分类: politics

  • Labor hopeful Iran war ‘drawing to a close’ after Trump threat

    Labor hopeful Iran war ‘drawing to a close’ after Trump threat

    As former U.S. President Donald Trump issues a stark 48-hour ultimatum to Iran over the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, Australia’s ruling Albanese government has voiced cautious optimism that the ongoing Middle East conflict is nearing its end, while moving swiftly to mitigate widespread domestic fuel shortages and price volatility.

    Local time Saturday saw Trump, the Republican incumbent leading U.S. military operations against Iran, deliver the ultimatum: Tehran must reopen the critical global oil chokepoint, or the U.S. will unleash “all hell” on the Islamic Republic. Earlier, in a national address, Trump laid out a public timeline for the conflict, stating that joint U.S.-Israeli military operations against Iran would conclude within two to three weeks.

    Australian Assistant Immigration Minister Matt Thistlethwaite confirmed that Canberra is aligning its expectations with the U.S. timeline, telling Sky News the federal government remains hopeful the conflict will wrap up soon. “The original goal of military action against Iran was to degrade and eliminate the country’s nuclear capabilities,” Thistlethwaite explained. “Per President Trump and U.S. intelligence assessments, that objective has already been accomplished. On that basis, we want to see rapid de-escalation, and a swift return to normal operations through the Strait of Hormuz.”

    Thistlethwaite added that Trump, who has full access to intelligence briefings and military input, shares the assessment that the conflict is drawing to a close. Even so, the Australian government has prepped contingency plans under its national fuel security framework to guarantee continued access to fuel for Australian households and businesses, and to cap upward price pressure as much as possible if hostilities drag on.

    Already this week, the Albanese government has enacted two temporary cuts to the national fuel excise tax. The second cut was finalized only after state and territory governments reached an agreement on how to allocate GST windfall gains to offset the revenue loss from the tax reduction. Thistlethwaite acknowledged that despite expected de-escalation, the conflict will leave a “long tail” of economic impacts that will be felt in Australia for months to come.

    To shore up supply, the federal government has already secured direct assurances from key Southeast Asian and East Asian fuel suppliers, which account for the majority of Australia’s imported fuel. “I met last week with Japan’s energy minister, and requested that existing supply volumes continue,” Thistlethwaite said. “Tokyo has given me a formal assurance that normal supply will hold. I’ve secured the same commitment from South Korea and Singapore, our three main suppliers. At the same time, we are actively diversifying our supply chains, and we have already started receiving additional fuel shipments from the United States to cover any gaps. We are covering all bases to expand supply diversification and secure as much fuel as possible for the domestic market.”

    The severity of the current supply crunch came into clear focus Saturday, when Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen confirmed that more than 600 fuel stations across Australia have already run out of at least one grade of fuel, with 410 stations entirely out of diesel. The most acute shortages are in New South Wales, where 182 stations have no diesel and 48 are out of all petrol grades. Bowen urged the public to avoid panic buying, advising: “I encourage people to act sensibly. Only fill up when you need to, only take as much fuel as you normally would, and don’t stockpile.”

    Amid the domestic upheaval, opposition foreign policy figure and Liberal Senator Dave Sharma has backed the assessment that the conflict will end soon, predicting hostilities will wrap up within two to four additional weeks. Sharma told Sky News that Trump is eager to wrap up military operations, having concluded that Iran’s nuclear program and ballistic missile infrastructure have already been severely set back. While Trump has publicly held out hope for further political change in Iran, and has called for the Strait of Hormuz to be reopened, Sharma noted the U.S. leader is not making an end to operations conditional on the strait reopening immediately.

    Sharma added that the marine expeditionary forces the U.S. has deployed to the Middle East give Trump flexible options to seize strategic territory if needed, though he does not expect a full-scale ground invasion of Iran. “The most likely move would be seizing key islands within the Strait of Hormuz to allow unimpeded control of commercial shipping through the waterway,” he explained.

    Sharma’s position puts him at odds with fellow Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie, a prominent critic of both the conflict and Trump’s handling of it. Sharma argued that even if hostilities end immediately, Iran’s ability to foment regional instability and export terrorism has already been permanently reduced.

