作者: admin

  • Belgium’s Beguinages: Tranquil oases in a world of noise and distraction

    Belgium’s Beguinages: Tranquil oases in a world of noise and distraction

    Bruges, Belgium’s most iconic tourist hub, hums with the constant energy of rolling suitcase wheels on cobblestones, chugging motorboats cutting through canal waters, and multilingual chatter from visitors that fills every historic street. Tucked away just across a small bridge, beneath an ornate stone arch carved with the Latin word “sauvegarde” — meaning “safe place” — a small group of 24 women have carved out a quiet sanctuary far from the city’s crowds: the Princely Beguinage Ten Wijngaerde, a serene oasis ringed with golden daffodils that dates all the way back to 1245.

    For Trees Dewever, this enclosed community has been home for 22 years. In a world defined by chaos and constant stimulation, she says the beguinage wraps its residents in an overwhelming sense of peace that feels essential to modern life. Her neighbor Jo Verplaetsen, who has lived here for the same span of decades, echoes that sentiment: the medieval spirit of shelter that shaped the community remains just as soothing and socially connected today, leaving residents grateful for their home every single day.

    The origins of beguinages stretch back to the 12th century, born as a response to widespread societal upheaval. Centuries of medieval conflict had decimated Europe’s male population, leaving a surge of widows and unmarried women without financial or social stability. Rather than committing to the strict, binding rules of traditional convents, many of these women chose the more flexible structure of beguinage life, explains Michel Vanholder, a volunteer at the Grand Beguinage Church of Mechelen. “They didn’t want to go become nuns but nevertheless they wanted to live together without men because there were not enough men to marry,” he notes.

    Women who joined these communities were called beguines. Unlike nuns, they were never required to take formal vows of celibacy or poverty, could own personal property, and were free to leave the beguinage at any time if they chose to marry. This middle way between secular life and religious order filled a critical gap for women seeking independence in a male-dominated medieval world, says Brigitte Beernaert, who has called the Bruges beguinage home for more than 20 years. Historically, beguines supported their communities by caring for the sick and impoverished, selling skilled handwork like needlepoint and fine lace, and reinvesting earnings back into shared community resources.

    For centuries, beguinages had a fraught relationship with the Vatican: at times embraced as legitimate religious communities, they were also targeted with waves of persecution. One of the most famous beguines, French Christian mystic Marguerite Porete, was burned at the stake as a heretic in 1310 for her unorthodox theological writings. Over the centuries, the beguine movement has captured the imagination of creative thinkers, with iconic novelists including Charlotte Brontë, Ken Follett, and Umberto Eco all featuring beguines and their male equivalent, the beghards, in their work.

    Architecturally, beguinages were intentionally designed to prioritize comfort, quiet, and safety for like-minded women. Small private gardens are tucked along quiet alleys or clustered around a central courtyard, where homes face inward to foster community connection, and a chapel or church almost always sits at the heart of the site. Today, 13 historic beguinages across Flanders, Belgium’s Dutch-speaking northern region, are protected as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, recognizing their unique cultural and historical significance.

    For visitors like German tourist Biata Weissbaeker, who explored the Bruges site with her husband, these all-women spaces remain just as vital today as they were 800 years ago. “Women need a place like this: a safe place that gives them the possibility to go inside themselves,” she says.

    While the last traditional beguine in Belgium, Marcella Pattijn, passed away in 2013 at 92 years old, the core mission of the beguinage community has endured through eight centuries. “Once you are in here, you are safe — that was of course literal in the Middle Ages, once you lived here, the law couldn’t take you away,” Beernaert explains. “Today it’s more like a safe place for women alone.”

    The Bruges beguinage still restricts residency to women exclusively, even as the city of Bruges now owns and maintains the grounds, with residents renting their homes from the municipal government. Across Belgium, beguinage communities host regular public events to nurture connection among residents through shared activities like community gardening, and open their doors to the public through open house events to share their history. Recently, residents of the Bruges beguinage planted raspberry bushes along the canal wall and keep beehives to produce their own honey. For Beernaert, the timeless peace of the site feels more important than ever amid global uncertainty. “The world is terrible for the moment, and this gives us the impression that it’s still safe here,” she says. “This gives Bruges already a little bit of a small paradise, if you want. And living inside that paradise feels unbelievable.”

