分类： world

On a recent Thursday, 30-year-old iconic Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong was handed a 10-year prison sentence on charges of colluding with foreign forces under the city’s sweeping 2020 National Security Law (NSL). The verdict arrives when Wong was just months away from scheduled release in January 2025, after already serving six consecutive years behind bars on prior subversion convictions. The judge ruled that only two months and two days of the newly issued 10-year term would run concurrently with Wong’s ongoing sentence, meaning he will face nearly a full additional decade of detention. The court heard that Wong, alongside exiled co-founder of their disbanded pro-democracy political party Demosisto Nathan Law, orchestrated a campaign between July and late November 2020 to lobby foreign governments to impose sanctions and blockades targeting Beijing. During the Thursday court hearing, Wong appeared dressed in a dark blue long-sleeve shirt, khaki trousers and black-rimmed glasses, noticeably slimmer than in his previous public appearances. He nodded to greet packed members of the public gallery, many of whom queued for hours to secure a seat, while a heavy police deployment was stationed outside the courthouse to maintain order. Wong had entered a guilty plea to the collusion charges back in September of this year. A prominent public face of Hong Kong’s now-suppressed pro-democracy movement, Wong’s decades-long activism traces back to his early teenage years. Diagnosed with dyslexia as a child and struggling with academic performance in his early school years, he demonstrated a willingness to challenge unfair norms from adolescence: as a secondary school student, he organized classmates via social media to protest overpriced canteen meals. At 14 in 2011, he co-founded the influential student activist group Scholarism, which led a 2012 campaign that drew over 100,000 participants to push back against the government’s proposed mandatory patriotic education curriculum in schools, forcing authorities to abandon the policy. By 2014, he emerged as a leading figure in the historic Umbrella Movement civil disobedience campaign, cementing his status as one of the most recognizable pro-democracy voices in the city. In 2016, he co-founded Demosisto alongside Nathan Law and Agnes Chow, who later also went into exile. Wong had repeatedly rejected framing himself as a top-down protest leader, emphasizing in a 2019 Financial Times interview that the movement operated on a decentralized, bottom-up model with countless unsung facilitators. When the NSL was imposed by Beijing in 2020 in the wake of large-scale pro-democracy protests that year, Demosisto immediately disbanded. While Law fled to the United Kingdom to continue advocacy overseas, Wong remained in Hong Kong and attempted to run for a legislative seat, only to be disqualified by authorities who cited his opposition to the NSL as a key grounds for the bar. His legal troubles accumulated rapidly: in November 2020, he pleaded guilty to charges tied to his participation in 2019 protests outside the Hong Kong police headquarters, and in early 2021 he was named as one of the 47 high-profile activists (later dubbed the “Hong Kong 47”) prosecuted for conspiracy to commit subversion, the largest NSL case to date, resulting in a 56-month prison term. Days before entering that 2020 guilty plea, Wong shared a public Instagram message addressed to Hong Kong residents, noting he held little faith in the city’s formal political system but unshakable confidence in its people, even as state power placed unprecedented strain on civil society resilience. The ruling against Wong has drawn sharp criticism from human rights organization Amnesty International, which argued the harsh sentence underscored authorities’ intent to detain prominent dissidents for as long as possible, out of fear of their influence. In contrast, Hong Kong officials have long defended the NSL as a critical framework to restore social stability after the 2019 unrest, repeatedly denying accusations that the legislation has eroded the city’s promised high degree of autonomy and systematically silenced political dissent. Wong’s 10-year sentence is the second-highest ever issued under the NSL, trailing only the 20-year term handed to former media mogul Jimmy Lai on parallel collusion with foreign forces charges.

On a seemingly ordinary September 30 morning, Sahar Abushbeika, a displaced Palestinian mother of five who had volunteered to teach third-grade science, stood before her pupils at the Dawn of Hope makeshift tent school in eastern Khan Younis, southern Gaza. Mid-lesson, a sudden sound resembling a drone was followed by a small blast, and a bullet tore through the thin fabric of the tent, striking her lower back. She collapsed to the ground as her young students screamed in panic, their cries the last thing she recalled before waking up in a hospital bed. Doctors were unable to extract the bullet, which had lodged in a highly sensitive region of her spine, leaving her unable to walk or sit properly. Compounding her trauma, medical teams deemed thousands of other patients to have more urgent needs, so she was never prioritized for the life-saving evacuation she required.

