标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Already under financial pressure, Midwest soybean farmers are squeezed further by tariffs, Iran war

    Already under financial pressure, Midwest soybean farmers are squeezed further by tariffs, Iran war

    As 60-year-old fifth-generation farmer Doug Bartek stepped into a Nebraska grain bin this spring, shoveling soybeans toward a conveyor amid gusty plains winds, the weight of mounting industry stress was far heavier than any load of grain. For Bartek, who chairs the Nebraska Soybean Association and runs a 2,000-acre operation near Wahoo where three-quarters of the land is rented, this planting season has brought a tangled web of crises that have left many American soybean producers trapped between skyrocketing input costs and stagnant, depressed crop prices.

    Bartek’s anxiety is far from unique. Across the U.S. Midwest, which produces the bulk of the nation’s soybean crop, thousands of commercial grain farmers are grappling with overlapping economic pressures that have pushed many toward negative margins, cash flow crunches, and even the risk of bankruptcy. What began as a gradual trend of rising costs and oversupplied global markets has been compounded in recent months by trade policy fallout and geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, creating a perfect storm for an industry that forms the backbone of American agriculture.

    Soybeans have grown from a minor crop to one of the United States’ most valuable agricultural exports over the past 60 years. Driven by rising international demand, particularly from China, production exploded in the 1990s, and today soybeans and corn are the two dominant row crops across U.S. farm country. But even before recent geopolitical and trade disruptions, farmers faced systemic financial headwinds. Global soybean production has consistently hit new record highs in recent years, largely fueled by expanded output from Brazil, which overtook the U.S. as the world’s top soybean producer years ago. The resulting global supply glut has kept soybean prices stubbornly low for nearly a decade.

    At the same time, every major cost associated with farming has climbed steadily, and in many cases sharply. U.S. Department of Agriculture data shows overall farm production expenses, including seed, pesticides, equipment, and land, have trended upward for decades, with soybean operating costs remaining elevated since 2020 and projected to rise again by 2026. For many Midwest farmers who rent at least part of their land — a common arrangement across the region — rising rental rates have added an extra layer of strain. Bartek notes that many absentee landowners, unfamiliar with the struggles of on-the-ground farming, are hiking rents to cover their own rising property taxes, passing that cost directly onto producers.

    Paul Mitchell, a professor of agricultural and applied economics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says the combination of low commodity prices and bloated input costs has left many farmers in a critical liquidity crunch. Long-term industry consolidation has amplified this pressure: the number of U.S. farms has shrunk for decades, as larger, more capital-intensive operations have absorbed smaller struggling farms. Today’s modern commercial farm requires far more financial reserves than it did a generation ago, leaving producers far more vulnerable to sudden market and cost shifts.

    Market forces are not the only drag on farmer profits. In 2025, sweeping tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Chinese goods triggered a full-scale trade war, with Beijing responding by placing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. soybeans — China was the top global buyer of American soybeans at the time, representing a critical export market for Midwest producers. The result was an immediate collapse in soybean prices that left farmers who needed to sell to cover operating costs and mortgage payments facing devastating losses.

    While the two nations reached a trade deal later that year, with China committing to large annual soybean purchases and the Trump administration rolling out a $12 billion emergency aid package for affected farmers, industry experts and producers agree the damage was lasting. Even with federal aid, the American Soybean Association estimates farmers still lost nearly $75 per harvested acre of soybeans from the 2025 crop. More importantly, the trade war pushed China to permanently shift its purchasing toward competing suppliers, primarily Brazil, accelerating the long-term decline of U.S. soybean market share in China. Today, U.S. soybean exports remain 15% to 20% below pre-trade war levels, a gap that has never been filled by other global markets, according to Iowa State University agricultural economist Chad Hart.
    “We’re not nearly as dominant in the world export market as we used to be,” explained Joseph Glauber, former chief economist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Global competitors have reaped permanent benefits from the trade shift caused by the dispute, he added.

