标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Palestine Action ban disproportionately impacts Palestinians in UK, court hears

    Palestine Action ban disproportionately impacts Palestinians in UK, court hears

    A high-stakes legal battle over the UK government’s ban on the direct-action advocacy group Palestine Action reached the Court of Appeal this week, with lawyers for the group’s co-founder arguing the proscription has inflicted disproportionate harm on Palestinian communities across Britain campaigning against Israeli military operations in Gaza.

    Appearing before judges on Wednesday, Raza Husain KC, counsel for Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori, told the court the ban has fostered a pervasive “culture of fear” among British Palestinians and rights advocates aligned with their cause. In written submissions, Husain emphasized that the designation as a terrorist group has hit British Palestinians particularly acutely: their right to speak out and organize has been chilled and criminalized at a moment when their families and communities in Gaza face widespread destruction.

    Husain referenced testimony submitted to the court from Dr. Aimee Shalan, chair of the British Palestinian Committee, to contextualize the widespread harm of the ban. Shalan documented that even before proscription, Palestinian community members involved in advocacy work regularly faced intimidation, including false accusations of being terrorists or terrorist sympathizers. The added designation has amplified this pressure dramatically, Husain explained, creating a chilling effect that pushes far more people to self-censor far beyond what any formal legal requirement would demand—even for those who face no immediate risk of prosecution.

    Counsel for Palestine Action also levelled criticism at the Home Office for failing to provide the group with advance notice of its terrorist designation, a step explicitly required under the UK’s 2000 Terrorism Act. Husain noted that the overwhelming majority of Palestine Action’s protest activity falls under the category of peaceful, low-level civil disobedience: common actions include sit-ins and physical lock-ons, with only a small faction of activists having engaged in more serious property damage. He acknowledged one high-profile 2025 incident in which two activists breached the perimeter of Royal Air Force Brize Norton in southern England and sprayed military aircraft with red paint, but argued that criminal damage targeting military infrastructure has historically never been classified as terrorism under UK law. “Criminal, yes, terroristic no,” Husain told the court.

    Fellow counsel Owen Greenhall KC added that UK authorities already had a range of less extreme legal measures available to address any unlawful activity by group members, including criminal charges for property damage, trespassing claims, and civil injunctions. A full terrorist proscription, he argued, was an unnecessary and disproportionate overreach.

    Representatives of the Home Office pushed back against these arguments in court, with James Eadie KC, counsel for the department, contending that prior notice was not required in this specific case. Eadie argued that Palestine Action is a “disparate group” with no clear central leadership structure, creating practical barriers to identifying who should receive formal advance notification. He also noted that the case involves core concerns of national security and public safety, arguing that pre-notification would have created an unacceptable risk of activists taking pre-emptive action to evade the ban.

    The appeal itself challenges a landmark February 2026 High Court ruling that sided with Ammori and struck down the Home Office’s proscription of Palestine Action as unlawful. The High Court found that the government’s ban violated the department’s own established policies and disproportionately interfered with the fundamental human rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. While High Court judges rejected framing Palestine Action as an entirely non-violent group, acknowledging evidence of criminal damage and confrontational actions during protests, they ultimately concluded that a full ban would cause unacceptable harm to civil liberties—especially for British residents seeking to express solidarity with Palestinians.

    Earlier in the week, Eadie argued that the initial High Court ruling ignored the UK’s democratic governance structures by blocking the government’s attempt to designate the group. The Home Office contends the lower court’s judgment was legally flawed, and that it undermines the government’s ability to respond to what it calls escalating protest activity linked to the group. Eadie noted that the proscription decision, made by former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, received formal parliamentary approval via an affirmative resolution process, meaning it carried clear democratic legitimacy. He argued the High Court gave insufficient weight to this statutory and democratic framework that underpins the Home Secretary’s proscription powers.

    The Court of Appeal is expected to deliver its final ruling in the coming weeks. The proceedings included a closed-door session scheduled for Thursday, where government lawyers will present classified evidence to judges that will not be made available to Palestine Action’s legal team. A special advocate with security clearance to view the secret material has been appointed to represent the group’s interests during the closed session, but procedural rules bar the advocate from sharing any details of the evidence or discussion with Palestine Action’s main legal team, even though they work on behalf of the group.

    At the core of the case is a deeply contentious question that has divided UK public and political life: where should the legal line be drawn between militant protest action and terrorist activity, and what trade-offs should be accepted between national security protections and fundamental civil liberties for political advocacy?

