作者: admin

  • From cool-down spots to chalk on windows – how Europeans are coping with the heat

    From cool-down spots to chalk on windows – how Europeans are coping with the heat

    A widespread, record-challenging heatwave has swept across Western Europe this June, pushing temperatures toward unprecedented highs for the month and forcing governments, local authorities and communities to roll out emergency adaptive measures to protect residents. With meteorologists predicting long-standing temperature records will be broken across multiple nations in the coming days, the BBC dispatched correspondents across the continent to document how communities are coping with the unseasonable extreme heat.

    In the Netherlands, Amsterdam is anticipating a peak temperature of 38C later this week, and city officials have launched a targeted network of public cool-down hubs to help residents escape the swelter. These shaded, accessible spaces are hosted in a wide range of public and commercial venues, including libraries, urban community farms, theaters, churches, neighborhood community centers and even local supermarkets. Each hub provides free drinking water, public seating and restroom access, with many welcoming pets to accommodate owners who need to leave overheated homes. The 12 pilot hubs are concentrated in Nieuw-West, the district identified by city climate modeling as facing the highest heat risk, after officials assessed factors including existing tree cover, the share of vulnerable residents (young children and elderly people) and how quickly local housing retains heat. Local schools have also adjusted their schedules, adopting modified “tropical timetables” that shorten the school day, reduce lesson loads, add more frequent rest breaks, increase water access and boost classroom ventilation. Since there is no national legal maximum temperature for classrooms, each school sets its own adjustments, with the core guiding principle of keeping both students and staff working in safe, healthy conditions.

    Across the border in France, authorities have rolled out a range of low-cost and innovative solutions to beat the heat. Paris’ 10th arrondissement town hall has partnered with three independent air-conditioned cinemas to offer free afternoon movie tickets for residents under 25 or over 65, encouraging vulnerable groups to escape the heat in cooled spaces. In Lyon, the city has temporarily dropped entry fees for all municipal museums, which are fully air-conditioned, to draw residents seeking relief from temperatures. A quirky homemade cooling hack has proven so popular that DIY stores across the country have reported a surge in demand for Meudon Whiting (Blanc de Meudon), a chalky powder that homeowners mix with water and paint onto window panes. The coating diffuses incoming sunlight to reduce indoor heating, and many residents report the low-cost trick delivers noticeable temperature drops inside homes. In Nantes, one local school has already applied this chalk coating to its classroom windows to protect students during lessons.

    In Spain, the northeastern region of Aragón is recording some of the continent’s highest temperatures during this heatwave, and local officials across the country have adapted public services to help residents cool off. In Zaragoza and Huesca, authorities have cut entry prices for public swimming pools, while the northern city of Logroño, which expects highs of 40C, has made all public pool entry entirely free for the duration of the heat emergency. The city has also extended operating hours for ornamental public fountains until 11 p.m. and activated mobile water sprinklers in public spaces for residents to cool off. Extreme dry conditions have forced the cancellation of traditional San Juan festival celebrations across multiple northern communities: the city of León scrapped a scheduled public fireworks display, and many towns have called off the traditional ritual bonfire over elevated wildfire risk. Like many other European nations, Spain has established a network of air-conditioned public heat refuges that any resident can access to escape extreme heat, and a 2024 national heat safety law mandates that employers implement protective measures for outdoor workers, including banning strenuous manual outdoor labor during the hottest peak hours of the day.

    Italy is also facing extreme June heat that is unusual even for the Mediterranean nation, with more than a dozen cities already under top-level red heat warnings, and that list is expected to expand on Wednesday. The most severe conditions are concentrated in central and northern regions of the country. The Italian government has reactivated emergency support measures for heat-exposed workers, including farmers, construction crews and staff in poorly ventilated indoor workplaces. Under the policy, businesses can suspend or reduce operations during temperature peaks and access state-funded furlough payments to compensate workers without laying off staff. For most residents, the solution has been to run air conditioning at full blast with closed shutters, while vulnerable residents without home cooling are advised to seek out air-conditioned public spaces. Tourist services have also adapted: in Palermo, horse-drawn carriage rides, a popular tourist attraction, are only offered after dusk or on cooler days, while some restaurants in Turin have closed outdoor dining terraces to avoid exposing guests to dangerous heat. Other venues across Rome and northern Italy have ramped up use of giant outdoor fans and mobile sprinklers to cool outdoor spaces. The Italian Ministry of Health has also issued public guidance for people dining out, recommending diners choose pasta over heavier meat dishes and swap dehydrating coffee or cold beer for still water to avoid dehydration.

