作者: admin

  • Pope heads to Cameroon as separatists announce 3-day pause in fighting

    Pope heads to Cameroon as separatists announce 3-day pause in fighting

    In the opening leg of his four-nation African tour following a stop in Algiers, Algeria, Pope Leo XIV — the first American pope in history — is set to arrive in Yaoundé, Cameroon’s capital, on Wednesday for a high-stakes visit focused on advancing peace, confronting systemic corruption, and clarifying the ethical obligations of political leadership. This trip puts the Vatican at the center of one of central Africa’s longest-running crises, pitting the Church’s commitment to democratic governance against the entrenched authoritarian rule of 93-year-old President Paul Biya, who has held uninterrupted power since 1982 and secured a disputed eighth term in national elections last October.

    The disputed election result has remained a flashpoint of national tension since October 2023. Biya’s main challenger, Issa Tchiroma Bakary, has publicly rejected the official outcome, claiming he won the vote and urging Cameroonians to refuse to recognize Biya’s new term. Even ahead of the pope’s arrival, Vatican officials have made clear that Catholic social doctrine stands in opposition to the authoritarian style of leadership Biya has cultivated over his four decades in power. Just days before the visit, Pope Leo outlined his broader vision for ethical governance in a message to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, dated April 1, that did not name Biya or Cameroon explicitly but carried clear resonance for the trip. In the address, the pope argued that authentic democracy acts as a critical guardrail against the abuse of political power, and that democratic systems only remain healthy when rooted in moral principle and a universal commitment to human dignity. Without that foundational commitment, he warned, democracy risks devolving into either majoritarian tyranny or a thin facade that masks unchecked control by narrow economic and technological elites.

    Upon his arrival in Yaoundé, the pope’s first official engagement will be a face-to-face meeting with Biya at the presidential palace. Following that audience, Leo will address a gathering of government officials, civil service leaders, and foreign diplomats, before traveling to a local orphanage operated by a Catholic congregation of nuns. With roughly 29 percent of Cameroon’s population identifying as Catholic, the visit carries deep cultural and spiritual weight for the country, alongside its political implications.

    The centerpiece of Pope Leo’s time in Cameroon will be a landmark peace gathering scheduled for Thursday in Bamenda, the capital of the country’s Northwest Region, which has borne the brunt of nearly a decade of separatist violence. The conflict erupted in 2017, when English-speaking separatist factions launched an armed rebellion to split from Cameroon’s French-speaking majority and form an independent state, Ambazonia. According to data from the International Crisis Group, the years of fighting have left more than 6,000 people dead and forced over 600,000 residents from their homes.

    In a gesture of goodwill timed to the pope’s visit, separatist groups have announced a temporary ceasefire. The Unity Alliance, a coalition of multiple separatist factions, confirmed the three-day pause in hostilities in a statement released Monday evening, noting that the truce reflects the profound spiritual importance of Pope Leo’s trip and is intended to ensure safe passage for civilians, pilgrims, and visiting dignitaries throughout the visit.

    Following the peace meeting in Bamenda, the pope’s second major public event will be an open-air Mass on Friday in Cameroon’s largest coastal city, Douala, where event organizers are projecting an attendance of roughly 600,000 worshippers and attendees. After wrapping up his time in Cameroon on Friday, Pope Leo will travel on Saturday to Angola for the third leg of his African tour, which will conclude the following week in Equatorial Guinea.

    This Associated Press religion coverage is produced through a collaboration with The Conversation US, with financial support from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP retains sole editorial responsibility for all content.

  • Aussie finance giant Latitude Finance Australia hit with $3.96m fine after 2.7m anti-spam law breaches

    Aussie finance giant Latitude Finance Australia hit with $3.96m fine after 2.7m anti-spam law breaches

    One of Australia’s major financial services providers has been handed a substantial eight-figure penalty for persistent violations of the nation’s spam marketing regulations, marking the second time in as many years the firm has been punished for identical misconduct. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), the country’s independent communications regulator, announced this week that Latitude Finance Australia will pay $3.96 million in penalties after an investigation uncovered more than 2.7 million breaches of Australian spam legislation.

