标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Poisoning suspected in deaths of 18 wolves in Italian national park

    Poisoning suspected in deaths of 18 wolves in Italian national park

    A devastating mass mortality event involving 18 wolves has rocked one of central Italy’s most biodiverse protected areas, triggering urgent investigations and widespread condemnation from environmental and government authorities. The deaths unfolded over just a few days in Abruzzo, Lazio, and Molise National Park, a protected reserve that spans three central Italian regions and is home to some of Europe’s most vulnerable wild species. Following the initial discovery of 10 wolf carcasses last week, stepped-up patrols uncovered an additional eight dead wolves in separate areas of the park.

    Park officials confirmed last week that they had located traces of suspected toxic bait near the site where five of the first wolves were found, and the discovery of eight more bodies in surrounding zones has deepened what authorities call an overwhelming suspicion that intentional poisoning is the cause of the deaths. Investigators are currently working alongside local public prosecutors to pinpoint the source of the poison and identify those responsible. Initial findings from the local animal health research institute IZS have backed up park authorities’ suspicions: testing on 13 of the recovered carcasses confirmed the presence of agricultural pesticides, the same toxins linked to the suspected poisoned bait found in the park.

    The severity of the incident has prompted national-level intervention, with Italy’s Environment Minister Gilberto Pichetto Fratin publicly denouncing the killings as horrendous and deeply alarming. Fratin emphasized that wolf conservation is not just an animal welfare issue, but a critical pillar of maintaining Italy’s natural ecosystem balance.

    Italy’s national Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (Ispra) warned that this mass poisoning represents a major step backward for decades of progress in wolf conservation and protection across the country. The agency also noted that toxic bait laid for wolves poses a widespread threat beyond the targeted species, putting other protected wild animals, domestic pets, and even human public safety at grave risk.

    Wolves have made a remarkable population recovery across Europe over the past decade: EU data shows the continent’s total wolf population grew 35% between 2016 and 2023, reaching roughly 23,000 individuals, with the largest populations concentrated in Central Europe and the Alpine regions. According to Ispra’s 2020-21 national census, Italy is home to approximately 3,300 wolves, making it one of the species’ key strongholds in Southern Europe.

    This population growth has not been without conflict, however. As wolf ranges have expanded, reports of wolf attacks on domestic livestock have increased, with latest EU figures indicating around 65,500 livestock animals are killed by wolves across the bloc annually. In response to this growing tension, the European Union downgraded wolves’ protection status from “strictly protected” to “protected”, clearing the way for Italy to implement a limited annual cull of 160 wolves starting in 2026.

    In the wake of this mass poisoning event, environmental conservation groups are now calling for that cull plan to be immediately revisited. Stefano Ciafani, head of Italy’s leading environmental organization Legambiente, described the deaths of 18 wolves as an unprecedented attack on protected wildlife, labeling the illegal killings an act of vigilante do-it-yourself justice. Ciafani also warned that the use of widespread poisoned bait puts other iconic at-risk species in the park in danger, including the Marsican brown bear — a critically endangered species that serves as a symbol of the Abruzzo region, with only around 50 individuals remaining in the wild.

  • What is Nato and which countries are in it?

    What is Nato and which countries are in it?

    A leaked internal Pentagon memo obtained by Reuters has exposed unprecedented proposals from the United States to impose punitive measures on NATO allies that the Trump administration accuses of failing to back the US and Israel during their late February military campaign against Iran. The controversial plans include the radical step of suspending Spain’s membership in the 77-year-old transatlantic alliance and reopening a formal review of the United Kingdom’s long-recognized sovereignty over the Falkland Islands.

    The disclosure comes amid a sustained wave of public criticism of NATO from President Donald Trump, who has spent months lashing out at member states for their perceived lack of support following the Iran conflict, which led to Iran imposing restrictions on commercial shipping through the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. Trump has repeatedly questioned the alliance’s relevance, even labeling it a “paper tiger” and openly floating the possibility of a full US withdrawal from the bloc. In a post on his Truth Social platform following a recent meeting with new NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the president doubled down on his stance, writing bluntly: “NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON’T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN.” He has also consistently accused fellow member nations of free-riding on the massive US military investment that underpins collective transatlantic security.

    NATO officials pushed back immediately on the suspension proposal, telling the BBC that the alliance’s founding treaty contains no legal mechanism to suspend or expel a member state. Downing Street also rejected the suggestion of reviewing Falkland Islands sovereignty, reaffirming that the UK’s claim to the territory remains unambiguous and fully rooted in the self-determination of the islands’ population.

    Founded in 1949 in Washington D.C. by 12 original signatory nations, NATO was initially created to counter Soviet expansion in Europe and foster political integration across the continent to prevent the resurgence of nationalist militarism. Today, the alliance counts 32 member states spanning North America and Europe, with the most recent expansions bringing Finland into the bloc in 2023 and Sweden in 2024, both abandoning decades of neutrality after Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia hold official candidate status and have formally requested membership.

    At the core of NATO’s collective defense framework is Article 5, which states that an armed attack against any single member is considered an attack against all, requiring members to take whatever action they deem necessary to restore security. To date, Article 5 has only been invoked once, in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States in 2001. A separate provision, Article 4, allows members to bring pressing security concerns to the alliance’s main decision-making body, the North Atlantic Council, and has been used seven times since the alliance’s founding.

