作者: admin

  • RAF jet carrying defence secretary has signal jammed near Russian border

    RAF jet carrying defence secretary has signal jammed near Russian border

    A Royal Air Force aircraft carrying UK Defence Secretary John Healey suffered a deliberate GPS signal jamming attack while flying near the Russian border earlier this week, in an incident that has further inflamed already fraught tensions between the West and Moscow.

    The disruption occurred Thursday as Healey returned to the United Kingdom following a working visit to Estonia, where he met British troops deployed as part of a NATO military exercise close to the Russian frontier. The Times was the first outlet to break news of the incident, multiple defense sources familiar with the matter confirmed.

    Intelligence assessments point to Russia as the perpetrator of the attack, according to initial reporting. The jamming disabled the aircraft’s primary GPS navigation system for the entire three-hour duration of the flight, forcing pilots to switch to backup alternative navigation technologies to complete their journey safely. Notably, this is not the first such incident recorded in the region: in 2024, another RAF jet transporting then-Defence Secretary Grant Shapps also experienced GPS jamming while operating near Russian territory.

    At the time of writing, it remains unclear whether Healey was specifically targeted for the attack. The Times noted that the flight’s planned route was publicly visible on commercial aircraft tracking platforms prior to departure, leaving open the possibility that the jamming was part of broader, unspecified Russian activity along the border rather than an intentional strike against the UK’s top defense official. The UK Ministry of Defence has not yet released an official statement on the incident, and declined to comment when contacted by reporters.

    The jamming incident comes just one day after new details emerged of a dangerous, separate air encounter between Russian and British military aircraft over the Black Sea last month. On that occasion, two Russian warplanes carried out repeated, aggressive interceptions of an RAF Rivet Joint surveillance aircraft in international airspace.

    According to the UK Ministry of Defense, the interception was the most aggressive Russian action against British aircraft since 2022, when a Russian pilot fired an air-to-air missile near a British Rivet Joint in the same area in a widely condemned incident. Last month’s encounter saw a Russian Su-35 fighter approach the British surveillance jet close enough to trigger the RAF plane’s onboard emergency systems and knock out its autopilot. A second Russian Su-27 fighter conducted six dangerous low-altitude passes directly in front of the RAF aircraft, coming within just six meters of the plane’s nose at its closest point.

    During his visit to Estonia earlier this week, Healey publicly addressed the Black Sea incident, praising the “outstanding professionalism” of the RAF crew that handled the unsafe interception, while condemning Russia’s “unacceptable” aggressive behavior in international airspace.

    Estonia, a Baltic member of NATO, hosts a contingent of British troops as part of the alliance’s collective defense posture along its eastern flank, deployed in response to heightened security threats following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. British service members are currently participating in large-scale NATO military exercises in the region designed to deter further Russian expansion, making the jamming incident a clear show of force amid ongoing standoff between Moscow and the Western alliance.

  • She was told to marry in a country which bans girls’ education. So she got in a taxi and fled

    She was told to marry in a country which bans girls’ education. So she got in a taxi and fled

    Five years have passed since the Taliban administration implemented a sweeping ban on secondary and higher education for girls across Afghanistan, a policy that has systematically dismantled millions of young women’s aspirations and narrowed their life options to a single socially expected path: early marriage. For 19-year-old Alia—whose real name has been withheld to protect her from retaliation—escaping that fate required a dangerous, hundreds-of-miles journey from her rural home in Daykundi to the capital city of Kabul last year.

    Traveling by taxi with her female cousin, the pair fully covered in line with the Taliban’s strict gendered dress rules that leave only eyes exposed, their trip flouted a separate regulation banning women from making long-distance journeys without a male family escort. At any checkpoint, Taliban enforcers could have stopped them and imposed harsh punishment—but by an unforeseen stroke of luck, the pair slipped through all checkpoints without incident and reached Kabul safely.

    Alia lied to her family about her purpose for travel, telling them she planned to meet old friends and former classmates. The truth, she reveals, was stark: if she had remained in Daykundi, her family would have forced her to marry immediately. Once in Kabul, Alia put an alternative plan into action: she enrolled in a private short-term English language course, one of the only limited learning options available to girls who have finished primary school in modern Afghanistan, alongside religious madrasas. Neither of these alternatives, however, can replace the structured formal education that girls were once guaranteed.

    Alia’s case is rare for two reasons: not only does it showcase extraordinary courage to defy the status quo, but her family also has the financial means to support her studies in Kabul—a privilege out of reach for most Afghans, three-quarters of whom cannot cover their basic daily needs according to United Nations data. While Alia’s parents supported her dream of becoming a pilot before the education ban, they too have been worn down by the constraints of life under Taliban rule. Today, they urge her to marry, arguing that there is no other future for her when school, university and formal work are all closed off.

