标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Eight Muslim countries denounce Israeli incursions at Al-Aqsa

    Eight Muslim countries denounce Israeli incursions at Al-Aqsa

    In a unified show of diplomatic pushback against shifting territorial and religious dynamics in Jerusalem, the foreign ministers of eight major Muslim-majority nations have issued a sharp condemnation of Israeli settler incursions into Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, while demanding formal international recognition of Jordan’s long-held legal jurisdiction over the sacred site.

    The joint position was released Wednesday in an official statement shared via social media by Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The statement, signed by ministers from Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, argues that the intrusions—carried out with explicit protection from Israeli security forces—represent a blatant breach of international law, binding United Nations resolutions, and the established historical and legal framework governing holy sites in occupied East Jerusalem.

    The coalition of foreign ministers went on to reject all Israeli efforts to unilaterally revise the centuries-old legal and religious status quo that protects both Islamic and Christian holy sites across Jerusalem. They reiterated their urgent call for the global community to formally uphold and recognize Jordan’s centuries-old custodianship mandate over the entire Al-Aqsa compound.

    Further emphasizing their stance, the ministers stressed that Al-Aqsa Mosque remains a sacred space reserved exclusively for Muslim worship. They also placed full accountability for the rising wave of intrusions carried out by settlers under Israeli military protection squarely on Israeli national authorities.

    The Al-Aqsa compound has operated under a carefully negotiated status quo arrangement for decades, an internationally agreed framework that enshrines its identity as an exclusive place of Islamic worship. The current governing structure was established following the 1967 Six-Day War, when Jordan and Israel reached a consensus: the Jordanian-backed Islamic Waqf would oversee all internal religious and administrative affairs of the site, while Israel would retain control over external security operations. Under this long-standing agreement, non-Muslim visitors are allowed to tour the compound during scheduled time slots, but are explicitly prohibited from conducting private or communal prayer on the grounds.

    In recent years, however, the site has seen a steady and alarming increase in intrusions by Israeli settlers, most of which proceed with armed military escort. This escalation comes amid broader reported efforts to alter the site’s governing status: independent regional outlet Middle East Eye previously revealed that the U.S. and Israel have been actively working to revoke Jordan’s historic custodianship of the Al-Aqsa complex, according to anonymous senior sources.

    Under the drafted plan first exposed by MEE, future management of the revered Muslim site would be restructured to align closely with Israeli strategic and political interests. The initiative is being spearheaded by former White House advisor Jared Kushner and current U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, according to accounts from U.S., Jordanian, Palestinian, Western and Gulf Arab diplomatic sources. If implemented, the plan would dissolve the existing authority of the Jordanian-backed Islamic Waqf and replace it with a new regulatory body appointed by the Israeli government, which would reclassify Al-Aqsa Mosque as a multi-faith religious site.

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly denied the existence of such a plan, but has stopped short of explicitly affirming Jordan’s long-standing custodianship rights over the compound, leaving the diplomatic status of the agreement in question.

  • North Korea unveils a new plant to produce fuel for nuclear weapons

    North Korea unveils a new plant to produce fuel for nuclear weapons

    In a move that amplifies regional security concerns and escalates tensions on the Korean Peninsula, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un publicly introduced a new nuclear weapons fuel production facility on Thursday, reiterating his pledge to rapidly grow the country’s nuclear capabilities at an exponential pace.

    According to state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), the new site leverages far more sophisticated enrichment technology than existing facilities, though the outlet released no key operational details, including the plant’s geographic location or the date it began active production. Published photos from KCNA show a large industrial hall densely packed with centrifuges, leading independent nuclear analysts to conclude the facility is purpose-built to enrich uranium to weapons-grade purity.

    KCNA reported that Kim toured the new site on Wednesday, where he received briefings on its current operational output and reviewed its long-term production roadmap. The unveiling of the plant directly aligns with Kim’s repeated public commitments to expand North Korea’s nuclear program, a response he says is necessitated by growing U.S.-led military pressure on the Pyongyang regime.

    In comments carried by KCNA, Kim emphasized that expanding the quality and quantity of North Korea’s nuclear deterrent has become increasingly urgent amid intensifying confrontation with what he called “the most ferocious enemies” – a widely understood reference to the United States and South Korea. Kim added that other unstated security threats and ongoing crises further justify accelerating the buildup of the country’s nuclear capacity.

    The KCNA report also included Kim’s claim that North Korea’s total production capacity for weapons-grade nuclear materials has more than doubled over the past five years. No independent third party has been granted access to verify this assertion, and outside nuclear monitors have no ability to conduct on-site inspections of North Korea’s secretive nuclear infrastructure.

    Following an inspection tour and leadership meeting at the facility, Kim and top ruling party officials confirmed the prioritization of a long-term strategic plan to grow North Korea’s national nuclear forces exponentially, per KCNA. The outlet released photos showing Kim walking between rows of centrifuges, as well as images of him conferring with senior officials around a table holding a blurred graphic of a cone-shaped object – it remains unclear whether the graphic depicts a nuclear warhead design.