  • ‘Hard to put a number’ on people targeted by Coalition’s new immigration policy: Duniam

    ‘Hard to put a number’ on people targeted by Coalition’s new immigration policy: Duniam

    Australia’s federal political landscape has been roiled this week by a heated debate over the opposition Coalition’s hardline new migration proposal, after the party’s senior home affairs spokesman declined to provide clear, concrete figures for how many people could face deportation or visa cancellation if the party wins the next national election. The plan, dubbed the Australian Values Migration Plan, was unveiled earlier this week by Opposition Leader Angus Taylor during an address at the Menzies Research Centre. Taylor framed the policy as a bold intervention to fix what he calls a broken immigration system, centering it on stricter checks for prospective migrants and a crackdown on people the party describes as threats to national social cohesion.

    In his launch speech, Taylor argued that migrants coming from established liberal democracies are far more likely to embrace what the Coalition terms “Australian values” than those arriving from nations governed by extremist groups, religious fundamentalists, or authoritarian regimes. The policy outlines two key changes: an expansion of social media background checks for all visa applicants, and the creation of a dedicated inter-agency task force that would coordinate with Australia’s leading national security and border agencies – including the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation, Australian Federal Police, Australian Border Force, and the Department of Home Affairs – to remove migrants who have overstayed their visas or are found to violate the policy’s values requirements.

    When pressed on Sunday by journalists to outline the expected scale of deportations under the new plan, opposition home affairs spokesman Jonno Duniam repeatedly conceded that producing a specific numerical target was not feasible. “It is very hard to put a number on these things, because there are global events shifting migration patterns constantly,” Duniam told Sky News’ *Sunday Agenda*. “Conflicts in different regions of the world change how many people move, so we can’t lock in a fixed figure. If we do our job correctly and stop people who pose a risk from entering the country in the first place, the number of people we have to deport after arrival should be minimal anyway.”

    Duniam pushed back against widespread criticism that the proposal duplicates existing immigration rules, noting that all visa applicants are currently required to sign the Australian Values Statement, but arguing that the current framework lacks enforceability. Under the Coalition’s plan, the Migration Act would be amended to embed a legally binding values test as a formal condition of all visa grants, giving authorities clearer power to reject or revoke visas for people who fail to meet the standard.

    The policy has already sparked fierce backlash across Australia’s human rights and refugee advocacy sectors, with major groups including Amnesty International, the Refugee Council of Australia, and the Asylum Seekers’ Resource Centre all issuing scathing condemnations. Critics have widely labeled Taylor’s rhetoric as deliberately divisive, accusing the Coalition of stigmatizing and demonizing migrants from non-Western backgrounds to court political support. Sitting Labor government officials have echoed this criticism: Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has challenged the Coalition to provide even one example of a case where existing ministerial powers would not already allow a visa to be refused or cancelled for the kind of high-risk individuals the party says it is targeting.

    Duniam dismissed this widespread criticism, telling reporters that critics would always oppose changes to immigration policy regardless of their content. “Critics will always criticise, won’t they? Or else they wouldn’t have much to say,” he said, adding that the Coalition would commit sufficient resources to the relevant enforcement agencies to root out potential risks before migrants enter Australia, and rapidly deport any high-risk individuals who do manage to arrive despite screening.

  • The US backs a South Africa project to extract rare earths despite a diplomatic clash

    The US backs a South Africa project to extract rare earths despite a diplomatic clash

    In the small South African town of Phalaborwa, two massive, sand-like dunes of industrial waste have become the focal point of a high-stakes U.S.-supported initiative to unlock a new supply of rare earth elements — minerals critical to modern high-tech manufacturing that the U.S. currently relies heavily on its top economic rival, China, to provide.

    The Phalaborwa Rare Earths Project, led by UK-founded firm Rainbow Rare Earths, secured a $50 million equity investment from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), a U.S. government agency established during the first Trump administration. The commitment was formalized in 2023 under the Biden administration, but the current second Trump administration has opted to advance the work despite a sharp recent diplomatic rift between the U.S. and South Africa. Shortly after Trump returned to office in February this year, he issued an executive order freezing all U.S. financial aid to South Africa, but strategic economic priorities have overridden that diplomatic friction for the project. The DFC has framed its involvement in Phalaborwa as part of a broader goal to unlock Africa’s untapped mineral wealth while advancing core U.S. strategic interests.

    Rare earth elements, a group of 17 chemically similar metals, are a key subset of the dozens of critical minerals that major global economies have identified as irreplaceable for manufacturing everything from smartphones and robotics to defense systems, electric vehicle motors and wind turbine generators. Expanding domestic and allied access to these critical minerals has been a signature policy priority for Trump across both of his presidential terms, with the current administration announcing this year it will allocate nearly $12 billion to establish a U.S. strategic reserve of these materials.