    In 2025, NATO leaders agreed to a landmark new defense spending target requiring all members to commit 5% of their national GDP to defense-related expenditure by 2035. Of that total, 3.5% must go toward core defense capabilities, with up to an additional 1.5% allocated to broader security infrastructure. Prior to this agreement, members operated under a non-binding 2% target, which all alliance nations finally met for the first time in 2025. The United States remains by far the alliance’s largest defense spender, contributing roughly $980 billion in 2025 – accounting for 60% of total NATO defense spending across all members. Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia, all frontline states facing direct Russian pressure, each spent over 3.5% of GDP on defense in 2025, while the UK reported 2.3% of GDP spent on defense that year, with a government target to reach 3% by the end of its next parliamentary term.

    Ukraine’s path to NATO membership remains one of the alliance’s most contentious issues. Russia has vehemently opposed Ukraine’s accession, viewing the expansion of alliance infrastructure to its border as an existential security threat. After the 2022 invasion, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky pushed to accelerate the accession process, but former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirmed membership would only move forward after the conclusion of active hostilities. Most recently, in August 2025, President Trump stated that Ukraine would not be permitted to join NATO as part of any proposed peace deal with Russia, placing a major new cloud over Kyiv’s long-term membership aspirations. While NATO has labeled Russia’s invasion of Ukraine the most direct threat to transatlantic security in decades, the alliance has declined to deploy direct military support or impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine to avoid a direct armed conflict with nuclear-armed Russia. Individual member states, however, have provided billions of dollars in military and humanitarian aid to Kyiv since the invasion began.

  • Bill to allow assisted dying in England and Wales is set to fall as parliamentary time runs out

    Bill to allow assisted dying in England and Wales is set to fall as parliamentary time runs out

    LONDON – A landmark piece of social policy legislation that would grant terminally ill adults in England and Wales the legal right to choose an assisted death is on track to fail Friday, derailed by procedural gridlock and a flood of opposition amendments in the UK’s House of Lords that exhausted all remaining parliamentary time.

    First introduced to the House of Commons by Labour backbencher Kim Leadbeater in late 2024, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill cleared the elected lower chamber in June 2024 after fierce debate. The legislation proposed to allow adults with a terminal diagnosis and fewer than six months left to live to apply for an assisted death, with final approval contingent on sign-off from two independent physicians and a specialized expert review panel, designed to prevent abuse of the framework.

    Backers of the bill had framed it as the most transformative change to UK social policy since the partial legalization of abortion in 1967, arguing it would bring compassion and autonomy to people facing unbearable suffering at the end of their lives. But the unelected House of Lords, the UK’s parliamentary revising chamber, has effectively stalled progress through a months-long filibuster-style strategy. Opponents tabled more than 1,200 amendments to the legislation – a record number for any backbench-sponsored bill, rather than one brought forward by the sitting government. Because backbench bills are only allocated debating time on Fridays, the massive volume of amendments left no path to complete consideration before the current parliamentary session draws to a close next week.

    Under UK parliamentary rules, any bill that does not complete all stages of debate and voting within a single parliamentary session automatically expires, even if it has already cleared one chamber. With the clock ticking down, the bill is confirmed to fail.

    The outcome has sparked sharp anger from assisted dying campaigners, who argue that unelected Lords have overridden the clear will of the elected House of Commons. They have already announced plans to reintroduce the legislation in the next parliamentary session, which opens on May 13 when King Charles III delivers the King’s Speech outlining the government’s upcoming legislative agenda. Leadbeater, the bill’s sponsor, has confirmed she will enter the backbench ballot to secure parliamentary time for a new introduction, saying she will “keep pushing for a safer, more compassionate law until Parliament reaches a final decision.”

    Opponents of the legislation, however, defend their procedural tactics as necessary scrutiny of a deeply sensitive policy. Many have argued the bill is unsafe and unworkable, raising concerns that weak safeguards could leave vulnerable people, including disabled individuals, open to coercion into choosing assisted death against their own interests. They argue the massive number of amendments was required to highlight critical flaws in the original text.

    The legislative failure comes just one month after lawmakers in the Scottish Parliament, which holds devolved authority over health policy, rejected a separate assisted dying bill that would have made Scotland the first part of the UK to legalize the practice. Globally, assisted dying – defined as a doctor prescribing a lethal dose that a patient self-administers – is already legal in a growing number of jurisdictions, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and multiple states across the United States, with strict eligibility criteria varying between each region.

  • Nato says ‘no provision’ to expel members after report US could seek to suspend Spain

    Nato says ‘no provision’ to expel members after report US could seek to suspend Spain

    Tensions are roiling the North Atlantic Treaty Organization after a leaked internal Pentagon email laid out potential retaliatory measures against alliance members that have declined to back US military efforts in the ongoing Iran conflict, sparking a fierce debate over alliance cohesion and the future of collective defense commitments. The leak, first reported by Reuters via an unnamed senior US official, triggered immediate pushback from NATO leadership, affected member states and key European allies, who have moved quickly to reject any suggestion that membership could be revoked or suspended.

