标签: Europe

欧洲

  • World Cup beer sales are hopping. Brewers hope the stout demand outlasts the tournament

    World Cup beer sales are hopping. Brewers hope the stout demand outlasts the tournament

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted across North America has delivered a welcome short-term boost to beer sales in host cities and across the U.S., but industry analysts and leaders remain divided over whether the historic tournament can reverse a years-long global downward trend in beer consumption.

    From packed Boston taprooms to sold-out stadium stands in Philadelphia, the scale of fan demand caught even seasoned industry operators off guard. FIFA organizers confirmed that fans purchased a total of 290,000 stadium beers across the six matches held in Philadelphia, while Boston bars reported scrambling to arrange emergency beer restocks to avoid running dry on high-traffic game days. Jim Koch, founder and CEO of Boston Beer Co., the maker of Samuel Adams, recalled that at the company’s downtown Boston taproom, staff poured a Sam Adams Boston Lager every 12 seconds when Scottish fans flocked to the venue for a match, requiring two emergency deliveries to keep up. What struck Koch most, however, was the return of in-person social connection that has been slow to rebound after the pandemic: “I didn’t see a single soul on their phone. They had a beer in their hand and they were talking to each other. They were doing what beer is meant to do, which is helping people enjoy each other’s company.”

    Official data from the Beer Institute bears out this temporary surge: between the tournament’s opening four weeks, on-venue beer sales at bars, restaurants, stadiums and other public locations rose 14% in U.S. host cities compared to the same period in 2025, with a 4% uptick recorded across the entire country. This open, fan-centric drinking culture stood in stark contrast to the 2022 Qatar World Cup, where alcohol sales were banned inside all match venues. Major brewers leaned heavily into the 2026 tournament to capitalize on the moment: AB InBev, the global brewing giant that owns Budweiser and Michelob Ultra and serves as the tournament’s official beer sponsor, rolled out widespread marketing support for local bars and hosted more than 200,000 public watch parties across 40 countries. Rival Molson Coors boosted its marketing budget for June and July by 60% compared to 2025, and launched a novelty limited-edition soccer ball container that holds 12 cans of Miller Lite to draw in fans.

    For casual fans like Maybell Romero, a Tulane University law professor who watched matches from bars in Mexico City, the World Cup has been a rare opportunity to enjoy beer over all-day viewing events. Romero, who typically favors cocktails, noted that beer’s lower alcohol content makes it ideal for extended match watch parties, a trend that has driven some of the temporary sales growth. But even she acknowledges the bump will likely fade once the tournament wraps: “I might order an occasional beer once the World Cup ends but expects to go back to mostly drinking cocktails.”

    The collective post-elimination lull after Mexico and Brazil exited the tournament already offered a preview of how quickly demand can cool: shares of major brewers AB InBev and Constellation Brands, which holds U.S. rights to top Mexican brands Corona and Modelo, tumbled immediately following the two teams’ eliminations, as investors priced in falling consumer activity across North American markets. Romero confirmed the mood shift on the ground in Mexico City: “The city is collectively depressed. Everything is a lot quieter, and people aren’t going out as much.”

    Beneath the temporary World Cup hype lies a stubborn, long-running decline that has impacted major beer markets across every inhabited continent. Data from the U.S. Craft Brewers Association shows domestic beer consumption has fallen steadily for 10 consecutive years, a trend mirrored in Statistics Canada data for the Canadian market and industry figures from the Brewers of Europe for the European Union.

    Three core shifts are driving the ongoing decline. First, growing consumer focus on wellness has pushed many people to cut back on alcohol consumption: 2025 marked the first time in Gallup’s polling history that a majority of U.S. adults (53%) said consuming one or two drinks daily carries negative health impacts. While non-alcoholic beer sales have grown steadily in recent years, the segment still accounts for just 1% of the total U.S. beer market, according to the Beer Institute, too small to offset declines in full-strength beer sales.

    Second, widespread economic anxiety and affordability concerns have dragged down overall alcohol consumption across categories. Data from beverage industry research firm IWSR shows total U.S. alcohol consumption across beer, wine and spirits fell 5% in 2025, with affordability cited as a primary driver of the decline.

