标签: Europe

欧洲

  • French PM calls for cities to impose curfews after violent weekend protests

    French PM calls for cities to impose curfews after violent weekend protests

    After a chaotic weekend of widespread rioting, arson and looting that swept across French cities and towns, the French government has moved to grant local mayors new authority to implement targeted curfews, as authorities work to regain public order and tally the staggering human and economic cost of the unrest.

    Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu announced the new powers following an emergency crisis meeting held Monday, noting that curfews can be rolled out “where they need” to protect civilian lives and local businesses. The prime minister did not exclude the possibility of declaring a national state of emergency if the violence continues, and has outlined a package of support for communities and workers impacted by the disorder.

    Marseille, France’s second-largest urban center, was quick to enact new restrictions, implementing a ban on all public gatherings between 12 p.m. and 8 p.m. to prevent further unrest. ABC reporter James Waterhouse was on the ground in Paris over the weekend, documenting widespread property damage and ransacked storefronts that left iconic public spaces like Place de la République resembling war zones.

    The unrest traces its initial roots to student-led protests over deteriorating school conditions that began last month, but demonstrations quickly expanded to encompass a broad set of public grievances, including rising fuel costs, soaring cost of living, and declining standards across key public services. By the weekend, an estimated 550,000 people had joined peaceful protests across the country, but the demonstrations were hijacked by groups of violent agitators.

    Witnesses reported that groups of rioters, many clad in black clothing and masked to avoid identification, set fire to vehicles and buildings, and looted retail and commercial spaces in Paris, Marseille and dozens of smaller communities across the nation. In Paris alone, police deployed tear gas and stun grenades against crowds Sunday, while protesters pelted officers with bottles and rocks, per reports from Agence France-Presse. One protester lost a hand after being struck by a police crowd-control grenade during the clashes, the news agency confirmed, alongside an unconfirmed number of additional protester injuries.

    One of the most shocking incidents of the weekend unfolded in the central French city of Limoges, where rioters set fire to the city’s ornate 19th-century town hall. The blaze gutted the historic building, causing its clock tower and roof to collapse. Local resident Gerrard described the scene as devastating, saying “It’s awful and unbelievable. We are very sad and I think it will be a long time to put it back as it was before.”

    Official figures confirm that more than 2,500 people have been arrested in connection with the violence nationwide, and roughly 1,000 police officers have sustained injuries during clashes. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez, who previously acknowledged that police had “lost control” of unrest in some cities, offered his resignation Sunday, but President Emmanuel Macron rejected the offer. The Élysée Palace said Macron turned down the resignation due to “the need for continued command of law enforcement” amid the ongoing crisis. Currently, around 200 investigators are reviewing hundreds of hours of CCTV footage to identify and apprehend the ringleaders behind the coordinated violence.

    For businesses, the damage is already catastrophic. Alain Di Crescenzo, head of France’s Chambers of Commerce and Industry (CCI), told French broadcaster RTL that more than 2,000 shops and commercial operations were directly impacted by the weekend’s violence. He estimated total damage will reach hundreds of millions of euros.

    To support affected communities, Lecornu announced the government will allocate immediate recovery funding to help rebuild damaged areas, with the cost ultimately recovered from the individuals convicted of orchestrating or participating in the violence. “There will be a law that will be put in place to find ways of making sure that those who have damaged properties will have to pay,” the prime Minister said. The government has also established a special partial unemployment fund for workers who are unable to perform their jobs due to riot damage and unrest.

    President Macron has publicly drawn a clear line between peaceful demonstrators and violent agitators, saying Sunday that there must be a distinction between the “legitimate demands” of those protesting peacefully and “those who destroyed, smashed and looted.”

  • Catalonia’s former rebel president can return to Spain, court rules

    Catalonia’s former rebel president can return to Spain, court rules

    Nearly a decade after he fled Spain following a failed bid for Catalan independence, former Catalonia regional president Carles Puigdemont can now return to the country without risk of arrest, following a landmark ruling from Spain’s Supreme Court. The high court has formally upheld a ruling to withdraw the national arrest warrant issued against Puigdemont over his role in organizing the 2017 unauthorized independence referendum, a vote that defied the central government in Madrid.

    After the 2017 referendum, Madrid imposed direct rule on the northeastern region, and Puigdemont fled to Belgium, where he has resided in self-imposed exile ever since. His only confirmed brief return to Spanish territory came earlier in 2024, a surprise appearance in Barcelona that immediately triggered a nationwide police manhunt before he escaped back across the border to France. Today, however, the political landscape Puigdemont would reenter looks drastically different than it did seven years ago: the Catalan independence movement has faded to a marginal issue on Spain’s national political agenda.

