标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Migrants using longer, more dangerous routes across Channel

    Migrants using longer, more dangerous routes across Channel

    As European authorities ramp up security along France’s most well-trodden migrant crossing routes near Calais and Dunkirk, human smuggling networks are adapting by shifting launch points hundreds of kilometers south and west, extending dangerous Channel voyages and raising new safety concerns for migrants attempting the crossing. This shift comes even as overall numbers of successful crossings have dropped sharply year-over-year, according to official data from French and UK governments.

    French local authorities report a dramatic uptick in crossing attempts originating far from the traditional northern launch zones. This year alone, 58 attempts have been recorded in Seine-Maritime, a coastal department in Normandy that borders the English Channel nearly 80 miles south of Calais. That figure is already nearly double the 30 attempts recorded across all of 2025, when crossings from Normandy remained extremely rare.

    One recent attempt underscores the growing risk of these longer routes: a small vessel that departed Normandy last week spent more than 30 hours adrift at sea before UK Border Force intercepted the craft and escorted it to the Port of Dover. Earlier this month, another boat launched near Cherbourg was intercepted by lifeboats off the Isle of Wight, hundreds of kilometers from the usual arrival points along the Kent coast.

    Audrey Baconnais-Rosez, the senior local government representative for Seine-Maritime, confirmed the geographic expansion of smuggling activity in an interview. “The number of attempts to cross the Channel has increased in number and it is getting further and further from the north of France,” she said. In response to the shift, local law enforcement has boosted coastal patrols across a 100-kilometer stretch of Normandy coastline running from Dieppe to the outskirts of Le Havre. Currently, 50 gendarmes are deployed along the coast, with an additional 20 plainclothes and uniformed police officers operating in Dieppe and surrounding communities. Baconnais-Rosez added that authorities have managed to intercept roughly half of all attempted crossings from the region, and are still cracking down on a smaller smuggling stream that hides migrants on commercial ferries bound for Newhaven in East Sussex, with intercepted smugglers facing prosecution.

    Migration experts say the shift to longer, riskier routes is a direct response to enhanced security at traditional crossing points near Calais and Dunkirk. Dr. Peter Walsh, a senior researcher at the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory, explained that the new launch sites are far from optimal for smuggling networks, but have become necessary as police block access to the northern beaches. “It’s not at all optimal for these boats to set off so far away from their intended destination,” he said. “Some of these journeys would not be 20 miles but 50 miles or even more, which substantially increases the danger on board the boats.”

    Marine safety analysts echo that warning, noting that extended time at sea dramatically elevates the risk of fatal incidents. David McFarlane, a veteran marine safety consultant, explained that longer voyages increase the chance of encountering sudden, dangerous weather shifts that are common in the English Channel. “If a low pressure system is developing over the Atlantic, it can mean that in advance of the winds picking up, a swell will start to increase, with the increased likelihood of sea sickness for some, which can lead to dehydration,” he said. Winds can rise rapidly in the Channel, pushing wave heights as high as 11 feet, enough to swamp small, overloaded craft and put migrants at severe risk of drowning or hypothermia.

    Official 2026 crossing data confirms the overall downward trend in arrivals: so far this year, 19,135 people have successfully completed the crossing, compared to 32,188 during the same period in 2025. Despite this drop, the shift to new routes has sparked new political pressure on the UK government, particularly after two migrant vessels reached the Kent coast last week without being intercepted. That same week, Home Office data recorded 781 migrant arrivals across 10 small boats, marking the highest single-day total for 2026.

    Tony Smith, the former director general of UK Border Force, warned that smuggling networks will continue to adapt to security changes as long as demand for irregular crossings remains. “They’re not going to give up as long as the business model continues to exist and there’s a market to bring migrants over from France,” he said. “Every successful landing is a message to the next migrant waiting on a French beach that it’s worth a try.”

