分类: politics

  • The hunger-striking engineer demanding education reforms in India

    The hunger-striking engineer demanding education reforms in India

    One of India’s most high-profile grassroots advocates, 59-year-old Sonam Wangchuk, has become the center of a growing national political firestorm after launching an open-ended hunger strike in New Delhi to back youth-led demands for sweeping overhaul of India’s crisis-plagued education system. Since starting his fast on June 28, Wangchuk has survived only on salt and water, shedding more than 9 kilograms as his health has declined sharply, prompting police to forcibly admit him to a hospital on July 18 – a move that escalated tensions between authorities and thousands of supporting protesters.

    Wangchuk’s protest is anchored in backing the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), a viral online satirical youth movement that draws its provocative name from a comment by India’s most senior Supreme Court justice, who labeled young critics of the government with that term. The CJP emerged in response to a string of high-profile education controversies, most recently repeated leaks of public examination question papers that have thrown the academic careers of millions of young Indians into chaos. Political analysts now frame the movement as one of the most significant displays of public dissent against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s national government, which has held power since 2014.

    A household name across India, Wangchuk commands widespread public respect that stretches far beyond the protest movement. A revered educator, engineer and innovator from the disputed Indian-administered region of Ladakh, he won the 2018 Ramon Magsaysay Award – widely known as Asia’s equivalent of the Nobel Prize – for his community development work. His life and innovations even served as the inspiration for the lead character in *Three Idiots*, the 2009 blockbuster Bollywood film that remains one of the most popular Indian movies of all time, and he has appeared as a celebrity guest on India’s top-rated game show *Kaun Banega Crorepati*. This public standing has turned his hunger strike into a national crisis: as his health has worsened, opposition politicians, fellow activists, A-list Bollywood stars and prominent musicians have publicly urged him to end his fast, but Wangchuk has refused three non-negotiable conditions for stopping: government accountability for recent systemic failures in education, a meeting between CJP leaders and members of parliament where lawmakers commit to taking up reform, or a personal visit from lawmakers to his hospital bed with the same assurance.

    This is far from Wangchuk’s first act of political protest via fasting, a tactic long rooted in India’s political and cultural history, where many major faiths frame voluntary self-denial as a moral act of conscience. Just one year ago, he staged two multi-week hunger strikes to draw attention to the environmental threats facing Ladakh, a high-altitude cold desert in the Himalayas that sits at the center of a long-running border dispute between India and China. Before launching that protest, Wangchuk and hundreds of supporters marched hundreds of kilometers from Ladakh to New Delhi to demand greater regional autonomy and constitutional safeguards for Ladakh’s fragile ecosystem. He argues that the Indian federal government’s accelerated push for large-scale infrastructure development – including new highways, power projects and military installations, built in response to the region’s strategic importance bordering both China and Pakistan – is irreparably damaging the Himalayan environment without any meaningful consultation with local communities. “We don’t oppose development. We want sustainable growth,” Wangchuk has said, noting that Ladakh’s unique ecology cannot accommodate the one-size-fits-all development model imposed by the national government on other Indian states.

    Wangchuk’s lifelong advocacy for education reform stems from his own childhood experiences in the Indian education system. As a young boy from Ladakh studying in Srinagar, where lessons were taught only in English, Urdu and Hindi, he recalled being mocked as a “dumb boy from the mountains” who could not fluently speak the dominant languages. That experience shaped his decades-long critique of India’s centralized education system, which he says fails to meet the needs of regional and indigenous communities. In the 1980s, he began organizing protests against the use of Delhi-published textbooks written in unfamiliar languages, full of cultural and environmental references that made no sense to Ladakhi children – examples ranging from ships and oceans to coconut trees and monsoon rains, concepts unrecognizable to most children growing up in the high Himalayan desert. He co-founded a local school focused on adapting curricula to Ladakh’s unique cultural and environmental context, working for decades alongside local communities and government officials to center regional needs in education.

    Beyond his education advocacy, Wangchuk has earned acclaim as a pioneering innovator focused on sustainable, low-cost solutions for Himalayan communities. After a relative noticed his early experiments using concave mirrors to heat dark mountain homes and cook food, he went on to study mechanical engineering. In recent years, he developed an affordable, passive-heating mud house that maintains a steady 15°C internal temperature even when external winter temperatures drop to -15°C, cutting reliance on carbon-intensive heating fuel for remote communities. He also designed the ice stupa, an artificial glacial spring shaped like a traditional Buddhist hemispherical monument that stores glacial meltwater for use by farmers during the critical late spring planting season, when water supplies often run dry.

  • One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce loses his cool during fiery interview

    One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce loses his cool during fiery interview

    A routine live political interview on Australia’s public broadcaster ABC took an unexpected, chaotic turn on [recent date], when One Nation MP and former Australian deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce’s outburst over an unruly off-camera dog ignited a heated exchange with the program’s host.