    Of the millions of unauthorized and non-compliant marketing messages distributed by the firm, more than 2.3 million failed to include accurate contact information for the company as required by law. Additionally, 344,416 of these commercial messages lacked a working unsubscribe mechanism that would allow recipients to opt out of future communications, according to ACMA’s official findings. Most of the non-compliant messages were sent to promote Latitude’s line of credit card products and other consumer financial services. While many messages instructed users to reply with the word ‘STOP’ to opt out of future mailings, the regulator confirmed that a large share of these requests were never processed correctly due to broken systems.

    Samantha York, a sitting member of the ACMA authority, emphasized that the size of the penalty was directly tied to both the staggering scale of the violations and the fact that this is a repeat offense. Back in 2022, Latitude was already ordered to pay $1.55 million in penalties for nearly identical spam law breaches. “Latitude is now a two-time offender and it is disappointing that it let consumers down again,” York said in a formal statement. “The spam laws have been in place for more than 20 years, there is simply no excuse for ongoing noncompliance, particularly after previous enforcement action. Given Latitude’s history of noncompliance, we will be very closely monitoring how it meets its obligations going forward.”

    In an official disclosure filed with the Australian Stock Exchange on Wednesday morning, Latitude acknowledged the regulator’s findings and the imposed penalty. The company noted that as soon as internal teams identified that it had sent potentially non-compliant SMS marketing messages, it self-reported the issue to ACMA and immediately moved to update and strengthen its internal spam compliance protocols. As part of an enforceable undertaking agreed to with the regulator, Latitude will now hire an independent third-party compliance expert to audit and verify that its updated processes meet all legal requirements moving forward.

  • UN Secretary-General: US-Iran talks ‘highly probable’ to resume

    UN Secretary-General: US-Iran talks ‘highly probable’ to resume

    On Tuesday, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres publicly addressed reporters, offering a cautious yet forward-leaning update on the long-stalled diplomatic process between the United States and Iran. Guterres stated that a resumption of suspended bilateral talks between the two nations is “highly probable”, marking the most prominent high-level international assessment of the improving diplomatic outlook for the conflict-ridden relationship in recent months.

    Noting the decades-long strategic divide and deep-rooted disagreements that have defined US-Iran relations for generations, Guterres also pushed back against expectations of a quick breakthrough. He emphasized that it would be fundamentally unrealistic to anticipate that this highly complex, decades-standing dispute could reach a full resolution during the very first round of renewed negotiations. The UN chief’s comments come amid months of quiet behind-the-scenes diplomatic outreach, as international actors have worked to de-escalate regional tensions and create a pathway back to formal dialogue between Washington and Tehran.

    The potential resumption of US-Iran talks carries major implications for global energy markets, regional security across the Middle East, and international non-proliferation efforts. Diplomats and analysts across the globe have been closely watching for signs of renewed dialogue after years of escalating tensions that at several points pushed the two nations close to open conflict.

  • A look at Sudan’s war by the numbers

    A look at Sudan’s war by the numbers

    As Sudan enters its fourth year of brutal internal conflict between the national military and the Rapid Support Forces, a harrowing portrait of widespread human suffering and systemic collapse has emerged, one that has largely been sidelined by global headlines of other crises. What started as a clash between the two rival power centers in April 2023 has spiraled into one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters, leaving millions grappling with starvation, displacement, and persistent violence against innocent civilians. Both warring factions have faced widespread allegations of gross human rights violations, including ethnic cleansing, extrajudicial executions, and widespread sexual violence targeting civilian populations. To fully grasp the scale of the catastrophe, a data-driven breakdown reveals the staggering impact of 36 months of uninterrupted fighting.

    The human cost of the conflict starts with a death toll that continues to climb, even as full access to conflict zones remains blocked. Conflict tracking organization ACLED has documented at least 59,000 confirmed fatalities since the war began, but humanitarian aid organizations warn the actual number is far higher. With much of Sudan’s vast territory cut off from independent monitors, thousands of unrecorded deaths from violence, starvation, and preventable disease have likely gone uncounted.

