分类: politics

  • Japan takes more revenue from Aussie gas than Australian government, inquiry told

    Japan takes more revenue from Aussie gas than Australian government, inquiry told

    A heated debate over Australia’s fossil fuel taxation regime has moved into the Senate inquiry stage, with policy analysts and activists arguing that a new 25 percent tax on gas exports could unlock billions in annual public revenue and fix a long-running inequity in how the country values its natural resources.

    The inquiry was convened to examine Australia’s existing gas tax frameworks, amid growing cross-political pressure to either introduce the new export tax or raise the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT) on extraordinary windfall profits earned by gas producers. Industry groups have pushed back hard against these proposals, warning that higher taxes would threaten domestic energy security and damage long-standing trade relationships with key Asian customers.

    Speaking to the inquiry this week, Richard Denniss, executive director of progressive think tank the Australia Institute, laid out a striking new finding from the organization’s research: the Japanese government collects more annual tax revenue from imported Australian gas than the entire Australian government collects from exporting the same resource. Denniss noted that the Japanese government pulls in roughly $8 billion annually in combined taxes from imported coal and gas, a large share of which comes from Australia, one of Japan’s largest energy suppliers.

    Denniss framed the proposed 25 percent export tax as a once-in-a-generation chance to correct this imbalance, arguing that parliament has a rare opportunity to bridge partisan divides on an issue that has resonated across the political spectrum. He stressed that the tax would not drive up energy costs for Japan or other export customers, pointing to Norway’s heavily taxed gas sector as evidence that global market pricing insulates buyers from exporting nation tax changes. “There’s no Norway premium for Norwegian gas, which is heavily taxed. All of the gas is selling at the same world price,” Denniss explained. He added that if Japan were concerned about domestic energy prices, it could simply lower its own import tariffs to offset any impact. Beyond revenue, Denniss argued the tax would boost domestic gas supply by incentivizing exporters to sell more domestically, driving down local gas prices for Australian households and businesses.

    The Australia Institute estimates the 25 percent export tax would generate as much as $17 billion in new annual government revenue. Denniss also pushed back on industry claims that the gas sector is a major driver of Australian employment, noting that the industry directly employs only around 18,000 people – far fewer than the 100,000 Australians working at McDonald’s. He added that nurses collectively pay more in annual income tax than the entire gas industry pays in corporate taxes.

    Adam Bandt, former leader of the Australian Greens and current chief executive of the Australian Conservation Foundation, who is also appearing before the inquiry, laid out one potential use for the new revenue: permanently free public transport across Australia. Bandt argued that forcing gas corporations to pay their fair share of tax would be wildly popular, saying “They would be erecting statues in every town square for the first prime minister that makes the gas corporations pay their fair share of tax and uses it to fund free public transport, grow the industries of the future or pay for the clean up after cyclones and floods.” He noted that there is broad public support for a full review of Australia’s outdated gas tax rules.

    Konrad Benjamin, a former schoolteacher and founder of grassroots advocacy group Punters Politics, told the inquiry that many ordinary Australian voters feel they are being exploited by the current low-tax regime for gas producers. “We, millions of regular Aussies, are now paying attention, and we understand a few things that we might not have understood before,” Benjamin said. “We understand that Australia’s gas is incredibly valuable. We understand that we’re giving most of it away for free to foreign corporations. We understand that those same foreign corporations pay close to bugger-all tax.” He questioned why, as a major resource holder, Australia is failing to capture the economic benefits of its own natural gas, especially as governments constantly claim they cannot afford to increase funding for public services like schools amid global economic volatility.

    Opponents of the new tax have raised a number of concerns, warning that the policy could jeopardize Australia’s critical trade relationships with major Asian gas importers, which are key economic partners for Australia. Industry groups also reaffirm their position that higher taxes would undermine investment in domestic energy production and threaten long-term national energy security.

  • Japan approves scrapping a ban on lethal weapons exports in a change of its postwar pacifist policy

    Japan approves scrapping a ban on lethal weapons exports in a change of its postwar pacifist policy

    In a landmark shift that upends seven decades of postwar pacifist governance, Japan’s Cabinet led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi gave formal approval Tuesday to eliminate long-standing restrictions on lethal weapons exports, clearing the last regulatory barriers for the country to expand its international arms trade.

