标签: North America

北美洲

  • Growing backlash in Japan over Trump’s use of anime characters

    Growing backlash in Japan over Trump’s use of anime characters

    A wave of public anger is building across Japan over former U.S. President Donald Trump’s unauthorized reuse of beloved Japanese anime and manga characters for political content on his personal social platform Truth Social. The most recent flashpoint came over the weekend, when Trump posted a manipulated video that positioned himself as Naruto Uzumaki, the central hero of the globally hit *Naruto* franchise centered on a young ninja’s quest to grow into a respected community leader. This latest post has reignited a controversy that first bubbled to the surface back in March, when sharp-eyed anime fans began spotting the 45th U.S. president inserting iconic characters including Pikachu, Naruto, and Yugi Mutou from *Yu-Gi-Oh!* into his political social media content.

    By this week, nearly 20,000 people have added their signatures to an online petition launched back in March demanding that Trump and the White House respect the intellectual property and original creative intent of Japanese manga works. Petition organizers argue that Trump’s repurposing of these characters runs counter to the core values that the beloved franchises have promoted for decades, and that the unlicensed political use may violate the intellectual property rights held by the original creators and rights holders.

    The first controversies that sparked the petition emerged in March, when the official White House X account released two high-profile posts that drew fierce criticism. One post paired footage of U.S. military strikes against Iran with edited clips pulled from the *Yu-Gi-Oh!* and *Dragon Ball* anime franchises. The day before that post, the account shared a graphic of Trump’s iconic campaign slogan “Make America Great Again” superimposed over a screenshot taken from the Pokémon franchise’s *Pokopia* video game.

    Beyond the widespread backlash, a small contingent of Japanese anime fans have expressed a more mixed perspective on Trump’s use of the content. Some online commenters found the edited Naruto video humorous, arguing that the high-profile political use would only boost the global visibility of the franchise, framing it as unparalleled free publicity. Other fans shared that they viewed Trump’s engagement with the anime as a point of pride, a sign that Japanese pop culture has gained such global influence that even a sitting U.S. president recognizes one of its most iconic characters.

    The Pokémon Company International has already issued an official condemnation of the unlicensed use of its intellectual property by Trump and White House accounts. Spokesperson Sravanthi Dev confirmed that the organization never granted permission for the imagery to be used, noting that “we were not involved in its creation or distribution. Our mission is to bring the world together, and that mission is not affiliated with any political viewpoint or agenda.” The BBC has reached out to other anime rights holders for comment on the controversy, as well as to the White House for a response from Trump’s team, and has not yet received additional public statements as of reporting.

  • Three questions Bill Gates could face as he testifies to Congress on Epstein

    Three questions Bill Gates could face as he testifies to Congress on Epstein

    One of the world’s most recognizable tech billionaires and philanthropists, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, will appear Wednesday before a U.S. congressional committee to answer long-simmering questions about his past connections to deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The interview marks the latest chapter in the ongoing fallout from the 2026 release of more than three million pages of court documents related to Epstein’s federal criminal investigation, where Gates’ name appears thousands of times.

    Gates has confirmed his appearance is voluntary, and in a public statement, he said he welcomes the chance to address the House Oversight Committee’s questions about his relationship with the disgraced financier. Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges; his long-time accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in his criminal ring.

    The recently unsealed documents from the U.S. Department of Justice have reignited public and congressional scrutiny of Gates’ ties to Epstein. Among the released materials are multiple undated photos: one captures Gates standing near an aircraft alongside Epstein’s pilot, while others show Gates posing with his arm around Epstein alongside several unidentified women. The documents also include a series of draft emails allegedly written by Epstein that make multiple unsubstantiated, disputed claims about Gates’ personal life. These include allegations that Epstein arranged secret affairs for Gates with married women, that Gates contracted a sexually transmitted infection from women Epstein connected him to, that Epstein helped Gates obtain medication to treat the infection, and that Gates attempted to secretly give antibiotics to his then-wife Melinda to prevent her from contracting the infection. Gates has forcefully denied all of these unproven claims, but he has publicly admitted to having had extramarital affairs with two Russian women.