    The developments come on the heels of an emergency diplomatic meeting attended by Australia, the United Kingdom, and more than 40 allied nations focused on coordinating efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global oil supplies.

  • US says it has arrested relatives of late Iranian ​general Qasem ​Soleimani

    US says it has arrested relatives of late Iranian ​general Qasem ​Soleimani

    A fresh diplomatic and legal controversy has erupted between the United States and Iran after US authorities announced the arrest of two women they identify as the niece and grand-niece of deceased top Iranian military commander Gen Qasem Soleimani, alongside the revocation of their permanent resident status.

    In an official statement released Saturday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that Hamideh Soleimani Afshar and her daughter Sarinasadat Hosseiny had their lawful US green card status canceled, and are currently held in custody by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) ahead of planned deportation proceedings. Taking to the social media platform X, Rubio further claimed the pair had been living a luxurious life in the US while holding legal permanent residency.

    US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials outlined the pair’s immigration history to CBS News, the US partner of the BBC. Hamideh Soleimani Afshar first entered the US on a tourist visa in 2015, was granted asylum four years later in 2019, and secured her green card in 2021. When filing for naturalization in 2025, she disclosed that she had made four trips back to Iran since obtaining her permanent resident status. DHS argues that these repeated visits prove her original asylum application was obtained through fraud.

    As for Sarinasadat Hosseiny, DHS records show she arrived in the US in 2015 on a student visa, followed the same asylum timeline as her mother in 2019, and received her green card just two years ago in 2023. The State Department has additionally labeled Hamideh Soleimani Afshar an open supporter of what it calls Iran’s “totalitarian, terrorist regime,” alleging she spreads state-backed Iranian propaganda through her personal social media accounts. Hamideh’s husband, who has not been publicly named by authorities, has also been barred from entering the US, per the statement.

    However, the claims from US officials have been met with immediate and categorical denial from Soleimani’s biological daughter. Narjes Soleimani, whose father was killed in a 2020 US airstrike ordered by then-President Donald Trump, says the two detained women have no family connection to her late father at all, calling all of the State Department’s assertions completely false. In a sharp rebuke, Narjes Soleimani accused the US of fabricating lies against the iconic Iranian figure, claiming the moves show the US has become “weak and insignificant.”

    Gen Qasem Soleimani was one of Iran’s most influential and powerful military leaders, heading the country’s elite Quds Force—the foreign operations arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps—and overseeing all Iranian military activity across the Middle East. He was killed in a targeted US airstrike at Baghdad International Airport in January 2020, alongside several leaders of Iran-aligned militias, a strike that sent already fraught US-Iran relations to a decades-long low.

    The controversy comes as former President Trump, who authorized the 2020 strike, recently reiterated his position on the killing during a national address this Wednesday. “I killed Gen Qasem Soleimani in my first term. He was an evil genius, brilliant person, a horrible human being however, the father of the roadside bomb, and he lived just horrible, what he did,” Trump told attendees. He added that he believes Iran would be in a much stronger military position in its ongoing regional conflict if Soleimani were still alive today.

    The BBC reached out to the US State Department to request additional context and comment on the arrests, but a department spokesperson said it had no further statement to add on the matter.

  • German males under 45 may need military approval for long stays abroad

    German males under 45 may need military approval for long stays abroad

    More than a decade after Germany abolished compulsory military service, a sweeping new law overhauling the nation’s military framework has introduced a little-noticed regulation that has recently come to public attention, reshaping how German men interact with national defense preparedness. The Military Service Modernisation Act, which took full effect on January 1 of this year, was crafted to expand Germany’s defense capabilities in response to heightened security risks stemming from Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Among its most surprising provisions is a requirement that all German males between the ages of 17 and 45 must obtain official prior approval before taking any trip or extended stay abroad that lasts longer than three months.

    A spokesperson for Germany’s Federal Ministry of Defense confirmed the new rule in an official statement provided to the BBC, clarifying that the obligation applies to all men aged 17 and above. Currently, the law notes that travel approval is generally granted for most requests, but official guidance has not yet outlined clear enforcement measures for individuals who fail to secure permission before traveling. The requirement flew under the radar of most citizens and media outlets until it was first reported by German outlet Frankfurter Rundschau this past Friday.