  • New Zealand Prime Minister Luxon survives party leadership vote months before election

    New Zealand Prime Minister Luxon survives party leadership vote months before election

    WELLINGTON, New Zealand — In a dramatic move to end swirling speculation about his political future, New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced Tuesday he has emerged victorious from a secret confidence vote held by his own National Party caucus. The leadership challenge was triggered by weeks of sliding poll ratings for the center-right party, which fueled widespread rumors that Luxon could be removed from his post months ahead of the country’s scheduled general election.

    The confidence ballot was held during an extended meeting of National Party parliamentarians at Wellington’s Parliament House. Originally scheduled as a routine one-hour caucus gathering, the meeting stretched to two and a half hours as lawmakers debated Luxon’s leadership. Speaking to reporters after the closed-door session, Luxon confirmed he had personally called for the confidence vote to put an end to persistent media speculation about internal unrest within the party.

    “The past week has been dominated by constant media speculation about my position as leader,” Luxon told reporters. “I called this vote to lay that speculation to rest once and for all.” The prime minister declined to release the exact breakdown of votes, nor would he confirm whether the result was unanimous, before leaving without taking questions from the press.

    Luxon, a former airline chief executive who entered Parliament in 2020 and has led the National Party since 2021, has governed New Zealand as head of a right-wing coalition government since the 2023 general election. The country’s next national election is set for November 7 this year, putting the leadership vote roughly six months before voters head to the polls.

    Recent polling had made discussion of a leadership challenge unavoidable, even as ousting a sitting prime minister mid-term remains an extremely rare occurrence in New Zealand’s modern political history. The most recent 1News-Verian poll showed a notable slump in support for both Luxon personally and the National Party, projecting that if an election were held immediately, the right-wing bloc led by National would trail the left-wing opposition bloc headed by the Labour Party.

    Luxon pinned the spread of rumors about internal party division on media coverage, saying he would not continue to engage with unsubstantiated speculation. “If the media want to keep focusing on speculation and rumor, I am not going to engage,” he said. New Zealand’s recent political history has seen two prime ministers — National’s John Key and Labour’s Jacinda Ardern — voluntarily step down from the role, but no sitting prime minister has been forced out by their own party in modern times.

  • Lori Chavez-DeRemer out as US labour secretary

    Lori Chavez-DeRemer out as US labour secretary

    In a sudden development announced by the White House on Monday, United States Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is stepping down from her cabinet post to accept a new role in the private sector. Her exit comes after months of growing public criticism and an ongoing internal probe into alleged improper conduct by the 58-year-old cabinet leader, whose department oversees federal workplace regulations and manages the national unemployment insurance system.

    The departure of Chavez-DeRemer marks the latest high-profile turnover in the Trump administration, following two other major cabinet shakeups in recent months: the removal of Pam Bondi from the post of Attorney General in early April, and the March firing of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who led the administration’s restrictive immigration policy initiatives.

    In the official public statement shared Monday afternoon on the social platform X by White House Communications Director Steven Cheung, the administration highlighted what it framed as Chavez-DeRemer’s successful tenure. The statement praised her for doing a “phenomenal job” in the role, crediting her with protecting American workers, implementing equitable labor standards, and expanding upskilling opportunities to help US workers boost their long-term career prospects.

    Cheung also confirmed that Keith Sonderling will immediately step into the position of acting Labor Secretary to lead the department until a permanent successor is named.

    Reports of an investigation into Chavez-DeRemer first emerged in January, when the New York Post broke the news that the Labor Department’s independent inspector general had opened a probe into allegations of workplace misconduct against the secretary. As this is a developing breaking news story, additional details surrounding the investigation and the circumstances of the secretary’s departure are still emerging. Updates will be posted as more information becomes available, and readers can access real-time alerts by following BBC Breaking on X or downloading the BBC News mobile application.

  • Israeli, Lebanese officials to meet Thursday for 2nd round of talks — Israeli state media

    Israeli, Lebanese officials to meet Thursday for 2nd round of talks — Israeli state media

    Weeks of intense cross-border conflict between Israel and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah have given way to a fragile truce, and now officials from both nations are set to meet for a second round of direct negotiations aimed at locking in long-term stability along their shared border.

