分类: politics

  • How US is using cash and threats to dump migrants in Africa

    How US is using cash and threats to dump migrants in Africa

    ### Introduction
    Under the second Trump administration’s hardline immigration crackdown, a little-known and highly controversial policy has pushed hundreds of deportees from across the globe into African nations, secured through a toxic mix of U.S. visa bans, financial incentives and diplomatic coercion. Two former senior U.S. State Department officials have confirmed to Agence France-Presse (AFP) that the initiative, conceived by anti-immigration advisor Stephen Miller and the White House Homeland Security Council, strongarms African governments into accepting third-country deportees — individuals who have no connection to the nations they are sent to, and often face abuse, indefinite detention and legal limbo after arrival. The White House declined to respond to specific allegations, while the State Department confirmed that enforcing the administration’s immigration priorities remains a core commitment, focused on curbing unauthorized migration and strengthening U.S. border security.

    ### The Mechanics of Coercion: Carrots and Sticks for African Nations
    The first wave of third-country deportations under the Trump administration focused on Central and South America, but Africa quickly emerged as the second major destination. Washington uses two key levers to pressure African governments: punitive restrictions, including full or partial travel bans targeting majority-African nation lists, and financial payoffs for cooperation. According to Democratic U.S. Senators and non-governmental organizations, two-thirds of the 39 countries hit by Trump administration travel bans are African, and nearly half of all nations that have signed secret deportation deals with Washington are located on the continent.

    Human Rights Watch documentation shows Eswatini, Africa’s last absolute monarchy ruled by King Mswati III, agreed to accept 160 deportees in exchange for $5.1 million in U.S. funding. Rwanda has reportedly sealed a similar $7.5 million aid agreement to take 250 deportees. For nations that refuse to comply, consequences are swift and severe. Burkina Faso’s junta, which has adopted a hostile stance toward Western influence, rejected the U.S. push to accept expelled migrants, with Foreign Affairs Minister Karamoko Jean-Marie Traore calling the pressure “blackmail” and affirming the nation “is a place of dignity… not a place of expulsion.” Shortly after the refusal, Washington halted visa processing in Ouagadougou and imposed a full travel ban on the country. When Nigeria declined to accept Venezuelan deportees in 2023, visa restrictions were quickly implemented in response. For cooperative nations, rewards are immediate: after Ghana agreed to take West African deportees, the U.S. reversed existing visa restrictions and lifted a 15% tariff on Ghanaian cocoa and agricultural exports.

    ### The Human Cost: Deportees Trapped in a ‘Legal Black Hole’
    For the deportees caught up in the policy, the outcome is almost universally grim. Lawyers across the U.S. describe the system as creating a “legal black hole,” where detainees are transferred to nations with no ties to them, held without charge, and stripped of basic human rights. Many of those sent to Africa already held legal protections against deportation to their countries of origin under the U.N. Convention Against Torture (CAT), which bars sending individuals back to places where they face risk of torture. The Trump administration has argued these protections only bar deportation to a individual’s home country, allowing transfer to any third nation — a legal interpretation that has been widely condemned by human rights advocates.

    Pheap Rom, a 43-year-old Cambodian national who completed a 15-year U.S. prison sentence for attempted murder, told AFP he could not understand why he was expelled to Africa instead of his home country. He was detained for months in Eswatini’s most notorious maximum-security prison, a facility long known as a tool for political repression under King Mswati, where pro-democracy activists and government critics are routinely held. For two months, Rom said he and other deportees were allowed only 15 minutes of outdoor time per day and just one phone call per week. “We went through misery,” he recalled.

    The case of 23-year-old Khalid, an East African man who fled torture in his home country and was granted deportation protection by a U.S. immigration judge in 2024, illustrates the policy’s disregard for existing legal safeguards. After crossing the Mexican border, a judge welcomed him to the U.S. and granted him formal protection from forced return. But in January 2025, Khalid was deported without documentation to Equatorial Guinea, a nation routinely criticized for systemic human rights abuses. The Equatorial Guinean government refused to allow him to stay, so he was put on a flight back to his home country — but border officials there turned him away for lack of valid travel documents. Stuck back in Equatorial Guinea, he has no ability to apply for asylum, as the country does not have a formal asylum system, per the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees. “They don’t know if we’re alive or not and they don’t seem to care,” Khalid said of the U.S. officials who oversaw his deportation.

    Even long-term U.S. residents with deep roots in the country have been targeted. Roberto Mosquera, a Cuban-born plumber who moved to Florida as a child and was an open supporter of Donald Trump, served time in his youth for a gang-related shooting, but rebuilt his life after release: he married, raised four daughters, and became an outspoken critic of gang violence. After he was detained for a routine check-in with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), his family was falsely told he had been deported to Cuba, which rarely accepts deported Cuban nationals. He was eventually revealed to be held without charge in the same Eswatini prison as Rom, where he has remained for a year. After a recent video call, family friends said he had lost significant weight and hair, held in harsh conditions alongside political prisoners. The Department of Homeland Security even publicly mislabeled him a “murderer” to justify his expulsion.

    Deportees sent to other African nations face similarly grim outcomes. Those sent to Ghana were held in secret at a remote military base without charge; some were dumped across the border in Togo without any documentation. A bisexual Gambian deportee was sent back to Gambia, where homosexuality is criminalized, forcing him into hiding. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, deportees are held in hotels near Kinshasa airport, where multiple people have fallen ill, and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) pressures detainees to sign up for “voluntary” repatriation to their home countries. “They’ve got us cornered because they tell us: ‘If you don’t accept the repatriation programme, you’ll be stuck in a mess here in Congo,’” said Gabriela, a 30-year-old Colombian deportee who spoke to AFP in Kinshasa. The IOM has denied any wrongdoing, saying its assistance is strictly voluntary and based on full informed consent.

