A tragic suspected outbreak of hantavirus on a cruise ship has claimed the lives of three people, prompting public health officials to launch an investigation into how the rodent-borne pathogen spread in a confined maritime setting. As authorities work to contain the incident and identify additional cases, many members of the public are seeking clear answers about what hantavirus is, how it spreads, and what risks it poses to human populations. Hantavirus is a type of virus that is primarily hosted and transmitted by wild rodents, with different species of the virus found across regions of North America, Europe, Asia, and other parts of the world. Humans most commonly contract the virus through contact with rodent urine, feces, or nesting materials, when infectious particles become airborne and are inhaled. Rare cases of transmission can also occur through bites from infected rodents, and in some documented instances, person-to-person spread has been reported for specific strains of the virus. The most severe form of hantavirus infection in North America is hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), which causes rapid fluid buildup in the lungs and has a mortality rate of roughly 38% according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This current outbreak on a cruise ship, a closed environment that can facilitate exposure if rodents have gained access to food storage or living areas, has raised new questions about public health protocols on commercial passenger vessels. At this stage, investigations are ongoing to confirm that the three deaths were indeed caused by hantavirus, identify the source of the outbreak on the ship, and implement measures to prevent further infections among passengers and crew.
分类: health
-

What to know about hantavirus, the illness suspected in a cruise ship outbreak
A rare rodent-borne hantavirus outbreak is suspected to have occurred aboard an Atlantic cruise ship, leaving three people dead and multiple others ill, international health authorities confirmed recently. As investigations into the source and spread of the outbreak continue, public health officials are reminding communities of the core risks and prevention measures for this little-understood pathogen.
Hantaviruses have circulated among animal populations for centuries, with early recorded outbreaks documented across Asia and Europe. In the Eastern Hemisphere, the virus is most commonly associated with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, a condition marked by kidney failure and internal bleeding. It was not until the early 1990s that a new strain of hantavirus was identified in the southwestern United States, where it causes a severe respiratory illness now named hantavirus pulmonary syndrome.
This virus re-entered public focus last year following the death of Betsy Arakawa, wife of the late legendary actor Gene Hackman, who contracted a hantavirus infection in New Mexico.
In a formal statement released Sunday, the World Health Organization confirmed that comprehensive investigations into the cruise ship outbreak are still ongoing. The process includes expanded laboratory testing, full epidemiological tracing to identify the origin of the infection, and ongoing genetic sequencing of the virus to confirm its strain.
As a zoonotic disease, hantavirus is primarily transmitted to humans through direct contact with rodents, or contact with their urine, saliva, and feces. The highest infection risk occurs when infected organic material is disturbed, releasing viral particles into the air that people can inhale. Most human exposures occur in enclosed, low-ventilation spaces such as rural cabins, outbuildings, or infrequently cleaned homes where rodent populations have established nests. While extremely rare, the WHO confirms that limited person-to-person transmission of hantavirus has been documented in past outbreaks.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established formal national tracking for hantavirus after a major 1993 outbreak in the Four Corners region, the intersection of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. The outbreak was first identified by a sharp Indian Health Service physician who noticed an unusual cluster of unexplained deaths among otherwise healthy young patients, a pattern that had gone unrecognized by larger health systems at the time.
Today, most confirmed hantavirus cases in the U.S. are concentrated in Western states, with New Mexico and Arizona longstanding hotspots for infection. Michelle Harkins, a pulmonologist at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center who has spent decades researching hantavirus and treating infected patients, explains the higher case rate is tied to increased interactions between humans and wild rodent populations in rural areas of these states.
Early hantavirus infection presents with generic flu-like symptoms, including fever, chills, muscle aches and headaches, making early diagnosis extremely difficult. “Early in the illness, you really may not be able to tell the difference between hantavirus and having the flu,” explained Dr. Sonja Bartolome, an infectious disease specialist at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
Symptoms of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome typically develop between one and eight weeks after exposure to an infected rodent. As the infection progresses, it causes fluid to build up in the lungs, leading to severe chest tightness and respiratory failure. The alternate form of the disease, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, develops much more quickly, with symptoms appearing within one to two weeks of exposure.
