标签: North America

北美洲

  • Olivia Rodrigo sings about heartbreak but she’s already chosen her wedding song

    Olivia Rodrigo sings about heartbreak but she’s already chosen her wedding song

    It was meant to be an open-air interview at Hampstead Heath, one of Olivia Rodrigo’s most beloved spots in London, but a sudden, torrential downpour derailed the original plan. Within minutes, the filming crew scrambled to pack up lights and cameras and relocated to the stately Victorian kitchen of nearby Kenwood House. By the time 23-year-old Rodrigo arrived, dodging wind and rain from her car to the new indoor set, every strand of her hair was still perfectly in place, and the production was just barely ready to go.

    Even for an early morning call time, the global pop star had already put in a full shift of work. During her drive to the location, she was putting final finishing touches on her upcoming track *Maggots For Brains*, scheduled for release just 10 days later. “I love that song musically, there’s so much going on – layers of harmonies everywhere,” she explained in the interview. “Literally in the car, I was telling them to turn that backing vocal up just one decibel. I was being so picky about it, I know no one else would even notice if I’d left it as it was.”

    Rodrigo has long been drawn to Hampstead Heath for the rare sense of normalcy it gives her: the sprawling open space lets her walk, relax, and blend into the crowd without being hounded for photos or autographs. “It’s just the best place to hang out,” she says. “No one ever acts weird around me, I think because it’s so spread out. One time I even saw a couple get engaged there – I was sitting on a bench, looked over, and all their friends were gathered, it was the sweetest thing.” That quiet, romantic moment lines up with Rodrigo’s own dream proposal: she hopes to one day get engaged in New York’s Central Park, with a custom bench placard that reads “Will you marry me?” “So spread the word… Hopefully my future husband will see this,” she laughs. She’s already picked out her wedding song, too – *I Melt with You* by Modern English, a track she says is perfect for walking back down the aisle after exchanging vows.

    For anyone who has followed Rodrigo’s music career since her breakout 2021 debut *Sour*, and 2023’s *Guts*, it’s no surprise that her first two albums are rooted in the messy, searing pain of catastrophic heartbreak, laced with equal parts confusion, anguish, and unapologetic feminine rage. It wasn’t until 2024 that she wrote her first uncomplicated love song, *So American*, a punchy new wave track inspired by her whirlwind romance with English actor Louis Partridge. The relationship quickly became public: Rodrigo’s Instagram filled with candid shots from Wimbledon trips and rides across London on double-decker buses, and when she headlined Glastonbury Festival last summer with Partridge watching from side stage, she changed a core lyric from “I think I’m in love” to “’Cause I’m in love.”

    When Rodrigo set out to write her third studio album, she expected the project to be a straightforward love letter to the joy of new romance, a sharp departure from the angsty heartbreak of her earlier work. “I really wanted to capture romantic joy and pleasure for the first time, because my last two albums were all heartbroken and really angsty,” she says. But the album’s final title – *You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love* – hints that the perfect romance she set out to document did not end as planned. “It’s a love story that falls apart,” she confirms. “It’s a time capsule of a relationship that spanned a few years of my life.”

    The album’s visual concept mirrors this arc: the front cover shows Rodrigo swinging through the air, carefree and giddy with new love, but flip it over, and she’s lying flat on the ground, hair messy and expression heavy with unhappiness. The narrative opens in a London pub, where Rodrigo is so besotted by her new partner, who she compares to “an angel on the walls of Versailles,” that she can barely believe he’s real, convinced she might “drop dead” if he kisses her. By the second track, *Stupid Song*, the pair have settled into a relationship, and Rodrigo is so blindingly happy that she struggles to write a coherent, meaningful lyric about it. “When you’re really deeply in love, it feels like any song is futile,” she explains. “It’s really hard to capture that feeling in a way that feels real to other people.”

    As the tracklist progresses, quiet doubts and persistent anxieties begin to creep into the story, and the narrative unravels around the seventh track, *Purple*. While the lyrics on the surface read as a happy love song, Rodrigo uses intentionally unresolved chords to create an undercurrent of constant instability. “Initially, it was a very sweet, sugary love song,” she says. “A few months after we wrote it, we went back, swapped out the chords, and tweaked the lyrics. It’s definitely the turning point on the album where things start to go sour.”

    A similar revision shaped *What’s Wrong With Me*, a dream duet between Rodrigo and her long-time musical hero, The Cure’s Robert Smith. The track was originally written about the all-consuming ache of missing a partner, but after Rodrigo’s breakup, she rewrote the lyrics to reflect a harder truth: the relationship itself was the source of her unhappiness. The new lyrics cut straight to the pain: “I can’t eat, I can’t sleep / I think you’re what’s wrong with me.”