    A senior Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to Xinhua News Agency on Monday, confirmed that the talks will take place Thursday in the U.S. capital Washington. While the official declined to share additional details about the negotiating agenda or expected outcomes, multiple sources have already confirmed leadership for both delegations.

    Israeli outlet Reuters, quoting an anonymous Israeli government source, reports that Yechiel Leiter, Israel’s ambassador to the United States who participated in the first round of talks held earlier this month, will lead the Israeli negotiating team this week. On the Lebanese side, the country’s presidency made an official announcement via social media platform X on Monday morning confirming that former Lebanese Ambassador to the U.S. Simon Karam will head the Lebanese delegation.

    The presidency emphasized in its statement that Karam is the sole authorized representative for Lebanon in these talks, noting that “No one else will participate on Lebanon’s behalf or take its place in this mission.” The talks are also structured as an independent negotiation track separate from any other ongoing diplomatic efforts between the two sides, the statement added.

    This upcoming meeting marks the first formal negotiation between the two parties since the 10-day ceasefire agreement came into force at 2100 GMT on Thursday, ending weeks of deadly exchanges of fire that displaced tens of thousands of civilians on both sides of the border. Ahead of the ceasefire, an Israeli strike on a bridge in southern Lebanon’s Qasmiyeh region left two people dead, with rescuers working to recover their bodies just hours before the truce took hold, according to on-the-ground reports from April 20.

    Lebanon has laid out clear core objectives for the negotiations: the permanent end to all hostilities along the border, a full Israeli withdrawal from occupied southern Lebanese territories, and the deployment of the official Lebanese army to the country’s internationally recognized southern border. In its statement, the Lebanese presidency framed the current moment as a stark binary choice for all parties: either continue a prolonged conflict that would carry devastating humanitarian, social, economic, and national sovereignty costs, or work toward a lasting negotiated settlement that can end years of tensions along the border.

  • Indian politicians are campaigning while holding fish. What is going on?

    Indian politicians are campaigning while holding fish. What is going on?

    On a humid, sticky pre-election morning in Kolkata, the capital of India’s eastern state of West Bengal, BJP candidate Koustav Bagchi makes his way through residential neighborhoods, door to door. Clad in a crisp traditional red-and-white sari-inspired garb, the former lawyer carries one unusual campaign accessory: a fresh fish. Drums beat in the procession behind him, supporters roar his name, and there are no lengthy policy speeches, no dense policy brochures. Instead, Bagchi leans on a single, powerful visual message – one that needs no words: I share your identity. I belong here, just like you.

    A few kilometers away, in Kolkata’s bustling port district, another BJP contender, Rakesh Singh, repeats the same striking campaign tactic. Dressed to draw a crowd and flanked by dozens of party workers, Singh hefts a large fish above his head again and again as he works the early morning foot traffic. He is running against incumbent Kolkata mayor Firhad Hakim in one of the most high-profile contests of the upcoming West Bengal Legislative Assembly elections, turning the humble aquatic staple into a political weapon.

    For the people of West Bengal, fish is far more than a staple food item. It is woven into the very fabric of daily life, local cuisine, cultural memory and ritual, serving as an enduring marker of regional identity and communal belonging. Today, that deep cultural resonance has been transformed into full-blown political theater, as candidates from both major parties brandish fish to address a specific, widespread voter anxiety that has come to define the 2026 election.

    In India, dietary habits have long been deeply politicized. The national ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been widely associated with an assertive, culturally framed push for vegetarianism, driven by the Hindu nationalist ideological underpinnings of the party. This perception has been cemented by periodic restrictions on meat sales in several BJP-governed states, as well as high-profile crackdowns tied to cow protection vigilante groups, even though the overwhelming majority of India’s population identifies as non-vegetarian. As the state election campaign heats up, fish has moved off dinner plates and into the political spotlight, recast as proof of cultural loyalty and a rebuttal to claims of outside ideological intrusion.

