA, Nigeria — A brazen act of violence has deepened fears over Nigeria’s spiraling security crisis, after armed bandits abducted 39 people during a community-led peace negotiation meeting in the restive northwestern state of Zamfara, regional police confirmed in a public statement released Monday.

    The attack unfolded Sunday in the Magamin Diddi community of Maradun Local Government Area, when a gathering of 47 local residents had assembled to discuss reconciliation and peace negotiations with family members of a notorious regional bandit kingpin linked to widespread abductions in the area. According to police spokesperson Yazid Abubakar, the suspected bandit leader himself unexpectedly arrived at the venue alongside a contingent of armed fighters, who seized 39 attendees before departing. The remaining eight people at the meeting managed to escape unharmed.

    For communities across northwestern Nigeria, such unofficial peace talks have become a grim necessity. Many local residents say the Nigerian military has failed to provide consistent protection against near-constant raids, kidnappings for ransom, and cattle rustling carried out by criminal bandit networks, pushing communities to pursue independent negotiations with armed groups in hopes of securing a fragile local truce.

    The high-profile abduction comes amid a sprawling, long-running security emergency that has engulfed large swathes of northern Nigeria. For more than a decade, the country has grappled with an Islamic insurgency centered in the northeast that has spread beyond its original borders, alongside a surge in violent criminal activity by bandit groups in the northwest and central regions. Per United Nations estimates, the insurgency alone has killed thousands of civilians and displaced millions more from their homes, while criminal gang attacks have become increasingly frequent across virtually all of northern Nigeria.

    The latest incident also comes just one day after the Nigerian military announced a major counter-insurgency win: a raid that freed 360 captives held by the Boko Haram militant group in the Mandara Mountains of southern Borno State, a traditional stronghold for the insurgent faction. Boko Haram and its offshoot, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), remain the two most powerful militant groups operating in Nigeria’s northeast. Just one month prior, Nigerian authorities announced that a joint military operation with U.S. forces had killed 175 ISWAP fighters, marking one of the largest single-counterterrorism strikes in recent years.

    Despite these high-profile military victories, security analysts warn that the Nigerian government has failed to implement the systemic changes needed to curb widespread violence, even as President Bola Tinubu has repeatedly made public promises to resolve the country’s security crisis since taking office. The abduction of peace negotiators underscores the persistent vulnerability of civilian communities caught between armed groups and an overstretched, underperforming state security apparatus.

  • Don’t bomb Iran, Trump tells Netanyahu, but Israel strikes anyway

    Don’t bomb Iran, Trump tells Netanyahu, but Israel strikes anyway

    A dramatic escalation of tensions across the Middle East unfolded this week after Israeli Defense Forces carried out an airstrike on Iran on Monday, just hours after former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on any retaliatory action. The strike came in direct response to a major Iranian missile barrage against Israeli targets a day earlier, which Tehran launched as payback for an earlier Israeli bombing operation in Beirut.

    Trump made his call for de-escalation in comments to Axios on Sunday, shortly after Iran’s strikes landed. He noted that the Iranian barrage had not resulted in any reported casualties, arguing that both sides had already carried out their reciprocal actions. “Each of them had their fun. Israel had its strike, and Iran had its strike. We don’t need another one,” Trump told reporters, adding that he would contact Netanyahu immediately to pressure him into standing down.

    Iran’s Sunday missile attack marked the first major cross-border strike against Israel since a fragile ceasefire agreement went into effect in early April, and the back-and-forth exchange has stoked widespread fears that the region could quickly slide back into a full-scale open conflict. Tehran defended its action as a legitimate defensive measure, saying it was responding both to the Israeli bombing of southern Beirut and repeated Israeli violations of the April ceasefire. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei pointed specifically to recent joint attacks carried out by Israel and the U.S. military against Iranian commercial vessels and targets in southern Iran over the preceding two weeks as proof of ongoing aggression.

    Baghaei rejected Trump’s framing of the conflict during a Monday press conference, arguing that no regional observer believes Israel would launch attacks against neighbors like Lebanon and Iran without prior coordination and backing from the United States. As a signatory to the April 8 ceasefire understanding, Washington bears full responsibility for all violations, Baghaei said. “Whether the US itself violates the ceasefire by attacking Iranian commercial ships or targeting southern parts of the country, or whether violations are carried out through the Zionist regime in Lebanon with US complicity, the direct responsibility of the United States is clear, and the consequences of any escalation will also fall on Washington,” he added.

