作者: admin

  • ‘Not working for young people’: Chalmers flags huge tax changes

    ‘Not working for young people’: Chalmers flags huge tax changes

    Ahead of the highly anticipated federal budget release this Tuesday, Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers has given the clearest hint yet that major, game-changing tax policy shifts will be front and center of the new fiscal plan, framing the adjustments as difficult but necessary to fix deep structural inequities in the nation’s housing and tax systems. In an exclusive interview on Sky News’ public affairs program *Sunday Agenda*, Chalmers stopped short of locking in concrete changes to controversial property investment tax concessions, namely negative gearing and the capital gains tax (CGT) discount, but confirmed the upcoming budget will center on targeted reform rather than broad-based revenue grabs. “When it comes to the tax package in the budget, it will have some difficult but necessary reforms,” Chalmers told host. “It is overwhelmingly not about collecting heaps more revenue over the budget period, it is about more reforms.”

    Chalmers, whose center-left Labor government won power 12 months prior, called the current arrangement unfair, noting it fails to adequately recognize the contributions of ordinary working Australians when compared to individuals who generate most of their income through investment holdings. For weeks, budget leaks have outlined two core proposed reforms to property investment taxation that are expected to be confirmed in Tuesday’s announcement. The first, for negative gearing — a tax break that allows property investors to deduct expenses including mortgage interest and repair costs from their overall taxable income when annual expenses exceed rental income — will only apply to new investment purchases of newly constructed properties. Crucially, the proposed changes are grandfathered: the more than 1 million existing Australian landlords who currently use negative gearing will retain their existing tax breaks, eliminating any immediate disruption for current holders. The policy design is intended to drive new construction and ease the nation’s chronic housing supply shortage, the core root of the country’s ongoing affordability crisis.

    The second major shift would alter the CGT discount, changing rules that have been in place since the Howard government in 1999. Under current policy, investors holding assets for at least 12 months qualify for an automatic 50% discount on any capital gains. The proposed change would return the system to inflation indexing, which matches the taxable portion of gains to rising prices, rather than offering a flat half-discount across all asset classes. Unlike the negative gearing adjustments, this change would apply to all current and future investors.

    Addressing growing public speculation that the government could also roll out a new earned income offset worth between $200 and $300 per taxpayer as cost-of-living relief, Chalmers pushed back against expectations of large, short-term cash handouts, framing the budget as a fiscally restrained document designed to avoid adding to existing inflationary pressures. “People shouldn’t expect in a very tight and responsible budget defined by spending restraint… big near term cash splashes in the budget because we take this inflation challenge seriously,” he said. The Treasurer noted the government has already delivered multiple forms of tax relief, including a cut to fuel taxes and an instant asset tax deduction for businesses, with already scheduled stage three income tax cuts set to take effect on July 1 next year.

    Rejecting criticism that the reforms amount to a punitive attack on existing investors, Chalmers emphasized the policy’s core goal is expanding access to homeownership for young and aspirational Australians, not punishing past investment decisions. “We’re not trying to punish anybody who has made decisions about how they’ve used the tax system or the housing market in the past,” he said. “It’s about trying to expand opportunities in the housing market for more people. Our motivation in considering some of these changes is recognising that helping people get a toehold in the housing market is a really important way of helping people get a toehold in the economy more broadly.” The Treasurer added that while boosting housing supply has been the government’s first priority, the status quo on housing and taxation is broken, unfair, and demands a policy response from a responsible government. Tuesday’s budget, he said, will mark the start of a more ambitious year of reform, following the first year in office focused on delivering on prior election commitments.

    Opposition figures have sharply condemned the proposed reforms, framing them as a naked tax grab that will fail to boost housing supply and hurt working Australians across all age groups. Liberal Senator Jane Hume questioned the government’s reversal on prior commitments to avoid negative gearing changes and challenged the government’s claims the reforms will increase housing construction. Shadow Treasurer Tim Wilson went further, dismissing the leaked budget plan as disjointed and ideologically driven. “So far their budget seems to be in complete disarray,” Wilson said. He criticized the plan for protecting existing older investors while closing off opportunities for young people seeking to enter the market, adding that the CGT changes will penalize young Australians saving for a home deposit through share market investments. Wilson argued that the changes will not result in more home construction, will drive up rents in major capital cities, and amounts to redistribution that does nothing to drive broader economic growth. “We need a tax system that is orientated towards encouraging wealth creation, jobs and growth for the next generation of Australians, while Labor’s plan is to feed resentment and redistribution,” he said.

    The budget announcement, scheduled for Tuesday night, will bring the years-long debate over Australia’s property tax system to a head, with stakeholders across the housing, finance and construction industries waiting for full details of the proposed reforms.

  • Indian model’s understated Met Gala debut revives debate on cultural representation

    Indian model’s understated Met Gala debut revives debate on cultural representation

    Two years ago, a chance encounter in a New York City subway station launched an unlikely new star onto the global fashion stage. Today, 26-year-old Indian model Bhavitha Mandava’s 2026 Met Gala debut has divided audiences and critics alike, igniting conversations about fashion excess, cultural representation, and the rising appeal of quiet authenticity in an industry defined by over-the-top spectacle.

