作者: admin

  • Greece awaits Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ with anticipation despite casting controversy

    Greece awaits Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ with anticipation despite casting controversy

    As Christopher Nolan’s highly anticipated big-screen adaptation of Homer’s epic *The Odyssey* prepares for its global theatrical release this Friday, a firestorm of pre-release debate over casting choices has dominated headlines in international conservative circles — but public opinion in Greece, the birthplace of the 3,000-year-old tale, tells a far different story.

    Discourse around literary adaptations often fixates on rigid faithfulness to the original source material. But for Greeks, who grow up studying and revisiting Homer’s epic at every level of education, the poem’s centuries-long survival has never depended on staying static: it has thrived precisely because of constant reinvention.

    Filippos Mantzaris, a seventh-grade educator who teaches *The Odyssey* to young Greek students, explained that the core lesson of the epic is not about rigid adherence to an ancient text. “What we want children to understand is that every new creation is exactly that — a new creation,” he told the Associated Press. In Greek classrooms, *The Odyssey* is not taught as a fixed artifact: students debate the morality of Odysseus’ revenge, question whether the battle-weary king qualifies as a positive role model, and participate in role-play exercises to step into the hero’s journey themselves. For 12-year-old student Kyriakos Agapiou, the epic’s core message is one of resilience: “That everything is possible and we should never give up.”

    This culture of open interpretation extends beyond school walls. Farm scientist Nikos Varelas recently attended a local stage adaptation of *The Odyssey* with his 4-year-old son, after the pair read simplified youth versions of both *The Odyssey* and *The Iliad* together. “It is our duty as parents, as Greeks,” Varelas said of passing the story to a new generation. Manos Pintzis, an actor who portrayed Odysseus in the stage production, noted that live performance makes the ancient myth accessible to young people in a way mandatory reading cannot. “You don’t tell a child, ‘Just read the story because you have to,’ because the child will resist when something is forced on them,” Pintzis explained. “When the child sees all of this unfolding before their eyes — that becomes a valuable step toward learning, to willingly learn what they’re expected to study.”

    The pre-release controversy ignited largely in the United States, where conservative commentators and public figures have attacked Nolan’s casting choices, most notably the casting of Black actor Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy. Billionaire Elon Musk went so far as to claim the director had desecrated the epic, despite having not seen the film. Other conservative voices, including commentator Matt Walsh, have echoed these complaints, arguing the casting prioritizes “identity politics” over tradition, a familiar line of attack against recent diverse reboots of beloved genre properties.

    Nolan has pushed back against the pre-release criticism, noting that these debates hold little weight before audiences have a chance to see the finished film. “Backlash comes with the territory,” he told The Telegraph, adding “these conversations that happen before people see the film — they’re always irrelevant, because no one having them knows what the film actually is yet.” Speaking to the AP, the director explained his goal was to create a version of the ancient story that feels modern and accessible, breaking from outdated conventions of how ancient Greek stories have been portrayed in past Hollywood productions. “You want to question people’s assumptions about how things should be portrayed in movies and what those are based on,” he said. “There’s a challenge to that and a risk to that. But my hope is that by creating a cohesive world, people understand the world as they watch the movie and they feel they understand it.”

    For most Greeks, the casting controversy is nothing new: Hollywood has a long history of casting non-Greek foreign actors in iconic ancient Greek roles, a practice audiences have grown accustomed to over decades. Scotsman Gerard Butler became globally famous for playing Spartan King Leonidas in *300*, Oklahoma-born Brad Pitt portrayed Achilles in *Troy*, and Irish actor Colin Farrell led the 2004 biopic *Alexander* — and even one of the most beloved on-screen Greek characters of all time, Zorba, was portrayed by Mexican-American actor Anthony Quinn in the 1964 classic. Nolan’s all-star cast, which includes Matt Damon as Odysseus alongside Nyong’o, Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson, Zendaya and Charlize Theron, is simply the latest iteration of this longstanding tradition.

    Only a small niche of Greek public opinion has aligned with the international backlash: far-right nationalist party Niki has objected to both the casting and the Greek government’s decision to provide roughly 6 million euros ($6.9 million) in production subsidies, claiming public funds are being used to impose “woke-type ideology” on Greek cultural identity, echoing Musk’s criticism. But Greece’s Culture Minister Lina Mendoni issued a sharp rejection of these demands. “It is not the state’s role to dictate to a creator how they should artistically interpret a work or a myth,” she told Greek pop culture magazine Lifo. “Can we seriously be having a conversation about whether the state should censor Christopher Nolan?”