Mortality rates for hantavirus infection vary widely based on the strain. According to CDC data, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome kills approximately 35% of all people it infects, while hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome has a mortality rate ranging between 1% and 15%.
Decades of research have yet to resolve many critical questions about hantavirus, and no targeted antiviral treatment or cure currently exists for infection. Even so, experts emphasize that early supportive medical care significantly improves a patient’s chance of survival. Harkins notes that core gaps in knowledge remain, including why the virus causes mild, asymptomatic infection in some people and life-threatening illness in others, as well as how the human body develops protective antibodies after exposure. She and her team have conducted long-term cohort studies of recovered patients to uncover insights that could lead to new treatments. “A lot of mysteries,” Harkins said, adding that the one clear takeaway from existing research is that limiting exposure to rodents is the single most effective way to prevent infection.
Public health officials advise that the core prevention step is to minimize contact with rodents and their waste. When cleaning up areas with rodent droppings, people must wear disposable protective gloves and use a bleach solution to decontaminate surfaces. Experts strongly warn against sweeping or vacuuming droppings, as these actions stir viral particles into the air, drastically increasing inhalation risk.
-

What is the hantavirus that has been confirmed on an Atlantic cruise ship?
A suspected hantavirus outbreak on an Atlantic Ocean cruise ship has left three people dead, the World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed. Of the six reported cases linked to the incident, one has received formal laboratory confirmation, while the remaining five are still being examined as part of ongoing investigations.
The outbreak unfolded aboard the MV Hondius, a cruise vessel operating on a voyage from Argentina to the West African island nation of Cape Verde. WHO spokespeople told the BBC that detailed epidemiological inquiries, including additional rounds of laboratory testing, are still underway to clarify the full scope of the transmission event.
To contextualize the public health risk, hantaviruses are a family of pathogens naturally hosted by rodent populations. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explains that most human infections occur when people inhale aerosolized particles contaminated with virus from dried rodent urine, droppings, or saliva. Rare secondary transmission routes include bites or scratches from infected rodents.
Infection with hantavirus can progress to one of two life-threatening syndromes. The first, Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS), begins with non-specific early symptoms including fatigue, elevated body temperature, and muscle pain, often followed by headaches, chills, dizziness, and gastrointestinal discomfort. Once the virus progresses to attack the respiratory system, CDC data places the mortality rate at roughly 38%.
The second, more severe form of disease is Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome (HFRS), which primarily targets kidney function. Advanced cases can lead to dangerously low blood pressure, internal bleeding, and acute kidney failure. Data from the U.S. National Institutes of Health estimates 150,000 new cases of HFRS are recorded globally each year, with the vast majority concentrated in Europe and Asia; over half of all annual cases occur in China. In the United States, where systematic hantavirus surveillance launched in 1993, just 890 confirmed cases were reported across the 30-year period ending in 2023. Still, one globally distributed common strain, Seoul virus, carried by widespread brown (Norway) rat populations, is present across the United States and most other regions of the world.
Unlike many viral pathogens, no targeted antiviral treatment or vaccine exists for hantavirus infection. Current clinical guidance from the CDC centers on supportive care tailored to a patient’s symptoms: this may include supplemental oxygen therapy, mechanical respiratory support, antiviral drugs, and kidney dialysis for patients experiencing renal failure. Severe cases require admission to hospital intensive care units, with many critically ill patients needing intubation to support breathing.
Public health officials emphasize that prevention focuses entirely on eliminating human contact with rodent populations. Core recommendations include sealing structural gaps in basements and attics that allow rodents to enter residential buildings, and wearing properly fitted protective equipment when cleaning up areas with rodent droppings to avoid inhaling contaminated dust.
This cruise ship outbreak marks the second high-profile hantavirus death recorded this year. In February 2025, Betsy Arakawa, wife of Oscar-winning American actor Gene Hackman, died from a respiratory illness caused by HPS, the most common strain of hantavirus in the U.S. Investigators found rodent nests and dead rodent specimens in outbuildings on Arakawa’s property, where she had been staying before her death. Police documents show Arakawa searched online for information comparing flu and COVID-19 symptoms in the days before her death, highlighting the challenge of distinguishing hantavirus’s early non-specific symptoms from more common respiratory illnesses.
