标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Fury in France after child murder suspect’s criminal record released

    Fury in France after child murder suspect’s criminal record released

    A wave of outrage has swept across France following the confirmed murder of 11-year-old Lyhanna, a tragedy that has exposed catastrophic gaps in the country’s justice system after revelations that the primary suspect had long been flagged as a danger to children.

    Lyhanna went missing shortly after leaving her school in the rural Gers region of southwestern France one week ago. On Thursday, search teams located a body on agricultural land near the small town of Fleurance, which authorities have confirmed is that of the missing girl, concluding a days-long large-scale search operation that mobilized hundreds of local officials and volunteers.

    The main suspect in the case, 41-year-old Jérome B. — father of one of Lyhanna’s classmates — has been held in police custody since Monday. Two independent witnesses have placed the girl in his vehicle on the same afternoon she disappeared, linking him directly to her abduction.

    As the community grapples with shock and collective grief, the case has rapidly escalated into a major national political scandal after official disclosures laid bare Jérome B.’s long history of red flags for child harm that were never acted on by authorities. Over recent years, he has been named as a person of interest in four separate incidents involving underage girls. Two of these investigations were closed prematurely due to insufficient evidence, while Jérome B. was ultimately fired from his position as a maintenance worker at a local secondary school for documented inappropriate behavior toward a teenage student.

    It is the fourth, unresolved complaint, however, that has triggered national fury. Last August, the mother of 10-year-old Rosa filed a formal police report alleging that Jérome B. had raped her daughter on multiple occasions. Medical examinations later confirmed the child’s account of abuse, yet in the nine months between the filing of the complaint and Lyhanna’s murder, investigators never once called Jérome B. in for questioning.

    France’s judicial system has long been criticized for crippling bureaucratic delays, and in this case, administrative backlogs were compounded by a confusing transfer of the case between two separate legal jurisdictions. What has most appalled the French public, however, is that multiple clear warning signs about Jérome B. were ignored entirely. Authorities prioritized rigid procedural adherence over removing a known potential threat from contact with children, systemic failures that directly led to Lyhanna’s death.

    With France’s presidential election less than 12 months away, political figures across the ideological spectrum have seized on the tragedy to condemn the current government’s handling of public safety and judicial reform. Jordan Bardella, president of the far-right National Rally party, wrote on social media platform X that “the French people demand a reckoning. This terrible tragedy could have been avoided if the justice system were not so dysfunctional.”

    Bruno Retailleau, a senior leader of the center-right Les Républicains party, echoed the criticism, saying, “Our justice system is a failure, it should be totally reformed. A society that is incapable of protecting its own children is a society which will one day start turning against itself.”

    On the left, Marine Tondelier, head of the French Ecologists party, framed the killing as a “symbol of a politico-judicial system incapable of handling the issue of sexist and sexual violence.”

    Incumbent President Emmanuel Macron has publicly acknowledged the systemic failures that led to the killing, admitting that “it is clear” that there were unforgivable missteps. “It is unacceptable. We cannot look Lyhanna’s family in the face and say this was properly handled,” Macron said.

    Justice Minister Gerald Darmanin also acknowledged the gravity of the failures, saying he was “terrified” by what the investigation has uncovered. “It is fair to ask why a man who was so obviously the object of suspicions was not kept away from youngsters… Why did no-one act, even though for months there had been complaints against him?” Darmanin told reporters.

    Prime Minister Gabriel Attal has formally ordered a full audit of the case, with investigators required to submit a full public report outlining all procedural failures within 15 days.

