作者: admin

  • Will Sabalenka and Osaka open door for women’s night sessions?

    Will Sabalenka and Osaka open door for women’s night sessions?

    For years, the French Open at Roland Garros had stuck to an unbroken tradition: every primetime night match on its iconic Court Philippe Chatrier went to the men’s draw. That 33-match men’s streak finally came to an end this year, when tournament organizers bowed to the inevitability of one of the most anticipated women’s fourth-round clashes: top-seeded Aryna Sabalenka against four-time Grand Slam champion Naomi Osaka. It was the first time a women’s match had claimed the coveted primetime slot at the clay-court major since 2023, closing a three-year drought of women’s matches under the Parisian lights.

    Organizers had long cited a range of justifications for keeping women’s matches out of the spotlight, most notably tournament director Amelie Mauresmo’s past argument that the potential for shorter women’s matches made them a less ideal fit for scheduled primetime broadcast windows. But when men’s world No. 1 Jannik Sinner exited the tournament early, leaving Monday’s men’s draw lacking any high-profile matchups worthy of primetime, there was no longer any reasonable way to overlook the blockbuster between the two Grand Slam-winning superstars. As Mauresmo acknowledged ahead of the match: “It was obvious that it should be a night match tonight.”

    When the two 28-year-old stars stepped onto Chatrier in front of a near-capacity crowd of nearly 15,000 fans, any doubts about whether a women’s match could deliver the same level of excitement and star power as a men’s primetime clash were quickly put to rest. Both players brought high-octane, first-strike baseline tennis from the opening serve, delivering a fast-paced, absorbing contest that kept the crowd on its edge of their seats for one hour and 27 minutes.

    For a set and a half, the match remained deadlocked, with little to separate the reigning world No. 1 Sabalenka and 16th-seeded Osaka. It was only in the late stages that Sabalenka’s refined combination of raw power and expanded shot variety allowed her to seize control, closing out a 7-5, 6-3 victory as Osaka faded late. Beyond the on-court action, the match delivered all the star power and entertainment that a primetime slot demands. Osaka made her entrance in a showstopping, Eiffel Tower-inspired sparkly haute couture gown that could have held its own on the Paris Fashion Week runway, while Sabalenka delighted the crowd with an unexpected moonwalk during her post-match victory speech.

    Nearly every fan in attendance left satisfied, with few complaining the match did not deliver value for money. The result has reignited calls for the French Open to add more women’s matches to primetime slots going forward, a push both Sabalenka and Osaka backed in their post-match comments.

    “I hope this is the beginning and we open the door to more women’s night sessions,” Sabalenka told reporters after the win. “I think the atmosphere and attention this match brought is going to show organisers that they should consider putting at least some women’s matches at night.” Osaka echoed that sentiment, saying: “I’m honoured the tournament chose us to play in this slot and I hope going forward they continue to do so. Shout out to the tournament for trusting us – I hope it was entertaining for people.”

    The historic match marked only the fifth women’s contest to be allocated a night session slot since night matches were introduced to Roland Garros in 2021, out of a total of 61 overall night sessions. For critics of the tournament’s longstanding bias toward men’s matches in primetime, the match proved exactly what female tennis stars can deliver when given the opportunity to shine on the sport’s biggest stages, with many arguing it should mark a turning point for future scheduling at the clay-court major.

  • ‘Mornings and nights no longer exist’:  A day in the hottest place in India

    ‘Mornings and nights no longer exist’: A day in the hottest place in India

    By early June 2026, a historic and unrelenting heatwave has pushed Banda, a dusty rural district in India’s northern Uttar Pradesh state, into the center of a growing climate crisis. For more than a straight week, temperatures hovered between 47°C and 48°C (116°F to 118°F) — an extraordinary stretch of extreme heat that even long-term residents describe as unprecedented, marking a dangerous shift from the region’s familiar seasonal weather patterns.

    Located just a short distance from the Tropic of Cancer, Banda is no stranger to sweltering summers. But this year’s heatwave has broken all patterns of persistence, bringing a grinding, non-stop heat that alters every part of daily life for the district’s 2.3 million residents, most of whom rely on outdoor labor like farming, construction, road work and small-scale trade to survive. With little access to air conditioning or even reliable cooling for millions of low-income households, Banda’s population has been forced to completely restructure their lives around the deadly heat.

    By 6 a.m., when most urban centers across India are just waking to morning, the sun over Banda already blazes with the harsh intensity of a mid-afternoon summer sun. Atarra’s wholesale vegetable market, which once bustled with trade until late morning, now clears out completely by 8 a.m. Farmers and traders travel to the market before dawn to unload their harvests of tomatoes, gourds, chillies and melons, rushing to sell all stock before the heat becomes unbearable — a necessity that grows more urgent by the day, as high temperatures cut the shelf life of fresh produce drastically. “It’s only 6:15 a.m., but it already feels like 8 or 9 a.m.,” explained Himanshu, a local vegetable trader, wiping sweat from his brow as he leaned against crates of ripening tomatoes. “A box of tomatoes has to be sold today or tomorrow; in this heat, it simply won’t last.”

    Across the district, this compressed daily schedule governs nearly every activity. As veteran Polish journalist Ryszard Kapuściński once observed of equally sweltering African landscapes, Banda’s residents now devote most of their energy to a constant, daily search for shade and cool air. Pappu Verma, a local mason, has rearranged his work schedule to start at 7 a.m., wrap up by noon, take a four-hour break to avoid the peak midday heat, then return to work from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. While the break protects him from dangerous heat exhaustion and headaches, it stretches his workday out to 12 or 13 hours — and his pay remains the same regardless. “Otherwise, whatever I earn would just end up being spent on medicine for heat sickness,” he shrugged, a common trade-off for low-income workers across the district.