This harrowing incident is far from isolated. After nearly three years of relentless Israeli military campaigns that have damaged or destroyed over 97 percent of Gaza’s formal school infrastructure, local education authorities, UNRWA, and independent community groups launched a network of tent-based makeshift learning spaces to resume classes for the hundreds of thousands of displaced school-age children who had lost years of formal education. Crippled by extreme shortages of trained teaching staff and adequate classroom space, these makeshift schools operate on staggered rotating shifts, with most pupils receiving only three hours of instruction, three days per week.

Roughly three weeks after Abushbeika was shot, nine-year-old Amir Abusneimah was attending class at a tent school operated by US-registered charity Gaza Children Village, located just 2 to 3 kilometers from Israel’s demarcated “Yellow Line” military boundary, when a stray Israeli bullet pierced the tent wall, ricocheted off the classroom blackboard, and lodged in his shoulder. The deflection from the blackboard narrowly prevented the bullet from piercing his heart, but the impact severed one of his arteries. His mother Muna, a single parent separated from her partner and raising five children in a nearby displacement camp, rushed to the school after staff called to alert her of the shooting. Even with sand barriers erected around the tent compound to fend off stray gunfire, the camp is regularly targeted by Israeli shooting. Just days after Amir was wounded, another Israeli bullet penetrated the school’s administrative office, striking a cabinet while the headteacher was inside. Amir underwent four hours of emergency surgery at Nasser Hospital to repair the damaged artery; he is now in stable condition but requires ongoing physiotherapy and has been forced to pause his schooling during recovery. Muna says she lives in constant, paralyzing anxiety every time her children leave their tent to attend classes, as stray gunfire is a near-daily occurrence across the displacement camp.

This academic year marked the first tentative step toward partial resumption of normal educational activities across Gaza since the outbreak of the Israeli military campaign that began in October 2023, but in less than two months after classes restarted, a wave of targeted Israeli attacks on educational facilities has once again upended fragile learning routines. Most recently, an Israeli airstrike struck the main entrance of the University College of Applied Sciences in Mawasi Khan Younis on a Tuesday, killing three Palestinians and injuring 11 others, multiple of whom were enrolled students. That same day, 16-year-old student Rimas Ismail al-Madhoun was killed in an Israeli airstrike mere minutes after she returned home from classes in central Gaza City. On October 25, two separate Israeli airstrikes hit the courtyard of Gaza City’s Islamic University, killing three security guards and wounding several students and staff.

Official data from the Palestinian Ministry of Education and Higher Education paints a devastating cumulative toll: since October 7 2023, at least 19,200 primary and secondary school students and 1,386 university students have been killed by Israeli military actions, with an additional 28,590 K-12 pupils and 3,100 university students suffering serious injuries. In the single month of October alone, 14 schoolchildren between the ages of 6 and 16 were killed, alongside four teachers and three university administrative staff. For Gaza’s displaced community, the makeshift tent schools that were meant to be a safe haven to rebuild children’s stolen educations have become yet another dangerous frontline in the ongoing conflict.