    Alia has already received multiple marriage proposals, and she lives in constant fear that she will eventually be forced to accept one that will end her dreams forever. “Some families can be very restrictive. It is possible they could tell me to forget my dreams. I don’t feel positive at all about it,” she says. Even so, her determination to resist remains unshakable. “If my family don’t force me to get married, I will wait. I will resist it until my very last breath.”

    For thousands of other girls across Afghanistan, that resistance has already failed. In a sparse, small apartment in western Kabul, 22-year-old Shama shares the story of the future she lost. If the Taliban had not seized power and closed girls’ schools, she would be nearly finished with her education and on track to achieve her lifelong dream of becoming a doctor. Instead, at 18, just four years after the ban took effect, her widowed mother Kamila had no choice but to push her into marriage. Today, Shama is the mother of two young daughters, and her own dreams of professional and personal fulfillment remain unfulfilled.

    Kamila, who worked as a cleaner to fund her daughters’ education after her husband died six years ago, says she felt immense pressure from Taliban enforcers to marry off Shama before she drew unwanted negative attention as an unmarried young woman. “I had wanted her to be educated, work and contribute to society. I am illiterate so I am like a blind person. But I wanted my girls to learn. She had so many dreams. But it didn’t happen for her,” Kamila explains.

    Shama, who was treated well by her husband, still carries the permanent grief of being barred from reaching her potential. “Having a husband is not the only dream a woman has. She needs to stand on her own two feet first, become independent and then she can marry and start a family. But I went into this new life with none of that. My dreams remain unfulfilled,” she says. Even small, everyday moments trigger her pain: when she watches a movie that shows women working or studying, she is flooded with stress and longing. “I feel like I am trapped in my home. I only live for my children,” she adds.

    Shama’s 18-year-old sister Nora now waits in fear for the same fate. “I’m too young to get married. I want to continue my education. It’s like being in prison. I fear going out because of the government, and at home my mother tells me I must get married,” says Nora, who still dreams of returning to the classroom she was forced to leave. She has no hope that the Taliban will ever lift the ban, even after years of waiting for a reversal.

    Since the Taliban returned to power in 2021, government officials have offered a rotating series of justifications for the ongoing education ban, with no clear timeline for reopening schools. In a September 2021 interview, a Taliban spokesman initially promised schools would reopen soon, saying the government was only working to improve security conditions. A year later, the explanation shifted to claims that religious scholars had raised concerns about girls traveling to and from school. By 2024, officials were simply deferring the question to the country’s supreme leadership. When the BBC recently asked deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat to justify the ongoing ban, he deflected the question to the Ministry of Education, which never responded to repeated requests for comment.

    While internal divisions over the ban have been reported within the Taliban government, the country’s supreme leader has only hardened his stance against lifting restrictions in recent years. For the girls who lost access to education the day the ban went into effect, that day remains etched in their memory. Alia recalls: “All I did was cry and sob the whole day and night. I could not sleep for a week. I felt like I was walking around like a dead body. When I see men my age who have graduated and are going to university – I feel very bad, I feel like I am burning in hell.”

    The education ban is just one of dozens of sweeping restrictions placed on women and girls by the Taliban, with other rules barring women from most public sector jobs, limiting their ability to travel, and confining them largely to the home. In recent weeks, the Taliban government codified new rules that effectively legalize child marriage, allowing a minor’s silence to be interpreted as consent to wed. Fitrat defends the Taliban’s record, pointing to thousands of business permits issued for women and the government’s claims to have resolved hundreds of cases of forced marriage and inheritance discrimination. But on-the-ground reporting confirms that forced and underage marriage rates are rising sharply, directly driven by the lack of education options for girls.

    Today, many Afghan women and girls report a growing sense of abandonment by the international community, as the systemic discrimination they face has faded from global headlines. “If we hadn’t been forgotten, then something would surely have been done by now,” Alia says. For Kamila, the lost opportunities for her daughters represent a complete erasure of the future she fought to give them. She has a message for mothers across the globe who live in countries where girls can still freely learn and work: “In a world where your daughters are allowed to study and work, let them do it. Let them become independent. Here in Afghanistan, it’s over for us.”

    According to UN projections, if the education ban remains in place through 2030, more than two million girls will have been denied a secondary education, leaving Afghanistan with one of the lowest female literacy rates on Earth.

  • World Central Kitchen halves Gaza meal aid as Iran war drives up costs

    World Central Kitchen halves Gaza meal aid as Iran war drives up costs

    The largest hot meal provider in the besieged Palestinian enclave of Gaza, World Central Kitchen (WCK), has been forced to slash its daily hot meal distribution by 50 percent, a decision driven by skyrocketing food and fuel prices that stem from regional spillover effects of the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran launched in February. The non-profit made the announcement this week, with NPR first reporting the development Thursday, and warned that ballooning operational expenses have eliminated any possibility of sustaining the organization’s previous high levels of humanitarian aid.

