标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Hackers say they obtained at least 19,000 files from ex-Israeli army chief Halevi’s phone

    Hackers say they obtained at least 19,000 files from ex-Israeli army chief Halevi’s phone

    An Iran-aligned cyber hacking collective known as the Handala Hack Team has announced it successfully breached the personal mobile device of Herzi Halevi, the former Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, claiming to have exfiltrated upwards of 19,000 confidential files in the operation. In an official statement published to the group’s website on Thursday, the hackers revealed their infiltration of Halevi’s device was the result of a multi-year surveillance and cyber operation that granted them unfettered access to what they describe as thousands of sensitive images and video recordings from closed-door high-level security meetings.

    In the bold statement, the group claimed that Israel’s most closely guarded national security assets — from top-secret military facilities and crisis command centers to operational strategic maps — have been fully exposed to their team for an extended period. The breach is being described as one of the most impactful cyber incidents targeting a senior leader in Israel’s national security establishment to date, with portions of the stolen data already circulated and reviewed by Middle East Eye. The released materials include visual evidence of previously unreported meetings between Halevi and Arab regional officials.

    One undated photograph places Halevi alongside Michael Kurilla, the former head of U.S. Central Command (Centcom), at a meeting held in Qatar, where a large official portrait of Qatar’s ruling Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani is clearly visible in the background. A second undated image shows Halevi visiting the iconic Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, while a released video recording captures a meeting between Halevi and Jordan’s Chief of the General Staff, Yousef Huneiti, on Jordanian soil. In the video, Halevi presents Huneiti with a historic dagger that originally belonged to a Jordanian soldier killed during the 1967 Six-Day War, a symbolic gesture that had not been reported publicly prior to the breach.

    Alongside the diplomatic and security-related materials, the hacking group also released personal content pulled from Halevi’s device, including private family photos, national identification cards for Halevi and his wife, and what the group frames as embarrassing personal moments. One short video shows Halevi hiding under a piano in a private living room as a woman enters the space.

    The Handala Hack Team says it is withholding a large volume of additional stolen data that has not yet been made public, including further visual proof of unreported secret meetings, detailed Israeli military strategic maps, and personal identifying information for senior Israeli military commanders. The group warned in its statement that all of this unreleased material, which includes clear, unobscured imagery of senior Israeli military personnel and combat pilots, will be published incrementally at a future time of its choosing.

    This cyber breach is not an isolated incident for the Handala Hack Team, which has built a track record of targeting high-profile Israeli political and security figures. Previous claimed attacks include a breach targeting former Israeli Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked and a senior aide to long-time Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Last year, the group claimed responsibility for hacking a personal device used by former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, releasing hundreds of his private chat messages and a 141-page contact list that included contact details for multiple international heads of state and world leaders. Bennett acknowledged the breach of his Telegram account at the time, but noted that the released content included a mix of authentic and forged materials.

    Herzi Halevi stepped down from his post as IDF Chief of Staff in March 2025, after leading Israeli military operations in the Gaza Strip through the first 17 months of the ongoing conflict. He assumed the role of army chief in January 2023, while Kurilla held his position as Centcom commander from April 2022 through August 2025, placing the Qatar meeting between the two leaders within the timeframe of January 2023 to August 2025.

  • Shenzhen hospital fined after ambulance took patient to wrong hospital

    Shenzhen hospital fined after ambulance took patient to wrong hospital

    A fatal medical emergency mistake in south China’s Shenzhen has resulted in heavy penalties for a private healthcare facility, following an official investigation that confirmed misrouting of an ambulance directly contributed to a deadly delay in care. Local health authorities announced the disciplinary actions on Wednesday, one year after the incident that sparked widespread public outcry.

    On August 5 last year, 54-year-old Zhang, a local resident, contacted the city’s 120 emergency hotline after experiencing sudden, severe abdominal pain. Following standard protocol, the central dispatch center ordered the responding ambulance to transport Zhang directly to Longhua District People’s Hospital, the designated facility for her emergency case. Instead of complying with the dispatch order, the ambulance crew redirected the patient to Shenzhen Jian’an Hospital – the private institution that owns the ambulance.

    By the time Zhang was finally transferred from the incorrect private facility to the originally assigned Longhua District People’s Hospital, she had already fallen into unconsciousness. Medical teams at the public hospital conducted emergency surgery and deployed all available rescue measures, but Zhang succumbed to an aneurysm the same afternoon.

    Once details of the incident emerged online, the story spread rapidly across Chinese social media platforms, drawing intense public scrutiny and sparking broad discussion about accountability within pre-hospital emergency care systems. In response to public concern, Shenzhen’s municipal health commission and Longhua District’s health department launched a full, thorough investigation into the circumstances of the case. The probe confirmed that Shenzhen Jian’an Hospital had violated Shenzhen’s formal medical emergency management regulations by deliberately diverting the patient to its own facility instead of following the official dispatch order.