For 11 consecutive days, Abbas Mujahid clung to the quiet, unsteady hope that he and his seven-member family would one day be allowed to return to their home in Hebron’s al-Jalda neighbourhood, never knowing when that long-awaited moment might arrive. The family was among hundreds of Palestinian residents forced out of their residences by Israeli forces last month, ahead of a sweeping military offensive launched on 23 October that formally concluded only earlier this week. The operation was triggered by a shooting in Hebron carried out by two Palestinian assailants that killed two Israeli soldiers, before both attackers were fatally wounded in the subsequent exchange of fire. What followed was a total, city-wide lockdown: all major thoroughfares were sealed off, every entry point to Hebron was blocked, and Israeli troops carried out raids on commercial storefronts, while industrial sites were systematically vandalised or razed to the ground. The scale of the devastation touched every corner of daily life across the occupied West Bank city. When Mujahid and his family were finally permitted to re-enter their home, they were met with a scene of utter ruin: every wooden interior door and the heavy iron main entrance had been ripped clean off their hinges, ornate gypsum wall detailing was smashed to fragments, light fixtures were shattered, and the family’s clothing and personal effects were strewn haphazardly across every room. Worse still, Mujahid reported that Israeli soldiers had left human excrement scattered throughout the property, and window frames had been wrenched out in clear acts of deliberate, gratuitous destruction. He had tried to prepare his children for the possibility of severe damage to their shared home, especially their private bedrooms, but no amount of advance warning could soften the visceral shock of witnessing the wreckage in person. Even so, Mujahid remains determined to move forward: he has already hired construction workers to begin repairs, a project projected to cost tens of thousands of shekels, and notes that the simple fact of his family’s return outweighs the grief of their lost possessions. The economic fallout of the 11-day incursion has been catastrophic. Official data from the Hebron Chamber of Commerce and Industry calculates that direct economic losses topped 12 million shekels (roughly $3.8 million) per day over the course of the operation, with 327 separate commercial and economic entities forced to shut down, 15 industrial facilities completely destroyed, and approximately 1,350 local residents losing their primary source of income. One of the most prominent affected business owners is Iyad al-Qawasmi, who ran a used auto parts enterprise spread across three dunums of land in the Farsh al-Hawa district, an area where dozens of factories and retail shops were demolished on the first day of the military operation. Israeli troops raided his property, which housed 600 used vehicles, and gave him just 60 minutes to evacuate before bulldozers moved in. When al-Qawasmi requested a formal written demolition order rather than the verbal instruction he had received, soldiers claimed an Israeli court had already signed off on the decision and that he had no choice but to comply, despite the fact he had never been issued any prior demolition notice in the eight years he had operated the site, save for a single 2022 incident where surveillance cameras were confiscated. He rushed to bring in his own bulldozer to salvage as much equipment as possible in the narrow window he was given, but a fleet of Israeli military and settler-owned bulldozers soon arrived on site. The crews seized at least 400 of his stored vehicles, alongside all of his heavy equipment, and days later returned to level the entire facility to rubble. The destruction was so complete that the previously obscured mountain range of Halhul is now fully visible through the empty plot where his business once stood. Al-Qawasmi is still barred from accessing his own land, leaving him no way to retrieve any remaining assets, and his total losses exceed 2.5 million shekels (around $790,000). His business employed 10 local workers who supported a combined 70 Palestinian family members, all of whom have now lost their sole source of income. “My only ‘guilt’, the only reason my facility was demolished, is that I am Palestinian. The facility is not even located near the site of the shooting incident,” al-Qawasmi stated in an interview. Humanitarian impacts are equally staggering: a 30 October report from UNICEF, citing official Hebron Municipality records, confirmed that 483 families totalling 4,304 people, including 1,845 children, were displaced by the military operations and movement restrictions imposed on the city. Multiple human rights groups have since accused Israeli authorities of imposing collective punishment on the civilian population of Hebron, a violation of international humanitarian law, via the mass displacement, widespread property destruction and sweeping restrictions put in place in response to the initial shooting attack. At least 15 separate residential and commercial structures were formally demolished during the operation, including three private homes, two of which belonged to the two Palestinian perpetrators of the fatal shooting. Hebron Mayor Yousef al-Jabari confirmed that local authorities are still in the process of documenting the full scope of the damage, with reports from residents detailing not just structural ruin, but widespread theft of gold jewellery, cash and other high-value personal items from abandoned homes. A cross-government assessment committee has been deployed to dispatch engineers to every affected property to log losses accurately, and preliminary estimates peg the damage to municipal public facilities and utility networks alone at roughly 6 million shekels ($1.9 million), including wrecked streets, broken pavements, fractured water and electricity lines, and destroyed municipal heavy equipment. While the city’s emergency response committee managed to sustain basic minimal services throughout the 11-day siege, al-Jabari noted that full restoration of normal daily life and full repairs to all damaged infrastructure will require a minimum of one month of concentrated work, alongside substantial financial and material resources. A Reuters photo dated 3 November 2026 captures local residents surveying the wreckage of a newly demolished Palestinian building on the outskirts of Hebron, a visual testament to the widespread ruin left in the wake of the military incursion.