    Defense ministry officials explained the policy’s core purpose: to maintain a accurate, reliable military registry that ensures authorities can quickly locate eligible personnel in the event of a national emergency. “In the event of an emergency, we must know who may be staying abroad for an extended period,” the spokesperson said. Officials also acknowledged that the new rule could carry “far-reaching” impacts for young German men, and noted that exemption guidelines are currently being drafted to cut down on unnecessary red tape for citizens.

    The legal foundation for the new travel requirement traces back to Germany’s 1956 Conscription Act, a law that has been amended repeatedly over the decades, with the most recent update approved by parliament last December. Before this change, the rule requiring advance reporting for extended international stays only applied when Germany was officially in a state of national defense or mobilization. Defense officials added that an almost identical provision was in place during the Cold War, but it never gained practical relevance for everyday citizens at that time.

    Beyond the travel regulation, the new Military Service Modernisation Act lays out an ambitious goal to grow Germany’s active armed forces personnel from its current count of roughly 180,000 to 260,000 by the year 2035. Last December, German parliament voted to roll out a revamped voluntary military service system: starting in January, all 18-year-olds in Germany receive a questionnaire asking if they are interested in joining the armed forces. Starting July 2027, all 18-year-olds will also be required to complete a fitness assessment, to pre-verify eligibility for military service if a full-scale conflict breaks out.

    Under Germany’s constitution, women are allowed to volunteer for military service but cannot be compelled to serve in any capacity. While the current framework relies entirely on voluntary participation, the law leaves open the possibility of reintroducing some form of compulsory military service if the regional security situation deteriorates or volunteer recruitment falls short of government targets.

    When the legislation was first approved by parliament late last year, thousands of young Germans joined mass public protests opposing the changes. “We don’t want to spend half a year of our lives locked up in barracks, being trained in drill and obedience and learning to kill,” one protest organizer wrote on social media, capturing widespread anti-conscription sentiment among young people.

    This shift marks a dramatic reversal of decades of post-Cold War defense policy in Germany. Like many of its Western European allies, Germany steadily downsized its armed forces through the 1990s, a period of sustained peacetime following the collapse of the Soviet Union. At the height of the Cold War, Germany maintained an active army of nearly 500,000 personnel. Compulsory military service was fully abolished in 2011 under then-Chancellor Angela Merkel, ending a decades-long policy that had defined German national service for generations.

    Today, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has made rebuilding the Bundeswehr a core policy priority, with a public pledge to turn Germany’s armed forces into the strongest conventional military force in Europe. This commitment comes in response to what his current government describes as a far more dangerous security environment across the European continent, driven by Russian aggression against Ukraine.

  • Iran announces new air defence used to down US fighter jet

    Iran announces new air defence used to down US fighter jet

    Tensions between Iran and the United States have spiked dramatically in recent days following a confrontation near the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, where Iran’s newly unveiled domestic air defense system engaged and downed at least one U.S. military aircraft. Iran’s state media has confirmed the engagement, marking a sharp escalation in the long-running standoff between the two nations over control of the key global oil shipping chokepoint.

    The announcement of the new air defense system was made by a spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Joint Military Command, who emphasized that the indigenous technology — developed by the country’s homegrown cohort of young scientists and engineers — has put Tehran on track to gain full, unchallenged control of its national airspace. In a strongly worded statement directed at foreign adversaries, the spokesperson warned that successive deployments of these advanced systems would continue to demonstrate the failure of hostile powers’ ambitions in the region, exposing their military weakness to the international community.

    According to initial Iranian reports, the strike targeted an enemy A-10 Thunderbolt II, a single-seat U.S. jet purpose-built for close air support of ground troops, operating in airspace near the Strait of Hormuz. Confirming details of the incident, *The New York Times* reported that the downed jet’s lone pilot survived the crash and was recovered by U.S. forces. Multiple U.S. outlets have also expanded on the incident: an anonymous senior U.S. official speaking to NBC News shared that two U.S. helicopters deployed to the rescue mission were also targeted by Iranian defensive fire, though all crew members on board the helicopters escaped without injury. In total, two U.S. combat aircraft were downed in Friday’s exchanges, according to Iranian military accounts.

