作者: admin

  • Bessent huddles with G20 to try to rally allies on Iran as tariffs strain ties

    Bessent huddles with G20 to try to rally allies on Iran as tariffs strain ties

    ASHEVILLE, North Carolina — The annual Group of 20 (G20) finance ministers’ summit kicked off in this mountain city on Monday, bringing top financial leaders from the world’s largest economies together at a moment of deep global geopolitical and economic tension, driven by U.S. policy shifts that have upended international order.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opened the gathering by laying out the Biden (Trump) administration’s core priorities: fostering broad-based global economic expansion and reining in the fast-growing sovereign debt that has burdened developing and advanced economies alike. But the summit convenes against a volatile backdrop: renewed U.S.-Iran hostilities that have kept global gasoline prices elevated for consumers worldwide, and a sharp spike in trade tensions with Canada after high-stakes negotiations collapsed, triggering a reciprocal escalation of tariffs between the two North American neighbors.

    In an exclusive interview with the Associated Press ahead of the summit’s opening, Bessent outlined plans to ramp up economic pressure on Iran, announcing a new round of sanctions targeting an additional Iranian bank as part of what the administration has dubbed “Operation Economic Outcast.” This move follows earlier sanctions action this month that restricted the operations of an Egyptian bank with ties to Iran in the United Arab Emirates. “We are prepared to deploy financial violence if necessary to achieve our goals,” Bessent told the AP.

    When pressed by reporters Monday on how quickly the Iranian economy could buckle under the mounting sanctions campaign, Bessent said a shift could come surprisingly fast: “I think it could be within weeks or months. The economy doesn’t have to fully collapse — we just need the regime to come to its senses and change course.”

    Bessent claimed the European Union has offered “fulsome support” for the U.S. sanctions push, a claim backed by a recent EU statement that welcomed expanded economic pressure on Tehran and pledged to coordinate with Washington and other global partners to maintain pressure on the Iranian government.

    Not all major economies have lined up behind the U.S. approach, however. French Finance Minister Roland Lescure told reporters ahead of Monday sessions that the G20 should prioritize reaching a collective, unified statement on a shared path to sustainable global growth, noting that the current global economic outlook carries significant uncertainty. “The world economy is a bit like the weather in Asheville — it’s unpredictable, it’s foggy,” Lescure observed.

    The summit also drew attention for the inclusion of Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, who held a one-on-one bilateral meeting with Bessent on the summit’s sidelines Monday. Critics, particularly from European capitals, have pushed back against allowing Russia to retain its G20 membership amid the ongoing war in Ukraine, but former President Donald Trump defended the decision. “We like getting along with everybody,” Trump told reporters when asked about the invitation. The U.S. Treasury Department has not yet issued additional comment on the meeting.

    Against this fractured geopolitical backdrop, analysts warn that the U.S. may struggle to rally unified support from its traditional allies for its dual agenda on Iran and trade. Daniel Fried, a former assistant secretary of state for European affairs during the George W. Bush administration, noted that recent U.S. policy moves have alienated many long-standing partners. “The U.S. may find it difficult to rally its usual friends and allies under the current circumstances,” Fried said. For the administration to secure broad international buy-in, he added, it will need to “take greater care in consulting with allies and partners than the U.S. has shown in recent months.”

    Bessent is pushing for global cooperation to isolate Iran economically, as the U.S.-led confrontation with Tehran enters its seventh month. While the U.S. conducted another strike against Iranian targets over the weekend, the administration has emphasized it prefers economic pressure over large-scale military action to force policy changes from the Iranian government. To date, the White House has not followed through on earlier threats of an “economic D-Day” that would impose sweeping secondary sanctions on all entities trading with Iran, instead relying primarily on targeted warnings to Iran’s global trading partners.

    The biggest hurdle to the U.S. sanctions campaign remains China, which is the world’s largest importer of Iranian crude oil. When asked if the administration would impose sanctions on Chinese entities for continuing to purchase Iranian oil, Bessent told the AP that “all options are on the table.”

    He rejected widespread claims that the administration is reluctant to confront Beijing over the issue, calling the perception “a completely false narrative.” Bessent insisted that Washington and Beijing share core goals: reopening the strategic Strait of Hormuz to unimpeded global oil trade and preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.

    But Nicholas Mulder, a Cornell University historian specializing in the history of economic sanctions, warns that designating major Chinese financial institutions for sanctions would carry severe global economic risks. “We might see a gradual trickle of smaller listings, but a large designation of, say, a major Chinese bank would cause serious upheaval and prompt retaliation from Beijing,” Mulder explained.

    Mulder also noted that disrupting global oil flows through secondary sanctions would add new upward pressure on global inflation, forcing the U.S. Federal Reserve to continue raising interest rates to cool price growth. “Given that Bessent’s Treasury already finds itself having to quell a growing unease in the bond markets, it will be very challenging to enforce aggressive secondary sanctions with credibility,” Mulder said.