    Rodrigo and Smith debuted the new track earlier this month at Spain’s Primavera Festival, marking their second collaboration after they shared the Glastonbury stage last summer. Backstage after the set, Smith heaped praise on the young star, telling BBC 6 Music: “She is genuinely fantastic, as a singer, as a songwriter, as a performer. I’m slightly in awe of how easy she makes all of it look.” That Glastonbury headline set, widely hailed as the performance of the weekend, cemented Rodrigo’s status as a generational talent, equally comfortable delivering soft, soaring ballads and high-energy pop-punk anthems that get crowds roaring. But even with that critical acclaim, Rodrigo admits she was crippled with anxiety before the performance. “I remember having a near anxiety attack in the bathroom, thinking ‘How am I going to do this? I don’t know if I’m ready,’” she says. “But the second I stepped on stage and started singing, something just shifted over me. I felt totally calm, totally in my element. I’m not very spiritual or religious, but moments like that make you feel like music is just so magical, you can’t really put it into words.”

    That iconic Glastonbury performance was fueled by an unexpected pre-show ritual: three full bowls of sticky toffee pudding from her hotel restaurant. “I stayed at this hotel that had the best sticky toffee pudding, and I was like, ‘You know what? I gotta do it,’” she laughs. “If the toffee’s really hot and the ice cream melts on top, it’s really good.” Sticky toffee isn’t her only British culinary obsession – she’s also completely hooked on dippy eggs and soldiers, and her friends have gifted her dozens of custom egg cups from all over the world to feed the habit.

    That down-to-earth charm is central to Rodrigo’s appeal. Raised in the entertainment industry, she spent years working on Disney Channel shows before launching her music career, but she’s never been aloof or overly precious about her fame. One of the biggest reasons she loves living part-time in the UK is the sense of normalcy it gives her. “I feel so normal here, very adult. I can walk to the pub and meet friends. It’s a city where spontaneity is really encouraged. People are very social here, in a way that they’re not in Southern California.”

    Despite boasting more than 40 million Instagram followers, Rodrigo has never cared much about conforming to other people’s expectations of how a global pop star should act. She’s been openly vocal about a range of political issues, from the rollback of reproductive rights in the United States to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Last year, she publicly called out the Trump administration for using her music in videos promoting ICE deportations, labeling the government’s policies “barbaric and cruel.” She approaches her activism thoughtfully, but says she has no desire to be universally liked. “I definitely try to be careful with my words, but simultaneously, the women I looked up to when I was young were really outspoken, and that was one of the reasons I adored them,” she says. “I don’t think my goal is to be liked by all. And when you stop making that your primary motivation, I think everything becomes a lot more joyful.”

    As the interview wrapped up, Rodrigo answered a series of quick, personal questions that revealed more little-known parts of her life: she has 60% permanent hearing loss in her left ear, she originally dreamed of becoming an obstetrician as a child (and even played obstetrician with her dolls, long before she understood what the job entailed), and if she made a biopic of her life, she’d title it *Olivia Rodrigo Lives the Happiest, Most Joyful Life Any Singer-Songwriter Ever Lived*. If she ever returned to acting, she says she’d jump at the chance to play Juliet in *Romeo and Juliet* – a fitting role for pop music’s most famous chronicler of heartbreak.

    Like Shakespeare’s tragic heroine, Rodrigo has always been mature beyond her years, and she recently took full control of her career, parting ways with her long-time managers to build a hand-picked creative team that lets her call every shot. That autonomy means she can skip high-profile industry events that don’t align with her values, like the Met Gala, which she recently told the *New York Times* doesn’t inspire her or fit with what she cares about.

    It’s clear that unflinching authenticity and uncompromising artistic integrity are the core of Rodrigo’s massive global appeal. Her songs have racked up billions of streams because she doesn’t shy away from the messy, ugly parts of being human: she’s just as willing to write about her own pettiness, jealousy, and insecurity as she is to call out the bad behavior of exes. “That’s one of my favourite things about songwriting,” she says. “I can write a song about being petty or jealous or super insecure, and I get it off my chest in a way that’s actually productive.”

    That honest self-expression is likely why she seems so well-adjusted and grounded even under the relentless pressure of global fame. Even the torrential London rain that derailed our interview didn’t dampen her mood. “It wouldn’t be a proper English summer without it,” she beams, already planning a post-interview swim in Hampstead Heath’s outdoor ponds with her friends. For a girl who just documented a devastating public breakup, she seems, in the end, pretty happy.

  • ‘A little goes a long way’: New York’s candy stores sweeten economic gloom

    ‘A little goes a long way’: New York’s candy stores sweeten economic gloom

    Across the United States, plummeting consumer confidence has created a challenging operating environment for the nation’s retail industry, with many small and large businesses struggling to maintain stable revenue. However, in New York City and its surrounding suburbs, one unexpected niche segment is experiencing unexpected growth: independent candy stores.

