A record-breaking surge of jellyfish congregating in coastal waters has forced widespread operational disruptions at one of France’s largest nuclear power facilities, the Gravelines plant in northern Hauts-de-France. State-owned energy operator Électricité de France (EDF) confirmed that three of the site’s six 900-megawatt reactors have been taken offline due to jellyfish blockages in the seawater cooling system, with two additional reactors running at reduced capacity as a precautionary measure. The plant draws cooling water from a man-made canal connected directly to the North Sea, leaving its intake filters vulnerable to marine wildlife incursions during warm summer months. The shutdown sequence unfolded gradually: one reactor was taken offline on August 10, followed by two more between Wednesday and Thursday of this week. Notably, the August 10 shutdown came just eight days after that same reactor was reconnected to the national grid following an earlier jellyfish intrusion earlier this month. A fourth reactor has been out of service for unrelated scheduled inspections. This is not the first time the Gravelines plant, situated between the coastal cities of Dunkirk and Calais, has faced this issue: a nearly identical disruption linked to jellyfish blockages shut down operations at the site in August 2024. Marine biologists explain that this annual summertime pattern is driven by rising North Sea water temperatures, which boost plankton populations near the surface and draw large swarms of jellyfish inshore to feed. Local authorities and plant operators have rolled out targeted mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of repeated incursions. According to French regional news outlet Ici, one key initiative is a partnership with local commercial fishermen, who deploy nets to catch large jellyfish blooms and relocate them further offshore, away from the plant’s cooling intake. While jellyfish-related shutdowns make headlines, industry data shows such events are extremely uncommon globally. The last documented major incidents date back more than a decade: Scotland’s Torness nuclear plant was partially shut down by a jellyfish bloom in 2011, and Sweden’s Oskarshamn facility faced the same issue in 2013. For France, which relies on nuclear power for roughly 70% of its national electricity generation, unplanned reactor disruptions during peak summer demand — when air conditioning use pushes grids to capacity — add unexpected strain to the country’s energy system. The current shutdown removes 2,700 megawatts of generation capacity from the grid, enough to power roughly 2.7 million average French households. EDF has not yet announced a clear timeline for when the affected reactors will be fully cleared and brought back online.
标签: Europe
欧洲
-

Uefa preparing criminal legal action against Infantino
A bitter rift at the top of global football has escalated dramatically, with European football’s governing body Uefa moving forward with planned criminal legal proceedings against Fifa president Gianni Infantino centered on a now-abandoned scheme to sell private stakes in the World Cup and other top Fifa competitions.
Internal documents obtained by BBC Sport senior journalist Daniel Austin confirm Uefa has filed applications to access critical evidence and documents that will underpin its upcoming criminal case against Infantino in Switzerland, where the global governing body Fifa is headquartered. The European association accuses the Fifa president of criminal mismanagement over the controversial proposal.
The plan at the center of the dispute was first tabled by Infantino shortly after this summer’s men’s World Cup. Under the proposal, a new subsidiary called Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE) would be created to hold the commercial rights to the men’s World Cup, women’s World Cup and Club World Cup, with minority stakes then sold off to private external investors. The scheme was quickly scrapped after triggering widespread condemnation and backlash from confederations and member associations across global football.
In its evidence application, Uefa lays out explosive allegations that Infantino designed the scheme specifically to benefit himself and a small inner circle of associates, at the direct expense of Fifa, its 211 member associations, and the broader global football community. “In truth, it was a vehicle for Infantino and that small circle to acquire a permanent stake in and otherwise profit from Fifa’s most valuable assets to the detriment of Fifa, its members, and other parties within the football family,” the document reads.
Uefa further claims that Infantino rushed the plan through internal Fifa approval in a last-minute, hastily called meeting. Only a limited group of Fifa management staff were invited, with some learning of the multi-billion-dollar proposal for the first time at the meeting and given just hours to sign off on the unprecedented scheme, the application alleges.