    Monday’s ruling closes out a years-long, tangled legal battle between the Spanish judiciary and the former separatist leader. The conflict over Puigdemont’s legal status reignited in 2024, when Spain’s ruling socialist government introduced a controversial amnesty law covering dozens of Catalan politicians and activists linked to the secession push. Initially, the Supreme Court ruled that Puigdemont and several of his closest allies should be excluded from the amnesty, arguing that ongoing charges of financial misconduct tied to the 2017 referendum disqualified them from the pardon.

    That ruling was overturned by Spain’s Constitutional Court earlier this month. On Monday, the Supreme Court additionally rejected an appeal brought by far-right opposition party Vox against the withdrawal of arrest warrants for Puigdemont and two of his former ministers, Lluís Puig and Toni Comín. The decision now paves the way for all three separatist leaders to return to Spain without legal risk of detention.

    Puigdemont, who leads the center-right pro-independence party Together for Catalonia (JxCat), was elected to the European Parliament in 2019, and won a seat in the Catalan regional parliament in 2024. For years, he has campaigned from just across Spain’s northern border in southern France, holding rallies where supporters travel from Catalonia to attend. He has remained an active voice for the independence cause across the continent, regularly criticizing Spanish democratic institutions while working to raise international awareness for the separatist movement.

    In the years immediately following the 2017 referendum, nine of Puigdemont’s former colleagues were jailed for their roles in the secession push; all were ultimately pardoned and released by the Spanish government in 2021. Immediately following Monday’s Supreme Court announcement, Puigdemont released a video on social media explaining his decision to remain in exile for seven years. “My role was to stir public opinion, internationalise the conflict and work from the heart of Europe to explain the reality of Spain,” he said.

    As of Monday, no official timeline has been announced for Puigdemont’s return to Spain. However, Comín, his former regional health minister and fellow exiled separatist, confirmed plans to travel to Madrid this week to complete administrative procedures tied to his status as an MEP.

    The 2017 unauthorized referendum triggered the most severe political crisis Spain has faced since the country transitioned back to democracy following the death of dictator Francisco Franco. The banned vote was met with a harsh police crackdown by national authorities, and after Catalonia’s separatist-led regional parliament declared independence, Madrid dissolved the regional legislature, removed the sitting separatist government, and called an emergency snap regional election.

    Today, the issue of Catalan independence no longer holds a central spot in Spanish politics, with voters and parties prioritizing pressing issues like housing affordability and immigration. Even so, Puigdemont’s JxCat party retains critical political sway: its parliamentary support was instrumental in allowing current socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez to form his new left-wing national government after the 2023 general election.

    Within Catalonia itself, JxCat has faced growing electoral pressure in recent years, with the more extreme pro-independence party Catalan Alliance siphoning off much of its traditional voter base. The political uncertainty comes as Spain prepares for a new general election next month, with polls indicating that the far right could enter the national governing coalition for the first time in modern Spanish history.

  • Meloni calls emergency meeting after weekend of violent clashes

    Meloni calls emergency meeting after weekend of violent clashes

    Widespread violent clashes erupted from peaceful cost-of-living protests in Milan over the weekend, leaving a trail of vandalism, injuries and more than 200 detentions across northern Italy, and pushing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to convene an urgent national security meeting on Monday.

    Organized demonstrations drew more than 5,000 demonstrators to Milan’s streets on Saturday, with tensions escalating quickly when a subset of masked protesters began launching paving stones, discarded bins and street furniture at responding police officers. Law enforcement ultimately deployed crowd control measures including tear gas and water cannons to disperse the unrest, which spilled over into Sunday. Clashes also spread to other major northern Italian cities, triggering pre-emptive security actions in multiple urban centers.

    Official Italian local media reports confirm that over 200 people have been taken into custody in connection with the violence, with 80 percent of those detained being minors. Prosecutors in Milan have already requested prison sentences for five adult arrestees charged with multiple offenses including looting, vandalism and resisting arrest. Multiple people, including serving police officers, were treated for injuries sustained during the confrontations. In Turin, authorities detained several individuals found transporting cobblestones and tools specifically intended for breaking windows, while Bologna’s central train station was temporarily closed as a safety precaution amid fears of spreading disorder.