    Joyce had joined ABC’s flagship current affairs program 7.30 to defend One Nation leader Pauline Hanson against mounting criticism over her controversial choices: a recent podcast interview with far-right extremist Tommy Robinson, inflammatory remarks that revived references to the discriminatory White Australia policy, and public questions over who funded her luxury trip to a Sicilian fashion event. Host Sarah Ferguson probed Joyce on each of these contentious issues, but it was not her tough questioning that pushed the MP to lose his composure.

    Midway through a prepared response, Joyce suddenly cut himself off with a sharp, booming yell of “Sit down!” directed at something out of the camera’s frame. After a stunned pause, he quickly clarified that the command was not for Ferguson, but for his pet dog that had wandered into his interview space. “Sorry, it’s the dog,” he explained, before attempting to resume the conversation.

    Minutes later, the dog began acting up again, forcing Joyce to issue a second apology on his pet’s behalf. “I do apologise for this dog, it’s just started to bail up,” he told the studio. That is when the tension between Joyce and Ferguson boiled over. When Ferguson asked Joyce to set the dog aside and return to answering her question, Joyce snapped, warning the host against what he called rudeness. “Don’t be rude Sarah or this interview will grind to a halt,” he said.

    By the end of the awkward, tension-filled interview, Ferguson attempted to lighten the mood by referencing the chaotic interruption in her closing remarks. “We will say thank you very much for joining us Barnaby Joyce, the dog was no problem,” she said. Joyce, however, remained frustrated, retorting dryly: “It was to me.”

    The incident comes amid growing backlash against Hanson for her recent comments reviving the ideology of White Australia, a 20th-century Australian immigration policy that systematically excluded non-European migrants. Political analysts have noted that the viral dog interruption has drawn even more public attention to the controversial choices that landed Joyce in the hot seat to begin with.

  • Starmer ‘proud’ of achievements as Andy Burnham set to become new UK PM

    Starmer ‘proud’ of achievements as Andy Burnham set to become new UK PM

    London — A historic transition of power unfolded in the United Kingdom on Monday, as Andy Burnham accepted King Charles III’s invitation to form a new government, stepping into 10 Downing Street just moments after outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer formally tendered his resignation to the monarch. The handover caps a turbulent period for the ruling Labour Party, and leaves Britain’s new leader facing a daunting stack of urgent challenges that have already brought down two previous premierships in less than a decade.

    In his final remarks outside his Downing Street residence before departing for Buckingham Palace, Starmer struck a defiant, positive tone about his two years in office. Elected in a 2024 landslide that ended 14 consecutive years of Conservative Party rule, Starmer said he left office confident that the country had improved under his leadership. “I am confident that Britain is now stronger and fairer than it was two years ago,” Starmer told assembled reporters. “I go with good grace, I go with a smile, and I go proud of everything that we have achieved.”

    Starmer’s resignation came last month, brought on by a cascade of internal scandals, policy missteps and repeated last-minute policy reversals that eroded public and parliamentary confidence in his leadership. At 56, Burnham, the former popular mayor of Greater Manchester who only regained a seat in Parliament four weeks ago, becomes the sixth UK prime minister to enter Downing Street over the past 10 years.

    Labour Party lawmakers tapped Burnham as the party’s new leader and prime minister in large part to counter the rising electoral threat of Nigel Farage’s right-wing, anti-immigration Reform UK party, which has climbed steadily in national polls ahead of the next general election scheduled for 2029. With Reform already leading voting intention surveys, Burnham told supporters ahead of his swearing-in that his leadership represents the “last chance” for Labour to course-correct and retain power.

    From his first day in office, Burnham faces an overflowing in-tray with no time to settle into the role. His most pressing challenges include persistently sluggish economic growth, soaring government borrowing costs, a rapidly expanding public welfare bill, and the ongoing small-boat irregular migration crisis that has fueled much of Reform UK’s electoral gains. Global headwinds add additional instability: unpredictable energy prices driven by ongoing tensions between the United States and Iran, and the volatile policy agenda of U.S. President Donald Trump threaten to upend domestic policy plans from the start.

    In an interview with *The Times* published Sunday, Burnham framed his premiership as a clear break from a decade of political dysfunction that has failed to deliver for British voters. “What we’ve been doing hasn’t been working. That’s the way I see it,” he said. “I am going to try and do things in a different way.”

    That different approach extends to economic policy, where Burnham said he will shift public spending toward long-term early investment and intervention, rather than the reactive spending on failed outcomes that defined previous governments. “We will be much more focused on setting people up for success, and much less paying for failure,” he explained.