    At fashion’s most high-profile annual event, where guests typically arrive in elaborate, statement-making couture that demands attention before the wearer even speaks, Mandava’s Chanel look read as deliberately restrained at first glance. From across the red carpet, she appeared in a sheer zip-up jacket paired with what looked like casual low-rise denim. Next to the structured gowns, dramatic silhouettes, and bold declarations that define the Met Gala’s red carpet, her outfit felt intentionally understated. But that simplicity was anything but accidental: fashion outlets soon revealed the “denim” was actually handcrafted silk muslin, printed and tailored to mimic textured cotton, turning casual everyday attire into a deliberate, high-fashion artistic choice.

    This deliberate contrast between appearance and craft has split public and media reaction. Some fashion observers have praised Mandava’s look as a thoughtful, quiet rebuke of the Met Gala’s typical over-the-top excess, a subtle subversion of the event’s obsession with grandeur. Others argue the understated ensemble failed to live up to the scale and prestige of the occasion, questioning whether it missed a once-in-a-generation moment for global visibility. Indian media has mirrored this divide, with some outlets hailing the outfit’s intentional minimalism and others arguing it undersold the importance of her debut as one of India’s rising fashion stars. On social media, the debate has expanded beyond fashion, touching on how Indian identity is framed, received, and often simplified on global cultural stages.

    Mandava’s rapid ascent from anonymous graduate student to global fashion fixture is as unusual as her signature aesthetic. Raised in Hyderabad, a city in southern India, she was pursuing a graduate architecture degree at New York University in 2024 when the 28Models scout approached her on her way to share a plate of biryani with a friend. The completely unplanned encounter quickly upended her life: within months, she was walking runways for luxury powerhouses Bottega Veneta, Dior, and Courrèges, before building a close ongoing partnership with Chanel. Even as her career exploded, Mandava never adopted the flashy persona common to rising modeling stars. In a February interview with *British Vogue*, she joked that her agent still teases her for early castings where she showed up in thrifted jeans and free NYU student t-shirts, wearing whatever was clean that day.

    Late last year, Mandava made history as the first Indian model to open Chanel’s prestigious Métiers d’Art show in New York, held on a meticulously reconstructed subway platform that intentionally echoed the setting of her discovery. Her opening look? A simple white t-shirt, half-zipped knit sweater, and loose denim — a template of deliberate understatement that she carried directly to the Met Gala red carpet.

    What makes Mandava’s story resonate far beyond fashion circles is its relatable core. Even after her rapid rise, she has carried the quiet authenticity of her former life as a grad student with her. She often speaks of her studies, her family, and the slow rhythm of ordinary life in interviews, rather than leaning into the manufactured myth of overnight stardom. When she opened the Chanel show, she shared a viral clip of her parents watching the live stream from their home in India: her mother repeating her name in stunned disbelief, her father sitting quietly beside her, beaming with quiet pride. The unguarded, intimate moment won millions of hearts online. On social media, she describes herself as a “Brooklyn lab rat”, balancing transatlantic life between architecture research, couture history study, and global runway commitments. It is a low-key persona that fits perfectly with fashion’s current embrace of “quiet luxury” and effortless, unforced style — but it clashed sharply with the heightened expectations of the Met Gala.

    In the wake of the social media firestorm over her Met Gala look, Mandava has declined to engage directly with critics, only sharing photos of the evening to her Instagram without additional comment. She later told *British Vogue* that the outfit was a personal tribute: a way to carry forward the memory of the subway encounter that launched her career, elevating the casual clothes she wore that day into couture while keeping it unmistakably hers.

    The fashion industry is notoriously fickle, and the current obsession with understatement may soon fade. It would also be unfair to expect Mandava, a young talent still early in her career, to remain frozen in this specific persona forever. But for now, her quiet, unforced presence offers a refreshing breath of air in an industry dominated by performance and overproduction — proof that authentic, understated style can still command the world’s attention.

  • Another year, another controversy for Eurovision – but fans are sticking by it

    Another year, another controversy for Eurovision – but fans are sticking by it

    The 70th iteration of the Eurovision Song Contest is set to open its doors in Vienna this Sunday, kicking off with the iconic turquoise carpet parade that will bring together competitors from 35 participating nations. What should be a joyous celebration of cross-cultural music and unity, however, has been overshadowed by a bitter, years-long controversy over Israel’s inclusion in the competition, driven by ongoing fallout from the 2023 Gaza conflict.

    As delegations assemble in the Austrian capital, five longstanding Eurovision participants will be notably absent: Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain have all pulled out of the 2026 contest in protest of Israel’s participation. The debate over Israel’s presence first ignited in October 2023, when the Israeli government launched a large-scale military offensive in Gaza in response to a Hamas-led attack that Israeli authorities report killed approximately 1,200 people and took 251 hostages. To date, the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry puts the Palestinian death toll from the offensive at 72,628. A ceasefire has been in place since October 2025, but the political rift over Israel’s Eurovision participation has not healed.

    Controversy has dogged Israel’s participation in the two most recent editions of the contest, held in Malmö 2024 and Basel 2025. During that time, mass anti-Israel protests filled host city streets, and Israeli contestants were assigned armed security detail for their protection. In 2025, Israeli entrant Yuval Raphael — a survivor of the October 7 attacks — told the BBC she had practiced performing through boos during rehearsals. Two stage invaders interrupted her performance during the grand final, and tensions boiled over after Raphael’s song unexpectedly placed first in the public vote, ultimately landing her second place overall after lower jury scores. Multiple countries alleged that the public vote was skewed by an unprecedented intervention from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, which repeatedly urged its social media followers to vote for Raphael’s entry.