    In her first public remarks following the unrest, Meloni drew a clear line between legitimate protest and destructive action. “To demonstrate is a right. To lay our cities to waste is not,” the prime minister stated Saturday, labeling the violent actors as “hooligans” who hijacked the original demonstration to spread widespread chaos. With a national general election scheduled for 2025, Meloni has issued a direct call to political opposition groups to issue unambiguous, unanimous condemnation of the rioting. Writing on the social platform X, she emphasized that “any hesitation becomes justification” for the violence.

    The leader of Italy’s main opposition Democratic Party, Elly Schlein, pushed back by confirming her party’s longstanding rejection of all violent action, while warning that the unrest should not be used to silence the grievances of thousands of peaceful protesters across the country who face severe economic hardship amid soaring living costs.

    Local leaders have also raised alarms about the character of the unrest. Milan Mayor Giuseppe Sala described the violence as an alarming “new phenomenon” that draws momentum from a broader unstable international context, linking the disorder to similar unrest seen across the globe. “I witnessed smashed shop windows, looted stores, and frightened citizens,” Sala told Italian news agency Ansa, noting “what happened here is what we are seeing in many cities around the world.”

    The Italian unrest follows a pattern of youth-led economic protests across Europe, where mostly peaceful demonstrations have been marred by isolated outbreaks of rioting. Similar clashes have been recorded in recent weeks in France, Spain and Albania, with hundreds of thousands of protesters marching in neighboring France against economic policies and living costs earlier this month. Friday saw student-led anti-government protests across multiple Italian cities, which set the stage for the larger weekend demonstrations that devolved into violence in the north of the country.

  • France’s government under pressure after weekend of widespread violence

    France’s government under pressure after weekend of widespread violence

    France is grappling with its worst wave of public disorder in modern history, after a peaceful mass protest over soaring living costs and collapsing public service quality devolved into widespread looting, arson and violent clashes over the weekend. What began as a coordinated demonstration drawing more than 500,000 participants, who marched to highlight grievances including underfunded public education, quickly spiraled into chaos when factions of black-clad, masked radical activists and vandals joined the demonstration. By the end of Saturday, an estimated 1,500 shops and businesses across the country had been looted or destroyed, iconic public monuments including central Paris’ Statue de la Republique were defaced, and multiple public buildings including a historic town hall were set ablaze.

    Riot police responded to the unrest with tear gas, water cannons and baton charges, leaving roughly 1,000 officers injured across the country, seven with serious wounds, according to France’s interior ministry. In the days leading up to President Emmanuel Macron’s Sunday national address, widespread speculation circulated that the executive would implement temporary regional curfews or even declare a state of emergency to defuse the volatile situation. Instead, Macron used his televised speech to call for national unity, promising that all perpetrators of the violence would face full legal accountability.

    The address has drawn fierce backlash from both political opponents and social media users, who uniformly criticize it for lacking concrete policy answers to the core grievances that sparked the protest, and failing to outline clear plans for key outstanding questions: how rioters will be brought to justice, how urban centers will be protected ahead of already announced new mass protests in two weeks, how affected small businesses will receive compensation for damages, and when negotiations will open with education sector representatives over long-simmering demands.

    Sophie Binet, Secretary General of the influential CGT union, echoed widespread criticism on Sunday, saying Macron had completely failed to address student concerns, the ongoing cost-of-living crisis and the steady decline of France’s public services. Many French citizens and political observers have also slammed the government, led by newly installed Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu, for being severely underprepared for the scheduled protests, with insufficient police deployments to stop large-scale vandalism and looting. Yaël Braun-Pivet, president of France’s National Assembly, the lower house of parliament, has formally called for a public inquiry to investigate exactly what unfolded over the weekend and what systemic failures allowed the unrest to escalate to such a scale.

    The chaos comes at a uniquely fragile moment for French politics, with a presidential election just six months away and Macron widely viewed as a lame-duck incumbent whose term is winding down. The already tense pre-election atmosphere has been amplified by two leading opposition candidates—far-right nationalist Marine Le Pen and far-left anti-capitalist Jean-Luc Melenchon—who have both seized on the unrest to attack the Macron administration, further polarizing the country. France’s parliament is already paralyzed by deep divisions between three competing political blocs, leaving little room for coordinated legislative action to address growing public anger.