    Beyond geopolitics and sanctions, the summit’s host city carries its own symbolic weight. Asheville is still recovering from the devastation of Hurricane Helene, which swept through the Southeast in September 2024, killing more than 250 people and causing nearly $80 billion in damage across a swath of the U.S. from Florida to the Carolinas. The city’s progress in rebuilding after the storm offers a model for what collective action can achieve, Bessent argued.

    Outlining his economic growth agenda for the summit, Bessent said the U.S. will push for global policy alignment on deregulation and energy independence, alongside discussions of persistent global economic imbalances, updated banking regulations, and sovereign debt restructuring for vulnerable developing economies. “The world has this mountain of debt, and we do have to grow our way out of it,” Bessent told the AP.

  • Djokovic in tears during US Open first-round exit

    Djokovic in tears during US Open first-round exit

    For nearly two decades, Novak Djokovic has owned a perfect record at the opening round of the US Open. That unbroken streak came to a stunning and emotional end on the opening days of the 2026 tournament, where 39-year-old tennis legend dropped a five-set defeat to Argentina’s 25-year-old Mariano Navone, capping a match marked by visible physical struggle and uncharacteristic vulnerability.

    Djokovic, a 24-time Grand Slam champion and the tournament’s fourth seed, entered the match having never fallen in the opening round at Flushing Meadows, and had not lost a first-round Grand Slam match since 2002. Through the four-hour contest in New York’s oppressive humidity, the Serbian icon fought through severe physical distress, repeatedly feeling nauseous and vomiting into a court-side towel bin, before ultimately succumbing to a 7-6 (7-5), 5-7, 4-6, 6-2, 6-1 defeat.

    The match unfolded with a promising start for Djokovic, who broke Navone’s first serve and jumped to an early 4-1 lead. But a grueling extended rally sapped his energy, and his physical struggles quickly derailed his momentum. By the end of the first set, he was bent over double between points, his serve and groundstroke speed dropped dramatically, and he called for a medical timeout to take medication to ease his symptoms. Navone, ranked world No. 49 and never advancing past the second round at the US Open, held his nerve to take the first set in a tiebreak.

    Cooler conditions under the Arthur Ashe Stadium roof briefly revitalized Djokovic, who fought back to level the match at one set apiece and even claimed a break lead in the third set — a position the legendary competitor has almost always turned into a comeback win throughout his career. But this time, Djokovic could not close out the match. As his health deteriorated further, Navone kept pressing, and the contest slipped away from the 39-year-old in the final two sets, culminating in a lopsided 6-1 fifth set that left the capacity crowd at Ashe Stadium stunned and somber.

    It was in the final set that the emotion boiled over: Djokovic broke down in tears as the match slipped away, a raw display of disappointment few fans have seen from the notoriously tough competitor. After the final point, he mustered a smile to congratulate Navone on what will go down as one of the biggest upsets of his career, but could not hold back emotion as he walked back to the locker room, clearly distraught over the result.

    The defeat ends Djokovic’s bid for a 25th Grand Slam singles title, which would have given him the outright all-time record, breaking a tie with Margaret Court. The tournament had been viewed as a strong opportunity for Djokovic, with world No. 1 Jannik Sinner sidelined by injury and defending champion Carlos Alcaraz returning from a long wrist layoff. This loss comes just two weeks after another shocking early exit to Argentine player Thiago Tirante at the Cincinnati Open, where Djokovic struggled in similar humid conditions.

    After the match, Djokovic opened up about a long-standing “serious” health issue that has plagued him for years in high heat and humidity, causing vomiting, cramping and widespread muscle pain that left his body unable to compete. “It’s something that I have been carrying pretty much every match this year — vomiting, throwing up,” he told reporters. “And then my whole body starts to collapse basically, cramping and pain — the back just gave up in the end and shoulder, and I couldn’t close it out.”

    The result has stoked long-simmering questions about Djokovic’s eventual retirement, questions the legend has repeatedly pushed back on. In a documentary released earlier this month, he insisted he has never placed an “expiry date” on his career, noting: “Why would I talk about retirement when I still keep proving to myself that I can still win?”

    Despite the historic first-round exit and his ongoing health struggles, Djokovic says retirement is not on his immediate agenda. His priority, he says, remains finding a solution to the undiagnosed health issue that has disrupted his 2026 season, leaving his legendary career hanging in a rare moment of uncertainty.

  • AI and robotics drive an IPO boom in China as Shein lists in Hong Kong

    AI and robotics drive an IPO boom in China as Shein lists in Hong Kong

    A growing wave of initial public offerings (IPOs) is surging through China’s major financial hubs of Shanghai and Hong Kong, fueled by ravenous investor demand for artificial intelligence and advanced technology stocks, alongside a shifting preference for domestic listings over overseas exchanges. The trend is reshaping global capital markets, positioning China’s two leading exchanges as major global players in new share issuance this year.