    Last November, a coalition of countries pushed for a formal vote to exclude Israel from the 2026 contest. When the motion failed, the boycotts began, including the withdrawal of Ireland — a seven-time Eurovision winner — and Spain, one of the competition’s largest financial backers.

    For Eurovision, a cultural event uniquely dependent on its passionate global fan community, the boycott and ongoing controversy have left audiences deeply divided. Unlike most major entertainment events, Eurovision integrates independent fan media directly into official proceedings, granting fan websites and blogs equal access to press centres, press conferences, and behind-the-scenes content alongside legacy outlets like the BBC and The New York Times. Fan creators publish year-round content, from pre-selection show analysis to rehearsal leaks, voting predictions, and staging breakdowns, cementing their central role in the event’s ecosystem.

    “The fan base is very important for the commercial dimension of Eurovision,” explained Dean Vuletic, historian and author of *Postwar Europe and the Eurovision Song Contest*. “When it comes to merchandising, when it comes to ticket sales, the fans are really the ones fuelling this Eurovision industry. They’re the ones you can count on to attend the contest, even when it becomes mired in political controversy.”

    In response to the 2026 boycott, a number of prominent fan platforms have suspended all coverage of this year’s contest. “The Eurovision we once knew, that shaped this community and inspired us to create this channel, just isn’t the one we fell in love with all those years ago,” wrote the team behind cross-continental fan page Eurovision Hub. Ireland’s Eirevision podcast echoed that sentiment: “A contest founded on unity, peace, and connection has never felt more divided. We no longer recognise the Eurovision Song Contest we grew up with.”

    Other conflicted fans have sought a middle ground. Welsh Eurovision fan Philip Dore published a widely shared reflective piece on fan site ESC Insight addressing the split, titled “So, what do Eurovision fans do now?” Dore noted that for many, Eurovision is far more than a one-night song competition: the event has longstanding deep ties to LGBTQ+ liberation and community, and is a key space of belonging for neurodiverse fans. He outlined a range of options for divided fans, from full personal boycott to a “halfway” approach that involves following pre-contest build-up but stepping back once events kick off in Vienna.

    “This isn’t an easy situation for anyone,” Dore wrote. “Many people in the community are feeling a mix of sadness, anger, and loss, and I have no intention of adding judgment to anyone.”

    Despite the deep rift, many of the traditional signs of Eurovision excitement remain visible across social media, where fans continue to share photos, memes, and interviews ahead of the contest. All tickets for nine total events in Vienna sold out in record time, with every grand final seat claimed in just 14 minutes. “To see every single show sell out so quickly is a powerful reminder of what the Eurovision Song Contest represents – joy, togetherness and shared experience at a time when that feels more important than ever,” said Martin Green, the British producer overseeing the 2026 contest.

    The on-the-ground mood among fans is far more nuanced, however. “It still feels exciting. It still feels like something that I couldn’t miss. And, that said, it feels different,” said Rob Lilley-Jones, host of UK-based podcast Euro Trip. “There’s still that fun element but now, and for the last few years, you are going into Eurovision week with a sense of apprehension and nervous anticipation.” Lilley-Jones called the 2024 Malmö contest, marked by heightened security and pervasive backstage tension, the worst in the event’s history.

    Marcos Maximillian Tritremmel, president of Austria’s national Eurovision fan club, told Germany’s Der Spiegel that he understands the motivations for protest, but confrontations with fans have crossed a line. “But when you get yelled at on your way into a concert hall – ‘What are you doing here? Why are you supporting the genocide?’ – at that point, it stops being funny.”

    Lilley-Jones says he has debated ending his podcast over the controversy, but ultimately decided that continuing to create content feels like the right choice: if the contest can still bring small moments of joy to audiences navigating a difficult global context, he argues, it is worth continuing. That approach — prioritizing dialogue over further division — has become the prevailing attitude among many fans who choose to engage with this year’s event.

    Vuletic, who has studied the contest’s long history of political controversy, argues that Eurovision will weather this current rift just as it has overcome past crises. He notes that claims this is the “most political Eurovision ever” overlook decades of political unrest tied to the event. For example, the 2009 contest in Moscow was overshadowed by violent police crackdowns on a gay pride rally held to coincide with the event, and the 2012 contest hosted by authoritarian Azerbaijan faced widespread criticism over the regime’s suppression of political dissent; that year’s winner, Sweden’s Loreen, publicly highlighted human rights abuses during her visit.

    “The media tends to sensationalise the current moment but we’ve always had to navigate the political context [of the contest],” Vuletic said. “And the fans have always kept coming, no matter what.”

    Organizers have worked to balance competing demands ahead of the 2026 opening: host Austrian public broadcaster has confirmed it will not ban Palestinian flags from the venue or censor audience booing of the Israeli entry. That said, the boycott will have concrete impacts: broadcasters in the boycotting countries will not air any 2026 content, almost guaranteeing a drop in global viewing figures. Uncertainty also lingers over what would happen if Israeli entry Noam Bettan’s ballad *Michelle* — ranked as one of the year’s strongest competitors — takes home the win.