  • Palestine football appeals Fifa decision to do nothing about Israeli clubs in illegal settlements

    Palestine football appeals Fifa decision to do nothing about Israeli clubs in illegal settlements

    A long-running diplomatic and sporting dispute over football in occupied Palestinian territories has escalated, as the Palestinian Football Association (PFA) has formally lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to challenge FIFA’s controversial refusal to impose sanctions on Israel. The global football governing body opted for no action against Israel over its operation of football clubs in illegal Israeli settlements located in the occupied West Bank, a ruling the PFA has decried as fundamentally unjust.

    The root of this latest clash traces back to a formal complaint the PFA submitted to FIFA in 2024. After completing a months-long investigation into the allegations, FIFA released its ruling last month, arguing that the final legal status of the West Bank remains an unresolved, highly complex issue under public international law, justifying its decision to take no punitive measures against the Israel Football Association. This stance directly contradicts a prior ruling from the International Court of Justice, which has repeatedly affirmed that all Israeli settlements established in the occupied West Bank after the 1967 Six-Day War violate international law.

    News of the April 20 appeal to CAS, the world’s highest authority for resolving international sporting legal disputes, was first confirmed by Reuters news agency. In an address to reporters on the sidelines of the Asian Football Confederation congress held in Vancouver, Canada, PFA vice president Susan Shalabi made clear the organization’s position: after exhausting all available internal appeal channels within FIFA’s governance structure, the PFA remains committed to following formal institutional processes to secure what it calls long-delayed justice.

    “FIFA’s council has spent 15 years deliberating this issue and ultimately chose not to issue a decision,” Shalabi explained. “This outcome is deeply unjust, so the only remaining path open to us is to bring this appeal to CAS. We will see this full process through to the end until we achieve a just result.”

    This latest development is only the most recent in a series of high-profile tensions between the PFA, FIFA and international stakeholders in recent months. Ahead of this week’s annual FIFA congress, also being hosted in Vancouver, three senior PFA officials, including organization president Jibril Rajoub, were initially denied entry visas by Canadian authorities. Canada is one of three co-hosts for the 2026 men’s FIFA World Cup alongside the United States and Mexico.

    Following public political pressure and significant media attention, FIFA intervened to support the PFA’s request for entry, and most of the visa applications were ultimately approved. Shalabi confirmed Tuesday that Rajoub and the PFA’s general secretary will still attend the congress, though they are expected to arrive late. The PFA’s legal counsel remains blocked from entry, as their visa application was never approved. In a statement following the initial denials, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada declined to share specific details about individual cases, noting that all visa applications are reviewed individually based on the documentation submitted by each applicant.

    Prior to the congress, Rajoub had been scheduled to deliver an address to assembled FIFA delegates specifically focused on the issue of Israeli football matches and clubs operating in occupied Palestinian territories. The current dispute is not an isolated incident: back in February, a coalition of six pro-Palestinian human rights and sports justice organizations – including Irish Sport for Palestine, Scottish Sport for Palestine, Just Peace Advocates, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, and Sport Scholars for Justice in Palestine – filed a 120-page formal complaint with the International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor, according to reporting from The New York Times. The complaint names FIFA president Gianni Infantino and UEFA (European football’s governing body) president Aleksander Ceferin, and accuses both leaders of aiding and abetting war crimes through their institutions’ policies. The coalition argues that FIFA and UEFA have improperly allowed Israeli clubs to compete in leagues organized by the Israel Football Association, even when those clubs host matches on land seized and settled by Israel in the occupied territories.

  • Palestine Action defendants drop lawyers and self-represent due to ‘decisions made by the court’

    Palestine Action defendants drop lawyers and self-represent due to ‘decisions made by the court’

    Six activists linked to the pro-Palestinian advocacy group Palestine Action made a dramatic procedural move on Wednesday, choosing to represent themselves during their trial over an August 2024 raid on an Israeli-owned Elbit Systems manufacturing facility near Bristol’s Filton area. The group, facing charges of criminal damage for the break-in, said court rulings left their defence lawyers unable to continue representing them, forcing them to deliver their own closing remarks to the jury. Only one defendant, 23-year-old Samuel Corner, retained his legal counsel; Corner faces an additional additional charge of grievous bodily harm with intent for allegations he struck a police officer with a sledgehammer during the incident.

    Many of the activists spoke through tears, their voices shaking with emotion as they laid out their motivations directly to the jury. In her address, 29-year-old Charlotte Head explained that court decisions left her barrister unable to continue her representation, and warned the jury that planned UK government reforms seek to eliminate jury trials entirely. “They are afraid of the power you hold as a jury,” Head told the assembled court.