    In Belgium, the most extreme heat is still approaching, with a national orange heat alert set to go into effect as temperatures climb toward the high 30s. The national weather service’s 1947 all-time June temperature record of 36.8C is widely expected to be broken this week. The Belgian federal government held an emergency cabinet meeting on Tuesday to coordinate the national response. The heat has already disrupted rail travel: older commuter trains not fitted with air conditioning have been temporarily pulled from service, while additional rail services have been added to accommodate crowds traveling to the cooler northern Belgian coast to escape the heat. A viral story from Brussels has highlighted how communities are adapting: high school students in the Brussels suburb of Tervuren moved their final exams into a local church to take advantage of the building’s naturally cool stone interior. The local pastor joked on Facebook that “the kids are doing their best, and the Holy Spirit is doing the rest.”

    In Germany, forecasters predict record-breaking June temperatures will arrive on Friday, with highs potentially reaching 40C in western and southwestern regions of the country. Employers have adapted workplace policies for outdoor staff: Deutsche Post has advised postal workers to wear long-sleeved protective shirts and sun hats, while parent company DHL Group has added Bermuda shorts to the corporate clothing catalogue to allow for cooler work attire. After multiple drowning incidents over the past weekend, the German Life Saving Association (DLRG) has issued urgent warnings to residents underestimating the hidden risks of swimming in overheated natural waterways. The German Forest Conservation Association has also warned that the prolonged heat has pushed wildfire risk to critically high levels across the country, reminding residents that open fires are only permitted in designated, maintained fire pits at the edge of forests. Private health insurer DAK has also launched a dedicated public hotline to provide guidance on heat safety and managing heat-related health issues.

  • Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members

    Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members

    In a landmark decision that reshapes the scope of U.S. court jurisdiction over international human rights claims filed against American corporations, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of tech giant Cisco Systems, bringing a long-running lawsuit brought by Falun Gong practitioners to an abrupt end. The plaintiffs had accused Cisco of intentionally designing and providing custom surveillance technology that Chinese authorities used to systematically persecute members of the spiritual movement. The nation’s highest court concluded that U.S. judicial forums lack proper jurisdiction to hear the case, rejecting the plaintiffs’ arguments that the litigation could proceed under two long-standing federal statutes: the 18th-century Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the 1991 Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA).

    Written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the 6-3 majority opinion closed the narrow exception that the high court had tentatively opened in a 2004 ruling, when the court suggested that a limited category of international human rights claims could be heard under the ATS. Barrett explicitly stated that the supposed class of viable ATS claims for actions occurring outside U.S. borders is effectively an empty set. While she acknowledged that the allegations in the case involve acknowledged horrific, inhumane conduct, Barrett affirmed that U.S. courts are not the appropriate venue to address alleged wrongs committed by foreign governments on foreign soil.

    In a sharp dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the ruling does not merely block access to court for the Falun Gong plaintiffs in this case, but effectively shuts the door to all future litigants seeking redress for violations of international law brought under the ATS.

    The legal dispute stretches back more than a decade to 2011, when Falun Gong members filed suit against Cisco, alleging that the company deliberately customized its networking and surveillance technology for the Chinese government, fully aware that the tools would be deployed to track, detain, and torture practitioners of the spiritual movement. To overcome the court’s long-standing skepticism of overseas human rights claims brought in U.S. courts, the plaintiffs argued that a significant share of Cisco’s core work related to the Chinese government’s surveillance project was developed and carried out at the company’s facilities within the United States. Cisco has repeatedly and vigorously denied all allegations of wrongdoing in the case.

