标签: North America

北美洲

  • Justice department to pay Trump ally Flynn in Russia probe lawsuit

    Justice department to pay Trump ally Flynn in Russia probe lawsuit

    The U.S. Department of Justice has finalized a confidential financial settlement with retired Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, resolving his wrongful prosecution lawsuit against the government. This resolution concludes years of legal battles stemming from the FBI’s Russia investigation.

    Flynn initiated the 2023 lawsuit seeking $50 million in damages, alleging the Justice Department deliberately targeted him due to his association with Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The case centered on claims of prosecutorial misconduct during the investigation into Russian election interference.

    In a significant reversal, the Justice Department now acknowledges Flynn’s prosecution as a “historic injustice.” A DOJ spokesperson stated: “Those who instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax and Crossfire Hurricane abused their power to mislead the American people and tarnish the reputations of President Trump and his supporters.”

    The settlement terms remain undisclosed, though court filings confirm both parties agreed to dismiss the case “with prejudice,” preventing future litigation on these grounds. Each side will bear its own legal costs.

    This development follows Flynn’s controversial legal journey. He initially pleaded guilty in 2017 to making false statements to FBI investigators during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe but later sought to withdraw his plea, alleging government “bad faith, vindictiveness, and breach of the plea agreement.” The case was ultimately dropped in 2020 under Attorney General William Barr, followed by a presidential pardon from Trump.

    The settlement occurs alongside other substantial financial claims against the Justice Department from Trump allies. Most notably, former President Trump himself has filed a $230 million claim seeking compensation for federal investigations into his 2016 campaign and handling of classified documents.

  • Who wants what and why from US-Iran peace talks?

    Who wants what and why from US-Iran peace talks?

    Diplomatic efforts to resolve the escalating Gulf conflict face significant obstacles as the United States and Iran present fundamentally incompatible positions. While Washington claims productive negotiations are underway, Tehran has categorically denied any formal peace talks are occurring, creating a credibility gap that underscores the profound distrust between the nations.

    According to sources, communication between the adversaries is being maintained indirectly through intermediaries such as Pakistan, which maintains positive relations with both governments. However, this backchannel dialogue falls far short of formal negotiations, explaining why Iranian military officials have explicitly rejected characterizations of ongoing peace talks.

    The proposed US 15-point peace plan, as reported by Israel’s Channel 12 network, demands the complete termination of Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, along with an end to its support for proxy militias throughout the region. In exchange, Tehran would receive sanctions relief and limited shared control over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

    Iran has countered with its own set of conditions, including war reparations payments, international recognition of its sovereign authority over the Strait of Hormuz, and security guarantees against future attacks. These demands present significant political challenges for Washington and its Gulf Arab allies.

    The conflict dynamics have shifted considerably since hostilities began on February 28. Initial expectations in Washington and Jerusalem that overwhelming military superiority would quickly collapse the Islamic Republic have proven unfounded. Instead, Iran has strengthened its strategic position by establishing de facto control over the Strait of Hormuz, providing significant leverage over global energy markets.

    Regional Gulf Arab states watch with growing apprehension as the conflict evolves. Having previously maintained an uneasy accommodation with Iran, these nations now face a wounded but resilient regime that has demonstrated capability to strike neighboring territories with drones and missiles.

    The arrival of approximately 5,000 US Marines and paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division potentially expands American military options, but ground operations carry significant risks of casualties and deeper entanglement in what critics describe as ‘a war of choice.’

    As the stalemate continues, Iran appears increasingly emboldened, believing time and geography favor its position. The White House’s public assertions that Tehran desperately seeks a deal have ironically made Iranian leadership less inclined to negotiate, creating a diplomatic impasse with global economic implications.

  • Trump accused of showing classified map to passengers on private flight

    Trump accused of showing classified map to passengers on private flight

    A newly disclosed congressional memo has revealed explosive allegations regarding former President Donald Trump’s handling of highly classified materials during his post-presidency period. According to the document provided to Congress, Trump reportedly displayed a classified map to passengers aboard a private aircraft in 2022 and retained another record of such sensitivity that access was restricted to merely six government officials nationwide.