    Speaking to the Financial Times after Iran’s missile strike, Trump maintained that the exchange would not derail ongoing diplomatic efforts to reach a broader negotiated agreement with Tehran. The U.S. president also asserted his authority over Israeli policy, saying that Netanyahu would have no option but to accept any deal his administration reaches with Iran. “I call the shots. I call all the shots. [Netanyahu] doesn’t call the shots,” Trump said.

    But critics of the February joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran say Netanyahu’s swift decision to defy Trump’s call for restraint lays bare the deep problems and unintended consequences of the conflict for U.S. influence in the region. U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, framed the incident as a major humiliation for both Trump and U.S. global standing. “This war has been humiliating for Trump and American power generally,” Murphy wrote on social media. “And when Trump announces he is going to call Netanyahu and tell him not to retaliate, and within hours Netanyahu retaliates, the humiliation just compounds.”

    Analysis from foreign policy experts echoes this critique, highlighting a fundamental mismatch in Trump’s approach to regional diplomacy that risks further escalation. Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, noted that Trump has only shown willingness to publicly pressure Netanyahu, rather than expending real political capital to rein in Israeli military action, unless a diplomatic deal with Iran is already finalized. “From Trump’s perspective, it is only worth doing if an agreement with Iran is already secured. In short, Trump is willing to restrain Israel to preserve a deal, but not to obtain one. Iran, however, wants evidence that Trump can restrain Israel before agreeing to a deal,” Parsi explained in a post-strike blog post. “As a result, the most likely scenario is another round of Iranian and Israeli strikes, with Trump declining to meaningfully constrain Israel.”

    The National Iranian American Council has warned that Iranian leadership has already threatened to launch a broader, more destructive military campaign if Israeli attacks continue. The group noted that the next 24 to 72 hours will be a critical window to determine whether the current crisis can be contained, or if it will mark the start of a new, more dangerous phase of the long-running regional conflict. Even as diplomatic efforts remain stalled, observers across the globe are watching closely for any further moves that could push the entire Middle East into open war.

  • Has Trump lost control of the Iran war?

    Has Trump lost control of the Iran war?

    Two months after a fragile ceasefire halted open hostilities between Israel and Iran, the region has been jolted by a fresh escalation: the first mutual missile strikes between the two adversaries since the truce took effect. This sudden breakdown of the ceasefire has reignited urgent debate over the scope of U.S. influence over Israeli security policy, particularly surrounding the question of whether former U.S. President Donald Trump, who oversaw a dramatic shift in Washington’s Iran strategy during his tenure, retains any meaningful control over the trajectory of the long-running Israeli-Iranian conflict. The precarious ceasefire, which had been held together by behind-the-scenes diplomatic pressure and informal understandings, had raised cautious hopes that de-escalation could lead to broader talks. Instead, the exchange of missile strikes has pushed the already volatile Middle East closer to open full-scale conflict, leaving regional and global powers scrambling to assess the new security landscape. Analysts note that the resumption of hostilities underscores the deep mistrust between Israel and Iran, with each side viewing the other’s actions as a deliberate provocation. For Washington, the new outbreak of violence also revives longstanding debates about the extent of U.S. leverage over its closest Middle Eastern ally, as well as the consequences of the Trump administration’s maximum pressure campaign against Iran that reshaped the regional security order years ago.

