分类： world

On September 3, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court issued a landmark ruling striking down the preventive detention order against 30-something Kashmiri research scholar Shafat Maqbool Wani, establishing a critical legal precedent that mere ownership of texts with politically charged or controversial titles cannot be classified as a criminal act, nor can it justify extrajudicial detention. Presiding Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi explicitly stated in her written judgment that “owning books with grim, provocative titles does not make their owner a criminal by default”, concluding that local administrative authorities had failed to produce any verifiable evidence of specific subversive activity that would legally warrant Wani’s detention under the draconian Public Safety Act (PSA) – a sweeping regional statute that permits administrative bodies to hold individuals without formal trial for up to two years in the name of state security.

The sequence of events leading to Wani’s detention stretches back months: Wani, a resident of the northern Kupwara district of Kashmir, was first arrested under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), India’s flagship anti-terrorism legislation. A special National Investigation Agency court based in Jammu eventually granted him formal bail in that UAPA case, but on September 13, 2025 – the exact day he was set to be released – the Kupwara district magistrate issued a new detention order under the PSA, claiming Wani’s unspecified activities posed a threat “detrimental to state security”. The four formal grounds cited for the PSA detention included tangential references to his father’s alleged past association with a 1990s militant outfit before his formal surrender, invitations Wani had received to present original academic research at Columbia University in the U.S. and Dublin City University in Ireland, the pending UAPA case against him, and a cache of printed materials seized from his family home that authorities labelled “anti-national”. Among the seized texts were two volumes: *Construction of an Islamic Order in Hindutva Reimagination* and *The Saffronisation of Occupied Kashmir: Demystifying Hindutva Settlers, Colonial Designers*, which police had incorrectly attributed to Wani as his own authorship – a factual error the High Court explicitly noted in its ruling.

The judicial intervention in Wani’s case unfolds against a rapidly shifting political backdrop in Indian-administered Kashmir, dating back to the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government’s 2019 unilateral abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian constitution, the legal provision that previously granted the region semi-autonomous special status. In the years following that move, the region has undergone sweeping administrative overhauls, including the implementation of new domicile laws that widespread critics across the region and global human rights groups decry as a deliberate “settler-colonial project” engineered to dismantle the region’s longstanding Muslim demographic majority. For local residents, the post-2019 era has brought steadily eroded civil liberties, with routine criminalisation of even peaceful dissent: journalists, academics and independent activists face waves of arbitrary detentions, sweeping blanket book bans, widespread withholding of passports for ordinary citizens, and a pervasive architecture of continuous state surveillance that permeates nearly every sphere of public life. Most recently, the BJP-appointed leadership of the Jammu and Kashmir Waqf Board – the state body tasked with overseeing the region’s Islamic shrines and mosques – issued a controversial directive mandating identical, uniform Friday sermon scripts for every mosque across the territory, a move that sparked widespread public outcry from religious leaders and worshippers alike.

Wani’s successful court challenge arrives at a moment of deepening alarm among regional academics, legal practitioners and human rights organisations over the accelerating erosion of intellectual life across Kashmir, as state security frameworks increasingly frame critical thinking and independent scholarly inquiry as inherent national security threats. Dozens of members of the region’s small, tight-knit academic community warn that years of arbitrary detentions targeting writers and researchers have already created a pervasive chilling effect, reshaping what topics scholars dare to explore, what texts they choose to publish, and even what ideas they discuss in public spaces. A 40-something Kashmiri fiction writer based in Srinagar, who requested full anonymity to avoid state reprisals, explained the stifling atmosphere: “When books are banned en masse, and people are locked up just on the unproven assumption that they hold anti-national views, you can imagine the pressure on every writer. Many of us are struggling to produce work at all, some have stopped writing entirely, and the rest only produce content that we know will not upset the authorities. You will not find a single critical, unflinching story in local media anymore – only content that the state deems acceptable. There is no remaining space for independent critical thought.”