    Unlike most rare earth projects that develop new ore deposits, Phalaborwa plans to extract its target minerals from 35 million tons of phosphogypsum, a waste byproduct left behind from decades of phosphate rock processing for fertilizer and industrial acid production at the site. Extraction is targeted to launch in 2028, with construction of the on-site processing facility scheduled to begin in early 2027 — and the $50 million DFC investment will only be disbursed once construction gets underway. The project is projected to operate for 16 years, producing high-demand rare earths including neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium, all core components of high-performance magnets for clean energy and defense technologies.

    Rainbow Rare Earths chief executive George Bennett told the Associated Press the project’s output will be primarily destined for the U.S. market, noting that American interest in the initiative is heavily tied to national defense supply chains. Project director Alberto Bruttomesso explained that the pre-processing of the waste material by former owners of the site eliminates one of the most costly steps in rare earth extraction, meaning the project can operate as a low-cost producer on par with Chinese mining operations. The firm also says up to 90% of the energy used for extraction will come from renewable sources, bringing the project’s environmental footprint far below that of traditional rare earth mining.

    While rare earth elements are geologically relatively common around the world, they typically appear in very low concentrations and require complex, expensive separation and processing, which has left the global market dominated by China for decades. Industry analysts note that the Phalaborwa project is unique in its experimental approach of extracting minerals from existing above-ground waste, but its long-term potential remains unproven.

    Neha Mukherjee, research manager at industry analyst firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, noted that the project’s low operational and capital costs are a major advantage, adding that it fills a pressing gap in global supply. “We do not have enough projects to meet the entire demand outside of China,” Mukherjee explained.

    The Phalaborwa initiative is just one part of a broader, sustained push by the U.S. to expand its access to rare earth and critical mineral supplies, both at home and abroad. Beyond domestic mining investments, the Trump administration has pursued critical mineral deals in Ukraine, and has repeatedly signaled interest in acquiring Greenland largely due to the Arctic island’s large untapped rare earth reserves. In Africa, where China has long held the position of the dominant foreign investor in mining, the U.S. is actively working to catch up, according to mining specialist Patience Mususa of the Nordic Africa Institute in Sweden.

    Other recent U.S.-backed rare earth projects on the continent include a $1.8 million feasibility study grant from the U.S. Trade and Development Agency for the Monte Muambe rare earth project in Mozambique, signed in February. The Trump administration is also continuing to fund the Lobito Corridor, a Biden-era infrastructure initiative to build a 1,290-kilometer railway connecting the mineral-rich interior of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia to the Atlantic coast, designed to open up new export routes for African critical minerals to Western markets.

  • Bulgarians head to the polls to elect a parliament for the eighth time in 5 years

    Bulgarians head to the polls to elect a parliament for the eighth time in 5 years

    SOFIA, Bulgaria — Balkan EU and NATO member Bulgaria is heading into its eighth national parliamentary election in just five years on Sunday, a vote that comes after years of crippling political gridlock that has left the country starved of stable, effective governance. This snap election was triggered last December, when a conservative-led administration stepped down in the wake of mass nationwide demonstrations that drew hundreds of thousands of protesters, overwhelmingly young Bulgarians, to capital and city streets across the country. Demonstrators’ core demand was the creation of a truly independent judiciary capable of rooting out the deep, systemic corruption that has defined the nation’s political landscape for decades.

    Since 2021, the country of 6.5 million people has been trapped in a cycle of fragmented legislative bodies that have only produced fragile, short-lived governments. No administration formed in that window has managed to hold power for more than 12 months, with every government falling either to mass public protests or unaccountable backroom power deals within parliament. This constant rotation of ruling coalitions has eroded public faith in democratic institutions, spurred widespread voter apathy, and driven a steady decline in election turnout across successive votes.

    Sunday’s ballot carries outsized geopolitical weight, coming just days after Hungarian voters rejected the long-ruling authoritarian administration of Viktor Orbán, a prominent far-right leader who has maintained close personal and policy ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The clear front-runner in this election is Rumen Radev, a left-leaning, pro-Russian former president who resigned from his largely ceremonial post in January — months before the end of his second five-year term — to launch a campaign for the position of prime minister. The 62-year-old Radev, a former fighter pilot and ex-air force commander, is leading the newly organized center-left Progressive Bulgaria coalition, and stands as Bulgaria’s most popular active politician.

    Radev has campaigned on a promise of a national fresh start, positioning himself as a vocal opponent of the country’s deeply entrenched oligarchic networks and their links to top political figures. At campaign stops across the country, he has vowed to “remove the corrupt, oligarchic model of governance from political power.” His support base is split between two broad groups: voters drawn to his anti-corruption platform, and backers who align with his open Eurosceptic and pro-Russia policy stances. While Radev has issued formal public condemnation of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, he has repeatedly opposed sending military aid to Kyiv and has advocated for reopening diplomatic negotiations with Moscow to end the ongoing conflict.

