分类: politics

  • NATO allies’ war game tests response to Russia and to US support

    NATO allies’ war game tests response to Russia and to US support

    On the strategically vital Baltic island of Gotland, a newly inducted NATO member Sweden is running large-scale military wargames designed to prepare for a growing threat along the alliance’s eastern frontier — with an unusual and telling addition: Ukrainian military advisors sharing hard-won battlefield expertise in modern drone warfare. The Associated Press was granted exclusive access to the exercise, which comes at a moment of dual uncertainty for transatlantic security: mounting Russian hybrid aggression across Europe, and growing questions about the reliability of the United States, NATO’s long-standing military powerhouse, under the second Trump administration.

    The wargame scenario crafted by Swedish military planners imagines a hypothetical incursion and sustained hybrid campaign against Gotland, where enemy sabotage has triggered widespread power outages and crippling food shortages. Crucially, the exercise is designed to test alliance coordination before NATO’s Article 5 collective defense clause — which triggers an automatic mutual defense response for all members — is ever invoked. “In theory, it could happen tomorrow,” Rear Adm. Jonas Wikström, the exercise director, told the AP.

    For months, multiple intelligence assessments and an AP investigation have documented a sharp ramp-up in Russian hybrid operations across Europe, including coordinated cyberattacks targeting critical civilian infrastructure, widespread disinformation campaigns to destabilize allied governments, and covert sabotage operations. The wargames held this week on Gotland are a direct response to this growing risk, with U.S. troops joining Swedish forces to practice coordinated responses.

    Uncertainty over U.S. commitment to the alliance hangs heavily over the exercise. Since returning to the White House in January 2025, President Donald Trump has repeatedly cast doubt on NATO’s value, once calling the bloc a “paper tiger.” Most recently, Trump ordered the withdrawal of at least 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany, and has openly threatened to pull thousands more troops out of Europe. The administration has also shifted U.S. air defense systems and missiles from European deployments to the Middle East amid tensions with Iran, leaving noticeable gaps in regional air defense capabilities, and multiple European allies have reported significant delays to their scheduled orders for U.S.-manufactured weapons. Trump has also paused U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine, and has repeatedly aligned with Russian positions in negotiations to end the ongoing war.

    Sweden’s chief of defense, Gen. Michael Claesson, acknowledged that shifts in U.S. military posture reshape alliance dynamics. “The U.S. is Europe’s most militarily capable ally so any change in the American presence affects the overall dynamics,” he told the AP, noting that public announcements of troop cuts are often misinterpreted as a full American withdrawal from the continent. While Claesson denied that recent initiatives — including a planned hybrid joint navy combining Nordic, Baltic, British, and Dutch forces, and a separate combined frigate fleet from the U.K. and Norway — were a deliberate hedge against a future U.S. withdrawal from alliance commitments, he added that “everything that offers European allies freedom of action is good.”

    One of the most valuable contributions to the wargames came from the contingent of Ukrainian drone pilots, who brought firsthand experience from three years of frontline combat against Russian forces. Invited to train Western troops on the evolving tactics of modern drone warfare, the Ukrainian advisors soundly defeated Swedish ground forces in a practical training drill, a 24-year-old Ukrainian drone pilot who goes by the call sign Tarik told the AP. “They stopped the training three times” for Swedish troops to rework their tactics, Tarik said. “If it were real life they would have been dead.”

    Another Ukrainian pilot, call sign Karat, explained that Western forces lack the on-the-ground understanding of frontline drone operations that Ukraine has developed through trial by fire. Karat, who flies small first-person-view attack drones against Russian positions, noted that many operations rely on improvisation, with pilots sometimes operating without reconnaissance support. “You need to see this with your own eyes,” he said, adding that Swedish troops have strong foundational skills but need to improve their drone hardware, update their tactical doctrine, and help senior commanders build a deeper understanding of how drone warfare changes modern battlefields.

    Alliance military leaders agree that Ukraine’s hard-won expertise is urgently needed across NATO. In recent months, the border between Russia and NATO has seen a sharp rise in unauthorized drone incursions, many of them Ukrainian drones that were jammed and redirected off course by Russian electronic warfare systems. “What they’ve taught us is you have to really focus on your survivability and how you can’t be detected,” said Brig. Gen. Curtis King, the U.S. military lead for the exercise. King added that Western forces also need to invest in long-range detection capabilities to spot incoming drones before they can reach their targets. A key ongoing goal, he said, is integrating radar systems built by different manufacturers across multiple allied countries to create a unified, shared threat tracking picture — a process that has already begun but is not yet complete. “We’re not there yet,” King noted.