    The most recent shock to hit soybean farmers came from the February 2026 Iran conflict, after joint U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran triggered a near-total shutdown of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint for energy and commodity trade. The shutdown sent global oil prices soaring, pushing up the cost of gasoline and diesel that farmers rely on for planting, harvesting, and transporting crops. More critically, the disruption cut off access to key fertilizer exports from the Persian Gulf: roughly half of the world’s traded urea, a widely used nitrogen fertilizer, comes from the Middle East, which is a top supplier of U.S. fertilizer imports.
    While soybeans do not require nitrogen fertilizer, nearly all U.S. soybean farmers also grow corn, which depends heavily on nitrogen inputs. The result was an immediate, dramatic spike in fertilizer prices that has not fully abated.
    A two-week ceasefire was reached in early April that called for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, but ongoing tensions over related conflicts have kept shipping slow, and fertilizer prices remain far higher than pre-conflict levels. While many farmers locked in fertilizer prices last fall by purchasing ahead of planting season, producers short on cash last year are now facing unmanageable input costs, according to Dave Walton, an Iowa farmer and vice president of the American Soybean Association. The conflict also damaged critical energy and chemical export facilities in the Middle East, and supply chain disruptions for crop chemical inputs will persist long after the ceasefire, according to Seth Goldstein, senior equity analyst at investment research firm Morningstar.
    For many corn and soybean farmers like Chris Gould of Maple Park, Illinois, the cumulative effect of higher fuel and fertilizer costs makes a negative return nearly inevitable this growing season. “It’s hard to say if I’m gonna come out ahead or behind on this whole deal,” Gould said. “But I suspect I’m going to come out behind.”

    The cumulative strain of these overlapping crises is already showing up in national farm health metrics. While still relatively low by historical standards, farm bankruptcies continued to climb in 2025, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. A late March survey of 400 U.S. farmers conducted by Purdue University’s Center for Commercial Agriculture found that nearly half of respondents reported their operations were in worse financial shape than one year prior. Goldstein warns that if input costs continue to outpace crop price growth, the U.S. will see more bankruptcies in coming months.

    For Bartek, who has farmed Nebraska soil for 43 years, the thrill of spring planting remains — but the uncertainty about the future has never been heavier. He has watched neighbors lose their farms to bankruptcy or forced retirement auctions, and even heard of farmers dying by suicide amid unmanageable financial stress. Today, he questions whether he made the right choice in helping his son purchase his own farm just a few years ago. Like many of his peers across the Midwest, Bartek compares modern commercial farming to a high-stakes gamble, where producers bet millions of dollars on an unpredictable growing season, with increasingly little guarantee of a return that will cover their costs.

  • Five emerging themes for the Indo-Pacific from Trump’s Iran war

    Five emerging themes for the Indo-Pacific from Trump’s Iran war

    The phrase “this is not our war” has become a major source of friction within the Trump White House, after dozens of European leaders invoked it to explain their refusal to deploy military forces alongside the U.S. and Israel in their ongoing attacks on Iran. This public rift has thrown the future of the post-WWII transatlantic alliance into renewed uncertainty, even as the ripple effects of the Iran conflict extend far beyond the Middle East to reshape global security and economic assumptions. While the war itself remains unresolved, following the breakdown of April 11 negotiations hosted in Islamabad, early trends indicate that five major long-term global shifts are already taking shape, affecting every region from the Indo-Pacific to the Persian Gulf.

    Financial markets have so far reacted with muted volatility to the conflict, as investors hold out hope for a rapid end to hostilities. This bet aligns with the reality that the dramatic disruptions of open war can fade as quickly as they emerge once active combat ceases. Still, analysts have identified clear emerging themes that will outlast any near-term ceasefire, starting with the greatest long-term risk: accelerated nuclear proliferation across the globe.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has openly argued that his country’s decades-long investment in nuclear weapons, begun by his father and grandfather, has insulated Pyongyang from the same type of attack Iran is now facing. Many experts agree that this example is not lost on Iran’s ruling regime, which is now widely believed to regret moving more slowly toward a nuclear weapons program. While some observers argue the war could deter proliferation by highlighting the risk of American intervention for nuclear aspirants, this logic falls apart for states that can leverage great power protection, like North Korea’s close relationship with China that makes a large-scale U.S. attack too risky to contemplate.

    In the Indo-Pacific, this new calculus has already pushed Japanese officials into open, unprecedented discussions about abandoning the country’s long-held nuclear taboo. These talks stem from two overlapping fears: that South Korea and other regional states could move quickly to develop their own nuclear arsenals, and that the U.S.-promised “extended deterrence” nuclear umbrella can no longer be counted on to protect regional allies. That doubt around American deterrence forms the second major shift laid bare by the Iran conflict.

    The war has put U.S. military power on full display, but it has also revealed alarming vulnerabilities. In a conflict against an already heavily weakened Iran, which had sustained significant damage from Israeli and American strikes in June of last year, the U.S. military rapidly depleted a large share of its stockpiles of advanced precision weapons and cutting-edge missile defense systems. This has raised urgent questions across the Indo-Pacific: if the U.S. can exhaust its stockpiles in weeks of fighting a weaker adversary, how would it fare in a prolonged conflict against a far stronger peer competitor like China?

