标签: North America

北美洲

  • Has football fever taken hold in the US?

    Has football fever taken hold in the US?

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada enters its knockout round phase, the co-host United States men’s national team is set to face Bosnia-Herzegovina in the round of 32, with a spot in the last 16 on the line. With the tournament now a few weeks in, BBC Sport’s senior team of correspondents has reflected on shifting perceptions of the U.S. leg of the event, after widespread pre-tournament questioning over whether the competition would gain traction in a country with stacked domestic sports calendars.

    Before the tournament kicked off, a raft of concerns hung over the U.S. hosting leg: Would ticket prices price out most fans? Would public enthusiasm fail to materialize in a country where soccer has long ranked below other major sports? Would security fears and political distractions overshadow the build-up? What reporters on the ground witnessed, however, tells a story of slow-burn momentum that grew into widespread, cross-city enthusiasm as the tournament progressed.

    Many correspondents shared a distinctly muted first impression, overshadowed by the New York Knicks’ first NBA championship win in 53 years that coincided with the tournament’s opening weeks. John Bennett, a BBC World Service reporter, recalled arriving in New York on the same day as the NBA Finals’ third game, spending his first week surrounded by Knicks fever rather than World Cup excitement. In those early days, the tournament felt like little more than a background event in a city already packed with major happenings. Ian Dennis, senior football reporter for BBC Radio 5 Live, echoed that experience, noting that his pre-tournament stay in Florida felt entirely disconnected from the World Cup, and his arrival in New York found the Knicks’ historic title run dominating local conversation. Even in Los Angeles, thousands of miles from the East Coast, the Knicks run dominated headlines, with minimal visible World Cup promotion beyond a handful of generic banners and billboards, BBC Sport journalist Gary Rose recalled.

    That muted opening, however, quickly shifted as the tournament progressed, with diaspora communities, strong host city engagement, and the U.S. national team’s impressive on-pitch run turning casual awareness into widespread excitement. “Slowly but surely you could tell that the World Cup was capturing the imagination in New York,” Bennett said, recalling a packed fan event in Harlem that showcased the huge role diaspora fans would play: fans hailing originally from competing nations, or with family ties to competing teams, turned public spaces across the country into hubs of celebration. Bennett even stumbled upon a group of construction workers and local business people who had stopped outside a Greenwich Village bar to watch the closing minutes of Cape Verde’s dramatic 0-0 draw with Spain – proof that World Cup fever had taken hold.

    For Dennis, the turning point came during a trip to Atlanta, where the downtown fan buzz and mingling fans from across the globe finally felt like a traditional World Cup. Liz Conway, a BBC Sport journalist, who entered the tournament cautiously optimistic, said her view has shifted completely. “World Cup fever has well and truly arrived in the United States,” she said, noting she was impressed by vibrant fan zones, friendly volunteer teams, and widespread enthusiasm even among casual fans who do not typically follow soccer. “Even some of the fans I’ve spoken to, who admitted they don’t usually watch football, have been genuinely excited to get behind the World Cup and learn more about the game. It’s been fantastic to see.”

    Across other host cities, the story was the same. In Philadelphia, the city fully embraced a nine-day stretch that hosted four matches, with the Rocky statue steps becoming an iconic pre-match gathering spot for visiting fans, and the Lemon Hill fan festival drawing a record U.S.-host crowd of nearly 55,000 fans to watch the USA’s second group match on the big screen. In Seattle, post-match street parties became a regular tradition, with city officials closing downtown streets to make space for singing, dancing and casual street football. In Los Angeles, iconic local spots including Santa Monica Pier, the LA Memorial Coliseum and Union Station were transformed into fan zones, with Mexican American communities turning the city’s streets into celebration hubs after every Mexico national team win.

    Correspondents also addressed one of the biggest pre-tournament concerns: empty seats from overpriced tickets. Neil Johnston, who has covered eight matches across five U.S. host cities, noted that every stadium he visited was full, with predictions of widespread empty seats failing to materialize. While some matches lacked the sustained chants and noise of traditional World Cup crowds in other host nations, the overall atmosphere compared favorably to past tournaments held in Brazil, Russia and Qatar, correspondents agreed. Even with some variation across cities – the spread-out geography of Houston made spontaneous street buzz harder to find, for example – the overall trajectory of growing enthusiasm matched predictions that Americans lean into major sporting events once they are underway, rather than leaning into long pre-tournament build-ups.