    Outdoor laborers bear the brunt of the crisis most directly. On a 46°C day last week, three female road construction workers were found huddled in the thin sliver of shade cast by a water tanker chassis on a highway bridge spanning the Ken River, eating their simple lunch of flatbread with onion, salt and pickle. “If we brought cooked vegetables, they’d spoil before noon,” explained Shanti Devi, one of the workers, who walks six kilometers to her job site every morning and another six kilometers back home each evening. She summed up the reality for Banda’s working poor in a blunt, memorable line: “Poor people don’t have the luxury of worrying about the heat.”

    The Ken River, which once provided a natural cooling effect for surrounding communities, has itself been weakened by decades of overexploitation. Researchers note that widespread illegal sand mining and steady groundwater depletion have eroded the river’s ability to moderate local temperatures, creating a vicious cycle where water scarcity amplifies extreme heat, which in turn worsens water demand.

    The economic and public health impacts of the prolonged heatwave are visible across every corner of the district. E-rickshaw drivers report almost no passengers during midday hours; shopkeepers now open before sunrise and close their doors from noon to 4 p.m., and customer numbers have fallen by half. Local hospitals report a steady stream of heat-related illnesses, with 15 to 20 new cases arriving daily, most involving children and elderly patients. Common symptoms include diarrhoea, vomiting and high fever, all brought on by constant exposure to extreme heat.

    Banda’s current ordeal is not an isolated anomaly: it is a local manifestation of a growing climate crisis unfolding across northern India. Climate researchers have identified the Indo-Gangetic Plain, the vast fertile belt that covers most of northern India including Uttar Pradesh, as one of the world’s fastest-growing hotspots for dangerous humid heat — a combination of high temperatures and high humidity that places far more physiological stress on the human body than dry heat alone. With a dense population of low-income outdoor workers, widespread irrigation that adds moisture to the air, and limited access to residential cooling, Uttar Pradesh is one of the most vulnerable regions in the world to deadly heatwaves, according to Delhi-based think tank Climate Trends.

    Local geographic and development choices have amplified Banda’s risk dramatically. Data from Banda University of Agriculture and Technology shows that nearly one-sixth of the district’s dense forest cover disappeared between 1991 and 2022, driven by agricultural expansion, mining and urban development. Tree cover now sits far below the recommended levels to moderate local temperatures, while concrete infrastructure and exposed sand river beds absorb and radiate heat, pushing daytime temperatures even higher. While Banda has recorded extreme temperatures of 48°C to 49°C in the past, including two consecutive days of 49°C heat in 2024, local meteorologist Dinesh Sah notes that this year’s heatwave is unprecedented for its persistence. “For eight or nine straight days, 47°C to 48°C without a break — that is what is new this year,” he explained.

    The heat does not fade when the sun sets. Overnight temperatures remain stuck around 30°C, meaning residents never get a chance to fully cool down and recover from the day’s heat. “It feels as if mornings and cool nights no longer exist,” Sah said. By 7 or 8 a.m., it already feels like mid-afternoon.

    In rural Achharaund village, 20 kilometers from Banda’s district headquarters, the crisis is as much about water as it is about heat. A single deep well supplies most of the village’s drinking water, and women spend up to five hours a day queuing under the blazing sun to fill buckets for their households. Eighteen-year-old Kranti Vishwakarma says that when afternoon power cuts cut off access to the village’s few electric pumps, the only relief comes from the shade of ancient neem trees. “We don’t have coolers or air conditioners, so for us, the neem trees play that role,” she said.

    Eighty-year-old Chunubadi, one of the village’s oldest residents, relies on a rickety table fan held together with string to circulate air in her small home. Even when the power stays on, the fan only blows dry, hot air. “In my 80 years, I’ve never seen heat like this,” she said, watching the fan blades turn slowly. “Old people die in extreme cold or extreme heat. I don’t know whether I’ll be able to endure this one.”

    Even as residents adapt their daily routines to survive the heat, adaptation does not equal safety. Research from the University of California, Berkeley estimates that a single severe five-day heatwave in Uttar Pradesh could cause more than 8,000 excess deaths, with the burden falling overwhelmingly on the elderly, outdoor workers and low-income households without access to cooling. What worries climate scientists is not that Banda is hot — it is that heatwaves are growing longer, more intense and more frequent, as the natural systems that once kept temperatures in check are destroyed by human activity.

    After more than a week of record heat, a western disturbance finally brought brief relief: dust storms and scattered rain dropped temperatures by 8 to 9°C, and Banda’s residents were finally able to step outside during midday without fear. But the respite is only temporary. The daily routines that Banda’s population has adopted to survive this heatwave — starting work before dawn, retreating indoors during peak heat, constantly searching for shade — are no longer temporary adaptations. They are quickly becoming the new normal, a preview of what climate change will bring to millions of vulnerable people across South Asia in the coming decades.

  • Leen Ezzeddine, the US-Lebanese graduate at Harvard Medical School who chose to speak out

    Leen Ezzeddine, the US-Lebanese graduate at Harvard Medical School who chose to speak out

    On the surface, Leen Ezzeddine’s 2026 commencement address at Harvard Medical School could have fit neatly into the beloved narrative of immigrant achievement: a young Lebanese woman earning a medical degree from one of the world’s most selective elite institutions. But Ezzeddine rejected that sanitized script, choosing instead to center stark personal and political contradiction in a speech that quickly went viral and reignited long-simmering debates on U.S. campuses over Palestine, academic complicity, and the moral obligations of medical professionals.

