分类: world

  • Anne opens history centre at war cemetery

    Anne opens history centre at war cemetery

    In a landmark ceremony highlighting post-war reconciliation between the United Kingdom and Germany, Princess Anne has officially opened a new purpose-built history centre at the Cannock Chase German Military Cemetery in Staffordshire. The Thursday event drew senior representatives from both nations, gathering at the sombre, historic site that holds the remains of nearly 5,000 German and Austrian service members killed across the two World Wars. An adjacent cemetery also holds the remains of 350 additional personnel, making the location one of the UK’s most prominent sites of shared cross-national commemoration.

    Managed and developed in partnership by the German War Graves Commission (Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge) and the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, the new facility is designed to turn the cemetery from a site of remembrance into a hub for public education. It features a fully bilingual exhibition and dedicated workshop spaces, which trace the complex shared history of Britain and Germany, and trace the decades-long process of reconciliation that has shaped their modern alliance.

    Vice Admiral Peter Hudson, Vice Chairman of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, spoke at the ceremony, expressing deep honour for his organisation’s role in delivering the project and gratitude for Princess Anne’s participation in the inauguration. He described the Cannock Chase site as a uniquely meaningful space for collective reflection, noting that it honours individual lives lost in the devastating global conflicts of the 20th century. “This new centre is more than a building, it’s a place of learning, of reflection and understanding. It reminds us of the immense human cost of war,” Hudson said. “The stories told within this centre help us understand that cost.”

    Hudson emphasized that the centre’s core mission extends beyond remembrance, to educating coming generations about the value of global cooperation and lasting peace. “Perhaps most importantly, the centre will help future generations engage with that history by understanding the past honestly and thoughtfully,” he explained. “People can better appreciate the value of peace, democracy and international cooperation. The friendship that exists today between the United Kingdom and Germany is one of the great achievements of post-war reconciliation. Places like this demonstrate how remembrance can bring people together.”

    The project marks a key milestone in cross-border collaborative remembrance work, creating a permanent public space that bridges historical division to foster mutual understanding and respect between former adversaries.

  • Warm words on Canada’s EU ‘associate membership’ but no guarantees

    Warm words on Canada’s EU ‘associate membership’ but no guarantees

    Recent headlines across Europe have stirred widespread confusion over a surprising prospect: could Canada, a North American nation thousands of kilometers from the continent, formalize a closer relationship with the European Union as its first ever associate member? Under existing EU constitutional rules, full membership is explicitly off the table, as the bloc restricts membership to geographically European states. But a new framework of associate membership has opened the door to a historic shift in transatlantic relations.

    The discussion moved from speculation to formal proposal last week, when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen extended an official invitation to Canada to take up this unprecedented associate status. Addressing the European Parliament on Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded with enthusiastic support, arguing that deepened cross-Atlantic cooperation across a wide range of strategic sectors is critical to bolstering shared autonomy for both sides.

    Brussels and Ottawa already benefit from the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a far-reaching free trade deal that has boosted bilateral commerce for years. Carney stressed that associate membership would go beyond existing trade ties, building new collaboration on energy security, economic resilience, critical raw material supply chains, higher education cooperation, artificial intelligence and tech innovation, and joint defense capabilities. These aligned efforts, he argued, would safeguard the sovereignty and economic interests of all participating nations.

    The push for closer alignment comes as both Canada and the EU face growing pressure from competing global forces. Both blocs have increasingly found themselves squeezed between the two world superpowers, the United States and China, while also grappling with the outsized influence of supranational tech giants that operate beyond the reach of individual national regulators. Carney was careful to frame the proposal not as an effort to build a competing third superpower or create a new bloc targeted at any other nation.

    “We do not pursue zero sum deals,” Carney told the assembled parliamentarians. Instead, he argued that like-minded democratic nations must band together to build a renewed, modern multilateral governance framework at a time when global order is shifting toward a ‘might makes right’ approach embraced by many major powers. Only through collective action and rejecting isolationism, he added, can nations close critical capability gaps, build collective strength, and protect their individual national sovereignty.

    Carney’s implicit rebuke of rising nationalist populism came as no coincidence: upcoming national elections across multiple EU member states have seen far-right, nationalist parties gain traction, with slogans ranging from ‘Italy First’ to ‘France for the French’ and ‘Make Poland Great Again’ that echo the nationalist rhetoric of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney’s address received a rapturous, heartfelt applause from the majority of European Parliament members in attendance.

    Reaction across the Atlantic has been far less welcoming. Earlier this week, Trump, who currently holds the U.S. presidency, dismissed the proposal out of hand, threatening to impose sweeping, ‘very heavy tariffs’ on both Canada and the EU if the associate membership agreement moves forward, and warned he would consider the move a ‘hostile act’ against U.S. interests.