    Representative Jamie Raskin, the leading Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, characterized the Justice Department memo as ‘damning’ evidence of Trump’s misconduct with classified documents. The 2023 document, originally prepared for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation, further contends that Trump deliberately withheld certain records to advance his personal business interests.

    The memo specifically identifies a classified map that prosecutors believe Trump showed to individuals onboard a private flight, with Susan Wiles—currently serving as Trump’s chief of staff—reportedly among the passengers. These allegations formed part of Smith’s federal prosecution regarding Trump’s retention of classified materials after leaving office.

    The White House has vehemently rejected these claims, with spokesperson Abigail Jackson stating that Raskin possesses ‘zero credibility’ and asserting that President Trump ‘did nothing wrong.’ The Justice Department similarly dismissed the memo’s credibility while not disputing the accuracy of Raskin’s quotations from the document.

    The legal context surrounding these allegations has evolved significantly. A federal judge previously dismissed the case against Trump due to concerns about the propriety of Smith’s appointment. Following Trump’s re-election in 2024, Smith dropped his appeal in accordance with longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.

    The Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee has launched its own investigation into Smith’s prosecution of Trump, examining what they characterize as an ‘unprecedented lawfare campaign’ against the former president. The full memo remains confidential, with only excerpts being released to congressional oversight bodies.

  • Woman charged with shooting at Rihanna’s home pleads not guilty to attempted murder

    Woman charged with shooting at Rihanna’s home pleads not guilty to attempted murder

    A 35-year-old Florida woman has entered a not guilty plea regarding multiple felony charges connected to a shooting incident at pop icon Rihanna’s Los Angeles residence. Ivanna Lisette Ortiz, a licensed speech pathologist, stands accused of firing approximately 20 rounds from an AR-style rifle at the musician’s Beverly Crest mansion on March 8th.

    The alleged attack occurred at approximately 1:15 PM local time while occupants were present both inside Rihanna’s home and adjacent properties. Remarkably, no injuries were reported despite the substantial gunfire that left visible damage to the property.

    During Wednesday’s proceedings at Los Angeles County Superior Court, prosecutors revealed disturbing details suggesting premeditation. District Attorney prosecutor Alexander Bott presented evidence indicating Ortiz possessed a wig allegedly intended as a disguise during the purported attack. The prosecution successfully opposed defense attempts to reduce the $1.875 million bail, emphasizing the severity of firing numerous rounds into an occupied dwelling.

    The court imposed additional restrictions prohibiting Ortiz from practicing speech pathology in California while the case proceeds. Law enforcement located Ortiz’s white Tesla approximately eight miles from the crime scene at a Sherman Oaks shopping center, where she was subsequently taken into custody.

    Ortiz now faces a comprehensive list of charges including attempted murder, ten felony counts of assault with a semiatuomatic firearm, and three felony counts of shooting at an inhabited dwelling. If convicted on all counts, she potentially faces life imprisonment. The case continues with a preliminary hearing scheduled for April 8th.

  • Carney says Air Canada’s English-only message after LaGuardia crash ‘lacks compassion’

    Carney says Air Canada’s English-only message after LaGuardia crash ‘lacks compassion’

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has publicly condemned Air Canada’s leadership for demonstrating “a lack of judgement and compassion” in its response to Sunday’s fatal collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. The criticism centers on CEO Michael Rousseau’s decision to issue condolence messages exclusively in English despite one of the two deceased pilots being a French-speaking Quebecer.

    The tragedy occurred when an Air Canada flight from Montreal collided with a fire truck shortly after landing, claiming the lives of 30-year-old Quebecois pilot Antoine Forest and his colleague Mackenzie Gunther. Dozens of passengers sustained injuries, with six remaining hospitalized as of Tuesday.

    Rousseau’s unilingual video statement on X platform, expressing “deepest sorrow for everyone affected,” ignited immediate backlash across Canada’s political spectrum. Although the video included subtitles in both official languages, the CEO’s spoken English-only delivery drew particular ire given the company’s statutory obligations under Canada’s Official Languages Act.

    Quebec Premier François Legault led calls for Rousseau’s resignation, stating the CEO should step down if unable to communicate in French. Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet characterized the English-only message as a “sad and gross lack of respect” toward the francophone pilot’s family.