-

A suspected hantavirus outbreak on a cruise ship in the Atlantic Ocean kills 3 people, WHO says
Three people have died and at least three others have fallen ill in a suspected hantavirus outbreak aboard an Atlantic Ocean cruise ship, the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed in a statement to the Associated Press on Sunday.
As investigations into the incident continue, global health officials have already verified at least one positive case of the rodent-borne pathogen. Hantavirus, which is distributed across every inhabited continent, is primarily transmitted to humans through direct contact with urine or feces from infected rodents, most commonly common rats and mice. While human-to-human transmission is rare, the virus is capable of spreading between people and can trigger life-threatening respiratory illness if left unaddressed.
According to the United Nations’ health agency, one affected patient is currently receiving intensive care at a hospital in South Africa. Teams are collaborating with national and local authorities to evacuate two other symptomatic passengers from the vessel to receive appropriate medical care.
“Detailed investigations are ongoing, including further laboratory testing, full epidemiological mapping, and genetic sequencing of the virus to confirm its origin and strain,” the WHO said in its official statement. “Medical care and support are being provided to all affected passengers and crew members currently on the ship.”
Unlike many common viral illnesses, hantavirus infection has no specific targeted treatment or approved cure. However, WHO notes that prompt, early clinical intervention drastically improves a patient’s odds of survival.
While the WHO declined to publicly name the vessel in its initial statement, local South African media outlets have identified the ship as the MV Hondius, a passenger cruise liner sailing from Argentina to Cape Verde off the western coast of Africa. Global shipping tracking platform MarineTraffic confirmed the vessel is a Dutch-flagged cruise ship, and showed it docked in Praia, Cape Verde’s capital, on Sunday evening.
South African health department spokesperson Foster Mohale, quoted in local reporting, shared additional details on the fatalities: the first victim, an elderly male passenger, died directly on board the ship, while his wife later succumbed to the infection after being admitted to a South African hospital.
This recent outbreak marks a return of hantavirus to public attention, just over a year after Betsy Arakawa, wife of legendary late actor Gene Hackman, died from a hantavirus infection in New Mexico. Hackman passed away one week after his wife’s death at their shared home.
-

Three dead in suspected virus outbreak on Atlantic cruise ship
A suspected hantavirus outbreak on an Atlantic Ocean cruise vessel has left three people dead, with multiple additional cases under active investigation, the World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed to the BBC. The outbreak is centered on the MV Hondius, a polar expedition cruise ship operated by Dutch tour operator Oceanwide Expeditions, which was en route from Ushuaia, Argentina to Cape Verde when illnesses began to spread.
According to official briefings, WHO has verified one case of hantavirus, with five other symptomatic passengers awaiting final testing to confirm infection. One British national remains in intensive care in South Africa following emergency medical evacuation. Tracking of the outbreak shows the first fatality was a 70-year-old passenger who developed symptoms and died on board the vessel. His remains have been taken to Saint Helena, a British overseas territory in the South Atlantic, pending next steps. The man’s 69-year-old wife also contracted the illness, was evacuated to a medical facility in Johannesburg, South Africa, and later died in hospital care. A third fatality, a 69-year-old British citizen, was also confirmed, while another British passenger remains in intensive care at the same Johannesburg hospital.
Hantavirus infections are most commonly transmitted through environmental exposure, typically contact with rodent urine, feces or saliva from infected animals. While person-to-person transmission is rare, the virus can cause life-threatening respiratory illness in severe cases, making the on-board outbreak a significant public health concern.
Initial reports from South Africa’s Ministry of Health had pegged the death toll at two, which was later updated to three by WHO. The ship departed on its scheduled voyage on March 20, with a planned arrival in Cape Verde on May 4. The MV Hondius is a 107.6-meter polar-class cruise ship that can accommodate up to 170 passengers across 80 cabins.
WHO has activated its cross-border public health response framework to manage the event, which it has classified as a formal public health event. The global health body is coordinating between affected countries, South African public health authorities and the ship’s operator to organize medical evacuations for remaining symptomatic passengers, conduct a comprehensive risk assessment of the outbreak, and deliver medical and public health support to all people still on board the vessel.