    Third, changing social habits have pulled consumers away from the beer-centric social gatherings that have long driven bulk sales. Craig Purser, president and CEO of the National Beer Wholesalers Association, argues that the rise of at-home streaming entertainment like Netflix and constant smartphone use has encouraged “cocooning” — a trend of staying home and socializing less in public groups, which directly cuts into on-premise beer sales. “If you have this behavior where we’re cocooning and we’re not spending time with other folks, that’s going to affect beer consumption,” Purser explained.

    Despite these headwinds, many industry leaders remain optimistic that large-scale live events like the World Cup can reignite consumer demand for beer over the long term, pointing to a pipeline of major global sporting events coming to North America in the coming years. Purser noted that the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles will offer another massive opportunity to draw crowds back to public gatherings, while expanding sports schedules for college and professional football have already created more regular occasions for group viewing with beer. He added that the growing variety of low- and no-alcohol beer options is also helping widen beer’s consumer base to include more health-conscious drinkers.

    A recent policy shift has also opened new opportunities for the industry: in May 2026, the NCAA reversed its decades-long ban on alcohol advertising during the March Madness college basketball tournament, allowing beer, wine, spirit and hard seltzer brands to sponsor the event starting in the 2027 season. Koch, for his part, said he is not concerned about the long-term future of the industry, pointing to beer’s 10,000-year history as a core part of human social life. “People worry that the beer business has declined for a few years, and I always remind them that beer has been a part of human society, human civilization, for 10,000 years,” Koch said. “Beer will always be a part enhancing our enjoyment of our lives and the time we spend on this earth.”

  • A Putin critic is convicted on charges that will keep him from campaigning for Russia’s parliament

    A Putin critic is convicted on charges that will keep him from campaigning for Russia’s parliament

    On a Friday in mid-2024, a Moscow suburban court delivered a verdict that effectively removes one of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s most vocal domestic critics from the upcoming national parliamentary race. Sixty-three-year-old Boris Nadezhdin, who has openly condemned Moscow’s military operation in Ukraine and attempted to challenge Putin in the 2024 presidential election, was found guilty of displaying prohibited “extremist symbols” in a 2023 online interview.

    The conviction stems from a brief appearance of an image of late opposition leader Alexei Navalny during that interview. At the time of the conversation, Navalny was already serving a 19-year prison sentence on widely discredited extremism charges that global observers and human rights groups uniformly labeled as politically motivated. Navalny, who had been the most prominent opposition figure to challenge Putin’s rule for years, died in February 2024 under suspicious circumstances while detained in a remote Arctic penal colony.

    Nadezhdin has repeatedly dismissed the conviction as a baseless, absurd political maneuver, arguing that Russian authorities are deliberately blocking him from participating in September’s scheduled parliamentary election. The court in Dolgoprudny, the Moscow outer suburb where Nadezhdin resides, handed down a 1,000 ruble fine (equivalent to roughly $13) alongside the guilty verdict. While the fine is minor, the conviction carries profound political consequences that permanently block Nadezhdin from holding public office.

    This legal action marks the latest in a string of restrictions placed on the Putin critic over the past several months. Just one week prior to the verdict, Russia’s Justice Ministry added Nadezhdin to its controversial “foreign agent” registry, a designation that brings heavy social stigma, constant state surveillance, and formal bars on running for public office. Prior to Friday’s ruling, Nadezhdin had still been permitted to pursue a symbolic, low-profile campaign for a parliamentary seat; that option is now fully closed.

    During the court hearing, Nadezhdin reported feeling unwell, forcing proceedings to pause briefly so an ambulance team could conduct a medical evaluation. Before the session began, he told reporters he had considered traveling abroad for medical treatment and political safety, but Russian authorities have already imposed an exit ban barring him from leaving the country.

    Nadezhdin’s exclusion from electoral politics follows a pattern of opposition crackdown that played out earlier this year during the 2024 presidential race. In January 2024, he drew widespread public support by openly calling for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine and collected more than the required number of voter signatures to qualify for the ballot. However, Russia’s Supreme Court ultimately disqualified him, ruling that over 9,000 of his submitted signatures were invalid — a margin just large enough to remove him from the March 2024 race. Putin ultimately won a fifth presidential term with only token, widely compliant opposition on the ballot, a result that drew international criticism for lack of democratic competition.