    As the tournament moves into its knockout stages, the USA will look to continue their strong run against Bosnia-Herzegovina, with momentum and home support firmly behind the co-hosts.

  • Williams’ knee injury leaves Wimbledon doubles in doubt

    Williams’ knee injury leaves Wimbledon doubles in doubt

    Tennis icon Serena Williams’ long-awaited comeback to the court at Wimbledon has hit an unexpected setback, with a knee injury sustained during her first singles singles match in almost four years putting her highly anticipated doubles reunion with sister Venus in serious jeopardy. The 44-year-old American legend, a 23-time Grand Slam singles champion, returned to Centre Court on Tuesday after 1,462 days away from the All England Club, drawing massive global attention to what was her first competitive singles outing since she stepped back from the sport in 2022. Her planned Friday doubles match with Venus, where the pair are six-time Wimbledon champions and set to play their first Grand Slam together since 2022, now hangs in the balance after Serena’s right knee swelled up during her three-set defeat to 20-year-old Australian rising star Maya Joint.

    The injury occurred late in the first set, when Serena tweaked her knee. Despite medical advice to withdraw from the match, sources confirmed to BBC Sport that the fiercely competitive champion refused to exit, pushing through the pain to take the match to a deciding third set. She received no in-match treatment, and observers noted her slowed movement and uncertain footwork throughout the decider. After the match, medical staff offered crutches to assist her walking, an offer she declined, and she left the venue unassisted that same night. She did not speak to reporters post-match, with Wimbledon officials confirming the medical teams from the tournament and the WTA excused her from mandatory media obligations due to the injury.

    In a post on her official Instagram following the match, Serena opened up about her emotions around her return, saying it felt incredible to be back on the court she has dominated for decades. “It felt so good to be back. I’m incredibly thankful for the wildcard – and even more grateful my daughters got to see that it’s never too late to chase something you love,” she wrote. She confirmed the knee tweak but stressed she is taking every possible step to be fit enough to compete alongside Venus on Friday. She also offered a public congratulations to Joint on her victory, and thanked fans for the overwhelming outpouring of support.

    This comeback marks a full-circle moment for Serena, who played what she expected would be the final match of her professional career at the 2022 US Open. Notably, she avoided calling the move a retirement, instead saying she was “evolving away” from tennis, leaving the door open for a potential return that has now materialized at the tournament where she has enjoyed some of her greatest success: seven singles titles and six women’s doubles titles at the All England Club.

    Against Joint, the veteran champion showed flashes of the unparalleled talent that made her one of the greatest players in the history of the sport, and was within touching distance of a sensational comeback victory before the younger Australian held firm to seal a 6-3 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 win. Her decision to push through the injury to finish the match was characteristic of her legendary competitive drive, which has been defined by her famous quote that she hates losing more than she loves winning. That grit, however, may now cost her the chance to share the court with her sister this week.

    While Serena has not officially ruled herself out of Friday’s doubles draw, multiple indicators suggest the odds of the iconic pair sharing the Centre Court once again are heavily stacked against them. Missing the doubles match would mark a deeply disappointing end to a comeback that has dominated headlines at SW19 over the past week, with fans and analysts alike captivated by the story of the 44-year-old’s return to the sport she revolutionized. Williams’ camp has reaffirmed that she is doing everything in her power to get fit in time, leaving the tennis world waiting to see if she can pull off one more magical moment at Wimbledon.

  • Art and heritage converge to renew cultural dialogue

    Art and heritage converge to renew cultural dialogue

    Two iconic coastal metropolises separated by the vast Pacific Ocean — Shanghai on the banks of the Huangpu River and New York along the Hudson Estuary — are rekindling people-to-people connections through a new initiative that weaves together art, heritage and academic exchange to renew cross-cultural dialogue between China and the United States. On Monday, the landmark gathering titled “From Shanghai to New York: A Century-Long Cultural Journey Inspiring New China-US Dialogue” opened at the China Institute of America in New York, drawing dignitaries, emerging young scholars, and artists from both nations to explore intersections of technology, traditional art and contemporary philosophy.