    For third-generation business owner Mitchell Cohen, this expansion is no surprise. As the head of Economy Candy, Manhattan’s oldest continuously operating sweet shop located on the Lower East Side, Cohen has long observed a pattern: when economic times turn tough, consumers still carve out room in their budgets for affordable candy. His family’s business itself is a product of economic crisis – it first opened its doors in 1937, at the tail end of the Great Depression, originally as a hat and shoe repair shop. To earn extra income, Cohen’s grandfather added a small candy cart outside the storefront. When cash-strapped New Yorkers stopped spending on repair services, the business pivoted entirely to selling the low-cost treats that still had steady demand. Eighty-nine years later, Economy Candy remains a beloved neighborhood staple, still going strong despite decades of economic ups and downs.

    Recent economic data underscores the challenging broader retail landscape. While official April retail sales figures show a 4.9% year-over-year increase, a closely tracked consumer sentiment survey hit an all-time historic low in May, reflecting widespread anxiety over inflation and economic uncertainty. Candy store entrepreneurs echo Cohen’s analysis, pointing to candy’s low price point as a key advantage during economic downturns: unlike big-ticket purchases that consumers are increasingly likely to postpone, a small sweet is an accessible luxury almost anyone can afford.

    This dynamic aligns with the well-documented “lipstick effect,” an economic theory popularized in the early 2000s that holds that when consumers can’t afford large, expensive purchases, they will treat themselves to smaller, more affordable luxury items instead. For Kate Bolger, a former film producer opening a new candy store called The Village Confectionery in Sleepy Hollow, New York, this logic holds true. “Even when people are feeling the economic pinch, everyone can still partake in a little piece of candy,” she explained.

    Existing candy retailers are also expanding their footprints across the region. BonBon, an upscale confectionery brand founded in 2018 by three Swedish expats, now operates five locations across Manhattan and Brooklyn, plus a store in the Hamptons that opened last summer. The brand specializes in importing Swedish candy, which has grown rapidly in global popularity in recent years, driven by social media buzz and its commitment to strict all-natural ingredient standards. To keep overhead costs low, BonBon intentionally avoids high-rent main shopping avenues, instead opting for smaller storefronts on side streets that allow for lower rent and a cozier customer experience. With a focus on small, unique brand details – like staff uniforms inspired by a popular Stockholm restaurant – the chain is set to open a new location in Greenwich, Connecticut this summer. It is not alone in its U.S. expansion: major Swedish candy chain Candy King opened its first American outlet in Manhattan last December.

    Newer small independent operators are also finding success by adapting to local market needs. In Brooklyn’s Fort Greene neighborhood, Cat Cirino launched Candor Candy’s in March. To boost revenue, she offers a curated selection of pantry staples from local independent producers alongside her core candy inventory, including granola, rice, soft drinks and beef jerky. Cirino notes that candy also offers practical operational advantages for small retailers: it has a long shelf life, requires no temperature control, and the popular pick-and-mix model lets customers handle much of the self-serve process, cutting down on labor costs.

    That said, the sector is not immune to the economic pressures facing all U.S. retailers. Cohen points to rising wholesale costs driven by two key factors: longstanding U.S. import tariffs imposed during the Trump administration, and spiking global shipping costs tied to rising fuel prices stemming from geopolitical tensions. Even iconic American chocolate brand Hershey’s has been impacted: while the company is based in the U.S., it sources all cocoa beans from overseas, and a Hershey bar that cost Economy Candy 62 cents before the COVID-19 pandemic now costs over $1. Cohen adds that one of his longtime United Kingdom-based suppliers stopped shipping to the U.S. entirely after sustained losses from customs and currency fluctuations.

    Despite these headwinds, most candy store owners report growing sales, with many absorbing cost increases rather than passing the full burden on to consumers. For Cohen, the formula for success is simple: in uncertain economic times, a small, affordable sweet goes a long way toward lifting consumer moods – and keeping small businesses afloat.

  • US launches new strikes on Iran after Trump vows to ‘hit them hard’

    US launches new strikes on Iran after Trump vows to ‘hit them hard’

    A sharp escalation in hostilities between the United States and Iran has plunged the Middle East into renewed uncertainty this week, after Washington launched a new round of military strikes ordered by President Donald Trump, who has criticized Tehran for dragging its feet on peace negotiations.

    US Central Command (Centcom) confirmed Wednesday that it had initiated what it described as “additional self-defense strikes” targeting multiple sites across Iranian territory. In an official statement, the command said the operation was a direct response to what it called Iran’s “unwarranted and continued aggression” against US interests in the region.