    Prior to the cut, WCK was producing roughly 1 million hot meals daily for hungry Gaza residents. That number has now dropped to 500,000 meals per day. The scaling back of aid comes at a moment when nearly the entire population of Gaza is already dependent on external humanitarian assistance, after more than two years of Israeli military attacks and a crippling air, land and sea blockade that have completely destroyed the enclave’s local food production systems and collapsed its already fragile economy. This is not the first sign of strain for the organization: earlier this month, WCK publicly noted that growing financial pressure was already pushing it to reduce the scope of its operations.

    In an official statement, the organization clarified that it would continue to deliver hundreds of thousands of hot meals each day to vulnerable families across Gaza, and maintain one of the largest food relief operations currently active anywhere in the world. But the group emphasized that its 1 million daily meal peak, reached at the height of emergency response efforts, was never a sustainable output for the organization to maintain long term.

    “Our core mission is emergency food relief, not solving long-term food insecurity for an entire besieged population,” the statement read. “The long-term responsibility of feeding Gaza cannot rest on the shoulders of one organization alone. The people of Gaza have lost their homes, their livelihoods, and their entire economy. The world must step up – not just issue empty statements about the plight of the Palestinian people. Governments, global institutions, and international partners need to commit the sustained, reliable funding that this catastrophic crisis demands.”

    To date, it remains uncertain whether other aid groups operating in the enclave will be able to cover the gap left by WCK’s cuts. The United Nations has already issued repeated warnings that its own agencies working in Gaza are also grappling with severe funding shortfalls and rising operational costs, even as data shows one in every five people in Gaza currently survives on just a single meal per day.

    Since Israel launched its large-scale military campaign in October 2023, Gaza has been pushed into a state of extreme food insecurity and full-blown humanitarian catastrophe. A US-brokered ceasefire announced in October 2025 was meant to halt active hostilities, lift the years-long blockade, and allow unimpeded flows of aid, food, and life-saving medicine into the territory. To date, however, Israel has systematically violated the terms of the ceasefire agreement, largely maintained the blockade, and kept critical supplies of fuel, food, and medicine at severely depleted levels. Active military operations including air strikes and artillery shelling have also continued across the enclave: more than 800 Palestinians have been killed since the ceasefire was announced, bringing the total death toll from Israeli operations since October 2023 to more than 72,700, with over 172,000 more people wounded, many of whom lack access to adequate medical care.

  • Senegal parliament speaker steps down in political crisis

    Senegal parliament speaker steps down in political crisis

    A fresh escalation of Senegal’s simmering political crisis unfolded Sunday, when National Assembly Speaker El Malick Ndiaye announced his resignation just 48 hours after his close political ally, former Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko, was removed from office by President Bassirou Diomaye Faye. The unexpected departure opens a direct path for the ousted premier to seek the speaker’s position, a move that would put Sonko at the head of the legislature and escalate his power struggle with President Faye.

    An official government notice released late Sunday confirmed that all members of parliament have been called to an extraordinary plenary session scheduled for Tuesday morning. The session’s agenda includes two critical votes: first, to restore Sonko’s parliamentary membership, and second, to elect a new speaker to fill Ndiaye’s vacant post.

    The ongoing rupture between Faye and Sonko has thrown the West African nation, which is already grappling with a crippling national debt crisis, into unprecedented political uncertainty. The split comes just months after the pair led their shared Patriotic African Party for the People (Pastef) to a landslide victory in the 2024 general elections, running on a populist platform promising sweeping anti-corruption reforms and a break from the politics of the previous administration.

    Faye’s ascension to the presidency was entirely reliant on Sonko’s political clout. Sonko, a fiery populist who built a massive, passionate following among Senegal’s disillusioned young population, was widely expected to win the March 2024 presidential vote before he was barred from running over a controversial defamation conviction. He threw his full support behind Faye, his former protégé, clearing the way for Faye’s election victory.

    For months, simmering tensions between the two former allies boiled beneath the surface, until they spilled into public view and collapsed their governing alliance. Sonko launched repeated public criticisms of Faye, accusing him of failing to show leadership when Sonko faced pushback from political opponents. He also lambasted the slow pace of corruption investigations into senior officials from former president Macky Sall’s administration, a key campaign promise Pastef made to voters. The pair also clashed over fundamental policy approaches to managing Senegal’s crippling sovereign debt, deepening their rift. On Friday, Faye formally removed Sonko from his post as prime minister.

