标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Iceland set to reject talks to rejoin EU, national broadcaster says

    Iceland set to reject talks to rejoin EU, national broadcaster says

    Reykjavik, Iceland – In a closely contested national referendum that concluded Saturday, Iceland appears poised to reject a proposal to restart stalled accession negotiations with the European Union, according to preliminary results from Icelandic national broadcaster RÚV, putting an end to one of the Nordic nation’s longest-running political debates for the second time in a decade.

    With all but one southwestern constituency fully counted, the “no” camp holds a thin but steady lead of 52.5 percent to 47.5 percent over supporters of resuming talks. RÚV analysts noted the outcome is nearly irreversible: the remaining uncounted ballots come from the same southwestern district where the pro-EU proposal is already trailing, making a last-minute reversal of the lead extremely unlikely. This result closes a chapter that first ended in 2015, when a euroskeptic Icelandic administration formally terminated previous EU accession talks that had launched more than a decade earlier.

    The snap referendum, originally scheduled for 2025, was moved up to 2024 by the newly elected left-leaning coalition government following a high-profile gaffe from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who incorrectly referred to Iceland multiple times during remarks about his stated interest in gaining control over Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory located near Iceland. That incident stirred fresh security concerns among Icelandic voters, even though the Nordic nation has long been a member of the NATO defensive alliance.

    Proponents of restarting negotiations argued that full EU membership would strengthen Iceland’s geopolitical security, giving the small island nation greater collective protection from great power expansionism should Trump ever turn similar territorial ambitions toward Iceland. Beyond security, backers framed membership as a boon to Iceland’s economic stability: they noted that adopting the euro would replace the highly volatile Icelandic króna, bringing down persistent inflation and lowering domestic interest rates. They also added that full membership would give Iceland a stronger seat at the table to address transboundary challenges like climate change, a pressing threat to the island’s unique glacial ecosystems.

    However, opponents of the proposal successfully rallied voters around two core arguments centered on national sovereignty and existing economic benefits. Opponents pointed out that Iceland already enjoys preferential access to the EU’s single market, allowing frictionless trade in goods and services, and is part of the Schengen Area that enables free movement across most of Europe. Full membership, they argued, would force Iceland to make unacceptable compromises on national governance, particularly its lucrative fishing industry, a cornerstone of the Icelandic economy that would come under EU common fisheries policy if Iceland joined. Opponents further argued that Iceland’s small population would leave its interests with little representation in the European Parliament, and that the nation retains more flexibility by negotiating independent trade deals, such as its existing agreement with China, outside of EU trade frameworks.

    The result confirms what opinion polling had suggested for years: a narrow majority of Icelandic voters remain skeptical of full EU integration, preferring to retain the semi-detached status that has served the small Nordic economy for decades.

  • Manhunt after one killed and five injured in Swiss shooting, police say

    Manhunt after one killed and five injured in Swiss shooting, police say

    In the early hours of Sunday morning, a deadly shooting rocked a pre-planned rave event near Aarau, a city roughly 29 miles west of Zurich in northern Switzerland, leaving one person dead and five others wounded, local law enforcement confirmed.

    Aargau Cantonal Police launched a massive, coordinated operation across the region immediately after the incident, with authorities confirming that a widespread manhunt is currently underway for an unidentified attacker. As of the latest updates, officials have not identified any clear motives for the violence, nor have they pieced together the full, exact circumstances of how the shooting unfolded.

    The attack occurred in Schachen, close to a local horse racing track, where an overnight rave had been scheduled to run into the early hours of Sunday. In response to the shooting, law enforcement has sealed off a large perimeter that encompasses the horse racing track, the town’s public swimming pool, and the local sports field. Police have issued a formal urgent plea for members of the public to avoid the entire cordoned area to preserve the crime scene and ensure public safety.

    Visuals captured from the region early Sunday show a overwhelming police presence, including an armored police vehicle positioned to block a key roadway. Beyond the immediate area around Aarau, police confirmed that they have deployed a large contingent of additional officers as a precautionary measure to prevent any further risk to the public.

    Beyond local police and fire department personnel, regional broadcaster SRF reports that the cantonal disaster response unit (KKE) was also activated to support the response operation. Additionally, a Swiss Army helicopter was deployed to conduct aerial surveys of the area in the early hours of the response to aid the search for the perpetrator.

    Authorities are now calling on any witnesses who were present in the area at the time of the incident to submit any photographs or video footage they captured of the scene to help investigators piece together what happened and identify the attacker.