    Head has pleaded not guilty to the criminal damage charge, arguing her actions were legally justified because the facility produced weapons. Though the court ruled that events following October 2023 are irrelevant to the proceedings, Head referenced the ongoing conflict in Gaza implicitly, tying her actions to the broader crisis. She described her prior experience volunteering with migrants and refugees in the Calais refugee camp in France, where she said she witnessed violence that she believes was funded by UK government money. Extending that argument, she claimed the UK is complicit in the Gaza crisis by allowing Israeli weapons manufacturers to operate on British soil.

    “The devastation I had witnessed in Calais was happening on an exponential scale,” Head said. “Watching a genocide live-streamed on my phone, I couldn’t sit back and do nothing when I knew once again our government was directly involved.”

    Head told the jury she exhausted all conventional channels of political advocacy before joining the Palestine Action action: she wrote to her Member of Parliament, receiving only an automated reply, and joined mass national protests, even as civilian areas in Gaza continued to be destroyed. She became involved with the group during a protest encampment outside London’s Hackney Town Hall, where activists called on the local council to divest from Israeli arms companies. After months of peaceful campaigning that produced no change, she said, “I had no other choice, no other options were available because we tried them all.”

    In her own closing address, 22-year-old Zoe Rogers echoed Head’s argument, pointing to evidence presented during the trial that confirmed Elbit Systems manufactures weapons for Israel on UK soil, and that British research and development has played a critical role in the Israeli military. She noted that the Filton facility targeted in the raid has been visited by the Israeli ambassador and holds official export licenses to ship weapons to Israel, framing the company as the “backbone of the Israeli military.” Like Head, Rogers said she and her co-defendants had tried every legal, democratic avenue to end UK support for Israeli arms manufacturing, and none of those efforts succeeded.

    Rogers drew attention to what she called a pattern of censorship throughout the three-week trial, telling jurors “you might have noticed certain words have been blacklisted, that, until our speeches, the word ‘genocide’ hasn’t been said once. It’s almost as if topics of conversation have been banned.” She accused prosecution officials of suppressing the reality of the facility’s role in the Gaza conflict rather than debating the facts of the case. “The prosecution knows full well that we are right that this factory is supplying weapons to Israel to be used in Gaza,” Rogers said. “They are choosing to suppress the truth rather than contest it.”

    The activist acknowledged that she faces major personal consequences including potential prison time that she has much to lose, but confirmed she intentionally planned to be arrested during the raid. She reminded jurors that they must be certain of the defendants’ guilt to convict, asking “How can you be sure, when you know that you haven’t heard the whole truth?” Breaking down in tears as she concluded her address, Rogers added, “There’s one thing you can be sure of, I’m proud, so proud I took part in this.”

    This report draws from original independent coverage by Middle East Eye, a publication specializing in on-the-ground reporting and analysis of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • Indians lost $25bn to digital fraud in 2025 – now its central bank is fighting back

    Indians lost $25bn to digital fraud in 2025 – now its central bank is fighting back

