标签： Europe

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited his long-running feud with the Norwegian Nobel Committee, launching a blistering attack on this year’s Nobel Peace Prize selection and labeling the honor an uneraseable mark of shame on the country of Norway. The 2025 prize was awarded Friday to veteran human rights advocate and former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, a South African jurist who previously served as a judge with the International Criminal Court. Minutes after the official announcement, Trump brought his criticism to a Syracuse, New York rally for his supporters, where he claimed he had never encountered the name of the new laureate, dismissing her as an unknown “mystery person”. “This is an indelible stain on the country of Norway,” Trump told the crowd. “We will not forget.”

This is not the first time Trump has publicly lamented being passed over for the peace prize. In 2024, when the award went to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, he issued similar condemnations of the selection process. Last year, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre attempted to clarify the process for Trump, explaining that the prize is chosen by an independent expert committee, not the Norwegian government itself — a distinction that has done little to temper Trump’s criticism.

At the New York rally, Trump repeated unsubstantiated claims that his time in office resolved eight active global conflicts, and that he was on the cusp of ending two more before leaving office. He went further to argue that the entire Nobel Peace Prize has been permanently discredited, claiming it is controlled by a small group of anti-democratic “radical ideologues” that he called “enemies of civilisation”.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee laid out its reasoning for awarding Pillay the 2025 prize, honoring her decades of work advancing global peace, human rights, and international law. Committee chair Jørgen Watne Frydnes noted that Pillay’s advocacy has been critical to building a more robust global legal framework, and that her work has been instrumental in holding perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide accountable for their actions. The 85-year-old jurist, who received the news while at Nuremberg’s Palace of Justice for an event, initially reacted with playful surprise, saying “it must be a joke” before thanking attendees for their applause. In a lighthearted quip directed at Trump, she added: “If you clap a little bit more I may share this prize with Trump.”

The current controversy echoes the fallout from last year’s prize, when Trump openly expressed anger at being passed over, with the White House accusing the committee of prioritizing political bias over the prize’s core mission of advancing peace. In January 2025, Machado — the 2024 laureate — gifted her Nobel medal to Trump during a White House meeting, saying the gesture recognized Trump’s support for Venezuelan freedom. Trump called the move “a wonderful gesture of mutual respect” on social media, but the Nobel Committee quickly stepped in to clarify that the prize is not transferable between individuals. “Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared or transferred to others,” the committee said in a statement. “The decision is final and stands for all time.”

Across northern France’s city of Lille, street barricades stand next to smoldering garbage bins, while chants of anti-police sentiment echo through crowded protest marches. For the hundreds of thousands of French secondary school students who have flooded the streets since late last month, the unrest stems not from abstract political debate, but from years of unaddressed, daily decay in the nation’s lycées – the public secondary schools that serve 15- to 18-year-old students across the country.

A 16-year-old anonymous protester from Lille summed up the everyday frustrations driving the movement: his school lacks sufficient seating for every student, forcing classes to hunt for chairs before each lecture, and a 50-minute lunch window leaves 2,000 students scrambling to get through an overstretched canteen. These local grievances quickly gained national traction after the movement ignited at Lycée Antoine-de-Saint-Exupéry in Créteil, a disadvantaged working-class suburb of Paris.

Within days, viral social media content amplified the crisis, with TikTok and Instagram posts showing rats scurrying through hallways, cracked and mold-damaged ceilings, broken non-functional toilets, and extreme temperature swings that leave classrooms sweltering in summer and frigid in winter. Beyond crumbling infrastructure, students have rallied against chronic understaffing, overcrowded lecture halls, excessively long school days, and a deeply unpopular university admissions system that has left generations of young people feeling disenfranchised.

Teachers have joined the movement in solidarity, echoing students’ claims of systemic failure. Marine Monins, a secondary school educator who marched alongside her students in Lille, explained how understaffing and poor planning have warped daily school schedules: students often start at 8 a.m. and finish as late as 6 p.m., with hours-long empty gaps between scattered lessons. When classes do run, they routinely pack 35 students into a single room – nearly 50% more than the average secondary class size in neighboring England. “It’s now impossible to give every child the attention they deserve,” Monins noted.