    In one of his first policy moves after taking the leadership, Burnham already scrapped Starmer’s signature £1.8 billion national digital ID scheme, a policy that faced widespread criticism over cost and civil liberty concerns. A spokesperson for the new prime minister said the resources earmarked for the three-year project would be redirected to address immediate public needs, primarily easing the financial strain of the ongoing cost-of-living crisis.

    Burnham’s first public address outside 10 Downing Street on Monday is expected to lay out his core policy priorities: restoring public trust in national politics, delivering immediate relief for households struggling with the cost of living, boosting long-term economic growth, and devolving more governing power to regional communities across the UK. Later in the day, he is set to announce his senior cabinet appointments, with widespread political attention focused on who will replace outgoing Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves at the head of the finance portfolio.

    Nicknamed the “King of the North” for his popular tenure leading Greater Manchester, Burnham has rebranded himself as a man-of-the-people politician, combining an approachable, folksy public image with a polished modern social media strategy. The former Labour minister served in the Cabinets of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown between 2001 and 2017, giving him decades of Westminster experience ahead of taking the top job. Still, critics have raised questions about the speed of his rise to the premiership — and whether his stated plan to fix Britain’s challenges will hold up amid severe fiscal constraints. Burnham inherits a framework of strict financial rules requiring balanced government spending and limited tax increases, paired with near-stagnant growth and high public debt that leaves him little room for policy maneuvering, with just three years to deliver results before the next general election.

  • Philippines condemns Chinese coast guard for injuring Filipino sailor in disputed shoal

    Philippines condemns Chinese coast guard for injuring Filipino sailor in disputed shoal

    A violent confrontation at the disputed Second Thomas Shoal in the South China Sea has reignited long-simmering territorial tensions between the Philippines and China, after the Philippine military confirmed a Filipino navy sailor was repeatedly beaten on the head with a wooden baton by Chinese coast guard personnel on Monday. The attack, which also left the sailor’s small rubber patrol boat damaged, was recorded on camera by other Filipino crew members in the area, triggering immediate and sharp condemnation from senior Philippine government officials.

    Philippine authorities have emphasized that their personnel acted with restraint throughout the encounter to avoid any further escalation of hostilities. According to the Philippine military’s official account of the incident, a large Chinese coast guard vessel deployed an inflatable motorboat carrying eight personnel to approach the BRP Sierra Madre — a decommissioned Philippine navy ship that has been intentionally grounded on the shoal since 1999 to serve as a permanent, if fragile, Philippine territorial outpost. The Chinese craft maneuvered in close proximity to the outpost while its crew captured photos and video of the site, prompting two small teams of Filipino sailors on rubber boats to approach and request the Chinese side move to a safer distance in a non-confrontational manner.

    Instead of complying, the Chinese coast guard personnel responded with immediate aggression. “The Chinese coast guard vessel personnel reacted violently and aggressively by striking a Philippine Navy personnel on the head with a wooden baton, causing injury and damaging the navy rubber boat,” the Philippine military confirmed in its statement. As of Monday, medical teams were still evaluating the extent of the injured sailor’s wounds to determine whether he requires evacuation for advanced medical care.

    China has not yet issued an official public response to specific allegations related to the Monday assault, but it has consistently maintained its territorial claim over Second Thomas Shoal and nearly the entire expanse of the South China Sea, a strategic waterway that carries more than $3 trillion in global trade annually. For years, China has demanded that the Philippines withdraw the BRP Sierra Madre, whose small rotating crew of Filipino navy personnel maintain a constant Philippine presence on the disputed atoll.

    Philippine officials have rejected any demands to remove the outpost, and framed the latest attack as part of a growing pattern of hostile behavior from Beijing. “No act of coercion or aggression will deter us from carrying out our constitutional mandate or exercising the Philippines’ lawful rights in the West Philippine Sea,” the military said, using the Philippine government’s official name for its claimed portion of the South China Sea.

    The Philippine Department of National Defense issued a particularly harsh rebuke of the incident, stating: “The latest act of violence and harassment committed by the China coast guard against Philippine navy personnel … adds to a clear pattern of provocative and hostile behavior and further contributes to the People’s Republic of China’s deficit of trust and credibility.”

    The clash comes at a sensitive diplomatic moment, as top foreign ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi are gathering in Manila this week for annual talks, where the long-running South China Sea territorial dispute is a top agenda item. Multiple regional governments, including Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and Taiwan, hold overlapping territorial claims across different parts of the waterway, creating one of the most volatile geopolitical flashpoints in the Indo-Pacific.

    In recent years, ASEAN and China have been engaged in ongoing negotiations for a formal nonaggression pact designed to prevent open armed conflict over the disputed territories. A major conflict in the region would almost certainly draw in the United States, which has a mutual defense treaty with the Philippines and has repeatedly vowed to deter Chinese expansionism and protect freedom of navigation in the heavily trafficked sea lane.