    The latest high-profile offering to hit the market is fast fashion and e-commerce giant Shein, a China-founded brand that is set to make its trading debut Tuesday on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The blockbuster IPO is projected to raise $1.7 billion, ranking among the city’s largest new share sales of 2026. Shein’s decision to list in Hong Kong came after it weighed options in New York and London, reflecting a broader industry shift toward domestic venues for Chinese firms.

    This year’s IPO boom has already been marked by a string of massive technology offerings. In July, CXMT, China’s top domestic memory chip manufacturer, secured more than $8.6 billion through an IPO on Shanghai’s Nasdaq-style STAR Market, marking the second-largest offering in the bourse’s history and the second-biggest IPO on mainland China this year. CXMT’s shares exploded 466% higher on their first day of trading, riding a wave of demand for AI-capable semiconductor manufacturing. Just one month later, leading Chinese humanoid robot developer Unitree followed suit with its own Shanghai debut, where shares soared 460% on opening day.

    Industry analysts note that investor enthusiasm for AI and next-generation technology is the core engine driving the current market momentum. “The current IPO boom is powered by investor appetite for AI and robotics,” explained Ruiying Zhao, senior research analyst at S&P Global Market Intelligence, adding that retail investor activity makes up a large portion of trading volume on Shanghai’s exchange.

    Perris Lee, head of APAC equity capital markets for ION Analytics, noted that CXMT’s landmark offering carries broader strategic implications for China’s technology ecosystem. CXMT, founded in 2016, saw revenue surge more than 700% year-over-year to 50.8 billion yuan (approximately $7.5 billion) in the first quarter of 2026, driven by skyrocketing demand for AI-grade memory chips. Lee said the successful IPO “placed China in a strategically significant position in tech manufacturing related to AI” and serves as clear evidence of the country’s progress toward its goal of technological self-sufficiency.

    Data from financial data platform LSEG confirms the scale of this year’s IPO boom. Total proceeds from IPOs and secondary listings on the Shanghai and Hong Kong exchanges have already surpassed $54 billion so far in 2026, outstripping 2025’s full-year total of more than $46 billion. Combined, the two Chinese exchanges account for roughly 21% of global IPO proceeds this year, ranking second globally only behind the U.S.-based Nasdaq, which holds a 55% global share. Nasdaq’s leading position was boosted by SpaceX’s $75 billion mega-IPO in June, which cemented the U.S. exchange as the world’s largest IPO market for 2026. To access international capital while adhering to China’s restrictions on foreign investment in mainland exchanges, many Chinese firms pursue parallel listings in Hong Kong that are open to global investors.

    A key factor driving the shift toward domestic listings is tightening regulatory scrutiny on both sides of the U.S.-China relationship in recent years. Chinese firms operating in strategically critical sectors such as advanced technology now face far higher barriers to listing on U.S. exchanges, pushing many to pursue offerings closer to home. Beyond regulatory hurdles, domestic IPOs also offer a faster path to going public, noted Howie Farn, capital markets partner at international law firm Freshfields.

    Beyond semiconductors and robotics, other high-tech Chinese firms have also seen strong investor demand for their Hong Kong IPOs this year, including Apple supplier Luxshare Precision Industry and Zhongji Innolight, a leading manufacturer of optical transceivers for AI data centers. The pipeline of future offerings remains robust, with two more major Chinese robotics firms, AGIBOT and Deep Robotics, already planning IPOs in Shanghai or Hong Kong in the coming months.

    Despite the widespread market enthusiasm, some industry observers warn of growing risks, including the potential for an AI investment bubble that has already shown early signs of correction. After record oversubscriptions and massive first-day gains, a number of newly listed tech firms have seen their share prices retreat sharply from debut-day peaks. As of last Friday, Unitree’s share price had dropped more than 40% from its all-time high set on opening day.

    Zhao from S&P Global notes that the same valuation questions worrying U.S. AI investors are now taking hold in China. “The critical question remains: is the AI sentiment enough?” she said. “For a durable market cycle, investors will demand sustainable revenue, visible profit margins, and realistic valuations.”

    The global AI investment frenzy has also diverted risk appetite away from non-tech IPOs like Shein. Jacob Cooke, CEO of WPIC Marketing + Technologies, explained that “the AI investment cycle is absorbing much of the risk appetite that would have otherwise flowed to a company like Shein.” Shein’s IPO values the company at roughly $27 billion, only a fraction of its peak valuation several years ago. That drop in valuation also partially stems from new trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. and EU that eliminate de minimis tax exemptions for small imported packages, cutting into Shein’s core cross-border business model.

  • China’s factory activity contracts in August despite an uptick in export demand

    China’s factory activity contracts in August despite an uptick in export demand

    HONG KONG, Aug. 31 (Xinhua) — After five consecutive months of contraction, China’s manufacturing sector saw a notable incremental improvement in August, with key indicators coming in better than market forecasts, lifted by unexpectedly strong global demand for Chinese exports, official data released Monday shows.