The European body also argues that the valuation of the stakes on offer was never verified by an independent third party, and that the $4.2bn asking price for a permanent stake in Fifa’s commercial operations implied an unreasonably low total enterprise value of just $20bn. Uefa calls the pricing “a fraudulently off-market price promoted by Infantino for his own benefit”, noting that the valuation was not set through an open, competitive bidding process or vetted by independent valuation experts.
To build its case, Uefa has filed an evidence access request with a Florida court, seeking to obtain records held by two Fifa-affiliated entities based in the U.S. state: Fifa Americas and FWC2026. These documents would then be used to support the criminal proceedings planned for Switzerland.
Uefa says the scrapped investment scheme posed direct potential harm to its 55 member nations, and notes that criminal proceedings could also be brought against other senior Fifa officials and advisors involved in developing the plan, beyond just Infantino. “Uefa and other interested parties are preparing to bring criminal claims in Switzerland against Infantino and possibly other Fifa officials and advisors for criminal mismanagement,” the application confirms.
The document adds that the plan’s secretive development, flawed valuation and opaque structure caused concrete damage to Fifa’s global reputation, governance credibility and key commercial relationships, harming both the governing body itself and all 211 of its member associations.
Contrary to Infantino’s claims that the plan was a transparent new proposal, Uefa alleges the scheme was developed in secret for more than a year by Infantino and a small group of co-conspirators, without any consultation with the Fifa Council, other continental confederations, or any of Fifa’s member associations. The public announcement of the plan on 28 July 2026 marked the first time any outside stakeholders learned of the initiative, the application says.
Uefa also references the well-documented history of corruption among senior Fifa leadership, arguing that the body’s concentrated power has long operated without effective internal checks and balances, with meaningful accountability only coming from external pressures such as public scrutiny, political pressure and international criminal law enforcement.
Under Swiss law, where Fifa is headquartered in Zurich, Uefa confirmed it has legal standing as a complainant to file the criminal mismanagement complaint, and that Swiss legal counsel has confirmed the proceeding is valid under local statute.
To win support for his proposal, Infantino reportedly offered each of Fifa’s 211 member associations a $40m payout if they backed the FFE private investment scheme. After widespread backlash led by Uefa, which pulled its support and secured a vote from its members to boycott future World Cups unless the plan was scrapped, Infantino walked back the proposal earlier this month. The move did not end the pressure, however, and he has faced growing calls to step down entirely.
Infantino, who is currently running for a fourth term as Fifa president in the upcoming March election, has already been accused of breaking trust through deception in a joint open letter from Uefa, Concacaf (North America’s governing body) and the Asian Football Confederation. All four UK home nations have withdrawn their support for his re-election bid, while he retains backing from South America’s Conmebol and Africa’s Caf. A number of individual member associations have broken ranks with their own confederations to publicly support the incumbent president.
In recent days, Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin, whose relationship with Infantino has deteriorated sharply in recent months, ruled out running for the Fifa presidency himself, while a coalition of top current and former players has publicly united to call for leadership change at the top of global football, stating that “change is necessary” at Fifa.
BBC Sport has reached out to both Infantino, Fifa and Uefa for comment on the new criminal proceedings, and as of publication has not received responses.
-

Convicted Bosnian Serb war criminal Mladić dies aged 84
Ratko Mladić, the high-profile Bosnian Serb war criminal convicted of orchestrating genocide and mass atrocities during the 1992–1995 Bosnian War, has died at the age of 84 while serving a life sentence in a United Nations prison in The Hague. The death, first broken by Serbian media outlets, was later officially confirmed by a UN spokesperson, ending a decades-long chapter of international justice proceedings for a man whose actions left an indelible mark on 20th-century European history.