    The confrontation comes amid a rapidly building U.S. military buildup in the Persian Gulf region. Over recent weeks, Washington has deployed thousands of additional troops to the area, a move that has fueled widespread speculation among global analysts that the U.S. is preparing for a potential ground operation to seize Iranian-controlled islands in the Strait of Hormuz — a suggestion that U.S. government officials have not formally denied.

    The escalating crisis has drawn comment from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who issued a stark ultimatum to Iran via his Truth Social platform on Saturday. Repeating a reference to his own previous threats against the Islamic Republic, Trump wrote, “Remember when I gave Iran ten days to MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT. Time is running out – 48 hours before all Hell will reign [sic] down on them.”

    The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most geopolitically sensitive waterways on the planet, with roughly 20% of the world’s total oil shipments passing through the narrow channel annually. Any sustained disruption to shipping through the strait would trigger immediate, far-reaching consequences for global energy markets and international security, making the current standoff a point of intense concern for world powers.

  • Search for missing airman presents serious test for US

    Search for missing airman presents serious test for US

    The recent downing of a U.S. F-15 Eagle fighter jet over Iranian territory has upended weeks of bold claims from the Trump administration about American military dominance in the region, leaving one of the two crew members unaccounted for and throwing the already volatile conflict between Washington and Tehran into a dangerous new phase.

    Prior to the incident, President Donald Trump insisted Iran’s air defense capabilities had been so severely degraded that it could not effectively challenge American aircraft operating in its airspace. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth doubled down on this assertion, declaring the U.S. had secured total air superiority over Iran. Friday’s shootdown, however, delivers a major setback to these claims, proving that Iran retains at least limited capacity to defend its sovereign airspace against incursions.

    The situation grew increasingly tense after it emerged that the U.S. national security team spent much of Thursday briefing the president in the White House West Wing on a search-and-rescue mission that itself came under fire from Iranian forces. While U.S. media reports indicate both crew members sustained injuries but managed to escape Iranian territorial airspace, one remains missing, and both U.S. and Iranian forces are now locked in a urgent race to locate him.

    According to BBC sourcing, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has launched a widespread search operation, deploying military troops and enlisting local communities with a $66,000 reward offered for capturing the missing weapons systems officer alive.

    Publicly, President Trump has sought to downplay the incident, arguing it will not derail ongoing negotiations with Tehran aimed at ending the conflict that began with joint U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28. Privately, however, U.S. officials are said to view the missing airman’s fate as a major strategic and political risk.

    If Iranian forces capture the American service member, the implications for the conflict could be far-reaching. At a minimum, it would represent a significant political embarrassment for the Trump White House. Iran could also choose to parade the captured airman for propaganda purposes, echoing the traumatic 1979-1981 Iran hostage crisis that saw 52 American diplomats held captive for 444 days. That crisis left deep, lasting political scars on the United States, and was only resolved after Washington lifted key sanctions and unfroze nearly $8 billion in Iranian assets.

    Decades later, the legacy of past hostage crises continues to shape U.S. policy. Successive U.S. administrations have gone to extreme lengths to secure the release of detained Americans, sometimes through tactics that sparked fierce political backlash. In 2014, for example, the Obama administration exchanged five Taliban detainees held at Guantanamo Bay for U.S. Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, who had been captured by the Taliban in Afghanistan five years earlier. Critics of the deal argued it created a dangerous incentive for future militant groups to take American hostages.

    The possible capture of the missing F-15 crew member presents the Trump administration with two starkly different paths forward. On one hand, political pressure would almost certainly mount on the president to order aggressive new military escalation in response to the capture. On the other hand, the situation could also create an opening to pause ongoing strikes and pursue quiet backchannel diplomacy to secure the airman’s release. Either way, if Iran gains custody of the American and uses him as a bargaining chip, it will amount to one of the most serious tests of the Trump administration’s handling of the conflict to date.