    Ezzeddine’s connection to the crisis unfolding in her home region is not abstract. Just 18 months before she crossed the commencement stage, a U.S.-supplied Israeli missile destroyed her family’s summer home in Arab Salim, a village in southern Lebanon. Her grandparents, who had lived in the home for decades, were forced to flee to Beirut, and the village has remained under repeated Israeli bombardment even as Ezzeddine delivered her speech. Standing in the sanctity of Harvard’s graduation ceremony, she drew a clear, unflinching line between her own privileged path to medicine and the experiences of equally ambitious medical students across Lebanon and Palestine, who are forced to pursue their degrees amid collapsing infrastructure, bombardment, displacement, and the constant threat of death.

    “The only difference between me and students who shared the same dream, the same work ethic, and the same devotion to medicine is that they had to pursue that dream in conditions no student should ever have to endure,” Ezzeddine told Middle East Eye in an interview following her speech. She rejected the common narrative that her success at Harvard stemmed solely from hard work or merit, framing her position as the product of luck and circumstance, not inherent worth.

    Ezzeddine’s speech entered a charged, long-running battle over Palestine that has roiled U.S. campuses for years, including at Harvard. Since the outbreak of Israel’s expanded military campaign in Gaza, student activists demanding university divestment from companies linked to the war have faced widespread disciplinary action, police raids, suspensions, and accusations of antisemitism. Just one year before Ezzeddine’s graduation, hundreds of Harvard graduates walked out of the commencement ceremony to protest the university’s decision to bar students who participated in a pro-Palestinian encampment from graduating. The university’s handling of Gaza-related activism has become a central flashpoint in a national debate over whether U.S. academia protects dissenting speech – or punishes it when it centers Palestinian rights.

    Rather than delivering an abstract political address, Ezzeddine anchored her argument in personal testimony and the core principles of medical practice. Citing Black liberation activist Assata Shakur, she emphasized that dehumanization is a precondition for violence, noting that people affected by war in the Middle East are too often reduced to statistics or political talking points instead of being recognized as full human beings with their own dreams, families, and aspirations. “Lives no less full, no less sacred, and no less worthy than their own,” she said of those caught in the conflict.

    For Ezzeddine, medicine cannot be separated from the political structures that determine who gets access to safety, shelter, clean water, and healthcare. “Medicine is a social science, and politics is nothing but medicine on a large scale,” she explained. “Our work does not begin and end at the bedside. A patient’s health is shaped by whether they have housing, clean water, food, safety, freedom of movement, and access to a hospital that has not been bombed or defunded. So when political decisions determine who is allowed to live with dignity and who is denied the basic conditions of survival, doctors cannot pretend medicine and politics are separate.”

    She also challenged the hypocrisy she sees embedded in modern medical education: while students are routinely taught to recognize structural violence, health equity, and the social determinants of health, those very principles are often abandoned when the lives at stake are politically inconvenient for institutional power holders. That contradiction has left countless students and faculty across the U.S. disillusioned since the start of the Gaza war, as universities navigate donor pressure, political backlash, and internal divisions over how to address the conflict.

    When asked about the personal and professional risks of speaking out, Ezzeddine situated her choice within a long history of dissident activists whose moral stances were once condemned before being widely celebrated, including Malcolm X, Assata Shakur, Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King Jr. “Moral clarity is often most costly before it becomes widely accepted,” she said, echoing activist and thinker Audre Lorde’s famous declaration: “Your silence will not protect you.”

    Beyond rhetoric, Ezzeddine has turned the attention drawn by her speech into tangible action. She launched a GoFundMe campaign to provide urgent essentials – including baby formula, diapers, medical supplies, mattresses, and blankets – to pregnant people, newborns, and displaced families in southern Lebanon. What began as a speech has already grown into a community-led response, with Ezzeddine noting that many people in the U.S. are hungry for concrete ways to support those affected by the conflict. Longer term, she plans to build a formal grassroots organization that meets emergency needs in Lebanon while creating pathways for more people from marginalized conflict-affected communities to enter elite institutions like Harvard and enter positions of power. “Because we need more of us in these rooms,” she said.

    Ezzeddine’s speech did not resolve the deep contradictions she laid bare. Harvard remains an elite institution embedded in existing power structures, U.S. academia remains a deeply contested terrain over Palestine, and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and southern Lebanon continues unabated. But her address cut through the comfortable ritual of graduation to demand that medical professionals live up to the ethical principles they claim to uphold. At its core, her message rejects the idea that medicine is separate from the systems that decide which lives are worthy of care – and in a moment where silence too often passes for neutrality, she chose to speak.

  • Iraqi national pleads not guilty in 18 attacks in Europe, calling himself a ‘prisoner of war’

    Iraqi national pleads not guilty in 18 attacks in Europe, calling himself a ‘prisoner of war’

    MANHATTAN, N.Y. — An Iraqi man accused of orchestrating a sprawling plot of terror attacks targeting Western and Israeli interests across Europe and North America entered a not guilty plea during his initial federal court appearance Monday, where he publicly declared himself a prisoner of war and decried civilian casualties in regional conflict involving the United States, Israel and Iran.

    Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi, 45, faces federal charges of conspiracy to provide material support to two U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations: Kata’ib Hizballah, an Iran-aligned Iraqi Shia militant group, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran. Prosecutors further allege he acted as a commanding figure within Kata’ib Hizballah while planning at least 18 coordinated attacks in retaliation for ongoing military conflict between the U.S.-Israel bloc and Iran.

    The proceeding took an unscripted turn when Al-Saadi refused to take his seat after entering his plea, prompting U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon to order marshals to escort him to his chair. Two court officers approached the defendant, with one resting a hand on his shoulder to guide him into position. Court observers noted Al-Saadi did not act aggressively or intentionally disrupt the hearing; his out-of-process comments stemmed from his response to the charges against him. Through an Arabic interpreter, Al-Saadi told the court, “I’m not guilty in a war situation. I’m a prisoner of war. I’m not a threat. Children and women are being killed by your rockets.”