    The controversy stems from growing friction between the US administration under Donald Trump and several NATO allies over responses to the Iran conflict that escalated after joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February. Following the attacks, Iran restricted commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global energy supplies. Spain has drawn particular US ire for its refusal to grant US forces access to its two military installations — Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base — to launch offensive operations against Iran.

    In the wake of the report claiming Washington was exploring options to suspend Spanish membership over its stance, a NATO spokesperson told the BBC that the alliance’s founding Washington Treaty contains no mechanism whatsoever to suspend or expel member states. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez also dismissed the leaked memo outright, noting that Madrid only recognizes formal official communications from the US government. “We do not work based on emails. We work with official documents and official positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States,” Sánchez told reporters. He added that Spain remains committed to full cooperation with its allies, but that all actions will adhere strictly to international law.

    Beyond potential action against Spain, the leaked email also outlined a far more provocative proposal: reassessing longstanding US diplomatic support for the United Kingdom’s sovereignty claim over the Falkland Islands, a South Atlantic territory that is also claimed by Argentina as the Malvinas. The 1982 Falklands War between the UK and Argentina ended in British control of the archipelago, which sits roughly 300 miles off Argentina’s coast and 8,000 miles from the UK. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has already drawn a line against deeper involvement in the Iran conflict, saying that expanding UK participation in the war or supporting the current US port blockade of Iran runs counter to British national interests. While the UK has allowed the US to use its military bases for strikes on Iranian targets and has deployed Royal Air Force jets to shoot down Iranian drones, Starmer’s government has stopped short of full backing for the US campaign.

    Other retaliatory options outlined in the memo included removing so-called “difficult” allied nations from key leadership positions within the alliance’s bureaucratic structure. The memo did not propose a full US withdrawal from NATO or the permanent closure of American military bases across Europe, the source told Reuters. Instead, it framed access to basing, staging and overflight rights as the non-negotiable baseline for alliance participation, arguing that members that refuse to extend these privileges should face consequences.

    Trump has spent months openly criticizing NATO allies for what he frames as unequal burden-sharing and a lack of reciprocity in security commitments. Just last month, he repeated his longstanding claim that NATO has been a “one-way street” for the US, writing that “We will protect them, but they will do nothing for us.”

    In an official comment following the leak, Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson did not deny the existence of the internal memo, and echoed the president’s criticism of alliance members. “Despite ‘everything’ the US has done for its NATO allies, ‘they were not there for us,’” Wilson stated. She added that the Defense Department will work to present the president with actionable options to ensure that allies move beyond being a “paper tiger” and begin contributing their fair share to collective defense efforts, declining to offer further detail on internal deliberations.

    Key European leaders have moved quickly to tamp down divisions and reaffirm their commitment to alliance unity in the wake of the leak. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni used a recent EU summit in Cyprus to call on all NATO members to close ranks, arguing that the alliance remains an indispensable source of collective strength for the transatlantic community. “We must work to strengthen NATO’s European pillar… which must clearly complement the American one,” Meloni told reporters.

    A German government spokesperson echoed that sentiment in a regular Berlin press briefing, saying that Spain’s NATO membership is not in any doubt: “Spain is a member of NATO. And I see no reason why that should change.” Other European powers, including France, have joined the UK in saying they will only commit to securing the Strait of Hormuz after a lasting ceasefire or end to the conflict. The BBC has reached out to both the Pentagon and 10 Downing Street for additional comment on the leak and the proposals outlined in the memo.

  • Czech power company ČEZ signs deal with Rolls-Royce SMR to prepare for first small nuclear reactor

    Czech power company ČEZ signs deal with Rolls-Royce SMR to prepare for first small nuclear reactor

    PRAGUE — In a landmark move that advances the development of next-generation nuclear energy across Central Europe, Czech energy utility ČEZ has finalized a new agreement with British firm Rolls-Royce SMR, tasking the company with carrying out preliminary engineering and administrative work for the Czech Republic’s first small modular nuclear reactor (SMR).

    Daniel Beneš, chief executive officer of ČEZ, confirmed Friday that the scope of the initial work covers core project planning and the compilation of all licensing documentation required to secure official building permits for the facility. Per ČEZ’s current timeline, the firm targets securing all necessary regulatory approvals for the SMR project by the end of the decade, with construction set to take place on an existing plot of land at the Temelín nuclear power complex, the country’s second operational large-scale nuclear site.

    The deal marks the latest international expansion of Rolls-Royce SMR’s SMR portfolio, following a contract signed in mid-April with Great Britain Energy – Nuclear, the UK government’s nuclear development agency, to launch design work for the UK’s first domestic SMR fleet. Beneš noted that the Czech reactor will be the British company’s second completed SMR project, coming after the delivery of the first operational unit in the UK.

    ČEZ already holds a 20% stake in Rolls-Royce SMR, and the two firms established a broader strategic partnership that aims to deploy up to 3 gigawatts of new SMR-generated generation capacity across the Czech Republic over the coming decades. The Czech state currently maintains a nearly 70% controlling stake in ČEZ, and the national government has been moving forward with plans to acquire the remaining outstanding shares to take full ownership of the country’s largest energy provider.