  • Gaza doctor Hussam Abu Safiya placed in solitary confinement, lawyer says

    Gaza doctor Hussam Abu Safiya placed in solitary confinement, lawyer says

    A prominent Palestinian doctor taken into Israeli custody from Gaza late last year is being held in solitary confinement under severely abusive conditions that have exacerbated his preexisting chronic health problems, his legal representative has confirmed, drawing sharp condemnation from global human rights groups. Hussam Abu Safiya, a hospital director abducted by Israeli forces in December 2024, has faced consistent mistreatment including medical neglect, physical violence, and insufficient access to food and water since his detention began, according to his lawyer Nasser Odeh. Odeh shared these details following his most recent contact with the detainee during a visit on 26 May, one of the limited opportunities for communication between Abu Safiya and his legal team. During that visit, Odeh documented that Abu Safiya remained physically restrained throughout the meeting, which was held in a camera-monitored room with a glass barrier separating the two men and armed guards positioned on both sides. Odeh described the meeting as extremely short, noting that Abu Safiya was too afraid of retaliation from prison staff to openly discuss many details of his treatment behind bars. Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI), an independent rights organization, had previously revealed that Abu Safiya lives with serious health conditions including severe scabies and chronic heart disease, and has lost a dangerous amount of weight since being taken into custody. As of 3 June, Abu Safiya was transferred from Negev Prison to Nafha Prison in southern Israel, where prison authorities immediately placed him in solitary confinement. Odeh confirmed that no updates have been shared on Abu Safiya’s condition or wellbeing since the transfer, leaving his legal team with no information about his current status. Despite being a civilian healthcare worker who was seized while carrying out his medical duties, Abu Safiya has been classified as an “unlawful combatant” under controversial Israeli legislation that has been widely decried by rights groups as a blatant violation of international humanitarian law. This designation allows Israeli authorities to hold detainees indefinitely without formal indictment, court approval, or guaranteed access to legal representation, and permits officials to withhold information about a detainee’s location and condition from outside parties. In response to Abu Safiya’s ongoing detention under this framework, Odeh confirmed that his legal team has filed an appeal with the Israeli High Court of Justice, which is scheduled to hold a hearing on the request on 10 June. The case of Abu Safiya is far from isolated: he is one of at least dozens of Palestinian doctors, nurses, and emergency medical workers who have been arbitrarily detained and targeted by Israeli forces since the outbreak of the current conflict, with many seized while treating patients in Gaza hospitals. According to tallies from Palestinian prisoner advocacy groups, the total number of Palestinian detainees held in Israeli prisons as of early June stands at roughly 9,500. This figure does not include thousands more uncounted detainees, mostly people abducted from Gaza, who are being held in undisclosed Israeli military camps with no public accounting of their status. Since 7 October 2023, multiple independent human rights investigations have documented widespread, systematic abuse of Palestinian detainees in Israeli custody. Reports from leading rights organizations outline patterns of starvation, deliberate medical neglect, routine physical violence, psychological humiliation, sexual assault, theft of personal property, and the use of mass solitary confinement on an unprecedented scale. Agnes Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, is among the leading global rights figures who have publicly called for Abu Safiya’s immediate release, joining a growing chorus of condemnation over the mistreatment of detained Palestinian healthcare workers.

  • Trump calls on Iran and Israel to ‘stop shooting immediately’

    Trump calls on Iran and Israel to ‘stop shooting immediately’

    A fragile regional ceasefire between Iran and Israel has collapsed into open tit-for-tat missile exchanges, prompting outgoing U.S. President Donald Trump to issue urgent public and private calls for an immediate end to hostilities amid growing global alarm over wider conflict.

    In a public post to his Truth Social platform over the weekend, Trump stressed that the two nations “must immediately stop ‘shooting’”, as cross-border attacks reignited long-simmered tensions that a fragile April ceasefire had temporarily paused. The escalation comes even as the Trump administration has pursued behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts to lock in a new peace deal, with the president directly pressuring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on retaliatory strikes, according to senior U.S. administration sources.

    The current cycle of violence was triggered Saturday when Israeli warplanes struck Beirut’s southern suburbs, killing at least two people and wounding 20 more. In a deliberate, proportional response, Iran launched a barrage of missile strikes toward northern Israel on Sunday, fulfilling long-stated pledges to retaliate for attacks on Iranian interests and allied assets. Despite Trump’s last-minute phone call urging Netanyahu to stand down to save faltering peace negotiations, Israel launched its own wave of counter-strikes against targets inside Iran.

    A senior anonymous U.S. official outlined that Trump told Netanyahu during the Sunday call that Washington was “close to doing something good in terms of a deal”. The official added that Netanyahu initially pushed back against the request before offering a tentative, non-binding agreement to hold fire, and confirmed the Trump administration never issued “the green light” for Israel’s strike on the Lebanese capital. Ahead of the call, Trump had already publicly expressed dissatisfaction with the Beirut attack, telling Fox News he was “not happy” about the strike on Lebanon’s capital. In separate comments to the Financial Times, Trump also claimed Netanyahu would have “no choice” but to accept a negotiated deal with Iran, asserting that “I call the shots” on regional diplomacy.

    The failed diplomatic push has drawn sharp criticism from political opponents in Washington. U.S. Democratic Senator Chris Murphy argued that the new wave of cross-border attacks compounds what he called Trump’s diplomatic “humiliation”, marking a clear failure of the administration’s efforts to constrain Israeli military action.

    Iran has meanwhile formally pinned responsibility for the escalation on the United States, in comments carried by the country’s state-run Tasnim news agency. Foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei noted that Washington is a signatory to the April 8 ceasefire agreement, saying “Whatever happens in the region… the direct responsibility of the United States is established, and it will also bear responsibility for the consequences of any escalation.” He added that the original negotiation framework was intended to end broader hostilities against Iran and resolve the ongoing conflict in Lebanon as core components of the ceasefire deal.