  • ‘King of the North’ Andy Burnham went from Manchester mayor to Britain’s new leader

    ‘King of the North’ Andy Burnham went from Manchester mayor to Britain’s new leader

    LONDON — After a decades-long political journey marked by setbacks, detours, and unexpected twists, 56-year-old Andy Burnham is set to be sworn in as the United Kingdom’s 59th prime minister on Monday, catapulted into Downing Street following the sudden resignation of Keir Starmer after just two years in office.

    Ten years ago, Burnham walked away from a 20-year climb up Labour’s London-based party hierarchy to pursue a new role leading the northern English region of Greater Manchester as its mayor. Just one month ago, he reclaimed a seat in Parliament via a high-stakes special election, clearing the final hurdle to take the top job — a turn of events that has left the country with big questions about how the largely regionally focused leader will tackle national office.

    ### The Making of a Northern-Bred Progressive
    Born in Liverpool and raised in a tight-knit working-class Catholic community in a commuter village between Liverpool and Manchester, Burnham’s political values were shaped early on by his family upbringing and the centre-left Labour Party. His father worked as a British Telecom engineer, and his mother as a receptionist; he and his brothers were the first generation of their family to attend university. Despite his own self-doubt that a working-class boy “did not belong” at the elite institution, he was persuaded to apply to the University of Cambridge, where he earned an English degree and met his wife, Marie-France van Heel, a Dutch marketing executive. The couple married in 2000 and share three children.

    After graduating, Burnham cut his teeth as a trade magazine journalist before moving into political advisory work for Labour figures. Elected to Parliament for the Manchester-area constituency of Leigh in 2001, he rose steadily through the ranks under prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, holding three senior Cabinet positions between 2007 and 2010: chief secretary to the Treasury, culture secretary, and health secretary. A defining turning point in his career came in 2009, when he was confronted by angry bereaved families at a commemoration for the 1989 Hillsborough Stadium disaster, which killed 97 Liverpool football fans. For decades, police had pushed a false narrative blaming unruly fans for the tragedy. Burnham stepped forward as a vocal advocate for the families, helping secure a new public inquest, a formal official apology, and landmark legislation imposing a legal duty of candor that requires public officials to disclose the full truth about tragedies, regardless of reputational damage.

    ### Building a Legacy as the ‘King of the North’
    Following Labour’s national defeat in 2010, Burnham made two unsuccessful bids for the party leadership, in 2010 and 2015. At a low point for Labour nationally in 2017, he stepped down from Parliament to run for Greater Manchester mayor, a role that would ultimately let him showcase his political strengths and build a national profile.

    As mayor, Burnham pioneered an approach dubbed “Manchesterism”: a brand of pragmatic, business-friendly socialism that combines private and public investment to upgrade transport, housing, and core infrastructure in the post-industrial region. Once the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution, Greater Manchester had suffered decades of economic decline after manufacturing collapsed; during Burnham’s tenure, the region experienced a sustained boom, with new skyscrapers rising on abandoned industrial lots. He earned widespread praise for bringing the region’s fragmented public transport system under public control and expanding access and reliability.

    Burnham also cultivated a relatable public persona, swapping formal suits for jeans and graphic tees, openly sharing his love for iconic northern British bands like Oasis, The Smiths, and New Order, and spending free time playing football or spinning 1990s tracks in public DJ sets. His national profile surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, when he publicly blasted then-Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson for a “London-centric” pandemic response that disproportionately harmed northern cities. The confrontation earned him the nickname “King of the North,” a *Game of Thrones*-inspired moniker that cemented his reputation as a champion for regional equity and signaled his long-held national political ambition.

    When Starmer was forced to resign by Labour lawmakers alarmed by the party’s plummeting approval ratings, Burnham saw his opening. To meet the requirement of holding a parliamentary seat to become prime minister and party leader, a sitting Labour legislator agreed to step down, triggering a special election in the Manchester-area seat of Makerfield. Burnham won by a landslide over the Reform UK candidate, proving his electoral appeal, and ran unopposed in the leadership contest to replace Starmer. He will formally take office after a required audience with King Charles III.

    ### High Expectations, Unanswered Questions
    Burnham enters office carrying the soaring expectations of a Labour base hungry for change after years of political turbulence. “A whole range of people across the Labour movement and in the country have projected onto Andy Burnham their hopes and their fantasies about how the country should be run and what Labour should stand for and what Andy Burnham stands for,” explained Joshi Herrmann, founder of the Manchester-based news outlet The Mill. “He has got lots of people’s hopes up.”

    In his first public remarks since securing the leadership, Burnham has pledged to deliver “a new politics based on unity and hope” and build “an economy that works for everybody, no matter where they live.” A core policy priority is devolving more power to regional leaders, a plan that includes moving a portion of the prime minister’s official office to a “No. 10 North” based in Manchester. He has spoken poignantly of his father, who lives with Alzheimer’s and cannot comprehend that his son has become prime minister: “The way I look at it, it’s his achievement as well. A whole family achievement, although he doesn’t know it.”