Mladić led Bosnian Serb military forces during the breakup of the former Yugoslavia, when competing ethnic and political factions clashed in a violent conflict that tore apart the Balkan region. Under his command, troops carried out widespread systematic ethnic cleansing campaigns against Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) and Bosnian Croat civilian populations. His forces also laid a years-long siege around Bosnia’s capital Sarajevo that killed more than 10,000 civilians and combatants trapped in the city, and perpetrated the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, where 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were systematically executed in the worst European atrocity since the end of World War II.
For nearly 16 years after the end of the Bosnian War, Mladić evaded international capture, moving between hiding locations across the Balkan region before he was finally apprehended in a rural area of Serbia in 2011. Following his arrest, he was transferred to The Hague to stand trial before the UN’s international war crimes tribunal. In 2017, the court handed down a full life sentence, finding him guilty on all counts of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. That conviction and sentence were upheld on appeal in 2021, cementing the legal finding against him for his role in the mass violence.
In the final months of his life, Mladić’s legal team launched an eleventh-hour bid to secure his early release, arguing that his health had declined to terminal levels and that he should be allowed to spend his final days outside of detention. In May 2025, the UN court rejected this request, acknowledging that Mladić’s health condition was “dire” but ruling that he was already receiving appropriate, comprehensive palliative care within the UN detention system. He remained in the facility’s on-site hospital for his end-of-life care up until his death, officials confirmed.
-

Mladić and the monstrous crimes of the ‘Butcher of Bosnia’
Ratko Mladić, the former Bosnian Serb army commander convicted of orchestrating the worst European atrocities since World War II, has died at age 84 while serving a life sentence for genocide and crimes against humanity. Infamously dubbed the “Butcher of Bosnia” for his brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing during the 1990s breakup of Yugoslavia, Mladić leaves behind a legacy of unresolved trauma and deep division across the Balkan region.
Born in March 1942 in a small mountain village near Sarajevo, Mladić grew up shaped by early loss: his father was killed fighting for Tito’s anti-Nazi partisans when Mladić was just two years old. After a brief stint as an apprentice tinsmith, he pursued a military career, graduating from officer training school in 1965. A driven and capable soldier, he rose quickly through the ranks of the Yugoslav People’s Army, earning command postings in Macedonia and Kosovo.
The 1980 death of Josip Broz Tito, the unifying leader of Yugoslavia’s fragile multi-ethnic confederation, unlocked decades of simmering nationalist tensions. When Croatia declared independence in 1991, Mladić was deployed with Yugoslav federal forces to reassert control, where he gained a reputation for reckless frontline courage that won him fierce devotion from his troops. As conflict spread to Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1992, Mladić defected to lead the army of the self-declared breakaway Republika Srpska, embracing a radical nationalist agenda to create an ethnically pure Greater Serbia.
Mladić viewed Bosnia’s Muslim Bosniak population as illegitimate “interlopers” descending from Ottoman-era occupation, and framed his campaign as a mission to correct historical injustice. His first major act of aggression was the 1,425-day siege of Sarajevo, the longest continuous city blockade in modern warfare. Holed up on the hills surrounding the multi-ethnic capital, Mladić’s forces pounded civilian neighborhoods with daily artillery barrages and sniper fire. On a single day in July 1993, nearly 4,000 shells rained down on the city. By the time the siege ended, more than 13,000 Sarajevo residents were dead, thousands of women were systematically raped, and the vast majority of the city’s buildings lay damaged or destroyed. Declassified command communications from Mladić’s headquarters revealed his deliberate strategy of terror: “Shoot at slow intervals until I order you to stop. Target Muslim neighborhoods… Shell them until they are on the edge of madness.”
Even as he waged war, Mladić kept his wife and two children in relative safety in Belgrade. His life was rocked by personal tragedy in the 1990s, when his 23-year-old daughter Ana, torn between her love for a human rights activist who demanded she renounce her father and her family loyalty, died by suicide with Mladić’s own service weapon. Mladić never accepted responsibility for her death, instead blaming the tragedy on foreign conspiracies.