    Unlike conventional large-scale nuclear reactors, which typically produce upwards of 1 gigawatt of power each, small modular reactors are designed to generate smaller, more flexible output. Proponents of the technology argue that SMRs can be constructed far more quickly than traditional reactors, come with lower upfront capital costs, and can be scaled incrementally to match local energy demand requirements.

  • Sánchez sidesteps a Spain-US dispute at NATO, brushing off reported Pentagon email

    Sánchez sidesteps a Spain-US dispute at NATO, brushing off reported Pentagon email

    Amid growing transatlantic friction over U.S. military operations in the Iran war, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has declined to engage with unconfirmed reports that the Pentagon is considering punitive measures against NATO allies that refuse to back American actions. Spain has emerged as a primary target of this potential pushback, after Madrid formally barred U.S. forces tied to the conflict from accessing its military bases and national airspace. The Spanish government has repeatedly justified its position by arguing that U.S.-Israeli military action in Iran violates international law.

    Spain is not alone in its refusal: both France and the United Kingdom have also declined to grant U.S. forces unfettered access to their territories for bombing operations against Iran. Reports of the Pentagon’s internal deliberations first emerged via Reuters, which cited an anonymous U.S. official referencing an internal Defense Department email. The document even raised the possibility of suspending Spain’s full membership in NATO, alongside a proposal to reassess longstanding U.S. support for the United Kingdom’s territorial claim over the Falkland Islands (known as the Islas Malvinas in Argentina).

    Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a European Union summit held in Nicosia, Cyprus, Sánchez pushed back on the unsubstantiated claims. “We do not work with emails,” the prime minister noted. “We work with official documents and positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States.” He reaffirmed that Spain’s stance remains unchanged: “The position of the government of Spain is clear: absolute collaboration with the allies, but always within the framework of international legality.”

    This tension comes as NATO itself has formally distanced itself from the Iran conflict. Operating on the basis of consensus, the alliance requires the unanimous agreement of all 32 member states to launch collective action. Crucially, NATO’s founding charter also lacks any formal mechanism to suspend or expel a member nation, even if a member disagrees with the policies of one ally. Member states are only permitted to voluntarily exit the alliance, a process that requires one year’s formal notification to other partners. As an institution, NATO’s only direct role tied to the conflict is limited to defending its own sovereign territory.

    The friction has its roots in former U.S. President Donald Trump’s public anger over what he frames as a failure of many NATO allies to back U.S. actions in Iran and assist with security patrols in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil trade chokepoint. Trump has repeatedly questioned the value of U.S. membership in the transatlantic military alliance, and has even threatened to impose trade restrictions on Spain in retaliation for its base access ban. Beyond the Iran war, Spain has also drawn criticism from allies for failing to meet agreed NATO defense spending targets.

    EU officials have voiced confusion over the U.S. criticism of European allies, noting that France and the United Kingdom are already leading a planned effort to secure maritime trade in the Strait of Hormuz once hostilities in Iran end. EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas pointed out that Washington has already asked the bloc to deliver exactly the post-conflict support Europe has committed to providing. “When we have had contacts with the American counterparts, then actually their asks for us have been exactly what we are able to offer after the cessation of hostilities,” Kallas said. “Demining, escorting of ships, all of this that we have been discussing.”

    NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, however, has implicitly criticized the position of Spain and other allied holdouts, noting that long-standing bilateral agreements between the U.S. and European allies covering overflight access and base hosting should be honored. To date, several other NATO allies have permitted U.S. warplanes to use their airspace and American military bases on their territory for operations tied to the Iran war.

    Against a backdrop of growing uncertainty over the durability of U.S. security commitments to Europe, EU leaders used the Nicosia summit to debate new frameworks for collective European self-defense. With Cyprus holding the rotating EU presidency through July, Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides confirmed that leaders have instructed the European Commission to draft a strategic blueprint outlining how the bloc would respond if one member requests collective assistance under Article 42.7 of the EU treaties.

    This mutual defense clause has only been invoked once in the bloc’s history, when France requested support following the 2015 terror attacks in Paris. Next month, EU envoys and defense ministers will hold table-top simulation exercises to test how the clause could be activated in future scenarios, mapping out how the bloc can leverage not just its combined military capabilities, but also other policy tools unavailable to NATO—including trade sanctions, border management, and visa restrictions.

  • In Baltic skies, NATO and Russian pilots size each other up warily but without a tilt into war

    In Baltic skies, NATO and Russian pilots size each other up warily but without a tilt into war

    At Lithuania’s Šiauliai Air Base, the rhythm of NATO’s frontline Baltic air policing mission is defined by split-second urgency. When the alliance’s scramble alert sounds, French Rafale fighter pilots — already pre-suited to cut response times — rush in vans to prepared, missile-armed jets waiting in hardened hangars. Within minutes of lifting off from the northern European base, they are over the Baltic Sea, executing standard intercept procedures for Russian military aircraft approaching NATO alliance airspace.