    ### Secrecy and Impunity Amid Ongoing Policy Expansion
    The entire third-country deportation program is shrouded in secrecy, with no public accounting of how many people have been sent to Africa, which countries have accepted them, or what conditions they face. An investigation by Senate Democrats found that at least nine African governments have agreed to take deportees as part of 25 global agreements, while nonprofit tallies put the number at 14 out of 34 countries with confirmed or alleged deals. The Senate report does not even include Sierra Leone, which accepted its first group of deportees in May 2025, or the Central African Republic, which received Iranian and other deportees in June 2025.

    Human rights lawyers warn the policy amounts to “chain refoulement,” a violation of international law that occurs when one country transfers a person to another nation to facilitate their onward deportation to a place where they face harm. “These governments are receiving money from the U.S. for the purpose of processing individuals who are deported there, just to be deported back to their countries — it’s chain refoulement and that is illegal,” said U.S. immigration lawyer Meredyth Yoon. One former State Department official described the administration’s approach as deliberate indifference: “Once they’re out of U.S. hands, you can do with them whatever you want. Hands washed. That’s how the administration approached it.”

    Despite growing legal pushback and widespread international criticism, the Trump administration has shown no sign of rolling back the policy. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran immigrant who became the public face of the administration’s wrongful deportation scandals after being mistakenly sent to El Salvador, remains at risk of expulsion to Uganda, Eswatini, Ghana or Liberia even after a U.S. judge dismissed all criminal charges against him in May 2025. When a judge ruled that the deportation of a woman to the DRC was illegal because the Congolese government could not provide her required medical care, U.S. officials claimed bringing her back to the U.S. was too dangerous due to the Ebola outbreak in the region, leaving her stranded. One former State Department source summed up the policy’s core ideology simply: “There was no real guiding philosophy, it was just xenophobia.”

    As recently as May 2025, a new deportation flight landed in Accra, Ghana. An AFP reporter attempted to access the heavily guarded hotel where deportees were reportedly being held, but was turned away. Staff confirmed the hotel was fully booked, but added there would be plenty of vacancies in two days — a signal that the deportees would be moved out to make room, continuing the cycle of secret transfers and forgotten people.

  • What to know about NATO’s summit in Turkey as America steps back from its defense of Europe

    What to know about NATO’s summit in Turkey as America steps back from its defense of Europe

    As leaders of the world’s largest military alliance gather in Ankara, Turkey this week for a critical two-day NATO summit, the bloc finds itself at an unprecedented crossroads, driven by a shifting U.S. security posture that has shaken long-standing trans-Atlantic trust. U.S. President Donald Trump’s opening demand for “loyalty” from alliance members has set a tense tone for the gathering, coming after several NATO partners refused to grant American forces access to their domestic military bases for strikes targeting Iran amid the ongoing regional conflict sparked by the U.S.-Israel war. Trump has publicly singled out major European powers — Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Spain — for criticism over their reluctance to back U.S. military action in the Middle East, deepening divisions ahead of formal talks.

    Ordinarily, a NATO summit serves as a highly symbolic showcase of shared commitment to collective defense, reaffirming the core Article 5 pledge that an attack on one member is an attack on all. This year, however, the trans-Atlantic bond is more fragile than it has been in decades, as the U.S. pulls back from its decades-long role as the primary security guarantor for Europe. The summit has been framed around the official theme of “a stronger Europe in a stronger NATO,” with the Trump administration pushing for a sweeping overhaul it has dubbed “NATO 3.0” — though the full details and implications of this restructuring remain unclear, with delegates hoping to hash out concrete plans over the course of the two-day meeting.

    Hosting the event is Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has welcomed leaders to his sprawling Bestepe Presidential Compound on the outskirts of Ankara. In preparation for the summit, Turkish authorities completed a high-profile conversion of an old military airfield into a new commercial airport specifically to accommodate visiting delegations, and have implemented unprecedented security measures across the capital. Air defense systems are on high alert, tens of thousands of police officers have been deployed to duty, adjacent residential neighborhoods have been closed to civilian traffic, and some public sector workers have been granted time off to keep key transport corridors clear. All public gatherings in the area have been banned, and pre-summit security sweeps have resulted in more than a dozen detentions — including two working journalists, according to the Turkish Journalists Association.

    The summit’s official schedule brings together a wide range of global partners beyond the alliance’s 32 member states. On Tuesday evening, Erdogan will host a formal dinner in his compound’s “Winter Garden,” with top officials from Indo-Pacific partners Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand in attendance, alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Parallel to the dinner, foreign ministers will convene the newly established NATO-Ukraine Council, while defense ministers will hold separate talks with their Indo-Pacific counterparts. An additional working session with officials from Gulf Arab states is also planned, and Trump is scheduled to hold a one-on-one meeting with Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa. The only closed working session for NATO heads of state alone will take place on Wednesday morning, scheduled to last just three hours, with a short public summary of outcomes expected immediately after the meeting concludes.

    Two core issues top the formal summit agenda, starting with defense spending — a long-running point of friction between the U.S. and its European allies, where Washington has consistently pressured partners to increase their military investments. Ahead of the gathering, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte highlighted that European allies and Canada increased their collective defense spending by 20% in 2025, marking one of the largest annual jumps in modern alliance history. Even so, this progress is not expected to satisfy the Trump administration, after leaders committed at the last summit to match U.S. defense spending levels as a share of gross domestic product. The 2026 U.S. military budget totals $901 billion, equal to roughly 3.3% of U.S. GDP — a target most European allies remain far from meeting.