    Thursday’s public reveal comes less than two years after North Korea unveiled another covert uranium enrichment plant in September 2024. That disclosure marked the first public showing of a North Korean enrichment facility since 2010, when Pyongyang allowed a group of visiting American scholars to tour a centrifuges hall at the main Yongbyon nuclear complex. During his 2024 visit to that previously undisclosed plant, Kim delivered an identical message, calling for expanding the number of centrifuges to exponentially grow the country’s nuclear arsenal and pushing for the development of more advanced centrifuge technology.

    Last September, South Korea’s Unification Minister Chung Dong-young publicly confirmed that North Korea currently operates four separate uranium enrichment facilities, including the core complex at Yongbyon, and that all sites run continuously around the clock.

    Nuclear weapons can be constructed using either highly enriched uranium or plutonium, and North Korea has long maintained production capacity for both materials at the Yongbyon site. Since the collapse of high-stakes denuclearization diplomacy between Kim and former U.S. President Donald Trump in 2019, Pyongyang has prioritized expanding and modernizing its nuclear arsenal. Kim has repeatedly rejected overtures from the U.S. and South Korea to restart diplomatic negotiations on the country’s nuclear program.

    As early as April this year, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi told reporters that the organization had confirmed a rapid increase in operational activity across all known North Korean nuclear facilities, signaling Pyongyang’s accelerating push to expand its nuclear stockpile.

  • British MP asks government to clarify stance on Jordanian custodianship of Al-Aqsa

    British MP asks government to clarify stance on Jordanian custodianship of Al-Aqsa

    A British independent lawmaker has launched a formal call for the United Kingdom to take an unambiguous public stance against reported covert efforts by the United States and Israel to revoke Jordan’s centuries-old custodianship of Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque, a move that has sparked widespread outrage among Muslim communities globally.

    Shockat Adam, who represents Leicester South in the UK Parliament, made the demand in an official letter dated May 29 addressed to Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, days after independent outlet Middle East Eye (MEE) published an exclusive report outlining the proposed power grab that would upend decades of agreed status quo for the holy site.

    MEE’s reporting, which cited anonymous confirmation from American, Jordanian, and Palestinian officials, details a plan spearheaded by former President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee. Under the proposal, Israel would secure unilateral authority to appoint imams and senior administrative staff at Al-Aqsa, and would also gain veto power over the content of weekly Friday sermons delivered at the mosque. Two senior US officials additionally confirmed to MEE that Washington has drafted a formal policy document outlining its vision for the site, which includes stripping Al-Aqsa of its exclusive Muslim religious identity to rebrand it as a multi-faith tourist landmark open to all three Abrahamic religions. One alternative provision floated in the proposal would replace Jordan’s permanent custodianship with a rotating oversight model involving multiple Arab states, according to a Western official and a source briefed by Jordan’s government.

    While a single unnamed US official has issued a blanket denial of the reported conspiracy, the revelations have already triggered sharp pushback from Muslim communities and political leaders. Adam confirmed in a public Twitter post accompanying a photo of his letter that his urgent appeal comes against the backdrop of ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza, framing the proposed change to Al-Aqsa’s status as unacceptable interference in a highly volatile regional context.

    In his letter, Adam notes that he has been inundated with messages from constituents in Leicester South expressing profound anger and deep alarm over the reported plans. He emphasized that for Palestinian people and Muslim communities across the globe, Al-Aqsa is far more than a site of daily worship: it stands as a core symbol of national and religious identity, collective dignity, and a bulwark against the ongoing displacement of Palestinian people from their historic lands.

    Adam has put four key questions to the UK Foreign Secretary to force a clear government position: whether ministers have already raised the controversial reports directly with their US and Israeli counterparts; whether the UK continues to formally recognize and support Jordan’s long-standing custodianship role; what official assessment has been made of the risks of escalating ethnic violence, further displacement of Palestinians, and regional instability that would follow any attempt to alter the holy site’s existing status; and whether the government will commit to a clear public rejection of any effort to undermine Jordan’s internationally recognized custodianship.

    The UK has long held an official policy of acknowledging Jordan’s custodianship over all Muslim and Christian holy sites located in East Jerusalem. MEE has contacted the UK Foreign Office for official comment on Adam’s letter and the reported plan, but has not yet received a public response.

    MEE, an independent media outlet focused on exclusive coverage of the Middle East and North Africa, first broke the story of the proposed US-Israeli plan last week, bringing international attention to the highly sensitive issue that threatens to upend decades of fragile regional diplomacy around Jerusalem’s holy sites.

  • Starmer accuses Farage of inciting rage in wake of Southampton riot

    Starmer accuses Farage of inciting rage in wake of Southampton riot

    A fierce political debate has erupted in the UK Parliament after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called for “pure cold rage” over the conviction of a murderer in a high-profile stabbing case, drawing sharp condemnation from Prime Minister Keir Starmer for overriding the explicit wishes of the victim’s grieving family.

    The case at the center of the controversy is the 2023 murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak, who was stabbed to death in Southampton by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa, a British Sikh man. Digwa was found guilty of murder last week, but new details that emerged after the verdict amplified existing tensions. Circulating police body camera footage shows Digwa falsely claimed Nowak had assaulted him, leading officers to handcuff the teenager even as he repeatedly told them he had been stabbed and could not breathe. Nowak died at the scene.