    According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), China’s official manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) — a closely watched gauge of factory activity — edged up to 49.8 in August from July’s reading of 49.2. While the figure remains below the 50-point threshold that separates expansion from contraction, it outperformed the median expectation of 49.3 from a survey of economists by major financial news outlets.

    The monthly PMI survey tracks a broad range of manufacturing metrics, and several key sub-indexes moved back into expansion territory in August, signaling broad-based improvement across the sector. The production sub-index rose to 50.4 from 49.1 in July, while the overall new orders sub-index climbed to 50.6 from 48.5. Most notably, the new export orders sub-index improved to 50.1 from July’s 49.6, crossing into expansion for the first time in three months and confirming solid global demand for Chinese goods.

    “Manufacturing activity rebounded thanks to strong export demand,” Nguyen Hoang Nam, a China economist at London-based independent research firm Capital Economics, wrote in a Monday research note. Huo Lihui, chief statistician at the NBS, also noted in an official statement that the August PMI results reflect broad incremental improvement across China’s overall economy.

    This latest uptick in factory activity aligns with recent export data that shows Chinese shipments have maintained double-digit growth through the first half of the year. Chinese exports surged nearly 24% year-on-year in July, following an 18% overall expansion across the first seven months of 2025. Multiple drivers are behind this strong export performance, economists say.

    First, the global boom in artificial intelligence development has spurred massive demand for high-tech Chinese exports, particularly semiconductors and related manufacturing components. Second, sustained elevated global energy prices stemming from ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, including the Iran conflict, have accelerated global adoption of electric vehicles, and Chinese EV manufacturers have captured a growing share of the growing global market. Third, demand for other green technology products, including solar panels and wind turbine components, has continued to accelerate this year after strong growth in 2024, adding further momentum to export gains.

    “Demand for green technologies was already accelerating last year and has continued to strengthen, providing an important additional boost to Chinese exports so far this year,” said Max Zenglein, senior economist for Asia Pacific at business research organization The Conference Board.

    Trade flows have also shifted in recent months, following the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the White House last year and the reimposition of broad punitive tariffs on Chinese goods. U.S.-China trade has declined as a result, but Chinese exporters have expanded market share in other regions, particularly the European Union and Southeast Asia, offsetting much of the lost sales to the U.S.

    Trade tensions between the two world’s largest economies are expected to be a top agenda item when Trump meets Chinese President Xi Jinping for high-level talks scheduled for late September, according to officials from both sides.

    Despite the bright spot of strong export growth, China’s economy still faces significant headwinds that are holding back broader expansion. Persistently sluggish domestic demand, driven largely by a years-long protracted slump in the country’s property sector, continues to weigh on overall economic growth. In the second quarter of 2025, China’s annual GDP growth came in at 4.3%, the slowest pace recorded in more than three years.

  • Leaders of China, Russia and India are among heads of state meeting to counter US influence

    Leaders of China, Russia and India are among heads of state meeting to counter US influence

    The capital of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, is this week hosting the high-profile Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, which has drawn heads of state from major global powers including China, Russia, and India, as observers frame the bloc as a growing counterweight to long-standing Western-dominated global governance structures.

    The summit’s agenda includes formal plenary sessions and a packed slate of bilateral meetings on its sidelines. Among the most anticipated talks are a Monday meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin, followed by discussions between Putin and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian scheduled for Tuesday, the date of the bloc’s official main summit sessions.

    For two key member states facing intense geopolitical friction with the West, the gathering offers a critical opportunity to deepen ties with other non-Western nations. Russia is now four and a half years into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, while Iran has been engaged in open conflict with the U.S. and Israel for six months; both view the SCO platform as a space to strengthen economic and political alignment with partners across the Global East and Global South.

    Founded in 2001 by China, Russia and four Central Asian republics as a regional security dialogue forum, the SCO has expanded dramatically in size and geopolitical clout over the past 24 years, even as its core institutional mandates and public profile remain relatively underdefined outside member states. Today, the bloc counts 10 full member states: China, Russia, India, Iran, Pakistan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, with dozens more countries holding formal dialogue partner status.

    Alongside Russia, China has positioned the SCO as a viable alternative to Western-led multilateral blocs such as the G7, making active pushes over the past decade to expand the organization’s geographic reach and policy scope, while pledging billions in development and financial assistance to member and partner states. Last week, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the bloc has successfully “explored a new path for regional cooperation,” with Beijing consistently advancing a vision for a multipolar alternative global order with Moscow’s backing.

    Despite the framing of the SCO as a unified counterweight to Western influence, analysts emphasize that the bloc remains far from a cohesive political or military alliance, with deep-seated divergent interests and long-running disagreements between many of its core members.

    For India, which shares tense border relations with China and has a long-standing territorial and geopolitical rivalry with fellow member Pakistan, experts frame the summit as more an exercise in strategic signaling than a venue for groundbreaking substantive outcomes.