    Gates’ core public defense of his relationship with Epstein has framed their association as strictly transactional: he has said the pair connected in 2011, three years after Epstein’s Florida conviction for soliciting prostitution involving a minor, to discuss potential philanthropic funding for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Gates has repeatedly stated no such funding ever materialized, and that he cut off all contact with Epstein in 2014. He has also repeatedly denied any wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein’s illegal activities, though he has publicly acknowledged he made a terrible mistake in ever meeting with Epstein. “I was foolish to spend time with him. I was one of many people who regret ever knowing him,” Gates said earlier this year. “Every minute I spent with him I regret.”

    Lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee have laid out three core lines of questioning they plan to pursue during Wednesday’s interview. First, they will challenge Gates’ claim that he was unaware of the full extent of Epstein’s criminal past even as the pair maintained contact years after his conviction. Committee Democrat Robert Garcia noted last week that Gates continued interacting with Epstein even after basic information about Epstein’s horrific crimes was already public, saying “we want to ask Mr. Gates, why continue that relationship? Who else did he see? What else might he know? And who else should we be bringing in to ask questions of?”

    Lawmakers also plan to press Gates on why he maintained a years-long relationship with Epstein when no philanthropic funding ever materialized from their discussions— a timeline that stretches far longer than would be expected for a failed funding pitch. Additionally, the committee will investigate whether Epstein sought to leverage his connection to Gates, one of the most connected and influential figures in global public life, to advance and protect his illegal criminal enterprise. The committee has stated it believes Gates has key insight into how Epstein and Maxwell cultivated powerful connections to shield their crimes.

    Congressman Suhas Subramanyam, another Democratic member of the committee, told the BBC that investigators specifically want to know if Epstein attempted to blackmail Gates, as he is alleged to have done with other high-profile associates. Epstein was known to meticulously document his relationships with powerful figures, keeping detailed records of meetings, personal information, and embarrassing personal details that could be used for leverage. While there is no concrete evidence of blackmail against Gates to date, the unproven claims about Gates’ personal life contained in Epstein’s documents raise questions about potential leverage. The Gates Foundation has previously confirmed that a small number of its staff interacted with Epstein at Gates’ direction to explore potential philanthropic funding for global health initiatives, but that no collaboration was ever finalized and the foundation regrets any contact with the disgraced financier.

    The interview comes as congressional investigators continue to unpack the full scope of Epstein’s network of powerful connections, years after his death brought an end to any criminal prosecution of the financier himself.

  • Model who alleges Kanye West choked her tells BBC she felt ‘suffocated and scared’

    Model who alleges Kanye West choked her tells BBC she felt ‘suffocated and scared’

    A former reality TV model has gone public with disturbing allegations against the iconic but controversial rapper Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, claiming he assaulted her during a 2010 music video shoot and left her terrified and disrespected. Jennifer An, who competed on *America’s Next Top Model* in 2009, has detailed her account of the encounter in an exclusive interview with the BBC’s *Fame Under Fire* podcast, more than 14 years after the alleged incident took place.

    An was 24 years old when she landed a casting spot for the music video of La Roux’s breakout hit *In For The Kill*, a gig that came as a promising career step following her television appearance. When she arrived on set at New York’s iconic Chelsea Hotel, she had no advance warning that Ye would be attending the shoot. According to An’s account, the production team suddenly halted filming and scrambled to prepare when word spread that Ye was arriving, lining all models up in a hallway for him to select from for an unplanned cameo scene. Ye ultimately chose three models, including An, to join his sequence.

