标签: North America

北美洲

  • Ariana Grande leaves problems at home as her tour hits the UK

    Ariana Grande leaves problems at home as her tour hits the UK

    As the United Kingdom grapples with its fifth heatwave of 2026, pop icon Ariana Grande touched down in London for the UK leg of her *Eternal Sunshine* tour – and even sweltering temperatures couldn’t dampen the fervor of thousands of fans who packed the O2 Arena on opening night.

    This marks Grande’s first live performance on British soil since 2019, a gap shaped by both global COVID-19 shutdowns and her burgeoning film career, which recently earned her an Oscar nomination for her portrayal of Glinda the Good Witch in the *Wicked* movie adaptation. Inside the arena, fans came prepared to celebrate: many showed up in playful costume, from cat ears and floral headpieces to full bridal gowns, erupting in screams when Grande nodded to widespread rumors that she has rekindled her decade-old romance with ex-boyfriend Ricky Alvarez, who confirmed their relationship on Instagram just one week prior.

    For two hours, Grande put her defining artistic talent – her staggering four-octave vocal range – front and center. While the tour boasts all the production trappings of a major pop spectacle, from elaborate large-scale sets to plumes of smoke and tightly choreographed dance routines, long stretches of the performance strip away the fanfare to leave just Grande, her live band, and her voice. This intentional focus on vocal craft is on full display during the title track *Eternal Sunshine*, where Grande builds the entire song live by looping her own vocals in multiple registers, a spontaneous, impressive display of melodic skill that echoes a famous viral YouTube clip of her arranging the harmonies for *Positions* in the recording studio.

    Beyond the vocal acrobatics, the *Eternal Sunshine* tour carries a deeply personal narrative. Named for Michel Gondry’s 2004 film about memory and heartache, the show follows Grande’s own journey of reckoning with grief: she has survived devastating public tragedy, including the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing that killed 22 of her fans, and the untimely death of her former partner Mac Miller. Where the film centers on erasing painful memories, Grande’s narrative leans into honoring them, framing the show as a process of healing and reconciliation.

    That narrative has gained new weight since the tour launched in California two months ago. Grande has confirmed to fans that after the tour wraps its 10-date London run in September, she will step away from touring for an extended period. Intense, unrelenting public scrutiny of her personal life, health, and body image has prompted the break, which Grande says she planned long ago from a “thoughtful, empowered place.”

    If the star is carrying private burdens off-stage, they never show in her performance at the O2. Grande leans into every moment of the show: teetering in towering heels, blowing kisses to the crowd, and leaning into the physical and vocal demands of the setlist. The only moment of visible emotion comes during *Hampstead*, a raw ballad about media portrayal and online toxicity, when she nearly cries reacting to a sobbing audience member, smiling through her own cracked voice to say “You’ll make me cry.”

    The setlist draws heavily from her 2024 *Eternal Sunshine* album, setting aside some of her decades-long chart-topping hits to center newer material. Still, fan favorites including *7 Rings* and her duet with Lady Gaga *Rain On Me* still bring the crowd to their feet, while her powerhouse performance of *Dangerous Woman* and the jaw-dropping vocal riffs on *Safety Net* leave audiences stunned. The show’s quietest moments land the strongest, too: on *Imperfect For You*, Grande sits face-to-face with her long-time guitarist for an intimate, delicate rendition that feels surprisingly private even in a room of 20,000 screaming fans.

    After the final note, fans left the arena unanimous in their praise for the performance. Harry, a Chinese fan based in London who dressed as a daisy to tribute Grande’s latest album *Petal*, called the show a “ten out of ten masterpiece.” Poppy from Kent, who stood front row, said “When she came on stage, I was literally bawling. She’s the best singer ever.” Clare, who flew from Monaghan in Ireland for opening night, called it “probably the best concert I’ve ever been to.”

    Fans have also been overwhelmingly supportive of Grande’s decision to step away from touring for what she calls a “long, long time.” Many framed the break as a necessary act of self-care amid relentless public criticism. “I’m proud of her. She took a stand to keep away the remarks, the critics,” said Brian, a French fan attending the opening run. “The public has bullied her out of it. We’ve bullied her out of fame. I think that’s gross,” added Cory from Banbury. Damon, another Chinese fan in attendance, noted: “She needed time to recover. Maybe she will make some more movies… I love her movies. And if she comes back, we’ll be in the front row.”

    As Grande wraps the final leg of her tour, the *Eternal Sunshine* run stands not just as a showcase of one of pop’s greatest vocal talents, but as a love letter to fans – and a well-earned goodbye for the years ahead.