    The cycle of escalating tit-for-tat attacks began earlier this week, when a US military helicopter was shot down in an assault that US officials have blamed on Iran-backed forces. Shortly after the downing, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched retaliatory strikes against multiple US military bases spread across the Middle East, raising the stakes in the rapidly deteriorating standoff.

    Wednesday’s US strikes triggered reports of loud explosions across several Iranian locations, including the Gulf island of Qeshm, as well as the southern port cities of Bandar Abbas and Sirik. In an immediate and defiant response to the new attacks, Iran’s top military leadership issued a sweeping announcement that it would block all maritime traffic passing through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical global oil and commercial shipping chokepoints. “The Strait of Hormuz has been completely closed to all types of vessels, including commercial ships,” the statement read.

    Hours before US forces launched the new strikes, President Trump had already signaled the coming escalation in a post on his Truth Social platform. “We hit them hard yesterday and we’re going to hit them hard again today,” Trump wrote, adding that Iranian leaders had “taken too long to negotiate a deal” to end the ongoing conflict.

    The Trump administration’s framing of the strikes has drawn sharp pushback from Iranian officials. Iran’s foreign ministry has accused the US of actively undermining diplomatic efforts through its conflicting messaging and unilateral military action. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated his country’s resolve in the face of US pressure, saying that Iran “will stand firm against any pressure or threat.”

    US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the operation in comments following the strikes, confirming that US warplanes targeted key Iranian infrastructure. Hegseth said that Iran had been offered a clear opportunity to reach a negotiated settlement but had failed to take that path, noting that Trump had explicitly warned of renewed attacks if no progress toward a peace deal was made.

    The current escalation marks a major breakdown of the fragile truce reached between Washington and Tehran back in April. That ceasefire was initially intended to last two weeks, and while both sides engaged in intermittent low-level fire over the following months, neither side returned to large-scale open conflict. In recent weeks, however, efforts to broker long-term peace talks between the two governments have stalled, creating the conditions for the sharp resurgence in hostilities seen this week.

  • Bill Gates says Epstein wanted personal relationship, but he ‘never reciprocated’

    Bill Gates says Epstein wanted personal relationship, but he ‘never reciprocated’

    On Wednesday, billionaire philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates appeared voluntarily behind closed doors before the U.S. House Oversight Committee, which is conducting a bipartisan investigation into the network of deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. During his testimony, Gates addressed long-swirling rumors about his relationship with Epstein, issuing a flat denial of any personal connection to the disgraced financier and pushing back against unsubstantiated claims of involvement in Epstein’s criminal activity.

    Gates told the panel that his only interactions with Epstein began in 2011, three years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to state-level prostitution charges in Florida, and centered entirely on Epstein’s promises to arrange major fundraising for Gates’s global health philanthropic initiatives. Gates emphasized that from the start of their interactions, he explicitly barred Epstein from any role in the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and made clear the financier would never receive compensation for any donations he helped secure. By 2014, Gates said, he realized Epstein’s fundraising pledges were empty: after Epstein assembled a group of purported potential donors, none expressed interest in moving forward with contributions. At that point, Gates cut off all contact with Epstein, saying he never met or communicated with him again.

    In his opening statement, Gates repeatedly denied any knowledge of or involvement in Epstein’s well-documented criminal conduct. “I never went to his island, his ranch, or his Florida home. I have never victimized anyone,” Gates told the committee. “While he may have sought to foster a personal relationship, I was never interested in that and never reciprocated.” He added that he never witnessed any illegal activity and had no indication of the exploitation Epstein was carrying out. Gates also addressed the unverified claims included in recently released court documents, including allegations that Epstein facilitated illicit affairs for Gates and that Gates sought to hide a sexually transmitted infection from his then-wife Melinda. Gates denied all of the false claims, but publicly admitted to having extramarital affairs years ago — a fact he said Epstein exploited to attempt to blackmail and pressure him. “Epstein was working to use information about my infidelities – in addition to many lies that he layered on top – to pressure me to re-engage with him,” Gates explained. He closed his opening remarks by expressing his hope that all survivors of Epstein’s crimes would ultimately receive the justice they deserve, echoing a previous public statement that every minute he spent with Epstein was a mistake he deeply regrets, and that he exercised poor judgment in ever agreeing to meet with him.