  • A maritime drone explodes at a Romanian Black Sea port, no one hurt

    A maritime drone explodes at a Romanian Black Sea port, no one hurt

    On a Friday morning in early 2024, a stray uncrewed maritime drone linked to the ongoing war in neighboring Ukraine exploded at Romania’s pivotal Black Sea port of Constanta, marking the third major security incident to strike the NATO member in less than a month and triggering widespread emergency precautions across the country’s eastern coastline. Romania’s Ministry of National Defense confirmed in an official statement that the drone self-detonated at approximately 10:30 a.m. local time, adding that the craft was not part of the Romanian military’s arsenal and had no connection to recent military drills conducted in the Black Sea region. In the immediate aftermath of the blast, Romanian intelligence services, coast guard units and defense personnel moved quickly to secure and cordon off the affected area, and a full evacuation of the site was completed without any reports of injuries or loss of life. This latest incident comes just one week after a Russian attack drone, launched as part of a massive air assault on Ukrainian infrastructure, veered off course and slammed into an apartment building in Galati, a Danube port city in eastern Romania, leaving two people injured. As a NATO member with a direct border with war-torn Ukraine, Romania has faced a growing stream of stray military ordnance and drone incursions linked to the full-scale Russian invasion launched in February 2022, with incidents involving both Russian and Ukrainian uncrewed vessels and aircraft documented in recent months. Just two days prior to the Constanta explosion, Romanian military assets destroyed a separate stray maritime drone in international waters of the Black Sea. Since the outbreak of the war, the Romanian navy has successfully neutralized nine of the 156 drifting sea mines that have drifted into the Black Sea basin adjacent to Romanian territory, according to defense ministry data. In the wake of Friday’s detonation, emergency officials moved rapidly to secure broader coastal areas. Raed Arafat, head of Romania’s Department for Emergency Situations, told reporters that military helicopters were deployed to conduct sweeping searches for additional stray drones, and national emergency alert text messages were sent directly to residents across the affected region. “There is a possibility that there may be other drones,” Arafat told reporters, emphasizing that the sweeping measures were proactive rather than reactive. “We are not panicking. These are preventive measures. If there are other drones, we want to make sure there is not another explosion in an area where people are not evacuated.” By the end of the day, authorities confirmed that more than 1,300 people had been evacuated from multiple popular Black Sea beach resorts, and all main access routes leading to the coastal areas were temporarily blocked to keep civilians out of harm’s way. Romanian President Nicusor Dan praised the rapid, proactive response from law enforcement and national security agencies, noting that officials had acted before the detonation to mitigate risk. “With a military conflict on the border, it is obvious that the security environment we are in is a sensitive one, which is why we will maintain a high level of vigilance,” Dan said, adding that Friday’s incident was an unavoidable “direct consequence of the war of aggression unleashed by Russia against Ukraine.” The president stressed that the government’s top priority remains protecting civilian lives and critical port infrastructure, which serves as a key logistical hub for Ukrainian grain exports amid the ongoing blockade of Ukrainian Black Sea ports. The international community quickly moved to express solidarity with Romania following the incident. French President Emmanuel Macron issued a public statement of support Friday, reaffirming France’s commitment to defending NATO member territory. “We will do whatever your authorities consider as a necessity in order to protect the sovereignty of the land and the air,” Macron said. “You can count on us.” European Council President António Costa also issued a formal statement of solidarity, noting that the European Union stands firmly behind Romania in the face of repeated security incursions. “The EU condemns the repeated violations of airspace of Member States and reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the security of all Member States,” Costa wrote in a social media post Friday. “This is the third significant security incident in Romania in recent weeks. These incidents are a direct consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.” The report was filed by Courtney McGrath from Leamington Spa, England, with additional contributions from Sam McNeil based in Brussels.

  • Former Prince Andrew made money subletting cottages on his rent-free estate, report shows

    Former Prince Andrew made money subletting cottages on his rent-free estate, report shows

    LONDON — A newly released report from the United Kingdom’s public spending oversight body has pulled back the curtain on questionable property arrangements within Britain’s royal family, shining a light on undisclosed subletting income earned by former Prince Andrew and subsidized housing for his daughters covered by King Charles III.

    The National Audit Office (NAO) published its long-awaited audit of royal family property holdings Friday, uncovering that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor generated private income by subletting three standalone cottages on the grounds of Royal Lodge, his former residence near Windsor Castle. For more than two decades, Andrew occupied the sprawling 30-room mansion and eight on-site cottages without paying regular market rent; a 2003 lease agreement locked him into only a nominal “peppercorn rent” arrangement, which granted him explicit permission to sublet three of the properties.

    Notably, the NAO report did not disclose the total amount of income Andrew earned from these sublets — an omission that has sparked sharp criticism from parliamentary figures. Margaret Hodge, a Labour Party member of the House of Lords and former chair of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee, called the lack of clarity deeply troubling. “It’s shocking that the National Audit Office was not able to establish how much money Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor secured from the properties he let,” Hodge stated.

    The independent audit was launched at the formal request of British lawmakers following a cascade of controversy surrounding Andrew’s ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which ultimately led to the former prince being stripped of all honorary royal titles and evicted from Royal Lodge by his brother, King Charles III. Andrew relocated to a smaller property on the king’s Sandringham Estate in eastern England earlier this year. The 66-year-old was arrested and questioned by police in February over allegations of misconduct in public office, though he has repeatedly denied all wrongdoing and no formal charges have been filed against him to date.

    Beyond Andrew’s arrangements, the report also detailed housing arrangements for other members of the royal family, confirming that 11 working royals receive free palace accommodation in exchange for carrying out official public duties. This group includes King Charles III, Queen Camilla, Prince William, Princess Catherine, Prince Edward and Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh. Unlike working royals, Prince William and Princess Catherine pay an annual rent of £307,200 (approximately $413,000) for their private family home near Windsor.

    The report also confirmed that Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie — who are not classified as working royals and hold private sector employment — currently occupy heavily subsidized royal properties, with their rent covered entirely by the Privy Purse, King Charles III’s personal financial fund. Eugenie’s cottage at Kensington Palace and Beatrice’s apartment at St. James’s Palace are subject to rent caps that set their annual payments at just 50% to 68% of full open-market value in recent years.