    The conviction of Nadezhdin comes amid a broader ongoing crackdown on anti-government dissent that accelerated after the Kremlin launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since that time, Russian authorities have dramatically expanded restrictions on freedom of speech and political opposition, targeting independent journalists, human rights organizations, civil society leaders, LGBTQ+ activists, and minority religious groups with sweeping legal penalties. Hundreds of dissidents have been jailed on politically motivated charges, while thousands more have fled the country to avoid persecution.

    In a parallel development on the same day as Nadezhdin’s verdict, another former supporter-turned-critic of Putin was taken into custody in St. Petersburg. Ilya Remeslo, a pro-Kremlin blogger and activist who publicly broke with the government earlier this year, was arrested on charges of spreading “false information” about the Russian military — a criminal offense that has become one of the most common tools used to target government critics. The state-run Tass news agency confirmed that Remeslo will be transferred to Moscow for an upcoming court hearing. Remeslo first publicly criticized the military campaign in Ukraine and called for Putin’s resignation in March 2024; shortly after that announcement, he was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric clinic for a month, a move he described as retaliation for his public comments.

  • Russian strikes kill 4 in Ukraine as Zelenskyy’s defense shake-up sparks anger

    Russian strikes kill 4 in Ukraine as Zelenskyy’s defense shake-up sparks anger

    Kyiv, Ukraine – As Russia unleashed a wave of deadly overnight airstrikes across multiple Ukrainian regions that claimed at least four civilian lives and left 20 others wounded, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy finds himself grappling with an unprecedented domestic political crisis triggered by his abrupt dismissal of the nation’s popular defense minister.

    The sweeping government reshuffle announced Thursday, which also included the nomination of a new prime minister, has sown divisions within Ukraine’s top military command and sparked widespread public outrage, just as Kyiv has begun to gain incremental ground in its defense against Russia’s full-scale invasion that began more than four years ago.

    The sudden ouster of 35-year-old Mykhailo Fedorov, who had served in the defense portfolio for just six months, drew thousands of demonstrators into streets across Ukraine on Thursday, with additional organized protests planned for Friday. A young, widely admired figure within the Zelenskyy administration, Fedorov has been widely credited as the driving force behind Ukraine’s rapid, transformative technological military innovations and aggressive anti-corruption reforms within the defense sector – initiatives that had renewed public hope for victory amid the grinding war.

    According to President Zelenskyy, irreconcilable tensions between Fedorov and General Oleksandr Syrskyi, Ukraine’s armed forces commander who launched his military career in the former Soviet Union, left Fedorov’s position untenable.

    To replace Fedorov, Zelenskyy has tapped Major General Yevgen Khmara, the acting head of Ukraine’s State Security Service (SBU) and a highly respected special operations veteran, to take over defense ministry responsibilities. The president confirmed late Thursday that he will formally submit Khmara’s nomination to Ukraine’s parliament for mandatory legal approval, though the appointment faces multiple bureaucratic delays. Ukrainian law requires the defense minister to be a civilian, meaning Khmara must first retire from active security service before he can be sworn in. Additionally, national lawmakers are currently in summer recess that runs through mid-August, further pushing back any final vote on the nomination.

    Khmara has led the SBU since January 2025, after previously commanding the agency’s elite Alpha special forces unit. He is best known as one of the key architects of Operation Spiderweb, Ukraine’s high-profile 2024 strike against Russian air bases that marked one of Kyiv’s most successful asymmetric attacks of the war. A veteran of the Alpha unit since 2011, Khmara rose to commander of the force in 2023 and was promoted to major general the following year.

    Parallel to the unfolding political upheaval in Kyiv, Moscow continued its pattern of intensifying strategic bombing of Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, a response to battlefield setbacks and Kyiv’s ongoing strikes on Russian oil facilities that have triggered severe domestic fuel shortages in Russia.