This crackdown on intellectual output has escalated sharply over the past 18 months. In 2024, regional authorities issued a formal blanket ban on the publication, sale and circulation of 25 prominent titles focused on Kashmir, alleging the works propagated “false narratives” and advocated for secession from India. The banned list included titles from globally celebrated scholars and award-winning journalists, including Arundhati Roy, A.G. Noorani, Victoria Schofield, Hafsa Kanjwal, Ather Zia and Anuradha Bhasin, with some of the suppressed volumes published by internationally respected academic presses including Cambridge University Press. The accompanying official directive ordered every school, college, university and public library in the region to conduct full audits of their collections to remove any material deemed to contain “objectionable content”.

The book screening drive intensified in July 2025, when authorities launched a territory-wide mass filtering of holdings across Kashmir’s most prominent libraries and higher education institutions, claiming stored texts included content that glorified leaders associated with the Kashmiri self-determination movement. All educational institutions received formal orders to conduct line-by-line vetting of every book, peer-reviewed journal, student dissertation, doctoral thesis and even digital educational resources on their servers, to “prevent any activity prejudicial to the sovereignty and security of the nation”. Current university students confirmed to independent outlet Middle East Eye that institutions now enforce strict mandates requiring all seminar topics to be pre-approved by administrations, all guest speakers to be vetted by state security officials, and syllabi to be systematically scrubbed of critical political science and literature content that addresses the region’s decades-long conflict or its unvarnished modern history.

In a September address to the local legislative assembly, Jammu and Kashmir’s education minister Sakina Itoo confirmed that authorities had already removed 4,249 books from public, school and college library shelves, and sent an additional 1,752 titles for formal “expert review” after completing initial screenings of more than 2.18 million total books across the region. Independent legislator Sheikh Khurshid, who first raised questions about the mass book removals in the assembly, told reporters in Srinagar that the untransparent removal of titles amounts to a deliberate effort to erase the region’s distinct collective history. “We have never been given a full, public list of exactly which books have been pulled from circulation, and that irony is impossible to miss,” Khurshid noted. “Banning books runs directly contrary to the government’s repeated public claims that full freedom of expression is enjoyed by every resident in Jammu and Kashmir.”

Leading global scholars of Kashmiri studies have framed the broader crackdown as a direct threat to the foundational values of open, democratic societies. Mohamad Junaid, an assistant professor of anthropology at the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, emphasised that academic freedom is inextricably tied to freedom of conscience, the core pillar of all modern liberal, tolerant societies. “The absence of that freedom signals that a society has drifted sharply in the opposite, illiberal direction,” Junaid explained. “The right to pursue unfiltered academic inquiry benefits every member of society, even when the sitting government finds its conclusions inconvenient. Blocking critical academic work blinds an entire population to its own flaws and systemic injustices. In these recent high-profile cases, what is at stake is not just the right to conduct independent research – it is the fundamental question of whether Kashmiris are even permitted to produce their own knowledge about their communities and their lived realities.”

Ather Zia, an associate professor of anthropology and gender studies at the University of Northern Colorado whose own work appears on the 2024 banned book list, noted that nearly every dimension of daily life for Kashmiri residents has grown exponentially more restrictive in recent years. “When books are reclassified as contraband, especially for researchers whose entire work depends on broad, unimpeded access to diverse ideas and critical inquiry, that tells you far more about the nature of the state itself than it does about the content of the texts,” Zia argued.

Even the region’s elected chief minister Omar Abdullah has publicly acknowledged his own powerlessness to intervene in the book ban policies, noting that the elected local government’s formal governing powers have been drastically curtailed under current administrative rules. “I hold my own personal views on whether banning books is ever justified, but unfortunately under the current system, the elected local government has no authority to make decisions on these matters,” Abdullah told reporters in September, adding that his administration would “take a fresh look at what is happening” to pursue potential future reforms.