Following the Democratic Party’s resounding landslide victory that secured full control of the U.S. Congress on Wednesday, a cross-section of Israeli political figures, diplomatic experts and mainstream media commentators have issued urgent warnings about cascading national security risks for Israel, tied directly to plummeting U.S. public and bipartisan approval of long-serving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Former Israeli prime minister Yair Lapid, who secured re-election to the Knesset just one week prior as a member of the centre-right Together alliance, stated publicly on the X platform Wednesday morning that the U.S. election outcome had fully eliminated any remaining feasibility of forming a proposed national unity government with Netanyahu’s Likud faction. Lapid emphasized that allowing Netanyahu to remain in office represented an unacceptable threat to Israeli national security, eroding domestic democratic guardrails and isolating the country on the global diplomatic stage.
Local Israeli media reports in the lead-up to the U.S. vote had previously revealed that sitting U.S. President Donald Trump had been exerting targeted pressure on both Netanyahu and Israeli opposition leaders to negotiate a unity government that sidelined extremist hardline factions, in order to clear a path for Trump’s planned Middle East policy priorities. That proposed framework is now formally off the table, multiple opposition leaders confirmed.
Yair Golan, head of the left-wing Democrats alliance and the most progressive leader in Israel’s Zionist opposition bloc, echoed Lapid’s assessment in the aftermath of the U.S. election, which saw a wave of progressive Democratic candidates secure congressional wins, including Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed, the first Muslim candidate ever elected to the U.S. Senate. Golan argued that Netanyahu has become politically toxic across the U.S. political spectrum, with eroding support among both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, and that his continued tenure as prime minister could set Israel on a trajectory of international sanctions, widespread global isolation, and a direct diplomatic collision with its longstanding closest ally the United States. Golan framed the moment as an existential choice for Israeli voters and policymakers: between a Netanyahu-led trajectory of a boycotted, regressive, isolated state, or a path toward a strong, technologically advanced, democratic and secure Israel, and called for immediate action to install a new change-focused governing coalition. His party’s Knesset member Gilad Kariv reinforced that position, noting that any Israeli public figure still advocating for a unity government with Netanyahu was demonstrating a total lack of understanding of both recent Israeli domestic electoral shifts and the full implications of the U.S. congressional results.
Progressive incoming Democratic legislators such as El-Sayed, who have publicly advocated for ending unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel over allegations of genocide in Gaza, are viewed by Israeli U.S. affairs analysts as posing unprecedented long-term risks to Israel’s core national interests. Former Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni, a longstanding vocal critic of Netanyahu, noted that the prime minister is no longer capable of defending the global legitimacy of the Jewish state, or upholding Israel’s internationally recognized right to self-defense, in the face of the emerging policy priorities of the new incoming congressional class.
Gili Cohen, diplomatic correspondent for Israel’s public broadcaster Kan 11, argued that the U.S. electoral results represented not just a major defeat for Trump’s Republican party, but a historic blow to Israel’s longstanding diplomatic standing in Washington, putting decades of uninterrupted, large-scale U.S. military aid to Israel in serious jeopardy. Amir Tibon, a senior correspondent for left-leaning Israeli daily Haaretz, described the U.S. election outcome as a political earthquake carrying catastrophic long-term consequences for Israel, writing on X that “Netanyahu’s continued tenure is an immediate danger to our special relationship with the United States”, and that the prime minister’s toxic reputation now extends well beyond Democratic ranks to include Republican leaders, many of whom now openly blame Netanyahu for contributing to their party’s congressional losses. Tibon added that Israel can only begin to rebuild its badly eroded public standing in the U.S. if it formally parts ways with Netanyahu, and that failure to do so would lead the country down a deeply dangerous, uncharted diplomatic path.
Even traditionally pro-Netanyahu right-wing Israeli political commentators echoed these widespread concerns. Prominent journalist Ariel Kahana, speaking to Israel’s Radio 103FM, stated that Israel had suffered a severe strategic blow in the U.S. elections, noting that Israel’s policy positions had effectively been a hidden ballot issue for American voters, and that Netanyahu had become an unsustainable liability for the country’s U.S. ties. Kobby Barda, a leading political analyst at the nonpartisan Jewish People Policy Institute think tank, went further to argue that Iran was the de facto biggest winner of the U.S. electoral results, while Netanyahu was the single largest individual loser, adding that Netanyahu could no longer credibly serve as the public face of the Israeli government given his collapsing approval ratings across U.S. political circles.
Former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren issued a stark warning that the election of progressive figures such as El-Sayed, whom he described as a virulently anti-Israel and antisemitic official, could trigger cascading catastrophic harms for Israel. Oren noted that a full halt to U.S. military aid would only be the first step of a broader breakdown in bilateral cooperation, with shared intelligence streams, joint military technology development, visa access for Israeli citizens traveling to the U.S., and steady supplies of critical military components all at imminent risk, and that targeted U.S. sanctions against Israeli government figures were now a plausible policy outcome. Oren concluded that the 50-year era of the longstanding unshakeable U.S.-Israel bilateral relationship as it has been widely understood is now formally over, leaving the future of the alliance shrouded in deep, unprecedented uncertainty.