    An alleges that after struggling to recall his lines for the planned shoot, Ye abruptly pivoted to film an impromptu new scene. He positioned An in a chair directly in front of the camera, seated himself out of frame facing her, and gave no prior direction or warning about what would happen next. Once filming began, An says Ye suddenly reached out and began choking her with one hand, then added a second hand to the choke, smeared her stage makeup across her face, and forced his fingers into her mouth in a movement that simulated oral sex. She recalled feeling frozen with fear, worried that speaking up would cost her the job and derail her budding modeling career, while crew members stood by without intervening, simply staring at the encounter. When it ended, An alleges Ye declared “this is art, I’m Picasso” before abruptly gathering his things and leaving the set without a word.

    Ye never appeared in the final cut of the released music video, though he did feature as a guest rapper on an official remix of the track. Immediately after the incident, An said she spoke to La Roux’s frontwoman Elly Jackson, who apologized for what occurred and agreed not to include the footage out of respect for An’s privacy. In 2024, An reached out to Jackson via Instagram to revisit the incident, and Jackson confirmed her memory of the event, calling it “horrific” in written messages that have since been submitted as evidence in court. Jackson also claimed that after the encounter, Ye whispered to her that he “bet you think I just put women back about 10 years,” to which she replied that he had actually set women back 500 years.

    An filed a civil lawsuit against Ye in 2024 under New York’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, a law that temporarily extends the statute of limitations for survivors of sexual and gender-based assault. The case has not yet gone to trial. Earlier this year, Ye’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the suit, confirming the encounter took place but framing it as an “intense and provocative theatrical performance” inspired by a scene from the cult film *American Psycho*. The defense argues that Ye is protected by the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of artistic expression, and claims An was a consenting participant who never objected to the scene or attempted to leave.

    An’s legal counsel, Jesse Weinstein, has pushed back against this argument, warning that dismissing the case would set a dangerous precedent that allows artists to commit harmful, non-consensual acts against other people in creative spaces simply by labeling their behavior as art. Ye, who has been one of the most polarizing figures in popular culture over the last decade, has previously drawn widespread backlash for repeated antisemitic remarks and pro-Nazi content. He has apologized for his antisemitic comments in the past and attributed his well-documented erratic behavior to his public diagnoses of autism and bipolar disorder. The BBC has reached out to Ye’s representatives, La Roux’s label Universal Music Group, and other involved parties for additional comment, and has not received further response from Ye as of reporting.

    For anyone affected by the issues raised in this story, support resources are available through BBC Action Line.

  • Texas teen sentenced to 35 years for killing fellow student at track meet

    Texas teen sentenced to 35 years for killing fellow student at track meet

    A teenage defendant from North Texas has been found guilty of murder following a racially charged trial that gripped national attention over questions of school safety and self-defense. Nineteen-year-old Karmelo Anthony was convicted by a Collin County jury on Tuesday for the 2025 fatal stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a Frisco high school athletics event, when both teenagers were 17 years old. He was ultimately sentenced to 35 years behind bars.

    Under Texas state law, minors as young as 17 can be charged and tried as adults for felony homicide offenses, a statute that allowed the case to proceed in adult criminal court. Prosecutors built their case over the course of the trial with testimony from nearly 24 witnesses, relying heavily on firsthand accounts from student witnesses who were present at the scene. The most harrowing testimony came from Collin County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Elizabeth Ventura, who detailed the fatal injury: a large, deep chest wound that penetrated Metcalf’s heart, causing immediate death. Multiple student witnesses for the prosecution uniformly identified Anthony as the initial aggressor in the confrontation that led to the killing.

    In contrast, the defense team mounted a self-defense argument, painting Anthony as a high-achieving student with no prior violent history who acted only to protect himself during the altercation. Defense witnesses highlighted Anthony’s academic standing — he held a perfect 4.0 GPA — and his standing in the school’s track and field program, where he had been nominated for team captain by his coach, Adam Linwood.