  • Shooting at a rave in Switzerland kills 1 and injures 5

    Shooting at a rave in Switzerland kills 1 and injures 5

    GENEVA – A deadly act of gun violence has shaken the northern Swiss canton of Aargau, leaving one attendee dead and five others wounded — several critically — after a shooting erupted at a large rave event early Sunday, according to local law enforcement and regional media reports. Authorities have launched an extensive manhunt for an unknown attacker, who remains at large as of the latest updates.

    In a public post on the social platform X, Aargau Cantonal Police confirmed that the search for the unidentified perpetrator is still active, adding that both potential motives for the attack and the full, exact sequence of events remain unconfirmed. The shooting unfolded at the seventh iteration of the popular “Aarau Rave VOL. 7”, which was being hosted at the horse racing facility located in Aarau’s Schachen neighborhood. Aarau, the capital of the Aargau canton, sits roughly 29 miles west of Switzerland’s largest city Zurich, and is home to a population of approximately 22,300 people.

    Police spokesperson Pascal Wenzel told Swiss public broadcaster SRF that local authorities received the first emergency alert about the shooting at approximately 2:30 a.m. local time. In the immediate aftermath of the incident, local fire services deployed to cordon off a wide perimeter around the rave site, and a large-scale coordinated police operation was launched to secure the area and locate the suspect. Residents of Aarau and nearby communities were formally urged to avoid the entire Schachen district area to support ongoing emergency and investigative work.

    Many attendees initially misidentified the sound of gunfire as celebratory fireworks, according to reporting from leading Swiss daily newspaper Blick. It was only after a panicked attendee shouted warnings for everyone to take cover that crowds realized the danger, the outlet reported. Blick also noted that the violence broke out moments after the scheduled end of the rave event. Law enforcement has issued a public appeal for any witnesses who may have captured photographs or video footage of the incident, asking them to share the material with investigating teams to help advance the case.

  • Movie stars, timely documentaries and awards hopefuls convene at the Venice Film Festival

    Movie stars, timely documentaries and awards hopefuls convene at the Venice Film Festival

    The lazy, slow days of August usually put Hollywood’s glitzy annual calendar on pause, but the 83rd Venice Film Festival is poised to launch the busy fall festival circuit with its signature blend of red carpet glamour, boundary-pushing cinema, and industry drama when it opens Wednesday on the historic Lido waterfront.

    A-list stars from across the globe are set to walk the iconic festival’s red carpets this year, with names including Noel Gallagher, Liam Gallagher, Robert Pattinson, Rooney Mara, George Clooney and Penélope Cruz confirmed to attend. Clooney and veteran actress Ellen Burstyn will also take center stage to accept lifetime achievement Golden Lions, capping decades of acclaimed work in film. For decades, the Venice Film Festival has served as a launching pad for awards season contenders, and industry observers already expect several of this year’s entries to earn Oscar nods in the coming months.

    But unlike past editions, much of the global conversation surrounding this year’s lineup centers not on A-list contenders or future blockbusters, but on a high-profile subject who will almost certainly not be in attendance: billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. The core of this attention stems from Oscar-winning documentarian Alex Gibney’s nearly four-hour investigative film, which has been four years in the making. Gibney initially hesitated to take on the project, but a close friend persuaded him that a deep dive into Musk’s life and career would offer a revealing portrait of power in the 21st century — a project that gained even more cultural relevance ahead of its release amid Musk’s high-profile involvement in the 2024 U.S. presidential election and his controversial leadership of social platform X (formerly Twitter), tied to his DOGE cryptocurrency initiative.

    When the documentary was first announced, Musk took to social media to dismiss it as a biased “hit piece.” Gibney quickly pushed back, asking publicly, “How would you know?” In comments to The Associated Press, Gibney shared that he began the project as an admirer of Musk’s work — and even a Tesla owner — and extended multiple invitations for Musk to participate in the film on camera.

    “Ultimately, he didn’t want to talk to me,” Gibney said. “But then you start digging into the facts and you follow them where they lead. And where they led, for me, was to a place that upended the myth, I would say, of Elon Musk as a kind of modern Leonardo da Vinci … I think that the news in this film is that Musk isn’t an inventor. He’s a confidence man.”

    Gibney and his team conducted interviews with hundreds of people with direct knowledge of Musk’s career at Tesla and SpaceX, many of whom spoke only off the record. The director compared Musk to fallen disgraced corporate leaders such as Enron’s executives and Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes. Gibney added that he was most struck by how many sources — even self-described Musk supporters — refused to speak on the record without first seeking Musk’s permission to comment.