    Ironically, it is Trump’s own unilateral, unpredictable trade and foreign policy that has pushed Brussels and Ottawa closer together. For decades, the United States has been both the top trade partner and the primary security ally for both Canada and the EU. But in recent years, the White House has repeatedly weaponized trade tariffs against both parties, with Canada currently locked in an escalating trade dispute that Ottawa has described as a full-blown trade ‘war’ with the Biden-Trumper administration. Beyond trade, both Canada and the EU have growing concerns that they can no longer rely on the United States for consistent security and defense backing, given Washington’s shifting foreign policy priorities.

    Canada is not the only non-European ally moving toward closer ties with the bloc amid growing doubts over U.S. reliability. Japan and South Korea, two key U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific, have also expressed interest in gaining closer alignment and what some describe as ‘policy shelter’ under the EU’s institutional umbrella. For its part, the EU has moved aggressively to diversify its global trade and strategic partnerships in recent years, concluding new deals with India, Indonesia, Japan, and other major economies to reduce overreliance on any single global power.

    Despite the momentum behind the proposal, there is no guarantee that Canada’s associate membership will ever come to fruition, let alone serve as a blueprint for other nations like the United Kingdom that have sought closer ties with the bloc short of full membership. Any revised partnership framework would require unanimous approval from all 27 current EU member states, a high bar that has sunk many ambitious proposals in the past. There is also no existing legal precedent for associate membership, meaning negotiations would likely stretch on for years, with multiple potential conflicts of interest already looming, including long-running disputes over global steel tariffs.

    A previous proposal from Germany earlier this year to grant associate membership to Ukraine, which is actively seeking full EU accession, was rejected by multiple member states, highlighting the political hurdles facing any new framework. Some member states, including the current French government, oppose granting non-members overly favorable access to the EU single market and institutions, arguing that this could embolden euroskeptic political forces at home and abroad by giving countries outside the bloc many of the benefits of membership without the corresponding obligations, encouraging voters to support leaving the bloc.

    At its core, however, the debate over associate membership reflects a broader shift for the EU. For decades, the bloc has maintained rigid rules around membership and institutional access. But buffeted by growing geopolitical pressures from the United States, China, and Russia, the EU is facing increasing pressure to demonstrate greater flexibility to accommodate aligned nations that want to deepen cooperation and stand with the bloc amid an increasingly fractured global order.

  • Palestinian prisoner gives birth in Israeli jail raising fears for pregnant detainees

    Palestinian prisoner gives birth in Israeli jail raising fears for pregnant detainees

    A highly publicized case of a Palestinian prisoner giving birth inside an Israeli detention facility has reignited long-simmering international and regional scrutiny over the systemic mistreatment of pregnant Palestinian detainees in Israeli custody, shining a harsh light on gaps in medical access, nutrition, and basic human rights protections behind bars.

    Thirty-five-year-old Dana Joudeh, who was held under Israel’s controversial administrative detention policy – a practice that allows indefinite detention without formal charge or trial – welcomed her baby daughter on September 14. Joudeh had been taken into custody from her home in Iraq al-Tayeh, a village near the West Bank city of Nablus, on March 1, when she was already three months pregnant. Just one day after the birth, both Joudeh and her newborn were released and transferred to a medical facility in Ramallah for urgent care. As of initial reports, Joudeh’s full health status remains undisclosed, with her family declining to address media inquiries.

    The Palestinian Commission of Detainees and Ex-Detainees Affairs has placed full responsibility for any harm to Joudeh and her infant on Israeli authorities. The organization confirmed that Joudeh was denied consistent, adequate medical care throughout her entire pregnancy, and condemned the forced delivery in a prison setting as a fundamental violation of human rights. In an official statement released Monday, the commission argued that detaining a pregnant woman and denying her routine prenatal care amounts to a deliberate crime that contravenes established international law and humanitarian conventions, adding that forcing childbirth within a prison system constitutes a second, separate violation.

    Joudeh’s experience has amplified urgent fears for two other pregnant Palestinian detainees still held in Israeli custody: 28-year-old Manar Karaja from Ramallah, who is six months pregnant, and Baraa Abu Khadija from Tulkarm, who is four months along.

    Banan Abu al-Haija, a former Palestinian detainee who spent 14 months in administrative detention alongside the three pregnant women, shared firsthand accounts of the dangerous conditions they endured. Abu al-Haija, who shared a cell designated for pregnant detainees with Joudeh, Karaja, and another detainee who has since been released, told reporters that Joudeh faced persistent health complications throughout her detention. Before her arrest, Joudeh had undergone gastric bypass surgery that required consistent access to specialized vitamins and nutritional supplements – all of which prison officials refused to provide, according to Abu al-Haija.