    Right-wing political and media figures have seized on the case to push claims of so-called “two-tier policing”, alleging authorities deliberately prioritized Digwa’s account over Nowak’s because of the victim’s white identity and the perpetrator’s non-white background. Under mounting pressure from Restore, a new far-right party founded by former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe – who once led Southampton Football Club and is currently mired in scandal over an unexplained £5 million donation from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne – Farage doubled down on the rhetoric this week.

    In a post on X Tuesday, ahead of a violent far-right riot in Southampton that saw known neo-Nazis clash with police, Farage wrote: “The fear of being called racist was greater than dealing with Henry Nowak’s murder. We should respond to this with pure cold rage. Britain’s historic way of life is being thrown away.” A close ally of Farage told Middle East Eye the Reform leader was standing firmly by his conviction that two-tier policing is a national reality, and that he has no concern about being outflanked on the far right by Lowe’s new party. “The issue isn’t Nowak, but what caused Nowak,” the source said.

    What makes Farage’s call for rage particularly controversial is that it directly contradicts a clear public plea from Nowak’s own family. On Monday, outside the courtroom following the guilty verdict, Henry’s father Mark Nowak addressed reporters, urging political actors not to twist his son’s death for divisive ends. “We do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We want his story to make our streets safer for everyone,” Mark Nowak said. “As the prosecution lawyer summed up in court: This is not a case about Sikhism. This is not a case about racism. This is a case about murder.”

    When the matter came to Parliament on Wednesday, Starmer echoed the family’s plea and launched a blistering attack on Farage for his actions. The prime minister accused the Reform leader of exploiting the tragedy to stoke national grievance and division, in open disregard of the family’s explicit request.

    Starmer said: “A grieving family have asked us not to respond in the way that the leader of Reform has responded… They have lost their son in the most appalling circumstances. They make a simple plea of us as human beings to please not exploit that. Rage – that’s his response to a father who has lost his son and asked for that not to happen. Exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division would be wrong in any circumstance, but to do it when the family are expressly saying ‘please don’t’ is unforgivable.” He also rejected the core of Farage’s claim, stating: “I don’t believe there is two-tier policing in this country.”

    During his own parliamentary address, Farage doubled down on his claims, repeating that “it is now clear to growing millions in this country that we are living under two-tier policing” and calling on Starmer to acknowledge what he called reality. When Farage referenced the violent unrest that had erupted in Southampton the previous night, multiple members of parliament interrupted in outrage, calling on him to condemn the rioting – a demand he did not fulfill. He only warned that public anger “is in danger of getting considerably worse if the public lose trust in being treated fairly by the police.”

    This incident has laid bare the growing friction between mainstream UK politics and an emboldened far right, which has increasingly sought to frame individual violent crimes as evidence of systemic bias against white Britons, even when victims’ families reject that framing.

  • Grab what you can while you can: The  new reality in the South China Sea

    Grab what you can while you can: The new reality in the South China Sea

    For decades, the South China Sea has remained one of the world’s most intractable territorial flashpoints, with overlapping claims from multiple regional powers turning submerged reefs and tiny atolls into focal points of geopolitical tension. Now, a startlingly fast transformation at one remote outpost has underscored a new, shifting phase of this long-running conflict: quiet land-building by every major claimant, reshaping the strategic map faster than diplomatic efforts can catch up.

    Antelope Reef, a teardrop-shaped submerged formation located in the northwestern Paracel Islands chain, stood as little more than a faint turquoise mark on nautical maps until this year. Over the course of just six months, an unprecedented dredging operation has turned this once-underwater feature into a 6-square-kilometer crescent of solid reclaimed land, dotted with early construction and ringed by a protected lagoon that hosts dozens of working vessels. Those vessels are almost exclusively large cutter-suction dredgers, part of China’s globally unmatched fleet of maritime construction equipment — some units can extract up to 6,000 cubic meters of seabed sediment per hour, a volume equivalent to filling two full Olympic-sized swimming pools. Maritime analysts say the speed of the Antelope Reef project is likely unprecedented in the history of large-scale land reclamation.

    China is not the only claimant pursuing this strategy, however. After years of observing China expand its territorial footprint through land reclamation, Vietnam has accelerated its own building activities on the reefs it controls in the region. Smaller-scale reclamation is also underway by other claimants, including the Philippines.

    The Paracel Islands, where Antelope Reef is located, are one of two major disputed archipelago chains in the South China Sea, alongside the Spratly Islands. Multiple nations, including China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei, lay competing claims to the area’s landforms, resource rights, and maritime boundaries. Most of the islands and reefs in the chains were submerged and uninhabited until recent decades. China first took full control of the Paracel Islands in 1974, following a short armed conflict with then-South Vietnamese forces.

    In recent years, China completed large-scale reclamation on three major Spratly Islands — Mischief Reef, Fiery Cross Reef, and Subi Reef — transforming them into permanent landmasses large enough to host military airports and defense infrastructure. These projects supported China’s long-standing claim to nearly the entire South China Sea under the widely contested nine-dash line it marks on official maps. Today, large fleets of Chinese coast guard vessels and maritime militia patrol the area within the nine-dash line, effectively outmatching efforts by smaller claimants to challenge Chinese control. Frequent standoffs and clashes between Chinese forces and the far smaller Philippine coast guard have become common in overlapping claim areas in recent years.