    The displacement crisis triggered by the war is one of the largest the world has seen in decades. Roughly 4.5 million Sudanese have fled across international borders, seeking refuge in neighboring countries including Egypt, South Sudan, Libya, and Chad. Another 9 million remain displaced within Sudan’s own borders, crammed into overcrowded makeshift shelters or abandoned public buildings with little access to basic necessities.

    Hunger has emerged as one of the conflict’s deadliest weapons, according to global food security experts. The United Nations World Food Program reports that more than 19 million Sudanese are currently facing acute food insecurity, a figure that has pushed millions to the brink of famine. The crisis has been exacerbated by spillover from the escalating conflict in the Middle East, which has driven a 24% spike in fuel prices across Sudan, crippling supply chains for food and humanitarian aid and making it even harder to reach vulnerable communities. Even community-run kitchens that once acted as a lifeline for millions of hungry Sudanese have been forced to shut down: Islamic Relief reports that 354 of these facilities have closed in just the last six months, leaving millions without their primary source of daily meals.

    Children have borne a disproportionate share of the war’s harm, UNICEF data confirms. More than 4,300 children have been killed or maimed by violence since the conflict began, and at least 8 million children are currently out of school. Roughly 11% of all schools in Sudan are now occupied by warring factions or repurposed as emergency shelters for displaced families, robbing an entire generation of access to education.

    Sudan’s once-functional public health system has also been torn apart by fighting. World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus confirmed that only 63% of the country’s health facilities are still fully or partially operational. Since the war began, the WHO has verified 217 deliberate attacks on hospitals and health care centers, targeting critical infrastructure that civilians depend on for survival. Even as the humanitarian situation deteriorates, ACLED data shows that air and drone strikes have intensified over the past year, killing 1,032 civilians in 2025 alone as these strikes increasingly target populated areas.

    With the war showing no sign of ending and global attention focused elsewhere, Sudanese officials have described the crisis as a “forgotten” or “abandoned” catastrophe, with millions of civilians left to suffer without sufficient international support or intervention to end the conflict.

  • Sudan enters a fourth year of war as officials lament an ‘abandoned crisis’

    Sudan enters a fourth year of war as officials lament an ‘abandoned crisis’

    As Sudan entered the fourth year of its devastating civil conflict on Wednesday, the country’s catastrophic humanitarian collapse has been sidelined by rising tensions in the Middle East, leaving millions of Sudanese in a state of unaddressed catastrophe that top United Nations officials have labeled an “abandoned crisis.”

    What began as a 2023 power struggle between two rival military factions — Sudan’s official national military led by Gen. Abdel-Fattah Burhan, and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) commanded by Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo — has since shattered the East African nation, displacing 13 million people from their homes and creating what aid organizations call the world’s most severe humanitarian emergency. Three years of continuous combat have left large swathes of the vast Darfur region in ruins, with no diplomatic breakthrough on the horizon to end the fighting.

    International attention and diplomatic resources have shifted sharply away from Sudan following the outbreak of new open conflict in the Middle East, leaving existing ceasefire efforts led by the United States and regional powers dead in the water. Mounting evidence confirms that multiple regional powers continue to back opposing factions from behind the scenes, prolonging the bloodshed with no accountability. UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher summarized the global failure in a stark statement: “This grim and chastening anniversary marks another year when the world has failed to meet the test of Sudan.”

    ### A Catastrophe Measured in Human Cost
    The human toll of Sudan’s war is staggering. Official counts record at least 59,000 people killed, with a single three-day RSF offensive on the Darfur city of el-Fasher last October leaving an estimated 6,000 people dead. UN-backed independent experts have concluded that this operation carried all the defining characteristics of genocide. The International Criminal Court is currently conducting active investigations into potential war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide in Darfur, a region that first became synonymous with mass atrocities two decades ago.