    Christos Tsagalis, a professor of ancient Greek literature at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, noted that whether the adaptation succeeds is ultimately up to individual viewers to decide. What matters most, he argued, is that the epic continues to be reimagined for new audiences. Homer’s works have endured for millennia precisely because they have been reinterpreted across generations and adopted as shared global culture, he explained. “I think it’s wonderful that something that is created at a specific point in time by a given people is shared by so many people across the globe … It’s shared culture,” Tsagalis said. “It’s a fascinating story. It is like a movie.”

  • One in four Israelis using hard drugs amid Gaza genocide and regional wars

    One in four Israelis using hard drugs amid Gaza genocide and regional wars

    A sharp, unprecedented rise in harmful substance use across Israel has been documented by leading mental health researchers, linking the growing public health crisis to the cumulative psychological toll of ongoing military conflict in Gaza and escalating instability across the Middle East. Data published in Israeli outlet Haaretz, drawn from analysis by the Israeli Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, reveals that one in four Israelis now engage in harmful substance misuse — a figure that has more than doubled since before the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Pre-pandemic, the national rate of problematic substance use sat at just 10% (one in 10 Israelis). That figure climbed to 14% (one in seven) during the height of global pandemic-related lockdowns and uncertainty, before spiking dramatically to 25% in the months following October 2023, when Israel launched its large-scale military campaign in Gaza in response to attacks led by Hamas.

    The research breaks down the specific shifts in substance consumption: use of prescription sedatives has increased 250% compared to pre-conflict levels, while consumption of opiates and stimulants has nearly doubled. Rates of harmful alcohol and cannabis use have also ticked upward across all demographic groups. For Israelis living with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) linked to ongoing conflict, the rate of problematic substance misuse now reaches 54.2%, highlighting the deep intersection of trauma and addiction in the current crisis.

    Prof. Shauli Lev-Ran, founder of the Israeli Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, explained that repeated waves of national crisis have cemented harmful coping habits that formed during periods of extreme stress. “The more stress there is, the more people use,” Lev-Ran told Haaretz, adding a critical warning that these addictive patterns often persist long after periods of immediate crisis abate.

    Firsthand accounts from people who use substances across the country paint a stark picture of how conflict has normalized drug use as a coping mechanism for daily uncertainty. Many report relying on ketamine, cocaine, amphetamines, cannabis, and prescription sedatives to navigate repeated missile alerts, attend funerals of conflict victims, cope with military mobilization of loved ones, and process a constant stream of violent death reporting.

    One Israeli man described his drug use escalating in lockstep with the expansion of Israel’s regional military campaigns, explaining that substances helped him create emotional distance from “all the blood and death” dominating news cycles. Another account noted that mourners have used amphetamines to get through funerals held for conflict victims since October 2023. Other residents report using ketamine before entering bomb shelters to manage extreme anxiety, while working adults turn to stimulants to maintain productivity despite chronic sleeplessness and stress.

    This rise in misuse is not limited to informal nightlife settings: interviewees described open substance use taking place in private homes, office workplaces, neighborhood bars, and public bomb shelters. Widespread access to encrypted messaging apps and anonymous digital payment platforms has also made it easier than ever for Israelis to obtain controlled substances, removing barriers that previously limited access.

    Dr. Roy Zucker, a clinician working in drug harm reduction, notes that the changing nature of substance use has created new risks for public health: more than 80% of drug-related emergency department cases now involve polysubstance use, a dangerous mix of multiple different drugs that increases the risk of fatal overdose and severe medical complications compared to single-substance use.

    The crisis also extends to Palestinian citizens of Israel, who face the compounded trauma of witnessing the destruction of Gaza while coping with growing systemic repression within Israel’s borders. Many Palestinian residents report turning to substances to cope after the trauma of seeing massacres of Palestinians in Gaza, with limited access to affordable or accessible mental health treatment leaving few alternative coping options. One Palestinian citizen described whole communities “falling apart” in the wake of the Gaza campaign, with substance use becoming a default for many struggling with unaddressed trauma.

    Lev-Ran warned that without targeted intervention, the public health crisis will only deepen as long as conflict and permanent national alert continue. Prolonged cycles of violence, he explained, make it impossible for people to reset and return to normal daily life, as just one crisis begins to ease another attack, military mobilization, or regional escalation begins.