    Over the past five years, India’s rapid embrace of cashless digital payments has unlocked unprecedented convenience for millions of consumers — but it has also opened the door to a soaring wave of cyber-enabled financial fraud that has drained billions of dollars from ordinary accounts. The scale of the crisis became stark in new data showing nearly 2.5 million Indian citizens lost a combined $25 billion to digital scams in 2025 alone, marking a staggering 4,300% increase in total losses since 2021. This explosive growth has forced India’s central banking regulator, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), to intervene with a slate of proposed policy changes aimed at curbing the harm, though industry experts warn the new measures face major implementation hurdles and may deliver only limited impact. The human cost of the crisis is illustrated by the experience of Alok, a business analyst based in Pune whose identity has been protected by changing his name. In February, he received an urgent text message claiming he owed a 1,000 rupee ($10.75) speeding fine, warning that his driving license would be suspended if he did not pay immediately. Pressured to act quickly, Alok clicked a linked payment portal and entered a one-time password (OTP) to complete what he thought was the small transaction. Within minutes, his credit card had been charged the full maximum limit of $3,225. Alok had fallen victim to one of India’s most common social engineering scams, where fraudsters use psychological manipulation — stoking fear and urgency — to trick users into revealing sensitive authentication details that allow scammers to drain their accounts. These fake messages mimic official government or bank communications, directing unsuspecting victims to convincing phishing websites that harvest their credentials. As digital payment adoption has accelerated far faster than public digital literacy and regulatory safeguards, this type of fraud has evolved into a national crisis. In response, the RBI released a public discussion paper earlier this month outlining a series of potential reforms to crack down on illegal activity. The most notable proposals include mandating a one-hour processing delay for account-to-account money transfers, requiring additional authentication from a pre-approved trusted person for high-value payments made by vulnerable groups such as senior citizens, imposing stricter limits and ongoing reviews for large credits to new customer accounts to flag potential money mule accounts used to launder fraudulent funds, and giving consumers the ability to toggle digital payment services on or off and set custom transaction limits, similar to the controls already available for physical credit and debit cards. While experts broadly praise the RBI’s proactive, consultative approach to addressing the crisis, many question the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed policies. Rajesh Bansal, former CEO of the RBI Innovation Hub, told the BBC that while a payment processing delay could block the type of OTP scam that targeted Alok, these simpler scams now make up only a tiny fraction of total fraudulent activity in India. “These scams were the dominant variety three or four years ago, but frauds have now moved to another level, and are far more sophisticated,” Bansal explained. Wriju Ray, a senior leader at leading regulatory technology firm IDfy, notes that implementing a system-wide payment delay would also be logistically extremely challenging. India’s digital payment ecosystem is built around the core principle of instant transaction processing, so adding delays would require a complete overhaul of existing network architecture, from transaction queuing systems to transaction cancellation protocols. The RBI itself acknowledges this challenge, admitting in the discussion paper that the change would require significant cost and effort across the entire industry, and would contradict the core design of India’s real-time payment infrastructure. Bansal compares the change to “building an expressway and adding speed breakers every few kilometres” — creating unnecessary friction for legitimate users that will do little to stop determined scammers. Ray adds that fraudsters are already likely to adapt to the change, for example by instructing victims to complete transactions an hour in advance to avoid triggering any fraud alerts. Other proposals also raise practical questions, experts say. While extra authentication for elderly users is a well-intentioned idea, it is unclear how the rule would work in practice: what if the trusted person is traveling abroad? And if the trusted person approves a transaction that still turns out to be fraudulent, who bears legal responsibility for the loss? The plan to strengthen detection of money mule accounts through stricter checks and credit limits may be effective, but it would also impose heavy new compliance costs on financial institutions — costs that would ultimately be passed on to ordinary consumers, Ray argues. Bansal adds that the RBI already has a fully developed mule detection platform called Mulehunter.AI, which was created during his tenure as CEO and is designed to provide real-time intelligence on high-risk beneficiary accounts. The platform has yet to be rolled out for widespread real-time use across India’s banking system, and Bansal is calling for its immediate, expedited implementation as a more effective immediate solution. Beyond regulatory changes, experts agree that policy intervention is only one piece of the puzzle. Closing the gap between rapid digital adoption and public digital literacy is a critical, long-overdue priority. India’s population has moved to digital payments at a breakneck pace that outstripped the growth of consumer education and fraud awareness safeguards. While the RBI has launched public awareness campaigns, recruiting high-profile celebrities such as Amitabh Bachchan and running ads during widely viewed Indian Premier League cricket matches, experts say far more investment is needed to bring digital literacy to all segments of the population, particularly vulnerable groups like the elderly that are most often targeted by scammers. Experts also add that the RBI needs to deepen cross-agency collaboration with police forces, relevant government ministries, the securities and markets regulator, and other stakeholders to tackle the root of the fraud crisis, as fragmented responsibility across agencies has slowed effective action to date. Despite the concerns about the specific proposals, experts do welcome the RBI’s new open, consultative approach to addressing the problem — a marked shift from the bank’s past practice of issuing top-down decrees without public input. Ray notes that the ongoing public discussion of the crisis is itself a positive step that will ultimately lead to more effective, widely accepted regulation over time.

  • A son overlooked and a jailed tycoon: Inside Samsung’s succession drama

    A son overlooked and a jailed tycoon: Inside Samsung’s succession drama

    For many global corporate giants, a changing of the guard at the C-suite rarely makes front-page news. As long as products reach consumers, services run smoothly and supply chains hold steady, public attention rarely turns to who sits in the boardroom. But for Samsung, South Korea’s largest and most influential family-owned chaebol, leadership transitions are never just internal business — they are national news that can shape the trajectory of an entire economy. The decades-long drama of Samsung’s royal family succession reached its long-awaited conclusion in July 2025, when the Seoul High Court upheld an acquittal for chairman Lee Jae-yong on fraud charges tied to the 2015 merger that secured his grip on the empire, closing a 10-year legal saga that once brought down a South Korean president and upended the future of the world’s biggest tech manufacturer.

  • In Gaza, life flickers as power cuts shatter livelihoods and healthcare

    In Gaza, life flickers as power cuts shatter livelihoods and healthcare

    Gaza City, Palestine — When 34-year-old baker Abrar Abdu pulled open the door of her oven after hours of careful preparation, she was left speechless. In her small, dimly-lit workshop, the only light came from her phone’s flashlight, which cast a shadow over 27 completely ruined cakes, destroyed by an unexpected power outage that left her aging oven malfunctioning.

