分类: politics

  • Bolivia at ‘breaking point’, president warns protesters

    Bolivia at ‘breaking point’, president warns protesters

    Bolivia has entered its fourth week of widespread anti-government demonstrations, with President Rodrigo Paz warning Wednesday that the Andean nation has reached a critical “breaking point” as blockades have choked off supplies of food, fuel, and life-saving medical resources to the country’s political capital La Paz.

    Six months into his term, the US-backed center-right leader took office during Bolivia’s most severe economic downturn in 40 years. Now he faces a growing wave of public anger rooted in policy disagreements, led by low-income workers and members of Bolivia’s Indigenous majority — the nation’s largest demographic group — who have gathered in La Paz demanding his immediate resignation.

    Speaking at a public gathering in the capital Wednesday, the 58-year-old president reiterated his call for negotiation while stressing the urgent need for social order. “The country needs order, and is reaching breaking point,” Paz stated. The previous day, Bolivia’s Congress removed legislative barriers that would prevent the president from declaring a national state of emergency, clearing the way for a potential military deployment to clear blockades and restore calm.

    To date, Paz has framed dialogue as his preferred path forward, but has refused to rule out activating what he calls “constitutional instruments” to end the ongoing siege of La Paz — a clear reference to emergency powers. “Anyone who wants to destroy the nation will have to deal with this president and the full force of the Constitution,” he added, confirming that police and military forces enjoy full public and government backing for their efforts to maintain order.

    Paz’s warnings coincided with a high-profile Mother’s Day march in La Paz, where thousands of Indigenous women in traditional layered skirts took to the streets to back striking transport workers and amplify the call for the president’s ouster. “We are not afraid to die. We have already told him to pack his bags and leave,” protest organizer Marta Poma Luque told Agence France-Presse in an on-the-ground interview.

    The unrest first erupted in early May, when demonstrators initially called for higher wages to offset the impact of the deep economic crisis, more reliable fuel distribution, and the full repeal of a deeply unpopular agrarian reform law. Though Paz has already backed down on several key demands, including rolling back parts of the land reform, demonstrations have expanded into a full-scale movement against his administration.

    Over the past two weeks, La Paz has descended into repeated conflict, with riot police clashing regularly with thousands of blockading protesters. The blockades have cut off all major supply routes into the city, leaving residents facing acute shortages of critical goods. Local resident Zulm Hinojosa, whose 13-year-old son lives with chronic asthma and heart conditions, told reporters that essential medication has become exponentially more expensive and in many cases has run out entirely.

    At Clinicas de La Paz, one of the country’s oldest and largest public medical facilities, medical staff confirmed Tuesday the hospital only has enough oxygen to sustain patients for a few more days. For his part, Paz has calculated total economic losses from the weeks of unrest at roughly $600 million.

    In a bid to defuse tensions, the president has already announced a series of concessions: he pledged to halve his own presidential salary as a gesture of solidarity with low-income Bolivians, a largely symbolic move given his monthly salary of just 24,000 bolivianos (approximately $3,500). He has also promised greater policy input for Indigenous groups and labor unions, and dismissed his widely unpopular labor minister. None of these steps have managed to end the protests.

    Paz’s administration has accused former president Evo Morales of secretly orchestrating the nationwide unrest. Morales is currently in hiding, facing criminal charges related to the alleged trafficking of a teenage girl with whom prosecutors claim he fathered a child.

    In response to the crippling blockades, small groups of La Paz residents have held counter-demonstrations in recent days calling for an end to the supply disruptions that have turned daily life in the capital into a crisis.

  • Israel kills chief of Hamas armed wing in Gaza strike

    Israel kills chief of Hamas armed wing in Gaza strike

    In a targeted strike that has further escalated tensions amid a fragile current ceasefire, Israel announced Wednesday that it has killed Mohammed Odeh, the newly appointed leader of Hamas’s Ezzedine Al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group. Odeh’s assassination marks the fourth time Israel has eliminated the top commander of the Brigades since the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, underscoring Israel’s sustained campaign to decapitate Hamas’s leadership structure.

    Odeh was appointed to the role just weeks earlier, following the Israeli killing of his predecessor Ezzedine al-Haddad on May 15. The confirmation of his death came in a joint statement from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Shin Bet domestic security agency, which noted Odeh was killed in a strike on Tuesday. Hamas later publicly confirmed Odeh’s death, referring to him as a martyred leader of the Palestinian resistance in a defiant statement that condemned the attack as a “cowardly assassination.”