A landmark 35-year UN peacekeeping presence in Western Sahara came to an abrupt end last week, after the UN Security Council collapsed into gridlock and failed to extend the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO), stoking widespread alarm that the long-running territorial dispute could spiral into open military conflict while fading entirely from global diplomatic attention.

First established in 1991, MINURSO was founded with two core mandates: to oversee a formal ceasefire between the Moroccan state and the Algeria-backed Polisario Front, the armed independence movement fighting for self-determination for the Indigenous Sahrawi population, and to lay the administrative groundwork for a long-promised independence referendum for the territory. Neither of those foundational goals was ever fully realized: the fragile 1991 ceasefire completely unraveled in 2020, and the self-determination vote was never scheduled, leaving the mission adrift in a diplomatic no-man’s-land for years.

The final death knell for MINURSO sounded on Sunday, when dueling vetoes from Russia and the United States scuttled competing resolutions aimed at extending the mission’s mandate. The U.S.-backed draft resolution would have stripped the word “referendum” entirely from MINURSO’s official name, rebranding it the United Nations Mission in Western Sahara, and enshrined Morocco’s widely criticized 2007 autonomy proposal as the sole legal framework for all future peace negotiations. That decades-old Moroccan plan offers the territory limited local self-governance while retaining full Moroccan sovereign control over Western Sahara, a framework that has won tentative backing from many UN member states and was described for the first time last year by the Security Council as “a most feasible outcome” for resolving the conflict, but has been repeatedly and categorically rejected by the Polisario Front.

For the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), the Polisario-led governing body that administers five Sahrawi refugee camps in Algeria and roughly 20 percent of Western Sahara’s territory, the Security Council stalemate was framed as a unexpected win. “The Russian veto saved the legal basis of self-determination,” SADR Foreign Minister Mohamed Yeslem Beissat told Middle East Eye, noting that the longstanding Polisario view of MINURSO was that it was at best ineffective, and at worst actively complicit in advancing Morocco’s occupation of the territory. Beissat added that the now-dead U.S. push to prioritize Morocco’s autonomy plan had been completely neutralized by the veto gridlock, as Russia would block any future attempt to table that framework before the Security Council. “At least in the short to medium term future, they cannot bring it again to the Security Council,” he explained. “Now we are back to square one.”

Western Sahara is widely recognized as Africa’s last remaining formal colony, and remains listed on the UN’s official roster of non-self-governing territories. Morocco seized control of the vast, resource-rich desert territory in 1975 following the withdrawal of former colonial power Spain, triggering a decades-long armed conflict with the Polisario Front that displaced hundreds of thousands of Indigenous Sahrawi people, hundreds of whom still reside in refugee camps in southwestern Algeria. Independence activists living in the 80 percent of Western Sahara controlled by Morocco have long reported systematic state repression, including arbitrary detention and restrictions on peaceful protest.