    On Capitol Hill, lawmakers have offered prayers for the missing airman and voiced support for U.S. forces, but new political divides have already emerged. Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace reiterated her call for a full withdrawal of U.S. troops from the region, arguing “it is far past time we bring troops home.” Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, meanwhile, called on Iran to comply with international law in its treatment of any captured U.S. service member.

    Across the U.S. political spectrum, there is growing anxiety over the safety of American personnel deployed to the region, especially amid growing speculation about a potential full-scale ground invasion of Iran. Broad public and political opposition to another open-ended “forever war” and further American casualties has been a consistent undercurrent of the conflict, a dynamic that is only amplified by the current crisis.

    The incident comes as President Trump has repeated his ultimatum that Iran must agree to a new deal and reopen the Strait of Hormuz by Monday, April 6, or face devastating new strikes targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, which he has described as bringing “hell” to Tehran. The president’s deadlines have shifted repeatedly in recent weeks, even as he has claimed ongoing talks with Tehran are “very good” and “productive” — claims Iranian officials have flatly denied.

    With the U.S. continuing to build up its military presence in the Persian Gulf, Trump openly warning of more American casualties in coming weeks, and new strikes already being promised, all indicators point to a significant escalation of the conflict that is already well underway. The fate of the missing airman has only added a new, unpredictable variable to what is already one of the most dangerous confrontations in the Middle East in decades.

  • World’s oldest leader to get a deputy for first time in 43-year rule

    World’s oldest leader to get a deputy for first time in 43-year rule

    After 41 years of uninterrupted rule by 91-year-old President Paul Biya — the world’s oldest serving head of state — Cameroon’s parliament has passed a landmark constitutional amendment to reinstate the office of vice-president, a post abolished nearly 50 years ago, triggering fierce backlash from the country’s opposition and raising new questions about the nation’s political future.

    The reform, approved Saturday during a joint sitting of Cameroon’s upper and lower legislative chambers, passed by a wide margin: 200 lawmakers supported the bill, 18 voted against it, and four abstained. It will take effect once signed by President Biya, who has led the central African nation since November 1982. Under the new rules, if Biya is incapacitated or passes away while in office, the appointed vice-president will automatically assume the presidency and complete the remaining seven-year term, rather than triggering an immediate snap election. Prior to this change, the constitution designated the Senate president to serve as interim president only until a new election could be organized.

    The vice-presidency has not existed in Cameroon since 1972, when a national referendum replaced the country’s original federal system — which granted autonomy to its French-speaking and English-speaking regions — with a unitary state. The abolition of the post came alongside the end of a longstanding convention that split the presidency and vice-presidency between the two linguistic communities. For years, persistent private speculation has swirled around Biya’s health, though public discussion of the topic remains a taboo in Cameroon. The president has repeatedly refuted rumors of his death by appearing in public following extended periods out of the public eye.

    Government supporters frame the reform as a practical adjustment to streamline governance and succession planning. Proponents argue the change boosts administrative efficiency by creating a clear, permanent line of succession when a stand-in for the president is required, while also removing succession-related burdens from the Senate to allow the body to focus on its core legislative work. The new framework specifies that the vice-president will be directly appointed by the sitting president, rather than elected via popular vote alongside the head of state.

    Opposition groups have decried the amendment as a power grab rushed through parliament without inclusive national consultation. The Social Democratic Front (SDF), Cameroon’s main opposition party which holds six parliamentary seats, boycotted the vote entirely. The party had pushed for two key changes that were not adopted: it called for the vice-president to be jointly elected on a ticket with the president, and for a return to the pre-1972 convention that splits the country’s top two offices between the anglophone and francophone communities, to reflect Cameroon’s linguistic divide. SDF chairman Joshua Osih called the reform a “missed historic opportunity,” noting that what could have been a moment of transformative political courage ended as a wasted chance to address longstanding national divides.