    The strike did not end with Odeh: the entire family was killed in the attack, including his wife and three children — two adult sons and a minor daughter. The assassination took place during Eid al-Adha, one of the most important religious holidays in the Muslim calendar. Bassem Abu Odeh, a cousin of the deceased leader, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) that Odeh and his family had been making preparations to celebrate the holiday when Israeli missiles struck their location. “They were ready to welcome Eid, but instead the criminal Zionists welcomed and targeted them with missiles,” he said.

    On Wednesday, hundreds of mourners gathered in Gaza City for Odeh’s funeral. An AFP journalist on the ground reported that an AK-47 rifle was placed atop Odeh’s casket as the procession carried his body to a local mosque for traditional funerary prayers before burial.

    Prior to taking command of the Brigades, Odeh served for years as the head of Hamas’s intelligence division and was one of the highest-ranking remaining Hamas leaders still operating in the Gaza Strip. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reacted to the killing with characteristic belligerence, writing on social media platform X that Odeh had been “sent to meet his associates in the depths of hell.”

    The strike on Odeh came hours before the IDF announced another targeted operation in northern Gaza Wednesday evening, saying it had hit two senior Hamas operatives, identified by Israeli media as a brigade commander and his deputy. Local rescue officials from Gaza’s Hamas-run civil defence agency reported that the central Gaza City strike left 10 people dead and multiple others wounded, with a medical source confirming five children were among the fatalities.

    Odeh’s assassination is the latest in a years-long, systematic Israeli campaign to eliminate top Hamas figures across the region, launched in response to Hamas’s October 7, 2023 cross-border attack that triggered the current war. Israel has already killed a long list of senior Hamas leadership in recent months: former political chief Ismail Haniyeh, Yahya Sinwar — widely labeled the mastermind of the October 7 attack — longtime armed wing commander Mohammed Deif, and Mohammed Sinwar, who succeeded his brother Yahya as Hamas’s Gaza leader, have all been killed in Israeli strikes.

    In his social media statement, Katz reaffirmed Israel’s commitment to eliminating all Hamas leaders responsible for the October 7 attack. “We committed ourselves to eliminating everyone who led the October 7 massacre, and that is what we will do: they are all marked for death, wherever they may be,” he wrote. IDF Arabic spokeswoman Lieutenant Colonel Ella Waweya echoed that messaging, joking that the position of Ezzedine Al-Qassam Brigades commander “has become the shortest-lived job in Gaza.” She added, “The question is no longer who’s next — but how long they have left.”

    Katz also reiterated Israel’s core war goal of dismantling Hamas’s rule over Gaza, and alluded to a controversial Israeli plan to push for the forced displacement of Gaza’s civilian population. “The plan for voluntary migration from Gaza will also be implemented — everything will be done at the right time and in the right way,” he said. The displacement proposal is heavily backed by far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, and gained brief support from former U.S. President Donald Trump before he walked back the position. The United Nations’ top human rights official, High Commissioner Volker Turk, condemned such plans in February, denouncing proposals “aimed at making a permanent demographic change in Gaza.”

    Hezbollah, the Lebanese armed group and key Hamas ally, released a statement of condolence following Odeh’s killing, dismissing Israeli efforts to break Palestinian resistance through leadership decapitation. “All Israeli attempts to undermine this resistance by targeting its leadership and fighters will end in failure,” the group said.

    Despite a formal ceasefire that has been in place since October 10, daily violent incidents continue to rock the Gaza Strip, with both sides repeatedly accusing one another of truce violations. Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry, whose casualty figures are deemed reliable by the United Nations, reports that more than 900 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli military action since the ceasefire went into effect. Israel currently maintains full military control over roughly 60 percent of the Gaza Strip, including all border entry and exit points, while the vast majority of Gaza’s civilian population is confined to a narrow coastal strip.

  • Legal bid to block UK-backed French migrant detention centre

    Legal bid to block UK-backed French migrant detention centre

    A looming legal appeal against a UK-supported migrant detention centre near Dunkirk has emerged as a major threat to a landmark £660 million bilateral agreement aimed at curbing illegal small boat crossings across the English Channel. The ongoing legal challenge, brought by a French environmental advocacy group, casts uncertainty over the timeline of the facility’s opening — a key prerequisite for the UK to release its pledged funding for the project.