    Background context for the suit has been reinforced by award-winning investigative reporting from the Associated Press, which last year published a sweeping investigation documenting how major American technology companies have actively collaborated to build and design China’s extensive domestic surveillance infrastructure. The reporting, which earned AP the 2024 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting, confirmed that successive U.S. presidential administrations from both major political parties have encouraged this collaboration, even as human rights activists repeatedly warned that the surveillance tools would be weaponized to suppress political dissent, target religious minorities, and persecute marginalized communities.

    Declassified documents and internal corporate presentations from 2008, leaked and reviewed by the AP, show that Cisco publicly framed China’s Golden Shield internet censorship and surveillance program as a major profitable business opportunity. Internal materials from that year even repeated the Chinese government’s official labeling of Falun Gong as an “evil cult,” and one company presentation confirmed that Cisco’s products could accurately identify more than 90 percent of Falun Gong-related online content. Additional internal presentations reviewed by AP show that Cisco categorized Falun Gong content as a national “security threat” for the Chinese government, and assisted in building a nationwide digital tracking system specifically designed to monitor Falun Gong practitioners. During oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, Sotomayor pointedly noted that Cisco was fully aware its technology would be used to torture Falun Gong members, a claim the company’s legal team has repeatedly rejected.

  • Gennaro Gattuso named as Lazio coach after Italy debacle

    Gennaro Gattuso named as Lazio coach after Italy debacle

    In an official announcement made public on Tuesday, Serie A side Lazio confirmed the appointment of former Italy men’s national team head coach Gennaro Gattuso as the new manager of their senior first team. The Rome-based club released only a brief introductory statement confirming the hiring, choosing to withhold any specific details regarding the length and financial terms of Gattuso’s contract. However, multiple Italian sports media outlets have reported that the 48-year-old tactician has put pen to paper on a two-year deal to take charge at the Stadio Olimpico.

    In the club’s official statement, Lazio’s management expressed confidence in Gattuso’s ability to deliver results, noting that “his experience, professionalism, and determination will contribute to achieving the club’s sporting objectives” for the upcoming campaign.

    Gattuso’s return to club management comes just two months after he stepped down from his role as Italy’s head coach. His departure from the Azzurri came only days after the national side suffered a shocking elimination from qualifying, extending their streak of missed World Cup appearances to three consecutive tournaments.

    This new role marks Gattuso’s third spell managing in Italy’s top flight, where he has previously held head coaching positions at two of the league’s most iconic clubs: AC Milan and Napoli. During his time in charge of Napoli, Gattuso led the Neapolitan side to a major domestic trophy, claiming the Coppa Italia title in 2020.

    Gattuso fills the vacancy left by Maurizio Sarri, who departed Lazio last month to accept the head coaching job at fellow Serie A club Atalanta.

  • Ukraine says it hit a railway bridge to Crimea, seeking to isolate the Russian-held peninsula

    Ukraine says it hit a railway bridge to Crimea, seeking to isolate the Russian-held peninsula

    As the Russia-Ukraine conflict stretches into its fourth year, Ukrainian military forces have launched a new wave of coordinated drone strikes against critical infrastructure across Russia-occupied Crimea, part of Kyiv’s expanding campaign to cut off logistical access to the strategically vital peninsula.

    Announced by Ukrainian defense officials this week, the attacks hit a series of high-value targets: an oil storage facility at the Kerch thermal power plant in eastern Crimea, a western regional electrical substation, and a liquefied natural gas distribution hub in Simferopol, Crimea’s second-largest urban center. In a separate operation, Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces — working alongside local Crimean resistance groups — confirmed they destroyed a key railway bridge spanning the North Crimean Canal near the village of Rozdolne. Ukrainian military spokespersons said the bridge served as a core logistics route for supplying Russian troops deployed in southern Ukraine. Initial drone strikes between Sunday and Monday collapsed a section of the structure, while a follow-up attack early Tuesday targeted repair crews and the bridge’s remaining intact segments, according to a post on the military’s official Telegram channel.