    Dinakar Peri, a security studies fellow at Carnegie India, explained that the SCO’s real value for New Delhi lies in giving India a seat at the table in a region increasingly defined by great power competition. “While it may not entirely shape the agenda, it gives New Delhi a first-hand view of the region and allows it to hedge its position with others,” Peri noted, adding that membership lets India protect its core interests, track shifting geopolitical trends, and project itself as a reliable regional stakeholder.

    Turkey, which has held SCO dialogue partner status since 2012, is also using the summit to advance its long-held goal of full membership. For Ankara, SCO membership fits into a long-running strategy of balanced foreign policy: it maintains long-standing institutional ties to the West as a NATO member, while seeking to expand its political and economic influence across Eurasia. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has repeatedly reiterated his push for full permanent membership, a move that comes as Turkey’s decades-long bid to join the European Union remains effectively stalled, even as the country retains a close 1995 trade deal with the bloc. The meeting’s reporting was supported by contributions from correspondents Andrew Wilks in Istanbul, Huizhong Wu in Bangkok, and Aijaz Hussain in New Delhi.

  • Great power rivalry threatens to overshadow a summit of some of the world’s smallest island nations

    Great power rivalry threatens to overshadow a summit of some of the world’s smallest island nations

    KOROR, Palau — Against the backdrop of a calm tropical archipelago with no traffic lights, far from the global diplomatic hubs of New York and Davos, leaders from some of the world’s smallest sovereign states have gathered for the annual Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting. For this year’s gathering, the tiny host nation Palau, which has a permanent population of just 18,000, has seen its population jump to 20,000 with the arrival of delegates from dozens of participating nations and territories.

    In the lead-up to the summit’s official opening on Monday, local communities mobilized to welcome guests: Palauan President Surangel Whipps Jr. joined senior government officials in cleaning litter along the island’s main coastal road, while local barbers and tattoo artists stepped in to volunteer as drivers for delegates, and student groups prepared to guide visiting dignitaries. But beyond this distinctly warm, unhurried Pacific welcome, a tense, escalating geopolitical dispute simmers beneath the surface, centered on which global powers will shape the future of this vast ocean region.

    Over the past several years, major global powers have raced to cement strategic alliances among Pacific island nations, intensifying a high-stakes contest for regional influence that pits China against the United States, Taiwan, Australia and New Zealand. These competing overtures have drawn deep dividing lines among the Forum’s 18 member states and territories, threatening to derail the annual gathering that has long served as the region’s premier diplomatic body.

    “The Pacific is our home, not a theater for geopolitical competition,” President Whipps told reporters on Sunday. He urged major global powers closely monitoring the week’s talks to stay out of internal discussions, which he said should center on the existential threats facing small Pacific island nations: accelerating climate change and collapsing local economies. “Let’s not use this as a place that we should be threatening or making people feel uncomfortable,” he added. But observers warn the reality of the summit will be far from simple.

    Many Pacific Islands Forum members, some of which count their populations in the low thousands or tens of thousands, were long known primarily as idyllic tropical tourist destinations. Today, however, these nations hold outsized strategic and economic importance: most control sprawling, resource-rich exclusive economic zones brimming with commercial fisheries and untapped seabed minerals, and their positions across the breadth of the Pacific have made them key strategic nodes amid rising global tensions, turning small island states into sought-after international allies.

    While Forum members often refer to themselves as a “Pacific family,” they encompass diverse cultures and political systems, and their geographic isolation means leaders rarely have the chance to meet in person. For decades, the annual leaders’ summit was a relaxed, informal affair, where small states with little global clout sought to amplify their collective voice by agreeing to unified positions — most notably, pushing wealthy major emitters to cut greenhouse gas emissions as rising sea levels began to threaten low-lying atoll nations with complete submersion.

    But over the past decade, as major powers have ramped up efforts to secure access to Pacific waters and port infrastructure by signing security agreements, offering large-scale funding, expanded immigration access and other incentives, the Forum’s longstanding ability to speak with one unified voice has fractured. The body’s traditional “Pacific Way” of decision-making — which requires consensus rather than a majority vote to move forward — has increasingly struggled to overcome these divides.

    “We see examples of this where that consensus-based model, which is referred to as the Pacific Way, can sometimes lead to a bit of paralysis in taking action,” explained Oliver Nobetau, Pacific Islands program director at the Australian think tank the Lowy Institute. A recent high-profile example underscored this weakness: when Forum foreign ministers gathered earlier this year, they failed to reach a consensus on a statement criticizing China’s July launch of a ballistic missile into the South Pacific. While most members strongly opposed the launch, the refusal of just two states to endorse the statement meant no official statement could be released at all.

    “At this point in time when Pacific Islands are facing a lot of acute security issues, decision-making is paramount for this summit,” Nobetau said. “We’ll be looking to see if President Whipps can sort of steer the forum to take tangible action.”