In 1995, NATO finally intervened to end the siege, launching devastating airstrikes against Mladić’s positions around Sarajevo that broke the blockade. But the worst atrocity of the Bosnian war was still to come. That summer, more than 40,000 Bosniak civilians fled to Srebrenica, a small eastern Bosnian mountain town designated a UN-protected “safe area.” Mladić’s forces surrounded and bombarded the town, then seized control. In front of international television cameras, Mladić greeted residents with false assurances of safety, handing out sweets to children and promising no harm would come to them. Within days, his troops rounded up every Bosniak man and boy they could find, from 12-year-old children to elderly men in their 70s. In a coordinated, industrial-scale mass killing, 8,000 people were executed and dumped in unmarked mass graves. The Srebrenica massacre remains the worst act of genocide on European soil since 1945, and a widely cited failure of the international community to protect vulnerable civilians.
After the massacre, Mladić was immediately indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), with the U.S. offering a $5 million reward for information leading to his capture. For 16 years, he evaded arrest, protected first by Serbian dictator Slobodan Milošević, who allowed Mladić to live openly in Belgrade, hunt deer, attend public events, and even maintained a dedicated military unit for his personal protection. Mladić remained a celebrated folk hero among many Serbian nationalists, who viewed him as a defender of Serbian national interests.
The net began to close after Milošević was ousted from power and arrested in 2000, with Serbia’s bid for European Union membership tied to its cooperation with the ICTY. Mladić went on the run, moving between hidden safe houses for nearly a decade, protected by a shrinking circle of loyal bodyguards and eventually his own family. After his former political partner Radovan Karadžić was arrested in Belgrade in 2008, Mladić became the tribunal’s top priority fugitive. In May 2011, Serbian police tracked Mladić to a squalid remote farmhouse, where he was found suffering from multiple strokes and in poor health, 16 years after his indictment.
Mladić’s ICTY trial lasted four years, with the court sitting for more than 500 days, hearing testimony from nearly 600 witnesses, and reviewing more than 10,000 pieces of evidence. In 2017, he was convicted on all counts: genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, and sentenced to life in prison. A defiant and unrepentant Mladić smiled and gave a thumbs-up to cameras upon entering the courtroom, but erupted in rage when the verdict was read, shouting that the ruling was “all lies” before being forcibly removed from the chamber. While survivors and victim relatives hailed the conviction as a long-delayed victory for justice, the ruling deepened divisions across the Balkans: Serbian nationalist leaders condemned the trial as an anti-Serbian plot, and many Serbs continue to view Mladić as a national hero.
In his final years, Mladić, who suffered from multiple heart attacks and strokes, repeatedly applied to be transferred to a Serbian prison to serve out his remaining sentence, a request supported by both Serbia and Russia, but repeatedly rejected by the court. As of January 2026, the regional divide over Mladić’s legacy remains raw: a Bosnian opposition politician was sentenced to three years in prison just months ago for publicly glorifying Mladić and Karadžić. While the 1990s Bosnian war has long ended, the tension and division sown by Mladić’s campaign of ethnic cleansing persist, with Bosniaks and much of the international community remembering him as one of the worst war criminals in modern European history, and segments of the Serbian public continuing to view him as a patriot and defender of their nation.
-

Ratko Mladic, ex-Bosnian Serb warlord who oversaw atrocities in Bosnia, dies in prison at 84
In a development that has reopened bitter wounds across the Balkans, convicted Bosnian Serb war criminal Ratko Mladic, the 84-year-old former military leader held responsible for some of the worst European atrocities of the 1990s, has reportedly died while in United Nations prison custody. Multiple regional state broadcasters, including Serbia’s public service network RTS and the official television service of Bosnia’s Serb entity, first broke the news of Mladic’s passing Wednesday, noting he died at a U.N.-administered prison hospital facility based in The Hague, Netherlands.