    Defense counsel Andrew Dalack pushed back on the prosecution’s narrative, telling the judge his client was a legitimate employee of the Iraqi government, though he declined to share details of Al-Saadi’s official role. Dalack also outlined the harsh conditions his client has endured in custody: he was held in an underground Turkish prison for two weeks before being transferred to U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation custody, and has been kept in solitary confinement at a high-security federal lockup in Brooklyn following his extradition to the U.S. Dalack added that Al-Saadi is seeking to establish contact with Iraqi diplomatic officials and his immediate family, but expects U.S. authorities will impose strict restrictions on all communications.

    When the charges against Al-Saadi were first announced publicly last month, Dalack told reporters his client maintains he is being politically persecuted for his personal ties to Qasem Soleimani, the longtime head of the IRGC Quds Force who was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Baghdad in 2020.

    The allegations against Al-Saadi outline a multi-year cross-continental terror campaign. Beyond the 18 planned attacks across Europe, he faces direct charges for two completed attacks: a 2023 firebombing of a bank in Amsterdam, and a stabbing targeting Jewish men in London. Court documents filed by federal prosecutors also reveal that Al-Saadi plotted to attack a synagogue in New York City as recently as last month, and shared detailed photos and site maps of Jewish community centers in Los Angeles, California and Scottsdale, Arizona to an undercover law enforcement operative he believed was a co-conspirator.

    He is also linked to two high-profile attacks in Canada from earlier this year: a breach of a synagogue and a March shooting at the U.S. Consulate in Toronto. Prosecutors confirm Al-Saadi directed and coerced other actors to carry out attacks against all U.S. and Israeli-affiliated targets, explicitly calling for the killing of American and Jewish civilians. According to court filings, Al-Saadi documented the attacks and coordinated planning through social platforms including Snapchat and Telegram, and discussed operational details in phone calls that were recorded by an FBI confidential informant he had recruited to help carry out domestic attacks in the U.S.

  • Peruvian shamans perform a blessing ritual ahead of a presidential runoff

    Peruvian shamans perform a blessing ritual ahead of a presidential runoff

    LIMA, Peru – As Peru braces for a high-stakes presidential runoff that will shape the future of a South American nation roiled by years of political upheaval and corruption, Indigenous shamans from across the country gathered Monday on the sunbaked shores of Lima’s Herradura Beach for a traditional blessing ritual focused on the two remaining candidates. Held in the coastal Chorrillos district, the centuries-old ceremony comes ahead of Sunday’s decisive vote, a contest that arrives amid a decade-long cycle of presidential ousters tied to widespread corruption scandals that have gutted public trust in the country’s political institutions.

    This pre-election ritual is a longstanding cultural tradition, held at the turn of every new year and ahead of major electoral contests to invoke spiritual guidance for the country’s political future. The gathered shamans arranged public portraits of the two runoff contenders at their seaside altar, where they led chants and blessings using traditional ceremonial items: vivid flower petals, fresh fruit, sacred coca leaves, aromatic palo santo (known locally as “holy wood”), cured black tobacco, ceremonial swords, and symbolic ritual dolls. To close the public portion of the ceremony, participants lit brightly colored flares and beat traditional drums, filling the coastal air with rhythm and smoke.

    The two candidates facing off Sunday are Keiko Fujimori, a conservative political figure and daughter of disgraced former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori, and Roberto Sánchez, a nationalist former cabinet minister and sitting congressman. Polling ahead of the runoff shows the pair locked in a dead heat, with neither candidate holding a statistically significant lead over the other. The path to the runoff has already been rocky: in April’s crowded first-round election, Fujimori captured just over 17% of the vote, while Sánchez earned roughly 12% to claim the second spot. That initial round was marred by widespread logistical failures that left thousands of voters both in Peru and living overseas unable to cast their ballots, forcing the country’s national electoral body to spend weeks sorting through disputes and finalizing the two candidates who would advance to the runoff.

    Andrés de los Santos, a shaman who traveled to the capital from northern Peru to participate in the ritual, emphasized the core purpose of the gathering: “The ritual we perform is primarily intended to ensure that the best candidate is the one who represents our Peru.” Unlike in past years, the assembled shamans chose not to issue a public prediction of the election’s outcome this cycle. That choice marks a departure from earlier ceremonies, when the group has publicly forecast political shifts: at the end of 2025, they predicted that Venezuela’s sitting President Nicolás Maduro, who currently faces U.S. drug trafficking charges, will leave office before the end of 2026.

    Whoever claims victory on Sunday will step into the office of president as Peru’s ninth sitting head of state in just 10 years, a staggering pace of turnover driven by repeated corruption scandals. The winner will replace interim President José María Balcázar, who took office in February after his predecessor, interim leader José Jerí, was removed from office just four months into his term over widespread corruption allegations. The new president will be sworn in on July 28 to serve a full five-year term, tasked with stabilizing the country’s fractured political landscape and restoring public faith in government.

  • Lebanese flee their homes as Israel orders attacks on Beirut

    Lebanese flee their homes as Israel orders attacks on Beirut

    Fresh escalation along the Israel-Lebanon border has sent civilians back into displacement, as Israel’s top security official’s threat to expand attacks into the Lebanese capital dashed the fragile normalcy residents of Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahieh had only just begun to rebuild.

    On Monday, thousands of residents who had trickled back to their homes following an April ceasefire began packing their belongings to evacuate once again, after Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz issued a blunt warning that no part of Beirut would be spared from violence if Hezbollah’s cross-front hostilities did not stop. Katz explicitly equated Dahieh, a dense, heavily residential district in southern Beirut long associated with Hezbollah, to Israeli communities in northern Israel that have faced frequent cross-border attacks. “If there is no calm in the north [of Israel], there will be no calm in Beirut,” he stated.