    Other senior opposition figures have gone even further in their criticism. Maurice Kamto, leader of the Cameroon Renaissance Movement, labeled the amendment a “constitutional and institutional coup” carried out by Biya’s ruling party. Kamto accused the incumbent administration of working to establish a “republican monarchy” and announced plans to launch a nationwide online campaign to oppose the change. Even one senator from Biya’s own ruling party has publicly described the legislative process behind the amendment as “suspicious.”

    Biya’s extended tenure has already been marked by controversy: he won an eighth term in office last October with 53.7% of the vote, a result the opposition rejected as fraudulent. Now that the constitutional change has been approved, public and political discourse across Cameroon is dominated by one pressing question: who will Biya appoint as the country’s first vice-president in more than half a century? Even with the new succession framework in place, the long-term political trajectory of Cameroon beyond Biya’s rule remains deeply uncertain.

  • UK police investigate after officers left guns outside mayor’s home

    UK police investigate after officers left guns outside mayor’s home

    A major security blunder has shaken London’s law enforcement community after armed protection officers assigned to guard Mayor Sadiq Khan accidentally left a cache of loaded weapons unsecured on a public street in the capital’s south end, triggering an urgent internal investigation. As of this week, five serving officers have been reassigned away from frontline protection duties while the probe into the incident moves forward, Metropolitan Police officials confirmed in an official statement released late Friday.

    The stockpile of weapons, which British tabloid newspaper The Sun has reported includes a Heckler & Koch MP5 semiautomatic carbine, a Glock service pistol, a Taser conducted energy weapon and a quantity of live ammunition, was discovered completely unattended by a local civilian couple earlier this Tuesday. The pair stumbled on the unmarked bag left along the curb before alerting police to the dangerous oversight.

    Jordan Griffiths, a scaffolder who was with his girlfriend when the bag was found, told reporters he was utterly stunned when he opened the bag and realized what it held. “I could not believe my eyes,” Griffiths said in an interview with The Sun. “I took some pictures as proof of what we had found, then I called the police right away and told them what I had. They turned up within a few minutes to collect the guns.”

    The Metropolitan Police’s Directorate of Professional Standards, the unit tasked with overseeing officer conduct and investigating procedural errors, is leading the review into how such a critical lapse in security protocol occurred. In the unit’s public statement, leaders acknowledged the public alarm the incident is likely to spark. “We are urgently reviewing the circumstances of this incident and recognize the concern it may cause,” the statement read. “At this stage it is believed the bag was misplaced by on-duty officers a short time before the member of the public located it.”

    A representative for Mayor Sadiq Khan said that while the incident does not pose an ongoing threat to the mayor, law enforcement leadership must take every possible measure to prevent similar dangerous oversights from happening in the future. “The police must now take all steps to ensure an incident like this never occurs again,” the spokesperson said.

  • Defenses not ‘annihilated,’ Iran reportedly downs two US planes

    Defenses not ‘annihilated,’ Iran reportedly downs two US planes

    Just 48 hours after former President Donald Trump asserted that Iran no longer posed a military threat and that the country’s entire air defense network had been completely destroyed, Iranian military forces carried out a stunning strike that downed two manned U.S. military aircraft on Friday, multiple international news outlets have confirmed.

    Citing an Israeli government official and a second anonymous source with direct knowledge of the incident, Axios first broke the news Friday afternoon that an F-15E Strike Eagle, one of the U.S. Air Force’s primary fighter-attack jets, was hit by Iranian anti-aircraft fire, forcing both crew members to eject over Iranian territory. This strike marks the first documented incident of a manned U.S. aircraft being shot down inside Iranian borders since the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran launched on February 28.

    As of Friday evening, one of the F-15E crew members had been recovered by U.S. special operations forces, though The Washington Post reports that details of his medical condition remain undisclosed. Search operations are still intensifying across the region to locate the second missing crew member.

    Shortly after Axios’ initial report, The Intercept published confirmation that a second U.S. aircraft, an A-10 Warthog ground-attack jet, crashed near the strategic Strait of Hormuz around the same time as the F-15E incident. Matching the pattern of the first crash, one crew member from the A-10 has been recovered, while the second remains unaccounted for.