An anonymous family member, who requested withholding their identity due to the highly sensitive political and social nature of Mladic’s case, confirmed the initial reports to the Associated Press. The source also shared that Mladic’s son, Darko Mladic, was already traveling to the Netherlands to coordinate next steps. As of initial reporting, however, spokespeople for the international U.N. tribunal system have stated they cannot immediately verify the death, leaving room for formal confirmation in the coming hours.
Mladic’s name remains permanently tied to the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, the worst act of ethnic cleansing on the European continent since World War II, where more than 8,000 Bosniak Muslim men and boys were systematically executed under his military command. He was also found guilty of orchestrating the 44-month siege of Sarajevo that killed more than 10,000 civilians during the 1992-1995 Bosnian War. After evading capture for more than a decade following the end of the conflict, Mladic was arrested by Serbian authorities in 2011 and transferred to The Hague to stand trial. In 2017, he was convicted of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes by the U.N. International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, which sentenced him to life imprisonment.
-

Thieves steal Bronze Age artifacts from Spanish museum in four-minute heist
In an audacious, meticulously planned early-morning robbery that has shocked the Spanish town of Villena, thieves have stolen a substantial portion of one of Europe’s most significant prehistoric gold collections from the MUVI Villena Museum, located in the province of Alicante.
The stolen artifacts are part of the world-famous Treasure of Villena, a one-of-a-kind Bronze Age assemblage totaling nearly 10 kilograms of gold that includes ceremonial bowls, ornate vessels, decorative bracelets, and gold rings dating back to approximately 1000 BC. Alongside the gold pieces, the full collection also includes rare silver, iron, and amber artifacts, comprising more than 60 prehistoric objects in total: 29 bracelets, 11 bowls, three decorative bottles, and a range of other assorted archaeological finds. The entire collection was first uncovered in 1963 by archaeologist Jose María Soler, who found it hidden inside a large vessel buried in the bed of a dried-out river just outside Villena, making it an irreplaceable piece of regional and global cultural heritage.
According to local authorities and Spanish media reports, the heist was executed with strategic diversion and remarkable speed. At around 5:15 a.m. local time (3:15 a.m. GMT), thieves triggered an alarm at a nearby municipal sports center, drawing responding police officers away from the museum location. Just five minutes later, the MUVI Villena Museum’s own security alarm activated. Investigations indicate the raiders spent only four minutes inside the exhibit hall, removing the targeted objects and escaping before law enforcement could reach the building. A spokesperson for the Villena town council described the operation as “super fast and super professional”, emphasizing that all the museum’s security systems functioned as designed during the break-in, rejecting any claims of systemic security failure.
While police are still conducting a full inventory to confirm the exact number and value of stolen pieces, museum officials have confirmed that gold rings, bowls, and bracelets are among the items taken. Villena Mayor Fulgencio Cerdán told Spanish national newspaper El Pais that thieves “stole a large part of the treasure”, specifically removing nearly all of the gold held in the collection. For the small Valencian town, the loss is devastating. “The town is devastated,” Cerdán said in comments to reporters. “They’ve taken most of the treasure. I’m even trembling. The truth is that for those of us from Villena, this destroys us. It’s part of our heritage, of our cultural wealth.”
This heist marks the latest in a growing string of high-profile museum robberies across Europe over the past year. In October 2025, a bold daytime robbery at Paris’ Louvre saw thieves escape on scooters with jewelry valued at $102 million after just eight minutes inside the museum. Just last week, Italy’s Ministry of Culture announced the theft of four “extraordinarily valuable” works by Renaissance master Antonello da Messina from a museum in Sicily. Earlier this month, Italian police announced the recovery of stolen paintings by renowned modern artists Renoir, Cezanne, and Matisse — works worth an estimated $10.4 million that were stolen from the Magnani-Rocca Foundation museum near Parma in a previous heist.
Spanish law enforcement has launched a full investigation into the Villena museum robbery, with authorities working to trace the stolen artifacts and identify the perpetrators behind the brazen raid.