    The incumbent ruling Trinamool Congress, led by three-term Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee who is running for a historic fourth consecutive term, has weaponized this public anxiety to attack the BJP. Banerjee has repeatedly warned voters that a BJP victory would threaten West Bengal’s centuries-old way of life, framing fish and rice – the iconic core of Bengali cuisine – as non-negotiable parts of regional identity. “The BJP will not allow you to eat fish. Nor will they allow you to eat meat or eggs,” Banerjee told a recent campaign rally. “Bengal lives on fish and rice. If you tell Bengal people they can’t have fish, meat or eggs, what will they eat then?” the 71-year-old firebrand leader asked the crowd.

    The BJP has pushed back hard against these claims, working to neutralize the criticism while turning the political framing of fish back against the Trinamool Congress. Senior BJP leader Smriti Irani dismissed Banerjee’s warnings as an outright lie during her campaign stops in the state, insisting that “Bengal and fish and rice are a part of its culture which will never end.” Swapan Dasgupta, the BJP’s candidate from the high-profile Rashbehari constituency in Kolkata, called Banerjee’s narrative a deliberate distraction. “They are trying to divert public attention from their corruption with this false narrative that we will prohibit fish consumption. This is rubbish,” Dasgupta said.

    Even Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a lifelong vegetarian, has leaned into fish as a political talking point – but reframed it as an indictment of Trinamool Congress governance failure. “Even after 15 years in power, the Trinamool Congress has failed to provide you with even something as basic as fish. Even fish has to be sourced from outside the state,” Modi told a campaign rally. Banerjee hit back immediately, countering that 80% of West Bengal’s domestic fish demand is met by local production, and attacking the BJP for its policies in other states. “You [BJP] do not allow fish consumption in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, states that you govern, and organise attacks on fish shops in Delhi. Aren’t you ashamed?” Banerjee asked.

    Between overlapping claims of cultural threat and governance failure, fish has become far more than a dietary staple – it is now shorthand for everything that both parties say is at stake in this election. India ranks as the world’s third largest fish producer and the second largest in aquaculture, but it sits at a low 129th globally in per capita fish consumption. For West Bengal, however, fish consumption is near universal: a 2024 joint study by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and WorldFish found that 65.7% of West Bengal residents eat fish on a weekly basis, and the state sits among a group of eastern and southern Indian states where more than 90% of the population includes fish in their regular diet. Overall fish consumption across India has risen steadily in recent years, now reaching more than 70% of the national population, per the study.

    Fish has always carried layered cultural meaning in Bengali life beyond the dinner plate, making its emergence as a political symbol almost inevitable. In Manik Bandopadhyay’s iconic Bengali novel *Padma Nadir Majhi (The Boatman of the Padma)*, fish is tied to fate and survival for river communities. In Amitav Ghosh’s *The Hungry Tide*, the ingredient is woven into narratives of ecology and precarity in the Sundarban delta. The prized hilsa fish, journalist Samanth Subramanian writes in his book *Following Fish*, is so central to Bengali cuisine that “if Bengali cuisine were Wimbledon, the hilsa would always play on Centre Court.” Even the skill of deboning a hilsa deftly in one’s mouth is framed as a cultural rite of belonging for Bengalis.

    The symbolism of fish extends even further: it signals geographic ties to the region’s sprawling river systems, carries echoes of the 1947 Partition that split Bengal into East and West, and even carries subtle class connotations tied to which varieties different groups can afford, and who holds the cultural knowledge to prepare them properly. Even the state’s most storied football rivalry is tied to fish: fans of East Bengal FC, many of whom have family roots in what is now Bangladesh, are playfully stereotyped as preferring hilsa, while supporters of Mohun Bagan Super Giant are said to favor prawns, a lighthearted shorthand for deeper histories of migration, class and regional identity.

    Sociologists and historians argue that this dense, layered cultural symbolism is exactly what has made fish such a powerful political tool in this election campaign. Parties are not just invoking fish as a talking point – they have built entire campaign choreography around it to attack their opponents. “Fish is inseparable from Bengali cuisine, shaped by geography and its long role as an affordable source of protein,” explains historian Jayanta Sengupta. “As the BJP has, at times, been associated with a push toward vegetarian norms, Bengal’s ruling party has folded food into a broader pitch around cultural pride. Knowing the symbolic significance of fish, the BJP could not ignore the issue. That’s how we see both sides countering each other’s campaign over one of Bengal’s favourite foods.”