Goldie Osuri, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Warwick, argued that Wani’s detention case is irrefutable evidence that no meaningful academic freedom remains in Indian-administered Kashmir. “When mere possession of academic or literary material is cited as a legitimate justification for detention, it is undeniable that a state willing to use preventive detention to punish people on that basis is engaging in textbook fascism,” Osuri stated. “We already know 25 landmark books on Kashmir were banned on August 5, 2025. Even though the Jammu and Kashmir High Court ultimately quashed Wani’s detention, the fact that state authorities described his academic materials as holding ‘dispiriting titles’ reveals the deeply hostile attitude both the state and local legal system hold toward independent critical research. Laws like UAPA and PSA are not counter-terror tools – they are designed to intimidate academics, journalists and ordinary citizens into silence. Wani was held for more than a year under the PSA, a deliberate signal to every other resident that any independent research, journalism or creative writing that deviates from official state narratives will be met with severe punitive consequences. Preventive detention in Kashmir no longer bears any connection to conventional justice – it is a political weapon, deployed explicitly to silence even the faintest hint of criticism or dissent against the state. In Wani’s case, nothing more than the possession of academic reading material was treated as sufficient grounds to lock him away without trial.”

As powerful Typhoon Champi churned toward Taiwan’s northeast coast on Friday, the entire East Asia region faced widespread disruption, with hundreds of flights canceled, daily operations shuttered, and emergency teams on high alert ahead of the storm’s expected peak impact on Saturday.

Taiwan authorities have pre-emptively closed schools, government offices and the island’s $5 trillion stock exchange across 21 of its 22 counties and cities, granting residents a widespread “typhoon holiday” as the storm approached. Only the western outlying archipelago of Kinmen maintained normal operations. Authorities have also issued urgent warnings, urging residents to avoid coastal areas and mountainous terrain that face the greatest risk of storm surge and landslides.

As of Friday, local authorities confirmed one person was killed after being swept away by rogue Champi-driven waves, with 171 others injured and more than 1,000 people evacuated from high-risk zones to emergency shelters. While regional weather forecasts from Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan indicate the storm’s eye will most likely remain offshore as it passes the island, Taiwan Central Weather Administration forecasters told reporters they cannot rule out a landfall, particularly if the storm shifts its path or stalls as it approaches the coast.

Forecasts call for up to 90 centimeters of torrential rain and sustained strong winds across northeast Taiwan through Saturday, with rainfall expected to peak Saturday morning before tapering off Saturday evening.

Champi carved a path of disruption far beyond Taiwan. In Japan’s southern Okinawa prefecture, nearly 8,400 households were left without power, and more than 160 flights operated by four major Japanese carriers were canceled. In the Batanes island chain of the Philippines, located south of Taiwan, the storm stirred up towering waves that crashed into coastal villages, forcing multiple road closures; no casualties have been reported in the area as of Friday.

Earlier this week, Champi earned its title as the strongest storm on Earth so far in 2025, reaching maximum sustained wind speeds of 298 kilometers per hour over the Philippine Sea, equal to a Category 5 hurricane. Though it has weakened since its peak, it still packs wind gusts of 191 kilometers per hour as of Friday afternoon.

After skirting Taiwan’s northeast tip and Okinawa, Champi is projected to drift over waters off China’s eastern coast before curving northeast toward Japan’s main island. The storm comes amid an unusually active typhoon season for the region, amplified by a powerful Super El Niño event that is warming Pacific Ocean waters and fueling more intense and frequent storm systems. This year marks the first time since 2013 that Japan has recorded 30 typhoons in a single season, underscoring the extreme weather trend tied to the current El Niño cycle.

On a recent Sunday evening in Juhu, Mumbai’s iconic leafy upscale neighborhood where countless A-list Bollywood stars reside and celebrity sightings are a daily routine, action icon Tiger Shroff faced a brush with death that has upended Indian public discourse. The 36-year-old actor, famous for his high-octane on-screen fight scenes and choreographed escape sequences, had just finished a casual football match and was exiting the playing field in his BMW when gunfire erupted. Two people – Shroff’s personal driver and a vlogger who had traveled to the spot to film the star – were struck by bullets, leaving the unharmed actor at the center of a unfolding national criminal investigation. Four days after the incident, the case remains the lead story across Indian media, with every new leak of information spawning a flood of competing conspiracy theories, conflicting claims, and wild speculation about hidden motives.