    Buckingham Palace defended the release of the report, framing it as a reflection of the royal household’s commitment to greater public transparency. A spokesperson noted, “this report is in line with the royal household’s commitment to transparency. We hope that the findings will help correct, clarify or contextualize a number of points regarding royal properties.”

    But critics of the monarchy have seized on the report’s findings as evidence that the royal institution fails to contribute fairly to public finances, with arrangements that prioritize royal privilege at the expense of British taxpayers. Norman Baker, a former Liberal Democrat lawmaker and longstanding critic of royal financial practices, called the arrangements a blatant display of disregard for the public. “It shows an absolute total contempt for the taxpayer, not only that Andrew was able to have a peppercorn rent for a gigantic property, but then to make potentially millions on the side from subletting properties,” Baker said.

    Andrew’s connection to Epstein remains under active investigation by British law enforcement. In January, the U.S. Department of Justice released millions of pages of court documents tied to the Epstein case, which detailed how the disgraced financier leveraged his network of wealthy and powerful friends, including Andrew, to build influence while sexually exploiting underage girls and young women. British detectives are currently investigating claims that Andrew shared confidential trade information with Epstein during his tenure as the U.K.’s trade envoy from 2001 to 2011, and authorities have confirmed they are considering expanding the probe to include allegations of sexual misconduct, issuing a renewed public call for witnesses to come forward.

    Andrew has largely stayed out of the public eye since relocating to Sandringham, approximately 160 kilometers north of London. He was photographed in a private car Thursday, with a large visible bruise on his face. The Times of London, citing anonymous sources, reported that the bruise stemmed from a nonserious medical condition.

  • Balkan leaders attend EU summit in Montenegro as enlargement gains urgency

    Balkan leaders attend EU summit in Montenegro as enlargement gains urgency

    On Friday, political leaders from across the European Union and the Western Balkans assembled in the coastal Adriatic town of Tivat, Montenegro, for a landmark summit focused on expanding the EU’s footprint into the region — a move framed as a critical geostrategic step to counter mounting security and economic threats from Russia and China.

    The high-level gathering draws top European figures, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and the heads of government of all Western Balkan EU candidate states. At the top of the summit’s priority list is Montenegro’s accession process: the EU has already assembled a working group to draft the country’s official accession treaty, a clear indication that full membership is now within tangible reach.

    The push for EU enlargement has gained new urgency in recent years, as the continent confronts a cascade of interconnected challenges: imbalanced trade relations with China, sustained migration pressures, the ongoing war in Ukraine, and escalating hybrid interference from Moscow. For years, the EU has tied Western Balkan accession progress to domestic reforms, including cracking down on systemic corruption and strengthening democratic institutions — changes that leaders argue will benefit both candidate nations and the entire bloc.

    Compounding this urgency is shifting transatlantic security dynamics: as questions grow over the United States’ long-term commitment to NATO collective defense amid multiple ongoing conflicts across the globe, EU member states are moving aggressively to build up independent military capabilities and shore up the bloc’s eastern and southeastern flank.

    European Council President Antonio Costa, the summit’s host, has spent the past week touring Western Balkan capitals to underscore the EU’s renewed commitment to enlargement. Speaking in Belgrade Thursday after a meeting with Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic, Costa announced the bloc would explore streamlined pathways to accelerate membership negotiations for all regional candidates. In an era of “global geopolitical uncertainty and economic instability,” Costa argued, enlargement is “not just an opportunity. It is a geostrategic necessity for Europe.”

    Montenegro, a small mountainous nation that split from Yugoslavia and marked the 20th anniversary of its full independence from a state union with Serbia just this week, stands as the clear front-runner for membership among the Western Balkan candidate pool, which also includes Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Serbia. After joining NATO in 2017, the country of just 623,000 people has set an ambitious target of becoming the EU’s 28th member by 2028 — a goal so widely embraced that the national airline has inscribed the motto “28 by 28” on one of its commercial aircraft.

    Under EU accession rules, candidate countries must align their national legislation with 35 distinct policy areas, or “chapters,” covering everything from judicial standards to agricultural and fisheries regulations. Every chapter requires unanimous approval from all 27 existing EU member states to open, and again to close before accession can be finalized. Montenegro is far ahead of other regional candidates in completing this process. Beyond the Western Balkans, Ukraine and Moldova are also advancing their own accession bids, and Iceland will hold a public referendum in August on whether to submit an EU membership application.