  • Watch: Why Tupac Shakur’s murder trial is happening 30 years after he was killed

    Watch: Why Tupac Shakur’s murder trial is happening 30 years after he was killed

    It has been nearly 30 years since legendary hip-hop artist Tupac Shakur was gunned down in a Las Vegas drive-by shooting, one of the most high-profile unsolved murders in modern American cultural history. But this long-stalled case is finally approaching a courtroom milestone, leaving many asking why justice has taken three decades to begin. On September 7, 1996, Shakur was riding as a passenger in a car driven by Death Row Records founder Suge Knight after attending a boxing match at the MGM Grand Hotel in Las Vegas. A white Cadillac pulled alongside their vehicle, and an occupant inside opened fire, striking the rapper four times. Shakur succumbed to his injuries six days later, on September 13, 1996, leaving behind a groundbreaking musical legacy and a case that confounded investigators for generations. For nearly 27 years, no formal charges were filed in connection with the killing, leading to countless conspiracy theories, speculative investigations, and public frustration over the lack of accountability. The break in the case came in 2023, when Las Vegas police secured an indictment against Duane Keith “Keffe D” Davis, a former South Side Compton Crips gang leader who has long been linked to the shooting in public accounts and investigations. To date, Davis remains the only person ever to face formal criminal charges for Shakur’s killing. Multiple factors have contributed to the decades-long delay in bringing the case to trial. For years, investigators faced a wall of silence from potential witnesses, many of whom were affiliated with street gangs and feared retaliation for cooperating with law enforcement. Additionally, the original investigation was hampered by limited forensic technology available in the 1990s, as well as the chaotic, high-profile nature of the case that led to a flood of false tips and misinformation. Prosecutors have also noted that the passage of time itself created procedural hurdles, as evidence degraded and key witnesses died before they could give formal testimony. In recent years, however, new investigative techniques, renewed public pressure, and a shift in willingness from some potential witnesses to cooperate have allowed prosecutors to move forward with the case. The upcoming trial has reignited widespread interest in Shakur’s legacy and the circumstances of his death, with hip-hop fans, legal analysts, and cultural commentators alike waiting to see if the case will finally bring a close to one of the music industry’s most enduring unsolved mysteries.

  • US women in politics spark conversation about balancing family and career

    US women in politics spark conversation about balancing family and career

    Two prominent American women from opposite ends of the political spectrum have reignited a long-simmering national debate about the unique struggles women face when building high-demand careers while planning for or raising a family, shining a bright light on systemic gaps in U.S. workplace policy that disproportionately disadvantage working mothers.

    This week, progressive Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced she had begun the process of egg freezing, sharing step-by-step documentation of her daily at-home hormone injections on social media to demystify the procedure for other professional women. Just days earlier, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, a conservative appointee in the Trump administration, revealed she would step down from her high-profile role to prioritize time with her young family, including her newborn infant.

    Leavitt framed her decision as a deeply personal choice, explaining that since returning to work after her daughter’s birth, she had come to recognize she could not simultaneously meet the relentless demands of the White House press secretary role and be the fully present parent her two young children deserved. Her announcement and Ocasio-Cortez’s reproductive planning came on the heels of similar shared experiences from other women in public office, including California Democratic Representative Sara Jacobs, who has already completed two rounds of egg freezing to delay childbearing while building her congressional career.

    Jacobs opened up about the grueling logistical and physical challenges of the procedure, describing how she would dash up to her Capitol Hill office between legislative sessions to administer hormone shots during her treatment. The 37-year-old lawmaker noted the process, which typically costs upwards of $10,000 and is rarely covered by U.S. health insurance plans, brought significant physical side effects: body aches, extreme hormonal swings that felt like going through puberty and menopause simultaneously. Still, she called the decision empowering, saying it gave her greater agency to choose when to fit children into her demanding career that requires weekly cross-country travel between California and Washington D.C.

    When Jacobs first began her egg freezing journey in 2021, she said the topic was almost never discussed among lawmakers in the halls of Congress. Today, just a small fraction of sitting members of Congress are mothers to children under 18, and only a tiny handful have ever given birth while holding office.

    The conversations sparked by these high-profile women have pulled back the curtain on a broader systemic issue: the United States remains the only industrialized nation in the world that does not require employers to offer paid parental leave. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms that fewer than one in four U.S. workers have access to employer-sponsored paid family leave, while more than 120 countries across the globe — including every European nation — mandate paid maternity leave for working women.

    Shifting demographic trends have only amplified these challenges. A 2025 report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows the average age of mothers giving birth in the U.S. rose from 28.7 to 29.6 between 2016 and 2023, as more women delay childbearing to build their careers, while a growing share choose not to have children at all.