    “The cell where Dana, Manar, and the other detained woman were held was cramped, overheated, and unsuitable for expecting mothers,” Abu al-Haija explained in her interview with Middle East Eye. “They had no access to enough nutritious food to support their own health and the development of their fetuses. They were denied any regular medical treatment, not even basic over-the-counter pain medication.” She added that trips to the on-site prison clinic were extremely infrequent, with gaps of more than a month between scheduled appointments, and inadequate, unsanitary hygiene facilities compounded their daily suffering.

    Abu al-Haija also recalled a violent incident involving another former cellmate: after Israeli forces fired stun grenades directly at the cell door, the detainee experienced repeated bleeding, yet prison officials dismissed her pleas for care out of hand. “All of these women live under constant, severe psychological stress,” Abu al-Haija said. “They worry nonstop about their families on the outside, their own uncertain legal status, and their children. Every day is spent just waiting and longing for release.”

    For the families of the two remaining pregnant detainees, the fear that their loved ones will face the same traumatic experience of giving birth in prison has grown exponentially in the wake of Joudeh’s case. Musab Zalloum, Karaja’s husband, told reporters that his family’s anxiety has spiked since news of Joudeh’s delivery broke. They now fear Karaja will remain in detention through her delivery and possibly beyond.

    Karaja’s last meeting with her legal counsel took place on August 29, and during that meeting, she outlined alarming conditions in her cell. She reported developing scabies, a contagious parasitic skin infection, caused by poor hygiene and a lack of basic sanitary supplies. She also confirmed consistent shortages of nutritious food and inadequate prenatal care. A mother of two young children – five-year-old Ayman and four-year-old Laila – Karaja told her lawyer that the only medical checks provided at the prison clinic are basic screenings for blood pressure and diabetes. Because of insufficient food rations, her weight has dropped throughout her pregnancy rather than increasing as medically recommended.

    “After we found out Dana gave birth in prison, our fears went from bad to overwhelming,” Zalloum told Middle East Eye. “We are terrified that Manar will have to go through that same traumatic experience, and we worry constantly about both her health and our unborn baby’s.” Zalloum, who was able to be by his wife’s side for both of her previous pregnancies and deliveries, is currently barred from any in-person visits and can only receive sporadic updates on her condition through her legal team. “Our two children miss her more than words can say. They just started kindergarten a few days ago, and she wasn’t there to be with them,” Zalloum said. “Everything is harder without her. We are all just waiting desperately for her to come home.” Karaja remains in detention as of this report, with her next court hearing scheduled for October 4.

    Joudeh’s case is far from an isolated incident: Palestinian prisoner advocacy groups have documented widespread, systemic abuse of female Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons for decades, including repeated cases of forced childbirth behind bars and forced separation of newborns from incarcerated mothers.

    In a statement released just five days before Joudeh gave birth, the Palestinian Prisoners’ Society (PPS) warned that conditions for all female Palestinian detainees have deteriorated to an all-time high level of severity. The group reported that Israeli prison authorities have carried out dozens of violent raids on women’s cell blocks since the start of 2024, including physical assaults, public humiliation, extended solitary confinement, and collective punishment of all detainees for individual actions. During raids, PPS reported, women are routinely handcuffed with their arms bound behind their backs, blindfolded, and forced into prison courtyards for extended periods, while their personal belongings – including essential hygiene and medical items – are confiscated and destroyed. The PPS added that Israeli forces have increasingly used tear gas inside cell blocks and have placed more women in prolonged solitary confinement, a practice that causes severe long-term psychological harm.

    “The damage from these abusive practices is not limited to the immediate physical pain they cause,” the PPS statement read. “It turns daily life for these women into a constant cycle of fear, anxiety, and humiliation that never ends.” The organization highlighted the case of Shaimaa Khazem from Jenin, another Palestinian woman held under administrative detention whose health has deteriorated in recent months.

    As of the beginning of September, prisoner advocacy groups estimate that 90 Palestinian women are currently held in Israeli detention facilities, part of a total population of more than 9,350 Palestinian prisoners overall.

  • UN experts say grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

    UN experts say grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

    In a landmark new report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, three independent human rights experts with the UN-mandated Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran have concluded there is credible evidence to hold both the United States and Iranian authorities responsible for severe, systematic violations of international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    The core finding of the investigation centers on two deadly February 28, 2026 missile strikes carried out amid open conflict between the US, Israel and Iran that killed a total of at least 177 civilians, more than half of them children. The first strike targeted Shajareh Tayyebeh Primary School in the southern Iranian town of Minab, where local officials confirm 156 people lost their lives, including 120 schoolchildren. While the school sits adjacent to an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval facility that was also attacked that day, the mission’s experts confirmed the educational site was clearly identifiable as a civilian space, with no evidence to suggest it was repurposed for military use.