    Within hours of Sonko’s dismissal, hundreds of his loyal supporters gathered outside his Dakar residence to demonstrate their backing. Sonko remains the undisputed, popular leader of Pastef, which holds a commanding majority in the National Assembly – a fact that leaves Faye’s ability to govern in serious question.

    “Cohabitation between President Faye and the Pastef majority in parliament is going to be extremely complicated,” explained Babacar Ndiaye, research director at West African think tank WATHI. Ndiaye noted that Faye is required to nominate a new prime minister to replace Sonko, and that nominee must receive parliamentary approval within three months of their appointment. “If deputies choose to introduce a motion of no confidence against the new government, they have the numbers to pass it,” he added.

    Complicating the political landscape further, President Faye cannot dissolve the National Assembly until November 2026, two full years after the last parliamentary election. A recent electoral reform passed by parliament several weeks ago also overturned Sonko’s ineligibility for public office, meaning he is now legally allowed to run for president. This sets the stage for a potential head-to-head matchup between the two former allies in the next presidential election, if the rift is not resolved before then.

  • Spurs win to relegate West Ham as Guardiola, Salah say Premier League farewells

    Spurs win to relegate West Ham as Guardiola, Salah say Premier League farewells

    The final matchday of the English Premier League season delivered a rollercoaster of emotion on Sunday, as Tottenham Hotspur secured their top-flight survival at West Ham United’s expense, while two of the league’s most iconic figures said tearful goodbyes and Arsenal celebrated their long-awaited title win.

    Tottenham entered their final home fixture against Everton knowing even a single point would likely be enough to stay up, holding a two-point advantage over West Ham and a far superior goal difference that would swing survival in their favour if results finished level. It took until the stroke of halftime for the pressure that had built across the entire season for the north London side to break, when Joao Palhinha put Spurs ahead. The Portuguese midfielder’s initial header cannoned off the goalpost, but he reacted quickest to poke the rebound into the net, and was immediately swarmed by jubilant teammates.

    A few miles across east London, West Ham delivered a dominant 3-0 victory over Leeds United at the London Stadium, with goals from Valentin Castellano, Jarrod Bowen and Callum Wilson. But the three points proved too little, too late: Tottenham held on to their 1-0 lead, sending West Ham down to the Championship for next season alongside already-relegated Burnley and Wolves. The Hammers, who have been a Premier League mainstay since earning promotion in 2012, will now plying their trade in England’s second tier.

    “This day for us is much more than winning a game,” match-winner Palhinha told BBC Sport after the full-time whistle. “A lot of people depend their lives on this club. It was a tough season but I think this season can help for the future. We can take a lot from it even if we didn’t reach the level Tottenham should.” Tottenham, ranked the ninth-richest football club in the world, have enjoyed a late-season upturn in form under interim manager Roberto De Zerbi, who joined the club in late March as their third head coach of a turbulent campaign. For West Ham manager Nuno Espirito Santo, the disappointment was unavoidable after his side did everything they could to claw out survival. “We knew it was going to be difficult, it was not in our hands,” he told Sky Sports. “We did our part and we hoped for the best — it didn’t happen. We have to pass the sad moment that we are living.”

    The day was as much about emotional farewells as it was about league outcomes, as Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola took charge of his final match at the Etihad Stadium after 10 seasons of unprecedented success. The Catalan coach confirmed last Friday he would leave the club at the end of the season, bringing to an end a decade that delivered six Premier League titles, a Champions League trophy and a host of other domestic and European honours. Before kickoff, City fans unfurled a massive banner over the stands bearing Guardiola’s portrait, with the words “Game Changer” and “History Maker” emblazoned across it. The match ended in a 2-1 win for visitors Aston Villa, the newly crowned Europa League champions, who secured fourth place in the table and a spot in next season’s Champions League with two goals from Ollie Watkins after Antoine Semenyo put City ahead. Addressing the crowd after the final whistle, an emotional Guardiola said: “In the next years, if you see me in the streets in the United States or Europe or somewhere and you are a Man City fan, come to me and hug me. I will need it.”

    Guardiola was not the only Liverpool legend saying goodbye. Mohamed Salah and Andy Robertson played their final match for the Reds, who finished fifth in the table after a 1-1 draw with Brentford, enough to secure the final Champions League spot for next season. Before kickoff, Liverpool’s coaching staff and squad formed a guard of honour for the pair, who were later embraced by club icons Kenny Dalglish and Ian Rush. “I think I cried more than in my whole life,” Salah told Sky Sports. “I’m not really an emotional guy. We lived our youth here, sharing everything from the beginning to the end. We put this club back where it belongs.”