    Visible straight shoreline grading on the new Antelope Reef has led some analysts to speculate China is preparing to build another military-grade runway, matching the infrastructure it already operates on the three Spratly outposts. But given that China already maintains a fully operational airbase on nearby Woody Island in the Paracels, and the region is already within easy strike range of major Chinese military facilities on Hainan Island, a new runway would likely be redundant. Instead, analysts say the rapid reclamation is almost certainly a calibrated strategic message to Hanoi.

    Vietnam and China have a long history of territorial disputes over the South China Sea, which Hanoi refers to as the East Sea. In recent years, Vietnam’s leadership has softened public anti-China rhetoric and prioritized building closer bilateral ties with Beijing. Vietnam’s newly elected President and Party General Secretary To Lam made his first international state visit to China in 2026, where both sides used unusually conciliatory language to acknowledge their ongoing differences over the Paracel and Spratly chains. While Vietnam has issued a formal diplomatic protest over China’s Antelope Reef construction, the statement was deliberately restrained and measured.

    Behind this diplomatic softening, however, Vietnam has pursued its own aggressive campaign of land reclamation across the reefs it controls, using the same large cutter-suction dredger technology China pioneered. According to the Washington-based Asian Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), Vietnam has carried out sand pumping operations on at least 20 reefs over the past three years, creating 11 new purpose-built harbors. Hanoi now controls more than 11 square kilometers of reclaimed land in the region — roughly half the total area held by China. Vietnam has also begun constructing military-aligned infrastructure such as navigation beacons, leading observers to summarize Hanoi’s approach as: if you cannot outcompete China, you match its land-building strategy.

    “The Vietnamese have been less willing to be at the forefront of the public diplomatic battle over their disagreements with China,” explained Greg Poling, director of AMTI. “They’re much more comfortable letting the Filipinos lead that public push. But on the water, we have seen the Vietnamese being far more willing to stand up to Beijing. As a result, China has mostly backed off from efforts to block Vietnamese oil and gas drilling, for example.”

    Ray Powell, director of Stanford University-based South China Sea monitoring program Sealight, says this quiet Vietnamese expansion is exactly what prompted China’s rapid work on Antelope Reef. “Vietnam has been taking advantage of China’s focus on tensions with the Philippines… The reclamation at Antelope Reef could be considered as China’s answer, reminding Vietnam who the major power in the region is.”

    So what does this new wave of land reclamation mean for the other claimants locked in the dispute? For 30 years, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has led attempts to negotiate a binding code of conduct between China and the four ASEAN member states that are also South China Sea claimants. A non-binding Declaration of Conduct was reached in 2002, but it carried no legal weight, and China has largely disregarded its provisions for de-escalation. Every year, ASEAN leaders reiterate their commitment to reaching a binding agreement, but no meaningful progress has materialized after decades of talks.

    Frustrated by the stalled diplomatic process, the Philippines launched a formal case against China’s territorial claims at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2013. The court issued a sweeping ruling in favor of the Philippines, concluding that China’s sovereignty claims within the nine-dash line had no basis in historical or international law, and that its reclamation activities violated the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone rights. China has refused to recognize or abide by the ruling, prompting the Philippines to adopt a new strategy of public confrontation, sending outnumbered coast guard vessels to challenge Chinese fleets in contested waters. These encounters have resulted in frequent tense clashes, but have done little to shift the region’s vast power imbalance.

    In recent years, the Philippines has also deepened military cooperation with the United States, and built new security partnerships with Japan and Australia. The U.S. has provided strong diplomatic backing for Manila’s position, alongside $500 million in military aid and new defense equipment. U.S. Navy vessels periodically conduct Freedom of Navigation Operations through the South China Sea alongside allied partners, to affirm the region’s status as international waterways open to all traffic, despite China’s claims. But these missions are largely symbolic, and have not altered the on-the-ground status quo.

    Today, the Philippines is also expanding its own limited footprint in the Spratlys. Manila is lengthening the runway on Thitu Island (known locally as Pagasa Island), building a new coast guard base there, and reinforcing the grounded landing craft BRP Sierra Madre, which has hosted a small Philippine military detachment on Second Thomas Shoal since it was run aground in 1999, despite constant harassment by Chinese vessels.

    Poling notes that most claimants have now abandoned hope of reaching the binding code of conduct that was once the core goal of regional diplomacy. “China just continues to do whatever it wants on the water, eroding the sovereignty of other claimants. So what I think you are eventually going to see is a non-binding agreement. But perhaps that will open up diplomatic space for Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and the others to pursue more effective negotiations among themselves without having to go through ASEAN.”

    This new landscape, where every claimant pursues incremental expansion of the territory it already holds, while accepting China’s position as the region’s dominant and most assertive power, has become the new reality of the South China Sea dispute.

  • More Israelis leaving country than arriving: Press review

    More Israelis leaving country than arriving: Press review

    Over the past two years, Israel has confronted a cascade of interconnected political, security and demographic challenges, alongside an unexpected milestone in its defense export industry, according to multiple official findings and leading Israeli media reports.