    Compounding political instability is France’s mounting financial pressure: international investors are pushing the government to rein in spiraling public debt, but any cuts to public services or welfare programs are almost certain to spark even larger street protests. Walking through central Paris the night after the unrest, one striking piece of graffiti summed up the national mood: “Things are dark in the city of light.” Polls and on-the-ground interviews show many French citizens are deeply shaken by the weekend’s violence, with images of burning buildings, unimpeded looting and tear gas-filled city squares spreading widespread anxiety. Many ordinary residents express frustration that political leaders are more focused on blaming each other than solving the underlying crises, framing the unrest as a political football ahead of the presidential vote.

    Following the violence, Macron has delegated day-to-day crisis management to Lecornu, who convened an emergency cabinet meeting on Monday to assess the damage and plan a response. For the next two weeks, authorities are hoping for a temporary reprieve, as French students enter their half-term break that will likely reduce protest activity. But labor unions, the remnants of the 2018 yellow jacket movement that disrupted Macron’s first term, and other activist groups have already scheduled a new wave of mass protests for November 5. As France waits for the next round of demonstrations, the entire country is holding its breath, uncertain what comes next for a nation facing growing political, economic and social pressure.

  • Threat forces Israel to Austria flight into emergency landing

    Threat forces Israel to Austria flight into emergency landing

    On Sunday evening, an Austrian Airlines commercial flight traveling from Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion International Airport to Vienna was forced to make an emergency diversion to Bulgaria’s capital Sofia after a verified bomb threat was received against the aircraft, multiple authorities and aviation sources have confirmed.

    The flight, identified as Austrian Airlines Flight 82 carrying a total of 57 people — 51 passengers and six crew members — was transiting through Romanian airspace when the threat was communicated, prompting the flight crew to immediately divert toward the nearest suitable major airport, Sofia’s Vasil Levski Airport. According to an official statement released by Bulgaria’s Ministry of Transport, local authorities activated full emergency response protocols immediately after receiving the diversion alert, including scrambling a MiG-29 fighter jet from the Bulgarian Air Force to escort the passenger airliner through the final approach and landing.

    The jet, an Airbus A320, touched down safely at Vasil Levski Airport roughly three hours after departing Tel Aviv, and all passengers and crew were quickly evacuated from the aircraft as planned. No injuries or harm have been reported among anyone on board, and a full security sweep of the plane and all passenger luggage was completed within 30 minutes of the emergency landing. Investigations into the origin and credibility of the threat are already underway, led by Bulgarian law enforcement and aviation security authorities.

    Austrian Airlines, a subsidiary of German aviation giant Lufthansa, confirmed the bomb threat in a brief statement to AFP, but declined to release additional details about the nature of the threat or the investigation as of press time. The BBC has reached out to Lufthansa for further comment on the incident, and no additional statement has been issued to date.

    This latest aviation security incident comes amid a string of recent safety scares across European and Middle Eastern airspace. Just one month prior, a Flydubai flight en route to Tel Aviv was the target of a hijacking attempt, when a passenger claiming to be a pilot attacked the aircraft’s captain mid-flight. The attempt was foiled when other crew members and passengers restrained the attacker, and the flight diverted to Saudi Arabia for a safe landing with no casualties. Last week, another false alarm triggered military responses in two European countries: Croatia and Germany both scrambled fighter jets after a commercial flight traveling from the Greek holiday island of Corfu to Nuremberg, Germany accidentally transmitted an erroneous hijacking alert, with no actual threat present on board.

  • Inside the shadowy world of anti-Putin sabotage from within Russia

    Inside the shadowy world of anti-Putin sabotage from within Russia

    In a revealing new BBC World Service documentary, two Russian men secretly affiliated with Ukraine’s military intelligence agency (GUR) have gone on record to share unprecedented details of their covert operations targeting military infrastructure and personnel within Russia’s borders. The rare firsthand account pulls back the curtain on the shadow network of opposition-aligned Russians supporting Ukraine’s war effort from inside enemy territory. Polish independent journalist Marcin Mamon, who produced the documentary *Shadowmen: Russians working with Ukraine*, profiles two operatives using the pseudonyms Ivan and Foma, each describing distinct roles in the GUR’s coordinated campaign inside Russia.

    Ivan, who operates from within Russia, claims to have directly supported Ukrainian drone strikes on key military assets including strategic bombers and munitions factories located on Russian territory. He told Mamon he conducts on-the-ground reconnaissance of military sites, hides drone components in pre-positioned locations across the country, and even smuggles explosives near high-value targets. Mamon verified that Ivan shared reconnaissance video of one such mission near a Russian military airfield. If captured, Ivan would face decades in prison on terrorism charges. He recalled one close call when Russian security officers stopped his car for inspection while he was carrying handmade explosives, yet he avoided detection.