    Katz’s warning came amid a sharp intensification of Israel’s ground and air offensive across Lebanon over the past week, a campaign that has already pushed far beyond the country’s southern border regions. The latest point of contention centers on the ancient Beaufort Castle, a strategic hilltop fortress in southern Lebanon. While Israeli officials announced Sunday they had seized the site and raised the Israeli flag there, Hezbollah contradicted the claim in a Monday statement, confirming its fighters were continuing a “battle of attrition” against Israeli troops in the area.

    Israel frames its expanded military campaign as a necessary operation to push Hezbollah forces away from its northern border communities. Katz added that the Israeli military aims to establish full security control over the entire Litani River basin, turning the region into a weapons-free zone cleared of what Israel terms “terrorist elements.” The Litani, which runs roughly 30 kilometers north of the Israel-Lebanon border, has long been a focal point of Israeli demands for Hezbollah to withdraw its military assets from southern Lebanon.

    In recent days, Israeli military operations have pushed even further north past the Litani. Last week, the Israel Defense Forces designated all territory south of the Zahrani River — located 40 kilometers from the border and encompassing the major population centers of Tyre and Nabatieh — as an official combat zone, issuing mandatory evacuation orders for all local residents. On Monday, IDF spokesperson Avichay Adraee extended these expulsion orders to additional towns and villages located north of the Litani River.

    For residents of Dahieh, the new threats have resurrected trauma many had only just started to process after months of displacement. Thousands of residents had gradually returned to the district following the April ceasefire, repairing damaged homes, reopening shuttered businesses, and working to rebuild a fragile sense of daily normalcy. That progress has now been completely upended.

    Thirty-one-year-old Batoul Fawaz, who had spent the duration of the conflict in rented temporary accommodation, had just finalized plans to move back to her Dahieh home and returned the keys to her rental when the Israeli threat was released. Now, she is forced to rent another short-term space just to have a place to sleep. “We are no longer afraid for our lives only. We are afraid for our homes,” Fawaz told Middle East Eye. Her entire family, she added, has been scattered by displacement once again: one of her sisters had just given birth and returned to Dahieh, only to flee again with her newborn just days later.

    The new threats against Beirut come after weeks of mounting pressure from Israel’s far-right ruling coalition to escalate operations against Hezbollah, in response to the group’s increasing use of explosive FPV drones targeting Israeli troops in southern Lebanon. A recent report from Israeli public broadcaster Kan found that Hezbollah’s advanced drone capabilities are currently limiting roughly 80 percent of Israeli ground assaults in southern Lebanon.

    Senior far-right ministers have publicly pushed for massive retaliation against Lebanese civilian centers. Last week, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called for the Lebanese capital to be collectively punished for Hezbollah’s drone attacks, arguing that “for every explosive drone, 10 buildings should fall in Beirut.” National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has additionally urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to resume full-scale war in Lebanon, calling for Israel to cut the country’s national electricity supply and seize all territory up to the Zahrani River. Netanyahu has aligned with the hardline position, vowing last Friday to push Israeli forces deeper into Lebanese territory and confirming that large swathes of southern Lebanon are now classified as combat zones.

    Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the latest Israeli escalation, labeling it “a vicious and reprehensible Israeli aggression.” The expanding offensive has also disrupted regional diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the wider conflict across the Middle East. Iran’s foreign ministry stated Monday that a full ceasefire in Lebanon remains a non-negotiable prerequisite for any indirect talks with the United States to end the broader regional war. Iranian state news agency Tasnim later confirmed that Iran has paused all indirect negotiations with the U.S. in response to Israel’s ongoing attacks.

    For the displaced families of Dahieh, the political and diplomatic standoff translates to a far more immediate crisis: the ceasefire that gave them a chance to return home has already been rendered meaningless, and any hope of resuming normal life has been delayed indefinitely once again.

  • ‘Ridiculous’: Social media reacts as Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur denied entry to UK

    ‘Ridiculous’: Social media reacts as Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur denied entry to UK

    On Monday, two high-profile American political commentators, Cenk Uygur, founder of the progressive media outlet The Young Turks, and Hasan Piker, a prominent left-wing critic of U.S. and Israeli foreign policy, confirmed that the United Kingdom government had rejected their Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) applications and blocked their entry to the country. The decision has ignited a firestorm of debate across global social media, with critics accusing the British government of bowing to external pressure to suppress legitimate criticism of the Israeli government and undermining long-standing commitments to free expression.

    Uygur and Piker had been scheduled to make multiple public appearances during their UK trip, including speaking slots at the newly launched SXSW London festival and a planned debate at the Oxford Union, one of the world’s most prestigious and historic collegiate debating societies. Piker, who has previously addressed the Oxford Union, used his 2025 speech to condemn U.S. military and diplomatic backing for Israel, arguing that mainstream Western media systematically manufactures public consent for Israeli policies that violate international law. Piker also confirmed he was set to hold private meetings with Zack Polanski, leader of the UK Green Party, and former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn during the visit, details first reported by the independent outlet Middle East Eye. In a YouTube explanation of the decision, Piker confirmed his ETA application had been formally denied.

    Shortly after Piker’s announcement, Uygur took to social platform X to confirm his own entry ban, publicly stating that his longstanding criticism of the Israeli government was the clear motivation behind the Home Office’s ruling. “I’ve been banned for criticizing Israel,” Uygur wrote. “Are we free anymore?” Piker echoed Uygur’s claim, writing in a social post that the ban was “at the behest of israel,” adding that Western powers were betraying their own stated liberal values to accommodate what he called a “genocidal fascist foreign government.”

    In an official statement provided to press outlets, the UK Home Office only confirmed that the pair’s ETAs had been cancelled “on the grounds that their presence in the UK may not be conducive to the public good.” The department added that entry decisions are “based solely on an assessment of the potential risk an individual may pose to UK society,” but declined to specify which comments or actions by Uygur and Piker formed the basis of the risk assessment.