Facing growing pressure, the Macron administration made its first concession in early October, promising to deploy 3,000 additional temporary supply teachers in the coming days. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has also pledged to release a full response plan by the end of the month, with ministers hinting at a potential review of education funding in next year’s tight national budget. But the modest proposals have done little to cool protester anger, with young organizers dismissing the measures as too little, too late.

“It goes beyond having decent toilets in schools,” said Alcidor, a lycée student protesting at Paris’ Place de la République, a historic hub for French activism. “It’s strong anger from the youth in France that doesn’t feel represented, that feels abandoned, that feels unheard and is scared of what’s coming in the future.” Official crowd estimates reflect the scale of the movement: the government put last Tuesday’s national march at 250,000 participants, while trade unions counted more than 500,000, the vast majority of them young people.

In recent weeks, the protests have devolved into sporadic violence, leaving hundreds injured on both sides and sparking fierce debate over police tactics. France’s interior ministry reports that nearly 7,000 people have been arrested since the unrest began, more than 85% of whom are minors. More than 700 police officers have sustained injuries in confrontations, while human rights groups and trade unions record at least 200 injured students and dozens of injured teachers.

The most serious incident to date occurred in the northern city of Lens, where a 15-year-old boy lost a hand during a confrontation between police and demonstrators. While a police union source claimed the teen picked up a fired sting-ball grenade that subsequently exploded, witnesses dispute this account. The incident prompted authorities to ban the use of stun and sting grenades at school-related protests, but critics say aggressive police tactics have already done permanent damage.
Bastien Riez, a teacher and union representative at the injured teen’s school, warned: “For many, this is their first experience of democracy and protest, and they are met with police and a sham of social dialogue and democracy. I fear that many young people will stop believing in this so-called democracy altogether.”

Many student organizers acknowledge that outside agitators have hijacked some peaceful demonstrations to incite violence. “These people are coming just to shoot fireworks at police officers and they run. This is not the message we want to send to the world,” explained 15-year-old Parisian protester Kaspar. Police leaders agree that external violence has complicated their work, adding that the protests have unfolded amid a rapidly radicalizing political climate ahead of next spring’s national elections and the 2027 presidential vote.

“Police officers find themselves caught in the middle of this social tension, which is sometimes fuelled by irresponsible politicians,” said Michel Chaballier, deputy secretary-general of the National Police Commissioners’ Union (SCPN). “That’s a shame, because I think this country deserves better.”

The unrest has already become a polarizing political battleground, with leaders of France’s far-right and far-left rushing to capitalize on the government’s perceived failure to resolve the crisis. Recent polling from Ipsos shows more than three-quarters of French under-30s report deep anxiety over the direction of their country, and political analysts warn the education crisis is accelerating the erosion of France’s political middle ground, pushing more voters toward the ideological extremes.

As of 2025, hard-right National Rally leader Marine Le Pen holds a narrow lead as the frontrunner for the 2027 presidency, tied neck-and-neck for second place are center-right former Prime Minister Édouard Philippe and hard-left France Unbowed founder Jean-Luc Mélenchon. Mélenchon has positioned himself as a vocal ally of the student movement, speaking at multiple rallies and comparing the current unrest to the historic 1968 May protests that shook Charles de Gaulle’s government. “This is the most potent movement since 1968,” he claims, a comparison echoed by 18-year-old Lille protester Massicella, who declared “I personally want to reproduce 1968!”

Le Pen, by contrast, has condemned the vandalism that has accompanied the unrest – damage that runs into millions of euros – and has pushed her longstanding “casseur-payeur” principle, which requires protesters who damage property to cover repair costs, often holding parents liable for minors’ actions. She has stayed away from protest marches, focusing instead on her platform of cutting public debt, curbing immigration, and restoring traditional classroom discipline and national history curricula.

For President Emmanuel Macron, the crisis offers no easy political out. Unlike the 2018 gilets jaunes protests, which were sparked by a single unpopular fuel tax that could be reversed, the lycée crisis is rooted in decades of underinvestment that cannot be fixed with quick policy tweaks. Wholesale education reform – new facilities, more teachers, smaller class sizes – would cost billions of euros and take years to implement, even as France struggles with a stretched national budget that sees annual debt servicing costs already exceed the entire core education budget. The 2027 draft budget only includes a 1.7% increase in education spending, a rise that fails to keep pace with current inflation.