    To reduce the risk of the entire network being compromised, Ivan says there is no formal hierarchical structure to the operation, and he has never met any other operatives working for the GUR inside Russia. A former member of Russia’s political opposition, Ivan says he is motivated by ideology: he opposes both Vladimir Putin’s regime and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and he believes accelerating the war’s outcome could lead to the collapse of the Putin government. “If Putin loses the war, his regime might fall, and we are working to speed that up,” he told Mamon. He added that even small, covert actions can have outsized impact: properly assembled drone components smuggled by operatives like him can become formidable weapons capable of destroying military assets worth millions of dollars in a single strike. He also acknowledged constant danger, saying, “Fear follows me everywhere. This is Russia.” Even so, he remains optimistic that long-term change is coming, noting “Putin won’t live forever.”

    Foma, the second operative, is a former member of the Russian elite who now lives in exile in Poland. He says he runs a network of roughly 300 to 500 undercover volunteers inside Russia that conducts surveillance on high-level Russian military officers and other targets identified by the GUR. He stresses that his network only collects intelligence and never carries out attacks itself. Foma trains new volunteers remotely through online tutorials, teaching them surveillance tradecraft such as trailing targets without being detected, and prohibits recruits from carrying phones while on observation missions to avoid leaving a digital trace. He shares target dossiers with volunteers that include full biographical details, vehicle information, and residential locations, and his network maps everything from weapons storage facilities and military unit positions to the home addresses of senior officers and strategic bomber pilots. Foma says his network conducts independent vetting of all GUR-suggested targets to confirm they are involved in military actions against Ukraine, a step he says justifies the work: “People who commit terrible acts in Ukraine on behalf of Putin must know they will eventually pay for their actions. I want them to be afraid.”

    Foma did confirm that his network provided intelligence on Lieutenant General Fanil Sarvarov, a senior Russian officer assassinated by a car bomb in Moscow in December 2024, noting that tracking the general took extensive effort as he frequently changed his schedule and hid his movements. Foma estimates his network has a few dozen operatives split between Russia, Ukraine, and other European countries, with cross-border members handling logistical support such as tracking targets’ digital footprints. Like Ivan, he emphasizes operational security through decentralized structure, warning that any large formal grouping or digital communication trail would quickly lead to the network being rolled up by Russian security services.

    While the GUR has publicly confirmed that both Ivan and Foma are working for the agency, even Ukraine’s intelligence service says it cannot independently verify every detail of their claims. When pressed on whether Ivan can be fully trusted, one of his GUR handlers admitted, “I’m not sure of anyone except myself.” Many of the specific activities described by the two men cannot be independently verified by the BBC. That said, Ukrainian officials have openly acknowledged their broader strategy: Kyiv has confirmed it carries out coordinated drone strikes on what it calls legitimate military targets inside Russia, and it admits using undercover agents to support these operations.

    For months, there have been media reports of Russian sabotage networks working for Ukraine, but this is one of the first times an operative on the ground inside Russia has spoken publicly about his activities. Since the full-scale invasion began, there have been multiple high-profile assassinations of senior Russian political and military figures. While Ukraine never officially claims responsibility for these targeted killings, a Ukrainian intelligence officer previously admitted to the BBC that the GUR was behind the December 2024 assassination of Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, another senior Russian military figure.

    It is impossible to confirm how many Russians are currently working for Ukrainian intelligence, though Foma estimates the total number is between 300 and 500. Ivan notes that most ideologically motivated Russians opposed to Putin have already either left the country or been arrested, leaving many operatives inside Russia either as unwitting participants (such as truck drivers who unknowingly transport compromised cargo) or paid contractors. Ivan himself is an unusual case: despite being a known former opposition member, he remains able to travel freely in and out of Russia, a fact that has raised questions even within the GUR about his reliability. Foma argues Ivan’s free movement does not automatically mean he is a double agent, pointing to widespread vulnerabilities in Russia’s governance that allow well-connected or lucky operatives to avoid detection. What lends credibility to Ivan’s account is his advance warning to Mamon of a major planned strike on Russian strategic bomber airfields, which came more than a year before a devastating large-scale drone attack on multiple Russian military airfields.

    The full documentary *Shadowmen: Russians working with Ukraine* is available to watch on YouTube for audiences outside the UK and can be listened to via the BBC World Service Documentary Podcast.