    “I thought, wow, for such a big and powerful person, that seems awfully weak,” Gibney noted. While the film tackles a “dark and dangerous topic,” Gibney described it as a compelling, engaging “fun ride” for audiences.

    Musk’s documentary is not the only timely, politically charged work headlining this year’s nonfiction lineup. Julia Loktev’s *My Undesirable Friends: Part II — Exile*, a nearly six-hour follow-up to her 2020s documentary, continues her sprawling portrait of independent Russian journalists who fled their home country after Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    “You see this group of young, very young journalists who’ve just fled their country, on a few hours’ notice. They had the choice of, you know, stop reporting the truth about the war, which didn’t seem like a choice at all, or go to prison, or leave the country so they can keep telling the truth,” Loktev explained. “It was a question of how long do you keep following? Because this takes place over four years. And over that time, exile becomes, of course, indefinite.” Despite its extended run time, Loktev says the documentary holds audience attention: “I hear it goes by easy.”

    The ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict in Gaza will also take a prominent spot in the lineup, with the new documentary *NAZA* added as a late entry to the main competition. The film comes from two of the creators behind the Oscar-winning documentary *No Other Land*. Unlike the 2024 edition of the festival, no large-scale public protests have been organized, but advocacy group Venice4Palestine has called on festival leadership to “suspend all agreements with entities and institutions linked to the Israeli government” and fly the Palestinian flag across festival grounds throughout the event.

    Beyond documentary, the festival’s narrative lineup includes a number of awards contenders vying for early Oscar momentum. The Venice Film Festival has a long track record of launching best picture nominees, and this year’s slate includes several high-profile projects from award-winning filmmakers. Martin McDonagh, whose last two features premiered at Venice before earning multiple Oscar nominations, returns with *Wild Horse Nine*, a 1970s-set CIA comedy starring John Malkovich and Sam Rockwell. Oscar-winning *The Father* director Florian Zeller brings his new psychological thriller *Bunker*, which stars Penélope Cruz and Javier Bardem. Danny Boyle examines a key turning point in tabloid journalism history with *Ink*, while Lance Oppenheim’s *Primetime* has drawn significant curiosity for Robert Pattinson’s lead performance as *To Catch a Predator* host Chris Hansen and its deep dive into early 2000s reality TV culture.

    International cinema also features heavily in this year’s main competition. Japanese master Hirokazu Kore-eda debuts *Look Back*, a coming-of-age story following two small-town teenage girls chasing their dream of becoming professional manga artists. Korean auteur Lee Chang-dong explores class, labor and romantic desire through the intersecting lives of two married couples in *Possible Love*.

    Notably, the 2025 festival comes at a moment when major Hollywood studios have increasingly pulled back on relying on international film festivals to build buzz for awards contenders. The 2025 Cannes Film Festival had no major studio blockbusters in its lineup, yet Hollywood went on to post one of the highest-grossing summer seasons in history. Last year’s best picture winner *One Battle After Another* skipped the entire festival circuit entirely. While Venice booked more Hollywood titles than Cannes this year, the overall buzz around awards contenders is far more muted than in years past, after multiple high-profile entries saw their Oscar prospects fizzle prematurely in recent seasons.

    Beneath the glamour and awards buzz, the 2025 edition also spotlights a long-unfulfilled promise the festival made to advance gender equity behind the camera. Just one of the 21 films in this year’s main competition is directed by a woman: Danish-Egyptian filmmaker May El-Toukhy. This mirrors the 2018 lineup, which also had only one female director in competition. That 2018 lack of representation prompted the festival to sign a public pledge promising that at least 50 percent of main competition films would be directed by women by 2020 — a goal it has yet to meet seven years later.

    The lack of representation stings even more given that actress-director Maggie Gyllenhaal, whose 2021 feature *The Lost Daughter* won the festival’s best screenplay award, is this year’s main competition jury president. One of her fellow jurors is Tunisian director Kaouther Ben Hania, whose film *The Voice of Hind Rajab* won the Silver Lion in 2024, a year when six competition films were directed by women. In the history of the festival, only seven women have ever won the top prize, the Golden Lion.

    Outside the main competition, representation is far better. The independent Venice Days sidebar, which opens this year with Hungarian director Lili Horvát’s English-language debut *My Notes on Mars*, has more than half of its 2025 lineup directed by women, including high-profile short films from established auteurs including Mona Fastvold and Claire Denis. Horvát called it “good to be in a progressive section.”