    This incident represents the latest chapter in Rousseau’s troubled relationship with French Canada. Appointed in 2021 despite limited French proficiency, the anglophone CEO previously drew criticism for suggesting his busy schedule prevented language learning—a remark that required subsequent public apology.

    Canada’s parliamentary Committee on Official Languages has summoned Rousseau to explain his communication strategy before MPs by May 1. The committee emphasized that the airline’s approach contradicts both legal requirements and public expectations for bilingual communications.

    Meanwhile, U.S. investigators continue examining the circumstances surrounding the runway collision. National Transportation Safety Board Chair Jennifer Homendy confirmed that air traffic controller communications are under scrutiny, with preliminary evidence indicating both the aircraft and emergency vehicle had received clearance to cross the active runway.

    The controversy highlights ongoing tensions regarding French language preservation in Canada, where bilingualism rates have shown concerning declines despite legislative protections for both official languages.

  • Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction trial

    Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction trial

    In a groundbreaking legal decision with far-reaching implications for the tech industry, a Los Angeles jury has delivered a historic verdict against Meta and Google. The case centered on a 20-year-old woman identified as Kaley, who successfully argued that these tech giants intentionally designed addictive social media platforms that caused significant harm to her mental health during her childhood.

    The jury panel, after carefully considering evidence presented during the five-week trial, assigned responsibility percentages to each company. Meta was found to be 70% responsible for the plaintiff’s psychological harm, while Google’s YouTube platform was deemed 30% accountable. This verdict represents the first successful case of its kind and is expected to influence hundreds of similar lawsuits currently progressing through the U.S. court system.

    During the proceedings, internal company documents and research were presented showing that Meta was aware that young children were using its platforms despite official policies prohibiting users under age 13. Meta Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg made his first-ever jury appearance in February, testifying that while he ‘always wished’ for faster progress in identifying underage users, he believed the company had eventually reached the ‘right place over time.’

    While Google was also a defendant in the case, the trial proceedings predominantly focused on Instagram and Meta’s practices. Notably, Snap and TikTok were initially named as defendants but reached confidential settlements with the plaintiff before trial.

    Meta has expressed disagreement with the verdict, stating: ‘We respectfully disagree with the verdict and are evaluating our legal options.’ The company’s legal team had previously argued that while acknowledging Kaley’s personal struggles, her use of Instagram did not cause or meaningfully contribute to those difficulties.

    This landmark decision raises critical questions about corporate responsibility in digital platform design and could potentially reshape how social media companies approach youth safety and addiction prevention measures.

  • First Lady Melania Trump arrives with humanoid robot at tech summit

    First Lady Melania Trump arrives with humanoid robot at tech summit

    First Lady Melania Trump made a striking entrance at a White House technology summit, accompanied by a humanoid robot, to highlight the intersection of artificial intelligence and education. The event, convened by Mrs. Trump, focused on critical discussions surrounding AI development and the imperative of safeguarding children in increasingly digital environments. This visual demonstration served as a powerful symbol of the technological advancements shaping modern society while underscoring the administration’s commitment to addressing both the opportunities and challenges presented by digital innovation. The summit brought together thought leaders from technology, education, and child advocacy sectors to explore responsible AI implementation and develop strategies for protecting young digital citizens. Mrs. Trump’s initiative reflects growing governmental engagement with emerging technologies and their societal implications, particularly concerning the wellbeing of the next generation navigating complex digital landscapes.

  • ‘We are in agony’ – Savannah Guthrie does first interview since mum’s disappearance

    ‘We are in agony’ – Savannah Guthrie does first interview since mum’s disappearance

    In a profoundly emotional interview with former TODAY show co-host Hoda Kotb, television anchor Savannah Guthrie has broken her silence regarding the devastating disappearance of her 84-year-old mother, Nancy Guthrie, who vanished from her Tucson, Arizona residence on February 1st.

    The Guthrie family’s ordeal has entered its second month with minimal breakthroughs, despite a combined reward of $1.1 million offered for information leading to Nancy’s safe return—$1 million from the family and an additional $100,000 from the FBI.