Indian law enforcement has so far apprehended or detained 10 suspects connected to the attack. Investigators are currently tracing suspected weapons shipments across multiple Indian states and tracing suspicious financial transfers to the men accused of carrying out the shooting. The attempted attack has also thrust the name of Lawrence Bishnoi, one of India’s most infamous active gangsters, back into national headlines. Within hours of the shooting, a screenshot of a social media post supposedly shared by an associate of the Bishnoi gang circulated widely online, claiming responsibility for the attack. A separate audio recording also emerged, featuring a man identifying himself as Anil Pandit who repeated the claim, explaining that Shroff was targeted due to his reported close ties to fellow Bollywood superstar Salman Khan – a figure Bishnoi has threatened repeatedly for years. Mumbai police have yet to verify these claims or confirm that the Bishnoi gang actually orchestrated the attempted shooting, and investigators are still working to identify who ordered the attack and what their ultimate motive was.

This targeting of Shroff is only the latest in a string of violent attacks and threats against high-profile Bollywood figures that have shaken the Indian film industry. In 2024 alone, gunshots were fired outside Salman Khan’s Mumbai residence, and shots were also reported outside the home of acclaimed filmmaker Rohit Shetty earlier this year. Taken together, these incidents have revived long-dormant public fears that organized crime is once again extending its reach into Bollywood, stirring up uncomfortable memories of a dark, violent chapter in Mumbai’s modern history.

Back in the 1990s and early 2000s, Mumbai’s underworld held formidable, open influence over the Indian film industry. Criminal groups financed big-budget productions, demanded massive protection payments from producers and stars, and regularly used violence to enforce their demands. It took decades of targeted police crackdowns and the gradual rise of legitimate, institutional film financing to loosen the underworld’s stranglehold on the industry. Today, as new allegations and conspiracy theories emerge nearly every day, a question long thought to be confined to Mumbai’s past has reemerged: Is the underworld attempting to retake control of Bollywood?

Veteran law enforcement officials who confronted organized crime at its peak in Mumbai say the answer is far more nuanced than a simple yes or no. D Sivanandhan, who led Mumbai’s Crime Branch starting in 1998, recalls an era when a single phone call from Dubai – where many of India’s most notorious gang leaders operated from exile – could decide the entire fate of a major film: who would star in it, who would finance it, and who would profit from its distribution. At the time, the industry relied almost entirely on unregulated private capital, and the line between a legitimate investor and an extortionist was often dangerously blurry. The threats were not just abstract: in 1997, legendary Indian music industry executive Gulshan Kumar was shot and killed outside a Mumbai temple, and just three years later, acclaimed filmmaker Rakesh Roshan survived a targeted assassination attempt.

Sivanandhan himself led the investigation into the financing of *Chori Chori Chupke Chupke*, a hit Salman Khan film. The movie’s producer and his assistant were each sentenced to six years in prison under Maharashtra’s organized crime laws for their ties to underworld figures, while the film’s financier received a one-year sentence for hiding information about those connections. Police seized the film’s original negatives, and it was only released eventually under direct court supervision. Sivanandhan also recalled that criminal influence was not always imposed on a reluctant industry: many filmmakers actively sought out underworld funding, entering into mutually beneficial arrangements that proved extremely difficult for police to dismantle.

Even so, Sivanandhan argues that the current wave of violence should not be interpreted as a return of the old Mumbai mafia he spent decades fighting. The criminal networks he pursued, led by figures such as Dawood Ibrahim, Chhota Shakeel, and Arun Gawli, were deeply rooted in Mumbai’s local networks, even when their leaders operated from foreign soil. “This is not the Mumbai mafia which we know in the last 60 years,” he explained. “This is something else.”

That “something else” is inextricably linked to Lawrence Bishnoi. A gangster with origins in northern India who has been incarcerated since 2015, Bishnoi has cultivated a mythic, menacing public persona: he is widely reputed to command a network of gunmen across multiple continents, and his name is regularly attached to threats and claims of responsibility that spread across social media within minutes.