    Supporters point to Burnham’s unique political strengths: a rare ability to connect with working-class voters, genuine empathy, and a deep commitment to reducing economic inequality. “He has got a set of principles about trying to make the country fairer, trying to bring people out of poverty, that he really does believe in,” Herrmann noted. Manchester music entrepreneur Sacha Lord, who served as Burnham’s nighttime economy advisor during his mayoral tenure, said the new prime minister hides a steely resolve behind his affable public persona. “He’s not scared of locking horns with people. Everybody thinks Andy’s this nice, cheeky-chappy guy. But trust me, when he wants something … he tends to get it.”

    Still, critics warn that Burnham leaves many key policy pledges undefined, most notably how he will fund his proposed infrastructure and social programs. He inherits the same intractable challenges that derailed Starmer’s premiership: a stagnant national economy, overstretched public services, and a persistent cost-of-living crisis that has squeezed household budgets across the UK. He also has little experience at the national level on high-stakes foreign policy issues, from the ongoing war in Ukraine to managing the UK’s critical relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump. For Burnham, the decades-long climb to the top is over — now the race to prove he can handle the weight of the office has just begun.

  • Why are Ukraine’s military recruiters facing violence in their own country?

    Why are Ukraine’s military recruiters facing violence in their own country?

    Ukraine is confronting a disturbing wave of violence targeting one of its most critical frontline institutions: military recruitment personnel. New data published by the National Police Service of Ukraine reveals that more than 600 physical assaults against recruitment officers have been documented since the start of the current conscription drive, with law enforcement officials issuing a stark warning that the aggression against these public servants is becoming steadily more dangerous and widespread.

    What began as isolated instances of public pushback against mandatory military service has evolved into a systemic pattern of violence that is raising urgent questions about domestic social cohesion amid the ongoing war with Russia. Recruitment officers, who are tasked with enforcing conscription laws to replenish Ukrainian frontline forces, now face routine threats and unprovoked attacks as they carry out their official duties across the country.

    The escalating violence reflects deep-seated public tensions around conscription policies. Many Ukrainians facing conscription have expressed frustration over what they claim are inconsistent enforcement of mobilization rules, lack of transparency around deployment timelines, and reports of improper selection of recruits that has seen vulnerable or ineligible individuals called up while others avoid service. These grievances have boiled over into open aggression against the officers tasked with implementing mobilization, who have become the public face of unpopular conscription policies.

    Law enforcement officials have emphasized that the rising intensity of these attacks poses a dual threat: it endangers the lives of public servants and undermines Ukraine’s ability to maintain the force levels needed to defend its territory against Russian invasion. The situation has prompted growing discussions among policymakers about potential reforms to conscription procedures to address public grievances and reduce the risk of further violence against recruitment personnel.

  • Rayann EL Houli: Woman accused of joining ISIS to be freed

    Rayann EL Houli: Woman accused of joining ISIS to be freed

    A 34-year-old Australian woman who stands accused of traveling to Syria to join the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group more than a decade ago is set to walk free on bail within hours, after a Melbourne magistrate ruled that exceptional circumstances justified her release ahead of trial.

    Rayann El Houli, a Melbourne native, was formally charged in May this year with two key offenses: being a member of a designated terrorist organization and illegally entering a declared conflict zone. The charges were laid eight months after she returned to Australia from Syria alongside her four children, ending a six-year detainment in a Kurdish-run internally displaced persons camp following the collapse of the ISIS caliphate.

    Court documents and prosecution allegations lay out a timeline of El Houli’s time in the Middle East: prosecutors claim she first traveled to Syria in 2014, when she was just 21 or 22 years old, alongside her first husband Allak Hamad, with the explicit intention of joining ISIS ranks. Hamad was killed fighting for the group by early 2015, and El Houli went on to marry two more ISIS-linked fighters, both of whom also died in conflict before she wed a third member in 2018, a marriage that ended in divorce within months.

    In 2019, after the territorial defeat of ISIS, El Houli was captured by Kurdish forces and held in Syria’s Al-Hawl camp, a sprawling facility notorious for housing thousands of former ISIS supporters and their families. She was smuggled out of the camp in June 2023 and eventually made her way back to Australia, where she was taken into custody to face terror-related charges.

    El Houli’s bail application was heard over a two-day hearing last week, with Melbourne Magistrate Brett Sonnet releasing his ruling on Monday afternoon. In his decision, Sonnet confirmed that he found clear exceptional circumstances to meet the requirements for bail, noting that the assessed risk El Houli poses to the Australian public is “relatively low”.