    On Monday, multiple reports from Iran’s official IRNA news agency confirmed widespread “powerful explosions” were heard across key Iranian cities including Tehran, Isfahan, and Tabriz. Israeli military officials confirmed they had targeted military sites across western and central Iran, including a strike on a major petrochemical facility in the port city of Mahshahr. To date, neither side has released official casualty figures from the latest exchange of strikes, though emergency management and hospital systems in both countries have activated full response protocols to prepare for the risk of prolonged open hostilities.

    In response to Israel’s strikes, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched a coordinated retaliatory operation codenamed “Operation Nasr”. The IRGC announced its aerospace division fired precision missiles at two key Israeli air bases: Nevatim Air Base and Tel Nof Air Base, saying the operation was launched in response to earlier Israeli strikes on Iranian radar installations across multiple locations. This marked the first major direct Iranian attack on Israeli territory since the April ceasefire came into force. Israeli air defense systems reported intercepting roughly 10 incoming missiles bound for northern Israel, with no casualties reported on the Israeli side as of Monday morning.

    In an official statement, the IRGC noted the operation was the first phase of a broader retaliatory campaign, added that the strike was dedicated to fallen Iranian service members killed during the previous year’s 12-day war, and carried out under the alternate code name “Ya Heydar Karrar”. The group stressed all of its combat units remain at full operational readiness to respond to any further escalation, warning that additional strikes will follow if Israel continues its military campaign across the region.

  • UN warns of ‘deepening crisis’ in oceans, urges action

    UN warns of ‘deepening crisis’ in oceans, urges action

    On Monday, a landmark United Nations report delivered a stark warning that the world’s oceans are facing a deepening, multifaceted crisis driven by human activity, and issued a urgent call for coordinated global intervention to reverse accelerating damage. Compiled over five years of collaborative research by 600 leading marine scientists from across the globe, the 1,352-page Third World Ocean Assessment (WOA) – which analyzes ocean conditions between 2018 and 2023 – lays bare the mounting toll of climate change, industrial overexploitation, and pollution on the planet’s largest life support system.

    Covering more than 70 percent of Earth’s surface, the ocean serves as the fundamental backbone of global life: it regulates the planetary climate and sustains food security for billions of people worldwide. But the report makes clear that this critical system is teetering toward irreversible breakdown. “The ocean is the foundation of life on Earth. But its health is at grave risk as ecosystems and habitats approach or surpass critical tipping points,” the WOA states, noting that overlapping pressures of climate change, plastic pollution, overfishing, and biodiversity loss have pushed ocean systems to their breaking point. The findings demand urgent, coordinated response: stronger cross-border multilateral cooperation, bolder policy ambition, and decision-making rooted in robust, peer-reviewed scientific evidence.

    In a rare nod to progress, the assessment welcomed the January entry into force of the UN high seas treaty, a landmark agreement designed to protect and sustainably manage marine biodiversity in international waters, calling it a “historic milestone for ocean stewardship and multilateral cooperation”. But UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres emphasized that far more action is needed. “We cannot keep treating the ocean as limitless,” Guterres said in an official statement. “We must build a new relationship with the ocean: Grounded in science. Framed by international law. And built on shared responsibility.”

    The report’s data paints an alarming picture of accelerating change. Since 1955, 16 percent of the total increase in ocean heat content has occurred in just the five years between 2018 and 2023. The ocean has long buffered humanity from the worst effects of fossil fuel emissions, absorbing more than 90 percent of excess atmospheric heat and 30 percent of human-caused carbon dioxide. But this buffering comes at a devastating cost: warming water expands, amplifying sea-level rise driven by glacial and ice sheet melt. The report finds that the rate of global sea-level rise has more than doubled, climbing from less than 2.0 millimeters per year before 2015 to 4.5 millimeters per year in 2023. While these incremental increases may seem insignificant on their own, they accumulate rapidly over time to threaten coastal communities worldwide, explained Ian Butler, an Australia-based marine ecologist and joint coordinator of the WOA expert group, in an interview with Agence France-Presse.

    Ice loss is accelerating at both poles, with far-reaching environmental and geopolitical consequences. The assessment projects that the Arctic Ocean could be completely ice-free during the month of September as early as the 2030s, and will almost certainly reach that state by mid-century under every greenhouse gas emissions scenario. Butler noted that an ice-free Arctic for parts of the year could arrive within just one to two decades. This dramatic melt is already reshaping global geopolitics: it opens previously impassable trans-Arctic shipping routes and intensifies competition for access to natural resources between major powers including the United States, Russia, and China. At the opposite end of the globe, Antarctic sea ice – which saw gradual growth between 1979 and 2015 – has undergone a rapid, unanticipated decline since 2016.