    Bulgaria’s geopolitical standing has shifted notably in recent months: the country joined the EU’s eurozone on January 1 of this year, shortly after gaining full membership in the EU’s border-free Schengen Area, even as its domestic political system remains mired in chaos. The current race was triggered by the 2021 resignation of three-time conservative prime minister Boyko Borissov, who stepped down after mass protests driven by public anger over corruption and systemic injustice. The closest rival to Radev’s coalition is Borissov’s center-right GERB party.

    Opinion polling indicates Radev’s coalition is on track to capture more than 30% of the national vote, putting it roughly 10 percentage points ahead of GERB. Most published polls carry a margin of error between 3% and 3.5%. Polling stations opened across the country at 7 a.m. local time and are scheduled to close at 8 p.m., with initial exit polls set to be released immediately after voting ends. Preliminary full election results are expected to be published on Monday.

  • A humanoid robot sprints to victory in Beijing, beating the human half-marathon world record

    A humanoid robot sprints to victory in Beijing, beating the human half-marathon world record

    On a race day in Beijing’s Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area (Beijing E-Town), a milestone event unfolded Sunday that underscores China’s rapid advancement in humanoid robotics: an autonomous humanoid built by Chinese consumer electronics firm Honor claimed the top spot at the world’s second annual robot-only half-marathon, clocking a finish time that outpaces the official human world record for the 21-kilometer distance.

    The winning Honor robot crossed the finish line in 5 hours? No, 50 minutes and 26 seconds, according to an official post from Beijing E-Town on China’s super-app WeChat. That time beats the current human men’s half-marathon world record of 57 minutes 31 seconds set by Uganda’s Jacob Kiplimo at the 2025 Lisbon Half Marathon in March by nearly seven full minutes. A separate remotely operated Honor robot finished even faster at 48 minutes 19 seconds, but under the competition’s weighted scoring framework that prioritizes autonomous navigation, the autonomously running unit was awarded the official championship. Two additional autonomous Honor robots took second and third place, finishing in 51 minutes and 53 minutes respectively.

    This dramatic improvement from the 2024 inaugural race is impossible to ignore: last year’s winning robot crossed the line after 2 hours 40 minutes and 42 seconds, a time that is more than double the 2025 winner’s result. Even with the clear progress, the competition was not without small missteps that highlight the technology is still maturing: one robot collapsed immediately at the starting line, while another collided with a course barrier along the route. Organizers noted that roughly 40 percent of all competing robots completed the course fully autonomously, with the rest operating via remote control.

    Du Xiaodi, a test development engineer leading Honor’s robot project, explained the design choices that enabled the standout performance. The team modeled the robot’s proportions off elite human long-distance runners, outfitting it with 95-centimeter legs, and integrated an in-house developed high-performance liquid-cooling system to manage heat output during extended operation. Du added that the core technologies refined through this racing project have broader practical potential: innovations like structural reliability testing and liquid-cooling systems can be adapted for future industrial use cases, even as full commercialization of general-purpose humanoid robots remains years away.

    Spectators at the joint human-robot race event expressed astonishment at how far the technology has come in just 12 months. Sun Zhigang, who attended the 2024 race and returned this year with his son, called the progress “enormous”, noting that a robot beating the human world record was something he never expected to see so soon. Another attendee, Wang Wen, who attended with his family, observed that the humanoid racers had already overtaken human runners as the main attraction of the day. “The robots’ speed far exceeds that of humans, this may signal the arrival of a new era of robotics,” he said. Beyond the race itself, event organizers even deployed a humanoid robot to work as a traffic marshal, directing participants using a combination of arm gestures and pre-programmed audio cues.

    The breakthrough performance comes as humanoid robotics has become a core priority of China’s national technology development strategy. The country’s recently released 14th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030) identifies accelerating the research, development, and real-world deployment of humanoid robots as a key target, part of Beijing’s broader push to lead global innovation in frontier technology sectors amid ongoing tech competition with the United States.

    Industry data already reflects China’s growing clout in the general-purpose embodied intelligent robot space. A 2025 global assessment from London-based technology research firm Omdia ranked three Chinese robotics firms — AGIBOT, Unitree Robotics, and UBTech Robotics — as the only first-tier global vendors based on shipment volume. All three companies shipped more than 1,000 units of general-purpose intelligent robots in 2024, with AGIBOT and Unitree Robotics each shipping more than 5,000 units, confirming China’s position as a major mass producer of advanced robotic systems.