    Independent verification of Ukraine’s claims remains unavailable as of Tuesday. Still, local energy suppliers in Crimea confirmed widespread power outages across multiple regions of the peninsula, though the Russian-appointed administration attributed the blackouts to unspecified “technical malfunctions” and said full service would be restored within 24 hours. The strikes have already created acute civilian disruptions: Russian authorities in Crimea have suspended retail gasoline sales to local residents, a disruption that comes amid the peak summer tourist season, when demand for fuel and energy typically surges.

    The targeting of Crimea’s infrastructure aligns with Kyiv’s publicly stated strategy to fully isolate the peninsula, which Russian forces illegally seized and annexed from Ukraine in 2014. In comments to a popular blogger’s YouTube channel last week, Ukrainian Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov framed the campaign in stark terms: “We are isolating Crimea with drones. It looks like in the nearest time, Crimea will become an island. This could lead to some very unexpected consequences for Russians.” This month alone, Ukraine has also expanded its long-range strike capacity to hit targets near the Kremlin in Moscow and across Russia’s second-largest city, St. Petersburg, demonstrating Kyiv’s growing ability to strike deep inside Russian territory.

    Western military analysts and diplomatic officials note that Ukraine’s stepped-up long-range campaign comes at a moment when large-scale Russian ground advances across eastern Ukraine have slowed to a near standoff. The strikes not only inflict tangible damage on Russian military capabilities and critical revenue streams — they also ramp up political and military pressure on the Kremlin. On Tuesday, Ukrainian defense officials added that since the start of 2024, Ukrainian drones have struck more than 800,000 Russian targets, and 95% of all drones deployed by Ukraine’s armed forces are now manufactured domestically, highlighting the rapid growth of Ukraine’s domestic defense tech sector.

    These tactical successes have lifted morale across Ukrainian front lines, where troops have used advanced drone technology to hold back Russian attrition assaults that have proven costly for both sides since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. Medium-range drones have consistently disrupted Russian frontline supply chains, while long-range strikes have repeatedly damaged Russian oil facilities — a core source of state revenue that funds Moscow’s war effort. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly reaffirmed that Ukraine remains committed to its defense, backed by sustained international support.

    Addressing the U.N. Security Council on Monday, Ukrainian U.N. Ambassador Andrii Melnyk said Kyiv remains open to direct negotiations with Moscow to reach a “just and lasting peace” aligned with the U.N. Charter, but warned that Ukraine’s willingness to compromise has limits. “A ceasefire along the current front line already represents a major concession,” Melnyk said, adding that Russia must withdraw completely from all occupied Ukrainian territory. He also noted that recent Ukrainian strikes have shifted the overall dynamics of the conflict, stressing: “This is just the beginning.”

    For its part, Moscow has moved to reinforce its alliance with neighboring Belarus. In comments Tuesday to Russian news agency Interfax, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the Kremlin is prepared to “ensure the security” of its close ally, after Zelenskyy recently demanded that Minsk remove drone signal relay equipment from its territory that Kyiv says Russia uses to guide attacks on Ukrainian targets. Lavrov accused Kyiv of attempting to draw Belarus directly into the open conflict, a notable development given Russia originally launched its full-scale 2022 invasion from Belarusian territory.

  • Irish government to contribute £197m to cross-border rail services

    Irish government to contribute £197m to cross-border rail services

    In a landmark move to deepen cooperation and drive shared development across the island of Ireland, the Irish cabinet has approved a €377m (£325m) allocation from the government’s Shared Island Fund to deliver 12 new cross-border projects between 2027 and 2030. This latest round of investment pushes total commitments from the fund past the €1bn (£862m) mark, fulfilling the initiative’s core mission of backing infrastructure, environmental, cultural, and social projects that deliver tangible benefits to communities in both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

    The single largest slice of this new funding, €228m (£197m), is earmarked for upgrading intercity rail connections across the two jurisdictions. Of this total, €193m (£166m) will go toward modernizing critical infrastructure along the Londonderry-Belfast-Dublin corridor, while the remaining €35m (£30m) will secure hourly Dublin-Belfast passenger services through at least 2030. Working in partnership, the Irish and Northern Irish governments have also set a target of cutting transfer times between the Dublin-Belfast and Belfast-Derry lines to just 15 to 20 minutes, slashing travel friction and boosting seamless connectivity between the three major urban centers.