    Beyond geopolitical rivalry, Pacific nations are grappling with a cascade of immediate, urgent crises. The current El Niño event has triggered extreme weather across the region, bringing severe droughts and destructive floods that threaten already fragile food security and clean water access. Most island nations rely heavily on imported goods and depend on foreign aid to balance their budgets, leaving them extremely vulnerable to these shocks. Compounding this, global fuel volatility stemming from ongoing Middle East tensions has triggered severe economic disruption across the region, which is almost entirely dependent on imported diesel and gasoline delivered through a fragile global supply chain — several nations have already declared national emergencies in response.

    President Whipps has proposed a path forward for wealthy powers seeking regional involvement: opening their coffers to fund the widespread installation of solar energy infrastructure across the Pacific, helping the region transition away from fossil fuels. “What are they doing together with us to partner to get a 100% renewable Pacific?” he asked this week.

    Geopolitical tensions are set to dominate much of the summit’s discourse, however. Palau is one of only 12 countries worldwide that maintains formal diplomatic recognition of Taiwan, a stance that has drawn consistent pushback from Beijing, which claims Taiwan as an inalienable part of its territory. The island nation also sits at the center of other great power competition: located in the western Pacific adjacent to the Philippines, Palau draws significant tourism from Asian markets and maintains closer ties to the United States than most Forum members, under a Compact of Free Association that grants U.S. defense and security access to Palauan territory in exchange for tens of millions of dollars in annual U.S. funding.

    This year’s summit also finds leaders once again attempting to finalize rules governing the participation of non-member states in Forum meetings. Approved participating nations such as the U.S. and China hold formal “dialogue partner” status, while Taiwan holds separate standing as a development partner. Beijing has increasingly pressured Forum hosts to bar Taiwanese envoys from the annual summit; this dispute grew so acrimonious ahead of the 2025 summit set to be hosted by the Solomon Islands that all non-member delegates were ultimately barred from attending entirely. This year, Palau’s close diplomatic ties to Taipei have allowed Taiwanese Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung to attend the summit, drawing a formal warning from Beijing that it opposes Taiwanese participation.

    The prospect of another summit overshadowed by non-member great power rivalry has sparked frustration among Pacific officials and regional analysts. Over the weekend, the gathering was already hit by unexpected upheaval: newly elected Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale, who is seen as more aligned with Australia than his Beijing-leaning predecessor, flew home just hours after arriving in Koror after a domestic political opponent launched a leadership challenge. It remains unclear how much his sudden departure, alongside the absence of other leaders including Kiribati President Taneti Maamau, whose administration has warmed ties with Beijing, stems from unease over the summit’s geopolitical dynamics.

    “You’d be defying gravity and logic if you said it wasn’t a big problem,” New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters told reporters in Koror on Sunday, referring to repeated attempts at foreign interference in the Forum’s work. The absence of key leaders was “seriously disappointing” and did not help the summit’s work, Peters added, but noted “in the main the delegations are of the highest standard. So let’s see how we go.”

  • Why is this teenager fighting fires dressed as superman?

    Why is this teenager fighting fires dressed as superman?

    As Indonesia grapples with the extreme environmental impacts of an intense super El Niño event, one 17-year-old volunteer firefighter has captured global attention for an unexpected choice that has turned him into an online sensation. Against the backdrop of scorching temperatures, prolonged dry conditions, and widespread wildfire outbreaks that have ravaged parts of the archipelago, this young volunteer has stepped up to serve his community while clad in a full Superman costume, turning a routine volunteer shift into a moment that has resonated with people across social media platforms.

    Super El Niño events, defined by unusually strong warming of Pacific sea surface temperatures, typically bring dramatic shifts to global weather patterns, and Indonesia has been hit particularly hard this cycle. The prolonged dry spell triggered by the climate event has created ideal conditions for uncontrolled wildfires, which spread rapidly across vegetation and agricultural land, straining official firefighting resources and forcing local communities to mobilize civilian volunteers to contain the blazes.

    Rather than shrink from the challenge, the teen decided to bring a dose of hope and inspiration to a grim situation by suiting up as one of the world’s most recognizable symbols of heroism. Images and videos of him working alongside other volunteer firefighters, his iconic Superman suit standing out against the smoke and charred landscape, quickly spread across TikTok, Instagram, and other social platforms, racking up millions of views and thousands of shares in just days. Online users have praised the teen for turning a dangerous, draining mission into a reminder of everyday courage, celebrating his blend of community service and playful creativity that has lifted spirits amid a devastating climate event.

    While the teen’s costume has drawn most of the public’s attention, his work as a volunteer underscores the larger strain that extreme climate events place on local communities across Indonesia. As official fire crews work around the clock to contain blazes that threaten residential areas, rainforests, and agricultural operations, civilian volunteers like the 17-year-old play a critical role in supporting response efforts, filling gaps left by stretched government resources. What started as a small, personal gesture to lift morale has now put a global spotlight on both the grassroots response to Indonesia’s wildfire crisis and the ongoing impacts of super El Niño on Southeast Asian nations.

  • What will Sonia Gandhi’s memoir reveal about India’s most powerful dynasty?

    What will Sonia Gandhi’s memoir reveal about India’s most powerful dynasty?