-

Russia says it launched a ‘massive’ overnight strike on 9 Ukrainian cities
A large-scale coordinated attack by Russian forces, combining missiles and drones, has swept across multiple Ukrainian cities, launching after dark on Wednesday and continuing through daylight hours on Thursday. Explosions shook the capital Kyiv repeatedly throughout Thursday morning, marking a fresh escalation in hostilities that have stretched into their fifth year since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
At the heart of Ukraine’s current crisis is a critical shortage of U.S.-manufactured Patriot air defense interceptors, systems designed specifically to neutralize Russia’s advanced ballistic missiles. Adding to Ukraine’s defensive challenges are Russia’s high-speed jet-powered drones, which test overstretched Ukrainian air defense networks already strained by nearly four years of continuous conflict. Ukrainian defense officials note that Russia has systematically built up its missile stockpiles and launched large, coordinated strikes every few days, a strategy designed to exhaust Ukraine’s limited defensive capabilities through sheer volume of fire. In response, Ukraine has carried out reciprocal strikes on high-value targets inside Russian territory, creating a cycle of mutual destruction that continues to escalate.
The Russian Defense Ministry confirmed the overnight offensive, framing it as a “massive strike” against military-linked infrastructure across nine Ukrainian cities. Russian officials stated that targets included defense industrial facilities, oil refineries, military logistics hubs, and port infrastructure, all of which Moscow classifies as legitimate war-related objectives. Despite this claim, multiple civilian areas suffered extensive damage. A 78-year-old woman was killed in the southern Zaporizhzhia region, and at least nine additional people were wounded across the country, according to local Ukrainian authorities.
In a public statement posted to social media, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasized Russia’s ongoing investment in missile production and expansion of its war effort, stating that additional defensive support from the international community remains non-negotiable. Zelenskyy noted that European countries had made new pledges of air defense assistance earlier in the week, and called for these commitments to be expanded with additional ballistic missile defense packages acquired through European purchases of U.S.-manufactured weapons.
Kyiv’s local police confirmed that four districts of the capital were hit during the overnight attack. Damage was recorded to multiple residential apartment blocks, a public school, and a medical facility, though no fatalities or injuries were reported in the city. In central Ukraine’s Poltava region, regional military administration head Vitalii Diakivnych confirmed that Russian strikes targeted both industrial sites and critical energy infrastructure. In southern Ukraine’s Odesa region, a key export hub for Ukrainian grain and agricultural goods, the attack lasted more than seven hours. Regional governor Oleh Kiper reported damage to a 16-story residential building, two educational institutions, and a grain storage elevator.
The attack coincided with a planned state visit by Zelenskyy to neighboring Moldova, where he was scheduled to attend events marking the country’s Independence Day, commemorating its 1991 separation from the Soviet Union — a milestone Ukraine also marked the same year. Eastern European neighbors of Russia have grown increasingly anxious that the conflict in Ukraine could expand into a wider regional war, and repeated unauthorized drone incursions into their airspace have amplified these fears. On Thursday, Moldova’s Ministry of Defense confirmed that five drones had breached its airspace overnight, though the statement did not attribute the launches to any party.
Ukraine’s Air Force announced that its defensive systems successfully intercepted or neutralized seven Russian ballistic missiles during the attack, though the branch did not release further details on the operation. In parallel to defending against Russian strikes on its own territory, Ukraine has stepped up its own campaign of near-nightly long-range drone strikes against targets inside Russia. The Russian Defense Ministry reported Thursday that its air defense systems shot down 267 Ukrainian drones across 14 Russian regions, the illegally annexed Crimean Peninsula, and the Sea of Azov and Black Sea.
In the latest development of Ukraine’s cross-border drone campaign, Ukrainian forces have begun targeting major Russian e-commerce infrastructure after destroying large warehouses belonging to Wildberries, Russia’s largest online retailer, in recent months. The second-largest Russian e-commerce platform, Ozon, confirmed Thursday that its logistics facilities in the Russian cities of Orenburg and Ufa came under drone attack, though neither site sustained fire damage.