    Beyond spending targets, NATO is aiming to showcase progress on modernizing its military capabilities, converting the billions in new public investment into cutting-edge military equipment adapted to 21st-century warfare. A dedicated defense industry forum will be held on the summit’s sidelines on Tuesday, bringing together senior alliance officials and industry leaders to accelerate weapons production and drive innovation in emerging defense technologies. The second top formal agenda item is ongoing military and humanitarian support for Ukraine, which is now entering its fifth year of full-scale war against Russian invasion. European allies and Canada currently cover the vast majority of Ukraine’s defense needs, including approximately 90% of the country’s national air defense systems.

    Despite the formal agenda, most of the behind-the-scenes debate is expected to center on two unaddressed tensions: the future of U.S. troop levels in Europe, and the escalating regional fallout from the war between Israel and Iran. European allies and Canada have been repeatedly caught off guard by Trump’s sudden announcements of troop cuts over the past 18 months, and are seeking clear reassurance about Washington’s long-term security commitment to the continent. Just ahead of the summit, the Pentagon surprised allies by announcing a six-month review of the entire U.S. military presence in Europe, which will assess both European progress toward self-defense and whether the U.S. retains full, unimpeded access to military bases and overflight rights across the alliance.

    NATO as an institution has not taken an active role in the ongoing war against Iran, and the alliance has no collective agreement with the U.S. on shared use of member bases or airspace, even though individual members have reached bilateral arrangements with Washington. At a joint public appearance with Rutte on June 24, Trump doubled down on his criticism of allied reluctance to join the U.S. campaign, telling reporters “We don’t need their money — we don’t need anything. I just want loyalty.” The demand has left many alliance members confused: NATO’s founding treaty already enshrines equal commitment to collective security through Article 5, the core mutual defense guarantee that forms the foundation of the entire organization. What additional terms of loyalty the U.S. president is seeking remains undetermined, leaving allies to navigate a summit defined more by uncertainty than shared purpose.

  • Democrat in key US Senate race denies sex assault claim

    Democrat in key US Senate race denies sex assault claim

    A high-stakes U.S. Senate race in Maine has been upended by a fresh sexual assault allegation against Democratic nominee Graham Platner, a political outsider whose unorthodox campaign has already been marked by repeated controversies. Platner, who has drawn comparisons to former President Donald Trump for his insurgent, anti-establishment political rise, issued a public denial of the claim on Monday, warning the accusation could derail Democrats’ top-tier opportunity to flip a Republican-held Senate seat this November.

    The allegation was first reported by Politico, which detailed the account of Jenny Racicot, a 41-year-old Maine resident and former romantic partner of Platner. According to Racicot’s account, Platner forced her to engage in sexual activity against her repeated objections during an incident in late 2021. She further claimed that Platner arrived at her rural Maine home uninvited, heavily intoxicated, before assaulting her.

    A Marine veteran and commercial oysterman who entered politics as a complete newcomer, Platner secured the Democratic nomination last month after an upset primary victory. In a video statement posted to the social platform X shortly after Politico published its report, Platner pushed back forcefully against the claim. “These allegations are troubling, serious and false,” he said, adding that his campaign’s core goals — defeating four-decade incumbent Republican Susan Collins and representing the people of Maine — remain unchanged. Still, he acknowledged the political damage the accusation will cause, noting that his campaign is pausing to assess the best path forward moving forward.

    The timing of the allegation could not be worse for national Democrats, who have identified Maine as one of their most critical battlegrounds in their push to retake majority control of the U.S. Senate in the 2026 midterm elections. Collins, a six-term incumbent and one of the last remaining moderate Republicans in Congress, has long been top of the Democratic Party’s target list for the 2026 cycle.

    Platner’s primary win was celebrated by progressive and anti-establishment Democrats, who saw his victory as confirmation that a blunt, unapologetic rejection of mainstream political norms resonates with voters frustrated by decades of incremental, establishment-led policy. However, the nominee has long worried moderate Democrats, who have raised repeated concerns about his extensive personal baggage and its potential to alienate the independent and moderate voters who typically decide general election outcomes in Maine.

    This latest allegation is not the first controversy to plague Platner’s campaign. Prior to the primary, he faced public scrutiny over offensive old online comments, sexually explicit messages leaked to the press, and a past tattoo that resembled a Nazi symbolic emblem, which he later covered up. Multiple previous allegations of mistreatment of former romantic partners have also circulated throughout the campaign.

    Platner has openly spoken about his past struggles with undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from his military service and alcohol addiction, but he has consistently denied ever physically harming former partners. His most loyal supporters frame his well-documented personal struggles and past mistakes as part of a broader public redemption story, arguing that his unpolished authenticity is what makes him appealing to fed-up voters, in contrast to career politicians like Collins.

  • Maine senate candidate asked to drop out of race over sexual assault allegation

    Maine senate candidate asked to drop out of race over sexual assault allegation

    A high-stakes U.S. Senate race in Maine has been thrown into chaos following a new sexual assault allegation against Democratic nominee Graham Platner, prompting top party figures and national Democratic leaders to publicly demand he exit the contest ahead of November’s pivotal midterm elections. The accuser, 41-year-old Jenny Racicot, shared detailed allegations in a series of interviews with Politico published Monday, marking the most serious claim to emerge against Platner in a growing string of controversies that have roiled his campaign over recent weeks.