    The BJP has even leaned into the joke of the fish-focused campaign to signal confidence ahead of the May 4 election results. Last week, BJP state president Samik Bhattacharya invited journalists to join the party for results day, promising to welcome them with fried fish. In a subsequent interview, Bhattacharya went even further, joking that after the BJP wins, the party will send a variety of small fish to Banerjee’s residence and invite Trinamool workers for a traditional mach bhaat – the iconic Bengali meal of fish and rice. The quip rests on an unspoken premise: that the BJP will be the one hosting the celebration, and the incumbent Trinamool Congress will be in a position to accept the invitation.

    While fish as a political symbol may not ultimately decide the outcome of the close election, it has already reshaped the contours of the contest. It offers a clear, vivid example of how seamlessly culture and politics bleed into one another on the Indian campaign trail, turning a everyday staple into the most recognizable talking point of the 2026 West Bengal election.

  • Peruvian court sets May 15 deadline for counting votes in presidential race

    Peruvian court sets May 15 deadline for counting votes in presidential race

    LIMA, Peru — Peru’s national electoral tribunal has moved to formalize the timeline of the country’s tightly contested presidential election, issuing an official mandate on Monday requiring the nation’s electoral oversight body to wrap up all vote counting and name the two candidates advancing to the June runoff by mid-May.

    The order establishes a firm May 15 deadline for the Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE), Peru’s national elections agency, to release the final, official vote tally and confirm which contenders will move forward to the second round of voting, scheduled for June 7. The runoff became a necessary step after the April 12 first round, which drew more than 30 presidential candidates, failed to produce any candidate who captured an outright majority of the popular vote. Peruvian electoral law requires a runoff between the top two finishers when no candidate secures more than 50% of ballots cast.

    What has turned this process into a nail-biting, delayed count is the razor-thin gap separating the candidates vying for the second spot in the runoff. The first round was also marred by widespread procedural irregularities that forced election officials to extend voting at dozens of polling stations across the capital city of Lima for an extra day to accommodate voters who faced long delays and broken voting equipment.

    As of the latest partial count, which includes 93.5% of all ballots cast, conservative leader Keiko Fujimori holds a clear lead with 17.05% of the vote, a position that makes her all but certain to advance to the June 7 runoff. The race for the second spot remains too close to call, however: nationalist congressman and former cabinet minister Roberto Sánchez — who served in the administration of imprisoned ex-President Pedro Castillo — currently holds second place with 12% of the vote, while ultraconservative former Lima mayor Rafael López Aliaiga trails him by less than 0.1 percentage points, sitting at 11.91% of the vote.

    Counting efforts are still ongoing because election officials are still processing hundreds of tally sheets arriving from remote, hard-to-reach rural regions across Peru, as well as ballots cast by Peruvian citizens living overseas at the nation’s consular missions. Hundreds of these tally sheets have also been formally challenged by independent electoral observers, triggering a mandatory review process that ONPE officials must complete before the final tally can be certified.

    The winner of this election will become Peru’s ninth president in just 10 years, capping a period of unprecedented political instability in the Andean nation. The incoming president will succeed interim President José María Balcázar, who was appointed to the role in February after his predecessor, another interim leader, was removed from office over sweeping corruption allegations just four months into his temporary term.

  • UK PM denies misleading MPs, says officials hid Mandelson info

    UK PM denies misleading MPs, says officials hid Mandelson info

    A deepening political scandal has engulfed British Prime Minister Keir Starmer this week, centered on his ill-fated appointment of veteran Labour politician Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the United States. Appearing before parliament on Monday, Starmer issued a stark admission of error while pushing back against accusations that he intentionally misled lawmakers, laying blame squarely on senior Foreign Office officials for deliberately concealing critical information about Mandelson’s failed security vetting.

    “I should not have appointed Peter Mandelson,” Starmer told MPs, acknowledging that his core judgment in selecting the 72-year-old for the prestigious Washington post was wrong. The controversy erupted in earnest last month when Starmer dismissed Mandelson from the role—seven months after he took up the post—after new details surfaced of Mandelson’s extensive personal ties to deceased American sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Mandelson, who has a long history of controversy that includes two prior resignations from Labour cabinet posts, was arrested earlier this year on allegations of misconduct in office dating back more than 15 years. He has denied all criminal wrongdoing and has not been formally charged.