    Per the official investigation conclusions, the Longhua District Health Bureau imposed a fine of 76,000 yuan (equivalent to approximately $11,115) on the private hospital. Separately, the municipal health commission ordered Shenzhen Jian’an Hospital to suspend all pre-hospital emergency medical services for a six-month period, a penalty that went into effect on March 18 this year.

    In the wake of the tragedy, Zhang’s family has launched a civil lawsuit against the hospital, alleging wrongful death stemming from delayed rescue and improper transfer of the patient. Local judiciary authorities confirmed that the court has already commissioned an independent judicial appraisal of the medical injury, and will proceed with further legal proceedings once the appraisal results are finalized.

    To prevent similar fatal mistakes from occurring across the city, Shenzhen’s health commission has launched a city-wide comprehensive inspection of all institutions that operate as part of the local pre-hospital emergency medical network. Any violations or non-compliance issues uncovered during the inspection will result in targeted penalties, ranging from mandatory rectification orders to temporary suspensions or permanent revocation of pre-hospital emergency service qualifications, depending on the severity of the infraction.

    Concurrent with the facility inspection, the Shenzhen Emergency Center is conducting a full review of its existing emergency dispatch protocols and management systems, with plans to implement targeted updates to strengthen operational oversight and prevent future non-compliance by ambulance crews and affiliated healthcare institutions.

  • Israeli cabinet ‘secretly approves record number’ of new West Bank settlements

    Israeli cabinet ‘secretly approves record number’ of new West Bank settlements

    In a move that has deepened long-simmering tensions in the Middle East, Israel’s cabinet has quietly given final approval to 34 new Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank — a single decision that breaks all previous records for settlement expansion in one sitting, Israeli broadcaster i24NEWS has reported. The unprecedented step comes amid Israel’s ongoing military campaign against Iran, and marks a dramatic acceleration of territorial expansion that critics warn eliminates any remaining path to a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians. The total number of settlements approved in this one vote already surpasses 63 percent of the all-time annual record set just last year in 2025, when 54 new settlements were greenlit.

    Under international law, all Israeli settlements constructed in the West Bank, a territory occupied by Israel since the 1967 Six-Day War, are formally classified as illegal. This widespread international condemnation has done little to slow expansion under the current Israeli administration, which took office in 2022. To date, the government has approved a total of 102 new settlements since 2022, alongside the creation of nearly 200 unregulated settler outposts that have since been retroactively legalized by state authorities.

    According to anonymous sources who spoke to i24NEWS, Eyal Zamir, the chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, attended the cabinet meeting where the vote took place. While Zamir did not issue an explicit formal objection to the settlement plan, he raised clear concerns about strained military personnel allocations to secure the new sites. He recommended that the government phase the rollout, authorizing a smaller number of settlements at a time rather than launching all 34 at once.

    The Israeli cabinet intentionally classified the decision initially, a move widely interpreted as an attempt to avoid sharp international backlash at a moment when relations between Israel and its key ally the United States are already strained over the war in Iran. Details of the secret approval were ultimately leaked to the public this Thursday after receiving formal clearance from Israeli military censors. While the full list of locations for the new settlements has not yet been made public, early reports indicate that several sites are located in areas of the West Bank that have never before hosted Israeli settlements, including remote zones that are rarely accessed even by regular Israeli military forces.

    This aggressive push into unoccupied territory comes as settlement expansion has ramped up sharply since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in 2023. Peace Now, the leading Israeli anti-settlement peace advocacy organization, confirmed that 2025 saw a record-breaking 54 settlement approvals, shattering the previous annual record of nine set just two years prior in 2023. Twenty-six of those 2025 approvals were retroactively legalizing unauthorised settler outposts that had already been built illegally on Palestinian land. The group’s data also shows that unauthorised outpost construction surged in 2025, with 86 new outposts erected — a 39 percent increase from 2024, working out to an average of one to two new unauthorised outposts per week.

    A recent United Nations report released March 17 documents the severe human cost of this accelerating expansion and rising settler aggression. Between November 2024 and October 2025 alone, the UN recorded that more than 36,000 Palestinians have been forcibly displaced from their homes in the West Bank amid a sharp spike in targeted attacks by Israeli settlers. Over the same 12-month period, 1,732 documented incidents of settler violence that resulted in Palestinian casualties or property damage were recorded — a 25 percent increase from the previous year.