    Gotland, the site of the exercise, was chosen for its unmatched strategic importance in the Baltic Sea. Located between Russia’s heavily militarized exclave of Kaliningrad and the Swedish mainland, control of Gotland effectively grants dominance over the central Baltic, a key maritime route for Russia’s shadow fleet of oil and gas tankers that generates critical revenue for Moscow’s war machine in Ukraine. After the end of the Cold War, Sweden drew down its military presence on the island, but Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine forced a major re-evaluation, prompting Sweden to rebuild its garrison and move forward with NATO accession alongside Finland in 2024.

    Gen. Claesson warned that the strategic value of Gotland makes it a likely target for Russian probing of NATO’s unity. “A very reasonable scenario” is that Russian President Vladimir Putin could seek to seize a small portion of Gotland territory to test whether the alliance is willing to invoke collective defense, Claesson said. That kind of limited probe, he explained, would allow Putin to gauge NATO cohesion without triggering an immediate full-scale conflict.

  • Uganda’s president sworn in for record seventh term

    Uganda’s president sworn in for record seventh term

    Eight-one-year-old Yoweri Museveni, Uganda’s long-standing head of state, has officially been sworn into office for a historic seventh consecutive presidential term, capping off a turbulent electoral process that has divided the East African nation and drawn international scrutiny. Museveni’s latest inauguration extends his nearly 40-year rule, placing him among the longest-serving incumbent leaders on the African continent, and will keep him in power through 2031.

    Days before the inauguration ceremony held at Kampala’s Kololo Independence Grounds — a national holiday declared by the ruling government — authorities deployed heavy security across the capital, including armored battle tanks. Police officials framed the extraordinary security buildup as a necessary measure to preserve public order, but critics view it as a show of force intended to deter opposition protests.

    Museveni first claimed victory in the January 2026 general election, with official results granting him more than 70% of the popular vote. However, his main challenger, 44-year-old singer-turned-politician Bobi Wine (whose legal name is Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu), has flatly rejected the outcome, alleging widespread ballot stuffing and systemic electoral fraud. National election officials have repeatedly denied all claims of irregularity.

    Following the election, Wine, who leads the opposition National Unity Platform party, fled Uganda, stating he faced credible threats of assassination at the hands of the ruling regime. Prior to his departure, his home was raided by security forces, and he accused authorities of targeting him and his family. Police have refuted these accusations, claiming they only deployed personnel to provide standard security for a presidential candidate. Museveni, for his part, has labeled opposition figures challenging the election results “terrorists” seeking to overturn the democratic outcome through violence.

    Museveni first seized power as a rebel leader in 1986, and has since won seven consecutive presidential elections. He joins a small cohort of African leaders who have held national power for more than four decades, alongside figures including Denis Sassou Nguesso of Congo-Brazzaville, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo of Equatorial Guinea, and Paul Biya of Cameroon.

    The inauguration drew attendance from multiple regional heads of state, including Tanzania’s Samia Suluhu Hassan, Félix Tshisekedi of the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan’s Salva Kiir, and Somalia’s Hassan Sheikh Mohamud. A defining demographic context of Museveni’s extended rule is Uganda’s status as one of the world’s youngest countries: a majority of the nation’s population has never lived under any other president.

    To date, Museveni has not publicly announced a timeline for his retirement, though many political analysts predict this seventh term will be his last. Widespread speculation has centered on his 51-year-old son, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the country’s top military commander, as the most likely successor. Kainerugaba, however, has faced growing backlash for inflammatory social media posts targeting opposition figures. Earlier this year, he posted — and later removed — a threat on X to remove Bobi Wine’s testicles, drawing widespread condemnation.

    Human rights organizations have continued to level sharp criticism at Museveni’s government over a harsh post-election crackdown on opposition dissent. In a report released last month, Amnesty International documented that at least 16 unarmed civilians, none of whom posed an immediate threat to security forces, were likely killed by police and military personnel between January 15 and 18, 2026. The organization has also criticized the detention of another senior opposition leader, Kizza Besigye, who has remained in Ugandan custody since late 2024 after being abducted from Kenya and forcibly returned to Uganda. He faces military charges of illegal pistol possession and attempting to purchase weapons abroad, all of which he denies.