    First, a new demographic study commissioned by Israel’s parliament has uncovered a troubling net emigration trend that experts warn poses a long-term strategic risk to the country. Data published by Israeli outlet Ynet this week reveals that more Israelis have left the nation than have returned in recent years, with a dramatic acceleration of this outflow following the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023. Between 2022 and 2024 alone, more than 210,000 Israelis emigrated — a sharp jump from the annual average of roughly 40,000 recorded between 2009 and 2021. Over this two-year period, the net outflow of citizens hit 140,000.

    Most alarmingly, the departure rate is disproportionately high among the country’s most highly skilled young demographics, the core of Israel’s technology and knowledge-driven economy. Of all recent emigrants, 48% fall between the ages of 20 and 44, a group that makes up just 32% of Israel’s total population. In terms of educational attainment, 33.2% of emigrants hold a bachelor’s degree, 21.5% have a master’s degree, and 3.7% hold a PhD. Graduates specializing in high-demand fields including mathematics, computer science and physics are particularly overrepresented among those leaving. The study also notes that a slight majority of 2024 emigrants — 52% — were born in Israel. Knesset member Gilad Kariv of the opposition Democratic Party emphasized that the exodus of tomorrow’s leading scientists and entrepreneurs, leaving at a rate far exceeding their share of the population, constitutes a clear strategic threat to Israel’s long-term future.

    In a separate development related to Israel’s military leadership, Ynet confirmed that Yisrael Shomer, head of the Israel Defense Forces Operations Division, has been removed from his senior post amid an active investigation into sexual misconduct involving a subordinate. Shomer, who had been widely tipped for promotion to lead either the IDF Personnel Directorate or the West Bank Command, was ousted over the alleged inappropriate relationship with a junior service member. This dismissal comes nearly 11 years after a controversial 2015 incident in which Shomer shot and killed 17-year-old Palestinian Muhammad Ali Kosba in the occupied West Bank town of al-Ram. Kosba, who was shot three times including once in the head while fleeing after allegedly throwing a stone at Shomer’s armored vehicle, became a symbol of excessive military force after the killing was captured on camera, sparking widespread international criticism that delayed Shomer’s promotion at the time. No criminal charges were ever filed, however, as the Military Advocate General closed the case in 2016. The IDF characterized this week’s dismissal as a response to clear moral violations.

    On the political front, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s already fragile right-wing governing coalition is facing a growing threat of collapse, centered on a long-running dispute over military conscription exemptions for ultra-Orthodox Jewish men. Aryeh Deri, leader of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party and a decades-long ally of Netanyahu, has publicly held the prime minister responsible for the growing rift, accusing him of putting coalition unity at serious risk over the failure to pass the desired exemption legislation. The crisis came to a head this week when the Knesset held a vote on self-dissolution, after Dov Lando, spiritual leader of Degel HaTorah (one of two factions making up the ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party), ordered his party’s lawmakers to support the dissolution motion in protest of Netanyahu’s handling of the conscription issue. Deri warned in closed-door discussions, as reported by Israel’s Channel 13, that UTJ lawmakers are willing to defect to form a left-wing government if new elections are held, adding that one senior UTJ figure is already actively working to bring such a center-left coalition to power. While Deri confirmed he personally would not join a left-wing administration, the warning aligns with recent opinion polling that puts Netanyahu’s current right-wing bloc on track to win only around 50 of the Knesset’s 120 seats — 11 seats short of the 61-seat majority required to form a new government.

    Against this backdrop of domestic political and demographic unrest, Israel’s defense export sector has hit an unexpected all-time high. The Israeli Defense Ministry announced this week that total arms sales revenue reached a record $19.2 billion in 2025, marking a 30% increase from the previous year’s figures. According to reporting from Haaretz’s economic affiliate TheMarker, sales to countries that signed the Abraham Accords — the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan — have surged dramatically, rising from just 3% of total Israeli arms exports in 2023 to 15% in 2025. More than half of 2025’s total revenue, approximately $10 billion, came from direct government-to-government arms deals. Regional export shifts show that European purchases fell from 54% of total sales in 2024 to 36% in 2025, while sales to Asia and the Pacific rose from 23% to 32% over the same period. Smaller export volumes were recorded for North America, Latin America and Africa. By product category, missile, rocket and air defense systems made up 29% of total revenue, while sales of surveillance and optronic systems jumped from 6% in 2024 to 22% of 2025 sales. Overall, Israeli arms exports accounted for 12% of the country’s total $160 billion in national exports in 2025, up 4.5 percentage points from 2022 levels. Defense Minister Israel Katz celebrated the record figures, attributing the growth to the combat experience and proven capabilities of the IDF and Israeli security forces operating across Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen.

  • Israeli study finds starvation in Gaza was result of deliberate policy

    Israeli study finds starvation in Gaza was result of deliberate policy

    Two years into the war that began in October 2023, a new study from an Israeli genocide scholar has upended the Israeli government and mainstream media’s repeated denials, concluding that the widespread starvation ravaging the Gaza Strip was the result of deliberate, pre-planned state policy.