    On a recent busy Monday observed by an Associated Press journalist, French pilots scrambled under NATO command to intercept a coordinated Russian flight formation: two nuclear-capable Tu-22M3 supersonic bombers, which Russia has repurposed for ground strikes in Ukraine, escorted by advanced Su-30 and Su-35 fighter jets. The Russian warplanes flew a more than four-hour mission from a base near St. Petersburg, passing the coastlines of five NATO nations — Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland — before turning back near Danish airspace. According to the French detachment, the Russian aircraft never activated their transponders, filed required flight plans, or maintained radio contact with civilian air traffic controllers. Fighters from Sweden, Finland, Poland, Denmark and Romania also launched to monitor the incursion, a multilateral show of coordinated airspace security.

    This high-alert cat-and-mouse game plays out hundreds of times a year, hundreds of miles from public view, as NATO seeks to avoid an accidental escalation that could pull the 32-nation alliance into open conflict with Russia amid tensions over Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In intercepts like this, neither side crosses into open hostility: pilots from both forces simply monitor and document one another, maintaining a cautious distance even as armed missiles remain visible on jet hardpoints. As mission commanders describe it, the dynamic is less cat and mouse than two wary cats, claws bared but holding back from a fight.

    The Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania — all NATO members that share borders with Russia and its ally Belarus — lack the independent air power to defend their own airspace. Since 2004, when the three countries joined the alliance, NATO has rotated national detachments through Baltic bases to maintain 24/7, year-round air policing, a mission designed to deter aggression rather than provoke conflict, and reassure frontline allies of the alliance’s collective security commitment.

    Currently, the Šiauliai base hosts two detachments: a four-jet French Rafale wing, commanded by Lt. Col. Alexandre — whose full surname is withheld for security reasons — and a six F-16 contingent from the Romanian Air Force. The French detachment took over the mission from Spanish forces earlier this spring, and will hand off to an Italian unit when their four-month rotation ends in August. A wall inside the base’s temporary headquarters bears plaques and badges from every rotating detachment that has served at the base, a quiet record of the mission’s continuity.

    Col. Mihaita Marin, commander of the Romanian detachment, explained that NATO forces are required to scramble whenever Russian military aircraft violate International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) rules for international airspace — rules that govern transponder use, flight planning, and radio communication. “There are plenty of times in which, on purpose or not, they’re not really respecting the ICAO rules,” Marin said. “So obviously we are forced to take off and just make sure that they are who they say they are and their intention is peaceful.”

    The arrival of spring, which brings milder temperatures and clearer flying conditions across the Baltic region, has pushed interception rates higher. Since French and Romanian forces deployed for their rotation in early April, interceptions have become nearly a daily occurrence, a rate commanders expect to climb further as weather improves. Lt. Col. Alexandre noted that it remains unclear why Russian pilots repeatedly operate in violation of global airspace rules. “We don’t know if it’s lack of professionalism or just a means for them to test us,” he said. “But what is sure is that we need to go every time. We cannot say, ‘OK, that’s usual, this time we will just let them pass.’”

    Across the tense standoff, the core goal of the NATO mission remains consistent: to maintain constant vigilance without triggering the open war both sides currently seek to avoid. “We watch each other, scrutinize each other and try to make sure that it doesn’t go any further,” Alexandre said.

  • Steve Rosenberg: Kremlin’s tightening grip on internet fuels public discontent

    Steve Rosenberg: Kremlin’s tightening grip on internet fuels public discontent

    Near the heart of Moscow, steps away from the Kremlin walls, dozens of Russian residents stand in an orderly line outside the presidential administration building. They have gathered not to protest openly, but to exercise one of the few legally permitted forms of civic action: submitting a formal petition urging President Vladimir Putin to roll back the Kremlin’s escalating crackdown on online access. What should be a routine act of democratic input, however, carries palpable risk in Russia’s increasingly authoritarian political climate. From across the street, uniformed security officers openly film both the petitioners and the reporting team documenting the event, a quiet but clear reminder that speaking out carries consequences. When asked if she feels afraid, Yulia, a small catering business owner waiting in the queue, admits openly: “Very scared. I’m shaking.”

    The Kremlin has been steadily tightening its grip on Russia’s digital cyberspace for years, but recent weeks have seen sweeping new restrictions that have upended daily life for millions of users. Access to globally popular messaging platforms including WhatsApp and Telegram has been sharply limited, while widespread mobile internet disruptions and full blackouts have been reported across multiple regions of the country. President Putin has publicly acknowledged the connectivity problems, framing the measures as necessary “operational work to prevent terrorist attacks.” He has also issued formal instructions to officials to preserve “uninterrupted operation” for critical internet services, but stopped short of promising to roll back the broader crackdown.

    For small business owners like Yulia, the restrictions are not just an inconvenience – they threaten her entire livelihood. Her catering operation runs entirely online, relying on global messaging apps to coordinate with clients and a public website to accept orders. “There were times recently when our website was not accessible. We couldn’t generate revenue,” she explained. “We are losing money every time there is a blocking of the internet, a blocking of Telegram and WhatsApp. Without internet access, my business in this form will not exist.”