-

Doctors warn nicotine pouches could spark repeat of the vaping epidemic
Australia is facing the early emergence of an unregulated public health crisis linked to unapproved nicotine pouches, with top medical authorities calling on the federal government to act fast to close regulatory gaps before the problem escalates into a repeat of the nation’s devastating vaping epidemic.
In an official submission shared with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the Australian Medical Association (AMA) is pressing the Albanese Government to immediately close existing loopholes that are allowing unapproved nicotine-containing products to flow freely into the domestic Australian market. As federal AMA vice president Associate Professor Julian Rait emphasized, regulatory inaction right now will allow these addictive products to become deeply entrenched across the country, a mistake Australia has already made with unregulated vapes in recent years.
Currently, not a single nicotine pouch product holds formal approval on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG), yet these products are widely available to consumers, including minors, Rait says. Unlike approved therapeutic nicotine products intended to help adults quit smoking, these unregulated pouches are marketed with bright, youth-appealing branding and sold through online platforms with almost no barriers to purchase. Some products have been found to carry extremely high concentrations of the addictive substance: independent, non-industry research has recorded nicotine levels as high as 150mg per pouch – equivalent to 50 cigarettes, given a 30mg pouch matches the nicotine content of a single conventional cigarette.
Beyond addiction, these unregulated pouches carry confirmed negative health impacts for users, Rait explained. Common adverse effects include persistent mouth and gum irritation, gastrointestinal distress, nausea, and elevated blood pressure, with long-term health risks still understudied because of the product’s unapproved status.
The submission also highlights that the combination of fast-growing social media promotion, loose online sales rules, and the rising use of unregulated synthetic nicotine has stretched Australia’s patchwork current regulatory framework to breaking point. Rait warned that without updated, technology-neutral national regulations and consistent cross-jurisdictional enforcement, unlicensed suppliers will keep exploiting grey market gaps to reach Australian consumers.
To address the crisis, the AMA is calling for a suite of targeted public health safeguards. These include mandatory, effective online compliance protocols to remove illicit product listings, clear and standardized health warnings on all packaging, child-resistant packaging requirements to prevent accidental child poisoning, and enhanced national monitoring of adverse health events and poisoning cases to inform ongoing regulatory adjustments.
Right now, Australia’s response to nicotine pouches is fragmented: state and territory governments have implemented inconsistent rules, with only a handful of jurisdictions such as South Australia and Queensland acting to restrict the products under existing tobacco legislation, while others have taken no formal action. The AMA’s proposed national regulatory framework would harmonize rules across the country, simplify enforcement for local authorities, eliminate inconsistencies between regions, and create a unified, robust enforcement environment to block unapproved products from the market.
“Without urgent federal action, we risk repeating every mistake that allowed the vaping epidemic to take hold and harm a generation of young Australians,” Rait said.
-

Australia wants to be first nation in the world to eliminate a cancer – can it?
Twelve years ago, Chrissy Walters’ life changed forever. Six months after welcoming her long-awaited first daughter into the world following years of fertility struggles, the Toowoomba resident was rushed to hospital with a severe internal bleed. After multiple tests, biopsies and specialist appointments, the 39-year-old received a devastating diagnosis: advanced cervical cancer.
Today, after more than a decade of grueling, invasive treatments, Walters’ cancer has spread throughout her body, and her condition is terminal. For her 12-year-old daughter, cervical cancer has been a constant presence throughout her life – the family began having open conversations about Walters’ mortality when the girl was just three years old. Now, as her daughter reaches the age Australia’s national immunization program targets for HPV vaccination, Walters holds onto the hope that her daughter’s generation will be the first to grow up free of the disease that is taking her life.
Australia is well on its way to making that hope a reality. On track to become the first country in the world to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health threat – potentially beating its 2035 target – the nation has built on decades of local innovation and public health investment to reach this historic cusp. The story of Australia’s progress begins in 2006, when University of Queensland scientists Ian Frazer and Jian Zhou developed Gardasil, the world’s first effective vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV), the most common high-risk cause of cervical cancer. A year later, Australia became the first country to roll out a national HPV vaccination program for adolescent girls, expanding the program to include boys (who can be asymptomatic carriers of the virus) in 2013.