    After less than three hours of deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict, rejecting the option of a lesser manslaughter conviction that would have carried a maximum 20-year prison sentence, an alternative that had been explicitly offered to jurors by Judge Roach. The case has drawn ongoing controversy over racial dynamics in the Texas criminal justice system: the civil rights group Next Generation Action Network, which organized advocacy on behalf of Anthony, pointed out that not a single member of the trial jury was Black, raising questions about impartiality in the verdict. The killing, which occurred on a public high school campus during a school-sponsored event, has also reignited national conversations about youth violence and gaps in safety protocols at U.S. secondary schools.

  • Platner wins Maine primary to challenge Collins

    Platner wins Maine primary to challenge Collins

    A series of high-stakes U.S. Senate and congressional primary elections across four states have wrapped up, reshaping the battlefield for November’s critical midterm contests that will ultimately decide partisan control of Congress for the final stretch of Donald Trump’s presidential term. In the most closely watched upset, political novice Graham Platner – an oyster farmer and retired combat Marine who has never held public office – secured the Democratic Party’s Senate nomination in Maine, overcoming a string of damaging scandals to set up a generational showdown against long-serving Republican incumbent Susan Collins this fall.

    Endorsed by high-profile independent Senator Bernie Sanders, Platner’s path to the nomination was far from smooth. His campaign was nearly derailed early on when reports emerged of a tattoo bearing a striking resemblance to a Nazi symbol. Platner quickly issued a public apology, claiming he had no knowledge of the symbol’s hateful origins, but the controversy still sparked widespread accusations of antisemitism, even from his own former political director. Later, additional scandals emerged: old online comments dismissing sexual assault were unearthed by media outlets, and reports detailed allegations of marital infidelity. Despite these headwinds, Platner’s campaign received a pivotal boost when popular Democratic Governor Janet Mills opted to exit the primary race, clearing a path for the non-traditional candidate to consolidate support from progressive and working-class voters. Platner’s candid, down-to-earth messaging – which centered on his lived experience with post-traumatic stress disorder from his military service and the economic challenges facing small business owners – resonated with a Democratic electorate increasingly open to backing outsiders over establishment politicians.

    Come November, Platner will face off against Collins, who has represented Maine in the U.S. Senate for nearly 30 years. Collins has carved out a reputation as a moderate Republican over her career, drawing the ire of Trump’s conservative base in 2021 when she voted to convict Trump during his second impeachment trial. In recent years, however, she has shifted closer to the former president, playing a key role in advancing his judicial and executive nominee confirmations.

    Meanwhile, in South Carolina’s Republican Senate primary, veteran incumbent Lindsey Graham fended off a hardline primary challenge from wealthy businessman Mark Lynch, who self-funded his campaign and attacked Graham for insufficient loyalty to Trump’s policy agenda. Lynch leaned on old 2016 footage of Graham praising President Joe Biden and criticizing Trump to bolster his case, and received backing from former Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene, the ex-Georgia congresswoman who split with Trump over the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and disputes over his commitment to the America First movement. Graham’s longstanding hawkish stance on Iran – a position that has seen him call for U.S. military intervention in the country for years – also made him a target of anti-interventionist America First critics, as tensions between the U.S. and Iran remain heightened. Still, Graham held onto his nomination, extending his decades-long career in Washington.

    In Nevada, Republicans are locked in a competitive primary race for an open congressional seat that has not been vacant in 15 years, following the retirement of the district’s long-serving incumbent. The contest has come down to two candidates: a political novice endorsed by Trump, and former state senator James Settelmeyer, with both candidates spending months competing to prove their unwavering loyalty to Trump’s policy agenda. Primary contests also concluded in North Dakota, where voters finalized their respective party nominees for November’s general election. Across all four states, the outcomes have set the stage for a fiercely contested midterm cycle, with control of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives hanging in the balance, and the balance of power during Trump’s remaining term in office on the line for voters.