    The 140-bed detention centre in Loon-Plage, currently under construction and targeted for operational launch by the end of 2026, was first greenlit by French interior authorities in July 2025. Within months, local environmental group Association pour la Défense de l’Environnement du Littoral Flandre-Artois (ADELFA) contested the construction permit, arguing the facility breached multiple local and national regulations. After an initial challenge was dismissed, the group escalated the case to the Administrative Court of Lille in February 2026, opening the current appeal process.

    ADELFA’s legal arguments center on four core claims: first, the site falls within an industrial zoning district where permanent residential accommodation is prohibited under local planning rules, and the detention centre qualifies as residential use; second, the facility sits in close proximity to industrial sites including an ammonia-cooled warehouse, creating unacceptable public health hazards for detainees; third, the interior ministry failed to comply with mandatory fire safety consultation requirements; and fourth, the ministry neglected to post the approved building permit in a publicly visible location as required by French law.

    While the appeal is not automatically suspensive, meaning construction work can continue throughout the legal process, legal experts warn a ruling in favor of ADELFA could result in the permit being revoked — and in the most severe scenario, require the partial or full demolition of the completed facility. Even an unsuccessful challenge, however, would almost certainly delay the centre’s opening, a common outcome for legal disputes over migrant detention infrastructure in France.

    This facility is a central pillar of the new bilateral migration deal signed by UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and French Interior Minister Laurent Nunez last month, which expands on a 2023 agreement struck between the UK’s former Conservative government and France. Under the terms of the new £660m arrangement, the UK has set aside £160m in dedicated funding directly tied to measurable results in reducing Channel crossings, with payment for the detention centre explicitly conditional on the facility opening and delivering proven outcomes within its first year of operation. If the centre fails to meet performance benchmarks, or does not open as scheduled, the UK has confirmed the allocated funding will be withdrawn.

    For UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the France agreement is a core policy response to mounting political pressure to reduce the persistent flow of small boat crossings that have become a defining political issue in recent years. Once operational, the new centre will house migrants intercepted while attempting to reach the UK, before they are deported to their countries of origin or EU member states they previously transited. The facility will prioritize deportations of migrants from the 10 most common origin countries for 2025 crossings: Eritrea, Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Iraq, Syria, Vietnam and Yemen. A pilot of the new detention and deportation model is already set to launch this month at an existing removal centre in nearby Coquelles, while construction of the permanent facility is completed.

    ADELFA president Nicolas Fournier said the group acknowledges a favorable ruling is not guaranteed, but remains committed to disrupting the project through the legal process. Fournier argued that the current approach of increasing law enforcement and detention capacity — what he described as overinvestment in repressive measures — has repeatedly failed to curb crossings, and that policymakers must pursue alternative, more humane solutions to address the risks migrants face when attempting the dangerous sea crossing.

    French legal experts have offered differing perspectives on the appeal’s potential outcome. Francois Benchendikh, a senior public law lecturer at Sciences Po Lille, noted the court’s central debate will revolve around whether the detention centre qualifies as residential accommodation under zoning rules, and that the nearby ammonia storage facility could be enough to justify annulling the permit. By contrast, Paris-based urban planning lawyer Alice Darson said the facility should be classified as a public service facility, which would exempt it from the residential zoning ban, though failure to properly consult fire safety officials could still lead to the permit being canceled.

    Migration policy analyst Dr. Mihnea Cuibus, a researcher at the UK’s Migration Observatory, noted that even if the centre opens on schedule, there are significant structural barriers to scaling up deportation operations from the facility, and that the project’s success will likely remain a contentious sticking point in bilateral relations between London and Paris. As of this reporting, the French government has not responded to requests for comment on the ongoing legal challenge, and has not released public figures for the total construction and operational costs of the facility. A recent report from the French Senate, however, estimated that a standard 140-bed migrant detention centre costs roughly €40 million (£36 million) to build. A UK government spokesperson reaffirmed that France remains committed to completing the project, and that the UK will only release funding once construction is finalized.