  • EU tariffs aimed at China hitting Ukraine, steel boss says

    EU tariffs aimed at China hitting Ukraine, steel boss says

    As Russia’s full-scale invasion continues to pummel Ukraine’s industrial backbone, the leader of one of the nation’s largest steel producers is sounding the alarm over new European Union trade rules, saying the bloc’s sweeping import curbs unfairly lump a war-ravaged Ukraine in with global steel giants exporting cheap goods.

    Yuriy Ryzhenkov, chief executive officer of Metinvest, made the case in an exclusive interview with the BBC, arguing that the EU’s recently enacted protective tariffs and import quotas fail to account for the extraordinary crisis Ukraine’s steel sector is currently navigating. He is calling for at least a targeted carve-out that would allow Ukrainian steel to enter the bloc’s market without the new restrictions, warning that continued access to the EU is a matter of survival for Ukraine’s vital steel industry.

    In a bid to shield domestic steel manufacturers from cut-price competition primarily from China and Turkey, the EU rolled out new trade protections that cap total annual duty-free steel imports at 18.3 million tonnes. That marks a sharp 47% reduction from the quota levels in place in 2024. While the policy includes country-specific quotas and a longstanding free trade agreement between the EU and Ukraine remains in effect, that deal does not override the bloc’s right to implement independent trade protection measures. As a result, Ukraine is bound by the new caps – a outcome Ryzhenkov calls fundamentally unfair.

    “Ukraine has been bundled together into those measures without any consideration for the situation Ukraine is in,” Ryzhenkov said, referencing the ongoing full-scale war with Russia. “Access to the European market is crucial for survival. The restrictive measures that have been put in place by the authorities in the European Union, they don’t help. I think it’s unfair that Ukraine has been treated in the same way as all of the other importers into the European Union.”

    Ukraine’s domestic steel industry projects that under the new rules, annual exports to the EU could plummet by between 50% and 60%. For a nation that has relied on steel exports as a core pillar of its economy for decades, that drop could be catastrophic. Before Russia launched its full invasion in 2022, metallurgy and mining made up roughly 10% of Ukraine’s total gross domestic product and accounted for a full third of the country’s total export revenue. The European Union has long been the largest single customer for Ukrainian steel, and Ryzhenkov emphasized that years of war have destroyed alternative logistics routes, leaving the EU as the only accessible major market for the country’s output.

    The war has already gutted Ukraine’s steel production capacity. Every one of the country’s operating steel mills has sustained damage from Russian bombardment, and Ryzhenkov noted that strikes on industrial infrastructure have “intensified significantly” in recent months. In September 2024, the country recorded its first month with zero domestic steel production – a first in more than 150 years of Ukrainian steel-making. Since the invasion began, nearly 800 Metinvest employees have been killed in attacks and ongoing conflict. The company has expanded bomb shelter coverage at mill sites and implemented strict safety protocols to protect workers during air raids, but Ryzhenkov acknowledged that large-scale industrial facilities cannot be fully protected from persistent attack.

    Looking ahead to the coming winter, Ryzhenkov predicted the season will be “one of the hardest in our history” for the sector. “We are in a dire situation when we don’t have logistics to access any other market apart from the EU and cutting our available market by 60%, that doesn’t help for the industry to survive,” he added.

    In response to the criticism, a European Commission spokesperson pushed back on claims that the bloc ignored Ukraine’s crisis when drafting the new policy, saying officials “took into account the difficult situation” of Ukraine during policy negotiations. The EU maintains that its framework sets a specific quota for Ukrainian steel that guarantees the country can continue exporting to the bloc, even if that quota is set at “a level lower than in the past years.” The spokesperson added that the EU has “offered compensations” to its largest steel suppliers, which includes Ukraine, to offset the impact of the reduced quotas.

  • Trump says suspension of Russia sanctions is to keep peace negotiations going

    Trump says suspension of Russia sanctions is to keep peace negotiations going

    A major diplomatic rift has erupted between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky after Trump halted a slate of incoming Russian sanctions just 48 hours before they were set to enter into force, a move that has escalated tensions between Washington and Kyiv and reshaped the trajectory of ongoing efforts to end the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    In a public post shared to his Truth Social platform, Trump defended the last-minute decision, framing it as a strategic step to advance his stated goal of brokering a lasting peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv. The U.S. president argued that imposing the new restrictions would have needlessly pushed Russia away from the negotiating table, undermining progress toward a ceasefire. “I am in the process of negotiating Peace in the war between Russia and Ukraine,” Trump wrote. “I didn’t want to do anything that will drive, foolishly, Russia away from the bargaining table.”