    In recent weeks, this violence has reached new levels of brutality. Dozens of Israeli settlers have carried out a wave of arson attacks against Palestinian property, including the burning of a Palestinian medical clinic, opened fire on civilian Palestinian residents, and vandalized a Palestinian school with hateful graffiti reading “Death to Arabs”. Data from the Palestinian Ministry of Health, compiled by Agence France-Presse, shows that at least 1,050 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank by Israeli military forces or settlers since October 2023, including six additional fatalities recorded since the beginning of March 2026.

    Lior Amihai, executive director of Peace Now, told independent outlet Middle East Eye that the 34-settlement approval is no accident, but a deliberate step toward permanent annexation of the entire West Bank. “They’re not hiding it. They’re actually very clear about it, and this is the de facto annexation that they’re doing, taking over the territories and ethnic cleansing the Palestinians from Area C,” Amihai explained, referencing the 60 percent of the West Bank that falls under full Israeli security and civilian control. Even with the initial attempt at secrecy, likely driven by a desire to avoid international pressure amid US tensions over the Iran war, Amihai said the current Israeli government makes no attempt to hide its end goal. “This government at large does not hide its intentions to destroy the possibilities of a Palestinian state and peace between Israelis and the Palestinians.”

    This latest approval marks the largest single batch of settlements ever approved by an Israeli cabinet, cementing the current government’s legacy as the most aggressively pro-expansion administration in Israeli history. The move is expected to draw sharp condemnation from the international community, though it remains to be seen if it will result in any meaningful diplomatic or economic consequences for Israel.

  • These Iranians supported the US-Israeli war. Now they realise their mistake

    These Iranians supported the US-Israeli war. Now they realise their mistake

    After weeks of devastating US-Israeli airstrikes across Iran, the announcement of a ceasefire has brought much-needed quiet to civilian communities across the country – but for a segment of Iran’s anti-establishment population that initially pinned hopes of political change on the foreign assault, the end of bombing has only delivered crushing disillusionment. For many who once framed external military action as a shortcut to systemic change, the destruction of civilian infrastructure and broken promises of targeted intervention have forced a painful reckoning.

    Leila, a 25-year-old Iranian who requested a pseudonym for security reasons, is among those who now admit they were wildly wrong in their early assumptions. “I thought this was it – I thought the Islamic Republic was finally coming to an end,” she explained. Like many other opposition-aligned Iranians, she bought into the narrative that the strikes would be quick, decisive, and deliver immediate political transformation, even claiming she believed Washington and Jerusalem had already struck a post-conflict power-sharing deal with exiled opposition leader Reza Pahlavi. “I was wrong,” she says plainly.

    Leila is far from alone. In the opening days of the conflict, a subset of Iranian opponents of the ruling government viewed former U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as unlikely allies who could clear the path for the change they had long demanded during years of internal unrest. But as the campaign dragged on and the full scale of civilian and infrastructure damage came into view, those rosy expectations evaporated almost entirely.

    Leila questions the logic of targeting the country’s basic civilian networks, pointing to the destroyed bridges, demolished railway lines, and flattened oil depots that dot the post-strike landscape. “How does that help change a government?” she asks. The contradiction between Trump’s past messaging and his eventual threats hit especially hard: back in January, at the peak of widespread anti-government protests that had been met with a brutal security crackdown, Trump took to social media to promise demonstrators that help was imminent. Just weeks before the ceasefire, he issued a terrifying public warning to Iran that “a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again” before backing down to agree to the pause in hostilities.

    “In the span of just two months, we went from ‘help is on the way’ to threats about the destruction of Iranian civilization,” Leila said. The fallout has not only been political – it has torn apart personal relationships, too. She says she lost friendships over her decision to trust foreign powers, after she dismissed warnings from peers that Trump and Netanyahu would not act in Iran’s best interest, even accusing doubters of being sympathetic to the ruling establishment. Many of those bonds have never healed. “Now I feel like everything I believed in just collapsed,” she admits.

    Twenty-nine-year-old Ali shared a nearly identical arc of hope followed by disillusionment. In the wake of the January nationwide protests – sparked by soaring inflation that escalated into widespread anti-government unrest, with conflicting death tolls putting fatalities between 3,117 (per Iranian government figures) and at least 7,015 (per the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency) – Ali came to believe external military force was the only path to change. “We thought war would finish everything,” he said. Instead, the strikes destroyed his family’s home, leaving him and his relatives homeless, though they escaped with their lives.

    Ali had bought into claims that U.S. and Israeli military technology would enable precision strikes that avoided civilian casualties, targeting only regime figures and military sites. “Maybe when they realised they couldn’t change the system, they started hitting everything. Or maybe I was just naive,” he reflected.