  • Jill Biden says she thought husband was ‘having a stroke’ during 2024 debate

    Jill Biden says she thought husband was ‘having a stroke’ during 2024 debate

    The 2024 U.S. presidential election, one of the most turbulent in modern American political history, has yielded new behind-the-scenes revelations from former first lady Jill Biden, who opened up about her panic during Joe Biden’s disastrous first debate against Republican nominee Donald Trump. In a forthcoming interview with CBS News Sunday Morning, set to air this weekend, Jill Biden shared for the first time her immediate visceral reaction to her husband’s faltering performance that upended the entire election cycle.

    “I was frightened, because I had never ever seen Joe like that before or since. Never,” she told CBS correspondent Rita Braver, as confirmed by the BBC, CBS’s partner for U.S. political coverage. “I don’t know what happened,” she added. “As I watched it, I thought, ‘Oh, my God, he’s having a stroke.’ And it scared me to death.”

    That June 2024 debate, held just five months before the November general election, was supposed to be a critical moment for incumbent President Joe Biden to make his case for a second term against his predecessor Trump. The two candidates clashed on defining national issues, from immigration policy and post-pandemic economic recovery to abortion rights, but any policy arguments Biden made were quickly overshadowed by his shaky on-stage demeanor. Then-Vice President Kamala Harris later described the performance as a “slow start”; Biden spoke with a raspy, strained voice (his team attributed this to a lingering illness) and at one point lost his train of thought mid-answer, leaving viewers and party leaders stunned.

    Long before the debate, voters had already raised widespread concerns about Biden’s age and mental acuity — he was 81 years old at the time, the oldest person ever to serve as sitting president — and that poor performance amplified those anxieties exponentially. Within hours, Democratic Party leaders began privately and publicly pressuring Biden to drop out of the race, warning that his candidacy would put not just the presidency but down-ballot congressional and gubernatorial seats at risk. Major U.S. media analysts echoed those concerns, arguing that Biden’s standing against Trump had deteriorated to a point that threatened the party’s chances of holding the White House.

    At first, Biden’s campaign pushed back hard against calls for him to exit, insisting the president would remain the Democratic nominee and would participate in a second scheduled debate against Trump. Political analysts also widely noted that replacing an incumbent nominee just months before a general election would require a chaotic, divisive process that could split the party and derail its campaign entirely. But a series of subsequent missteps, including awkward gaffes at a NATO summit in the weeks after the debate and a visibly frail appearance following a COVID-19 diagnosis, convinced Biden that he could not continue. He ultimately announced he would end his re-election bid and endorsed Harris, his vice president, to take his place as the party’s nominee.

    Jill Biden, who has been a constant presence alongside her husband through his 50-plus-year political career — from his early days as a U.S. Senator from Delaware to his four years in the White House — was widely recognized as one of Joe Biden’s most trusted and influential advisers during his presidency, and multiple reports have confirmed she was among those who encouraged him to step away from the 2024 race.

    Three months before the general election, Harris officially secured the Democratic nomination, but she ultimately failed to overcome the late start and lost the general election to Trump. In the aftermath of her defeat, Harris offered a scathing rebuke of Biden’s decision to run for a second term in her memoir, calling the choice an act of recklessness. “‘It’s Joe and Jill’s decision.’ We all said that, like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized,” Harris wrote. “Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness.”

    Jill Biden’s new comments offer the most intimate look yet at the moment that changed the trajectory of the 2024 election, laying bare the fear that gripped even Biden’s closest inner circle in the aftermath of the debate.

  • Canada signs landmark LNG energy deal with Germany

    Canada signs landmark LNG energy deal with Germany

    On a Wednesday announcement held in Vancouver, Canadian officials unveiled a historic long-term energy agreement that will open a new transatlantic energy corridor, shipping 1 million tons of Canadian liquified natural gas (LNG) to Germany every year for up to two decades. The deal, struck between the proposed Ksi Lisims LNG project on British Columbia’s northwest Pacific coast and Germany’s state-owned energy utility Securing Energy for Europe (SEFE), marks the first permanent LNG export route from Canada to Europe, addressing dual strategic priorities for both nations.

    For European partners, the agreement comes amid a years-long push to replace unreliable fossil fuel supplies following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, as the continent continues to shore up diversified, stable energy sources amid ongoing global geopolitical volatility including the Middle East conflict. For Canada, the deal delivers a long-sought win for trade diversification: 2024 data from Canada’s national energy regulator shows nearly 100 percent of the country’s current LNG exports are delivered exclusively to the United States, making this new route a significant shift away from overreliance on a single trading partner.