    Alongside the suspension of sanctions, Trump launched a pointed public attack on Zelensky, claiming the Ukrainian leader has no real interest in ending the full-scale conflict that Russia launched in February 2022. “He doesn’t want to end this war, and probably never did,” Trump asserted. “He could have made a better deal two years ago than he can now.”

    Zelensky has pushed back forcefully against these claims, reiterating that Kyiv’s core priority is reaching a just end to the fighting, while repeatedly emphasizing that Russian President Vladimir Putin has refused to engage in good-faith peace negotiations. The Ukrainian leader warned Sunday in an interview with NBC News that aligning with Putin over Ukraine would constitute a “historic mistake” for the United States. The tension between the two leaders deepened further last week, after Trump commented publicly that Zelensky was “more difficult to deal with” than Putin. During a recent address to an EU leaders’ summit in Brussels, Zelensky pointedly noted that it was “nice to be among real leaders” — a comment widely interpreted as a subtle rebuke of Trump’s approach.

    Russia has welcomed Trump’s decision to suspend sanctions, with Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev describing the move as “an important and truly historic moment.” Dmitriev added that the proposed sanctions would have caused “serious damage” to both the U.S. economy and global financial markets more broadly.

    The growing rift between Washington and Kyiv comes on the heels of two other contentious moves by the Trump administration that have strained bilateral relations: last week, the U.S. finalized a controversial new deal to import Russian diesel, and the White House has pulled back key military assistance for Kyiv, moves that have already eroded trust between the two governments.

  • Macron calls for calm in France and warns rioting must not escalate

    Macron calls for calm in France and warns rioting must not escalate

    France was plunged into unrest on Saturday, as hundreds of thousands of demonstrators gathered across the country to voice frustration over soaring fuel costs, a skyrocketing cost of living, and declining public services including primary and secondary education. While the vast majority of the 550,000 protesters participated in peaceful demonstrations, isolated pockets of unrest spiraled into widespread rioting and looting that shook major urban centers over the weekend.

    By Sunday, French President Emmanuel Macron convened an emergency inter-ministerial crisis meeting at the Élysée Presidential Palace in Paris to address the escalating chaos. Following the closed-door meeting, the president delivered a live national address to the country, acknowledging the deep discontent that had driven people to the streets while drawing a clear line between peaceful advocacy and destructive violence.

    “We all feel anger and shame” after the turn of events on Saturday, Macron told viewers. He emphasized that the core concerns raised by demonstrators were legitimate, but stressed that no grievance could justify the uncontrolled violence that left a trail of damage across the nation. “Nothing justifies the unbridled violence we have seen, and all those who have taken part in this destruction will answer for their actions before the law,” he said.

    Eyewitness and official reports documented widespread chaos in multiple major French cities: groups of rioters, many clad in black and concealing their identities with masks and balaclavas, targeted vehicles and buildings with arson in Paris, Marseille and dozens of other urban areas. Looting was particularly rampant across Paris, Marseille and Lille, with retail storefronts and commercial districts bearing the brunt of the damage.

    Official data confirms that roughly 2,400 people have been arrested in connection with the unrest. The French Interior Ministry also reported that approximately 1,000 police officers were injured while responding to the violence on Saturday, seven of whom sustained serious injuries. Over the weekend, law enforcement deployed tear gas and water cannon to disperse unruly crowds, and videos and witness accounts documented riot officers striking demonstrators with batons in multiple locations across the country.

    In response to the damage to commercial and public properties, Macron announced that local prefects and municipal leaders would coordinate national efforts to secure communities and protect businesses and infrastructure. He also committed to full transparency regarding law enforcement’s actions during the protests, responding to growing scrutiny over the tactics used by police to control crowds.

    In his address, the president issued a clear warning that the unrest could not be allowed to escalate further, calling on all French citizens to prioritize calm and public order in the coming days as the government works to address the underlying grievances that sparked the mass demonstrations.