    Interviews with professional women across a range of fields illustrate the uneven playing field for working mothers, even for those with significant privilege. Michele Heisler, a professor of internal medicine at the University of Michigan and medical director for the nonprofit Physicians for Human Rights, gave birth to her first child after returning to medical school at age 30, and carried her second child during her third year of training. Heisler said she only been able to advance in her high-profile career because she could afford childcare support like nannies and had a partner who shared domestic work equally. Without that equal division of labor, she noted, child rearing almost always falls disproportionately on women, forcing them to step back from their career ambitions. She relies on a flexible schedule that often requires working late into the night and waking as early as 5 a.m. to complete research, so she can prioritize time with her children during the day.

    Seema Patel, an associate professor of law at UC Law San Francisco and a former workers’ rights attorney, echoes that experience. Like Heisler, she completes most of her academic work after her three children, now ages 13, 11, and 7, go to bed, so she does not miss key moments with them while they are young. Even with access to partial maternity leave and a supportive partner, she says the constant balancing act between career advancement and active parenting remains an unresolved challenge. “How can I do that while also being there for my kids and attentive to them? I don’t have an answer,” she said.

    Patel, who previously worked for San Francisco’s Office of Labor Standards Enforcement — the first local U.S. government to pass a mandate requiring paid parental leave for private sector workers — points out that lower-wage working parents face far greater barriers than women in professional roles like hers. Most low-income workers have no access to paid leave at all, leaving them with impossible choices between keeping their jobs and bonding with a new child.

    Jacobs points to a root cause of the systemic issue: most U.S. workplaces, including the federal government, were designed by and for men who traditionally had stay-at-home spouses to manage all domestic and childcare responsibilities. Even the U.S. Congress does not offer its own members paid parental leave, she notes. “It’s going to take a lot of work for us to create a society where the domestic work is really shared equally between women and men,” she said.

    For now, egg freezing has given Jacobs a safety net, allowing her to delay childbearing until she can navigate the logistical challenges of raising a child while serving in Congress that requires half her time away from her home state. “I hope to be able to do that one day, but I just haven’t figured the time is right just yet,” she said.

  • Hawaii braces for potential first direct hit by a hurricane in 34 years

    Hawaii braces for potential first direct hit by a hurricane in 34 years

    Three decades after the last devastating hurricane struck the Hawaiian archipelago, the entire state is on high alert as Category 1 Hurricane Lala churns toward its shores, poised to deliver the first direct hurricane landfall the region has seen since 1992.

    After intensifying from a tropical system to reach hurricane strength on Saturday, Lala currently carries sustained maximum winds of 75 miles per hour (120 kilometers per hour), according to official meteorological assessments. Forecasters warn that the storm could bring catastrophic impacts to the state’s largest island, the Big Island, if its worst-case trajectory plays out: extreme rainfall totaling up to 25 inches (63 centimeters) and a dangerous 3-foot storm surge that threatens coastal communities.

    The National Weather Service (NWS) has issued a full hurricane warning for the entire Big Island, while neighboring Maui County, Oahu, Kauai, and Niihau remain under active tropical storm warnings as the system progresses. State and local officials have emphasized that Lala brings potential life-threatening hazards, including fast-moving flash floods and destructive mudslides across sloped and low-lying areas. The storm is projected to either make landfall along the southern tip of the Big Island on Saturday or pass within just a few miles of the coast, before continuing its westward track across the Pacific. Notably, historical records cited by the Associated Press show that no hurricane has made direct landfall on the Big Island in the 155 years since modern record-keeping began.

    As the weekend progresses, forecasters expect Lala to gradually weaken back to tropical storm strength after passing the Big Island, with its center tracking just south of Hawaii’s other major populated islands. Still, state officials are urging caution across all islands.

    Hawaii Governor Josh Green issued an urgent alert to residents via the social platform X, warning that the archipelago should prepare for “an incredible amount of water” over the coming days. “Damaging winds, heavy rain, flash flooding and dangerous surf are possible across the state through the weekend,” Green’s statement read.

    The approaching storm has already severely disrupted travel to and from the islands. Flight tracking data from flightaware.com shows widespread flight cancellations across Big Island’s two primary airports: 40 percent of all scheduled flights have been grounded at Ellison Onizuka Kona International, the island’s largest air hub, while 80 percent of flights have been called off at Hilo International.

    For the southeastern region of the Big Island, the NWS has issued its most severe rainfall and flooding forecast. “Major rainfall flooding may prompt many evacuations and rescues,” the agency said, noting that rivers and small tributaries across the area “may rapidly overflow their banks in multiple places.”