    Starmer insisted that neither he nor other senior cabinet ministers were aware of the failed security clearance until last week, painting the withholding of information as a deliberate act by bureaucratic leadership rather than accidental oversight. “It beggars belief that throughout the whole timeline of events, officials in the Foreign Office saw fit to withhold this information from the most senior ministers in our system of government,” he said. “It wasn’t negligence. It was a deliberate decision not to tell me. Had I been provided this information, I wouldn’t have made the decision.”

    The heated parliamentary session descended into chaos early on, when two opposition lawmakers—one from left-wing Your Party and a second from the far-right Reform UK—were ejected from the chamber after refusing to withdraw accusations that Starmer had lied to parliament. Zarah Sultana, the Your Party MP who first made the allegation, called Starmer “a bare-faced liar” who was “gaslighting the nation” before the speaker ordered her removal.

    Last Thursday, in a move to address the fallout, Starmer dismissed the Foreign Office’s top civil servant, Olly Robbins, and launched a formal review of the UK’s security vetting process for senior political appointments. But the move has drawn sharp backlash from former civil servants, who accuse Starmer of scapegoating Robbins to deflect from his own missteps. Robbins is scheduled to deliver his own testimony before a parliamentary watchdog committee on Tuesday, where he is expected to push back against Starmer’s narrative.

    Opposition leaders have united in calling for Starmer’s resignation, arguing that the prime minister has failed to answer lingering questions about when he learned of the failed vetting and whether he intentionally hid the information from parliament. “We still do not know exactly why Peter Mandelson failed that vetting,” Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, told parliament. She was joined by Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey, who described the appointment as “a catastrophic error of judgment” and said the only honorable course of action for Starmer was to step down.

    Senior figures within Starmer’s own Labour Party have so far rallied around the embattled prime minister. Scotland Secretary Douglas Alexander defended the original appointment logic on Monday, noting that “the Trump administration was an unconventional administration and an unconventional ambassador could do a job for the United Kingdom.” Other cabinet ministers have argued that maintaining stable government through ongoing global instability sparked by the Middle East war outweighs demands for a leadership change.

    Public opinion remains deeply divided on the scandal, matching Starmer’s already abysmal approval ratings that rank him among the most unpopular prime ministers in modern British history. In on-the-record comments to AFP, 59-year-old retired dentist Andrews Connell said that if Starmer knew about the failed vetting ahead of the appointment, “then he has to go, he has to resign.” But 67-year-old retiree Duncan Moss offered a contrasting view, saying he would be “very worried if Starmer was to leave … I think he’s doing a very good job.”

    The controversy comes at a precarious time for Starmer and Labour, who are bracing for crucial local and devolved elections across the UK next month, including votes for the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Senedd. Political analysts widely expect the party to face significant losses at the polls, in large part fueled by public anger over the Mandelson scandal.

  • China’s strengthened IP protection system supports sustainable innovation

    China’s strengthened IP protection system supports sustainable innovation

    During the opening of China’s annual National Intellectual Property Publicity Week held in Beijing on Monday, a top World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) leader has publicly affirmed that China’s ongoing efforts to refine and strengthen its intellectual property (IP) protection framework are delivering robust, long-term support for sustainable global innovation — particularly in high-stakes frontier technology sectors, as China moves to upgrade its entire IP protection ecosystem.

    Wang Binying, WIPO Deputy Director General, delivered her remarks at the main event of the publicity week, which this year centers on two core priorities: boosting IP safeguards for emerging technology sectors and accelerating the development of high-quality new productive forces. The week-long national initiative runs from April 20 to 26 this year, aimed at raising public awareness of IP rights across the country.

    In her address, Wang pointed out that a growing group of frontier technologies — including artificial intelligence, cloud computing, biotechnology and nanotechnology — have emerged as the central driving forces of global innovation expansion. She emphasized that the global innovation landscape is steadily shifting toward the Asia-Pacific region, with China positioned as a central player in this ongoing technological transformation.

    Wang noted, “China’s strengths in systematic cross-sector innovation across multiple key technologies, especially its proactive work to build a comprehensive, effective IP ecosystem, has become a core engine powering the country’s high-quality growth and nurturing the development of new quality productive forces.”