The 2020 collapse of the 1991 ceasefire followed a U.S. diplomatic deal struck under the Trump administration, in which Washington formally recognized Morocco’s full sovereignty claim over Western Sahara in exchange for Morocco agreeing to normalize diplomatic relations with Israel, a position the Biden administration has retained with no major policy shifts, despite limited hopes for change following recent U.S. midterm elections. Beissat criticized both Washington and European Security Council members that backed the U.S. draft resolution for acting against their own national interests, warning that a return to large-scale conflict in North Africa would trigger widespread instability and refugee flows directly into the European continent. “The alternative to diplomacy is war. That’s the message the UNSC have sent to the world,” he said. “They didn’t care. It’s more important for them to rally with America than defend their own interests in the peace and stability of North Africa.”

The UN has already initiated the formal process of winding down MINURSO’s operations in the Western Sahara coastal city of Laayoune, transferring all remaining mission assets to Moroccan authorities. In a public statement released Wednesday, the Moroccan government insisted it would uphold its “voluntary” commitment to a ceasefire in the territory, while vowing to defend what it calls its national security and territorial integrity. Morocco controls its 80 percent share of Western Sahara behind a massive, 2,700-kilometer sand defensive barrier known as “the Berm,” which it constructed in the 1980s to separate its controlled territory from the smaller Polisario-held zone and the Algerian border.

Since the 2020 ceasefire collapse, low-level skirmishes have persisted across the demarcation line: the Polisario Front has launched repeated attacks on Moroccan military outposts along the Berm, while Moroccan forces have carried out targeted drone strikes against Polisario positions, displacing thousands of local civilians who have fled to safety in either Mauritania or Algeria’s refugee camps. Analysts warn that the total removal of UN monitoring personnel from the long-patrolled buffer zone between the two sides eliminates the last remaining guardrail against wider war. “The risk is that a military incident inside Western Sahara’s buffer zone, no longer monitored by the UN, could ignite a larger military escalation, with Rabat potentially taking over this area and the Polisario attacking Moroccan defence facilities directly from Algerian territory,” Riccardo Fabiani, North Africa project director at the International Crisis Group, explained. “It’s this kind of scenario that the disappearance of the Minurso will make more plausible from now on.”

For decades, the Western Sahara conflict has been largely sidelined in global diplomatic discourse, overshadowed by higher-profile crises including the Israel-Palestine conflict and other armed conflicts across the Middle East and North Africa. Sahrawi human rights activists warn that the full withdrawal of MINURSO will erase the last formal mechanism that kept the long-simmering dispute on the UN Security Council’s regular agenda. “For more than 30 years, Minurso kept Western Sahara on the Security Council’s agenda – it meant that the world’s most powerful states had to address our situation, and that the UN secretary-general had to report regularly on developments,” said Asria Taleb Mohamed, a Sahrawi artist and human rights campaigner. “Without that presence, I fear Western Sahara will become easier for the world to forget.”

In a late-night operation on Tuesday, Israeli security forces detained high-profile Palestinian political organizer and journalist Abd Abu Shahadeh from his private residence in Jaffa, transporting him to an unannounced location, per reporting from regional news outlet Arab48. Approximately 15 security personnel, a subset of whom wore face-concealing masks, forcibly entered Abu Shahadeh’s home around midnight, carrying out the arrest in full view of his two young children. During the raid, officers seized a range of personal electronic devices and multiple printed books, and initially refused to share any details regarding the justification for the detention or which governing body had taken Abu Shahadeh into custody. Israeli police later confirmed the case was under joint oversight by the Tel Aviv Central Investigative Unit and Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence service, before a local court issued a sweeping publication ban tied to claims of a “security-focused ongoing investigation.”

The detention unfolds against a sharply charged political backdrop, marked by a surge in targeted rhetoric directed at Palestinian citizens of Israel in the immediate wake of last week’s national elections, where Palestinian voter participation hit a historic high and Palestinian-aligned political parties secured unprecedented electoral gains. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party publicly alleged the elections had been “stolen” by Palestinian political factions, citing isolated, minor claims of electoral fraud. Opposition lawmakers have pushed back hard against the claims, accusing Likud of amplifying unsubstantiated allegations as a deliberate tactic to discredit and invalidate the official election results. Palestinian-led political parties have categorically rejected all fraud accusations, and Israel’s independent Central Elections Committee formally certified the final election results on Wednesday, announcing its exhaustive review had uncovered no evidence of systemic irregularities that would compromise electoral integrity or alter the final outcome of the vote.