Alongside widespread vaccination, Australia has implemented a world-leading screening program that has drastically improved early detection. In 2017, it became one of the first nations to replace traditional pap smears with more sensitive HPV-based screening, which only needs to be completed once every five years. It also introduced the option of self-collected samples, a change public health officials call a game-changer for people who avoid screening due to anxiety about pelvic exams, or barriers like limited time or geographic distance from healthcare services.
Public health experts define elimination of cervical cancer as fewer than four new cases per 100,000 people annually. As of the latest data, Australia already records 6.3 new cases per 100,000 women, down from double that rate when national record-keeping began in 1982. Most notably, 2021 data recorded zero new diagnoses of cervical cancer in women under 25 – a landmark that would have been unthinkable a generation ago. Karen Canfell, a leading epidemiologist at the University of Sydney and global pioneer in cervical cancer control, says the end of cervical cancer as a widespread public health threat is in sight. “It’s not all women of all ages yet, but you can see that concept of elimination being realised,” she notes.
Canfell adds that Australia’s early investment in vaccination and screening has served as a blueprint for the World Health Organization’s global elimination strategy, making the country a trailblazer in the first global effort to eliminate any form of cancer. “Public health innovations in Australia sort of gave a general exemplar for WHO to follow,” she says.
Despite this remarkable progress, significant challenges remain. The latest progress report highlights a small but concerning decline in vaccination coverage across the country, with stark disparities for First Nations communities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women currently face twice the rate of cervical cancer diagnoses and three times the mortality rate of non-Indigenous Australian women, due to long-standing barriers to healthcare access that often lead to late detection. On current trends, cervical cancer elimination for Indigenous Australian women will not come until 2047 – 12 years after the national 2035 target.
Researchers add that other barriers, including lingering vaccine hesitancy in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, rising healthcare costs, and missed school-based vaccinations among students who have missed class time, are slowing progress. Many families also remain unaware that the HPV vaccine is fully free under Australia’s universal healthcare system, and there is no systematic national program to help children catch up on missed doses. “There’s not a lot of a concerted effort to get them back in if they’ve missed it… The onus is very much on families to get their child caught up on that vaccine,” explains researcher Jocelyn Jones.
Beyond Australia’s borders, high implementation costs remain a major barrier to replicating the nation’s success in low- and middle-income countries, which often lack the robust public health infrastructure and funding needed to roll out widespread vaccination and screening programs. Global aid cuts have exacerbated this gap: in 2025, former U.S. President Donald Trump announced the end of American support for Gavi, the global vaccine alliance that supplies HPV vaccines to developing nations. Australia has stepped in to support neighboring nations including Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea to pursue their own elimination goals, but Canfell notes that high-income countries hold a unique advantage. “To say the obvious thing, we are obviously lucky to be in a high-income country where we have a form of universal healthcare and access for all,” she says.
Canfell argues that eliminating cervical cancer is a worthwhile long-term investment for all nations, pointing to not only the saved lives and societal benefits but also tangible economic returns: when women do not die prematurely from cervical cancer, they remain active in the workforce and boost national economic productivity.
Currently, Australia is in a quiet global race to be the first to reach elimination, with Sweden and Rwanda targeting 2027 and the UK targeting 2040, though all other nations currently lag behind Australia on key coverage milestones. For terminal patient Chrissy Walters, who describes living with cervical cancer as a full-time job that has left her with debilitating side effects, crippling fatigue and crippling financial stress even under Australia’s universal healthcare system, the progress could not come soon enough. While she will not live to see a world free of cervical cancer, she holds onto the hope that her daughter’s generation will never have to experience the pain and loss the disease has brought her family. That future, for Australia, is now within reach.
-

Experts warn of rising lead risks in Africa’s solar energy boom
In the tight-knit residential settlement of Owino Uhuru on Kenya’s Mombasa coast, the doors of a local lead-acid battery recycling plant closed more than a decade ago. But for thousands of residents who call this neighborhood home, the toxic legacy of that facility has never faded — a warning sign of the hidden public health risks emerging as Africa’s clean energy transition drives an unprecedented surge in battery demand across the continent.