    During the hearing, Gates reportedly provided committee members with the names of powerful individuals that Epstein approached for fundraising during his interactions with Gates, though the panel has not released those names publicly. Committee members from both parties echoed a consistent assessment of Epstein’s modus operandi: the financier actively collected relationships with high-profile, influential figures to bolster his own power and public standing. “It’s pretty clear to me that Epstein was a friend collector. He just liked to have people around him that were big deal and get his picture made with them and hang out with them, and I think that’s how he reeled them,” Republican committee member Tim Burchett told reporters after the hearing. Democratic ranking member Robert Garcia noted that Gates acknowledged he knew Epstein had been convicted of a serious crime, but still continued interactions to pursue philanthropic funding. Democrat Emily Randall added that Gates’s testimony reinforced a pattern: many prominent men who interacted with Epstein only saw what they wanted to see during their encounters, ignoring obvious red flags. Lawmakers also pressed Gates on how the tech billionaire, a leading figure in the global information industry, failed to look into Epstein’s publicly available criminal record beyond a vague awareness that Epstein had faced some form of legal restriction. Burchett added that Gates appeared notably reserved during the hours of intense questioning, describing him as “down-trodden for a guy worth several billions.”

    Gates is the latest in a string of high-profile figures to be questioned by the committee’s investigation, joining former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and current U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, among others. Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting federal trial on sex trafficking charges. His long-time associate Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of multiple felonies related to Epstein’s crimes and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence; she appeared virtually before the committee in February but invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to refuse to answer questions. The testimony comes months after the U.S. Department of Justice released millions of pages of documents from the Epstein investigation earlier this year, in which Gates’s name appeared thousands of times, including in multiple photographs of Gates alongside Epstein. Gates has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein’s illegal activity since the documents were published.

  • Republicans gained edge over Democrats in redistricting battle, internal party assessment finds

    Republicans gained edge over Democrats in redistricting battle, internal party assessment finds

    A little-known internal assessment conducted by House Republicans’ top campaign organization has found that the bitter, nationwide battle over redrawing congressional electoral maps has delivered a significant partisan advantage to the GOP ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, according to reporting from the BBC.

    The analysis, prepared by the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) and not previously made public, was finalized last month after the last holdout states completed their redistricting processes. Its findings show that the reshuffled maps have created 10 new House districts that lean toward the Republican Party. Most notably, the number of Democratic-held House seats that went to President Donald Trump in his 2024 re-election victory has jumped to 23, up from just 13 at the opening of the 2026 midterm cycle. On the flip side, Republicans now hold just eight districts that 2024 Democratic nominee Kamala Harris won, an increase from three at the start of the cycle. When all shifts are tallied, the assessment concludes Republicans net a potential advantage of five favorable seats compared to the previous map layout.

    The new electoral landscape comes at a critical moment for House Republicans, who currently hold a fragile 217-212 majority with five congressional seats sitting vacant. While public polling shows widespread voter anxiety over economic conditions, sky-high living costs and the ongoing conflict in Iran, the revised maps offer the party a critical buffer that could help them hold their narrow control of the chamber.

    Historically, midterm election cycles tend to favor the opposition party, the out-of-power bloc in Congress. This year, that dynamic would normally work in Democrats’ favor, particularly with Trump’s approval rating hovering near the lowest point of his second term. But both major parties have waged an unprecedented partisan fight to redraw district lines outside the standard once-a-decade census-based redistricting process, a battle that has reshaped the playing field. A 2020s Supreme Court ruling that struck down a core provision of the Voting Rights Act cleared the way for many states to revise their congressional maps, supercharging this off-cycle redistricting fight. While Democrats successfully pushed through revised maps in California and Virginia, the Virginia changes were later invalidated by state courts, leaving the GOP-aligned original map in place.

    If the current finalized maps remain unchanged through the November election, the NRCC’s analysis confirms Republicans have secured a clear edge in the bitter redistricting war. While a net five-seat advantage may sound modest, political observers note it could prove decisive if Republicans overperform historical trends and the election results end up much closer than pre-election polling predicts.

    Top Democratic strategists have already acknowledged that the new maps give House Republicans a wider margin of error heading into November. Even so, many Democratic operatives argue the advantage is smaller than many within the party originally feared, pointing to independent polling that still shows Democrats are well-positioned to flip the chamber and take majority control.

    Republicans, for their part, argue redistricting is not the only factor behind their stronger-than-expected position this primary season. NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella told the BBC that robust candidate recruitment and a substantial fundraising lead over Democratic groups have also boosted the party’s odds. “Democrats are climbing an uphill battle, and their outlook for the House gets darker by the day. The math doesn’t work. The map doesn’t work. The money doesn’t work. The candidates don’t work. That’s why House Republicans are on offence,” Marinella said in his statement.

    The NRCC’s internal assessment, which drew on public voter demographic data, aligns closely with analysis from nonpartisan election watchdogs. The Cook Political Report currently rates 18 House seats as competitive toss-ups, and 17 of those competitive districts were carried by Trump during his 2024 presidential win, which saw him flip all key swing states to secure a comfortable victory over Harris.