    Authored by Shmuel Lederman, a researcher specializing in genocide studies, the report titled *Data for Denial: The Smokescreen Behind the Starvation of Gaza* was published last month by the Forum for Regional Thinking at Jerusalem’s Van Leer Institute. Lederman told Middle East Eye he launched the research in response to what he calls pervasive denial across Israeli society of the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza, a pattern he says aligns with public responses to historical cases of mass violence.

    “There is a thirst for denial,” Lederman explained, noting that most Israeli citizens seek to frame the Israeli military’s actions in Gaza and the broader occupied territories as entirely morally justified and free of systemic abuse. A separate August 2025 investigation from Israeli news outlet Walla corroborates this pattern of denial, confirming that mainstream Israeli television outlets routinely minimize or erase coverage of Gaza’s starvation crisis entirely.

    Lederman’s study pushes back against the belated, limited acknowledgement of food insecurity that emerged in some Israeli circles by mid-2025, where commentators framed starvation as an accidental, isolated bureaucratic miscalculation rather than a product of intentional state decision-making. Drawing on core principles of famine research, which holds that hunger is driven not just by total food availability but by equitable access to food, the scholar documents how Israeli policy systematically stripped Palestinians of access to sustenance. Restrictions on the entry of aid, fuel, and cooking gas, the deliberate destruction of critical food infrastructure including bakeries, and repeated disruption of humanitarian operations all combined to create catastrophic levels of food deprivation.

    The study’s core conclusion leaves little room for ambiguity: Gaza’s starvation is the product of “deliberate planning, experimentation, and manoeuvring around the humanitarian ‘red line’”, designed in large part to manage mounting international pressure on Israel throughout the course of the war.

    A central point of contention in public debates over Gaza’s hunger has been the number of daily aid trucks required to meet the enclave’s basic needs, a metric that Israeli officials have repeatedly manipulated to downplay the crisis. COGAT, the Israeli military body responsible for civil administration in occupied Palestinian territories, claimed in August 2025 that just 80 daily aid trucks would be enough to meet Gaza’s population’s needs, a figure that was widely repeated by sympathetic Israeli researchers and journalists.

    This claim has been rejected by nearly every independent and international body: human rights organizations, UN agencies, and even the administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden disputed the number. The Biden White House estimated roughly 250 trucks per day were required to avoid mass hunger, while international humanitarian organizations put the necessary number between 500 and 600. What is more, COGAT’s own past data undermines its current claim: in 2008, when Gaza’s population was 1.5 million people, 500,000 less than its current population, COGAT itself stated 178 trucks per day were needed to meet basic needs. As recently as last month, Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom reported that COGAT urged the Israeli government to cut aid truck entries to 250 per day after an October 2025 ceasefire, claiming that level met basic needs. For Lederman, this revelation is an implicit admission that the earlier 80-truck claim was a deliberate falsehood: “In practice, this is an admission of starvation,” he told MEE, speaking after COGAT released its post-report statement.

    Lederman traces the origins of Gaza’s starvation to the very start of the war in October 2023. For the first five months of the conflict, until March 2024, Israel allowed only a tiny fraction of the recommended number of aid trucks into the Strip, rapidly deepening the food crisis. UN agencies, human rights groups, and on-the-ground Palestinian testimonies all documented extreme food shortages during this period, with women and children bearing the brunt of the deprivation.

    In May 2024, mounting U.S. pressure following Israel’s deadly assault on Rafah forced Israel to allow more commercial trucks into Gaza, but the government simultaneously restricted access for humanitarian convoys. Last month, Wala also revealed that 11 major Israeli supermarket chains won an exclusive tender to supply food and aid to Gaza, generating hundreds of millions of shekels in profit. Lederman argues that this privatization of aid delivery created a profit-driven monopoly that actively worsened the humanitarian crisis, allowing a small number of connected actors to enrich themselves, often in coordination with Israeli authorities, while the vast majority of Gazans go hungry.

    While U.S. pressure produced a brief easing of the crisis, Israel reversed course in October 2024, slashing aid shipments back to minimal levels. By March 2025, Israel imposed a full blockade on all food and humanitarian aid entry, pushing Gaza over the edge into full-scale famine. In August 2025, the Integrated Food Phase Classification (IPC), the UN-backed global body that monitors hunger, officially declared famine in Gaza City.

    The report also reveals that even as COGAT publicly disputed international warnings about growing hunger, the agency privately warned the Israeli government as early as 2025 that Gaza was on the brink of catastrophic famine. Despite this internal warning, the Israeli government pressed ahead with its policy to advance a clear strategic goal: using starvation as a tool to pressure Palestinians to relocate south out of northern and central Gaza, and ultimately to leave the territory for third countries. This tactic aligns with the controversial “voluntary emigration” plan publicly backed by both the Israeli government and former U.S. President Donald Trump. Lederman cites the creation of the U.S. and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as further evidence of this strategy, writing: “Severe food deprivation in Gaza that would compel Gazans to travel to aid distribution centres was not a ‘mistake’, it was part of the plan.”

    Beyond the immediate humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, the study frames the territory as a testing ground for a new model of population control through hunger. “Over the past two and a half years, Gaza has served to a large extent as a testing laboratory not only for methods of warfare, but also for the architecture of starvation and the management of a population through deprivation,” the report reads. Lederman warns that the implications of this experiment will extend far beyond Gaza’s borders, noting that while starvation has been used as a weapon of war in other recent conflicts, few if any cases have so systematically and openly undermined the long-standing international norm banning the practice.