    Al Jazeera later added that a U.S. Black Hawk search-and-rescue helicopter was also struck by an Iranian projectile while participating in the operation to locate missing pilots. The helicopter was able to exit Iranian airspace before making a safe landing outside Iranian territory, with no reported casualties on board.

    Iran has officially claimed responsibility for downing the F-15E, with Tasnim News Agency — the semiofficial media outlet of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — releasing a formal statement confirming the strike. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has a history of rejecting previous Iranian claims of downing U.S. aircraft, including a separate claim made near the Strait of Hormuz just one day prior on Thursday. However, CENTCOM has not issued any denial regarding Friday’s incidents, and has publicly confirmed that the F-15E was indeed lost.

    Friday’s development directly contradicts sweeping claims Trump made during a national televised address just this past Wednesday. During the speech, Trump declared that five weeks of intense U.S. bombing campaigns had “eviscerated” Iran’s military capabilities, and that the country was “essentially really no longer a threat” to regional or American interests. He went further to claim that Iran’s entire air defense infrastructure had been wiped out, saying, “They have no anti-aircraft equipment. Their radar is 100% annihilated. We are unstoppable.”

    Just one week prior, Trump claimed that Iran’s leadership was desperate to negotiate a peace deal because it “can’t do a thing” to defend itself against U.S. airstrikes. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed this narrative, repeatedly touting unchallenged U.S. “air superiority” over the region.

    Even before Friday’s downing of the two jets, these rosy assessments from the White House were already called into question. A Thursday report from CNN cited internal U.S. intelligence findings that roughly half of Iran’s missile launchers remain fully operational, and that the country still retains around 50% of its drone fleet. One senior source told CNN that Iran remains “very much poised to wreak absolute havoc throughout the entire region.”

    Military analysts have warned that any missing crew members captured by Iranian forces could become critical bargaining chips for Tehran in future negotiations with Washington. Iranian officials have already seized on the incident to mock the Trump administration’s claims. Mohammad Ghalibaf, speaker of Iran’s Parliament, posted a scathing rebuke on social media following news of the downing. “After defeating Iran 37 times in a row,” Ghalibaf wrote, “this brilliant no-strategy war they started has now been downgraded from ‘regime change’ to ‘Hey! Can anyone find our pilots? Please?’”

    The incident also comes amid growing controversy over casualty transparency in the conflict. An analysis published by The Intercept earlier this week found that at least 15 American troops have been killed in the region since the campaign began, with more than 520 others injured. CENTCOM has been accused of covering up the true scope of U.S. casualties after the command released incomplete, outdated casualty figures to reporters and repeatedly declined to share full, updated totals.

  • Senegal limits foreign trips for officials as the fallout from Iran war deepens

    Senegal limits foreign trips for officials as the fallout from Iran war deepens

    DAKAR, SENEGAL — Facing mounting economic pressure from a global energy crisis spurred by the Iran conflict, the Senegalese government has implemented strict new rules barring cabinet ministers from all foreign travel except for trips deemed absolutely critical to state affairs, as part of sweeping cost-cutting initiatives to stabilize public finances.

    Like most sub-Saharan African nations, Senegal relies almost entirely on imports to meet its domestic petroleum product demand. this heavy dependence leaves the country’s already fragile economy extremely exposed to global supply chain disruptions, most notably the tensions around the Strait of Hormuz — a key global oil chokepoint. Ongoing conflict linked to the Iran war has driven dramatic, sustained increases in global crude prices, squeezing both public budgets and household finances across the country.

    Speaking publicly Friday, Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko outlined the scope of the new austerity measures, noting that the national government’s initial 202X budget was built around a projected crude oil price of just $62 per barrel. In the wake of market volatility tied to the Iran conflict, current crude prices have surged to nearly twice that forecast, creating a massive unplanned budget shortfall that requires urgent action.

    “I have implemented a series of drastic measures to rein in all unnecessary government spending, starting with the full cancellation of all non-essential international missions,” Sonko stated in comments carried by state-owned national newspaper Le Soleil. The prime minister confirmed he had already scrapped multiple of his own planned trips to regional and European destinations, including Niger, Spain, and France.