    Abdu is one of thousands of Palestinian small business owners navigating Gaza’s escalating total energy crisis, a disaster that has unfolded since Israel cut all power connections to the 2.2 million-person enclave at the start of its military campaign in 2023. The territory’s only power plant ceased operations on October 11 that year, after running out of fuel under a strict Israeli blockade on energy imports. Today, Gaza remains trapped in near-total darkness, with most residents relying on expensive, overstretched private generators or limited, costly solar infrastructure just to access basic power.

    For Abdu, the latest power failure was a devastating blow that wiped out months of slow progress toward rebuilding her small cake shop after the war. She was forced to issue apologies to waiting customers, refund all orders, and absorb the full cost of spoiled ingredients, a loss she says has pushed her business to the edge of collapse. “I have incurred devastating financial losses due to the chronic instability of the electricity generators,” Abdu told Middle East Eye in an interview, adding that the crisis threatens not just her own livelihood, but the incomes of her small team of employees.

    Even after the October 2025 ceasefire agreement, Israeli restrictions on fuel and critical equipment imports remain fully in place, deepening the humanitarian crisis and derailing fragile efforts to rebuild civilian life. Abdu explained that the dependence on overpriced commercial generators has created a constant cycle of financial stress: at one point, the business was forced to halt production for nine straight days due to repeated generator breakdowns. “This leaves us in a constant struggle against financial ruin, the loss of our clientele, and the burden of paying workers who support their families amid extreme poverty,” she said.

    The crisis hits hardest at Gaza’s already crippled healthcare system, which has been left on the brink of collapse after repeated Israeli attacks and restrictions on medicine and medical equipment. Hospitals across the strip are almost entirely dependent on generators to keep critical care units running, but years of blockade and the intensification of the energy crisis have left this infrastructure failing. Mohammed Abu Salmiya, director of Gaza’s Al-Shifa Medical Complex, said key generator components have worn down completely, and entire units have stopped operating due to constant mechanical strain, a lack of spare parts, and shortages of specialized maintenance oil.

    Abu Salmiya described conditions inside the hospital as “tragic,” with frequent generator failures disrupting life-saving services including intensive care units, neonatal incubators, and dialysis centers. “These departments cannot afford even a minute of downtime. Consequently, we have been forced to shut down non-critical wards to keep life-saving sections operational,” he told MEE. Hundreds of patients waiting for scheduled surgeries now face indefinite delays, as hospital administrators are forced to prioritize only the most urgent, life-threatening cases. Fluctuating, unstable power has also permanently damaged thousands of pieces of sensitive medical equipment, which require a consistent energy flow to operate safely.

    The Association of Generator and Alternative Energy Owners in Gaza has issued repeated urgent warnings in recent weeks over the growing shortages of mineral oil and spare parts, warning that the entire system is on the edge of total failure. “If the current situation persists, Gaza will sink into total darkness,” said Mustafa Abu Hassira, a senior official with the association. “If these generators continue to fail without the necessary oils and parts for maintenance, people will have neither water nor light in their homes. This will paralyze what remains of commercial and industrial activity.”

    Abu Hassira noted that Gaza has endured an Israeli-led technical blockade for nearly 20 years, after Israeli forces bombed the main transformers of the territory’s only power plant and imposed a full blockade in 2006. For decades after that, residents relied on a patchwork of aging private generators, with access to just a few hours of power per day. “We have endured a technical blockade for 15 years, during which we were prevented from importing new generators. But the real collapse began when this war started,” he said. “Most of the vital generators in the strip have been destroyed, and operational infrastructure has been targeted, leaving us with a stark reality: no spare parts, no mineral oils, and no prospect of repair.”

    With no access to proper maintenance supplies, generator owners have been forced to use makeshift alternatives including industrial diesel and even cooking oil, which speeds up engine wear and causes irreversible damage. Abu Hassira reported that of the 150 large generators that once provided basic power for public services across Gaza, roughly 60 have now stopped working entirely, and the number of failed units grows every day. Prices for the few remaining supplies of proper mineral oil have skyrocketed from 14 shekels per litre to 1,500 shekels per litre, putting it out of reach for most small operators. “We are not just facing an electricity crisis; we are facing total paralysis that will dismantle what remains of the local economy and cut off the basic necessities of life,” he added.