    Local officials confirmed the human cost of the overnight attacks: in southern Ukraine’s strategic port city of Odesa, two people were killed and 10 more wounded – including several children – in a Russian missile strike. One of the fatalities was a woman killed while walking in a public park with her children, who escaped the attack unharmed, regional military administrator Oleh Kiper confirmed. Zelenskyy added that two additional civilians died in strikes on the Zaporizhzhia region, where five people were injured, while three more people were wounded in Russian shelling of the northeastern Kharkiv region. Additional injuries were reported in Russian strikes across five other Ukrainian regions.

    For its part, Russia’s Defense Ministry announced Friday that its air defense systems intercepted and destroyed 243 Ukrainian drones launched overnight into Russian-held and Russian territory. In occupied parts of Ukraine’s Kherson region, Vladimir Saldo, the Moscow-appointed regional administration head, claimed that three civilians had been killed and seven wounded in Ukrainian drone strikes over the preceding 24 hours.

  • Surprise British Open leader Jackson Suber faces another breezy day on the Birkdale links

    Surprise British Open leader Jackson Suber faces another breezy day on the Birkdale links

    Southport, England — Few in the packed galleries lining the dunes of Royal Birkdale expected to see an unknown American rookie atop the British Open leaderboard when the first round wrapped up Thursday. But that is exactly where Jackson Suber landed after a blistering 5-under-par 65 that turned the 2025 Open Championship on its head, capping a meteoric rise that has brought the golfer to Europe for the first time in his career, just days after he first played links-style golf for the first time ever.

    Suber’s rapid ascent up the leaderboard came together in a flash of exceptional play: the 29-year-old sank back-to-back birdie and eagle in quick succession to surge past a field of 36 golfers who finished the opening round under par, clinching a one-shot lead heading into Friday’s second round. It is a story for the ages in major golf: not only had Suber never teed off on a links course until three days before tournament play began, this week marks his first ever appearance at the British Open, and his first trip to the European continent at all. Even adjusting to local driving customs has been a new experience; Suber joked Thursday that he has refused to get behind the wheel on the right-hand side of the car, saying “I’m trying to make it here for four days.”

    The opening momentum carried into Friday’s early play, with Suber picking up another birdie on the second hole to hold his position near the top. Wind picked up across the Birkdale links as the day went on, however, and the American dropped three strokes off his lead by the middle of the round. Currently ranked 115th in the Official World Golf Ranking and 81st in the PGA Tour FedEx Cup standings, Suber has notched three top-10 finishes on the Tour this season, including a tied-fourth result at the Canadian Open that earned him his spot in the Royal Birkdale field. This week is just his third appearance at a major men’s professional championship.

    Suber’s surprise run is far from unprecedented in the history of major golf. Over the decades, unheralded players have repeatedly stepped into the opening round lead, sending fans scrambling to search up their biographies. In the 2003 British Open at Royal St. George’s, South African Hennie Otto, then ranked 200th in the world, opened with a 6-under 66 to claim the first-round lead. More recently, Andrew Landry made his major debut at the 2016 U.S. Open at Oakmont and shot a 4-under 66 to hold a one-shot lead over eventual champion Dustin Johnson after 18 holes. Amateurs have even claimed a share of the first-round lead twice in the last 25 years, most recently Christo Lamprecht at Hoylake in 2023. In 1981, Nick Job, a journeyman who never finished higher than 25th on the European Tour Order of Merit, claimed the opening-round lead and held his position through the first two days before a 75-74 weekend dropped him down the standings.

    Despite his lack of links experience, Suber has expressed steady confidence in his game ahead of the remainder of the tournament. “I feel like I’ve just been playing good the last few months,” he said Thursday. “Just knowing that good golf is going to take care of everything, and really trusting my caddie to figure out where we’re going to hit it.”

    While Suber grabbed headlines, other top contenders got off to uneven starts at Royal Birkdale. Four-time major champion Rory McIlroy, one of the early starters on Thursday, carded an opening round 2-over 72, dragged down by six bogeys and a series of missed short putts that left him seven strokes off Suber’s pace. Defending Open champion Scottie Scheffler fared better, finishing the afternoon opening round at 3-under 68, four strokes ahead of McIlroy and within striking distance of the lead. Local favorites also had a slow start: England’s Tommy Fleetwood mounted a late rally to climb the leaderboard, while Justin Rose faltered, leaving the home contingent with work to do over the remaining three rounds.