    For nearly 30 years, Sonia Gandhi has stood as one of the most consequential and closely watched political figures in modern Indian history. When the Italian-born widow of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi took the helm of India’s historic Indian National Congress party in 1998, few observers expected the once-reticent outsider to emerge as the backbone of the country’s main opposition movement.

    From her unexpected entry into politics to the seismic 2004 decision to reject the prime ministership despite holding full party and coalition support, Gandhi’s career has been defined by pivotal choices and enduring public mysteries. Now, at 79 years old, she is preparing to share her own firsthand account of a life marked by extraordinary love, unthinkable tragedy, and unrivaled political power with the upcoming memoir *Belonging: A Journey of Love*, set for publication this November. The book will be released by Alfred A Knopf in the United States and William Collins in the United Kingdom.

    The memoir traces Gandhi’s life from her 1965 days as a 19-year-old student at Cambridge University, where she first met and fell in love with Rajiv Gandhi – grandson of Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister – through her decades at the center of Indian political life. Publishers describe the work as a revelatory, candid reflection on a journey that carried her from a quiet childhood in small-town Italy to the core of India’s most influential political dynasty. For Gandhi, the memoir is deeply personal: in a statement from her publisher, she frames it as “a testament of my heart’s journey through the tender joys and dark despair that have marked my life.”

    Gandhi’s life has been indelibly shaped by the violence that cut short two generations of her family’s political service. She was present when her mother-in-law, then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, was assassinated by her own bodyguards in 1984, and just seven years later, she lost Rajiv to a suicide bomber’s attack. These losses, which reshaped the course of Indian politics, pushed the woman who had spent years avoiding public life into the political arena she now dominates. When the Congress Party fractured and declined through the 1990s, Gandhi agreed to join the party in 1997, and just 12 months later, she was elected its president – despite being dismissed by rivals as nothing more than an inexperienced “housewife” and an outsider foreign to Indian politics.

    What makes this memoir one of the most anticipated political books in recent Indian history is the long list of unresolved questions it could finally answer. At the top of that list is the 2004 decision that redefined modern India: after leading Congress to an unexpected election victory, Gandhi turned down the prime ministership and instead nominated Manmohan Singh, the architect of India’s 1990s economic liberalization, to the post. Political observers have debated the decision for decades: Was she stepping down because of widespread political backlash against her foreign origins? Or, as former Congress leader Natwar Singh claimed in his own memoir, did Sonia step aside after her son Rahul Gandhi vehemently opposed her taking the role, fearing she would suffer the same fatal fate as Indira and Rajiv?

    Beyond that defining moment, readers and political analysts are eager for insight into other lingering mysteries: What pushed her to enter politics full-time after years of rejecting a public role? How does she reflect on the controversial Bofors corruption scandal that undermined Rajiv Gandhi’s government, and what does she know about longstanding allegations linking the family to Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi? How does she view the 2004-2014 Congress-led UPA government, which passed landmark progressive policies including the Right to Information Act and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act but ended its second term mired in corruption allegations and policy gridlock? What does she think of her son Rahul’s leadership of the Congress, and why did she choose Rahul over his more charismatic sister Priyanka to carry the family’s political legacy?

    Even before its release, the memoir has been entangled in political controversy in India. Reports that Penguin Random House India requested edits to portions of the manuscript sparked allegations from Congress leaders that the publisher faced political pressure from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to remove passages critical of the current government. Penguin Random House has disputed these claims, stating it remains fully willing to publish the book and that any discussions about the manuscript are standard industry practice.

    Today, as the Nehru-Gandhi legacy faces unprecedented attack from the ruling BJP, which has campaigned for a “Congress-mukt Bharat” (Congress-free India), Gandhi’s memoir arrives as a defense of the dynasty she has spent decades preserving. Political journalist Neerja Chowdhury argues that the book’s title, *Belonging*, reveals its core focus: Gandhi’s long-held sense of duty to preserve the political legacy she inherited, and her journey to finding her place as a leader in India. As Gandhi notes, much has been written about her family, but few accounts have captured the full truth of their motivations, their actions, and their shared humanity. For the iconic leader, this memoir is less a political memoir than a homage to the family that shaped her life and the nation she has spent decades serving.

  • FIFA president Infantino ‘must go’, says ex-UEFA boss Platini

    FIFA president Infantino ‘must go’, says ex-UEFA boss Platini

    A major upheaval is roiling global football governance, as former UEFA president and French football icon Michel Platini has publicly demanded that current FIFA chief Gianni Infantino step down immediately in the wake of cascading scandals that have undermined the credibility of world football’s top governing body.

    Infantino, who previously served as Platini’s general secretary during the Frenchman’s tenure leading UEFA, has faced growing backlash in recent weeks. The 56-year-old Swiss-Italian administrator drew early fire for his scrapped proposal to open FIFA flagship events including the World Cup to private outside investment. Criticism has only intensified following the conclusion of the recent 2026 World Cup hosted in North America, where multiple procedural controversies sparked public outrage.