    Racicot told Politico she had an on-again, off-again romantic relationship with Platner spanning more than two years before the alleged 202X incident. According to her account, Platner entered her Maine home uninvited while heavily intoxicated and assaulted her sexually. After she explicitly told him the encounter was non-consensual, Racicot said she cut off all contact with him permanently.

    Racicot was originally among the women interviewed for an earlier New York Times report published ahead of Maine’s Democratic primary, where three former girlfriends accused Platner of patterns of erratic and aggressive behavior. She chose not to go public with her assault claim at that time, explaining she did not want to be publicly identified as a rape victim. But after widespread public controversy surrounding the Times’ initial reporting, Racicot said she felt compelled to share her full account publicly.

    Platner, a former combat Marine and commercial oyster farmer who won the Democratic nomination to challenge four-decade incumbent Republican Senator Susan Collins, has forcefully denied the sexual assault allegation, calling it “categorically false.” Despite the denial, he acknowledged in a social media video statement released hours after Politico published the report that he is pausing to evaluate his political future. “Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting, but mindful the political reality it will inflict, we are taking the time to reflect on the best path forward for the state that I love, the people that I love, the movement I belong to and the goal of defeating Susan Collins,” he said. In the days following the report, Platner’s campaign has postponed all public events scheduled for this week, and the BBC confirmed it has reached out to his team for additional comment with no further response as of press time.

    This latest allegation is far from the first controversy to upend Platner’s campaign. Earlier this year, reports emerged of a chest tattoo he received in 2007 while drinking with fellow Marines in Croatia that closely resembled the Totenkopf, or death’s head symbol used by Nazi SS forces during World War Two. Platner later said he had the tattoo removed after recognizing the problematic resemblance. Old Reddit posts from 14 years ago were also unearthed, in which Platner argued sexual assault victims should “take some responsibility for themselves” and avoid excessive intoxication. Platner later apologized for the comment, asking voters to judge him by his current character rather than a decade-old offhand remark. Most recently, reports that Platner exchanged sexually explicit messages with women outside his marriage were published, which Platner acknowledged were true, saying he had made mistakes early in his marriage that he and his wife had since worked through together.

    In the wake of Monday’s new sexual assault allegations, prominent Democrats across the country have rapidly withdrawn their endorsements and called for Platner to drop out of the race immediately. Former Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile wrote on the social platform X that “It’s time for Mr. Platner to step aside and be replaced by July 13th. Platner needs time to heal, focus on his family and well-being. Enough. Enough.” U.S. Representatives Ruben Gallego and Ro Khanna, both fellow Democrats, also pulled their support, with Khanna saying “the report [is] serious and credible… Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.” Even the Maine Democratic Party, the official state organization that backed Platner’s nomination, issued a statement calling for his withdrawal. “Over the past several weeks, multiple women have made serious, credible allegations against Graham Platner. Today’s statements take those allegations even further,” the party’s leadership said. “Maine Democratic Party leadership is calling on Graham Platner to withdraw as the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate.”

    The Maine Senate race is widely viewed as one of the most critical pickup opportunities for Democrats as they mount an uphill longshot bid to flip control of the U.S. Senate from Republicans in the 2024 midterm elections. Collins, the Republican incumbent, has held her seat for nearly 30 years and repeatedly fended off Democratic challenges, even as Maine has not backed a Republican presidential candidate since 1988. A Platner withdrawal would force the Maine Democratic Party to nominate a replacement candidate in less than a week, per party deadlines, putting their bid to unseat Collins in serious jeopardy just months before voting begins.

  • Canada makes largest defence procurement deal in its history, citing ‘dangerous and divided world’

    Canada makes largest defence procurement deal in its history, citing ‘dangerous and divided world’

    Just days ahead of a critical NATO summit in Turkey, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced one of the most consequential defence investments in the nation’s modern history: a massive contract to build a new 12-vessel submarine fleet awarded to German defence firm Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems (TKMS), the world’s leading builder of non-nuclear submarines.

    The deal marks the largest military procurement in Canadian history, and forms a core pillar of Carney’s sweeping pledge to ramp up national defence spending. Since taking office, Carney has already lifted Canada’s defence expenditure to 2% of national GDP, with a binding commitment to hit 5% by 2035 – a target that aligns with longstanding pressure from NATO, and more recently from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who has pushed all 32 alliance members to boost their military investment. The timing of the announcement, delivered on Monday in Halifax, Nova Scotia, puts Carney in a strong position to demonstrate Canada’s commitment to collective defence when he meets with other NATO leaders this week.

    Canada’s need for a new submarine fleet has grown increasingly urgent in recent years. The country’s current aging Victoria-class vessels, purchased in 1998, are in a state of severe disrepair: official government data confirms only one out of the four existing submarines is currently seaworthy. For a nation that boasts the longest coastline on the planet, shifting geopolitical and environmental conditions have amplified security risks dramatically: rapid climate change is melting Arctic sea ice, opening new navigable waterways that create potential flashpoints for adversarial activity and threaten Canadian sovereignty over its northern territories.

    TKMS beat out South Korea’s Hanwha Ocean in a competitive bidding process to secure the contract. The German bid is structured as a joint partnership with Norway, which TKMS says offers Canada a low-risk, NATO-aligned solution that includes shared provisions for maintenance, training, logistics, and operations. Unlike Canada’s current fleet, the new conventionally-powered submarines will be purpose-built with advanced under-ice operational capabilities, tailored to meet the unique security challenges of the Arctic.

    While the federal government has not publicly released a full cost estimate for the project, officials confirmed negotiations to finalize the formal contract will now launch, a process expected to take several months. Beyond just military capability, Carney emphasized that the investment will drive long-term domestic economic growth, noting the project will build and expand sustainable Canadian industrial capacity in the defence and shipbuilding sectors.