    Officials have repeatedly urged residents to complete their emergency preparations well ahead of the storm’s arrival. Social media posts from local Facebook community boards show residents scrambling to stock up on supplies, fill sandbags to reinforce their homes against flooding, and confirm whether local grocery and hardware stores remained open in the early hours of Saturday.

    Hawaii County’s Civil Defense Agency confirmed that public emergency shelters are available in every district across the Big Island, and urged residents to finalize their safety plans immediately. “At this time, you should have completed your storm-ready preparations and focusing on your Sheltering Plan,” the agency announced via X.

    The last hurricane to directly strike Hawaii was Hurricane Iniki, a powerful Category 4 storm that made landfall on Kauai’s southern coast in 1992. Iniki left a devastating legacy: six fatalities and an estimated $3 billion in total damage across the state, a memory that has underscored state officials’ urgency as Lala approaches.

  • Five injured, one critically, in shooting at Virginia State University

    Five injured, one critically, in shooting at Virginia State University

    A mass shooting in the early hours of Saturday left five people wounded outside a residential building on the campus of Virginia State University, with one victim in critical condition, university officials have confirmed. Multiple attackers are believed to be involved in the violent incident, which sent shockwaves through the academic community just days before the start of the fall semester.

    Local law enforcement officers were first dispatched to the scene at approximately 1:28 a.m. local time, which corresponds to 5:28 a.m. GMT. Responding teams located all five victims with gunshot wounds, and quickly transported them to area medical facilities for urgent treatment. Four of the injured are suffering from non-life-threatening injuries, according to an update from the university, while one remains in critical care.

    As of Saturday, no suspects have been publicly taken into custody, and the full circumstances surrounding the attack remain unclear. A spokesperson for the BBC confirmed that the outlet has reached out to local law enforcement to request additional details and comment on the ongoing probe. A temporary campus-wide lockdown implemented immediately after the shooting has now been lifted, but a heavy contingent of law enforcement personnel remains posted across the campus to secure the site as investigators work.

    Chesterfield County Police are leading the joint investigation into the incident, with supporting assistance from both surrounding local law enforcement agencies and the Virginia State University campus police department.

    Located roughly 20 miles south of Richmond, Virginia’s state capital, Virginia State University counts approximately 5,000 enrolled students. The institution is also one of the nation’s dozens of historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs), a category of post-secondary schools created during the era of segregation to provide access to higher education for Black Americans, who were barred from attending most majority-white institutions across the country at the time.

    The shooting comes at a particularly sensitive time for the campus community. According to the university’s official academic calendar, on-campus housing opened for returning students just one day before the shooting, on Friday. The first day of classes for the new academic term was scheduled to begin on Monday, leaving university administrators to assess next steps in the wake of the violence. The incident is the latest in a long-running string of gun violence incidents on U.S. college campuses, a crisis that has fueled repeated national debates over gun control legislation in the United States.

  • BBC seeks to subpoena Trump’s family members in Panorama lawsuit

    BBC seeks to subpoena Trump’s family members in Panorama lawsuit

    A high-stakes legal battle between former U.S. President Donald Trump and the British Broadcasting Corporation has taken a dramatic new turn, as the public broadcaster moves to compel testimony and document disclosure from three of Trump’s closest family members as part of its defense against a $10 billion defamation claim.

    Court records made public reveal that the BBC’s legal team first attempted to serve legal subpoenas in May to Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and former senior White House advisor. The lawsuit stems from a 2024 episode of the BBC’s long-running investigative documentary series Panorama, which edited together two separate segments of a speech Trump delivered ahead of the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

    Trump launched the defamation suit against the BBC last December, filing the claim in a Florida court. He alleges the broadcaster intentionally and maliciously altered his speech to falsely imply he directly called for violent action on January 6, arguing the edit caused severe harm to his business and personal reputation. While the BBC has issued a public apology for the editing error that created the misleading impression of Trump advocating violence, it has repeatedly denied the error meets the legal standard for defamation and is pushing to have the entire case dismissed. The network has also noted the documentary was never made available to audiences on its U.S.-facing platforms.

    In its latest court filing, the BBC’s legal team argues that the three Trump family members hold unique, firsthand knowledge of the former president’s intentions when he delivered the January 6 speech, making their testimony and relevant documents critical to the defense against the defamation claim. Drawing on evidence previously compiled by the U.S. House committee that investigated the Capitol riot, the filing notes that Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump were present while their father revised and delivered the speech. It adds that Jared Kushner personally drafted a proposed version of the speech that included explicit language condemning political violence, a detail that could undermine Trump’s current claims about the content and intent of his final remarks.