  • WhatsApp chat used to send cash for crime and extremism

    WhatsApp chat used to send cash for crime and extremism

    A cross-border investigation led by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which includes the BBC, has exposed a massive underground money transfer network that leveraged WhatsApp and the centuries-old hawala system to move hundreds of millions of euros in untraceable funds to criminal and extremist groups across the globe. The network, which included a 532-member chat called “Traders of Greater Europe”, moved money across international borders, including to major British cities London and Birmingham, and even sent payments from Brussels to Islamic State (IS) militants operating in Syria. The investigation also linked similar unregulated hawala systems to widespread people smuggling, drug trafficking, and other transnational organized criminal activities across the continent.

    The chat log, which held more than 82,000 messages exchanged between February and December 2022, was first discovered on the personal phone of a convicted Brussels-based network leader by Belgian investigating magistrate Vincent Guerra. What began as a narrow probe into terrorist financing quickly expanded to reveal a global operation of unparalleled scale. Guerra described the total volume of transactions documented in the chat as “staggering”, noting that the network’s reach extended across the entire planet. He called the discovery of the full chat “hitting the jackpot” that unlocked access to the inner operations of a shadow financial system that operates entirely outside of government oversight.

    The network relied on the hawala system, a trust-based money transfer mechanism that operates without formal electronic records or physical cross-border movement of cash. Under the system, two geographically separate brokers (called hawaladars) reach an agreement: one accepts cash from a sender, and the other pays out the equivalent sum minus a commission to the intended recipient, with all outstanding balances settled between the brokers at a later date. While hawala is often used legally to support remittances from migrant workers to family members in regions with limited formal banking access, it has also become a critical tool for criminals seeking to avoid the anti-money laundering checks built into the mainstream SWIFT international banking system, which requires banks to flag and report suspicious large transactions.

    The “Traders of Greater Europe” chat was restricted to transactions of 5000 euros or more, with most transfers being far larger. Authorities stress that not all chat participants were aware of or involved in handling illicit funds. Hawala is currently banned in most European Union member states, but remains legal in the United Kingdom as long as brokers register with His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

    The cache of chat messages was obtained by the EBU following a 2024 Belgian court conviction of six money launderers connected to the network, including Abu Adam, the Brussels head of the operation, and his deputy Abu Ahmed. The investigation into the pair began when authorities uncovered evidence they had transferred funds to IS to help the wives of militants escape detention camps in northeastern Syria. When Abu Adam was arrested, investigators found not only the WhatsApp chat on his phone but also 6,000 photos of 5-euro banknotes (with visible serial numbers, which are used as unique transaction identifiers in hawala operations) and 6,000 photos of identity documents. Guerra said these records indicate Abu Adam alone processed at least 12,000 transactions, describing the operation as fully professional criminal enterprise operating at a scale “we could never have imagined”, adding that the hawaladars operate effectively as unregulated bankers for transnational criminal groups.

    The EBU investigation uncovered evidence of parallel criminal hawala networks operating across multiple European countries. A former insider in these networks, speaking anonymously under the pseudonym Frank, told reporters he had personally handled hundreds of millions of euros in illicit transactions. He described his first exposure to the system at a small office outside Rotterdam, where couriers delivered more than 1 million euros in cash in less than 90 minutes. Frank noted that the network facilitates far more than just money laundering, saying “it’s about the financing of terror. It’s about drug trafficking. It’s about prostitution and all sorts of other crap.”

    Investigations in Austria have further highlighted the brutal human cost of these unregulated networks. A probe by ORF, an Austrian public broadcaster and EBU member, uncovered a large-scale hawala hub operating out of a busy central Vienna kebab restaurant that was used to process payments for people smuggling operations. Two Syrian brothers running the hub were convicted last year of human trafficking, torture, and rape after they abused a courier who claimed he had been robbed of 350,000 euros in network funds. The pair were sentenced to 18 and 8 years in prison respectively.

    Earlier this year, Austrian police and Europol dismantled another people smuggling ring funded via hawala that authorities estimate smuggled 100,000 migrants into the European Union over an 18-month period. Gerald Tatzgern, who leads human trafficking investigations for Austria’s Criminal Intelligence Service, explained that criminal networks routinely use torture against migrants who cannot pay smuggling fees, then distribute videos of the abuse to the migrants’ families to extort additional payments, which are processed through the hawala system to avoid detection. “Videos of the torture are then sent to the families, saying that if they don’t send another 1,000 euros or several thousand euros, then the person concerned – your son, your brother, your father – will suffer,” Tatzgern said.