    This reporting is from independent outlet Middle East Eye, which provides dedicated, unrivaled coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • Ukraine reels after Sen. Lindsey Graham’s sudden death, fearing a weaker link to Trump

    Ukraine reels after Sen. Lindsey Graham’s sudden death, fearing a weaker link to Trump

    In the wake of the sudden passing of veteran Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, Ukraine is confronting a significant and unexpected gap in its Washington advocacy networks, as the long-standing pro-Kyiv lawmaker stood as Kyiv’s most trusted, high-profile link to former President Donald Trump — a connection that has left Ukrainian leaders and analysts bracing for weakened influence ahead of Trump’s return to the White House.

    Just two days before news of his death broke, Graham stood in Kyiv’s iconic St. Michael’s Square, framed by the gilded domes of the historic monastery and the charred wreckage of destroyed Russian military hardware on public display. There, he delivered a message of cautious optimism to Ukrainians, announcing that a sweeping, hard-hitting new package of economic sanctions against Russia — legislation he had spent years co-developing with Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut — was finally close to advancing through Congress. He was set to return to Washington to hold meetings with bipartisan leaders to push the proposal over the finish line.

    Graham’s passing on Sunday sent waves of grief and concern across official Kyiv. For years, the South Carolina senator had stood out as one of Ukraine’s most unwavering allies in the U.S. capital, and uniquely positioned as a trusted go-between for Kyiv and Trump, who has long had a strained public relationship with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukrainian officials now warn that Graham’s absence will not only put the long-awaited Russia sanctions bill at risk, but could also erode Ukraine’s ability to shape White House policy across a wide range of priorities tied to its war against Russian invasion.

    “Huge and absolutely unexpected loss,” said Oleksandr Merezhko, a senior lawmaker from Zelenskyy’s ruling Servant of the People party. “He was truly indispensable. I even don’t know who might be as important for us now in Trump’s entourage. He was the closest link between Ukraine, our president and Trump. Our position in Trump’s entourage might be weaker.”

    Condolences poured in from across Ukraine’s top leadership, with Zelenskyy leading tributes to Graham as one of Kyiv’s most steadfast champions in Washington, who maintained constant communication with Ukrainian officials throughout the war. Zelenskyy said he was “deeply saddened” by the senator’s sudden passing, noting that Graham had made 10 visits to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, always showing up when Ukrainians needed international support most. “We were in constant dialogue and will miss that greatly,” Zelenskyy wrote on his official Telegram channel, recalling that the two had met twice in the week before Graham’s death — first at the NATO summit, and again during Graham’s recent Kyiv visit.

    Ukrainian Parliament Speaker Ruslan Stefanchuk echoed those remarks, calling Graham a “steadfast friend of Ukraine” whose support for the country was “principled and resolute.” He noted he would long remember their “meaningful, sincere, and warmly personal meetings,” and expressed confidence that Graham’s work to advance tougher Russian sanctions would be completed in his honor.

    In the period since Trump secured the Republican presidential nomination and his impending return to the White House next year, Ukrainian officials moved quickly to build ties with Trump-aligned Republicans amid growing uncertainty over the future of U.S. military and economic support for Kyiv. Lawmakers and analysts have confirmed Graham quickly emerged as the central figure in those outreach efforts.

    Oleksandr Kraiev, a leading political analyst at the Kyiv-based think tank Ukrainian Prism, noted that Graham’s standing in Ukraine was unusually prominent, even compared to many domestic Ukrainian politicians. “Graham is even more well-known and more popular among Ukrainians than many Ukrainian politicians,” Kraiev said. Without Graham, he added, Ukraine risks losing its most influential advocate with direct, unfiltered access to Trump, and “I don’t see anyone else who will take the lead in helping Ukraine maintain those necessary connections.”

    A rare figure in today’s Trump-dominated Republican Party, Graham carved out a political identity that broke with the growing isolationist “America First” strain of the Make America Great Again movement on key foreign policy issues. He remained committed to traditional conservative foreign policy principles, including staunch opposition to Russian expansionism, hawkish policy toward Iran, and unwavering support for U.S. ally Israel under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He also continued to back traditional U.S. alliances in Europe at a time when Trump has repeatedly threatened to withdraw American troops from the continent and doubled down on his criticism of NATO.

    Even as his positions put him at odds with many high-profile Trump supporters, Graham retained a close personal relationship with the former president, who often values loyalty above all else from congressional Republicans. Unlike many GOP lawmakers who have faced public ridicule from Trump for breaking with his agenda, Graham remained a trusted voice, particularly on foreign policy, that Trump was willing to listen to.

    Blumenthal, Graham’s Democratic collaborator on the Russian sanctions bill, highlighted Graham’s independent streak in a statement following his death. “He marched to his own drummer,” Blumenthal said. “He could be strong-minded, fiercely driven, and sometimes unpredictable, but also deeply compassionate and sympathetic when he saw suffering and injustice.”