    The filing also details repeated failed attempts by the BBC’s legal representatives to serve the subpoenas in person, prompting the network to ask the court for permission to serve the documents via email and certified mail. When a process server attempted to deliver subpoenas for Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner at their Florida residence, they were denied access at a police checkpoint and later informed by the U.S. Secret Service that the agency could not accept the legal documents on the couple’s behalf. Separate attempts to serve Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower in New York also stalled: on the first attempt, building staff said the employee responsible for accepting legal documents was out at lunch, and on a second visit two days later, the server was told the entire legal department was off-site that day.

    Recent weeks have already seen major shifts in the case. Last month, Trump’s legal team was forced to concede that they had no evidence to back their original claim that the Panorama episode was available to U.S. audiences on the BBC’s BritBox streaming service, BBC.com, BBC Select, or through any U.S. broadcast partners. Shortly after that, Trump agreed to remove BBC Studios, the corporation’s commercial production arm, from the lawsuit after the BBC argued the unit played no role in creating or distributing the documentary. Earlier this month, the judge overseeing the case granted Trump’s request to delay turning over financial records to the BBC, which has requested the documents to challenge Trump’s claim that the edit caused substantial damage to his business interests. Trump’s legal team has argued that disclosing the records would cause irreversible harm to the former president. If the case proceeds through pre-trial proceedings, a trial is scheduled to begin in February 2027.

    As of this reporting, no response has been issued by Trump’s legal team to the BBC’s latest subpoena request, and the BBC’s press office has declined to comment on ongoing litigation.

  • Many Canadians are boycotting the US, so this is where they’re travelling instead

    Many Canadians are boycotting the US, so this is where they’re travelling instead

    More than 12 months after Donald Trump returned to the White House, thousands of Canadian travelers are continuing a deliberate boycott of leisure travel to the United States, a response driven by controversial trade policies and inflammatory rhetoric about Canada’s sovereignty that has already cost the U.S. tourism sector billions in lost revenue.

    For many Canadian households, the shift in travel plans did not happen overnight. Kent Truscott, a resident of London, Ontario, had made multiple recreational trips to the U.S. over the years, visiting destinations from California to New York as recently as 2023. But within months of Trump’s 2024 re-election, Truscott and his family made a permanent decision to avoid American travel. That meant scrapping a long-planned spring trip to Texas, where he and his brother had intended to spend thousands of dollars watching the SpaceX Starship launch. Instead, Truscott redirected that travel budget to exploring Canada’s own Atlantic provinces of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island.

    Far from regretting the change of plans, Truscott said the domestic trip exceeded his expectations. He and his wife rented a car, hiked the iconic, cliffside Cabot Trail, and stayed at a women-owned coastal resort, where he ate what he described as the best halibut dinner of his life, caught fresh that same morning in the Atlantic bay. But the decision to boycott runs deeper than a change of scenery: Truscott cited Trump’s imposition of new tariffs on Canadian goods, repeated comments suggesting Canada should become the U.S.’s 51st state, and controversial domestic policies including anti-immigration raids as core reasons for his stance. Even if Trump leaves office in the future, Truscott noted that more than 70 million Americans voted for his agenda, leaving a fundamental rift in cross-border relations that will not quickly heal.

    Truscott is far from alone in this choice. Official national travel data shows that even with a small uptick in Canadian road trips to the U.S. in April of this year, total trips were still 800,000 lower than the same month in 2024, before Trump won re-election. The economic impact has been substantial: the boycott stripped an estimated C$3.3 billion ($2.35 billion) from U.S. tourism revenue last year alone, with that money instead flowing to Canadian domestic businesses and international destinations outside the U.S. Many U.S. cities and states that rely heavily on Canadian tourism have already scrambled to reverse the trend, rolling out targeted promotions and deep discounts to lure visitors back. In July, New York City’s tourism board announced a 30% discount on Broadway show tickets and hotel rooms exclusively for Canadian travelers.

    For Lynda Rousseau, a retired dual U.S.-Canadian citizen now living in Ottawa, the boycott came hand-in-hand with an early move back to her home country. Rousseau and her husband Joe had lived in Texas for 19 years, with a planned return to Canada scheduled for summer 2025. But they pushed their relocation up to February that year, immediately after Trump’s election win, saying they could not stomach living in the U.S. under his leadership. After Trump began publicly referring to Canada as the “51st state” and mocking former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as a “governor,” the couple decided to boycott all U.S. travel entirely.

    They canceled a summer cruise scheduled to depart from New York City and travel through the Panama Canal, rebooking the same cruise line for a Mediterranean itinerary that took them to Rome and Barcelona, where they explored ancient Roman ruins and sampled local cuisine. The couple also scrapped their long-held plan to become “snowbirds” — Canadian retirees who spend cold winter months in warm U.S. states like Florida and Arizona. Today, they only cross the border occasionally to pick up mail, and never spend money on goods or services during their brief trips. While Rousseau says she misses the convenience and affordability of nearby U.S. travel, the boycott has brought an unexpected benefit: a renewed sense of national pride in Canada.