  • Trump-endorsed Brit Steve Hilton advances in California governor’s race

    Trump-endorsed Brit Steve Hilton advances in California governor’s race

    After seven days of ongoing ballot counting from California’s June 2 gubernatorial primary, US media projections have confirmed that Steve Hilton, a former senior advisor to ex-United Kingdom Prime Minister David Cameron and one-time Fox News host, will advance to the November general election as one of the two remaining candidates.

    Hilton narrowly bested Democratic billionaire climate campaigner Tom Steyer to claim his place on the general election ballot. He will now face off against Xavier Becerra, who served as Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Biden administration, for California’s top executive office this fall.

    The candidacy has earned the public backing of former President Donald Trump. Should Hilton claim victory in November, he will become the first Republican governor to lead the heavily Democratic-leaning state in 15 years, marking a major political shift for California.

    The primary race drew an unprecedentedly large field of more than 60 candidates, the vast majority of whom were Democrats vying to replace incumbent Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who is barred from seeking re-election due to state term limits. Newsom, who has long been named as a potential Democratic contender for future presidential campaigns, built a high-profile profile as one of the most prominent critics of Trump’s policy agenda during his tenure. California repeatedly clashed with the Trump White House over a sweeping range of policy issues, from immigration regulation to environmental and climate action.

    Over the coming months, Hilton and Becerra will campaign across the state, competing to win the governorship — a role that carries responsibility for managing a state budget worth hundreds of billions of dollars, supervising a workforce of tens of thousands of public employees, and overseeing hundreds of separate state agencies that touch nearly every aspect of life for California’s 39 million residents.

  • Will this scandal-plagued outsider help save or sink the Democrats?

    Will this scandal-plagued outsider help save or sink the Democrats?

    On the eve of Maine’s critical Democratic Senate primary, first-time candidate Graham Platner stood before hundreds of supporters at a Portland town hall, visibly emotional after receiving a handcrafted card emblazoned with the message “We are your Graham-ily, and we’ve got your back.” The moment capped a turbulent week for the political outsider, who had been hit by a string of damaging national investigative reports exposing a pattern of controversial behavior that would have ended the campaigns of most conventional politicians. Yet for the loyal base that has propelled his unlikely rise, none of the scandals have shaken their commitment.

    Platner’s path to the primary has been anything but smooth. Over the past several months, controversies have mounted: a chest tattoo resembling a Nazi-era Totenkopf symbol, unearthed 14-year-old online comments dismissing personal responsibility for rape survivors, leaked allegations of infidelity during his early marriage, and most recently, accusations from three former girlfriends of violent, erratic emotional abuse. His former campaign chief of staff penned a scathing Washington Post op-ed warning that Platner “exhibits a pattern of dishonest behavior that is impossible to ignore,” and a recent poll from the opposing campaign shows his unfavorable rating among Maine voters has jumped 20 points to 49% following the latest allegations.

    But what has made Platner’s campaign a political phenomenon is his ability to retain support despite the growing baggage, a reflection of both Maine’s unique political culture and the deep anger of rank-and-file Democratic voters toward the national establishment. A former Marine Corps combat veteran turned oyster farmer and small business owner, Platner has cut a relatable figure, touring the state in jeans and a baseball cap, speaking openly about his struggles with post-traumatic stress disorder and his family’s journey with infertility. By his own count, he has hosted more than 80 town halls across the sparsely populated state, where face-to-face retail politics still holds enormous sway. His anti-elite, anti-lobbyist message and left-leaning policy platform — which echoes progressives like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, calling for universal healthcare, free college, and a wealth tax on the ultra-wealthy — has tapped into a deep well of frustration with business-as-usual Washington politics.

    His rise has already upended the state’s Democratic race: party establishment favorite Governor Janet Mills was pressured by national leaders to enter the race, but she dropped out earlier this spring after falling far behind in fundraising and polling, stunned by Platner’s early viral momentum. Even some voters who acknowledge discomfort with Platner’s past say they have no choice but to back him to defeat long-serving Republican incumbent Susan Collins, who has held the seat for three decades. “I would vote for him exclusively to keep Susan Collins from winning,” explained Portland voter Ann Oliver, echoing a sentiment shared by many anti-Collins Democrats who prioritize party control over candidate perfection.