    Beyond rail upgrades, the funding package supports a wide range of cross-border priorities spanning sports, infrastructure, environment, and education. A £3m contribution from the fund will go toward redeveloping cricket facilities at Belfast’s Stormont Estate, part of preparations for the 2030 Men’s T20 Cricket World Cup, which will be co-hosted by Ireland and the UK. Cricket Ireland and the Northern Ireland Civil Service Sports Association are each adding an extra £1m to the project, which will bring the Stormont grounds up to the international standard required to host World Cup matches. Expected to draw a global audience of hundreds of millions – the 2022 iteration of the tournament recorded 3.95 billion total viewing hours across all platforms – the 2030 event is set to be the largest broadcast sporting event in the island’s history.

    A €40m (£34m) allocation has also been approved for an island-wide port development scheme, designed to expand cargo handling capacity at ports across Ireland to support growing trade and logistics demand. Another €30m (£26m) will fund the third phase of the Ulster Canal restoration project. This stage, which stretches 10km from Clonfad to Castle Saunderson, represents the flagship blueway segment of the wider restoration, creating new and refurbished navigable waterways that connect Clones to the existing Erne System and Shannon-Erne waterway. The project will also deliver a new 9km Ulster Canal Greenway for pedestrians and cyclists running from Clones to Gortnacarrow, boosting recreational tourism across the border region.

    One of the most high-profile environmental projects to receive backing is a €33m (£28m) Lough Neagh Catchment Area Water Quality programme, aimed at addressing the severe blue-green algae outbreaks that have blighted the UK’s largest freshwater lake in recent years. The funding follows repeated cross-border discussions on the ecological crisis at the North South Ministerial Council, with Northern Ireland’s Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs Minister Andrew Muir describing the declining state of Lough Neagh as “one of the most distressing and visible environmental crises” Northern Ireland has faced in modern times. “This funding represents a joint commitment to our island’s largest freshwater lake and a substantial investment in its future,” Muir noted. The multi-faceted programme will combine on-the-ground infrastructure improvements with targeted resourcing, cross-border knowledge sharing, and collaborative governance to tackle the root causes of poor water quality and reverse ecological damage across the catchment area.

    On the social development front, €13.5m (£12m) from the fund will expand professional development opportunities for early years educators across the island, creating 1,000 new upskilling places – 40% of which are reserved for educators based in Northern Ireland. The investment will also roll out a tailored training and capacity-building programme for more than 10,500 early learning and childcare providers, including registered childminders, with specialized resources to support the needs of all young children, including those with additional developmental requirements.

    Announcing the approval of the new projects, Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin emphasized the long-term vision guiding the Shared Island Fund investment. “This is a major investment for our shared future on the island of Ireland with €377m committed through the Shared Island Fund for 12 new programmes,” Martin said. “This brings total government allocations from the fund so far to over €1bn, building a more connected, sustainable and prosperous island for all communities.”

  • Stop pretending EU’s new border system is working, says airports chief

    Stop pretending EU’s new border system is working, says airports chief

    As the 2026 peak summer travel season approaches, Europe’s aviation sector is grappling with mounting disruption caused by the European Union’s newly launched digital Entry-Exit System (EES), with top industry leaders warning of escalating chaos that threatens to derail the region’s vital tourism economy.

    Completed its full rollout earlier this year, the EES mandates that all non-European Economic Area (EEA) travelers entering the Schengen Area submit biometric data—including facial scans and fingerprints—during entry checks, with a verification step required when they exit the bloc. While the system has functioned smoothly in a handful of member states, widespread reports of crippling processing delays have emerged at airports across the continent, leaving hundreds of passengers stranded and forcing airlines to revise travel guidance.