    Most recently, the Ugandan parliament passed a controversial Sovereignty Bill that has raised alarm among civil society groups. The new legislation criminalizes any action deemed to “promote the interests of a foreigner against those of Uganda” and classifies organizations and individuals receiving foreign funding as “agents of foreigners”, a move critics say will further restrict political dissent and close democratic space in the country.

  • Mayor of Californian city resigns over Chinese agent charge

    Mayor of Californian city resigns over Chinese agent charge

    In a high-profile case that underscores rising tensions over foreign influence in U.S. local politics, the mayor of a Southern California city has stepped down from her post following criminal charges brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) alleging she acted as an unregistered foreign agent for China.

    Fifty-eight-year-old Eileen Wang, who held the rotating mayoral position in Arcadia, has agreed to enter a guilty plea for the felony charge against her, and the Arcadia City Council confirmed her formal resignation took effect on Monday. The conviction carries a maximum potential sentence of up to 10 years of federal prison time.

    In a written statement released to the public on Wang’s behalf, her defense attorneys Jason Liang and Brian Sun said, “she apologises and is sorry for the mistakes she has made in her personal life.” The statement further emphasized that Wang remains committed to the community she served, noting “Her love and devotion for the Arcadia community have not changed and did not waver.”

    Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney, framed the guilty plea agreement as a landmark victory for federal efforts to counter foreign interference in U.S. governance. “This plea agreement is the latest success in our determination to defend the homeland against China’s efforts to corrupt our institutions,” Essayli said. He went on to warn of the fundamental threat posed by clandestine foreign influence, adding, “Individuals in our country who covertly do the bidding of foreign governments undermine our democracy.”

    According to court documents from the DoJ, Wang is alleged to have followed direct instructions from Chinese government officials for years, including distributing pro-Beijing content through publicly accessible channels without completing the required registration as a foreign agent with U.S. authorities. Wang first won a seat on Arcadia’s five-member City Council in November 2022; the body uses a rotating system where each council member fills the ceremonial mayoral role on a scheduled basis, placing Wang in the mayor’s position at the time of her resignation.

    Federal investigators say Wang collaborated with 65-year-old Yaoning “Mike” Sun to run the *US News Center*, a digital outlet that marketed itself as an independent news source for Arcadia’s large Chinese American community. One key example cited by the DoJ details how a Chinese government official sent Wang pre-written news content via the encrypted messaging platform WeChat. Among the prepared pieces was an article that denied widespread international allegations of forced labor and systemic human rights abuses against ethnic minority groups in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Shortly after receiving the content, Wang published it to the *US News Center* website and sent a confirmation response back to the Chinese official, the DoJ confirmed.

    Arcadia City Manager Dominic Lazzaretto released an official public statement on the city’s website addressing the unfolding case, acknowledging the gravity of the accusations. “The allegations at the centre of this case, that a foreign government sought to exert influence over a local elected official, are deeply troubling. We take them seriously,” Lazzaretto wrote. He sought to reassure residents by clarifying the scope of the investigation, noting that the alleged misconduct pre-dated or ended immediately after Wang took office in December 2022. “Following an internal review, we can confirm that no City finances, staff, or decision-making processes were involved,” he added.

  • EU needs to delay social media access for children – von der Leyen

    EU needs to delay social media access for children – von der Leyen

    At a recent EU summit hosted in Copenhagen, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has put forward landmark new plans to protect minors across the bloc from the harms of unregulated social media access, announcing that draft legislation could be introduced within just a few months.

    Central to the proposal is the concept of a ‘social media delay’ for children, a framework designed to restrict underage users’ exposure to platforms while broader regulatory structures are finalized. Von der Leyen confirmed that an independent expert panel is on track to deliver a full set of actionable protection recommendations by July, and she declined to rule out the possibility of formal age-based bans for minors, a policy that has already gained traction across multiple countries worldwide.

    ‘The discussion about a minimum age for social media can no longer be ignored,’ von der Leyen told attendees at the summit, adding that the core question at hand is not whether young people should be able to access social media, but whether unregulated platforms should be allowed unfettered access to young users. ‘Let us give childhood back to children,’ she said.

    The push for EU-wide rules comes as a growing number of member states and global nations have already advanced their own national regulations to address rising concerns about childhood social media addiction, exposure to harmful content, and exploitation. Host nation Denmark has been joined by nine other EU member states, including France, in putting forward proposals for formal minimum age requirements for platform access. Australia became the first country in the world to implement a national ban on social media access for users under 16 last December, setting a global precedent that many European nations are now moving to follow.