    Widespread starvation is now a daily reality across large parts of the country, with the conflict pushing multiple regions into outright famine. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the global leading authority on food insecurity, projected in February that the number of Sudanese suffering from severe acute malnutrition — the deadliest form of hunger — will rise to 800,000 by the end of 2025. Overall, the UN estimates that 34 million Sudanese — nearly two-thirds of the entire population — require urgent life-saving humanitarian assistance. The World Health Organization reports that less than two-thirds of the country’s health facilities remain even partially operational, while cholera and other preventable diseases spread rapidly across unassessed communities.

    The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has only exacerbated Sudan’s crisis: fuel prices across the country have spiked by more than 24% in recent months, driven by regional shipping disruptions tied to Middle East tensions, which have in turn pushed already sky-high food prices even higher out of reach for most families.

    Denise Brown, the UN’s top humanitarian official based in Sudan, issued a searing rebuke of global inaction earlier this week. “A plea from me: Please don’t call this the forgotten crisis. I’m referring to this as an abandoned crisis,” she said, emphasizing that international neglect is a deliberate choice that prolongs the suffering of the Sudanese people.

    ### The Origins and Risk of Regional Spillover
    The current war grew out of a fractured democratic transition that followed the 2019 popular uprising that ousted longtime authoritarian ruler Omar al-Bashir. After Bashir’s removal, Burhan and Dagalo shared power on a transitional ruling council, but long-simmering tensions over military integration and political control boiled over into open civil war in April 2023. Today, Sudan is effectively split into two competing blocs: the internationally recognized military-backed government centered in the capital Khartoum, and the RSF’s rival administration that controls most of Darfur and parts of the Kordofan region along the South Sudan border.

    Neither faction is positioned to win a decisive military victory, according to Sudanese journalist and researcher Shamel Elnoor, who added that the Sudanese people “have become powerless and are subjected to foreign dictates.” The military currently holds control over northern, eastern, and central Sudan, including critical Red Sea shipping ports, national oil refineries, and key pipeline infrastructure. The RSF and its allied militias hold Darfur and most of Kordofan, regions that hold the majority of Sudan’s valuable gold mines and remaining untapped oil reserves.

    Regional states have openly backed opposing sides, prolonging the conflict. Egypt has publicly supported the Sudanese military, while UN experts and human rights organizations have repeatedly accused the United Arab Emirates of supplying arms to the RSF — an accusation the UAE has repeatedly denied. Earlier this month, the Yale School of Public Health’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which tracks the conflict via satellite imagery, documented that the RSF has received consistent military support from a base inside neighboring Ethiopia. The RSF has not issued any public response to the allegation.

    Josef Tucker, senior Horn of Africa analyst at the International Crisis Group, warned that the risk of the conflict spreading across Sudan’s national borders is growing, which would make the already intractable war even more difficult to resolve.

    ### Widespread Atrocities Continue Unchecked
    Three years of combat have seen mass atrocities become routine across Sudan, including systematic mass killings, widespread sexual violence including gang rapes, and deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure. The World Health Organization confirms that more than 2,000 medical workers, patients, and first responders have been killed in targeted attacks on hospitals and ambulances across the country.

    Most of the documented atrocities have been attributed to the RSF and its allied Janjaweed militias, the same Arab militias that carried out mass genocide in Darfur in the early 2000s. The modern RSF grew directly out of the original Janjaweed, and experts warn that the pattern of atrocities targeting non-Arab communities in Darfur has remained consistent for decades.

    Brown, the UN’s Sudan envoy, warned that there is no sign the mass killing will slow. “We have … no reason at all to believe it will stop the mass atrocities that we saw in el-Fasher,” she said.

    While the Sudanese military’s 2025 recapture of Khartoum and other central urban areas allowed roughly 4 million displaced people to return to their home regions, those returns have not brought peace or normalcy. Tjada D’Oyen McKenna, CEO of international aid group Mercy Corps, explained that “It’s not really a return to normal. It is trying to survive amidst a new normal” — a reality defined by destroyed infrastructure, collapsed basic services, and persistent economic instability.