    For Arsenal, the final day was all celebration, as the Gunners lifted the Premier League trophy in front of travelling fans at Selhurst Park after a 2-1 win over Crystal Palace. It is Arsenal’s first Premier League title since 2004, ending a 20-year wait for the top-flight crown after three consecutive second-place finishes. Manager Mikel Arteta admitted he had doubted whether the club would break their drought during those near-misses. “That was beautiful,” he said. “Look at the joy of all of the people, they have been waiting for this for so long. We have had difficult moments along the way but it is all worth it when you see that kind of reaction.”

    Elsewhere, newly appointed Chelsea manager Xabi Alonso will have no European football to contend with next season after the Blues, playing with 10 men for much of the match, fell to a 2-1 away defeat to Sunderland. The win lifted Sunderland into next season’s Europa League alongside Bournemouth, while Brighton & Hove Albion will compete in the Conference League.

  • ‘No Eid’ in Gaza for third year as livestock crisis erases holiday rituals

    ‘No Eid’ in Gaza for third year as livestock crisis erases holiday rituals

    For generations, the weeks leading up to Eid al-Adha in Gaza have been defined by the bustle of livestock markets, where breeders showcase healthy herds for families preparing to fulfill one of Islam’s most sacred religious obligations. This year, that familiar rhythm is gone entirely – reduced to a distant memory by the ongoing destruction of Gaza’s agricultural sector under Israeli military operations and a crippling, long-running blockade.

    Mazen al-Jerjawi, once one of Gaza City’s most prominent commercial livestock breeders, now operates a small café, scraping by on sales of frozen meat that trickles into the besieged enclave under strict Israeli entry limits. Where he once sold upwards of 200 head of cattle and sheep ahead of each Eid, his pastures and barns now sit empty. “No live animals are being allowed into Gaza at all,” he explained in an interview with Middle East Eye. “Israel treats the people of Gaza as if they are living here temporarily, and what is allowed is merely to ‘keep things going’ at a minimal level.”

    Eid al-Adha, one of Islam’s holiest annual celebrations, centers on the ritual sacrifice of an animal for Muslims who can afford the practice, with the meat distributed equally among family members, neighbors, and low-income community members. Before the outbreak of full-scale war in October 2023, Gaza typically imported 40,000 to 60,000 sheep and calves annually in advance of the holiday to meet consumer demand. 2025 marks the third consecutive year that Gazan Palestinians have been barred from observing this central tradition, as Israeli military actions and the ongoing blockade continue to dismantle the enclave’s basic infrastructure and economy.

    Official data from Gaza’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry confirms that more than 90 percent of the enclave’s entire livestock sector has been destroyed or rendered inoperable since the war began, a toll that has rippled across every layer of Gazan society. Along with the annihilation of local herds, Israel’s total ban on live animal imports has snapped already fragile supply chains, pushing what remains of the industry to the brink of total collapse.

    The impact on pricing has been catastrophic. Before the war, a single sacrificial sheep cost between $500 and $600. Today, the handful of surviving private animals that reach the market can fetch as much as $7,000 – a sum out of reach for nearly all Gazan families grappling with widespread unemployment and runaway inflation. Jerjawi says he has ceased selling livestock entirely, and often advises Palestinians living abroad who reach out to buy a sacrifice for relatives in Gaza to reconsider. “I tell them it’s better to buy 50 kilograms of frozen meat instead of spending all that money on one sheep,” he said. “The 20,000 shekels [$7,000] for a sheep could even help pay for a couple to get married.”

    The destruction of herds has come on multiple fronts: many animals were killed directly in Israeli airstrikes, while repeated forced displacement left breeders with no option but to abandon or hastily offload their animals. “Many of my sheep died after a nearby house was bombed,” Jerjawi recalled. “This was the case for most livestock owners; we lost them because of the strikes.” When evacuation orders forced him to flee his home, he was forced to slaughter or sell his remaining flock for a fraction of their value just to afford basic food for his own family. “We did everything we could to keep the animals alive, even feeding them pasta and whatever we could find,” he said. “In the end, how can someone care for livestock while trying to protect your wife and children?”

    Figures from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) underscore the scale of the loss: by November 2024, at least 80 percent of Gaza’s sheep and 70 percent of its goats had been killed during the war. Gaza’s Ministry of Agriculture reports that the total population of sheep and goats in the enclave has plummeted from roughly 60,000 before the war to just 3,000 today, while cattle and calves have almost entirely disappeared. Most of the surviving animals are held by nomadic herders and are not available for commercial sale during the Eid season, according to ministry spokesperson Raafat Assaliya.