    Speaking in an interview with French broadcaster Canal+, Platini laid out his core accusation against Infantino: that as the official guardian of international football’s rules, the FIFA president has fundamentally failed to uphold those standards. “Economic affairs are one thing but Infantino has failed because he is the guarantor of the rules of the game and he didn’t respect them,” Platini stated.

    Platini called out multiple specific rule breaks from the recent World Cup. He criticized the extended four-minute hydration breaks introduced during matches, which host broadcasters repurposed for extra commercial advertising slots that have no basis in official competition rules. He also called out the overextended half-time show during the World Cup final, which stretched 15 minutes past the maximum allowed duration. Most damaging, Platini argued, was the reversal of a red card suspension for United States forward Folarin Balogun, which came immediately after a personal phone call from former U.S. President Donald Trump to Infantino.

    “The ad breaks are not in the rules, the 30-minute half-time break in the final is not in the rules, and the red card, that’s the worst,” Platini said. “He’s the guarantor (of the rules), he doesn’t respect them, he must go.”

    The call for Infantino’s resignation comes amid a coordinated push against his leadership from multiple continental football confederations. UEFA has already threatened to boycott all FIFA tournaments unless Infantino abandons his FIFA Forward Enterprises plan for private investment, and has formally leveled accusations of “criminal mismanagement” against him over the financing proposal. Top confederations from CONCACAF and Asian football have joined the pressure campaign, as Infantino prepares to stand for re-election to the FIFA presidency in March.

    Platini argued that institutional pressure alone will not be enough to force Infantino out of office. “It won’t be sporting institutions that sort this out and bring him down,” he said. “If UEFA wants to bring down Infantino, it will be through the courts.”

    The falling out between Platini and Infantino is rooted in a decade-long power struggle that reshaped global football. In 2015, Platini — who was widely expected to succeed Sepp Blatter as FIFA president — was accused of fraud over an alleged illegal $2 million payment from Blatter. Though Platini was ultimately acquitted of all criminal charges in 2025, he was forced to step down from UEFA at the time, clearing the way for Infantino to win the FIFA presidency in 2016 elections.

    “I always knew that he loved money and power,” Platini said of his former protégé. “He didn’t bring me down, he benefitted from it. But now that there are lots of investigations into him all over the world, there is some noise about how he knew about certain things — let’s see what happens next.”

    Platini is currently pursuing legal action against Infantino alongside former FIFA officials Marco Villiger and Domenico Scala in French courts. The lawsuit seeks financial compensation for damages Platini claims he suffered from a coordinated conspiracy to block his 2015 FIFA presidential bid. He accuses the three men of criminal conspiracy, false accusations, influence peddling, and aiding and abetting corrupt activity.

  • ‘Return to play’: Sam Walker undergoes surgery as Roosters star races clock to play again this year

    ‘Return to play’: Sam Walker undergoes surgery as Roosters star races clock to play again this year

    The Sydney Roosters’ 2024 National Rugby League (NRL) premiership aspirations now hang in the balance, as the club confirms star halfback Sam Walker underwent successful surgery on a severe syndesmosis injury to his left foot this past Sunday – while leaving the door ajar for a potential comeback before the end of the current season. The injury unfolded during the team’s round 26 clash against the Dolphins, when Walker was brought down in a tackle by Dolphins forward Kulikefu Finefeuiaki in the 53rd minute of play. Clearly in severe pain, the playmaker was unable to leave the pitch under his own power, requiring assistance from training staff to exit the field, and the match ended in a costly defeat for the Roosters. In the wake of the injury and back-to-back poor results, the Roosters have dropped two places in the NRL ladder standings, sliding from first position to fourth over just two weeks. Even with the loss and Walker’s unexpected injury, however, the club has already secured a top-four finish in the regular season, a result that guarantees them a second chance via the semi-finals knockout structure in September. That safety net does little to soften the impact of Walker’s absence, though: the Roosters’ long-held title ambitions are overwhelmingly dependent on the young star recovering fast enough to be cleared for game action before the end of the 2024 campaign. In the immediate lead-up to the team’s upcoming match against South Sydney Rabbitohs, utility back Hugo Savala has shifted into the halfback position, a role he is widely expected to retain for the upcoming fixture. In an official public statement confirming the injury and procedure, the Sydney Roosters outlined the next steps for Walker’s recovery. “Sydney Roosters halfback Sam Walker sustained a syndesmosis injury during the club’s round 26 NRL match against the Dolphins,” the statement read. “Walker underwent surgery on Sunday and will work closely with the club’s medical and rehabilitation staff towards a return to play as his recovery allows.” Team representatives and Walker’s teammates are scheduled to address assembled media on Monday afternoon to deliver an additional, more detailed update on the playmaker’s recovery timeline and progress. The injury has sent immediate ripple effects through the NRL title race, with experts and fans now debating how Walker’s potential absence – or a limited, late return – could shift the dynamics of the upcoming finals series.