    The NRCC analysis also highlighted another positive trend for the GOP: At the start of the 2018 midterm cycle, the last midterm election when Trump held the presidency, House Republicans controlled 42 districts where Trump had won less than 50% of the vote in the prior presidential election. Today, that number has dropped to just 14 Republican-held districts where Trump failed to win a majority in 2024, meaning Republicans are far less exposed to headwinds in swing districts than they were eight years ago.

    Despite the shifted map, Democratic leaders remain confident they can flip the House in November. CJ Warnke, communications director for House Majority PAC, House Democrats’ lead super PAC, noted that many of the 23 Trump-won Democratic-held districts remain highly competitive this cycle, including battleground seats in South Texas and Ohio where Republican candidates still face steep obstacles. “No amount of trying to change the maps on redistricting is going to prevent House Republicans from losing this fall,” Warnke said. He went on to tie Republican incumbents to ongoing economic pain, arguing “Inflation continues to rise, gas prices are skyrocketing, and after promising no new wars Trump and Republicans went off and started a war with Iran that’s now hurting the American economy.”

    Democrats are also counting on long-standing historical trends to hold in their favor. Data from the American Presidency Project at the University of California, Santa Barbara shows that since 1934, the party that controls the White House has gained House seats in just three midterm elections, and gained Senate seats in only six cycles. This pattern held in recent cycles: Democrats flipped 40 Republican-held House seats in 2018, while Republicans flipped nine Democratic seats in the 2022 midterms.

  • New York to keep security tight for NBA finals game between Knicks and Spurs

    New York to keep security tight for NBA finals game between Knicks and Spurs

    New York City is bracing for a tense high-stakes NBA Finals Game 4 between the New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs on Wednesday, with city officials enforcing strict, New Year’s Eve-level security measures across the Madison Square Garden area after a chaotic Monday watch party near Bryant Park devolved into widespread violence and mass arrests.

    The heightened security framework, which will keep the surrounding neighborhood blocked off in a so-called “frozen zone” similar to restrictions put in place for former President Donald Trump’s attendance at Monday’s Game 3, has sparked a heated public feud between city leaders and Knicks ownership, even as officials defend the crackdown as a necessary public safety precaution.

    Monday’s Game 3, which ended in a narrow 115-111 Spurs win that cut the Knicks’ series lead to 2-1, brought tens of thousands of elated and disappointed fans onto the streets of Midtown Manhattan. Thousands of fans without arena tickets gathered for an official city-sponsored public watch party at Bryant Park, a few blocks from Madison Square Garden. What began as a collective celebration of the Knicks’ first NBA Finals appearance since 1999 quickly spiraled out of control: crowds overwhelmed the area, blocking vehicle traffic, climbing atop parked cars and scaling building scaffolding to catch a glimpse of the game screens. The chaos escalated into multiple brawls, with attendees throwing glass projectiles at one another. By the end of the night, the New York Police Department (NYPD) arrested 21 people in what department officials described as an “incredibly reckless” turn by fans.

    The most shocking incident to emerge from the chaos was a brutal group assault on a 39-year-old visiting Spurs fan, who was attacked while walking back to his midtown hotel. Video of the assault quickly went viral across social media. According to NYPD accounts, multiple suspects punched and kicked the victim across his body before forcibly tearing his Spurs jersey off his frame. The NYPD’s Crime Stoppers unit has since launched a public manhunt to identify and apprehend the remaining suspects.

    Reaction to the violence has been swift and widespread across the sports and political spheres. San Antonio Spurs star Victor Wembanyama called the assault “unacceptable,” while Texas Senator Roland Gutierrez directly called out New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, saying “We don’t do this to your people.” High-profile Knicks celebrity fan Ben Stiller, a frequent courtside presence during the 2026 Finals, also pushed back against the violence, emphasizing that fan passion should never cross into harassment or harm.

    “Being a Knick fan doesn’t mean being disrespectful to Spurs fans in any way…we get caught up during the games but we gotta show respect to our fellow humans,” Stiller said.

    Mamdani echoed Stiller’s sentiment, framing the strict new security measures as a necessary step to protect public safety ahead of Wednesday’s ticketed watch party inside Madison Square Garden, which is expected to draw 1,000 attendees.

    “As we prepare to watch together, let me be clear: this is a historic, joyful moment for our city. We will not allow it to be disrupted by violence,” Mamdani said at a press conference Tuesday. “Couldn’t agree more. We’ll win this series on the court … not by targeting, harassing, or attacking Spurs fans.”

    NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch confirmed that security for Game 4 will match the stringent protocols seen during Times Square’s New Year’s Eve celebration. All attendees will go through mandatory security screenings, and the NYPD has advised fans to arrive early and leave personal bags at home to reduce entry delays. Even though former President Trump will not attend Wednesday’s game, the full “frozen zone” perimeter that was put in place for Trump’s Game 3 visit will remain in effect, keeping surrounding streets largely closed off to vehicle and foot traffic.