-

Champions League draw to be held at gathering of European soccer elite amid UEFA’s crisis with FIFA
Monaco is set to host one of European soccer’s most anticipated annual events Thursday: the group stage draw for the UEFA Champions League, the continent’s premier club soccer competition. But beyond the glamour of assembling the season’s matchups, off-field governance tensions are taking center stage at the gathering of top European soccer decision-makers.
Two hours before the draw ceremony kicks off at 6 p.m. local time (1600 GMT), 55 UEFA member federations will hold their first face-to-face meeting since a month-long global soccer governance crisis erupted. The conflict was triggered by FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s unsuccessful push to sell minority stakes in World Cup commercial profits to private investors. Chaired by UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin, the gathering comes as UEFA has already publicly declared it has no confidence in Infantino’s leadership, who is standing for re-election as FIFA president in March. Infantino is not expected to attend the Monaco event, a role he once hosted regularly during his tenure as UEFA general secretary before his 2016 election to the top FIFA post.
Speculation over potential successors to Infantino has increasingly centered on Nasser al-Khelaïfi, president of defending Champions League title holder Paris Saint-Germain, who will be in attendance at the draw. Al-Khelaïfi has not yet publicly confirmed whether he intends to run for the FIFA presidency.
This year’s Champions League iteration brings several notable firsts to the competition alongside the off-field political friction. Four clubs will make their debut in the main 36-team league phase: Italy’s Como, coached by former Spanish international star Cesc Fàbregas; Austrian side LASK; Norwegian club Viking; and Azerbaijani champion Sabah, which was only founded in 2017. Sabah’s head coach Valdas Dambrauskas has already drawn media attention for his unique origin story: as a young aspiring coach in his native Lithuania, he funded a study trip to England to learn coaching tactics with prize money he won competing on the television quiz show *Who Wants to be a Millionaire*. Another historic milestone for this season sees Yaya Touré, the former Manchester City and Barcelona midfield star, become the first African coach to lead a team into the Champions League main phase after guiding Slovakian champion Slovan Bratislava through qualifying this week.
Off the pitch, the Monaco agenda also includes meetings for the influential European Football Clubs association, UEFA’s club competition oversight committee, and a special caucus of UEFA member federations. Delegates are set to formally formalize the withdrawal of their earlier threat to boycott FIFA competitions, a threat issued in response to Infantino’s secretive plan to sell stakes in a new FIFA commercial subsidiary to a group of investors led by Joshua Kushner.
For the draw itself, UEFA uses a specialized seeding and pairing system to set up the new expanded league phase. Seeding is determined by each club’s competitive performance in UEFA competitions over the past five seasons, with 36 teams divided across four seeding pots. Each team will be drawn to play eight total matches — four at home and four away — with two opponents drawn from each pot, and no club will face a team from its own national federation. The first round of matches kicks off September 8-10, with the first six matchdays wrapping up by December. The league phase resumes in January, with the final round of matches scheduled for January 27.
Under the new competition format, the top eight teams in the final league phase standings automatically advance to the round of 16 in March. Teams finishing between 9th and 24th place will compete in knockout playoffs in February to claim the remaining eight spots in the round of 16, while clubs finishing 25th to 36th are eliminated from the competition. The 36 qualified teams will split a total prize pool of roughly 2.5 billion euros ($2.9 billion), one of the largest prize pools in global club soccer.