    In response to the evolving situation, the UK Home Office said bilateral cooperation with French authorities has already delivered major results. Since the last UK election, joint operations have prevented more than 48,000 crossing attempts and seized more than 1,100 boats and engines. “Our efforts are having an impact, with the number of small boat crossings down significantly this year and the lowest number recorded for the month of July since 2020,” a Home Office spokesperson said. To address the shift to western French coasts, the UK has signed a new payment-by-results agreement with France that will increase patrol personnel on French beaches by 40%, including a dedicated surge unit of 45 additional officers focused on western coastal areas.

  • Three Egyptian security officials convicted of kidnapping Italian student

    Three Egyptian security officials convicted of kidnapping Italian student

    Nearly a decade after the brutal death of 28-year-old Italian researcher Giulio Regeni sent shockwaves across the international community, an Italian court has handed down a long-awaited verdict in a case that has strained bilateral relations for years. On Monday, a Rome court convicted three members of Egypt’s security forces of aggravated kidnapping, sentencing each to 10 years in prison. The defendants were tried in absentia and have consistently denied all charges against them, while a fourth Egyptian official standing trial in the same case was acquitted.

    Regeni, a Cambridge University PhD candidate, disappeared in January 2016 while conducting field research on Egypt’s independent trade unions, a politically sensitive topic in the country. Just days after he went missing, his extensively tortured, mutilated body was discovered in a ditch on the outskirts of Cairo. An official autopsy later confirmed he had endured prolonged abuse, including repeated beatings with fists, kicks, sticks and clubs, and ultimately died from a broken neck. In a 2018 testimony before the Italian parliament, Regeni’s mother recalled that his body was so disfigured she could only identify him by the tip of his nose.

    From the outset of the investigation, Italian and Egyptian authorities reached starkly opposing conclusions about the circumstances of Regeni’s death. Egyptian officials have repeatedly denied any state involvement in the researcher’s abduction and killing, instead attributing his death to a range of alternative causes including a run-in with criminal gangs, a fatal car accident, botched drug deal, or failed robbery. But Rome-based prosecutors, who ultimately launched their own independent prosecution after the joint investigation collapsed, concluded that Egypt’s national security agency orchestrated the kidnapping.

    The four defendants in the trial were General Tariq Sabir, Colonel Usham Helmi, Colonel Athar Kamel Mohamed Ibrahim, and Major Magdi Ibrahim Abdelal Sharif. Of the four, only General Sabir was acquitted, while the three colonels and major received their conviction and sentence on Monday.

    The road to this verdict has stretched on for years. The trial was initially scheduled to begin in 2021, but was delayed after prosecutors raised concerns that they had not been able to locate the defendants to formally serve charges. It was only in September 2023 that Italy’s Constitutional Court ruled the trial could proceed, clearing the final legal hurdle for the case to move forward.

    As the guilty verdict was read out in the Rome courtroom, Regeni’s family members and their supporters, many wearing the yellow t-shirts and badges that have become the symbol of their 10-year campaign for justice, stood in silence. Legal representatives for the family and Rome’s chief prosecutor both welcomed the outcome, framing the conviction as a landmark victory against impunity for abuses of power.

    “From today, people around the world can feel safer,” said Alessandra Ballerini, the lead lawyer for the Regeni family. “Impunity can be defeated and democracies can place limits on arbitrary power.”

    While extradition of the three convicted men to Italy to serve their sentences is widely considered unlikely, legal analysts and diplomatic observers note the conviction is almost certain to reignite long-simmering diplomatic tensions between Rome and Cairo, two countries with deep economic and political ties that have repeatedly been tested by the Regeni case over the past decade.

  • Infantino makes bigger cash pledge to Fifa members

    Infantino makes bigger cash pledge to Fifa members

    FIFA President Gianni Infantino has broken his silence following widespread backlash over his scrapped private investor proposal, breaking ranks to throw his support behind distributing a portion of FIFA’s £4.4 billion in cash reserves to the governing body’s 211 global member associations.

    The proposal comes after months of mounting pressure on Infantino, triggered by the abrupt collapse of his Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE) scheme, which would have sold stakes in the World Cup and other top FIFA competitions to private investors. The plan sparked immediate and fierce condemnation from football governing bodies across multiple continents, leading to its swift withdrawal and growing calls for Infantino’s resignation.