    The event marks a core component of the third season of the “Bund: A Global Urban Humanities Dialogue” series, designed to expand mutual understanding between younger generations of Chinese and Americans through open intellectual exchange and collaborative cultural practice. In his remarks at the opening, Yu Yougen, education counselor for the Chinese Consulate General in New York, framed the gathering as far more than a routine cross-border academic meeting. He emphasized that it represents a meaningful cultural exchange that bridges decades of shared history and paves the way for future people-to-people connections. “Shanghai and New York, two internationally renowned cities shaped by water, have maintained close and fruitful exchanges for decades,” Yu noted. “From the Huangpu River to the Hudson River, what crosses the Pacific is not only exhibitions and conversations, but also the shared aspiration of people from both countries to learn from each other.”

    Zhang Huihong, deputy chair of the University Council of East China Normal University (ECNU) based in Shanghai, echoed this sentiment, pointing out that the two cities share far more than their status as leading global economic and cultural hubs. Despite being thousands of miles apart, both have cultivated a defining city spirit rooted in radical openness and radical inclusiveness. She explained that the collaborative event grew from this shared identity, with organizers aiming to unlock new avenues for sustainable civil society exchange between the two nations through joint creative projects and transoceanic dialogue.

    Running from July 9 to 30 at the China Institute’s on-site gallery, a central companion exhibition will feature more than 100 original works created by ECNU students and faculty. The show draws direct inspiration from a landmark moment in China-US cultural history: Peking Opera master Mei Lanfang’s groundbreaking 1930 tour of the United States, which introduced traditional Chinese theatrical art to mainstream American audiences for the first time. Spanning multiple mediums including traditional prints, oil paintings, hand-drawn illustrations, digital animations, and even AI-generated contemporary pieces, the exhibition reimagines traditional Chinese art and intangible cultural heritage through the lens of 21st-century design thinking and emerging technology.

    Wei Shaonong, a professor in ECNU’s School of Design who leads the exhibition’s curatorial team, explained that the program encourages emerging Chinese creators to draw from the deep well of traditional Chinese cultural heritage while leaning into contemporary artistic practices. “Traditional Chinese culture contains rich artistic elements, and we hope students can reinterpret them through today’s artistic language and creative approaches,” Wei said. Reflecting on Mei Lanfang’s enduring influence on cross-cultural communication, Wei noted that the 1930 tour holds vital lessons for modern cultural exchange. At a time when Peking Opera was entirely unfamiliar to most American audiences, Mei achieved enormous success because he recognized the importance of framing art through a contextual and narrative language that new audiences could connect with. This lesson remains relevant today, Wei emphasized: effective cultural exchange requires translation not just of spoken language, but of cultural context and storytelling to build genuine connection.

    Monday’s opening event also marked the official launch of Collaborative Learning, an in-person intercultural roundtable initiative based in New York, founded by Paul J. D’Ambrosio, a professor of Chinese philosophy at ECNU. D’Ambrosio emphasized that cultural exchange thrives through diverse forms of engagement. While rigorous academic research and focused expert discussions remain core to cross-border intellectual exchange, he argued that there is a growing need for open, accessible forms of communication that bring broader groups of people from both nations into the conversation.

  • World Cup fans sweat through US ‘heat dome’

    World Cup fans sweat through US ‘heat dome’

    While the 2022 World Cup captured global attention, millions of soccer fans across the United States gathered to watch matches and cheer on their favorite nations. But this shared excitement came with an unexpected environmental challenge: a powerful heat dome parked over the U.S. East Coast, pushing temperatures to dangerous, record-breaking levels. As thermometers climbed well into the triple digits in many major cities, leaving infrastructure and local residents strained, devoted supporters refused to let the sweltering conditions keep them away from watch parties and public viewing events. A BBC reporting team on the ground traveled through several affected urban areas to speak with these fans, documenting their dedication as they pushed through oppressive heat to share the thrill of the world’s biggest sporting tournament with fellow supporters. Many fans came prepared with portable fans, bottled water, cooling towels and sun protection, huddling in shaded areas whenever possible to avoid the worst of the midday sun. Even as local weather services issued heat advisories warning residents to limit outdoor exposure, these supporters said the once-in-four-years event was worth the discomfort, highlighting the unique community and excitement that only a World Cup can bring. Local organizers of public watch events also adapted, adding extra cooling stations and extending access to indoor spaces to help fans stay safe while still enjoying the matches. The combination of a global sporting spectacle and an extreme weather event created a one-of-a-kind experience for East Coast fans, blending the joy of international competition with the grit of enduring a summer heat wave.