    Russian officials defend the curbs as a matter of national and public safety. They claim that mobile internet blackouts help disorient attacking Ukrainian drones, a justification critics point out is undermined by the fact that drone strikes have continued in regions where connectivity has been fully shut off. Authorities also accuse international messaging platforms of refusing to comply with Russia’s strict local data storage laws, which require user information to be held on servers within Russian borders. Alongside restricting global services, regulators have launched a crackdown on virtual private networks (VPNs), tools that thousands of Russians use to circumvent government censorship and access blocked content.

    As the centerpiece of the Kremlin’s push for a “sovereign internet” – a closed, state-controlled network cut off from much of the global web – the government has aggressively promoted MAX, a new homegrown, state-backed messaging app. But the Russian public remains deeply skeptical of the platform. Many users worry the app is designed specifically to let security services surveil private communications, a concern echoed by opposition figures. “Many people think that this messenger is made especially by the government to check our messages,” said Boris Nadezhdin, a former member of parliament who was barred from running against Putin in the 2024 presidential election.

    Across much of Russia today, only government-approved websites and services are accessible to mobile users. Opposition analysts warn that a digital equivalent of the Cold War-era Iron Curtain is being constructed around the country, designed to cut Russian citizens off from outside information and unapproved content. “The idea is to divide Russia from the outside world,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, a columnist with independent opposition outlet Novaya Gazeta. “This world is believed to be poisonous to the brains of Russians. Russia was always blocked, primarily from the West, which was the source of ‘bad, revolutionary, liberal ideas’. It was always like this.”

    Unlike the Soviet era, however, generations of Russians have fully integrated the open internet into every part of daily life, making the new restrictions feel like a sudden and disruptive shock to routine. For many, the anger over the crackdown stems less from ideological demands for free speech and more from the loss of ordinary convenience that most people now take for granted. “It’s less to do with freedom of speech and more about habit,” explained Yulia Grekova, an activist based in Vladimir, a city 190 kilometers outside Moscow. “People have got used to paying for things and ordering taxis with their mobiles. They sit in the bus messaging friends. There are very few people who don’t use mobile internet for work, public services and to keep in touch with family. That’s why there’s such an angry reaction. Everyone’s affected.”

    Grekova has firsthand experience of how the Kremlin responds to public pushback against the internet restrictions. She recently attempted to organize a public rally in Vladimir to protest the curbs, but authorities blocked the event through a series of procedural stalling tactics. When she submitted applications for 11 different potential rally locations, officials rejected every site claiming street cleaning was scheduled for the requested date. City hall offered an alternative venue, only to reverse that approval a short time later, citing the risk of a Ukrainian drone attack. Grekova was later visited at her workplace by three police officers who served her a formal warning prohibiting any unsanctioned protest. “They filmed me signing the official warning from the prosecutor. I felt like some kind of terrorist,” she said. Similar attempts to hold protest rallies have been rejected across dozens of Russian cities, with authorities offering a range of absurd justifications, from scheduled roller-skating classes to residual COVID-19 restrictions.

    During a visit to central Vladimir, the impact of the crackdown was immediately visible: state media sites and domestic taxi apps functioned normally, but Google searches failed to load, and all independent news sites were completely inaccessible. Local residents described constant small disruptions that have upended ordinary routines. “It’s much harder to communicate,” said Maria, who was out walking with her infant child. “We want to keep across the latest news and trends. Instead, we’re lagging behind.” For some, the restrictions have compounded existing fatigue over the ongoing war in Ukraine. “In the past, when there was no internet, the world seemed a brighter place, because we knew less,” Maria said. “I try to avoid news about the war. I don’t want to fill my head with it. We’re tired of news about people being killed.” Other residents described far more practical disruptions: “Today I couldn’t pay for petrol. And my satnav is glitching,” said local resident Denis. Small business owners have been hit hardest, said Alexander, another local resident: “People are annoyed. Especially those with small businesses. They lose customers when they can’t access the internet.” For Grekova, the crackdown feels like a deliberate step backwards into a pre-digital era. “It feels like we’re going backwards, sliding back to the past,” she said.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov defends the restrictions as a temporary necessity driven by the current security environment. “In the current situation, security considerations dictate the need for certain measures,” Peskov told reporters in Moscow. “These are being taken and most of our citizens understand the need for them. It’s clear that internet restrictions inconvenience many people. But this is the period we’re in. Once the need for such measures disappears, services will be fully restored and return to normal.” But critics warn that the new restrictions have already become the permanent new normal, and that the Kremlin will only continue to ramp up controls rather than roll them back. “I don’t think that this regime is ready to go back,” Kolesnikov said. “They can only go forward in terms of more repressions. What is bad for the authorities is an accumulation of discontent and it could play out in the future. We don’t know in what shape. But it is evident that irritation and discontent are accumulating.”

    That discontent is already starting to bubble into public view. In recent weeks, a viral video posted to Instagram by prominent Russian celebrity blogger Victoria Bonya criticizing the internet crackdown has amassed tens of millions of views. While Bonya did not directly blame Putin, she told him directly: “There is a huge, thick wall between you and us, the ordinary people.” Under growing public pressure, Putin acknowledged last week that he could not ignore the connectivity problems facing Russian citizens, and instructed security officials to find ways to accommodate the “vital interests of citizens.” But the statement stopped far short of a policy reversal, with no mention of ending the broader restrictions.