Bishnoi has publicly targeted Salman Khan for years over a 1998 poaching case involving blackbucks – a species of antelope that holds religious reverence for the Bishnoi community. In April 2024, unidentified gunmen fired five rounds outside Khan’s Mumbai home. Six months after that attack, Baba Siddique, a senior Indian politician with close ties to Khan and multiple other Bollywood stars, was gunned down in a public assassination. Mumbai police have connected both attacks to the Bishnoi gang, though investigators have not confirmed any direct personal involvement by Bishnoi in Siddique’s murder.

While some allegations against Bishnoi’s network have been confirmed by official police investigations, many others remain unproven. But the line between what the gang has actually done and what is claimed in its name often blurs in public discourse, only amplifying Bishnoi’s notoriety. Rakesh Maria, a former Mumbai police commissioner, has described Bishnoi as a representative of a new generation of Indian gangsters who are far more technologically savvy and globally connected than their predecessors. “The old underworld was visible and territorial, but the new one is dispersed, fluid, making it harder to pin down,” Maria told Indian outlet *The Print* last year. “They no longer need to reside in the city to command it.”

The relationship between criminal groups and Bollywood has shifted in another key way: who gets to shape the gangster’s public image. In the 1990s, Bollywood itself turned Mumbai’s feared underworld figures into objects of widespread public fascination. Films such as *Satya* (1998) and *Company* (2002) brought a gritty, raw realism to the portrayal of gang life, and Manoj Bajpayee’s iconic performance as gangster Bhiku Mhatre in *Satya* became what film scholar Ashvin Immanuel Devasundaram calls “mythologised and talismanic.” The fear and fascination of that era are “seared into the collective consciousness” of the Indian public, Devasundaram told the BBC. Each new attack pulls those old memories back to the surface.

But today’s gangsters no longer need mainstream cinema to build their own mythology. Social media platforms allow them to craft and spread their own public image directly, circulating threats, claims of responsibility, and carefully staged content to audiences that reach far beyond Mumbai’s borders.

In the wake of the Shroff shooting, Indian police have reportedly increased security detail outside the homes of Salman Khan and Rohit Shetty. The All Indian Cine Workers Association has called for enhanced protection for Bollywood figures, asking publicly: “Today it is Tiger Shroff. Who is next?”

So far, there is little concrete evidence that criminal networks have regained the level of overt influence over Bollywood financing and creative decisions that the old underworld held in the 1990s and early 2000s. But the recent string of attacks has exposed a new, different vulnerability for the industry. Modern gangsters no longer need to control the entire $2.7 billion Indian film industry to destabilize it and spread widespread fear. A single attempted shooting, amplified across millions of social media feeds and phone screens, can create panic that extends far beyond the original target.

Sivanandhan, who spent decades confronting Mumbai’s most powerful criminal groups, understands that even the most robust security has gaps. “There is always a crack in the armour,” he observed.

Three separate, high-profile controversies have emerged in Israel this week, drawing public scrutiny and international attention to issues of settler violence, military conduct, and discriminatory immigration policy. The first and most widely condemned centers on the near-total release of 10 Israeli settlers arrested just two days prior over alleged violent attacks targeting a senior journalist and European diplomatic delegates, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported Wednesday. Of the 10 detainees, nine have already been granted release from custody, with only one suspect remaining behind bars on unrelated charges.

The arrests were carried out in a rare coordinated operation by Israeli national police, the Israel Defense Forces, and the Shin Bet domestic intelligence service. Authorities detained the settlers over two separate alleged assaults that took place last weekend in the occupied West Bank, a region that has seen a sharp rise in settler violence against Palestinian communities, particularly during the annual olive harvest season. The first attack left veteran Washington Post photojournalist Heidi Levine hospitalized following an assault in the village of Abu Falah on Friday, while the second targeted a European diplomatic delegation visiting the nearby village of Taybeh a day later. Both incidents triggered widespread international condemnation before the arrests were even made.