    Vancouver retiree Nick Smith has avoided U.S. travel on and off for years, having first boycotted after Trump’s initial 2016 election win, only resuming cross-border trips when Joe Biden took office. Now, he is back to avoiding the U.S. entirely, encouraged by the widespread boycott among his fellow Canadians. Smith even avoids connecting flights through U.S. airports, opting for more expensive direct flights to international destinations to avoid stepping on U.S. soil. Earlier this year, he and his wife Sylvia traveled to Morocco for the first time, where they experienced Ramadan firsthand, an experience he called deeply eye-opening and unlike anything they could have had in Canada. For Smith, a change in U.S. administration would not be enough to bring him back; he says he needs to see tangible action to repair cross-border relations before he would consider visiting again.

    For Christie Mitchell, a 50-year-old mother of two from Powell River, British Columbia, the boycott has been a particularly emotional shift. Mitchell has traveled to the U.S. countless times over her life: she has hiked American national parks, attended NFL games, and driven an RV across multiple states down to Florida. She even grew up in an era when Canadians did not need a passport to cross the border, and once thought of Canada and the U.S. as one shared, open country. But that warm sense of closeness has faded under the current U.S. administration, and she does not want to support it with her travel spending. “It breaks my heart, because I love Americans and I love America,” she said.

    Instead of taking a planned cheap birthday trip to Las Vegas to celebrate her 50th birthday this year, Mitchell fulfilled a lifelong dream by hiking the 490-mile Camino Francés pilgrimage route in Spain. The trip exceeded her expectations, she said, as she got to meet travelers from across the globe and have deep, meaningful conversations with people from all walks of life. Mitchell says she would be open to returning to the U.S. if a new administration takes office and cross-border relations are fully repaired.

    While political tensions are the primary driver of the boycott, some Canadians also cite economic factors: the declining value of the Canadian dollar has made U.S. travel significantly less affordable for many households, pushing more travelers to seek domestic or alternative international destinations instead. For most of those surveyed, however, the core issue remains the strained relationship between the two neighboring countries, a rift that many say will take years to mend, even if political leadership changes.

  • Who is Luigi Mangione, the man who admitted to shooting a healthcare CEO?

    Who is Luigi Mangione, the man who admitted to shooting a healthcare CEO?

    For many who knew Luigi Mangione growing up, the 28-year-old’s trajectory seemed nothing short of promising. Born into one of Maryland’s most prominent and well-connected families, with business holdings spanning country clubs, nursing homes and local media, Mangione excelled academically from his earliest years. He graduated as valedictorian from Baltimore’s elite all-boys Gilman School before going on to earn both a bachelor’s and master’s degree in computer science from the Ivy League University of Pennsylvania, where he launched a student video game development club. After graduating, he built a career as a data engineer at automotive digital retail platform TrueCar, leaving the role in 2023. To friends and classmates, he was a sharp, unassuming person with no obvious enemies – a far cry from the man accused of one of the most high-profile corporate assassinations in recent U.S. history.

    On December 4, 2024, Brian Thompson, the 50-something CEO of UnitedHealthcare and father of two, was shot and killed outside a midtown Manhattan hotel where he was attending an industry conference. Five days later, Mangione was arrested at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, where law enforcement recovered a firearm, ammunition, multiple fake identification cards, a large sum of cash, and a handwritten note expressing hostility toward corporate elites that included the line “frankly, these parasites had it coming.” For nearly 20 months following his arrest, Mangione was held without bail at Brooklyn’s notorious Metropolitan Detention Center, the same facility currently housing music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs.

    Initially, Mangione pleaded not guilty to the murder, denying any involvement in Thompson’s killing. But on August 14, 2026, in a dramatic shift during his federal court proceeding, Mangione changed his plea to guilty, formally admitting to two counts of interstate stalking that resulted in Thompson’s death. “I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan and he died,” he told the court in a calm confession. He went on to explain his motive, tying the killing to years of debilitating chronic pain stemming from a broken back that he said left him disillusioned with the U.S. healthcare system. He told the court he had researched Thompson’s schedule and learned the executive would attend the New York conference before traveling to the city to carry out the attack.

    The guilty plea has set off a new legal process, with Mangione’s federal sentencing scheduled for December 2026. He still faces a separate slate of state charges in New York, where a trial is set to begin this September. Those charges include second-degree murder, six counts of criminal weapon possession, and one count of possession of a forged driver’s license. Following his federal guilty plea, Mangione’s legal team has filed motions to dismiss the majority of the state charges, leaving only the forged identification count in play.