Forty-year-old Faith Muthama, a mother of four, is one of hundreds of residents still living with chronic health damage linked to the site’s contamination. Decades after the plant first began operations, she still cannot complete routine household work without gasping for breath. A 2012 blood test confirmed what her body had already been signaling: dangerous, elevated levels of lead were circulating in her bloodstream. “Life has never been the same,” Muthama says.
The contamination that poisons this community traces back to 2007, when Kenya Metal Refineries EPZ — a local subsidiary of an Indian firm headquartered in Mumbai — opened the recycling plant in the middle of the residential area. For seven years, the facility processed spent lead-acid batteries to extract refined lead for export to India. Residents say toxic waste from operations leached untreated into the neighborhood’s soil and groundwater, sparking a public health disaster that has been linked to more than 20 deaths to date. Even after the Kenyan government shut the plant down in 2014, the embedded lead in local ecosystems continues to sicken generations of residents.
Medical research confirms lead exposure carries irreversible, life-altering health harms: permanent neurological damage, stunted cognitive development in children, and chronic organ damage that cuts life expectancy. Vulnerable groups including children, the elderly and pregnant people face the highest risk, as growing bodies absorb lead far more readily than adults.
In 2025, affected residents won a rare legal victory for environmental justice: Kenya’s Supreme Court upheld a class-action lawsuit against the smelting company, ordering roughly $12 million in damages to be distributed to nearly 3,000 impacted community members. But months after the landmark ruling, activists and residents say the Kenyan state has failed to move forward with timely disbursement of the awarded funds, leaving sick residents without financial support to cover ongoing medical care.
Seventy-year-old Alfred Ogulo, a village elder, has already spent all of his life savings on treatment for lead-related illness. Tests once showed critically high lead levels in his blood, leaving him with permanent nerve damage that leaves him unable to walk without a cane. He lives with persistent chest pain and a chronic cough, a leftover from breathing toxic fumes when the plant was active. “I am just waiting for help as I have exhausted all my resources treating myself,” Ogulo says.
The crisis in Owino Uhuru is far from an isolated case. Public health experts warn that similar lead contamination risks are emerging across the entire African continent, driven by the rapid expansion of renewable energy access that relies heavily on lead-acid battery storage. A February 2025 report from the Centre for Global Development, an independent think tank with offices in Washington and London, finds that the boom in off-grid solar systems — widely seen as a critical solution to closing Africa’s decades-long energy access gap — has caused a sharp spike in demand for affordable lead-acid batteries, and by extension, for battery recycling services.
Lead-acid batteries remain the dominant power storage option across low-income African markets because they cost a fraction of the price of newer alternatives such as lithium-ion batteries. But safe, environmentally sound recycling of these batteries requires expensive specialized infrastructure that most African countries lack. As a result, the majority of lead-acid battery recycling in the region falls to informal, unregulated operators who use low-cost, rudimentary methods that release massive amounts of lead particles into the surrounding air, soil and water.
“Off-grid solar could account for a substantial share of batteries entering the recycling stream in Africa,” explained Lee Crawford, a senior research fellow at the Centre for Global Development and one of the lead contributors to the report. “That’s on top of existing demand from vehicles like cars and motorbikes.”
Crawford notes that the high cost of safe recycling creates powerful economic incentives for operators to cut corners on environmental and public health protections. While banning lead-acid batteries entirely would address the risk, Crawford says such a ban is unfeasible given the current affordability gap with alternative technologies. The only viable path forward, he argues, is investing in scaling up safe, regulated recycling infrastructure across the continent.
The scale of the threat is staggering. Studies conducted across Africa and South Asia estimate that between one-third and half of all children living in these regions have elevated blood lead levels, making lead poisoning one of the most widespread underreported environmental health risks in the world. Weak regulatory enforcement across many African nations amplifies the problem: while most countries have environmental rules on paper that would limit toxic exposure from lead operations, inconsistent implementation and lack of funding for inspections allow unregulated recycling to continue unchecked.
“This is a silent threat,” Crawford said. “It’s often invisible, but it affects health, cognitive development and economic productivity for entire communities.”