According to court records, Jerusalem District Court oversaw the release of five of the suspects on Wednesday, with police granting release to a sixth that same day. Three additional suspects were granted immediate release on the day of their arrest this Monday. While judges confirmed that law enforcement had presented credible evidence tying the suspects to the assaults, the presiding judge framed the violence as part of a broader chaotic event involving large-scale stone-throwing by Palestinians. Even after law enforcement formally requested that detention be extended for four of the West Bank-based settler suspects, courts still approved their release.

Honenu, a far-right Israeli legal organization that provides representation to settlers accused of violence, praised Wednesday’s court rulings. In a statement following the releases, the group claimed the arrests were entirely manufactured and lacked any legal basis, arguing they were carried out solely to defuse international media pressure and appease foreign political interests.

The only suspect still being held is Nadav Cohen Tzemach, an Israeli military reservist who is facing separate charges for allegedly running over a Palestinian civilian who was praying on the side of a road near Ramallah last year. Courts have extended his detention through next Monday.

In a second separate controversy, circulating social media footage has sparked fresh calls for accountability over alleged animal abuse by Israeli soldiers. The video, published to the platform X Wednesday by Israeli journalist Daniel Amram, shows an uniformed Israeli soldier throwing a live cat over the perimeter fence of an Israeli military base. Amram reported that fellow soldiers stationed at the base have publicly called for the soldier to be immediately removed from his post, but senior military commanders have so far refused to take disciplinary action.

In a statement to Amram, an Israel Defense Forces spokesperson acknowledged that the military views animal cruelty as a serious offense that violates official military rules and expected standards of conduct for all service members. The spokesperson confirmed that a formal investigation into the incident has been launched. This latest accusation is far from an isolated case: over the past three years, a growing string of reports and circulating videos have documented multiple alleged cases of animal abuse carried out by Israeli soldiers and settlers across the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. The documented incidents include the 2024 killing of a Palestinian family’s pet cat during a home raid in Masafer Yatta, an incident earlier this year in which an army officer threw a cat at a fellow soldier as an assault, and a viral September 2025 video showing Israeli soldiers blowing up a donkey in Gaza for recreational purposes.

The third controversy unfolding this week centers on an immigration dispute, in which Israel’s Population and Immigration Authority is attempting to deport a Moroccan woman married to an Israeli citizen, despite the couple sharing a young daughter together, Israeli news outlet Ynet reported Wednesday. The couple first met in Morocco in 2023, married the following year, and entered Israel together in January 2025, at which point Israeli officials granted the woman, Salma Jud, formal permission to reside in the country. After Jud gave birth to the couple’s daughter several months later, she was summoned for two interviews with immigration officials, who openly questioned whether her relationship with her husband was legitimate.

Following the announcement of a deportation order, the couple’s legal team filed an official appeal, highlighting two critical procedural flaws: first, immigration authorities failed to provide a qualified Moroccan Arabic interpreter for one of Jud’s interviews, and second, the order directly violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty Israel is legally bound to uphold as a signatory.

Jud’s husband, Yossef Inbar, an Israeli citizen who completed mandatory military service in the IDF, accused Israeli authorities of systemic discrimination based on ethnic and religious identity. “In the State of Israel, they distinguish between a Jew and an Arab,” Inbar told Ynet. “If I were a Jew, I would get everything easily, and they wouldn’t punish me. Sometimes I regret that I did military service.”

Beersheba District Court has since issued a temporary stay on the deportation order, giving the Population and Immigration Authority 30 days to submit formal justification for the expulsion of Jud.

For Fazal Mia, the agony of unknowing has turned into irreversible grief: clutching a faded photograph of his daughter Suety Akhter, the Bangladeshi father still struggles to comprehend that he was never notified of her impending execution in Saudi Arabia, where she had moved to work as a migrant laborer.

Akhter’s story follows a familiar, devastating arc for low-wage South Asian workers in the Gulf. For the first five months after her arrival, she sent regular remittances home to her family in Tangail, Bangladesh. Then, out of the blue, a single call revealed she had been imprisoned — and it was only through local news reports that the family learned she had been sentenced to death, alongside 22-year-old Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir, another Bangladeshi national from Brahmanbaria.