Even with the official certification complete, Shin Bet director David Zini, a close political ally of Netanyahu, has moved forward with plans to summon top leaders of Palestinian-led parties for formal, cautionary interrogations. The list of targeted figures includes United Arab List head Mahmoud Abbas, Ta’al party leader Ahmed Tibi, and Balad party chief Sami Abu Shehadeh. Reporting from Israeli daily Haaretz confirms this push is moving forward even as rank-and-file police officials and state prosecutors have not been presented with any tangible evidence to back up the Likud-originated claims of mass electoral fraud tied to Palestinian voting blocs.

Speaking publicly on Wednesday, Balad leader Sami Abu Shehadeh framed Abd Abu Shahadeh’s arrest as a deliberate step in a coordinated campaign by Netanyahu and Zini to overturn the legitimate election outcome. “Abd’s detention is not an isolated incident: it is one piece of a wider, systematic effort of targeted arrests, coercive interrogations, and explicit threats against grassroots political activists, deployed to weaponize law enforcement and intelligence agencies to invalidate the will of the voting public,” he stated. “None of these heavy-handed tactics can erase the unassailable fact that Netanyahu lost this election, driven by the record-breaking turnout of Arab Palestinian citizens who turned out in droves to vote him out of office.” Abu Shehadeh went on to characterize the unacknowledged detention as a “serious, unlawful abduction,” emphasizing that the intimidation campaign would not succeed in suppressing Palestinian civic participation. “We will not be bullied into silence, and we will never allow them to steal an election that our community turned out in historic numbers to decide,” he added.

A respected community leader, Abd Abu Shahadeh serves as the elected head of Jaffa’s Islamic Council, sits on the editorial board of Arab48, and is a frequent contributing opinion writer for independent regional news outlet Middle East Eye.