    To avoid past missteps as it brings new countries into the bloc, the summit is expected to produce new accountability safeguards for incoming members. Faruk Bašić, a senior researcher at the Brussels Institute for Geopolitics, noted the gathering comes just weeks after Viktor Orbán — Hungary’s long-serving Russia-friendly former prime minister, who spent 16 years eroding democratic norms, flouting EU rules and building ties with global autocrats — suffered a stunning electoral defeat. The Orbán era has left the EU determined to prevent similar democratic backsliding among new members, Bašić explained.

    In response to the challenges created by Orbán’s rule and his frequent use of veto power to block EU action, the bloc is developing new enforcement mechanisms: financial penalties and restricted access to the EU single market will be used to pressure incoming nations to follow through on required reforms and adhere to bloc standards. “The EU is trying to find a way how to admit a country that isn’t fully ready to be admitted without losing the ability to hold it accountable after the fact,” Bašić said, noting this framework applies to Ukraine’s accession bid as well as candidates across the Western Balkans such as Serbia and Kosovo.

  • UK in most dangerous period I’ve known, military chief says

    UK in most dangerous period I’ve known, military chief says

    The United Kingdom now faces graver security risks and threats than at any point since the Cold War, according to the nation’s top military leader. In a candid interview with BBC Radio 4’s flagship current affairs program Today, Chief of the Defence Staff Sir Richard Knighton starkly framed the current moment as the most perilous he has witnessed in his entire professional career.

    A key indicator of this mounting tension, Knighton revealed, is the sharp spike in incursions by Russian strategic aircraft into United Kingdom airspace. In just the first five months of this year, the number of such incursions has already matched the total count recorded across the entire 12 months of 2025. This sustained pattern of aggressive probing has left the military chief warning that Russia is steadily raising the stakes, with a growing risk of accidentally crossing a red line that could trigger far more serious escalation.

    Looking back at the 2025 Strategic Defence Review, Knighton described the policy document as a clear “call to arms” for British national security. He noted that for decades, the UK armed forces structured their training and readiness around short, contained conflicts. But that framework is no longer fit for purpose, he argued: today, the UK must prepare for prolonged, large-scale conflicts of the type seen in Ukraine.

    Knighton’s comments arrive ahead of the long-delayed publication of the UK’s upcoming Defence Investment Plan, which is expected to be released in the coming weeks. The plan, which will lay out funding allocations for new military equipment and defense infrastructure across the next 10 years, was originally scheduled to be published in autumn 2025. This week, Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed that Prime Minister Keir Starmer is committed to releasing the plan before the key Nato summit scheduled for July 7.

    Responding to recent criticism from former defence secretary Lord Robertson, who warned that UK military capabilities have been severely diminished, Knighton expressed confidence that the current government recognizes the scope of existing threats and is moving to increase defence spending. “Exactly as the prime minister says, we need to spend more on defence and do it faster,” Knighton stated, adding that the core challenge for ministers remains making the tough trade-off decisions required to free up necessary resources.

    The military chief also emphasized the urgent need to adapt to the changing nature of modern warfare. He highlighted that uncrewed drones and autonomous weapons systems will grow increasingly central to future military operations, requiring UK forces to update their equipment and strategy accordingly.

    Beyond traditional airspace incursions, Knighton pointed out that Russia is probing the UK on multiple fronts, including through cyberattacks, sabotage operations, and assassination attempts on UK soil. “Russia is definitely raising the stakes and risks crossing a line,” he reiterated, stressing that the British public must understand the gravity of the current situation and accept that this may require shifting national priorities and making different policy choices.

  • Pope Leo’s visiting Europe’s migration hot spots. Catholics hope he’ll ease political tensions

    Pope Leo’s visiting Europe’s migration hot spots. Catholics hope he’ll ease political tensions

    Early in his papacy, Pope Leo XIV is stepping into one of Europe’s most polarizing policy debates by planning back-to-back visits to two frontline migration hubs: Spain’s Atlantic Canary Islands next month, followed by Italy’s Mediterranean island of Lampedusa in early July. For years, these small, remote European outposts have borne the brunt of massive migration flows, with tens of thousands of mostly African migrants crossing one of the world’s deadliest migration routes to reach European shores. While overall arrival numbers have dropped this year, particularly in the Canaries, the issue continues to upend domestic politics in both Spain and Italy, two historically Catholic nations grappling with deep ideological divides over migration policy.

    Many faith leaders, aid workers and even the migrants themselves hope the papal visits will shift public conversation away from partisan fighting that has split right-wing factions and pitted them against progressive parties, and refocus the debate on human solidarity and compassionate support for new arrivals. “Stuck in the middle are the migrants,” explained Most Rev. José Mazuelos, bishop of the Canarias diocese that covers multiple islands in the archipelago. “So the church says, ‘Let’s give them a face, because we’re talking about people, not numbers.’”