    The continued restrictions have sparked sharp criticism from Knicks owner James Dolan, who has slammed Mamdani and Tisch as “New York City’s biggest party poopers” and argued the safety measures are an unnecessary overreach that will dampen the historic celebratory mood for fans. Dolan claimed the initial restrictions were framed as a response to Trump’s visit, but the extension of the lockdown for Game 4 proves the measure was never tied to the former president’s attendance.

    “We now know that these restrictions were never about the President. It was just a convenient excuse to restrict how and when Knicks fans celebrate,” Dolan said in a public statement.

    Pushing back on Dolan’s criticism during Tuesday’s press conference, Mamdani countered that the scope of the upcoming watch party justifies the heightened security framework. Many local fans have also echoed Dolan’s frustration, noting that the sweeping restrictions will put a damper on the excitement of the Knicks’ first finals berth in 27 years, after a generations-long drought that left New York fans starved for championship contention.

    After Monday’s loss, the series stands at 2-1 in favor of San Antonio, with Game 4 set to tip off Wednesday at Madison Square Garden.

  • Trump: ‘I love the inflation’

    Trump: ‘I love the inflation’

    In a stunning, unscripted remark that sent ripples through political and economic circles, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly declared “I love inflation,” a comment that defies mainstream economic consensus and contradicts decades of political messaging around price stability. The unusual statement comes as American households continue to grapple with persistent cost-of-living increases that have eroded purchasing power for low- and middle-income families across the country. In the same public appearance, Trump dropped another unanticipated bombshell regarding U.S. energy policy toward Iran, confirming that the United States has been extracting millions of barrels of oil from Iranian reserves without Tehran’s awareness until his public disclosure. “Tehran didn’t know until right now,” Trump stated, confirming the unannounced action that escalates long-running tensions between Washington and Tehran. Foreign policy experts have already raised alarms over the reveal, noting that unacknowledged seizure of energy resources risks amplifying regional instability in the Middle East and could prompt retaliatory measures from Iran that roil global energy markets. The dual comments have drawn sharp criticism from economic analysts who point to widespread public hardship linked to high inflation, as well as from national security specialists who warn that public disclosure of covert operations undermines strategic messaging and puts U.S. interests at greater risk in the region.

  • ‘People can change’: Scandal-hit Platner on Maine primary win

    ‘People can change’: Scandal-hit Platner on Maine primary win

    In a surprising turn of events that has upended expectations for Maine’s U.S. Senate race, Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate whose primary campaign was roiled by high-profile controversies, has emerged victorious in the state’s party primary. His win now sets him up as the Democratic Party’s official nominee heading into the critical November midterm elections, where he will compete for the open Senate seat representing Maine.

    Platner’s path to the nomination was far from smooth. For weeks leading up to primary day, his campaign faced constant scrutiny and public backlash over a series of unflattering revelations that dominated local political headlines. Many political analysts had predicted that the cascading scandals would derail his bid for the nomination, with opponents and pundits alike arguing that the controversies would make voters unwilling to throw their support behind him. But in a post-victory statement, Platner pushed back against that narrative, leaning into a message of personal redemption that appeared to resonate with primary voters. “People can change,” Platner told supporters after the results were finalized, framing his campaign as a testament to the possibility of personal growth and second chances.

    The outcome of the primary has already shifted the dynamics of the general election race. Political strategists across the state are now re-assessing their projections for November, as Platner’s ability to overcome scandal to win the nomination signals an unpredictable race ahead. While Democrats will now unify behind Platner as their official nominee, the lingering questions from the primary campaign are expected to remain a central point of attack for his general election opponent. Regardless of what comes next, Platner’s primary win stands as a reminder that even the most troubled campaigns can defy political odds when candidates connect with voters on messages of change and redemption.

  • Trump and Iran trade new threats after strikes exchanged

    Trump and Iran trade new threats after strikes exchanged

    Fresh rounds of mutual strikes between the United States and Iran have reignited open hostility, with senior leaders from both nations trading sharp, escalatory threats that have thrown fragile ceasefire negotiations into serious doubt.

    The latest cycle of violence began on Monday, when an Iranian drone struck a US Army Apache attack helicopter patrolling the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global shipping chokepoint that has remained effectively closed to most commercial traffic since large-scale conflict broke out in late February. Both crew members on board survived the incident and were rescued by an unmanned American sea drone, according to official US accounts. While US officials confirm an Iranian drone carried out the attack, one anonymous senior official told CBS News it remains unclear whether the strike was deliberate. Notably, Iran has not officially claimed responsibility for downing the helicopter, per semi-official Iranian outlet Mehr News Agency.