    Public opinion polling suggests that Putin’s approval ratings have fallen to their lowest level since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, with internet restrictions just one of multiple sources of growing public unease. Russians are also facing rising food prices, strained public services, and growing war fatigue. “People begin to understand there is a direct connection between their everyday problems, like healthcare, food prices, problems with internet, and the politics of Vladimir Putin,” Nadezhdin said. “And this is a new situation in Russia.”

    After submitting her petition outside the Kremlin, Yulia has returned to work baking bread at her catering company, already planning how to adapt to the new online restrictions. Like many Russians, she says her family has a long history of adapting to massive political and social upheaval. “My great-grandfather was wealthier than average. In a Soviet village that was considered a sin. His property was taken away from him and he was moved to Siberia. But his family adapted. My parents went through the collapse of the Soviet Union: they adapted to a market economy. Now it’s my turn to adapt. Then it will be my daughter’s turn.” When asked what she expects for the future, Yulia says long-term planning has become impossible. “The future is not even mentioned in day-to-day conversations with friends and relatives. It’s like: what are we doing in three days, in a week, in a month? Nothing more than a month.” Across Russia, as restrictions tighten and daily life grows more unpredictable, a deep, pervasive sense of uncertainty is quietly rising.

  • What to know if your flight is canceled amid rising jet fuel costs

    What to know if your flight is canceled amid rising jet fuel costs

    A wave of flight cancellations is spreading across the globe, sparked by jet fuel supply strains and sharp price hikes tied to ongoing conflict in the Middle East – and the ripple effects are leaving travelers navigating inconsistent, confusing rules for compensation and rebooking that shift dramatically depending on their departure and destination regions. What makes this wave of disruptions particularly impactful is its timing: it comes as the summer travel season begins to ramp up, with high-profile global events set to put additional strain on already stretched airport and airline infrastructure.

    “These pressures are arriving at a time when summer travel demand is ramping up, with major events such as the World Cup expected to put additional strain on airports,” explained Eric Napoli, chief legal officer at AirHelp, a passenger rights advocacy organization that supports travelers seeking compensation for disrupted travel plans.

    Unlike sudden weather-related cancellations that often leave passengers stranded with little advance notice, most fuel-linked flight cuts are being announced weeks or months ahead of schedule to give travelers time to adjust plans. German aviation giant Lufthansa Group, for example, recently confirmed it would cut 20,000 short-haul flights across its entire network through October, one of the highest-profile industry adjustments to date.

    If your flight is canceled, industry experts say the first step is to check your carrier’s official digital channels immediately. For passengers flying with U.S.-based airlines, the airline’s app or website typically offers the fastest, most streamlined path to rebooking, according to Tyler Hosford, security director at International SOS, a leading global risk and travel security firm. For non-U.S. carriers, however, digital self-service tools are often less robust, so Hosford advises travelers to pursue multiple channels simultaneously, including dedicated customer service phone lines and in-person assistance at airport check-in desks.

    In nearly all cases, passengers are guaranteed at minimum a choice between a full refund or a rebooking on the next available flight, though exact regulatory requirements differ by country. For example, under U.S. consumer protection rules, if a cancellation leads a passenger to choose to abandon their trip entirely, the airline is legally required to issue a full cash refund, regardless of the reason for the cancellation. While carriers may offer travel credits as an alternative, passengers are legally entitled to full repayment for unused airfare and add-on fees, including checked bag charges and paid seat upgrades.

    Passenger protection rules are not uniform across the world, ranging from the cross-border liability standards set by the Montreal Convention, which applies to over 140 countries, to individual national regulatory frameworks in the U.S., Canada, the EU, UK, Turkey and Brazil.

    Europe boasts some of the strongest passenger protections globally, including mandatory compensation for eligible disrupted flights. These rules apply to all flights departing from any EU airport, regardless of where the airline is based, as well as all inbound flights to the EU operated by EU-based carriers, even for journeys starting outside the bloc. The United Kingdom retains a nearly identical regulatory structure to the EU.

    By comparison, the U.S. and Canada offer far more limited statutory protections for passengers facing cancellations. Across Asia, rules vary wildly from country to country, and in many markets, travelers must rely on individual airline policies rather than binding formal government regulations. To avoid confusion, experts recommend researching the passenger rights rules of your departure country before starting your trip.

    The question of whether you are entitled to additional compensation beyond rebooking or refund usually hinges on whether local regulators classify the disruption as within the airline’s control. Even if airlines cite fuel shortages or price spikes as the reason for cancellation, Napoli notes that EU regulations still require carriers to fulfill their duty of care to stranded passengers, which includes providing necessary support such as accommodation, meals and rebooking assistance.

    “While airlines are citing fuel shortages as a reason for upcoming cancellations, travelers need to know that this does not automatically waive their rights” under EU laws, Napoli emphasized.

    To minimize stress and complications if disruptions occur, travel experts recommend a handful of proactive steps before your departure. First, always sign up for official flight alerts from your carrier to get real-time updates, and book your ticket directly through the airline rather than third-party online travel agencies: resolving issues directly with the carrier is far faster and simpler than going through an intermediary. Mapping out backup options ahead of time can also cut down on stress if your original plans fall through.