The problem of accountability extends far beyond small informal recycling workshops, experts add. Even larger, formal recycling facilities often lack proper pollution control measures, while globalized supply chains for recycled lead make it easy for responsible parties to avoid accountability for contamination. “There needs to be accountability across the entire supply chain,” Crawford emphasized.
A small number of African countries have begun to implement policy solutions to address the gap. South Africa, for example, has introduced a formal producer responsibility framework that requires battery manufacturers to fund and manage end-of-life recycling for their products, creating a structured, regulated system for processing spent batteries. But across much of the continent, especially in countries that import most of their batteries rather than producing them domestically, assigning clear responsibility for safe recycling remains a major policy challenge.
International development donors have increasingly shifted funding toward lithium-ion battery technologies, which do not carry the same lead-related public health risks. But industry analysts project that lead-acid batteries will remain in widespread use across Africa for decades to come, particularly in low-cost off-grid solar systems that bring energy access to remote communities.
For the residents of Owino Uhuru, the crisis remains an immediate, daily reality. Phyllis Omido, who leads the Mombasa-based Centre for Justice Governance and Environmental Action and helped residents bring their class-action lawsuit, says the Kenyan government has failed to uphold the Supreme Court’s ruling, leaving vulnerable residents without the relief they were awarded.
“It is sad that the state has ignored prioritizing the compensation payment as ordered by the court,” Omido said. “These monies would have alleviated the current suffering these vulnerable residents are going through.”
Sixty-year-old Mejumaa Hassan Nyanje, who has lived in Owino Uhuru through the entire crisis, says residents feel abandoned by national leaders and the company that caused the contamination. “Is it fair that we are the ones still chasing justice while the company walks away?” Nyanje said, fighting back tears. “Will we all die before justice is served? It feels like we’ve been abandoned, like our lives and our health don’t matter.”
This climate and environmental reporting from The Associated Press receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP maintains full editorial control over all content.
-

US infant formula supply is ‘safe,’ FDA says after looking for potential contaminants
U.S. federal health officials announced Wednesday that a landmark safety analysis of commercial infant formula sold across the country has found mostly reassuringly low concentrations of heavy metals, pesticides, and other potentially harmful contaminants. The comprehensive testing was carried out as part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Operation Stork Speed, an initiative the agency describes as the most expansive and rigorous assessment of U.S. infant formula safety ever conducted. Both FDA leaders and independent public health experts have concluded that the current domestic infant formula supply remains safe for consumer use.
“There is no reason for American parents to avoid any available infant formula on the market right now,” stated Dr. Steven Abrams, a pediatrics professor at the University of Texas at Austin who served as an independent reviewer for the FDA’s findings.
Between 2023 and 2025, FDA scientists collected and tested more than 300 samples of commercially produced infant formula for a full panel of potential contaminants, including four common heavy metals: lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. The testing also extended to pesticide residues, phthalates (industrial chemicals commonly used in plastic packaging and manufacturing), and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the persistent man-made compounds widely nicknamed “forever chemicals” for their ability to remain in the environment and human body for decades.
Per the FDA’s final report, all tested contaminants registered either undetectable levels or concentrations far lower than established safety thresholds. Any heavy metals that were detected fell well below the strict exposure limits set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for drinking water. Ninety-nine percent of tested samples showed no trace of pesticide residues at all, and 25 out of the 30 specific PFAS compounds included in the testing panel were not detected in any samples.
Most independent experts who reviewed the data have backed the FDA’s conclusion that the current supply is safe, noting that trace amounts of some heavy metals can enter the food supply naturally through environmental contamination, rather than as a result of manufacturing flaws. But not all specialists share the full reassuring conclusion: synthetic compounds like phthalates and PFAS do not occur naturally, so even trace detections raise red flags for some clinicians and researchers.
“These are completely human-made chemicals,” explained Dr. Sheela Sathyanarayana, a pediatrics professor at UW Medicine and researcher with the Seattle Children’s Research Institute. “The fact that we can detect any of these compounds in infant formula at all is a cause for concern.” Sathyanarayana added that the findings underscore a critical need for expanded ongoing monitoring of contaminants not just in infant formula, but across the entire U.S. food supply.