    Lederman also emphasizes the shared responsibility of the United States, under both the Biden and Trump administrations, as well as other Western governments, for enabling Israel’s policy, arguing that their diplomatic and military support made the starvation campaign possible. He warns that Israel’s tactics will spread to other conflicts around the globe, as other actors feel empowered to adopt similar methods, shielded from criticism by charges of Western hypocrisy. “What Israel did in Gaza will not stay there, it already has not remained there,” Lederman said. “Therefore, this is not only a struggle against what Israel did to the Palestinians in Gaza, but a global struggle against these kinds of actions.”

  • Shaun White’s Snow League opening its second season with a team halfpipe event in New Zealand

    Shaun White’s Snow League opening its second season with a team halfpipe event in New Zealand

    Created by legendary American snowboarder and Olympic gold medalist Shaun White, the Snow League — a premier competitive circuit dedicated to halfpipe action sports — is gearing up for its highly anticipated second season, with an opening team competition set to take place in the snow-covered highlands of Cardrona, New Zealand.

    The opening round of the 2025–2026 season will run from September 18 to 20, timed perfectly to align with the Southern Hemisphere’s peak winter season. Cardrona has long held a reputation as a go-to training hub for elite action sports athletes from across the globe during the Northern Hemisphere’s off-season, making it an ideal location to kick off the new competitive calendar. This opening event will feature four squads drawn from different world regions, each consisting of one male snowboarder, one female snowboarder, one male freeskier, and one female freeskier, bringing a fresh team-focused dynamic to the traditional individual halfpipe competition format.

    Following the New Zealand opener, the circuit will travel to three iconic winter sports destinations across North America and Europe for the remainder of the season. The next stop is scheduled for Aspen, Colorado, running January 7 to 9, before the league moves on to Park City, Utah, from January 21 to 23. Park City, which is set to serve as a host venue for the 2034 Winter Olympics, will welcome back halfpipe competition for the first time since 2019, marking a key milestone for the sport’s return to the venue. The season will wrap up in Laax, Switzerland, one of the world’s most renowned alpine resorts, with the final event taking place March 11 to 13.

    In its inaugural 2023–2024 season, the Snow League drew a roster of elite Olympic talent, including freeski star Eileen Gu, snowboarders Gaon Choi and Yuto Totsuka — all Olympic medal holders. The circuit also offered one of the most generous prize purses in action sports: first-place finishers took home $50,000 per individual event last season, and six top athletes, including Gu and Totsuka, earned more than $100,000 in total prize money across the entire season, highlighting the league’s commitment to supporting elite athletes financially as they compete at the highest level.

  • Xi’s new US-China formula signals a self-confident shift in terms

    Xi’s new US-China formula signals a self-confident shift in terms

    Last month’s high-profile Xi-Trump summit in Beijing produced one particularly consequential, if intangible, outcome: Chinese President Xi Jinping unveiled a new authoritative policy formulation, or tífǎ, to frame the future of US-China relations.

    For decades, these standardized, authoritative concepts have served as a core communication tool for the Communist Party of China, allowing the top leadership to articulate its strategic priorities, policy assessments, historical judgments, and core governance agendas at key junctures. Historically, tífǎ have also acted as reliable leading indicators of shifting ideological and policy directions, enabling top leaders to outline and consolidate their political priorities across all areas of governance. This tradition has only expanded under Xi Jinping’s leadership, with official formulations now released to guide policy across domains ranging from ethnic minority governance to global diplomatic strategy.

    The new framing put forward for bilateral ties is “constructive strategic stability”, a guiding concept structured around four distinct pillars, according to official reporting from China’s state-run news agency Xinhua. These four layers are: “positive stability with cooperation as the mainstay”, “stability with moderate competition”, “stability with manageable differences,” and “an enduring stability with promises of peace.” Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi later expanded on each of these pillars in a post-summit press briefing.

    Wang explained that the first pillar – cooperation-centric positive stability – forms the baseline for healthy bilateral relations, a reflection of the deep economic interdependence that binds the two largest economies in the world, where “neither can cut the other out, nor prosper without the other.” The second pillar, stability with bounded moderate competition, signals Beijing’s clear preference for establishing formal guardrails around bilateral rivalry, to ensure that competition “is kept within proper limits and is not turned into a zero-sum game.”

    Wang went on to outline the non-negotiable bottom line that defines these “proper limits”: both nations must “respect each other’s social systems and development paths, respect each other’s core interests and major concerns, and respect each other’s right to development.” Only when this bottom line is fully honored can the two sides achieve the overarching final goal of the framework: long-term, enduring stability for bilateral ties.

    Analysts note that this new formulation carries major strategic significance for at least two key reasons. First, it marks a clear shift in Beijing’s approach to managed competition: while China has long acknowledged that US-China relations contain a substantial competitive element, the new framework formalizes Beijing’s commitment to keeping that competition bounded and controlled.