    Across Europe, national policymakers have already advanced a range of targeted rules: The United Kingdom is currently drafting strict regulations for under-16s that include potential access bans, mandatory age verification and targeted content restrictions, with a major public consultation set to close on 26 May 2026. France is advancing a ban on social media access for children under 15, targeting implementation as early as September 2025. Spain has proposed a full ban for under-16s to combat addiction, non-consensual pornography, and damaging content that targets young users. Earlier this year, Portugal passed legislation requiring explicit parental consent for users aged 13 to 16, with sweeping restrictions for children under 13 and mandatory age-verification technology for all platforms. Germany is currently developing rules that would introduce a ban for children under 14, with additional restrictions for teenagers up to 16, including enforcement of strict age checks, development of ‘safe’ youth-specific platform versions, and mandatory removal of addictive recommendation algorithms. Norway has announced plans to roll out a strict under-16 ban by the end of 2026, requiring tech firms to build and implement robust age verification systems. Outside of Europe, New Zealand, Malaysia and India have also proposed their own age-based restrictions for minor social media users.

    The new EU plans mark a significant escalation of the bloc’s years-long conflict with large social media platforms over content and user protection rules. Von der Leyen made clear that new age restrictions would not excuse platforms from broader accountability for harms caused to young users. As the EU’s digital regulatory body, the European Commission has already opened multiple high-profile enforcement investigations against major platforms under the bloc’s landmark Digital Services Act (DSA), which grants the institution broad powers to enforce stricter safety rules. Just last month, the Commission concluded that Meta’s Instagram and Facebook had violated the DSA by failing to block under-13s from accessing the platforms, opening the door for potential heavy fines. In February, regulators threatened similar massive penalties against Chinese-owned TikTok unless the company overhauled its platform’s ‘addictive design’ that targets young users.

    The EU’s aggressive crackdown on large social media companies has already sparked a major diplomatic dispute with the United States, where the Trump administration has heavily criticized the bloc’s regulatory actions. When the Commission fined Elon Musk-owned platform X last December, Washington accused EU regulators of targeting and censoring U.S. tech firms. In retaliation, several prominent European political figures, including former EU digital commissioner Thierry Breton, were barred from entering the U.S. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly claimed that ‘ideologues in Europe’ have pushed American platforms to censor American political viewpoints that European regulators oppose.

    Responding to the criticism at the Copenhagen summit, von der Leyen reaffirmed the bloc’s commitment to upholding its regulatory framework: ‘The EU has set rules. It’s the law, and those who break it will be held accountable.’

  • French president announces billions in African investments at summit focused on partnership

    French president announces billions in African investments at summit focused on partnership

    NAIROBI, KENYA – The 2024 Africa Forward Summit concluded on Tuesday with a core theme of reciprocal respect between France and African nations, marking a potential turning point in post-colonial relations between the European power and the African continent. During the closing proceedings, French President Emmanuel Macron announced a landmark 23-billion-euro ($27-billion) investment package designed to support key development sectors across Africa, from clean energy expansion and artificial intelligence innovation to agricultural modernization.

    Macron detailed the structure of the investment plan: 14 billion euros ($16.4 billion) will be contributed by private and public French companies, while the remaining 9 billion euros ($10.5 billion) will come from African institutional partners. He framed the mixed funding model as a clear break from past power dynamics, positioning the initiative as a financial shift that redefines ties between France and African countries, including its 14 former colonial territories across West and Central Africa.

    Kenya, the co-host of the summit alongside France, used its platform to underscore Africa’s demands for equal standing. Kenyan President William Ruto referenced national and continental sovereignty eight times in his closing address, emphasizing that the era of African reliance on European patronage has come to an end.

    “New partnerships between African nations and France must not be built on dependency but on sovereign equality, not on aid or charity but on mutually beneficial investment, and not on extraction or exploitation but on win-win engagements,” Ruto told assembled delegates. The summit is expected to wrap up with a formal joint declaration signed by 30 attending heads of state and government by the end of Tuesday.

    The gathering comes amid widespread tensions between France and several West African nations that were once its colonies. For decades, France maintained a sphere of political, economic and military influence across much of West Africa, a system widely known as Françafrique that included a permanent deployment of thousands of French troops across the region. In recent years, rising anti-French sentiment and criticism from newly installed leaders in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, who decried France’s approach as demeaning and overbearing, pushed Paris to withdraw nearly all of its military presence from the region. France completed its final troop pullout from Senegal in July this year.