    In a confidential letter sent to FIFA’s six continental confederations on Monday and obtained by BBC Sport, Infantino stated he backs “the greatest level of additional funding that can responsibly be delivered” from the organization’s existing reserves. The president’s letter is a direct response to a joint demand from UEFA (European football’s governing body) and CONCACAF (the confederation representing North America, Central America and the Caribbean) calling for a $10 million (around £7.5 million) distribution to every FIFA member, to be drawn from FIFA’s current cash reserves.

    Infantino stopped short of endorsing a specific total in the letter, noting that “a single figure can begin the discussion, but it cannot complete a global policy.” He also reaffirmed his original justification for the withdrawn FFE scheme, arguing that the plan was designed to generate more revenue to invest back into global football development. “The recent commercial proposal, now withdrawn, was intended to enable FIFA to invest more in football,” Infantino wrote in the letter.

    Criticism of the FFE scheme has continued to grow in recent weeks. Debbie Hewitt, chair of the Football Association (FA) and a FIFA vice-president, earlier this month called on Infantino to release all internal documents related to the controversial plan and pushed for an independent third-party review of the aborted initiative.

    The distribution proposal will go before the FIFA Council for formal consideration when the governing body’s top decision-makers meet on October 15. Looking ahead, Infantino already confirmed he will stand for a fourth term as FIFA president in elections scheduled for March 2027. Potential challengers have until mid-November to declare their candidacy and secure the required backing to run against the incumbent, who was first elected to the role back in 2016.

  • French PM warns against escalation of school protests after 164 arrested

    French PM warns against escalation of school protests after 164 arrested

    A growing wave of student-led protests, centered on long-standing grievances within France’s secondary education system, has swept across multiple regions of the country, leaving dozens injured, triggering hundreds of arrests, and sparking a fierce political clash between government officials and opposition groups. What began last week as scattered school blockades in the Île-de-France region surrounding Paris has quickly expanded into a national movement, with lycées – the equivalent of U.S. high schools or UK sixth-form colleges – in southern Alpes-Maritimes, Var, Marseille, northern Lille and north-eastern Sedan all reporting disruptions this week.

    The core grievances driving the unrest are well-documented systemic failures: persistent teacher and staff shortages, overcrowded classrooms, crumbling school infrastructure, and widespread student anxiety over the competitive Parcoursup higher education admission platform. The Union Syndicale Lycéenne (USL), the main student union representing lycée students, has framed the blockades as a legitimate response to a decade of austerity policies under Emmanuel Macron that have gutted resource allocations for public education. The union has explicitly tied the current crisis to government budget cuts, and called for continued coordinated blockades on Tuesday to push for tangible reforms.

    The demonstrations have been amplified by a cross-sector national day of strike action the same day, with teacher, hospital worker and civil servant unions also walking off the job to protest low pay and poor working conditions, creating a broad front of public sector discontent against the Lecornu administration.

    Tensions boiled over on Monday, when widespread unrest left 27 people injured – 12 security force members, 12 students, and three school staff members – and led to the arrest of 164 people across the country. According to Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez, as many as 180 lycées have been impacted by the blockades and associated unrest. Nuñez has drawn sharp criticism from opposition groups for characterizing the unrest not as legitimate protest, but as organized urban violence. He claimed that many involved demonstrators were masked, armed with fireworks and projectiles, and sought out violent confrontation with police rather than pushing for policy change. “It wasn’t about making demands; it was really violence in its purest form,” Nuñez told reporters.

    Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu echoed this condemnation in a statement posted to the social platform X, saying that nothing could justify acts that endanger students, school staff, or law enforcement. “Fireworks, fires, violence near high schools: nothing justifies endangering students, staff, or police officers,” he wrote, adding that while the government is prepared to listen and address the legitimate challenges facing lycées, any further escalation of unrest would be irresponsible. “Violence must be condemned unequivocally, and its perpetrators must answer for their actions,” Lecornu added.