    Quentin Mugg, a police commander and Europol liaison officer who has led multiple anti-money laundering probes, called the unregulated hawala system “the primary money-laundering channel for organised crime”. He noted that criminal hawaladars will process any transaction regardless of its source or purpose, saying: “Whether the money comes from migrant smuggling, human trafficking, pimping, a grandmother’s savings sent as a birthday present to her son, or a Malian working in France who wants to support his family, [the hawaladars] couldn’t care less. And they’ll apply their rates.”

  • Iceland EU referendum on a knife edge as counting continues

    Iceland EU referendum on a knife edge as counting continues

    Iceland’s historic public vote on restarting European Union membership negotiations remains too close to call Saturday, with early partial counts showing the two opposing sides separated by a razor-thin margin of just 435 ballots. As counting continues across the small North Atlantic island nation, the tight result has underscored how deeply divided Icelanders remain on the question of deepening their integration with the EU after more than a decade of frozen accession talks.\n\nWith 153,197 of the 270,000 eligible ballots counted so far, public broadcaster RUV reports that 50.1% of voters have rejected the proposal to resume negotiations, while 49.9% have voiced support for moving forward. The outcome will not be confirmed until all remaining ballots are processed, leaving the country waiting for a final result in one of the most closely watched political events in Iceland’s recent history.\n\nThe snap referendum, originally scheduled to take place no later than 2027 under Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir’s centre-left administration, was moved forward amid growing international security tensions across the North Atlantic. These tensions include Russian military’s increased maritime activity near Iceland’s territorial waters and repeated public interest from former U.S. President Donald Trump in acquiring the autonomous Danish territory of Greenland, which sits close to Iceland.\n\nHowever, far from security concerns driving public debate, the core of the campaign has centered on the future of Iceland’s $4 billion fishing and marine industry, which accounts for nearly 40% of the country’s total export revenue. Opponents of restarting talks have repeatedly warned that joining the EU would require Iceland to cede partial control of its lucrative exclusive fishing grounds under the bloc’s Common Fisheries Policy, a policy that many Icelandic fishers and industry leaders argue would threaten the country’s most economically vital sector.\n\nIceland first launched its EU accession process back in 2009, in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that collapsed Iceland’s entire domestic banking system and plunged the country into a deep recession. At the time, joining the EU was widely seen as a path to economic stability and deeper integration with European markets. By 2013, accession talks were well advanced when a Eurosceptic government won national elections and immediately paused negotiations, with fishing rights emerging as the single biggest sticking point that remains unresolved today.\n\nCurrently, Iceland already participates in two key EU frameworks: it is a full member of the EU single market for goods and services and part of the Schengen Area, which eliminates border checks between participating European countries. If voters approve resuming talks and a final accession deal is reached, Iceland would join the EU customs union and eventually adopt the euro as its national currency.\n\nAfter casting her vote in the capital city of Reykjavik on Saturday, Prime Minister Frostadóttir emphasized that the referendum itself represents a key milestone for Icelandic democracy, regardless of the final result. “This is a great day, we’ve been waiting for this for years to be able to have a vote,” she told reporters, adding that her administration will continue its governing agenda no matter which way the result falls.\n\nVoters were asked a direct question on the ballot: “Should Iceland resume accession negotiations with the European Union?” Importantly, a Yes vote would not finalize Iceland’s EU membership; instead, it would only authorize the government to begin negotiating an accession treaty, which would then need to be put to a second public referendum for final approval. Similarly, a No vote would not permanently close the door to EU membership, leaving the possibility open for future governments to revisit the question.\n\nBeyond the dominant economic and fishing debates, security considerations did play a role in campaign discourse. Iceland is a founding member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) but maintains no standing military of its own, relying entirely on alliance allies for national defense. The country has been a strong backer of Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, and Icelandic officials have grown increasingly concerned over Russian military activity near the island in recent years. Trump’s repeated comments about seeking control of Greenland have also added to regional security anxieties that influenced the decision to hold the referendum earlier than planned.\n\nAs counting continues, the entire country is on edge waiting for a final result that will shape Iceland’s political and economic trajectory for decades to come.

  • They fell in love – then had to check they weren’t brother and sister

    They fell in love – then had to check they weren’t brother and sister

    For decades, Arthur Kermalvezen, a man conceived via sperm donation, lived with a persistent, unsettling mystery: any man he encountered – from his grade school teacher to strangers on the city bus – could have been his biological father. This uncertainty bred deep anger and unrest, leaving him unable to feel grounded in his own identity. What he never expected was that this lifelong question would become even more urgent when he fell in love with Audrey, another Paris-born donor-conceived woman, whom he met at a 2010 gathering for donor-conceived rights activists.