  • What we know about Taylor Swift’s rumoured NYC wedding celebrations

    What we know about Taylor Swift’s rumoured NYC wedding celebrations

    Ever since global pop icon Taylor Swift and NFL superstar Travis Kelce announced their engagement last summer in the backyard of Kelce’s Kansas City residence, fans across the world have fixated on one burning question: when and where will the couple exchange wedding vows? This Fourth of July weekend, that years-long wait for an answer may finally come to an end.\n\nFamous for dropping subtle easter eggs about major life updates across her wardrobe, discography, and world tours, Swift has stayed completely silent on plans for her upcoming nuptials. But her discretion has done little to curb rampant public and media speculation, which has reached a fever pitch in recent weeks. The conversation shifted from tabloid gossip to credible reporting last week, when *The New York Times* broke the story that event organizers had submitted permits for a large-scale gathering at Manhattan’s iconic Madison Square Garden (MSG) in early July, a permit that would require closing multiple blocks of the busy Midtown neighborhood surrounding the arena. The hype has spilled over into online prediction markets, where total wagers on the location and date of the couple’s wedding have now surpassed $4.5 million (£3.4 million).\n\nCity officials have confirmed to the BBC that an application for a street closure permit near MSG was submitted in early June, covering the period from July 2 through July 4 over the Independence Day holiday weekend. *The New York Times* was the first major outlet to confirm the permit filing, adding that multiple players from Kelce’s Kansas City Chiefs have already booked hotel rooms within walking distance of the arena. Long before the paper of record confirmed the permit, tabloid outlets including TMZ had been floating MSG as the top candidate for the celebration. The 20,000-seat arena, normally home to the New York Knicks NBA team and host to the world’s biggest concert tours, has not officially been tied to the wedding by any representative of the couple, but CBS News — the BBC’s U.S. media partner — has reported that the couple is scheduled to host a 100-person rehearsal dinner at the arena’s on-site Infosys Theater, followed by a larger celebration running from Friday night into Saturday morning expected to welcome around 1,000 guests.\n\nAs preparation work has ramped up at the venue, more tangible clues have emerged to fuel the rumors. Large delivery trucks were spotted entering the MSG grounds earlier this week, marked with loading labels reading “Garden Party” and its abbreviation “GP”. Work crews have been photographed unloading stage rigging, professional lighting systems, and other event equipment, most of which has been kept covered to conceal its purpose. One visible crate was clearly marked as holding a 40-inch mirror ball, and a large white staircase railing was also spotted being carried into the building. On Tuesday, workers were seen rolling out a wide red carpet up the main entrance steps of the arena before quickly removing it, a moment captured by tabloid photographers.\n\nEven New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has joined in on the fun, dropping playful hints about the event in recent public appearances. During a press conference earlier this week focused on an impending heat wave set to hit the city this weekend, Mamdani quipped: “If you happen to be getting married at MSG, you will be staying inside and staying cool, and I think it’s a good example to set for the city at large.”\n\nDespite the mounting evidence, many fans and media commentators have noted that all the preparation could be an elaborate decoy, designed to draw paparazzi and public attention away from a smaller, private wedding elsewhere. The hype surrounding the high-profile event has already been compared to America’s equivalent of a royal wedding, with 24/7 media coverage and constant speculation across social media.\n\nWhile MSG may seem like an unusual choice for a wedding, the venue actually offers unique benefits that appeal to A-list celebrities. It features private underground VIP entrances that let guests avoid paparazzi, and full event organizers can exercise complete control over who is allowed to photograph or attend the event — a level of privacy that is nearly impossible to secure at popular outdoor wedding venues. It is also not the first time a wedding has been hosted at MSG: singer Sly Stone wed Kathy Silva at the arena in 1974, and the Unification Church hosted a mass wedding for more than 2,000 couples at the venue in 1982. For Swift personally, the venue holds extra meaning: she has performed there eight times over her two-decade career, owns a private residence in New York City, and was spotted at MSG earlier this spring attending a New York Knicks playoff game, which fans have since retroactively framed as a clue.\n\nOther theories about the wedding location have circulated in recent months. Many fans guessed Swift would opt for her sprawling coastal estate in Rhode Island, a popular summer spot that would fit the timeline of a July wedding. A rumor that Swift had offered another couple money to reschedule their wedding at a nearby Rhode Island venue was quickly debunked by the venue itself, and a swarm of fans that descended on the area last month left empty-handed after spotting a random wedding setup. Other speculated locations have included Kelce’s home base of Kansas City, Swift’s home state of Pennsylvania, and Kelce’s home state of Ohio. Still, the timing holds symbolic weight: Swift posted a famous Instagram teaser referencing Kansas City just after the 2023 Independence Day weekend, meaning a July 2026 wedding would fall almost exactly three years after the couple first met, a detail that fits Swift’s well-known love of symbolic Easter eggs. She has also long celebrated the Fourth of July holiday with big gatherings, adding more credibility to the weekend date theory.\n\nDetails about the guest list also remain tightly under wraps, but a handful of attendees have confirmed they will be present, including NFL star George Kittle, singer Benson Boone, and actress Suki Waterhouse. Longtime Swift confidantes including Selena Gomez, producer Jack Antonoff, and childhood friend Abigail Anderson Berard are widely expected to attend, while fans are still speculating whether former best friends Blake Lively and Karlie Kloss will receive invitations. Rumors have also swirled that music legends Stevie Nicks and Tim McGraw, both major influences on Swift’s career, could perform at the celebration, a theory fueled by Swift wearing a Stevie Nicks t-shirt to her recent Knicks game at MSG.\n\nTo date, neither Swift nor Kelce has released any official statement confirming or denying that their wedding will take place this weekend at Madison Square Garden. The BBC reached out to representatives for both celebrities for comment, and received no response. For now, fans around the world will just have to wait and see if the long-speculated celebration is real.