    Graham’s unwavering support for Ukraine has long put him at odds with Trump, who has repeatedly criticized the volume of U.S. spending on aid for the war-torn country. Even so, Blumenthal confirmed that Graham was confident the sanctions legislation was finally within reach, telling reporters he had spoken with Graham over the weekend, when the South Carolina senator was “exulted” about the prospect of moving the package forward. Blumenthal added that passing the bill into law should now serve as a “fitting tribute” to Graham’s years of work on the issue.

  • Planes sent to tackle wildfires of ‘exceptional scale’ near Paris

    Planes sent to tackle wildfires of ‘exceptional scale’ near Paris

    A large, fast-spreading wildfire has ignited near Noisy-sur-Ecole, close to the iconic Fontainebleau forest just 60 kilometers southeast of Paris, triggering an extraordinary emergency response amid the third record-breaking heatwave to hit the French capital region this summer. Local officials have labeled the blaze as “virulent” and of “exceptional scale”, with flames tearing through more than 800 hectares of forest as of early Monday, with the fire line still expanding across the wooded landscape.

    In response to the crisis, French authorities took an unprecedented step: two dedicated firefighting aircraft were deployed from the warmer, drier southern region of the country, where large wildfires are more common, to combat the blaze near Paris. This marks the first time such aerial assets have been reassigned north to the Paris region for wildfire response, according to Eric Brocardi, a spokesperson for France’s national federation of firefighters. Joining the two water-bombing planes were two additional firefighting helicopters and a dedicated observation aircraft, all mobilized to prioritize the core mission of protecting civilian lives and nearby infrastructure, Brocardi confirmed in comments to Agence-France-Presse.

    The spreading fire has already caused major travel disruption across France, hitting the first major summer holiday weekend when millions of Parisians travel out of the capital for seasonal getaways. The blaze forced partial closure of France’s key north-south highway, snarling traffic for thousands of travelers. Earlier in the emergency, a separate fire linked to the hot, dry conditions blocked an eastbound highway out of Paris and interrupted service on the high-speed rail line connecting Paris to southern France. By Sunday evening, French national rail operator SNCF announced that travelers faced delays of up to six hours for all services arriving at or departing from Paris Gare de Lyon.

    This wildfire is not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern of extreme heat and fire risk sweeping Europe this summer, where multiple countries across the continent have already broken all-time temperature records. In France alone, the prolonged heat has forced additional cascading disruptions beyond the wildfire: three nuclear power plants have been temporarily taken offline, as operators avoid releasing warm cooling water into already overheated rivers and waterways that would further threaten aquatic ecosystems. Even the Tour de France, one of the world’s most high-profile annual cycling events, was forced to adjust its schedule, cutting 30 kilometers from Sunday’s race stage as temperatures climbed close to 40 degrees Celsius to protect rider safety.

    Across the continent, the record heat has sparked a series of devastating wildfires with severe human costs. In southern Spain, a wildfire near Almeria that broke out Thursday has already killed at least 13 people, making it one of the deadliest wildfire events in the country’s modern history. In the United Kingdom, emergency services declared a major incident Sunday after a large wildfire broke out in north Wales, with fire crews battling multiple blazes across both Wales and England as the region also swelters under record high temperatures.

  • Powerful pharmacy lobby using secret deals to inflate medicine prices, report claims

    Powerful pharmacy lobby using secret deals to inflate medicine prices, report claims

    A new analysis from one of Australia’s leading independent think tanks has ignited fierce debate over pharmaceutical pricing, claiming that closed-door negotiations between the federal government and a powerful industry lobby have forced taxpayers and patients to overpay billions of dollars annually for prescription medications. The Grattan Institute’s new report pulls back the curtain on decades of opaque policy making, arguing that the Pharmacy Guild of Australia — the national body representing the majority of Australian community pharmacy owners — has leveraged its significant political influence to lock out patient representatives and hide critical cost data from public scrutiny during funding and policy negotiations.

    Lead researcher and Grattan’s Health Program Director Peter Breadon argues that this closed negotiating model is a global outlier. “Unlike almost every other developed nation, Australia’s negotiations for pharmacy funding exclude all stakeholders outside the Guild and the government, and proceed almost entirely without public, evidence-based cost data,” Breadon explained in the report. “This poor governance structure has only delivered bad outcomes for everyone except pharmacy owners themselves.”