    The race result is being seen widely as a visible public demonstration of how quickly Chinese humanoid robot capabilities are advancing, moving beyond lab demonstrations to real-world dynamic navigation and sustained operation that challenges even the limits of top human athletic performance.

  • Labor claims victory in Liverpool by-election after Liberal challenger concedes defeat

    Labor claims victory in Liverpool by-election after Liberal challenger concedes defeat

    A closely contested by-election for a seat on Liverpool City Council’s South Ward has ended in a victory for the Australian Labor Party, after Liberal candidate Azam Dabbagh conceded defeat earlier than formally expected despite thousands of outstanding votes still left to count.

    The by-election was triggered last month following the resignation of sitting Labor councillor Betty Green, forcing voters back to the polls on Saturday to elect her replacement. Eleven candidates total stood for the vacant seat: eight independent contenders, one representative from the Community Voice of Australia, and one candidate each from the state’s major Labor and Liberal parties.

    By Saturday evening, election officials from the New South Wales Electoral Commission had counted nearly 49,000 ballots: more than 44,000 in-person votes cast on election day, alongside roughly 4,800 returned postal votes. The partial count put Labor’s candidate Zeli Munjiza ahead of Dabbagh by a margin of more than 6,000 votes, giving her 37.2% of the counted first-preference votes compared to Dabbagh’s 20.7%.

    Shortly after the partial results were released, Dabbagh took to his public Facebook page Saturday night to confirm he had contacted Munjiza to formally concede the race. “I’ve called Zeli and I’ve congratulated her. I’ve conceded so congratulations Zeli,” he wrote in the post. “It was an awesome experience and it was lovely meeting you and your family. It was a pretty short experience – it’s two weeks to organise all this so thanks to all the supporters. Liverpool, I just want to say thank you for all your support.”

    While the official final result will not be confirmed until counting wraps up next week, the projected outcome delivers a major political blow to Liverpool’s Liberal mayor Ned Mannoun, who openly endorsed Dabbagh’s candidacy. Currently, the Liberal Party holds five of the 11 total seats on the council, while Labor holds four and the remaining two are held by independents. Munjiza’s win will bring Labor’s seat count up to five, tightening the already competitive split of power on the local governing body.

    Responding to the concession, Munjiza shared her own victory post on social media, noting that both Dabbagh and Mannoun had reached out to congratulate her campaign. “It’s a win that belongs to all of us,” she wrote. “Now the real work begins! I’m excited to join my Liverpool Labor colleagues on Council where we will work together every day for you.”

  • Iran shuts down Strait of Hormuz again, accusing US of ‘piracy’

    Iran shuts down Strait of Hormuz again, accusing US of ‘piracy’

    A fragile two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran has been pushed to the edge of total collapse, after Tehran announced it would reimpose strict travel restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, reversing a one-day opening of the critical global waterway. The reversal came in direct response to Washington’s refusal to lift its ongoing naval blockade of Iranian ports and vessels, which Iranian officials say violates the core terms of the temporary truce set to expire this Wednesday.

    The Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint through which roughly 20 percent of the world’s total oil supplies transits each year, has been Iran’s most impactful leverage against Western commercial and political interests since the United States and Israel launched their joint military campaign against Iran in February. Keeping the waterway open to unimpeded commercial traffic was the central pillar of the ceasefire agreement that took effect two weeks prior.

    The cascade of escalating tensions began days earlier, when Iran declared the strait “fully open” for navigation on Friday, a reciprocal gesture following a newly announced ceasefire between Israel and Lebanese armed groups. That bilateral truce has already crumbled amid repeated violations by Israeli forces, which have continued shelling residential areas in southern Lebanon and demolishing civilian homes even as displaced families attempt to return to their communities.

    Iranian officials justified their decision to reinstate transit restrictions by pointing to the Trump administration’s failure to uphold its end of the ceasefire deal. Since Washington launched its naval blockade of Iranian shipping over the prior weekend, US Central Command confirmed via a social media post Saturday that American military forces have already turned away at least 23 commercial vessels near the strait since the blockade went into effect on April 13.

    Contradicting Iranian accounts of the agreement, US President Donald Trump claimed Friday that Iran had agreed to reopen the strait with no preconditions, while insisting that the American blockade would “remain in full force” until a broader permanent deal is reached to curb Iran’s nuclear program. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh pushed back on that characterization hours later during a public panel Saturday, stating bluntly, “That is not the term we agreed on.”