    The pair experienced immediate, undeniable chemistry, describing their first meeting as love at first sight. But their new romance came with a alarming possibility: in the era when they were conceived, Paris had only two operating sperm banks, and most donors contributed sperm multiple times to help more couples conceive. This meant the chance of them sharing the same biological father – and being half-siblings – was far from hypothetical. Before they could build a life together, they needed an answer. Yet France’s strict laws around donor anonymity and genetic testing made that answer almost impossible to obtain legally.

    Since 1994, France has barred private citizens from accessing or using at-home DNA testing kits, making personal genetic testing a criminal offense. Only licensed doctors, research scientists, and judges are legally permitted to order and oversee genetic analysis. Anyone caught with a personal testing kit can face fines of more than €3,500, and major direct-to-consumer DNA companies including 23andMe, Ancestry, and MyHeritage do not sell their products in the country. Lawmakers and supporters of the ban argue it protects sensitive genetic data from exploitation by commercial entities and prevents unexpected DNA results from tearing families apart. Critics, however, point out that France is the only European nation that criminalizes personal use of these tests.

    Audrey, a bioethics lawyer by training, understood the intricacies of French law better than most: the country enshrined donor anonymity in legislation, guaranteeing that identity would remain hidden even after a donor’s death. But Audrey’s conception in 1979 predated this law, leaving her with a legal gray area that offered no clear path to information. While searching online for other donor-conceived people born before the 1994 law went into effect, Audrey found Arthur, who had published a book chronicling his lifelong search for answers about his biological origins. She was immediately struck by how perfectly he captured the confusing, unspoken feelings she had carried her whole life – even though both had grown up in loving, supportive families, the mystery of their biological origins left a permanent hole in their identities.

    After their first in-person meeting, the connection was immediate – but so was the problem. No French regulatory or legal body would help them confirm whether they were related. After months of dead ends, they located a doctor in southern France who agreed to conduct a genetic test for €900 in cash, breaking the law to share the result with them directly: they were not related. Still, the couple was left uneasy. They worried the unregulated test was inaccurate, and Audrey, committed to upholding the law, refused to use a black market at-home kit to confirm the result. Starting in 2010, she launched a series of legal challenges against the French system, asking only for access to non-identifying information about her donor, including how many donations he made, to confirm whether she and Arthur could be related. Every challenge was rejected. After three years of fighting, the couple took a leap of faith and married.

    In 2015, France’s highest administrative court rejected Audrey’s final appeal. It was only shortly before the birth of their first child that another doctor agreed to bend the rules: he checked their donors’ birth years in the confidential sperm bank records, and confirmed their donors were two different men. The result was life-changing, but it came only from an illegal act. “It’s completely weird,” Audrey said of the ruling that allows doctors to know more about her own origins than she does. Even after this confirmation, Arthur still carried doubts, so years later, the couple finally agreed to take an at-home DNA test, ordered through a friend in a neighboring country where the kits are legal. The test confirmed what the doctor had told them: they were not related.

    That illegal test unlocked far more than just reassurance for the couple. In 2017, Arthur finally connected with his biological sperm donor on Christmas Day, ending decades of uncertainty. For Audrey, the surprise was even greater: one of her DNA matches was Sophie, a fellow donor-conceived activist whom she had represented in court years earlier. The two women, who had fought side-by-side for legal rights, were biological sisters. When the couple took the test alongside eight other fellow activists, the results revealed just how high the risk of accidental genetic relations really is: four of the ten participants shared the same donor, including Audrey, Sophie, and their two brothers.

    Years later, a DNA match with an American relative led Audrey to her own donor, a man named Philippe, but he had already passed away. Audrey’s mother wrote a letter to Philippe’s family, thanking them for the “immeasurable gift” he had given, and the family welcomed Audrey into their lives. Philippe’s own sister had never known he was a sperm donor, and the meeting gave Audrey answers she had chased for decades: she got access to her full biological medical history, saw photos and videos of her donor, and finally got to know the story of her origins.

    The couple’s years of activism – Audrey’s legal challenges and Arthur’s writing – helped drive a landmark change to French donor conception law: people conceived after April 2025 will now be able to access identifying information about their donors once they reach adulthood. Yet the fight is not over: France still remains one of the only European countries to ban at-home DNA testing, and thousands of donor-conceived people born before 2025 still lack legal access to information about their origins. Audrey says the core of the fight is simple: “Every person has the right to know their origins and the right to know their history.”