    One such person is Eslim Jallow, a 27-year-old migrant who left Gambia with his younger brother in 2023, chasing the promise of a more stable, prosperous future before landing in the Canaries. After an initial difficult period of adaptation, Jallow mastered Spanish, completed professional coursework and now works full-time as a programmer and web developer based in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. “Perhaps the pope will change the way in which people here look at immigrants,” Jallow said. “Immigrants should be treated with dignity and respect, not ignored.” Though Jallow is not Catholic, like the majority of migrants arriving in the islands, he says he believes Pope Leo will amplify the voices of migrants and remind the global community that they are people first, not political talking points.

    Advocacy for just and humane migration policy has long been a core priority for the Catholic Church, dating back to the papacy of Pope Francis. Just one year into his tenure, Pope Francis made his first pastoral trip outside of Rome to Lampedusa in 2013 to honor migrants who died at sea, and three years later brought 12 Syrian Muslim refugees back to Vatican City with him from a visit to Lesbos, Greece. Pope Leo has carried on this legacy, repeatedly calling for dignified treatment of migrants across the globe – most notably decrying mass deportation policies in his home country, the United States.

    Michele Pistone, a Villanova University professor who leads the institution’s new research center on migration, notes that staging these two visits so early in Pope Leo’s papacy sends a clear signal about how high of a priority migration is for the new pontiff. During his June 11 stop in the Canaries, Pope Leo will first visit the port of Arguineguín on Gran Canaria to hold a memorial for thousands of migrants who have died or gone missing while crossing the Atlantic. The following day, he will meet with migrants staying at a reception camp on Tenerife.

    In 2024 alone, the Canary Islands emerged as the epicenter of a major humanitarian crisis, with nearly 47,000 migrants from North and West Africa arriving on its shores, including thousands of unaccompanied minor migrants. Most Rev. Eloy Santiago, bishop of Tenerife whose diocese covers the small island of El Hierro, explained that half of all 2024 arrivals landed on El Hierro – a number nearly triple the island’s permanent resident population. Even though most migrants only stay for a few days before being transferred elsewhere, the influx pushed the island’s already limited public resources to a breaking point. “If a boat arrives, the couple of local doctors have to go out running to take care of them, and then the local residents who had their medical appointments can’t have them,” Santiago said.

    Catholic organizations and charities have been on the ground aiding migrants from the moment they step off the overcrowded, unseaworthy boats that carry them across the ocean. While stricter coastal controls along the African coast have cut arrival numbers dramatically this year, a long-term, unresolved challenge remains: supporting unaccompanied minor migrants who, after being placed in state care, are forced out into the streets with no job prospects or social support once they turn 18.

    For Jallow, this challenge hits close to home: his younger brother, who was paralyzed from the neck down in an accident shortly after arriving in the Canaries and currently lives in a Catholic hospital in Las Palmas, will turn 18 next year, and Jallow says he fears what will happen to him after that. Caya Suárez, secretary general for Caritas, the Catholic charity operating in the Canaries, has seen firsthand how this coming-of-age transition leaves young migrants disproportionately vulnerable. “That’s a very bad moment, even though they’d been waiting for it with hope, because they see they are still stuck without alternatives,” she explained. Caritas works to connect these young adults with housing and employment opportunities, and has even relocated a small number to mainland Spain, including Madrid and small rural communities in Galicia, even as many regional governments have refused to accept additional underage migrants.

    Many long-term Canary Islands residents report feeling abandoned by national and European institutions, left to manage a crisis they did not create as they struggle to stretch already limited resources to support new arrivals. Migrants themselves often come to the islands believing they will soon be able to travel to mainland Europe to build new lives, only to find themselves stuck on the outer edge of the EU, struggling to make ends meet, send money home to their families, or move onward. Compounded by the widespread perception that national and EU policymakers frame this as an “island problem” that local authorities must solve alone, the ongoing strain has eroded morale even among long-time island residents who are historically accustomed to migration flows between the Canaries and Latin America. Bishops across the islands say they hope the pope’s visit will renew energy for local residents who have poured years into supporting migrants. “The pope’s word can help so that in the middle of this fatigue, people can buck up again because they see they are supported,” said Santiago, who was born and ordained as a priest on the islands.

    At the national level, Spain’s Catholic Church has publicly thrown its support behind a new government measure that would grant temporary residency permits to more than half a million undocumented migrants currently living and working in the country, many of whom come from Latin America. The socialist government of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and the church both note that these undocumented migrants often fill critical labor gaps in hospitality, agriculture and elder care, boosting Spain’s overall economy.