    Compounding these concerns is the fact that the Iran war has forced the U.S. to reallocate critical military assets—including warships, entire Marine regiments, and layered missile defense systems—from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East. While the immediate capability gaps created by this shift are not the primary worry, regional strategists cannot discount the risk that China or North Korea could choose to exploit this opening, even if the probability remains low. The far bigger concern is that despite an annual defense budget approaching $1 trillion, the U.S. military has already become severely overstretched after just a short conflict in Iran. This confirms long-held warnings about U.S. defense production capacity constraints, and suggests that current spending prioritizes fixed overhead costs like global basing over the flexible assets and stockpiles needed for modern conflict.

    The third key takeaway from the war is a global reevaluation of air and missile defense doctrine. The Gulf monarchies—the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia—have faced repeated barrages of Iranian missiles and drones, and their existing defense systems have failed to stop these attacks effectively. Part of this failure stems from the global shortage of advanced, costly interceptors for U.S.-made Patriot and THAAD systems, a supply crunch that was first exposed by the war in Ukraine. Another factor is that most countries had not adapted their defense strategies to counter the swarms of low-cost drones that have become a staple of modern warfare, until the Iran conflict forced a reckoning. As a result, demand for the type of low-cost, mass-deployed anti-drone defenses Ukraine has honed is set to surge across the globe, not just in the Middle East.

    Fourth, the conflict has underscored the urgent need for diversified energy supply chains and expanded strategic stockpiles of critical commodities. For years, analysts have warned that global trade chokepoints could become tools of leverage during open conflict, but the U.S. largely downplayed or even ignored the strategic risk of the Strait of Hormuz, despite the fact that roughly 20% of the world’s annual oil supply passes through the narrow waterway shared by Iran and Oman. After the collapse of the Islamabad talks, the world now faces a high-stakes game of brinkmanship between Trump and Iran over control of the strait. Trump’s recent declaration that U.S. warships will blockade the strait to block Iran from levying transit tolls is a direct challenge to Tehran, a bold gambit that carries a major risk of reigniting full-scale hostilities.

    Beyond the immediate crisis, the Hormuz standoff makes clear that nations need to diversify trade routes and build up larger strategic reserves to reduce the leverage chokepoints can give to adversarial powers. For Taiwan, this lesson hits particularly close to home: the island’s still-small strategic energy and commodity stockpiles leave it extremely vulnerable to a potential Chinese blockade.

    The fifth and final emerging shift centers on the future of American global alliances. The Iran war has laid bare Trump’s extreme sensitivity to any perceived lack of support from U.S. allies, even as he spent much of the past year publicly insulting and alienating those same partners. Already, the rift over European refusal to join the war has increased the odds that Trump could withdraw the U.S. from NATO in a fit of pique. While the Indo-Pacific alliances have not yet faced the same existential risk, the conflict confirms that U.S. foreign policy is now heavily concentrated in the hands of a single individual: the president. Though Trump is scheduled to leave office in less than three years under current constitutional rules, he has already made dozens of deeply personal, unilateral decisions that will reshape global order in that time, and no country can insulate itself from the consequences of his actions.

    This article is an updated version of an original piece published by Mainichi, appearing in Bill Emmott’s Substack column Global View.

  • Trump announces closure of Hormuz Strait as Iran talks falter

    Trump announces closure of Hormuz Strait as Iran talks falter

    In a sudden Sunday announcement via his Truth Social platform, U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered an immediate military blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a move that comes after Vice President JD Vance’s negotiation team failed to secure the trust of Iranian officials amid already heightened tensions between the two nations. Iranian negotiators, who have a long history of broken agreements with the United States, have refused to compromise on their sovereignty over the country’s nuclear program, derailing the first direct high-level talks between Washington and Tehran since 1979.

    Trump’s early morning post framed the closure as a response to what he called “world extortion” by Iran, claiming the country has leveraged unconfirmed claims of hidden mines in the strategic waterway to extract illegal tolls from commercial shipping. Prior to the Trump administration’s launch of the latest conflict, the strait — which carries roughly 20% of global oil trade — remained open to all vessels. “At some point, we will reach an ‘ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO IN, ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO OUT’ basis, but Iran has not allowed that to happen by merely saying, ‘There may be a mine out there somewhere,’ that nobody knows about but them,” Trump wrote. “THIS IS WORLD EXTORTION, and Leaders of Countries, especially the United States of America, will never be extorted.”