    Macron used his summit address to confirm Paris’s new approach, committing to unconditional respect for every African nation’s independent policy choices. “Sovereignty and autonomy is shared, and your success is our success,” Macron said. He added that France’s long-standing model of one-sided aid to African countries is a thing of the past, and that Paris will now center its engagement on collaborative investment.

    “I’d like to focus on co-investment,” Macron stated, praising the high turnout of African leaders as evidence of a unified African continent with aligned priorities for forward-looking partnerships.

  • Philippine senator vows to fight International Criminal Court order to arrest him over killings

    Philippine senator vows to fight International Criminal Court order to arrest him over killings

    In a dramatic development that reignites global scrutiny of the Philippines’ deadly 2010s anti-drug campaign, former Philippine national police chief and sitting Senator Ronald dela Rosa has publicly pledged to resist any effort to transfer him to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to face charges of crimes against humanity. Dela Rosa, who oversaw the initial phase of then-President Rodrigo Duterte’s brutal war on drugs that killed thousands of mostly low-level suspects, maintains he never sanctioned extrajudicial killings during his tenure.

    The ICC based in The Hague unsealed an existing arrest warrant for dela Rosa on Monday, nearly eight months after it was first issued in November 2024. The charge documents accuse the senator of crimes against humanity through murder, alleging he is linked to the unlawful killings of no fewer than 32 people between July 2016 and April 2018, the period when he led the Philippine National Police (PNP).

    Dela Rosa emerged from months of public absence on Monday, after which the Philippine Senate placed him under protective custody. Speaking to reporters on the Senate floor Tuesday, he insisted he would only answer to domestic legal authorities, rejecting the global tribunal’s jurisdiction over his case. “If I have something to answer for, I will face those in our local courts and not before foreigners,” dela Rosa told reporters, adding he would leverage every available legal avenue to block extradition. He also made a direct appeal to current Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., pleading: “Don’t bring me to The Hague.”

    Dela Rosa’s ties to the controversial anti-drug campaign run deep. A long-time loyal ally of Duterte, he was appointed PNP chief immediately after Duterte won the 2016 presidential election, tasking him with rolling out the harsh anti-illegal drug initiative that would define Duterte’s six-year term. Prior to his national appointment, dela Rosa served as police chief in Davao City, the southern stronghold where Duterte built his political reputation on an aggressively hardline approach to crime decades before winning the presidency.

    When questioned about the massive death toll that resulted from the crackdown, dela Rosa defended his leadership, framing the anti-drug campaign as a public safety initiative, not a deliberate campaign of killing. “My role was to lead the war on drugs, and that war on drugs was not meant to annihilate people,” he said. He added that any fatalities that occurred during police operations were justified acts of self-defense when officers’ lives were put at risk.

    Dela Rosa is the second high-profile figure from Duterte’s administration to face ICC detention. Duterte himself was arrested by the ICC in March 2023 and is currently detained in The Netherlands, awaiting trial on charges of crimes against humanity linked to the thousands of killings during his drug war. In 2019, three years before Duterte left office, he withdrew the Philippines from the ICC entirely, a move that human rights advocates have long argued was a deliberate attempt to avoid accountability for the campaign’s deaths. The ICC has repeatedly reaffirmed that it retains legal jurisdiction over crimes committed while the Philippines was still a state member of the court.

    Philippine government officials have signaled they are prepared to comply with the ICC’s arrest warrant, a stance aligned with the country’s existing domestic legislation that addresses crimes against humanity including genocide. Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro told reporters that the state has a clear legal obligation to ensure any individual facing credible charges is held accountable. She also clarified that dela Rosa cannot claim parliamentary immunity from arrest, noting that the crimes he is accused of are extremely serious and carry long prison sentences, which disqualify him from such protection.

    In a related security development, nearly 350 additional law enforcement officers have been deployed outside the Senate compound, a move that drew concern from dela Rosa and his political allies. Officials moved quickly to downplay speculation that the deployment was preparation for an immediate arrest, stating the officers were assigned to the area solely to maintain public order.

  • UK PM Starmer defiant as quit calls grow

    UK PM Starmer defiant as quit calls grow

    Less than a year after Keir Starmer took office as United Kingdom Prime Minister, the Labour leader is facing the deepest crisis of his premiership, with growing ranks of lawmakers and cabinet members demanding he step aside. During a high-stakes meeting with his top ministerial team on Tuesday, Starmer made his position clear: he would not voluntarily resign, and would continue fulfilling his governing mandate regardless of the mounting backlash.