    The outcome of Tuesday’s primary carries national stakes. A Platner victory would leave the pivotal general election race in play, with control of the U.S. Senate hanging in the balance. National Democrats fear a repeat of the Tea Party era, where grassroots enthusiasm elevated unelectable candidates that cost the party winnable seats. If Platner wins, he will face off against Collins, a formidable moderate Republican with deep Maine roots, a $20 million campaign war chest, and a history of winning over cross-party voters in a state that has not backed a Republican presidential candidate since 1988. Collins’ operation is already preparing to flood the airwaves with negative ads focusing on Platner’s scandals, while national Republicans have already called his candidacy a gift that could help them hold the seat.

    Yet for his supporters, Platner’s authenticity outweighs any past missteps. “He’s got a little bit of baggage, but who gives a shit? He is a saint here to me,” said Kevin Claik, a retiree who drove 48 kilometers to attend Sunday’s town hall. Autumn Crisovan, a Portland recreational sports worker who opposes lobbyist influence in politics, said Platner’s grassroots campaign signals a much-needed shift for the country: “It’s nice to see there are people who are trying to fight and that it gets the ball rolling for everyone else.”

    Platner has leaned into the anti-establishment framing, echoing the scandal-resilience playbook that worked for Donald Trump, framing the attacks as a coordinated effort by elite media and party insiders to defeat the people’s candidate. “What everybody fails to understand is they think this is a race about me,” he told supporters Sunday night. “What they don’t understand is this is a race about us. It’s about the people of Maine. It’s about the recognition that only in each other, only in our communities, do we find the power necessary to take back our politics.”

    Political analysts note that Platner’s working-class, rugged nonconformist image resonates deeply with rural Maine voters, a demographic that has drifted toward Republicans in recent presidential elections that Platner could potentially flip. “He is straight out of central casting for a firebrand politician who doesn’t take any bullshit,” noted Colby College political science professor Nick Jacobs. “There is a deep connection to place that seems genuine, because it is quite pervasive throughout his style and substance.”

    Platner has attempted to frame past controversies as stories of redemption, apologizing for each misstep: he removed the Nazi-resembling tattoo, explaining he got it drunk on vacation with fellow Marines without knowing its meaning; he asked voters to forgive his old rape comments as the words of a younger man on his worst day; and he acknowledged his past infidelity, saying he and his wife have worked through the issue and strengthened their marriage. Even some national progressives have stood by him, though with caveats: California Congressman Ro Khanna, who campaigned with Platner last week, acknowledged the abuse allegations were “wrong, was misogynistic, was toxic or volatile” but said Platner has expressed shame for his actions.

    As Maine voters head to the polls Tuesday, the race remains unresolved, with national political observers watching closely to see if a political novice with a long list of scandals can pull off an upset that would reshape the balance of power in Washington for years to come.

  • Watch: Is the US ready to host the 2026 World Cup?

    Watch: Is the US ready to host the 2026 World Cup?

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup rapidly approaches, a critical question is gaining increasing attention across global sports circles: is the United States fully prepared to welcome the world’s biggest football tournament? The question has been thrown into sharp focus in the New York-New Jersey metropolitan area, one of the key host zones that is scheduled to stage eight matches during the month-long event, more than many other host cities across the North American joint hosting project.

    BBC correspondent Nada Tawfik has recently been on the ground investigating the current state of preparations in the region, uncovering a series of lingering concerns that have yet to be fully resolved. From infrastructure upgrades to transportation capacity, and fan experience planning to security arrangements, multiple aspects of the readiness work are still undergoing final adjustments, leaving observers questioning whether all deliverables will be completed on time ahead of the tournament’s kickoff.