    The prime minister also accused far-left opposition party France Unbowed (LFI) of fanning the flames of unrest by urging students to expand the protest movement. LFI leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon pushed back hard against this accusation, blaming the Lecornu government for ordering a harsh crackdown on peaceful demonstrators and noting that the participating high school students were “harmless.” One particularly contentious incident, reported by French broadcaster BFMTV, saw a police officer fire a crowd-control grenade round that injured a teenage student, with official investigations now open into the event.

    The standoff highlights deep divisions over the state of France’s public education system, with student organizers warning that unrest will continue until the government addresses years of underfunding and systemic neglect that have left secondary students grappling with unworkable learning conditions.

  • Watch: RAF Fairford suspects are bailed, what happens now?

    Watch: RAF Fairford suspects are bailed, what happens now?

    In a developing update to a major counter-terrorism operation targeting a suspected plot linked to Royal Air Force Fairford, five UK nationals in their 20s who reside in London have been released on bail following their arrest late last week. The group was taken into custody last week under provisions of the Explosives Act, with additional suspicion of being involved in preparations to carry out a terrorist act, sending shockwaves through national security circles and raising fresh questions about domestic extremism risks in the United Kingdom.

    RAF Fairford, a key Royal Air Force base located in Gloucestershire, England, is a strategically critical installation that regularly hosts U.S. Air Force operations and large NATO military exercises. Its high-profile status makes it a potential target for malicious actors, prompting swift action from counter-terrorism policing when intelligence flagged potential suspicious activity in the area.

    Authorities confirmed that all five suspects remain under active investigation following their release on bail, which was granted by Thames Valley Police, the lead law enforcement agency handling the case. Bail conditions include strict requirements: suspects must surrender their passports, adhere to curfews, avoid contact with co-accused individuals, and stay away from RAF installations across the country. These measures are designed to eliminate any potential risk of further criminal activity while investigators sift through digital evidence, witness statements, and intelligence gathered during searches conducted after the arrests.

    Counter-terrorism policing officials have stated that the public was not considered to be in immediate danger at any point during the investigation, but they have urged communities to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity to authorities. The case highlights the ongoing work of UK security agencies to disrupt potential terror plots before they can cause harm, even as law enforcement navigates the legal process of building a strong prosecutorial case.

    Now that the suspects have been bailed, the investigation enters a critical evidence-gathering phase. Forensic teams are still analyzing materials seized during multiple searches of properties in London linked to the suspects, and detectives are following up on hundreds of lines of inquiry to confirm whether the alleged plot was fully planned, who else may be involved, and what the intended target was. Legal teams will review all evidence gathered to determine whether formal charges will be filed once the bail term concludes.

  • Stand-up comic set for release after being convicted of insulting Erdoğan

    Stand-up comic set for release after being convicted of insulting Erdoğan

    On Monday, supporters of Turkish comedian Deniz Göktaş assembled outside an Istanbul courthouse holding placards declaring “Deniz Göktaş not alone,” as a local court issued a highly anticipated verdict in a case that has drawn international attention to shrinking free speech protections in Turkey.

    The court found Göktaş, one of Turkey’s most popular stand-up performers, guilty of insulting President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, sentencing him to nearly 19 months in prison. However, the court ordered his immediate release from custody, accounting for the 88 days he has already spent behind bars. The ruling also imposed a permanent travel ban that bars Göktaş from leaving Turkey, and the case will now move to an appeals court for a final judicial decision.

    Göktaş has consistently denied the charges against him. The case stems from a viral stand-up routine posted to YouTube that has racked up more than 15 million views. Prosecutors took issue with a single line from the set where Göktaş described Erdoğan as “a shy dictator.” During the proceedings, the comedian pushed back against the characterization of his comment as an insult, arguing that “dictator is not an insult, it is a political characterisation” and that there was “no criminal element” to his remarks.