  • Oil facilities hit in deadly overnight attack on St Petersburg

    Oil facilities hit in deadly overnight attack on St Petersburg

    Escalating cross-border hostilities between Russia and Ukraine have spilled into Russia’s second-largest city St Petersburg, where an overnight drone attack left at least one civilian dead and five others injured, targeting critical energy infrastructure and major commercial facilities across the urban area. Regional Governor Alexander Beglov confirmed Saturday that emergency response teams were working to contain large blazes that broke out at two major energy sites: the city’s primary St Petersburg Oil Terminal and the Ruchyi oil depot. Additional targets in the coordinated strike included a logistics hub operated by Ozon – Russia’s leading e-commerce platform, often compared to Amazon – and a regional data center belonging to VKontakte, the country’s dominant domestic social media network that serves as a local alternative to Facebook.

    Ukrainian officials have not yet issued an official claim of responsibility for the strikes, which come amid a sharply escalating cycle of energy infrastructure attacks ahead of the winter heating season. The strike also follows a recent breakdown in a temporary truce on energy targets brokered by former U.S. President Donald Trump during ongoing negotiations to secure Russian diesel supplies for the U.S. market.

    Over the past week, the intensity of mutual attacks has surged rapidly. Zelensky stated Saturday morning that Russian forces have carried out 76 separate strikes on Ukraine’s energy sector since Trump announced his so-called “energy ceasefire” initiative just seven days prior. Ukraine initially paused its own campaign of strikes on Russian energy infrastructure – which Kyiv frames as a targeted effort to cut off Moscow’s primary source of revenue for its full-scale invasion – for three days following Trump’s announcement. But Ukrainian officials quickly accused Russia of violating the truce by continuing its own attacks on Ukrainian energy sites, prompting Kyiv to resume its strikes earlier this week. That resumption drew sharp public criticism from Trump, who has defended his deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin to import diesel to the U.S.

    This is not the first time St Petersburg has come under Ukrainian drone attack: the city’s oil terminal was previously hit in a July strike, though strikes on Russian territory are far more frequent in regions directly bordering Ukraine. Following Saturday’s attack, Beglov confirmed that 12 multi-story apartment buildings and two private residential homes sustained damage in the attack, prompting authorities to temporarily suspend all flight operations at Pulkovo International Airport, the region’s main air hub. The governor also warned residents of potential temporary disruptions to mobile internet service across affected districts.

    Both companies whose facilities were targeted confirmed the attack but sought to downplay long-term disruptions. VKontakte confirmed that a drone struck its regional data center, acknowledging early morning service outages reported by users but emphasizing that full functionality had been restored quickly and platforms were operating “as usual.” Ozon also confirmed a drone hit its St Petersburg logistics center, sparking a small fire that was contained by emergency crews. The company stated that all staff were safely evacuated before the fire was extinguished, and no injuries were reported at the site. Ozon added that it has temporarily stopped accepting new seller shipments at the location while structural and operational assessments are completed.

    Ukraine’s recent drone campaign has expanded beyond energy infrastructure to target key Russian commercial and digital assets in an effort to disrupt broader economic activity tied to the war effort. Earlier this month, Kyiv launched a series of coordinated cyber and physical strikes against Yandex, Russia’s largest internet search engine and technology conglomerate, causing widespread temporary service disruptions across the country.

    The U.S. deal to import Russian diesel has sparked significant political friction between Washington and Kyiv, as relations between the two allies have frayed in recent weeks. The deal, struck ahead of U.S. midterm elections, is designed to lower skyrocketing domestic U.S. energy prices that have surged amid the ongoing Iran war. Zelensky has publicly condemned the agreement, arguing that it amounts to the U.S. directly funding Russia’s war machine. Trump’s accompanying decision to temporarily suspend a broad package of economic sanctions on Russia has also drawn fierce criticism from political opponents, including a number of lawmakers within his own Republican party.

    As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine enters its fifth year, both sides have ramped up attacks on each other’s energy infrastructure as winter approaches. Russian military officials maintain that all of their strikes target facilities tied to Ukraine’s war effort, but a United Nations report released Friday noted that the first two weeks of October marked the deadliest period for Ukrainian civilians in years. Russian strikes on energy infrastructure across Ukraine have already left hundreds of thousands of households without access to electricity, stoking widespread international concerns that Ukrainian civilians will face another deadly freezing winter without reliable heating or power. Speaking Saturday, Zelensky confirmed that tens of thousands of Ukrainians remain without power as of Saturday, adding that Russian forces launched nearly 2,700 drones, 1,700 aerial bombs, and 66 guided missiles against Ukrainian targets over the past week – the vast majority targeting energy infrastructure sites.

    Russian defense ministry officials claimed overnight into Sunday that their air defense systems had intercepted and destroyed more than 1,000 Ukrainian drones launched across Russian territory.