    In response to the helicopter incident, US Central Command (Centcom) launched targeted airstrikes on Tuesday against Iranian military infrastructure near the Strait of Hormuz, hitting Iranian defense systems, ground control stations and radar sites. Centcom framed the operation as a “proportional response” to the attack, but Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) dismissed the strikes as “vicious.” The IRGC confirmed the US strikes hit targets near the cities of Jask, Sirik and Qeshm Island, reporting only minor damage to a telecommunications tower and two water tanks.

    Hours after the US strikes, the IRGC launched retaliatory attacks targeting 21 sites at US military bases in the region, including installations in Bahrain and Jordan. Kuwait’s military also confirmed it intercepted an incoming projectile linked to the Iranian retaliatory wave. A senior unnamed US official told Reuters nearly all Iranian missiles and drones launched in the counterattack were intercepted by allied defense systems, with no US casualties reported.

    On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump amplified tensions in a series of posts on his Truth Social platform, departing sharply from his remarks just one day earlier, when he told reporters the US and Iran were in the “final throes” of reaching a “very, very good deal.” Trump claimed Iran’s military was a “complete and total mess,” asserting much of its naval and air force capabilities no longer exist and that the country had been “completely defeated.” He accused Tehran of dragging its feet on negotiating a mutually beneficial agreement, warning “now they will have to pay the price!!!” In separate comments to Fox News, Trump clarified the Iranian drone that hit the Apache struck while flying at very low altitude and did not explode on impact.

    Iranian officials have pushed back sharply on Trump’s claims and condemned the US for undermining diplomatic progress. Earlier this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghci reiterated that Iran would “leave no attack or threat unanswered,” arguing the US has already suffered “defeats on the battlefield.” On Wednesday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqai accused the US of sabotaging the diplomatic process through contradictory public messaging, repeated shifts in negotiating positions and ongoing ceasefire violations. He added that Iran now must re-assess its path forward, noting any viable diplomatic process requires a baseline of stability that the US has failed to uphold.

    The current conflict traces its origins to February 28, when the United States and Israel launched a sweeping series of strikes on Iran that killed the country’s supreme leader. Iran responded immediately with attacks on Israel and US-aligned states across the Persian Gulf, and fighting escalated rapidly across the Middle East, drawing Lebanon into the conflict in March. In April, the two sides agreed to a two-week ceasefire, and while full-scale large-scale hostilities did not resume, both sides have exchanged intermittent fire. Negotiators have held multiple fraught discussions, including a high-stakes meeting in Pakistan, aimed at forging a lasting peace deal, though the latest escalation has thrown those talks into disarray.

  • US inflation surges to three-year high of 4.2%

    US inflation surges to three-year high of 4.2%

    U.S. consumer inflation accelerated to its fastest annual pace in three years during May, climbing to 4.2% and extending a three-month consecutive upward trend that is putting growing financial pressure on American households, according to new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

    The latest reading marks a notable jump from April’s 3.8% inflation rate, with skyrocketing energy costs accounting for the vast majority of the overall increase. Geopolitical tensions stemming from the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran have created ripple effects across global energy markets, directly driving the acceleration that is now squeezing household budgets nationwide.

    The last time U.S. inflation outpaced this current reading was in April 2023, when the country was still working to absorb the massive energy market disruption triggered by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Data from the BLS shows overall energy prices — including natural gas for heating and electricity for homes and businesses — are up nearly 25% compared to May of last year. Motor gasoline accounts for the single largest share of that increase. Separate figures from the American Automobile Association (AAA) confirm the spike: the national average price for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline now stands at $4.15, a dramatic 39% jump from the $2.98 average recorded on February 28, the date President Donald Trump ordered military strikes against Iran.

    In direct response to those strikes, Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic global chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s total oil and natural gas supplies are shipped each day. The closure has choked off global energy supply, pushing crude and refined product prices sharply higher in markets around the world, with American consumers feeling the impact immediately at gas pumps.

    Beyond energy, the BLS noted broad-based price growth across other key sectors of the U.S. economy. Airfares, personal services, medical care, recreational goods and services, and communication services all saw notable price increases during the month.

    The Consumer Price Index, the benchmark measure used to calculate annual inflation, tracks changes in the price of a broad basket of consumer goods and services compared to the same period one year prior. The U.S. Federal Reserve has a long-term target of keeping inflation anchored at 2%, so the current 4.2% reading is more than double that goal.

    Persistently higher inflation raises the probability that the Federal Reserve will move to raise benchmark interest rates in the coming months. Higher interest rates are designed to cool consumer and business spending, which in turn eases upward pressure on prices, but the policy move also typically raises borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards, adding extra financial strain to households.