    Canadian Energy Minister Tim Hodgson framed the pact as a defining milestone for the country’s global energy role during the announcement. “This is an exciting and important milestone that proves the world trusts Canada,” Hodgson said, noting the country’s standing as a stable democratic nation with abundant untapped natural resource reserves that can fill critical gaps in global energy markets. He added that the binding export commitment is expected to unlock the final investment decision for the Ksi Lisims project within months, with construction set to begin shortly after funding is secured. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who prioritized the project during a 2025 trade mission to Berlin with his cabinet, has designated Ksi Lisims as a project of national importance, qualifying it for a fast-track regulatory review process.

    Despite the federal government’s celebration of the deal, the Ksi Lisims LNG project faces substantial headwinds on multiple fronts. More than 15 Indigenous and environmental organizations have pledged to block the development, arguing the project carries unacceptable environmental risks and faces unresolved legal challenges. “Ksi Lisims is not a future Canadian export success story,” explained Alex Walker, a campaigner with Environmental Defence, one of the leading opposition groups. “This is a high-risk, legally contested fossil fuel project that has failed to attract private capital for decades.” While the Nisga’a Nation, on whose traditional territory the export terminal would be built, supports the project, multiple other First Nations groups have already launched formal legal challenges to stop its development.

    Domestic political friction is also growing within Carney’s own government over climate policy. Just last week, 14 Liberal Party Members of Parliament signed an open letter to the prime minister expressing “deep concern” over what they characterize as a rollback of the federal government’s stated climate and environmental commitments. On the same day the LNG deal was announced, former Canadian Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault — a prominent Greenpeace activist before entering electoral politics — confirmed he will resign from the Liberal caucus this summer to focus on climate advocacy outside of government. “These seven years, intense, demanding and deeply meaningful have been among the most formative of my life,” Guilbeault told reporters from Parliament. “It is time now for me to find new ways to pursue my life’s work.” Responding to Guilbeault’s departure, Hodgson framed the Liberal Party as a “big tent” that accommodates a range of ideological perspectives, saying “At the end of the day we come together, form a collective view and execute on that.”

    In a separate announcement made the same day, Carney confirmed Canada will purchase new early-warning aircraft technology from a Swedish defense manufacturer, rejecting bids from competing U.S. contractors. The decision aligns with Carney’s previously stated pledge to reduce Canadian military spending on American-made equipment, telling audiences last April that “the days of our military sending 70 cents of every dollar to the United States are over.”

  • Trump appears to threaten to ‘blow up’ ally Oman

    Trump appears to threaten to ‘blow up’ ally Oman

    In a stunning verbal outburst that has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles, former US President Donald Trump issued what appears to be an explicit military threat against Oman, a long-standing key American ally in the volatile Middle East, over ongoing negotiations to reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. The remarks, delivered during a White House cabinet meeting Wednesday, have already reignited questions about the 79-year-old leader’s inconsistent rhetoric and frequent verbal missteps amid rising tensions in the Gulf region.

    When pressed by reporters on whether he would accept a short-term agreement that would let Iran and Oman jointly manage access to the key waterway, Trump delivered a blunt and aggressive response. “No, the strait is going to be open to everybody,” he stated firmly. “It’s international waters and Oman will behave just like everybody else or we’ll have to blow them up. They understand that, they’ll be fine.”

    Immediately following the comments, reporters from Agence France-Presse reached out to the White House to ask whether Trump had misspoken, with widespread speculation that he may have intended to target Iran rather than Oman — a close security partner that has repeatedly attempted to mediate ongoing Middle East conflicts and has even faced direct attacks from Tehran in recent months. To date, the White House has not issued any correction, clarification, or walkback of the president’s remarks. The US State Department even went a step further, publishing an unedited video clip and full transcript of Trump’s comments about Oman to its official channels, with no note indicating a verbal error.

    This latest verbal gaffe fits a broader pattern of mixed-up names and locations for the president. Earlier this term, Trump confused Iran and Venezuela, incorrectly claiming that the South American nation — whose leader Nicolas Maduro was toppled by US military intervention in January — “no longer has a navy, no longer has an air force.” This aggressive phrasing of destroying a target’s military capabilities is one Trump has repeatedly deployed when referring to Iran, which was jointly attacked by US and Israeli forces on February 28.