    Marine ecosystems are already suffering massive, widespread disruption. As ocean temperatures rise, many fish species are shifting their ranges toward cooler polar waters or deeper depths to survive, but Butler warned that “some have no future at all because there’s nowhere for them to go”. Coral reefs, among the most biodiverse ecosystems on the planet, face imminent collapse. Repeated back-to-back marine heatwaves and intense storms leave reefs no time to recover from damage, the report says, and mass bleaching events since 2018 have caused widespread coral death. If global warming exceeds 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, up to 90 percent of the world’s coral reefs could disappear forever.

    Two growing emerging threats are also highlighted in the report: plastic pollution and deep-sea mining. Every year, 52.1 million tonnes of plastic waste leak into the world’s oceans, contributing to a current total of an estimated 24.4 trillion microplastic particles circulating in marine environments. These tiny plastic fragments are now documented to harm more than 4,000 different marine species, from plankton to large mammals. The assessment calls for drastic cuts in plastic production, a point that has deadlocked ongoing international negotiations aimed at a global plastic pollution treaty. On deep-sea mining, the report notes that exploration for seabed mineral resources is well advanced, though no commercial extraction has yet begun. Critics warn that large-scale mining would smother deep-sea ecosystems with sediment waste and disrupt marine migration patterns with constant heavy machinery noise, prompting the WOA to call for a coordinated international response to address growing risks.

    The assessment’s release comes amid controversy over a decision by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump to remove hundreds of long-standing deep-sea scientific instruments that have monitored climate change impacts on marine environments for a decade. Butler called the move a major setback for global ocean science. “The deep ocean monitoring system is an extremely important part of our global monitoring and understanding of the ocean,” he said. “The removal of it would leave a huge gap in our long-term ocean science.”

    Environmental advocacy group Greenpeace echoed the report’s call for urgent action, saying “This report must serve as an urgent wake-up call to governments to act to protect the ocean.”

  • Couple arrested in Spain over gangland murder bid

    Couple arrested in Spain over gangland murder bid

    A joint investigation by Spanish and British law enforcement has resulted in the arrest of a pair of British suspects with ties to Edinburgh, who stand accused of orchestrating a targeted gangland shooting that left a man with permanent life-altering injuries on Spain’s Murcia coast. The attack, which took place in November 2024 outside the victim’s home in the San Javier district of Santiago de la Ribera, saw the male and female suspects shoot the victim four times in the back at close range as he stood on his doorstep, according to official allegations from Spanish authorities.

    After the shooting, the victim was rushed to a local hospital for emergency care, where he underwent months of intensive medical treatment. While he ultimately survived the attack, the injuries he sustained have permanently altered his quality of life, investigators confirmed.

    Spain’s Civil Guard, one of the country’s two national law enforcement agencies, has linked the arrested couple to a powerful organised criminal group involved in drug trafficking and a pattern of violent criminal activity across the region. Witness accounts collected immediately after the attack described the shooter fleeing the scene on foot before escaping in a pre-positioned waiting vehicle.

    Just one hour after the shooting, investigators located the suspected getaway vehicle burned to a shell on a rural road connecting San Javier and Los Narejos. Forensic analysis confirmed the torched car was stolen, fitted with counterfeit license plates, and matched the description provided by eyewitnesses.

    The following day, law enforcement executed a second search in the Mazarrón region, where they seized another high-end British vehicle also registered with false plates. Inside the abandoned vehicle, investigators uncovered critical evidence: a silenced handgun that ballistics tests later confirmed was the weapon used in the attempted murder, along with unused ammunition, a black balaclava, and a pair of disposable gloves used by the suspects to avoid leaving evidence at the crime scene.

    Forensic experts matched DNA samples collected from the seized clothing and accessories to the two suspects, cracking the case and allowing investigators to name the pair months after the attack. Investigators also recovered fired shell casings from the attack scene, which helped confirm the weapon used in the shooting.

    The 12-month cross-border investigation, codenamed Operation Esbroya 24, brought together Spanish law enforcement and UK police agencies to track down the suspects. The first arrest came in April 2025, when officers took the male suspect into custody at Alicante-Elche Miguel Hernández International Airport as he prepared to board a commercial flight bound for Edinburgh. Two weeks later, in May 2025, the female suspect was arrested at the same airport moments after she entered Spain from an international flight.

    Official charges allege the couple travelled specifically to the Murcia region in southeast Spain to locate the victim and carry out the pre-planned killing at his residence. Spanish Civil Guard officials confirmed that the investigation into the attack and broader connections to the organised criminal network remains ongoing, with further arrests possible as detectives continue to uncover new details about the case.