    The crisis extends far beyond the loss of animals themselves: nearly all of Gaza’s livestock-related infrastructure – from barns and grazing lands to feed warehouses and veterinary clinics – has been damaged or destroyed in repeated airstrikes. Compounding this, the inability to operate water wells has eliminated any realistic path for the sector to recover, even in the short term. “This has prevented thousands of families from carrying out the Eid sacrifice, in an unprecedented situation,” Assaliya said.

    For Gazan residents, the loss of the sacrificial tradition has transformed the holiday into a muted, unrecognizable event stripped of its core meaning. Muhammed Aburiyala, a Gaza City schoolteacher who has participated in the annual sacrifice for most of his life, says it has been three years since his community experienced a true Eid celebration. “The ritual itself, and the feeling of sharing it with others, has disappeared. Without sacrifices and the ability to share, there is no Eid,” he said.

    The absence of available livestock is just one layer of a far broader food security crisis that has left most of Gaza’s population struggling to access enough food for daily survival. Even frozen meat is out of reach for many: “Many can barely secure daily meals, and some have not eaten frozen meat for more than a year,” Aburiyala said. “What enters Gaza is limited and depends entirely on the status of the crossings, which means prices remain extremely high.”

    A 2025 assessment from the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) estimates that roughly 1.6 million people – 77 percent of Gaza’s total population – are currently facing acute food insecurity. The crisis has been exacerbated by erratic and restrictive Israeli policies on humanitarian aid and commercial imports, even during ceasefire periods, with repeated border closures that leave basic goods regularly disappearing from market shelves.

    Aburiyala argues that the blockade on livestock is a deliberate effort to dismantle Gaza’s local economy and prevent the enclave from achieving self-sufficiency. “If livestock were allowed into Gaza, it would sustain many professions – veterinarians, livestock breeders, farmers who rely on manure, butchers and restaurant owners,” he said. “This is not what Israel wants. They want to paralyze society and prevent it from becoming self-sufficient.”

    Reporting for this article was published by Middle East Eye, an independent outlet covering the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • Ecuador’s president touts US-backed crime-fighting efforts and vows to keep hunting down criminals

    Ecuador’s president touts US-backed crime-fighting efforts and vows to keep hunting down criminals

    QUITO, Ecuador — In his annual State of the Union address delivered before the National Assembly in Ecuador’s capital on Sunday, President Daniel Noboa highlighted the outcomes of his administration’s U.S.-backed anti-organized crime campaign, alongside promising improvements to key national economic indicators. The hardline security push comes as Ecuador grapples with a years-long drug violence crisis that has become the top public concern for the South American nation.

  • Trump tells US negotiators ‘not to rush’ into deal with Iran

    Trump tells US negotiators ‘not to rush’ into deal with Iran

    Diplomatic efforts between the United States and Iran have entered a careful, deliberate phase after US President Donald Trump instructed American negotiators to avoid rushing into a final agreement, even as both sides acknowledge ongoing constructive progress in talks. The emerging framework under negotiation includes three core components: a 60-day extension of the existing ceasefire, the full reopening of the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, and the launch of expanded negotiations to address longstanding international concerns over Iran’s nuclear program.

    The push for a negotiated settlement comes after months of escalating military conflict in the region. On February 28, the United States and Israel launched large-scale air strikes targeting Iranian positions. Tehran responded in kind, launching a series of drone and missile attacks against Israeli and American assets across Gulf nations, raising fears of a full-scale regional war. An initial ceasefire agreed to in April has been largely respected by both sides, though sporadic exchanges of fire have continued in the weeks since.

    Just one day before his announcement pausing any rush to a deal, Trump told supporters a broad agreement was already “largely negotiated”, sparking widespread speculation that a formal announcement could come within hours. That optimism has since been tempered by conflicting signals from Tehran, where Iranian media reports note that “one or two” key sticking points remain unresolved. While Iranian officials confirmed that discussions have made tangible progress over the weekend, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei stressed that this progress does not guarantee final consensus on the most contentious core issues.

    In a Sunday post published to his Truth Social platform, Trump doubled down on his call for cautious diplomacy. “Negotiations are proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner, and I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal because time is on our side,” he wrote. “Both sides must take their time and get it right. There can be no mistakes!”

    The US president also reaffirmed a longstanding non-negotiable US stance: Tehran must permanently abandon any effort to develop a nuclear weapon. This position is fully shared by Israel and other Western allies. Washington and its partners have long accused Iran of pursuing a covert nuclear weapons program via its uranium enrichment activities, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied, maintaining that all of its nuclear work is for purely peaceful civilian purposes, including energy production and medical research.

    Trump also confirmed that the US naval blockade of Iranian ports, implemented in early April to pressure Tehran into making concessions, will remain in full effect until a final agreement is reached, officially certified, and signed by both parties. The standoff over the Strait of Hormuz has had global economic consequences: since Iran effectively closed the vital waterway, through which roughly 20% of the world’s total oil and liquefied natural gas shipments pass, global energy prices have spiked sharply, impacting consumers and economies worldwide.