    The report’s economic modelling estimates that Australian pharmacies collect nearly $3 billion annually in excessive dispensing fees, driven by a lack of market competition and restrictive industry rules that block widespread discounts for consumers. Under Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which subsidises most prescription medications for the public, the nation’s 6,000 community pharmacies fill 335 million prescriptions each year at a total taxpayer cost of $3.8 billion. Breadon’s analysis found the average dispensing fee — charged to cover the cost of verifying prescriptions, preparing medications, and providing patient counselling — currently sits at $9.24 per script, a figure that cannot be justified because the Guild has repeatedly blocked efforts to measure the actual cost of dispensing services.

    “No one knows the real cost of filling a prescription in an Australian community pharmacy, and that is no accident,” Breadon said. “Fees should be set independently, tied to actual operational costs, not the outcome of closed-door bargaining. Unjustified inflated fees need to be scrapped entirely.”

    The report also takes aim at the existing Community Pharmacy Agreements, which the institute says include overly generous funding terms that shield pharmacy owners from revenue declines while inflating profits at the expense of taxpayers and consumers. Breadon added that while regulatory rules already allow pharmacies to discount medications priced below the PBS maximum co-payment — a policy that has delivered $319 million in annual savings for patients in 2025 — a web of complex industry regulations prevents pharmacies from passing additional savings on to consumers for other prescription drugs. Simplifying these discount rules alone could deliver an extra $48 million in annual savings for Australian patients, the modelling found.

    To fix the systemic flaws, the Grattan Institute is calling for a full overhaul of the negotiating framework: the federal government should open negotiations to independent, evidence-based fee-setting, the same model used for other Australian health care sectors. If wholesale reform is not pursued, Breadon said, patient representatives should at minimum be included at the negotiating table, with all cost data released to the public to justify final funding decisions. “The Australian government spends billions of dollars on community pharmacy services every year,” Breadon said. “Fairer fee structures and stronger competition will ensure the system works for patients, not just pharmacy owners.”

    The Pharmacy Guild of Australia has pushed back forcefully against the report’s claims, with National Vice President Simon Blacker arguing the organisation has a long track record of advancing affordable access to medications for Australians. Blacker highlighted the Guild’s recent collaboration with the federal government to cut the PBS general co-payment to $25 starting in January 2026, a reduction that will bring the co-payment to its lowest level since 2004 — only the second cut to the co-payment in the PBS’s entire history.

    Blacker also reaffirmed the critical public health role that community pharmacies play across Australia, noting that increasingly, specially trained pharmacists are able to diagnose, treat, and prescribe for a wide range of common acute and chronic health conditions — a expanded scope of practice that Blacker says should be supported by a national consistent prescribing framework. Both the Grattan Institute and the Pharmacy Guild have acknowledged the essential role community pharmacies play in guaranteeing access to medicines, health advice, and frontline care for Australian communities, leaving the debate focused on governance and pricing rather than the core value of local pharmacy services.

  • Cult activewear brand Stax collapses into voluntary liquidation

    Cult activewear brand Stax collapses into voluntary liquidation

    Once a rising Australian challenger to global activewear giants Lululemon and Nike, popular inclusive fashion label Stax has formally entered voluntary liquidation, leaving thousands of customers uncertain about unfulfilled orders and unusable gift cards, according to official updates from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

    The liquidation process comes after National Australia Bank (NAB), Australia’s one of the big four banking groups, appointed receivers from FTI Consulting earlier this year to recover outstanding debt owed by the brand. Following this step, the ACCC confirmed that joint liquidators Brian Silvia and Michael Hird from Cascap Advisory have been appointed to oversee the wind-down of multiple Stax corporate entities. Unlike receivers, whose primary mandate is to recover funds for specific creditors (in this case NAB), liquidators are tasked with selling off all remaining assets of the insolvent business and distributing proceeds evenly across all outstanding creditors.

    Founded in 2015 and formally registered in Western Australia in 2017, Stax grew from a small grassroots startup to a major competitor in the global activewear market. The brand built a massive cult following across Australia for its signature “buttery soft” leggings, fashion-forward designs, and industry-leading inclusive sizing, operating both an e-commerce platform and two physical boutique stores in Sydney and Liverpool. At its peak operational height, Stax generated more than AUD 30 million in annual revenue and employed more than 160 workers across the country. Just one month before entering liquidation, Stax’s co-founders Dan and Matilda Murray made a last-ditch effort to keep the business solvent, selling off its retail store assets and luxury personal vehicles including a Lamborghini and a Porsche.

    In an official public statement posted to Stax’s website, the brand confirmed that a large number of pending customer orders will not be fulfilled, and the company is no longer able to honor outstanding gift cards or store credit notes. Receivers first took control of Stax operations on June 24 to assess the business and negotiate with key stakeholders to explore options for continued trading, but those talks have not resulted in a rescue deal to date.