    The current standoff centers on the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway that normally carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s daily oil trade. In recent weeks, Iran has pushed to establish a new status quo at the strait, proposing a plan to charge transit tolls on passing commercial vessels and split the generated revenue with Oman. Negotiations to end the ongoing Middle East war and reopen the strait to full unimpeded transit have stalled once again, a development that has deepened Trump’s public frustration — just days after he confidently claimed a final deal was within reach.

    Diplomatic observers have noted that the uncorrected threat against Oman marks an unprecedented break with longstanding US diplomatic norms, raising concerns about the stability of American alliances in a region already roiled by months of open conflict.

  • Live snakes, dead bears and brain worms: RFK Jr’s wild animal antics

    Live snakes, dead bears and brain worms: RFK Jr’s wild animal antics

    A newly viral video showing U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. grabbing two writhing black snakes with his bare hands has reignited public discussion of the controversial cabinet member’s long track record of unusual, often bizarre encounters with wild animals.

    Kennedy, who has long drawn backlash for his fringe, conspiracy-tinged views on public health issues including false claims that childhood vaccines are linked to autism and unsubstantiated warnings that fluoride added to public drinking water causes harm, has built a public reputation as an eccentric figure through his many offbeat animal-related antics.

    The most recent incident, shared by Kennedy himself on the social platform X on Tuesday, shows the health secretary dressed in a formal dress shirt and tie, pulling two black racers from the corner of an outdoor patio by their tails and holding the squirming reptiles up for the camera with a smile. At one point in the footage, one of the snakes bites Kennedy, as an off-camera voice—identified in Kennedy’s caption as his wife, actress Cheryl Hines—pleads, “Bobby, Bobby, please.” Kennedy noted in his post that the snakes were removed from the patio of Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which falls under the Department of Health and Human Services that Kennedy leads.

    The National Park Service confirms that black racers are non-venomous and pose no threat to humans if left undisturbed. But snake conservation experts have issued a sharp warning against copying Kennedy’s behavior, noting that untamed snakes will often bite when handled, and misidentification of venomous vs. non-venomous species can lead to life-threatening injury.

    “What I don’t want is people copying him,” Cameron Young of the Center for Snake Conservation told Agence France-Presse. “If a kid picks up a venomous snake because RFK did, then the kid may receive a medically significant bite.”

    This viral snake video is far from the first of Kennedy’s unusual animal adventures to make headlines. In 2024, Kennedy himself admitted in a video that a decade prior, he dragged a dead bear cub killed by a car upstate New York to Central Park in Manhattan, propping it next to a bicycle to stage the appearance that the animal had died in a cycling accident. The bizarre incident baffled New York City law enforcement for years, until Kennedy confessed to the prank.

    Other stories shared by Kennedy and his family add to the eccentric image. According to an account from his daughter, Kennedy once used a chainsaw to sever the head of a dead whale that washed up on the coast of Massachusetts, then strapped the massive body part to the roof of the family minivan to transport it home for study of its skull. In an upcoming 2026 biography, Kennedy also recalled cutting the genitalia off a road-killed raccoon to preserve the specimen for later study.

    In one notable incident that carried actual health risks, The New York Times once reported that a physician discovered a dead parasitic brain worm in Kennedy’s brain after he sought treatment for persistent memory loss. Kennedy has stated he made a full recovery with no long-term health effects from the infection.

    Unlike many public figures who would face embarrassment over such a collection of unusual stories, Kennedy has never expressed shame or regret over his actions. Washington Post columnist Monica Hesse summed up public reaction to his unusual connection to wildlife in a sharp quip: “He has a relationship with animals that most of us only dream of. Nightmares are also dreams.”

  • Northern Ireland’s former unionist leader faces trial in sexual abuse case involving 2 girls

    Northern Ireland’s former unionist leader faces trial in sexual abuse case involving 2 girls

    In opening statements delivered Wednesday at a crown court trial in Northern Ireland, a senior prosecutor outlined decades-old allegations of repeated sexual abuse against two underage girls leveled against Jeffrey Donaldson, the former head of the region’s largest pro-union political party.

    The 63-year-old, who led the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) from 2021 to 2023, has entered a full not guilty plea to all 18 charges against him: one count of rape, four counts of gross indecency, and 13 counts of indecent assault. The alleged offenses are tied to the two complainants and are said to have occurred between 1985 and 2006.