    The energy crisis has now spilled into every corner of civilian life, even affecting transportation across the strip. With fuel and maintenance parts impossible to import, around 70 percent of Gaza’s vehicles were destroyed during the war, and the remaining fleet is at risk of total collapse, according to Anas Arafat, spokesperson for Gaza’s Ministry of Transport and Communications. Restrictions on spare parts, oil, and tyres have left the surviving vehicles vulnerable to permanent breakdown, Arafat explained, warning that the impact extends far beyond civilian travel: “Without them, ambulances cannot transport the wounded, water trucks cannot distribute supplies, and the generators powering hospitals and bakeries will fail. The wheels of life in Gaza may stop at any moment unless this crisis is resolved urgently.”

    For Abdu, the crisis comes after she made a painful effort to rebuild her business following the war. Her bakery was forced to shut down when she and her family were displaced, and it was only after the 2025 ceasefire that they were able to return to Gaza City, repair the damaged workshop, and restart operations after four months of work. “We invested thousands to repair our ovens and refrigerators. After nearly four months, we managed to reopen despite the challenges,” she said.

    Solar power, the only alternative to private generators, remains out of reach for most small business owners like Abdu, with a basic setup costing as much as 5,000 shekels ($1,400) — a sum most cannot afford. Unstable power has already damaged her ovens and refrigerators, adding more unexpected costs to an already strained budget. “We continue to bleed money due to power outages while paying more for raw materials than larger businesses,” she said. “Our suffering as we try to rebuild from the ashes remains invisible.”

  • UK: Starmer condemns antisemitic attack after two Jewish men stabbed in London

    UK: Starmer condemns antisemitic attack after two Jewish men stabbed in London

    A violent stabbing incident that left two Jewish men seriously injured has shaken Golders Green, a majority-Jewish residential neighborhood in northwest London, with a suspect taken into custody following a rapid intervention by local Jewish community security volunteers. On Wednesday afternoon, members of Shomrim, the neighborhood Jewish security patrol, detained the attacker before official police forces arrived to take him into formal custody, according to initial incident reports. Immediately after the assault, the two wounded men received urgent on-site care from Hatzola, a Jewish volunteer emergency ambulance service, before being transported to local hospitals for further treatment for their serious injuries. In the wake of the attack, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer issued a forceful condemnation of what he labeled an unambiguously antisemitic act of violence. “The antisemitic attack in Golders Green is utterly appalling,” Starmer stated, extending public gratitude to both the community volunteer groups and law enforcement for their fast response. “Attacks on our Jewish community are attacks on Britain,” the prime minister emphasized, adding that all those responsible for the violence would face full legal accountability. This assault comes at a moment of growing national crisis, as the United Kingdom has recorded a dramatic surge in antisemitic hate crimes across the country in recent months. Over the past 30 days alone, London’s Metropolitan Police has launched investigations into dozens of suspected antisemitic incidents, including multiple acts of arson targeting Jewish community spaces. Just one week prior to the Golders Green stabbing, on April 15, an arson attack damaged a synagogue in Finchley, another north London neighborhood with a large Jewish population. Two additional suspected arson attacks targeting Jewish sites in the capital followed within days of the Finchley incident. Security and community officials link the sharp rise in antisemitic violence to heightened geopolitical tensions following the U.S.-Israeli military strike on Iran earlier this year, which has coincided with a surge in hate speech and targeted attacks against British Jewish communities. In an official statement released on April 20, Security Minister Dan Jarvis outlined new government measures to address the growing threat. Jarvis confirmed that the UK government has allocated an extra £5 million ($6 million) in the current financial year to fund the deployment of specialist security officers to high-risk locations across the country, to better protect vulnerable faith communities. “The government’s commitment to supporting British Jews is an enduring one,” Jarvis said. “We are taking firm steps to root out antisemitism wherever it appears across public life – from our public services to our universities, charities and beyond.”

  • Israeli officers say Lebanon mission focused on ‘systematic destruction’ of buildings

    Israeli officers say Lebanon mission focused on ‘systematic destruction’ of buildings

    Deep divisions have emerged within Israeli military ranks over the nature of ongoing operations in southern Lebanon, with senior officers confirming that the force’s core mission has shifted from active combat to the systematic leveling of civilian infrastructure and residential communities, a new investigation by Israeli newspaper Haaretz has revealed.

    The Wednesday report outlines a coordinated, top-down plan to destroy predominantly Shia villages across the border region, a strategy explicitly designed to block displaced local residents from returning to their homes once operations conclude. Under the current operational framework, infantry units are assigned specific geographic zones to clear for demolition, with commanding officers mandated to submit daily tallies of the number of structures destroyed to senior leadership.

    “The only mission is to continue the destruction,” one unnamed Israeli commander told Haaretz. “There are no other tasks.” A second senior officer pushed back against official Israeli military narratives that frame the campaign as targeting solely “terrorist infrastructure,” saying: “These are not terrorist infrastructures – everything is being destroyed.”