    Not all anti-establishment Iranians shared the initial optimism that foreign intervention would bring freedom. Forty-seven-year-old Maryam says she always knew the campaign would end in disaster. “Only blind people could think that a war started by Trump and Netanyahu would bring us freedom,” she argued. “Didn’t we see Gaza? Lebanon? Syria? How could anyone think this would be different?”

    By the end of the strikes, U.S. and Israeli attacks had leveled critical national infrastructure: energy facilities, transportation links, steel and petrochemical plants, a Tehran synagogue, multiple hospitals, universities, schools, and hundreds of small local businesses. “Maybe we should be relieved that the explosions have stopped,” Maryam concedes. “But how do you rebuild a country after this?” She remains sharply critical of Iranians who initially backed the strikes, many of whom she says are now trying to distance themselves from their earlier support. “I cannot forgive that,” she says.

    Fifty-four-year-old Abbas goes even further, arguing that the war has permanently ended any remaining political relevance for Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s last monarch and a leading exiled opposition figure. “Reza Pahlavi did everything he could to reach to power,” Abbas said. “But he never condemned any of the US or Israeli attacks on Iran’s infrastructure.” He pointed to Pahlavi’s public praise for Trump, noting the opposition leader used every form of flattery to win U.S. support, only to be cast aside once Washington reached a ceasefire deal with the Tehran government. “I hope his supporters understand now: you can’t rely on someone who is willing to see his own people killed and his country destroyed just to get to power,” Abbas added.

    For many ordinary Iranians, the ceasefire has brought a long-overdue sense of relief, even as deep uncertainty lingers. Thirty-four-year-old Niloufar, a Tehran resident who spent 40 days sheltering indoors to avoid airstrikes, says the announcement of a ceasefire still feels surreal. “When the ceasefire was announced, it felt unreal. Like something had lifted off my chest,” she said. “For the first time in 40 days, I was able to sleep peacefully.”

    Despite the pause, sporadic explosions continue to be reported, and a recent Israeli strike in Lebanon that killed dozens has already been labeled a violation of the ceasefire terms by Iranian officials. Many Iranians remain skeptical that the truce will hold, and distrust runs deep on all sides. Thirty-one-year-old Mehdi says he trusts neither the U.S. and Israeli governments nor his own country’s ruling establishment. “I don’t trust the US or Israel. Honestly, I don’t even trust them more than our own government,” he said. He notes that negotiations were already underway before the strikes began, leaving him wondering why this round of talks should be trusted more than past efforts. “We were negotiating, then suddenly they attacked,” he said. “What if they negotiate again and then strike even harder?”

    That sense of profound, widespread disillusionment defines the current moment for many opposition Iranians. Ali sums it up bluntly: “Before the war, we used to say things couldn’t get worse. Now we know they can. We thought war would solve everything. Now we know it’s not that simple.” He adds a final, sharp judgment: “And we learnt something else, too: Reza Pahlavi is a stupid and ineffective politician who shows little real concern for the lives of those of us still living inside Iran.”

  • KMT chairwoman emphasizes cross-strait peace creates new opportunities

    KMT chairwoman emphasizes cross-strait peace creates new opportunities

    During an official visit to Shanghai on April 8, 2026, Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun reiterated that sustained cross-Strait peace is the foundation for unlocking unprecedented mutual opportunities for both sides of the Taiwan Strait, while emphasizing the natural complementary strengths that the Chinese mainland and Taiwan bring to collaborative development.

    Speaking to reporters during a tour of Shanghai’s Yangshan Deep Water Port — a world-leading hub for intelligent, sustainable maritime shipping that launched commercial operations in 2005 — Cheng stressed that unnecessary tensions and miscommunication must not be allowed to hinder the shared progress of people on both sides. “We should not let unnecessary conflicts and misunderstandings limit our potential for progress and development,” Cheng stated, noting that both the mainland and Taiwan have built globally leading advantages across distinct industries and sectors, and that coordinated collaboration would allow both sides to maximize these strengths.

    Yangshan Deep Water Port, which Cheng visited as part of her delegation’s itinerary, stands as a landmark example of the Chinese mainland’s advances in modern shipping infrastructure: it currently operates a global network of more than 350 international trade routes, connecting to major port hubs across over 200 countries and regions worldwide.

    After observing firsthand the mainland’s cutting-edge progress in high-growth sectors including drone logistics, the low-altitude economy, and artificial intelligence, Cheng pointed out that deeper cross-Strait collaboration could open new pathways forward for Taiwan’s service industries and traditional manufacturing sectors, which currently face major growth bottlenecks. She underlined that technological innovation can drive much-needed industrial upgrading for Taiwan, while also noting that Taiwan has accumulated valuable practical experience in integrating technology with ecological conservation — expertise that could offer key insights for the mainland, particularly in the field of water resource management.