    Guthrie described the psychological torment that grips her nightly, stating, ‘To think of what she went through, I wake up every night in the middle of the night, every night. In the darkness, I imagine her terror. It is unthinkable—but those thoughts demand to be thought and I will not hide my face.’

    Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos, leading the investigation, has revealed authorities believe Nancy Guthrie was specifically ‘targeted’ and that they have established a motive, though details remain confidential due to the active case. Sheriff Nanos issued a stark warning that the perpetrator might strike again in the same community, urging residents to remain vigilant.

    The investigation has yielded potential evidence including DNA samples and ransom communications, yet no suspects have been publicly identified. The Guthrie family represents one of 33 cases in Arizona currently listed in the U.S. Justice Department’s missing-persons database, with six originating from Pima County alone.

    In a move to assist other families experiencing similar crises, the Guthries donated $500,000 to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children in February, hoping to channel public attention toward all missing persons cases.

    Savannah Guthrie has temporarily withdrawn from her broadcasting responsibilities at NBC, including planned Winter Olympics coverage, as her family continues their desperate search for answers.

  • ‘Men need to be perp-walked’ after Epstein files release, Massie tells BBC

    ‘Men need to be perp-walked’ after Epstein files release, Massie tells BBC

    Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has expressed profound dissatisfaction with the limited disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents, declaring that true justice remains elusive until survivors feel vindicated. In a candid interview with BBC Newsnight, the West Virginia representative emphasized that the American justice system has failed until powerful accomplices face public accountability through criminal proceedings.

    The controversy centers on the Department of Justice’s implementation of the Epstein Documents Release Act—legislation co-authored by Massie and signed into law by President Trump. While the DOJ maintains it has released all non-exempt materials, Massie alleges improper redactions that exceed privacy protections for victims. The congressman, who has reviewed unredacted versions alongside fellow lawmakers, claims critical evidence remains concealed.

    This transatlantic scandal has taken dramatic turns with recent arrests in the United Kingdom. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and former US Ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson were detained on suspicion of misconduct in public office regarding their Epstein connections, though both were subsequently released pending investigation. Mountbatten-Windsor continues to deny any wrongdoing, while Mandelson maintains his actions weren’t criminal or for personal gain.

    Massie highlighted the ironic reversal of justice systems, noting that Britain—the nation from which America sought independence to establish better justice—is now demonstrating more robust accountability. He confirmed that unredacted documents should be shared with London’s Metropolitan Police to assist their ongoing investigations involving Epstein victims.

    Regarding potential testimony from high-profile figures, Massie suggested Mountbatten-Windsor could be compelled to testify if cases emerge in the United States, mirroring Britain’s requests for American cooperation.

    The Department of Justice, represented by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, defends its handling of the release, citing three million items withheld due to medical privacy concerns, graphic abuse depictions, and ongoing investigation protections. Officials explicitly denied withholding documents based on embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.

    Massie specifically seeks transparency regarding Epstein’s controversial 2008 plea deal, which many consider excessively lenient. The congressman’s comments followed a powerful Newsnight segment featuring five Epstein survivors sharing their traumatic experiences—from Epstein’s private island to his New Mexico ranch—highlighting the devastating power imbalance between the financier and his young victims.

  • Dog rescued after falling into a 12-foot (3.6m) sinkhole

    Dog rescued after falling into a 12-foot (3.6m) sinkhole

    A routine day in a residential neighborhood turned into a dramatic rescue operation when Tessie, a yellow Labrador Retriever, plummeted into a sudden 12-foot (3.6-meter) sinkhole that opened in her own backyard. Emergency response crews were swiftly dispatched to the scene following distress calls from the dog’s owners. Utilizing specialized technical rescue equipment, a team of first responders carefully descended into the unstable cavity to secure the stranded pet. Miraculously, the canine emerged from the ordeal completely unscathed, showing no signs of injury from either the initial fall or the subsequent extraction process. Following the successful rescue, municipal public works crews undertook the critical task of permanently filling and securing the sinkhole to eliminate any future hazards, ensuring Tessie could safely return to her familiar outdoor environment. The incident has highlighted the unpredictable nature of ground subsidence and the commendable preparedness of local emergency services in handling non-traditional crises.