    This story is based on an episode of *The Gift* on BBC Radio 4.

  • Norway’s new king remembers ‘my dear father’ in first speech

    Norway’s new king remembers ‘my dear father’ in first speech

    In his first televised address to the Norwegian people since ascending the throne, King Haakon VIII delivered an emotional, tearful tribute to his late father, King Harald V, on the eve of what would have been Harald and Queen Sonja’s 58th wedding anniversary. The 89-year-old former monarch, who earned widespread affection as the “people’s king” and was widely praised for modernizing the Norwegian monarchy during his 35-year reign, passed away Friday morning in a Oslo hospital while receiving treatment for a rare blood disorder.

    Seated at a wooden desk inside Oslo’s Royal Palace, flanked by a framed portrait of Harald, two glowing candles, and an arrangement of delicate white roses, Haakon spoke through waves of emotion to open his first national address as Norway’s new head of state. “Thank you for being such a good dad,” the 53-year-old new king said. He remembered Harald as a loving father to himself and his sister Princess Märtha Louise, a playful, warm grandfather to his six grandchildren, and a devoted, caring husband to his widow, Queen Sonja. As he marked the approaching anniversary of his parents’ wedding, Haakon paused to choke back tears.

    Haakon recalled that Harald united the royal family with a quiet, natural authority he often did not recognize in himself, and remained unwaveringly committed to his core values throughout his life. “He constantly reminded us in the family that each of us must do things in our own way. Find our own style. Be ourselves,” Haakon shared. He also reflected on the profound comfort drawn from the thousands of ordinary Norwegians who gathered outside the Royal Palace in the days since Harald’s death, laying flowers, lighting candles, and leaving tributes to the late king. “We are in mourning, yet at the same time it brings comfort and strength that so many are grieving together with us,” he said.

    Since news of Harald’s passing broke Friday, crowds have continued to lay flowers outside the palace gates, and the Norwegian government has declared a national period of mourning, though a date for the late king’s funeral has not yet been announced. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre was among those who paid tribute, laying a floral arrangement, signing the official condolence book, and meeting with the new king. After the meeting, Støre said the entire nation was “united in grief and gratitude” for Harald’s decades of service.

    Haakon is set to formally take office on Tuesday, when he will swear an oath of allegiance before the Norwegian parliament. He will later join his wife, Queen Mette-Marit, for a simplified consecration service — Norway abolished full coronation ceremonies decades ago. But Haakon assumes the throne at a uniquely challenging moment for the Norwegian royal family, which has weathered a string of public controversies and health crises in recent months.

    Earlier this year, Mette-Marit faced intense public scrutiny after revelations of a three-year friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein came to light, prompting a public apology from the queen. Just months after the controversy, Mette-Marit underwent a life-saving lung transplant to treat pulmonary fibrosis, a condition she has lived with since 2018. Physicians do not expect to declare her medically stable until 2027, meaning Haakon must balance the demands of his new constitutional role with caring for his wife.

    Additional controversy has come from Haakon’s stepson, Marius Borg Høiby, who was raised in the royal family after Haakon married Mette-Marit when Høiby was four years old. Though Høiby holds no official royal title, his June conviction on rape and other criminal charges, which resulted in a four-year prison sentence, has sparked public criticism of the royal family. Høiby is currently appealing the conviction. Haakon’s sister, Princess Märtha Louise, also stepped back from all official royal duties earlier this year after widespread backlash over her 2024 marriage to an American self-described shaman and their controversial joint business activities.

    Without explicitly referencing these challenges, Haakon addressed the moment of turmoil in his address, noting: “Our family has experienced the importance of standing together in order to remain steadfast both within ourselves and for one another even during difficult times.” He emphasized that he, Mette-Marit, and Crown Princess Ingrid Alexandra would “always strive to understand the life situations of different people,” and committed to national unity, saying: “No one who lives in this country knows what we will face together, but what we do know is that we will stand by one another through both good days and difficult ones.” He stressed that the royal family remains committed to a Norwegian society “built on law and justice, where everyone is of equal value.”

    While the late King Harald retained broad popular support through the end of his reign, public support for the Norwegian monarchy has declined in recent years: a poll conducted earlier this year for leading Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten found that monarchy support dropped from 72% in 2024 to 54% ahead of Haakon’s ascension. Still, royal analysts interviewed by the BBC expressed cautious confidence in the new monarch, noting that Haakon is widely viewed as a respected, hardworking public servant who is well-equipped to navigate the challenges ahead and unify the nation and royal family.