    She also shared key data highlighting China’s rapid growth in IP output: as of 2026, China holds 5.32 million valid domestic invention patents, making it the first nation globally to cross the 5 million threshold in this category. Beyond that, China holds more than 60 percent of the world’s total artificial intelligence patents, and roughly two-thirds of all global patents related to robotics technology, Wang added.

    The senior WIPO official also stressed that China has taken a constructive, collaborative approach to advancing multilateralism in global IP governance, bringing much-needed stability and new momentum to the international multilateral system amid rising global geopolitical uncertainty.

    Speaking at the same event, Shen Changyu, Commissioner of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), noted that emerging technology sectors — led by artificial intelligence, big data, quantum technology and biomedicine — have become the primary frontline of global technological and economic competition today.

    “We must proactively adapt to the unique demands of emerging sectors, and refine and update our IP protection system in a timely, responsive way to create a more enabling environment for innovators across the country,” Shen stated.

    Shen also outlined key priorities for China’s top IP regulator in 2026. A core task this year is the rapid development of a targeted work plan to update IP protection rules specifically tailored to emerging technology sectors. In addition, the CNIPA will speed up revisions to existing regulations governing the protection of integrated circuit layout designs, changes that are intended to meet the technical requirements for developing ultra-large-scale integrated circuits and support the sustained growth of China’s domestic chip industry.

  • Slovaks to vote in a July referendum on lifelong payments for Prime Minister Fico and others

    Slovaks to vote in a July referendum on lifelong payments for Prime Minister Fico and others

    BRATISLAVA, Slovakia — Slovak President Peter Pellegrini announced Monday that the nation will hold a nationwide referendum this coming July 4 to let voters decide on two high-stakes, widely debated issues tied to Prime Minister Robert Fico’s populist government: ending the controversial lifelong benefit payments granted to Fico and other senior former leaders, and reinstating the dissolved special prosecutor’s office that targeted large-scale corruption and organized crime.

    The referendum move comes after a grassroots petition drive organized by the Democrats, a pro-Western opposition party that currently holds no seats in parliament, crossed the legal required threshold of 350,000 valid citizen signatures. While public pressure has mounted for a vote on snap parliamentary elections amid widespread discontent with Fico’s administration, Pellegrini confirmed that question will not appear on the ballot. He cited a 2021 binding ruling from Slovakia’s Constitutional Court, the nation’s highest legal body, which deemed a public vote on early elections unconstitutional.

    The lifelong payment policy at the center of the referendum was expanded in 2024, just after an assassination attempt left Fico gravely wounded during a pre-election campaign event. The shocking attack on the prime minister sent ripples across the small Central European nation and the entire European continent. Previously, this lifelong benefit — which grants eligible recipients a monthly payment equal to the full salary of a sitting member of parliament — was only available to former presidents. The revised rules extended the perk to any prime minister or parliamentary speaker who has served at least two full terms in office, framed by the government as a measure to enhance long-term security for former top officeholders.

    The second referendum question addresses the fate of the special prosecutor’s office, which Fico’s ruling coalition shut down through legislative action in 2024. The independent body was tasked with prosecuting high-level corruption, transnational organized crime and violent extremism, and its elimination drew fierce condemnation from both domestic critics and international observers. Thousands of Slovak citizens gathered in repeated street protests to oppose the closure, which came as multiple individuals with close ties to Fico’s ruling party were facing active corruption prosecutions from the office.

    Fico, who returned to the prime ministership in 2023, has emerged as one of Slovakia’s most polarizing modern political figures. His government’s pro-Russian stance on the ongoing war in Ukraine and a series of domestic policy shifts that critics say erode democratic checks and balances have already sparked mass, sustained protests across the country. This referendum marks the latest flashpoint in the growing tension between the populist government and its opponents.

    It is worth noting that only one referendum has ever succeeded in Slovakia’s post-independence history: the 2003 vote that approved the country’s accession to the European Union. Every other public referendum held in the nation has failed to meet the required voter turnout threshold, a hurdle that could still block the results of this year’s vote from taking effect even if a majority of participating voters back the opposition’s proposed changes.