Operation Stork Speed was launched by the Trump administration in March 2025, marking the first comprehensive update to U.S. infant formula safety and quality standards in decades. The initiative builds on earlier FDA work that examined heavy metal contamination in a range of infant foods, a public health priority because high early-life exposure to these toxins is linked to long-term impairments in children’s brain development, learning capacity, and behavioral development, Abrams explained.
Currently, unlike regulatory frameworks in the European Union, Canada, and Australia, the U.S. does not have legally enforceable maximum exposure limits for heavy metals in infant formula. For years, consumer advocacy organizations have pushed the FDA to implement these strict, science-based limits. In 2024, independent consumer organization Consumer Reports published its own analysis of 41 U.S. infant formulas, claiming that many products contained troublingly high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants. However, that study set its own safety threshold for concern far lower than the existing standards used by the European Union, and the high-profile report sparked widespread public anxiety that led many parents to avoid necessary commercial formula use unnecessarily, Abrams noted.
Abrams himself has called on the FDA to continue regular safety monitoring of infant formula and maintain transparent public reporting of test results. Abbott, one of the largest domestic infant formula manufacturers in the U.S., has also urged the FDA to formalize scientific, enforceable standards for contaminants in the sector.
“Producing infant formula at scale domestically is a matter of national security for the United States,” Abbott spokesman John Koval said in a prepared email statement. “These latest results confirm that our current domestic supply is safe for American families.”
This reporting was produced by The Associated Press Health and Science Department, which receives grant support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP maintains full editorial control over all of its independent content.
-

Gabonese patient walks again after life-changing surgery in Changsha
For eight long years, 57-year-old Mapekeko Marie from Gabon lived in constant pain and near immobility, trapped by severe spinal stenosis and progressive hip degeneration. Dependent on heavy pain medication to manage her symptoms and barely able to move short distances, she faced a difficult choice: local doctors recommended urgent surgery, but Gabon’s limited specialized orthopedic infrastructure and the high perceived risk of the procedure left her unwilling to proceed. That changed when a former Gabonese patient who had received successful care in Changsha, China, connected Marie with Changsha Taihe Hospital, opening the door to a life-changing new treatment path. After a thorough remote consultation to review her complex medical history, the hospital’s specialized orthopedic team agreed to take on her challenging case, welcoming her to Hunan province for care. On February 9, a multidisciplinary team of 13 surgeons spent eight hours completing the combined procedure: total replacement of both severely degenerated hips and surgical decompression of the compressed spinal cord. The complex operation went entirely according to plan, marking a major clinical success. Just two weeks after surgery, Marie was discharged from the hospital. Rather than returning home immediately, she chose to stay in Changsha to complete her supervised rehabilitation, renting a local apartment and working closely with hospital physical therapists to rebuild her strength and mobility. It was during this recovery period that she experienced a breakthrough moment: during a visit to a nearby city park, she stood unassisted, without crutches, for the first time in nearly a decade. For weeks, she progressed through structured rehabilitation, steadily gaining the ability to move freely and independently. By April 10, when she was ready to return to Gabon, Marie could walk without assistance and even board her international flight entirely on her own. Within days of arriving back in her home country, Marie reached out to her care team in Changsha to share her joy and continued progress, writing, “I bought a bicycle, and I keep up with my daily exercises.” In a heartfelt final message before departing China, she even thanked her medical team in simple Mandarin: “Thank you, Chinese doctors.” Marie’s stay in Changsha coincided with the Chinese Lunar New Year holiday, a time when most people travel to reunite with family. Instead of taking leave, the hospital’s care team remained on site to support her recovery, going out of their way to make her feel welcome and at home: they shared traditional holiday dumplings, gave her handwritten Spring Festival couplets and small festive gifts, turning her medical trip into a warm, cross-cultural experience. This successful treatment is not an isolated case for Changsha Taihe Hospital. According to Kuang Yahua, the hospital’s medical dean, the facility has treated international patients from 15 different countries since last year, building a reputation for high-quality, accessible specialized orthopedic care. “Our core mission has always been to put patients first, and through providing excellent care to international visitors, we hope to build lasting bridges of health and friendship between China and communities across the world,” Kuang explained. For Marie, that bridge has already transformed her life, turning a future of limited mobility and constant pain into one of newfound independence and possibility.