    US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently offered a measured assessment of the talks, confirming that “significant” progress has been made, but stopping short of declaring the negotiations final. He hinted at positive movement on the Strait of Hormuz file, noting that progress made over the 48 hours prior to his comments could lead to a “completely open strait… without tolls” if the current momentum holds.

    On the Iranian side, Baghaei told state-run television Saturday that Tehran is currently finalizing a memorandum of understanding that would clear the way for additional, more in-depth talks aimed at reaching a binding final agreement. Trump also referenced the planned memorandum in an earlier Truth Social post on Saturday.

    Pakistan, which has served as the third-party mediator for the indirect talks between Washington and Tehran, has struck an optimistic tone. Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said that recent progress in negotiations creates “grounds for optimism” and that a positive outcome is now “within reach”. Still, multiple US media outlets have cited anonymous American officials reporting that no final agreement is expected to be signed on Sunday, pushing any potential announcement back to a later date as negotiators work through the remaining outstanding disagreements.

  • ‘Nightmare for Israel’: Republican hawks attack Trump’s emerging Iran deal

    ‘Nightmare for Israel’: Republican hawks attack Trump’s emerging Iran deal

    A wave of rare public criticism from senior U.S. Republican foreign policy leaders has targeted former President Donald Trump over emerging details of a proposed 30 to 60-day initial ceasefire framework with Iran, with critics warning the reported deal includes sweeping U.S. concessions that would boost Tehran’s regional power and jeopardize Israeli security.

    The backlash gained momentum Sunday after Trump confirmed that a draft memorandum of understanding to end the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran was largely finalized and only waiting for formal approval. In his comments, Trump highlighted that the agreement would reopen the Strait of Hormuz — the critical global energy transit chokepoint that Iran has held effective control over since the war launched in late February — but made no mention of Iran’s nuclear program, a sharp departure from his repeated prior pledges that Tehran would never be permitted to acquire a nuclear weapon.

    Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed Saturday that Tehran was putting the final touches on the preliminary framework, which would set a 30 to 60-day temporary agreement. The 14-clause draft covers core sticking points: the Strait of Hormuz status, the ongoing U.S. naval blockade of Iran, and a full ceasefire across all conflict fronts including Lebanon. Unconfirmed reports have also suggested the deal could unlock billions of dollars in previously frozen Iranian assets, but Iranian leaders have repeatedly ruled out including nuclear issues in the current round of negotiations, and senior officials have explicitly denied agreeing to give up Tehran’s existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

    Negotiations have stretched for weeks since an initial ceasefire took effect April 8, including landmark face-to-face negotiating sessions in Islamabad, but no permanent peace deal has been reached, and the Strait remains closed. The ongoing closure has triggered the most severe global oil supply disruption in modern history, amplifying pressure on all parties to reach a resolution.

    But the apparent concessions from the Trump administration have sparked deep alarm among hardline Republican foreign policy hawks, many of whom were early and vocal backers of the war. Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the most prominent Republican voices on national security, issued a stark warning Saturday that any deal that leaves Iran’s military capacity and ruling government intact would become a “nightmare for Israel.”

    Writing on social platform X, Graham argued that if a deal is reached that accepts Iran’s ongoing ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and attack critical Gulf oil infrastructure, Tehran will be viewed as the dominant power in the Middle East, fundamentally reshaping the regional balance of power in Iran’s favor.

    Graham’s criticism was quickly echoed by other top Senate Republicans, including Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton, who shared Graham’s comments to his own audience to amplify the rebuke. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker called the reported 60-day ceasefire framework “a disaster,” warning that all gains from Operation Epic Fury — the Trump administration’s official name for the war on Iran — would be lost. Earlier in the week, Wicker accused anonymous White House officials of pushing Trump toward a hollow deal that holds no real value, rather than allowing him to follow through on his original goal of ending the conflict with a complete Iranian surrender.

    Senator Ted Cruz also joined the growing chorus of criticism, saying he was “deeply concerned” by leaked details of the emerging agreement. Cruz, who explicitly named Trump in his criticism while also blaming unnamed administration advisers for pushing the deal, argued that if the final outcome leaves the Islamist Iranian government in power, unlocks billions of dollars in assets for Tehran, allows Iran to continue enriching uranium and pursue a nuclear weapon, and leaves Tehran with effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, the result will be a catastrophic mistake for U.S. national security.