    The decision drew immediate criticism from across the UK political spectrum and from public figures across the globe. Green Party leader Polanski described the ban as a “grim decision” in a post on X, warning that the move signals a dangerous erosion of civil liberties under the current Keir Starmer administration. “People often talk about [the] dangerous road we’d go down under a Reform government – this is another clear warning we’re down there already,” Polanski wrote.

    Even critics of the two commentators’ political views condemned the entry ban. American-Jewish political commentator Shabbos Kestenbaum, who was scheduled to debate Uygur on Piers Morgan Uncensored on the day the ban was announced, called the ruling “completely unfounded and must be reversed. Free speech must always be protected and allowed. Shame on Prime Minister Keir Starmer.” Conservative commentator Sohrab Ahmari, who has debated Uygur in the past and disagrees with nearly all his political positions, echoed that sentiment, writing on X: “But he’s no extremist or threat to public order — ridiculous to have to even type that — and I hope the UK government reconsiders.”

    Dimi Reider, co-founder of Israeli independent magazine +972 Magazine and a longstanding domestic critic of the Israeli government, argued that the Starmer administration’s decision was setting a dangerous precedent for future authoritarian policy. “The Starmer government is creating the mechanisms, precedent and, worst of all, legitimacy for the authoritarian Reform government they keep warning us about. They’re paving the way,” Reider wrote.

    Many social media users have highlighted what they call a blatant double standard in the UK’s entry policy, pointing out that Israeli President Isaac Herzog was not only permitted entry to the UK last September, but was personally welcomed by Starmer at 10 Downing Street. Herzog has been named in a UN Commission of Inquiry report as making statements that amount to direct and public incitement to commit genocide, stemming from comments he made after the October 7 2023 Hamas attacks, in which he claimed all Palestinians in Gaza were “unequivocally” responsible for the violence, rejecting distinctions between militant groups and civilian civilians.

    Other users compared the ban on Uygur and Piker to previous UK entry restrictions on far-right and extremist figures, including 11 far-right activists barred from a Tommy Robinson-led rally in May, and American rapper Kanye West, who was blocked over repeated antisemitic comments including a song titled “Heil Hitler.” Critics of the ban were quick to distinguish these cases, noting that Uygur and Piker have never been accused of promoting targeted, racist hate speech against ethnic or religious minorities.

    Both commentators have forcefully pushed back against unsubstantiated claims of antisemitism from pro-Israel supporters, rejecting the widespread conflation of anti-Zionism and criticism of the Israeli state with hatred of Jewish people. In a statement to Middle East Eye, Uygur explained: “No one should equate the actions of the Israeli government with Jewish people at large. For example, I don’t blame the British people for this decision, I blame the British government. If that statement were declared to be racist against Brits, that would be patently absurd. Banning me from the UK for criticizing the government of Israel is equally absurd. Israel often says they’re our special ally because they help defend Western civilization, this is the exact opposite – tearing down our freedoms to protect their country and their crimes against humanity.”

    Piker has similarly explicitly condemned antisemitism on multiple occasions, including during his 2025 Oxford Union address, where he stated: “Antisemitism is a canary in the coal mine of fascism.” He criticized the long history of violence against Jewish people enabled by antisemitic propaganda, adding: “Valid criticisms against the state [of Israel] committing these atrocities and tying it back to Judaism is a cynical ploy to stop all manner of conversation.”

    Prominent British media personality Piers Morgan, host of Piers Morgan Uncensored, also rejected the idea that the ban was justified, writing on X: “I only support banning people who advocate violence or who spew hateful bigotry against people based on their ethnicity/religion. Where has Cenk done that? His rage has been against the Israel govt and its policies. Free speech should protect that.”

    Officials from SXSW London released a muted statement acknowledging the decision, noting that entry rulings are the exclusive purview of the Home Office. “SXSW London’s role is to convene a broad range of diverse voices and perspectives. We remain focused on delivering a programme this week fostering open dialogue and exchange of ideas,” the statement read. Oxford Union president Arwa Elrayess directly criticized the government’s decision and reaffirmed the society’s commitment to free expression. “To this day, we defend freedom of speech; the right for our invited speakers to express themselves, and to be challenged, irrespective of political viewpoint,” Elrayess told Middle East Eye, adding that the union is currently exploring virtual format options to allow Uygur and Piker to still participate in their scheduled events. “We will not allow this event to be shut down.”

    As of publication, Middle East Eye has stated that it has reached out to the Home Office and Piker for additional comment, and no further response has been issued.

  • Mandelson called Wes Streeting’s Israel criticism ‘wild’ and ‘hysterical’

    Mandelson called Wes Streeting’s Israel criticism ‘wild’ and ‘hysterical’

    Thousands of pages of confidential documents tied to Peter Mandelson, the disgraced former Labour cabinet minister and UK ambassador to the U.S., have been made public, pulling back the curtain on bitter internal divides within Britain’s ruling Labour Party over the Israeli military campaign in Gaza and the recognition of a Palestinian state.

    Mandelson, who was appointed to the ambassador post by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in 2024, was forced to step down from the role in September 2025 after reports of his long-standing personal ties to deceased convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein became public. It was the 1,000-plus page release of files related to Mandelson on Monday that has now revealed the intense behind-closed-doors clash between Mandelson and current UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting over Streeting’s sharp condemnation of Israeli actions in Gaza.