    Customers who purchased items in pre-sale promotions on or before June 24 face particular uncertainty: the company noted that most pre-ordered goods were not held in domestic stock, instead relying on overseas suppliers to manufacture and ship inventory to Australia. Order fulfillment for these purchases depends on cooperation from the full supply chain, including overseas manufacturers, freight forwarders, and third-party logistics providers, many of which are also owed outstanding payments by Stax. For all other undelivered orders placed before June 24, delivery is similarly contingent on reaching a new agreement with the third-party logistics firm, which is an unsecured creditor of the insolvent Stax group.

    At this stage, the business is also unable to process any returns or exchanges for customers, and all unused gift cards and credit notes will not be accepted for future purchases. “We recognise how disappointing this will be for affected customers and we are sorry for the impact this has. Should this position change, we will provide updates promptly,” the statement read. As of the latest update, liquidators are continuing their assessment of the business’s remaining assets and creditor claims, with further updates expected as the wind-down process progresses.

  • Surprising new data reveals most financially confident generation

    Surprising new data reveals most financially confident generation

    Against a backdrop of ongoing national cost-of-living pressures and shifting economic expectations, new data from Australia’s MLC Real Retirement Report has upended common generational stereotypes, revealing that Generation Z is now the most financially confident cohort in the country — even as they report the highest levels of frustration with their current financial circumstances. The annual report, which surveys thousands of Australians to gauge attitudes toward workforce exit and long-term financial security, draws a nuanced picture of young Australians’ relationship with money: while systemic barriers and early career challenges leave many struggling to hit their savings targets, Gen Z is proactively taking control of their financial futures far earlier than previous generations.

    According to the report’s findings, 45% of Gen Z Australians report feeling confident or extremely confident in their personal financial knowledge, outpacing Millennials, Gen X and Baby Boomers by a clear margin. This confidence translates into forward-thinking planning: many Gen Z respondents already expect to retire as early as age 63, and are actively leveraging strategies to grow their retirement savings, including switching superannuation funds to access better returns or lower fees, using salary sacrificing to boost pre-tax contributions, and seeking professional financial guidance tailored to their long-term goals.

    Renee Howie, chief customer officer at MLC, attributed Gen Z’s distinct approach to financial planning to the unstable socio-economic environment they have come of age in. Rather than waiting for external systems or employers to secure their retirement, Howie explained, young Australians have embraced personal agency over the factors they can control, most notably their superannuation savings. “They’re not waiting for it to be done to them. They’re actually taking control and wanting to build their financial security for the future themselves,” Howie said in an interview. “There is a lot more control that they have in their super than they might have in other external factors that affect their financial capability today.”

    The report also identifies a major shift in core financial priorities for Gen Z: for the first time, financial freedom and retirement security have overtaken home ownership as the primary savings goal for many young Australians. Howie noted that this shift aligns with Gen Z’s focus on autonomy, explaining that financial independence is ultimately a goal centered on control over one’s own life and future. “It means that they have an interest, they’re planning for the long term, they’re making choices around their investments,” she said.

    Despite this unprecedented proactivity and confidence, the report also highlights significant challenges facing Gen Z on their path to a comfortable retirement. Only 45% of Gen Z respondents believe they are currently on track to meet their retirement goals, while just 30% have actually started putting aside dedicated retirement savings. Gen Z also reported higher levels of frustration with their current financial situation than any other generation, with 37% saying they feel held back by systemic cost-of-living pressures that make consistent saving difficult.

    Still, Howie struck an optimistic tone about Gen Z’s long-term prospects, pointing to the rise of financial influencers (or “finfluencers”) on social media and the expanded availability of free digital financial education tools as game-changing advantages for young people. These resources give Gen Z early access to money management skills that older generations often did not learn until mid-career, creating a foundation for healthy long-term saving habits. “Gen Z also get to see what their peers are doing through the likes of social channels, and so the education is leading them to consider their own circumstance,” Howie said. “Not only are they actively switching member funds, they’re also more predominantly going into products that enable them to have a little bit more control and a little bit more choice.”

  • Liberal MP Julian Leeser lashes ABC, SBS over ‘systematic’ anti-Israel bias

    Liberal MP Julian Leeser lashes ABC, SBS over ‘systematic’ anti-Israel bias

    As Australia’s Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion prepares to hear testimony from Jewish university staff and students, a senior opposition politician has launched a pointed public attack on the country’s two major state-funded broadcasters, demanding they address long-running allegations of systemic bias against Israel in their coverage of the ongoing Israel-Gaza war.