    The New York-New Jersey area is one of 16 host cities across the three co-host nations of the United States, Mexico and Canada, and its central role in the tournament means any delays or gaps in preparation could have knock-on effects for the entire event. Football fans from every corner of the globe are expected to descend on the region to watch top-tier matches, placing significant expectations on local organizers to deliver a seamless, world-class experience. As preparations enter the final stretch, all eyes remain on how organizers will address the identified concerns and cross the finish line in time for the historic 48-team tournament.

  • Excitement and nerves in the US as football fans get ready for the World Cup

    Excitement and nerves in the US as football fans get ready for the World Cup

    It has been more than three decades since the United States last opened its stadium doors to the FIFA World Cup, and with the 2026 edition — the first expanded 48-team tournament, co-hosted alongside Canada and Mexico — just days away, the nation is caught between soaring anticipation and lingering uncertainty over whether it is fully prepared to welcome the global sporting event.

    Multiple growing pains have emerged in the final lead-up to kickoff. Geopolitical tensions, widespread frustration over strict visa entry requirements, and eye-popping match ticket prices have dominated pre-tournament conversations, casting a shadow of concern over what is supposed to be a unifying global celebration. Yet for millions of American soccer fans and small business owners across the country, the excitement of hosting the world’s most-watched sporting event on home soil has outweighed these growing pains.

    At the Red Bull training complex in Morristown, New Jersey, one of the world’s most successful national sides, Brazil, has already settled into its official base camp. As the Seleção runs through tactical drills and fitness preparations, crowds of giddy fans have gathered along the facility’s sidelines to catch a rare, close-up look at their favorite football stars. Many young fans have left with cherished autographs and selfie photos with the players.

    Brazilian forward Matheus Cunha, who plies his club trade at Manchester United, praised the host nation’s preparations in an interview with the BBC. “The fans have been amazing, and so far, it’s off to a good start,” he said, lauding the quality of the training facility, the pitch, and even the mild New Jersey summer weather, which he says reminds him of home back in Brazil. He only had one lighthearted quip for his hosts: “The only thing, it’s called football, not soccer.”

    Across the country in New York City’s Brooklyn neighborhood, young players with the S.C. Gjøa Soccer club are already counting down the minutes to kickoff, with many having secured coveted tickets to multiple matches. Dennis Wyrwoll, a long-time soccer fan who attended the last U.S.-hosted World Cup in 1994, is set to bring his 10-year-old son Nicholas to four matches. Recalling the 1994 tournament, he noted that “at that point, nobody knew anything about football” and tickets were easy to obtain. Today, he says there is undeniable buzz in major New York, but he remains curious to see if that excitement translates to smaller cities across the U.S. where soccer has historically had a smaller fanbase.

    Indeed, the profile of soccer in the U.S. has grown exponentially since the 1994 tournament, and many local coaches credit the 2026 hosting gig with accelerating that growth. S.C. Gjøa coach Kaha Tavadze told the BBC that his club has seen a threefold increase in youth player registrations and tryouts in just the past 12 months alone, a shift he directly attributes to the excitement of hosting the World Cup.

    “Children now follow the sport more closely, know every top player, and wear their favourite team’s jersey,” Tavadze explained. He added that the tournament could even inspire a new generation of American players to pursue professional careers: “Watching live games, especially at that level, will change their mindset.”

    For all the excitement, however, systemic barriers remain. Sky-high ticket prices have put in-person attendance out of reach for many working-class fans, even those with deep connections to the sport. Shantay Armstrong, whose 7-year-old son has played with the Brooklyn club for five years, says she and her son have long dreamed of attending a World Cup match together. She entered an official raffle for affordable tickets hosted by New York City, only to watch the raffle close to new entries within minutes of going live.

    “It’s almost heartbreaking that there’s like a lack of accessibility for people who can’t afford to go,” Armstrong said. “I wanted to give him that opportunity, but that lack of opportunity makes me feel locked out, like we’re here but we’re not really part of it.”