    Looking ahead to future cross-Strait engagement, Cheng framed dialogue, reconciliation, people-to-people exchange and mutually beneficial cooperation as initiatives that can deliver transformative gains, even amid longstanding tensions. “Reconciliation, dialogue, exchange, and cooperation across the Taiwan Strait can bloom into the most beautiful flowers in the least likely places,” she said.

    A day earlier, at a youth cultural exchange event held on Shanghai’s Yangpu Riverside, Cheng met with multiple young Taiwanese residents who shared their stories of pursuing higher education and launching new businesses on the mainland. She praised the group for their courage and celebrated their successful achievements in establishing roots across the Strait.

    Cheng also shared a personal goal for her 2026 visit: that strengthened engagement would deliver the lasting gift of peace to people across Taiwan. “Peace makes everything people hope for possible,” she said, adding that stable, peaceful relations in the Taiwan Strait would not only benefit people on both sides, but also create new opportunities for the global community at large.

  • Impressed by Shanghai’s vitality, KMT leader urges cross-Strait goodwill, mutual trust

    Impressed by Shanghai’s vitality, KMT leader urges cross-Strait goodwill, mutual trust

    In a landmark visit to one of China’s most dynamic economic hubs, Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) chairwoman Cheng Li-wun has publicly called for deepened goodwill and mutual trust between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, after being struck by the mainland’s vibrant innovation and rapid development during a four-day tour that included stops in Shanghai.\n\nCheng, who leads a cross-party KMT delegation, traveled to Shanghai from Nanjing via high-speed rail on Wednesday afternoon, kicking off her itinerary with a visit to the headquarters of on-demand service giant Meituan. During the stop, the delegation tested the platform’s cutting-edge drone food delivery system, getting an up-close look at the mainland’s fast-evolving smart economy ecosystem. Cheng herself even placed an order for milk tea through the Meituan app, experiencing the convenience of the mainland’s digital services firsthand.\n\nThe following morning, Cheng and her delegation continued their tour with two key stops: Yangshan Port, one of the world’s busiest automated container terminals that serves as a linchpin of global trade, and the Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, a division of the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC) — the state-owned manufacturer behind China’s domestically developed C919 narrow-body passenger jet. These visits allowed the delegation to observe the mainland’s major progress in advanced manufacturing, infrastructure development, and technological self-reliance.\n\nIn a press briefing after the tours, Cheng praised Shanghai for its remarkable prosperity and urban charm, while reflecting on the city’s turbulent wartime history and its extraordinary transformation into a global economic center over the past decades. “Peace is the most powerful force,” Cheng told reporters. “Given enough time, peace can make anything possible.”\n\nShe emphasized that people across the Taiwan Strait should remain steadfast in their commitment to cross-Strait peaceful development, laying the groundwork for greater mutual understanding and people-to-people exchanges through sustained goodwill. After completing her engagements in Shanghai, the KMT delegation departed for Beijing on Thursday afternoon to continue their cross-Strait exchange itinerary.

  • The Lebanese civilians killed in Israel’s massacre

    The Lebanese civilians killed in Israel’s massacre

    Just days after former U.S. President Donald Trump announced a two-week ceasefire agreement between the United States and Iran, the Middle East has been plunged back into deadly violence after Israel carried out the most destructive and lethal wave of air strikes on Lebanon since the start of 2024.

    The scale of the attack was unprecedented in recent months: Israeli military officials confirmed they launched 100 separate strikes across Lebanon in just a 10-minute window on Wednesday, with the heaviest bombardments concentrated in the capital Beirut. Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health confirmed Thursday that the assault left at least 200 people dead and more than 1,000 others injured, marking the single deadliest day of Israeli bombing in Lebanon in months.

    Israeli officials have repeated longstanding justifications for the large-scale attack, stating that all operations target only members of the armed group Hezbollah, with the stated goal of weakening the organization’s capacity to launch cross-border attacks against Israeli territory. In a video address released Thursday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz claimed that “more than 200 terrorists were eliminated yesterday” in the strikes.

    However, on-the-ground reporting and multiple verified accounts confirm that a large share of the fatalities are innocent civilians, including children caught in the sudden, widespread attacks. Multiple reports document that children being collected from schools by their parents were among those killed in the surprise bombardments. Outlets including Middle East Eye have begun profiling the civilian victims of the assault, whose lives spanned multiple professions and communities across the country.

    Among the dead is Ghada Dayekh, a veteran radio presenter and reporter with the independent Sawt Al-Farah radio station. Dayekh had worked at the outlet for nearly four decades, reporting from southern Lebanon continuously since the 1980s, before an Israeli strike destroyed her home in the southern city of Sour.