    Göktaş was first arrested in July at Istanbul airport as he returned from an overseas vacation, and he has been held in solitary confinement for nearly three months. Prosecutors had initially sought a sentence of up to 12 years in prison, making the Monday verdict a milder outcome than many observers expected. Remarkably, Göktaş retained his signature wit even after months in solitary. When addressing the court, he joked, “Three months have been taken away from my life. But I quit smoking, so I’ll add another three months to my life.” The quip drew laughter and loud applause from supporters packed inside the courtroom.

    Outside the courthouse, Göktaş’s supporters expressed cautious relief at the outcome. Firat Aksal, a fellow comedian and friend of Göktaş, shared that the community had gone into the trial with little expectation of a fair ruling. “We hardly know what to do with our happiness,” Aksal said. “We are thrilled. To be honest we weren’t hopeful of getting a fair trial.” According to Aksal, Göktaş plans to take a short break to reunite with his family before returning to the stage, with his release expected within hours of the ruling.

    Despite this partial win for Göktaş and his supporters, the broader crackdown on dissent in Turkey continues unabated. Human rights organizations have documented a sweeping wave of arrests targeting critics of the Erdoğan administration, and thousands of detainees remain behind bars. Those still in custody include dozens of journalists, human rights campaigners, student protesters, LGBTQ activists, and even Ekrem İmamoğlu, the popular elected mayor of Istanbul. Prisons across Turkey are currently operating over capacity as the government continues its campaign to suppress opposition voices.

  • People escape historic Kyiv building hit by Russian drone

    People escape historic Kyiv building hit by Russian drone

    A Russian drone attack has damaged a historic building in central Kyiv, forcing all people inside the structure to evacuate to safety, according to on-the-ground reporting from the BBC’s senior correspondent Paul Adams. The targeted site is Ukraine’s National Academy of Sciences, an institution deeply rooted in the country’s academic and cultural heritage that has stood in the Ukrainian capital for more than a century. Adams, who arrived at the strike location shortly after the incident, documented visible damage to the building’s facade, with broken glass scattered across surrounding sidewalks and debris littering nearby street areas. Local emergency services responded quickly, cordoning off the perimeter of the site to clear unexploded ordnance if needed and check for any trapped or injured individuals. As of the latest update from the scene, no fatalities have been confirmed, and all occupants who were inside the building at the time of the drone impact have successfully escaped the area. This latest strike comes as Russia has resumed a pattern of frequent long-range drone and missile attacks targeting Ukrainian infrastructure across multiple cities, just as Ukraine works to shore up its air defense capabilities with newly promised Western military support. The National Academy of Sciences, one of Kyiv’s most important academic institutions, has continued partial operations through much of the full-scale invasion, making this strike an example of how Russia’s campaign is increasingly targeting cultural and educational infrastructure across the country.

  • Seoul summons Ukraine envoy over North Korean prisoner-of-war row

    Seoul summons Ukraine envoy over North Korean prisoner-of-war row

    A major diplomatic rift has opened between Seoul and Kyiv after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly disclosed the transfer of two captured North Korean soldiers to South Korea during his address to the UN General Assembly, breaking what South Korean officials say was a agreed confidentiality arrangement.

    The two captured service members were part of a contingent of thousands of North Korean troops deployed to support Russia’s military operation in Ukraine starting in 2024. Ukrainian forces seized the pair in Russia’s Kursk Oblast in early 2025, and after more than 12 months of quiet negotiations between the two governments, the soldiers were transferred to Seoul last week. The soldiers had previously stated to media that they wished to resettle in South Korea.

    In response to Zelensky’s public announcement, South Korea summoned Ukraine’s acting ambassador Andrii Vieshkin, where Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoon-joo issued a formal complaint and registered “strong regret” over the unapproved disclosure. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung called the revelation “greatly disappointing”, noting that the transfer of the soldiers was a highly sensitive matter that directly impacts the country’s national security.

    A statement from President Lee’s office clarified multiple reasons for the required secrecy: first, the confidentiality was intended to protect the family members of the two North Korean soldiers still residing in North Korea; second, Ukraine had also shared an interest in keeping the transfer quiet, to avoid domestic criticism that it had forfeited a chance to swap the prisoners for Ukrainian captives held by Russia. The statement further added that while Seoul was aware Zelensky would reference the soldiers in his UN speech, the two sides had agreed he would not confirm the transfer had already been completed.