  • Andy Burnham to become UK Labour leader in last step before taking over as prime minister

    Andy Burnham to become UK Labour leader in last step before taking over as prime minister

    LONDON — Britain is on the cusp of a Downing Street transition, with Andy Burnham set to formally assume the leadership of the country’s governing Labour Party on Friday, clearing the final procedural step before he takes office as prime minister next week. The center-left party will officially confirm the outcome of the leadership contest to replace outgoing prime minister Keir Starmer, a race where Burnham stood as the only candidate. As of Thursday evening, the former Greater Manchester mayor had secured the backing of 379 out of 403 sitting Labour Members of Parliament in the House of Commons, locking in his expected victory.

    For weeks, Burnham has held the unofficial title of prime minister-in-waiting, but he has released few concrete details of his policy agenda to date. One month ago, after winning a by-election to secure a seat in Parliament, he pledged to build a new brand of British politics “rooted in unity and hope” and craft an economic framework that spreads balanced growth evenly across every region of the United Kingdom. To this point, he has avoided formal press conferences and granted only a small number of interviews, meaning he will enter 10 Downing Street as a largely unfamiliar figure to most voters outside of his northern Manchester base.

    Burnham brings a far more approachable, relaxed leadership style compared to the stern demeanor of his predecessor Starmer, and is widely regarded as one of the Labour Party’s most skilled communicators. However, he will inherit many of the same urgent challenges that defined Starmer’s tenure, including sluggish national economic growth, a persistent cost-of-living crisis exacerbated by ongoing armed conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and chronically overstretched public services that have struggled to recover after the COVID-19 pandemic.

    According to statements from Burnham’s office, he will outline his core policy priorities for the first time as Labour leader in his inaugural address on Friday. In the speech, he is expected to frame his administration as one that has the “courage to fix the big issues that successive political leaders have neglected.” Key areas of focus will include national economic renewal, expanding public ownership of critical infrastructure sectors, and creating new, high-quality modern industrial jobs. Burnham will argue that Britain took “a series of wrong turns in the 1980s”, when successive governments centralized political power in Westminster and pursued mass privatization of national economic assets – policies implemented by Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher that fundamentally reshaped the UK’s economic and social landscape.

    In a pre-recorded social media video released late Thursday, Burnham added that improving access to consistent social care for people requiring support due to age, chronic illness or disability will also be a top legislative priority. The issue, which has confounded both previous Labour and Conservative governments, has grown increasingly pressing as the UK’s population continues to age, leaving millions of vulnerable citizens and their families without reliable support.

    Starmer first announced his resignation last month, ending a two-year tenure marked by repeated missteps and public judgment errors that eroded his support among both Labour Party members and the general public. Currently, the governing Labour Party consistently trails the anti-immigration Reform UK party in national opinion polls, and the party suffered catastrophic losses in May’s local government elections – a result that built irresistible pressure for Starmer to step down.

    Starmer will remain in the role of caretaker prime minister until Monday, when he will formally tender his resignation to King Charles III. Following Starmer’s exit, the monarch will invite Burnham to form a new government, in line with UK constitutional convention. Under Britain’s parliamentary democratic system, governing parties are permitted to replace their leader and sitting prime minister without triggering a snap general election; the next scheduled national election is not required to be held until 2029.

    This leadership transition marks a continuation of a trend of frequent prime ministerial turnover in the UK that has reshaped British politics in recent years. When Burnham takes office, he will become the seventh person to hold the role of prime minister since 2016.

  • Economists likened to climate deniers in Irish unity debate

    Economists likened to climate deniers in Irish unity debate

    A fierce political clash has erupted in Ireland’s lower parliamentary chamber, the Dáil Éireann, over the projected fiscal costs of unifying the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, after a senior Sinn Féin lawmaker compared independent economists predicting high initial unification costs to climate change deniers.