The 36-team field is headlined by defending champion PSG, alongside perennial contenders including 15-time European champion Real Madrid, German giant Bayern Munich, Spanish side Barcelona, and last season’s runner-up Arsenal. The full seeding breakdown for Thursday’s draw divides teams as follows:
Pot 1: Paris Saint-Germain (France), Bayern Munich (Germany), Real Madrid (Spain), Liverpool (England), Inter Milan (Italy), Manchester City (England), Arsenal (England), Barcelona (Spain), Atletico Madrid (Spain)
Pot 2: Borussia Dortmund (Germany), Roma (Italy), Sporting Lisbon (Portugal), Aston Villa (England), Porto (Portugal), Manchester United (England), Club Brugge (Belgium), Real Betis (Spain), PSV Eindhoven (Netherlands)
Pot 3: Feyenoord (Netherlands), Lille (France), Napoli (Italy), Leipzig (Germany), Villarreal (Spain), Fenerbahce (Turkey), Shakhtar Donetsk (Ukraine), Galatasaray (Turkey)
Pot 4: Slavia Prague (Czech Republic), Slovan Bratislava (Slovakia), Stuttgart (Germany), AEK Athens (Greece), LASK (Austria), Como (Italy), Lens (France), Viking (Norway), Sabah (Azerbaijan) -

Norway’s royal family gathers at King Harald’s bedside as his condition worsens
Oslo, Norway – Norway’s royal household has confirmed that 89-year-old King Harald V, Europe’s longest-serving and oldest sitting head of state, is currently in extremely serious health condition at Oslo University Hospital, prompting the entire royal family to convene at his bedside and forcing key senior royals to scrap all scheduled public duties.
-

Fan backlash as gay World Cup star joins Saudi club
Veteran Spanish women’s football forward Esther Gonzalez, a 2023 World Cup winner and recent Euro 2025 runner-up with Spain, finds herself at the center of widespread controversy after confirming a high-profile move to Saudi Women’s Premier League club Al Qadsiah. The 33-year-old’s transfer came just weeks after she agreed to a mutual termination of her contract with defending National Women’s Soccer League champions Gotham FC, a move the club initially framed as a temporary break from professional football to address personal matters back in her home country of Spain.
When Gonzalez first announced her departure from the New York-based side, she emphasized that her choice was driven exclusively by strictly personal considerations, adding that Gotham FC would forever occupy a special place in her heart. Her contract with the NWSL club was not set to expire until 2027, making the sudden mutual termination all the more surprising. The forward had built an impressive legacy during her three seasons in the United States, claiming two NWSL championship titles, an NWSL Challenge Cup, and a Concacaf W Champions Cup trophy after moving to the league from Spanish giants Real Madrid.
But the veil of secrecy around her exit was lifted on Sunday, when Al Qadsiah officially announced the signing of the Spanish striker, immediately igniting fierce backlash from multiple groups. Gotham FC supporters have expressed deep disappointment over the misleading nature of the exit narrative, pointing out that the club missed out on collecting a transfer fee for the player due to the mutual termination agreement. Fans across social media have also questioned the forward’s true motivations for the sudden career shift.
Criticism has been particularly sharp from members of the global LGBTQ+ community, due to Saudi Arabia’s strict laws that criminalize same-sex relationships and sexual activity. Spanish news outlet El Mundo has reported that since finalizing the deal with Al Qadsiah, Gonzalez has removed all social media posts and photographs showing her with her wife and their first child, who was born in January this year. That reporting has only intensified calls for accountability and amplified public criticism of the transfer.
Gonzalez is far from the first high-profile footballer to face widespread condemnation for choosing to continue their career in Saudi Arabia. In 2023, England men’s midfielder Jordan Henderson drew fierce backlash after his move to Saudi Pro League side Al-Ettifaq. Henderson, who had long positioned himself as an ally to the LGBTQ+ community – wearing rainbow laces during Premier League matches, sporting the pro-diversity One Love armband at international tournaments, and writing messages of solidarity for queer fans in matchday programs – received particular condemnation from openly gay English footballer Jake Daniels, who described the move as a “slap in the face” after he had received a public message of support from Henderson when he came out. Henderson ultimately left Al-Ettifaq after just six months at the club.
Al Qadsiah, the club that Gonzalez has now joined, finished fourth in the Saudi Women’s Premier League 2025-26 season. BBC Sport has reached out to Gotham FC to request an official statement on the recent developments, but no comment has been released as of yet.