    The U.S. president went on to outline the parameters of the new blockade, stating he has instructed the U.S. Navy to interdict any vessel in international waters that has paid the so-called toll to Iran — a provision that was reportedly part of a draft ceasefire agreement Trump approved just last week. “No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas. We will also begin destroying the mines the Iranians laid in the Straits. Any Iranian who fires at us, or at peaceful vessels, will be BLOWN TO HELL!” he added. Trump doubled down on his hardline stance, warning that Iran will not be permitted to profit from what he calls illegal extortion, and reiterated that the U.S. military is “locked and loaded” to complete the destruction of remaining Iranian military infrastructure if necessary, citing Iran’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities as a core casus belli.

    The announcement sparked immediate pushback from peace advocates, policy experts, and Iran-focused analysts across the political spectrum. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the anti-war organization CodePink, highlighted the contradictory logic of Trump’s policy in a post on X, writing, “So get this. Trump wants to open the Strait of Hormuz by closing the Strait of Hormuz. Blow up the world economy to punish Iran. Make sense?” Ryan Costello, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, went further, noting that a blockade qualifies as an act of war under international law. “Trump is announcing he will reenter the US into a war has been illegal under domestic and international law and has been disastrous for US interests, regional security, and the people of Iran,” Costello added. Independent journalist Séamus Malekafzali called the policy one of the most reckless in modern U.S. history, saying “I have legitimately never heard of a more insane, designed-to-backfire policy under this administration; maybe ever. Not only attempting to blockade Iranian ships, but ANY ship that goes through the Strait of Hormuz by paying the toll.”

    While Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio attended a high-profile Ultimate Fighting Championship event in Miami, Vance led the collapsed talks with Iranian officials in Islamabad, Pakistan. Speaking to reporters after the negotiations concluded, Vance reaffirmed the White House’s core demand: “We need to see an affirmative commitment that [Iran] will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon. That is the core goal of the president of the United States, and that’s what we’ve tried to achieve through these negotiations.”

    Contextualizing the collapse of trust, Iranian officials note that Tehran was open to sweeping nuclear concessions before the U.S. and Israel launched a joint bombing campaign against Iran on February 28. Notably, every U.S. administration former President George W. Bush’s term — including Trump’s first term — has concluded that Iran is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Iran previously committed to permanent non-proliferation under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the landmark nuclear deal brokered during the Barack Obama administration. Trump unilaterally withdrew from the agreement in 2018 during his first term, despite widespread confirmation that Iran was in full compliance with its terms.

    Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf publicly blamed the U.S. for the failed talks, confirming that Iranian negotiators refused to trust Vance’s team despite Tehran putting forward new, forward-looking proposals. The Iranian negotiating delegation was named “Minaab 168” in honor of 168 children and school staff killed in a U.S. cruise missile strike on the town of Minaab on the first day of the current war. “Before the negotiations, I emphasized that we have the necessary good faith and will, but due to the experiences of the two previous wars we have no trust in the opposing side,” Ghalibaf explained on X. He added that “America has understood our logic and principles, and now it’s time for it to decide whether it can earn our trust or not.”

    This is not the first time talks have collapsed amid accusations of bad faith from Tehran: just hours before Trump ordered the start of bombing in February, Omani mediators — who have facilitated backchannel talks between the two sides for years — announced a peace deal was within reach, leading Iranian officials to accuse Washington of walking away from a near-agreement to launch hostilities. Similar accusations arose when the U.S. and Israel launched offensive strikes against Iran in summer 2025, mid-way through an earlier round of nuclear negotiations.

    As of Trump’s blockade announcement, the U.S. and Israeli bombing campaign against Iran has entered its 43rd day. Coalition forces have struck more than 13,000 targets across Iran, assassinated dozens of senior political and military leaders — including former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — and killed more than 3,000 Iranians, hundreds of whom are women and children, according to Iranian medical officials. Concurrent Israeli bombing operations in Lebanon have killed hundreds of additional civilians, and the Israeli campaign in Gaza has killed and maimed over 250,000 Palestinians, leading to an ongoing genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice and an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from the International Criminal Court on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Trump has previously publicly vowed to bomb Iran “back to the Stone Ages” and “destroy Iranian civilization.”