    Thomas Gould, a Sinn Féin Teachta Dála (TD), made the controversial remarks during a scheduled debate focused on the tax and public spending ramifications of a potential united Ireland. The core of the disagreement centers on wildly varying projections from academic analysts, who have arrived at drastically different cost estimates based on differing core assumptions about post-unification governance and public spending.

    Gould argued that some commentators are deliberately leveraging fabricated data and inaccurate figures to undermine support for Irish unification. He specifically called out Professor John Fitzgerald, an economist who co-published a 2024 study examining how Northern Ireland’s current public service funding requirements would translate to a unified Irish state. Fitzgerald’s study put forward a central projection of €11 billion (£9.4 billion) in annual net initial costs for unification, equal to roughly 5% of the Republic of Ireland’s total national income. That estimate would require the new unified state to implement unpopular policy adjustments: tax increases, higher government borrowing, or cuts to public spending.

    That projection was directly challenged by political scientist Professor John Doyle, who used an alternate set of assumptions to calculate a far lower annual initial cost of approximately €2.5 billion.

    In defending his criticism of high-cost projections, Gould drew a parallel to decades of climate change denial. “For years, when we talked about climate change, climate change deniers were rolled out to give their opinions, even though all the science was against them,” Gould told the Dáil. “Now, we have that happening here, where we know the data and the positive implications Irish unity could have but we are allowing false data to come in to skew the conversation.”

    Irish Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Simon Harris offered a more nuanced perspective earlier in the debate, acknowledging that the transition to a united Ireland would bring with it significant fiscal costs and logistical complexity, while pushing back on efforts to sum up the full impact in a single figure. Harris argued that the economic effects of unification would shift over time rather than remaining static, and that the public debate should focus on what the island’s two divided economies can collectively build after integration.

    “The fiscal position in year one would, of course, not remain static. Over time, costs and revenues would evolve as both economies adapt, grow and become integrated,” Harris said. “How these opportunities are managed, and the extent to which these benefits are realised, will be the key determinant of the long-term fiscal impact. In other words, these outcomes are not predetermined. They will be shaped by the policy choices we make, the policies we pursue and the decisions we make.”

    The debate comes just one week after the two governing parties of the Republic of Ireland – Harris’ Fine Gael and coalition partner Fianna Fáil – defeated a Sinn Féin proposal that would have started formal state planning for unification. The proposal included two key elements: the creation of a citizens’ assembly bringing together 99 randomly selected citizens to debate the advantages and drawbacks of Irish unity under the guidance of an independent moderator, and a requirement for the Taoiseach (Irish Prime Minister) to draft a public green paper outlining cross-government preparations for unification, covering everything from economic policy to public health and housing.

  • Man and woman killed in two-vehicle collision

    Man and woman killed in two-vehicle collision

    A devastating two-vehicle road traffic collision has left two people dead and two others with critical injuries in the Republic of Ireland, close to the Northern Ireland border. The crash unfolded at approximately 15:10 local time on Thursday along the R173 roadway in the small community of The Bush, County Louth, according to initial official updates.

    First responders who arrived at the scene confirmed that the male driver and female passenger from the first vehicle, both in their 70s, could not be saved and were pronounced dead at the site of the collision. The two occupants of the second vehicle, a male driver and a female passenger both aged in their 30s, suffered serious, life-threatening injuries. Emergency medical teams arranged emergency aeromedical evacuation to two major Dublin hospitals: the pair were transferred separately to Beaumont Hospital and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital to receive urgent specialized care for their injuries.

    In the aftermath of the collision, Gardaí, the national police service of the Republic of Ireland, have launched a formal investigation to establish the full circumstances that led to the crash. Law enforcement officials are issuing a public appeal for any members of the public who were traveling in the area around the time of the incident and may have dashcam, CCTV or other mobile camera footage of the collision or the vehicles involved to come forward and share the material with investigators. This evidence is expected to help officers reconstruct the events of the crash and determine any contributing factors.