    For Eurovision’s fans, who have already navigated years of growing tension, the 2026 contest will unfold with far more trepidation than the usual upbeat pre-event anticipation.

  • Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years

    Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years

    For generations, Canada has been widely regarded as a global underperformer when it comes to defence investment. Just two years ago, recruitment shortfalls grew so severe that a former Canadian defence minister issued a stark warning: the country’s armed forces were caught in an irreversible “death spiral.”

    Today, that narrative is shifting dramatically. The Canadian Armed Forces are now expanding at a pace unmatched in 30 years, posting the largest annual intake of new recruits in three decades, a turnaround that could finally reverse the chronic personnel shortages that have hobbled the military for generations. This surge over the past two years has unfolded against a backdrop of rising global geopolitical tension, with major armed conflicts raging across multiple regions and widespread uncertainty reshaping security calculations around the world. It also comes as the Canadian government has committed tens of billions in new military spending after decades of falling short of its mandatory NATO defence spending obligations.

    This recruitment boom also aligns with a notable uptick in Canadian nationalist sentiment, a shift triggered after former U.S. President Donald Trump’s provocative comment labeling Canada the “51st state” — a remark widely interpreted as a threat to Canadian sovereignty from its closest and most powerful neighbor. According to Charlotte Duval-Lantoine, a defense researcher at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, while a so-called “Trump effect” likely contributed to rising enlistment, the spike in military applications actually began in 2022, coinciding directly with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    “When people recognize that the world is no longer as secure as they once believed, and that their own country could face risk, we consistently see more people step forward to join the military,” Duval-Lantoine explained.

    Global instability is far from the only factor driving this surge. Canada’s persistently high youth unemployment rate, which hovered near 14% in March this year, paired with new promises of job security and substantial pay raises following Prime Minister Mark Carney’s announcement of the largest military pay increase in a generation, have also drawn more young people to enlist, Duval-Lantoine added. Since taking office 12 months ago, Carney has centered military expansion and modernization as a core priority of his administration, rolling out what he describes as an “ambitious” roadmap to rapidly grow and upgrade the Canadian Armed Forces.

    In March of this year, Carney announced that Canada had officially hit the NATO target of devoting 2% of its gross domestic product to defence — a milestone the country had not reached since the late 1980s. This year’s defence spending totals more than C$63 billion ($46 billion), and Carney has also committed Canada to the NATO alliance’s new pledge to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. Canada hit the 2% target through a combination of across-the-board salary increases for service members, pledges to purchase new advanced military equipment, upgrades to existing domestic bases, and new infrastructure investments in the Canadian Arctic to strengthen sovereignty claims.

    Even with this surge in new recruits, however, defence analysts caution that the Canadian military still lags far behind many of its key NATO allies, and it will take years for new funding to translate into meaningful operational improvements. Richard Shimooka, a senior defence fellow at the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute public policy think tank, noted that the Canadian Armed Forces currently only have the capacity to deploy a few thousand active soldiers at any given time, alongside a very limited fleet of operational fighter jets. For context, the United Kingdom’s military can deploy 10,000 troops on short notice when required, he said.

    “The Canadian Armed Forces are starting from a very low point right now, and it will take between five and 10 years before we see a real, tangible improvement in operational capability,” Shimooka said. A core underlying reason for this slow pace of progress, he argued, is Canada’s decades-long overreliance on the United States — its southern neighbor and the world’s dominant military power — for collective defence.

    Successive U.S. presidential administrations and senior officials have repeatedly pressured Canada to ramp up defence spending, and critics have long labeled Canada a military “freeloader” that benefits from U.S. security guarantees without contributing its fair share. In 2024, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson publicly accused Canada of “riding on America’s coattails” when it came to defence. Last year, Trump name-checked Canada as one of NATO’s top “low-payers,” telling reporters: “Canada says, ‘Why should we pay when the United States will protect us for free?’”

    Even after hitting the 2% GDP target this year, Canada still ranks among the lowest-spending NATO members when compared to alliance peers, falling behind the U.S., UK and France, according to a 2025 NATO defence report. Still, the sharp rise in new recruits is seen as an early sign that gradual improvement is underway. Canadian Defence Minister David McGuinty says he expects the country to hit its long-term personnel recruitment goals sooner than previously projected.

    The rate of attrition — the share of active service members leaving the military each year — has also dipped slightly, a major reversal from 2024, when then-Defence Minister Bill Blair warned that chronic attrition had pushed the force into a “death spiral.” Active service members deployed on a recent Arctic sovereignty and security operation in Canada’s northern Nunavut territory told reporters the new funding package is widely welcomed, and in many cases, has been decades in the making.

    “We’ve been behind for a couple of decades, but at least we’re finally taking action to fix things now,” said Alden Campbell, a first officer with the Royal Canadian Air Force. Campbell noted that the recent restructuring of military pay has given a major boost to troop morale, as has the government’s promise to deliver long-awaited upgraded equipment. “Hopefully I’ll still be in my career long enough to benefit from these upgrades,” he added.