    Drawing on multiple lines of evidence – including open-source media reports indicating an internal preliminary US military inquiry already found American forces responsible for the strike, and the fact that only the US deploys Tomahawk missiles, the weapon system used in the attack – the experts determined there are reasonable grounds to believe the school was an intentional target, not an accidental miss or unintended collateral damage from the strike on the IRGC complex. Survivor accounts further supported this conclusion, with multiple witnesses confirming the school was hit by two separate missile strikes. The US has not issued an immediate formal response to the report’s findings, and has not yet published the full results of its own internal investigation into the Minab incident. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has previously stated that American forces “never target civilian targets.”

    The second strike examined by the mission hit a civilian sports complex and surrounding residential neighborhood in Lamerd, also on February 28. Local records confirm 21 civilians, including seven children, were killed when Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) dispersed a cloud of lethal tungsten pellets over the area. As with the Minab school, the experts confirmed the sports complex was a clearly marked civilian site with no indication of military use. Again, the mission found reasonable grounds to attribute the strike to the US, noting that only the US possesses PrSM technology. The US military has previously denied carrying out any strikes in Lamerd on that date and disputed claims that PrSM missiles were used.

    Across both incidents, the panel concluded there are reasonable grounds to confirm the US committed the war crime of launching indiscriminate attacks that resulted in mass civilian death, injury and widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure.

    Beyond the US-led strikes, the report also details the Iranian government’s violent crackdown on nationwide anti-government protests that swept the country between December 2025 and January 2026. The experts found that the repression marked a staggering, unprecedented escalation of force compared to past protest crackdowns, with lethal violence deployed across all 31 of Iran’s provinces.

    Witness accounts, testimony from healthcare workers, and statements from victims’ families collected by the mission confirm that Iranian security forces positioned themselves on rooftops and other high vantage points before opening fire with assault rifles on assembled crowds. Many protesters suffered life-altering injuries, including permanent blindness, after being struck by metal shotgun pellets to the head, face and chest. As the crackdown intensified, security forces raided hospitals and other healthcare facilities, beating and arresting wounded demonstrators and detaining medical staff who provided treatment. The experts say this campaign of intimidation prevented hundreds of injured protesters from accessing life-saving medical care.

    Tens of thousands of protesters detained during the unrest have been subjected to widespread torture, prolonged solitary confinement, and systematic denial of access to legal counsel, the report confirms. The panel also found that Iranian authorities have drastically ramped up the use of the death penalty against detained protesters in the months following the unrest: at least 29 men have already been executed after rushed, expedited trials on charges linked to the protests.

    While the mission notes it could not independently verify the full death toll from the crackdown due to restrictions on access, it concluded the actual number of people killed is far higher than the Iranian government’s official count of 3,000 dead – a figure the government frames as mostly security force members and bystanders. The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (Hrana) has independently confirmed more than 7,000 deaths, almost all of them unarmed protesters, a number the mission says is consistent with the evidence it gathered.

    Based on the systematic, widespread nature of the violence against civilian protesters, the experts concluded Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity, including murder, arbitrary imprisonment, severe unlawful deprivation of liberty, torture, and other inhumane acts carried out as part of a coordinated attack on the country’s civilian population. Iranian officials have not yet issued a formal response to this specific finding, but have previously rejected all claims of systematic human rights violations, and have blamed the unrest on US and Israeli interference, framing protesters as “terrorists” and “rioters.”

    In a closing statement released alongside the report on Thursday, the fact-finding mission warned that Iranian civilians are trapped between two competing forces carrying out gross violations of human rights: “Civilians in Iran are caught between gross human rights violations and crimes against humanity committed by their own government and the nation’s deadly conflict with the United States and Israel.”

  • Houthis have further tightened their grip on the Red Sea

    Houthis have further tightened their grip on the Red Sea

    In a rapid, sweeping offensive in recent days, Houthi rebels in Yemen have seized control of the key port of Mocha and multiple strategic Red Sea islands positioned near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a critical maritime chokepoint linking the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean. This development has sent fresh ripples through global energy and trade networks, coming on the heels of repeated disruptions to another major Gulf waterway, the Strait of Hormuz, which has elevated Bab el-Mandeb’s status as a vital alternate route for oil, liquefied natural gas, and commercial cargo moving in and out of the region.