    Another journalist, Suzanne Khalil, a presenter and reporter for Al-Manar TV, was killed in an Israeli strike targeting the village of Kaifoun in Lebanon’s Mount Lebanon Governorate. Khatoon Salma Kershet, a respected poet and researcher who was an alumna of the American University of Beirut, was killed alongside her husband Mohammed in a strike on the Tallet al-Khayyat neighborhood of central Beirut; her death was officially confirmed by the university.

    Two young people affiliated with Al-Karama High School in Choueifat — student Talin Ahmed Hamzi and recent graduate Yasmin Hussein Allam — were also killed in the strikes, the school announced via its official Instagram page. In Kaifoun, Rana Hessaiki Mlaheb was killed while on a mission to purchase medication for people displaced by previous Israeli air raids, local outlet L’Orient Today confirmed.

    In one of the most devastating individual losses reported, physician Nadim Shamseddine was killed alongside his wife Asrar and their three young children when a strike hit their family home in Kaifoun — a space where Shamseddine also saw patients for his medical work. In Beirut, Ola Attar became the latest member of her family to die from violence: her husband Hamad Attar was killed in the catastrophic 2020 Beirut Port explosion, and she leaves behind two orphaned children.

    The deadly attack comes at a moment of fragile hope for de-escalation in the region, following Trump’s ceasefire announcement between Washington and Tehran just 48 hours before the strikes. It has already drawn widespread condemnation from humanitarian groups, who have called attention to the rising civilian death toll and the growing displacement of Lebanese communities amid escalating cross-border violence.

  • Iranian press review: Principlists call for the continuation of war

    Iranian press review: Principlists call for the continuation of war

    After 40 consecutive days of cross-border strikes targeting Iranian industrial facilities, public infrastructure, educational institutions and healthcare facilities carried out by the United States and Israel, a landmark two-week ceasefire agreement reached between Tehran and Washington has triggered sharp internal backlash from Iran’s influential hardline principlist factions, who are demanding military operations continue rather than grant the opposing coalition time to recover. The deal, announced Tuesday, pauses all offensive military actions for 14 days to pave the way for a new round of diplomatic negotiations, but it has already faced fierce pushback from leading conservative voices in the country.

    Hossein Shariatmadari, the high-profile conservative figure and editor-in-chief of hardline Iranian newspaper Kayhan, publicly condemned the ceasefire decision Wednesday, arguing it runs directly counter to core Iranian national interests. In his remarks, he argued that any pause in hostilities combined with new diplomatic talks would only serve as an unexpected opportunity for the US and Israel to regroup their military forces and replenish their supplies, calling the agreement nothing short of a strategic gift to Iran’s enemies. Shariatmadari also cast deep doubt on Washington’s willingness to honor any future deal, noting that even if the United States formally agrees to Iran’s negotiating terms, there is no enforceable guarantee the US side will follow through on its commitments. Pointing to on-the-ground conditions across battlefields, he added that current military indicators show the US-Israeli coalition is already overstretched and exhausted, while Iran holds a stronger strategic position. “We should not let the enemy go when it is out of breath,” Shariatmadari emphasized.

    The divide over the ceasefire has spilled onto Iranian social media as well, where a pre-ceasefire interview clip broadcast on Iranian state television has gone viral across Persian-language platforms. In the footage, Mehdi Khanalizadeh, an international affairs analyst with close ties to principlist groups, criticized an earlier proposal for a 45-day ceasefire, warning that any extended pause would allow enemies that have pledged to target critical Iranian energy infrastructure to rebuild their military capacity and carry out devastating planned attacks.

    While Iranian authorities have imposed restrictions on media coverage of the full scope of damage caused by the 40-day US-Israeli bombing campaign, independent domestic outlets have continued to publish on-the-ground accounts from rescue and relief teams working at strike sites. Reformist daily Shargh published harrowing firsthand testimony from rescue workers responding to air raids across the country. A Tehran-based rescue worker told the outlet the scenes of destruction were so devastating that he could not bring himself to describe the carnage to his own family, describing one particularly traumatic incident where only a partial human remains were recovered from rubble, leaving rescue workers to grapple with what the victim’s family would be forced to bury.

    Another rescue worker described the grim recovery effort at a Minab primary school targeted in a so-called “double-tap” strike—an attack tactic where a second strike hits the same site shortly after the first, targeting first responders. That strike killed at least 165 people, the vast majority of whom were young schoolgirls between the ages of 7 and 12. Recounting the effort to recover a female teacher’s remains from the rubble, the worker told Shargh the body was so badly damaged it was unrecognizable, missing its head. “Everything was so unreal,” he said, adding that workers wrapped the remains in a classroom curtain pulled from the wreckage. The newspaper noted that the scale of destruction the team encountered was beyond what could be easily imagined.