    Shortly after Khatibzadeh’s remarks, Iran’s military headquarters released an official formal statement confirming the new transit restrictions. “The Islamic Republic of Iran, following previous agreements met in the negotiations conducted in good faith, agreed to manage the passage of a limited number of oil and commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz,” the statement read. “Unfortunately, the Americans, with their repeated breaches of trust that are part of their history, continue their acts of piracy and maritime theft under the pretext of a so-called blockade. This strategic waterway is under strict management and control by the armed forces. As long as the United States does not end [its blockade] and allow complete freedom of movement for vessels from Iran to their destinations and back, the situation in the Strait of Hormuz will remain under strict control and will remain as it was before.”

    Hours after the announcement, gunboats operated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) opened fire on an oil transiting the strait, though no injuries were reported in the incident. Al Jazeera correspondent Ali Hashem summed up the diplomatic fallout, noting that talks between Washington and Tehran have been brought “back to square one.”

    With less than three days remaining before the ceasefire is set to expire, the gap between the two sides appears nearly unbridgeable. Trump continues to demand that Iran allow the US to remove all of its domestically produced enriched uranium, a demand Iranian leaders have repeatedly labeled a non-starter that violates national sovereignty.

    The human cost of the ongoing conflict has already been staggering. According to the US-based Human Rights Activist News Agency, more than 1,700 Iranian civilians have been killed in US and Israeli strikes since the war began. The United Nations Refugee Agency estimates that over 3 million Iranians have been displaced from their homes since the start of military operations.

    Trump has already signaled he has no intention of extending the truce if a deal is not reached by Wednesday’s deadline. “The blockade is going to remain. If an agreement is not reached by Wednesday, unfortunately, we’ll have to start dropping bombs again,” he said Friday. Responding to Iran’s decision to reclose the strait, Trump added that Iran “got a little cute” with the move, but insisted “Iran can’t blackmail us.”

    Despite Trump’s tough rhetoric, closing the Strait of Hormuz has proven to be one of Iran’s most effective tools of pressure against the US. The disruption to global oil supplies has already pushed US gasoline prices above $4 per gallon, sending inflationary ripples across the entire Western economy. The rising energy costs have further dragged down Trump’s already weak approval ratings just months before the US midterm congressional elections.

    Military analysts note that the asymmetric leverage gives Iran a distinct upper hand in the standoff. Jennifer Parker, an adjunct fellow in naval studies at the University of New South Wales, explained that the US blockade cannot inflict the same level of economic damage on Iran that Iran can inflict on global markets through closing the strait. “It is not the US blockade on Iranian ports that is impacting the majority of shipping going through that strait. It is the attacks the Iranian navy and IRGC have undertaken on civilian ships,” she told Al Jazeera. “To solve the problem in the Strait of Hormuz, there either needs to be an agreement for Iran to stop attacking vessels, or a forcible military intervention that stops them from attacking vessels, and then general reassurance across the strait that it is clear of mines and that if the IRGC start trying to attack merchant ships, they will be defended…. We are a long way from all of that.”

    For many Iranian observers, the Trump administration’s inconsistent statements and refusal to abide by ceasefire terms have convinced Tehran that Washington can never be a reliable negotiating partner. Mostafa Khoshcheshm, an Iranian political science professor, noted that Trump’s erratic behavior has erased any remaining trust between the two sides. “Trump’s contradictory statements surrounding the ceasefire have convinced Tehran that the United States is not a trustworthy partner for any kind of deal,” he said. “As Trump continues to behave erratically, Iran will continue the war. Iran believes it has the upper hand and that this must be established in any future confrontation.”

  • French peacekeeper killed in southern Lebanon

    French peacekeeper killed in southern Lebanon

    A deadly deliberate attack on a United Nations peacekeeping patrol in southern Lebanon has claimed the life of one French service member and left three other peacekeepers injured, two critically, according to senior UN and French officials. The incident, which unfolded on a routine mission near the village of Ghanduriyah, has deepened concerns over the safety of UN personnel in the region just days after a fragile 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah took effect.

    The fatal shooting occurred when the patrol, deployed with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), was working to clear explosive ordnance along a key road and reopen access to a UN position that had been cut off by weeks of cross-border fighting between Israel and the Iran-aligned militant group Hezbollah. French Armed Forces Minister Catherine Vautrin confirmed the unit was ambushed at close range by an armed faction. The fallen French peacekeeper was struck immediately by a direct small-arms round; fellow troops pulled him to safety but were unable to resuscitate him, Vautrin added.

    French President Emmanuel Macron publicly placed blame for the attack squarely on Hezbollah, saying “Everything suggests that responsibility for this attack lies with Hezbollah.” He called on Lebanese national authorities to immediately arrest those responsible and fulfill their security commitments alongside UNIFIL personnel. A spokesperson for UN Secretary-General António Guterres echoed the condemnation, noting that an initial UNIFIL assessment attributed the gunfire to non-state actors, which the mission presumes to be Hezbollah. The spokesperson stressed the urgent need for all factions to honor the recently agreed cessation of hostilities and maintain full compliance with the ceasefire terms.