On October 14, just one day after Sri Lanka successfully secured the overturn of a death sentence for one of its citizens in Saudi Arabia, the kingdom carried out the executions of Akhter and Basir in Mecca. Both had worked as cleaners for Saudi firm Al-Majal company; Basir, the eldest of four siblings, left his family back in Bangladesh, while Akhter — the youngest of four daughters — left behind a four-year-old child of her own.

The Saudi Ministry of Interior confirmed the executions in an Arabic-only statement carried by the Saudi Press Agency, claiming the pair had committed an “indecent act” inside a mosque, but offering no further details on the alleged offense. Authorities stated the death sentences were classified as ta’zir, or discretionary punishments under Islamic jurisprudence, and had been approved following judicial review and a royal decree. Yet Saudi officials have refused to release basic procedural information: no specifics of the alleged crime, no date of the alleged offense, no clarity on whether the pair were granted access to qualified legal representation or translators during their trials.

Confidential diplomatic information leaked to Bangladesh’s *Daily Star* newspaper has cast doubt on the official narrative, revealing the two workers were arrested separately and charged with unrelated offenses. A prisoner list shared with Bangladesh’s consulate in Jeddah on September 30 shows Basir was detained in August 2023 under the kingdom’s strict cybercrime law, while Akhter was arrested the next day on allegations of adultery. Akhter told her family before contact was cut off that she had been framed by co-workers following an argument, and her family lost all communication with her for nearly a year. Both spent three years in prison before execution, and the September prisoner list made no mention of any death sentence having been handed down. The leaked memo also fails to connect the original 2023 charges to the “indecent mosque act” for which they were ultimately executed.

The Bangladeshi government claims it only learned of the executions after they were completed, but the leaked document confirms the country’s Jeddah consulate had received the full prisoner list that included both individuals weeks before the sentences were carried out. The government’s response has drawn fierce public and expert criticism, particularly after State Minister for Foreign Affairs Shama Obaed Islam publicly stated that Bangladeshi citizens must follow the laws of host countries, and that “when a law is violated there is not much I can do for a Bangladeshi citizen.”

Human rights advocates and policy analysts have highlighted two core failures in the Bangladeshi government’s handling of the case: first, a total lack of proactive engagement, with no official effort to obtain court records, clarify the charges against the pair, or provide legal support during their detention. Second, the government failed to uphold its basic consular obligations: while the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations requires host nations to notify foreign governments of detained citizens, it also requires sending nations to proactively monitor citizens facing severe criminal penalties.

The stark contrast between Bangladesh’s inaction and Sri Lanka’s coordinated response just days earlier has amplified these criticisms. The same week the executions took place, Sri Lanka moved quickly to save Anojan Sivarasa, a Sri Lankan migrant worker sentenced to death for a Facebook post ruled blasphemous. Shortly after the death sentence was issued in September, the Sri Lankan foreign ministry publicly confirmed its diplomatic engagement, dispatched its ambassador to Saudi Arabia to visit Sivarasa in prison, and sent a specialized legal team to handle his appeal. On October 13, just 24 hours before Akhter and Basir were executed, Saudi Arabia’s Supreme Court overturned Sivarasa’s death sentence.

The case has cast a harsh light on the reality for more than three million Bangladeshi migrant workers residing in Saudi Arabia, who form the backbone of Bangladesh’s $27 billion remittance industry. World Bank and IMF data shows remittances make up roughly 7.4% of Bangladesh’s total annual GDP, with Saudi Arabia the single largest source of those earnings. For low-wage migrant workers, who often lack the resources to navigate opaque Gulf legal systems on their own, the executions underscore just how high the stakes are when their home governments fail to advocate for them.

The outcome of this case lays bare the systemic dangers facing vulnerable migrant workers in Gulf judicial systems, and reaffirms that active, proactive consular intervention is not just a diplomatic formality — it is a matter of life and death for thousands of migrant workers dependent on their home governments for protection.