    The procurement project moves at an unprecedented pace for Canadian defence policy. Canada first launched the search for a contractor to replace its aging fleet in July 2024, with Carney pledging to select a winning bidder by June 2025 – a timeline that analysts describe as remarkably fast by Canadian standards. David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, called the timely selection a major win for Carney’s government, saying the contract delivers significant credibility to the prime minister’s promise to accelerate and expand defence spending.

    Perry noted that the decision to award the contract to a German firm also aligns with Carney’s broader geopolitical strategy. As Canada navigates growing trade tensions with its southern neighbor and longstanding ally the United States, Carney has actively prioritized strengthening economic and security partnerships with Europe. “This project will push our core defence modernization forward consequentially,” Perry explained, adding that the new fleet will transform Canada’s maritime operational capacity. Once completed, the fleet is expected to maintain three reliably operational submarines at any given time – a massive upgrade from the current status of just one occasionally operational vessel, which has been Canada’s reality for years.

    In a statement ahead of the announcement, Carney framed the investment as a necessary response to an increasingly unstable global environment. “In a more dangerous and divided world, Canada must be prepared to defend our interests, protect our citizens, build our economy, and secure our future,” he said. “To that end, we are making the largest defence procurement in our nation’s history with speed, ambition, and discipline.” Canadian federal officials have reaffirmed that the new submarine fleet is an critical investment to protect the country’s maritime sovereignty and national security across its vast territorial waters, particularly in the fast-changing Arctic region.

  • France’s Marine Le Pen, who brought hard-right National Rally to cusp of electoral success

    France’s Marine Le Pen, who brought hard-right National Rally to cusp of electoral success

    As France’s right-wing nationalist figurehead Marine Le Pen awaits a key verdict from a Paris appeals court this Tuesday, the future of her decades-long political career hangs in the balance. Should the court rule to bar her from running in the 2027 French presidential election, it would bring an abrupt close to a political journey that has reshaped the country’s far-right landscape for a generation.

    In a gathering with supporters over the weekend in Liévin, located in the heart of her Pas-de-Calais constituency, the 57-year-old leader made clear her plan if the ruling goes against her: if barred from seeking the presidency, she will step back and throw her full support behind her hand-picked protégé, current National Rally head Jordan Bardella. Observers who attended the event noted that the moment carried the quiet air of a planned leadership transition, even as Le Pen and Bardella publicly presented a united front ahead of the verdict.

    Le Pen’s path to this crossroads stretches back more than half a century, rooted in the legacy of her father Jean-Marie Le Pen, who founded the original National Front (FN), the predecessor to today’s National Rally, in the 1970s. Her first brush with the dangers of her family’s political life came at just 8 years old, when a bomb destroyed the Le Pens’ central Paris apartment in 1976. Though Marine and her two elder sisters escaped with only minor injuries, the attack was a formative “night of horror,” as she later described it, that cemented her awareness of her father’s place in French politics.

    Eight years later, her family fractured when her mother left the household to live with her father’s biographer, later posing for *Playboy* magazine. All three sisters stood by their father, but it was the youngest, Marine, who would go on to inherit his political mantle. She once reflected in a 2004 television interview: “You’re born Le Pen’s daughter, you die Le Pen’s daughter. He’s the man of my life. He’s made me the woman I am.”

    By the early 1990s, Le Pen had graduated from law school in Paris and launched her formal political career. Her family name led to boycotts from fellow legal professionals, pushing her to focus full-time on party work within the National Front. She rose steadily through the ranks: becoming vice-president of the party in 2003, winning a seat in the European Parliament in 2004, and finally taking the party’s top leadership from her father in 2011, nine years after he reached his own political peak by advancing to the 2002 presidential runoff against Jacques Chirac.

    Once in charge, Le Pen set out on a deliberate mission to de-demonize the party her father built, working to distance it from the overt racism and antisemitism that had long defined the FN’s public image. She expelled Jean-Marie Le Pen from the party in 2015 to solidify this shift, a move that sparked a bitter family feud; after her father’s death last year, she acknowledged she would “never forgive myself for this decision, because I know it caused him immense pain.” She completed the rebrand in 2018, renaming the FN the National Rally, repositioning the once-fringe movement as a mainstream political contender while retaining its core anti-immigration platform focused on prioritizing French nationals for housing, jobs, and social benefits.

    Le Pen’s own electoral record reflects the party’s growing popularity: she placed third in the 2012 presidential race, then advanced to the runoff twice, losing to incumbent Emmanuel Macron in both 2017 and 2022. With Macron constitutionally barred from seeking a third term in 2027, Le Pen currently leads early polling for the race, positioning 2027 as her strongest ever shot at the Élysée Palace.

    But the legal conviction that led to this week’s appeal stems from a 2024 ruling that found Le Pen played a “central role” in a scheme that diverted €1.4 million (£1.2 million) in European Parliament public funds to pay unqualified National Rally party assistants. She has rejected the charges, but a disqualification from running would end her presidential bid before it formally begins.

    Le Pen’s political career has also been marked by controversial ties to the Kremlin. Decades ago, when major French banks refused to lend to the far-right party due to its history of bigotry, the National Rally turned for financing to a Russian-Czech bank linked to the Kremlin — a deal struck the same year Vladimir Putin illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Le Pen openly praised Putin for years, met him at the Kremlin ahead of the 2017 election, and infamously told the BBC on the eve of the 2022 full-scale invasion that she did not believe Russia would attack Ukraine, though she later voiced support for Ukrainian sovereignty. That handshake photo with Putin has repeatedly come back to undermine her credibility with centrist voters.