  • Spain practices outside before the World Cup final as smoke fills the air in northern New Jersey

    Spain practices outside before the World Cup final as smoke fills the air in northern New Jersey

    As smoke plumes from raging Canadian wildfires drifted south and turned the New Jersey sun into a hazy, muted orb, the Spanish men’s World Cup squad held an outdoor training session on Thursday ahead of Sunday’s championship match, despite official warnings that local air conditions had reached hazardous levels.

    The intensity of the hour-long practice, which kicked off at 11 a.m. EDT in East Hanover, remains unclear: members of the press were only permitted to observe the opening 15 minutes of the scheduled session. Across the country in the southeastern U.S., Argentina’s national team continued their preparation undisturbed by the wildfire fallout, holding training in the Atlanta area less than a day after pulling off a dramatic comeback semifinal win over England that booked their spot in a second consecutive World Cup final. Marietta, Georgia, where the team is based, sits far enough south to escape the smoke, which has been carried southeast by winds from northern Ontario, triggering air quality warnings stretching from the U.S. Midwest all the way to the Northeast.

    Public health officials have urged residents across affected regions to limit outdoor time and wear protective masks when outside, as air quality indexes have fallen into the unhealthy to hazardous range—ranks that pose risks to all people, regardless of pre-existing health conditions. Multiple public health and climate experts have raised urgent red flags over the decision to hold high-intensity outdoor training for elite athletes in these conditions.

    “These are high-level athletes who are moving a lot of air through their lungs during every practice and every game, and really they shouldn’t be practicing outside if the air quality levels are at hazardous sort of ranges for wildfire-related air pollution,” explained Dr. Courtney Howard, an emergency room physician and leading official with the Global Climate and Health Alliance. “That’s the time to schedule a practice inside. You could put an N95 mask on them, but trying to make sure that everybody’s mask is well-fitted, I suspect that’s not the best choice. I would go find an air-conditioned indoor facility that’s a clean-air shelter.”

    Requests for comment sent to both FIFA and the Spanish Football Association, asking whether an indoor alternative had been considered or was logistically possible, went unanswered as of Thursday. Officials do project that the wildfire smoke will clear out of the East Rutherford, New Jersey region long before Sunday’s 3 p.m. EDT championship kickoff, easing concerns that the final itself will be disrupted.

    Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Air Now monitoring network shows that while East Hanover’s air quality started Thursday in the “unhealthy” category, conditions gradually improved through the day, falling to only “unhealthy for sensitive groups” by mid-afternoon. Even so, particle pollution levels across New Jersey on Thursday registered more than seven times higher than the maximum safe threshold set by the World Health Organization. Forecasters expect air quality to improve to the “moderate” range by match day Sunday.

    Wildfires are growing in size and frequency across North America as global average temperatures rise, and decades of medical research confirm that wildfire smoke causes systemic damage to nearly every organ system in the human body, contributing to tens of thousands of premature deaths annually. Smoke irritates the respiratory tract almost immediately, triggering sharp spikes in asthma attacks and emergency ambulance dispatches within hours of pollution levels rising. It also sparks widespread inflammation throughout the body, targeting a person’s most vulnerable pre-existing health conditions and triggering unregulated immune system responses to the toxic irritants, medical researchers explain.

    “It’s not healthy for anyone to be in the smoke, especially if you’re exercising,” said Mary Johnson, an environmental health research scientist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “You’re exchanging more air, so you’re being exposed to even more pollutants, and even healthy individuals at some point will have some type of health effect from the exposure to the smoke. So, even though these are healthy, young individuals, it’s not a good idea to be exercising in this type of environment.”

    Scientists have identified at least 1,000 distinct toxic compounds in wildfire smoke, according to Luke Montrose, an environmental toxicologist at Colorado State University. “If I gave you a list you would recognize some of these as being very bad often times associated with the burning of diesel fuel or cigarette smoke things like formaldehyde or volatile organic compounds,” Montrose said. “Just the smoke itself can be bad.”

    Climate video producer Teresa de Miguel in Washington, D.C., and SNTV videographers Lissette Romero in East Hanover, New Jersey, and Max Feliu in Marietta, Georgia, contributed reporting to this article.