    Hezbollah has forcefully rejected all accusations of involvement, calling the claims rushed and baseless. In an official statement released Saturday, the group urged stakeholders to exercise caution before assigning blame, calling for a full, transparent investigation by the Lebanese Armed Forces to uncover the full circumstances of the incident. The militant group also called for continued close coordination between UNIFIL, the Lebanese army, and local communities during this period of heightened volatility.

    Lebanese national leaders have moved quickly to condemn the attack. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun spoke by phone with President Macron, pledging that all perpetrators would be brought to justice. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has formally ordered a full official investigation into the ambush. The Lebanese Armed Forces said the shooting followed earlier exchanges of fire with unidentified armed individuals, adding that it is maintaining close operational coordination with UNIFL during what it describes as an extremely sensitive security phase in southern Lebanon.

    This attack is the latest in a string of deadly incidents targeting UN peacekeepers in the region. In late March, three Indonesian UNIFIL personnel were killed in two separate incidents: one in a vehicle-borne explosion and another in a projectile strike a day prior. Since UNIFIL was first established by the UN Security Council in 1978, following Israel’s initial invasion of southern Lebanon, more than 330 peacekeepers have lost their lives during the mission.

    UNIFIL has reiterated that under binding international law, all armed and political actors are legally obligated to guarantee the safety and security of UN personnel deployed in the region. The mission emphasized that deliberate targeted attacks on peacekeepers constitute grave violations of international humanitarian law, and can be formally prosecuted as war crimes.

    The current attack comes against a backdrop of sharply escalating tensions along the Lebanon-Israel Blue Line, where cross-border clashes between Hezbollah and Israel reignited on March 2, drastically raising the security risks for peacekeepers deployed to the area. The 10-day ceasefire brokered by the United States went into effect on April 16, with Washington calling on Hezbollah to strictly abide by the agreement’s terms.

    Originally mandated to oversee Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon, restore regional stability, and support the Lebanese government in reasserting sovereign control over its southern territory, UNIFIL’s mandate was expanded following the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah war. UN Security Council Resolution 1701 expanded the mission’s responsibilities to include monitoring ceasefire compliance along the Blue Line, the de facto border between Israel and Lebanon, in partnership with the Lebanese Armed Forces.

  • Blues clues: James Tedesco dominates as Roosters veteran mounts his case for an Origin recall

    Blues clues: James Tedesco dominates as Roosters veteran mounts his case for an Origin recall

    With just four weeks remaining until the New South Wales Blues name their starting 13 for the 2026 State of Origin opening clash, veteran fullback James Tedesco delivered a career-defining performance on Sunday that has thrown his name back into contention for the coveted number 1 jersey, powering the Sydney Roosters to a thrilling 38-24 comeback victory over the Newcastle Knights at Allianz Stadium.

    The former NSW captain entered the weekend avoiding questions about his Origin selection hopes, but his masterclass on the pitch sent an unmistakable message to Blues coach Laurie Daley just when selection conversations are heating up. Against the Knights, Tedesco put up stat lines that rarely appear outside of video game simulations: 24 carries for 223 running metres, 17 broken tackles, one individual try, three try assists, and three line breaks. The standout, all-around performance ranks among the most impressive individual displays of the entire 2026 NRL season.

    Tedesco’s standout showing comes at a pivotal moment, as Dylan Edwards has long been framed as the presumptive starter at fullback for the Blues. The last time Tedesco wore the NSW fullback jersey was 2024, when he stepped into the role after Edwards was sidelined by an injury. On Sunday, he proved he still has the speed, power, and playmaking ability to compete at the highest representative level, dominating the second half to flip the game on its head after the Roosters got off to a sluggish start.

    His influence on the try sheet was undeniable: he threw the final pass for the Roosters’ opening four-pointer, put a pinpoint grubber kick through for winger Hugo Savala to score his first try of the afternoon, crashed through the Knights’ defensive line to score a try of his own, and flicked a deft offload to set up another score off a well-drilled scrum move. Throughout his representative career, Tedesco has never let the Blues down, leaving Daley with a difficult selection call that pits a proven veteran in red-hot form against the competition’s current favourite for the role.