    An independent analysis of the released files by Middle East Eye confirms that in July 2025, just two months before the UK government formally recognized Palestinian statehood, Streeting reached out to Mandelson directly to share his unvarnished views and seek input on the pending recognition decision. Streeting argued that recognizing Palestinian statehood was the correct course of action on both moral and political grounds, writing that Israel was openly committing war crimes in Gaza for the world to see. He added that Israel’s ruling leadership used rhetoric matching ethnic cleansing, and that he had spoken to British medical personnel deployed in Gaza who described systematic, deliberate brutality targeting civilian women and children.

    Calling Israeli actions “rogue state behavior”, Streeting pushed for the UK to impose full state-level sanctions on Israel, writing that Israel should face consequences as an international pariah rather than only targeting a small number of extreme cabinet officials. These messages were originally released by Streeting himself earlier this year, and multiple anonymous Labour Party sources confirmed to Middle East Eye that the leak was intentionally orchestrated by Streeting to consolidate grassroots support ahead of a potential future leadership bid and increase political pressure on Starmer.

    Within days of receiving Streeting’s message, Mandelson launched a scathing personal attack on the Health Secretary in private text exchanges with Pat McFadden, the UK’s current Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. Mandelson described Streeting’s message as “a wild long hysterical message” and told McFadden he had pushed back against Streeting’s claims, adding that the comments reflected poorly on Streeting’s political maturity. McFadden responded by confirming Streeting was aggressively pushing his views on the issue across WhatsApp groups for sitting Labour MPs.

    Four days after that exchange, Mandelson shared a post from the U.S. State Department on X with McFadden, noting that the U.S. had rejected the upcoming UN two-state solution conference that the UK planned to attend. McFadden replied that Streeting had already circulated a set of videos and a redacted memo to the entire cabinet ahead of the conference, prompting Mandelson to dismiss the action as “pathetic” and joke that Streeting was “experiencing an early midlife crisis.”

    While large portions of the released files remain redacted, the texts offer rare insight into the internal deliberations of senior British cabinet ministers in the months leading up to the UK’s formal recognition of Palestinian statehood. In a July 19 exchange, McFadden described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as heavily redacted, and added that Starmer was not inclined to support symbolic political gestures but may have no other option, suggesting that the scale of humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza left the government with little choice but to move forward with recognition.

    The files also confirm that former UK Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair remained actively engaged with current cabinet ministers throughout the decision-making process. Blair had been a key figure in former U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial Gaza Board of Peace initiative the previous year. When Mandelson asked McFadden if he had consulted Blair on Gaza, McFadden confirmed they had spoken, noting that Blair was focused on long-term solutions, including cooperation with Arab states and reform of the Palestinian Authority. Mandelson, who has long backed a two-state solution dating back to the 1970s, responded that if the party did not move carefully, the decades-long push for a two-state solution would stall entirely, recounting how previous attempts at a final agreement had collapsed due to spoilers on both sides over the past 50 years.

    Earlier this year, former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn publicly released a letter he sent to Streeting, accusing Streeting of a “shameful failure” to resign from the Starmer cabinet despite his private condemnation of Israeli war crimes. In the letter, Corbyn argued that if the UK government acknowledges Israel is committing war crimes, any continued military or political support for the country amounts to the UK knowingly aiding and abetting those violations of international law.

    To date, the Starmer government has only imposed sanctions on far-right Israeli cabinet ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, rejecting widespread calls to sanction the state of Israel itself. While diplomatic relations between the UK and Israel have grown strained under Labour, with the UK imposing a partial arms embargo on Israel, the Starmer government has maintained military cooperation with Israel throughout its ongoing military campaign in Gaza that has been widely described as genocide. As recently as March 2025, just months before Streeting sent his private messages, Starmer walked back comments from then-Foreign Secretary David Lammy that confirmed Israel had committed a breach of international law in Gaza.

  • Trump inserts himself into the centre of America’s 250th birthday celebrations

    Trump inserts himself into the centre of America’s 250th birthday celebrations

    As dozens of high-profile musical performers have pulled out of or disavowed involvement in the series of official anniversary events marking the United States’ 250th year of independence, former and current U.S. President Donald Trump has declared the celebrations do not need celebrity entertainment to succeed.

    On his social media platform Truth Social, Trump issued a blunt dismissal of the exiting artists. “I don’t want so-called ‘artists’ that get paid far too much money, who aren’t happy,” he wrote. “I only want to be surrounded by happy people, smart people, successful people and people that know how to win.”

    Following the wave of withdrawals, the president directed his administration representatives to explore making him the headlining attraction of the 16-day “Great American State Fair” scheduled to open on the National Mall in Washington D.C. later this month. While it remains unconfirmed whether Trump’s proposed “giant Make America Great Again Rally” will replace the absent musicians, the move is the clearest example yet of how the sitting president has centered himself in the nation’s landmark Independence Day commemorations.

    Since returning to the White House in January 2025, Trump has repeatedly framed his second term as a unique opportunity to lead the U.S. through a series of historic national and global events, including this year’s men’s FIFA World Cup, the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Olympics, and the 250th anniversary of American independence. Of these milestone occasions, Trump has shown particular interest in the semiquincentennial, an event steeped in patriotic symbolism and national pageantry.

    A decade ago, the U.S. Congress created the official “America 250” commission to plan coordinated, national anniversary events. But shortly after Trump’s return to office, allies and groups aligned with the president launched a parallel, privately funded initiative called the “Freedom 250” committee to host separate celebrations aligned with the president’s agenda. The competing slate of events includes the National Mall state fair, a UFC mixed martial arts fight hosted on the White House grounds, a national fitness competition in Orlando, Florida, a street Grand Prix racing event through downtown Washington D.C., and what Trump has claimed will be the largest fireworks display the world has ever seen on the Fourth of July. Trump has regularly promoted these events on social media, even sharing AI-generated images of himself starting the street race and posing beside the White House fighting ring.

    In contrast, the official congressionally authorized America 250 initiative has planned far more modest events, including traveling art exhibitions and community block parties across all 50 states.