    Despite major military losses, Iran retains strategic leverage in the conflict, a reality Trump has rejected in his public statements. “The Iranians don’t seem to realize they have no cards, other than a short term extortion of the World by using International Waterways,” Trump wrote on Truth Social as Vance departed for negotiations in Pakistan. “The only reason they are alive today is to negotiate!” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei struck a measured tone in response to the collapse, advising that breakthroughs do not come after a single round of talks. “Naturally, from the beginning we should not have expected to reach an agreement in a single session,” Baghaei said. “No one had such an expectation.”

  • Iran’s IRGC warns any wrong move by ‘enemy’ in Strait of Hormuz to have lethal consequences

    Iran’s IRGC warns any wrong move by ‘enemy’ in Strait of Hormuz to have lethal consequences

    Tensions have flared again in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz just days after a fragile ceasefire between Iran and the United States went into effect, with Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy issuing a stark public warning that any miscalculated move by hostile forces in the waterway will be met with deadly consequences.

    The warning was published Saturday on the social media platform X, where the IRGC Navy also shared drone-collected surveillance footage purporting to show the full operational landscape of the strait. The branch emphasized that every movement—whether active or stationary—of foreign vessels within the strategic waterway is under constant, full surveillance by Iran’s armed forces. “Any erroneous maneuver will trap the enemy in deadly whirlpools in the strait,” the post read.

    The escalation of rhetoric follows conflicting accounts of a U.S. naval operation in the region one day prior. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Saturday that two American warships had completed a transit through the Strait of Hormuz and launched mine-clearing operations in the Persian Gulf. Iran’s top military body, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, immediately pushed back against the claim, issuing a strong denial that any American vessels had entered the strait’s territorial waters.

    In an exclusive Sunday report, Iran’s state-owned Press TV framed the U.S. military’s attempted deployment of the two destroyers—identified as the USS Michael Murphy and USS Frank E. Peterson—as a botched propaganda exercise timed to coincide with newly resumed Tehran-Washington negotiations in Islamabad. Press TV reported that Iranian naval forces forced the two American destroyers to retreat before they could reach the strait.

    Expanding on its stance Sunday, the IRGC released an official statement clarifying that any foreign military vessel seeking to approach the Strait of Hormuz under any pretext will be classified as a violation of the ongoing ceasefire and will face harsh, decisive retaliation.

    The current standoff comes against a backdrop of sharply escalated regional conflict that began in late February 2026, when Israel and the United States launched joint airstrikes targeting Tehran and multiple other Iranian cities. The strikes killed Iran’s then-Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, alongside a number of senior Iranian military commanders and civilian bystanders. In response, Iran launched a massive retaliatory campaign of missile and drone attacks targeting both Israel and U.S. military assets across the Middle East, and moved to tighten its control over the Strait of Hormuz by banning passage for all vessels owned or affiliated with Israel and the United States.

    A two-week ceasefire between Iran and the United States entered into force on Wednesday, paving the way for extended bilateral negotiations between the two delegations in the Pakistani capital. As of Sunday, those talks had not resulted in any breakthrough agreement, leaving the fragile truce at growing risk of collapse amid the latest naval dispute.

  • Political turmoil in Indian border state as nine million lose voting rights

    Political turmoil in Indian border state as nine million lose voting rights

    Ahead of high-stakes state assembly elections scheduled for late April in India’s eastern state of West Bengal, a massive voter roll cleanup initiative has plunged the state into political chaos, triggering accusations of disenfranchisement, partisan bias, and a threat to India’s democratic foundations.

    The dispute centers on the Election Commission of India’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR), a nationwide drive launched to purge duplicate, outdated, or ineligible entries from electoral registers. While 13 other Indian states and union territories have completed the SIR process, West Bengal is the only region required to add an extra layer of adjudication for challenged deletions. To date, the exercise has removed roughly 9 million names – 12% of the state’s total 76 million electorate – from the 2026 voter rolls. Of those deletions, more than 6 million have been categorized as absentee or deceased voters, leaving 2.7 million eligible-looking voters in limbo, their voting fate pending tribunal review.

    One of those caught in the bureaucratic and political crossfire is 65-year-old Muhammad Daud Ali, a retired Indian Army technician from West Bengal. Despite holding official Indian documentation including a valid passport and military service records, Ali and all three of his children were struck from the rolls, leaving only his wife registered to vote. Ali is far from alone: with polls set to open on April 23 and 29, thousands of voters in similar limbo see virtually no path to restoring their voting rights before ballots are cast. “I am dumbstruck. I feel deeply hurt and insulted,” Ali told reporters. “How can they conduct the elections without solving our disputes? I simply have no idea who to seek justice from.”