    The strategic importance of the strait has grown dramatically for Saudi Arabia, which currently diverts as much as 64% of its crude oil exports through an overland east-west pipeline that delivers crude to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, from where tankers transit Bab el-Mandeb to global markets. Just days before the Houthi offensive, this critical Saudi pipeline suffered a drone attack that sent global oil prices soaring and caused damage that analysts estimate will take weeks to fully repair. The attack, widely attributed to an Iranian-backed militant faction operating from Iraqi territory, was the first major blow to Saudi energy infrastructure in recent weeks, with the Houthi advance marking the second.

    Mocha’s geographic location just 75 kilometers north of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait puts Houthi forces within striking distance of all maritime traffic moving through the chokepoint. Analysts warn that the group can disrupt or even halt global shipping using low-cost asymmetric tactics, including weaponized drones, anti-ship missiles, and fast attack craft, giving it effective operational control over the waterway. While commercial shipping through the Red Sea has continued largely unimpeded in the immediate aftermath of the offensive, the broader strategic shift carries profound implications for global security and the world economy.

    The Houthi push is a major escalation in Yemen’s years-long civil war, which pits the Iranian-backed Houthi movement against the Saudi-aligned Presidential Leadership Council. A fragile truce brokered in 2022 held largely intact until this year, ending a seven-year period of direct Saudi military involvement in the conflict that included air campaigns and limited ground operations. Though Iran has not been explicitly named as a direct party to the latest offensive, regional security analysts widely agree the Houthi advance would not have been possible without Iranian approval and backing. This move, experts note, places Iran and its regional allies in a position to control two of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints – the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb – giving Tehran significant leverage to pressure the United States, the global economy, and its regional rivals.

    Global supply chains, already strained by years of disruption, are facing a new era of heightened risk. A 2025 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development report predicted shipping disruptions would remain a persistent challenge through at least 2030, with frequent rerouting of vessels becoming the new normal. The Houthi advance also underscores a clear erosion of United States influence over key global shipping routes, a shift laid bare by recent political developments: US President Donald Trump has confirmed the Houthis have called for Washington to stay out of the conflict, and he has rejected a request from Saudi Arabia’s crown prince to join cross-border strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen.

    Faced with growing risks to maritime traffic through Bab el-Mandeb, regional powers are expected to accelerate development of overland road and rail corridors to move cargo out of the region. But analysts warn these alternate land routes will take years to become fully operational, and will never be able to handle the same volume of goods as large-scale maritime shipping. In the interim, the global economy will face continued pressure from elevated energy prices and upward pressure on inflation.

    A full closure of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait could also draw European powers, which have so far avoided direct involvement in the US-Iran confrontation, into open conflict. The European Union already maintains a defensive maritime operation in the Red Sea tasked with protecting freedom of navigation, and a prolonged crisis in the region would likely force Brussels to take more direct action against the Iranian-backed Houthi movement. This would mark a major escalation of the conflict, after European leaders previously refused to join US efforts to enforce a military blockade of the Strait of Hormuz or reopen the waterway by force, a decision that drew public criticism from President Trump.

    The trajectory of the crisis in the coming weeks will depend heavily on the next moves of both Saudi Arabia and the Houthi movement. Houthi media confirms Saudi warplanes have already conducted air strikes on Mocha airport and other Houthi-held targets in recent days. If Saudi Arabia launches a full-scale bombing campaign, it will formally end the 2022 truce and open a new chapter of full-scale conflict. A key unknown remains how the Houthis will use their new strategic position: as recently as August, the group targeted a commercial cargo vessel in the Red Sea, killing six crew members. If the Houthis launch sustained attacks on commercial shipping through the strait, analysts widely expect a coordinated military response from Saudi Arabia, the European Union, and potentially the United States. The current moment marks a clear turning point, with the Houthis and their backers signaling they are prepared to sustain a long-term conflict to advance their regional goals.

  • US blocks Palestinian leader from UN meeting in New York for second year in row

    US blocks Palestinian leader from UN meeting in New York for second year in row

    Two Palestinian sources have confirmed to the BBC that the United States has refused to issue an entry visa to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, blocking his planned in-person attendance at next week’s United Nations General Assembly gathering in New York City. This latest visa restriction follows a formal US announcement expanding existing visa sanctions on unnamed Palestinian officials, with Washington accusing the targeted individuals of failing to uphold commitments made under the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

    Visa restrictions for Palestinian leadership were first rolled out in August 2025, when 80 Palestinian officials were blocked from accessing that year’s annual UN General Assembly meeting. In its official justification for the expanded sanctions, the US has leveled accusations against both the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), claiming the bodies “glorify terrorism” and seek to “internationalize” the long-running Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This critique comes against the historical backdrop of the Oslo Peace Accords, which established the PA and secured international recognition for the PLO as the official representative of the Palestinian people – an agreement reached in exchange for the PLO’s formal recognition of Israel and commitment to renounce armed violence.