    Going forward, Sonko emphasized, “No minister in my government will be permitted to leave the country except for missions that are absolutely essential.”

    The energy-driven price shock has extended far beyond government balance sheets, worsening daily hardship for millions of low-income Senegalese and other Africans who already struggled with poverty. For many households across the region, soaring fuel prices have made daily commutes to work unaffordable and put regular meals out of reach for vulnerable families.

  • Trump seeks $152m to reopen notorious Alcatraz prison

    Trump seeks $152m to reopen notorious Alcatraz prison

    A controversial new provision in the Trump administration’s 2027 fiscal budget request has sparked fierce political debate across California, as the White House seeks $152 million to restart operations at one of America’s most infamous correctional facilities: Alcatraz Island.

    Perched just off the coast of San Francisco, within view of the iconic Golden Gate Bridge, Alcatraz—widely nicknamed “The Rock”—has held a unique place in American popular culture for decades. First built as a coastal naval defense fort in the 1800s, the site was converted first into a military prison, then into a maximum-security federal prison in the 1930s under the U.S. Department of Justice. For nearly 30 years, it held some of the nation’s most notorious criminals, including gang kingpin Al Capone, organized crime leader Mickey Cohen, and Prohibition-era outlaw George “Machine Gun” Kelly. The site’s remote location and brutal conditions made it nearly impossible to escape, cementing its reputation as the most feared prison in the country.

    Alcatraz’s operational costs far outpaced those of other federal facilities, however. By 1963, the Bureau of Prisons confirmed running the island prison cost three times more than any comparable mainland facility, in large part due to the lack of natural infrastructure: the island has no native running water or permanent sewage system, meaning all supplies and waste must be shipped in and out by boat. It was permanently decommissioned as a prison that year, and turned over to the National Park Service to operate as part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Today, it is one of San Francisco’s most popular tourist landmarks, drawing millions of visitors each year and generating roughly $60 million in annual tourism revenue for the region. It has also been featured in dozens of major Hollywood films, including *Escape from Alcatraz* starring Clint Eastwood and *The Rock* starring Sean Connery and Nicolas Cage.

    The Trump administration’s proposal would reverse that decades-long status. The $152 million request would cover the first year of construction costs to “rebuild Alcatraz as a state-of-the-art secure prison facility,” and is part of a broader $1.7 billion investment package for the Bureau of Prisons. President Trump first announced the plan on his social media platform Truth Social last year, stating he was directing the Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security to collaborate on a “substantially enlarged and rebuilt ALCATRAZ” that would “house America’s most ruthless and violent offenders.”

    The proposal has faced immediate, fierce pushback from Democratic politicians in California, who have raised a host of practical, financial, and cultural objections to the plan. House Democratic leader and longtime California representative Nancy Pelosi called the proposal “absurd on its face and should be rejected outright.” In a statement, Pelosi argued that “rebuilding Alcatraz into a modern prison is a stupid notion that would be nothing more than a waste of taxpayer dollars and an insult to the intelligence of the American people.” Pelosi and other local politicians also warned that converting the island back into an active prison would permanently eliminate one of the Bay Area’s most iconic tourist landmarks, cutting off millions in annual economic revenue.

    Beyond the loss of tourism, critics point to long-standing structural challenges that led to Alcatraz’s original closure 62 years ago, which remain unresolved. The island still lacks any natural source of running water or a permanent, modern sewage system, requiring all infrastructure for the facility to be built from scratch at massive extra cost. Unlike the 1960s, modern environmental regulations would also add billions in unaccounted-for costs to the project, critics say, making the final price tag far higher than the Trump administration’s initial estimate. Even if construction is completed, ongoing operational costs will still dwarf those of any mainland federal prison, as all food, fuel, staff, and supplies must be ferried to the island daily.

    Before the plan can move forward, it must first receive full approval from the U.S. Congress, where Democratic leaders have already signaled they intend to block the provision. While the proposal is popular with some conservative voters who frame Alcatraz as a symbol of harsh justice for violent crime, it remains deeply unpopular with California voters, local leaders, and the tourism industry that relies on the landmark for thousands of local jobs.