Last Friday, an Algerian military convoy crossed into Niger, marking the North African nation’s first overseas force deployment in 52 years, dating back to 1973 when Algeria dispatched troops to back Egypt during its conflict against Israeli occupation of the Sinai Peninsula. This move represents a landmark break from Algiers’ decades-old foundational policy of non-interference in other sovereign nations’ internal affairs. The deployment follows a late August decision to send four fighter jets to Niger to block an attempted coup targeting the country’s de facto leader Abdourahamane Tiani, even though Algeria had publicly opposed the 2023 military coup that originally brought Tiani to power. The deployment was formally requested by Tiani’s administration, with Algerian Senator Belkacem Boulghiti clarifying in a Sunday public statement that the deployed forces will not engage in offensive combat operations, but will instead focus on safeguarding critical economic infrastructure and oil facilities operated by Algerian state-owned enterprises. The shift in Algeria’s long-held foreign policy posture is rooted in mounting concerns over spiraling instability across the Sahel region, which senior retired Algerian diplomat Amar Belani detailed in an October published analysis. Belani framed growing unrest in Niger and neighboring Sahel states as the product of a coordinated destabilization campaign backed by the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Israel, and aligned French proxy actors, warning that prolonged chaos in Niger would directly erode Algerian national interests, most notably jeopardizing the landmark Nigeria-Niger-Algeria Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline project. Zine Ghebouli, a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, explained that evolving regional geopolitics have imposed urgent new security priorities on Algiers, forcing the government to take concrete steps to shield its high-stakes energy sector interests. Tensions between Algeria and the UAE boiled over in September, when Algiers formally severed all diplomatic ties after officials stated they had exhausted every diplomatic channel to resolve disputes over Abu Dhabi’s alleged hostile regional actions. The Algerian foreign ministry issued a public statement noting that repeated formal warnings to the UAE over its destabilizing behavior had been ignored, and that Abu Dhabi’s persistent interference in regional sovereign nations’ internal affairs had crossed a threshold that could no longer go unanswered. Ghebouli emphasized that the decision to fully cut diplomatic relations demonstrated that Algerian leadership viewed Emirati regional maneuvers as fundamentally explosive and incompatible with peaceful bilateral coexistence. The UAE’s pattern of interventionist policies across the Middle East and Africa has drawn widespread condemnation from other regional governments in recent years: Sudan severed ties with Abu Dhabi over well-documented evidence that the Emirati state funded and fueled Sudan’s brutal ongoing civil war, while Somalia, Libya, and Yemen have all publicly accused the UAE of undermining their territorial integrity by arming and financing rival armed factions and separatist movements. Ghebouli added that Algerian officials view Emirati financial, diplomatic, and military backing for disparate armed groups across the region from Libya to the Sahel as a deliberate strategy to foment division, and that Abu Dhabi’s aggressive lobbying to expand the US-brokered Abraham Accords normalization deals between Israel and Arab states – including Morocco – further deepened rifts with Algiers. Over the past few years, the UAE has steadily built deep ties with ruling military regimes across the Sahel through high-level diplomatic outreach, gold trading partnerships, and targeted investment, with Emirati minister Sheikh Shakhboot bin Nahyan holding a summit with the leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger in May 2025 to discuss cooperation spanning economic development, energy, and security sectors. Analysts note that Algeria has long viewed the entire Sahel as a natural extension of its own national security perimeter, and that the government is now moving decisively to defend that space. Ghebouli added that longstanding Algerian taboos against overt military deployments abroad have been discarded amid intensifying geopolitical rivalries and foreign intervention in the region, as Algiers now uses visible military presence to clearly mark its non-negotiable national security redlines. Another key source of Algerian concern is the influence of UAE-backed eastern Libyan strongman Khalifa Haftar, whose Libyan Arab Armed Forces have been expanding military control toward the border corridors linking Libya and Niger, raising alarms about growing Emirati sway along Algeria’s entire southern national border. Libya analyst Jalel Harchaoui, affiliated with the Royal United Services Institute, noted that Algeria has maintained frosty relations with the Haftar family for years, with tensions flaring during the August 2025 Niger coup attempt, as Haftar’s son Saddam openly backed Mahamoud Sallah, a leading political opponent of Niger’s Tiani. Harchaoui clarified that the current Algerian military mission is limited to Niger’s borders, and there is no evidence to suggest Algiers is planning direct intervention in Libya at this stage. Recent diplomatic shifts, including Turkey’s October rapprochement with Haftar, may create new opportunities for Algeria to shore up its position in the Sahel, as Ankara and Algiers share close bilateral ties and aligned interests in stabilizing Libya and Sudan. Reports also indicate that Morocco has recently pursued outreach to the Haftar clan, with Khalifa Haftar’s son and eastern Libyan forces chief of staff Khaled Haftar making an official state visit to Morocco in the previous month. Complementing these geopolitical priorities are Algeria’s high-stakes economic and energy interests in Niger. Algerian state energy giant Sonatrach, alongside the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation and the Nigerien government, is leading development of a 4,000-kilometer Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline designed to transport Nigerian natural gas through Niger and Algeria to export markets in Europe. Dr. Fatiha Dazi-Heni, a senior political scientist specializing in Arabian Peninsula affairs at Paris-based research institute Irsem and Sciences Po Lille, confirmed that the deployed Algerian troops are explicitly tasked with protecting Sonatrach’s energy projects and the planned route of the Trans-Saharan pipeline. The project faces direct commercial competition from a rival Nigeria-Morocco Atlantic coastal gas pipeline that would draw on the exact same Nigerian gas reserves to supply European markets, with the UAE committing to provide full financial and technical backing to the Moroccan-led project. Dazi-Heni noted that Niger is geographically impossible for the overland Trans-Saharan pipeline route to bypass, meaning that by securing stability in Niger, Algeria is actively defending its core strategic asset against the competing Morocco-UAE alliance – a dynamic where Israel also holds indirect stakes via its formal normalization partnership with Morocco. Dazi-Heni added that this unprecedented military deployment reflects a major evolution in Algeria’s traditionally cautious, low-profile strategic culture, as policymakers adjust to the harsh new geopolitical constraints reshaping the entire North and West African region.