    The controversy has deepened along partisan and religious lines, pitting the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC), led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, against the national Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India’s national Election Commission. The TMC alleges the SIR process was intentionally designed to disenfranchise millions of Muslim voters to tilt the election outcome in the BJP’s favor – a claim both the BJP and the Election Commission strongly deny. Modi and other BJP leaders have framed the voter roll cleanup as a crackdown on “illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators”, a framing the TMC argues is targeted directly at West Bengal’s large Muslim community.

    Data compiled by political parties and independent analysts supports uneven exclusion patterns that have amplified these concerns. Muslims account for roughly 27% of West Bengal’s population per the 2011 national census, but make up 34% of the 9 million deleted voters and 65% of the 2.7 million undecided cases. The deletions have not been limited to Muslim voters, however: in Kolkata, the state capital, up to 29.6% of all registered voters have been struck from rolls across the city, and in the border district of North 24 Parganas, which lost 1.26 million voters (15% of its electorate), most deletions were Hindu voters, including large numbers of Dalit Hindus from the Matua migrant community. In Paschim Bardhaman district, 80% of deleted voters are Hindi-speaking Hindus with roots in northern India.

    India’s Supreme Court has allowed the election process to move forward even as 2.7 million voter disputes remain unresolved, scheduling a hearing on the challenges for April 13 – leaving only a narrow, uncertain window for any last-minute relief. Banerjee, whose TMC has held power in West Bengal since 2011, has vowed to return to the Supreme Court to challenge the decision, arguing that holding an election while millions are disenfranchised undermines democratic principles.

    Political observers and voters alike have voiced deep alarm over the impact of the deletions. Political scientist Sibaji Pratim Basu called the situation unprecedented, noting “there is no example of an election happening in India with voters’ rights remaining suspended.” He described leaving 2.7 million voters off the rolls as “an absurd proposition” and “a shame for democracy.” London School of Economics anthropologist Mukulika Banerjee added that voting is far more than a procedural act for marginalized communities, saying “By denying them their right to vote, one takes away one of their fundamental rights, and one that is hugely meaningful to them and allows them to assert their voice.”

    BJP leaders have defended the SIR process, arguing that purging non-citizen voters is a constitutional requirement. “The constitution says only Indian citizens can choose prime ministers and chief ministers. Therefore, purging non-citizens was important,” said Sukanta Majumdar, a BJP federal minister from West Bengal. Majumdar blamed the TMC state government for delays in resolving the 2.7 million disputed cases, arguing the party’s decision to bring the matter to the Supreme Court slowed the revision process, and rejected claims the Election Commission is biased toward the BJP.

    For affected voters like Hasnara Khatun, a 35-year-old resident of Harishchandrapur constituency along the West Bengal-Bangladesh border, the deletion has left her feeling disenfranchised and uncertain. Five of seven members of Khatun’s multi-generational voting family have been removed from the rolls, leaving her to question her status as an Indian citizen. “We have been effectively turned into non-citizens. Who knows what comes next?” Khatun said. “The system can’t be trusted anymore. Therefore, the legal battle will go on, but we won’t stop protests either.”

    West Bengal holds outsized political importance in Indian national politics: it is the fourth-largest state by parliamentary representation, and the BJP has not yet won control of its state government. In the 2021 assembly elections, the BJP secured just a quarter of the state’s 294 assembly seats, making the 2026 race a key target for the national ruling party. The voter roll controversy has now overtaken nearly every other campaign issue, setting the stage for one of the most tense and closely watched elections in India’s recent history.

  • US, Iran fail to reach a deal after talks in Pakistan

    US, Iran fail to reach a deal after talks in Pakistan

    After 21 hours of marathon face-to-face negotiations hosted in Islamabad, Pakistan, the United States and Iran have failed to strike any binding agreement, throwing a fragile two-week truce into severe jeopardy just six weeks into a conflict that has already claimed thousands of lives and roiled global energy markets.

  • Israel’s Ben Gvir says he feels like the ‘owner’ of Al-Aqsa Mosque compound

    Israel’s Ben Gvir says he feels like the ‘owner’ of Al-Aqsa Mosque compound

    On a recent Sunday, far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir stoked international outrage after delivering inflammatory remarks during a provocative raid on Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound, one of the most sensitive and sacred sites in Islam. Standing within the walled Old City complex, Ben Gvir declared in an official video circulated by his office that he “feels like the owner” of the site, adding that he is actively pushing for expanded access for Jewish worshippers to the holy ground.