  • A look at the deadliest Russian attacks on Ukraine this year

    A look at the deadliest Russian attacks on Ukraine this year

    As Russia ramps up the intensity of large-scale offensive operations against Ukraine in a bid to wear down Kyiv’s defensive capabilities, the deadliest attack of the year so far has claimed at least 37 civilian lives in a Ukrainian village west of the capital. The overnight strike on Friday targeted a civilian warehouse in the small settlement of Myla, located in Kyiv’s western suburbs, leaving a devastating trail of death and destruction that has drawn renewed attention to the human cost of Moscow’s full-scale invasion.

    Local officials confirmed that 34 of the fatalities from the Myla attack occurred at a residential care facility for elderly and disabled citizens, located adjacent to the targeted warehouse. According to Ukrainian authorities, the warehouse was allegedly being used to illegally store munitions. The initial drone strike triggered a chain of secondary explosions and fast-spreading fires that rapidly spread to neighboring residential structures, including the care home. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy labeled the incident an “absolutely terrible situation”, noting that the scale of loss appeared to stem from “terrible negligence on the part of those who stored explosives right next to ordinary people”.

    The Myla attack is not an isolated incident: 2024 has seen a string of lethal Russian strikes on Kyiv and its surrounding regions that have killed dozens of civilians and tested Ukraine’s overstretched air defense networks. Just over a month before the Myla attack, on July 6, a wave of coordinated missile and drone strikes across Kyiv region left 22 people dead. Notably, every ballistic missile launched in that assault successfully hit its intended target, a stark demonstration of the growing gaps in Ukraine’s air defense capabilities that have left Kyiv pleading for additional advanced interceptors, particularly U.S.-manufactured Patriot systems. After that attack, Ukraine’s Emergency Service ordered the evacuation of roughly 600 residents from the Kyiv suburb of Vyshneve over risks posed by unexploded ordnance. In a pattern that mirrored the Myla incident, Zelenskyy later confirmed that munitions had also been illegally stored at the targeted Vyshneve site.

    Weeks earlier, on July 2, Russia launched a hours-long combined drone and missile barrage across Kyiv that killed 31 people and wounded more than 100 others. Moscow explicitly framed the attack as retaliation for earlier Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil infrastructure. Air raid sirens sent more than 50,000 Kyiv residents scrambling for shelter in the city’s underground subway stations, as repeated explosions rocked residential neighborhoods across the capital. For a full day, emergency response teams worked through the rubble of collapsed, burned-out apartment blocks to recover victims and search for any survivors.

    The first of the year’s deadliest major attacks on Kyiv occurred on May 14, when a Russian cruise missile strike leveled a nine-story apartment building, killing 24 people and wounding dozens more. At the time, Ukraine’s Air Force called the assault the largest single missile barrage launched against the capital since Russia expanded its full-scale invasion in February 2022.

    The string of high-casualty strikes comes as Russia continues to increase the frequency of major offensive attacks across Ukraine, with the strategic goal of exhausting Ukraine’s air defense networks and demoralizing civilian populations ahead of a planned push for new territorial gains. International observers note that repeated gaps in Ukrainian air defense have left civilian populations in Kyiv and other major urban centers increasingly vulnerable, even as Western allies continue to debate the pace and volume of additional military aid to Kyiv. Associated Press coverage of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war is available at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine.

  • Far-right British provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos has been deported after his immigration arrest in US

    Far-right British provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos has been deported after his immigration arrest in US

    U.S. immigration officials confirmed Saturday that controversial far-right British commentator Milo Yiannopoulos has been taken into custody and deported back to the United Kingdom.

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that Yiannopoulos, who originally entered the United States legally in May 2019, was expelled to his home country on Friday following allegations that he had overstayed the terms of his entry visa. According to a DHS spokesperson, an immigration judge issued a final formal removal order on July 22, after Yiannopoulos failed to appear at a scheduled immigration hearing to address his overstay violation.

    The commentator was taken into custody by officers from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) this past Thursday during processing at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport, located in the state of Louisiana. No immediate public statement has been issued regarding the deportation: requests for comment sent to Yiannopoulos’ representatives have gone unanswered as of Saturday.

    Yiannopoulos has built a high public profile as an outspoken advocate for far-right conservative causes, known for repeatedly taking intentionally provocative stances on divisive social and political issues. He has drawn widespread controversy for his public criticisms of feminism, Islam, and immigrant communities, and was an early and prominent supporter of former President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration restriction policies.