    Some of the sharpest criticism came from former Trump administration officials: former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo compared the emerging framework to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the Obama-era nuclear deal that Republicans universally opposed. Pompeo argued the reported deal follows the exact diplomatic playbook of Obama-era negotiators Wendy Sherman, Robert Malley, and Ben Rhodes, and fails to live up to Trump’s signature “America First” foreign policy. He called for the U.S. to maintain harsh economic and military pressure on Iran instead of pursuing negotiations. Former national security adviser John Bolton went even further, dismissing all talks with Iran as “a waste of oxygen.”

    For his part, Trump has sent mixed signals on the negotiations over the past week, alternating between renewed threats of military escalation and optimistic comments about progress on a deal. Over the weekend, he shared an image of Iran covered by an American flag on social media, a clear signal of continued military pressure. In an interview with CBS Saturday, he said the two sides were “getting a lot closer” to a deal, but warned that if no agreement is reached, Iran will face a level of military punishment no country has ever experienced. Speaking to Axios, he put the odds of a deal at a “solid 50-50,” saying “I think one of two things will happen: either I hit them harder than they have ever been hit, or we are going to sign a deal that is good.”

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is currently traveling in India, echoed Trump’s optimistic tone Saturday, telling reporters that “some progress” has been made, and that negotiations are ongoing even as he spoke to reporters.

  • Ebola outbreak poses massive challenges, warns nurse

    Ebola outbreak poses massive challenges, warns nurse

    As the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) grapples with a rapidly accelerating Ebola outbreak that has already claimed hundreds of lives, a senior leader from international medical charity Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has sounded the alarm over crippling gaps in the global response to the crisis.

    Kate White, an MSF programme manager with hands-on experience responding to previous Ebola outbreaks across Africa, departed Manchester Airport on Sunday to join the international relief mission deployed to the affected region. In the lead-up to her departure, she outlined the cascading challenges that aid groups are facing on the ground, starting with a critical shortage of deployable resources.

    Already, the outbreak has taken a devastating toll on frontline responders: three Red Cross volunteers, who were working to manage remains of Ebola victims — one of the highest-risk roles in any outbreak response — died earlier this month after contracting the virus. Official figures place the current toll at more than 200 suspected deaths and over 850 suspected cases across the affected regions, with the World Health Organization (WHO) confirming last week that transmission is outpacing early projections. The WHO has already designated the event a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), the highest level of global public health alert.

    What makes this outbreak uniquely dangerous, responders and public health officials agree, is the absence of ready-to-use medical tools to fight it. No approved vaccine exists for this specific strain of Ebola, and while experimental candidates are in late-stage development, none have been cleared for widespread deployment. There are also no approved antiviral treatments targeted at this variant, leaving clinicians only able to provide supportive care rather than curative treatment.

    White called the lack of accessible, scalable countermeasures decades after the first major Ebola outbreaks a stark indictment of global public health priorities. “After all these years of responding to Ebola outbreaks across the continent, we still don’t have comprehensive medical countermeasures — vaccines, treatments, rapid-rollout diagnostic testing — that we can deploy immediately,” she said. “That says a great deal about the current state of global health equity.”

    She also raised alarms over additional logistical barriers, including airspace closures that are slowing the movement of frontline workers and critical life-saving supplies into affected zones. “The sheer volume of resources we need to get into the DRC right now is massive, and any delay puts more lives at risk,” she added.

    Beyond treatment and supplies, White emphasized that major improvements to diagnostic capacity are urgently needed across all affected geographic areas. Faster, more widespread testing ensures that patients without Ebola are not unnecessarily held in treatment centres, allowing them to return to their families quickly once they recover from other unrelated illnesses. Current testing gaps mean that goal remains out of reach, she said.

    A years-long pattern of small, contained Ebola outbreaks in remote rural African regions has shifted in recent decades, as urbanization brings growing human populations into closer contact with the natural animal reservoirs that host the virus. Ebola, a viral hemorrhagic fever that jumps from animals to humans, typically causes flu-like symptoms including fever, headache and fatigue that emerge between 2 and 21 days after exposure. As the disease progresses, patients develop vomiting, diarrhoea, and in severe cases organ failure and uncontrolled bleeding. The virus spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids such as blood or vomit, making proper personal protective equipment for frontline workers non-negotiable.

    This specific outbreak carries additional unique challenges: the epicentre is located in a conflict-affected region of the DRC, where insecurity complicates access for aid workers, and the virus circulated undetected for a significant period of time before being identified. “By the time we picked it up, it had already been spreading for quite a while, which means we don’t have a full picture of all transmission chains,” White explained. “Without that clarity, getting the outbreak under control becomes far more difficult.”

    As responders on the ground work to screen travellers, trace contacts, and slow transmission, White stressed that immediate scaled-up support from the international community is critical to turning the tide of the outbreak.