    This represents a noticeable shift from China’s position during most of the Biden administration, when it was the United States that pushed aggressively for the creation of competition guardrails, while China was far less receptive to the idea. At that time, Beijing’s stance was shaped by the widespread perception within the Chinese leadership that the United States was a declining power, a view encapsulated by Xi’s 2021 assertion that “time is on our side.”

    With Donald Trump’s return to the White House, Beijing has not abandoned its view that U.S. power is in decline. Instead, this perception has evolved: Chinese analysts now argue that a declining U.S. is far more likely to leverage military pressure and coercive diplomacy to compensate for its eroding economic competitiveness. As Jin Canrong, vice dean of Renmin University’s School of International Studies, argues, “America’s current toughness and arrogance do not reflect a true rise in strength” but rather demonstrate the acceleration of its decline through the “self-depletion” of its military, economic and diplomatic resources. In this new context, as Wang Yi put it, guardrails are now necessary to prevent the bilateral relationship from veering wildly “like a roller coaster.”

    The second, and arguably more impactful, dimension of the new framework is that it positions China as an equal peer to the United States in its contribution to global order and international stability. “A positive outlook of China-US cooperation,” Wang argued, “will provide more certainty for both countries’ development and for the international situation.” As such, “constructive strategic stability” should “be a goal both sides uphold.” As scholar Zongyuan Zoe Liu notes, the clear implication of this framing is that “the United States should respect China’s core interests, refrain from defining the relationship primarily as strategic competition and manage disputes within limits acceptable to Beijing.”

    With the Trump administration signaling acceptance of this new phraseology, even if it has not yet formally signed on to its full substance, Beijing is widely expected to view this outcome as a significant win in its campaign to define the acceptable boundaries of US-China rivalry on terms that align with Chinese core priorities. This analysis is by Dr. Michael Clarke, associate professor of international politics and strategy at the Centre for Future Defence and National Security, Deakin University, and adjunct associate professor at the Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney.

  • Gaza records highest death toll in six months as Israel intensifies bombing

    Gaza records highest death toll in six months as Israel intensifies bombing

    Seven months after a U.S.-brokered ceasefire was supposed to end the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip that launched in October 2023, rising violence has pushed monthly Palestinian fatalities to their highest level of 2024, according to official Palestinian health data. The Palestinian Ministry of Health confirmed Tuesday that Israeli forces killed at least 119 Palestinians across Gaza in May, a toll that includes 19 children and 10 women.

    The surge in deaths comes amid a clear escalation of Israeli bombardment and ground operations across the blockaded enclave, with multiple ceasefire violations recorded on a near-daily basis. Local Palestinian media outlets documented 11 separate Israeli breaches of the truce agreement in just a 24-hour period, each leaving a trail of deaths and injuries among civilian populations. On Wednesday morning, fresh attacks were reported: Israeli military vehicles opened heavy fire on locations in eastern Khan Younis, a densely populated area in southern Gaza, while separate strikes hit eastern zones of the Jabalia refugee camp in the northern part of the territory.

    Cumulative data from Gaza’s Government Media Office paints a far broader picture of sustained violence since the ceasefire took effect. Officials report more than 3,000 total Israeli violations across all of Gaza, encompassing everything from heavy shelling and precision air strikes to direct targeting of civilian communities, the complete demolition of entire residential neighborhoods, and ongoing ground incursions into populated areas. These violations have already killed more than 933 Palestinians, wounded an additional 2,868, and left at least 82 people abducted by Israeli forces since the truce went into effect.

    The mounting death toll from these attacks pushes the total number of Palestinians killed since the outbreak of hostilities in October 2023 to 72,942, with thousands more still unaccounted for, trapped and presumed dead under the rubble of destroyed buildings across Gaza.

    Gaza’s de facto governing authority Hamas has issued multiple sharp condemnations of the continued Israeli operations, labeling them ongoing “crimes and violations” of the ceasefire. In a pre-recorded address released Tuesday, Abu Obeida, the movement’s military spokesperson, denounced the persistent daily killing of Palestinian civilians and resistance fighters, noting that Israeli forces have assassinated several high-ranking Hamas leaders over the past month.

    “If our cowardly enemy imagines that it can weaken us by assassinating our leaders, then their blood is the fuel that propels our ship through difficulties and proof of the truth of our cause, our leadership, our unity with our people, and our willingness to sacrifice ourselves for them,” Abu Obeida said in his speech.

    In a separate statement, Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem pushed back against recent claims that the movement refuses to cede administrative control of Gaza, dismissing the allegations as “misleading lies aimed at providing cover for the occupation to continue its aggression.” Qassem placed blame for the stalled administrative transition squarely on Israel and Nickolay Mladenov, director-general of the American Board of Peace, saying the two parties have blocked a proposed technocratic committee from entering Gaza to take over governance from Hamas.

    Critics note that Israeli actions extend far beyond military strikes to undermine the terms of the truce. Beyond ongoing attacks and territorial incursions that have seen Israel seize additional land across Gaza, the Israeli government has also severely restricted the flow of humanitarian aid into the besieged enclave, worsening an already catastrophic humanitarian crisis for the 2 million Palestinians trapped in the territory. These combined actions have effectively derailed progress toward the second phase of the ceasefire agreement, which was intended to cement a lasting end to hostilities.