    In stark comments delivered at an aviation industry conference in Prague, Stefan Schulte, president of Airports Council International (ACI) Europe and chief of Frankfurt Airport’s operating company, called out EU policymakers for downplaying the scale of the crisis. “Politicians should stop pretending that EES is working just fine. It is not,” Schulte stated, noting that passengers already face multi-hour waits during peak travel windows. With summer passenger volumes projected to jump sharply in the coming weeks, Schulte admitted industry leaders have no clear plan to absorb the added strain, calling the growing backlog a problem that “keeps me and other industry bosses awake at night.”

    Multiple high-profile disruptions have already been linked to the new border rules. Earlier this month, dozens of Ryanair passengers bound for London Luton were left stranded in Athens after their flight departed without them. While neither the airline nor Athens airport explicitly named the EES as the cause, Ryanair cited widespread border delays, and the airport acknowledged congestion driven by “additional processing requirements.” This incident followed a similar disruption in April, when passengers flying from two Milan airports—Bergamo and Linate—to Manchester missed their flights after hours-long passport control queues. Low-cost carrier Wizz Air has already taken the step of urging British leisure travelers to arrive at European airports a full three hours before outbound departure to account for extended wait times.

    Schulte has laid out urgent demands for EU regulators to address the crisis, calling for full authority for border control agencies to suspend EES processing during peak demand periods to prevent further disruption, alongside a complete overhaul of the system’s operating procedures. “This is about showing respect and decency for those who chose to travel to the EU, and safeguarding our reputation as a welcoming and efficient destination,” he explained.

    The rollout has already sparked political friction between member states and EU institutions. Earlier this year, Greek Tourism Minister Olga Kefalogianni pledged that British travelers would be exempt from biometric EES checks this summer to avoid burdening visitors with unnecessary red tape. However, the Greek Foreign Ministry later walked back the commitment, confirming no formal exemption had been approved. Unconfirmed reports also suggested Portugal and Italy were exploring similar exemptions for British nationals, but the European Commission has denied any such plans are under consideration.

    The BBC has reached out to the European Commission, the body responsible for overseeing the EES, for comment on the growing criticism and disruption, but has not yet received a response.

  • US cut to South Africa’s HIV response could cost lives, UNAids chief warns

    US cut to South Africa’s HIV response could cost lives, UNAids chief warns

    A looming public health crisis is building in South Africa after the Trump administration confirmed it would draw down all United States HIV and AIDS funding to the country, a move that the head of the UN’s leading HIV agency warns will put countless lives at risk and undo decades of critical progress.

    Speaking to reporters on the eve of a high-level UN meeting focused on global HIV response efforts, UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima issued an urgent plea to Washington to reverse course and pursue a planned phase-out of funding instead of an abrupt withdrawal. “Please do not take money away because you are taking lives away,” Byanyima stressed, adding that the sudden cut to life-saving programs puts the most vulnerable populations directly in harm’s way.

    For decades, the U.S. President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has poured approximately $400 million annually into South Africa’s national HIV response, covering around 17% of the country’s total HIV programming budget. While South Africa has built domestic capacity to supply antiretroviral HIV drugs independent of U.S. funding, PEPFAR resources have anchored a wide range of prevention programs that have slowed transmission dramatically across the country, which is home to more than 8 million people living with HIV — the highest national caseload globally.

    Byanyima warned that eliminating this core contribution risks reversing all the gains the global public health community has made against the epidemic in South Africa over the past two decades. She also noted that financing cuts to global HIV assistance are not isolated to the U.S., calling on all UN member states to uphold their commitment to protecting the human rights of people living with HIV.

    The funding withdrawal is tied to rising diplomatic tensions between the Trump administration and the South African government. U.S. officials confirmed the phased drawdown last week, citing Pretoria’s failure to meet Washington’s policy demands, specifically over unsubstantiated claims that the South African government has failed to protect the white-minority Afrikaner community. The Trump administration has previously pushed widely discredited claims of a “white genocide” in South Africa, and has condemned the country’s Black Economic Empowerment policy, which Pretoria has defended as a necessary correction to deep economic inequality rooted in the apartheid era. South African officials reject all accusations of discriminatory policy against minority groups.