    The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the visa denial in an official statement released Thursday, framing the move as an unjustified action that directly undermines global efforts to rebuild trust between parties, advance constructive Palestinian-US relations, and cultivate the political conditions needed to implement a two-state solution and reach lasting regional peace and stability. Palestinian leadership has uniformly rejected long-standing accusations pushed by both the previous US administration and the Israeli government, emphasizing that under international law, they retain the right to pursue accountability for actions committed by the Israeli occupying force.

    Following last year’s identical visa block for Abbas, a spokesperson for the Palestinian president noted that the US decision ran in clear violation of both international law and the long-standing UN Headquarters Agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, the US – as host country for the UN headquarters – is legally required to grant unimpeded access to foreign diplomats traveling to New York for official UN business. However, the US government has repeatedly asserted its right to deny visa access on grounds of national security, countering extremism, and core foreign policy priorities. Last year, after the in-person access was blocked, Abbas addressed the full General Assembly gathering of global leaders via pre-recorded video link. This week, all 193 UN member states are scheduled to hold a vote on Thursday to approve whether Abbas will be permitted to address the 2026 assembly through the same remote format.

    Currently, an estimated 75% of the UN’s 193 member states formally recognize the State of Palestine, including major global powers such as the United Kingdom, France, Canada, and Australia. Among the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, the US remains the only country that does not extend formal recognition to an independent Palestinian state.

    The US visa decision comes at a moment of extreme humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, with the United Nations repeatedly warning that conditions remain catastrophic despite a ceasefire agreement reached last October. Ongoing Israeli air strikes and ground operations continue to target populated civilian areas, causing repeated civilian casualties, widespread destruction of civilian property, and new waves of forced displacement. On Tuesday alone, Israeli air strikes killed at least five Palestinians, including two young children and a senior Hamas commander, according to local Palestinian health officials and Hamas sources. The Israeli military confirmed it targeted a Hamas commander in southern Gaza and a separate militant fighter in northern Gaza, and acknowledged that child casualties were reported in both strikes.

    In a separate incident, the UK-based medical charity Medical Aid for Palestinians reported that an Israeli drone strike killed a patient at a health clinic the organization supports in Jabalia, located in northern Gaza. A spokesperson for the Israeli military stated that the force had no record of this specific incident.

    The current round of conflict in Gaza began after the Hamas-led cross-border attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, which killed approximately 1,200 people and abducted 251 others as hostages. According to the Hamas-run Ministry of Health in Gaza – whose casualty data is assessed as reliable by the United Nations – more than 73,790 people have been killed in Gaza in the 23 months since the conflict began.

  • Assad regime planned US journalist’s kidnap for weeks, BBC finds

    Assad regime planned US journalist’s kidnap for weeks, BBC finds

    Twelve years after American journalist Austin Tice vanished while covering the Syrian civil war, a years-long BBC investigation has uncovered explosive new details revealing his abduction was not the opportunistic incident long assumed, but a carefully plotted operation more than a month in the making, personally approved by then-Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.

    A former Marine Corps captain and Georgetown University law student, Tice built a reputation as a bold reporter, pushing into rebel-held territories most correspondents deemed too dangerous to deliver front-page coverage for the *Washington Post* as the Assad regime waged a brutal crackdown on critics and anyone documenting human rights abuses. He was last publicly seen in a distressing blindfolded video posted online more than a month after his August 2012 capture, and his high-profile case has drawn repeated attention from successive U.S. presidents and global media outlets.

    For decades, the prevailing narrative held that Tice was unexpectedly detained at a government checkpoint during routine travel, a random case of bad luck for a journalist working in a war zone. The new investigation, released as the third season of the BBC podcast *Where is Austin Tice? I’m Not A Monster Presents*, upends that account entirely.

    Through interviews with former members of the Assad-loyal National Defence Forces (NDF), review of internal regime discussions, and cross-referenced sourcing, the investigation traced the plot to a trusted driver Tice had relied on during his time in Syria – a man named Hamid Abu Obeid, whose identity was confirmed after more than 20 interviews across Syria. Abu Obeid, a Palestinian refugee from Gaza living in poverty in Syria, had been secretly passing information about Tice to senior NDF officials for months, the investigation found. In exchange for betraying Tice, he was promised a life-changing package of rewards: Syrian citizenship, a passport, a home, and a weapon. Only a pistol was ever delivered, his family told the BBC.