    Beyond lining up events, the Trump administration has prioritized a series of public space “beautification” projects across Washington D.C. to prepare for months of anniversary activities. More than a dozen iconic fountains in high-traffic public parks and circles across the capital have been restored, and Lafayette Park directly across from the White House is currently closed for major renovations. The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, a landmark at the heart of the National Mall, is undergoing resurfacing work, though the project has drawn questions over its funding and construction methods. Four historic bronze horse statues near Memorial Bridge are set to receive a coating of 23.75-karat gold leaf, while downtown streets have been repaved and city lampposts repainted by work crews.

    Trump, who built his pre-political career as a New York City real estate developer, has leaned into his personal interest in construction projects, often sounding more like a municipal public works official than the U.S. head of state when discussing the renovations. During last week’s Cabinet meeting, he dedicated more than 20 minutes to detailing the capital improvement projects, saying, “I love construction. DC is looking beautiful.”

    Last month, the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts approved plans for a new 250-foot triumphal arch to be built across the Potomac River from the Lincoln Memorial, though the controversial project still requires additional regulatory approval and is already facing ongoing legal challenges from critics who argue it is an unnecessary distortion of the National Mall’s historic landscape.

    White House aides and senior administration officials have worked for months to tie Trump directly to every part of the anniversary celebrations. In March, the U.S. Treasury approved a commemorative gold coin featuring Trump at a presidential desk. Just last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed the department is also developing a special $250 bank note that would feature Trump’s portrait. Adding a portrait of a living U.S. president to federal currency would require explicit approval from a majority in both chambers of Congress, however.

    The proposal for the Trump-branded $250 note drew immediate fierce pushback from congressional Democrats, who are broadly united in opposing the administration’s framing of the anniversary. “Get over yourself,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries wrote on social media platform X. “The upcoming July 4th anniversary is not about a wannabe king. It is about celebrating the American journey.”

    Trump and his administration have dismissed the criticism as unpatriotic, arguing that the administration’s large-scale events and investments are appropriate for a momentous national occasion. But the end result has transformed what was meant to be a unifying national milestone into yet another front in American partisan conflict, coming at a time when the nation remains as deeply politically divided as it has ever been.

  • Sabalenka overpowers Osaka to reach French Open quarter-finals

    Sabalenka overpowers Osaka to reach French Open quarter-finals

    On Monday night at Roland Garros, top-ranked women’s singles star Aryna Sabalenka delivered a powerhouse performance to defeat four-time Grand Slam champion Naomi Osaka in straight sets, securing her spot in the 2024 French Open quarter-finals and extending an extraordinary streak of deep major tournament runs. The world number one’s 7-5, 6-3 victory not only marked her fourth consecutive quarter-final appearance at the clay-court major, but also her 14th straight advancement to the last eight of any Grand Slam — a feat no other remaining singles player at this year’s tournament can match. In fact, Sabalenka now stands as the only former Grand Slam champion left in both the men’s and women’s singles draws, after a wave of unexpected upsets swept through the early rounds.

    Sabalenka’s aggressive game was on full display throughout the clash, firing 39 winners and 12 aces past a resilient Osaka who pushed her to tight service games on multiple occasions. The opening set set the tone for the tight contest: the two power hitters traded breaks in the early going before Sabalenka leveled at 2-2 with a hold that included three aces, the third coming on a powerful second serve. The set remained on serve until the 11th game, when Sabalenka broke through with a blistering backhand winner that earned her two break points, converting on the first after Osaka found the net. She closed out the set with a ruthless love hold to take the lead.

    In the second set, Osaka fought hard to stay in the match, saving a break point in a marathon sixth game to hold a 3-2 lead. But Sabalenka, who had dropped only six points across her previous seven service games, responded with a clever drop shot to hold serve in a grueling game that proved pivotal. In the very next game, a brilliant low volley at the net broke Osaka’s serve, shifting all momentum to the top seed. Two games later, an Osaka double fault set up match point, and Sabalenka sealed the win with a blistering return.

    The Monday night clash carried extra significance beyond tournament advancement: it was the first women’s match scheduled for the French Open’s prime-time night session since 2023, ending a streak of 32 consecutive men’s night matches that drew widespread criticism from players and fans over unequal treatment. Both Sabalenka and Osaka embraced the moment, with Sabalenka — who has previously spoken out in favor of equal scheduling for women — saying she hopes the match opens the door for more women’s night sessions in future tournaments. “I hope that this is the beginning, today’s match. It’s like we open up that door for woman night sessions,” she said after the win.

    For Sabalenka, the victory keeps alive her bid for a maiden French Open title, a chance to avenge her painful 2023 final defeat to Coco Gauff. She will next face Russian rising star Diana Shnaider for a spot in the semi-finals. Reflecting on the wave of upsets that cleared her path to this point, Sabalenka said she has remained focused on her own game regardless of results elsewhere. “I was able to kind of separate myself from what’s going on this year at the Roland Garros,” she said. “I have been around. Anything can happen. That’s tennis. My mindset, it’s basically that I’m ready to do whatever it takes to get this beautiful trophy.”

    For Osaka, the result marks the best deep run of her career at the French Open, ending her tournament in the round of 16. The 28-year-old Japanese star, who once again competed in her iconic sequined gold dress she has compared to the Eiffel Tower at night, showed a new sense of perspective post-match, noting how her approach to the sport has matured. “If I lost this match when I was younger, I’d shut myself in my room or whatever,” she said. “But now I feel like obviously I love tennis, and I’m trying my best to do everything to be the best player I can. But… it’s kind of like a clock in/clock out type of thing. I’m excited to go home and see my daughter.” She added that she found playing the historic night match a fun experience, calling it “really cool” to share the spotlight with Sabalenka.