    The disagreement quickly escalated after Zelensky’s office issued a counterstatement denying any formal non-disclosure agreement had ever been reached between the two states. This prompted Seoul to demand an immediate apology from Kyiv for spreading what it calls a false claim, warning that the unilateral action has caused severe and lasting damage to bilateral trust between the two nations.

    The public disclosure has also created significant domestic political fallout for President Lee, who has faced intense criticism from South Korea’s opposition parties, which accuse him of attempting to cover up the transfer in a bid to appease the Pyongyang regime. Lee’s ruling party has long pursued a conciliatory policy toward North Korea, and his administration has made repeated efforts to restart inter-Korean peace talks, though those efforts have yet to yield any tangible progress.

    The diplomatic clash unfolds against a complex backdrop of competing regional and global security priorities for both nations. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, South Korea has maintained a position of public sympathy for Kyiv, but has stuck to its long-standing national policy of refusing to supply lethal weapons to countries involved in active conflict. That position has come under growing pressure from Ukraine after North Korea deployed troops to support Russia in 2024.

    Kyiv has repeatedly pushed Seoul to provide advanced anti-air missile systems to help defend critical Ukrainian energy infrastructure from relentless Russian drone and missile strikes. Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior advisor to President Zelensky, argued in comments that South Korea can no longer afford to stand on the sidelines now that North Korea is actively participating in a European conflict. “The transfer of defence technologies and capabilities from Seoul to Kyiv is not just about helping Ukraine; it is about South Korea protecting its own long-term security interests by containing the expansion of an aggressive totalitarian axis,” Podolyak said.

    In July of this year, Seoul announced a new $100 million aid package for Ukraine, which Lee’s office confirmed would expand previous non-lethal assistance shipments that have included helmets, body armor, and medical equipment. Russia, for its part, has issued explicit warnings to South Korea that if it agrees to supply lethal arms to Kyiv, Moscow will have “no choice but to retaliate”, though it has not yet specified what form that retaliation could take.

    South Korea has long worked to maintain constructive diplomatic and trade ties with major powers that oppose the United States, including Russia and China. Russia shares a border with North Korea, and Seoul has long viewed both Moscow and Beijing as critical partners in efforts to moderate Pyongyang’s behavior and advance regional stability. Ukraine’s foreign ministry has so far declined to issue any public comment on the dispute when approached by the BBC.

  • Families welcome guilty verdict over Mali crash that killed 116

    Families welcome guilty verdict over Mali crash that killed 116

    After more than 12 years of uncertainty and grief for hundreds of bereaved relatives, a Paris criminal court has issued a landmark ruling holding Spanish carrier Swiftair criminally responsible for one of the deadliest aviation disasters of the 2010s. The 2014 crash of Air Algérie flight AH5017, which claimed the lives of all 116 people on board, has finally resulted in a guilty verdict for involuntary manslaughter.

    The tragedy unfolded on July 24, 2014, when a McDonnell Douglas MD-83 aircraft — owned by Swiftair, leased to Air Algérie, and operated by a Swiftair crew — crashed in the arid plains of northern Mali while en route from Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso, to Algiers, Algeria’s main international hub. Eyewitness and meteorological reports confirmed the plane was flying through a severe thunderstorm when it went down, killing passengers and crew from 15 different countries: among the deceased were 54 French citizens, 23 Burkinabè nationals, dozens of Lebanese and Algerian passengers, and all six Spanish crew members.

    Years of investigation and legal wrangling uncovered the root causes of the disaster. The court concluded in its Monday ruling that systemic negligence in Swiftair’s crew training programs directly contributed to the fatal chain of errors during the flight. Investigators long established that the flight crew failed to activate the aircraft’s anti-icing system as it passed through stormy conditions, allowing dangerous ice crystals to build up on critical air pressure sensors. This blockage triggered an automatic, uncommanded reduction in engine power that left the plane uncontrollable, leading to the crash in the Sahel region south of the Sahara Desert.