    Pablo Simón, a political science professor at Madrid’s University Carlos III, explains that the church’s pro-migration stance has put it in direct opposition to Spain’s right-wing and far-right political parties. This has created an open rift between the Catholic Church and far-right groups such as Vox, which often frames its anti-migration rhetoric in religious language but has repeatedly criticized the church’s welcoming stance. The Rev. Fernando Redondo, who leads the migration department of the Spanish bishops’ conference, says the church’s position follows the core Christian mandate to welcome strangers, but acknowledges that the church faces an uphill battle changing perspectives among many faithful who believe migrants take native jobs and rely on public welfare. “We have a big challenge, which is raising awareness among our faithful … that from the viewpoint of faith, to welcome a migrant person is to welcome Christ himself,” Redondo said. “Then, of course, there needs to be ways, proper social and political ways, so that migration doesn’t become a total mess.”

    Across the Canaries, ordinary residents have long been on the front lines of the crisis: local fishermen who hand out fresh water to migrants on flimsy rafts, vacationing sunbathers who run into the surf to help migrants who have reached shore, and volunteers who greet new arrivals in more than a dozen languages. Residents have also seen successful integration in action: one small, depopulating mountain village saw its population, local economy and school revitalized after a reception center for 36 migrant children opened there, even reviving participation in the local church’s annual feast procession.

    It is for this reason that many on the islands are hoping Pope Leo will bring a simple, deeply needed message of reconciliation that centers the human experience of migration rather than partisan politics. “The pope doesn’t support this slogan of ‘let’s go, open doors for the whole world here.’ Nobody supports that,” Mazuelos said. “When here comes a gentleman in a wooden boat after five days in the Atlantic, what are we supposed to do, kick him back? We’ve got to find a way to welcome him.”

    This reporting was contributed by Dell’Orto from Minneapolis, and is part of Associated Press religion coverage supported through a collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP holds sole responsibility for the content of this report.

  • France stunned by Ivory Coast in World Cup warmup, Spain held by Iraq

    France stunned by Ivory Coast in World Cup warmup, Spain held by Iraq

    In a stunning pre-World Cup friendly upset held on Thursday at Nantes’ Stade de la Beaujoire, Ivory Coast secured a 2-1 victory over host nation France, with the match delivering a special personal twist for Ivory Coast’s standout performer Guéla Doué, whose own brother Désiré Doué sat on France’s substitutes bench.

    The first half looked to be heading France’s way, as promising young attacker Rayan Cherki broke through two Ivory Coast defenders in stoppage time before slotting a low shot past Ivorian goalkeeper Yahia Fofana to put Les Bleus up 1-0 going into the break. Fofana was put under consistent pressure throughout the 90 minutes, pulling off critical saves to deny star forward Kylian Mbappé, Michael Olise, and a second effort from Cherki that would have doubled France’s lead.

    Ivory Coast turned the tide early in the second half. Eight minutes after the restart, Nicolas Pépé played a perfectly timed through ball to Guéla Doué, who converted the chance to level the score at 1-1. With six minutes remaining on the clock, the 22-year-old winger set up the match-winning goal: his low cross from the right flank found Amad Diallo, who fired home to secure the unexpected win for the African side.

    France head coach Didier Deschamps opted to leave all six of his players who featured in the recent 2024 UEFA Champions League final – Ousmane Dembélé, Bradley Barcola, Warren Zaïre-Emery, Désiré Doué, Lucas Hernandez and William Saliba – on the bench for the fixture. He did bring on Hernandez, Zaïre-Emery and Barcola as second-half substitutes as he looked to change the game. The match also marked a rare public show of appreciation for Deschamps, whose tenure as France manager, which began in 2012 and includes a 2018 FIFA World Cup title and a 2022 World Cup final appearance, will end following this summer’s tournament. Many fans in attendance held up posters displaying Deschamps’ image to thank him for his years of successful leadership.

    In a separate pre-World Cup warm-up fixture on the same day, another tournament favorite Spain was held to a 1-1 draw at home against Iraq in La Coruña. La Roja, missing key young forwards Lamine Yamal and Nico Williams through injury, took an early lead through Ferran Torres, who found the back of the net in the 16th minute. But Iraq equalized before the 30-minute mark, when Merchas Doski hit a powerful left-footed strike from just outside the penalty area that beat Spain goalkeeper Joan Garcia.

    Spanish manager Luis de la Fuente confirmed after the match that he expects Lamine Yamal to regain full fitness in time for Spain’s opening World Cup group match against Cape Verde, scheduled for June 15 in Atlanta. Like Deschamps, de la Fuente rested all players who took part in the recent Champions League final – David Raya, Martin Zubimendi and Fabián Ruiz – while recently injured midfielder Mikel Merino made an appearance as a second-half substitute.

    Following Thursday’s fixtures, both European sides have one final warm-up match scheduled before traveling to the United States for the World Cup. France will face Northern Ireland in Lille on Monday, while Spain will take on Peru in Mexico the same day. For their opening group matches, Ivory Coast kicks off its World Cup campaign against Ecuador in Philadelphia on June 14, with Spain facing Cape Verde a day later in Atlanta. France opens its title bid against Senegal on June 16 in New Jersey, while Iraq meets Norway on the same day in Massachusetts.