  • Watch: What to know as Genoa bridge disaster trial ends

    Watch: What to know as Genoa bridge disaster trial ends

    Eight years after one of Italy’s deadliest modern infrastructure failures, the high-profile criminal trial over the 2018 collapse of Genoa’s Morandi Bridge is reaching its final stage. The tragic incident, which claimed 43 lives when a 200-meter span of the busy highway bridge crumbled onto residential and industrial areas below during a heavy rainstorm, has gripped the nation for years, sparking fierce debates over infrastructure maintenance, corporate accountability, and regulatory oversight.

    At the heart of the proceeding held in Genoa’s courthouse are more than 50 defendants facing a range of charges, including manslaughter, negligence, and failure to maintain critical infrastructure. The accused group spans a wide cross-section of stakeholders: senior executives from the companies responsible for the bridge’s design, construction, and decades of upkeep, as well as former infrastructure agency officials and public works managers who oversaw safety inspections and approval processes for the aging structure.

    The collapse immediately raised urgent questions about the state of Italy’s aging transportation network, with critics pointing to decades of underinvestment in maintenance and alleged conflicts of interest between private concessionaires and public regulatory bodies. Over the course of the trial, prosecutors have presented thousands of pages of evidence, including engineering reports, internal corporate communications, and testimonies from survivors and expert witnesses, arguing that the disaster was preventable, caused by long-known structural flaws that were left unaddressed by responsible parties.

    As the court prepares to deliver its verdict, families of the victims have pushed for full accountability, saying that justice for the 43 lives lost is the only way to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future. The trial’s outcome is also widely expected to set new precedents for infrastructure safety regulations and corporate liability across Italy, prompting broader reforms to how the country inspects and maintains its network of aging bridges and highways.

  • New law will remove 32 million annual passenger cap at Dublin Airport

    New law will remove 32 million annual passenger cap at Dublin Airport

    Nineteen years after Dublin Airport’s annual passenger cap of 32 million was first written into planning rules, Ireland has formally enacted legislation to eliminate the long-contested limit, marking a major shift in the country’s aviation strategy.

    The newly signed Dublin Airport (Passenger Capacity) Act 2026 grants Ireland’s Transport Minister the formal authority to fully scrap the 2007-era restriction. The legislation cleared Ireland’s lower house of parliament, the Dáil Éireann, earlier this week, and received formal presidential approval from President Catherine Connolly this past Thursday.

    The 32 million cap has been tied up in legal challenges for years, and has been temporarily suspended since a 2024 High Court ruling, with the suspension set to remain in place until a ruling from the European Court of Justice. Even with the cap on the books, official data from Irish national public broadcaster RTÉ shows the airport far exceeded the limit last year, handling roughly four million more passengers than the cap allowed. As far back as 2024, the restriction already created disruptive travel disruptions: Leinster Rugby was forced to depart from Belfast International Airport for away matches to avoid eating into Dublin Airport’s limited passenger quota. Last year, the airport also secured separate planning approval to expand its allowed number of nighttime flights, loosening another key operational constraint.

    The original 2007 cap was introduced by city planners primarily to address growing concerns over chronic road congestion in the communities surrounding the airport. Today, opposition to lifting the limit remains, with local residential groups and environmental organizations still backing the cap. For environmental advocates, the restriction is a critical tool to curb growth in the aviation sector, one of the highest-emitting industries contributing to climate change.

    But proponents of repealing the cap, which include major Irish, European and U.S. airlines, argue that retaining the limit would cause severe long-term economic harm to Ireland. Dublin Airport serves as the country’s primary international entry and exit point, and industry groups have repeatedly warned that a binding cap would limit tourism growth, block business connectivity, and harm Ireland’s global competitiveness.

    Transport Minister Darragh O’Brien has emphasized that the new law formally acknowledges the airport’s outsize strategic role as Ireland’s leading international gateway. O’Brien said he intends to move swiftly to amend or fully revoke the cap once required environmental assessments are completed, stressing that all reviews will be finished within the strict timelines laid out in the new legislation. “This legislation recognizes the strategic importance of Dublin Airport as our primary international gateway,” O’Brien said, underscoring the government’s priority of unlocking the airport’s capacity to support national economic growth.