  • Ukraine’s military to get biggest-ever shipment of UK drones

    Ukraine’s military to get biggest-ever shipment of UK drones

    As the war in Ukraine enters its fifth year, unmanned aerial systems have rapidly grown into one of the most decisive battlefield technologies shaping conflict dynamics on both sides. Against this backdrop, the United Kingdom has announced what its Ministry of Defence (MoD) calls the single largest drone donation Ukraine has received to date: a package of 120,000 unmanned aerial vehicles that marks a major expansion of Western military support for Kyiv.

    The comprehensive donation includes multiple categories of drones tailored to diverse operational needs: long-range strike variants, reconnaissance models, logistics support drones, and maritime-capable systems, with the majority of the aircraft manufactured by UK-based defense firms. The MoD confirmed that delivery of this cutting-edge battlefield technology began earlier this month, describing the shipment as a transformative boost to Ukraine’s frontline capabilities.

    British Defence Secretary John Healey framed the donation as a deliberate response to what he says is Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attempt to divert global attention from the war in Ukraine amid rising tensions in the Middle East. “Putin wants us to be distracted by events in the Middle East in recent weeks, but we will not be pulled off course,” Healey emphasized in an official statement. “Ukrainians continue to fight with huge courage and nothing will distract us from continuing to stand with them for as long as it takes to secure a just and lasting peace.”

    Healey is scheduled to co-chair a high-stakes meeting of the Ukraine Defence Contact Group in Berlin later this week, alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and the defense ministers of Ukraine and Germany. The 50-nation coalition, which coordinates Western military support for Kyiv, is expected to discuss further long-term assistance commitments at the gathering. Separately, British Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is set to outline additional financial support measures for Ukraine during an upcoming meeting of international finance ministers in Washington, D.C.

    The UK’s announcement comes on the heels of a landmark operational milestone claimed by Kyiv: last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Ukrainian forces had captured a Russian-held position using only a combination of ground-based and aerial drones, marking the first time such an operation has been conducted entirely with unmanned systems. The donation also follows public comments from Zelenskyy, who told reporters that U.S. peace negotiators currently “have no time for Ukraine” as they refocus their efforts on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

    Meanwhile, frontline violence has intensified across Ukraine following the expiration of a touted Russian Orthodox Easter ceasefire that expired at the end of Sunday. Ukraine’s national emergency services reported that overnight Russian strikes targeted an industrial zone in the northern city of Sumy, carrying out three separate attacks even as first responders were already working to clear damage from initial bombardments. Additional Russian strikes hit areas near the strategic port city of Odesa in southern Ukraine, sparking large fires in port-adjacent infrastructure.

    Negotiations to end the 4-year conflict have stalled in recent weeks, after the United States — acting as a key mediator in talks between Kyiv and Moscow — shifted its diplomatic focus to the escalating crisis in the Middle East following the election of Donald Trump’s second term. The two sides remain deadlocked on core procedural terms for a lasting truce: Ukraine has repeatedly pushed for a full and permanent ceasefire as the first step toward negotiations on a final peace agreement, while Moscow insists that a final peace deal be agreed upon before any ceasefire takes effect. Kyiv has repeatedly cited this mismatch as evidence that Russia has no genuine intention of ending the invasion through diplomatic means.

  • Indian PM Modi’s party gets first chief minister in Bihar state

    Indian PM Modi’s party gets first chief minister in Bihar state

    In a historic political shift for India’s eastern state of Bihar, Samrat Choudhary of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been officially sworn in as the state’s new chief minister, marking the first time the BJP has held the top executive post in the politically critical state.

    Choudhary, 57, previously served as deputy chief minister under outgoing chief minister Nitish Kumar, a veteran Bihar politician who stepped down from the role earlier this week. Kumar, 75, who led Bihar’s government for the vast majority of the past two decades, was elected to India’s national parliament’s Upper House last month. His resignation had long been anticipated amid reports of declining health, clearing the path for Choudhary’s ascension to the top post.