  • Ferry search leads to €2.9m drugs seizure

    Ferry search leads to €2.9m drugs seizure

    In a major breakthrough against cross-border drug trafficking, Irish law enforcement and revenue officials have seized a massive shipment of illegal cannabis worth an estimated €2.9 million (£2.5 million) at a key southern Irish port. The bust unfolded Thursday at Rosslare Europort, located in County Wexford, after the contraband arrived aboard a cross-Channel ferry originating from Dunkirk, France.

    Officers from the Irish Revenue Commissioners stopped the sealed freight unit for inspection as part of ongoing anti-smuggling work. A mobile X-ray scanning device picked up anomalies hidden within the unit’s legitimate cargo, leading to the recovery of approximately 145 kilograms of suspected herbal cannabis and an additional 7.9 kilograms of compressed cannabis resin.

    The operation, which grew out of routine intelligence-led profiling of incoming freight, has resulted in the arrest of a man in his 20s, who remains in police custody at an Irish station as investigations continue. An Garda Síochána, Ireland’s national police service, confirmed the details of the seizure in an official statement following the bust.

    Authorities emphasized that the large-scale seizure is part of a sustained, coordinated campaign targeting transnational organized criminal networks that profit from the illegal importation, distribution, and sale of controlled substances across Ireland. Officials have published an official photograph of the seized drug haul to highlight the scale of the operation, part of ongoing efforts to disrupt illegal drug supply chains before they reach domestic communities.

  • Zelensky proposes face-to-face talks in open letter to Putin

    Zelensky proposes face-to-face talks in open letter to Putin

    More than three years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has made a new public push for direct negotiations with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, issuing an 1,800-word open letter calling for an immediate, full ceasefire during talks and a face-to-face meeting hosted by a neutral third country such as Switzerland or Turkey.

    In the letter, Zelensky argues that waiting for the United States to shift its foreign policy focus back to Eastern Europe — amid Washington’s current preoccupation with the Iran conflict — is a reckless mistake that costs unnecessary lives. He emphasized that a lasting peace can only be forged through direct dialogue between Kyiv and Moscow, rather than through delayed, third-party mediated talks that have repeatedly collapsed over the past months. Previous negotiation rounds hosted in Geneva, Abu Dhabi and Istanbul have ended without progress, and ceasefire talks have been stalled since the outbreak of hostilities in Iran.

    Addressing Putin directly, Zelensky acknowledged that after the widespread destruction Russia’s invasion has brought to Ukraine, he has little sympathy for the hardships facing Russian troops. But he stressed that every Ukrainian death inflicted by the ongoing conflict is a devastating loss for his country, and noted that ordinary Russian citizens are already grappling with the burdens of war: repeated Ukrainian drone and missile strikes, growing fuel shortages, and spiking domestic prices. “Do not be afraid to take the path out of this war. That is the main thing that is required of you now,” Zelensky implored.

    The letter landed on the same day that Putin was addressing international journalists on the sidelines of the major annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. A day before the forum, Kyiv launched a drone strike on the outskirts of St. Petersburg, which Zelensky referenced in the letter as a symbolic “visit” to the Russian leader. Separate attacks the same day in Russian-occupied Crimea left four people dead, according to Russian-backed local authorities, who blamed Kyiv for the strike. Ukraine confirmed it targeted a key fuel depot in the regional capital Simferopol.

    The Kremlin confirmed Thursday that it had received Zelensky’s letter and that Putin would receive a full briefing on its contents. Speaking to reporters before the letter’s contents were formally delivered to him, Putin said he remained “certainly prepared and willing to reach an agreement with Ukraine,” but added that any deal would require significant compromises from both sides. The Russian leader immediately cast doubt on the prospects of a meeting, however, questioning whether Zelensky qualifies as a legitimate representative of Ukraine, a matter he said required further legal analysis. Putin also reaffirmed Russia’s long-stated goal of seizing full control of the Donbas region, suggesting the European Union could pressure Kyiv to concede the territory as part of any peace deal. In his letter, Zelensky pushed back directly on this claim, telling Putin “You will not capture” the Donetsk region, a core part of the Donbas.

    The proposal quickly drew a response from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who praised the move toward talks. “I think it would be great if they met. They should. Get it done,” Trump told reporters Thursday, adding that he believed U.S. mediation had been instrumental in creating an opening for direct dialogue. When asked what compromises each side would need to make to reach a deal, Trump declined to share specifics but said he expected both parties would make the necessary concessions to end the fighting. Earlier Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov attempted to frame the conflict through a U.S. political lens, claiming that “Biden’s war has become Trump’s war” and noting that Washington’s policy on Ukraine remains aligned with its European NATO allies.