    “In my view the application for bail must be granted,” Sonnet told the court.

    Prosecutors had pushed back hard against bail, presenting disturbing evidence collected by Australian Federal Police that they argued demonstrated El Houli’s deep commitment to ISIS ideology during her time in Syria. Senior AFP Constable Paul Sherlock told the court that communications El Houli sent to family in Australia before 2019 clearly showed her active support for the terrorist group.

    This evidence included messages encouraging other Australians to travel to Syria to join ISIS, as well as multiple videos filmed by El Houli that show her exposing her young children to extremist propaganda. One of the most disturbing videos, dated March 2016, captures El Houli questioning her then two-year-old eldest child about the killing of non-believers by ISIS fighters. Prosecutors say the video shows her asking the toddler to describe how mujahideen slaughtered “kuffar” (infidels) and “apostates” with knives, prompting the child to mimic the actions. Additional evidence presented to the court includes a photo allegedly showing El Houli teaching her child how to hold a toy rifle.

    Despite the severity of the allegations and the disturbing nature of the evidence, the court heard arguments from El Houli’s defense that painted a picture of a young woman manipulated into joining the group, who has since renounced all ties to violent extremism. Her barrister, Peter Morrissey SC, told the court that El Houli was a naive young woman when she traveled to Syria, who “drank the Kool-Aid” and followed her husband into the conflict zone, without fully understanding the ideology she was aligning herself with.

    Morrissey added that in the months since her return to Australia, El Houli has worked diligently to rebuild her life, addressing ongoing physical and mental health trauma, enrolling her four children in local schools and community sports programs, and completely cutting all ties to extremist groups. “She renounces ISIS and violent jihad, wanting nothing to do with it,” Morrissey told the court.

    Magistrate Sonnet echoed many of these points in his ruling, noting that while the videos presented by prosecutors were unquestionably disturbing, he accepted the assessment of clinical psychologist Katie Seidler, who used standardized clinical assessment tools to evaluate El Houli and found her to be at low risk of reoffending or supporting extremism. Sonnet also highlighted a number of strong protective factors that support bail: El Houli has custody of her four minor children, has the consistent support of her extended family in Australia, has fully cooperated with federal law enforcement since her return, and has already accessed ongoing physical and mental health care to address the trauma she experienced during her time in Syria.

    El Houli is expected to be released from custody on Monday afternoon, with strict bail conditions yet to be publicly announced ahead of her upcoming trial.

  • Russian President Putin meets with North Korean foreign minister in latest high-level diplomacy

    Russian President Putin meets with North Korean foreign minister in latest high-level diplomacy

    High-stakes diplomatic engagement between Russia and North Korea has entered a new active phase, after Russian President Vladimir Putin held a closed-door meeting with North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui at the Kremlin, where he openly thanked Pyongyang for its backing of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russian state media has confirmed.

    Choe’s unannounced, unscheduled trip to Russia — extended at the formal invitation of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, with North Korean state media confirming her departure from Pyongyang over the weekend — has sparked widespread international speculation that the visit lays the groundwork for a new potential trip to Russia by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. To date, Pyongyang has not released any detailed statement on the core agenda of Choe’s meetings in Moscow beyond confirming the visit itself.

    South Korea’s Unification Ministry, the government body tasked with managing inter-Korean affairs, announced Monday that Seoul is maintaining close, real-time monitoring of the diplomatic exchanges between Moscow and Pyongyang. Spokesperson Yoon Min Ho declined to offer any on-the-record assessment of whether a new summit between Putin and Kim is currently under negotiation.

    According to Russia’s state-owned Tass news agency, Putin used Sunday’s meeting to reinforce his public praise for the steady deepening of bilateral ties between the two nations. He repeated explicit gratitude to “the North Korean leadership and people” for their consistent support of Russia’s military operations in Ukraine. In response, Tass reported, Choe conveyed to Putin that Kim remains fully committed to advancing the “comprehensive development” of the Russia-North Korea relationship.

    This latest meeting builds on a years-long trend of rapidly expanding strategic cooperation between the two authoritarian states. Kim has already traveled to Russia’s Far East for two separate summits with Putin, in 2019 and 2023. During a landmark June 2024 summit in Pyongyang, Putin extended a formal invitation for Kim to make a return visit to Russia, and the two leaders signed a sweeping new strategic partnership agreement that includes pledges of mutual military assistance if either nation faces an act of aggression.

    Over the past several years, Kim has prioritized alignment with Moscow as a core pillar of North Korea’s foreign policy. Independent defense analysts widely confirm that Pyongyang has supplied Russia with thousands of artillery rounds, millions of artillery shells, and short-range ballistic missiles to support its war effort in Ukraine, alongside deploying thousands of North Korean troops to frontline operations. In exchange, experts say North Korea has received badly needed economic aid and access to advanced Russian military and aerospace technology that has accelerated the development of Pyongyang’s domestic nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile programs.