    Not all Israeli personnel have echoed the description of a blanket demolition order. One separate officer maintained that operations are targeted exclusively at Hezbollah’s underground militant networks, weapons caches, and surveillance and communications systems, arguing that “We are operating pragmatically, according to operational need.”

    Despite this official framing, on-the-ground data and visual evidence confirm the scale of devastation being inflicted on civilian communities. Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research estimates that approximately 40,000 housing units have been partially or completely destroyed since operations began in early March. On peak days of activity, more than 1,000 residential structures are damaged or leveled, with entire neighborhoods reduced to rubble. Drone footage circulated publicly in recent weeks shows entire southern Lebanese villages wired for controlled demolition before being completely destroyed by Israeli explosive teams.

    The investigation also uncovered that the majority of demolition work is being carried out by private contractors, whose compensation is tied directly to the volume of destruction they complete. “The companies profit based on the number of houses [destroyed],” one serving Israeli soldier told Haaretz. “And we’re there to provide security, at risk to our lives.”

    Multiple frontline soldiers have criticized the demolition mission as strategically senseless, noting that the task of guarding contractors while they destroy civilian structures leaves troops exposed to regular Hezbollah drone strikes. “We stand exposed, guarding demolitions while drones are in the air,” one soldier said.

    Official casualty figures from Lebanon’s Ministry of Health underscore the devastating human toll of the two-month campaign. Since Israeli ground operations launched on March 2, at least 2,290 people have been killed across Lebanon, including 100 rescue workers and healthcare personnel, and more than 7,500 others have been wounded. The violence has displaced roughly 1.2 million people nationwide, nearly a quarter of Lebanon’s total population.

    Though a US-brokered truce was announced in mid-April, Israeli airstrikes and ground operations have continued uninterrupted in southern Lebanon, triggering renewed exchanges of fire with Hezbollah militants. Israeli forces maintain a permanent presence roughly 10 kilometers inside sovereign Lebanese territory, with consistent reports of targeted strikes on civilian areas and ongoing demolition of residential structures.

  • Kuwait revokes journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin’s citizenship

    Kuwait revokes journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin’s citizenship

    A high-profile, award-winning Kuwaiti-American journalist who spent nearly two months in Kuwaiti custody for sharing public materials related to the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran has been formally stripped of his Kuwaiti nationality, marking the latest step in a sweeping regional crackdown on dissenting speech that has accelerated sharply since the outbreak of the conflict.

    Ahmed Shihab-Eldin, 41, a veteran contributor to leading international outlets including *The New York Times*, Al Jazeera English and PBS whose work has earned honors including the British Journalism Award and Amnesty International’s Human Rights Defender Award, released a statement Wednesday through his legal team following the citizenship revocation. “I am free – but many remain behind bars in Kuwait and across the region for speaking the truth,” he said. “Today, my sisters and I have become part of the more than 50,000 Kuwaitis who have had their citizenship revoked.”

    Born in the United States, Shihab-Eldin was arrested on March 2 during a routine family visit to Kuwait. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, his detention followed his online sharing of publicly available footage and imagery tied to the Iran war, including video of a U.S. fighter jet crashing at an American air base located on Kuwaiti territory. His international legal counsel confirmed he was cleared of all criminal charges and released from prison last week, but the unexpected citizenship revocation immediately stripped him of legal status as a national of the country.

    In a joint statement, Shihab-Eldin’s lead lawyers Caoilfhionn Gallagher KC and Kate Gibson condemned the prolonged abuse of his rights. “Ahmed Shihab-Eldin is a superb journalist and storyteller,” they said. “For 52 days, he was wrongly imprisoned and endured repeated, grave violations of his fundamental rights due to his work. For reporting. For expressing opinions. For simply doing his job.”

    The revocation of Shihab-Eldin’s citizenship is not an isolated incident: Kuwait has overseen a mass campaign of citizenship stripping in recent months that rights campaigners warn could eventually impact hundreds of thousands of people, a push that has gained significant momentum since the US-Israeli war on Iran began. In December 2024, Kuwait’s legislature passed a new law that explicitly allows the state to revoke citizenship for a broad set of vaguely defined infractions, including actions deemed “moral turpitude or dishonesty,” threats to state security, or even criticism of the emir or prominent religious figures. Prominent Kuwaiti Islamic scholar Tareq al-Suwaidan was among the high-profile figures stripped of nationality in recent months.