    Details that have emerged in the lead-up to the plea paint a picture of a man increasingly undone by chronic unmanaged pain. Friends confirm Mangione underwent back surgery after injuring the area while surfing and hiking during a stint living in a Hawaii co-living surfing community, where he left early due to worsening symptoms. In November 2024, his mother filed a missing person report with San Francisco police, noting she had not heard from her son since July that year. That report was later flagged to New York investigators following the shooting. When contacted by police, Mangione’s mother did not confirm her son was the suspect but told authorities “it might be something that she could see him doing.”

    Online records tied to Mangione further reveal his preoccupation with chronic back pain and anti-establishment ideology. An X profile believed to be his uses a spinal X-ray showing surgical hardware as its background image. A Reddit account linked to him detailed struggles with persistent pain and brain fog, and a Goodreads account under his name showed he read two books about back pain in 2022, including *Crooked: Outwitting the Back Pain Industry*, a critique of the commercial back pain treatment industry. He also left a four-star review for *Industrial Society and Its Future*, better known as the manifesto written by Ted Kaczynski, the domestic terrorist known as the Unabomber who killed three people in a decades-long bombing campaign. In the review, Mangione acknowledged Kaczynski was a violent man but referred to him as a political revolutionary.

    The shocking killing has left Mangione’s family and community reeling. Shortly after his arrest, his cousin Nino Mangione, a Republican state legislator in Maryland, released a statement saying the entire family was “shocked and devastated,” adding “We offer our prayers to the family of Brian Thompson and we ask people to pray for all involved.” Local defense attorney Thomas Maronick, who knows the Mangione family, told the BBC the crime was completely out of step with what anyone knew of the family or Luigi. “You wouldn’t think someone of privilege or means from a family that’s known for doing so much for the community would do something like this,” he said. Even former roommate RJ Martin, who recalled Mangione never complained about his pain but acknowledged it often stopped him from doing everyday activities, said he never could have imagined his former roommate would harm another person. “There’s no making sense of it,” Martin added.

  • Mangione admits killing healthcare CEO and pleads guilty to federal charges

    Mangione admits killing healthcare CEO and pleads guilty to federal charges

    In a dramatic turn of proceedings in Manhattan federal court Friday, 28-year-old Luigi Mangione formally admitted to the assassination of UnitedHealthcare Chief Executive Officer Brian Thompson, entering guilty pleas to federal charges of interstate stalking that resulted in death. The public admission marked a stark reversal from Mangione’s earlier not guilty pleas in both the federal and state court cases stemming from the December 2024 killing that sent shockwaves through the U.S. healthcare and business communities.

    Dressed in a standard beige prison uniform and appearing visibly somber throughout the 90-minute hearing, Mangione spoke clearly to the court as he read out a detailed account of his premeditated attack. He confirmed that he planned the killing months in advance, crossing state lines from his home state of Pennsylvania to New York with the explicit intent to end Thompson’s life. The weapon he used, he told the court, was a homemade firearm he produced on a 3D printer, which he modified with an unauthorized silencer and high-capacity magazine ahead of the attack.

    Mangione told the court his motive stemmed from years of chronic severe pain he suffered following a broken back injury, claiming his frustrating and damaging experiences with the U.S. healthcare system pushed him to target Thompson. After learning UnitedHealthcare would host its annual investor conference at a midtown Manhattan hotel in early December 2024, Mangione said he posed as an investor in emails to company organizers to obtain details about the event and Thompson’s schedule. He then traveled to New York ahead of the conference to carry out his plan.

    On the morning of December 4, 2024, as Thompson walked into the midtown Manhattan hotel for the conference, Mangione shot the 50-year-old executive from behind. Thompson, a father of two, died from his injuries shortly after the attack. “On the morning of 4 December 2024, I shot Mr Thompson in Manhattan and he died,” Mangione repeated in his statement to the court Friday, confirming the core fact of the killing.

    Following the plea hearing, Thompson’s family released a statement calling the guilty plea “an important step toward justice for Brian and for our family.” The family noted they will continue pursuing justice in both New York state courts and in Pennsylvania, where Mangione was taken into custody shortly after the shooting. “While nothing will ease the pain of losing him, we are grateful that the federal justice system has held the person responsible for this heinous act accountable,” the statement read. “Now we look to the court to ensure that sentencing reflects the severity of this crime.”

    Mangione now faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison, with his federal sentencing hearing scheduled for December 18. But the guilty plea has immediately ignited a major legal battle over whether Mangione can also face prosecution on eight separate state charges, which include second-degree murder, possession of a forged fake driver’s license, and six counts of illegal criminal weapons possession. His legal team is pushing to have the entire state case dismissed ahead of its scheduled September trial start date.