  • Canada celebrates its birthday as Mark Carney battles to keep it intact

    Canada celebrates its birthday as Mark Carney battles to keep it intact

    As Canadians across the nation gathered this week to mark Canada Day, celebrating 159 years of confederation, the festive atmosphere has masked deep growing strains that are putting the country’s longstanding unity to an unprecedented test. Two separate separatist movements, one in the western energy powerhouse of Alberta and another in the francophone province of Quebec, have gained new momentum in recent months, setting the stage for pivotal votes that could reshape the future of the world’s second-largest country by land mass.

    In Alberta, a years-long grassroots separatist push has built enough support to trigger a non-binding sovereignty referendum on October 19. The vote will ask Albertans whether they support splitting from Canada and moving forward with a legally binding separation vote at a later date. Opinion polling places support for separation between 25% and 30% — a share that has caught political observers off guard, even as long-simmering Western alienation has been part of Canadian politics for generations.

    Many backers of Alberta’s separatist movement argue the resource-rich province has been systematically sidelined by federal policymakers in Ottawa for decades. They point to sweeping federal environmental rules that they say have blocked pipeline construction, stifled development of Alberta’s vast oil and natural gas reserves, and cost the province billions in lost economic opportunity.

    André Lecours, a political science professor at the University of Ottawa, notes that today’s separatist drive in Alberta is far different from the historical regional frustrations that have defined the province’s relationship with Ottawa. He calls the current movement a direct offshoot of modern right-wing populism, pointing out that nearly all the leading separatist groups in the province formed during the COVID-19 pandemic, when federal public health rules stoked deep anger toward Ottawa among many Western Canadians. Notably, no elected provincial representative has yet openly and formally backed full separation, a key distinction from Quebec’s decades-long organized sovereignty campaign.