    While South Africa’s health ministry says it has not received formal notification of the funding cut, it noted that the country has been developing a national HIV self-reliance plan for years to reduce dependence on international aid. Even so, public health experts warn that an abrupt end to U.S. funding would leave a crippling gap in prevention programming that South Africa’s domestic budget cannot fill overnight.

    Byanyima emphasized that the U.S. has long been the world’s largest contributor to global HIV response efforts, and expressed hope that Washington would reconsider its decision to withdraw PEPFAR funding from South Africa. “Taking it away is taking life-saving support from the most vulnerable people, so that is sad and I would like the United States to reconsider their position,” she said.

  • Thai woman faces a Myanmar court in an immigration trial tied to US diplomat’s killing

    Thai woman faces a Myanmar court in an immigration trial tied to US diplomat’s killing

    BANGKOK – In a high-profile case unfolding under Myanmar’s military-led administration, a Thai citizen has made her second court appearance this week, facing an initial immigration charge tied to the alleged murder of her former American diplomat husband earlier this year.

    Pavinee Suparivisarn was found connected to the May killing of the U.S. diplomatic official, whose identity has still not been made public by authorities. While a murder charge carrying the maximum penalty of death is already filed against her, Myanmar’s judicial system is moving forward first with the separate immigration violation charge. Under local law, this charge can be applied to any foreign national who commits a criminal offense within Myanmar’s borders, carrying a sentence of between six months and five years in prison if convicted.

    Tuesday’s hearing at Yangon’s Kamayut Township Court saw three prosecution witnesses – including two immigration officials – give testimony, according to a legal professional familiar with the case who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity. The source cited fear of retaliation from Myanmar’s ruling military junta as the reason for withholding their name. They added that Pavinee was accompanied by two court-appointed legal representatives, but no additional details on the proceeding were available, and it remains unclear whether the defendant has formally entered a plea to the charge.

    An official from the Kamayut Township Immigration and Population Department independently confirmed that witness testimony was held during the hearing, but also declined to share further details, speaking anonymously as they were not granted permission to engage with international media.

    Multiple key institutions connected to the case have declined all requests for comment. This includes the investigation team leading the murder probe, the prison where Pavinee is believed to be detained, and the court itself. Under current rules in Myanmar, independent journalists are barred from observing open court proceedings, leaving little public visibility into the progression of the case. It is also still unknown how long the immigration trial will run, or when the separate murder trial – which could result in a 10-year prison sentence or capital punishment – will begin.

    The killing took place on May 11 at the Sakura Residence & Hotel, a Yangon accommodation located just 1.5 kilometers from the U.S. Embassy, a popular venue for international diplomats, business executives and foreign visitors. According to the legal source, the deceased diplomat was found dead at the property with multiple stab wounds to the head and neck. The U.S. State Department has publicly confirmed the death of the American official but has declined to release any additional details, including the victim’s full identity.

    Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has confirmed it is providing consular support to Pavinee, consistent with standard consular practices for Thai nationals facing legal proceedings overseas, but has also refused to share further details on the case.

    The proceeding comes against a volatile backdrop in Myanmar, which has been locked in widespread civil conflict since the military seized power in a 2021 coup that ousted the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi. Since the coup, junta authorities have severely restricted press freedom, limited public access to judicial proceedings, and rarely engage with independent international media.

  • A legal battle over a former Zambian president’s burial might be over

    A legal battle over a former Zambian president’s burial might be over

    More than a year after the death of former Zambian President Edgar Lungu, a months-long cross-border legal fight over the final resting place of his remains has taken a decisive turn, with South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal siding with his family and rejecting custody claims brought by the Zambian government. Tuesday’s appellate ruling reverses an earlier lower court decision that had ordered Lungu’s relatives to turn over his body to Zambian authorities for repatriation to his home country.

    Lungu, who led the southern African nation from 2015 to 2021, passed away in South Africa on June 5, 2025, at the age of 68. What should have been a peaceful period of mourning has instead stretched into a public, politically charged conflict that extends the bitter rivalry between Lungu and his long-time political foe, current Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema, beyond Lungu’s death.