    A seasoned politician with a 30-year career spanning multiple parties, Choudhary comes from a prominent Bihar political family: his father Shakuni Choudhary held a legislative seat for more than 20 years starting in the mid-1980s, while his mother Parvati Devi, a social activist turned politician, also served one term as a legislator. Politically, Choudhary first cut his teeth with Bihar’s main opposition party Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), moved to Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal (United) (JD(U)) in 2014, then joined the BJP in 2017, aligning with Kumar when the veteran politician realigned with the BJP that same year. After Kumar switched alliances again in 2022, Choudhary became one of his most outspoken critics, but the two mended ties when the BJP and JD(U) renewed their coalition in 2024, leading to Choudhary’s appointment as deputy chief minister and home minister — a powerful portfolio overseeing Bihar’s state police force.

    Choudhary’s rise carries significant political weight for the BJP in Bihar, a state of more than 74 million registered voters that remains India’s poorest, with millions of residents migrating across the country for work each year. As a prominent leader from a key Other Backward Class (OBC) caste grouping — a socially and economically disadvantaged community that makes up a large share of Bihar’s electorate, where caste remains a defining factor in regional politics — his elevation is widely viewed as a strategic move by the BJP to expand its social base ahead of upcoming elections.

    Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad framed the transition as a historic milestone for the state, acknowledging Kumar’s decades of leadership while welcoming Choudhary’s tenure. “Bihar has changed and I must acknowledge that and give him [Kumar] due respect… Now Samrat Choudhary is set to become the chief minister. This is a big and historic day,” Prasad told reporters ahead of the swearing-in.

    Still, Choudhary steps into a role defined for 20 years by Kumar, a politician famous for shifting alliances to retain power, and faces no shortage of challenges. Within the ruling coalition, his political approach has drawn both backing and scrutiny: supporters argue his appointment will strengthen the BJP’s standing with key voter blocs and deliver long-term electoral gains, while critics question his alignment with the BJP’s traditional organizational structure and his readiness for the top job. Even with these hurdles, Choudhary has already made history as the first chief minister from the BJP in one of India’s most electorally important states.

  • AFL 2026: Port Adelaide star Zak Butters finds an ally in Essendon coach Brad Scott

    AFL 2026: Port Adelaide star Zak Butters finds an ally in Essendon coach Brad Scott

    A controversial disciplinary ruling against Port Adelaide star midfielder Zak Butters has sparked public pushback, with one high-profile rival coach and the AFL Players’ Association (AFLPA) questioning the fundamental logic of the tribunal’s finding, delivered Tuesday afternoon.

    Butters was handed a AU$1,500 fine after the tribunal found him guilty of making a suspicious comment to field umpire Nick Foot following a contentious in-match call. According to the umpire’s account, Butters asked, “How much are they paying you?” — a line that implies accusations of bias or match-fixing. Butters has pushed back on this characterization, arguing his comment was actually a misheard phrase along the lines of “How are you paying that?”

    The case has thrown a spotlight on a glaring evidential gap: Foot’s on-field microphone failed to clearly capture the full exchange, leaving no concrete audio evidence to corroborate either version of events. Despite this absence of clear proof, the tribunal ultimately sided with the umpire’s testimony, even rejecting additional consistent testimony from Butters’ teammate Ollie Wines that aligned with the player’s account. After the match, Butters attempted to clarify the misunderstanding with Foot directly, but the veteran umpire refused to engage in further discussion.

    Essendon head coach Brad Scott, a former AFL staff member who now leads the Bombers, has become one of the most prominent voices questioning the ruling, saying he shares the widespread confusion shared by most Australian Rules football fans and observers. While Scott made clear he supports the league’s rule barring general post-match dialogue between players and umpires, arguing that opening that door would create far more problems for the sport at all competition levels, he says the tribunal’s conclusion defies basic evidentiary logic.

    “Like every other footy follower out there, I’m waiting for a clear explanation of how one person’s testimony can be prioritized over another when there is no other supporting evidence,” Scott told reporters. “There’s nothing to back up either side beyond conflicting accounts, so how you reach a firm conclusion on that basis is totally beyond me. Hopefully we’ll get a clearer explanation down the line.”