    Outside of politics, Le Pen holds a professional certification in cat breeding, a hobby she has long said could be a post-political life. After suffering a regional election defeat in 2015, she told *Le Parisien* she could easily “stop everything, do something else — breed cats for example.” She earned her official breeding diploma five years later, once even earned a small side income from the venture, and was most recently spotted carrying a kitten in a pet carrier during a visit to the prime minister’s official residence in 2025. Yet for many observers, it is hard to imagine Le Pen stepping fully away from the political sphere she has inhabited since childhood.

    As the country waits for the court’s ruling, one thing is clear: whatever the outcome, the next chapter of French right-wing politics will likely be led by a new generation, with Jordan Bardella waiting in the wings to carry forward the movement Le Pen built.

  • Jordan Bardella: The ‘blank canvas’ who could be France’s youngest president

    Jordan Bardella: The ‘blank canvas’ who could be France’s youngest president

    At 30 years old, Jordan Bardella, the current president of France’s far-right National Rally (RN), stands on the cusp of a historic political breakthrough: he could become the youngest head of state in modern French history, and the first hard-right leader to occupy the Elysee Palace, if a pending court ruling bars party figurehead Marine Le Pen from running in the 2027 presidential election. The upcoming Tuesday verdict on Le Pen’s appeal trial will decide whether she retains her ban from running for public office, opening the door for Bardella to step in as the RN’s nominee. With the party holding a commanding lead in national polls and Bardella posting strong 40% approval ratings, political observers now consider a presidential victory in 2027 a plausible outcome.

    Bardella’s path to this moment began in the working-class Paris suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis, where he was raised by his Italian immigrant single mother, who often struggled to cover household expenses. While his father – also of Italian descent – owned a successful drinks distribution business in the more affluent town of Montmorency, a detail that softens the narrative of extreme working-class hardship Bardella often cites on the campaign trail, his background reflects a side of France far removed from the traditional elite that has long dominated the country’s politics. As a teen, Bardella even felt self-conscious about his non-traditional name, which stood out among the aristocratic, classic names common among the French political class.

    Bardella joined the then-National Front (FN), the RN’s predecessor, at age 17 in 2012, after convincing his initially reluctant mother to approve the move. He dropped out of university to pursue politics full-time, climbing the party ranks at a meteoric pace: he became a local departmental secretary at 19, a regional councillor for the Paris region at 20, the RN’s national spokesperson in 2017, and one of the youngest Members of the European Parliament in 2019. By 27, he had been elected president of the RN, taking the reins of the party Le Pen had remade from a fringe extremist movement into a mainstream political force.

    Bardella has long cited Le Pen as his core inspiration for joining the party, praising her unique courage, energy and political vision. That admiration quickly became mutual: Le Pen took the young rising star under her wing, elevating him to the party’s inner circle just years after he joined. In 2024, Bardella led the RN to a 33% first-place finish in snap parliamentary elections, falling just short of capturing the prime minister’s office when a center-left alliance secured a second-round victory. Despite that narrow loss, his popularity has remained robust ever since, matching Le Pen’s own steady 39% approval rating.

    Political analysts and sociologists who study the RN attribute Bardella’s broad electoral appeal to his unique ability to connect with disparate voter groups. Described by sociologist Raphael Llorca as an “incredible blank canvas,” Bardella lets different voter segments project their own ideal candidate onto him. He retains old-school RN supporters by leaning into the party’s core anti-immigration and populist platform, while courting young voters through active social media outreach, where he boasts two million followers. He balances a glamorous public profile from his relationship with Italian socialite Princess Maria Carolina of Bourbon-TTwo Sicilies with constant references to his modest upbringing to connect with working-class voters. For business leaders, he promises to cut burdensome fiscal and regulatory rules; for Eurosceptics, he pledges to renegotiate France’s EU membership terms, while reassuring moderate voters he has no intention of leaving the bloc entirely.

    Though he has carefully cultivated this adaptable public image, Bardella has rarely deviated from core RN policy, especially on the party’s signature issue of immigration. He has called for cutting social benefits for immigrants, ending birthright citizenship, and has promised that his first act as president would be to hold a national referendum on immigration to “take back control” of France’s borders. Critics have noted that the French constitution does not permit referendums on immigration, meaning the policy would require a lengthy constitutional amendment that would need broad parliamentary support to pass.

    On European policy, Bardella has abandoned the RN’s old demand for a full French exit from the EU and the euro, but has described the bloc as “profoundly old-fashioned” and “obsolete.” He has pledged to cut France’s EU budget contribution by half – a total of €10 billion – and renegotiate the EU electricity market’s price-setting rules to lower consumer energy bills. On foreign policy, he has promised to withdraw France from NATO’s integrated military command after the end of the war in Ukraine, rejected Emmanuel Macron’s proposal to extend France’s nuclear deterrence to European allies as a potential “national betrayal”, and has built close ties with other European nationalist leaders including Italy’s Giorgia Meloni – who he calls a personal role model – and Poland’s PiS opposition, with the goal of building a large nationalist bloc in the European Parliament.

    As the nation waits for Tuesday’s court ruling on Le Pen’s eligibility, Bardella has navigated a careful political balancing act, positioning himself as ready to assume the presidential nomination while vowing to stand aside if Le Pen is cleared to run. Speaking ahead of the verdict, he said he was “calm and ready to accept the consequences.” Whatever the ruling brings, the 30-year-old politician has already reshaped modern French politics, and a 2027 presidential victory would cement the most dramatic political shift in the country’s modern history.