    The first crack in the government’s junior ranks emerged Tuesday, when Miatta Fahnbulleh became the first lower-tier minister to resign from Starmer’s administration, joining the growing chorus calling for him to outline a clear timeline for his exit. In her resignation call, Fahnbulleh urged Starmer to “do the right thing for the country and the party” by paving the way for an orderly leadership transition. Starmer pushed back against the pressure during the closed-door talks, noting that Labour’s official internal process for ousting a sitting leader has not yet been activated.

    “The country expects us to get on with governing. That is what I am doing and what we must do as a cabinet,” Starmer told his ministers, on what has emerged as the most critical juncture of his premiership to date.

    As of Tuesday, more than 70 of Labour’s 403 sitting members of Parliament have publicly called for Starmer’s immediate resignation or a public timetable for his departure. Starmer’s Monday vow to fight on and disprove his critics did little to quell the growing unrest within the party. The most high-profile rebuke to date came late Monday, when UK media reported that Interior Minister Shabana Mahmood — the most senior government figure to break ranks so far — had advised Starmer to reconsider his position. Multiple national newspapers have also reported that other top cabinet members, including Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, have privately raised questions about Starmer’s future with the leader directly.

    The wave of pressure that has engulfed Starmer’s premiership was sparked by catastrophic local election results last week, where Labour lost hundreds of council seats to the hard-right Reform UK party and left-wing Green Party. The poor showing extended beyond local councils: Labour lost its century-long grip on power in Wales, and suffered a heavy defeat to the Scottish National Party in the devolved Scottish Parliament.

    The election results compounded what has already been a turbulent few months for Starmer. He was already mired in controversy over his decision to appoint, then quickly sack, Peter Mandelson as UK Ambassador to the United States, after Mandelson’s long-standing ties to convicted American sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became public. That controversy already forced Starmer to fend off earlier resignation calls earlier this year. Compounding these challenges, Starmer has also failed to deliver on his campaign promise of accelerated economic growth to ease the severe cost-of-living crisis that continues to strain British household finances.

    On Monday, Starmer attempted to shore up support by pledging that a Labour government under his leadership would deliver “better, bolder” policies to win over disillusioned voters who have grown impatient for meaningful change. Just 24 hours later, four more parliamentary private secretaries resigned their government positions, joining dozens of backbench Labour MPs in publicly calling for Starmer to step down. Joe Morris, former aide to Health Secretary Wes Streeting — a figure widely speculated to be weighing a leadership bid — wrote on social media platform X that “it is now clear that the prime minister no longer has the trust or confidence of the public to lead this change.”

    Despite the growing mutiny, a bloc of senior cabinet ministers has publicly reaffirmed their support for Starmer in the wake of Tuesday’s crisis meeting. Technology Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed the prime minister holds her “full support”, while Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle praised Starmer for “showing really steadfast leadership” amid the chaos. Housing Minister Steve Reed echoed the prime minister’s framing, noting that no formal leadership challenge has been triggered under party rules, “so we all intend to get on with our jobs.”

    Under Labour Party rule, any potential challenger to the sitting leader needs the backing of 81 Labour MPs — 20 percent of the party’s parliamentary caucus — to formally trigger a leadership contest. Starmer has already publicly vowed that he would fight any challenge that is brought, rather than step aside voluntarily. A formal contest would almost certainly plunge the party into damaging internal infighting, with left- and right-aligned factions jockeying to advance their preferred candidate or shore up support for Starmer’s retention of power.

    Speculation over potential successors has been swirling for months, with Health Secretary Wes Streeting and former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner widely named as the most likely candidates to launch a bid. Neither figure commands universal support across the fractious Labour party, however. Another popular contender, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, is currently ineligible to stand for leader because he does not hold a seat in Parliament, leading some of Burnham’s backers to push for Starmer to announce a delayed departure date that would allow Burnham time to win a parliamentary seat before a contest.

  • What to know about contenders who could replace Keir Starmer as Britain’s Labour leader

    What to know about contenders who could replace Keir Starmer as Britain’s Labour leader

    LONDON – Just months after Keir Starmer’s Labour Party took national power, the British prime minister’s hold on the nation’s top office is facing unprecedented turmoil, triggered by a devastating string of losses in last week’s local government elections that have amplified long-simmering anger within his own party over a controversial ambassadorial appointment.

    The poor local election performance has emerged as a breaking point for Starmer, whose credibility has already been damaged by widespread backlash over his decision to appoint veteran Labour figure Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the United States. The appointment sparked outrage over Mandelson’s well-documented personal ties to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a scandal that has lingered and eroded trust in Starmer’s judgment among lawmakers and voters alike.