    Beyond internal Iranian political divisions, the conflict has sparked a high-profile embarrassment for pro-war Iranian exiles. A group of pro-monarchist Iranian exiles based in Canada, who were traveling to Washington DC to attend a pro-war rally supporting US military action against Iran, were denied entry to the United States by border officials. The group are supporters of Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s deposed Shah, who is openly backed by Israel and has repeatedly publicly supported US-led military strikes against the current Iranian government.

    Canada-based pro-Pahlavi Persian-language magazine Kiosk first reported that US border agents turned away the majority of the traveling group on March 28. “Nine out of 12 buses carrying Iranians from Toronto, along with a large number of private cars heading to Washington, were unable to obtain entry permits. After hours of delays, they were turned back,” the magazine reported. The incident has triggered widespread mockery on Persian-language social media, where many pro-war exiles openly refer to US President Donald Trump as “Uncle Trump” for his anti-Iran government policies. One user wrote, “Their Uncle Trump did not receive them, despite all the praise they have given him during this time.” Another commenter added, “Those who betray their country for others will always be disgraced. A mercenary is a mercenary everywhere in the world.”

    In a separate development, 320 Iranian political activists, civil society organizers, human rights advocates and university professors have signed an open letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee calling on the body to revoke the moral validity of the 2003 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Iranian activist Shirin Ebadi. The signatories argue that Ebadi, a prominent Iranian lawyer and writer, has openly supported military action against Iran in recent years, including a pre-war letter she sent to President Trump explicitly calling for US military intervention in the country.

    “The Nobel Foundation has always emphasised efforts for peace, human rights, coexistence and the rejection of violence,” the open letter reads. “However, in recent years, Shirin Ebadi’s positions have been in clear contradiction with these values.” The letter draws a parallel between Ebadi and former Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi of Myanmar, who faced widespread international condemnation for her silence on the campaign of ethnic violence against the Rohingya minority. The letter notes that Ebadi herself previously criticized Aung San Suu Kyi for failing to condemn what she called ethnic cleansing, and urged the Myanmar leader to uphold the core values of the Nobel Peace Prize. “Today, Ebadi finds herself in a similar position, one that is even more concerning,” the letter concludes.

  • China launches cloud-seeding campaign to support spring farming

    China launches cloud-seeding campaign to support spring farming

    China has rolled out a large-scale national cloud-seeding initiative across its northern regions, designed to boost natural rainfall and snowfall, shore up water supplies for critical spring agricultural activities, and strengthen regional ecological restoration, according to official announcements from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA).

    Dubbed the “Spring Moistening” action, the targeted campaign kicked off in mid-March 2026 with three core priorities: easing persistent drought conditions across arid northern zones, ensuring adequate water access for spring plowing and crop planting, and accelerating recovery of fragile local ecosystems.

    To maximize operational efficiency, both national and provincial-level meteorological agencies have coordinated closely to run regular cross-regional weather modification operations spanning Northwest China and North China, two major grain-producing regions that frequently face spring water shortages. The campaign’s deployment plan allocates 19 specialized aircraft for aerial cloud-seeding work, alongside a vast network of ground-based cloud-seeding equipment. This integrated air-ground framework allows teams to launch multiple coordinated rounds of operations tailored to real-time drought severity and evolving weather patterns.

    As of early April 2026, the initiative has already completed three large-scale joint operations, covering a total affected area of approximately 979,300 square kilometers. CMA data estimates these operations have generated an additional 129 million metric tons of precipitation across the campaign’s working regions.

    The extra rainfall and snowfall have already delivered tangible, positive outcomes: they have supported the resumption of crop growth following winter dormancy, markedly improved soil moisture levels for planting, and significantly reduced the risk of destructive forest fires in drought-prone northern forest zones.

    The Spring Moistening campaign will remain active through April 30, and it forms a core component of a new year-round four-season weather modification program launched by the CMA in 2026 to upgrade China’s national weather modification infrastructure and service capacity. The full annual program is divided into four seasonal operations: Spring Moistening, Summer Safety, Autumn Harvest, and Winter Clearing, structured to deliver continuous, targeted weather modification support across the year for national priorities including disaster risk reduction, national food security, sustainable water resource management, and long-term ecological protection.

    Later in 2026, the CMA will roll out additional seasonal weather modification operations to other parts of the country, including Southwest China, Central China, and East China. These upcoming operations will address local needs such as mitigating severe weather damage, increasing water storage in key reservoirs, and clearing fog at busy coastal port areas to maintain smooth maritime traffic.