  • Canada selects Germany’s ThyssenKrupp to build submarine fleet as it boosts NATO spending

    Canada selects Germany’s ThyssenKrupp to build submarine fleet as it boosts NATO spending

    TORONTO – In a landmark move that reshapes Canada’s defense capabilities and aligns with its new pledges to ramp up NATO-aligned military spending, the Canadian government announced Monday that Germany’s ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems (TKMS) has been chosen as the preferred supplier for a planned fleet of up to 12 new conventionally powered submarines. Marking the largest military procurement initiative in Canadian history, the decision comes just days before Prime Minister Mark Carney’s attendance at this week’s NATO summit, where alliance leaders are set to face growing pressure to back pledges for higher defense investment with concrete, actionable policy plans.

  • Trump, Turkey and Nato: What’s at stake at the Ankara summit?

    Trump, Turkey and Nato: What’s at stake at the Ankara summit?

    A pivotal NATO summit convening this week in Ankara, Turkey, stands poised to reshape the 75-year-old transatlantic alliance’s strategic direction, as leaders gather to address a planned drawdown of United States military forces in Europe and chart a course for the bloc’s next evolution, dubbed NATO 3.0.

    US President Donald Trump is set to join alliance heads of state and government in the Turkish capital, where tensions are already expected to emerge over negotiations to shrink America’s long-standing military footprint on the continent. Ahead of the high-stakes gathering, Turkish authorities have launched a sweeping effort to spruce up Ankara: city workers have planted thousands of decorative flowers, resurfaced damaged arterial roads, and erected large fabric banners to cover aging, poorly maintained structures that line major summit routes. Starting Tuesday, the city will implement a two-day partial lockdown to secure the event, and security officials have detained dozens of people they identify as potential protest organizers, including members of left-wing groups, environmental activists, and pro-Palestinian demonstrators, to prevent unplanned disruptions described by officials as “public nuisances.”

    For the Turkish government, the summit represents far more than a security meeting: it is a high-profile global marketing opportunity to tie Turkey’s booming domestic defense industry to Western supply chains and highlight the country’s growing industrial capabilities. Turkey has rapidly expanded its defense manufacturing footprint in recent years, emerging as a leading global exporter of armed drones, advanced ammunition, and naval vessels, with defense exports projected to hit $10 billion in 2025. Ankara’s existing alignment with NATO’s industrial standards also positions the country to capitalize on any expansion of the alliance’s European defense output, a factor that has softened criticism from Western allies of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s increasingly hardline crackdown on domestic political opposition. European leaders have opted to set aside concerns over democratic backsliding in Turkey in exchange for Ankara’s commitment to contribute troops from NATO’s second-largest standing military (second only to the United States) and help jumpstart a continent-wide revival of European defense production.

    The summit’s central agenda item revolves around the alliance’s new strategic framework, already labeled NATO 3.0 by alliance insiders. The concept builds on two prior eras of alliance adaptation: the post-Cold War restructuring that defined the original NATO 1.0, and the shift to counter-terrorism readiness that followed the September 11 attacks, known as NATO 2.0. The updated framework prioritizes three core goals: upgrading allied military capabilities, modernizing cross-bloc defense industrial infrastructure, and redistributing the burden of collective defense as the United States reorients its global military focus toward countering China.

    The Pentagon has already announced a six-month review to determine which conventional forces, aircraft, and capabilities it will withdraw from European bases. While the full details of the drawdown have not been made public, anonymous military sources shared specifics with Reuters outlining steep cuts to US assets allocated to NATO: the number of F-15 and F-15E fighter jets available to the alliance will drop by a third to 99, the fleet of MQ-4 and MQ-9 Reaper surveillance and strike drones will be halved to 12, KC-135 and KC-46 refueling aircraft will be reduced from 79 to 63, and only one strategic bomber and one aircraft carrier will be assigned to NATO operations, down from the prior commitment of two each.

    Despite the reductions, NATO’s top commander, US Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, confirmed last week that European allies have already moved to fill nearly all the capability gaps left by the US drawdown. Multiple European diplomats told Middle East Eye that the summit will formalize a strengthening of NATO’s European pillar, with member states set to pledge deeper industrial cooperation, expanded weapons production, and increased operational commitments to the alliance.

    Long-time European affairs journalist Guldener Sonumut, based in Turkey, notes that the shift will require structural changes to NATO’s command architecture. As the US steps back from conventional defense responsibilities, those roles will increasingly fall to European allies and Canada, while Washington retains control over strategic command and core planning functions. “This will require changes in Nato’s command structure, with the US retaining strategic command and planning leadership while Europeans take on more operational responsibilities,” Sonumut wrote in a weekend column.

    The summit also marks a turning point for the alliance’s defense industrial cooperation. NATO’s long-standing Standardisation Agreements (Stanag) are expected to remain the central governing framework for allied military equipment, a move that blocks the European Union from developing separate, standalone defense standards. The outcome is a major win for Turkey’s growing defense sector, which already designs and manufactures all its military hardware to meet NATO Stanag requirements. A dedicated defense-industry forum will be held on the summit’s opening day, where dozens of multinational defense cooperation agreements are set to be signed, covering sectors from multidomain operational capabilities to space-based intelligence gathering.

    Yahya Bostan, a columnist for Turkish daily Yeni Safak, argued last week that years of debate between Turkey and European powers over Ankara’s place in a post-US drawdown European security architecture have ended with a clear consensus: Turkey’s role remains firmly within the NATO alliance. Instead of building a new independent security framework, Bostan says European nations will instead increase defense spending and deepen collaboration under the NATO umbrella alongside Turkey.