    If you need to file a compensation claim or formal complaint, thorough documentation is non-negotiable. Travelers should save every relevant document, including original boarding passes, receipts for extra expenses incurred due to the cancellation, official cancellation notices, and all communication with airline representatives. Experts advise taking screenshots of all digital updates and messages, writing down key details from phone calls with customer service, and requesting a written confirmation of the disruption from the airline that includes the official stated reason for the cancellation.

    One common mistake travelers make is accepting the first alternative flight offered by the airline without exploring other options. Experts advise checking other flights, alternate routes, and even nearby airports to find a faster or more convenient connection that fits your schedule.

    If the airline’s offered rebooking does not meet your needs – particularly if the next available flight is days after your original departure – you are permitted to book an alternative flight independently and request a refund from the original airline. However, travelers should be aware that they will likely need to cover any fare difference upfront, and there is no guarantee that the difference will be reimbursed later.

    Additional practical tips to avoid getting stuck include booking the earliest flight possible on your travel day, which leaves more time to rebook the same day if your flight is canceled; setting up independent flight alerts through third-party tracking apps like Flighty, which often notify users of cancellations or delays before the airline sends out an official alert; and maintaining a calm, polite demeanor when interacting with airline staff, who are far more likely to go out of their way to help respectful passengers.

    “Ultimately, the shortage is squeezing the entire system, from travelers to airlines, and is something to watch as the industry looks for any relief ahead of the summer travel season,” Napoli said.

  • Headscarf with a beret: Muslim designers showcase floral dresses and boxy streetwear in Paris

    Headscarf with a beret: Muslim designers showcase floral dresses and boxy streetwear in Paris

    Against the backdrop of longstanding debates over religious attire in French public life, Paris made history this week with its first-ever Modest Fashion Week, bringing together nearly 30 international designers specializing in loose, full-coverage garments and modest headwear. The event, held at the historic Hôtel Le Marois steps from the Champs-Élysées, showcases the rapidly expanding global modest fashion movement while challenging prevailing narratives around religious clothing in a country with strict secular policies.

    Modest clothing, defined by designs that cover arms, legs, and often the hair, is most commonly worn by Muslim women adhering to religious modesty principles, but its appeal has expanded far beyond this demographic in recent years. For organizers, holding the groundbreaking event in France carried unique symbolic weight. France is home to an estimated 5 to 7.5 million Muslims, and Özlem Şahin, head of the organization behind Modest Fashion Week, calls Paris “one of the leading modest fashion capitals in Europe.”

    Runway collections spanned a wide range of aesthetics, blending global cultural influences with contemporary design trends. Nature-inspired palettes dominated many presentations: Turkish label Miha founder Hicran Önal centered her collection on romantic themes, pairing fluid silhouettes with water-like teals, soft blues, and delicate floral pinks. Indonesian designer Nada Puspita offered a modern take on modest design with cleaner, more structured lines, while Australian brand Asiyam creator Aisa Hassan drew from warm, earthy natural tones—deep forest greens and autumnal reds—adding a nubby bucket hat as a nod to her Australian heritage. Hassan’s soft, flowing designs stood in stark contrast to the sporty streetwear aesthetic that has grown popular in modern modest fashion, a trend already embraced by global sportswear giants Nike and Adidas.

    Local French brands brought a distinctly Parisian Gen Z edge to the event. Soutoura and Nour Turbans presented boxy, jewel-toned nylon streetwear silhouettes, with Nour Turbans making a striking cultural statement by styling a model’s headscarf beneath a classic French beret. Turkish swimwear label Mayovera showcased burkinis—full-coverage swimwear that leaves only the face, hands, and feet exposed—a garment currently banned from most French public swimming pools despite being permitted on public beaches.

    The global modest fashion industry has expanded exponentially over the past decade, with research firm DinarStandard projecting global consumer spending on modest clothing will surpass $400 billion by 2025. While the segment initially launched to serve Muslim women, it has increasingly gained traction among other faith groups and secular shoppers seeking full-coverage, stylish clothing options.

    For participating designers, the event represents far more than a fashion showcase—it is a milestone for inclusion in a country where religious clothing has faced decades of restrictions. France’s strict interpretation of secularism, known as laïcité, has banned religious symbols including hijabs in state-run schools for over 20 years, with abayas (loose full-length robes) added to the school ban in 2023. Public sector workers including teachers and civil servants are also prohibited from wearing visible religious attire.

    Fatou Doucouré, founder and creative director of French label Soutoura, shared that she has long faced challenges related to wearing her hijab in France, but presenting her work at the Paris event left her feeling hopeful. “Exhibiting my designs in Paris made me feel that women who wear headscarves could take on any role in society,” she said. That sentiment was echoed by attendees, many of whom spoke to the BBC about the event’s transformative impact. One young attendee of Malian heritage, who has faced discrimination for wearing a hijab, said the historic event in central Paris filled her with joy and made her “never want to leave France.” Another attendee noted a visible shift in French culture: for the first time, her hijab no longer felt like the center of political debate, both at the event and on city streets, as people are starting to see her as more than her clothing.