    Ben Gvir’s incursion came just days after Israeli authorities reversed an extraordinary 40-day closure that barred all Palestinian worshippers from entering the compound — a closure that blocked Palestinian access during major religious milestones including the holy month of Ramadan, the Eid al-Fitr holiday, and weekly Friday congregational prayers. Following the lifting of the ban, Israeli officials have not only resumed near-daily incursions by ultranationalist Jewish groups into Al-Aqsa, but have extended the length of these visits, a shift that has further alarmed Muslim and regional leaders.

    The Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound has long been governed by the decades-established international Status Quo agreement, a fragile arrangement that explicitly recognizes the site’s exclusive Islamic character, entrusts Muslim religious authorities with full control over worship, access, and site maintenance, and permits Jewish visitation only — not prayer — to preserve the delicate religious balance. For years, however, Israel has systematically violated this agreement, allowing unapproved incursions and private prayer by ultranationalist Israelis inside the compound without the consent of Muslim governing bodies.

    These repeated violations have fueled growing regional fears that Israel is working to fundamentally rewrite the long-standing rules governing the site, potentially reallocating physical space or additional worship time exclusively to Jewish visitors. While Israel’s own chief rabbinate has maintained a centuries-long ban on Jewish prayer at the site, which ultranationalist Jews revere as the location of the ancient Jewish First and Second Temples, ultranationalist factions have increasingly pushed for open Jewish worship, receiving explicit political backing from high-profile government figures including Ben Gvir himself. Ben Gvir’s spokesperson confirmed this week that the minister not only is seeking formal prayer permits for Jewish visitors, but had already conducted personal prayer during his visit to the compound.

    Regional and Palestinian leaders have swiftly condemned Ben Gvir’s actions and comments. Jordan, which holds official custodianship over the Al-Aqsa site under international agreements, condemned the visit as a blatant violation of the Status Quo, calling it “a desecration of its sanctity, a condemnable escalation and an unacceptable provocation.” The office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas warned that such provocative moves threaten to further destabilize an already volatile region, raising risks of wider unrest along the Israel-Palestinian divide.

  • China satellites track giant iceberg’s end

    China satellites track giant iceberg’s end

    After four decades of drifting and gradual transformation through the Southern Ocean, what was once recognized as the world’s largest iceberg, A23a, has reached the end of its lifecycle, with its final collapse fully captured by China’s network of Fengyun meteorological satellites, according to the China Meteorological Administration.

    When A23a first calved off Antarctica’s Filchner Ice Shelf in 1986, it was a massive frozen structure spanning 4,170 square kilometers, measuring nearly 400 meters thick, and weighing an estimated one trillion tons. For decades, the giant iceberg remained grounded in the Weddell Sea, locked in place and largely unchanged until around 2020, when warming ocean temperatures melted enough surrounding ice to free it from the seafloor. It remained stationary for another two years, however, before significant movement began in late 2022.

    By early 2023, A23a still covered 4,035 square kilometers, earning it an official Guinness World Record as the largest iceberg on the planet at that time. From that point, the iceberg entered a period of steady northward acceleration: it exited the Weddell Sea in 2024 and entered the powerful Antarctic Circumpolar Current, which carried it steadily toward warmer waters. Between June and September 2025, the iceberg suffered multiple large-scale fracture events, shrinking its total area from 3,536 square kilometers at the start of the year to roughly 1,400 square kilometers. By January 2026, further breakup reduced the iceberg’s main remaining body to just 503 square kilometers.

    Propelled by the swift currents of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, A23a continued its rapid drift, experiencing three more major collapse events in its final weeks. Data from the Fengyun-3 meteorological satellite confirms the iceberg completed its final breakup between late March and early April 2026. By April 3, a final collapse event reduced the largest remaining fragment to just 11 kilometers long and 35.2 square kilometers in area — a size that no longer meets the official classification threshold for an iceberg, closing the book on A23a’s 40-year existence.

    A research team led by Zheng Zhaojun, chief expert at the National Satellite Meteorological Center’s International User Service Center, has leveraged high-resolution remote sensing data from Fengyun satellites to track A23a’s trajectory, morphological shifts, and gradual disintegration over its entire lifecycle. The Fengyun-3 satellite series, in particular, has proven uniquely suited for monitoring massive ice formations in polar and subpolar waters, thanks to its on-board Medium Resolution Spectral Imager (MERSI). With a spatial resolution of 250 meters, the instrument can capture both the full outline of giant icebergs and fine-grained details of their surface structure, allowing researchers to track growing structural instability long before major collapse events occur.