    On the nuclear security front, analysts expect the US to reaffirm its role as the alliance’s primary nuclear security guarantor, potentially expanding the number of NATO member states allowed to host dual-capable weapons systems — platforms that can deploy both conventional and nuclear warheads. Currently, only five NATO allies, including Turkey, are permitted to host such systems, and Finland’s parliament has already passed legislation to approve hosting the weapons, clearing the way for its inclusion in the expanded scheme.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte framed the summit’s collaborative vision in a joint op-ed published over the weekend in *The Economist*. “This is a true endeavour on both sides of the Atlantic. Our defences are unmatched when we leverage assets, expertise and innovative capabilities from California to Kyiv, Copenhagen to Warsaw, Oslo to Ankara,” they wrote. “The only way to get there is through co-operation: combining the efforts of countries and industries, allies and partners.” Off the record, European diplomats have already acknowledged Erdogan’s key role in convincing Trump to attend the summit in Ankara, and say they are counting on the Turkish leader to reinforce the value of continued US engagement with the alliance for the Trump administration.

  • Mourning and celebration collide as Iran, US both claim victory

    Mourning and celebration collide as Iran, US both claim victory

    In a striking convergence of historical moments, two defining global events unfolded in the same week: the long-awaited burial of Iran’s slain supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the United States’ 250th anniversary of national independence. Against a backdrop of a fragile 60-day ceasefire that paused a bitter US-Israeli initiated war to open negotiations for a permanent peace deal, both sides have leveraged their respective commemorative events to lay claim to victory in the conflict.

    Khamenei was deliberately targeted and killed in a US-Israeli airstrike on the very first day of the war, February 28. Islamic tradition requires prompt burial of the deceased, often within a day of death, but Khamenei’s remains were preserved for more than four months. Sustained US-Israeli bombardment across Iran made large-scale public commemorative gatherings impossible, forcing Iranian authorities to delay the farewell ceremony until the security environment allowed for a fitting tribute.

    Iran’s Islamic government aimed to push back against the invading force before holding a formal, elaborate state burial. An intermittent ceasefire took effect on April 8, which could have allowed for an earlier service – an event that would have carried the same level of security risk as the ceremony held this week, making the deliberate timing clear.

    The alignment of Khamenei’s burial with the US’ high-profile independence jubilee is no random coincidence, according to regional analysts. While some dismiss the overlap as accidental, a far more plausible reading frames the timing as a calculated move by Iran’s leadership to draw global attention away from the US celebration and assert the Islamic Republic’s continued relevance on the world stage.

    Iran’s new post-Khamenei leadership, headed by Khamenei’s son Mujtaba – who has remained out of public view after reportedly being wounded in the strike that killed his father – was fully aware of months of public planning for the US anniversary. US President Donald Trump, who partnered with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to launch the offensive against Iran, has spent months hyping the 250th independence celebration, promising to showcase what he calls America’s “Golden Age”. He used the event to once again formally claim total victory in the war against Iran.

    The evidence strongly suggests Tehran deliberately scheduled Khamenei’s burial to counter the US festivities. Iranian officials choreographed the mourning events to draw mass public participation and welcome dozens of foreign political and religious delegations from allied and friendly nations across the globe, a turnout that overshadowed much of the US celebration.

    The ceremony also honored Khamenei’s four decades of uncompromising rule as a marja, a leading source of emulation within the Shia Islamic religious hierarchy. Beyond honoring the late leader, the overlapping events sent a series of clear messages to both domestic and international audiences:
    – The Islamic Republic has survived a full-scale foreign invasion and emerged more unified and stronger than it was before the outbreak of war
    – The Iranian regime is far less unpopular and internationally isolated than the US and Israel, its main adversaries, have repeatedly claimed
    – The republic retains the resilience and capability to defend itself against both internal unrest and foreign military aggression
    – The Iranian government remains steadfast in its opposition to its enemies, and positions itself as the ultimate victor in the recent conflict

    The massive public turnout for mourning processions and the large number of foreign delegations in attendance even caught US leadership off guard: Trump had previously claimed that the Iranian people “hated” the former supreme leader, and did not anticipate the scale of public and international support on display.

    Going forward, Khamenei will be enshrined in Iranian history as a transformative religious authority, political thinker, and leader who built the Islamic Republic into a formidable, defensible regional power. While the Islamic system remains firmly entrenched in Iran, observers warn that urgent structural reform remains an unaddressed priority. Widespread public demands for expanded political and social freedoms, and improved economic living conditions, have not faded – instead, these grievances simmer beneath the surface of post-war unity.

    Uncertainty also hangs over the ongoing US-Iran negotiations, and the future political and economic trajectory of the country. If the two sides manage to reach a lasting comprehensive settlement that resolves core disputes – including Iran’s nuclear program, security in the Strait of Hormuz, the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, the lifting of international sanctions, the unfreezing of Iranian sovereign assets, and the reintegration of Iran’s economy into the global market – it would create space for the Iranian government to address longstanding public demands.

    Iran’s new President Masoud Pezeshkian and National Assembly Speaker Bagher Ghalibaf have both publicly signaled a willingness to pursue reform and change. However, the most powerful political actor to watch remains the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which gained additional influence after the war thanks to its new control over the Strait of Hormuz, granting the group expanded veto power over major domestic and foreign policy decisions.

    For the moment, both Tehran and Washington can each claim a symbolic victory from their dueling, simultaneously held commemorative events. But the permanent agreement that negotiators work toward in the coming weeks will carry profound, long-lasting consequences for both nations, and for global security and stability.

    This analysis is from Amin Saikal, emeritus professor of Middle Eastern Studies at the Australian National University, The University of Western Australia, and Victoria University.