    Already, dozens of sitting Labour Members of Parliament have publicly called for Starmer to step down, clearing the way for an open leadership contest to select a new party leader who would immediately assume the role of prime minister. So far, Starmer has repeatedly refused to resign, stating publicly that he intends to remain in post, and no formal challenge to his leadership has yet been formally registered with the party. While no candidate has yet emerged as the clear frontrunner to replace Starmer if a vacancy opens up, several senior Labour figures have been flagged as the most likely contenders for the leadership.

    Wes Streeting, 43, currently serves as the UK’s Health Secretary, and is widely viewed as one of the current government’s most effective and charismatic public communicators. He has been handed the responsibility of delivering one of Labour’s core election pledges: fixing the chronically underfunded and overstretched National Health Service. Rumors of Streeting’s leadership ambitions have circulated for years, and they burst into public view last year, when allies of Starmer reportedly briefed British media that the prime minister would aggressively fend off any attempt to oust him – with most media speculation at the time pointing directly to Streeting as the would-be challenger. Since being elected to Parliament in 2015, Streeting has repeatedly denied any secret plot to replace Starmer, dismissing such claims as completely unfounded “nonsense.”

    Another top potential candidate is Angela Rayner, the former deputy prime minister with a well-known working-class origin story. Now 46, Rayner grew up in public social housing, left formal schooling at age 16, and became a teen mother, a background that has shaped her political brand as a voice for working people. Before entering Parliament in 2015, she was a prominent trade union organizer, and she aligns with the left wing of the Labour Party. She rose quickly through the party’s ranks during Labour’s years in opposition, and was elected deputy party leader in 2020. Rayner holds substantial grassroots support across the party, but she was forced to resign from the current cabinet last year after acknowledging she had underpaid tax on a property purchase. She remains waiting for the outcome of an official parliamentary inquiry into the tax controversy, a cloud that hangs over any potential leadership bid. In the wake of new revelations about Mandelson’s ties to Epstein from newly released Epstein documents, Rayner led a rebellion of backbench Labour lawmakers that forced the government to allow Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee to take control of decisions over which related documents will be declassified and released to the public.

    Andy Burnham, 56, the popular center-left mayor of Greater Manchester and a former national cabinet minister, has long been marked as a potential challenger to Starmer. But his path to the leadership hit a major setback in February, when the national Labour Party blocked him from standing as the party’s candidate in a recent parliamentary by-election. By longstanding constitutional convention, the UK prime minister must be a sitting member of the House of Commons, so Burnham’s supporters are pushing for any leadership contest to be delayed, which would give him time to win a seat in Parliament through a future by-election. Burnham brings extensive experience from past Labour governments, having previously served as both culture secretary and health secretary in previous national administrations.

    Ed Miliband, 56, the current Energy Secretary and a former Labour Party leader, is another experienced potential contender. Miliband led the party for five years during its time in opposition, but his tenure ended after Labour lost the 2015 general election. Miliband has publicly downplayed any interest in returning to the top party leadership role, but he remains one of the most experienced and well-respected senior figures in the current Labour cabinet.

    Rounding out the list of likely contenders is Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, 45, who holds one of the most high-stakes roles in the current government, with oversight of immigration policy, law enforcement, and domestic security. Her moves to strengthen border controls and crack down on unauthorized immigration have made her a favorite among centrist and right-leaning members of the Parliamentary Labour Party.

  • Starmer faces mounting pressure to resign as he meets UK Cabinet in crunch talks

    Starmer faces mounting pressure to resign as he meets UK Cabinet in crunch talks

    LONDON — Just eight months after securing a landslide general election victory, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is fighting for his political survival, confirming to his Cabinet on Tuesday that he refuses to step down even as internal dissent within his own Labour Party reaches a fever pitch.

    The current crisis erupted last week after the Labour Party suffered devastating losses across local elections nationwide. Political analysts warn that if the poor performance is replicated in a future national vote, the party could be swept out of power in a historic rout. The disappointing results laid bare long-simmering frustrations with Starmer’s leadership, triggering a wave of calls for his departure from within party ranks.

    So far, more than 70 Labour backbench members of Parliament — nearly one-fifth of the party’s total representation in the House of Commons — have publicly called on Starmer to either resign immediately or outline a clear timeline for his exit. Notably, no lawmaker has yet launched a formal leadership challenge against Starmer, a move that would require meeting a minimum threshold of parliamentary support under party rules. Even so, the number of lawmakers calling for change signals deep and widespread discontent across the party.