    The intelligence on Tice traveled up the ranks from Abu Obeid to Sakr Rustom, an NDF member who is the nephew of Bassam al-Hassan – one of Assad’s most trusted security chiefs and the head of the NDF. From there, the plot went directly to Assad himself, according to former NDF member Abu Ali, who spoke to the BBC on the condition of partial anonymity. “Bring him to us,” Assad told Hassan, Abu Ali claimed, and the operation was formally approved at the highest level of government.

    Rather than seize Tice immediately, the plotters continued surveilling him to map his movements and document his activities. Abu Ali told the BBC the driver noted Tice, a trained Marine, occasionally shared basic military guidance with rebel fighters on weapons handling. That behavior led the regime to incorrectly label Tice as a CIA operative – a claim the BBC found no evidence to support, and which a former senior U.S. official involved in the Tice case has explicitly denied.

    Days before the abduction, Abu Obeid even stole Tice’s backpack – containing his MacBook, satellite transmitter, and personal documents – while the journalist interviewed rebel fighters, so regime operatives could search its contents for evidence. On August 11, 2012, Tice celebrated his 31st birthday at a rebel safe house just a few miles from Assad’s presidential palace on the western edge of Damascus, tweeting what would become his final public message: “Hands down, best birthday ever.” What Tice did not know was that he would never reach his planned next stop in Lebanon; he was instead heading to a pre-arranged meeting point in the Damascus suburb of Tahouneh, where NDF operatives including Abu Ali were waiting.

    When they reached the facility gates, Abu Obeid pulled a gun on the unsuspecting journalist. Tice initially laughed, believing his trusted driver was joking, before realizing the betrayal. He even pulled out his chequebook and attempted to bribe Abu Obeid to let him go, Abu Ali recalled. Militia members then swarmed Tice, blindfolded him, and took him into custody. Hassan immediately called Assad to confirm the journalist had been captured.

    In the aftermath of the Assad regime’s collapse this year, the BBC uncovered hundreds of pages of secret Syrian intelligence files confirming for the first time definitively that the regime held Tice after his abduction. A months-long search of multiple suspected detention sites, provided by an intelligence source to the investigation, turned up no trace of the journalist. A former Syrian commander has claimed Tice was executed, but no remains have been found, and other sources have questioned that account. When the regime fell earlier this year and tens of thousands of detainees were released from government prisons, Tice was not among them.

    As for Abu Obeid, the man who facilitated the abduction, he too has disappeared. After the regime’s collapse, he received threats from a man who knew of his role in Tice’s capture, who threatened to expose his involvement to the U.S. embassy unless he cooperated to secure asylum. Abu Obeid told his wife he was going shopping, left with a small amount of money, and has not been seen since. Masked men later raided his home, seizing his laptop and other electronic devices. His family says they do not know whether he is in hiding, detained, or dead.

    Today, two families separated by a 12-year-old tragedy share the same unanswered question: where is their loved one, and will they ever get the truth? Tice’s mother Debra has spent years pressing successive U.S. presidents to continue efforts to locate and recover her son, while Abu Obeid’s wife also holds out hope for answers about the husband and father who vanished after the abduction.

  • Israel trying to ‘eliminate’ living conditions for Palestinians in occupied West Bank, says report

    Israel trying to ‘eliminate’ living conditions for Palestinians in occupied West Bank, says report

    A damning new report from prominent Israeli human rights organization B’tselem has accused the Israeli government of pursuing a deliberate, state-backed campaign to eliminate livable conditions for Palestinians residing in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Titled *The Elimination Project*, the investigation frames ongoing violence by Israeli settlers and military forces not as isolated incidents or a temporary crisis, but as a core component of a long-running political project operating within what B’tselem terms an Israeli apartheid regime rooted in settler-colonial ideology.

    The report details a widespread intensification of harm that touches every sphere of daily Palestinian life, from basic access to employment, education, and medical care, to the ability to maintain social connections, cultivate agricultural land, and participate in cultural and community life. In its analysis, B’tselem defines “elimination” not solely as mass physical violence, but as the systematic erosion of the conditions that allow Palestinians to exist as a cohesive people with their own territory, institutions, culture, language, collective history, and political future. The campaign, the report argues, is designed to restructure the region’s geography and social order: it consolidates contiguous, permanently institutionalized Jewish control across the territory while fragmenting Palestinian communities, rendering their existence precarious and dependent on Israeli goodwill. For Palestinians in the West Bank, B’tselem outlines only three stark outcomes under this project: surrender national claims to live under permanent Jewish supremacy, leave the occupied territory entirely, or face violent military crackdown for resistance.

    The release of B’tselem’s report coincides with a rapidly shifting international landscape, as a growing coalition of Western nations have recently announced new trade restrictions or bans on goods originating from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. Last week alone, 12 countries including Canada, Denmark, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom confirmed they were either implementing new bans or considering formal sanctions on settlement trade, a move that aligns with longstanding international legal consensus that Israeli settlements built on occupied Palestinian territory violate the Fourth Geneva Convention.