    Tournament organizers have moved to address this gap by opening free public fan zones across host cities, allowing fans without match tickets to still gather and experience the excitement of the tournament. Officials have also worked to direct foot traffic to local small businesses, in the hopes that communities across the country can share in the expected economic windfall from the global event.

    Enda Keenan, owner of Legend’s Bar — a popular destination for overseas soccer fans located just steps from the Empire State Building in Manhattan — says he already expects a historic boost to his business, so much so that he has even turned down extra event requests from FIFA. “I said we can’t help ourselves, it’s going to be so crazy, we’d love to help, but there’s nothing we can do,” Keenan explained. He anticipates that even New Yorkers who never watch soccer will flood bars and fan zones to join the fun, saying that “it’ll be that much of a buzz.”

    During last year’s UEFA Champions League final, Keenan’s bar hosted 1,300 fans inside and an additional 700 outside on the sidewalk, where the bar set up an 85-inch television for overflow crowds. He says the World Cup will be an entirely different scale of crowd, and he has already prepped by sending overflow customers to neighboring bars to avoid overcrowding.

    In total, roughly 1.2 million international and domestic visitors are expected to travel to the New York-New Jersey host region alone over the course of the tournament. Beyond ticket access, transportation and logistics remain a top concern for many attendees. Thirteen-year-old goalkeeper Baxter Rowland will attend two matches, traveling to one with his family and another with a group of friends on a chartered bus. But even with tickets secured, his mother Alice Baxter says she is already bracing for traffic and parking chaos when she drives to the stadium.

    “I think it’s going to be a little bit stressful, and I think it might be difficult for the first few games, at least,” she said. “And hopefully it’ll get better and they’ll work out the kinks before the final here in New Jersey and New York.”

    In just a matter of days, the world will turn its attention to North America, and the question on everyone’s mind — whether the U.S. is truly ready to host the world’s biggest sporting event — will finally get an answer.

  • ‘There is no one else’ – Platner voters on backing the controversial Democrat

    ‘There is no one else’ – Platner voters on backing the controversial Democrat

    On a crisp Election Day across the pine-tree lined districts of Maine, BBC reporters sat down with Democratic voters to unpack the driving forces behind their support for their party’s controversial U.S. Senate candidate, who is set to take on longtime Republican incumbent Susan Collins this election cycle.

    Across multiple conversations, a consistent theme emerged: even with the well-documented controversy surrounding Platner, the vast majority of Democratic voters interviewed made clear they see no better alternative to unseat Collins. Many respondents framed their choice not as an enthusiastic endorsement of every position Platner has taken over his career, but as a strategic and ideological commitment to flipping the Senate seat held by Collins, a figure who has become a polarizing force in Maine politics over her decades in Washington.

    Several voters acknowledged the criticisms that have dogged Platner’s campaign, from past policy stances that have angered some progressive factions of the party to ethical questions raised by opposing groups. Yet even with these concerns top of mind, nearly all interviewees reiterated the phrase echoed across the state: ‘There is no one else.’

    Background context for this race: Collins, first elected to the Senate in 1996, has long held a reputation as a moderate Republican willing to cross party lines. But in recent years, shifting national political dynamics have made her seat a top target for national Democrats, who have poured resources into flipping it to help maintain or gain partisan control of the upper chamber. Platner, the Democratic nominee, emerged from a crowded primary field, but his nomination left some factions of the state party dissatisfied, leading to ongoing questions about whether rank-and-file Democratic voters would turn out to support him in the general election.

    The on-the-ground interviews from Election Day, however, suggest that concerns about voter apathy around Platner’s controversial candidacy may be overstated. Voters repeatedly emphasized that their top priority is replacing Collins, and that even with his flaws, Platner is the only candidate who can deliver that outcome for Maine. Many noted that they have supported Democratic candidates for statewide and national office for years, and that defeating what they frame as extreme GOP leadership in Washington is the defining issue of this election for them, outweighing any concerns they hold about their own party’s nominee.