  • Israel’s Lebanon strikes threaten to blow up US-Iran ceasefire

    Israel’s Lebanon strikes threaten to blow up US-Iran ceasefire

    Hours after the United States brokered a tentative two-week ceasefire between Israel and Iran, the fragile agreement already faces imminent collapse, as competing interpretations of the deal’s terms and a devastating new wave of Israeli airstrikes have exposed deep cracks in the diplomatic process. In the 24 hours following the ceasefire announcement, hundreds of Lebanese civilians and combatants were killed in Israeli air raids across the country, a move that directly contradicts Iran’s core condition for the truce and raises urgent questions about whether the agreement can survive its first week.

    The core dispute at the heart of the emerging crisis centers on Lebanon’s status in the deal. Iran has repeatedly demanded that an end to all hostilities in Lebanon be a non-negotiable component of the ceasefire, while Israel maintains that the truce only applies to the main open conflict between the two states and excludes military operations against Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. This disagreement is no trivial miscommunication: it cuts to the heart of decades of proxy conflict that has defined Israeli-Iranian tensions across the Middle East.

    To understand why Lebanon has become the make-or-break issue for this ceasefire, it is necessary to unpack the long-running regional power dynamic that has shaped the conflict. Since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the Iranian government has poured funding and weapons into anti-Israel armed movements across the region, building a network of proxy forces that include Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Houthis in Yemen. For Israel, these proxies represent an ongoing existential security threat, positioned far closer to Israeli population centers than Iran’s formal military.

    Over the course of its modern history, Israel has prioritized establishing expanded security buffer zones along its borders to neutralize these threats. Following the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria in 2024, Israeli forces quickly moved into a demilitarized buffer zone in southwest Syria, extending their security footprint. Since the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas, Israel has launched intensive military campaigns against both Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, treating the two proxy groups as equal threats to Israeli security. Though both groups have suffered heavy losses over the past two years of conflict, they remain operational, and the Netanyahu government has seized on the broader war with Iran to push for a permanent expanded buffer zone in southern Lebanon. Analysts widely agree that Netanyahu is highly unlikely to abandon this territorial and security goal, and it remains unclear whether U.S. President Donald Trump has any interest in or ability to pressure him to reverse course.

    The current crisis, analysts argue, was largely inevitable given the Trump administration’s approach to the conflict. The White House has shown no willingness to address the deep-rooted intractable issues that lie at the core of Middle Eastern tensions, instead prioritizing a quick exit from a conflict that has become deeply unpopular with U.S. voters. With Trump’s approval ratings sitting at record lows, the administration has rushed to frame a messy partial truce as a diplomatic victory, even as it leaves the core status quo that sparked the war completely intact.

    Unless the U.S. can force Israel to halt its operations in Lebanon and bring Netanyahu into compliance with Iran’s terms, the two-week ceasefire will almost certainly collapse within days. For Iran, a halt to fighting in Lebanon is not just a tactical concession: protecting its proxy network is central to the ideological identity of the regime, which has defined itself in opposition to Israel and U.S. influence in the region for decades. As negotiations begin for a potential long-term peace deal, Lebanon will remain the critical sticking point, and as long as the underlying antagonisms driving regional conflict remain unaddressed, there is little prospect of lasting stability.

    The Trump administration’s exit strategy is fundamentally flawed, critics argue, because it ignores the core historical and political issues that have shaped the conflict. The president’s primary priority is not resolving the Israeli-Palestinian issue or defusing long-running Israeli-Iranian tensions, but rather extricating the U.S. from a war that has dragged on longer than expected and become a major political liability at home. This shift in priorities explains why the administration has reversed course on Iran’s 10-point negotiating framework, which Trump previously dismissed as “not good enough” but now calls a “workable basis” for talks.

    Even a cursory look at the terms of Iran’s proposal shows that it includes core demands that the U.S. could never reasonably accept, such as full Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s continued right to enrich uranium – a right that directly contradicts the stated core goal of the U.S.-led war: preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. By moving ahead with talks on this basis, the Trump administration is creating the illusion of progress to justify a hasty exit, rather than securing tangible concessions that would lead to real peace.

    In practice, the U.S. has already ceded significant ground to Iran, which has shown no willingness to compromise on its core demands. While Iran’s conventional military capacity to project power across the region has been diminished by the war, its ideological commitment to opposing Israel and the U.S. remains unchanged. With the two-week ceasefire in place, the most likely outcome is that the U.S. will withdraw claiming victory, leaving a trail of destruction in the region and the same underlying tensions that sparked the conflict still in place, setting the stage for future rounds of tit-for-tat violence between Israel and Iran.