    Top European Union foreign policy official Kaja Kallas has thrown her weight behind an EU-wide trade ban on settlement goods, drawing a parallel between the international response to Russian occupation of Crimea and the need for a unified European stance on Israeli settlements. Speaking to *The Irish Times* on Friday, Kallas argued the EU’s credibility on global rule of law is at stake as long as member states remain divided, urging nations to adopt a unified principled position. While the total volume of EU trade with settlements is currently small, Kallas emphasized that the policy would carry significant symbolic weight. Crucially, Kallas has proposed advancing the ban as a trade measure rather than a formal foreign policy sanction, a procedural change that would only require a majority vote of EU member states to pass — avoiding the unanimous approval requirement that has stalled past action due to opposition from countries including Germany, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovenia.

    In the United Kingdom, the new government’s recent sanctions announcement has already drawn criticism from more than 130 British lawyers, former judges, and legal academics. In a formal six-page letter sent to Prime Minister Andy Burnham this week, the legal experts welcomed the government’s decision to align with international partners but argued the measures announced by Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband fall far short of the UK’s legal obligations under a 2024 International Court of Justice ruling ordering states to oppose Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory.

    Last week, the UK government formally declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory illegal, with Miliband telling parliament he agrees that ethnic cleansing is currently unfolding in the West Bank. Government sources have confirmed that the UK’s new restrictions will not be limited to the West Bank, and will also cover Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem.

    Since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in October 2023, at least 1,107 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli soldiers and settlers in the occupied West Bank, according to on-the-ground casualty tallies, underscoring the escalating violence documented in B’tselem’s new report.

  • Two Britons among three killed in Swiss Alps light aircraft crash

    Two Britons among three killed in Swiss Alps light aircraft crash

    A tragic small plane crash in the Swiss Alps has claimed three lives, with two British nationals among the deceased, local law enforcement confirmed this week. The single-engine Cirrus SR22T aircraft, which departed from Sion Airport located in Switzerland’s Rhône Valley, went down in high-altitude mountain terrain near the resort town of Leukerbad in the southern canton of Valais on Tuesday, just 10 minutes after takeoff.

    For reasons still undetermined, the aircraft collided with a steep mountain slope. Eyewitnesses at the scene reported seeing flames and thick smoke billow from the wreckage immediately after impact. In response to the incident, a large multi-agency emergency response was mobilized quickly: teams from the Valais Rescue Organisation, cantonal police, and local fire services were deployed to the remote crash site, supported by three rescue helicopters to access the high-altitude location.

    Following the recovery operation, multiple official investigations have been launched to determine the cause of the crash. The Swiss Transportation Safety Board, the agency responsible for probing aviation accidents across the country, has opened a formal investigation. Parallel inquiries are also being conducted by Valais Cantonal Police and the Swiss Office of the Attorney General.

    As of Thursday, authorities are still working to complete formal identification of all three victims. The UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) has confirmed it is supporting the families of the two British citizens killed in the incident. “We are providing support to the families of two British nationals who died in Switzerland, and our officials are in close contact with local authorities,” an FCDO spokesperson said. “Our thoughts remain with the families during this incredibly difficult time.”

  • Watch: Leaked photos reveal extensive damage at US bases in Gulf

    Watch: Leaked photos reveal extensive damage at US bases in Gulf

    Newly leaked photographs obtained from an active-duty U.S. military service member have pulled back the curtain on the full scale of destruction inflicted on American military installations located in the Persian Gulf region in the wake of recent Iranian strikes. The visual evidence, which has not been previously released to the general public, offers an unvarnished on-the-ground look at the aftermath of the attack that escalated tensions between the two nations dramatically.

    Among the most striking damage documented in the imagery is a military radar aircraft that has been completely severed, its structure split apart by the impact of ordnance from the strikes. The photos also show multiple mobile trailer facilities that have been completely flattened, crushed under the force of blasts that hit the base compounds. Permanently constructed buildings on the installations are also depicted with extensive structural damage, with compromised load-bearing walls, collapsed roofing, and shattered infrastructure throughout the affected areas.

    The leak comes at a moment of already heightened geopolitical friction across the Middle East, with the release of the images raising new questions about the actual extent of damage from the strikes, which had previously been the subject of conflicting official accounts. The authenticity of the photos has been confirmed by the source, who is currently deployed to the region and provided the materials on condition of anonymity to protect their identity and military standing. Military analysts note that the level of damage shown in the images indicates that the strikes were more powerful and accurately targeted than some initial assessments suggested, with potential implications for future military positioning and regional security strategy.