    The trial itself only opened in Paris this past March, delayed by years of cross-border legal disputes and procedural hurdles. Spanish prosecutors had previously closed their own investigation into the disaster without filing any criminal charges against the airline or its staff, leaving French courts to take on the prosecution. Swiftair’s defense team has repeatedly rejected the findings of the French investigation, dismissing the entire case as “a botched job” in court arguments. Following Monday’s guilty verdict, the company now has 10 days to file an appeal against the ruling.

    The court handed down the maximum possible penalty permitted under French law: a €225,000 fine (equivalent to roughly $256,000 or £193,000). The court also ruled that Swiftair must cover all legal costs accrued by the prosecution and civil parties in the case, which legal representatives say will push total costs far above the base fine amount.

    For victim relatives, who have waited more than 12 years for a formal ruling holding a party accountable for the crash, the verdict has brought a long-sought sense of closure. Sandrine Tricot, a leading advocate for victim families who lost her husband Frederic in the crash, called the outcome a profound relief after what she counted as “4,449 days of waiting for the victims’ families.”

    Tricot, who heads the French National Federation for Victims of Terrorist Attacks and Collective Accidents — which joined the case as a civil party — spoke to reporters outside the Paris courthouse alongside other bereaved relatives. “The amount of money was never the end goal. We are relieved that justice has finally been delivered,” she said. “No amount of money could bring back our loved ones.” She added that coordinating with families across Algeria and Burkina Faso who also lost loved ones had been a long, difficult process, but she hoped the guilty verdict would bring all bereaved relatives a measure of peace. “The conviction is an important step towards recognising criminal responsibility for the disaster,” she noted.

    Nathalie Police, who lost both her 65-year-old father Didier and her 18-year-old half-brother Nicolas in the crash, attended every day of the four-week trial and stood alongside Tricot outside court, also praising the ruling. Sébastien Busy, the lead lawyer representing the vast majority of victim families, echoed that sentiment, calling the guilty verdict a long-overdue relief for all those affected by the tragedy.

  • Passports needed for ferry passengers travelling between UK and Ireland

    Passports needed for ferry passengers travelling between UK and Ireland

    Starting this Monday, all passengers traveling across ferry routes connecting the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland will face a new travel requirement: a valid passport must be presented before boarding, bringing an end to years of allowing alternative photo identification for cross-channel trips.

    Two of the region’s major ferry operators, Irish Ferries and Stena Line, have confirmed that the regulatory change applies to all major cross-route services between the two nations. For Irish Ferries, the new rule applies in both directions on its two busiest routes: Dublin to Holyhead, and Rosslare to Pembroke. Stena Line, meanwhile, has extended the mandatory passport requirement to all passengers departing from or arriving at its four terminals in Dublin, Holyhead, Fishguard and Rosslare.

    Prior to this update, passengers crossing the Irish Sea were permitted to use a range of alternative official photo identification, including national identity cards and UK or Irish driving licences. Both operators have confirmed that these alternative documents will no longer be accepted on the affected routes starting Monday. The shift in policy is not a voluntary decision by the ferry companies, but a mandatory adjustment to bring operations in line with updated regulations issued by UK Border Force.

    In an official notice published on its website, Stena Line explained that the new pre-boarding passport check requirement is designed to satisfy UK Border Force’s new standards for the accuracy and integrity of passenger identity data collected before departure. Irish Ferries echoed that the mandatory passport rule applies to all passengers, regardless of whether they hold Irish or British citizenship.

    Beyond the new passport requirement, Irish Ferries has also issued an additional reminder for international travelers: non-British and non-Irish citizens planning a short stay of up to six months in the United Kingdom may need to apply for and obtain an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) prior to travel. This digital entry permit grants approval for travel to the UK, as well as the Crown Dependencies of Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man, for stays of up to six months. Notably, both ferry operators confirmed that passport cards, the wallet-sized alternative to full passport booklets offered by some national governments, will still be accepted for travel under the new rules.