    In late April, the Canadian military confirmed it had enrolled more than 7,000 new active service members in the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the highest annual recruit total in 30 years. That 7,000 figure only accounts for recruits who completed the full enlistment process; total confirmed eligible applications to the Canadian Armed Forces nearly doubled year-over-year as of February, jumping from 21,700 in 2024-2025 to 40,116 this year, according to data shared by Canada’s Department of National Defence. The total number of people who expressed initial interest in enlistment was far higher, reaching nearly 100,000 over the past 12 months, a massive jump from the 36,000 total applications recorded in 2019-2020.

    Travis Haines, a lieutenant colonel in the Canadian Armed Forces, told reporters he attributes a large share of the recruitment surge to the military’s recent efforts to cut through outdated red tape. For years, the military faced heavy criticism for its slow, bureaucratic application process that left many eligible applicants waiting months for a response. In recent years, the force has digitized key parts of the application process — including allowing electronic submission of required eligibility documents — to drastically cut processing times. “There has always been strong public interest in joining, it was just nearly impossible to get through the old system,” Haines explained.

    Another key policy shift that has expanded the applicant pool is the 2022 change opening enlistment to Canadian permanent residents, not just Canadian citizens. Last year, foreign-born permanent residents made up roughly 20% of all new recruits. Now, Canada is laying the groundwork for a major military expansion, with a long-term target of 85,500 active regular service members and a total mobilization reserve force of up to 300,000. Duval-Lantoine noted that Canada has not pursued a mobilization plan of this scale since 2004, a clear sign the country is adjusting its defence posture in response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, where the role of large-scale military manpower has been a defining feature of the conflict. Like its European NATO allies, Duval-Lantoine said, Canada is “preparing for future conflicts by studying the lessons of the current one.”

  • Mortgage holders hit with third rate rise but the real pain is delayed

    Mortgage holders hit with third rate rise but the real pain is delayed

    Australia’s central bank has extended its streak of monetary policy tightening, delivering a third straight 25-basis-point increase to the official cash rate that has lifted the benchmark to 4.35%. But a leading finance industry analyst is sounding the alarm: the full weight of these successive hikes has yet to hit struggling household budgets, with the most severe mortgage pain still on the horizon.

    Following its two-day policy meeting, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) announced the latest rate increase last Tuesday, with eight of the nine-member governing board supporting the hike and one member pushing to hold rates steady at 4.1%. The move follows matching 25-basis-point hikes in February and March, bringing the cumulative increase this cycle to 75 basis points. This puts rates back exactly where they stood in January 2025, before the RBA delivered three rate cuts through that year. The RBA justified the move by pointing to persistent inflation, which remains at 4.6% – far above the central bank’s 2-3% target range. Officials signaled future hikes remain on the table, noting they will closely monitor incoming economic data and shifting global economic conditions.

    RBA Governor Michele Bullock acknowledged that geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, specifically the disruption to oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz – which carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil consumption – have already strained household budgets through higher fuel costs. Still, she argued that allowing inflation to remain entrenched would create far worse outcomes. “Australians are poorer because of this shock to oil prices. We are poorer and there is no way out of that, but the trade off is much worse,” Bullock said. “Now I understand this is a really difficult time for households who are already facing higher fuel prices and other cost of living pressures, but we must get on top of inflation now so that it doesn’t get away from us.”

    Sally Tindall, director of data insights at finance comparison platform Canstar, explained why the full impact of the three hikes has not yet reached mortgage holders. While banks calculate accrued interest on a daily basis, they do not immediately demand higher repayments from customers. Instead, lenders send formal notifications of changed repayment amounts and give borrowers a grace period to adjust their budgets before the new higher payments take effect. Among Australia’s largest lenders, Tindall noted Commonwealth Bank gives customers a minimum of 20 days from notification to the first higher payment, while the other three major banks require at least 30 days. In practice, this staggered implementation means it takes two to three months for all rate hikes to flow through to borrower repayments. As a result, many households are still only paying the higher rate from the first February hike, and have yet to absorb the increases from March and the latest May move. Tindall added that while the delayed timeline can confuse borrowers, it ultimately works in consumers’ favor by giving them breathing room to adjust their finances.

    To date, more than 40 Australian lenders have confirmed they will pass the full 25-basis-point May hike on to mortgage holders, a group that includes Australia’s four largest banks: Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB and ANZ. All four big banks will implement the higher rates from May 15. It is expected that smaller lenders, many of which do not make public announcements about rate changes, will follow suit. Major bank leaders have acknowledged the added pressure on households and highlighted support available for struggling borrowers, alongside increased rates for savers that can offset some cost-of-living pressures. “We recognise many customers are already managing higher living costs, and further rate increases could add to that pressure,” said Angus Sullivan, group executive of retail banking at Commonwealth Bank. “Our focus is on supporting customers to stay on top of their finances, with practical tools, clear guidance and access to help when it is needed.”

    Westpac chief executive of consumer Carolyn McCann echoed that commitment, noting that ongoing Middle East tensions have amplified global economic uncertainty and inflationary pressures. “Right now our focus is on helping customers through the current economic environment. We encourage customers who are feeling stretched to reach out early. We have a range of support options available and our teams are ready to help,” she said. “We’ve also increased deposit rates which will provide some relief for savers who are navigating higher living costs.”