    The Zambian government has argued that long-standing national custom and protocol require that former heads of state be interred at a designated national cemetery reserved for the country’s fallen leaders. But Lungu’s family has pushed back against this claim, saying they are upholding the former president’s explicit final wishes: he explicitly barred Hichilema from accessing his remains and refused to allow a state funeral led by the incumbent administration on Zambian soil. The family chose instead to lay Lungu to rest in South Africa.

    The dispute left Lungu’s body held at a local mortuary for more than a year as legal proceedings moved through South Africa’s court system. A planned funeral service held by the family in South Africa last June was abruptly cut short when Zambian authorities filed an urgent court motion to seize the remains, prolonging the standoff.

    Delivering the panel’s majority ruling this week, appellate judges stated that the common law and constitutional rights of the deceased’s family take legal precedence over the Zambian government’s claim to custody. As South Africa’s second-highest judicial body, the Supreme Court of Appeal’s ruling leaves the door open for further legal action: the Zambian government retains the right to launch a subsequent appeal to the country’s Constitutional Court if it chooses to do so.

    The underlying political tensions that fueled this posthumous conflict stretch back years. Lungu defeated Hichilema in two consecutive presidential elections during his time in office, and when Hichilema was still leader of the opposition, he was jailed for four months on treason charges that were ultimately dismissed. The dynamic shifted in the 2021 presidential election, when Hichilema defeated Lungu to claim the presidency. In the years after his election loss, Lungu alleged that he had been placed under de facto house arrest by security forces acting on Hichilema’s orders, deepening the enmity between the two political rivals.

  • Niger becomes the third country to leave the International Criminal Court

    Niger becomes the third country to leave the International Criminal Court

    THE HAGUE, Netherlands — In a formal step that underscores growing rejection of international judicial oversight among West Africa’s military-ruled states, Niger has officially initiated its departure from the International Criminal Court, leveling accusations that the Hague-based institution practices systemic selective justice.

    The West African nation delivered an official withdrawal notification to the United Nations on Monday, activating the one-year departure process outlined in the ICC’s founding legal document, the Rome Statute. The notification letter, released publicly through UN channels, voiced disillusionment with the court, which was established to deliver accountability for the world’s worst atrocities. “While the court had raised great hopes among peoples who cherish peace and justice, it has been misused and exploited,” the document read.

    Niger’s exit was not unexpected: the country joined Mali and Burkina Faso in announcing their collective intent to withdraw from the court last year. All three nations have undergone seismic political shifts since 2020, when Mali’s military first seized power. In Niger’s case, a 2023 coup overthrew the country’s democratically elected civilian government, installing a nationalist military junta that has cut ties with long-time Western and regional partners and forged new strategic alliances with actors including Russia — a country whose leader, Vladimir Putin, currently faces an ICC-issued arrest warrant over the forced deportation of Ukrainian children during Moscow’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

    Niger’s completed departure will make it the third sovereign state to formally exit the ICC, following prior withdrawals by Burundi and the Philippines. Only Hungary launched a similar exit process last year, but the country reversed its decision following a national election that saw anti-withdrawal forces take power.

    ICC officials responded to Niger’s announcement with measured disappointment, emphasizing that the court’s core mission relies on collective global participation. “We regret any decision to depart from the collective effort to end impunity for the most serious international crimes,” the court said in an official statement following the notification.

    Under the terms of the Rome Statute, Niger’s withdrawal will not take full effect until one year after the UN received the official notification. Importantly, the ICC will retain full jurisdiction over any crimes committed on Nigerien territory before the withdrawal enters into force.

    Niger’s exit comes as the country faces escalating security instability linked to jihadi insurgent groups operating across the Sahel region. Earlier this month, a brazen armed attack on Niamey’s main international airport — a critical strategic hub that houses the military junta’s air force base, its fleet of drones and combat aircraft, and the headquarters of a new regional security alliance between Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso — left more than 30 people dead. The assault marked the second major attack on the airport this year, part of a growing trend of insurgent groups expanding their operations from rural border areas to major urban centers across the Sahel.