    Julian Leeser, the opposition’s education spokesperson and member of the Berowra electorate who identifies as part of Australia’s Jewish community, made the demand on Monday, tying the call for broadcaster accountability to the federal government’s new anti-racism rules for Australian higher education institutions. Leeser confirmed that the country’s Special Envoy into Antisemitism, Julian Segal, has formally raised repeated complaints about the public broadcasters’ Israel coverage, which has unfolded amid a conflict that has killed more than 73,000 people in Gaza since the October 7, 2023 Hamas terror attack that left more than 1,000 mostly civilian Israelis dead.

    “I think the public broadcasters actually have to be prepared to address systemic bias against Israel in their reporting, and I think they need to subject themselves to greater transparency mechanisms as outlined by the envoy,” Leeser told ABC Radio National in an interview, adding that the exact structure of new transparency rules would be determined by the ongoing Royal Commission.

    Australia’s two public broadcasters, the ABC and SBS, have faced sustained criticism from peak national Jewish groups over their coverage of the 10-month-long Israel-Gaza conflict. Last week, the ABC issued a public correction and acknowledged it made a “bad mistake” when it incorrectly reported that 14,000 babies would die of starvation in Gaza within a 48-hour window.

    Despite that misstep, ABC Editorial Director Gavin Fang defended the public broadcaster’s overall coverage during testimony to the Royal Commission, noting the outlet has made a deliberate effort to center the experiences of Australia’s Jewish community when reporting on rising antisemitism domestically. Fang added that covering the Middle East conflict, which has profound impacts on Australian communities, aligns directly with the ABC’s legislated charter obligation to deliver independent news and current affairs. “We have covered the impact of a variety of domestic attacks, for instance, on Jewish synagogues, on graffiti and other incidents of anti-Semitism,” he said.

    For its part, SBS has faced criticism from Segal over its use of casualty statistics published by the Gaza Health Ministry, which was previously overseen by Hamas’ now-defunct civilian administration. Amanda Wicks, SBS Director of News and Current Affairs, pushed back against that criticism, noting the outlet always contextualizes its use of the data by clearly stating Hamas is recognized as a terrorist organization by Australia and controls the Gaza Strip.

    Both broadcasters have also rejected repeated calls from Segal to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, a policy that critics argue disproportionately and unfairly restricts legitimate criticism of the Israeli government and its military actions in Gaza. Leeser, a staunch supporter of mandating the IHRA definition, pushed back on that critique, noting the definition explicitly states that criticism of Israel comparable to that leveled against any other sovereign nation cannot be classified as antisemitic.

    Leeser’s calls for broadcaster accountability come as the federal government rolling out new mandatory anti-racism standards for Australian universities, which require institutions to establish more transparent public antisemitism complaint handling processes. The opposition has gone further, demanding that universities make combating antisemitism on campus a formal requirement to access federal funding. Pro-Palestinian student encampments have sprung up on multiple Australian university campuses since October 7, mirroring similar protests across the globe.

    Leeser also slammed Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke for failing to mandate the IHRA definition for all universities, arguing that more than a year since the October 7 attacks, there is no more room for delay. “The universities said ‘oh, we don’t like IHRA, we’ll adopt our own definition’, and yet they’d had more than a year and failed to do so,” Leeser said. “The time for mucking around with these issues is long past. 15 people were allegedly murdered in cold blood on our most famous beaches because of their religion. The time to adopt IHRA is now, and I’m calling on the minister to mandate the IHRA definition.”

    Leeser added that while legitimate criticism of Israel is acceptable, the spread of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery on university campuses crosses a clear line. “There are lots of Jewish people in this country who criticise the state of Israel, but the idea that you can walk around your university campus and use Nazi iconography to describe Israel and to describe Jews is just wrong,” he said.

  • Thailand PM visits aftermath of deadly Bangkok bar fire

    Thailand PM visits aftermath of deadly Bangkok bar fire

    A devastating fire that tore through a popular pub in central Thailand’s capital Bangkok in the early hours of Monday has left the nation in shock, prompting the country’s top leader to travel directly to the scene to assess the destruction and meet with first responders. Local time just after midnight, witnesses and emergency crews reported the sudden blaze breaking out at the venue, which was crowded with late-night patrons when the fire ignited.

    Captured camera footage from the area in the hours after the fire was contained paints a grim picture of the aftermath: blackened exterior walls, shattered windows, and a gutted interior that stands as a reminder of the rapid spread of the blaze that emergency workers battled to bring under control. As rescue teams continue to comb through the wreckage to confirm casualty numbers and investigate the cause of the fire, Thailand’s Prime Minister did not delay in visiting the site, where he received briefings from local officials about the response effort and the next steps for the investigation.