    Canstar’s analysis puts the tangible cost of the latest hike in perspective: for a borrower holding a $600,000 mortgage with 25 years remaining on their loan, the May increase will add roughly $91 to monthly repayments. When combined with the two prior hikes, the cumulative increase pushes average monthly repayments up by $272 from pre-hike levels. If rates hold steady for the next 12 months, that adds up to an extra $3,265 in annual mortgage costs compared to a scenario with no 2026 hikes.

    Even though rates have only returned to 2025 levels, Tindall warned that today’s economic landscape means the burden is far heavier for households. Cost-of-living pressures have intensified dramatically over the past 16 months: grocery prices have climbed, national electricity rebates have expired, and global oil market disruptions have sent fuel prices soaring. “The pressure is actually higher this time around,” Tindall said. “For some households it will be a mountain that is too high to climb and they won’t have the funds for it.”

    Tindall noted that Australian households are currently split along sharply different financial lines: some borrowers have built equity buffers and are ahead on their mortgage repayments, while others are already teetering under the weight of soaring living costs. For borrowers struggling to meet new repayment requirements, she advised reaching out to their lender directly or contacting the free, independent national debt hotline to access support.

  • Militia kill at least 69 in NE DR Congo: local, security sources

    Militia kill at least 69 in NE DR Congo: local, security sources

    A brutal militia assault in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s restless northeastern province of Ituri has claimed the lives of at least 69 people, according to local and security sources who spoke to Agence France-Presse on Saturday. The massacre marks just the latest in a prolonged string of violent incidents that have rocked the gold-rich border region, which has grappled with years of destabilizing armed conflict.

    The attack, carried out by gunmen aligned with the Cooperative for the Development of Congo (Codeco) militia, was actually carried out at the end of April, sources confirmed. Ongoing instability driven by the persistent presence of Codeco fighters in the area prevented recovery teams from reaching the site to retrieve victims’ remains for multiple days, delaying the announcement of the full death toll.

    While security sources have confirmed a confirmed death toll of 69, Dieudonne Losa, a local civil protection official, told AFP the actual number of fatalities exceeds 70. A full accounting of victims is still ongoing as access to the area remains restricted.

    Codeco frames itself as a defender of the rights of the Lendu community, a population primarily made up of agricultural farmers, in long-running tensions with the Hema community, whose members largely work as pastoral herders. A second armed faction, the Convention for the Popular Revolution (CRP), operates in the province and says it advocates for the Hema community.

    The two groups are only among several armed actors active in the region. One of the most prominent is the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), a faction formed by exiled Ugandan rebels that has sworn loyalty to the Islamic State group. Just two days before Saturday’s announcement of the Codeco attack, local and security sources reported that ADF fighters had killed at least 36 people across two days of assaults in Ituri and neighboring North Kivu province.

    Since 2021, the Ugandan People’s Defence Force has operated alongside the Congolese national military in northern North Kivu and across Ituri to coordinate counter-insurgency operations against the ADF. A notable complicating dynamic in the conflict is that the Congolese army has occasionally deployed Codeco fighters as auxiliary forces in its operations against other armed groups.

    Earlier on Saturday, the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUSCO) issued a public warning of an accelerating “deadly” wave of attacks targeting civilian populations across the country’s unstable eastern borderlands. “Dozens of civilians have been killed in recent days” across Ituri, North Kivu, and South Kivu, the UN mission said, declining to share further details on the incidents at the time of the statement.

    Eastern DRC, a region teeming with valuable untapped mineral reserves, has been engulfed in overlapping cycles of armed conflict for nearly 30 years, involving dozens of militias, rebel factions, and national military forces. Civilians have consistently borne the brunt of the violence, with thousands displaced annually and hundreds killed in targeted attacks across the region.

  • Israeli settlers force Palestinian family to exhume father’s body in West Bank

    Israeli settlers force Palestinian family to exhume father’s body in West Bank

    In a shocking incident that has drawn widespread international rebuke, a Palestinian family was compelled by Israeli settlers to disinter the body of their late father from a West Bank cemetery on Friday, deepening ongoing concerns over escalating settler violence in the occupied territory. The confrontation unfolded near the recently reestablished Israeli settlement of Sa-Nur, located close to the city of Jenin. Settlers claimed the burial site, situated roughly 300 meters from the settlement outpost, violated their unstated proximity rules – a demand that ignored the fact the family of the deceased, Hussein Asasa, had secured all required Israeli government permits for the burial.

    According to reporting from Israeli outlet Haaretz, settlers immediately began digging at the cemetery shortly after the funeral ceremony concluded, triggering tense physical confrontations between the settlers and local Palestinian residents who gathered to protect the grave. The Israeli military confirmed it dispatched forces to the scene, where personnel seized the digging tools the settlers had brought to excavate the site. Despite this intervention, the Asasa family ultimately said they had no choice but to remove the body themselves and reburry it at a separate cemetery, all under armed Israeli military escort. During the traumatic process, settlers pelted the grieving family with stones as they carried out the exhumation.

    The United Nations’ top human rights official in Palestine condemned the act in stark terms. Ajith Sunghay, head of the UN human rights office in the Palestinian territories, called the incident appalling, noting it was a clear example of the systematic dehumanization of Palestinians unfolding across the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). “It spares no one, dead or alive,” Sunghay said of the ongoing pattern of abuse.