Still, students show no signs of stepping back from the movement, leaning into France’s long history of mass protest to demand change. “In France, we have this tradition and history of revolting,” Alcidor said. “That’s the way we gained our rights and the way we will always gain them. That’s our spirit.” As the movement continues into its second month, the hunger for systemic change among France’s young generation shows no sign of being sated – and its impact on the country’s political future is only just beginning to unfold.

In a striking policy reversal that has sent ripples through global politics and energy markets, former President Donald Trump has announced a new deal to bring Russian diesel fuel into the United States and global markets, just three weeks after signing legislation that expanded sanctions and tariffs on countries importing Russian oil and gas.

Per Trump’s announcement, Russian President Vladimir Putin has committed to supplying hundreds of thousands of tons of diesel in the coming months. The agreement comes as the Trump administration continues to navigate political fallout from the ongoing Iran conflict, which has driven global energy prices sharply higher, with just weeks remaining before the 2026 U.S. midterm elections that will decide whether Republicans retain control of Congress.

Surging fuel prices across the United States have dragged down Trump’s public approval ratings, as consumers face steep costs at the pump and broader inflation triggered by energy price increases. The strain has been particularly severe in major agricultural states, where diesel is an indispensable input for operating farm equipment and moving crops and goods to market. Key agricultural states including Iowa, Kansas, Texas, and Ohio have emerged as critical swing battlegrounds in the upcoming midterm contests, making energy affordability a top political priority for the Republican party.

For months, Trump has rolled out a series of measures aimed at easing political pressure on his party amid public frustration over rising costs. He has pushed European allies to draw down their strategic oil reserves, suspended federal fuel taxes for certain uses, and allowed fuel earmarked for agricultural operations to be redirected to interstate trucking. In a rare explicit acknowledgement of the conflict’s political stakes, he also pledged to hold off on new strikes against Iran until after the midterm elections. The Russian diesel deal marks the most dramatic of these pre-election interventions to date.

Key details of the agreement remain opaque, consistent with the often incomplete information shared by Trump on his Truth Social platform. It is unclear how exactly Russia will deliver the fuel to global markets, and what concessions Moscow will receive in exchange beyond the much-needed hard currency that the sales will generate. The deal has already opened Trump to sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and European allies, who argue the agreement will effectively fund Russia’s ongoing military operations.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been among the most vocal critics, dismissing the arrangement as a gift to Putin that Russia will repay with further “terror and perfidy.” “Allowing Russia to sell petroleum products is an investment in a war that must be ended, not prolonged,” Zelensky wrote on the social platform X.

Even beyond the diplomatic controversy, it remains uncertain whether the move will deliver the political boost Trump is seeking for Republican candidates ahead of voting. A prior coordinated release of diesel reserves from Europe failed to move global energy prices meaningfully, and there is no clear timeline for when Russian fuel could reach U.S. markets. Russia’s domestic diesel refinery capacity has already been weakened by repeated Ukrainian strikes—attacks that Trump has previously urged Zelensky to scale back.

In quantitative terms, the impact is also expected to be modest. The U.S. consumes roughly 3.6 million barrels of diesel per day, and even if Russia delivers the promised 300,000 tons this month, that volume equals only about half of one day of U.S. consumption. Most American consumers are unlikely to see an immediate noticeable drop in fuel prices as a result of the deal.

With less than a month until the November midterm elections, early voting is already underway across much of the country, meaning most voters’ political preferences are already largely solidified. In his Truth Social announcement of the deal, Trump framed the move as a priority for working Americans: “Lower prices for Americans, especially our Great Farmers, Ranchers, and Truckers, is my Greatest Priority.”

Yet over the past seven months, energy, fuel, and consumer prices have continued to climb, even as Trump and his administration have repeatedly reassured anxious voters that an end to the conflict and subsequent economic relief are imminent. Trump is now betting that this last-minute policy shift—despite its problematic diplomatic ramifications—will be enough to convince voters that his promise of incoming economic relief is more than empty political rhetoric ahead of the crucial midterm contests.