    Half a country away in Quebec, the situation follows a different but equally fraught trajectory. The province, which is majority French-speaking and has long defined itself as a distinct cultural society within Canada, has already held two independence referenda, in 1980 and 1995, with the “yes” side falling just short of a majority both times. Today, the sovereigntist Parti Québécois holds a lead in polling for the province’s October 5 general election. The party has pledged to organize a third independence referendum by 2030 if it secures a governing majority.

    Public support for Quebec sovereignty has held steady at roughly 30% in recent years, but the Parti Québécois has capitalized on widespread voter frustration with incumbent parties to surge into the lead ahead of the fall vote. Party leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon has already released a 500-plus-page policy blueprint laying out his plan for a fully independent Quebec, cementing the issue as the central theme of the upcoming election.

    Standing at the center of these overlapping tensions is Prime Minister Mark Carney, a former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England who cut his teeth watching the United Kingdom’s chaotic Brexit process unfold. Carney, who was raised in Edmonton, Alberta, has framed national unity as his top priority in the coming months, saying Canada is “worth fighting for” and promising to campaign aggressively to keep the country intact.

    On Canada Day itself, Carney traveled to his hometown of Edmonton for a symbolic visit, where he was set to lay out his case for a unified Canada to a province that has grown deeply disillusioned with federal policy. Drawing on his experience with Brexit, Carney has warned that separatist leaders make unrealistic promises to voters during referendum campaigns, claiming separation will be easy, and that Albertans could retain their Canadian passports and currency even after leaving the country. He argues that these false claims risk undermining Canada’s global reputation as one of the most stable and attractive destinations for international business — a status the country cannot afford to lose.

    Historians and political analysts say the current strains on Canadian unity stem from the country’s unique origins and geography. JDM Stewart, a prominent Canadian historian and author of a book on Canadian prime ministers, notes that Canada’s enormous size and deeply rooted regional identities have created tensions that have persisted since the country’s founding in 1867. “Because it’s so big, and because it is so regional, it does create tensions that have been with us since the beginning, and we still wrestle with them today,” Stewart explained.

    Carney has already taken steps to address regional grievances, hoping to shore up support for national unity ahead of the fall votes. In Alberta, he brokered a landmark deal to approve a long-sought oil pipeline to the Pacific Coast, ending decades of acrimony between Ottawa and the province over energy development. The agreement marked a major reset in relations between the federal government and Alberta, which had been locked in conflict over climate and energy policy for generations. This week, Alberta is set to formally ask the Carney government to fast-track the million-barrel-per-day project, which would unlock billions in new revenue for the province. In Quebec, Carney has offered a C$10 billion infrastructure package to fund new hospitals, affordable housing, and public transit projects, aiming to build goodwill with Quebec voters ahead of the provincial election.

    In a pre-Canada Day video address, Carney acknowledged that past federal energy policies left many Albertans feeling alienated, saying “What should have brought us together began to divide us.” He framed his approach as one focused on shared progress, saying his goal is “focusing on what we can build together.” Stewart notes that this approach follows the playbook of successful past prime ministers, who balanced a strong vision for national unity with a willingness to listen to regional grievances and compromise. “Provinces are sometimes a bit like people, they want to be seen and they want to be heard,” Stewart explained. “In a time like this, you need to be able to sell a vision for Canada.”

    Despite the rising tensions, most Canadians remain optimistic that the country will stay united. A recent poll from the Angus Reid Institute finds that a large majority of Canadians believe neither province will actually leave the federation. Stewart argues that the tradition of compromise and pragmatism that has defined Canadian politics since its founding will hold the country together once again. “Most Canadians really feel happy about the country, and are happy to keep working to make it work, and do the bit of compromise that has really been the secret sauce,” he said. “Compromise and pragmatism has been what has kept this country together.”