    The incident has already drawn widespread attention across the country, raising new questions about fire safety protocols for entertainment venues in densely populated urban areas of Thailand. Local law enforcement and fire safety agencies have launched a formal probe to determine what sparked the fire, whether it originated from an electrical fault, a cooking accident, or another source, and whether the venue failed to meet mandatory safety standards that could have prevented the high death toll.

  • Protected but deported anyway, as Trump goes after ‘dreamers’

    Protected but deported anyway, as Trump goes after ‘dreamers’

    Three individual stories of so-called ‘dreamers’—recipients of the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program—have cast a harsh spotlight on the Donald Trump administration’s aggressive crackdown on undocumented immigration, revealing how protected immigrants are being expelled from the only country many have ever called home, despite legal safeguards designed to prevent their deportation.

    DACA was launched in 2012 to grant temporary protection from deportation to people who were brought to the United States as undocumented minors. The program allows recipients to legally live and work in the U.S. while they pursue long-term immigration status adjustments. Currently, an estimated 500,000 active DACA recipients, widely known as dreamers, live across the country, according to federal government data.

    But new reporting from AFP details how the Trump administration, which has long sought to dismantle the program, has targeted hundreds of DACA recipients for deportation. According to advocacy organization Home is Here, which cites a formal Department of Homeland Security letter to Congress, U.S. immigration officials have arrested at least 343 DACA recipients and deported at least 86 of them, even while the program’s protections remained in place after courts blocked Trump’s earlier attempt to end DACA entirely during his first presidential term.

    Jose Contreras, a 30-year-old DACA recipient who grew up in the U.S. after arriving as a child, thought he was safe from deportation when he attended a routine immigration hearing in early January. When he asked for a short stay of removal to wait for the birth of his first child, he told AFP immigration officials laughed at his request, reacting as if his ask was absurd. He was handcuffed, put on a plane, and deported to his native Honduras that same day. His son was born in Texas weeks later, in late February, without Contreras present for the birth.

    “I lost it, you know. I fell to the ground. And then I cried,” Contreras said. “Because I wasn’t planning to not be there for my son.” After 118 days in Honduras, a U.S. court ultimately ruled his deportation was unlawful and ordered his return, allowing him to reunite with his family in Edinburg, Texas, where he now wears an ankle monitor required following his return.

    A similar case unfolded for Maria de Jesus Estrada, 42, who was brought to the U.S. at age 15 and built a life in California. When she attended an immigration hearing accompanied by her 23-year-old daughter, she was immediately confronted by six immigration agents who ordered her arrested. Distraught, she only asked for a moment to say goodbye to her child. “I’m not gonna resist anything. I just need a minute. I need to hold my daughter. I need to hug my daughter,” she recalled telling agents. She was deported to Mexico that same day, before a court later ruled her expulsion illegal and ordered her return.

    Immigration officials have defended the deportations by citing old, outstanding removal orders issued when Contreras and Estrada were minors. But their legal attorney Stacy Tolchin argues the cases prove the Trump administration has deliberately broken existing law to target protected dreamers. “The cases of Jose Contreras and Maria de Jesus Estrada are evidence of this administration’s unlawful and inhumane distortion of the law,” Tolchin said.

    For other DACA recipients, there has been no lucky court-ordered return. Jessica Trevino, who was brought to the U.S. from Mexico at age 7 and has lived in the country almost her entire life, was arrested by immigration agents in Alamo, Texas, in late December as she left church with her family. Cellphone video of the encounter, which showed agents roughing up Trevino’s husband, spread widely on social media. Both Trevino and her husband were deported to Mexico in March, leaving their three U.S.-raised children behind to live with relatives in Texas.

    Now living in Matamoros, Mexico, Trevino waits for U.S. courts to hear her case, and holds out hope she will return in time for her daughter’s 15th birthday in August. “Although I was not born in the United States, I have lived here my whole life,” she said. “Sometimes I go to sleep thinking that I will wake up at home.”

    Advocacy groups say the deportations are part of a deliberate strategy to dismantle DACA through incremental action, after the Supreme Court blocked the administration’s attempt to end the program outright. “We are seeing this administration dismantling DACA through delay, denials, detentions and deportations,” said Todd Schulte, president of pro-immigration advocacy group FWD.us. The Trump administration is currently pressing Congress to pass a permanent resolution to the country’s long-running immigration policy dispute, as the future of DACA remains unresolved.