    Speaking to reporters outside the courthouse after Friday’s hearing, Mangione’s lead defense attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo argued that pursuing state charges after Mangione’s federal guilty plea violates the U.S. Constitution’s double jeopardy protection, which prohibits prosecuting a person twice for the same criminal offense. “New York law does not permit a person to be prosecuted and punished twice for the exact same crime,” Friedman Agnifilo said, adding that Mangione has already taken “full responsibility” for Thompson’s death through his federal guilty plea.

    But the Manhattan District Attorney’s office has rejected the defense’s argument and says it remains fully committed to moving forward with the state prosecution. In an official statement released after the hearing, the DA’s office said it welcomed the accountability Mangione’s guilty plea provided for Thompson’s family. “While federal sentencing is pending, we are prepared to litigate the defence motions. The Manhattan DA’s Office remains committed to seeking justice for Mr Thompson and his family,” the statement read. The legal fight over the double jeopardy motion is expected to play out in state courts in the coming weeks, ahead of the scheduled September trial.

  • ‘I shot Mr Thompson’- What it was like inside court as Mangione pleaded guilty

    ‘I shot Mr Thompson’- What it was like inside court as Mangione pleaded guilty

    Eighteen months after the high-profile assassination of UnitedHealthcare chief executive Brian Thompson that sent shockwaves across the United States, accused killer Luigi Mangione entered a New York federal courtroom Friday to formally admit his role in the killing, ending months of speculation and legal maneuvering. The 28-year-old defendant, clad in a standard-issue beige prison uniform over a plain white T-shirt, entered the room with shackles securing his ankles, his hands held behind his back without handcuffs per U.S. Marshals protocol.

    The small courtroom was filled to capacity, with a cross-section of attendees including national reporters, self-identified supporters of Mangione, independent court observers, and a small group of court staff who won a public lottery to claim one of the limited public seats. In the front row, directly behind the prosecution team, sat members of Thompson’s family, who struggled to contain visible emotion as proceedings got underway. The hearing, originally scheduled to kick off at 11 a.m., started shortly after its planned start time, and opened with a dramatic announcement that set the tone for the day.

    Lead defense attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo was the first to speak, informing Judge Margaret Garnett directly that her client was ready to enter a guilty plea. What followed was a period of quiet procedural checking, as Garnett walked Mangione through a series of standard questions to confirm he fully understood the ramifications of his decision, including queries about his personal background and any prescription medications he takes. Mangione responded to each question briefly but with clear resolve, confirming he understood the possibility of a life sentence for his crimes. Only when he began to read his prepared statement to the court did the defendant show visible nerves; his speech came quickly and was at times difficult to hear. After a gentle prompt from Garnett to move closer to the microphone, he regained his composure and continued to the end of his statement, where he explicitly admitted to killing Thompson.

    Weeks leading up to the hearing, U.S. media outlets had reported that Mangione was expected to enter into a formal plea deal with prosecutors, but that did not come to pass. Instead, Mangione simply changed his original not guilty plea to a plea of guilty, laying out his own account of the planning and execution of the attack in open court for the first time.

    Mangione told the court he had spent years living with chronic severe pain from a broken back, and had repeatedly clashed with the U.S. health insurance system over access to care. After learning that UnitedHealthcare planned to hold its annual conference in Manhattan in December 2024, he began to plan the attack. He conducted open-source online research on the event, and posed as an independent investor in an email to the company to obtain additional details about Thompson’s public schedule — a query that received a far quicker response than any of his past inquiries to insurers about his own medical care, he told the court. He added that he manufactured the firearm used in the attack using a 3D printer. On the morning of December 4, 2024, he carried out the shooting on a Manhattan street. “I shot Mr Thompson in Manhattan and he died,” he told the court plainly.

    This hearing marked the first time Mangione has publicly recounted the details of the crime, which sparked a national media firestorm and drew international attention immediately after it occurred. After the statement was complete, Garnett asked Mangione to formally state his plea for the record. “Guilty,” he said clearly, leaning into the microphone. The judge formally accepted the plea.

    Shortly after the ruling, Thompson’s family released a statement calling the day an important milestone in their quest for justice, as they remained visibly shaken in court during the admission. Mangione’s sentencing is scheduled for December 18 of this year. Each of the two stalking charges he faces carries a maximum possible sentence of life in prison, while prosecutors have formally recommended a 24 to 30 year prison term; final sentencing authority rests with Judge Garnett. A separate trial on state-level charges connected to Thompson’s killing is still on track to begin in September.