    Multiple motivations have been documented for this mass revocation campaign beyond the crackdown on anti-government dissent. For decades, Kuwait has relied on its oil wealth to fund a generous national welfare system for citizens, supported by a large low-wage migrant labor force. As oil-rich Gulf states move to diversify their economies and restructure public spending, citizenship stripping has emerged as a tool to preserve welfare access for a smaller group of eligible citizens without collapsing public finances. Tiana Danielle Xavier from the Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion explained to Middle East Eye in December that the policy is being deployed in part to maintain Kuwait’s existing welfare and public sector arrangements while avoiding economic instability. Xavier also noted that the campaign directly violates established international human rights law, which bans arbitrary deprivation of nationality, prohibits discriminatory treatment, protects individuals from being rendered stateless, and requires all citizenship decisions to follow formal due process.

    The crackdown extends far beyond Kuwait’s borders. Just days after Bahrain’s King held a meeting with Kuwait’s foreign minister, the Bahraini government revoked the citizenship of 69 people, accusing the group of sympathizing with Iran and aiding foreign entities. The list includes people accused of harming Bahrain’s national interests, as well as their dependent family members. Rights campaigners confirmed to Middle East Eye that most of those targeted belong to the Ajami community, a long-established ethnic group in Gulf states whose ancestry traces back to southern Iran.

    Bahraini-Danish activist Maryam al-Khawaja told Middle East Eye that regional Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) regimes have exploited the outbreak of the Iran war to escalate repression across the board. “Unfortunately, since the beginning of the war on Iran, the GCC regimes have taken this as an opportunity to crack down even harder,” she said.

  • China calls US hypocritical for expressing concern over Panama’s sovereignty

    China calls US hypocritical for expressing concern over Panama’s sovereignty

    PANAMA CITY – A new high-profile diplomatic confrontation between the United States and China has broken out over a port and shipping dispute in Panama, dragging the Central American trade hub into the middle of intensifying great power competition in the Latin American region. The war of words erupted this week after the U.S. State Department joined several smaller regional allies to accuse Beijing of violating Panama’s national sovereignty, a charge China has forcefully rejected as unfounded distortion while turning accusations back on Washington for its own history of interference in the hemisphere.

    The origins of the current dispute stretch back to earlier this year, when Panamanian authorities took control of two strategically critical ports along the Panama Canal from a subsidiary of a Hong Kong-based logistics firm. In early April, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio claimed that in response to the port seizure, China had engaged in “bullying” behavior by temporarily detaining and delaying dozens of commercial ships flying Panama’s national flag. China has repeatedly denied these allegations from the start.

    Last Tuesday, the State Department released a coordinated joint statement alongside six regional partners – Bolivia, Costa Rica, Guyana, Paraguay, and Trinidad and Tobago – condemning the alleged ship detentions. The statement labeled the incident a “blatant attempt to politicize maritime trade” and affirmed that the signatories stood in solidarity with Panama. In a separate social media post Tuesday evening, Rubio, who currently serves as U.S. Secretary of State, emphasized that “the sovereignty of our hemisphere is non-negotiable.”

    This latest escalation in U.S.-China tension comes as the Trump administration has adopted a far more aggressive policy approach to Latin America than any U.S. administration in recent decades. The current administration has carried out a high-profile overnight raid that captured Venezuela’s sitting president, pushed sweeping regulatory and political changes in Caracas, imposed a strict oil blockade on Cuba, intervened openly in regional elections, and even threatened direct military action against drug cartels based in Mexico.

    On Wednesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian pushed back firmly against the U.S.-led accusations during a regularly scheduled news conference, calling the joint statement “completely unfounded and distort reality.” Jian went on to question the U.S.’s own credibility on the issue of Panamanian sovereignty, pointing to Washington’s own historical actions in the country.

    “Who occupied the Panama Canal for a long time, invaded Panama with its military, and arbitrarily trampled on its sovereignty and dignity? Who covets the Panama Canal, seeks to turn this international waterway — meant to remain permanently neutral — into its own territory, and disregards the sovereignty of regional countries? The answer is self-evident,” Jian said. He closed by noting that the United States itself is the power that has “politicized and securitized the issue of ports.”

    Shortly after China’s rebuttal, Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino released a public statement seeking to defuse the rising tension. Mulino expressed appreciation for the “solidarity of friendly countries” regarding the status of Panamanian-flagged vessels in Chinese ports, but made clear that Panama sought to avoid being pulled into a larger diplomatic conflict. “We do not wish to engage in controversy, as we value respectful relations with all nations,” he said.

    The current dispute is just the latest flashpoint in a long-running push by the United States to counter China’s expanding economic and political influence across Latin America. For Panama, the strategic importance of the Panama Canal to global trade has placed the country directly in the middle of the escalating geopolitical rivalry between the two global superpowers, a standoff that intensified last year after former President Trump openly accused Beijing of seeking to control the critical international waterway.