    Prior to Zelensky’s proposal, Putin had already ruled out a full ceasefire during any negotiation period, creating an immediate sticking point for the new peace push. The conflict, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, has killed hundreds of thousands of people on both sides and left large swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine in ruins.

  • Ireland facing EU court case over peat extraction

    Ireland facing EU court case over peat extraction

    ### European Commission Initiates Legal Action Against Ireland at Court of Justice Over Peat Extraction Regulation Failures

    The European Commission has announced it is referring the Republic of Ireland to the European Court of Justice, the bloc’s highest judicial body, over persistent claims that Irish authorities have failed to fully enforce strict EU environmental regulations governing commercial peat extraction. This latest development comes years after Ireland implemented a national ban on the sale of peat for fuel use over widespread environmental concerns, but the practice of commercial mining for horticultural compost production remains active.

    While the EC has openly acknowledged that Ireland has taken “significant action” to curb large-scale peat cutting, most notably reining in operations by the state-owned extraction firm Bord Na Móna over the past six years, it argues that regulatory and enforcement gaps remain for smaller extraction sites covering less than 50 hectares. According to the commission, numerous active extraction operations on these smaller sites proceed without required planning permissions or mandatory environmental impact assessments (EIAs) — core requirements under EU law for projects expected to cause major ecological harm. “Despite evidence of these ongoing illegal activities, enforcement action at the local level is not being taken,” the EC said in its official statement announcing the legal referral.

    Peat extraction itself is not banned under EU legislation, but it is subject to stringent oversight due to the severe ecological damage unregulated extraction can cause. Peatlands are recognized globally as one of the most critical carbon sinks, capable of storing far more carbon per hectare than most forest ecosystems, making them a key natural defense against climate change. They also provide unique, rare habitats for a wide range of native Irish wildlife species.

    Irish environmental advocacy groups have welcomed the commission’s legal move. Tristram Whyte, policy officer for the Irish Peatland Conservation Council, a leading charity focused on protecting Ireland’s native bogs, described the long-term damage caused by unregulated commercial extraction. “They go into a bog, strip off the surface and then also drain the bog into the local rivers and lakes,” Whyte explained in an interview with BBC News NI. He added that this practice creates what he calls “brown deserts” across Ireland’s midlands, with far-reaching consequences: silt clogs waterways, and drained peat converts to ammonia, which kills aquatic life. Whyte also noted that commercial peat extraction generates large profits for the horticultural industry, with much of the harvested resource exported abroad, while Ireland is left with permanent ecological damage and degraded habitats.

    Irish government bodies have pushed back on the commission’s claims, pointing to existing regulatory frameworks and enforcement efforts already underway. Ireland’s Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment has emphasized that commercial peat extraction is a formally regulated activity in the country. Under current Irish rules, any extraction on sites larger than 50 hectares requires a pollution control license from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). For sites between 30 and 50 hectares, both local authority planning permission and an EIA are mandatory. For sites smaller than 30 hectares, planning permission and an assessment are required if the project is expected to cause significant environmental harm, the department explained.

    The department also noted that the EC has already acknowledged the “significant enforcement” carried out by the EPA against unauthorised extraction on sites larger than 50 hectares, work that has pushed some private operators to end their activities. All EPA inspection reports are published publicly on the agency’s website and shared with the European Commission, the department added. When it comes to enforcement on smaller sites, the Department of Climate stated that responsibility falls to local planning authorities and the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.

    That claim has drawn clarification from the Department of Housing, which says it has no direct role in enforcement or penalty imposition beyond creating the underlying legislation. According to the department, city and county councils hold full responsibility for planning enforcement, including addressing violations of planning rules. If an operator fails to comply with an official enforcement notice, local planning authorities can refer the case to the national courts, where guilty findings can result in criminal convictions, fines, and even prison time.

    This latest dispute over peat extraction comes against a long backdrop of tension over peat policy in Ireland. For centuries, cutting peat (known locally as turf) for domestic heating has been a deeply rooted cultural tradition for rural Irish families, passed down through generations. More than a decade ago, the introduction of EU restrictions on turf cutting at 53 protected bog sites sparked large, defiant protests across rural communities. In 2022, the Irish national parliament, the Dáil, voted to ban the commercial sale of turf, but carved out explicit exemptions for small-scale domestic cutting for personal use.

    Whyte emphasized that the current legal action brought by the EC does not target these domestic exemptions at all, and will not change the existing rules for personal turf cutting. Instead, the case focuses exclusively on unregulated industrial-scale commercial peat extraction, which continues to operate despite its well-documented environmental harms. “Ireland must demonstrate that it takes its environmental responsibilities seriously,” Whyte added.

    The Court of Justice’s core mandate is to ensure that EU law is interpreted and applied uniformly across all 27 member states of the bloc. A ruling against Ireland could result in financial penalties and force the country to tighten enforcement across all sizes of peat extraction sites.