    Choe’s trip to Moscow comes on the heels of a flurry of high-level diplomatic exchanges between North Korea and China, another key partner for Pyongyang as it works to build a united bloc opposing U.S. influence in the Indo-Pacific. Earlier this month, North Korean Premier Pak Thae Song, Kim’s top economic advisor, traveled to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, and senior Chinese Politburo Standing Committee member Wang Huning traveled to Pyongyang for talks with Kim. Kim hosted Xi for a formal summit in Pyongyang earlier this summer, as part of Pyongyang’s strategy of positioning itself as a core member of a so-called “new Cold War” front against Washington.

    Since the 2019 collapse of nuclear disarmament talks with then-U.S. President Donald Trump, Kim has frozen all substantive diplomatic engagement with both the United States and South Korea. Analysts note that Kim has leveraged global attention focused on Russia’s war in Ukraine to speed up development of North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs, while repeatedly refusing to enter new talks with Washington unless the U.S. abandons its requirement that Pyongyang commit to nuclear disarmament as a precondition for any negotiation.

  • Andy Burnham becomes the UK’s seventh prime minister in a decade after Starmer resigns

    Andy Burnham becomes the UK’s seventh prime minister in a decade after Starmer resigns

    LONDON — In a carefully choreographed transfer of power that brought a temporary end to years of British political upheaval, Andy Burnham has been officially sworn in as the United Kingdom’s new prime minister, taking over from the resigning Keir Starmer in a historic transition that required no national general election.

    The formal handover unfolded Monday following constitutional tradition laid out over centuries. After Starmer traveled to Buckingham Palace to formally tender his resignation to King Charles III — an offer the monarch graciously accepted — Burnham met separately with the king for the traditional “kissing hands” ceremony. A newly released official photograph captures the moment the king and Burnham shook hands, with Buckingham Palace confirming in an official statement that the monarch “received in audience the Rt. Hon. Andrew Burnham MP and requested him to form a new Administration. The Rt. Hon Andrew Burnham MP accepted The King’s offer and kissed hands upon his appointment as Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury.”

    While the ceremony retains its historic roots, modern constitutional arrangements mean the king holds no formal political power; the invitation to form a government is automatically extended to the leader of the party that holds a majority in the House of Commons, and no actual hand-kissing is required today.

    Burnham’s ascent to the top job makes him the UK’s seventh prime minister since 2016, a streak of rapid leadership turnover that the new leader openly acknowledged in his first public remarks from outside 10 Downing Street. The former Greater Manchester mayor, who was confirmed as the new leader of the governing centre-left Labour Party last Friday after running unopposed and securing the nominations of 379 out of 403 sitting Labour MPs, said he is “acutely conscious” of the revolving door of leadership the country has navigated over the past decade.

    “This a moment for reflection and new resolution,” Burnham told assembled reporters and onlookers. “It requires my generation of politicians to raise our game and rise to the new challenge. Britain needs to show the world that we can regain our stability once again, and that is our challenge to make politics work, to make it work better.”

    In his opening policy pledges, Burnham committed to ending street homelessness across the UK, and promised to deliver a “circuit breaker” for a national governing system he argues has taken wrong turns since the 1980s. Beyond tangible policy goals, he has positioned himself as a leader committed to rebuilding trust in public life, pledging to deliver a “new politics” that is less divisive, lifts living standards for all regions of the country, and restores hope that has faded among much of the public.

    “I will work to build a new politics,” Burnham said after winning the Labour leadership last Friday. “The country is crying out for it.”

    His predecessor Keir Starmer, who left Downing Street alongside his wife Victoria after delivering a short farewell address, struck a gracious tone as he stepped down. Starmer, who was forced to resign after missteps and judgment calls eroded his support among both his party and the general public, took the opportunity to highlight his achievements in office.

    Starmer became Labour leader in 2020 in the wake of one of the party’s worst ever general election defeats, overhauled the party to make it electorally competitive, and led Labour to a landslide general election victory in 2024. In his two years as prime minister, he pointed to progress including strengthened protections for working people, reduced child poverty, new legislation banning official cover-ups following public tragedies, and increased defense spending, alongside steady support for Ukraine in its conflict against Russia.

    “I go with good grace, I go with a smile and I go proud of everything that we have achieved,” Starmer said. “Since then, it has been the privilege of my life to serve you and this great country as prime minister. I am confident that Britain is now stronger and fairer than it was two years ago.”

    Burnham has already said he will build on the policy foundation Starmer laid, but political observers across the UK are now waiting for details of how he will deliver his ambitious pledges. Joshi Herrmann, founder of Manchester-based news outlet The Mill who has followed Burnham’s political career for years, noted that all of the new prime minister’s goals depend on unlocking long-stagnant economic growth.