    Settler violence against Palestinian communities in the occupied West Bank is not a new development, but experts and local authorities have documented a dramatic surge in attacks since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023. Today, settlers carry out near-daily assaults on Palestinian villages and population centers, ranging from property vandalism and arson to forced displacement and violent physical attacks, many of which involve the use of firearms.

    Just last month, a deadly settler attack on a school northeast of Ramallah left two Palestinians dead, including a 15-year-old teenage student. Data collected by the Palestinian Authority’s Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission underscores the scale of the escalating violence: since October 2023, at least 50 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli settlers, with 15 of those fatalities recorded in the current year alone. The incident has renewed international calls for accountability for settler violence and protections for Palestinian civilians living under occupation.

  • Iran wants team members who served in the Revolutionary Guard to get visas for the World Cup

    Iran wants team members who served in the Revolutionary Guard to get visas for the World Cup

    DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — In a firm announcement made Saturday, the Football Federation Islamic Republic of Iran has confirmed that the country’s national men’s soccer team will “definitely” take part in the 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, while calling on the three host nations to address Tehran’s key concerns over cross-border travel and fair treatment of the delegation.

    Per reporting from Iranian state media, federation president Mehdi Taj outlined a core demand: all members of the Iranian squad and technical staff, particularly those who completed mandatory military service with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), must be granted entry visas without obstruction or delay.

    Iran’s participation comes against a backdrop of extreme geopolitical tension. The Islamic Republic currently holds a fragile ceasefire with the U.S. following a February 28 series of attacks on Iran by the U.S. and Israel that escalated into open conflict. Additionally, Iranian citizens have long faced broad travel restrictions imposed by the Trump administration that remain in place.

    In the official statement carried by Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency, delivered Friday, Taj confirmed that Tehran had submitted formal conditions for its participation, including binding guarantees for visa access, on-ground security, and respectful treatment of all Iranian players and officials. He emphasized that Iran would compete “without retreating from our beliefs, culture and convictions.”

    Taj’s comments follow a high-profile incident last month, when Canadian border authorities denied him entry ahead of a scheduled FIFA Congress, citing his reported past links to the IRGC. Both the U.S. and Canada have formally designated the IRGC as a terrorist organization, a labeling that Iran rejects fiercely.

    This is not the first time visa concerns for IRGC conscripted personnel have emerged. The issue could directly impact one of Iran’s star players: team captain and star striker Mehdi Taremi, who completed his mandatory military service with the Guard. In Iran, mandatory conscription assigns recruits to the IRGC, national army, or police force largely at random, meaning many young Iranians have no choice in their service assignment.

    Taj has repeatedly pushed FIFA to deliver formal assurances that Iranian national symbols — including the country’s flag and national anthem — will be treated with full respect across all World Cup venues and events.

    Iran has been drawn into Group G for the 2026 tournament, where it will face off against Belgium, New Zealand and Egypt. The team will kick off its World Cup campaign against New Zealand in Inglewood, California, a city adjacent to Los Angeles in the U.S.

    This cycle marks Iran’s fourth consecutive World Cup qualification, and its seventh appearance at the tournament overall. To date, the Iranian national team has never advanced past the group stage of the World Cup. Currently ranked 21st in the official FIFA global rankings, Iran lost only a single qualifying match throughout the Asian qualification process, making it one of the most in-form teams heading into the 2026 competition.

  • Mexican parents criticise ending school year a month early for World Cup

    Mexican parents criticise ending school year a month early for World Cup

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted by Mexico, the United States and Canada approaches, a controversial government plan to cut the academic year one month short has sparked fierce backlash from parents, business groups and regional authorities across Mexico, forcing President Claudia Sheinbaum to soften the original announcement and rebrand it as a non-final proposal.

    The initiative, first unveiled publicly by Mexican Education Secretary Mario Delgado last Thursday, would have wrapped up the current school year on June 5 – a full 3 weeks ahead of the traditional end date. Delgado justified the move by pointing to two key expected challenges during the tournament, which runs from June 11 to July 19 across the three North American nations: crippling traffic congestion from an expected surge in domestic and international travel, and an forecasted extreme heatwave across much of Mexico. He added that the decision had been reached “unanimously” together with state-level education authorities, and that the next academic year would still launch as scheduled on August 31, with a two-week pre-term learning reinforcement period designed to prevent students from falling behind on coursework.

    The policy change triggered immediate anger from Mexican families, who were suddenly forced to scramble to find last-minute childcare for an extra month of summer break. Many parents also raised concerns about disrupted end-of-year academic assessments and the heavy financial burden of unplanned summer activities for children. Speaking to local newspaper El Universal, one parent questioned the rushed handling of student evaluations, noting that students would now be graded based on incomplete coursework, while another criticized the policy for prioritizing tourist convenience over working families’ livelihoods, asking “They want the city empty for tourists, but what are we supposed to do for income?”

    The National Union of Parents issued a formal condemnation of what it called a “unilateral decision”, labeling the use of the World Cup as a justification for cutting classes “inexcusable”. The union pointed out that World Cup matches will only be held in three Mexican cities, questioning why the policy would disrupt the education of nearly 23 million students nationwide under what it called an “absurd pretext”.

    Business groups also joined the criticism. Coparmex, Mexico’s leading employers’ association, warned that the sudden unplanned schedule change would create widespread uncertainty for both working parents and businesses, and called on individual state governments to implement their own localized solutions to address heatwave and travel disruptions, while minimizing damage to household finances and national economic activity.