    Addressing the jury at Newry Crown Court, prosecutor Rosemary Walsh explained that the two victims first brought their accounts of the “difficult and traumatic childhood incidents” to police more than two years ago. The younger complainant told investigators that Donaldson groped her when she was of primary school age, Walsh said. The older complainant, identified in court proceedings only as Complainant B, reported that the abuse persisted for multiple years. Years after the alleged abuse ended, Complainant B said a mediated meeting was arranged through a local church, where Donaldson personally apologized for the harm he caused in the past, Walsh added.

    When questioned by law enforcement following his March 2024 arrest, Donaldson dismissed the allegations as unbelievable, insisting he never sexually touched either complainant. Donaldson stepped down immediately from his role as DUP leader and resigned his seat in the UK House of Commons shortly after his arrest. His departure sent shockwaves through Northern Ireland’s political establishment, coming just weeks after the DUP ended a two-year boycott of the region’s devolved power-sharing government. The party had returned to the governing arrangement after Donaldson secured key concessions from the UK government and European Union over post-Brexit trading rules for the region, a contentious issue that had divided unionist communities for years.

    As DUP leader, Donaldson was the most prominent and influential figure in Northern Ireland’s unionist movement, which advocates for retaining the region’s constitutional status as part of the United Kingdom, opposing reunification with the Republic of Ireland.

    Donaldson’s wife Eleanor has also pleaded not guilty to charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged crimes. However, she is not present in court for the proceedings: Judge Paul Ramsey ruled she is unfit to stand trial due to ongoing mental health challenges. While the jury will review the facts of the case against her, she cannot be convicted or sentenced if the jury finds the allegations proven. The overall trial is expected to proceed over the course of four weeks, with the jury set to deliver a verdict on all counts after closing arguments.

  • Trump says US ‘not satisfied’ with Iran deal yet

    Trump says US ‘not satisfied’ with Iran deal yet

    Amid fragile ceasefire talks between the United States and Iran following months of open conflict, US President Donald Trump has publicly stated that Washington is still unsatisfied with the current terms of a potential peace deal, leaving the prospect of a final agreement uncertain. Speaking during a public cabinet meeting held in Washington DC on Wednesday, Trump outlined his stance on the ongoing negotiations, confirming that while Iranian leadership is eager to reach a negotiated settlement to end the conflict, the two sides have not yet closed the gap on core disagreements.

    “Iran is very much intent on getting a deal done. They want this very badly,” Trump told reporters in attendance. “So far, they haven’t gotten there, and we’re not satisfied with what’s on the table. Either we get a deal that works for the United States, or we will have to finish the job,” he added, repeating a longstanding US threat to resume large-scale military strikes if no acceptable agreement is reached. Trump also downplayed Iran’s current negotiating position, claiming the country was “negotiating on fumes” and had no other choice but to reach a deal with Washington.

    The comments came hours after Iranian state television published leaked details of what it claimed was a full draft framework agreement between the two delegations. The leaked draft included a number of major proposed terms: Iran would reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping within one month, restoring traffic to pre-conflict levels, with vessel routing and management overseen jointly by Tehran and Muscat. In exchange, the draft claimed the US would lift its naval blockade of Iranian ports and withdraw all American military forces from the region. The leaked document notably made no mention of Iran abandoning its nuclear enrichment program or surrendering its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, two longstanding core US demands in prior negotiations with Tehran.

    Within hours of the report, the White House dismissed the leaked draft as a “complete fabrication”, denying that any such agreement had been put forward. President Trump also directly addressed the proposed terms during Wednesday’s briefing, rejecting the idea that Iran would control access to the Strait of Hormuz. “Nobody controls the Strait of Hormuz,” he said, adding that the waterway must open immediately under any final deal. He also denied two other circulating reports that have drawn domestic political pushback: that he was considering lifting sweeping US sanctions on Iran, and that he would allow Russia and China to remove Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile to meet US non-proliferation requirements.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed Trump’s general tone Wednesday, confirming that “some progress and some interest” has been made in ongoing talks but declined to share details of remaining sticking points between the two delegations. “We’ll see over the next few hours and days whether that progress can continue and solidify into something we can move forward with,” Rubio said.