  • Anthropic says US lifts export ban on its advanced AI tools

    Anthropic says US lifts export ban on its advanced AI tools

    In a swift reversal of a weeks-old national security order, the U.S. Department of Commerce has removed export restrictions on two of Anthropic’s most cutting-edge artificial intelligence models, the AI developer has confirmed. The company announced Tuesday it will restore global access to its consumer-facing Claude Fable 5 and enterprise-focused Mythos 5 starting Wednesday, just 21 days after it abruptly halted access to both tools at the U.S. government’s request. Launched only three days before the June 12 suspension, the two models represent Anthropic’s most advanced AI work to date, positioning the startup as a leading competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. The restrictions were implemented over federal concerns that the powerful models could be exploited by malicious actors to compromise digital systems, with specific focus on a potential ‘jailbreak’ loophole that could bypass built-in safety controls to unlock unrestricted capabilities. Mythos 5, built for business and cybersecurity clients, is specifically designed to detect and test exploits for coding vulnerabilities, which raised red flags for national security officials. In an official letter to Anthropic reviewed by the BBC, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed that the company has fully addressed the identified risks. Under the new agreement reached with regulators, Anthropic has committed to proactive ongoing monitoring to detect and mitigate security threats linked to both models. The firm will also coordinate with federal authorities on all future AI model releases and immediately report any suspicious or malicious activity related to its platforms. Lutnick emphasized that the Commerce Department retains full authority to reimpose restrictions if future risks emerge that are not adequately mitigated by Anthropic’s new safeguards. At the time of the initial suspension, Anthropic pushed back on the government’s action, noting that regulators had not outlined specific, detailed flaws in its technology beyond the broad report of a potential narrow jailbreak. The company contested the decision to pull a commercial product already deployed to hundreds of millions of users over an isolated, limited vulnerability. Fable 5, Anthropic’s flagship consumer model, is engineered for advanced deep reasoning and can execute complex, multi-step tasks independently, while Mythos 5 caters to professional cybersecurity teams supporting digital infrastructure defense. The BBC has reached out to the U.S. Department of Commerce for additional comment on the lifted ban and the terms of the new regulatory agreement.

  • Trump made more than $1bn from crypto in first year back in office

    Trump made more than $1bn from crypto in first year back in office

    Newly released mandatory financial disclosures for former-turned-incumbent U.S. President Donald Trump have revealed that the commander-in-chief earned more than $1 billion in 2025, with the vast majority of that income stemming from his family’s fast-growing cryptocurrency business dealings, reigniting long-simmering ethical debates over potential conflicts of interest tied to his private ventures while holding public office.

    The 927-page public filing, which is required for all senior federal officials including the U.S. president, breaks down the stunning sum of earnings: $635 million alone came from royalties generated by Trump’s own meme coin, a digital asset that launched just three days before his inauguration and has since plummeted sharply in market value. Beyond the meme coin royalties, Trump reported more than $500 million in additional income from World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency investment firm co-founded by his two sons and the children of his special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff.

    The 2025 figures mark a major jump in Trump’s reported annual income compared to his 2024 disclosure, when he recorded just over $600 million in total earnings. Outside of the crypto sector, the president also pulled in millions of dollars in additional revenue from more traditional Trump-branded ventures, including commercial real estate holdings, Trump-themed Bibles, branded luxury watches, and a range of other merchandise bearing his name.

    Critics have raised questions about the arrangement, particularly noting that Trump and his immediate family retain a 75% stake in all proceeds generated by World Liberty Financial, tying the president’s personal wealth directly to policy decisions his administration makes around the cryptocurrency industry. However, the White House has forcefully pushed back against all claims of unethical conduct or conflicts of interest, denying that Trump is leveraging his presidency to boost his private bottom line.

    White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly defended the president’s financial activities in an official statement, arguing that Trump’s pro-crypto policies have positioned the United States as a global leader in digital asset innovation. “Neither the President nor his family has ever engaged – or will ever engage – in conflicts of interest,” Kelly said, adding that all administration actions are rooted in advancing the interests of the American public. She dismissed critical coverage of the disclosure as nothing more than a decades-old false narrative pushed by political opponents and legacy media outlets.

  • Trump sons set to profit from tax-funded Kazakh tungsten mine deal

    Trump sons set to profit from tax-funded Kazakh tungsten mine deal

    A newly published investigative report has ignited fierce demands for government accountability after exposing that former President Donald Trump’s two eldest sons stand to gain significant personal profits from a federal-backed tungsten mining deal brokered by their father during his second term in the White House. Democratic congressional leaders have framed the taxpayer-supported project as the latest example of unprecedented, unregulated corruption spreading through the current administration.