    “Fundamentally, it only will work if you can generate significant economic growth, because it’s the lack of growth that’s really holding the country back,” Herrmann said.

    All eyes are now on Burnham’s upcoming first cabinet appointments, where he is widely expected to shake up Starmer’s top team, with changes anticipated for three of the most senior roles: Chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign Secretary, and Home Secretary. Under UK parliamentary rules, the governing party is able to replace its leader — and thus the prime minister — without holding a snap general election. The next mandatory national election is not scheduled until 2029, though Burnham retains the power to call an earlier vote if he chooses to do so.

  • India’s Cockroach movement supporters gather to attempt a march to Parliament

    India’s Cockroach movement supporters gather to attempt a march to Parliament

    NEW DELHI — On Monday, as India’s national Parliament prepared to open its annual monsoon session, thousands of demonstrators aligned with the youth-led “Cockroach Movement” defied a formal police protest ban to push forward with a planned march to the legislative building, stepping up their demands for the resignation of the country’s top education official amid growing public fury over systemic failures in India’s examination system.

    Delhi law enforcement had already rejected the organizers’ application to hold the march, citing needs to preserve public order in the vicinity of Parliament during the opening week of the session. Scores of police officers were deployed to the designated starting point of the demonstration at Jantar Mantar, a central New Delhi landmark long used for public protests, where barricades were erected to block demonstrators from moving toward the Parliament complex, located just a few kilometers away. Police repeatedly broadcast calls for the crowd to disperse over loudspeakers, raising widespread fears of potential violent confrontation if protesters pushed past the police cordon.

    The diverse crowd gathered for the demonstration included university students, working professionals, and even entire families with young children. Many participants came prepared for an extended day of action, carrying backpacks stocked with bottled water and non-perishable food, while others waved national Indian flags as they marched. demonstrators chanted coordinated slogans calling for the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling government.

    The satirical yet rapidly growing movement, which formally calls itself the Cockroach Janta Party, has its origins in an offhand comment from India’s Supreme Court Chief Justice back in May. During an unrelated public hearing, the chief justice compared a group of unemployed young job seekers to “cockroaches” — a dismissive remark that supporters reclaimed intentionally, turning the pejorative label into the identity of a grassroots movement that has already amassed millions of followers across major Indian social media platforms.

    The movement has gathered explosive momentum in recent weeks amid a string of repeated high-profile leaks of competitive entrance exams for government jobs and medical college seats, scandals that have sparked widespread public anger. Many young people see these repeated leaks as evidence of deep-rooted corruption and systemic failure in India’s education and employment systems, which leave millions of graduates competing for a tiny pool of stable public sector positions.

    Protests gained even more national attention over the weekend, when Delhi police forcibly transferred prominent activist Sonam Wangchuk, who had been leading a hunger strike at Jantar Mantar, to a local hospital on Saturday. For the past month, self-identified “cockroach” protesters have maintained a continuous encampment at Jantar Mantar, with dozens of student groups across the country joining the action and joining Wangchuk’s hunger strike. Large solidarity rallies have also been held at major universities and urban centers across India, expanding the movement’s reach far beyond the national capital.

    Before the Monday march, Wangchuk set clear conditions for ending his 21-day hunger strike: either the central government must formally accept responsibility for the systemic failures that enabled the repeated exam leaks, or authorities must allow demonstrators to march unimpeded to Parliament, where lawmakers must pledge to debate the movement’s demands in both upper and lower houses of the legislature.

    Alongside demanding Pradhan’s resignation, the movement is calling for sweeping structural reforms to India’s national examination system, as well as financial compensation for the families of dozens of students who have died by suicide in the wake of the repeated exam leaks, which have derailed the academic and career prospects of hundreds of thousands of young people.

    The protest movement represents one of the most significant public challenges to Modi’s Hindu nationalist government since the prime minister won a third consecutive term in 2024 national elections. It has drawn cross-sector support from major national opposition parties, prominent human rights activists, and even well-known Bollywood celebrities. Protesters argue that space for public dissent has shrunk dramatically under Modi’s administration, which has faced repeated international criticism for jailing opposition activists, restricting peaceful protest, and in some cases ordering aggressive police crackdowns on dissenting gatherings.

    Senior leaders from Modi’s ruling party have taken a uniformly hard line against the movement. Pradhan has publicly accused protesters of acting against national interests, while other senior government ministers have acknowledged the widespread frustration among unemployed students but have refused to open any formal negotiations with movement organizers.

    Jyoti Rajput, a yoga teacher who joined the Monday demonstration, summed up the frustration shared by many participants. “This rotten system refuses to take action,” she said. “It cannot see the pain of students, and that’s why so many people have joined this movement.”