    The current round of negotiations follows months of escalating conflict that upended stability across the Middle East. The US and Israel launched large-scale, widespread strikes against Iranian targets on February 28, officially launching the open conflict. Iran responded with strikes against Israeli targets and US-allied Gulf nations, and moved to fully close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of the world’s daily oil supplies. The closure sent global crude prices soaring, triggering widespread economic concerns across global energy markets.

    An initial ceasefire agreement was reached on April 8, and has been largely respected by both sides, but formal talks to resolve the underlying conflict stalled for weeks. In recent days, the fragile truce has come under renewed strain: the US launched new strikes targeting Iranian missile sites and coastal boats that US military officials claimed were laying mines in international waters on Monday, followed by additional self-described “self-defense strikes” against targets in southern Iran on Tuesday. Tehran has repeatedly denounced these new strikes as a “gross violation” of the April ceasefire agreement, raising fears that full-scale conflict could resume if talks collapse. BBC News has not independently verified the contents of the purported draft framework leaked by Iranian state media, and no official confirmation of the draft’s terms has been provided by either negotiating delegation.

  • Israeli defence minister insists there are ‘voluntary emigration’ plans for Gaza

    Israeli defence minister insists there are ‘voluntary emigration’ plans for Gaza

    More than 18 months into Israel’s military campaign in the Gaza Strip, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz has formally advanced long-circulated proposals to push Palestinians to leave the enclave through what the government frames as “voluntary emigration”, announcing this week that preparations are on track to be implemented when the government deems conditions appropriate. In a public statement Wednesday, Katz confirmed the plans will move forward “at the proper time and in the proper manner”, one day after he announced Israel had assassinated Mohammed Odeh, the leader of Hamas’s armed wing, alongside his wife and three children in a targeted strike. Back in March, Israel’s security cabinet already greenlit Katz’s proposal to set up a dedicated internal directorate within the defence ministry to manage the process of mass “migration” out of Gaza, a policy that has been raised repeatedly by senior Israeli officials since the current military campaign began in October 2023.

    To date, the military offensive has killed more than 72,700 Palestinians and reduced most of Gaza’s built infrastructure to rubble, yet repeated surveys show the overwhelming majority of the enclave’s population refuses to leave their ancestral homeland. The push for emigration has dovetailed with growing public calls from extremist Israeli settler groups and far-right politicians to annex parts of Gaza and establish new Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian territory. While some senior government figures have attempted to frame the exit initiative as a purely voluntary program, other Israeli officials have openly advocated for forced expulsion — a practice widely recognized under international law as a war crime.

    One of the most prominent voices pushing for forced removal is far-right Member of Knesset Limor Son Har-Melech, who doubled down on her position during a tour of the Gaza border region in early May. Speaking on social media platform X following the visit, Son Har-Melech argued that full reoccupation of Gaza, mass expulsion of its existing residents, and the construction of permanent Israeli settlements is the only path to what she calls long-term security for the state of Israel. “Regrettably, the State of Israel is still captive to a flawed conception. There is no alternative to conquest, expulsion, and settlement,” she wrote, adding that any other diplomatic or political solution would fail and lead to future violence. She also emphasized Israel must retain permanent control over the Netzarim Corridor, a strategic route that splits the Gaza Strip into northern and southern zones, and establish a continuous Israeli settlement presence along the corridor.

    The current situation on the ground remains dire, despite a U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement reached in October that was intended to end active hostilities, lift Israel’s total 18-month blockade of Gaza, and allow unimpeded access for humanitarian aid including food, clean water, and critical medical supplies. Since the truce was announced, Israel has repeatedly violated its terms and has largely kept the crippling blockade in place, leaving basic necessities including fuel, food, and life-saving medication at critically low levels for Gaza’s 2 million remaining residents.

    Over the course of the war, only a few thousand Palestinians have managed to evacuate Gaza through the Rafah border crossing into Egypt. Following the ceasefire, Israeli authorities have allowed just a tiny handful of displaced Palestinians to return to Gaza from Egypt each day, and many who have crossed back have reported systemic abuse and harassment by Israeli forces during their journey. Even with the nominal ceasefire in place, Israeli airstrikes and artillery shelling across the enclave have continued nonstop, killing more than 800 additional Palestinians since the truce took effect. As of the latest count from Gaza’s Ministry of Health, the total death toll from Israel’s military campaign since October 2023 now stands at more than 72,700, with over 172,000 more people sustaining life-altering injuries.