    According to reporting from The New York Times, Donald Trump, alongside members of his inner circle—including billionaire Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick—secured a formal agreement with Kazakhstan’s head of state that granted a little-known U.S. firm exclusive access to one of the planet’s largest untapped deposits of tungsten. This critical rare metal is deemed strategically essential by the U.S. government, as it is a core component in the manufacturing of missile warheads, military fighter aircraft, advanced semiconductors, and a wide range of other defense-critical and industrial products.

    Months before the deal was finalized in September of last year, the Trump administration gave preliminary approval for up to $1.6 billion in federal financing to back the project, which is being developed by the U.S.-registered firm Kaz Resources, with construction planned for a rural mining site in northern Kazakhstan.

    The investigative investigation documents direct financial ties between top Trump and Lutnick family members and the mining venture. Within just weeks of high-level negotiations held at the St. Regis Hotel, the report confirms that investors linked to Dominari Securities—a New York-based firm based out of Trump Tower that is partially owned by the president’s eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump—teamed up with other stakeholders to acquire a 20% ownership stake in a corporate entity connected to the Kazakh project. This stake puts the first family’s eldest children in line for massive windfalls as the project moves toward production.

    For the Lutnick family, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s two sons, Brandon and Kyle Lutnick, who lead the major investment firm Cantor Fitzgerald, also stand to profit significantly. The pair assisted one of the lead investors in the Kazakh deal raise $210 million in new capital for a separate linked business entity, a move that is projected to deliver multimillion-dollar gains to Cantor Fitzgerald, according to the report.

    The investigation further uncovered that at least 14 separate companies working on federally backed critical mineral mining projects have confirmed financial ties to either the Trump family or Cantor Fitzgerald—beyond the Kaz Resources deal, these include major mining firms Perpetua Resources and USA Rare Earth.

    This potential mining profit windfall is not an isolated case for the Trump family during their current return to the White House. A public “Trump Family Digital Grift Wealth Tracker” maintained by Democratic members of the House Oversight Committee estimates that cryptocurrency ventures spearheaded by the president’s two eldest sons have already generated more than $2.4 billion in cumulative profits for Trump and his immediate family since he retook office in 2025.

  • Supreme Court keeps birthright citizenship, overruling Trump order

    Supreme Court keeps birthright citizenship, overruling Trump order

    On a Tuesday in Washington D.C., the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark rejection of former President Donald Trump’s controversial effort to rewrite the longstanding interpretation of birthright citizenship enshrined in U.S. constitutional law. The 6-3 vote delivered a decisive victory for established constitutional interpretation, with a majority of justices reaffirming the century-old principle of automatic citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil, no matter the immigration status of the newborn’s parents.

    Writing the majority opinion for the court, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. made clear that Trump’s executive order directly contravened the text and intent of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. “Arguments for limiting birthright citizenship to those domiciled in the United States fail,” Roberts wrote in his opinion. “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. Under the Constitution, they are citizens at birth.”

    This policy push originated on the first day of Trump’s second presidential term, when he signed the executive order aimed at stripping automatic birthright citizenship from children born in the U.S. to parents without permanent legal status, including those holding temporary visas or living in the country without formal authorization. Legal analysts and policy experts had repeatedly warned that allowing the order to stand would create a large new class of stateless people, triggering widespread administrative chaos for U.S. hospitals and local government agencies tasked with recording births and issuing key documentation.

    In a break from typical presidential precedent, Trump made the rare move of attending oral arguments for the case in person ahead of the ruling. Ahead of the decision, Trump acknowledged he would abide by the court’s final call, while still making his preference clear: “It’s up to them, but in terms of for the good of the country, it’d be great if they … didn’t allow it,” he told reporters from the Oval Office. The White House had not issued an immediate formal response to the ruling when contacted by States Newsroom shortly after the decision was announced.

    The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump, who positioned the redefinition of birthright citizenship as a core plank of his broader hardline immigration policy agenda, which seeks to restrict entry and reshape who qualifies as a U.S. citizen. Notably, the defeat comes on the heels of two recent high court rulings that expanded presidential authority over immigration policy: one that curbed asylum seeker claims at the U.S. Southern border, and another that removed deportation protections for approximately 350,000 Haitian migrants and 6,000 Syrian migrants living in the U.S.