The death of convicted Bosnian Serb military leader Ratko Mladić at age 84, while serving a life sentence for genocide at a United Nations prison in The Hague, Netherlands, has drawn thousands of mourners to the Serbian capital of Belgrade for a public funeral, while triggering sharp international backlash over efforts to honor a man widely branded the “Butcher of Bosnia”.
Mladić commanded Bosnian Serb military forces during the 1992–1995 Bosnian War, waging a campaign of ethnic cleansing to forcibly expel non-Serb populations from territory claimed by Bosnian Serb separatists. His forces oversaw the 44-month siege of Sarajevo that killed more than 10,000 civilians, and he was ultimately found guilty of genocide for orchestrating the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, where roughly 8,000 Bosniak Muslim men and boys were executed in the worst European atrocity committed since World War II. After 16 years as a fugitive, Mladić was arrested in 2011, and following a nine-year international trial, he received a sentence of life imprisonment in 2021.
Despite his confirmed conviction for mass atrocities, Mladić retains a deeply revered status among many Serbian nationalists, who view him as a heroic defender of Serbian interests. This divide was on full display in the days leading up to and during his funeral. Plans to grant Mladić an official state funeral were initially announced by a Serbian government minister, but the proposal was scrapped after widespread pushback from European leaders. Even so, the event retained significant state-aligned support: Mladić’s remains were transported back to Serbia from The Hague on a government aircraft, carried by six active-duty soldiers, and free bus transport was organized to bring mourners from across Serbia and the Bosnian Serb entity of Republika Srpska to the capital.
Long queues formed outside Belgrade’s St Luka church hours before the public lying in state began, with thousands of people waiting to pay their respects. Attendees included multiple sitting Serbian government ministers — including Defence Minister Bratislav Gašić and Justice Minister Nenad Vujić — and the funeral service itself was led by Patriarch Porfirije, head of the Serbian Orthodox Church. In his remarks, the patriarch stated that Mladić’s name would remain “deeply etched in the memory and prayers of the majority of our Serbian Orthodox people, who feel and nurture a deep sense of gratitude towards him.” Many in attendance were war veterans, and some attendees wrapped themselves in Serbian flags emblazoned with Mladić’s portrait. Outside the church, mourners lit candles as a choir performed over loudspeakers under clear skies. Mladić’s coffin was guarded by veteran volunteers inside the church, as his immediate family received condolences from the public. The tribute extended even to Serbian football: the night before the burial, supporters of top-tier club Red Star Belgrade unfurled a large tifo display honoring Mladić ahead of their capital derby match against Partizan Belgrade.
The public honoring of Mladić has prompted fierce condemnation from international bodies and war survivors alike. The European Union, which Serbia has sought to join since 2012 (with accession talks currently stalled), issued a formal statement denouncing any glorification of the convicted war criminal. “Ratko Mladić was a convicted war criminal who committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity,” the statement read. “Any glorification of war criminals, genocide denial and revisionism contradict the most fundamental European values and have no place in the EU or in EU candidate countries.”
For survivors of Mladić’s campaign of violence, the funeral has reawakened decades-old trauma. Zdravka Gvozdjar, a Sarajevo resident whose nine-year-old son was killed by Mladić-led forces during the siege of the capital, called the public funeral “really horrible.” “Mladić deserved to be erased from memory for good, not to be promoted as a hero,” she told reporters. “He should only be remembered as a butcher.”
Analysts point to systemic failures in confronting the legacy of the Bosnian War as the root of Mladić’s continued popularity in Serbia. Daniella Peled, editor at the Institute of War and Peace Reporting, who covered Mladić’s international trial extensively, noted that while the UN tribunal produced a comprehensive, evidence-based record of Mladić’s crimes, Serbia’s domestic media and education systems have not acknowledged the full scale of his atrocities or centered the perspectives of survivors. Pro-government outlets in Serbia regularly frame Mladić as a loyal soldier who only followed orders, Peled explained, leaving many ordinary Serbs with a skewed understanding of his actions. “It’s extremely challenging for post-conflict societies to undertake a national reckoning or acknowledge responsibility for the crimes of the past,” she added.