    Scott’s public criticism comes shortly after AFLPA chief executive James Gallagher issued a formal statement expressing disappointment with the ruling and confirming the union’s full backing for Butters as he explores an appeal. Gallagher noted that the incident, rooted in a simple miscommunication over what was said on the field, should have been resolved immediately after the match rather than being escalated to a full tribunal hearing.

    The union head added that the tribunal’s choice to uphold the charge without sufficient reasonable doubt, while rejecting evidence consistent with Butters’ account, is deeply concerning for player stakeholders. Ahead of the 2026 season, the AFLPA had already pledged to closely monitor tribunal rulings after a string of player complaints about disciplinary processes in recent seasons. Gallagher stressed that maintaining player confidence in the league’s disciplinary system is a core priority for the union, and it will continue to support both Butters and Port Adelaide through every step of the appeal process.

  • Australia ‘better placed’ for energy crisis triggered by Iran war due to renewable uptake: Bowen

    Australia ‘better placed’ for energy crisis triggered by Iran war due to renewable uptake: Bowen

    As the Israel-US conflict with Iran sends global energy markets into chaos, Australia is far better positioned to weather resulting price volatility and supply disruptions than it was during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine crisis – and progress in renewable energy adoption deserves much of the credit, Australia’s Energy Minister Chris Bowen has said.

    Following Tehran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s total oil supply passes, global energy markets have been roiled by extreme volatility. International benchmark Brent crude has seesawed wildly around the $100 per barrel mark in recent trading sessions, while damage to liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure in the Persian Gulf – most notably in major exporter Qatar – has tightened global gas supplies and pushed prices sharply upward.

    Bowen pushed back Wednesday against claims made by Amos Hochstein, a former energy security official in the Biden administration, who argued that renewable energy sources are incapable of resolving ongoing global energy crises. When pressed by Australian journalists on whether he shared Hochstein’s view, Bowen made clear he holds a sharply different perspective, pointing to tangible progress in Australia’s energy transition that has reduced national exposure to global fossil fuel price shocks.

    “One of the reasons we are better placed in this international energy crisis than we were even in 2022, for the last one, was that we are using a lot less gas,” Bowen explained, noting that Australian gas generation fell to 1.5 terawatt-hours last summer, down from 2.7 terawatt-hours in the summer of 2022. “That means that if the gas price goes up, we are less vulnerable to that – it will still have impact, but less vulnerable than we were because we’re using less gas. And one of the big reasons we’re using less gas, is we’re using more batteries to get through the night. So I think renewables are part of a common sense, careful, calibrated approach to a more reliable energy system.”

    As of Saturday, Bowen confirmed Australia’s national fuel stockpiles have remained stable amid the crisis, though localized supply shortages persist across the country. Approximately 2% of Australian service stations – equaling 156 locations – still report being out of diesel, with every state recording at least a small number of dry petrol outlets.

    Alongside his assessment of national preparedness for global energy shocks, Bowen also announced new emissions data this week showing that on-site carbon pollution from Australia’s largest industrial facilities has fallen by 12%, or 5.8 million metric tons, under the federal government’s signature safeguard mechanism policy. That reduction is equal to removing 2 million passenger vehicles from Australian roads, or roughly 60% of the nation’s total annual domestic aviation emissions, Bowen noted.

    “This is good policy working well, providing that investment certainty for industry to make the investments they need to make sure that their operations are viable on an ongoing basis, but also reducing emissions as they go,” he said.

    The safeguard mechanism requires large industrial emitters to cap and gradually cut their greenhouse gas output, a policy that the opposition Liberal-National Coalition has repeatedly promised to abolish, framing it as an unfair, punitive regulation on Australian business. Critics have also argued that the policy’s allowance for carbon offsets creates a loophole that lets major polluters continue emitting at unchanged levels while purchasing offsets to comply with rules.

    Bowen pushed back against that critique, clarifying that the 12% reduction reported this week counts only direct on-site emissions cuts from facility operations, not emissions reductions achieved through offset purchases. “We’re not talking about offsets. We’re talking about firms making investments and new solutions,” he said.