    The rebellion gained traction on Tuesday when junior minister Miatta Fahnbulleh resigned from her post in the housing, communities and local government department. A prominent figure on the Labour left, Fahnbulleh issued a public statement urging Starmer to “do the right thing for the country” and make way for new leadership. In her resignation notice, she argued the current government has failed to deliver the transformative change voters mandated in last year’s general election, and has not governed with a clear, consistent set of core Labour values. “Nor have we governed as a Labour Party clear about our values and strong in our convictions,” she wrote.

    Starmer’s rapid drop in popularity since his July 2024 landslide victory stems from a range of interconnected issues. Critics point to repeated policy missteps, a widespread perception that the prime minister lacks a clear governing vision, ongoing stagnation in the British economy, and major questions over his political judgment — most notably his controversial appointment of Peter Mandelson as U.K. Ambassador to the United States, despite Mandelson’s well-documented personal ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Last week’s local election results also underscored a dramatic shift in the United Kingdom’s political landscape: the traditional two-party system long dominated by Labour and the Conservative Party is fracturing, with Labour losing significant support to both the right-wing populist Reform UK (an anti-immigration party) and the left-leaning Green Party, which campaigned on an eco-populist platform.

    Opening Tuesday’s emergency Cabinet meeting, Starmer acknowledged his responsibility for the poor local election results but immediately doubled down on his commitment to stay in office. He reminded his ministers that Labour’s internal rules require a formal leadership challenge to gather the support of at least one-fifth of the party’s sitting MPs — a threshold that currently stands at 81 signatures, a mark challengers have not yet hit — and that no formal ousting process has been triggered.

    “The country expects us to get on with governing,” Starmer told the gathering. “That is what I am doing and what we must do.”

    Under British law, the next national general election is not required to be held until 2029, and the UK political system allows parties to replace a sitting prime minister mid-term without triggering a national vote. Starmer has already moved to shore up his position, launching his fightback with a combative speech to detractors on Monday. He is also set to push forward with an ambitious slate of new legislative proposals, which will be formally announced by King Charles III during the State Opening of Parliament on Wednesday, in a bid to regain momentum and reframe his premiership.

    Danica Kirka contributed reporting from London.

  • Ukraine officials name Zelenskyy’s ex-chief of staff as a suspect in money-laundering probe

    Ukraine officials name Zelenskyy’s ex-chief of staff as a suspect in money-laundering probe

    KYIV, Ukraine — In a move that sends significant ripples through Ukraine’s political landscape amid its bid for European Union membership, two of the country’s leading anti-corruption watchdogs have formally named former presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak as an official suspect in a large-scale money laundering investigation.

    The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office made the announcement public via the Telegram messaging platform late Monday, detailing that the alleged scheme involves roughly 460 million Ukrainian hryvnia, equal to around $10.5 million. Investigators confirmed that the case remains active and ongoing, with the formal suspect designation coming before any official criminal charges are filed.

    Yermak, who stepped down from his post in November, previously served as Ukraine’s lead negotiator in high-stakes talks with the United States. His resignation came amid a growing political scandal that has emerged as the most significant challenge to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s administration since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of the country in 2022.

    Once one of Zelenskyy’s closest and most trusted confidants, Yermak held considerable power within the Ukrainian government. Zelenskyy for months resisted widespread calls to remove Yermak from his role, a fact that makes the current corruption probe deeply politically damaging for the president as he works to advance Ukraine’s EU accession agenda. Long-standing systemic corruption is widely cited as one of the key barriers slowing Kyiv’s progress toward membership, a process that is already projected to take years to complete.

    Investigators allege that Yermak was complicit in laundering illicit funds through a series of construction projects located in the outskirts of Kyiv. Authorities executed a search of Yermak’s personal residence back in November, and no additional suspects have been publicly named as part of the investigation to date.

    Zelenskyy has so far declined to issue any public comment on the anti-corruption agencies’ announcement. His press spokesperson, Dmytro Lytvyn, stated that with the investigation still unfolding, it is too premature to draw any definitive conclusions about the case. A final decision on whether to file formal criminal charges against Yermak could still be months away, according to official updates.

    At the time of Yermak’s departure from the presidential office, Zelenskyy framed the resignation as part of a broader restructuring of his administration, publicly thanking Yermak for his work leading international peace negotiations.