    While Tedesco stole the headlines, Newcastle young gun Fletcher Hunt turned in a breakout first-half performance that nearly secured a massive upset for the away side. Making his first start after recovering from a season-opening knee injury, the 22-year-old left centre scored a first-half hat-trick and pulled off two game-changing try-saving tackles to keep the Knights in the driver’s seat at halftime. Hunt crossed for his first try in the ninth minute, reeled in a spectacular airborne catch off a Dylan Brown kick to put the Knights up 12-6 midway through the half, then finished off a break from late inclusion Francis Manuleleua to complete his three-try opening 40. Late in the half, he came up with huge stops on both Mark Nawaqanitawase and Siua Wong to send Newcastle into the break with a 24-12 lead.

    However, the Knights could not carry their momentum into the second half, barely registering an attacking opportunity as the Roosters seized complete control of the match. The result means Newcastle coach Justin Holbrook and key former Roosters players Sandon Smith and Dom Young missed out on a fairytale win over their old club.

    For the Roosters, Hugo Savala also turned in a standout performance in his new role at left centre, a position he shifted to after the club signed star halfback Daly Cherry-Evans in the off-season, which had sparked widespread speculation about Savala’s future at the club. The towering playmaker proved he has settled comfortably into his new spot, scoring a try in each half. His first came off a Sam Walker kick that Daniel Tupou knocked back into his path for an easy walk-over score, and he proved far more than a stationary edge player, roaming across the pitch to create overlaps that kept the Knights’ defence scrambling all afternoon.

  • Australia has not been asked, formally or informally, to aid US Hormuz efforts: Conroy

    Australia has not been asked, formally or informally, to aid US Hormuz efforts: Conroy

    A sharp public disagreement has erupted between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Australia’s federal government over claims of an unmet request for military support in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, a dispute unfolding against a backdrop of renewed regional tension after Iran reimposed shipping restrictions on the key global energy waterway.

    Trump has repeatedly targeted Australia in public criticism since recent joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran, launching his fourth public rebuke of the country this week during a press briefing. The former president told reporters he was deeply dissatisfied with Australia’s refusal to join a U.S.-led naval coalition in the Strait of Hormuz, saying, “I’m not happy with Australia because they were not there when we asked them to be there. They were not there, having to do with Hormuz. So I’m not happy, I’m not happy with them.”

    This public callout follows an earlier inconsistent outburst on Truth Social, where Trump first claimed the U.S. had achieved such overwhelming military success that it no longer needed or wanted assistance from allied nations, even writing “WE NEVER DID!” before singling out Australia, South Korea, and Japan for their reluctance to back U.S. military actions. He had previously told reporters he was caught off guard by Australia’s unwillingness to join the effort.

    But top Australian government officials have pushed back forcefully against Trump’s claims, uniformly denying that any request for naval support in the Strait of Hormuz — either formal or informal — has ever been received from Washington. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy reiterated this position during an appearance on Sky News’ *Sunday Agenda*, declining to engage further with Trump’s personal criticism but confirming that no ask for naval assets has been made. “What I can say to you and your viewers is we’ve had no formal request to provide naval assets to the Strait of Hormuz,” Conroy stated Sunday.

    According to Conroy, the only recent military assistance request from the U.S. was for Australia to deploy an E7A Wedgetail airborne early warning and control aircraft to provide defensive support to the United Arab Emirates, a request that was also made directly by the UAE government itself. When pressed to confirm whether any informal request for Strait of Hormuz support had been extended by U.S. officials, Conroy responded, “Not to my knowledge.”

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has previously echoed this denial, noting that the Australian government maintains regular, open communication with U.S. counterparts and that no request for coalition participation has been raised.

    The political dispute comes as regional tensions flared again overnight, when Iran announced it would reimpose shipping restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz — just less than 24 hours after the waterway was reopened to commercial traffic. Iranian officials cited “repeated breaches of trust” by the U.S. during a recent temporary ceasefire, and demanded that Washington lift its ongoing blockade of Iranian ports and its coastline. The closure of the strait, which handles roughly a fifth of global oil supplies, has already triggered disruption to international energy markets.

    Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles described Iran’s decision to reclose the strait as a “disappointing development” in comments to ABC’s *Insiders*. “Clearly, this is a situation which is in flux … I think what we need to see now is every diplomatic avenue being pursued to turn this temporary ceasefire into one that is permanent, open the Strait of Hormuz to return the global fuel supply chain to normality, and to put events on a pathway to peace,” Marles said. He added that de-escalation and reopening the strait aligns with both Australia’s national interests and the broader interests of the global community.

    Marles declined to comment on Australia’s position regarding the U.S. blockade of Iran, saying only that “Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz, and America has reacted. I’m not about to second guess America’s reaction in the context of that.”

    The story remains developing as diplomatic efforts continue to address the regional crisis.