    Even Delgado’s claim of unanimous state support quickly fell apart. Three state governments publicly spoke out against the plan – including two that are actually hosting World Cup matches – with one state confirming it would retain the original academic calendar regardless of the federal proposal.

    Facing this broad wave of opposition, President Sheinbaum used her daily Friday press briefing to walk back the original announcement, reframing the plan as a draft proposal still open to review and revision. “Since many Mexicans love soccer and are looking forward to the World Cup, this proposal was put forward to bring forward the holiday break,” Sheinbaum told reporters. “But we also have to take into account the school days of our boys and girls. So it is just a proposal; the final schedule has not been set yet, and we will wait before making a definitive decision.” She also noted that the idea originated from teachers’ unions and state education authorities, rather than being initiated by the federal government.

    The controversy over the school calendar is not the only challenge Mexico has faced ahead of the 2026 tournament. Earlier this year, a government crackdown on violent drug cartels that resulted in the death of the leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) sparked a wave of retaliatory violence across the country, raising international concerns about visitor safety. One of Mexico’s host cities is Guadalajara, the capital of Jalisco state and the epicenter of the recent unrest. Sheinbaum has repeatedly stressed that there is “no risk” to visiting football fans, while FIFA President Gianni Infantino has said he feels “very reassured” by Mexico’s security preparations. To address safety concerns, the Mexican government plans to deploy thousands of additional security personnel to host city streets throughout the duration of the tournament.

  • Sinner opens Italian Open account, Sabalenka suffers shock early exit

    Sinner opens Italian Open account, Sabalenka suffers shock early exit

    The 2024 Italian Open in Rome delivered its first slate of dramatic upsets and statement wins on Saturday, as men’s world No. 1 Jannik Sinner lived up to massive home crowd expectations to launch his bid for a historic title, while two of the women’s top seeds suffered stunning early exits.

    Sinner, the 24-year-old Italian carrying the hopes of a nation that has not seen an Italian men’s champion at the Foro Italico since Adriano Panatta lifted the trophy 50 years ago, got his campaign off to a flawless start with a 6-3, 6-4 straight-sets victory over Austria’s Sebastian Ofner. The world No. 1 extended his incredible winning streak to 24 consecutive matches, wrapping up the contest in just 100 minutes in breezy Rome conditions, barely tested against his outmatched opponent. Even two brief stoppages in the second set to treat ill spectators did not disrupt his rhythm, with Sinner even finding reason to smile through the interruptions.

    The victory pushes Sinner into the third round, where he will face either Australia’s Alexei Popyrin or Czech teen Jakub Mensik. Buoyed by Sinner’s win, other Italian men also delivered strong results on home soil Saturday: 2023 Davis Cup winner Flavio Cobolli defeated France’s Terence Atmane 7-6(7/1), 6-3, while world No. 64 Mattia Bellucci upset 24th seed Tomas Martin Etcheverry 5-7, 6-2, 6-3 to book his spot in the fourth round. With last year’s champion Carlos Alcaraz sidelined from the tournament, Sinner enters the event as the heavy favorite to go one step further than his 2023 run, where he fell to Alcaraz in the final, and notch a record-extending fifth straight Masters 1000 title.

    Several other men’s story lines unfolded Saturday: former US Open champion Daniil Medvedev received a walkover into the third round after his scheduled opponent Tomas Machac withdrew from the tournament due to an unspecified illness, pushing back Medvedev’s opening match. Fourth seed Felix Auger-Aliassime suffered a shock second-round exit, falling to world No. 44 Mariano Navone of Argentina in straight sets 7-6(7/4), 7-6(7/5).

    The biggest story of the day, however, came on the women’s side, where world No. 1 and pre-tournament favorite Aryna Sabalenka was ousted in a stunning third-round upset by Romania’s Sorana Cirstea, 2-6, 6-3, 7-5. The result marks Sabalenka’s earliest tournament exit since the 2023 Qatar Open, and ends her bid for a first Italian Open title in Rome. Sabalenka started the match with a blistering first set, but dropped her level dramatically as the match went on, visibly frustrated by her performance and hampered by physical discomfort that forced her to call a medical timeout for lower back and left hip issues. The injury concern casts uncertainty over her fitness ahead of the French Open, scheduled to start later this month in Paris.

    For Cirstea, the upset marks the first win over a reigning world No. 1 in her 18-year professional career. She will advance to face Linda Noskova in the fourth round.

    Sabalenka’s early exit was followed by another upset of a home favorite: defending women’s champion Jasmine Paolini saw her title defense end in the third round at the hands of Belgium’s Elise Mertens, who claimed a 4-6, 7-6(7/5), 6-3 come-from-behind win. Paolini, who came into the match holding three match points on Mertens’ serve in the second set, failed to convert any of her chances, dropped the tiebreak, and could not recover her momentum in the decider. The result will push Paolini out of the women’s top 10 world rankings, extending her current slump that has seen her fail to reach the fourth round in four consecutive tournaments.

    Not all top seeds fell Saturday: reigning French Open champion Coco Gauff battled past Argentina’s qualifier Solana Sierra in a three-set thriller, 5-7, 6-0, 6-4, to advance to the next round and keep her Italian Open title bid alive.