    These continuous observations have already revealed new insights into the physical processes that drove A23a’s rapid final breakup, the center noted. Beyond glaciological research, the satellite data has also uncovered notable ecological shifts in the waters surrounding A23a during its final disintegration. Starting in late 2025, satellite imagery captured a gradual “greening” of the ocean in the iceberg’s fragmented ice zone, with expanding green plumes shifting across the sea surface as meltwater flowed into the surrounding waters.

    This visible discoloration is tied directly to phytoplankton blooms, which are triggered when nutrient-rich meltwater from melting icebergs enters the open ocean. Zheng explained that the research team is continuing to analyze the data to build a clearer understanding of the broader ecological impacts of iceberg melt in polar regions. The continuous, high-quality observations of A23a’s entire lifecycle collected by Fengyun satellites will provide a valuable open-access dataset for future research into polar glacial change and polar ecosystem dynamics, Zheng added.

  • Trump says US Navy to immediately blockade all ships attempting to enter or leave Hormuz Strait

    Trump says US Navy to immediately blockade all ships attempting to enter or leave Hormuz Strait

    WASHINGTON – U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping new order directing the United States Navy to enact an immediate full blockade of all vessels attempting to transit in or out of the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. The major policy shift was made public via a post on his Truth Social platform on Sunday, confirming that the restrictive maritime measure would go into effect without delay.

    The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman, is one of the world’s most vital chokepoints for global energy trade. Roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil supplies and a substantial share of global liquefied natural gas shipments pass through the strait, making any disruption to maritime traffic there capable of sending shockwaves through international energy markets and global supply chains. Trump’s announcement of a full blockade marks an unprecedented escalation of maritime tensions in the already volatile Middle East region, with broad implications for global energy security and international diplomatic relations.

  • Runners measure Xiong’an’s rapid growth at 2026 marathon

    Runners measure Xiong’an’s rapid growth at 2026 marathon

    On a sunny Sunday morning in April 2026, the starting gun for the 2026 Xiong’an Marathon fired precisely at 7:30 a.m., launching the event from the steps of the Xiong’an Urban Computing Center — one of the most iconic modern landmarks of this young urban development zone in northern China’s Hebei Province.

    More than 12,000 long-distance running enthusiasts from every corner of the country converged on Xiong’an, a national-level new area established by Chinese authorities in 2017, for a rare opportunity to experience the region’s staggering nine years of progress with their own steps. Unlike traditional marathon courses that wind through long-established cityscapes, this route was intentionally designed to connect Xiong’an’s most defining development milestones, linking the cutting-edge Urban Computing Center, the ecologically restored Baiyangdian wetland zone, and the newly completed headquarters of central state-owned enterprises relocated from the national capital Beijing.

    Along every stretch of the course, runners were greeted by tangible evidence of Xiong’an’s evolution: fully functional residential amenities that now serve a growing permanent population, state-of-the-art technology hubs driving the area’s innovation-focused economy, and expansive green spaces that underscore the new area’s commitment to sustainable, low-carbon urban development. For many returning participants, the contrasts between visits were striking. A male runner from Hebei’s provincial capital Shijiazhuang, who first ran the Xiong’an Marathon in 2023, shared that the changes he observed over just three years left him stunned. “This year, I’m literally using my feet to measure how much Xiong’an has transformed in that short time,” he said, noting that entirely new landmarks and infrastructure that did not exist three years ago now line the route.

    Beyond the competitive running itself, organizers upgraded the race’s beloved community-focused “Xiong’an Stars” initiative for the 2026 event. Originally launched with a small team of 30 young cheerleaders, the program was expanded this year to 100 children who share the same age as Xiong’an New Area itself. These young supporters lined the course to cheer on exhausted runners, and later took up the honored role of placing finisher medals around the necks of athletes who crossed the finish line, adding a heartfelt, intergenerational touch to the event.

    To further enrich the participant and spectator experience, organizers worked with nearly 50 local businesses to set up public booths along the course perimeter, offering regional specialty foods, traditional and modern cultural products, and interactive activities that brought extra energy to the race day. Local residents turned out in droves, lining the sidewalks outside the course barriers to cheer on every runner, creating a warm, lively atmosphere that surprised many first-time visitors to the new area.

    From the sweeping transformation of once undeveloped land into a modern, sustainable smart city to the childlike enthusiasm of the young volunteers and the warm welcome from local residents, the 2026 Xiong’an Marathon did more than host a competitive race: it offered a living snapshot of Xiong’an’s vibrant, dynamic growth, and highlighted the new area’s ongoing journey toward its ambitious vision for a brighter, more innovative urban future.