  • Pope to urge peace in Cameroon’s conflict zone

    Pope to urge peace in Cameroon’s conflict zone

    Pope Leo XIV is set to land in Cameroon Wednesday, kicking off the second leg of his landmark African tour that has already been marked by unexpected tensions: verbal attacks from former U.S. President Donald Trump and twin suicide bombings during his opening stop in Algeria.

    The 70-year-old pontiff’s four-day schedule in the majority French-speaking central African nation opens with a private audience with 92-year-old Cameroonian President Paul Biya, the world’s oldest sitting head of state who has held uninterrupted power since 1982 and is currently serving his eighth consecutive term. The 3:20 pm (1420 GMT) closed-door meeting has already split the country’s Catholic community, which makes up roughly one-third of Cameroon’s population.

    Local clergy have raised urgent concerns that the meeting will provide a public relations boost to Biya’s administration, just six months after security forces violently cracked down on mass protests sparked by disputed results of the country’s presidential election.

    On Thursday, following his meeting with Biya, the Pope will travel under heavy security to Bamenda, the heart of Cameroon’s long-running Anglophone separatist insurgency. There, he will lead a prayer service for peace before a gathering of 20,000 worshippers, fulfilling the core mission of his Cameroon visit: calling for an end to nearly a decade of armed conflict.

    The roots of what is known as the Anglophone Crisis stretch back to the 1970s, when the former French and British-administered regions of Cameroon formally unified. The country’s English-speaking minority, concentrated in the northwest and southwest regions, quickly raised alarms about the erosion of their unique legal institutions and cultural identity. A deadly government crackdown on peaceful Anglophone protests in 2016 escalated into full-scale armed conflict between separatist fighters and Cameroonian government forces, a dispute that remains unresolved to this day. By 2024, human rights non-governmental organizations estimate the violence has killed more than 6,000 people and displaced hundreds of thousands.

    Leo launched his first ever international papal tour in Algeria on Monday, where he paid homage to Saint Augustine, one of Christianity’s most influential theologians, at his birthplace and celebrated mass at a historic basilica that draws 18,000 interfaith pilgrims annually, including Muslim and Jewish worshippers. During the service, he urged Algeria’s small Christian community to “bear witness to the Gospel through simple gestures, genuine relationships and a dialogue lived out day by day.”

    His trip to Algeria was overshadowed by twin suicide bombings in the city of Blida. While Algerian authorities have not yet issued an official statement, a well-placed government source confirmed the attacks, noting investigators do not currently believe the bombings were connected to the Pope’s visit to the majority-Muslim country. No fatalities have been reported beyond the two bombers themselves.

    Even before the tour began, the pontiff’s trip faced unplanned controversy after Donald Trump launched a verbal attack against him, saying he was “not a big fan” of the pope after Leo called for renewed peace efforts in the Middle East. U.S. Vice President JD Vance doubled down on the criticism during an appearance at a Turning Point USA event in Georgia on Tuesday, arguing the Vatican should “stick to matters of morality… and let the president of the United States stick to dictating American public policy.” Vance added: “It’s important, in the same way that it’s important for the vice president of the United States to be careful when I talk about matters of public policy, I think it’s very, very important for the pope to be careful when he talks about matters of theology.”

    Leo dismissed the criticisms outright while speaking to reporters aboard the papal plane en route to Cameroon. Citing the biblical verse “Blessed are the peacemakers,” the pontiff said: “I have no fear, neither of the Trump administration, nor speaking out loudly about the message of the Gospel.”

    This visit marks the fourth papal trip to Cameroon, a diverse multi-religious nation often called “Africa in miniature” for its wide range of ethnic and linguistic groups. Streets in the capital Yaoundé have already been lined with welcoming banners and Vatican flags in anticipation of the Pope’s arrival. On Friday, Leo will celebrate open-air mass for hundreds of thousands of worshippers at a stadium in Cameroon’s economic hub Douala, before departing for Angola on Saturday to conclude the third leg of his African tour.